October 20, 2011
— DrewM It's probably not the end of the story.
Yesterday in an interview with Piers Morgan on CNN, I was asked questions about abortion policy and the role of the President.I understood the thrust of the question to ask whether that I, as president, would simply “order” people to not seek an abortion.
My answer was focused on the role of the President. The President has no constitutional authority to order any such action by anyone. That was the point I was trying to convey.
As to my political policy view on abortion, I am 100% pro-life. End of story.
I will appoint judges who understand the original intent of the Constitution. Judges who are committed to the rule of law know that the Constitution contains no right to take the life of unborn children.
I will oppose government funding of abortion. I will veto any legislation that contains funds for Planned Parenthood. I will do everything that a President can do, consistent with his constitutional role, to advance the culture of life.
Via Jeff Emanuel.
I know we've had a lot of Cain today. Too much Cain really but it's unfair to do the original post without putting out his statement.
With that said, that answer is laughable.
Look at the exchange with Piers Morgan.
MORGAN: By expressing the view that you expressed, you are effectively -- you might be president. You can't hide behind now the mask, if you don't mind me saying, of being the pizza guy. You might be the president of United States of America. So your views on these things become exponentially massively more important. They become a directive to the nation.CAIN: No they don't. I can have an opinion on an issue without it being a directive on the nation. The government shouldn't be trying to tell people everything to do, especially when it comes to social decisions that they need to make.
Cain didn't say "The President shouldn't be trying to tell people everything to do, especially when it comes to social decisions that they need to make" he said "the government". That includes the Congress and the courts, which he now says he'd appoint judges to that would remove the "right" to abortion. And where was that statement last night about judges?
This isn't the first time Cain has made a muddle of what seems to be a pretty straight forward question.
As I said this morning, taken in totality, I think Cain is pro-life. The problem is that once again he's taken simple things and made them into a mess.
Related enough... Cain was on with Sean Hannity this afternoon and addressed the Romney-Perry showdown at the most recent debate.
Cain tells Hannity Romney-Perry fight over immigration in debate "reflectled negatively on Perry. … I think Mitt handled himself well."More Cain: "Mitt was trying to have a civil conservation. Perry … shot himself in the foot” by talking over Romney in debate.
So the great hope of the "not Romney" camp is defending, er.....Mitt Romney.
Posted by: DrewM at
03:26 PM
| Comments (272)
Post contains 525 words, total size 4 kb.
Coincidence I am sure.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at October 20, 2011 03:28 PM (1fS1H)
Posted by: Roman P. at October 20, 2011 03:28 PM (niZvt)
Posted by: fluffy, LHE at October 20, 2011 03:29 PM (4pSIn)
Posted by: The Hermanator at October 20, 2011 03:29 PM (cLbEN)
Posted by: Arlen Specter at October 20, 2011 03:30 PM (L8TIZ)
I know we've had a lot of Cain today. Too much Cain really but it's unfair to do the original post without putting out his statement.
Uh huh.
Posted by: ErikW at October 20, 2011 03:31 PM (JyUB5)
Posted by: Heorot at October 20, 2011 03:31 PM (lnhHH)
Still not why I'm not voting for the guy, but worse than I'd originally thought
Posted by: Y-not at October 20, 2011 03:32 PM (5H6zj)
As for this fellow Cain, well...
All I can say is that I, as opposed to this pizza salesman, made my money the old fashioned way. I inherited it.
Posted by: T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII at October 20, 2011 03:33 PM (cLbEN)
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 20, 2011 03:33 PM (niZvt)
Posted by: Cherry pi at October 20, 2011 03:33 PM (OhYCU)
Posted by: Lady in Black at October 20, 2011 03:33 PM (ycuSb)
Will this thread involve foot sniffing and/or piss drinking?
Off, sock
There is your answer. Go for it.
Posted by: fluffy, LHE at October 20, 2011 03:34 PM (4pSIn)
The reason why I chose Perry is
1. because Cain knows jack shit about policies. I knew this already. Did all his current backers not see his right of return statement or the "I wont have a foreign ploicy till I'm president" crap?
2 He works for Romney
Posted by: Flapjackmaka says Mitt rhymes with sh*t at October 20, 2011 03:34 PM (5QP16)
Posted by: Bosk at October 20, 2011 03:34 PM (n2K+4)
Posted by: Not Drinking Nearly Enough at October 20, 2011 03:35 PM (HtUdo)
Cain: IÂ’m pro-life from conception, yes.
Stossel: Any cases where it should be legal?
Cain: I donÂ’t think government should make that decision.
Stossel: People should be free to abort a baby?
Cain: I support life from conception. No, people shouldnÂ’t just be free to abortbecause if we donÂ’t protect the sanctity of life from conception, we will also start to play God relative to life at the end of life.
Stossel: So IÂ’m confused on what your position is.
Cain: My position is IÂ’m pro-life. Period.
Stossel: If a woman is raped, she should not be allowed to end the pregnancy?
Cain: ThatÂ’s her choice. That is not governmentÂ’s choice. I support life from conception.
Stossel: So abortion should be legal?
Cain: No, abortion should not be legal. I believe in the sanctity of life.
Stossel: IÂ’m not getting it. IÂ’m not understanding it. If itÂ’s her choice, that means itÂ’s legal.
Cain: No. I donÂ’t believe a woman should have an abortion. Does that help to clear it up?
Stossel: Even if she is raped?
Cain: Even if she is raped or the victim of incest because there are other options. We must protect the sanctity of life and I have always believed that.
Posted by: Y-not at October 20, 2011 03:36 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: soothsayer at October 20, 2011 03:36 PM (KUrJA)
I'd walk through broken glass covered in salt through a valley of naplam while being raped by a syphallitic monkey to vote for him over Obama.
Do you have these dreams often?
Posted by: zombie Sigmund Freud at October 20, 2011 03:36 PM (4pSIn)
As opposed to Rick Perry's tightly integrated, all-encompassing economic plan? Wait, it'll be here in a day or two. 300 tops.
Posted by: Rick Perry's pharmaceutical wonderland plane at October 20, 2011 03:38 PM (6TB1Z)
"So the great hope of the "not Romney" camp is defending, er.....Mitt Romney."
Yes, but that is actually very smart strategy. Cain needs Perry not to make a comeback so that Cain remains the last viable not-Romney standing. Makes perfect sense, then, that he would claim Perry shot himself in the foot... while Perry was in the process of taking Mitt down a peg. In that equation, both Mitt and Perry take hits, and Cain doesn't.
Posted by: stuiec at October 20, 2011 03:39 PM (98Xq9)
If he can't handle them now, why would he be able to handle them during a campaign?
Posted by: Rick Perry's pharmaceutical wonderland plane at October 20, 2011 03:39 PM (6TB1Z)
Hey, what about me?
Posted by: The Racist Rock at October 20, 2011 03:40 PM (cLbEN)
Posted by: Bosk at October 20, 2011 07:34 PM (n2K+4)
Mmmm hmmm. Go on.
Posted by: syphallitic monkey at October 20, 2011 03:40 PM (Kkt/i)
Posted by: Spike at October 20, 2011 03:40 PM (g/arr)
Posted by: soothsayer at October 20, 2011 03:41 PM (xIzGn)
These are pretty basic questions he should have canned responses for.
Posted by: Jose at October 20, 2011 03:42 PM (WTNJJ)
Yes, no one loves teh crackaz. Not even the dumb black guy. They're alone. Silenced. Off in the wilderness, making sounds no one whose voice counts will ever echo.
Whereas you're all up in the shit. With people who matter. Because...well...you're not Them. And you say so. So you must be important, in a way. Because important people hear you. They must. You say what they want to hear.
Do you feel good? Better, at least? I mean, you know Mitt would never have anything to do with you, even by proxy, because you're nobody, someone for his guards to keep out of reach of him, but hey—maybe you can fuck up some crackas' day, make them feel a little more hopeless.
Because...what else?
Nothing.
Posted by: oblig. does know the difference at October 20, 2011 03:43 PM (cePv8)
Yep, but they aren't. So we take the next best thing we can get. Even if it's Romney. Still lightyears ahead of Barack "the Destroyer" Obama.
Posted by: pep at October 20, 2011 03:43 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: soothsayer at October 20, 2011 03:44 PM (LVtr+)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 20, 2011 07:38 PM (aYQHH)
Has that ever stopped it before?
Posted by: Tami-Cardinals! at October 20, 2011 03:45 PM (X6akg)
Posted by: Mitt Romney, Mormon at October 20, 2011 03:46 PM (L8TIZ)
Great jobs dumbasses.
Please let us know if Santorum has bad breath, or if Paul ever jay walked okay.
Posted by: flyonthewall at October 20, 2011 03:46 PM (gmi2T)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 20, 2011 07:38 PM (aYQHH)
Yes and it'll be repeated ad infinitum up to the Elections.
I'm with Cain, bottom line. Character means a lot.
Posted by: ErikW at October 20, 2011 03:47 PM (JyUB5)
He probably remembers his time in the military as a officer. Plus he is wearing a back brace from surgery a few months ago.
Your next weak ass point please.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at October 20, 2011 03:47 PM (1fS1H)
Posted by: soothsayer at October 20, 2011 03:48 PM (KreG+)
Let's revisit blue on blue topics two or three times a day. From now until election day 2012.
I guarantee it's a winning strategy!
Posted by: Ed Anger at October 20, 2011 03:49 PM (7+pP9)
Posted by: phoenixgirl occupying my kitchen at October 20, 2011 03:49 PM (SH3gZ)
Posted by: fixerupper at October 20, 2011 03:49 PM (ffV1/)
Posted by: phoenixgirl occupying my kitchen at October 20, 2011 03:49 PM (SH3gZ)
Posted by: phoenixgirl occupying my kitchen at October 20, 2011 03:50 PM (SH3gZ)
This isn't rocket surgery.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at October 20, 2011 03:51 PM (REXkU)
I've seen this several times lately, and I'm confused. Aren't we the red ones?
Also, what are twinkles?
Posted by: pep at October 20, 2011 03:51 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at October 20, 2011 03:52 PM (bjRNS)
Thanks for that knife twist right there.
Still trying to find a replacement for him.
Rick "You're Heartless" Perry doesn't seem to be it.
Neither does Newt "≈Romney" Gingrich.
Since you decided to piss in my wheaties (Though I wasn't eating them anymore anyway) what would you suggest?
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at October 20, 2011 03:52 PM (0q2P7)
Forget the rest of this crap and focus on this:
economy
jobs
SCOAMF failure
economy
jobs
SCOAMF failure
economy
jobs
SCOAMF failure
Only Mittens is electable. FIFY
Posted by: Jumbo Jogging Shrimp at October 20, 2011 07:50 PM (qjUnn)
Posted by: Ed Anger at October 20, 2011 03:52 PM (7+pP9)
Posted by: phoenixgirl occupying my kitchen at October 20, 2011 03:52 PM (SH3gZ)
Posted by: movigique at October 20, 2011 03:53 PM (Cepxj)
Posted by: soothsayer at October 20, 2011 03:53 PM (Y4TdB)
Posted by: phoenixgirl occupying my kitchen at October 20, 2011 03:53 PM (SH3gZ)
Posted by: I Hate Libs at October 20, 2011 03:54 PM (ql1dc)
If you're connected to the internet using DHCP server, then it might have changed your IP address, which will change your hash.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at October 20, 2011 03:54 PM (bjRNS)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OW56Z-0xwIQ
Posted by: NfromNC at October 20, 2011 03:54 PM (MbeEN)
Thanks, but it sounds like hook 'em horns to me.
Posted by: pep at October 20, 2011 03:54 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: soothsayer at October 20, 2011 03:55 PM (vzLhi)
Posted by: phoenixgirl occupying my kitchen at October 20, 2011 03:56 PM (SH3gZ)
"Twinkles" is a stupid OWS thing. "Twinkles" or "up twinkles" refers to agreement; "down twinkles", disagreement.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at October 20, 2011 03:57 PM (bjRNS)
Posted by: phoenixgirl occupying my kitchen at October 20, 2011 03:57 PM (SH3gZ)
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at October 20, 2011 03:57 PM (xOy1A)
Posted by: phoenixgirl occupying my kitchen at October 20, 2011 03:57 PM (SH3gZ)
Posted by: soothsayer at October 20, 2011 03:57 PM (KUrJA)
Let's revisit blue on blue topics
I've seen this several times lately, and I'm confused. Aren't we the red ones?
Also, what are twinkles?
Posted by: pep at October 20, 2011 07:51 PM (6TB1Z)
Blue on blue means fratricide.Twinkles are the GOP equivalent of skittles. Romney is the only candidate who has them.
Posted by: Ed Anger at October 20, 2011 03:58 PM (7+pP9)
Posted by: Fair Tax Forever at October 20, 2011 03:58 PM (dt9ss)
Posted by: tommygun at October 20, 2011 03:58 PM (T2ydq)
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at October 20, 2011 07:57 PM (xOy1A)
Elaboration, please? I hadn't heard this ...
Posted by: eastvalleyphx at October 20, 2011 03:58 PM (qiOph)
Posted by: HondaV65 at October 20, 2011 07:49 PM (Wm6n5)
How? He stands on his own position. You can probably rip him for being ignorant on foreign issues but you cannot diss him on how to run an economy.
Posted by: ErikW at October 20, 2011 03:58 PM (JyUB5)
Posted by: phoenixgirl occupying my kitchen at October 20, 2011 03:59 PM (SH3gZ)
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at October 20, 2011 07:51 PM (REXkU)
How about this....
"That exchange reflected poorly on both of them. Perry was wrong not to let Mitt talk but at the same time, Mitt's calling out for help from Anderson Cooper makes me wonder if he has what it takes to go toe to toe with Obama.
Personally, I think between Mitt's "I can't have illegals, I'm running for office for Pete's sake" and Perry's support for illegals paying instate rates for college, neither of them is very strong on immigration.
I'm the only candidate who has been consistent on this issue. I'll build a fence, etc".
Of course he hasn't been consistent but that's another issue.
Cain's just a lousy candidate and he wound up helping Mitt there. Fantastic!
Posted by: DrewM. at October 20, 2011 03:59 PM (WNzUA)
You want stupid? Some of our own have introduced a bill in the House to criminalize making fun of the TSA.
Thanks, guys.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at October 20, 2011 03:59 PM (bjRNS)
Posted by: phoenixgirl occupying my kitchen at October 20, 2011 04:00 PM (SH3gZ)
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at October 20, 2011 04:00 PM (Zufb9)
Thank you for your Pizza Hut order
Your order is on its way!
Order Details:
1 - Large Pan Pizza
1 - Breadsticks w/Cheese with Marinara Sauce - single order
Suck it, Cain.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at October 20, 2011 04:00 PM (/qkBU)
BREAKING: Perry flat tax devised all-star econ team: John Taylor, John Cogan, David Malpass (via @TheKudlowReport )
Posted by: Tami-Cardinals! at October 20, 2011 04:00 PM (X6akg)
Circular firing squad with bazookas.
Yeah its kind of sad, supposedly these guys are all on our side, right? So lets treat them like they're on our team, rather than the rival's team huh?
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at October 20, 2011 04:01 PM (r4wIV)
Instapundit linked to an article about the TSA operating on Tennessee freeways today.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at October 20, 2011 04:01 PM (bjRNS)
pep twinkles are wiggling your fingers on both hands pointed upward if you agree with what someone is saying...down twinkles, point down in disagreement
I tried to to give twinkles while giving a speech back in '88, which is why I had to drop out of the race. Apu at the Dunkin' Donuts said it meant something obscene, and I wrenched my back while he was chasing me with a gherkin, so don't screw around with me, Twinkle Toes!
Gotta go; time for 'Nilla Wafers.
Posted by: JB at October 20, 2011 04:01 PM (4pSIn)
Posted by: Alice's Clone Army at October 20, 2011 04:01 PM (wDzxx)
Posted by: phoenixgirl occupying my kitchen at October 20, 2011 07:49 PM (SH3gZ)
I'm FED UP with this question. FED UP, I tell ya. Did I mention I am FED UP?
Posted by: Rick Perry at October 20, 2011 04:01 PM (ze29X)
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at October 20, 2011 08:01 PM (bjRNS)
Thanks, man. I picked it up at Drudge in the interim.
Posted by: eastvalleyphx at October 20, 2011 04:02 PM (qiOph)
Posted by: I Hate Libs at October 20, 2011 04:03 PM (ql1dc)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OW56Z-0xwIQ
Posted by: NfromNC at October 20, 2011 07:54 PM (MbeEN)
Gold!
Posted by: Flounder at October 20, 2011 04:04 PM (Kkt/i)
Posted by: AmishDude at October 20, 2011 04:04 PM (73tyQ)
Posted by: OCBill at October 20, 2011 04:04 PM (YJvVE)
Posted by: phoenixgirl occupying my kitchen at October 20, 2011 07:59 PM (SH3gZ)
Shit, I missed it. Spill...
Posted by: Steph at October 20, 2011 04:04 PM (cMKnf)
Posted by: steevy at October 20, 2011 04:05 PM (fyOgS)
Posted by: Zimriel at October 20, 2011 04:05 PM (6GvAC)
Posted by: Herman Cain at October 20, 2011 04:05 PM (wtlYt)
The correct answer is that it should be up to the individual states, not the federal gummit. That's the whole purpose of the 10th Amendment.
Maybe that's what Cain was trying to say, maybe not.
Posted by: Dogbert at October 20, 2011 04:05 PM (ve3F/)
Posted by: DrewM. at October 20, 2011 07:59 PM (WNzUA)
Maybe, but if Perry wants to be (a) president and (b) an effective president, he has to seal the deal. The only reason that Cain even has the numbers he does is that Perry did horribly in 2 debates and mediocre in another.
Posted by: AmishDude at October 20, 2011 04:06 PM (73tyQ)
Posted by: soothsayer at October 20, 2011 04:06 PM (xIzGn)
Posted by: tommygun at October 20, 2011 07:58 PM (T2ydq)
So when do we get to discuss social issues? Is there ever the right time? This is the problem with Cain and even Perry when he pushed off gay marriage as 10th amendment issue. When politicians on the right are to afraid to address social issues out of political correctness and personal political gain that's when the left is setting the narrative.
Posted by: lowandslow at October 20, 2011 04:06 PM (GZitp)
Posted by: phoenixgirl occupying my kitchen at October 20, 2011 04:06 PM (SH3gZ)
Posted by: I Hate Libs at October 20, 2011 04:07 PM (ql1dc)
Yeah its kind of sad, supposedly these guys are all on our side, right? So lets treat them like they're on our team, rather than the rival's team huh?
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at October 20, 2011 08:01 PM (r4wIV)
The DNC plants the disguise themselves as conservatives will make sure that never happens.
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at October 20, 2011 04:07 PM (Zufb9)
Posted by: phoenixgirl occupying my kitchen at October 20, 2011 04:08 PM (SH3gZ)
Posted by: steevy at October 20, 2011 04:09 PM (fyOgS)
Posted by: DJ Monghee at October 20, 2011 04:09 PM (3ySTf)
Posted by: Spike at October 20, 2011 04:09 PM (g/arr)
Posted by: DJ Monghee at October 20, 2011 08:09 PM (3ySTf)
Incredibly yes.
Posted by: Barbarian at October 20, 2011 04:10 PM (EL+OC)
As opposed to Rick Perry's tightly integrated, all-encompassing economic plan? Wait, it'll be here in a day or two. 300 tops.
Posted by: Rick Perry's pharmaceutical wonderland plane at October 20, 2011 07:38 PM (6TB1Z)
And yet Perry's plans have come out faster than Romney's. It took Romney 3 months to come out with his 59 point plan. Even longer when you consider Romney's announcement to be sort of a joke. I mean who didn't think Romney was going to announce well before the June announcement.
Posted by: buzzion at October 20, 2011 04:12 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: steevy at October 20, 2011 04:13 PM (fyOgS)
Posted by: Barbarian at October 20, 2011 04:13 PM (EL+OC)
Posted by: Cherry pi at October 20, 2011 07:33 PM (OhYCU)
so does this mean uk is letting us know what our president is going to do next?
sigh, i'm always the last to know
Posted by: willow at October 20, 2011 04:13 PM (h+qn8)
Posted by: eastvalleyphx at October 20, 2011 04:14 PM (qiOph)
And yet Perry's plans have come out faster than Romney's. It took Romney 3 months to come out with his 59 point plan. Even longer when you consider Romney's announcement to be sort of a joke. I mean who didn't think Romney was going to announce well before the June announcement.
Posted by: buzzion at October 20, 2011 08:12 PM (GULKT)
Romney has had three years to work out an economics plan since he hasn't been doing shit since 2008.
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at October 20, 2011 04:14 PM (Zufb9)
Why do you hate freedom? Are you a communist?
Posted by: I Hate Libs at October 20, 2011 04:15 PM (ql1dc)
Maybe there's just a chance of that. Because that seems to have been the overwhelming reaction of everyone I've seen except the hardcore committed I-hate-Romney folks. Including Luntz's focus group, and the majority of commentators I've read so far.
Nah, y'all are right. Cain's probably just taking dirty Bain money under the table from Mitt in order to sabotage the dreams of True Conservatives. Hey, my Occam's Razor is pretty rusty anyway, might as well just toss it out and embrace conspiracy theories.
Posted by: Jeff B. at October 20, 2011 04:15 PM (hIWe1)
Posted by: steevy at October 20, 2011 08:13 PM (fyOgS)
But, but, Ron Paul has the most foreign policy experience.
Posted by: Ostrich at October 20, 2011 04:16 PM (ze29X)
this blog is going downhill fast.
Posted by: b7183 at October 20, 2011 08:06 PM (dg/Yt)
I agree. You can thank some of the cob-loggers for it.Posted by: Ed Anger at October 20, 2011 04:16 PM (7+pP9)
Posted by: mantuaBill at October 20, 2011 04:18 PM (96j+b)
Posted by: soothsayer at October 20, 2011 04:18 PM (vyPsz)
Gee, Drew, I'm sorry that Herman Cain doesn't exist solely to fulfill your fantasies of building up Rick Perry and dousing Mitt Romney with gasoline and setting him on fire. His virtue -- he calls it as he sees it, for better or worse -- is also his flaw.
Posted by: Jeff B. at October 20, 2011 04:18 PM (hIWe1)
Posted by: DaMav at October 20, 2011 04:19 PM (QNU76)
Maybe there's just a chance of that. Because that seems to have been the overwhelming reaction of everyone I've seen except the hardcore committed I-hate-Romney folks. Including Luntz's focus group, and the majority of commentators I've read so far.
Nah, y'all are right. Cain's probably just taking dirty Bain money under the table from Mitt in order to sabotage the dreams of True Conservatives. Hey, my Occam's Razor is pretty rusty anyway, might as well just toss it out and embrace conspiracy theories.
Posted by: Jeff B. at October 20, 2011 08:15 PM (hIWe1)
And who here doesn't think Romney could beat Obama?
Posted by: Breaker19 at October 20, 2011 04:19 PM (ze29X)
His virtue -- he calls it as he sees it, for better or worse -- is also his flaw
Hmmm. More like pull shit out of his ass on the fly.
I like Cain personally, but I don't think he's thought much about some of this stuff.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at October 20, 2011 04:20 PM (dDAmb)
Posted by: workingclass artist at October 20, 2011 04:21 PM (tBMfq)
150
Not sure if you tortured that analogy or just confused it.
brb, gotta read my 'Hooked on Phonics'
Posted by: fluffy at October 20, 2011 04:21 PM (4pSIn)
Posted by: I Hate Libs at October 20, 2011 04:21 PM (ql1dc)
Posted by: Joe at October 20, 2011 04:22 PM (ItELF)
I said she didn't have the guts to run. And I was correct. St Sarah of the Perpetual Victimhood didn't have the spine to get in the race.
As much as I despise Romney (Who I will vote for if he is the nominee) at least he has the guts to get in the race and debate the other candidates.
Unlike ol half term.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at October 20, 2011 04:22 PM (1fS1H)
Thanks, guys.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at October 20, 2011 07:59 PM (bjRNS)
You know, it's times like these when Republicans really do seem to be hardly different from Democrats.
Posted by: KG at October 20, 2011 04:23 PM (LD21B)
Don't know if He can get himself ready in time to win the primary. we'll see
also like Perry. i guess i'm in the tank for both of them.
cause Romney is Not conservative.
Posted by: willow at October 20, 2011 04:23 PM (h+qn8)
Posted by: willow at October 20, 2011 04:24 PM (h+qn8)
I know Laura Ingraham is going to cry into her pillow. And I know a lot of you had your hearts set on us having OUR black guy - anti raciss armor, and all that.
But Cain is an idiot. He can barely speak english. He has no friggin idea, outside of racist rocks, and NON NON NON!
Enough with him. Enough. Let it rest.
Posted by: Joe at October 20, 2011 08:22 PM (ItELF)
Look in the mirror. What do YOU see? And it's not spelled 'raciss'.
Posted by: Breaker19 at October 20, 2011 04:25 PM (ze29X)
I like Cain personally, but I don't think he's thought much about some of this stuff.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at October 20, 2011 08:20 PM (dDAmb)
My ass, you know better.
Posted by: ErikW at October 20, 2011 04:25 PM (JyUB5)
Posted by: I Hate Libs at October 20, 2011 04:25 PM (ql1dc)
Posted by: dr kill at October 20, 2011 04:25 PM (le5qc)
Posted by: USS Diversity at October 20, 2011 04:26 PM (aD5Kx)
Posted by: willow at October 20, 2011 04:27 PM (h+qn8)
My ass, you know better.
When I know more about basic concepts like "right of return" than a major party presidential candidate, I'm probably not going to be inclined to support him.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at October 20, 2011 04:27 PM (dDAmb)
Rep. Michael Rogersz [R-AL3]Rep. Mo Brooksz [R-AL5]Rep. Chip Cravaackz [R-MN8]Rep. Peter Kingz [R-NY3]Rep. Daniel Lungren [R-CA3]Rep. Timothy Walberg [R-MI7] All Republicans? Wait, what? With Constitutional friends like these, who needs the Democrats?
Peter King is a gun grabbing northeast cocksucker like Christie.
Posted by: Herb Cain at October 20, 2011 04:28 PM (EL+OC)
Posted by: Paul at October 20, 2011 04:28 PM (DsHk0)
Posted by: DaMav at October 20, 2011 04:28 PM (QNU76)
>>>Hmmm. More like pull shit out of his ass on the fly.
>>>I like Cain personally, but I don't think he's thought much about some of this stuff.
Oh I totally agree. He shoots from the hip. And I'm sure that's exactly what he was doing here too. I have absolutely no doubt in my mind that there was no political calculation whatsoever in his expressed opinion about the Romney-Perry exchange: he genuinely thinks, as most people do (the commenters here being a remarkable and self-selecting exception), that Perry came across as an utter tool during the debate. The point is that he's not saying stuff like this because he's "running interference for Romney" on purpose, or because there's some sort of tacit agreement between the two of them, or any of that conspiratorial nonsense. He's saying it because it's actually what he believes.
Now the thing is, the people who continue to support Herman Cain here keep praising him for...being honest and straightforward. Saying what he believes. Not engaging in that dastardly "Romney-like" calculation that we're all supposed to hate. But now, suddenly, when he expresses an honest opinion that reflects poorly on Perry and doesn't dump on Mitt as hoped, out come the "fuck you Cain!" and "he must on the take!" accusations. It's embarrassing for the people making those accusations, or would be if I thought those folks were capable of enough self-reflection to feel shame.
So, to recap: the very thing we're supposed to like about Cain (his bluff no-bullshit frankness) is also, as we have seen over and over again, his major weakness: he just shoots from the lip. Sometimes he gives an honest opinion that violates the "Romney must die" precepts that bind a lot of Cain (or Perry) supporters, sometimes he says something embarrassingly uninformed, sometimes he makes a hash of his positions like the abortion thing. But it all goes to the core of who he is as a candidate.
Posted by: Jeff B. at October 20, 2011 04:28 PM (hIWe1)
Posted by: willow at October 20, 2011 04:29 PM (h+qn8)
Posted by: AmishDude at October 20, 2011 08:04 PM (73tyQ)
Back in the Navy I had a Pharmacy print up a label for a bottle of aspirin... marked as "Retroactive Birth Control Pills" with a prescription for a Guys Mother... told him to send it to her...
He didn't get it until someone explained... /doh... facepalm
Posted by: Sen. Bluto Blutarski at October 20, 2011 04:29 PM (NtXW4)
Santorum should run for governor before he runs for president, just to make sure his own state still loves him. Or something.
Posted by: Breaker19 at October 20, 2011 04:29 PM (ze29X)
Posted by: DaMav at October 20, 2011 08:28 PM (QNU76)
yes becasue even though the Government works FOR the people... even thought they PAY for it... they should not be empowered to make fun of it, even with freedom of speech!
Posted by: Sen. Bluto Blutarski at October 20, 2011 04:31 PM (NtXW4)
When I know more about basic concepts like "right of return" than a major party presidential candidate, I'm probably not going to be inclined to support him.
Fine.
Posted by: ErikW at October 20, 2011 04:31 PM (JyUB5)
This is nothing. Just wait, if Cain doesn't fall in the polls ,and you'll see. It's as predictable as the sunrise.
Posted by: Heorot at October 20, 2011 04:31 PM (lnhHH)
Posted by: USS Diversity at October 20, 2011 04:32 PM (aD5Kx)
Posted by: willow at October 20, 2011 04:32 PM (h+qn8)
Posted by: Concealed kerry or submit at October 20, 2011 04:32 PM (WYsp5)
Posted by: Jeff B. at October 20, 2011 08:18 PM (hIWe1)
Just curious but how you square that idiocy with what I actually wrote? You may have missed it but I wrote that Cain passed on an opportunity to go after Mitt AND Perry.
Just keep living in your own little world.
Posted by: DrewM. at October 20, 2011 04:32 PM (WNzUA)
Posted by: DaMav at October 20, 2011 04:33 PM (QNU76)
Me. Though it could just be low blood sugar talking.
Too many people think Mitt is emblematic of what's wrong with the party -- if he gets the nomination, the fire's gonna go out of the base, and we'll be looking at a third party. If not 2012, by 2016.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at October 20, 2011 04:34 PM (bjRNS)
You're right. I missed it, flat out. I fucked up. Sorry about that.
Posted by: Jeff B. at October 20, 2011 04:36 PM (hIWe1)
And anyone who votes third party in 2012 if Romney the cocksucker is the nominee is a Obama supporter.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at October 20, 2011 04:37 PM (1fS1H)
I've always wanted to do that to someone after the joy i experienced being a Palinbot.
Posted by: willow at October 20, 2011 04:37 PM (h+qn8)
Posted by: DrewM. at October 20, 2011 04:38 PM (WNzUA)
Posted by: steevy at October 20, 2011 04:38 PM (fyOgS)
Posted by: Fair Tax Forever at October 20, 2011 04:39 PM (dt9ss)
Debt is approaching 100% of GCP within days. Obama's annual deficit is equal to the entire net worth of the top 400 wealthiest Americans. Marxist are trying to take down our entire economy with the help of the media and the left.
Clearly Herman Cain's abortion views are more important that all these combined.
Posted by: Ms Choksondik at October 20, 2011 04:40 PM (fYOZx)
Posted by: steevy at October 20, 2011 08:38 PM (fyOgS)
I DON'T KNOW YOU!!!
Posted by: big baby douche at October 20, 2011 04:40 PM (ze29X)
Posted by: Mr. Book at October 20, 2011 04:40 PM (qe1yY)
It's amazing baby einstein the Jack of all Babies!
Posted by: willow at October 20, 2011 04:40 PM (h+qn8)
Posted by: steevy at October 20, 2011 04:40 PM (fyOgS)
Posted by: Jeff B. at October 20, 2011 08:36 PM (hIWe1)
That's what a text-book non apology looks like.
Posted by: ErikW at October 20, 2011 04:41 PM (JyUB5)
Posted by: macintx at October 20, 2011 04:41 PM (ucs8Y)
Don't complain to us. Complain to your candidate. He's the one making these gaffes. Are we supposed to ignore it when the current front runner says or does something newsworthy?
Posted by: DrewM. at October 20, 2011 04:41 PM (WNzUA)
Seriously? How could I be more sincere? I admitted that I misread his post, flatly acknowledged that it was my fault, my fuck-up, and then apologized for it. Unless you're being sarcastic or something I honestly don't know what you're talking about.
Posted by: Jeff B. at October 20, 2011 04:45 PM (hIWe1)
Sure, but not just yet. I'm still a pre-op trans-Romneybot. Let me get these Bain cybernetic enhancements surgically grafted into my scalp and THEN you can fire away.
I'm warning you, though -- they're going to turn me into liquid metal, so good luck hitting your target.
Posted by: Jeff B. at October 20, 2011 04:47 PM (hIWe1)
Mind you I am happily married for 25 years....
Romney is the date that would say anything I wanted to hear. He would sell his soul to tell me what I wanted to hear. It was up to me to welcome or refuse his intentions.
I relish the control of saying... without a doubt... NO WAY!
Hate me or love me that is Romney is the cheap date wanting something. A BIG something.
Posted by: macintx at October 20, 2011 08:41 PM (ucs8Y)
Yeah, and then once he got you to say yes, got you to third base, he'd suddenly realize that he forgot his 'protection'... and leave you hanging...
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 20, 2011 04:47 PM (NtXW4)
Posted by: Herb Cain at October 20, 2011 04:48 PM (EL+OC)
Posted by: steevy at October 20, 2011 04:50 PM (fyOgS)
Jes. We like Meester Mitch berry much.
I'm sorry. I couldn't resist.
Posted by: Mitt's lawn crew at October 20, 2011 04:50 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Jeff B. at October 20, 2011 08:28 PM
Most of the time, he calls it as I see it, too.
Perry did come off like a jerk when he was comparing dick size with Mutt Romney. And it is possible to be strongly against abortion without wanting the government to step in and make yet another decision for people. (you KJLopez-like vehement single-issue abortion-haters need not reply. I agree with you in principle, just not in enforcement.)
Also, I find it sad that Ace and his cob-loggers will take every opportunity to piss in Cain's cornflakes, even to the extent of using tortuous logic to interpret his words far differently than many others do. Maybe the guy makes goofs, but, goddamnit, he is out there, not burping pablum like Mutt Romney or bloviating -- mainly at debates, where he has gotten a pretty easy ride so far -- like The Newt.
I haven't heard a thing from Ace, Drew, Malor, etc., etc. that makes me change my mind: I'll vote for Perry, even if he is sometimes a stumbling half-wit, or I'll vote for Cain before I'll vote for Mutt Romney. I'll vote for any one of the three (or Bachmann) before I'll vote for Osama Obama.
And I admit it: I'll vote for Ron-fucking-Paul before I'll vote for the SCoaMF.
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 20, 2011 04:51 PM (YjjrR)
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at October 20, 2011 04:51 PM (bjRNS)
What is this supposed to mean, exactly?
Posted by: Jeff B., pre-op transromneybot at October 20, 2011 04:51 PM (hIWe1)
Oh damn. I knew I should have picked that one in the pool.
Posted by: Heorot at October 20, 2011 04:52 PM (lnhHH)
Posted by: When Elves Attack ePub at October 20, 2011 04:53 PM (OMloq)
Posted by: macintx at October 20, 2011 04:54 PM (ucs8Y)
Posted by: steevy at October 20, 2011 04:55 PM (fyOgS)
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 20, 2011 04:56 PM (niZvt)
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 20, 2011 05:02 PM (niZvt)
Posted by: macintx at October 20, 2011 05:08 PM (ucs8Y)
Posted by: Dick Nixon at October 20, 2011 05:08 PM (1fS1H)
Didn't I used to hear you calling in to Art Bell and going on about grassy knolls, chemtrails, HAARP and the Bilderbergers?
Jeebus crisco, man, save all that frantic spleen-venting for Osama Obama.
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 20, 2011 05:10 PM (YjjrR)
@98: "Cain's just a lousy candidate and he wound up helping Mitt there."
Whatever, fool. I'm not mad at ya, though. Haters got hate, just like a playa's gotta play. It's time to end this!
Posted by: Herman Pimpstick (Cain was my slave name) at October 20, 2011 05:13 PM (xy9wk)
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 20, 2011 05:18 PM (niZvt)
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 20, 2011 05:20 PM (niZvt)
Posted by: Three million previously uncounted Obama votes just waiting to be "found" at October 20, 2011 05:20 PM (xy9wk)
Posted by: Fair Tax Forever at October 20, 2011 05:21 PM (dt9ss)
Til he blows that fifteen plus million. He's in it til he gets beat.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at October 20, 2011 05:22 PM (1fS1H)
Took me time to read all the comments, but I really enjoyed the article. It proved to be Very helpful to me and I am sure to all the commenters here! ItÂ’s always nice when you can not only be informed, but also entertained!
Posted by: Steve Jobs epub at October 20, 2011 05:23 PM (OMloq)
Posted by: macintx at October 20, 2011 05:25 PM (ucs8Y)
@200: "Marxist are trying to take down our entire economy with the help of the media and the left."
Hey! Don't forget our not-insignificant contributions!
Posted by: The GOP at October 20, 2011 05:25 PM (xy9wk)
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 20, 2011 05:29 PM (niZvt)
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 20, 2011 05:38 PM (niZvt)
Posted by: Fair Tax Forever at October 20, 2011 05:50 PM (dt9ss)
Posted by: Death & Taxes ePub at October 20, 2011 05:58 PM (2CDMi)
Posted by: DJ Monghee at October 20, 2011 08:09 PM (3ySTf)
Well, *applied* math. But real mathematicians are really incapable of communicating. Especially with all you...normies.
Posted by: AmishDude at October 20, 2011 06:00 PM (73tyQ)
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 20, 2011 06:05 PM (niZvt)
Posted by: Unclefacts Out Of Commenting Retirement Just For This One Thing at October 20, 2011 06:06 PM (6IReR)
i'm prolife but i wouldn't care if some of these creeps were retroactively aborted...........
Posted by: phoenixgirl occupying my kitchen at October 20, 2011 08:06 PM (SH3gZ)
Funny how what I said is creepy and scary, but fetus-abortion, not so much.
Posted by: AmishDude at October 20, 2011 06:14 PM (73tyQ)
From Senate Run
"Herman Cain favors Federal Government intervention in the work place on the behalf of blacks and minorities."
"Cain opposes school vouchers for private schools and backs efforts only to 'revisit,' not eliminate, affirmative action."
"He declined to give his position on abortion rights. In the primaries, Cain's moderate social stances could pose problems."
Posted by: Bill at October 20, 2011 06:23 PM (EG212)
Here we are coming up on the most important presidential election of our lifetime and who do the Republicans throw into the melee?
Mitt Romney aka Ned Ryerson BING!
Rick Perry aka Herb Tarlek/Mayor Bates
Newt Gingrich aka Archie Bunker/Judge Smails
Michele Bachman aka Baily Quarters/Vera Gorman
Rick Santorum aka Frank Burns
Herman Cain aka Chef, Hello Children!
Huntsman and Johnson, aka Rosencrantz and Guildenstern.
and Ron Paul as his loveable self. Which, thanks to you seems a somewhat viable option and not half as crazy as he seemed before. So thank again Republicans for giving obama hope for re-election.
Posted by: you know at October 20, 2011 06:29 PM (yN6cl)
With that said, that answer is laughable.
Cainiacs,
*bites lip*
I feel your pain.
Cain is getting the racist drugplane treatment.
Posted by: Entropy at October 20, 2011 06:56 PM (MGZjj)
Romney has had three years to work out an economics plan since he hasn't been doing shit since 2008.
I'll have you know that I have worked out thousands of economics plans, and I'll work out hundreds more before the election.
Posted by: Mitt Romney at October 20, 2011 07:00 PM (MGZjj)
I keep telling you and I keep telling you: He will endorse Romney when Romney needs it most. Second, Cain is a DMZ minefield for the GOP--and we don't have a map. He's been how many hours on the radio, saying what ever pops into his head? And now, when the pressure is on, he had had more gaffs than is excusable. Just what do you think is hidden in all those hours of radio? Recipes from Aunt Em? Lost dog reports? Weather updates?
Run, run, run far away from Cain--it's cool that he says what he wants. So does your uncle Ron after a 6-pack of beer--an he sure as hell don't impress you then, does he?
Posted by: jimmuy at October 20, 2011 07:06 PM (hROVJ)
What is Romney's record with minority voters?
Dude cleans house with mormons.
Does that work for you?
Posted by: Entropy at October 20, 2011 07:08 PM (MGZjj)
Posted by: doug at October 20, 2011 07:11 PM (gUGI6)
Anyone of you backing Cain be willing to take the bet that Cain, after he fades, will endorse Romney well before the nomination is decided? That is, Cain will do everything he can when his book tour is over to throw the race to Romney.
jimmuy, if he does - and I am suspicious myself - they drop him like a hot potato.
As quick as I'd drop Perry if he started sucking Charlie Crist's dick.
And then, whomever you presumptivly support would want those people's votes, so getting pissy with them in advance doesn't help you much.
So if you think he'll do it, just wait for them to see it your way.
And if he doesn't, you were wrong anyway, at least you don't owe anyone an apology.
Posted by: Entropy at October 20, 2011 07:11 PM (MGZjj)
Posted by: Gonzo at October 20, 2011 07:16 PM (RPozk)
Posted by: BurtTC at October 20, 2011 07:23 PM (Gc/Qi)
Posted by: Gonzo at October 20, 2011 07:29 PM (RPozk)
Fact of the matter is I say we give undeniable hype to Cain right now, let the dude poll 60%.
Make that devious Mittens take a shot a him (he's good for some things!), and if Mr. Polished can't stop the Cain train, then we run the glorious crazy bastard.
If not, Perry will be there to catch the Anti-Romney support and we move forward with Operation Avoid Debates because a botched science experiment back in the 70's makes Rick Perry rip out of his clothes and transform into a retard when he debates.
But the good news is, Rick Santorum can still beat the SCOAMF, even if he nominates himself for his own VP because Jesus told him to.
And even if he does it in a racist drug plane.
Posted by: Entropy at October 20, 2011 07:30 PM (MGZjj)
Posted by: Tamora Pierce Mastiff ePub at October 20, 2011 07:31 PM (wkzne)
Posted by: BurtTC at October 20, 2011 07:34 PM (Gc/Qi)
Posted by: zoomwsu at October 20, 2011 07:39 PM (gStwB)
Posted by: cackfinger at October 20, 2011 07:40 PM (a9mQu)
Posted by: cackfinger at October 20, 2011 07:41 PM (a9mQu)
This bickering over who is more centrist on illegal immigration is not going to make a big dent, except for ... Cain's type of 'joke' about electrocuting people with obviously does cater to the paranoia of the hard left and the race hustlers a little bit.
So Perry's attack did very little damage outside the primary, and it's not like Perry wasn't pretty mild for the first month of his campaign as he was accused of making girls retarded and of being corrupt and of amnesty he's always opposed.
Anyway, I support Perry. He's far from perfect, but I agree with him 90% of the time and his record is great, and he's very good in interviews with hostile libs, so I think he'll be good in debates against Obama (better than he's been in the debates so far). I also think his record is the perfect answer to the inevitable Obama smear.
What is Obama going to do? Dismiss Perry's record because conservatives at other levels ALSO wanted a balanced budget? That's coat-tails for the GOP.
I don't think Cain wants to beat Romney. He's not even on some important primary ballots yet. He's hoping to split the vote with Perry in a few states, giving those to Romney, and not even try to win enough states to actually Beat Romney.
But Perry is much better than Romney for a conservative. He's led well enough to be reelected every time, just because of results. I don't want a cult of personality and I don't care that Perry is not full of pizzazz like Cain or Romney. I hope we rally behind the most conservative guy who can win.
Posted by: Dustin at October 20, 2011 08:03 PM (fF625)
Thanks, CoolCzech, for all the unwashed and unvarnished truths....and all the laughs. Fun and "testy" thread, DrewM. It's good to have deep, rolling belly laughs in such an absurd situation.
Nutty, loveable Uncle Herman who will never really say no to his wonderful neices and nephews. Just his friendly 9-9-9; simple, my darlings; don't expect me to explain it; I am eating apples and oranges; just look at my website. And soon I will be living with your other loveable Uncle Mitty.
Meanwhile, that mean, dastardly Papa Perry is the one who will say no to you. Drop him in his tracks -- with every big gun you've got.
It is rather poignant that the menacing Perry meme fits with people's unconscious knowledge that the party has come to an end. We have (over)spent all the societal savings from the generations back to at least our great-great-grandparents. There ain't nothin' left except knowledge and desire on the part of the majority. Only the meanie, no-sayer, Perry can help us capitalize on our limited (but significant -- we aren't Americans for nothing) assets. Tough love parenting; lean and mean everyday decisions; lots of no's; our only hope for the future. Waaaaaa....I just wanna have fun.
Posted by: pyromancer76 at October 20, 2011 08:27 PM (i0aYq)
This is the most essential point that Jeff B @155 understands: "I don't suppose it's occurred to anyone here that the reason Cain said he thought Perry came across as a hostile asshole in his exchange with Mitt Romney is because...he actually came across like a hostile asshole to anyone who isn't already so deep in the tank with their hatred of Romney? "
Jeff, If you want to tell someone to keep their lying shit to yourself (Romney's diarrhea on Perry's illegal immigrant problem exacerbated 1000% by the marxist Whitehouse), you sit him down in his own shit. Oh, he shits, too? That was a surprise to prissy Mitt. Someone has to take the (adult) responsibility to say "NO" and that is not easy. It doesn't go down easily for any of us. But Perry alone of the present can do it and he has a track record. Not perfectly, but he can do it. That is the candidate we need. We can have nostalgia for "hopeful" Reagan all we want, but this is a different ballgame. The savings, the resources, the jobs are gone; they are gone! Not only caused by purposefully destructive marxist Obama, but by all of us, especially big government Republicans, who participated in the "bubble" since the 1970s. We need to get used to pulling on those boot straps (that have a Texas accent) because that is where the hope lies.
Posted by: pyromancer76 at October 20, 2011 08:54 PM (i0aYq)
Posted by: Kathy from Kansas at October 20, 2011 09:00 PM (F0o5k)
"Vice President Cain has a nice ring to it."
I'm sure Senatror O'Donnel tickled your fancy too.
--
I don't see anything wrong with Cain's statements.
Fake outrage. Suck it.
Posted by: Cherry pi at October 20, 2011 07:31 PM (OhYCU)
No, it isn't "fake"outrage (and you suck it). A lot of us don't believe in leaving it up to the individual woman whether she can kill her kid or not. Many of us believe in using one of the few essential roles of government, the justice system, to STOP selfish women (and irresponsible men and principle-less greedy doctors, for that matter) from MURDERING children, in an evil sick act.
Posted by: Random at October 20, 2011 09:00 PM (YiE0S)
Posted by: K~Bob at October 20, 2011 10:09 PM (mbUoF)
Posted by: Doc at October 21, 2011 05:45 AM (Zrqw8)
Posted by: Nord at October 21, 2011 06:30 AM (2wLRr)
Posted by: Doc at October 21, 2011 09:45 AM (Zrqw
"
Perry's done a lot of interviews lately. He did a great one with Stephonapolis or however you spell it. And he did it without sounding, frankly, very stupid like Cain did.
Cain is better in the 15 second soundbite area. Perry is better, even than Romney, when it's time to get some substance out there.
Try google before you claim someone hasn't been doing interviews.
Posted by: Dustin at October 21, 2011 07:23 AM (fF625)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2014 seconds, 400 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Minutman (who used to be trainer) until Juggy is Gone at October 20, 2011 03:27 PM (DGxyd)