May 14, 2011
— DrewM Huckabee emailed supporters yesterday about tonight's episode of "The Decision".
Looks like he's planning on taking his talents to Ames, Iowa.
I will look forward to speaking with you soon and once I fulfill my sworn obligation to Fox, I will be free to discuss things that I can't now due to promises to them and to some possible legal considerations of the announcement.Many friends have said, "how can we help you in the decision?" My answer has consistently been, "Pray that I have clarity." I have it and will share it Saturday night during the show. Please be patient if I don't respond immediately to an email because I expect that once I pull the trigger Saturday night, things will get even crazier, as if that's possible.
I'm not sure how saying, "I'm not running, tune in next week for another show. Just like we've been doing for about 3 years now" would make things "even crazier". Also, what would the, "possible legal considerations" of the status quo be?
You know who this benefits? I wish I did.
"He's not going to run, " Ed Rollins, Huckabee's 2008 national campaign chairman tells FOX. " Rollins, who with other members of the Huckabee inner circle, was in charge of setting up a potential campaign operation, emotes a sense of frustration."About a week ago he broke off communications which tells me he's not going to run," Rollins says gruffly. "It was different this time around. I always told him it was his decision, and no one else's. I have always told him, If you don't have the fire in the belly, don't get into the race ."
Another member of Huckabee's inner circle, who has known the former Arkansas governor since the 90's confirms Rollins description, but says Huckabee has not spoken to him directly.
"He would have made a great president, but I am not despondent about it," he says. "I've known him for years. He knows what he is doing."
The one thing I am pretty sure of is, either way this will be the highest rated episode of Huckabee ever.
BTW- When does FNC tell Palin to decide one way or the other? Are they giving her me leeway because she's the more popular and valuable to them than Huckabee, Gingrich and Santorum. Or...do they already know what she's (not) going to do?
Via Ben Smith
Update [ace]: Since DrewM., quite understandably, also does not read this blog, it falls to me to say I told you so.
Posted by: DrewM at
08:22 AM
| Comments (141)
Post contains 442 words, total size 3 kb.
After reading up on Daniels insane decision to veto a bill designed to get rid of the Missouri Plan for judicial appointments - and seeing first-hand what happened as a result - I am a woman without a candidate.
Posted by: Y-not at May 14, 2011 08:26 AM (pW2o8)
Posted by: journolist-still in trouble for coming home at 10:30 P.M. from Golf course at May 14, 2011 08:26 AM (iHfo1)
By "crazy" he's referring to the shock to everyone that he decided against running and the scramble to analyze who's going to benefit, who he's going to endorse, etc..
Or maybe he's not going to announce but he's going to endorse.
Long shot. I know. He's probably running. I'm just brainstorming here.
Posted by: Benson at May 14, 2011 08:30 AM (qzcNU)
Posted by: arhooley at May 14, 2011 08:31 AM (he3WA)
Or maybe he was going to run but Cheri Daniels told him not to.
Posted by: Y-not at May 14, 2011 08:31 AM (pW2o8)
As for Palin, she is not going to run.
Posted by: Vic at May 14, 2011 08:33 AM (M9Ie6)
They don't call him "The Huckster" for nothing.
If' he's doing this for ratings, it's brilliant.
Maybe he thinks that he can get a ground game going in Iowa in plenty of time for the straw poll and go from there. One thing, though, it doesn't look like Rollins has gone to anybody else yet.
It wouldn't be an official announcement (you do that in front of crowds of screaming supporters) at most it would be an announcement that he's canceling his show and forming an exploratory committee. I don't think he could say any more on Fox News.
Posted by: AmishDude at May 14, 2011 08:33 AM (73tyQ)
Yep cue banjo music. I've barely traveled outside the NE USA. I think I'm in for a cultural shock.
Posted by: ParisParamus at May 14, 2011 08:33 AM (GcoHq)
Would you let us know if Mitch has any thoughts on this obvious trampling if the US Constitution?
Court: No right to resist illegal cop entry into home
Posted by: Barbarian at May 14, 2011 08:34 AM (EL+OC)
Posted by: ParisParamus at May 14, 2011 08:35 AM (GcoHq)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at May 14, 2011 08:38 AM (d0Tfm)
High schooler challenges Michele Bachmann to Constitution showdown
"I have found quite a few of your statements regarding The Constitution of the United States, the quality of public school education and general U.S. civics matters to be factually incorrect, inaccurately applied or grossly distorted".
/Why is this girl writing to just Rep Bachmann? This same statement describes basically all the Dems currently in the US Congress along with a good portion of the Republicans. Guess she's a lib...
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at May 14, 2011 08:39 AM (c0A3e)
That is true.
I do think the starry-eyed religious support is gone, especially with his disastrous pardons. But if you think about it, there isn't a first-tier candidate for social conservatives.
Posted by: AmishDude at May 14, 2011 08:40 AM (73tyQ)
Posted by: ginaswo at May 14, 2011 08:41 AM (jz1Zd)
Court: No right to resist illegal cop entry into home
-----
That's the decision that prompted me to look into the judges which led me to research why Mitch appointed one of ones in the majority which led to the background on him vetoing a 2009 attempt to get rid of their judicial appointment commission.
I don't know how to figure out if Mitch picked the lesser of three evils (the 3 nominees he was offered). I tried to look up the other judges, but couldn't find anything useful. However, it does seem like he was really stupid to veto the bill that would have gotten rid of this judicial commission system.
I only recently switched to Mitch after Romney's latest double-down on Masscare. I'm not enthusiastic about either, but thought they were the best of a weak group. Now I don't know what I'll do. I guess I'll research Pawlenty, but I'm not optimistic.
Posted by: Y-not at May 14, 2011 08:41 AM (pW2o8)
Posted by: JackStraw at May 14, 2011 08:41 AM (TMB3S)
Posted by: Dan at May 14, 2011 08:41 AM (mXBxH)
Posted by: nickless at May 14, 2011 08:41 AM (MMC8r)
Contrary to popular opinion, I think Obama will have the edge in general election debates against most of them. Perception, not substance, drives that train. I hate it, but there it is.
Posted by: long toss at May 14, 2011 08:42 AM (AJzgk)
He's dragging his gutsy moment out as long as possible. I wouldn't be surprised if, come next October, the administration finally, after long and thoughtful study and 16 hours of sleep, decides that the American public can handle the truth.
I question the hypothetical timing.
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at May 14, 2011 08:43 AM (Srhra)
Posted by: somebody else, not me at May 14, 2011 08:43 AM (7EV/g)
----
Well, I agree with you there.
It galls me that a vocal minority of supposed conservatives focus on Romney's "heretical" religion more than on policies and qualifications. I hate that sort of bigotry.
But it's not enough for me to vote for Romney just to put my thumb in their eyes.
However, if I keep reading snide comments about Romney from people pushing candidates with the "right" religion, I may just apply my own bigotry and refuse to vote for an Evangelical.
Posted by: Y-not at May 14, 2011 08:46 AM (pW2o8)
As one of a handful of women in Congress, you hold a distinct privilege and responsibility to better represent your gender nationally.
Again, why single out Bachmann unless you're a misguided liberal teenager? (btw, there are currently 75 women Represenatives in the US House, considerably more than "a handful" - math fail!).
The statements you make help to serve an injustice to not only the position of Congresswoman, but women everywhere. Though politically expedient, incorrect comments cast a shadow on your person and by unfortunate proxy, both your supporters and detractors alike often generalize this shadow to women as a whole.
This applies to essentially everything Nancy Pelosi or Maxine Walters or Debbie Wasserman Schultz has said while in office, past, present, and future.
Rep.
Bachmann, the frequent inability you have shown to accurately and
factually present even the most basic information about the United
States led me to submit the follow challenge, pitting my public
education against your advanced legal education.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at May 14, 2011 08:47 AM (c0A3e)
Posted by: eman: Japanese Babe Rescue Team at May 14, 2011 08:48 AM (64xTs)
Posted by: CoolCzech at May 14, 2011 08:49 AM (kUaEF)
Posted by: Dan at May 14, 2011 08:50 AM (mXBxH)
Posted by: Vic at May 14, 2011 12:33 PM (M9Ie6)
She has been in the race since July 2009.
It's a floor wax, AND a dessert topping.
Posted by: nickless at May 14, 2011 08:50 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Berserker at May 14, 2011 08:50 AM (FMbng)
Posted by: Barbarian at May 14, 2011 12:34 PM (EL+OC)
There's a thread below.
Basically, Daniels has supported the Missouri plan in which judges are chosen in part by the ABA and a small list is given to the governor. In fact, he vetoed an attempt to partially do away with it that passed the legislature overwhelmingly two years ago. I don't know if he was overridden.
He got three terrible choices. He picked one, praised him (that I think was pro-forma) and appointed him.
Daniels is a conventional wisdom guy. He's easily rolled by people with nefarious intentions.
Posted by: AmishDude at May 14, 2011 08:52 AM (73tyQ)
Posted by: eman: Japanese Babe Rescue Team at May 14, 2011 08:53 AM (64xTs)
Posted by: rickl at May 14, 2011 08:53 AM (hZFhS)
Posted by: eman: Japanese Babe Rescue Team at May 14, 2011 12:48 PM (64xTs)
Yep. She also knows with Ryan, Christie, Rubio et al waiting in the wings, 2016 won't be kind to her. Now or never. It'll be interesting to see how the Bachman/ Huckabee/ Palin vote split goes for that segment.
Posted by: long toss at May 14, 2011 08:54 AM (AJzgk)
Posted by: Y-not at May 14, 2011 08:56 AM (pW2o8)
Posted by: JackStraw at May 14, 2011 08:56 AM (TMB3S)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at May 14, 2011 08:57 AM (RBSIp)
O/T: White House has banned cameras from Jay Carney's daily briefings.
Can't linky anymore but it comes via a FB linked examiner.com article.
Posted by: ErikW at May 14, 2011 08:58 AM (r/tCh)
if there's one thing the conservative GOP base is in the mood for it's showmanship, teasing, and mind-games
this is great stuff
keep it comin' idiots!
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 14, 2011 08:58 AM (yA45Y)
Posted by: nevergiveup at May 14, 2011 08:58 AM (i6RpT)
So, it was Trump two weeks ago, Romney last week, and this week it's Fuckupabee. The MFM is tripping over themselves to set up the GOP frontrunner for us. The sooner they commit, the sooner the attacks can start.
Since no one could effectively counter Obama last time, or even stand up to his radical, left-wing, lame-assery, I don't have much hope this time around either.
Where, oh wherefor art thou, oh great Republican slayer of Dims? Who is the firery orator who can show to the crowd that the emperor has no clothes?
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at May 14, 2011 08:58 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at May 14, 2011 12:47 PM (c0A3e)
Two things: One, she doesn't want to debate Hank Johnson on plate tectonics (or "Teutonics" if you're the wise and learned Barack Obama).
Second, I don't know that she's all that "typical". Cherry Hill East is (IIRC) a fancy area and I looked up the FEC database ($250 to Barack) that there is a Wayne Myers who works for Brown Brothers Harriman (fancy bank, Prescott Bush was a partner when it merged). Some more searches suggest that he's a Systems Programmer at the Jersey City office. Helluva commute if it's the same guy.
Well at least the little crumb crunchers are learning early who their Emmanuel Goldsteins are supposed to be. Let the little sophomore have her two-minutes' hate.
Posted by: AmishDude at May 14, 2011 08:58 AM (73tyQ)
Posted by: nevergiveup at May 14, 2011 08:59 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: ErikW at May 14, 2011 08:59 AM (r/tCh)
I have it from super secret sources that can't be named that Fuckabee is going to announce he has accepted B. Hussein's offer to replace Joe Biden on the Obama ticket and run for VP.
Posted by: robtr at May 14, 2011 08:59 AM (MtwBb)
Posted by: ace at May 14, 2011 09:00 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: rickl at May 14, 2011 09:01 AM (hZFhS)
Posted by: Y-not at May 14, 2011 12:56 PM (pW2o
Well, one was worse inasmuch as she had a longer record. I did rely on Gary Marx' old column from NRO and he didn't say much about the third.
Posted by: AmishDude at May 14, 2011 09:02 AM (73tyQ)
Posted by: nevergiveup at May 14, 2011 09:03 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: CoolCzech at May 14, 2011 09:04 AM (kUaEF)
Living large in NJ
Ahh, wouldst that he wouldst consider the run. T'would be good for the country, it would.
Mehinks I had a few too many Guinnii last evening.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at May 14, 2011 09:05 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: Hucks $2.8M FL Mortgage at May 14, 2011 09:05 AM (MWXXs)
Posted by: rickl at May 14, 2011 01:01 PM (hZFhS)
No, thank God. My boy, Joba, got lit up pretty good last night.
Posted by: long toss at May 14, 2011 09:06 AM (AJzgk)
Posted by: Minuteman at May 14, 2011 09:10 AM (/FqjZ)
Posted by: long toss at May 14, 2011 09:11 AM (AJzgk)
Posted by: PaleRider at May 14, 2011 09:12 AM (cQZV0)
Posted by: kathleen at May 14, 2011 09:12 AM (w2pFe)
And there are people freaked out by Romney's LDS thing?!
Posted by: ParisParamus at May 14, 2011 09:14 AM (GcoHq)
Posted by: eman: Japanese Babe Rescue Team at May 14, 2011 09:14 AM (64xTs)
Yeah. We had a guy calling him a heretic and pushing Thune a day or two ago.
Posted by: Y-not at May 14, 2011 09:16 AM (pW2o8)
Posted by: Minuteman at May 14, 2011 01:10 PM (/FqjZ)
THIS. She's a team player. She doesn't care who gets the credit, just that the job gets done. She'll take the slings and arrows so someone (Cain?) else can get through.
Posted by: lurker at May 14, 2011 09:18 AM (OMz8r)
Posted by: kathleen at May 14, 2011 09:22 AM (w2pFe)
Ooohhh...Hucklefuck is being coy...keeping everyone on pins and needles and shit
The re-fat fuck is going to run...and will try to smear the other candidates again.
He's a dick
Posted by: beedubya at May 14, 2011 09:23 AM (AnTyA)
I'm hoping (praying, burning incense, sacrificing goats) that he is maybe somehow trying to generate one last pulse of buzz (maybe to keep VP an option) with the "crazier than ever" titillation before opting to stick this one out.
Sometimes good things do happen, right?
Posted by: Lincolntf at May 14, 2011 09:23 AM (xMT+4)
Posted by: Huckster at May 14, 2011 09:24 AM (1fanL)
That was rhetorical, not a question. Romney is being so skewered by the center-right media and blogosphere that he just. might. win.
Posted by: ParisParamus at May 14, 2011 09:24 AM (GcoHq)
Posted by: kathleen at May 14, 2011 09:25 AM (w2pFe)
In our southwest Iowa county, I *will* caucus aggressively against you. I will point out how you're a fiscal Democrat -- the kiss of death in Western Iowa. I will point out all your anti-libertarian inclinations where it's evident you want to micromanage other people's lives (presumably due to the lack of control over those skeletons in your closet).
So if your backers want to throw away more money, go for it. But an Iowa Caucus win will be something too many of us will actively work against.
Posted by: Multitude at May 14, 2011 09:26 AM (7r7wy)
Must be the season of the Mitch
Posted by: Donovan at May 14, 2011 01:19 PM (h+MAX)
No, sorry, his latest disqualification is that he appointed a judge who grew in office and made a liberal ruling.
So he's a RINO. Like Reagan was.
Posted by: FUBAR at May 14, 2011 09:27 AM (1fanL)
Posted by: Albert Magnus, Einstein Extraordinaire at May 14, 2011 09:29 AM (HrAUl)
I still don't think he is running. It doesn't make sense that Fox News would make a contract with Huckabee that he could leave at any time with no consequences. Not running is the only decision Huckabee could make without having to talk to the people who right the paycheck and are going to be so important to his financial future.
I think he is going to endorse Cain or that one of the candidates is going to be on his show, and he is going to endorse that candidate.
Posted by: Paper at May 14, 2011 09:31 AM (VoSja)
Well, the stars, they are aligning...
Posted by: mrp at May 14, 2011 09:31 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: The Donald, what want to fire Fucklebee but knows effective businessery at May 14, 2011 09:34 AM (wOaLi)
No, sorry, his latest disqualification is that he appointed a judge who grew in office and made a liberal ruling.
So he's a RINO. Like Reagan was.
--
I think if you read the posts you'll see that the bigger knock was that he decided to veto the legislature two years ago when it tried to get rid of the judicial commission system of justice appointments. If you read his quotes, he really doesn't justify overturning the legislature except to say how much he loves the system and how it doesn't need fixing.
Posted by: Y-not at May 14, 2011 09:35 AM (pW2o8)
Posted by: Paper at May 14, 2011 09:37 AM (VoSja)
Posted by: California Tower at May 14, 2011 09:37 AM (7Ahkq)
Posted by: mrp at May 14, 2011 01:31 PM (HjPtV)
Mostly I think she deserves to grow old and enjoy her grandchildren. I'm not all that impressed that our SS is that good if she runs. I think that this election will be for the heart and soul of America and if we can't get it done with ballots...then it's civil war part deux.
Posted by: lurker at May 14, 2011 09:39 AM (OMz8r)
No, sorry, his latest disqualification is that he appointed a judge who grew in office and made a liberal ruling.
So he's a RINO. Like Reagan was.
Posted by: FUBAR at May 14, 2011 01:27 PM (1fanL)
He didn't "grow in office". He was a Gitmo defense attorney and has only been on the court 6 months.
Mitch didn't have a lot of choice because of the system he's under.
However, Mitch vetoed a bill passed by overwhelming majority to overturn the system that handcuffed him.
Posted by: AmishDude at May 14, 2011 09:39 AM (73tyQ)
Yeah, I'm going to have to call bullshit on that. I never got involved in it but some of my friends ran the local HOBY program. They were some of the most apolitical people I've ever known.
Want to know why Hugh O'Brien started it? Here's his philosophy...
"The concept for HOBY was inspired in 1958 by a nine-day visit OÂ’Brian had with famed humanitarian Dr. Albert Schweitzer in Africa. Dr. Schweitzer believed "the most important thing in education is to teach young people to think for themselves."
Hugh O’Brian’s message to young people is “Freedom to Choose” Here is his brief speech on this topic: "I do NOT believe we are all born equal. Created equal in the eyes of God, yes, but physical and emotional differences, parental guidelines, varying environments, being in the right place at the right time, all play a role in enhancing or limiting an individual's development. But I DO believe every man and woman, if given the opportunity and encouragement to recognize their potential, regardless of background, has the freedom to choose in our world. Will an individual be a taker or a giver in life? Will that person be satisfied merely to exist or seek a meaningful purpose? Will he or she dare to dream the impossible dream?
"I believe every person is created as the steward of his or her own destiny with great power for a specific purpose, to share with others, through service, a reverence for life in a spirit of love."
Posted by: DrewM. at May 14, 2011 09:46 AM (plesI)
Posted by: Man watching paint dry on his wall at May 14, 2011 09:48 AM (XthHy)
>>Posted by: kathleen at May 14, 2011 01:25 PM (w2pFe)
Take a second look at Hugh O'Brian aka Wyatt Earp @ Wiki, scroll to the HOBY part and read from graph 3-5. You can't just dismiss that out hand if you call yourself conservative.
Huck is a dangerous religious demagogue/fake populist however and deserves no support.
Posted by: ontherocks at May 14, 2011 09:48 AM (HBqDo)
A bit circular, there. I believe that she's the only Republican who can beat Obama. If Obama wins and your vision proves correct (a POV I don't share), then as far as Palin is concerned it doesn't matter how good the Secret Service is.
2012 will be a Ruling Class vs. Plebs campaign.
Posted by: mrp at May 14, 2011 09:49 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: MarkD at May 14, 2011 09:49 AM (6CLxP)
Posted by: MarkD at May 14, 2011 01:49 PM (6CLxP)
A turd's a turd, regardless of a (D) or (R) designation. And as much as I hate this administration I'm not totally convinced some of these candidates ARE better. Huckabee? shakes head.....No thanks
Posted by: Man watching paint dry on his wall at May 14, 2011 09:55 AM (XthHy)
Posted by: Shiggz at May 14, 2011 09:56 AM (mLAWK)
You don't use the phrase 'once I pull the trigger' if you're NOT going to run.
And I'm going to go vomit....violently.
Posted by: Tami at May 14, 2011 09:57 AM (VuLos)
Tami, I share your nausea. I already did not like Huckster, for many reasons (freeing the cop killer topped it), but now I like him even less for his big tease and ego. What a jerk to do this, to increase ratings with his drama.
Please, God, let someone with some character and testosterone run, and very, very soon.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky at May 14, 2011 10:02 AM (FnRYN)
I still don't understand how he could quit a television show without any interaction with the people who make the show possible. Would he seriously be telling all the staff and producers in one day that they don't have a job?
It is more likely to me that he is 'pulling the trigger' on some new job with Fox like moving to Beck's spot. Again, he just realized some pay-by-month animated video sales system. This isn't the decision-making process of someone who is going to run, but someone who has decided to double-down on the pundit thing.
The crazy part could be an endorsement or candidate appearance, or it could just be him talking about his own life if he moves into a larger media position.
Posted by: Paper at May 14, 2011 10:03 AM (VoSja)
Posted by: Tami at May 14, 2011 01:57 PM (VuLos)
Oh c'mon Tami! After my announcement tonight, I'm gonna put on my crazy hat and just go CRAAAAZZZYYYY!!!!!!
Posted by: Huck-a-luck(my CRAZY nickname) at May 14, 2011 10:04 AM (XthHy)
I loathe him....my dislike of him may actually equal my dislike of Obama because I see absolutely no difference between them.
Posted by: Tami at May 14, 2011 10:10 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: kathleen at May 14, 2011 10:17 AM (w2pFe)
Posted by: Tami at May 14, 2011 02:10 PM (VuLos)
You've got it all wrong. Obama likes basketball while I enjoy pretending people care what I think. He likes burgers and I.....oh, you meant politically? No.....no difference whatsoever.
Posted by: Huck-a-luck(my CRAZY nickname) at May 14, 2011 10:19 AM (XthHy)
Posted by: kathleen at May 14, 2011 10:21 AM (w2pFe)
Posted by: ParisParamus at May 14, 2011 10:22 AM (GcoHq)
Posted by: kathleen at May 14, 2011 10:22 AM (w2pFe)
"The crazy part could be an endorsement or candidate appearance, or it could just be him talking about his own life"
Like announcing that he'll be taking a 6-month leave of absence, returning to TV in 6 months as Michelle Huckabee?
Posted by: Lincolntf at May 14, 2011 10:23 AM (xMT+4)
Posted by: kathleen at May 14, 2011 10:24 AM (w2pFe)
Posted by: kathleen at May 14, 2011 10:31 AM (w2pFe)
Posted by: kathleen at May 14, 2011 10:33 AM (w2pFe)
Posted by: kathleen at May 14, 2011 02:31 PM (w2pFe)
Kathleen, you need to drop what you're doing instantly, go to your nearest pet store and stare at the fishies for awhile, it will help.
Posted by: ontherocks at May 14, 2011 10:36 AM (HBqDo)
I hope it's just a mega-tease for his show, but I fear for the worst. . . .
Posted by: logprof at May 14, 2011 10:36 AM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: kathleen at May 14, 2011 10:39 AM (w2pFe)
Posted by: kathleen at May 14, 2011 02:39 PM (w2pFe)
Worked for me!!!
Posted by: zombie Michael Jackson at May 14, 2011 10:42 AM (XthHy)
Ah, I don't think that I'm what is making you tired, but do get some sleep, and try some deep breathing exercises.
Posted by: ontherocks at May 14, 2011 10:44 AM (HBqDo)
Posted by: kathleen at May 14, 2011 10:47 AM (w2pFe)
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at May 14, 2011 11:21 AM (Er/am)
You know who this benefits?
Yes.
Everyone not named Sarah Palin.
Which is why I'm eagerly awaiting Huck's announcement, and why so many Palinistas are wishcasting that he isn't running.
Posted by: Vyceroy at May 14, 2011 11:22 AM (Yhbmt)
Doesn't mean I think she's either going to run or going to win.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at May 14, 2011 11:26 AM (bxiXv)
I'm wishcasting that he is not running, and I'm not a Palinista.
Huck and Paul would be the two most difficult for me to support. Paul because he is an insincere nut who takes treasonous political positions while getting nothing accomplished on the issues he is supposed to be so 'good' on, and Huck because he isn't a fiscal conservative along with being troubling on immigration.
Posted by: Paper at May 14, 2011 11:28 AM (VoSja)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at May 14, 2011 03:26 PM (bxiXv)
What's the official AoS policy on the Atlantic piece that ran this week on Palin? That it's lies and garbage?
Because, to me, it seems like Palin actually IS running a bit of a con here on people, because the Alaskan Palin was a far different animal than the Mama Grizzly of today. One who was more moderate, and who actually compromised with Democrats.
Posted by: Vyceroy at May 14, 2011 11:32 AM (Yhbmt)
#128
Palin was a populist in Alaska, and she is a populist now. Being a populist in Alaska meant taking positions against the oil companies/state corruption and bringing in more money to the state through taxation. Being a populist in a national election would look more like than Palin we see now.
I think he principles lie more with actually reflecting the views of the base of her party (and even the electorate at large) than with being a completely consistent conservative. This is why she had such high approval ratings in Alaska. She actually seemed like someone who wanted to do what the people wanted.
Posted by: Paper at May 14, 2011 11:42 AM (VoSja)
Posted by: Douglas at May 14, 2011 11:57 AM (YKOnu)
Posted by: Mike Schmuckabee at May 14, 2011 12:04 PM (mfQD5)
Posted by: Dan at May 14, 2011 12:07 PM (mXBxH)
I agree that the state was/is corrupt, and she was absolutely right to take them on, but I don't think that it was necessary to raise taxes to the extent that she did.
I really like her, even if she made some decisions that I didn't agree with in Alaska. I do think that she isn't a member of the 'political elite' or the group that can't do anything more than try to be accepted by elite opinion. She showed an incredible amount of focus to fix the issue that pissed her and many Alaskans off.
To borrow the article's title, the 'Tragedy of Sarah Palin' to me is more how the media attacked her and how she was baited in to stooping to their level. She saw another corrupt institution, and she was conditioned to keep fighting. They media wanted a specific type of woman to be the face of women in politics, and she was not it. It would be like if Ken Blackwell or Herman Cain had been the first Black President. They want a liberal icon.
I hope she keeps fighting, but in a way that is more conscious of the media game. Opinion and image change all the time. If she were to enter and win the primary, I'll support her as much as I can. I honestly think though that she needs more time right now, but she has proven people wrong before.
Posted by: Paper at May 14, 2011 12:40 PM (VoSja)
Posted by: Loves the Sound of Trains at May 14, 2011 01:31 PM (0Yzaw)
What's the official AoS policy on the Atlantic piece that ran this week on Palin? That it's lies and garbage?
Posted by: Vyceroy at May 14, 2011 03:32 PM (Yhbmt)
We're Honey Badgers, dude. We don't HAVE an "official position."
Also, after the 2008 election, I have a pretty fuckin' high bar for taking trash talk about Palin seriously. I'm interested in the facts, but pretty much everyfuckinbody's lyin' to me, so there you are.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at May 14, 2011 01:57 PM (bxiXv)
I think she's running.
I think she's probably the (ideologically) best candidate out there.
I wish she'd work more (or any) with a voice coach.
I don't know if her negatives can be overcome.
But a pack of hungry Republicans tearing at the political flesh of one B. Hussein Obama which includes the Mama Grizzly is almost certain to be more effective at pulling him the rest of the way off of Mount Olympus than a pack of hungry Republicans without her.
A corollary here is that the pack of hungry Republicans really, really, really, REALLY need to concentrate on Obama and not on tearing apart each other . . . "when you're up to your ass in alligators . . . " and all that. The BEST Republican candidate for 2012 is IMHO by definition the one that will do the best job in bringing Teh Won down to earth. To me, that's what the primary season will be about--who can do it the most consistently and effectively.
Taking down Obama in 2012 is Job One. Cleaning up the mess is Job Two. Let's keep focused here, people.
And I don't think that, once the Republican presidential field is set, that the media will see fit to give Palin any daylight whatsoever, so the "she'll be more effective as an outsider" argument leaves me utterly unmoved. So, I don't think she really has any option but to run--if nothing else to stay relevant on the national political stage up to the GOP Convention.
Posted by: filbert at May 14, 2011 02:04 PM (smvTK)
Posted by: gwrgwrg at May 15, 2011 06:36 PM (iQ/HO)
Posted by: gwrgwrg at May 15, 2011 06:36 PM (iQ/HO)
Posted by: gwrgwrg at May 15, 2011 06:36 PM (iQ/HO)
Posted by: thomas sabo uk at May 15, 2011 11:16 PM (57bMN)
Posted by: ray ban 3025 at June 02, 2011 10:51 PM (MpYKx)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2777 seconds, 269 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Berserker at May 14, 2011 08:23 AM (FMbng)