May 17, 2011
— Ace Via Hot Air, where Jon Huntsman says he believes in global warming because 90% of scientists do, a great article. Worth reading in full.
The debate about global warming has reached ridiculous proportions and is full of micro-thin half-truths and misunderstandings. I am a scientist who was on the carbon gravy train, understands the evidence, was once an alarmist, but am now a skeptic. Watching this issue unfold has been amusing but, lately, worrying. This issue is tearing society apart, making fools out of our politicians.LetÂ’s set a few things straight.
The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s. But the gravy train was too big, with too many jobs, industries, trading profits, political careers, and the possibility of world government and total control riding on the outcome. So rather than admit they were wrong, the governments, and their tame climate scientists, now outrageously maintain the fiction that carbon dioxide is a dangerous pollutant.
The whole "science" of global warming is based on a hunch. Carbon dioxide, itself, is not enough to warm the earth catastrophically. AGW skeptic and noted physicist Freeman Dyson has worked out the math-- even if you replaced every single particle of oxygen with carbon dioxide, the earth would only warm by about eight degrees. And since current CO2 levels are about 400 parts per million, obviously that is an absurd hypothetical.
But AGW posits there is a positive feedback mechanism. Some CO2 comes in, makes some more moist air, which itself is a greenhouse gas, which makes the earth warmer, which makes more CO2, which makes more moist air... And so on.
Almost the entirety of AGW theory is based on this postulated positive feeback mechanism.
There is no evidence for it. It's plausible, but a negative feedback mechanism is also plausible -- moist air makes clouds which reflects more sunlight away, mitigating any heating by adding some cooling shade.
Or maybe there's not really any strong feedback either way, neither positive nor negative.
The scientist points out that all the predictions of a positive feedback have failed. It is predicted that such positive feedback will produce masses of moist air over the tropics; there are none. We've sent lots of weather balloons to check, but no evidence of the key predictive claim of AGW "science."
They don't care. Because it's not science. It's faith.
At this point, official “climate science” stopped being a science. In science, empirical evidence always trumps theory, no matter how much you are in love with the theory. If theory and evidence disagree, real scientists scrap the theory. But official climate science ignored the crucial weather balloon evidence, and other subsequent evidence that backs it up, and instead clung to their carbon dioxide theory — that just happens to keep them in well-paying jobs with lavish research grants, and gives great political power to their government masters.
Posted by: Ace at
12:22 PM
| Comments (187)
Post contains 520 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: Speller at May 17, 2011 12:24 PM (J74Py)
Posted by: model_1066 at May 17, 2011 12:24 PM (VnECg)
Posted by: Captain Hate at May 17, 2011 12:24 PM (l3wWa)
/Yes, I carried over from the last thread, what of it
Posted by: AoSHQ's *second* worst commenter, DarkLord© at May 17, 2011 12:24 PM (GBXon)
Posted by: AGW sciency guy at May 17, 2011 12:25 PM (RD7QR)
Oh, thank goodness, a new thread. On the same subject, that guy who's running for prez, Jon Huntsman believes in global warming "because 90% of scientists do." Let's cross him off the list (not that he was on it because I forgot his name).
Posted by: ChristyBlinky at May 17, 2011 12:26 PM (FnRYN)
Way OT, but this is from the AP about the UBL raid.
Back at the White House Situation Room, word was relayed that bin Laden had been found, signaled by the code word “Geronimo.” That was not bin Laden’s code name, but rather a representation of the letter “G.” Each step of the mission was labeled alphabetically, and “Geronimo” meant that the raiders had reached step “G,” the killing or capture of bin Laden, two officials said.
I call BS. AP again covering for their marxist in the WH. Unless there has been a recent change, "Golf" is used to represent "G", not Geronimo.
Posted by: Turd Ferguson at May 17, 2011 12:27 PM (6yyVB)
The entire scheme is a fraud and anyone pushing it belongs in jail. On the political stage a supporter of the AGW scam and crap and tax is dead. This is a single issue downer for me because it means you are one of three things as a politician
1. A communist using this to push your agenda
2. A crook getting some kind of money out of it
3. Dumber than a creosote post and don't deserve to occupy space in this universe.
This is why I have no support for T-Paw even though he has tried to walk it back.
Posted by: Vic at May 17, 2011 12:27 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Lefty Hussein McMoonbat at May 17, 2011 12:27 PM (saRwI)
Posted by: model_1066 at May 17, 2011 12:27 PM (VnECg)
Posted by: Jean at May 17, 2011 12:27 PM (WkuV6)
"This issue is tearing society apart, making fools out of our politicians."
It is an attempt to ruin our Western civilization. But politicians, corporatists, community organizers, and eco-activists are planning to make a big score off this hoax.
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 17, 2011 12:28 PM (gM4zK)
Hey screw you Vic, even I haven't fallen for this AGW BS
Posted by: Creosote Post at May 17, 2011 12:28 PM (wuv1c)
Huntsman says he opposes cap-and-trade proposals because “this isn’t the moment,” but he buys the climate change argument because “90% of the scientists” say it’s happening
Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 17, 2011 12:28 PM (UOM48)
If you accept the global warming "greenhouse gas" analogy, then if the amount of CO2 doubled, it would be like taking a greenhouse made of 10,000 panels and smashing 9992 of them and looking at all the warming that would result.
And nobody's talking about the doubling of CO2.
But, let's face it, all "science" is anymore is a hypothesis that doesn't involve the supernatural. The "scientific method" to most people is to ask somebody with a Ph.D. in something that sounds sciency.
Posted by: AmishDude at May 17, 2011 12:29 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Chicken Little at May 17, 2011 12:29 PM (ODJgp)
Posted by: momma at May 17, 2011 12:29 PM (penCf)
Posted by: Jean at May 17, 2011 12:31 PM (WkuV6)
Posted by: Soona at May 17, 2011 12:31 PM (LgItj)
Posted by: Bob Saget at May 17, 2011 12:31 PM (F/4zf)
Posted by: The Medieval Scholastics at May 17, 2011 12:31 PM (ODJgp)
Posted by: momma at May 17, 2011 12:32 PM (penCf)
making fools out of our politicians
I think the AGW supporters among the pols were already fools, AGW just helps to expose their respective individual levels of foolishness to the public.
greater support of AGW=greater level of foolishness
Posted by: Speller at May 17, 2011 12:33 PM (J74Py)
Posted by: The Union of Very Concerned Scientists at May 17, 2011 12:33 PM (ODJgp)
I can't help but wonder if some of those who cling to AGW aren't products of our society that blanches at the thought of correctng a child's schoolwork with a red pen for fear of embarrassing the little dears.
I'm sure plenty of AGW prophets are counting the profits but we are a society that fears admissions of being wrong. If you're never wrong then there is never a reason to move forward in your thinking.
Perhaps Christianity, with its penchant for confession and penance, really is the best vehicle for advancing science.
Posted by: SGT Snuggle Bunny at May 17, 2011 12:33 PM (2eLg/)
If the industrial revolution was the cause of the warming of the earth, how come so many of the heat records were set back in the 1920's and 30's?
Fucking scientists aren't the smartest guy in the room either. They're just bought and paid for like the politicians.
Posted by: © Sponge at May 17, 2011 12:34 PM (UK9cE)
Great think about being a liberal - history always begins this morning.
/How old is he? I remember in HS that it was called "global warming", and I"m not that old.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at May 17, 2011 12:34 PM (c0A3e)
I don't buy that argument. All of us were lied to. Most of us investigated the theory and found it severely lacking even before the break came on the fraudulent stuff.
A politician willing to vote on that crap and tax bill which was truly bad bad bad and which would destroy this country without investigating the validity of the problem doesn't deserve to be in office, much less President.
Even if he didn't have the time he did have a shit pot of staffers which we don't have.
Posted by: Vic at May 17, 2011 12:34 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Newton Leroy Gingrich at May 17, 2011 12:34 PM (zhC9L)
Laugh right at them.
Posted by: Unclefacts Luxury-Yacht at May 17, 2011 12:34 PM (6IReR)
Huntsman says he opposes cap-and-trade proposals because “this isn’t the moment,” but he buys the climate change argument because “90% of the scientists” say it’s happening
Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 17, 2011 04:28 PM (UOM4
99 percent of Americans don't think he's suited for being President.
Posted by: Oldcat at May 17, 2011 12:34 PM (z1N6a)
Wait...what...
Posted by: John Holdren Sooper Genius at May 17, 2011 12:34 PM (Rn2kl)
I call BS. AP again covering for their marxist in the WH. Unless there has been a recent change, "Golf" is used to represent "G", not Geronimo.
Considering JugEars' favorite pastime, there's no way in HELL that AP was gonna use the proper military phonetic alphabet.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at May 17, 2011 12:35 PM (7YzRS)
Great think about being a liberal - history always begins this morning.
/How old is he? I remember in HS that it was called "global warming", and I"m not that old.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at May 17, 2011 04:34 PM (c0A3e)
HS? It was like two years ago they changed it.
Posted by: Oldcat at May 17, 2011 12:35 PM (z1N6a)
Posted by: model_1066 at May 17, 2011 04:24 PM (VnECg)
The AGW ninnies are 19th century New York newsies?
Carryin' the banner!
(Yes, that is a Newsies reference. Should I denounce myself?)
Posted by: MWR at May 17, 2011 12:36 PM (4df7R)
Posted by: Vic at May 17, 2011 04:27 PM (M9Ie6)
If he's truly converted, then he'll be the most passionate spokesman we have.
It doesn't say a lot about his judgement, but even Reagan signed a bad abortion law in CA.
And, frankly, I want a GOP candidate who will bend to the protestations of the right and recognizes the error of his ways.
Posted by: AmishDude at May 17, 2011 12:36 PM (T0NGe)
He played on our fears!!!
Posted by: Al Gore at May 17, 2011 12:36 PM (Q5+Og)
Posted by: momma at May 17, 2011 04:32 PM (penCf)
We have always been at war with East Asia....
Posted by: Oldcat at May 17, 2011 12:36 PM (z1N6a)
Los Al board passes global warming rule
LOS ALAMITOS - The city's school board is requiring the teacher of an advanced-placement science class to present "multiple perspectives" including the view that global warming is not being caused by man, a newspaper reported Sunday.
The Los Alamitos Unified School Board voted 4-0 to require that science teachers present "a balance of viewpoints" on controversial items. A school board member, Jeffrey Barke, told the Orange County Register that the policy is based on his concerns that "global warming dogma" is being taught in local schools.
"There are two clearly divergent opinions on global warming," Barke told the newspaper. "There are those who believe that global warming is a fact, created by man's impact on the environmental and the consequences will be devastating."
Some parents in the district have criticized what they say is a political intrusion into a classroom.
"There is a consensus in the field that we have global warming happening," said parent J.M. Ivler, who told the newspaper he has a daughter in the district.
"This is not in dispute in the scientific community, it is in dispute in the political community," he was quoted as saying. "This is a science class. Teach science."
Posted by: momma at May 17, 2011 12:37 PM (penCf)
Posted by: NASA at May 17, 2011 12:37 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: © Sponge at May 17, 2011 12:38 PM (UK9cE)
May 17 is National Cherry Cobbler Day.
May 17 is Norwegian Constitution Day.
Posted by: Dr. Varno at May 17, 2011 12:39 PM (QMtmy)
Gotta love a guy like Huntsman. He's a typical Washington insider.
He just admitted he's a clown. An ass clown.
Huntsman is the type of politician who never passed up what the lobbyists were selling.
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 17, 2011 12:39 PM (gM4zK)
So how does this end exactly?
I know we are all expecting some "big reveal" where the liars and assholes come clean and are shamed, but will that happen?
It seems unlikely. A lot of people who pushed the Global cooling sh*t are the exact same people. What happened to them then? nothing.
It will just be downplayed and pushed under the rug until the next environmental "scare" comes down the pike.
I've been here nearly three decades and I've already seen several. The people who promulgate this crap are never considered frauds.
Look at Paul Erhlich and his ilk. They say the sky is falling for one reason and then when it doesn't claim it is falling for another reason.
Posted by: Ben at May 17, 2011 12:39 PM (wuv1c)
Posted by: ChuckOH at May 17, 2011 12:39 PM (zhC9L)
Posted by: god at May 17, 2011 12:40 PM (nj7LO)
Posted by: Lemmiwinks at May 17, 2011 12:40 PM (pdRb1)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 17, 2011 12:40 PM (ODJgp)
Dude. My lib brother insists that it has NEVER been called global warming, it has always been called climate change
Time to google the historic reviews of Al Gore's 'An Inconvenient Truth' and show your Bro that the interwebs never forget inconvenient truths.
Posted by: Speller at May 17, 2011 12:40 PM (J74Py)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at May 17, 2011 04:34 PM (c0A3e)
31. He just changes the facts to make them lies, calls them facts and the spews them.
Posted by: momma at May 17, 2011 12:40 PM (penCf)
It's good to be me.
Posted by: John Holdren Sooper Genius at May 17, 2011 12:41 PM (Rn2kl)
Keep in mind, y'all, if Dear Leader's reign of terror is not stopped (right now it is a little quieter as he is in campaign mode), Cap and Trade will be an issue he will pass. With $4 gasoline he is tilting a bit to the center, pretending to open oil fields, etc.
Please do notice that this has not been a hot media topic lately, as the MSM continues to protect Barky from hot topics (Hot Pockets, however, is the code name for his iReggie). Where is Al Boreth? I thought he'd be yelping about the tornadoes and flooding in the South as well as earthquakes and cicadas being the cause of climate change.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky at May 17, 2011 12:41 PM (FnRYN)
Time to google the historic reviews of Al Gore's 'An Inconvenient Truth' and show your Bro that the interwebs never forget inconvenient truths.
Posted by: Speller at May 17, 2011 04:40 PM (J74Py)
Did that. He said, 'Well, I've always called it climate change!'
Posted by: momma at May 17, 2011 12:41 PM (penCf)
"This is a science class. Teach science."
Hear! Hear!
If only this a-hole understood scientific methods.
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 17, 2011 12:41 PM (gM4zK)
Newt
The Donald
Huckster
Huntsman
Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 17, 2011 12:41 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: Jean at May 17, 2011 12:41 PM (WkuV6)
With words like hunch and faith, you're giving them more credit than I do. I prefer line and scheme.
It's kind of like telling the chick in your sociology class that sleeping with you will help to bring an end to society's oppressive patriarchy. If she goes along with it, who cares if she really believes it?
Posted by: FireHorse at May 17, 2011 12:41 PM (Rq1/g)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff, Atheist and Arbiter of Morality at May 17, 2011 12:42 PM (TATbF)
31. He just changes the facts to make them lies, calls them facts and the spews them.
Posted by: momma at May 17, 2011 04:40 PM (penCf)
Aren't lib siblings fun? And "special."
Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 17, 2011 12:42 PM (UOM48)
Did that. He said, 'Well, I've always called it climate change!'
Posted by: momma at May 17, 2011 04:41 PM (penCf)
Then he is just full of shit and a lost cause. Don't waste your breath anymore...
Posted by: Hedgehog at May 17, 2011 12:43 PM (Rn2kl)
Posted by: ChuckOH at May 17, 2011 04:39 PM (zhC9L)
My condolences. Record cold temps and precip here in Ohio for the season. Did the Prof address that?
Posted by: ErikW at May 17, 2011 12:43 PM (7KrHw)
Posted by: Jean at May 17, 2011 12:43 PM (WkuV6)
Posted by: Rodney C. Johnson at May 17, 2011 12:44 PM (5uGq7)
Posted by: © Sponge at May 17, 2011 04:34 PM (UK9cE)
Same thing can be said about the second-hand smoke splooge (or the whole anti-tobacco meme, for that matter). It's all about money and power. Politicians and their lackeys prey on the public educated ignorance of so many people. I wouldn't care if those sheeple paid the price they're paying for their stupidity, but they've sucked everyone else into the malestrom also.
Posted by: Soona at May 17, 2011 12:44 PM (LgItj)
Did that. He said, 'Well, I've always called it climate change!'
Posted by: momma at May 17, 2011 04:41 PM (penCf)
Well then, just smack him. He's your younger brother; you have the right and the responsibility to do everything in your power to snap him out of his delusion.
Corporal punishment is a marvelous way of focusing people's attention on what is important!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at May 17, 2011 12:44 PM (LH6ir)
AGW skeptic and noted physicist Freeman Dyson has worked out the math--
Never trust the man who designed a thousand dollar vacuum cleaner!!11!!
Posted by: dananjcon at May 17, 2011 12:45 PM (pr+up)
Posted by: Lemmiwinks at May 17, 2011 04:40 PM (pdRb1)
That's funny. I think that was the excuse as to why the surface of Mars was so hot. When Al-gore was asked about it he responded, "because the entire atmosphere is made up of carbon dioxide."
Nothing like fitting the narrative.
Posted by: © Sponge at May 17, 2011 12:45 PM (UK9cE)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 17, 2011 12:45 PM (ODJgp)
I called him right back and said: 'My Faith in God compels me to immediately forgive you for lying and name calling. May you find comfort in my forgiveness.'
I still laugh about it.
Posted by: momma at May 17, 2011 12:46 PM (penCf)
Posted by: Damiano at May 17, 2011 12:46 PM (3nrx7)
Posted by: ChuckOH at May 17, 2011 12:47 PM (zhC9L)
Posted by: momma at May 17, 2011 04:40 PM (penCf)
Have you called him a fucking idiot to his face?
At some point, the sharp knife of reality needs to slit his wrists.......
Posted by: © Sponge at May 17, 2011 12:47 PM (UK9cE)
Come to think of it, has anyone ever seen Ace and Allahpundit in the same room?
Yes. Karol, Ace, and Allahpundit went to the movies together a few years ago.
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 17, 2011 12:47 PM (gM4zK)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 17, 2011 12:48 PM (ODJgp)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff, Atheist and Arbiter of Morality at May 17, 2011 12:49 PM (OW0nw)
Posted by: Jean at May 17, 2011 04:43 PM (WkuV6)
Penn & Teller's recycling Bullshit show is a classic. People are stupid...
Posted by: Will Folkes at May 17, 2011 12:49 PM (Rn2kl)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 17, 2011 12:50 PM (ODJgp)
Posted by: TexasJew at May 17, 2011 12:50 PM (L8Let)
Posted by: nerdygirl at May 17, 2011 12:50 PM (1ckSh)
As I see it, there are 3 possible situations in play.
1. The Earth is warming
2. The Earth is cooling
3. The Earth is in a period of stasis.
Given any of these, the only practical solution, if you must have one, is to adapt to the particular, thus ensuring, or at least maximizing your chances of survival.
The rest is scam and spin.
Posted by: irongrampa at May 17, 2011 12:50 PM (ud5dN)
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 17, 2011 04:45 PM (gM4zK)
Go watch Total Recall......in honor of the philandering Ahnold, and you'll understand.
Posted by: © Sponge at May 17, 2011 12:51 PM (UK9cE)
If Barack Obama Is Christian, Michael Jackson Was White
Posted by: Islamic Rage Boy at May 17, 2011 12:51 PM (PrXnz)
Posted by: Rodney C. Johnson at May 17, 2011 12:52 PM (5uGq7)
Then I just watch this video and just feel sorry for them that they need to be committed for their own safety.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at May 17, 2011 12:52 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 17, 2011 04:48 PM (ODJgp)
Rule #1: There's no reason to credit a brilliant scientist's insights on any subject outside his field.
Rule #2: In his field, Max Plank's Principle applies: "To get a new theory to gain acceptance, you have to wait for the old scientists to die." Hawking is no longer young, so I would take even his Physics pronouncements with a grain of salt.
Posted by: Oldcat at May 17, 2011 12:52 PM (z1N6a)
Posted by: Mr Natural at May 17, 2011 12:53 PM (uHZFN)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff, Atheist and Arbiter of Morality at May 17, 2011 12:53 PM (TATbF)
Posted by: ChuckOH at May 17, 2011 04:47 PM (zhC9L)
I hear that. Don't waste anymore time than you need to.
Posted by: ErikW at May 17, 2011 12:53 PM (7KrHw)
Add to that the recent musings of Alan Carlin, the EPA physics PhD who told the EPA that they were wearing no clothes in regard to AGW.
From a policy perspective, the paperÂ’s conclusions include the following:
· The economic benefits of reducing CO2 emissions may be about two orders of magnitude less than those estimated by most economists because the climate sensitivity factor is much lower than assumed by the United Nations because feedback is negative rather than positive and the effects of CO2 emissions reductions on atmospheric CO2 appear to be short rather than long lasting.
· The costs of CO2 emissions reductions are perhaps an order of magnitude higher than usually estimated because of technological and implementation problems recently identified.
· CO2 emissions reductions are economically unattractive since the few benefits remaining after the corrections for the above effects are quite unlikely to economically justify the much higher costs unless much lower cost geoengineering is used.
· The risk of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming appears to be so low that it is not currently worth doing anything to try to control it, including geoengineering.
Posted by: James Loughner at May 17, 2011 12:53 PM (PrXnz)
Posted by: TexasJew at May 17, 2011 12:53 PM (L8Let)
MAN-BEAR-PIG!!!
EXCELSIOR!!!!
Posted by: Lemmiwinks at May 17, 2011 12:53 PM (pdRb1)
Their is no talking with a lib because their reality changes by the second.
It isn't about ethics, moral, looking at everything and deciding on you own personal view, it really is a cult. It makes them who they are. That is why they hate God. You can't have faith in God and at the same time believe/live like your opinions are who you are.
Being a 'Child of God' means I am of Him and everything I am revolves around Him. Being a liberal means they are a child of someone else's thoughts, and everything they are revolves around (a stranger) someone else's thoughts.
Posted by: momma at May 17, 2011 12:53 PM (penCf)
Next you'll try telling us Alec Baldwin has no business lecturing us on politics.
Posted by: Film Actors Guild at May 17, 2011 12:56 PM (zhC9L)
Posted by: Al Gore at May 17, 2011 12:56 PM (Q5+Og)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff, Atheist and Arbiter of Morality at May 17, 2011 12:56 PM (TATbF)
Posted by: momma at May 17, 2011 04:53 PM (penCf)
Pinch his cheek, say "You're so cute when you're rude, and I forgive you" and walk off. Drives em nuts to be dismissed and laughed at.
Posted by: Oldcat at May 17, 2011 12:56 PM (z1N6a)
Posted by: Congress at May 17, 2011 12:56 PM (pdRb1)
I called him right back and said: 'My Faith in God compels me to immediately forgive you for lying and name calling. May you find comfort in my forgiveness.'
I still laugh about it.
Posted by: momma at May 17, 2011 04:46 PM (penCf)
Way to go momma. Smash their faces with the fist of spiritual principle.
Posted by: Soona at May 17, 2011 12:56 PM (LgItj)
Next you'll try telling us Alec Baldwin has no business lecturing us on politics.
Posted by: Film Actors Guild at May 17, 2011 04:56 PM (zhC9L)
Not without a script, and a good chase scene.
Posted by: Oldcat at May 17, 2011 12:56 PM (z1N6a)
Remember that day we were supposed to all turn off our lights for a photo from space (for earth hour or something)? I left mine on.
However, I do recycle and have for decades here in Florida (curbside). My stuff builds plastic stuff or makes big landfills of recycle stuff. Don't know, but it is a shameful habit of mine.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky at May 17, 2011 12:57 PM (FnRYN)
As a mere layman who follows astrophysics, I understand Hawking is pretty brilliant. However, I'm beginning to wonder if he isn't rather overrated.
He's actually fucked up at least twice. He's not nearly as well respected by his peers as he is by the press. I've seen a documentary on one of the sciency channels that was a Hawking slamfest. One thing that he backed away from because of how stupid it was, was the belief that if and when the Universe began contracting time would begin to run in reverse. O_o
Posted by: eleven at May 17, 2011 12:57 PM (7DB+a)
Yep, scratch Huntsman off the list.
Like He ever made it.
106 -
Organically induced schizophrenia.
Posted by: SomeWhereSouthWest at May 17, 2011 12:58 PM (CyPWX)
However, I do recycle and have for decades here in Florida (curbside). My stuff builds plastic stuff or makes big landfills of recycle stuff. Don't know, but it is a shameful habit of mine.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky at May 17, 2011 04:57 PM (FnRYN)
We only forgive you if you do it for the money.
Posted by: Oldcat at May 17, 2011 12:58 PM (z1N6a)
Posted by: Damiano at May 17, 2011 04:46 PM (3nrx7)
I thought that the real reason was that the Dow patent on Freon was running out. Thus, for the chirrens we needed to go from R12 to R-134a (and restart the patent clock). The overt reason was ozone holes and climate damage.
Posted by: Hrothgar at May 17, 2011 12:59 PM (yrGif)
Michael Crichton wrote a GREAT book about the myth of Global Warming complete with internet footnotes to reference his evidence years ago called "State of Fear". It's actually a great read.
Fact: anthropomorphic CO2 production is THIRD behind volcanoes and (try not to laugh) termites. Mankind maxes out at about 1/2% of all CO2 generated depending on how many volcanoes go off this year. And that's propably DOWN from pre-industrial revolution times when mankind burned off ground cover and heated their homes and cooked with wood fires.
Like Honey Badger, the Earth knows you're here.... but she just don't care.
Posted by: MrObvious at May 17, 2011 12:59 PM (H87Hu)
Mr. Huntsman, Paging Mr. Huntsman. ..............................................
Would a Mr. Huntsman Please report to irrelevence. Mr. Huckelbee, Trump, and Gingrich are waiting for you.
Posted by: BruceTheRobert at May 17, 2011 01:00 PM (re6ik)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff, Atheist and Arbiter of Morality at May 17, 2011 01:00 PM (OW0nw)
Hawking used to get A's in Physics by selling his hot mute sister to his Professors for sportsfucking in the lounge.
He's actually dumber than crap.
Posted by: TexasJew at May 17, 2011 01:00 PM (L8Let)
Posted by: ChristyBlinky at May 17, 2011 01:01 PM (FnRYN)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 17, 2011 01:02 PM (ODJgp)
Aren't lib siblings fun? And "special."
Posted by: Jane D'oh
DO they get their own helmet and window to lick?
Posted by: todler at May 17, 2011 01:02 PM (fPOY0)
This guy better prepare to get everything the left has thrown at him. He's a heretic and one who blows the whistle on their scam will be especially targeted. He should be worried about his safety. These turds are violent, especially when you expose them. I don't say that lightly. The lefties/green nics are nasty.
Posted by: BruceTheRobert at May 17, 2011 01:02 PM (re6ik)
Posted by: Al Gore at May 17, 2011 01:06 PM (Q5+Og)
Posted by: Chellita at May 17, 2011 01:06 PM (9BzDU)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 17, 2011 01:08 PM (ODJgp)
Posted by: t-bird at May 17, 2011 01:10 PM (FcR7P)
The press wanted another Einstein. And Hawking has a look that they can "hawk" and write praise about constantly. They just want their "rock star" scientist they can always go to for a quote.
Posted by: buzzion at May 17, 2011 05:07 PM (oVQFe)
We used to have a radio morning show guy that did some outrageously funny bits on Hawking. They never were complimentary.
Posted by: Soona at May 17, 2011 01:12 PM (LgItj)
I read an article a few months back that someone wrote after investigating several cities with recycling programs. After all the separate bins were collected and brought back to the center they were mixed together and taken to the landfill and burried just like they had done since time immemorial.
This occurred in 80% of the cities he studied.
Posted by: Vic at May 17, 2011 01:12 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Dr. Varno at May 17, 2011 01:13 PM (QMtmy)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at May 17, 2011 01:13 PM (OW0nw)
Posted by: nerdygirl at May 17, 2011 01:14 PM (1ckSh)
Do they get their own helmet and window to lick?
Nope. They get and eyepatch and a fork with a protective cork on it.
"May I use the bathroom?"
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at May 17, 2011 01:14 PM (d0Tfm)
This occurred in 80% of the cities he studied.
Posted by: Vic at May 17, 2011 05:12 PM (M9Ie6)
In mine they are dumped into the same bin on the truck.
Posted by: Oldcat at May 17, 2011 01:17 PM (z1N6a)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff, Atheist and Arbiter of Morality at May 17, 2011 05:00 PM (OW0nw)
Nope. You know the reason I only type with one hand . . .
Posted by: momma at May 17, 2011 01:17 PM (penCf)
Don't make me write another poem!
Posted by: Algore, billionaire poet at May 17, 2011 01:17 PM (9BzDU)
I worked for GE back in the late 90s and guess where housekeeping emptied all of our mandatory RECYCLING bins? The landfill destined garbage dumpster.
Always take mine to a scrap metal recycle center, get 50 cents a pound for Beer soda pop cans here...
Posted by: SomeWhereSouthWest at May 17, 2011 01:17 PM (CyPWX)
Posted by: SomeWhereSouthWest at May 17, 2011 05:17 PM (CyPWX)
You know recycling is a scam as long as they don't pay you to take your stuff. Do iron smelters make the ore company pay them?
Posted by: Oldcat at May 17, 2011 01:18 PM (z1N6a)
Buddy of mine who works at the county dump has told me the same thing.
Posted by: Dr. Varno at May 17, 2011 01:19 PM (QMtmy)
Sorry, but some pointy-heads need to explain to me how gasses are able to stratify if they're in motion. I still rather doubt that they do that in the upper atmosphere, and I especially doubt the "Ozone Layer" theory since it was posed in the early 20th century, well before any type of advanced methods of study, like satellites.
From what this layman understands, the upper layers of the atmosphere are constantly pelted with micrometeorites, thus keeping the gasses stirred up.
I've probably asked this before, but since I'm a moron, I don't remember the answer.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at May 17, 2011 01:19 PM (d0Tfm)
Seems the hobo apocalypse started in Moscow.
Posted by: Al Gore at May 17, 2011 01:20 PM (Q5+Og)
More importantly, what about the carbon dioxide on Uranus?
Posted by: juvenile commenter at May 17, 2011 01:21 PM (gmlb7)
Don't make me write another poem!
Posted by: Algore, billionaire poet at May 17, 2011 05:17 PM (9BzDU)
If you do, please don't try to paint a picture of crunchy clouds.
Posted by: Soona at May 17, 2011 01:21 PM (LgItj)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 17, 2011 01:21 PM (ODJgp)
Your family get togethers must be awesome.
Posted by: buzzion at May 17, 2011 05:04 PM (oVQFe)
They asre even better than you can imagine because my family-union-Dem husband turned Conservative has a way of getting really blunt when my bro refuses to listen to what I say, and starts name calling.
Between my husband and I (both confident, outspoken, intelligent, reasoned thinkers), my quiet yet snarky Conservative brother, my timid sister and my 'not picking a side' mom, get togethers are awesome.
Until we started having kids of our own, we never had a Thanksgiving dinner that didn't end with someone getting pissed and leaving before dessert was served. I really thought it was the norm in every family.
Posted by: momma at May 17, 2011 01:22 PM (penCf)
Until we started having kids of
our own, we never had a Thanksgiving dinner that didn't end with someone
getting pissed and leaving before dessert was served. I really thought
it was the norm in every family.
Posted by: momma at May 17, 2011 05:22 PM (penCf)
More pie for you!
Posted by: Oldcat at May 17, 2011 01:24 PM (z1N6a)
Posted by: nerdygirl at May 17, 2011 01:25 PM (1ckSh)
Posted by: toby928™ at May 17, 2011 01:26 PM (GTbGH)
Posted by: political correctness czar at May 17, 2011 01:27 PM (UPNlB)
Posted by: Dan Collins at May 17, 2011 01:27 PM (dRi3N)
Posted by: TexasJew at May 17, 2011 01:29 PM (L8Let)
Goddamn it! Now all I have left to choose is Klaus Fuchs, and he's a freaking commie.
Posted by: George Orwell at May 17, 2011 05:21 PM (ODJgp)
Damn! He was my first choice too. Then I was going to pick Bernard Burke, but he went on the injury list after submitting his last paper.
Posted by: Soona at May 17, 2011 01:29 PM (LgItj)
Posted by: Vic at May 17, 2011 01:29 PM (M9Ie6)
But AGW posits there is a positive feedback mechanism. ... It's plausible, but ...
Actually, no, it's not even plausible. Being someone who has studied control theory, this would be what you call an unstable situation - the least little blip in temperature would set it off this unstable mode, and the temperature would spiral upward until some other mechanism became dominant. And these scientists should be well aware of that.
Posted by: Optimizer at May 17, 2011 01:30 PM (F56VB)
"Nope. You know the reason I only type with one hand ."
FAP..FAP...FAP....FAP.....FAP......FAP.......FAP........FAP!
Posted by: Jimi at May 17, 2011 01:31 PM (JMsOK)
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 17, 2011 04:47 PM (gM4zK)
I thought it was a Broadway musical?
Posted by: Wicket at May 17, 2011 01:31 PM (AN8d5)
Posted by: TexasJew at May 17, 2011 01:34 PM (L8Let)
And there is a guaranteed 600-comment post just waiting to be written.
Posted by: Kevin In ABQ at May 17, 2011 01:35 PM (BvTwT)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 17, 2011 01:40 PM (ODJgp)
It's really very simple. Of all the so-called green-house gases (water vapor, methane, CO2, ozone) the only one that is easily taxed is CO2. Who cares if it is only 0.04% of the atmosphere! Oh, and who cares that plants NEED fucking CO2. I'm guessing clear-cutting forrests to install windmills is not helping to reduce CO2.
The idea that that minute amount could heat up the other 99.96% of the atmosphere is like a BB stopping a Kenworth.
Posted by: Schwalbe : The © at May 17, 2011 01:41 PM (UU0OF)
Sorry, but some pointy-heads need to explain to me how gasses are able to stratify if they're in motion. I still rather doubt that they do that in the upper atmosphere, and I especially doubt the "Ozone Layer" theory since it was posed in the early 20th century, well before any type of advanced methods of study, like satellites.
From what this layman understands, the upper layers of the atmosphere are constantly pelted with micrometeorites, thus keeping the gasses stirred up.
I've probably asked this before, but since I'm a moron, I don't remember the answer.
Gasses just like any other element have different molecular weights. Visualize oil and water seperating into layers and realize that gasses don't have as much viscosity to slow down the seperation process. So yes, mixed gasses will seperate into stratified layers over time. Heavier gasses mix with the weather turbulance near the earth and the higher levels seperate into increasingly lighter gasses as pressure and density get lighter at higher altitudes.
The very highest level is known as Obama Farts.
Posted by: MrObvious at May 17, 2011 01:41 PM (H87Hu)
Crap! What Globally Devastating Catastrophe Requiring Further Advancement of the NWO Agenda can we scam teh people with now???
Posted by: George Soros at May 17, 2011 01:41 PM (9BzDU)
All those "God Deniers" need to shape up.
Posted by: James Loughner at May 17, 2011 01:44 PM (PrXnz)
The whole "science" of global warming is based on a hunch.
That's undoubtedly putting it kindly. What happens is, that somebody notices an upward trend in the global temperature (as measured by hopelessly flawed instruments, BTW), gets the idea in their head that "evil" mankind is the culprit, and then self-annoints themselves as the Saviors of the entire world. Then, they start drawing up computer models, which leads to a desperate search for any mechanism that sounds even remotely "plausible" (if you don't think about it for over two seconds).
Such a process is the likely birthplace of CO2 "positive feedback", not a "hunch".
Posted by: Optimizer at May 17, 2011 01:44 PM (F56VB)
That means 66% don't believe in UFOs, so UFO Deniers are cool
Posted by: James Loughner at May 17, 2011 01:46 PM (PrXnz)
Posted by: High School Graduate at May 17, 2011 01:47 PM (IYLAL)
Why did so many scientists throw in with this cult when they should've known better? If grants are causing this subversion of science then the whole damn practice needs review and better oversight. If this is about unicorns and a rainbows in some socialist utopia, they must resign from whatever "scientific" organization they belong to and run for office with the rest of the brain dead politicians.
I do recall some scientists asking one of the AGW proponents (I think it was Hansen but not sure now) about this CO2 problem and instead of an answer or reasonable explanation he got insulted for daring to question "the science".
Hansen should be fired right now. He should not be drawing a paycheck from tax payers. NASA is already running on borrowed respect -- if it does not begin divorcing itself from this cult then it will lose even more, not a prescription for future funding.
Posted by: Full Moon at May 17, 2011 02:06 PM (m75CK)
Posted by: Aeris Ghwynne Moonshade at May 17, 2011 02:10 PM (JVEmw)
Ozone, or O3, is created constantly in the upper atmosphere by energetic particles and energy from solar radiation. It is "destroyed" when it chemically interacts with other stuff.
The reason why there's a "layer" of it is that the upper atmosphere is where he conditions exist that create it from O2, and it doesn't last long.
That's all, no mysteries, no magic, no need for complex explanations.
That's also why there are "holes at the poles," there's less sunlight and thus less creation of Ozone.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at May 17, 2011 02:17 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: ParisParamus at May 17, 2011 02:33 PM (tUIG0)
At the other end of the scale, by way of contrast, the MetÂ’s principle research scientist John Mitchell told us: People underestimate the power of models. Observational evidence is not very useful, adding,'Our approach is not entirely empirical
Posted by: Clavius at May 17, 2011 08:01 PM (cQghS)
And they call themselves scientists?
Posted by: Clavius at May 17, 2011 08:02 PM (cQghS)
Posted by: Dave in Oz at May 17, 2011 10:20 PM (bejci)
Posted by: Ago Solvo at May 18, 2011 03:14 AM (k8JkR)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3924 seconds, 315 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








They're all gonna soon admit it's not science.
It's for the children.
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 17, 2011 12:23 PM (gM4zK)