October 09, 2011
— Guest Blogger Attorney General Eric Holder fired off a 5-page letter to congressional leaders yesterday. It was the healthy mix of whining, blame shifting, deliberate misrepresentations and bumbling incompetence we've come to expect from our fine Attorney General.
Senator Grassley has suggested that I was aware of Operation Fast and Furious from letters he provided to me on or about January 31, 2011 that were addressed to the former Acting Director of the ATF. However, those letters referred only to an ATF umbrella initiative on the Southwest Border that started under the prior Administration -- Project Gunrunner -- and not to Operation Fast and Furious.
So, Bush's fault?
Much has been made in the past few days about my congressional testimony earlier this year regarding Fast and Furious. My testimony was truthful and accurate and I have been consistent on this point throughout. I have no recollection of knowing about Fast and Furious or of hearing its name prior to the public controversy about it.
Eric, do you know who Sharyl Attkisson is? If not, you will.
I simply cannot sit idly by as a Majority Member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform suggests, as happened this week, that law enforcement and government employees who devote their lives to protecting our citizens be considered "accessories to murder." Such inflammatory rhetoric must be repudiated in the strongest possible terms.
Representative Paul Gosar shot back at Holder in an interview with the Daily Caller.
“It [Holder’s letter] is rhetoric. I think it’s funny that that’s the heat we take now when we’re in the focus of hearings and the focus of calls for his resignation,” Gosar told The Daily Caller. “[He says] ‘oooh, we want to sing Kumbayah and bring everybody together so that we can diffuse that.’ It’s also interesting that he and leadership in the Justice Department didn’t really exercise that in Arizona by reaching out and really trying to work on issues – they just continue to dictate accordingly."
Darrell Issa had a good line on Hannity Friday night when he said he wanted "change we can believe in at the Justice Department."
I wrote yesterday about the "under the radar" comment made by Obama to Sarah Brady regarding gun control. Well, Holder's letter had a similar eyebrow-raising comment.
As I have said, the fact that even a single gun was not interdicted in this operation and found a way to Mexico is unacceptable. Equally unacceptable however, is the fact that too many in Congress are opposed to any discussion of fixing loopholes in the laws that facilitate the staggering flow of guns each year across our border to the South.
What's interesting, beyond the staggering level of hypocrisy, is that Holder knows there are people that already suspect this was more about the second amendment and gun control than it ever was about investigating illegal gun trafficking. For him to take this position publicly, in a letter to Congress leads me to believe this might end up being his primary defense of the program. The walls are starting to close in on him and maybe that's all he has left. If that's the case, expect a lot of mud-slinging. Eric Holder doesn't strike me as the type of person to willingly fall on the sword.
Unthinkable corruption executed with criminal incompetence.
Posted by: Guest Blogger at
07:28 AM
| Comments (110)
Post contains 563 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: Have Blue at October 09, 2011 07:34 AM (IKTC8)
Posted by: macintx at October 09, 2011 07:35 AM (ucs8Y)
Posted by: ErikW at October 09, 2011 07:36 AM (zKHLn)
Posted by: Have Blue at October 09, 2011 07:37 AM (IKTC8)
Posted by: jrg at October 09, 2011 07:37 AM (BkQvr)
Posted by: bill cinton at October 09, 2011 07:38 AM (+56Bh)
Issa just talked about that on Fox News Sunday. He also said they are issuing more subpenas tomorrow. It's not on the web yet, but I might post it later.
Posted by: Johnny (John E.) at October 09, 2011 07:38 AM (nRTou)
Posted by: Vic at October 09, 2011 07:38 AM (M9Ie6)
I think Eric Holder is cute, so I emailed him some pics of my junk.
Posted by: brett favre at October 09, 2011 07:40 AM (+56Bh)
Holder's vision of the Justice Department is strictly focused on the left's and Obamas agenda. Pushing racialist greivances and neo-Marxist ideology in order to transform America into thier vision of a 'New America'.
They told us what they planned, we just didn't believe them.
Posted by: Have Blue at October 09, 2011 07:40 AM (IKTC8)
what a difference a D president makes huh Holder?
Equally unacceptable however, is the fact that too many in Congress are opposed to any discussion of fixing loopholes in the laws that facilitate the staggering flow of guns each year across our border to the South.
why of course.
Posted by: willow at October 09, 2011 07:42 AM (h+qn8)
Well, they were expecting that just a bunch of brown Mexican people would get killed.
Posted by: Heorot at October 09, 2011 07:42 AM (zH5oX)
Posted by: macintx at October 09, 2011 07:43 AM (ucs8Y)
Eric Holder throws a hissy fit.
Well, at least he is getting back to doing what he knows best.
Countdown to when the race card gets thrown in 5,4,3,2...............
Posted by: Mallamutt, RINO President for Life at October 09, 2011 11:38 AM (OWjjx)
Did you see the story quoting the new(?) head of ATF making light of the whole situation? He was quoted as saying basically, "I don't know why everyone is so upset, most of the people killed were just Mexicans."
Posted by: Have Blue at October 09, 2011 07:43 AM (IKTC8)
Posted by: Doom am I, full-ripe, dealing death to the worlds, engaged in devouring mankind. at October 09, 2011 07:44 AM (EyCRD)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 09, 2011 07:44 AM (UlUS4)
Posted by: BH Obama at October 09, 2011 07:44 AM (+56Bh)
If we're going to try pushing another catch-phrase (a la SCOAMF), one specific to Fast & Furious, I don't think the "Unthinkable corruption" part is applicable -- indeed, it's not even punchy enough.
We're not talking about corruption happening here in F&F, not in the same way as we can about Solyndra and the rest of the DOE stuff.
What we're talking about here is an ideology-driven attempt to subvert the 2nd Amendment, and indeed probably other sections of the Constitution. And the ideology in question is one that sees the US as historically and little-c constitutionally a malefactor.
So I'd re-jigger the catch-phrase as something along the lines of:
"Inhuman anti-Americanism executed with criminal incompetence."
But the glory of this blog is that the collective moronicity should be able to come up with the truly optimal recommendation. Takers?
Posted by: RamonAllones at October 09, 2011 07:44 AM (ha+6S)
Posted by: willow at October 09, 2011 07:44 AM (h+qn8)
Posted by: ErikW at October 09, 2011 11:36 AM (zKHLn)
Need a lift?
Posted by: Tami-Cardinals fan at October 09, 2011 07:44 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 09, 2011 07:45 AM (UlUS4)
Send them for trial in Mexico. Good luck pardoning them out of a Mexican prison.
Posted by: Heorot at October 09, 2011 07:46 AM (zH5oX)
Yeah, before this operation it was shown that there were virtually no guns flowing across the border in any magnitude. It took the lying shit-weasels in this administration to cause that.
All in the name of closing out the second amendment which Democrats consider a "loophole".
Posted by: Vic at October 09, 2011 07:47 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at October 09, 2011 07:47 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: frank sinatra at October 09, 2011 07:47 AM (+56Bh)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 09, 2011 11:45 AM (UlUS4)
You assume the GOP is intelligent.
Posted by: Dial '0' For Murder at October 09, 2011 07:48 AM (EL+OC)
Posted by: Spiker at October 09, 2011 07:48 AM (4t9J5)
Posted by: No Whining at October 09, 2011 07:49 AM (er04D)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at October 09, 2011 07:50 AM (AZGON)
Need a lift?
Posted by: Tami-Cardinals fan at October 09, 2011 11:44 AM (X6akg)
Sure! We can tag team on some mofos.
Posted by: ErikW at October 09, 2011 07:51 AM (zKHLn)
Posted by: kansas at October 09, 2011 07:53 AM (nNgbi)
Eric Holder Senate confirmed as Attorney General 75 to 21
Republicans voting for:
Alexander (R-TN)
Bennett (R-UT)
Bond (R-MO)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Collins (R-ME)
Corker (R-TN)
Graham (R-SC)
Grassley (R-IA)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hatch (R-UT)
Isakson (R-GA)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Lugar (R-IN)
McCain (R-AZ)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Sessions (R-AL)
Snowe (R-ME)
Specter (R-PA)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Thanks guys, real quality advise and consent there.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at October 09, 2011 07:54 AM (/qkBU)
Posted by: willow at October 09, 2011 07:55 AM (h+qn8)
Posted by: kansas at October 09, 2011 11:53 AM (nNgbi)
In fairness, we only intended to kill the adults so we could save the children.
Posted by: J Reno at October 09, 2011 07:55 AM (jucos)
Posted by: kansas at October 09, 2011 07:55 AM (nNgbi)
Normally I'd agree, I just don't know how you re-establish the rule of law once a nation has gone this far down the rabbit hole. The bureaucrats are getting seriously out of control and the only hope I see is for a lot of them to face some very serious punishment.
Posted by: Heorot at October 09, 2011 07:57 AM (zH5oX)
Posted by: kansas at October 09, 2011 07:58 AM (nNgbi)
Posted by: willow at October 09, 2011 07:58 AM (h+qn8)
Posted by: GOP Senators at October 09, 2011 07:59 AM (AZGON)
Good lord, really? I don't remember him standing up for our soldiers who were being slandered by Democrats just a few years ago. He seemed to be sitting idly by then.
"Marines just said we’re going to take care – we don’t know who the enemy is, the pressure was too much on them, so they went into houses and they actually killed civilians." John Murtha
"But you're going to spend it to blow up innocent people if we can get enough kids to grow old enough for you to send to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the President's amusement.” Pete Stark
"In a fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan." The haughty, French-looking Senator from Massachusetts, who, by the way, served in Vietnam.
This list could go on and on.
Posted by: JohnJ at October 09, 2011 07:59 AM (aCBL/)
sickinmass.
the telling thing was their decision to Not follow the guns.
I'd like to see that memo!
Posted by: willow at October 09, 2011 08:01 AM (h+qn8)
Posted by: kansas at October 09, 2011 11:58 AM (nNgbi)
RICK PERRY ACTUALLY ATTENDED A CAMP WHERE N*GG^R WAS PAINTED ON A ROCK!!!!! ELEVENTY!
Posted by: MFM at October 09, 2011 08:01 AM (jucos)
Posted by: SDN at October 09, 2011 08:02 AM (8bRU6)
Posted by: Johnny (John E.) at October 09, 2011 11:38 AM
Wonderful thing, these sub-peenies!
Posted by: Wilford Brimley at October 09, 2011 08:04 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: Have Blue at October 09, 2011 11:43 AM (IK
yeah or next it would be just , or just hippies, or those that cling to their guns and bibles. or returning vets.
all to save the children of course.
Posted by: willow at October 09, 2011 08:07 AM (h+qn8)
Sure! We can tag team on some mofos.
Posted by: ErikW at October 09, 2011 11:51 AM (zKHLn)
You drop'em and I'll stompy boot them.
Posted by: Tami-Cardinals fan at October 09, 2011 08:08 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: deadrody at October 09, 2011 08:09 AM (eOvu0)
Although you've been told numerous times how brilliant you were by your fellow elitists, they were just saying that in order to avoid accusations of racism.
You really are dumber than a box of rocks
Posted by: kbdabear at October 09, 2011 08:09 AM (Y+DPZ)
Here is
a "Downfall" parody for Operation Fast and Furious:
http://tinyurl.com/69wya8l
Enjoy!
Posted by: Idaho Spudboy at October 09, 2011 08:10 AM (DHM4d)
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at October 09, 2011 08:11 AM (OhYCU)
Posted by: AG Eric Holder at October 09, 2011 08:11 AM (FabC8)
Posted by: Have Blue at October 09, 2011 11:43 AM
Rick Perry said that? WOW ... ooops, we'll just issue a correction on page a54 next to the zoning meetings. We still have integrity to sell!
Posted by: The MBM at October 09, 2011 08:12 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: SantaRosaStan, but the levee was dry... at October 09, 2011 08:12 AM (UqKQV)
i hope i'm wrong!
but if following the guns to a destination was not allowed, and the guns were Given to known drug and cartels. what could be the excuse?!
Posted by: willow at October 09, 2011 08:15 AM (h+qn8)
You drop'em and I'll stompy boot them.
Posted by: Tami-Cardinals fan at October 09, 2011 12:08 PM (X6akg)
Damn! Get out the way, son!
Posted by: ErikW at October 09, 2011 08:15 AM (zKHLn)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at October 09, 2011 08:19 AM (AZGON)
but how much can we keep saying that to everything.
well is Obama and crew just consistantly making the wrong decisions because they aren't experienced in management?
Posted by: willow at October 09, 2011 08:21 AM (h+qn8)
Posted by: Tjexcite at October 09, 2011 08:22 AM (emjFY)
We don't give a rip who paid for it. It's all funny-money to us anyway.
Posted by: Turbo Tax Timmy at October 09, 2011 08:40 AM (NZMKc)
Posted by: Bob Saget at October 09, 2011 08:48 AM (dBvlk)
Extradite the BATFE.
I'm sure the "they are just Mexicans" comment will be enough to convince a Mexican judge to forgive them.
Extradition is also a 2013 option that a last minute pardon by Obama cannot prevent.
Posted by: Kristopher at October 09, 2011 08:50 AM (Z3y1K)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at October 09, 2011 08:54 AM (ndlFj)
Posted by: The SCOAMF Awards (aka at October 09, 2011 09:08 AM (cKeZa)
Well that marble tit did make a great backdrop.
Posted by: DaveA at October 09, 2011 09:14 AM (txTVO)
Posted by: Marmo at October 09, 2011 09:20 AM (VQCqZ)
Posted by: Spiker at October 09, 2011 09:23 AM (KESXl)
Posted by: steevy at October 09, 2011 09:23 AM (fyOgS)
Posted by: steevy at October 09, 2011 09:26 AM (fyOgS)
Posted by: Jornolist at October 09, 2011 09:32 AM (UE0B9)
Holder would be nice get, but this goes higher. And yes I mean to Obama.
Posted by: Have Blue at October 09, 2011 11:31 AM (IKTC
Maybe even as high as puppet master Valerie Jarrett
Posted by: phreshone at October 09, 2011 09:35 AM (T3vCe)
Posted by: pat at October 09, 2011 09:36 AM (UFxap)
Posted by: pawn at October 09, 2011 09:37 AM (iMsF6)
Posted by: Spiker at October 09, 2011 09:41 AM (4t9J5)
Posted by: Daryl Herbert at October 09, 2011 09:51 AM (mDJ5B)
More from the LA Times: http://lat.ms/nysqgu
Oh, and the same charge applies to the stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure if he knew what was going on.
He did, of course.
I wish Mexico would charge these two slimeballs. God knows no one in the USA has the balls to do it.
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 09, 2011 09:52 AM (YjjrR)
People need to go to prison for this, for a very long time...
Posted by: Stu-22 at October 09, 2011 10:00 AM (k4bdL)
Posted by: Ms. Trish at October 09, 2011 10:27 AM (zaW0K)
Good. The perfect end result would be for him to be crushed to the size of a matchbox once everything is done.
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at October 09, 2011 10:29 AM (Sih+c)
Posted by: steevy at October 09, 2011 10:55 AM (fyOgS)
People need to go to prison for this, for a very long time...
Posted by: Stu-22 at October 09, 2011 02:00 PM (k4bdL)
The only frame of reference we might possibly have is a (good, early-era) Clancy-type techno-thriller novel . . . this is Worst Nightmare Of A Fiction Writer's Reject Pile For Being Too Fricking Implausable type stuff . . .
Posted by: filbert at October 09, 2011 11:01 AM (smvTK)
There's something to be said for Issa waiting to charge people until 21 January 2013.
Can JEF issue pardons for people who have not even been charged? Simple logic says "no".
JEF's term ends before 21 January 2013, so he will have little ability to protect his operatives then.
And the piecemeal subpoenas and releases, publicly broadcast over August, September and October 2012, ... we need something for entertainment, while waiting for the Fall lineup.
Posted by: Arbalest at October 09, 2011 11:01 AM (2At9+)
This line:
"I simply cannot sit idly by as a Majority Member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform suggests, as happened this week, that law enforcement and government employees who devote their lives to protecting our citizens be considered "accessories to murder." Such inflammatory rhetoric must be repudiated in the strongest possible terms."
was actually a paraphrase for what I actually said:
"Ladies and gentlemen, I'll be brief. The issue here is not
whether we broke a few rules, or took a few liberties with our ATF putting weapons in the hands of Mexican drug runners - we did.
But you can't hold the whole justice
department responsible for the behavior of a few, sick twisted individuals. For
if you do, then shouldn't we blame the whole executive branch? And if the whole
executive branch is guilty, then isn't this an indictment of our govermental
institutions in general? I put it to you, Congressman Issa - isn't this an indictment of our
entire American society? Well, you can do whatever you want to us, but we're not
going to sit here and listen to you badmouth the United States of America.
Gentlemen!"
Posted by: Eric "Otter" Holder at October 09, 2011 11:53 AM (CGxxU)
Posted by: rabidfox at October 09, 2011 12:00 PM (FROPA)
While Holder is pulliing the standard "blame Bush" shit, here's what actually happened:
Wide Receiver sought to track and interdict guns being smuggled south using a combination of RFID-tracking devices embedded in the shipments and overheard surveillance aircraft. Wide Receiver failed because of the limitations of the technology used, compounded by the ineptness of its installation and the unexpected resourcefulness of the cartelÂ’s gun smugglers.
As a result of the mistakes made in Wide Receiver, guns were lost: approximately 450 made it into Mexico. As a result, the botched operation launched in 2006 — and in this instance, actually botched — was shut down in 2007.
Compare the mistakes of Wide Receiver to the operations launched under Eric HolderÂ’s Department of Justice, which had the advantages of learning from the postmortem failures of Wide Receiver two years before.
http://tinyurl.com/3vx2c43
Posted by: SFC MAC at October 09, 2011 12:28 PM (h1hkE)
Oh? But you can make the same accusations about Arizona law enforcement agencies, is that it? Except Sheriff Dumbshit in Pima County.
Posted by: ExExZonie at October 09, 2011 01:50 PM (HhqrH)
Posted by: Steve Johnson at October 09, 2011 02:23 PM (lr+d3)
Kevin Williamson at NRO The Corner points out:
http://tinyurl.com/4x8ob35
And here is 18 U.S.C. § 1112:
(a) Manslaughter is the unlawful killing of a human being without malice. It is of two kinds: Voluntary–Upon a sudden quarrel or heat of passion. Involuntary–In the commission of an unlawful act not amounting to a felony, or in the commission in an unlawful manner, or without due caution and circumspection, of a lawful act which might produce death.
(b) Within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, Whoever is guilty of voluntary manslaughter, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; Whoever is guilty of involuntary manslaughter, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six years, or both.
So not murder, involuntary manslaughter, so far.
Posted by: geoffb at October 09, 2011 04:13 PM (d3wbb)
Posted by: The Cat’s Table ePub at October 09, 2011 04:26 PM (pYMqs)
This web site is my breathing in, really fantastic pattern and perfect subject matter.
Posted by: Neverwinter iBooks at October 09, 2011 04:38 PM (x9Bn8)
Posted by: Shatner Rules AudioBook at October 09, 2011 04:48 PM (SpVD8)
Posted by: CMU VET at October 09, 2011 05:01 PM (F+1Cp)
That is useful information and its quite easy to come a croper if you are not vigilant.
Posted by: Dark Souls The Official Guide ePub at October 09, 2011 05:07 PM (2B8ft)
Can JEF issue pardons for people who have not even been charged? Simple logic says "no".
Posted by: Arbalest
History says yes.
See Carter, James Earl: blanket pardon of draft dodgers
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at October 09, 2011 05:24 PM (/qkBU)
Posted by: smittywood at October 09, 2011 07:08 PM (fL7XO)
Posted by: The Artist Who Painted a Blue Horse ePub at October 09, 2011 07:40 PM (cfDVi)
@ 38. "If being a know-nothing is the prime requirement for being AG, as Holder states time and again, let's stop hiring poseurs and go for the Gold Standard: Sgt. Schultz."
Hey, at least Sgt. Schultz was "I know nothing" in a likable way. Holder is just an ass.
Posted by: Case at October 09, 2011 10:32 PM (DYR2Q)
"In a fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan." The haughty, French-looking Senator from Massachusetts, who, by the way, served in Vietnam.
That's Jen-jis, you unwashed peasant.
Posted by: Kerry-Heinz Inc at October 10, 2011 10:24 AM (xm1A1)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.1987 seconds, 238 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








The more you know!
Posted by: alexthechick at October 09, 2011 07:31 AM (Gk3SS)