March 12, 2011
— Open Blogger H/T Cap'n Ed, a reminder of how to keep things in perspective.
I actually have something of a fondness for Bill Clinton. Yes, his first tendencies getting into office were ridiculously tilted toward Big Government. But he was a capable administrator and a wickedly shrewd politician, perhaps the best ever.
He was (is still, I imagine) a womanizer. Yes, he did what most adulterers do when accused, and lied. Yes, it was worlds worse because of his position & who he lied to.
He was a rascal and a son of a bitch, but he was our son of a bitch.
By our I mean the United States'. I never doubted that his first love was to his country, warts and all.
So while he may be slow to rock the boat, it comes as no surprise to me that at the same conference where he criticized the current Administration's lack of direction on Libya, he says this concerning the lack of Domestic oil production:
Former President Bill Clinton said Friday that delays in offshore oil and gas drilling permits are “ridiculous” at a time when the economy is still rebuilding, according to attendees at the IHS CERAWeek conference.Clinton spoke on a panel with former President George W. Bush that was closed to the media. Video of their moderated talk with IHS CERA Chairman Daniel Yergin was also prohibited. …
Clinton said there are “ridiculous delays in permitting when our economy doesn’t need it,” according to Noe and others.
Posted by: Open Blogger at
08:53 AM
| Comments (121)
Post contains 260 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: William Jefferson Clinton at March 12, 2011 08:59 AM (yQWNf)
Posted by: eman: United People's Front of Wisconsin at March 12, 2011 09:00 AM (azrS2)
Sing hallelujah! Meanwhile, back at the WH, Barky is sucking his thumb under his desk. [ok, poor choice of words and visuals here, but he is in the fetal position somewhere]
I have never doubted the security of our nation, under any president, until January 2009 with the coronation of Dear Leader. But if I think of this too often I will drink too much, therefore, I don't think about it too often or until you morons tell me to take shelter with my gin.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky at March 12, 2011 09:00 AM (oTjfX)
I have to disagree. He, like Barry, had the full force of the MBM holding him up, both during the campaign, and during his presidency.
Also, like Barry, he lied constantly and with fucking impunity, and for the same media dicksucking reason.
We used to point out that Bill lied even when the truth would have been just as good.
Feh.
Posted by: toby928™ at March 12, 2011 09:05 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Beagle at March 12, 2011 09:05 AM (sOtz/)
That said, Clinton would never have been stupid/vindictive enough to shut down domestic oil drilling in the face of heightened Mideast turbulence and $4 gas. At least with Clinton there was never any doubt he was American.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead Sheens at March 12, 2011 09:06 AM (OSYzX)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at March 12, 2011 09:07 AM (DPM1U)
Posted by: eman: United People's Front of Wisconsin at March 12, 2011 09:07 AM (azrS2)
I never doubted that his first love was to his country, warts and all.
don't you mean - '...Genital Warts and all.'.
Posted by: garrett at March 12, 2011 09:08 AM (Cg4P1)
Posted by: World Decomposition Society at March 12, 2011 09:08 AM (2bg5P)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at March 12, 2011 09:09 AM (DPM1U)
I mean fondness in the since you are fond of that guy -- the one who's fun to party with, has a long string of girlfriend, always has a great story, always brings beer to the cookout.
Also, a respect for how very good he was at being a politician. Triangulation was a masterpiece. The government shutdown was sublime tactically -- a more classic bit of political judo would be hard to find.
Do I want that in a president? Not hardly. Yes, he disgusted me often.
But stepping back objectively, he was a wealth of entertainment on many levels. To me at least.
Maybe I'm alone in that.
Posted by: krakatoa at March 12, 2011 09:10 AM (a0Jhx)
Posted by: beckster at March 12, 2011 09:11 AM (FzVlt)
Billy Jeff only looks good in retrospect because of who is in office now. This was the man who almost foisted upon us an even more extreme version of Obamacare, the man whose indifference to terrorism lead to the 9/11 attacks, and who mostly abdicated his responsibilities as Commander in Chief to pursue his own selfish ends.
Future generations will see Billy Jeff as the man who helped start facilitate the End of America as we know it.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at March 12, 2011 09:12 AM (zmlzP)
As for Clinton...he did a lot of things wrong (and I don't give a damn about the Monica situation) but compared to the clown we've got in there now, he at least showed occasional evidence of competence and an ability to learn from his mistakes.
Posted by: JEM at March 12, 2011 09:12 AM (o+SC1)
Again I must call Bullshit. When the entire press corp is carrying your lies for you, you can pull any shit you want.
Posted by: toby928™ at March 12, 2011 09:12 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Mama AJ at March 12, 2011 09:12 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: Monica Lewinski at March 12, 2011 09:13 AM (azrS2)
Yeah, I can't get too misty-eyed over Bubba.
Clinton was a liberal hack who was smart enough to talk conservative when he had to save his political skin. He also benefitted from having really incompetent/geriatric enemies (Gingrich/Dole). His only two redeeming qualities? 1: He loved politics, so he was at least sort of paying attention in between Oval Office gang-bangs. 2: He presided over inconsequential times so the country could afford his lack of seriousness.
In contrast, St. Pantscrease is lazy and bored by political minutiae. Obama wants to be president of Heaven, so partisan wrangling with the evil meanie-head Republicans is just tedious. Moreover, America in 2011 is a different place than it was in 1995. Under attack by militant Islam from abroad and a 5th column Left determined to drive it into bankruptcy, the US cannot afford Obambi's doe-eyed platitudes and inexperienced floundering.
Any president would look good (or just not so bad) in comparison to Obama. Even Carter seems almost not completely incompetent compared to the current President. Bill Clinton benefits from a low baseline when being stacked up against the Bamster.
Posted by: KingShamus at March 12, 2011 09:14 AM (8n1j5)
Posted by: toby928™ at March 12, 2011 09:14 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at March 12, 2011 09:15 AM (DPM1U)
Posted by: troyriser at March 12, 2011 09:15 AM (mU1zA)
Posted by: Soona at March 12, 2011 09:16 AM (2bg5P)
Posted by: Grayson at March 12, 2011 09:16 AM (NP5lB)
Exert from Clinton to Lt Col Holmes regarding ROTC commitment.
"Because of my opposition to the draft and the war, I am in great sympathy with those who are not willing to fight, kill, and maybe die for their country (i.e. the particular policy of a particular government) right or wrong. Two of my friends at Oxford are conscientious objectors. I wrote a letter of recommendation for one of them to his Mississippi draft board, a letter which I am more proud of than anything else I wrote at Oxford last year. One of my roommates is a draft resister who is possibly under indictment and may never be able to go home again. He is one of the bravest, best men I know. That he is considered a criminal is an obscenity"
Clinton was a punk bitch then and remains so today. Thousands of men answered their country's call to duty, but Clinton lied to Lt Col Holmes about his intent to join ROTC, and he was able to avoid the draft.
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at March 12, 2011 09:16 AM (ZHsNw)
Does that mean we can go back to the traditional blue=Conservative, red=Liberal/Labour color scheme?
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at March 12, 2011 09:17 AM (DPM1U)
No matter what his demeanor, he has a entirely different set of values than me and (when I do eventually have one) I'd be terrified to let my wife around the guy.
Posted by: AD at March 12, 2011 09:18 AM (zZgft)
Posted by: AE at March 12, 2011 09:18 AM (YYjeh)
Posted by: eman: United People's Front of Wisconsin at March 12, 2011 09:18 AM (azrS2)
Posted by: rdbrewer at March 12, 2011 09:19 AM (5inr1)
Posted by: iknowtheleft at March 12, 2011 01:03 PM (G/MYk)
And the bookend on his other side is Carter. Clinton is definitely head and shoulders above those two presidential midgets.
Posted by: NC Ref at March 12, 2011 09:20 AM (/izg2)
Bill was the ceremonial president, but Sir Edmund Hillary Rodham Clinton wore the balls and confirmed that when she stated, 'we are the president."
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at March 12, 2011 09:20 AM (ZHsNw)
Posted by: Asprin Factories and Cuban Children at March 12, 2011 09:21 AM (XdlcF)
Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at March 12, 2011 01:12 PM (zmlzP)
I agree. I was literally sick to my stomach when Billy Jeff beat H.W.
Posted by: Truck Monkey at March 12, 2011 09:21 AM (yQWNf)
Posted by: Meddler at March 12, 2011 09:21 AM (fCBw5)
I hate when conservatives fall for Clinton's shtick.
Posted by: Kensington at March 12, 2011 09:22 AM (mEyVv)
Posted by: Adolf Oliver humpwaddles at March 12, 2011 09:22 AM (iHSFS)
Bill Clinton is a lot of things, but unlike President Obama, he was never a committed socialist ideologue. If you wanted to categorize him, Clinton is a traditional Democratic liberal politician. Cynical and amoral? Sure, but those also seem to be the attributes of traditional Democratic liberal politicians. President Obama is something entirely different.
Are you shitting me? He's as much of a socialist/communist as Dear Leader is. You need to re-read his history. He wanted to "fundementally change" the USA as much as Dear Leader does. You may not believe all of his lies, but it's obvious you're believing some of them.
Posted by: Soona at March 12, 2011 09:22 AM (2bg5P)
Posted by: Talk Radio at March 12, 2011 09:25 AM (mEyVv)
Posted by: Firehand at March 12, 2011 09:25 AM (oJsjh)
Posted by: troyriser at March 12, 2011 09:27 AM (mU1zA)
“I like that about the Republicans; the evidence does not faze them, they are not bothered at all by the facts.”
-Bill Clinton
Imagine that coming from the serial prevaricating Clinton.
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at March 12, 2011 09:28 AM (ZHsNw)
Posted by: A.G. at March 12, 2011 09:29 AM (oAVyq)
Posted by: Meddler at March 12, 2011 09:31 AM (fCBw5)
Posted by: Adolf Oliver humpwaddles at March 12, 2011 09:33 AM (iHSFS)
Posted by: A.G. at March 12, 2011 09:33 AM (oAVyq)
Posted by: WTF at March 12, 2011 09:34 AM (xs5wK)
Never forget that Bill Clinton lied under oath to a Federal Magistrate, and was subsequently charged with perjury and obstruction of justice.
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at March 12, 2011 09:35 AM (ZHsNw)
Dude was the reason I decided Democrats could never be trusted, how much they fawned over that corrupt, dictatorial sack of shit. I was too young to actually *experience* the Carter Malaise, I just knew at the time that Reagan was better - partly because the worst people I knew hated him.
Clinton's full history may never be known, but I suspect that some of the conspiracy nuts are closer to the truth about him than I'd prefer.
No, I don't *like* him, and I wouldn't want to "party" with him any more than I would Putin, who also seems to lead an amusing lifestyle but is actually a dangerous SOB.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at March 12, 2011 09:37 AM (bxiXv)
By our I mean the United States'. I never doubted that his first love was to his country, warts and all.
I did.
Clinton's loyalty was to himself. Himself was best served by being popular as president, which meant not being an absolute fuck-up, a la Barry.With Clinton, it's always Clinton.
He gets his nut, you he's not so worried about.
Posted by: nickless at March 12, 2011 09:41 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Adolf Oliver humpwaddles at March 12, 2011 09:46 AM (iHSFS)
Posted by: ktgreat at March 12, 2011 09:46 AM (7cvwd)
so now we have "conservative" blogs rehabbing slick willie's reputation?? way to go!
in stupidity this ranks up there w/ patterico's statement about obama being a good guy.
it amazes when right thinking folks have the wool pulled over their eyes.
Posted by: chas at March 12, 2011 09:56 AM (yxwmg)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at March 12, 2011 09:57 AM (61b7k)
It's hard to imagine Obama signing any welfare reform or balancing the budget by cooperating with a Republican Congress. So whatever Billy Jeff is, he's not as bad as Obama.
Yes, BJ balanced the budget in part by gutting defense. And so on... But he's still more pragmatic than Obama, who is a true believer.
Posted by: Beagle at March 12, 2011 10:00 AM (sOtz/)
Point of order, however... Patterico's been something of an idiot for some time now.
We, OTOH, are just getting started. >8^>
Posted by: Additional Blond Agent at March 12, 2011 10:03 AM (uehxp)
Posted by: eman: United People's Front of Wisconsin at March 12, 2011 10:04 AM (azrS2)
Obama is our enemy. He attacks us reguarly. His administration considers us terrorists.
And by the way, I find Putin interesting. He's probably the only genuinely right-leaning dictator I can think of. He generally has a libertarian approach...if you respect his power, he leaves you to live your life. Not that I like him or his government, but it's preferable to many dictatorships.
Posted by: Crazee at March 12, 2011 10:05 AM (xsoRi)
Ol' Bubba Clinton rides,
He's comin' in on a hot dusty trail,
To serial rape your brides.
Posted by: Fritz at March 12, 2011 10:07 AM (/8mBu)
May have? I was awake during his Presidency and not only did he attack "talk radio", he demonized all conservatives and tarred them with the McVeigh brush. There's barely any difference between Bubba and the Bamster in this regard.
Posted by: Additional Blond Agent at March 12, 2011 10:13 AM (uehxp)
Bill Clinton's first love was and remains Bill Clinton, warts and all, though I do believe he loves his country far more than Obambi does.
Posted by: MissTammy at March 12, 2011 10:13 AM (BebB7)
Bill Maher is a total tool. Yet, it's interesting that he at least willing to acknowledge that radical Islam is a serious threat. Maher's an anti-religious bigot, but at least he seems principled. He's borderline reasonable in comparison to the anti-Christians who just LOOOVVVEEEE them some Islam.
Posted by: Crazee at March 12, 2011 10:15 AM (xsoRi)
Posted by: Talk Radio at March 12, 2011 01:25 PM (mEyVv)
No way was Clenis going to have a presiduncy marred by yet another terrorist attack on the US -- besides the 1993 WTC bombing. (BTW -- I'm surprised this didn't get way more coverage than it did. Dude was working the baggage area in Logan the morning of 9/11!)
Posted by: RushBabe at March 12, 2011 10:16 AM (urYpw)
I'm just saying that Clinton is less anti-us than Obama is. I have to say, though, that I was in my teens during the Clinton years. I'm practically a whippersnapper. Did Clinton ever use offensive slurs about regular voters, and call them gun glinging, racist bible thumpers like Bamster has? I actually don't like Bill, I'm just saying you could work with him. That's all. Plus, some libs are better than others.
Posted by: Crazee at March 12, 2011 10:20 AM (xsoRi)
Crazee at March 12, 2011 02:05 PM
you think that the libertarian approach is "if you mess w/ us we will destroy you?" ask khodorkovsky, Politkovskaya, Litvinenko, et al if putin is a live and let live kinda guy.
what the fuck is the matter w/ this blog?? posts like this and comments like that? wow, im shocked
Posted by: chas at March 12, 2011 10:20 AM (yxwmg)
Posted by: RJ at March 12, 2011 10:22 AM (qDPnZ)
That's unfortunate. It blurs meaning or worse, implies something that's factually untrue.
Posted by: Additional Blond Agent at March 12, 2011 10:23 AM (uehxp)
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 12, 2011 10:24 AM (if2zg)
Posted by: iknowtheleft at March 12, 2011 01:36 PM (G/MYk)
That's a fantastic analogy. Spot on!
Posted by: krakatoa at March 12, 2011 10:25 AM (a0Jhx)
And by the way, I find Putin interesting. He's probably the only genuinely right-leaning dictator I can think of. He generally has a libertarian approach...if you respect his power, he leaves you to live your life. Not that I like him or his government, but it's preferable to many dictatorships.
You might want to remind the UK about Ronald Reagan's warning about not letting Russia control the gas lines.
Posted by: Pooty Poot Ain't Nobody's Friend at March 12, 2011 10:29 AM (urYpw)
Putin's Russia is a danger to the world, and I believe one day soon they will probably stage open war in Asia and the Middle East. I shouldn't have to say this. You have to fucking know your enemies, treat them objectively, and understand who they are.
Do we have to attack each other over this? We're adults, here.
Posted by: Crazee at March 12, 2011 10:30 AM (xsoRi)
Posted by: BillyBob at March 12, 2011 10:36 AM (F0Pf9)
Thursday: St. Patrick's Day gala
Friday: Obama & family depart on a 5-day Latin America trip to Brazil, Chile & El Salvador.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 12, 2011 10:36 AM (if2zg)
hey, stop digging your hole!! if your "loyal"?? you mean if you dont oppose him and his cronies. dude, he is as bad as stalin, hitler, quadaffi, any of them, maybe worse than some of them. just cause he hasnt killed as many doesnt mean he's not willing.
as for attacking each other over this, yeah. you expressed admiration, albeit inexplicitly for a tyrannical dictatorship. i will call you out for that. not doing so just provides you w/ cover. did you research those names i sent you? what did they do taht wasnt "loyal" and deserving of death or imprisonment? get your head out of you ass, apologize for what you said. it was wrong 100% and trying to justify it just makes you look worse.
Posted by: chas at March 12, 2011 10:37 AM (yxwmg)
You're probably right. I am usually a stickler for language, I'm surprised that I still use that. I think it sounds better when you say it out loud, but...krakotoa said in the post. "He may have been a son of a bitch, but..." . It's pretty common place. That said, I get where it can be misleading.
I study History, and I like to analyze historical figures and compare them. I'm kind of a geek for that. So, I probably can get into this stuff too much with taking unpopular positions. I like to play Devil's Advocate. Usually, I do it to liberals. Just two weeks ago, I was arguing that Richard Nixon was more credible and decent than Obama. Heads exploded.
Posted by: Crazee at March 12, 2011 10:37 AM (xsoRi)
Posted by: chas at March 12, 2011 10:42 AM (yxwmg)
And by the way, I find Putin interesting. He's probably the only genuinely right-leaning dictator I can think of. He generally has a libertarian approach...if you respect his power, he leaves you to live your life. Not that I like him or his government, but it's preferable to many dictatorships.
I kinda think the Eastern Block may have something to say about that.
Posted by: Bill H at March 12, 2011 10:42 AM (q8CmE)
Do you have a personal stake in this? If so, I'm sorry. I'm not trying to defend him. I'm detached from this, and I've been studying a lot about Russia's relations with the Middle East lately. I'll study the things you brought up, maybe he has been more oppressive to his own people. It just seems like regimes like Iran and China are absolutely brutal in comparison.
It's like World War II. Mussolini was terrible, but he was a different type of terrible than Hitler. I'm comparing evil people to evil people, trying to understand them...
Posted by: Crazee at March 12, 2011 10:44 AM (xsoRi)
It's like World War II. Mussolini was terrible, but he was a different type of terrible than Hitler. I'm comparing evil people to evil people, trying to understand them...
Not trying to attack you, Crazee, but that's a fools errand. Professional historians, politicians, and all manner of psychologists with far greater understanding than ours can't figure this shit out. Human nature, dude, that's all it is.
Posted by: Bill H at March 12, 2011 10:51 AM (q8CmE)
Not really, the Eastern Block aren't Russian. They are other nations. I never said Putin wasn't a danger to his neighbors, I think he needs to be stopped.Or else, his power base will expand.He's using smart power, and he's been ABUSING Obama.
People read stuff into my comments that aren't there, at ALL. Some evils are different than other evils. Most Dictatorships tend to start with controlling the populace, than they turn outward to expansion. Putin's Russia seems more bent on expansionary power, as opposed to the the kind of "reforms" people like Mao and Castro put in place. It's a different kind of evil that has to be fought a different way. You can subvert Iran and Cuba through supporting opposition movements. Large amounts of Russians want their country to gain relevance and power, so you can't subvert them as easily. This is because Putin has avoided robbing people on the ability to marry and earn a living. Does he rob them of Freedom? Yeah, but on a lesser scale so do Western Democracies. People don't notice what they're missing if you hold a carrot in front of them. In Russia, that carrot is "Revival of Russian Power!". I think Mark Steyn has written about this before.In the long run, Putin is more dangerous than China. We're going to need to be smart to defeat them.
...This is really what I'm getting at. Admittedly, I shouldn't have made a little throwaway comment. I was terrible at expressing what I was trying to express here. What I've seen suggests he remains popular there, and it's hard to defeat that. But I was making a small comment after sleeping for 10 hours, and I'm not being very clear. Sorry.
Posted by: Crazee at March 12, 2011 10:55 AM (xsoRi)
I tend to believe in the idea that Russia and Islamic nations will eventually attack Isreal...and I've been studying this. I was reading... http://tinyurl.com/4778j5q
Kind of interesting stuff. Sorry for offending people, I didn't mean to. Seriously. I'm trying to run things through my mind for a project I'm working on...:/
Posted by: Crazee at March 12, 2011 11:04 AM (xsoRi)
Posted by: hadsil at March 12, 2011 11:07 AM (n6DMf)
Posted by: Crazee at March 12, 2011 11:08 AM (xsoRi)
Posted by: Kevin at March 12, 2011 11:13 AM (ENL+r)
Posted by: Patton at March 12, 2011 11:14 AM (+HIl0)
Crazee -- I get what you are saying about Putin. I think he is a big step in the wrong direction for Russia, and I wonder if the reason he is so restrained in comparison to the likes of NORK & Iran is more due to the direction Russia has moved since Glasnost than to his own inclinations; but it is true that he is no Stalin or even Andropov.
Posted by: krakatoa at March 12, 2011 11:44 AM (a0Jhx)
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 12, 2011 12:00 PM (kKA7V)
Posted by: soulpile is... expendable at March 12, 2011 12:06 PM (afWhQ)
Posted by: Clyde Shelton at March 12, 2011 12:14 PM (NITzp)
H/T Mr. Ed, a reminder of how to keep things in perspective.
I actually have something of a fondness for Bill Clinton.Good God. I never thought I'd see two back-to-back sentences this wrong-headed at AoSHQ. It's a sad, sad day. Just a reminder, Ed keeps gay marriage and amnesty in "perspective" too. And I'm not even going to start on Slick. Suffice it to say that time has clouded your memory.
Posted by: FUBAR at March 12, 2011 12:20 PM (McG46)
Didn't he run an apology tour? I know he protested our involvement in Vietnam on foreign soil. I know he thinks at least half the country is racist. Remember how he enthusiastically pushed drilling in ANWR? Yeah, me either.
Posted by: FUBAR at March 12, 2011 12:23 PM (McG46)
I clarified earlier in the comments. I supposed I should have added an update, but I sort of left it ambiguous for a reason.
To clarify further -- I meant as president, I felt his first love was to the US. Granted, it was a Leftist vision of the US, but I never felt the disdain for the US that is evident from Obama.
Again, not saying he was a great President. And I'm not claiming that what he is quoted as saying here, is what he would have said during his presidency.
Spending enough time with Bush the eldest seems to have colored his perspective somewhat.
Call me crazy, but I think it's a good thing to reinforce good behavior. Do I think this means I'll be voting D in a presidential election? Not hardly.
Do I hope to maybe swing the debate more onto our side of the issue?
Hell yes.
The other purpose of this piece wasn't to convince anyone we had it great under Clinton (although relative to today...?), rather, the point was to perhaps allow "independents" who voted for Clinton to feel less than alienated for the mistakes of their past when looking for an alternative to the Socialist Snob currently occupying the WH.
More flies w/ honey and all that.
Certainly I know that works with my "independent" friends who are alarmed at the direction the country has taken under Obama.
Give it a try is all I suggest. Not saying: Forgive & Forget all that was bad about Clinton's ideology. Just saying: Find some common ground that allows you to move the debate to the right in an agreeable manner.
Posted by: krakatoa at March 12, 2011 12:48 PM (a0Jhx)
Then I scroll down and bingo.
Posted by: Nicholas Kronos at March 12, 2011 12:55 PM (KktlX)
I'm on the side that says he had his good points. There was no doubt about his being American throuh and through, plus he actually was the brilliant, articulate, quick-thinking intellectual barry gets credit for being. He could ad lib and talk off-the-cuff, and he knew his facts. He showed that he was intellectually curious and actually cared about more than sports. You got the feeling that (when he wasn't bonking chicks) in his spare time, he read and talked about issues. And tho' he might not have followed it, he was brought up in that Southern Baptist tradition, not in islam.
Plus there was this thing he did with cigars...
Posted by: monica at March 12, 2011 01:04 PM (c66df)
Here's some common ground: I agree with you, he was better than Oblahblah. Did he love America? I think it's a close call, but I'll agree he loves what all lefties love: their vision of America. Does that count? If you actively loathe and revile, for one reason or another, most of what America did and does, can you at the same time claim to love America? Of course, most of 'em do.
Didn't mean to bust your ass too hard. The Era of Post-Partisanship has pushed me into a take-no-prisoners frame of mind.
I condemn myself most roundly for violent rhetoric.
Posted by: FUBAR at March 12, 2011 01:10 PM (McG46)
Of course, I should have been more clear...but I'm still not used to talking online to people who don't know me. I used to talk only to friends and longtime associates.
Posted by: Crazee at March 12, 2011 01:19 PM (xsoRi)
Posted by: pd at March 12, 2011 02:34 PM (ZR8/4)
Posted by: Gem at March 12, 2011 04:07 PM (zw+pb)
Let's not get too carried away here.
Bill tried to do what Obama succeeded at. What made him better than Obama is that he failed in his big-government takeover of healthcare. But that is a matter of opportunity. Given the opportunity, he would have been every bit the disaster that Barak has been.
He had disadvantages that Obama lacked. He had only 4 years preceding him of a Republican president embarrassed by his own ideology and the hostility the elites felt for it, rather than the 8 that Barak had. Hence, he had only substantial -- not overwhelming -- Democratic majorities. He couldn't ram his legislation through like Barak had. He he had those majorities, he would have done so. It also helped that he put his politically tone-deaf wife in charge of his health care bill, but that's just a matter of competence.
He was rabidly anti-American, just like Barak. He would go on Apology for America tours just like Barak does. He youth was spent as a member of the Hippie culture (who, once they had crawled out from under the rock they were hiding under, went on to destroy our American fabric of life) which he never repudiated. He was a draft-dodger who, in his own words, loathed the military. Let's not forget that fishy Chinese money that filled Democratic party coffers while they were getting missile technology. He cynically used the Oklahoma City disaster to paint his opponents as evil extremists. He put Ginsberg on the Supreme Court. He vetoed legislation banning partial-birth abortions.
So he's making a couple of nice noises right now. Even broken clocks tell the correct time twice a day. Even Nancy is capable saying the right thing on occasion (regarding human rights violations in China, for instance). That doesn't change what he did, and what he tried to do, when in office. If you want him for your sonofagun, fine, but I'd prefer not to have him as mine.
Posted by: JoeofPA at March 13, 2011 03:06 AM (WeQhq)
Posted by: Ken at March 13, 2011 06:53 AM (Xl3xp)
Posted by: The greatful Chinese government who got classified missile technology from Bubba in exchange for cam at March 14, 2011 11:14 AM (KDxa0)
I actually have something of a fondness for Bill Clinton.
The greatful Chinese government who got classified missile technology from Bubba in exchange for campaign cash
Posted by: The greatful Chinese government.... at March 14, 2011 11:16 AM (KDxa0)
Well, this is my first visit to your blog! We are a group of volunteers and starting a
new initiative in a community in the same niche. Your blog provided us valuable
information to work on. You have done a marvelous job!
Posted by: Cheap True Religion Jeans at March 18, 2011 11:04 PM (jNjLA)
Posted by: oakley sunglasses outlet at June 20, 2011 09:19 AM (LGHKZ)
Radii Straight Jackets-- Radii Footwear is definitely at the top of their game right now, as they are putting out tons of hot releases. To join the inaugural color way of the Radii Straight JacketsShoes, Radii quietly rolled out this special color way of the infamous game changing high-top. The radii footwear includes a metallic leather upper, patent high-lights in black and a big tongue marked by cutouts. Men's Radii Footwear is definitely raising the bar on lifestyle trainers designs. Not only in professional sports fields Radii Straight JacketsFootwear is indispensable to tide bound strength. Radii each footwear have no personality, only has the remarkable in appearance, also attach great importance to the performance, the specialized trainers shockproof system can better protect your feet.
Posted by: radii shoes at June 30, 2011 11:49 PM (cywe7)
Posted by: swarovski wholesale at July 07, 2011 06:08 PM (rFkvp)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2845 seconds, 249 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Why didn't he drill when he had the chance ... and accept the consequences?
Posted by: Adriane at March 12, 2011 08:57 AM (0yDnd)