April 27, 2011
Denied
— Ace He was getting pressured by Fox to make up his mind one way or another (due to their position that they would have to let him go, should he be a live candidate), and a report says he's given the would-be members of his South Carolina political team the go-ahead to work for other candidates.
That's the report, I stress.
This is wacky. I figured he'd run.
He's still at the top of the polls, or close to the top.
I'd run under those circumstances. It's a toss up.
Well, I wouldn't run. I'm lazy. I'd just watch TV.
But if I had greater energy and drive, like Huckabee, I'd run.
Update: At the same Hot Air link, Huck's team denies the story, and says they still haven't decided.
Posted by: Ace at
02:39 PM
| Comments (159)
Post contains 135 words, total size 1 kb.
Some mentally-challenged viewer on Fox & Friends Morning Zoo Crew e-mailed his dream ticket:
Trump/Huckabee
I hadn't even had my first cup of coffee.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at April 27, 2011 02:42 PM (UOM48)
Why are Republicans so terrified of running against the worst President in American history, during the worst economy in two generations, with gas going to $5 or $6 a gallon?
Posted by: CoolCzech at April 27, 2011 02:42 PM (kUaEF)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at April 27, 2011 02:43 PM (qIHlG)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 27, 2011 02:43 PM (yJ7/V)
Posted by: AmishDude at April 27, 2011 02:43 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: nevergiveup at April 27, 2011 02:43 PM (7wmOW)
Why are Republicans so terrified of running against the worst President in American history, during the worst economy in two generations, with gas going to $5 or $6 a gallon?
Posted by: CoolCzech at April 27, 2011 06:42 PM (kUaEF)
Probably because they got schooled by a neophyte last time
Posted by: Jackhole at April 27, 2011 02:44 PM (+qHxi)
Posted by: Rod Rescueman at April 27, 2011 02:44 PM (HwE/1)
Posted by: Rod Rescueman at April 27, 2011 06:44 PM (HwE/1)
Real candidate? You mean Ron Paul?
Posted by: CoolCzech at April 27, 2011 02:46 PM (kUaEF)
Posted by: SnowSoul at April 27, 2011 02:47 PM (+7e79)
Update: Still no decision, says Team Huck.
Just saw that; he says he'll make a decision in the summer.
Without a team behind him and entering late, I have to wonder what he's thinking here. As much as I disapprove of him, I think he'd be a stong contender in a weak field.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at April 27, 2011 02:47 PM (WRW1S)
President's salary doesn't pay for a house that costs a couple million
You need to be a Senator for that kind of income!
Posted by: Barack 'Husseinus Africanus' Obama at April 27, 2011 02:49 PM (Kq/LG)
About stuff.
Posted by: sifty at April 27, 2011 02:49 PM (ei2Q9)
Posted by: Bloody Mary at April 27, 2011 02:49 PM (dDbkT)
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at April 27, 2011 02:49 PM (V+VTK)
Nah, he'd've done poorly in Iowa and for a known candidate, that's death.
Huh? He'd have to play catch-up with his ground game, but he won IA in 2008 and remains popular there according to the polls.
I don't care for him, but I see little reason to believe that he wouldn't have a good shot at winning IA and SC.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at April 27, 2011 02:49 PM (WRW1S)
Fred Thompson."
Posted by: Ace's Political Desk at April 27, 2011 06:47 PM (GC5/b)
Do you MIND? I'm trying to take a nap!
Posted by: Fred Thompson at April 27, 2011 02:51 PM (kUaEF)
Posted by: Lawrence O'Donnell: Ultimate Theologian at April 27, 2011 02:51 PM (0vJ4C)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at April 27, 2011 02:51 PM (qIHlG)
He wont run if palin does. She'll have to drop a hint on fox or something. Huckabee has a giant mortgage in florida, he has A LOT of skeletons, the guy cant fundraise, and plus he is fat as a cpw with no indication of losing weight.
Huckabee and Palin appeal to different demographics. She polls terrible in the South, and not that great in IA, either.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at April 27, 2011 02:51 PM (WRW1S)
Posted by: ace at April 27, 2011 02:52 PM (nj1bB)
Because Whoopi Fuckin Goldberg told them they were racist. And she wouldn't lie.
Posted by: sifty at April 27, 2011 02:53 PM (ei2Q9)
Posted by: nevergiveup at April 27, 2011 02:53 PM (7wmOW)
Posted by: JackStraw at April 27, 2011 02:53 PM (TMB3S)
Lots of the craftspeople are pissed about the shooting schedule on Justified. Not just the fans.
Some of the actors are shooting features this summer.
Posted by: sifty at April 27, 2011 02:54 PM (ei2Q9)
Posted by: railwriter at April 27, 2011 02:54 PM (daRzV)
Funny enough, I like to see Ron Paul running. He can't win and I don't want him anywhere near the White House, but he'll keep talking about deep deep spending cuts and will keep the others from getting cowardly on the subject.
No, I meant real candidates like Daniels, TPaw, Christie (I can dream), etc...
And no, you freaks, Christie will not send the Gestapo to take your guns away. You asses who talk that way sunk Castle and gave the Republicans their first deeply stupid Wiccan candidate in history. So, you know, just shut up already. You purity testers have done enough damage.
Posted by: Rod Rescueman at April 27, 2011 02:55 PM (HwE/1)
Posted by: ryukyu at April 27, 2011 02:55 PM (MOHSR)
WHAT A FUCKING FREAKSHOW THE REPUBLICAN FIELD IS.
Posted by: CAPTAIN ALL CAPS at April 27, 2011 02:55 PM (q177U)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at April 27, 2011 02:55 PM (c0A3e)
Posted by: Rocks at April 27, 2011 02:55 PM (th0op)
Without a team behind him.......
Posted by: Hollowpoint at April 27, 2011 06:47 PM (WRW1S)
He still has "The Little Rockers".
Posted by: PoconoJoe at April 27, 2011 02:56 PM (Qetbx)
Posted by: Bloody Mary at April 27, 2011 02:56 PM (dDbkT)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at April 27, 2011 02:56 PM (qIHlG)
Posted by: Cicero at April 27, 2011 02:56 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at April 27, 2011 02:58 PM (SB0V2)
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at April 27, 2011 02:58 PM (V+VTK)
"WHAT A FUCKING FREAKSHOW THE REPUBLICAN FIELD IS."
Posted by: CAPTAIN ALL CAPS at April 27, 2011 06:55 PM (q177U)
Now, now, Trump IS running, after all...
NO, Wait!!
Posted by: CoolCzech at April 27, 2011 02:58 PM (kUaEF)
Posted by: dananjcon at April 27, 2011 03:02 PM (uIz80)
Posted by: Bloody Mary at April 27, 2011 03:02 PM (dDbkT)
Posted by: 4 Dead Cops at April 27, 2011 03:04 PM (cDRYC)
OMG....This is awesome news!
Huckelberry Hound had no chance. The polls lie. It's just like 2008, the Democrats pick our candidates for us, and of course they wanted Huckleberry Hound!
"So your saying we still have a chance?"
Posted by: Jimi at April 27, 2011 03:04 PM (JMsOK)
Posted by: Damiano at April 27, 2011 03:04 PM (3nrx7)
I know you hate palin but i call bullshit. She appeals very in the south (ie evangelicals)
Google it. Her poll numbers in states like SC, GA and MS suggest that her appeal lies somewhere between Abraham Lincoln and the ebola virus.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at April 27, 2011 03:05 PM (WRW1S)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at April 27, 2011 03:05 PM (cDRYC)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at April 27, 2011 03:07 PM (cDRYC)
Posted by: Dang at April 27, 2011 03:08 PM (TXKVh)
So, you're happy with the pragmatic GOP leadership in the House, are you?
Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at April 27, 2011 03:10 PM (fjoLg)
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at April 27, 2011 03:10 PM (V+VTK)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at April 27, 2011 03:11 PM (cDRYC)
Last year when she was in the news, she was tieing schmuck in SC.I say bullshit. She has dropped off the radar for now which suggest current polls. You are obsessed with. 2 year out polls, a campaign has not started yet.
You got into a college?
Posted by: garrett at April 27, 2011 03:13 PM (Kq/LG)
I'm happy with a candidate that won't make swing voters run screaming from the GOP. I want to win this fucking thing. We cannot survive as a country with 4 more years of Obama.
That's my priority. What's yours?
Posted by: Rod Rescueman at April 27, 2011 03:13 PM (HwE/1)
Posted by: curious at April 27, 2011 03:14 PM (k1rwm)
Posted by: that guy who likes to start thread wars at April 27, 2011 03:17 PM (ZkHkm)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 27, 2011 03:18 PM (ZkHkm)
Posted by: Palerider at April 27, 2011 03:18 PM (dkExz)
Anyone who would think of voting for that worthless turd in the primary deserves to be kicked in the crotch.
Posted by: jimmuy at April 27, 2011 03:19 PM (GDCB+)
Posted by: MAJHAM at April 27, 2011 03:19 PM (AfjsS)
I can't picture her with a strap-on. Oh, wait a minute... never mind.
Posted by: Dang at April 27, 2011 03:20 PM (TXKVh)
Last year when she was in the news, she was tieing schmuck in SC. I say bullshit. She has dropped off the radar for now which suggest current polls. You are obsessed with. 2 year out polls, a campaign has not started yet.
Make up your mind- are the polls meaningless or not? Or are they only relevant if they show her doing well?
Two SC polls released just yesterday:
Huckster 19.1%, 20%
Romney 16.6%, 18%
Palin 10%, 10%
While one should rely too heavily on early polls, especially with regards to lesser-known candidates, she's not nearly as strong in the South as you seem to believe.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at April 27, 2011 03:20 PM (WRW1S)
Go Jesus.
Posted by: railwriter at April 27, 2011 06:54 PM (daRzV)
You know it!! Hey--everyone have a chance to see my wang?!
Posted by: Hunky Jesus (endorsed by Zombie of PJM) at April 27, 2011 03:20 PM (GAQ6o)
Nope. Palin's numerical base is men west of the Appalachians. Huck's is TV-addicted church-lady busybodies who think Palin's a lipstick-wearing whore. The South is full of those.
In what-if? polls where Palin's in and Huck's out, the homeless Huckabites split evenly among anyone-but-Palin. His presence in the race corrals the anti-Palin vote, making him a sort of kingmaker—if she doesn't run. So he's waiting for her not to.
"You know who this benefits?"
Posted by: oblig. at April 27, 2011 03:22 PM (xvZW9)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at April 27, 2011 03:22 PM (cDRYC)
That's my priority. What's yours?
Well, first of all I should make it clear that both Huckabee and Paul are in my view terrible choices, for reasons unrelated to the pragmatist-purist axis.
My priority at this point is getting the most conservative candidate possible nominated. When the party (and Democrat voters in open primary states) has made it's choice, I will vote for him/her/it.
But my point was that events since the recent election have pretty much killed the whole corrosive purity-pragmatism argument around here, and I was wondering why you would bring it up again.
Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at April 27, 2011 03:22 PM (fjoLg)
Posted by: curious at April 27, 2011 03:22 PM (k1rwm)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 27, 2011 03:22 PM (ZkHkm)
Posted by: Walter Sobchak at April 27, 2011 03:23 PM (Rk+mU)
Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at April 27, 2011 03:25 PM (fjoLg)
Posted by: Any Topic But the Huckster, Please! at April 27, 2011 03:25 PM (dDbkT)
Posted by: Ted Kennedy's Gristle Encased Head at April 27, 2011 03:26 PM (+lsX1)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 27, 2011 03:26 PM (ZkHkm)
Posted by: Any Topic But the Huckster, Please! at April 27, 2011 03:27 PM (dDbkT)
Posted by: curious at April 27, 2011 03:27 PM (k1rwm)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at April 27, 2011 03:27 PM (cDRYC)
Posted by: Ted Kennedy's Gristle Encased Head at April 27, 2011 07:26 PM (+lsX1)
Even if said titties have hair on them?
Posted by: Truck Monkey at April 27, 2011 03:28 PM (yQWNf)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at April 27, 2011 03:29 PM (cDRYC)
If Obama wins a second term, I'm leaving the country. Seriously. I'll find a job teaching English in another country.
You'd do better to learn Mandarin.
Posted by: Donald Trump's Forehead Merkin at April 27, 2011 03:29 PM (Kq/LG)
Posted by: mare at April 27, 2011 03:32 PM (A98Xu)
" Integrative Complexity is an accurate indicator of an imminent conflict.
Changes in the integrative complexity of other players indicates an imminent escalation in hostilities
In a related study, "the integrative complexity of the communications of major decision-makers [was found to be] significantly lower during crises that eventually culminate in war than during crises that are resolved peacefully." (pg. 431) Therefore, if you seek peace, try to increase the level of complexity of discussion. Ultimatum type yes/no, black/white discussions are less complex, and are therefore more likely to culminate in war. "
Source - Seudfeld, TetLock & Ramirez; "War, Peace, and Integrative Complexity"
Posted by: Odin at April 27, 2011 03:32 PM (3OCZw)
Because national elections work differently. If you don't seize the squishy middle, you don't win. Period. And with them, it's not so much wooing them (since they're already dis-satisfied with Obama) as it is not scaring them off.
Posted by: Rod Rescueman at April 27, 2011 03:32 PM (HwE/1)
Posted by: curious at April 27, 2011 03:34 PM (k1rwm)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at April 27, 2011 03:34 PM (cDRYC)
Did I miss the definition of this here in the thread? because its meaning is not self-evident.
Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at April 27, 2011 03:35 PM (fjoLg)
In other words, obfuscation is the best path to negotiating peace.
That's interesting. Because I know when people talk in circles and try to confuse me, it makes me desire peace with that person.
Integrative Complexity, is there anything it can't do?
Posted by: Leftover Soothsayers at April 27, 2011 03:36 PM (En7xg)
"I'm leaving the country"
Why bother? Just quit your job, and go on welfare. It seems to wrok well for everybody else. Besides, you know if Obama wins a second term.....the Nanny State is coming back bigger than ever!
Posted by: Jimi at April 27, 2011 03:37 PM (JMsOK)
Integrative is one of those college-campus words.
Like normative. And hetero-normative. And reductionism.
Nobody uses these words in real life; only on campus.
Posted by: Leftover Soothsayers at April 27, 2011 03:39 PM (En7xg)
Posted by: Ken Royall at April 27, 2011 03:41 PM (9zzk+)
Now, see how easy it is to express yourself cogently without using divisive terms of abuse?
There's demonstrable truth in what you say, but you are doing the usual Republican thing of underestimating the popularity of conservatism, properly put forth. This kind of thinking gave us McCain last election.
Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at April 27, 2011 03:41 PM (fjoLg)
Mitt's in the race, so Huckster is in the race. I've been pimping the idea for awhile, but I really think that he hates Romney enough that he'll run just to piss all over Mitt's campaign. I'll be massively surprised if Huck opts out.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 27, 2011 03:42 PM (7YzRS)
And like some others, i would vote for roadkill before the Huckster. The man is a frickin' menace.
Posted by: Penfold at April 27, 2011 03:42 PM (WdtC6)
Posted by: John Holmes at April 27, 2011 03:42 PM (GS9dw)
Posted by: steevy at April 27, 2011 03:43 PM (HLVoN)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at April 27, 2011 03:43 PM (cDRYC)
Nader is coming to MA in a few days.
He'll be speaking at Andover High School, talking about activism and how to be a general nuisance.
Posted by: Leftover Soothsayers at April 27, 2011 03:44 PM (En7xg)
Because I know when people talk in circles and try to confuse me, it makes me desire peace with that person.
The first step to peace is to walk up to Mr. Scrabble-Champion and kick him in the 'nads.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 27, 2011 03:46 PM (7YzRS)
No shit, my older one is in the second grade, and apparently there is more than one way to do subtraction. It's bad when even his union-loving teacher was bitching about it (and I know she is a union-loving teacher because she sends home flyers from her union to us - asking us to rally for the teachers).
Posted by: Penfold at April 27, 2011 03:46 PM (WdtC6)
Posted by: ya2daup, an iPhone iMpeded iPosting at April 27, 2011 03:46 PM (85+IL)
Posted by: ErikW at April 27, 2011 03:48 PM (NgJve)
@119
Yep.......it's either we run with Romney or the fat lady is gonna sing.
The people that keep talking about Pawlenty, Huckleberry Hound, Paul, and Palin don't quite seem to understand how to win. Out of those people just listed....Palin probably has the best shot at the nomination but, I doubt she can beat Obama. The only hope is, if we are gonna get stuck with Obama hopefully the Republicans get a supermajority in the House and Senate. I'm not sure what kind of numbers it is gonna take to make that happend, but that would be the least painful situation.
Posted by: Jimi at April 27, 2011 03:48 PM (JMsOK)
"Even if said titties have hair on them?"
Posted by: Truck Monkey at April 27, 2011 07:28 PM (yQWNf)
You got a problem with that, Punk?
Posted by: Rosie O'Donnel at April 27, 2011 03:49 PM (kUaEF)
124 121 I agree.He showed real,personal animosity.Is it because Romney is mormon?
Posted by: steevy at April 27, 2011 07:43 PM (HLVoN)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 27, 2011 03:50 PM (7YzRS)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at April 27, 2011 03:51 PM (cDRYC)
Posted by: Ken Royall at April 27, 2011 07:41 PM (9zzk+)
Sure looks like it, don't it?
Unless Pawlenty surprises us, or Mitch Daniels jumps in and suddenly catches fire. Beyond that... Donald Trump? Jeesh.
I just hope his Mormon Magic Underwear don't show at his nomination acceptance speech.
Posted by: CoolCzech at April 27, 2011 03:51 PM (kUaEF)
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at April 27, 2011 03:54 PM (u8JAM)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 27, 2011 07:50 PM (7YzRS)
How you worship is one thing, but Jebus, the Book of Mormon? The American Indians are really ancient Hebrews in disguise? Really?? Our continent is covered with (invisible) ruins of ancient cities built by the Lost Tribes of Israel? Jesus, after ascending to the Father, decided a Comeback Tour of America was a good idea? Who knew??
I can't help thinking of all that as the Scientology of the 19th century - and wonder about the judgment of a convert like Romney.
Posted by: CoolCzech at April 27, 2011 03:54 PM (kUaEF)
Yep.......it's either we run with Romney or the fat lady is gonna sing.
Too soon to say. Romney has to overcome the Romneycare albatross around his neck, probably won't win IA, and may have a tough fight in SC. If he loses those two, I'm not sure that wins in the Mormon states will be enough momentum to drag him over the line. Sort of depends on which version of Mitt we see this time around.
If Pawlenty can close the charisma and name-recognition gap, he could be a contender depending on who actually runs. I wouldn't count Daniels out yet, either.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at April 27, 2011 03:55 PM (WRW1S)
I can't help thinking of all that as the Scientology of the 19th century - and wonder about the judgment of a convert like Romney.
Posted by: CoolCzech at April 27, 2011 07:54 PM (kUaEF)
This. Mormons are a wierd cult.
Posted by: ErikW at April 27, 2011 03:57 PM (NgJve)
If I thought that, I'd vote for him even if he was an amateur voodoo witchdoctor.
Posted by: CoolCzech at April 27, 2011 03:58 PM (kUaEF)
@137
"I can't help thinking of all that as the Scientology of the 19th century - and wonder about the judgment of a convert like Romney."
But it's not about all that! It's about ensureing Obama doesn't get another term. We all know Romney isn't no Obama, so if we don't like him, we cn kick him out in 4 years.
Hell....I'd vote for Roseanne Barr right now, just to get this Commie out of there. They got big plans for us in the second term, we must boot him. But, I can't bullshit you......what I really believe is....there is no way Obama is gonna lose this next term....it's just that Romney is the best chance at that possiblity 
Posted by: Jimi at April 27, 2011 03:58 PM (JMsOK)
Posted by: steevy at April 27, 2011 04:00 PM (HLVoN)
Posted by: steevy at April 27, 2011 04:04 PM (HLVoN)
My so-called "divisive terms of abuse" was to preemptively head off screaming nonsense posts full of "he's going to take our guns!!!1111!!eleventy!!" because I had the temerity to mention Christie as my dream choice.
I'll take a brilliant communicator who can actually sell the masses on conservatism over, well, just about anything else I'm seeing out there right now. We need another Reagan. This guy's got it.
A shame he isn't running.
Posted by: Rod Rescueman at April 27, 2011 04:05 PM (HwE/1)
No, we can't. Only the Dems can. Has an incumbent President ever been successfully primaried?
Posted by: Rod Rescueman at April 27, 2011 04:07 PM (HwE/1)
@145
Rod,
I would take my chances of 8 years of Romney, over 4 more of Obama......It just couldn't be anymore Black and White than that for me!
Posted by: Jimi at April 27, 2011 04:09 PM (JMsOK)
The problem is.......or the reason why I keep saying that Obama is gonna win....is that there is alot of people out there that if they get the sense that the Republican can't win.......they won't even vote.......and the media are experts at this.
By late next summer they will have Conservatives and Independents so demoralized I think everybody is gonna be amazed how big Obama is gonna win!
Posted by: Jimi at April 27, 2011 04:11 PM (JMsOK)
Iowa's a strange state given the predominance of independent voters. Given we have to register with a party in order to participate in the caucus, it tends to confuse the national forecasts. Not speaking to the blue collar and U of Iowa radical left on the eastern part of the state, much of the state consists of small towns and educated rural folk (where Norwegian Ollie and Lena jokes are common). That's what perplexes me when the news media "elites" write off our rural folk as uneducated; most of my farmer friends in southwest Iowa all have college degrees. The small town attorney I work with a county over graduated in the top of his Princeton law school class. We live here in small Iowa towns because we like the lifestyle, but by no means are we hicks.
So I'd suggest that Huckabee, who tends to require a less thoughtful, more reactive, white socioeconomically challenged lower class voter, will not likely find support in Iowa this time. Our lower class is predominantly Democratic and located on the eastern side of the state, voting how the unions instruct them to.
Posted by: Multitude at April 27, 2011 04:15 PM (7r7wy)
I have a few of them in my family. Some of their beliefs are odd, but they're good people. Anyone who would not vote for Romney solely on the Mormon issue is the walking definition of intolerant. There, I said it. Besides, there are so many better reasons not to vote Mitt (like socialized medicine).
Is what they believe that much stranger than actually believing that the wafer and wine literally turn into the blood and body of Christ during communion, as Catholics do (or at least are supposed to)? And as far as that goes, how many people really believe in every single tenet laid down by their religion, whether chosen or inherited from birth? Do we know for a fact that Romney buys the whole Joseph Smith story?
Posted by: Rod Rescueman at April 27, 2011 04:16 PM (HwE/1)
The problem is.......or the reason why I keep saying that Obama is gonna win....is that there is alot of people out there that if they get the sense that the Republican can't win.......they won't even vote.......and the media are experts at this.
By late next summer they will have Conservatives and Independents so demoralized I think everybody is gonna be amazed how big Obama is gonna win!
Posted by: Jimi at April 27, 2011 08:11 PM (JMsOK)
Say, we like you kid. And, we like the way you accept the inevitable, like John McCain in '08. You just keep away from that twisted Rush Limbaugh and you'll be fine. Everything's gonna be A-okay. You'll see.
Posted by: The MBM at April 27, 2011 04:18 PM (Ew27I)
Jimi,
I agree with you. I was just questioning the statement that we could replace Mitt with another one of our own if he turns out lousy. I would pull the lever for Mitt in a heartbeat if it came down to him or Obumbles.
Ron Paul or Huckabee topping the ticket might just make me stay home, however. We have to have some standards, after all.
Posted by: Rod Rescueman at April 27, 2011 04:19 PM (HwE/1)
The problem is.......or the reason why I keep saying that Obama is gonna win....is that there is alot of people out there that if they get the sense that the Republican can't win.......they won't even vote.......and the media are experts at this.
By late next summer they will have Conservatives and Independents so demoralized I think everybody is gonna be amazed how big Obama is gonna win!
Posted by: Jimi at April 27, 2011 08:11 PM (JMsOK)
Shut up. We wont be demoralized.
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at April 27, 2011 04:26 PM (u8JAM)
Posted by: mare at April 27, 2011 04:28 PM (A98Xu)
He's a fucking idiot.
Did I mention he doesn't drink?
Posted by: Kemp at April 27, 2011 04:57 PM (JpFM9)
Posted by: swamp_yankee at April 27, 2011 05:01 PM (ZIpcL)
Posted by: Andrew at April 27, 2011 07:14 PM (Yvrvz)
Posted by: Obama's People at April 27, 2011 08:56 PM (hsk48)
Posted by: skh.pcola at April 28, 2011 12:34 AM (vsFI8)
Posted by: wholesale lingerie at April 28, 2011 03:40 PM (Yczb7)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2279 seconds, 287 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
Posted by: Ed Anger at April 27, 2011 02:41 PM (7+pP9)