May 03, 2011

How We Got Bin Laden, Take 2
— DrewM

Looks like the White House would like the opportunity to revise and extend it's remarks on exactly how bin Laden met his fate.

The White House backed away Monday evening from key details in its narrative about the raid that killed Osama bin Laden, including claims by senior U.S. officials that the Al Qaeda leader had a weapon and may have fired it during a gun battle with U.S. forces.

Officials also retreated from claims that one of bin LadenÂ’s wives was killed in the raid and that bin Laden was using her as a human shield before she was shot by U.S. forces.

...However, during a background, off-camera briefing for television reporters later Monday, a senior White House official said bin Laden was not armed when he was killed, apparently by the U.S. raid team.

Another White House official familiar with the TV briefing confirmed the change to POLITICO, adding, “I’m not aware of him having a weapon.”

“The bottom line is the team that entered that room was met with resistance and took appropriate action,” said a third American official.

He, um, didn't have a weapon? That's an interesting little factoid, no?

The obvious and potentially wrong inference to be drawn from that is that capture was not really on the menu at any point. Maybe if he had his hands up or was lying face down on the floor when the SEALs burst in he could have been taken alive. Otherwise he got the same chance as he gave the people in the African embassies, on the USS Cole and 9/11. Let me say one thing up front...I am absolutely fine with that.

I noticed something in Sunday night's statement by Obama that caught my attention. I didn't post on it because it was kind of a small thing at the time but I did email it around to the co-bloggers. Here's Obama announcing OBL's death.

Today, at my direction, the United States launched a targeted operation against that compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan. A small team of Americans carried out the operation with extraordinary courage and capability. No Americans were harmed. They took care to avoid civilian casualties. After a firefight, they killed Osama bin Laden and took custody of his body.

"After a firefight, they killed Osama bin Laden". Not 'during' it, 'after'.

"Unarmed" and "after".

Again, this would be a good time to note I'm 100% fine with this. Capturing and trying him was simply impractical. He would have become a symbol for years to come. So far we've managed to try what 2 detainees (the guy in NY and the driver down at Gitmo)? Capturing bin Laden would simply have brought out every nut job liberal lawyer. We also likely would have seen spectacular attacks in an effort to free the guy. Not on the prison itself but imagine a Beslan style hostage taking where a group of jihadis hold schools full of kids hostages while demanding the release of the world's most famous terrorist.

Again, things could change as debriefings continue and information is released official or via leaks but I'll just note this wrap up from Victor Davis Hanson.

Some plaintiffs “preventively detained” for an “indeterminate” period at “al-Qaeda’s chief recruiting tool” in a lame-duck Guantanamo offered critical information about bin Laden’s otherwise not very important “pawns” and “couriers”; some even did so after being subject to superfluous and not very legal “enhanced interrogation techniques.” We then dispatched a questionable “assassination” team into a sovereign nation without its consent, executed bin Laden and various unnamed others,

If Bush had done this the calls for his impeachment would be deafening. Speaking of Bush...America would like to say thanks.

Whatever, I'm just glad it's done. As Jim Geraghty put it, an important message has been sent.

This is the moment to cheer, to scream, to pump your fist, to break into that old bottle of your favorite beverage youÂ’ve been saving for a special occasion. Because the world is different this morning. A key message has been beamed to every corner of the earth, sure to reach anyone who has ever committed terror against Americans, who seeks to do so again, or who is contemplating the act: No matter who you are, no matter how many followers you have, no matter how smart or careful you think you are, our guys can find you. ItÂ’s just a matter of time. If you kill our countrymen, they will look, and they will look, and they will look and they will never quit and we will never forget. You will die in prison at Gitmo or you will die quickly from a covert-ops teamÂ’s bullets. But one way or another, you will pay the price for harming our people.

Amen.

Posted by: DrewM at 09:23 AM | Comments (163)
Post contains 808 words, total size 5 kb.

1

Seal Team 6 Shot first!

/Maybe we can get George Lucas to add a blaster in the remake footage?

Posted by: Randy at May 03, 2011 09:27 AM (vI8R6)

2 I  will be sleeping with the night light on tonight!

Posted by: Moammar Kaddafy at May 03, 2011 09:28 AM (eMcW8)

3 Iiiiif you're happy and you know it stomp your feet...

Posted by: everybody sing along at May 03, 2011 09:29 AM (6zFxS)

4 I don't have a problem with this either. the Team was trained to ask him in Arabic to surrender. I'm thinking he responded something got to hell. The team also had a a time line which was limited. Taking down a non-cooperative individual would have blown that time line.  If they could have taken him out of there quickly, calmly and quietly they probably would have done it but Osama didn't comply and now he's dead.  Oh, well.

Posted by: Rocks at May 03, 2011 09:30 AM (Q1lie)

5 The obvious and potentially wrong inference to be drawn from that is that capture was not really on the menu at any point.

There were reports of that from "undisclosed leaks" yesterday. They never intended to take him alive. As I posted in the previous thread, with the current Supreme Court it is not advisable to take any terrorist prisoners.

Posted by: Vic at May 03, 2011 09:31 AM (M9Ie6)

6 Make them own it.  That's all I care about.  We should push for the truth to come out because we need them to embrace their inner assassins. 

Posted by: Y-not at May 03, 2011 09:31 AM (pW2o8)

7 In my fantasies they stood him up against the wall, made him say "Who's your daddy?" in arabic, and then gave him the double tap. But then I'm a heartless right-wing death monkey.

Posted by: joncelli at May 03, 2011 09:31 AM (RD7QR)

8 The real story was the tension in the Situation Room.  Pins and needles.  Heroes, the lot of them.

Posted by: Team Obama at May 03, 2011 09:32 AM (D+BRt)

9 No blood for oil!

Posted by: Good Times, Good Times at May 03, 2011 09:32 AM (uqJo6)

10 Lefties in heaven:

@Milbank: First day of Obama's second term goes smoothly. http://wapo.st/mznT2q


Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at May 03, 2011 09:32 AM (qdBf5)

11 Wasn't there a picture released of the brain trust at the White House (and Sheriff Joe) watching the live helmet mounted camera of the murder takedown?

Wouldn't they have been able to see if OBL had a gun, or if he fired it, hid behind a woman, etc?

Something's fishy here.  CONSPIRACY!!!11!11!

Posted by: Hedgehog at May 03, 2011 09:32 AM (Rn2kl)

12

I also noticed and did not mention the "after a firefight, they killed Osama...".

If anything, I thought it was clumsily worded, but it does sound relevant if they've already gone "full Tillman" on the story.

Posted by: Lincolntf at May 03, 2011 09:32 AM (xMT+4)

13 This is great news for the 2012 elections! After the leftists break their arms patting themselves on the back for OBL's demise, they won't be able to pull the lever or punch the card at the voting booth! Repub blowout!

Now all we need is Repub pols to start acting noticably different from the Democrats and we've got something!

Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at May 03, 2011 09:32 AM (2PTT7)

14 "WaPo poll shows 51% of Americans think GW Bush should get some credit for killing Bin Laden. His image may improve too."

In other news, 49% of Americans are morons. But we already knew it was roughly that number.

Posted by: JoeInMD at May 03, 2011 09:33 AM (PIahf)

15 Oh, and my previous comment was my way of saying "Yes indeed, I am just fine with this, but the lefties are definitely NOT okay with it, and there will be much wailing, gnashing of teeth, and rending of garments as the details came out." But I wanted to keep it short.

Posted by: joncelli at May 03, 2011 09:33 AM (RD7QR)

16 Well if they decided on not using bombs because they wanted to be able to confirm the kill, then yeah they weren't looking to take him alive.

(He wouldn't have had a weapon if they used bombs either)

Posted by: Tami at May 03, 2011 09:34 AM (VuLos)

17 Hey, that wasn't a gun in his pants, he was just glad to see them.

Posted by: Taliboom at May 03, 2011 09:35 AM (gppu7)

18 See, that hot Chinese news lady was right!

Posted by: Ted Kennedy's Gristle Encased Head at May 03, 2011 09:36 AM (+lsX1)

19 11 Lefties in heaven: @Milbank: First day of Obama's second term goes smoothly. http://wapo.st/mznT2q Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at May 03, 2011 01:32 PM (qdBf5) I'm going to e-mail this to Miss Dana on the morning after the GOP candidate wins.

Posted by: joncelli at May 03, 2011 09:36 AM (RD7QR)

20 Posted by: Lincolntf at May 03, 2011 01:32 PM (xMT+4)

The reason I noticed it is in the waiting period leading up to the announcement Wolf Blitzer kept saying how the WH would be working very carefully on every word in the statement and chose them for very specific reasons.

He was right, this was the defining moment of the Obama presidency, a moment that will be replayed for generations. It wasn't some, um, slapdash blog post. When I heard 'after' it was like...wooh, two in the back of the head?

Posted by: DrewM. at May 03, 2011 09:36 AM (WNzUA)

21 I personally don't are if Osama was unarmed when he got shot. The perfect scenario, for me, would be him on his knees begging for mercy and THEN getting shot. However, I would like a little consistency from the professional left on this matter. If OBL was unarmed, then this was an assassination (which, again, is fine by me), and the left had a thing or two to say about that tactic when GWB was President. Just be consistent and stand for SOMETHING, please!

Posted by: Joejm65 at May 03, 2011 09:36 AM (BDB5n)

22

"But one way or another, you will pay the price for harming our people."

We're still standing, bitches.

Posted by: Iranian Ayatollahs at May 03, 2011 09:37 AM (FUEui)

23 BTW, I keep seeing references to "double-tapping" OBL in media reports.  Do we think that's an accurate description or just the media trying to sound all Dirty Harry cool?  'Cause double-tap to me sounds a lot different than killed in a fire fight. 

Usual disclaimer: I don't care how OBL was offed, but I do care that Obama be held accountable for what he ordered the SEALs to do.  It sounds to me like capture was never an option.  If so, that needs to be clear. 

Posted by: Y-not at May 03, 2011 09:37 AM (pW2o8)

24

He, um, didn't have a weapon? That's an interesting little factoid, no?

Not to me. In the video of him actually shooting an AK-47 it was obvious he barely knew which end the bullet came out of. I think he used the weapon as a prop, to enhance his image, and had little other use for it, no skill with it, much less comfort handling it. Besides, he had had no need for it for years, if what I've read is close to correct.

Posted by: maddogg at May 03, 2011 09:38 AM (OlN4e)

25

If they had put 2 in the back of his head while he was kneeling, Sopranos-style, I would be fine with that.

Liberals can't get their heads around the indisputable fact that there are people in this world beyond any form of redemption, and they need killing. There are plenty of people in this country willing to do the killing, and the bleeders need to shut the fuck up and get out of their way.

Posted by: UGAdawg at May 03, 2011 09:38 AM (osx1V)

26 "After a firefight"

At any time during or immediately after a firefight, any enemy is fair game. You don't arrest Osama Bin Laden, you don't ask him to put his hands up and get face down on the ground, because you don't know if he's got a gun, or if he's wired to explode and take several soldiers with him. Furthermore, you DO NOT take that chance!

In modern war, a firefight in a building means everyone in that building gets eliminated, you don't take chances.

Posted by: Sgt. York at May 03, 2011 09:38 AM (LJBsr)

27 As I wrote earlier this morning over at my place, I'm glad the last thing that went through OBL's mind was American lead.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy at May 03, 2011 09:38 AM (d0Tfm)

28 This administration sucks.  Even when we get the guy who's been murdering innocent civilians for years, they still manage to fuck it up somehow.


Posted by: NC Ref at May 03, 2011 09:39 AM (/izg2)

29 In my fantasies they stood him up against the wall, made him say "Who's your daddy?" in arabic, and then gave him the double tap. But then I'm a heartless right-wing death monkey.

Posted by: joncelli at May 03, 2011 01:31 PM (RD7QR)

In my fantasies the shooter repeated what was said to Saddam: "President Bush sends his regards. (*blam*)"

Posted by: MiGeighteen at May 03, 2011 09:39 AM (FtEpW)

30

Can I admit something and ask if anyone else feels this way?

I feel an extreme amount of pride and fear over the killing of Bin Laden.

 

The pride because we've now shown that given enough time, there is no where on this earth, that is 197 million square miles, can you hide from America if we are determined.

The fear for the exact same reason.

Posted by: Ben at May 03, 2011 09:39 AM (wuv1c)

31 The Obama Admin. should have gotten all its facts straight before it went out and bragged about how they took-down OBL. More importantly, the multiple stories do a disservice to the SEALs because it feeds conspiracy theories. So they should have waited.

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at May 03, 2011 09:39 AM (qdBf5)

32 Hey Drew, I thought I tweeted to you about the "after" thing right after he said that?

Posted by: Michael K. at May 03, 2011 09:39 AM (H6VxR)

33 IF I had to guess, few if any shots were fired by Team Osama. The raid was over in 5 minutes. Who was there to stop it, two couriers, Osama's son and the Tall Doofus himself?

Posted by: Ranger Rick at May 03, 2011 09:40 AM (qr+c4)

34 I'm going with the Taiwanese version. No mention of the goat in the press, yet?

Posted by: cicerokid at May 03, 2011 09:40 AM (JTn+9)

35

Liberals can't get their heads around the indisputable fact that there are people in this world beyond any form of redemption, and they need killing.

If you limit that to conservative Republicans they are totally on board. 

Posted by: Beagle at May 03, 2011 09:40 AM (sOtz/)

36 No blood for oil!
Posted by: Good Times, Good Times at May 03, 2011 01:32 PM (uqJo6)

Violation of international law!

Secret death squads!

Illegal invasion!

Due process!

 

Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 03, 2011 09:40 AM (SY2Kh)

37

Speaking of Bush...America would like to say thanks.

WaPo poll shows 51% of Americans think GW Bush should get some credit for killing Bin Laden. His image may improve too.

Obviously, that twitterer is a dyslexic.  I'm sure that number is supposed to be 15%.  Imbecilic George W. Bush is a total screw up who was too busy mountain biking, clearing brush and going to bed early to focus on the rigors of being President. 

Thank God President Obama is finally able to make some headway despite all the heavy lifting he had to do first, in order just to clean up the huge mess left by Bush.  As a concern Christian, I feel really blessed to have such a smart, brave man with  amazing acumen and flawless judgment like President Obama to be in the White House.  Bush had 10 years, Obama had 2 years, and look who caught the worm!  Because of his amazing courage to get the hard work done, I will be pulling the lever for Obama.


Posted by: Concern Christian at May 03, 2011 09:41 AM (ihSHD)

38 Double bluffÂ…Look, you obviously don't know anything about intelligence work, lady. It's an XK Red 27 technique.

Posted by: Otto at May 03, 2011 09:42 AM (gQLr2)

39 @33 The Obama Admin. should have gotten all its facts straight before it went out and bragged about how they took-down OBL.

Yep. 

Posted by: Y-not at May 03, 2011 09:42 AM (pW2o8)

40

I think they fully intended to kill Osama. And that bothers me.

Because now that President Obama has authorized a mission into Pakistan without seeking Pakistani permission and authorized this assassination, I find my raging hatred for the man mellowing into smoldering, bitter distaste instead.

I'm getting to be an old softy these days.

Posted by: Dumb_Blonde at May 03, 2011 09:42 AM (C9JSP)

41 I will be pulling the lever for Obama.


Posted by: Concern Christian at May 03, 2011 01:41 PM (ihSHD)

They still have levers in your corrupt precinct?

Posted by: MiGeighteen at May 03, 2011 09:42 AM (FtEpW)

42 Seal Team 6? Cut Jib Newsletter.

Posted by: Han Solo at May 03, 2011 09:42 AM (qIHlG)

43 Any of y'all read this yet?

Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at May 03, 2011 09:42 AM (1rHeD)

44 Posted by: Michael K. at May 03, 2011 01:39 PM (H6VxR)

I may have. I tweet a lot. I'm shocked anyone follows me. I'd drive me nuts if I followed someone like me.

Posted by: DrewM. at May 03, 2011 09:43 AM (WNzUA)

45 I am glad bin Laden is dead. He was a skunk and a rascal and now resides with other criminals like Reagan, Nixon, and Hitler !!

Posted by: Mary Clogginstein from Brattleboro,VT at May 03, 2011 09:43 AM (48wze)

46 IF I had to guess, few if any shots were fired by Team Osama. The raid was over in 5 minutes. Who was there to stop it, two couriers, Osama's son and the Tall Doofus himself?

Posted by: Ranger Rick at May 03, 2011 01:40 PM (qr+c4)

According to reports it took awhile to get to the 3rd floor. When they first touched down they needed to make arraignments for the bad helicopter. They  probably moved slowly clearing each room on the way to the top where Osama was.

Posted by: Rocks at May 03, 2011 09:43 AM (Q1lie)

47 REDRUM for oil.

Posted by: Bob Saget at May 03, 2011 09:43 AM (F/4zf)

48

Heh, my liberal friends who didn't have one word to say about Osama's demise yesterday are all weighing in today; many with this same quote:

"I mourn the loss of thousands of precious lives, but I will not rejoice in the death of one, not even an enemy. Returning hate for hate multiplies hate, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness: only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that. ~Martin Luther King, Jr."

 

Here's my response:

 

You know, I see this more as a karma thing. You live by the sword, you die by the sword. Al Qaeda has killed thousands of Americans here and abroad as well as the mass murders of scores of people in The Philippines, Spain, several African... countries, Turkey, Indonesia, England, India, and numerous countries in the Middle East. Its members have tortured, raped and beheaded innocent civillians as well as assasinated government officials. It is a truly evil organziation committed to hate.

That being said, "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" (Edmund Burke) rings true. MLK also said "He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps perpetrate it."

Posted by: runningrn at May 03, 2011 09:44 AM (ihSHD)

49

Alternate theory...

Pakistan knew Bin Laden was there all along.  One of the Bali bombers was arrested in Abbotabad and he lead us to Bin Laden.  We went to the Pakistanis and said we are going to get him and will give you complete deniability if you don't f it up.

 

Posted by: AndrewsDad at May 03, 2011 09:44 AM (C2//T)

50 now that this tragedy has taken place on foreign soil.  i hope that international pressure will be brought to bear on the country of pakistan to allow the religious community of this country to build a synagogue and or church on the site of the event to celebrate the lives of the deceased, facilitate cultural understanding, and worship together.

Posted by: matt at May 03, 2011 09:44 AM (X69df)

51

I am glad bin Laden is dead. He was a skunk and a rascal and now resides with other criminals like Reagan, Nixon, and Hitler !!

 

Ha! Ha!  I just had a flashback to Sunday night when Geraldo called Osama "a bum".  LOL!

Posted by: runningrn at May 03, 2011 09:45 AM (ihSHD)

52 The Obama Admin. should have gotten all its facts straight before it went out and bragged about how they took-down OBL. More importantly, the multiple stories do a disservice to the SEALs because it feeds conspiracy theories. So they should have waited.

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at May 03, 2011 01:39 PM (qdBf5)

Jebus...they watched the whole thing occur!!  To get the statement wrong is some major incompetence...but we already knew that.

Posted by: Tami at May 03, 2011 09:45 AM (VuLos)

53 yep, taking him alive would have been one of the worst mistakes in human history, so I am glad we avoided that.

and I might note that the Taiwanese video might turn out to be close to reality.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at May 03, 2011 09:45 AM (IXLvN)

54 @42

I think they fully intended to kill Osama. And that bothers me.

Because now that President Obama has authorized a mission into Pakistan without seeking Pakistani permission and authorized this assassination,

It doesn't bother me because it was simply the completion of an act that was authorized properly under Bush.  So going into Pakistan or assassinating OBL is fine with me.  I just want Obama to own it. 

It does bother me that he's clearly trying to assassinate Qaddafi when he hasn't even gotten authorization from Congress to be in Libya in the first place.

Posted by: Y-not at May 03, 2011 09:46 AM (pW2o8)

55 Posted by: Sgt. York at May 03, 2011 01:38 PM (LJBsr)

Exactly but Brennan said yesterday he was given a chance to surrender but didn't.

It's not law enforcement but sounds like the administration is trying to have it both ways.

They should just man up and say, "Yeah we went there to kill the motherfucker and we did. You're welcome.".

Posted by: DrewM. at May 03, 2011 09:46 AM (WNzUA)

56

Any of y'all read this yet?

Yup, already dismissed it, too.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy at May 03, 2011 09:46 AM (d0Tfm)

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at May 03, 2011 09:46 AM (qdBf5)

58 I'd drive me nuts if I followed someone like me.

Posted by: DrewM. at May 03, 2011 01:43 PM (WNzUA)

You're nothing....Tammy Bruce is a maniac tweeter.  I unfollowed her today.

Posted by: Tami at May 03, 2011 09:47 AM (VuLos)

59 Which one of you morons is socking Mrs John Hinckley Mary Clogginstein?

Posted by: Captain Hate at May 03, 2011 09:47 AM (vEVry)

60 In the script I wrote, as Osama is cornered, the helmet cam broadcasts his monologue directly to the war room. He brags about killing thousands of bastard American infidels and then laughs condescendingly at our impotent justice system. As he holds his hands out for the restraints, the grizzled, war weary SEAL utters a wry comment and puts him down. As the gathered bleeding hearts in the war room recoil in horror, the hero turns the camera on himself and says something awesome and then lights a cigar.

Posted by: Ted Kennedy's Gristle Encased Head at May 03, 2011 09:47 AM (+lsX1)

61 Osama shot himself when the raid began, but that's a shitty ending - he practically "wins" by going out on his own terms like that. So this cock and bull story was concocted about special forces delivering the fatal shot, and Osama's body was conveniently dumped so that nobody can determine that the cause of death was a self-inflicted wound from a small caliber (though I don't doubt his body took a few post-mortem rounds of 5.56 just for fun).

Posted by: 3.14159 at May 03, 2011 09:48 AM (tTlIu)

62

Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at May 03, 2011 01:42 PM (1rHeD)

 

I wouldn't be surprised if that's the case.  I kind of wonder about Panetta too.  He was the guy that had to watch Osama get off scott free as his boss, BJ Clintoon dithered and blew.  Panetta must have felt like deja vu all over again, and maybe decided he didn't want to have to live with that again.

Posted by: runningrn at May 03, 2011 09:49 AM (ihSHD)

63 My respect for Bush grows every day. We all know he wasn't perfect and some of his domestic decisions pissed me off but he took withering and undeserved abuse for years about his policies in Iraq and Afghanistan and in the larger war on terror and specifically on enhanced interrogation techniques and never lowered himself to respond to his most unhinged critics. The actions he took set up the opportunity Obama had to take bin Laden out and he made a very classy statement congratulating Obama and the troops. He will always have my respect for how he handled this issue. While Obama does deserve some credit for authorizing the SEAL response he doesn't receive nearly the tongue bathing he is getting. What was he going to do, a massive bombing campaign on a purported allies territory without approval? Yeah, right. Even if he did how did get approval how did that work out for Clinton? Even if this had gone badly how much criticism would he really have taken for launching a campaign to take out bin Laden. I'm glad the SEALs did what they did and they get most of my respect and thanks but Bush takes second place. Obama is somewhere down the list.

Posted by: JackStraw at May 03, 2011 09:49 AM (TMB3S)

64 Posted by: runningrn at May 03, 2011 01:44 PM (ihSHD)

That MLK quote is bogus.

http://tinyurl.com/3wb43ar

Posted by: Tami at May 03, 2011 09:49 AM (VuLos)

65 The Euroweenies/UN are already questioning the legality of the raid.

Posted by: Chariman LMAO at May 03, 2011 09:50 AM (yJyNa)

66

They still have levers in your corrupt precinct?

 

I have a um, personal private lever...

Posted by: Concern Christian at May 03, 2011 09:51 AM (ihSHD)

67 The Euroweenies/UN are already questioning the legality of the raid. Posted by: Chariman LMAO at May 03, 2011 01:50 PM (yJyNa) I'm sure. Hey how are Gaddafi's grandkids doing?

Posted by: nevergiveup at May 03, 2011 09:51 AM (i6RpT)

68 Ace, are you shelving the "Telegraph, Citing Wikileaks: ..." (http://ace.mu.nu/archives/315642.php) post?

Posted by: JoeInMD at May 03, 2011 09:51 AM (PIahf)

69 #57 You always have a chance to offer to surrender. Trouble is, the other side is under no requirement to accept the offer. It takes two to get the job done.

Posted by: Oldcat at May 03, 2011 09:51 AM (z1N6a)

70 Excuse me, UBL was feeble and on dialysis, he didn't need to "surrender" to be captured. You think the SEALS couldn't have managed to capture him if those were their orders? That's insane. This was all a farce. They can't even get their storyline straight.

Posted by: kathleen at May 03, 2011 09:52 AM (K4ia2)

71

It doesn't bother me because it was simply the completion of an act that was authorized properly under Bush.  So going into Pakistan or assassinating OBL is fine with me.  I just want Obama to own it. 

Honestly the only thing that bothers me about this is that I've had to ratchet down my hatred for Obama (just by a teeny tiny bit). I'd love to be able to find fault with him but ultimately this was his decision and I can't find anything wrong in what's he decided.

Posted by: Dumb_Blonde at May 03, 2011 09:53 AM (C9JSP)

72 It does bother me that he's clearly trying to assassinate Qaddafi when he hasn't even gotten authorization from Congress to be in Libya in the first place.

Posted by: Y-not at May 03, 2011 01:46 PM (pW2o

Bothers me too.

Posted by: Moammar Khaddafi at May 03, 2011 09:53 AM (QKKT0)

73 Obama is somewhere down the list.

I think he's just behind me.

Posted by: Pvt Smith's dog walker at May 03, 2011 09:53 AM (tf9Ne)

74 Joe, there's a new post up about it.

Posted by: Tami at May 03, 2011 09:53 AM (VuLos)

75

That MLK quote is bogus.

 

Heh!  I saw it as on several FB accounts today!  heh! 

 

I cross referenced the ones I put up against several sources, so I hope they are right!


Posted by: Concern Christian at May 03, 2011 09:54 AM (ihSHD)

76 Posted by: Dumb_Blonde at May 03, 2011 01:53 PM (C9JSP)

A blind squirrel finds the occasional nut.  

Posted by: Oldcat at May 03, 2011 09:54 AM (z1N6a)

77 Ooops!  Sock!

Posted by: runningrn at May 03, 2011 09:55 AM (ihSHD)

78

Exactly but Brennan said yesterday he was given a chance to surrender but didn't.

It's not law enforcement but sounds like the administration is trying to have it both ways.

They should just man up and say, "Yeah we went there to kill the motherfucker and we did. You're welcome.".

Yeah, it does seem that they're having trouble getting the narrative straight.

I'm not fully convinced that killing him if/when we had the opportunity to capture, detain, and interrogate him. 

I'm totally cool with just shooting the SOB on sight, but it might have been more humiliating to AQ to see their brave leader captured without putting up a fight, no longer able to credibly claim martyrdom.  I'm not sure either way; water under the bridge now.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 03, 2011 09:55 AM (SY2Kh)

79 Frankly, I don't care how he died. I do wish that the Obama White House wasn't using this as a political tool but I expect no less.

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at May 03, 2011 09:55 AM (qdBf5)

80

I cross referenced the ones I put up against several sources, so I hope they are right!


Posted by: Concern Christian at May 03, 2011 01:54 PM (ihSHD)

Well, it's bogus in a mashed up sort of way.  The first person to quote it on FB put her own thoughts in the first sentence but it was passed around as all his words.

Posted by: Tami at May 03, 2011 09:56 AM (VuLos)

81 Posted by: Downscaled Upscale at May 03, 2011 01:54 PM (IhHdM)

OBL is not an individual. He's the leader of the terrorist forces we declared hostilities against in 1991. Its of no more moral import than the Iraqi officers we popped in Gulf War I and II during the war.

Posted by: Oldcat at May 03, 2011 09:57 AM (z1N6a)

82 "But one way or another, you will pay the price for harming our people."

Hezbollah -- 241 + 92,  USA -- 0

Posted by: Jean at May 03, 2011 09:57 AM (WkuV6)

83 Tami, yeah, now there is.

Posted by: JoeInMD at May 03, 2011 09:57 AM (PIahf)

84 I wonder if he was standing next to his bed with the IV bag hanging next to him, probably why they dont want to release any pics as we probably did him a favor.  Oh well, RIH you SOB

Posted by: Red Shirt at May 03, 2011 09:58 AM (FIDMq)

85

The Euroweenies/UN are already questioning the legality of the raid.

Without a doubt, they would've put OBL in jail and then had the mother of all show trials for at least a decade while they let their precious little "international law" work its magic. In a way, we saved the world, and ourselves, a small fortune, 'cause you just know we'd wind up paying for it.

Not to mention the increased probability of terror attacks that we'd be under. How anyone can deny that we did the right thing escapes me, "law" or no. It's a sad testament to the current state of morals in the rest of the world where multiculturalism and postmodernism are the norm, and there's no such thing as right or wrong and all cultures are just wonderful.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy at May 03, 2011 09:59 AM (d0Tfm)

86 I dunno... I uncorked a bottle of champagne and toasted his death, as well the men and women that brought him to justice, and those that didn't live to see justice done, as soon as the talking heads confirmed the news.

But if we went there, with no intention to take him prisoner... that rubs me the wrong way. It's different than the shoot out we were all expecting in a cave. He was in a suburb, maybe unarmed. I understand it would be inconvenient to take him prisoner. But I think it would be better to deal with that inconvenience, than the questions that are now popping up.

Don't take this the wrong way, but something is out of sorts here... as I look at how this is all coming together, it seems like there is some bit of Jessica Lynch mythology/Pat Tillman coverup brewing about the circumstances of his death, and how we were led to his hide out.

I salute the President for taking this bold action, and I salute the brave men that executed it... but I feel like there is something else going on here.

And for the love of God... don't we have any Helicopters that fucking work? Good Grief...

Posted by: Jim T at May 03, 2011 09:59 AM (l+flC)

87 My hezbo count could be off:

US Embassy 1st time -- 63*
Marine Barracks     -- 241
AU President -- 1
Will Buckely -- 1
Col Higgins -- 1
US Embassy 2nd time -- 23*
TWA/Stetham - 1
Q8air - AID guys - 2

* not all Americans
==============

More then enough reasons to kill Assad's whole family

Posted by: Jean at May 03, 2011 10:00 AM (WkuV6)

88 Excuse me, UBL was feeble and on dialysis, he didn't need to "surrender" to be captured. You think the SEALS couldn't have managed to capture him if those were their orders? That's insane.
This was all a farce. They can't even get their storyline straight.

Posted by: kathleen at May 03, 2011 01:52 PM (K4ia2)


Where has it been suggested he was feeble?

Posted by: Rocks at May 03, 2011 10:01 AM (Q1lie)

89 Capturing bin Laden would simply have brought out every nut job liberal lawyer.

Is this a bad thing?

We could have them all consult for him.  In one place.  At a nuclear testing site.

Just throwing out ideas.

Posted by: AmishDude at May 03, 2011 10:01 AM (T0NGe)

90 There is no way that the assault team could not have assumed OBL would not have had some kind of suicide device handy.  Shoot to stop.

Posted by: Jean at May 03, 2011 10:01 AM (WkuV6)

91 So we just did a no-knock raid in Pakistan then? Complete with the bullshit press releases uttered by the local flacks and police agencies?

Posted by: Blue Hen at May 03, 2011 10:02 AM (326rv)

92 Posted by: BackwardsBoy at May 03, 2011 01:59 PM (d0Tfm)

Its just reflexive anti Americanism. The funny part is if we'd locked him up in a base of ours on their soil they'd be crapping bricks.

I'll care what they think when they have some ability to act on it.

Posted by: Oldcat at May 03, 2011 10:02 AM (z1N6a)

93 Posted by: AmishDude at May 03, 2011 02:01 PM (T0NGe)

I don't like to jump to conclusions but after reading your comments for a number of years, I'm getting the impression you don't like lawyers.

Posted by: DrewM. at May 03, 2011 10:03 AM (WNzUA)

94

The Euroweenies/UN are already questioning the legality of the raid.

 

Oui! Zuch theengs arrr earesponsabeeel.

Posted by: Mirage pilot bombing the crap out of Libya at May 03, 2011 10:04 AM (Gzv/o)

95 So the Obama admin is playing out the "murder mystery" of Osama just like you do in the game of Clue?

1.Guess at how it went down
2.Check the polling data
3.Poling data is bad = wrong answer
4.Guess a different way it went down
5.Repeat until they finally win the game

Posted by: Buzzsaw at May 03, 2011 10:04 AM (tf9Ne)

96 And for the love of God... don't we have any Helicopters that fucking work? Good Grief...

Posted by: Jim T at May 03, 2011 01:59 PM (l+flC)

I doubt you'd find many compounds that a chopper can fit into without issues. In the Son-Tay raid the plan was to expend the choppers to get the troops in. This may have been the plan, or it may just have clipped something and been expended.

Choppers are fragile little things. Use em and buy another. As long as the job gets done.

Posted by: Oldcat at May 03, 2011 10:05 AM (z1N6a)

97 Posted by: Jean at May 03, 2011 02:01 PM (WkuV6)

And if we had dropped a bunch of JDAMs on his ass no one but the most hardcore lefty/libertarian types would have said squat.

The problem is simply Brennan tried to put a spin on things yesterday that was totally unnecessary.

Posted by: DrewM. at May 03, 2011 10:08 AM (WNzUA)

98 Also... I can't help but feel infuriated that this dude has been living under our nose for 6 years in this house...probably being hidden by the Pakistani government.. don't we have spies and CIA operatives all over that country. It feels like a massive failure of intelligence on our part.

I mean, on the one hand you have this amazing story of them following a trail to find him for 8 or 9 years... on the other hand the dude has been sunbathing on a roof top, while drones have been flying over for 6 years... it's almost sort of infuriating.

I think Mike Hendrix of Coldfury made a comment like 9 years ago (at least I think it was him) that Osama was hiding out behind a 7/11 in Dearborn... not that far of compared to where we all thought he'd be...

Posted by: Jim T at May 03, 2011 10:08 AM (l+flC)

99 77

That MLK quote is bogus.

 

Heh!  I saw it as on several FB accounts today!  heh! 

LOL, my Liberal wife posted that "MLK" quote on her Facebook page, too.  She doesn't want anyone to think she's happy that bin Laden is dead.

She admitted that she instead wanted bin Laden tortured and drowned in pig blood, though... Strange woman.

Posted by: Pyrocles at May 03, 2011 10:09 AM (cv5Iw)

100 That sidebar post by Ben linking a white house insider who says Obama/Jarret were overruled by Panetta, Clinton, Gates and Daly is interesting. Uses the term "temporary coup".

This seems rather plausible.  Since Bill Clinton received copious criticism in having bin Laden in his sites back in 1998 and failed to act, perhaps Mrs Bill had an overwhelming desire to vindicate her cheatin' man (but he's my man, dammit!).

And I have extreme trouble understanding how Obama could have taken the stands he did re: rendition/civilian trials/muslim outreach/ military baby killers and then turn around and order this.  Its just so Orwellian. 
But if Hillary did it...............


Posted by: Derak at May 03, 2011 10:09 AM (CjpKH)

101 http://tinyurl.com/3gfhedc "Last night, however, a well-placed source with strong links to Pakistan's security establishment put to me an alternative analysis. He said that bin Laden had been lured away from his mountain hideout with a promise of total security – only to be betrayed. This is a very different kind of story, because it suggests that the ISI and the Pakistani army may have played a significant part in the operation which brought about bin Laden's death." From the today's Daily Telegraph, story entitled "Whose side was Pakistan on in this shootout?"

Posted by: kathleen at May 03, 2011 10:09 AM (K4ia2)

102 52 now that this tragedy has taken place on foreign soil.  i hope that international pressure will be brought to bear on the country of pakistan to allow the religious community of this country to build a synagogue and or church on the site of the event to celebrate the lives of the deceased, facilitate cultural understanding, and worship together.

Matt,  that is just too perfect.  Let's start a website to promote your idea and solicit for donations.  Let's have contest for the name of this "community center." 

Posted by: lan sing at May 03, 2011 10:10 AM (YHrQZ)

103 Abbotabad, abbotabing, abbotaboom!

Posted by: cicerokid at May 03, 2011 10:10 AM (JTn+9)

104 Posted by: Jim T at May 03, 2011 02:08 PM (l+flC)

No we don't have a lot of on the ground intelligence in the Muslim World, for a number of reasons. And when we get some, the Democrats leak it if a Republican is in power.

And if you thought Pakistan was anything more than a marriage of convenience, well, think again. Its no shocker to me.

Posted by: Oldcat at May 03, 2011 10:10 AM (z1N6a)

105 The Admin. should have just (1) released whatever information they could in the most factual way possible and (2) thanked the military and intelligence community for making it happen.

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at May 03, 2011 10:13 AM (qdBf5)

106 I'm still hoping that they did capture him, and are working him over for information. The "dead and buried at sea" story could allow for this while (hopefully) preventing some of the problems that might occur if we acknowledged that he was a prisoner.

Posted by: oooOOOooo at May 03, 2011 10:13 AM (UU52+)

107 now that this tragedy has taken place on foreign soil.  i hope that international pressure will be brought to bear on the country of pakistan to allow the religious community of this country to build a synagogue and or church on the site of the event to celebrate the lives of the deceased, facilitate cultural understanding, and worship together.

Matt,  that is just too perfect.  Let's start a website to promote your idea and solicit for donations.  Let's have contest for the name of this "community center." 

Posted by: lan sing

 

We can donate the landing gear of the helicopter. It can match the landing gear that wound up at the erstwhile mosque site in NYC.

Posted by: Mirage pilot bombing the crap out of Libya at May 03, 2011 10:13 AM (326rv)

108 In my version of perfection a SEAL kicks open the door, sees osama and says "fuck you dude" and then empties an entire mag into the scumbag. I myself wanted nothing less than for him to be killed with all the hatred of the universe channeled into one long muzzle blast.

Posted by: Berserker at May 03, 2011 10:13 AM (FMbng)

109 From the today's Daily Telegraph, story entitled "Whose side was Pakistan on in this shootout?"

Posted by: kathleen at May 03, 2011 02:09 PM (K4ia2)

Its a millennial old tradition for countries to keep their hands on refugees and political types for possible use against a country, or to sell them out if the price is right. Think of France keeping the refugee "Pretender" kings of England for all those years.

I'm not sure the Pakis actually closed the sale on OBL in this case, but it could have been that way. Or maybe Obama just went around them and got him.

Posted by: Oldcat at May 03, 2011 10:14 AM (z1N6a)

110

She admitted that she instead wanted bin Laden tortured and drowned in pig blood, though... Strange woman.

Posted by: Pyrocles

Uh......is she a good cook?

Posted by: Blue Hen at May 03, 2011 10:15 AM (326rv)

111
And if you thought Pakistan was anything more than a marriage of convenience, well, think again. Its no shocker to me.

Posted by: Oldcat at May 03, 2011 02:10 PM (z1N6a)

I know it's a marriage of convenience, which is why I figured we'd be watching things more carefully. It doesn't really surprise me at all that they've been hiding him all this time. It does piss me off though, since foreign aid money was probably helping to keep his dialysis machine humming.

Posted by: Jim T at May 03, 2011 10:15 AM (l+flC)

112 Posted by: Jim T at May 03, 2011 02:15 PM (l+flC)

Another thing to consider is that saying "Pakistani Government" like it is a monolith is probably inaccurate. Part of the Government could have been shielding him while another part was less inclined that way.

Posted by: Oldcat at May 03, 2011 10:17 AM (z1N6a)

113 I would like to note that when a Republican administration comes into office that fuckers like Obama and Holder would be complaining about Osama's mistreatment. Waterboarding  - bad. Leadboarding - good.   

Posted by: Minuteman at May 03, 2011 10:17 AM (gqqCJ)

114 It has been said Osama was shot in the head, then in the chest to assure he was dead. However, if the pictures of his head injuries are so bad why did they shoot in in the chest to assure he was dead? Obama is not releasing the photos because they will show Osama was shot in the head execution style, which is great. However Obama does not want the world to know he ordered a kill mission.

Posted by: Uqbal at May 03, 2011 10:18 AM (4emjH)

115

I've got  a little list, said somebody in the Mikado.

Question:  Suppose the Pakis knew where OBL was, and that they were actively hiding him.

The ISI knows, from practical experience, how good out intel gathering and analysis is.  Did they think we'd never, as in never-ever, find him?

Did they think, having found him, we'd leave him alone?

Did they think that, having decided to get him, we'd think the Pakis had him too well protected?

Did they think, if we tried, that they could defeat US?

After our mutual experiences with our friends in the Paki military and intelligence, it's odd to think they might have come to those conclusions.

More rational to think they didn't know. Which, of course, is flatly impossible.

So, what went on????

Posted by: Richard Aubrey at May 03, 2011 10:19 AM (wxHHM)

116 40 Double bluffÂ…Look, you obviously don't know anything about intelligence work, lady. It's an XK Red 27 technique.

Posted by: Otto at May 03, 2011 01:42 PM (gQLr2)

Shouldn't the sock have been Mr. Fred Manfrenjensendon.

Posted by: Hedgehog at May 03, 2011 10:19 AM (Rn2kl)

117 Carney is now saying that OBL's wife rushed the SEALs. She was shot but only wounded.

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at May 03, 2011 10:20 AM (qdBf5)

118

Choppers are fragile little things. Use em and buy another. As long as the job gets done.

Posted by: Oldcat at May 03, 2011 02:05 PM (z1N6a)

Wired Magazine's Danger Room has a satellite photo of the compound with the helicopter parked inside of it here.

Also there, Spencer Ackerman furiously tries to minimize the importance of the "enhanced interrogation techniques" used to identify Osama's courier.

Posted by: Ed Anger at May 03, 2011 10:21 AM (7+pP9)

119 Another thing to consider is that saying "Pakistani Government" like it is a monolith is probably inaccurate. Part of the Government could have been shielding him while another part was less inclined that way.

Posted by: Oldcat at May 03, 2011 02:17 PM (z1N6a)


That is an excellent point, i keep thinking it's like a western type government...it's most definitely not.

Posted by: Jim T at May 03, 2011 10:21 AM (l+flC)

120 Obama is not releasing the photos because they will show Osama was shot in the head execution style, which is great. However Obama does not want the world to know he ordered a kill mission.

Posted by: Uqbal at May 03, 2011 02:18 PM (4emjH)

This is my hypothesis also, how long did it take to release the images of Saddam's sons? I think he was probably executed.

Posted by: Jim T at May 03, 2011 10:22 AM (l+flC)

121 Posted by: Richard Aubrey at May 03, 2011 02:19 PM (wxHHM)

I'd guess a combination of 1 and 3.  It would be hard to find him, and hard to be sure you got him. And if they got wind we were planning a mission, they could move him and start the ball over again.

And if we did get him, what have they really lost? Not much.

Posted by: Oldcat at May 03, 2011 10:23 AM (z1N6a)

122 With the seeming evolution from Obama to Brennan to Carney, the White House has really manged to step on its own dick with it's narrative.


Posted by: DrewM. at May 03, 2011 10:24 AM (WNzUA)

123 Backing away! hell the WH is running. Carney just stated that the decision to kill was made on the operation and not by the WH. Plausible denial. CYA. Will the WH throw the Navy Seal under the buss if things get too hot? Think about it. Yesterday Obama in his speech it was I, me, mine and moses. Today the questions are getting a little pointed (surprise that the MSM is questioning the one), and the stories are a changing. Hum.  

Posted by: Buffalobob at May 03, 2011 10:24 AM (QPgXF)

124 With the seeming evolution from Obama to Brennan to Carney, the White House has really manged to step on its own dick with it's narrative.


Posted by: DrewM. at May 03, 2011 02:24 PM (WNzUA)

Hardly a shocker.

Posted by: Oldcat at May 03, 2011 10:25 AM (z1N6a)

125 With the seeming evolution from Obama to Brennan to Carney, the White House has really manged to step on its own dick with it's narrative.

Posted by: DrewM. at May 03, 2011 02:24 PM (WNzUA)

Seriously!

CARNEY: 'Resistance does not require a firearm'...

What did he have a sword cane? Sharks with laser beams attached the their heads? Did he give the SEALs a stern look, or try to use a vulcan death grip?

These guys all watched the live feed... how could they mess this up so badly?

Posted by: Jim T at May 03, 2011 10:28 AM (l+flC)

126 120 Carney is now saying that OBL's wife rushed the SEALs. She was shot but only wounded.
Yes - that, as opposed to her being used as a shield.   Earlier I think it was Jennifer Griffin who reported that there were no armed guards at the compound. Which leads to the question of who, exactly, they were having a firefight with.

Posted by: Optimizer at May 03, 2011 10:28 AM (F56VB)

127

These guys all watched the live feed... how could they mess this up so badly?

Posted by: Jim T at May 03, 2011 02:28 PM (l+flC)

Because the proper response, that this fucker's hide was paid for 10 years ago, is alien to their nature. They can't just laugh and say "So frickin what?"

Posted by: Oldcat at May 03, 2011 10:29 AM (z1N6a)

128

129 ...The MSM is daring to question a Nobel Piece Price winner who started a war in Lybia and quite possibly ordered the assassination of a terrorist leader?...

Priceless. 

Posted by: Optimizer at May 03, 2011 10:30 AM (F56VB)

129 "Another thing to consider is that saying "Pakistani Government" like it is a monolith is probably inaccurate. " Of course it's not a monolith. But nor is it a thoroughly divided government, with one half terrorists and the other half pure as the driven snow. It is a thoroughly compromised government that has made a deal with the devil. And it seems more and more clear that in our dealings with Pakistan, we've shaken hands with the same devil.

Posted by: kathleen at May 03, 2011 10:31 AM (K4ia2)

130 and if you think we didn't know where OBL the past few years, I've got a bridge to sell you.

Posted by: kathleen at May 03, 2011 10:32 AM (K4ia2)

131 Shoot Him the Head!  Then again, then in the chest!

Don't tell anybody I said that tho.

Posted by: Prez Nobel Peacenik at May 03, 2011 10:32 AM (IXLvN)

132 "Earlier I think it was Jennifer Griffin who reported that there were no armed guards at the compound. Which leads to the question of who, exactly, they were having a firefight with." A narrative never gets this f***ed up unless it's a coverup

Posted by: kathleen at May 03, 2011 10:33 AM (K4ia2)

133

Where are the photos? These guys can't pull of a decent circle jerk, and zerO wants us to believe he was closely involved? Bullshit, he was dragged kicking and screaming is my guess.

Posted by: maddogg at May 03, 2011 10:33 AM (OlN4e)

134 So, will Holder bring SEAL team 6 up on manslaughter charges now? Don't think that is too far fetched for this group grope.

Posted by: maddogg at May 03, 2011 10:37 AM (OlN4e)

135

Where are the photos? These guys can't pull of a decent circle jerk, and zerO wants us to believe he was closely involved? Bullshit, he was dragged kicking and screaming is my guess.

Posted by: maddogg at May 03, 2011 02:33 PM (OlN4e)

This is a case where Obama's laziness works in our favor. Unlike Carter, who was involved in every step to screw things up, Barry had golf games to go to, so he let the guys on the ground work uninterrupted.

Posted by: Oldcat at May 03, 2011 10:37 AM (z1N6a)

136

and if you think we didn't know where OBL the past few years, I've got a bridge to sell you.

It took that long for the conspiracy theory crazy to rear it's head?

What happened to the Internet I thought I knew?

Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 03, 2011 10:42 AM (SY2Kh)

137

Yeah, of course they were sent there to kill the guy.  I mean, come on, this whole story about OBL resisting them - what, did he throw a shoe at them, fidget a bit ("Hey, Osama, is that a gun in your gown or were you in the middle of something with that young wife of yours?") Hard to believe these SEAL's, one of the toughest special ops teams in the world, couldn't have restrained this old guy and taken him, if those were their orders. I think Obama wanted him taken out. That way he wouldn't have to worry about any trials, or public opinion, or where to house him, and all those annoying questions from the media and the public. (Because, nobody asks Hu Jintao any questions...)

(This is no criticism the SEAL's...I'm a Navy brat! They did what they were trained to do.)

Posted by: sydney jane at May 03, 2011 10:49 AM (gNJg7)

138 130 120 Yes - that, as opposed to her being used as a shield.   Earlier I think it was Jennifer Griffin who reported that there were no armed guards at the compound. Which leads to the question of who, exactly, they were having a firefight with.

I wonder if any of the Pakistani officials in the area responded.

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at May 03, 2011 10:49 AM (qdBf5)

139 Obama may have committed an impeachable offense, but took the chance anyway. If that's the case I'll give him:

He has committed numerous impeachable offenses but capping OBL is not one of them. The prohibition against assassination only applies to heads of State, not terrorists.

Besides that, it is a Presidential finding only. He can countermand that.

Also, it was reported yesterday that there was never any intent in capturing him. It was always intended to be a kill mission.

Posted by: Vic at May 03, 2011 10:50 AM (M9Ie6)

140 I wonder if any of the Pakistani officials in the area responded.

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at May 03, 2011 02:49 PM (qdBf5)

Only if they were really stupid Pakistani officials.

Posted by: Oldcat at May 03, 2011 10:51 AM (z1N6a)

141 Panetta says President Obama Couldn't See Bin Laden's Death, but Received 'Geronimo' Signal . Why Obama?? Because you don't want to see one of your Muslim Brothers Fragged You piece of Pig Shit?????????????

Posted by: Billy Berue' at May 03, 2011 10:55 AM (48wze)

142 So it sounds to me like the XO only applies to heads of State.

Posted by: Vic at May 03, 2011 11:03 AM (M9Ie6)

143 I think the WH was ok with saying "hey, he reached for his AK, and we plugged him."  The early Daily Beast (I think) story mentioning OBL got a double-tap to the head made me doubt this whole "he was caught in a firefight" business.

So now the admin, having laid some groundwork about him being given the chance to surrender, feels (for some reason I don't understand) like it might have to release a photo of the body. I think they are concerned they might also need to release the video (or have decided that the video is beneficial for some reason) and have to start comporting earlier statements to reality.  Which makes them look a little silly.

I am sure they IDed him visually, by voice (from the video and any listening devices/techniques they were using), by facial recognition software, and by DNA. I don't need any further evidence to believe it.


Posted by: DM! at May 03, 2011 11:17 AM (XNLXh)

144 Funny in that article that Russia is concerned with "targetted killings". I guess you can only kill reporters.

Posted by: Vic at May 03, 2011 11:31 AM (M9Ie6)

145 This is one of the biggest events since Bill Clinton won the Cold War.

Posted by: t-bird at May 03, 2011 11:34 AM (FcR7P)

146

 First OBL eats American lead; and now...

67 The Euroweenies/UN are already questioning the legality of the raid.Posted by: Chariman LMAO at May 03, 2011 01:50 PM (yJyNa)   American leftists about to be hoist on their own European petard! Life is good.

Posted by: Its Morning in the Pension Fund of America at May 03, 2011 11:51 AM (K/USr)

147
Seal Team 6 Shot first!

Wait for it...wait...wait...SEAL Team 6 acted stupidly. You know if this goes sideways somehow, this where the blame will be laid.

Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at May 03, 2011 12:07 PM (1hM1d)

148 The message: Even those swishy "peace dividend" presidents will kill Osama Bin Laden if they find him.

Posted by: cackfinger at May 03, 2011 12:18 PM (HpG1y)

149 I want to see the video of the Americans murdering an unarmed Osama. And Obama can be tried for War Crimes.

Posted by: dfgdgd at May 03, 2011 12:47 PM (xW/nO)

150

I think that the reason the Administration is tied in a knot over the facts of his killing is that they still have not come to terms with whether Osama is a military combatant or a criminal. 

From my (admittedly limited) understanding, if you are a combatant in a military context you do not have to offer surrender to another party but you must take a properly offered surrender (if you are able to).  To be a proper surrender, the surrendering party must become non threatening (drop the weapon) and present itself to the other combatant in a manner that displays the surrender.

In a criminal context the goal is to arrest.  Therefore, there is more of an obligation on the part of the "arresting" party to try and take the other party alive.  Even if the other party doesn't offer surrender the arresting party cannot kill in the absence of a threat of imminent great bodily harm.

I think Osama never offered to surrender.  I think that the SEALs had him cornered in his room (they were likely outside) and they (going beyond what they are required to do in a military context) gave him the opportunity to surrender.  When he did not take it, they entered the room and shot him dead.   His "resistance" was his failure to surrender.  Think of the Japanese in their caves in WWII.  We offered opportunities to surrender.  When they did not come out we lawfully burned them alive in their caves.  You are not required to risk you troops to clean out cornered dead-enders.  Basically it presumes (for good reason) a constant state of imminent great bodily harm.

If this had been a criminal context, that shooting could be considered unlawful if Osama did not have a weapon when they entered the room or if had one and did not threaten anyone with it.  Obama's explainers need to explain the difference between the military and civilian context - but they do not want to because that would be (yet another) admission that this is a war we are fighting (you would have thought that the use of SEALs here already made that clear).

Posted by: Brian at May 03, 2011 01:01 PM (Hd5n8)

151 It doesn't make any difference what he is.

Posted by: Vic at May 03, 2011 01:08 PM (M9Ie6)

152

Dammit Vic, that took me a long time to write and you dissed it in 8 words.

 

Posted by: Brian at May 03, 2011 01:24 PM (Hd5n8)

153 We posted a lot of research on this subject earlier. The XO applies to heads of State, not terrorists. And besides an XO can be overridden by another XO.

Posted by: Vic at May 03, 2011 01:59 PM (M9Ie6)

154 I like this information and it has given me some sort of inspiration to have success for some reason, so thank you. free dvd ripper for mac, free dvd decrypter, dvd ripper mac free, free dvd rippers.

Posted by: free dvd ripper at May 04, 2011 01:45 AM (RO5Tp)

155 support the DVB-S standard. It has a Common Interface and a Smartcard plot as well.

Posted by: convert video to mp3 at May 06, 2011 01:54 AM (cFtpD)

156 Wie Sie Dateien auf konvertieren m4r? M4R Converter kann Ihnen die beste Antwort. Mit M4R Converter k?nnen Sie Konvertierung verschiedener Video-und Audioformate zu M4R Format wie AVI, MPEG, WMV, MP4, H.264, AVCHD, MKV, RM, MOV, XviD, 3GP, WAV, WMA, RA, M4A, MP3 Und so weiter. Keine Angelegenheit sind Sie ein Veteran oder Anf?nger sind, k?nnen Sie Ihre eigene iPhone Klingelton. Hier ist eine Anleitung zeigt Ihnen, wie Sie Dateien auf M4R umwandeln und einen iPhone-Klingelton.

Posted by: km at May 26, 2011 09:35 PM (XJkhP)

157 In our daily life, we pay more attention to our dress-up and life taste. In 2011 summer, we don't need to worry about it because summer clothing is always stylish and charming. However, we often feel annoyed in winter because those winter coats in general are heavy. Thus, we cannot show our personality and style during the winter time. However, when the canada goose label comes into our sights, we know that everything would be all right. It is because Canada goose clothing can bring us a stylish and charming look even under the brutal conditions.(yang)

Posted by: canada goose at June 15, 2011 07:47 PM (+Yddc)

158 ap plastic which will stick to you and press into your skin when you are hot and b

Posted by: Gucci 2011 at June 23, 2011 07:11 PM (cpw4F)

159 you and press into your skin when you are hot and b

Posted by: Gucci Shoulder Bag at June 23, 2011 07:12 PM (cpw4F)

160 ou and press into your skin when you are hot and b

Posted by: Gucci Hobo at June 23, 2011 07:13 PM (cpw4F)

161 our skin when you ar

Posted by: Gucci Ipad Case at June 23, 2011 07:13 PM (cpw4F)

Posted by: Steve at June 29, 2011 04:15 PM (ha0jB)

163

The mission of Radii  (ray-dee-eye) footwear is to create unique designs that reflect each individualÂ’s personality, and the Radii 420 Top definitely achieves that. This interesting high top design contains three straps around the forefoot, a large strap around the ankle and perforated accents on the toe box, tongue, and heel. Radii shoseare available in an array of striking colorways and will demand attention as soon as you put them on.

Posted by: radii straight jacket at July 07, 2011 11:24 PM (cQjLk)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
168kb generated in CPU 0.0451, elapsed 0.2392 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.2049 seconds, 291 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.