August 17, 2011
— Gabriel Malor Some hardy soul going by the moniker garnet92 has researched and written up the good and the bad things that folks are saying about Governor Perry. They are long, accurate, and utterly necessary reading in the face of the current media blitz against Perry. Bookmark 'em.
I can't in good conscience borrow much; they're just too perfect and I really want you to click over and read. I will grab just a bit from the responding-to-critics post because it's an issue that even Republicans from the North have been bugging me about.
Some say that Perry wants Texas to secede from the Union and he is a traitor for saying so. The governor never said that he wanted Texas to secede. Scholars know that Texas secession is an urban myth and certainly, the governor knows it as well.What actually happened was that after people shouted “Secede!” at an Austin rally, he said that he understood their frustration but added, “We’ve got a great union. There is absolutely no reason to dissolve it. But if Washington continues to thumb their nose at the American people, who knows what may come of that. Texas is a very unique place, and we’re a pretty independent lot to boot.”
Perry emphasized that he was not advocating secession, but understands why Americans may have those feelings because of frustration. He said itÂ’s fine to express the thought. He offered no apology and did not back away from his earlier comments. PerryÂ’s remarks were in response to a question from The Associated Press as he walked away from the rally. The governor said he didnÂ’t think Texas should secede despite some chatter about it on the Internet and his name being associated with the idea.
I honestly didn't understand how weirded out even a joking reference to Texas' secession legend makes some northerners until a few weeks ago. But apparently even GOP northerners can get a bit creeped out about it and his joking response -- "we're a pretty independent lot to boot" -- has been stretched beyond all reason to comprise an actual Perry policy preference for seceding.
So, to be clear: Perry did not advocate or "threaten" (as the media, Democrats, and some anti-Perry Republicans have characterized it) secession. In fact, he said, quite seriously, that there is no reason to dissolve the Union. Perry went on to affirm a point of Texas pride: we are pretty independent and self assured, so don't mess with Texas, punks. This nod to Texan superiority should not be taken to mean Texas will secede next week if Bernanke keep printing money.
It's something Texans say, like, e.g. the oft-repeated indisputable fact that Texas is the best country state in the Union. (SWIDT?) Have you ever heard a Texan disrespect his home state? No, I submit that you have not. And if you think you did, he ain't a Texan. Home-state pride is a virtue, not a vice. You'll find that Texans are fiercely loyal to their own and if you want a fiercely loyal president, say, in contrast to a certain trans-national lightbringer, Perry's a good choice.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
03:30 AM
| Comments (155)
Post contains 531 words, total size 3 kb.
I honestly didn't understand how weirded out even a joking reference to Texas' secession legend makes some northerners until a few weeks ago.
Jealous.
Posted by: dagny at August 17, 2011 03:35 AM (2RsaU)
Posted by: Vic at August 17, 2011 03:36 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Joffen at August 17, 2011 03:37 AM (EPcuy)
Posted by: BuddyPC at August 17, 2011 03:40 AM (N/Bgb)
The one state that has the most hardcore, active secessionist culture is......Vermont.
Posted by: BuddyPC at August 17, 2011 07:40 AM (N/Bgb)
Cuba north.
Posted by: dagny at August 17, 2011 03:41 AM (2RsaU)
Posted by: Vic at August 17, 2011 03:42 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Joffen at August 17, 2011 03:42 AM (EPcuy)
Best sentence I'll read all day and I haven't even finished my first coffee.
Posted by: Well there at August 17, 2011 03:44 AM (u+8qs)
Posted by: Joffen at August 17, 2011 07:42 AM (EPcuy)
The first States to actually talk about secession were the NE States during the War of 1812. Bing up the Hartford Convention.
Before the unfortunate war at 1861 all States thought it was their right to "opt out" and all considered the States to be the final arbiter of the Constitution.
Posted by: Vic at August 17, 2011 03:45 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Joffen at August 17, 2011 07:42 AM (EPcuy)
Any state that continually elects cocksuckers like Leahy and Dean isn't exactly known for thinking out consequences. Plus Quebec is so economically depressed it may as well be an islamic shithole.
Posted by: Captain Hate at August 17, 2011 03:46 AM (houma)
Let's start ...Could I see OblameO's transcripts please ...
Does he have any college friends who will say he was actually there?
Any ex-girlfriends?
How about radical prreachers.
You did no Black Liberation Theology is ???
Posted by: tarpon at August 17, 2011 03:46 AM (MoWf3)
Posted by: Joffen at August 17, 2011 03:46 AM (EPcuy)
Posted by: buzzion at August 17, 2011 03:47 AM (GULKT)
Surprisingly, it apparently won't appease Michelle Malkin, who is attacking Perry today in one of her syndicated hissy-fits, stamping her little foot and whining about how Eeeeeeevil that Texas Totalitarian is.
Of course Malkin is one of those responsible for giving us Osama Obama, as she spent more time in 2008 clawing at McCain than she did pointing out the endless list of flaws in now-President Stuttering Clusterfuck.
What is it with the my-way-or-the-highway types, anyway? I'm not 100% sold on Perry, not 60% sold on Palin, and not even 10% sold on Mutt Romney. But I'd vote for any one of them over the Traitor-in-Chief. Whichever wins the nomination -- or even if we choose a nonentity like T-Paw -- gets all the support I can muster.
Apparently it won't be that way with Filipina Rage Girl. Hang on four another four years of mega-DOOM if she gets her way.
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 17, 2011 03:50 AM (YjjrR)
Posted by: Joffen at August 17, 2011 07:46 AM (EPcuy)
They really haven't changed much since 1812. They hate everybody who doesn't trace their linage back to VT for 10 generations (except those who come from MA because MA is too conservative) and they elect avowed communists to congress.
Posted by: Vic at August 17, 2011 03:51 AM (M9Ie6)
Eat your peas, indeed
Posted by: Well there at August 17, 2011 03:51 AM (u+8qs)
It's just a stick to beat on someone they don't like. They don't really believe it.
Posted by: toby928™ at August 17, 2011 03:53 AM (GTbGH)
Does anyone know what the immigration policy will be when Texas secedes?
Posted by: Undocumented Michigander at August 17, 2011 03:54 AM (u+8qs)
They really haven't changed much
since 1812. They hate everybody who doesn't trace their linage back to
VT for 10 generations (except those who come from MA because MA is too
conservative) and they elect avowed communists to congress.
Posted by: Vic at August 17, 2011 07:51 AM (M9Ie6)
I think it comes from thinking you can farm in a mountainous area that even if you find a patch of flat earth it has huge rocks all over the fucking place. Eventually that unique brand of craziness spreads to everything else.
Posted by: Captain Hate at August 17, 2011 03:55 AM (houma)
Posted by: Andy at August 17, 2011 03:58 AM (veZ9n)
Well, let be honestly cynical, (or cynically honest.) There are a lot more page hits to be mined and appearances on Fox News to be had from being the anti-Obama rage girl than there are to be had from doing the tedious scut work of defending the policies of President Romney.
Posted by: Undocumented Michigander at August 17, 2011 04:00 AM (u+8qs)
Naughty Geraldo, socking commenters again.
Posted by: Tom Selleck's fighting mustache at August 17, 2011 04:01 AM (A1Zmj)
Posted by: In Exile - Moderately Functioning Sociopath at August 17, 2011 04:02 AM (D1f0p)
okay, think about this for a minute.
Why would Perry want Texas - the state of which he is Governor - to secede from the same country in which he is running for President? It's just a stoooopit statement on its face.
Posted by: MDH3 at August 17, 2011 04:02 AM (4u+LN)
Posted by: Mandy P., Teahadi from Hobbitton at August 17, 2011 04:03 AM (qFpRI)
Posted by: Andy at August 17, 2011 07:58 AM (veZ9n)
I'm not sure I understand your meaning.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at August 17, 2011 04:05 AM (FkKjr)
Which religious belief system would be more of a threat to our individual freedoms and way of life? And yet if the commie media were ever to report on Perry's Islamic connection it would be featured in the plus column. The same goes for Grover Norquist, who is filthy with muzzie money and in fact married to one.
Posted by: ontherocks at August 17, 2011 04:09 AM (HBqDo)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 17, 2011 04:09 AM (kUaEF)
Posted by: Tsar Nicholas II at August 17, 2011 04:10 AM (iRlbA)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at August 17, 2011 04:12 AM (cbyrC)
And no, Perry wasn't really threatening Texas secession, but holding onto that radical card in the political poker game to rally public fervor. With Perry's positions on hot buttons, "Now you see it. Now you don't."
Posted by: maverick muse at August 17, 2011 04:13 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Joffen at August 17, 2011 04:13 AM (EPcuy)
Posted by: Joffen at August 17, 2011 04:14 AM (EPcuy)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 17, 2011 04:15 AM (kUaEF)
Ron Paul: "I would not have violated Pakistan's sovereignty to kill Bin Laden"
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at August 17, 2011 04:17 AM (FkKjr)
Posted by: Joffen at August 17, 2011 04:18 AM (EPcuy)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 17, 2011 04:19 AM (kUaEF)
Posted by: Mandy P., Teahadi from Hobbitton at August 17, 2011 04:19 AM (qFpRI)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 17, 2011 04:20 AM (kUaEF)
Posted by: Mr Pink at August 17, 2011 04:21 AM (Axo+R)
Posted by: kelleyinvirginia at August 17, 2011 04:21 AM (VIqi1)
Posted by: Dirk Hardpec at August 17, 2011 04:22 AM (e8T35)
Posted by: Laughing in Texas at August 17, 2011 04:22 AM (dL9LY)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at August 17, 2011 04:23 AM (a0HmB)
Posted by: Johnny Cakes at August 17, 2011 04:23 AM (pF9/M)
That may be true in ordinary economic times... but
CoolCzech
So long as it is noted that Religious Revivalism is being used not simply to rally the "faithful" but to cover a lot of the candidates' closet political alliances under the evangelical cloak of self-righteousness that "good people" are supposed to trust.
Posted by: maverick muse at August 17, 2011 04:24 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Joffen at August 17, 2011 04:24 AM (EPcuy)
Posted by: Andi Sullivan at August 17, 2011 04:24 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 17, 2011 04:25 AM (kUaEF)
Posted by: Joffen at August 17, 2011 04:27 AM (EPcuy)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 17, 2011 04:29 AM (kUaEF)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at August 17, 2011 08:23 AM (a0HmB)
Your inability to apply this to your drama queen obsession with gay marriage is hilarious.
Posted by: Captain Hate at August 17, 2011 04:29 AM (houma)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 17, 2011 04:30 AM (kUaEF)
Nine?
All but two of the Texian defenders were killed defending their rights at what was their last stand, The Alamo. Most eyewitness accounts reported between 182 and 257 Texians dead, while most historians of the Alamo agree that 400–600 Mexicans were killed or wounded. (wikipedia)
Posted by: maverick muse at August 17, 2011 04:30 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: UGrev at August 17, 2011 08:28 AM (862vz)
And there ya go.
Dude, you new around here? It's been discussed to death.
Posted by: Tami at August 17, 2011 04:30 AM (X6akg)
They really haven't changed much since 1812. They hate everybody who doesn't trace their linage back to VT for 10 generations (except those who come from MA because MA is too conservative) and they elect avowed communists to congress.
I was born there. I've lived there. I moved away for good about 15 years ago. I can assure you that the trend towards communism is a relatively recent thing and largely imported from outside; mostly Mass, CT, NJ & NY to be precise. Mind you, VT is unique in the fact that these imports weren't interested in moving to more urban areas. They came to live in the sticks and stink it up with their patchouli wearing, unshaven womenfolk. As a result, the (generally) more conservative natives have been outnumbered everywhere.
I was in H.S. when Bernie Sanders was elected as the mayor of Burlington. The pot smoking Dead heads from UVM are the culprits for giving him his first stage. At the time, Dick Snelling (R) was the governor, G_d rest his soul. He was the last hold out on raising the drinking age to 21 in the Union.
Just remember, VT was one of the only states to go against FDR all 4 times.
Oh, and remember, VT was an independant state for a few years after the revolution due to some dust up over land with New York.
Posted by: The Outlaw in the Heavenly Hall at August 17, 2011 04:31 AM (zxrQh)
"I certainly think threatening the Fed chairman is not a good idea," White House spokesman Jay Carney said.
Hysterics; It's what's for breakfast.
Oh, and Obama thinks he has it tougher than Abe Lincoln.
Posted by: Fritz at August 17, 2011 04:31 AM (/ZZCn)
44O/T: Obama plans on giving a "major speech" about jobs and the deficit in early September. Let me tell you, I cannot wait. I wonder what he'll say...?
---------
Tenth in the series on how he's going to figure out a plan pretty soon.
Posted by: Jimmah at August 17, 2011 04:33 AM (TfRqk)
Posted by: buzzion at August 17, 2011 04:33 AM (jIDIz)
Posted by: sayoung at August 17, 2011 04:33 AM (UNkA7)
Posted by: Andy at August 17, 2011 07:58 AM (veZ9n)
Why the fuck would ANYONE want to do that??? (move to MA that is)
Posted by: GGE Of The Banned at August 17, 2011 04:34 AM (lufzh)
Don't worry. The Enemy Within -- Malkin, Rove, etc. etc. -- and the Foreign Enemy -- the media, Democrats and concern trolls -- aren't sleeping. They have been, and will be, on the attack.
A pity there are no Dangling Courage Units on our side. The so-called leadership has a golden opportunity to savage President Stuttering Clusterfuck and drive him into well-deserved obscurity, but is instead more eager to destroy a good man who might rise to greatness if elected POTUS simply because he doesn't play the kissy-face, wimpy-ass game of nicey-nice "politics" with them.
It's time for hardball, and I don't mean Pissy Chrissy Matthews.
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 17, 2011 04:34 AM (YjjrR)
61 Not sure. The thing looks like a giant rolling hearse.
Naturally, not in any way environmentally friendly.
Jon Stewart skewered Obama's campaign bus tour that "isn't" but simply shouldn't be happening, whether campaigning or not.
Posted by: maverick muse at August 17, 2011 04:34 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Jimmah at August 17, 2011 04:35 AM (TfRqk)
Posted by: Texan Economist at August 17, 2011 04:35 AM (TC/9F)
No telling what Obama's bus will leave behind as road kill.
Posted by: maverick muse at August 17, 2011 04:36 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: blaster at August 17, 2011 04:36 AM (Fw2Gg)
Posted by: Joffen at August 17, 2011 04:36 AM (EPcuy)
Posted by: Case at August 17, 2011 04:38 AM (FD6YW)
Posted by: Jean at August 17, 2011 04:39 AM (5HAgy)
Darn tootin' I would!
Shit, I'd vote for Balloon Boy or Snookie before I would put a mark by the stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure's name.
Of course if Paul won, I'd pray that Congress stayed as lazy, clueless, incompetent and corrupt as it is now. Their biggest campaign contributors would never let them go along with President Nutjob.
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 17, 2011 04:39 AM (YjjrR)
Posted by: buzzion at August 17, 2011 04:39 AM (jIDIz)
LOL, I was mostly kidding. But I did make a day trip through there when I lived in upstate NY many years ago and I did find the people, shall we say, somewhat stand-offish for outsiders.
Posted by: Vic at August 17, 2011 04:39 AM (M9Ie6)
I would vote for that particularly odoriferous turd I just dropped into the can this morning if the other piece of shit on the ballot was Obama.
Posted by: Typical disgusting moron at August 17, 2011 04:40 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Texan Economist at August 17, 2011 08:35 AM (TC/9F)
Having voted for McCain in 2008 I think that effectively says that I'd vote for a steaming pile of dogshit against El JEFe. And DR RON passes that criterion; although most of his followers don't.
Posted by: Captain Hate at August 17, 2011 04:40 AM (houma)
Posted by: maverick muse at August 17, 2011 08:36 AM
The United States.
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 17, 2011 04:40 AM (YjjrR)
No. If the Republican Party nominates a man who places Pakistan's sovereignty above killing Bin Laden, I'm leaving it outright and voting for somebody else.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at August 17, 2011 04:40 AM (FkKjr)
Wrong question: Better question: Really? Why would we stop them?
It's a pity really. Vermont used to be the last bastion of hardcore conservatism in New England. Now, not so much.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 17, 2011 04:41 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: nati at August 17, 2011 04:43 AM (S5Z6T)
Posted by: buzzion at August 17, 2011 04:44 AM (jIDIz)
Gabe and Mitt share a trait in common, belief that their mistakes are not errors. The only fault must be mis-perceptions of feeble, unsophisticated minds, those violently radical conservatives unconverted to PC revisionism.
Posted by: maverick muse at August 17, 2011 04:44 AM (lpWVn)
Didn't say we wouldn't either.
Posted by: SouthTexas at August 17, 2011 04:44 AM (Rmz5I)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 17, 2011 04:46 AM (LH6ir)
Cuba north.
LOL! That comes across a lot like Miami.....also known as "Lower Brooklyn" and/or "Little Israel".
Posted by: MrObvious at August 17, 2011 04:46 AM (2uovW)
LOL, I was mostly kidding. But I did make a day trip through there when I lived in upstate NY many years ago and I did find the people, shall we say, somewhat stand-offish for outsiders.
Well, look at what they did. Is it any wonder? It used to be nice up there. Now, it's just another commie shithole where a man can't get a decent job.
Posted by: The Outlaw in the Heavenly Hall at August 17, 2011 04:47 AM (zxrQh)
Let me be clear: If the land of boned, California, ever wanted to seceed...........we should let them.
Posted by: Mallamutt, RINO President for Life at August 17, 2011 08:46 AM (OWjjx)
Fuck that! We should sell them to the Chinese and pay off the debt
Posted by: In Exile - Moderately Functioning Sociopath at August 17, 2011 04:47 AM (D1f0p)
Posted by: buzzion at August 17, 2011 04:48 AM (jIDIz)
Posted by: Joffen at August 17, 2011 04:48 AM (EPcuy)
True or False
Rick Perry asked his obliging father-in-law to perform his vasectomy.
True!
What do I win?
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 17, 2011 04:48 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Laughing in Texas at August 17, 2011 04:48 AM (dL9LY)
But if/once he is the nominee, no more attacks! I always hated working on campaigns with d-bags that weren't in it to win. It seems like some prefer to lose so that they can snipe at their political rivals rather than actually winning and needing to do something.
Posted by: In Exile - Moderately Functioning Sociopath at August 17, 2011 04:50 AM (D1f0p)
Now, part of this is because (to take one at random) Oklahoma's State History would take up about 20 pages prior to it becoming part of the Union, Texas has a rather longer, more storied (some would say: sordid) history. Part of it, however, is that State Pride to which Gabe refers.
Oh, and because we are the best State in the Union. Don't forget that part.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 17, 2011 04:50 AM (8y9MW)
Santorum write-in, "If you're not with me, you're against me."
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk sock at August 17, 2011 04:51 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Vic at August 17, 2011 04:51 AM (M9Ie6)
True or False
Rick Perry asked his obliging father-in-law to perform his vasectomy.
True!
What do I win?
A Perry "Reset" Button
Posted by: maverick muse at August 17, 2011 04:52 AM (lpWVn)
*sigh* I should send my father to read this Perry roundup. He needs a dose of sanity. I fear my dear dad is becoming a Paulbot. He's going to a Ron Paul event this evening. *facepalm* And while I can agree with SOME things Ron Paul says, there are others - letters of marque? seriously? - that are just...
*SIGH*
Posted by: MWR, proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at August 17, 2011 04:53 AM (4df7R)
Re: "Adios Mofo"
Oberg changed his originally recorded statement before re-releasing this video. He did not say "I guess I can't win this one", he was badgering Perry to give some details on his education. He didn't say “Try as I may, Governor, I guess I can’t win this one.” he said "I can't wait that long (until tomorrow).
What a dick.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at August 17, 2011 04:54 AM (WvXvd)
Thank you for the good writeup. It in fact was a amusement account it. Look advanced to more added agreeable from you! However, how could we communicate?
Posted by: Sleeping with the Enemy AudioBook at August 17, 2011 04:56 AM (25tFl)
I know most conservatives understand the "unintended consequences" of government intervention and complex governmental regulations.
Here are two for you. Michigan just passed a relatively complex "tenure reform."
Instead of simply making it easier to dismiss incompetent teachers (streaminglining the process), our brilliant Republican legislators mandated that all schools come up with a laughable 100 point system for "rating" teachers based on effectiveness. Basically, because it is extremely difficult to "rate" teachers in every discipline, these ratings will rely heavily upon classroom observations made by administrators. Then, when layoffs are made, they will be based on these "ratings" rather than based on seniority.
I just had a planning meeting with my district's administrative team. Our administrators are already facing two major problems.
1. Mere passage of the law has already put a huge chill on collaboration in our district. Predictably, top teachers are now unwilling to share their "tricks of the trade" with others because they are now in competition with them for job status. In other words, if you have two instructors teaching the same course, and instructor A is getting fantastic results, he/she has a disincentive to share teaching techniques with others. By helping his fellow teachers improve, said teacher is literally increasing the chances that he may be laid off during the next round of budget cuts. FAR better for the best teachers to share nothing.
2. As a medium-sized / small district, we have some rather small departments. This creates another big issue come lay off time. Under the traditional seniority system, the district might make 5 layoffs district wide. Basically, the 5 lowest teachers on the totem pole (usually probationary teachers) would be let go and remaining employees would do some job shifting to meet needs.
These 5 teachers would retain their recall option for 2 years. In other words, after the next year's round of retirements, some or all of these teachers might be recalled after 1 year.
During this time period, these 5 young teachers were free to search for other jobs with NO STIGMA attached to their status as "laid-off" employees.
Now, under the new system, layoffs may not be based on seniority, but rather on the teacher's evaluative score (out of 100).
Here's the problem. Suppose a district has a small department - say they have 4 Spanish teachers 7-12 certified. All four of these Spanish teachers may be very good teachers. If enrollment and funding dip, the school may need to reduce to 3 Spanish teachers.
Under the old system, layoffs would be made district-wide and people would simply shift to fill holes. Now, schools MUST make cuts based on evaluative scores. They are forbidden from using seniority as a factor.
So what happens. Well, the school will have to dump one of those four excellent Spanish teachers. Suppose their scores are 94, 93, 92, 90. The teacher with the 90 rating will be laid off.
And here's the really fun part. In the State of Michigan, that teacher's career is effectively over. Under the old system, being laid off carried no negative connotation because it was based on years of service. Now, every laid-off teacher - NOT TERMINATED or FIRED for ineffectiveness - has been labeled as the WORST TEACHER in his previous district.
Basically, the whole thing boils down to this. Michigan has created an extremely complex, heavily regulated, top-down system, all in order to create a utopia where only the "best" teachers are allowed to teach, and all of our students make AYP. (In the meantime, our state continues to get poorer and poorer, which makes the previous three years of gains on the ACT test more impressive.)
My guess is that these Republican-led "reforms" will have unexpected consequences.
Hopefully, they'll be more successful than the reforms that have helped create the horrific pile of feces that is the Florida public school system.
Posted by: stickety at August 17, 2011 05:02 AM (FUDwf)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 17, 2011 05:08 AM (2tTzd)
I'll take "Non-sequitur Wall of Text That I Ain't Fucking Reading" for $800, Alex
Heh. You should read the latest one at the bottom of the headlines post.
Posted by: The Outlaw in the Heavenly Hall at August 17, 2011 05:13 AM (zxrQh)
Posted by: stickety at August 17, 2011 09:02 AM (FUDwf)
I'd take that system in a heartbeat compared to the Union Thugs and their "tenured for life" system prevelent in most states. Atm it's almost IMPOSSIBLE to get rid of teachers unless you can catch them selling drugs or accuse them of pedophilia. The system you propose in Michigan sounds a lot more rational.
Posted by: MrObvious at August 17, 2011 05:26 AM (2uovW)
How loyal are Texans? In the 50's, the Ford Motor Company built sedans, Ranchero's, and pickups in Dallas, and every vehicle came off the line with a sticker in the rear window, "Built in Texas by Texans."
The Toyota Tundras coming out of San Antonio, today, have the same sticker on them. Pride hasn't waivered. People from outside do not understand the culture of Texas to appreciate this.
Posted by: Old Texas Turkey at August 17, 2011 05:27 AM (lUwxR)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 17, 2011 08:46 AM (LH6ir)
Well said, sir. The same can be said of virtually every politician in the nation, or the world. There may be a few exceptions - Allen West seems like a damned fine guy, for instance - but the exception proves the rule.
I personally consider Palin the best candidate for office, but, much as with Perry, she is a politician. Everything must be seen through that light.
No trust, no fandom - only support and careful monitoring. Once you move past tentative support and into being a fan, you set yourself up for disappointment aplenty. Trust no one! They are politicians, after all.
Posted by: KinleyArdal at August 17, 2011 05:31 AM (S6InS)
Ronald Reagan: "Ron Paul is one of the outstanding leaders fighting for a stronger national defense. As a former Air Force officer, he knows well the needs of our armed forces, and he always puts them first. We need to keep him fighting for our country."
Note well that the great divide in public perception illustrates the Progressive neoconservative popularity that swept the Republican Party away from what constitutional conservative principles either Barry Goldwater or Ronald Reagan initially campaigned to utilize in American Governance and foreign policy. It isn't Ron Paul whose position has drifted, but the populace unwilling to admit just how far we've allowed ourselves to play petty socialist enablers of our own corrupted, authoritarian government playing the UN mercenary 'Up" dog. SQUIRREL! The standardized 'Ron Paul is insane because Paultard' has no logic, placing the tinfoil hat on the proclamation without logic.If it weren't for Ron Paul's platform agenda that represents the Tea Party movement, the public outrage would not have forced Bill Kristol to admit that Bush's well intended wars have proven to be political and military failures, and none of the other GOP candidates would ever promote (as they are now) bringing our troops home from Afghanistan (and the NATO "Arab Spring kinetic actions"), or freezing the congressional budget, and decommissioning the parasitic Federal Reserve monopoly over the US Treasury printing press since the Feds refuse any/all transparency and are in perpetual defiance of our constitutional official Congressional investigations, propping up globalist investment corporations hell bent on destroying EVERY sovereign nation, most particularly the USA/Dollar.
It's no secret, no lie. Destroy a nation's economy and the war is won. Leave a nation's borders open without guard and rule of law is lost, let alone any concept of sovereignty. Spread the world's greatest military too far while that nation's borders are unprotected, with that nation's oil conduit vulnerable to sabotage, and irony rules that greatest nation's demise. Perpetually redeploy the all volunteer military into never-ending PC wars and the troops' suicide rate goes ballistic.
Posted by: maverick muse at August 17, 2011 05:31 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Major (P) Graham at August 17, 2011 05:33 AM (Yl+oL)
Posted by: TexBob at August 17, 2011 05:34 AM (7cXE7)
The only question is when, not if.
Posted by: J. Moses Browning at August 17, 2011 05:46 AM (3rKjY)
Posted by: CitizenOfTheRepublic at August 17, 2011 05:47 AM (uqY5u)
Posted by: maverick muse at August 17, 2011 08:00 AM (lpWVn)
---
You're kidding, right? At this place that's a glowing endorsement.
I really think you're tilting at windmills here.
Posted by: Y-not at August 17, 2011 05:48 AM (5H6zj)
Nice cut and paste from the Ron Paul campaign site.
I notice nothing about Ron Paul and earmarks.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at August 17, 2011 05:49 AM (kaOJx)
Posted by: Mike at August 17, 2011 05:53 AM (NH9Y5)
There is a distinction between the Battle of the Alamo and the Battle of San Jacinto.
Posted by: mpurinTexas, Evil Conservanatrix, supports Rick Perry, bitch at August 17, 2011 05:53 AM (ignDe)
Posted by: Y-not at August 17, 2011 05:55 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Y-not at August 17, 2011 05:57 AM (5H6zj)
Hey! That's carved on the corner stone of the Parthenon!
Posted by: De' Debil Hisself at August 17, 2011 05:57 AM (j5CHE)
When I was pregnant with the boy, my husband suggested a trip to Utah to visit his family. I was due at any time. I told him, "No, I don't want to travel this late in the pregnancy." He responded with "There are hospitals in Utah, you know." I told him "No son of mine is going to be born outside Texas." I think he and his parents were a little offended.
Posted by: mpurinTexas, Evil Conservanatrix, supports Rick Perry, bitch at August 17, 2011 05:58 AM (ignDe)
I have lived in Texas 37 years and am originally from Oklahoma. I hate to rain on anyone's parade but there is a gloss on the analysis of the 17 Bad Things that I find misleading on a couple of points.
The image of Texas as having tough penny pinching fiscal discipline is true only in degree and only by comparison with States like Illinois, California or New York. Texas has been in budgetary crises for the last two Legislatures and that is likely to continue for at least two more. Lots of smoke and mirrors are being deployed but the problem has pushed beyond the smoke and mirror stage.
Then there is the related hope that Perry might be a budget hawk. Perry has a fondness toward “public private partnerships” and “targeted government investments” that is almost Obama-like (see The Texas Enterprise Fund and The Emerging Technology Fund.) Perry, the Lieutenant Governor and the Speaker of the House jointly control distribution of pork from these large barrels created by the Legislature at Perry’s initiative. Slush funds are not consistent with tough fiscal discipline. Cronyism is only part of the problem, but of course without the cronyism, what would the point be.
Perry talks tough on border enforcement, but to Perry and the rest of the Texas Republican establishment border enforcement doesnÂ’t involve activities away from the border itself that would ever involve a business supporter would be brought up on criminal charges or even penalized for ignoring immigration law. Perry takes histrionic but pointless actions such as sending the Nation Guard to the border (where they sit around with nothing to do) but has generally opposed, or tried to water down, the limited number of legislative actions Texas could take that would actually discourage illegal aliens from locating here. As a practical matter Perry is indifferent to the chaotic effects of the huge influx of Mexicans and Central Americans who wind up representing a burden on the State and local budgets that is at the root of financial crises in cities and local school and hospital districts statewide. I guess thatÂ’s just a local problem.
Posted by: snipe at August 17, 2011 06:21 AM (99zVG)
Posted by: mpurinTexas, Evil Conservanatrix, supports Rick Perry, bitch at August 17, 2011 06:27 AM (ignDe)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 17, 2011 06:30 AM (H/Wdv)
Actually no, the "Okies" all moved to California and quite a few of them were from West Texas.
Posted by: snipe at August 17, 2011 06:45 AM (99zVG)
Posted by: OCBill at August 17, 2011 06:47 AM (MiSre)
Romney ain't looking so good at the moment. Perry is the GOP Establisment's last line of defense against a Palin nomination. He's in to keep Palin out. He won't.
Posted by: mrp at August 17, 2011 06:52 AM (HjPtV)
Romney ain't looking so good at the moment. Perry is the GOP Establisment's last line of defense against a Palin nomination. He's in to keep Palin out. He won't.
And if she doesn't run?
Posted by: Entropy at August 17, 2011 07:02 AM (IsLT6)
Then there is the related hope that Perry might be a budget hawk. Perry has a fondness toward “public private partnerships” and “targeted government investments” that is almost Obama-like (see The Texas Enterprise Fund and The Emerging Technology Fund.)
snipe has absolutely nailed the truth about Perry with that post. Perry has not done anything to qualify him as a fiscal hawk of the type this country desperately needs. On immigration, he slammed AZ's immigration law while championing taxpayer subsidies for in-state tuition rates for illegal aliens.
Perry is a pure opportunist with his finger in wind. He's acting like a conservative for now.
Posted by: Mook at August 17, 2011 07:14 AM (eP5IM)
Posted by: CACooper at August 17, 2011 07:15 AM (ezK4U)
As long as he stays bought, and I think he will, and he beats the stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure, it's all good.
Posted by: toby928™ Texan in Exile at August 17, 2011 07:17 AM (GTbGH)
2. Palin is being give short shrift here now, I see, but if she declares and makes some rhetorical inroads against the MFM, would you change your tune? I like her and she may be more genuinely small government than Perry, definitely the AntiElite.
3. Yes, nearly all the Texicans at the Alamo were killed. The Alamo was followed by the "Runaway Scrape" and the Battle of San Jacinto (near present day Houston) where the Texicans attacked Santa Anna and his troops while they were taking their afternoon siesta.
4. Perry should ask asshole MFMers why the hell Texas SHOULDN'T secede from a country drowning in debt from paying people to sit on their asses.
5. And finally, it's damn early in the primary process. Primary voting has not yet begun. You never know who will catch on, who will lose, who will screw up by committing gaffes, etc, who will be found out to have a girlfriend on the side, etc. Of course, Repubs are vetted about 2000 percent harder than Democrats by the D-Lovin MFM. That's a given.
Posted by: Sphynx at August 17, 2011 07:21 AM (fEmj2)
Palin is being give short shrift here now, I see, but if she declares and makes some rhetorical inroads against the MFM, would you change your tune?
I sure would. Perry is a poseur pretending to be as conservative as Palin. His record proves otherwise
Posted by: Mook at August 17, 2011 07:25 AM (eP5IM)
Posted by: Paul Zummo at August 17, 2011 07:26 AM (IGkEP)
Thanks for the pointer.
Posted by: 1idvet at August 17, 2011 10:25 AM (xUxh3)
Posted by: steevy at August 17, 2011 11:24 AM (ey1dd)
Posted by: ReadyorNot at August 17, 2011 01:08 PM (ErUlJ)
Good on you, man!
I discovered those articles via Twitter a couple days ago, and I would agree, without a doubt, these are both absolutely necessary reading. Garnet92 deserves a heap of thanks from every Repub.
Posted by: Kathy from Kansas at August 17, 2011 02:28 PM (2AfqM)
Posted by: Jimmy Choo at August 18, 2011 12:05 AM (Wa1a/)
Posted by: creeper at August 18, 2011 10:04 AM (gre5a)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2954 seconds, 283 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Joffen at August 17, 2011 03:34 AM (EPcuy)