August 30, 2011
— Ace Given that Obama's actual grades are hidden in some cavernous government warehouse containing the Ark of the Covenant, Jack Cashill grades a letter Obama wrote while serving as President of the Harvard Law Review.
As background, everyone on a law review has one title in common: Editor. Usually the person elected to head the review is called "Editor in Chief." (At Harvard, apparently it's "President.") That's not just a made-up title; everyone on law review is an editor. That's what the job is: Those serving on law review edit the articles submitted to the journal to ready them for publication.
I stress this isn't just some made-up title that has survived from antiquity but has no real meaning in the current day. Everyone on law review really, actually, truly is an editor, tasked with putting together and editing their publication -- the law review itself, a book of articles on law, reviews of legal-oriented books, notes on breaking cases -- and then shepherding it to the printer.
It's not the case that this is just a formality; it's not the case that the students on law review just have an honorary title, while actual professors, or some hired staffers, do the work. Nope. If you're on law review, you are actually an editor, just the same as an editor at any other publication. You have a part-time unpaid job at law review.
Clean up grammar, patrol for ambiguity, rewrite for clarity, check for accuracy, and, where possible, shorten and condense: that's the job. Now the preceding over-write should indicate that I wasn't actually a very good at that shorten and condense part, but still. (Boston Irish had a saying: Three words -- editors edit.)
So how did Barack Obama, President of the editors at the top-ranked law review in the country (or, if not top-ranked, top two or three) when writing his own brief letters for publication?
Given his performance in the Oval Office, he did pretty much as you'd expect.
Read the whole thing; not only does he repeatedly make grammatical errors in a letter intended for publication, but he writes this senseless sentence, senseless because he ends it with a baffling clause that seems to be missing a verb.
"No editors on the Review will ever know whether any given editor was selected on the basis of grades, writing competition, or affirmative action, and no editors who were selected with affirmative action in mind."
Emphasis added -- Obama wasn't italicizing his own mistakes.
He also can't seem to get the plural/singular noun-verb agreement right in multiple whiffs at the ball. At law review during my years you got a Little Blue Book Bluebook. I forget who published it -- maybe MLA? Not sure. (Turns out, ironically -- it's published by the Harvard Law Review Association.)
But that little book contained the proper rules to correct all of the little errors people make while writing.
Did he not have such a Little Blue Book? Because I guarantee him that he would have discovered the rule for verb-subject agreement for words like "half" had he just flipped through the first twenty pages of it.
Or was he just lazy?
Before serving as President -- a managerial position, chiefly -- in his third year, he would have served as just a gruntwork editor his second year. Did he not learn the rules of verb-subject agreement that second year as an editor, at least?
Or did he just forget them a year later?
One thing that's sort of admirable from Obama is a quote in which he acknowledges the possibility that he "undoubtedly" benefited from Affirmative Action policies. Well, as Cashill notes, at this time the Harvard Law Review had just instituted AA policies a couple of years before, which is, if I can borrow Obama's word, "undoubtedly" how he made the cut, given the hash he makes of standard English grammar.
If even Obama states that he "undoubtedly" benefited from Affirmative Action, is no one else permitted to do likewise? Is it racist to state what Obama has stated himself? Is Obama racist?
This is the weird double-standard liberals impose for discussing Affirmative Action. They proudly proclaim how effective it is in promoting minorities who otherwise might have not gotten a job or gotten into a school (or got a very high honor at a school, like law review). They praise each other for their success in Affirmative Action admissions and placements.
But the moment a conservative tries to say pretty much the damn same thing, they shout "racism!"
But this isn't really about affirmative action per se. With the media asking "Is Rick Perry dumb?" (and "Is every other Republican candidate except Jon Huntsman dumb?"), it's a very legitimate question to ask "Is Obama dumb, or, if not quite dumb, at least far less the scholarly renaissance man the media has claimed he was?"
The media has told the tale of Obama's brilliance based on two main data points: That he was on the Law Review at Harvard (and was elected President, but that is usually strongly influenced by popularity), and that he wrote the "brilliant" Dreams from My Father.
But he seems to have gotten on Law Review thanks to Harvard's then-recently implemented AA policy -- some students would get on the typical way, a combination of grades and writing assignment scores, and other students would then be selected from a pool in which race or physical handicap could be considered -- and suffice to say that there are questions about who actually wrote Dreams from My Father.
So: Is Obama dumb?
Not-so-ironically, the very letter Obama so artlessly wrote explains why this question is forbidden. Obama was responding to someone who suggested the AA policies might "stigmatize" minority students; Obama's response (to the extent we can divine meaning from his gibberished version of English) is that we should simply hector and shut up anyone who might think in such a manner, thus stopping the stigma through moral scolding.
Seems to have worked.
Thanks to Ben, and others.
Correction (?): Commenters are telling me the Little Blue Book -- which isn't what it's called; it's the "Bluebook" -- deals with citations format, not questions of grammar.
I don't think they're right, but I could be wrong. I thought the first chapter or two was on the topic of frequently made errors -- things like "Is the word 'none' singular or plural?"
Like "Ham and eggs." Is Ham and Eggs a unit, considered singular, or read as a collection of plural things, and hence plural? (I think that one depends on particular usage but in most cases it's singular, as people use it.)
I thought the Bluebook covered that stuff.
At any rate, there would be some book issued (or required for purchase, rather) that would cover basics of grammar.
Posted by: Ace at
06:55 AM
| Comments (357)
Post contains 1150 words, total size 7 kb.
And then refuse to see the much higher than normal failure and dropout rate of these AA admissions. People who could have done fairly well at a less demanding college, fail at the more prestigious schools.
And it's racism that's to blame.
Posted by: toby928™ at August 30, 2011 07:02 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Deanna at August 30, 2011 07:02 AM (GUMna)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 30, 2011 07:02 AM (jx2j9)
Posted by: Tsar Nicholas II at August 30, 2011 07:03 AM (f8XyF)
Posted by: Jimmuy at August 30, 2011 07:03 AM (6KlT6)
Posted by: Captain Hate at August 30, 2011 07:04 AM (UMH09)
Posted by: nickless at August 30, 2011 07:04 AM (MMC8r)
Under water grottos, caverns
Filled with apes
That eat figs.
Stepping on the figs
That the apes
Eat, they crunch.
The apes howl, bare
Their fangs, dance,
Tumble in the
Rushing water,
Musty, wet pelts
Glistening in the blue.
Posted by: toby928™ at August 30, 2011 07:05 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: F Minus at August 30, 2011 07:05 AM (tqwMN)
Posted by: nickless at August 30, 2011 11:04 AM (MMC8r)
Denzel Washington?
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 30, 2011 07:06 AM (jx2j9)
But, you see, for a lot of these fields (I'm looking at you, law school) it doesn't matter because (almost) nobody flunks out.
So, once you're in the club, you get the credential and you're forever a "Harvard Law Grad".
When you apply AA to engineering students or math students or physics students, you end up with a lot of disappointed black and Hispanic and female students graduating with business, or worse, sociology degrees.
Posted by: AmishDude at August 30, 2011 07:07 AM (73tyQ)
Posted by: nickless at August 30, 2011 11:04 AM (MMC8r)
What am I? Chopped Liver?
Posted by: Clarence Thomas at August 30, 2011 07:07 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: ace at August 30, 2011 07:07 AM (nj1bB)
Did anyone ever step up and give Drew three pieces of evidence that Obama's actually smart? I'm going to assume no.
Look, I'll give Obama canny and manipulative, but not smart. Clinton (oh lord I miss Clinton this is the depths to which the SCOAMF has sent me) may be smarmy as all hell and utterly amoral but at least I believe he has two functioning brain cells. SCOAMF not so much.
Posted by: alexthechick at August 30, 2011 07:08 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: ace at August 30, 2011 07:09 AM (nj1bB)
Is it any wonder that it encourages exactly Mr. Obama's brand of not-quite-even-mediocre reasoning and rhetoric?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 30, 2011 07:10 AM (8y9MW)
But, you see, for a lot of these fields (I'm looking at you, law school) it doesn't matter because (almost) nobody flunks out.
No, but then they can't pass the bar exam. There's a long simmering controversy about that.
Yeah, I'll give Obama a pass on the apes poem because I've written far, far worse. Let's just say I was a spectacularly earnest 20something, okay?
Posted by: alexthechick at August 30, 2011 07:10 AM (VtjlW)
That depends on how much he has handlers setting things up for him. He may not even be canny or manipulative.
Posted by: nickless at August 30, 2011 07:10 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Theresa D., TPT at August 30, 2011 07:10 AM (Zgfnd)
We have to "understand his personhood," as Ed "Poppin' Fresh" Morrissey has reminded us. Putting the best "in fairness" face on it, I can only conclude that Osama Obama was stoned when he wrote this.
Can't hold that against him. If I were in a position where I was clearly in way over my head and saw a future full of affirmative action promotions ahead, I'd probably want to do a line or ten every once in a while, just to put the stress out of my mind.
After all, there's always a chance that at some point someone would have expected the Chicago Jesus to, you know, do something....
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 30, 2011 07:10 AM (YjjrR)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 30, 2011 07:11 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Tsar Nicholas II at August 30, 2011 11:03 AM (f8XyF)
Well, in a big company, there's always a 6-figure job with a meaningless title you can shove them into. Call 'em a "diversity coordinator" and you can probably write it off.
Posted by: AmishDude at August 30, 2011 07:11 AM (73tyQ)
LOL no; it's absolutely banal and terrible, produced by some shallow dipshit trying to appear insightful and profound.
Posted by: Captain Hate at August 30, 2011 07:11 AM (UMH09)
It's amazing how successful you can be if you have average intelligence and no scruples.
Posted by: AmishDude at August 30, 2011 07:12 AM (73tyQ)
Posted by: Osama bin Truck Monkey, TEArrorist at August 30, 2011 07:12 AM (jucos)
Posted by: nickless at August 30, 2011 11:04 AM (MMC8r)
I quibble with the "articulate" meme and the nice-looking meme. Sorry but I find him neither articulate nor nice looking.
Posted by: dagny at August 30, 2011 07:12 AM (zrSw4)
The first line alone has me in stitches with its stupidity. Under water grottos. Is that supposed to mean something?
Posted by: Waterhouse at August 30, 2011 07:12 AM (OK/vv)
Posted by: In Exile at August 30, 2011 07:12 AM (A8GJO)
You know what that poem reminds me of? The other day I was walking through the half of my back yard we've fenced off for my dog and I wasn't paying enough attention.
That's what that poem reminds me of.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 30, 2011 07:13 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: kathleen at August 30, 2011 07:13 AM (wT34k)
Posted by: ace at August 30, 2011 11:09 AM (nj1bB)
Yes. The famous 'Incomprehensibly Avant Garde' style of poetry.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 30, 2011 07:13 AM (jx2j9)
Posted by: BigDaddy1964 at August 30, 2011 07:13 AM (DueYW)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at August 30, 2011 07:14 AM (71LDo)
Posted by: dagny at August 30, 2011 07:15 AM (zrSw4)
Posted by: Corky the Retard at August 30, 2011 07:15 AM (GIdqF)
Posted by: Ian S. at August 30, 2011 07:15 AM (tqwMN)
Posted by: ace at August 30, 2011 07:16 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Paris Paramus at August 30, 2011 07:16 AM (ikVPE)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at August 30, 2011 07:17 AM (9hSKh)
No, but then they can't pass the bar exam. There's a long simmering controversy about that.
"Harvard Law grads" don't have to actually practice law, you know.
They can get 6-digit jobs as diversity coordinators at public hospitals.
That's pretty funny that they can't pass the bar. With all the bar prep courses and the fact that the average grad from Directional State University's Law School can more often than not pass it, that's a major problem.
Posted by: AmishDude at August 30, 2011 07:17 AM (73tyQ)
Posted by: ace at August 30, 2011 07:17 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Brad at August 30, 2011 07:17 AM (zTZGo)
Posted by: Paris Paramus at August 30, 2011 07:17 AM (ikVPE)
Now, I like the best people getting the placement, but if you are going to argue for AA as a remediation of prior bias, this is the only way to justify it.
Posted by: toby928™ at August 30, 2011 07:18 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Waterhouse at August 30, 2011 07:19 AM (OK/vv)
Posted by: ace at August 30, 2011 07:19 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: ace at August 30, 2011 11:07 AM (nj1bB)
I dunno ace, the topic is insipid and...odd. Do apes really live in caves "under water grottos?" And do figs crunch?
Also, the lines:
"That the apes
Eat, they crunch."
would probably have a sad face next to it in a fifth grade English class. The verb really shouldn't be the start of a new line. It's jarring.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at August 30, 2011 07:19 AM (FkKjr)
Posted by: streetwiseprofessor at August 30, 2011 07:20 AM (sY2mG)
Posted by: ace at August 30, 2011 07:20 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: kallie at August 30, 2011 07:20 AM (ct0KL)
Posted by: kathleen at August 30, 2011 07:20 AM (wT34k)
Posted by: ace at August 30, 2011 11:09 AM (nj1bB)
You are so right, ace.
Every time someone springs that poem on me unannounced, I want to punch myself in the face for having read it.
Posted by: No Whining at August 30, 2011 07:21 AM (HmCnI)
Barack Obama is a confident incompentent.
Posted by: boniface ballers at August 30, 2011 07:21 AM (bPbwB)
So, as I understand that line of argument (and I know you don't support it, so I'm not criticizing you), it would, in effect, go like this: Because people 40 years ago refused to hire women and/or minorities, I cannot select the best candidate who will provide me the best value for the salary I'm paying, I have to select the best woman/minority candidate- as long as that candidate is "competent"- even if that woman/minority is far inferior to the best candidate. Because "fairness."
Sorry, it doesn't sound any more intelligent that way.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 30, 2011 07:21 AM (8y9MW)
The first line alone has me in stitches with its stupidity. Under water grottos. Is that supposed to mean something?
Posted by: Waterhouse at August 30, 2011 11:12 AM (OK/vv)
He probably got the word by reading Playboy.
Poems are poems. Some people think Maya Angelou is a good poet. I've written some wretched tripe in my teenage years and sometimes later. It's just for fun. If he were publishing books of poetry in a sort of Mao-style, I'd be more mocking, but having written a little bad poetry is the most endearing and human aspect of the man.
Posted by: AmishDude at August 30, 2011 07:21 AM (73tyQ)
Posted by: observer at August 30, 2011 07:22 AM (iuAj0)
Posted by: Ben at August 30, 2011 07:22 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: David Rodaxel at August 30, 2011 07:22 AM (kKWmw)
Posted by: dagny at August 30, 2011 07:22 AM (zrSw4)
"and no editors who were selected with affirmative action in mind."
That sentence made my head hurt. It's not like there was just a word missing - the whole structure made it hard to figure out what he even meant.
Posted by: kallie at August 30, 2011 07:23 AM (ct0KL)
Pop
Sitting in his seat, a seat broad and broken
In, sprinkled with ashes,
Pop switches channels, takes another
Shot of Seagrams, neat, and asks
What to do with me, a green young man
Who fails to consider the
Flim and flam of the world, since
Things have been easy for me;
I stare hard at his face, a stare
That deflects off his brow;
IÂ’m sure heÂ’s unaware of his
Dark, watery eyes, that
Glance in different directions,
And his slow, unwelcome twitches,
Fail to pass.
I listen, nod,
Listen, open, till I cling to his pale,
Beige T-shirt, yelling,
Yelling in his ears, that hang
With heavy lobes, but heÂ’s still telling
His joke, so I ask why
HeÂ’s so unhappy, to which he replies...
But I donÂ’t care anymore, cause
He took too damn long, and from
Under my seat, I pull out the
Mirror IÂ’ve been saving; IÂ’m laughing,
Laughing loud, the blood rushing from his face
To mine, as he grows small,
A spot in my brain, something
That may be squeezed out, like a
Watermelon seed between
Two fingers.
Pop takes another shot, neat,
Points out the same amber
Stain on his shorts that IÂ’ve got on mine, and
Makes me smell his smell, coming
From me; he switches channels, recites an old poem
He wrote before his mother died,
Stands, shouts, and asks
For a hug, as I shink, my
Arms barely reaching around
His thick, oily neck, and his broad back; ‘cause
I see my face, framed within
PopÂ’s black-framed glasses
And know heÂ’s laughing too.
Posted by: toby928™ at August 30, 2011 07:23 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: ace at August 30, 2011 07:23 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 30, 2011 07:24 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: somebody else, not me at August 30, 2011 07:24 AM (7EV/g)
To quote the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy:
Vorgon poetry is of course the third worst in the Universe. The second worst is that of the Azgoths of Kria. During a recitation by their Poet Master Grunthos the Flatulent of his poem "Ode to a Small Lump of Green Putty I Found in My Armpit One Midsummer Morning" four of his audience died of internal hemorrhaging, and the President of the Mid-Galactic Arts Nobbling Council survived by gnawing one of his own legs off. Grunthos is reported to have been "disappointed" by the poem's reception, and was about to embark on a reading of his twelve-book epic entitled My Favorite Bathtime Gurgles when his own major intestine, in a desperate attempt to save life and civilization, leaped straight up through his neck and throttled his brain.
The very worst poetry of all was written by a clean, good-looking man of color elected President of the former colonies of Britain.
------------------------
I may have adjusted that last part a bit.
Posted by: Jimmuy at August 30, 2011 07:24 AM (6KlT6)
That's what that poem reminds me of.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 30, 2011 11:13 AM (8y9MW)
So it's a metaphor ... a deep metaphor ... a deep, squishies between the toes metaphor? Amitrite?
Posted by: No Whining at August 30, 2011 07:24 AM (HmCnI)
Posted by: blaster at August 30, 2011 07:24 AM (l5dj7)
In any case, Barack Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 30, 2011 07:24 AM (8y9MW)
would probably have a sad face next to it in a fifth grade English class. The verb really shouldn't be the start of a new line. It's jarring.
It also makes the apes sound as if they themselves are crunchy.
Posted by: dagny at August 30, 2011 07:24 AM (zrSw4)
This is pitiful. Harvard Law Review, and you can't even successfully edit your own work? I'm a technical writer, and I have to constantly edit my work. I'm pretty sure if I were "smart" enough to be at Harvard, I would have caught this mistake (or not even made it in the first place).
Unless I wasn't smart enough...
Posted by: Hobbitopoly at August 30, 2011 07:25 AM (h1p5V)
Filled with apes
That eat figs.
Stepping on the figs
That the apes
Eat, they crunch.
The apes howl, bare
Their fangs, dance,
Tumble in the
Rushing water,
Musty, wet pelts
Glistening in the blue.
Kill my landlord,
Kill my landlord.
C-I-L-L my land-lord.
Posted by: nickless at August 30, 2011 07:25 AM (Rv2N4)
Posted by: dawnfire82 at August 30, 2011 07:25 AM (bIeax)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at August 30, 2011 07:25 AM (1Jaio)
Heh. My current boss went to Harvard Law and won't shut up about it. Which might mean something, if his job had anything to do with law. Too bad "Accountability Officer" has nothing to do with law, and everything to do with research and statistics, of which he has little to no training.
Posted by: taylork at August 30, 2011 07:25 AM (5wsU9)
What happens to an affrimative action president?
Does it dry up
like a union worker voluntarily paying dues?
Or fester like a jobs program--
And then run?
Does it stink like Helen Thoma's Vagina
Or crust and sugar over--
like a syrupy sweet?
Maybe it just sags
like a heavy load.
Or does it stutter, clusterfukerly like a failure?
Posted by: Ben at August 30, 2011 07:26 AM (wuv1c)
Well, I was smart enough to have my shoes on, but yes.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 30, 2011 07:26 AM (8y9MW)
Thanks, ace.
Now I have bacon up my nose from trying to stop laughing here at work.
Posted by: No Whining at August 30, 2011 07:27 AM (HmCnI)
I thought Barak's communist mommy was getting him up early in the morning in Indonesia and tutoring him? Did she ignore verb tenses? Or did they just ignore them at the Punahole school? Or Occidental? Or Columbia? Or Harvard?
Seriously, to miss basic grammar after all that? You would have to be a fucking idiot not just AA.
Posted by: dagny at August 30, 2011 07:27 AM (zrSw4)
Posted by: No Whining at August 30, 2011 07:27 AM (HmCnI)
Posted by: Vercingetorix at August 30, 2011 07:28 AM (psCad)
Actually, it reads like someone whose first language isn't English.
Just sayin'
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 30, 2011 07:28 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 30, 2011 07:29 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: AmishDude at August 30, 2011 11:21 AM (73tyQ)
Wait, has the SCoaMF addressed this before and owned up to it being horrible sub-doggerel that young people produce when forced in school to do something they don't have an aptitude for? Because that would be refreshingly honest for somebody who has an outlandishly overrated view of his own capabilities.
Posted by: Captain Hate at August 30, 2011 07:29 AM (UMH09)
His book that he allegedly wrote says he was "enthusiastically" into drugs from roughly his junior year of high school through at least Columbia.
Posted by: Ian S. at August 30, 2011 07:29 AM (tqwMN)
Posted by: Warden at August 30, 2011 07:30 AM (KulgD)
Posted by: blaster at August 30, 2011 07:30 AM (l5dj7)
Posted by: ace at August 30, 2011 07:31 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: trainer at August 30, 2011 07:31 AM (Rojyk)
Don't at least some leftists find this kind of thing disgusting from their own?
Posted by: Shiggz at August 30, 2011 07:31 AM (v8Pb8)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 30, 2011 11:29 AM (8y9MW)
You ain't kidding. Hey, did you know Client #9 claims to have aced his LSAT? Wikipedia told me so.
Posted by: Rex Harrison's Hat at August 30, 2011 07:31 AM (4136b)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 30, 2011 07:31 AM (TMB3S)
Posted by: joncelli at August 30, 2011 07:32 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: joeindc44 at August 30, 2011 07:33 AM (QxSug)
He also can't seem to get the plural/singular noun-verb agreement write in multiple whiffs at the ball.
Spelling correct won't catch this...but everyone who reads it will.
Posted by: garrett at August 30, 2011 07:34 AM (HksrE)
Posted by: dagny at August 30, 2011 07:35 AM (zrSw4)
Posted by: airedale at August 30, 2011 07:35 AM (EWvm7)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 30, 2011 07:35 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: formerly known as cherry pi at August 30, 2011 07:35 AM (OhYCU)
Posted by: Vercingetorix at August 30, 2011 07:36 AM (psCad)
Okay, Tobe, now you've gone too far.
Tell me SCoaMF didn't write this. Please, I'm beggin' ya.
I can accept that he wrote the "apes in underwater grottoes" (or whatever the fuck it is) doggerel, but this one comes from too far down the evolutionary chain to be real.
Don't make me read Osama Obama's books to find it. I'm all out of brain bleach.
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 30, 2011 07:36 AM (YjjrR)
Posted by: ace at August 30, 2011 07:36 AM (nj1bB)
Amish Dude always says this. It's really not true.
Some flunk out, many drop out.
Posted by: ace at August 30, 2011 11:19 AM (nj1bB)
I'm comparing it to graduate school in the sciences where, say, a dozen start the program and if it's a great class, 3 graduate with a Ph.D. in 5 years or less. Another 2 will take more time and the rest will either drop out or get the consolation Master's.
Hell, why not compare it to an undergraduate program?
From Harvard's own website: "Harvard [law school] graduates 97 percent of its students, among the very highest graduation rates in the nation. We are certain that everyone admitted to Harvard has the ability to complete all academic requirements successfully."
BTW, you know why it took so long to reply, Ace? Because there's almost no information on graduation rates from law school. You know why? Because it isn't a factor. Nobody who gets into law school has any expectation of not graduating. I have no hard info other than HLS, but from some anecdotal stuff that came from an old Volkoh thread, that number is pretty much de rigeur for anything resembling an elite law school.
Posted by: AmishDude at August 30, 2011 07:36 AM (73tyQ)
Posted by: dagny at August 30, 2011 07:36 AM (zrSw4)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 30, 2011 11:35 AM (8y9MW)
And tried to enforce all laws equally.
Posted by: Captain Hate at August 30, 2011 07:36 AM (UMH09)
For the independent vote, I can go with the fiction that Obama too is well meaning and loveable, you just don't want him to be Sheriff.
Posted by: formerly known as cherry pi at August 30, 2011 07:36 AM (OhYCU)
Let's be fair. The SCOAMF's inability to write basic English in this letter wasn't necessarily because he was a coddled brat who'd been given everything on a silver platter his whole life and had thus been given a spot on the Harvard Law Review without actually earning that privilege. Nor does it indicate that the benefits of affirmative action were to blame for placing a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure in a position of respect and importance for which he was clearly unprepared. It's unfair to accuse Obama of such chicanery based on one writing sample.
After all, I'd like to see anyone here compose a coherent letter while high as a kite on a few lines of blow with a fat joint hanging from your bottom lip.
So there.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at August 30, 2011 07:37 AM (4df7R)
That being said, these grammar concepts are usually mastered by the third or fourth grade. They certainly shouldn't find their way into a Harvard Law Review publication.
Posted by: Hobbitopoly at August 30, 2011 07:37 AM (h1p5V)
There is truth, here.
If, by "smart" you mean "functionally intelligent," then I've seen no evidence that Barack Obama, who is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure, is smart. If, however, you mean "knows how to get ahead," then, of course, Barack Obama, who is still a SCOAMF, is very smart.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 30, 2011 07:37 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Barack Obama at August 30, 2011 07:38 AM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: Harvard Law Review at August 30, 2011 07:38 AM (/ZZCn)
Yeah, it is called 4 years of GRAMMAR school, then middle school then high school.
Posted by: Stephana at August 30, 2011 07:39 AM (530OM)
Already forgetting his fraudulent "Constitutional Scholar" revising his guest appearance as the ACORN grassroot activist into a University of Chicago Law Professorship. Obama's specialization: ignore the Constitution, ignore contract law, ignore rule of law.
And the enabling device is AA, back to the drawing board.
Posted by: maverick muse at August 30, 2011 07:39 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Bob Saget at August 30, 2011 07:39 AM (F/4zf)
Posted by: nickless at August 30, 2011 07:40 AM (Rv2N4)
Is he dumb? No. Is he smart? No. Obama drifts in between, a floating leech who's good at spotting a useful idea and latching onto it.
He's like a salesman who can recognize a good pitch--and repeat endless variations of it while trying to Close..
. Because you gotta ALWAYS BE CLOSING
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at August 30, 2011 07:40 AM (UqKQV)
I have edited many an academic paper, and every journal states the style manual that it uses. If they don't, you use Chicago Manual of Style, which contains all information necessary on subject/verb agreement, etc. Harvard LR does use Bluebook for citations.
http://tinyurl.com/3bgmqsp
I would have sent this letter back to him for extensive corrections. To be fair, most kids today do not even know there is such a thing as subject/verb agreement. All they have learned at school is that Jefferson owned slaves and slept with one of them.
Posted by: PJ at August 30, 2011 07:40 AM (FlVA8)
"Okay, we got a president who‘s got about a 160 IQ. He can move fast... he can adapt."
-Chris Shitforbrains Matthews
June, 2011
Posted by: Soothsayer at August 30, 2011 07:40 AM (sqkOB)
Posted by: ace at August 30, 2011 11:16 AM (nj1bB)
That is genius.
Oh. God. The Bluebook. Oh the hate, the hatey hate of white hot hateness for clown spiders I have for The Bluebook. I once had to teach citation format using that wretched thing and hatey hate mchate.
On the one hand, I've edited for lawyers and they tend to be indifferent writers, mostly because they're in a hurry. The bad ones are very, very bad, to the point of unreadability; the good ones are pretty good, but they're dealing with technical material and it can be only so good.
I have one litmus test for judges: Can you pass an eighth grade grammar test?
As someone who has had to write extensively about mind numbingly boring things, it is true that there is only so much that you can do. You have fun in the footnotes, like the time when the other side was trying to claim we provided a report late when we provided it a day in advance of the deadline and I put in a footnote that our response was premised on an assumption that we were not moving at greater than light speeds or that we had not otherwise encountered a time space anomaly thus resulting in a temporal loop making the eve of the deadline equate to other than prior to the deadline. The other side was livid but the judge thought it was hilarious.
Posted by: alexthechick at August 30, 2011 07:41 AM (VtjlW)
No, you're right. No grammar in the BB.
In any case, you don't need a law degree or a bluebook. You just need elementary school to avoid the simple errors he made.
So where's that donkeypunch guy....
Posted by: lu at August 30, 2011 07:41 AM (pLTLS)
King Putt is not one of them.
Posted by: shibumi at August 30, 2011 07:41 AM (z63Tr)
Posted by: formerly known as cherry pi at August 30, 2011 07:41 AM (OhYCU)
Under water grottos, caverns
Filled with apes
That eat figs.
Obvously air filled cave open to the surface (fig supply) at one end and the water via sunlit subterranian pools. The apes feel safe in the caves with a ready supply of food.
Stepping on the figs
That the apes
Eat, they crunch.
Apes are sloppy eaters
The apes howl, bare
Their fangs, dance,
Stepping on sharp crunchy fig residue they hop around.
Tumble in the
Rushing water,
Musty, wet pelts
Glistening in the blue.
They hop around and fall into the pools, which are lit by sunlight filtering down thru their seaward passage turning the water blue and reflecting on the grotto walls. Wet apes smell.
See, perfectly understandable.
Posted by: trainer at August 30, 2011 07:42 AM (Rojyk)
Posted by: Obama's writing coach. at August 30, 2011 07:42 AM (s0uvO)
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at August 30, 2011 07:42 AM (UqKQV)
"This is the first president that actually writes his own books since Teddy Roosevelt and arguably the first to write them really well since Lincoln. If you accept the premise, and I do, that the United States is the most powerful country in the world, then Barack Obama is the most powerful writer since Julius Caesar."
-Rocco Landesman, NEA chairman
2009
Posted by: Soothsayer at August 30, 2011 07:43 AM (sqkOB)
Posted by: Warden at August 30, 2011 07:43 AM (KulgD)
You learn verb agreement in middle school. I don't want to hear that lawyers are busy. It should be completely automatic at that point.
Not in Indonesia, you don't.
Posted by: garrett at August 30, 2011 07:43 AM (HksrE)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at August 30, 2011 07:43 AM (PLvLS)
"Okay, we got a president who‘s got about a 160 IQ. He can move fast... he can adapt."
-Chris Shitforbrains Matthews
June, 2011
Posted by: Soothsayer at August 30, 2011 11:40 AM (sqkOB)
But he cannot improvise and overcome, can he?
No long, languorous showers while swapping spit for you two, Tingles.
Posted by: No Whining at August 30, 2011 07:44 AM (HmCnI)
Posted by: taylork at August 30, 2011 11:25 AM (5wsU9)
I went to a perfectly ordinary suburban Pennsyltucky high school with a graduating class of around 225. I knew a woman who went to HLS. She was a smart enough and perfectly nice person, but she didn't rank in the top 3 in the class. And none of the top 3 is exactly competing for Nobel prizes in physics.
Posted by: AmishDude at August 30, 2011 07:44 AM (73tyQ)
Posted by: Taylor at August 30, 2011 07:44 AM (Rv2N4)
Posted by: dagny at August 30, 2011 11:22 AM (zrSw4)
You obviously haven't hung out with us.
Posted by: The Sloths at August 30, 2011 07:45 AM (Y2WVW)
This is the weird double-standard liberals impose for discussing Affirmative Action. They proudly proclaim how effective it is in promoting minorities who otherwise might have not gotten a job or gotten into a school (or got a very high honor at a school, like law review). They praise each other for their success in Affirmative Action admissions and placements. But the moment a conservative tries to say pretty much the damn same thing, they shout "racism!"
I've had this debate with liberals for years. They essentially want need to believe that a policy of choosing one job applicant over another based on race does not result in...people denied jobs based on their race.
I've had to walk them through the concept that a finite number of jobs being awarded on race, not merit, has the expected result.
Basically, if you were denied a job based on AA, as I was, you don't exist.
Posted by: CJ at August 30, 2011 07:45 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: Barack Obama at August 30, 2011 07:45 AM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: al-Cicero, Tea Party Jihadist at August 30, 2011 07:46 AM (ehEyA)
It's the Newyorker, so take it for what it's worth.
Primary Sources Two Poems by Barack Obama July 2, 2007
Posted by: toby928™ at August 30, 2011 07:46 AM (GTbGH)
Don't forget, everyone:
Next week we need to act with a "heightened sense of urgency" on the economy.
Until then just chill.
Posted by: B-Jay Carney at August 30, 2011 07:46 AM (sqkOB)
Posted by: matt at August 30, 2011 07:46 AM (nxTmu)
Posted by: al-Cicero, Tea Party Jihadist at August 30, 2011 11:46 AM (ehEyA)
Sucks we much equally
Posted by: phreshone at August 30, 2011 07:47 AM (T3vCe)
Posted by: joeindc44 at August 30, 2011 07:47 AM (QxSug)
Pop takes another shot, neat,
Points out the same amber
Stain on his shorts that IÂ’ve got on mine, and
Makes me smell his smell
Gay pride?
Posted by: formerly known as cherry pi at August 30, 2011 07:48 AM (OhYCU)
Also how can their pelts musty
Oh, it can happen. Best to just pull it out by the roots and start over, because you'll never get that smell out of the carpet.
Posted by: Michelle Obama's Landing Strip at August 30, 2011 07:48 AM (HksrE)
Posted by: Barack Obama at August 30, 2011 07:48 AM (Xm1aB)
...Now elementary, middle and high school graduate illiterates who can't perform basic arithmetic, either.
This week's local morning FOX news featured another bleeding heart liberal seeking tax funding for her pet project for school children (not physically impaired, not dyslexic) who've failed to develop motor skills sufficient to hold a pencil and therefore take too long to write anything by hand. And of course, the news commentary ended with the "need" for yellow paper with raised lines and margins for these children who refuse to hold a writing utensil and manually print. The final nail in the coffin was to surmise that aside from tossing out cursive handwriting from curriculum, simply teach keyboarding, and out-mode handwriting all together from curriculum since it's "too hard".
Posted by: maverick muse at August 30, 2011 07:49 AM (lpWVn)
There is truth, here.
If, by "smart" you mean "functionally intelligent," then I've seen no evidence that Barack Obama, who is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure, is smart. If, however, you mean "knows how to get ahead," then, of course, Barack Obama, who is still a SCOAMF, is very smart.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 30, 2011 11:37 AM (8y9MW)
The term of art is bien pensants.
Roughly, it means "good thoughts". It refers to having the right philosophy or politics.
Posted by: AmishDude at August 30, 2011 07:49 AM (73tyQ)
Posted by: Barak Hussayn Obama at August 30, 2011 07:49 AM (Rv2N4)
It
Heightens
Young womyn
It
Frightens
Can't we
Be like
Noun and verb
And agree
That agreement
In tense
Is
Raaaaacist?
Posted by: No Whining at August 30, 2011 07:49 AM (HmCnI)
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at August 30, 2011 07:49 AM (UqKQV)
Posted by: joeindc44 at August 30, 2011 11:47 AM (QxSug)
I'm sure it sounds beautiful in its original Klingon
Posted by: phreshone at August 30, 2011 07:50 AM (T3vCe)
>>>"This is the first president that actually writes his own books since Teddy Roosevelt and arguably the first to write them really well since Lincoln. If you accept the premise, and I do, that the United States is the most powerful country in the world, then Barack Obama is the most powerful writer since Julius Caesar."
Give unto Obama what is the taxpayers.
Posted by: Ben at August 30, 2011 07:50 AM (wuv1c)
If he weren't a minority, Barack Obama would be the guy who works at McDonald's but isn't given any jobs that require interaction with other human beings, or with their food. You know, that weird guy you see walking around with the mop and bucket who seems to exist only to walk around with a mop and bucket.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 30, 2011 07:51 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: toby928™ at August 30, 2011 07:52 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: kansas at August 30, 2011 07:52 AM (mka2b)
Posted by: rdbrewer at August 30, 2011 07:52 AM (SleRV)
Posted by: Warden at August 30, 2011 11:43 AM (KulgD)
If I'm standing to Warden's Right, and I'm the last to go... I'm guessing 1, Bob.
Posted by: garrett on the 'Price is Right' at August 30, 2011 07:52 AM (HksrE)
Posted by: dogfish at August 30, 2011 07:52 AM (NuPNl)
The "Blue Book" is actually entitled something like "The Harvard Uniform System of Citation". It's been published in various iterations over the years.
I used mine when I was an editor on The California Law Review at UC Berkeley's Boalt Hall Law School in the late 1960's.
One thing that Ace did not mention--and maybe things have changed since the 1960's. All of our editor's "graded on"--the Review simply took the top 12% or so of students based on grades at the end of your first year in law school. None of this "writing on" or affirmative action crapola. If you made the grades you were invited to be on the Review. If you didn't--you didn't get invited.
And there was a second requirement. During your second year of law school you had to write either two "case notes" analyzing a single case, or one "comment". The work had to be of publishable quality. Like a PhD thesis, a comment was supposed to contribute something new to legal knowledge. Comments were published with the student author's name. Case notes were published without the author's name. You can be damned sure that the Editor in Chief selected from my class on the Review wrote a published comment.
Now I've heard--just last night--some Democrat ninnies saying "He was PRESIDENT OF THE HARVARD LAW REVIEW" as an argument that he was smart. But what I find peculiar is that there is no record of The Bamster every writing anything that got published in the Harvard Law Review.
Out here on the West Coast Stanford Law and Boalt Hall are as prestigious as Harvard and Yale on the East Coast. It's clear that The Bamster wouldn't have been named editor in chief on either one of those school's law reviews--unless he was an Affirmative Action kiddie. It appears to me that The Bamster "President of the Harvard Law Review" is all legal hat and no intellectual cattle.
Posted by: Comanche Voter at August 30, 2011 07:53 AM (3ESDJ)
Posted by: Johnny (John E.) at August 30, 2011 07:53 AM (nRTou)
Paradoxical statement. Haiku is sin, after all.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 30, 2011 07:53 AM (8y9MW)
That would be true, but ONLY if the general public (a group I suspect will soon be communicating exclusively in grunts and pictograms) could tell the difference.
When I first started writing professionally, editors (and a few readers who cared) appreciated the clarity and literacy of my work. I put a great deal of time and effort into it.
Today, the primary thing editors want to know is: "Will you write a 1500-word article for $5.00?" And readers seem most interested in pictures and links to other articles.
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 30, 2011 07:53 AM (YjjrR)
Just sayin'
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 30, 2011 11:28 AM (8y9MW)
My first language isn't English. But, when I write formal letters, or in job interviews, or having discussions, I try to keep it simple to avoid putting up big words that might be wrong. Plus I don't want to sound pretentious.
When Scoamf gives speeches he likes to throw big words around. And since I have to listen more carefull than a natural english speaker I usually catch the disjointed bullshit he is spewing when he is off TOTUS.
Posted by: Ma Bell at August 30, 2011 07:53 AM (H/MnC)
I don't know what will come from it, but people up here in MA are digging into Uncle Ubungo's voting record, if he has one.
Posted by: soothie at August 30, 2011 07:53 AM (sqkOB)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at August 30, 2011 07:53 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: The Poster Formerly Known as Mr. Barky at August 30, 2011 07:53 AM (qwK3S)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at August 30, 2011 07:54 AM (f9c2L)
So maybe he decided to marry someone who can? Like, write?
The scales will never fall away from the eyes of the thirty-eighters, and the twelvers, if that is the percentage of blacks, have their eyelids permanently stitched shut.
Posted by: I'm in a New York state of mind at August 30, 2011 07:54 AM (4sQwu)
well you get what you pay for..and since he didn't pay for an education...he didn't get one...........
Posted by: phoenixgirl at August 30, 2011 07:54 AM (IpiZb)
Posted by: Rick Perry at August 30, 2011 07:54 AM (48wze)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at August 30, 2011 07:55 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 30, 2011 11:51 AM (8y9MW)
No, I credit Obama with a fundamentally amoral, semi-socio-pathic cleverness combined with ambition that would have gotten him into the 'public sector' / political action sphere--and pushed him up a ways
He would be a community organizer, good at recognizing useful slogans and bumper sticker phrases: He'd be perpetually useful to better men, a toady who could kiss their ass while serving up re-packaged ideas and schemes
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at August 30, 2011 07:56 AM (UqKQV)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at August 30, 2011 07:56 AM (IpiZb)
Did he not learn the rules of verb-subject agreement that second year as an editor, at least?
Are this rule that important?
Posted by: FireHorse at August 30, 2011 07:56 AM (RZRz9)
Verb-subject agreement game.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at August 30, 2011 07:56 AM (9hSKh)
There are many forms of intelligence. Obama does not have the talent to be a successful president, but he is one of the most brilliant con men ever. I thought John Edwards was a good con man with his ability to snag the VP slot in 2004, but that was nothing compared to Obama and 2008.
Posted by: nohype at August 30, 2011 07:57 AM (9yfLe)
He would be a community organizer, good at recognizing useful slogans and bumper sticker phrases:
'Winning The Future'
I'm trying to use my 'Moral Imagination', but I think you whiffed on that one.
Posted by: garrett at August 30, 2011 07:58 AM (HksrE)
You're right: Those who learned English as adults are much more careful with the language ( writing and speaking).
Obama learned English as a child, but was never required to use it well-- Affirmative action in all its Glory
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at August 30, 2011 07:58 AM (UqKQV)
Posted by: nevergiveup at August 30, 2011 07:58 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: garrett on Jeopardy at August 30, 2011 08:00 AM (HksrE)
_________
It's a trap!
Posted by: Loan Officer Akbar at August 30, 2011 08:00 AM (xGZ+b)
Posted by: nerdygirl at August 30, 2011 08:00 AM (EJlMQ)
Personally, I don't care for the Obama is stupid line.
It is smarter for us to say he is smart. He and his friends just pushed for a Marxist America. They should be discredited for their ideas.
Posted by: formerly known as cherry pi at August 30, 2011 08:00 AM (OhYCU)
My point is that the people I personally know whose first language is not English (especially if it's also not a Germanic or Romance language) have a very hard time with noun/verb agreement and English verb conjugation.
Yes, in writing formal/business documents, they take great care to be as clear as possible, but you can still tell that they're not "comfortable" with the language. This is true if their first language is Chinese, Japanese, Farsi, or Arabic (that covers all the ones I personally know, I think).
The writing that I've seen of Barack Obama's suggest that the language with which he is most "comfortable" is some non-European language. Which makes sense, if he was reared for his first several years in Indonesia. (No, not if he was born there, I'm really just talking about youthful language acquisition: I doubt he heard much English growing up)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 30, 2011 08:00 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: alexthechick at August 30, 2011 11:41 AM (VtjlW)
Always good to get a judge with a sense of humor. Surprisingly, many of them do have a sense of humor here in Texas. Lawyers not so much. Loser Pays (passed by the Lege this year) has sort of caused humor to become scarce around here on the Plaintiff's side.
As regards The Bluebook-A Uniform System of Citation. So that's what that thing is for. And it's in the Nineteenth Edition? I'm only three editions behind.
Posted by: mikeyslaw at August 30, 2011 08:01 AM (QMGr1)
Posted by: toby928™ at August 30, 2011 11:46 AM
If there's anything worse than the stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure's attempts to write poetry, it's linked the article lauding his efforts and attaching significance to them.
In the New-fucking-Yorker, to boot. Yeah, they're wacked-out lib ninnies, but they used to actually have a certain basic level of intelligence under which they would not go.
All I can say is: Holy shit!
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 30, 2011 08:01 AM (YjjrR)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 30, 2011 08:01 AM (TMB3S)
Posted by: nevergiveup at August 30, 2011 08:01 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at August 30, 2011 08:01 AM (IpiZb)
He is speaking now at the American Legion Annual Conference
Posted by: Mjim at August 30, 2011 11:51 AM (rN9Na)
Heh. Can't wait to read the "review" at Blackfive.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at August 30, 2011 08:01 AM (UOM48)
SCOAMF is speaking at the Legion convention.
Let me sum up:
(After everyone is assembled at 1000 for the POTUS speech, and t-shirts handed out, the POTUS arrives at 11:3Posted by: Chuck Z at August 30, 2011 08:01 AM (OITDh)
186 Thank God for over-educated doofuses who canÂ’t write; without them, those of us who write for a living would be much poorer. Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at August 30, 2011 11:43 AM
Amen, brother.
Posted by: CJ at August 30, 2011 08:02 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: Chuck Z at August 30, 2011 08:02 AM (OITDh)
Posted by: MooShelle at August 30, 2011 08:03 AM (vYB+W)
Posted by: Indonesian Reader's Digest at August 30, 2011 08:03 AM (Rv2N4)
I used to take the "Obama didn't write his books" claims with a grain of salt, but no more. I've edited mountains of briefs and motions during my 17 years of law practice and have never seen a newbie lawyer with technically deficient writing skills become anything more than a merely adequate writer. There is no way a 29 year-old 3L with the writing proficiency of a high school sophomore could, in just four years, produce the high level prose found in Dreams of My Father. In fact, the letter demonstrates that Obama simply lacks the talent to compose high quality prose. There's no shame in that - most people (myself included) simply weren't born with that talent. Of course, lying about it is something else entirely.
Posted by: Dreams of passing remedial English class at August 30, 2011 08:03 AM (QjQyX)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 30, 2011 08:04 AM (8y9MW)
I saw, smelled and did things that make me shudder to this day.
I once had a gig cleaning the pumps / filters at a dairy.
Don't drink the ready-made Chocoale Milk...don't do it.
Posted by: garrett at August 30, 2011 08:04 AM (HksrE)
Posted by: joe biden at August 30, 2011 08:04 AM (IpiZb)
I find I can bear their grief with great fortitude.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 30, 2011 08:05 AM (8y9MW)
I've had to walk them through the concept that a finite number of jobs being awarded on race, not merit, has the expected result.
Basically, if you were denied a job based on AA, as I was, you don't exist.
Posted by: CJ at August 30, 2011 11:45 AM (9KqcB)
But what AA does is it kills that sense of achievement. That's why you get people like Sotomayor and the Obamas who benefited but are still bitter. The sense of achieving something is stolen from them forever.
Posted by: AmishDude at August 30, 2011 08:05 AM (73tyQ)
Obama is a reasonably smart guy, but he's no genius. If he were white he could have gotten into a good state school, but probably not into their honors program.
Remember, we know for a fact he was not a National Merit Scholar Finalist , Semi-finalist, or Commended. We also know he wasn't even a National Achievement Scholar (the lesser award given to blacks). So that definitely puts him outside the top 5%, and probably much lower considering the much lower standards for the black National Achievement Scholar award.
These awards are a matter of public record. They put an upper limit on Obama's vaunted intelligence. I'd guess he's in the top 20% IQ wise. He's learned to seem smarter than he actually is. Probably because most of his life he's been surrounded by people much smarter than himself.
He was probably one of the dumbest people at Harvard. Bottom third at least. Yet he made Law Review.
Posted by: Clubber Lang at August 30, 2011 08:05 AM (QcFbt)
So, Grammar Nazis, I have a question.
SCOAMF is normaly used as a Noun... but can you SCOAMF? ie, can it be used as a Verb as well?
As in: I SCOAMF'd (Stuttering Cluster Fuck of A Miserable Fail'd) the country up so bad I could not get reelected?
Posted by: Romeo13 at August 30, 2011 08:05 AM (NtXW4)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 30, 2011 08:05 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: kathleen at August 30, 2011 08:06 AM (wT34k)
I don't get the praise for that 'writing.' It always struck me as horribly bad. Romance novel bad.
Posted by: nickless at August 30, 2011 08:06 AM (Rv2N4)
Best thread since that (indy, libertarian?) guy running against murky voted for her.
Iowahawk could come here for inspiration.
Oh, and in TX we have the greenbook too.
Back to lurking. Or working.
Posted by: NoCargoCults at August 30, 2011 08:06 AM (Jy3Hc)
Posted by: Arnonerik at August 30, 2011 08:08 AM (mmI0p)
Posted by: MrScribbler
Hell, I won't write a grocery list for $5.00.
Posted by: Hobbitopoly at August 30, 2011 08:08 AM (h1p5V)
Posted by: OregonMuse at August 30, 2011 08:08 AM (hixzH)
In as much as the 'F,' as normally understood, means "Failure" not "Fail" I'd have to say, "no." You would not, under normal circumstances, use SCOAMF as a verb.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 30, 2011 08:08 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: joeindc44 at August 30, 2011 08:08 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: nerdygirl at August 30, 2011 08:09 AM (EJlMQ)
------------------------------
SAN DIEGO -- San Diego police say a boy throwing rocks at vehicles was struck in the abdomen by a crossbow bolt fired by a passenger in small sport utility vehicle.
Officer Dino Delimitros says the boy and a friend were throwing rocks in the Linda Vista neighborhood Monday afternoon when a passenger in a black Toyota RAV4 pulled out a crossbow and fired.
The boy was shot in the abdomen and was taken to a hospital. The San Diego Union-Tribune says his injuries are not life-threatening.
His name and age weren't released.
Nobody has been arrested.
----------------------------
Posted by: Johnny (John E.) at August 30, 2011 08:10 AM (nRTou)
>What is: The Nobel Stuttering Clusterf*ck Of a Miserable Failure Prize?
Apparently, the presidency
Posted by: Jones at August 30, 2011 08:10 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: AmishDude at August 30, 2011 12:05 PM (73tyQ)
Yes, they take the salary and power but retain the anger and bitterness of people who were 'victimized'. We get the Worse of Both Worlds: incompetent or semi-competent embittered Losers With Power
while obviously more qualified and deserving people side on the sidelines, robbed of what they earned. Oddly--sadly--our whole society is increasingly infected with this.
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at August 30, 2011 08:10 AM (UqKQV)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 30, 2011 08:10 AM (8y9MW)
Writing's a skill. Obama was just never forced to do it. Bill Ayers isn't all that smart, but he writes constantly.
I can write pretty well when I'm banging out a letter of recommendation, but writing actual mathematics is a torture for me. The hardest thing is to explain complex ideas succinctly.
Posted by: AmishDude at August 30, 2011 08:11 AM (73tyQ)
Okay, that may be over the top, but what are the bets that kid never throws rocks at cars again?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 30, 2011 08:11 AM (8y9MW)
btw, do you know who wrote Rocky?
Posted by: soothie at August 30, 2011 12:03 PM (sqkOB)
Sylvester Stalone. The guy is sharp!
Posted by: Havedash at August 30, 2011 08:11 AM (sFD5n)
But what AA does is it kills that sense of achievement. That's why you get people like Sotomayor and the Obamas who benefited but are still bitter. The sense of achieving something is stolen from them forever.
Posted by: AmishDude at August 30, 2011 12:05 PM (73tyQ)
Definitely that. But it's worth reminding folks that in addition to denying a sense of achievement, it also denies people jobs. It's designed to do that.
Now that you mention it, it did ultimately enhance my sense of achievement. I had to move far from home to find a job that paid a fraction of the one I was qualified for in the Big City. It probably made me work harder.
And, I wouldn't have met my future wife. So, thanks Affirmative Action! You're A-OK!
Posted by: CJ at August 30, 2011 08:12 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: Arnonerik at August 30, 2011 12:08 PM (mmI0p)
no shit..............
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at August 30, 2011 08:12 AM (UqKQV)
I'd guess he's in the top 20% IQ wise.
Based on what? Where is there proof his IQ is even average?
I submit that nobody over the age of 12, with an IQ over 95, would have a problem getting an umbrella through a gate.
Posted by: garrett at August 30, 2011 08:12 AM (HksrE)
Posted by: joeindc44 at August 30, 2011 08:12 AM (QxSug)
Any noun can be used as a verb. For example, "At the VFW today, Barky was SCOAMFing quite well." Now that the noun is a concept, it adapts to verb usage quite well.
Posted by: Hobbitopoly at August 30, 2011 08:13 AM (h1p5V)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at August 30, 2011 08:13 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: I'm in a New York state of mind at August 30, 2011 08:14 AM (4sQwu)
I admit I read only exerpts of that book. But high level prose? In german there is a word for that kind of writing: Schmaltz
Posted by: Ma Bell at August 30, 2011 08:14 AM (H/MnC)
Posted by: Johnny (John E.) at August 30, 2011 12:10 PM (nRTou)
Humongous was unavailable for comment...
Posted by: Mad Max, Wasteland Reporter at August 30, 2011 08:14 AM (NtXW4)
Fwiw -
He doesn't understand Math.
He doesn't understand Physics.
He can't write or follow the rules of the English language.
So, what is left - Finger Painting?
Posted by: garrett at August 30, 2011 08:14 AM (HksrE)
consider the skills required of a good community organizer:
blame-shifting
demagoguing
communicating threats
promulgating lies
in general, being a profound pain in the ass
Posted by: Jones at August 30, 2011 08:15 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: TennDon at August 30, 2011 08:15 AM (o6Yv2)
Any noun can be used as a verb. For example, "At the VFW today, Barky was SCOAMFing quite well." Now that the noun is a concept, it adapts to verb usage quite well.
aw man, that's some SCOAMFed up shit
Posted by: Jones at August 30, 2011 08:16 AM (8sCoq)
Any noun can be used as a verb. For example, "At the VFW today, Barky was SCOAMFing quite well." Now that the noun is a concept, it adapts to verb usage quite well.
Posted by: Hobbitopoly at August 30, 2011 12:13 PM (h1p5V)
Lolly lolly lolly, get your adverbs here...
Posted by: Grammar Rock at August 30, 2011 08:16 AM (NtXW4)
Funny, when I applied to an Ivy League school I was told I was a shoo-in because my test scores were so high. I guess I just didn't have that same gutsy resolve in the face of discrimination that Michelle had.
Posted by: Clubber Lang at August 30, 2011 08:18 AM (QcFbt)
Tennessee Tarheel
Posted by: TennDon at August 30, 2011 12:15 PM (o6Yv2)
BLUEbook??? RAAACCCIIISSSTTTTT!!!!!!!
Posted by: Angry Smurf, the one they didn't let in the movie at August 30, 2011 08:18 AM (NtXW4)
Isn't that yiddish?
Not sure, they might have a similar word. I heard yiddish as a kid and some words are almost the same
Posted by: Ma Bell at August 30, 2011 08:19 AM (H/MnC)
Posted by: kansas at August 30, 2011 08:19 AM (mka2b)
Posted by: joeindc44 at August 30, 2011 08:19 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: kathleen at August 30, 2011 11:13 AM (wT34k)
Dead on. It also gives such people delusions of intellect. The "economics philosopher" from yesterday strikes me as one of these sorts.
Posted by: baldilocks at August 30, 2011 08:19 AM (T2/zQ)
What kind of mathematician are you, giving away the secrets to ordered insanity, turn in your union card.
Posted by: Jean at August 30, 2011 08:19 AM (WkuV6)
Because we allow them to get away with it. Letting the enemy choose the terms of engagement is stupid.
Far too many keep pretending, or at least acting, as if the left were honest. You can't reason with a liar because he isn't interested in the truth.
Posted by: Lee Reynolds at August 30, 2011 08:19 AM (zkRoG)
The first line alone has me in stitches with its stupidity. Under water grottos. Is that supposed to mean something?
Actually, it does. There are grottoes you have to dive down to enter. One off the Phillippines comes to mind.
youtube
Diving the Underwater Grotto in Bien Unido, Bohol, Philippines
Posted by: Jim Sonweed at August 30, 2011 08:19 AM (y1xZO)
"At least it abides by the William Carlos Williams rule that I like, which keeps poems from being horrible -- keep it tangible, talk about real-life nouns, make it simple, let simple words speak for themselves"
Yeah, who needs Shakespeare?
Posted by: Cricket at August 30, 2011 08:22 AM (DrC22)
AA for some Mexican kid who's father illegally immigrated to California in 1992? Fuck that.
What plausible historical debt does America owe to a Mexican kid born in Arizona in 1993?
There's been more official legal discrimination against Asians in America than hispanics. But asians get screwed by AA cause they are too smart.
Posted by: Clubber Lang at August 30, 2011 08:23 AM (QcFbt)
No.
If he were genetically identical to his current self but weren't the son of an African politician and a UN (etc.) bureaucrat, he'd be a random guy-at-an-office who trudges through his days nurturing the delusion that he's really a writer, but shit just didn't work out somehow.
I know a guy who's basically Obama's unassisted alternate-world self. He kinda even looks like him, except that my guy's a physically imposing man-shaped man. (His dad's a black guy, not an African.)
The dude's very charming, says the right first few things to everyone, and everyone he meets gets the immediate impression that he's really Somebody, or should really Be Somebody—but that impression fades when you realize the dude's working a sort of interpersonal short-con routine and is actually incredibly lazy and kinda dumb.
So that guy's a receptionist. A very good one. But he thinks he should be Howard Stern or Rush Limbaugh or something.
And he should, in a sense. He has a natural leg up on everyone else who'd want to be that. But he never made more than a token effort to be a radio guy, and he wasn't the son of two radio people whose positions guaranteed him a lifetime of access to radio-land, so doing almost nothing got him nowhere.
Posted by: oblig. at August 30, 2011 08:25 AM (xvZW9)
there are"The elements of style" and "The elements of Grammar" out there that a lot of people use.
Posted by: Brad at August 30, 2011 08:26 AM (2GsJg)
Posted by: Brad at August 30, 2011 08:27 AM (2GsJg)
Where's my medication?
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber
Yo Man, can I get some of that?
Posted by: Terry at August 30, 2011 08:28 AM (TJ8HB)
"The MSM has always been quick to expound on the brilliance of Democrats, and of course they always point out how intellectually challenged Republicans are. There's an old adage, "the proof is in the pudding." Consider our current POTUS, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Maxine Waters, Barney Frank, John Kerry, Al Gore, Sheila Jackson Lee, and of course, Joe Biden. The list could go on and on, but I think you get my point."
I lifted this from the American Thinker comments section, but I will claim its authorship since it comports with current standards of academic excellence and journalistic mores. Sub-Tard be brillant.
Posted by: Sub-Tard at August 30, 2011 08:29 AM (0M3AQ)
This is pitiful. Harvard Law Review, and you can't even successfully edit your own work? I'm a technical writer, and I have to constantly edit my work. I'm pretty sure if I were "smart" enough to be at Harvard, I would have caught this mistake (or not even made it in the first place).
Even if he wasn't smart enough, he should have had a classmate check it. Even the most careful writer occasionally makes mistakes of grammar and/or spelling. That's why you have someone else check it.
Unless you're either lazy, too arrogant, or have no friends...
Posted by: RightWing Prof, managing partner, Bacon & Cleavage LLC at August 30, 2011 08:30 AM (UOcNk)
Posted by: I'm in a New York state of mind at August 30, 2011 08:31 AM (4sQwu)
Posted by: Al Sharpton at August 30, 2011 08:32 AM (UOcNk)
Pwesident Obama stoled it fwom me. I gotted a "F" ifor it n Engwish for Special Kids
Posted by: Corky Thatcher at August 30, 2011 08:32 AM (AnTyA)
I had an articles editor who was dumber than a flat rock but possessed with an Obama-like cerebral narcissism. He wanted everyone to just assume he was brilliant, like he did. It was laughable, and it got in the way of the product at times.
And the management team was several editions into the Christian mafia. Believe it or not, I'm fairly socially conservative, but I try to keep my religious belief separate from my civic activities. I think a more personal, authentic relationship with God is more meaningful, and that those who wear religion on their sleeves run a great risk of appearing undignified, especially if they do it for personal gain, for profit--not to mention appearing as a bad witness for Christianity. That is who ran our law review. It was ugly. Christianity was social currency. And seeing in-group, out-group behavior based on a primitive display-language centered on religion was disgusting.
I wonder what God thinks about that shit.
Anyway. It would only have been at the management level where completely subjective considerations crept in. At the entry level, it was fairly objective (the note) and completely objective (class rank) considerations that mattered. It sounds like Harvard's AA provisions scooted Obama right past the entry level qualifications I suspect would have screened him out at our law review.
Posted by: rdbrewer at August 30, 2011 08:32 AM (SleRV)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at August 30, 2011 08:34 AM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Jones at August 30, 2011 08:35 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: joeindc44 at August 30, 2011 08:36 AM (QxSug)
And he should, in a sense. He has a natural leg up on everyone else who'd want to be that. But he never made more than a token effort to be a radio guy, and he wasn't the son of two radio people whose positions guaranteed him a lifetime of access to radio-land, so doing almost nothing got him nowhere.
Posted by: oblig. at August 30, 2011 12:25 PM (xvZW9)
Not gonna lie, your friend sounds like a real interesting guy. As well as reminiscent of certain individuals I have known.
Posted by: Yoshi, Aggrieved Victim of the White Man at August 30, 2011 08:37 AM (MNha9)
Posted by: Jones at August 30, 2011 08:38 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: baldilocks at August 30, 2011 08:39 AM (T2/zQ)
Posted by: joeindc44 at August 30, 2011 08:39 AM (QxSug)
Yeah man, [dragging deeply on a splif] we're all like apes man. [exhales] Like apes in a grotto, man. [inhales, cough, cough] Gorillas in the grotto, man. [exhales] Get it? We're all underwater, man. [inhales] Our pelts [cough, cough cough] is musty. And we're stepping on figs, like crunchy one. That would be so cool to be! [exhales]
Posted by: President Editor Obama at August 30, 2011 08:39 AM (N05oL)
Correction (?): Commenters are telling me the Little Blue Book -- which isn't what it's called; it's the "Bluebook" -- deals with citations format, not questions of grammar.
I don't think they're right, but I could be wrong. I thought the first chapter or two was on the topic of frequently made errors -- things like "Is the word 'none' singular or plural?"
I believe you are talking about the august tome "The Elements of Style" or "Strunk & White," which is often prescribed for college freshman. Seems a lot more similar to what you're talking about.
Posted by: Yoshi, Aggrieved Victim of the White Man at August 30, 2011 08:40 AM (MNha9)
Posted by: baldilocks at August 30, 2011 12:39 PM (T2/zQ)
Damn, you beat me.
Posted by: Yoshi, Aggrieved Victim of the White Man at August 30, 2011 08:41 AM (MNha9)
Okay, so calling Dreams of My Father high level prose might be an overstatement. The point remains that whoever wrote that book was writing at a level that was light years beyond that shown in Obama's letter.
In the future I will carefully edit out all indavertent Bill Ayres compliments.
Posted by: Dreams of passing remedial English class at August 30, 2011 08:44 AM (QjQyX)
Posted by: Reginald at August 30, 2011 08:44 AM (HH76v)
The Bluebook is citation format (or style) only.
Grammar and basic writing style is covered by the MoUS.
http://www.texaslrev.com/publications/mous
Or the law review might have their own internal style manual, or might use the state court appellate style manual, if there is one.
Posted by: imp at August 30, 2011 08:44 AM (UaxA0)
"all my life I wantid to be smart and not dumb and my mom always tolld me to try and lern just like Miss Kinnian tells me but its very hard to be smart and even when I lern something in Miss Kinnians class at the school I ferget alot."
- Barry Charlie Gordon Obama
Posted by: Count de Monet at August 30, 2011 08:44 AM (4q5tP)
Posted by: Arnonerik at August 30, 2011 08:44 AM (mmI0p)
Posted by: rdbrewer at August 30, 2011 12:32 PM (SleRV)
To be honest, I haven't fully bought into the conservative sacking of Obama's (mystery) record, but that quoted sentence...from the head editor...kind of gives me the willies.
And if you're talking about the same breed of Christian political animal I'm thinking of, their writing can be insanely treacly and vicious at the same time. Pretty damn weird.
Posted by: Yoshi, Aggrieved Victim of the White Man at August 30, 2011 08:45 AM (MNha9)
Posted by: baldilocks at August 30, 2011 08:47 AM (T2/zQ)
This is an intellectually dishonest point. The main point I can glean from this piece is that Obama's performance as an editor is related to his poor performance as President of the United States. If this is to be our barometer for President, let's not talk about anything else but someone's mastery of the written word. While we're on the subject, if we're going to talk about AA, let's also talk about the advantage of wealth, and family connections, and how GW Bush did in his time in school, or his mastery of the written word, or even the spoken word.
You don't have to be a conservative or liberal to call B.S. where you see it. But, sorry, this is B.S.
Posted by: David Beem at August 30, 2011 08:48 AM (nRzvI)
Posted by: tasker at August 30, 2011 08:49 AM (14jKX)
Posted by: tasker at August 30, 2011 08:51 AM (14jKX)
Posted by: Reginald at August 30, 2011 12:50 PM (HH76v)
What the hell? You're serious?
Posted by: Yoshi, Aggrieved Victim of the White Man at August 30, 2011 08:51 AM (MNha9)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at August 30, 2011 08:52 AM (PLvLS)
By the time you get to law school, and especially if you are elected to law review (or however you get on the law review at Harvard), you're supposed to already be familiar with the rules of grammar. The Blue Book is subtitled, "A Uniform System of Citation," not "How to Write a Simple Letter and Not Sound Like a Moron." Legal citation is something you learn in law school.
Strunk & White? Clearly, this grammar you speak of is some ofay rules handed down by the man, the White Man. Racist.
Speaking of white: "Some people have a way with words, other people, ..., not have way, I guess."
Posted by: AMartel at August 30, 2011 08:52 AM (1Bqk7)
He's abused a lot of drugs and was a failed student, and then he somehow made it to Harvard Law anyway, and somehow made it to a prestigious law review.
My guess is that while Obama was abusing a variety of hard drugs are Columbia, he made friends with Francis Piven (A professor there) and perhaps Ayers. The connections he got, combined with affirmative action, helped him gain admission to Harvard Law.
Harvard is a very competitive law school, they say. What if that's a myth, though? What if they fudge grades for URMs? I know most law schools have tons of fluff seminar classes. And it's likely Obama's grades were not good enough to get onto law review anyway. Perhaps he was a median student for a single year (first year) then took fluff classes through graduation, and his entire resume is built on his 'success' at being on a law review that picked him for racist reasons?
"But those who hate can never admit they are hypocrites can they.
Posted by: Reginald at August 30, 2011 12:44 PM (HH76v)"
Bush never got any special academic credentials on the basis of his skin color. That Obama did is disgusting. Bush is not considered the most brilliant man in the room, but many fools think Obama is. Bush was actually quite humble whereas Obama presents himself as capable of changing sea levels.
Posted by: Dustin at August 30, 2011 08:52 AM (fF625)
David Beem,
ok on your premise - because Bush was dumb, that makes it ok for Obama to be dumber? Got it.
BTW - what evidence do you have that Bush's family wealth was the barometer of his scholastic abilities? Affirmative action was specifically designed to give those that don't measure up a chance to compete where they never would otherwise be up to the task. It cheats them into the game.
Posted by: President Editor Obama at August 30, 2011 08:53 AM (N05oL)
FIFY
Posted by: Piñon Farmer at August 30, 2011 08:54 AM (IzuWw)
Posted by: Democrat Fucktard at August 30, 2011 08:55 AM (QcFbt)
Sorry, that's easy to understand. He's trying to say that the editors who were selected because of "Affirmative Action" won't be told that they were selected for that reason, and therefore won't know it themselves.
Easy to understand, but total crap. All you have to do is compare the quality of your writing to the least competent non-disabled white guy on teh Review. Are you worse than him?
Then you got in via AA.
Which Obama clearly did.
Posted by: Greg Q at August 30, 2011 08:56 AM (/0a60)
Posted by: tasker at August 30, 2011 09:00 AM (14jKX)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at August 30, 2011 09:02 AM (bxiXv)
If this is to be our barometer for President, let's not talk
about anything else but someone's mastery of the written word.
It's not "our barometer for President," and furthermore, no one suggested it should be. Dislodge thy head from thy rectum.
While we're on the subject, if we're going to talk about AA, let's also talk about the advantage of wealth, and family connections, and how GW Bush did in his time in school, or his mastery of the written word, or even the spoken word.
Bush was perfectly fine with both, and there's precious little to suggest (given his executive performance under pressure) that he was less than a suitable candidate for a Harvard MBA. Granted, he was a child of legacy and power, but my point still stands.
Posted by: Yoshi, Aggrieved Victim of the White Man at August 30, 2011 09:03 AM (MNha9)
I believe the missing verb clause is supposed to be "will ever know," tacked onto the very end:
"No editors on the Review will ever know whether any given editor was selected on the basis of grades, writing competition, or affirmative action, and no editors who were selected with affirmative action in mind."
ALL of the "beneficiaries" of affirmative action, left and right, criticize how these policies leave everyone unsure whether any particular black has made it on his how or has been advanced by race rather than merit. It seems that Obama saw this as a GOOD thing: "They aren't going to tell me whether I was picked on race or merit, whew," and he thought this was so obvious that he did not bother to repeat the verb.
Posted by: Alec Rawls at August 30, 2011 09:04 AM (kTTUz)
"No editors on the Review will ever know whether any given editor was selected on the basis of grades, writing competition, or affirmative action, and no editors who were selected with affirmative action in mind."
It's not a missing verb, it's an extra "who"
He's claiming two diametrically opposed positions. No one was selected with affirmative action in mind, and people were selected because of affirmative action.
He may have meant "solely on the basis of affirmative action" but that's giving him too much credit since we all know he's a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure.
Posted by: imp at August 30, 2011 09:17 AM (UaxA0)
Posted by: tasker at August 30, 2011 09:20 AM (14jKX)
Posted by: PJ at August 30, 2011 09:23 AM (FlVA8)
Agree with #339. Not that hard to 'fix' that sentence. Just drop the word 'who'.
"No editors on the Review will ever know whether any given editor was selected on the basis of grades, writing competition, or affirmative action, and no editors [ ] were selected with affirmative action in mind."
Posted by: MyCherryS'mores at August 30, 2011 09:27 AM (VOBGw)
That's exactly right and guess what! Black people feel this way too. When looking for service, we always eye black professionals warily--especially physicians--unless they have a proven track record of competence.
My parents were against AA from its inception--and they were Democrats back then. They recognized immediately that the policy implied that black people really were inferior. And judging by the policy's results, it almost seems to have been designed to promote inferiority, the inferior and to affirm them. Exhibit A: you know who.
Posted by: baldilocks at August 30, 2011 09:28 AM (T2/zQ)
President Obama himself admitted several times in that letter that he'd personally benefitted from Affirmative Action, which suggests at some level he recognizes he wasn't good enough to make it on his own, but won't admit it.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at August 30, 2011 09:35 AM (r4wIV)
That would (at least at all of my law school's journals) be The Chicago Manuel of Style. Probably not required like the Bluebook because people at competent law schools assume that you've figured out the basics of grammar and don't need a backup for it. There would probably be one sitting on a shelf in the Review office for the rare occasion it was needed, and nothing more.
As far as Bluebook content, there's nothing at all about grammar in it. It's organized into "blue pages" and "white pages" -- blue is standard rules for court docs, which always have their own local court-designated rules, and white is for pretty much everything else. The white pages are divided into two sections: rules and tables. Rules have wonderful titles like "Rule 2: Typefaces for Law Reviews" and "Rule 6: Abbreviations, Numerals, and Symbols." Rules are things like "underline this," "italicize that," "abbreviate those" and so on. The running joke about the rules is that there's literally a rule about whether to italicize the period in the abbreviation "id." as though people can tell whether a period is italicized in the first place. It's Rule 4.1: "Id." Tables are horrendous long lists of officially sanctioned abbreviations or special citation formats for anything deemed important enough for the Bluebook authors to shine down their praise. Tables are mostly useful for readers to backwards-engineer what an abbreviation was supposed to mean after some editor zealously followed the obtuse abbreviations in the tables.
Posted by: sayyid412 at August 30, 2011 09:42 AM (fbBXB)
Yes, of course there are underwater grottos. But underwater as an adjective is one word. What Dipshit wrote is meaningless.
Posted by: Waterhouse at August 30, 2011 10:25 AM (OK/vv)
I must say I found the Obama letter discussed in this post to be appallingly bad. One seriously wonders what his grades and standardized test scores look like. No MENSA member he....
Posted by: CatoRenasci at August 30, 2011 10:30 AM (touQ6)
So what, this proves nothing, even the smartest authors make some typos. Its the analysis where you can know if a legal editor is good or not. And what is biggoted about this is did you listen to how George Bush talked.
Writing is not speaking. Try again.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at August 30, 2011 10:45 AM (ujg0T)
Affirmative action is a heavy cross to bear. If one is talented he will always bear the stigma of affirmative action. If you are lacking in ability, affirmative action will not compensate for inadequate knowledge and skills.
It does however give us the Obamas and Michelles of this world. Frauds with neither the talent, ambition or industry to compete with their betters.
Posted by: Molon Labe at August 30, 2011 10:47 AM (e36+G)
This is an intellectually dishonest point. The main point I can glean from this piece is that Obama's performance as an editor is related to his poor performance as President of the United States.
Nope.
The main point I can glean from this piece is that Obama's performance as an editor is related to his the media's poor performance as with respect to reporting about the President of the United States.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at August 30, 2011 10:49 AM (ujg0T)
Indeed. I remember the time before Affirmative Action: whenever you ran into a black or Hispanic in a major university (either as faculty or as a student) or in a responsible job, you could be very sure they were at least as competent and the upper 1/3 of the whites in the same role. That was because of discrimination; blacks and Hispanics (to a lesser degree) were only admitted or hired when they had truly excellent ability and credentials.
I was involved in the early debates over Affirmative Action in the academic senate at the University of California - I was part of the group that lost because we saw the purpose of affirmative action as a way to identify really promising candidates and then to provide them with pre-university support that would enable them to come to the university and compete with the rest of the students on their own, without special programs or support. Our idea was to send the identified talented minority students to solid junior/community colleges (with curriculum guidance, financial and academic support and promise of a university scholarship if they did well enough) so that they could remedy any academic deficiencies and demonstrate the ability to do real university level work. We were afraid, as has proven to be the case, lowering the actual admissions standards would result in lowering the academic standards one the students were at the university (whether by special help, special programs ( 'studies' majors, etc.) or otherwise) and would result in those who were AA admits and graduates being stigmatized as less qualified - ultimately devaluing the university degree for them and for everyone.
We were assured that was nonsense, and that it was more important for the minority students to spend the full 4 years at the big U to have the "full university experience" (never mind that 1/3 to 1/2 of the white students were upper division transfers from community colleges and didn't have the 'full university experience'). Snort!
Posted by: CatoRenasci at August 30, 2011 12:01 PM (touQ6)
Posted by: heywood at August 30, 2011 12:02 PM (fm9IF)
Yes, it's called "The Elements of Style", by Strunk and White. They give that out in High School, or did THE ONE get by through Affirmative Action in High School as well? /sarc
Posted by: RedInABlueState at August 30, 2011 12:11 PM (WycQd)
Posted by: just a cpa at August 30, 2011 12:24 PM (Wnk4X)
Bluebook was for citation formats. Still, Strunk & White's isn't exactly unknown on campuses and its even shorter and easier to read than the Bluebook. I can read it over a long lunch. Even Barry could probably polish it off in the time it takes to play 18. Couldn't be bothered, I suppose.
Here's a "Frost-Nixon" moment. How about turning Meg Kelly loose on him after he leaves office and having her go Couric-Palin on him, but this time ask him about his own administration's policies. Let's see how many he was even conversant with, much less promulgated. And while she's at it, she can ask him about issues that a "Constitutional scholar" should be familiar with.
Talk about the Emperor having no clothes. At best, the 52%-ers would find out they elected Jayson Blair with even less integrity and poor language skills to boot. The DNC could just cut-and-paste Howell Raines' apologia for the Blair scandal, right down to admitting he was promoted due to race rather than ability.
Posted by: SocietyIs2Blame at August 30, 2011 12:34 PM (yK8YH)
He thought dad was questioning his ability because he was black, and he got pissed. So he decided he'd get some payback by not giving me a local anesthetic. Worst pain I've ever felt. I almost pulled the hospital bed apart, writhing around while trying to hold my head still. And.. he fucked up the stitch line, bunching up a wad of tissue between two stitches on one side. Had to be deliberate.
My dad asked him if he was qualified to do that because he was an ER doctor, not because he was black.
He sure showed my dad, though, by golly.
We had it redone a day or two later by a friend of the family.
But that's the kind of thinking AA fosters. People doubting qualifications (not the case here) and people getting angry because they're fed up with people doubting their qualifications.
Posted by: rdbrewer at August 30, 2011 12:45 PM (SleRV)
15 years out of college, and I still managed to pull that out of my ass.
Posted by: Russ at August 30, 2011 01:16 PM (7r11k)
Posted by: A Mindful Webworker at August 30, 2011 01:44 PM (W6lga)
When it comes to writing and stuff, Obama was a SCOAMF.
There, now it's out where it is in the open, which is a colloquikk coloqquee old saying for meaning you can write stuff about it.
Posted by: K~Bob, trying to write like the SCOAMFOTUS at August 30, 2011 11:25 PM (9b6FB)
Yoshi, Aggrieved Victim of the White Man et. al.
I think you're misunderstanding my statement. Don't read my earlier remarks as defending Obama's dismal presidency, or coming down on Bush's. This is the problem with how we talk about politics. We're all conditioned to believe there's only left and right, and there can be no dissenting voices from within.
The fact remains that the Ace's argument, while clearly intelligently drafted, is nevertheless an intellectually dishonest argument.
Also, by saying Obama had to rely on affirmative action to get a leg up, or since he constructed a crummy sentence, therefore we have an explanation for his presidency, is just wrong. Point to his presidency directly, the over regulation, if you like, but point to something specific and criticize it on its own merit. There's plenty of "lame" to go around on what he's done/doing today. But pointing to his crummy college days and other similar types of arguements are eroding our ability to talk about these things in a constructive way.
By the way, for whoever posted to the contrary, I am not shocked to learn that Obama isn't running against Bush, but thank you for the earnest reminder. I know it comes from a postive and constructive place and the you sincerely wish to help America.
Posted by: David Beem at September 02, 2011 03:48 PM (nRzvI)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2258 seconds, 485 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 30, 2011 06:57 AM (8y9MW)