April 20, 2011
— Ace Interesting topic. A speech by a guy named Dr. Robert Lustig making this case below the fold, naming the fructose component of sugar as teh primary villain.
There's also this article about it.
This writer, Gary Taubes, is an in-the-bag Atkins theory believer (and concedes as much in this article, disclosing that). He was the guy who, more than anyone, set off the Atkins craze of the 00's with his big article in the New York Times Sunday section on fat, provocatively headlined, "Have we been wrong all along?"
The Atkins thing had been around since the seventies, but it was that article that turned it into a craze.
I think (I haven't read the whole thing yet) is that Taubes is of the opinion that sugar (and other carbs) are the villains, whereas Lustig is more selective in choice of villain, and thinks it's mostly just fructose. But apart from that point, they're mostly on the same page.
I haven't read the whole article yet or watched the full lecture, so I don't know if I buy the Villain Fructose claim.
Here's
And here's his long (hour and a half) lecture on sugar.
The most interesting part of this so far is at 9:40-10:00, where he makes the point that in 1982 the government admonished us to reduce fat consumption from 40% of the calories in our diets to 30%. The interesting thing is that America actually did so -- our current average fat intake did fall to 30%.
At the same time, obesity and diabetes skyrocketed.
So... that wasn't good advice.
Posted by: Ace at
11:42 AM
| Comments (410)
Post contains 269 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: AoSHQ's worst commenter, DarkLord© at April 20, 2011 11:45 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 20, 2011 11:45 AM (Y0wFY)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at April 20, 2011 11:46 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: Waterhouse at April 20, 2011 11:47 AM (Q95Dr)
And here's his long (hour and a half) lecture on sugar.
I'm no academic, but come on, man, sugar warrants a paragraph, at most.
Posted by: Soothsayer 6 of 8 at April 20, 2011 11:48 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 20, 2011 11:49 AM (Y0wFY)
Eggs are bad for you!
ten years later: Eggs are an excellent source of protein!
This. I was in my thirties when I started to notice the pattern. Every few years, some pointy-heads come out with some new study showing that this or that is good or bad for you, like coffee.
I'm back to eating what I damned well please.
Eat right, exercise, die anyway.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at April 20, 2011 11:49 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: Lizbth at April 20, 2011 11:49 AM (JZBti)
Sadly, even if sugar is toxic, I love it too much to quit it. I do, however, try to limit my intake. I avoid the worst stuff, like wonderful donuts, delicious regular pop, etc.
mmmmm... sugar...
And hey - gotta die of something. I'd like to see a diet that promises me a massive heart attack or stroke in my early-to-mid 70's. My Grandad is 90 now, and it ain't looking like a great deal. I'd rather check out ahead of that.
Posted by: Reactionary at April 20, 2011 11:49 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: garrett at April 20, 2011 11:50 AM (0oUd+)
Posted by: The guy on his third brandy and coke. at April 20, 2011 11:50 AM (cDRYC)
Posted by: Blackford Oakes at April 20, 2011 11:50 AM (Klxrr)
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at April 20, 2011 11:50 AM (FD7Ct)
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at April 20, 2011 11:51 AM (Ilc9V)
To all the chemist-types here: isn't alcohol a sugar?
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at April 20, 2011 11:51 AM (d0Tfm)
Well, Sirs, I'll tell you how good it tasted.
Also, it should be mentioned, people have been eating Fructose for about as long as man has been, well, eating, and obesity has only become a general problem relatively recently in history. I'm not thinking that Fructose is a villain, I'm thinking that people are stupid and eat too much of the wrong things and don't get enough exercise. But I'm not a doctor, so my opinion probably doesn't count.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at April 20, 2011 11:51 AM (8y9MW)
Please. From someone who has to constantly watch the diet, it's not fructose, it's not protein or fat. It's the quantity. As someone upthread has already mentioned, water can be toxic in high enough amounts.
I'm really fucking tired of all the food nazis we've got living in this country. I mean really really fucking tired of them.
Posted by: Soona at April 20, 2011 11:52 AM (2ryjh)
I'll buy it if it means they go back to making Coke with real sucrose again.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at April 20, 2011 11:52 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: marine43 at April 20, 2011 11:53 AM (g0Uoh)
Posted by: Lizbth at April 20, 2011 11:53 AM (JZBti)
Why do people pay so much attention to these cranks? What's next -- WERE THE MAYANS VISITED BY ALIENS?!
Posted by: Rob Crawford at April 20, 2011 11:53 AM (IuKAf)
SORRY FOR OT: Tomorrow is Earth Day, and I ask all morons not of the Christian faith to look around at all the ads and signs about the environment and Gaia and CO2, and imagine that instead of low carbon footprints and sustainability someone was shoving Christ in your face, in the most offensive way possible, every two minutes. (IIW, if things *really were* the way some people *claim* they are.)
I am a middle-aged moron, and I remember when there was lead in gasoline and the trash got burned in the county incinerator (ashes falling in my yard when the wind was wrong). The air and water are a lot cleaner now, I wish the evangelical enviros would be happy about it and leave my light bulbs alone.
Posted by: delayna at April 20, 2011 11:53 AM (NKkrL)
If you're not diabetic or a lard-ass, enjoy your Pepsi and Ding Dongs, unless or until they're making you a lard-ass. Then stop, or you might get diabetes.
Posted by: Dr. oblig. at April 20, 2011 11:54 AM (xvZW9)
Posted by: booger at April 20, 2011 11:54 AM (9RFH1)
Posted by: Dr. Varno at April 20, 2011 11:54 AM (QMtmy)
Screw it, even if it is bad for me, I'm going to eat what I want. I'm 37; it isn't like I'm going to lose the good years. In fact, I might start smoking again. If I lose ten years off my life, that's ten fewer years crapping my Depends.
Grim
Posted by: Grim at April 20, 2011 11:54 AM (gyNYk)
This is the same kind of shit that gets stuff like the globull warming scam pushed.
Posted by: Vic at April 20, 2011 11:54 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: The Great and Secret Show at April 20, 2011 11:55 AM (NL03B)
Egg yolks are bad for you because they're high in cholesterol. So is bacon. Don't eat them every day and you'll be fine.
Fuck that noise. I'm going down with a bacon-contented smile on my face.
Eggs bad, bacon bad, chocolate bad, ice cream bad, alcohol bad, beef bad, milk bad, etc. We might live longer by cutting these out of our diet, but why would we want to?
Posted by: Paul Krugman at April 20, 2011 11:55 AM (sBoN3)
No. Alcohol is an alcohol. But it is derived from the decomposition of sugar and it does have an -OH group.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at April 20, 2011 11:55 AM (Ilc9V)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 20, 2011 11:56 AM (Y0wFY)
Posted by: The guy on his third brandy and coke. at April 20, 2011 11:56 AM (cDRYC)
Posted by: gebrauchshund at April 20, 2011 11:56 AM (iYwUw)
"And hey - gotta die of something. I'd like to see a diet that promises me a massive heart attack or stroke in my early-to-mid 70's. My Grandad is 90 now, and it ain't looking like a great deal. I'd rather check out ahead of that. "
My observation is the last 3 years of life suck, like suck out load suck. Better to be felled in mid stroke than wither hoplessly for years watching TeeVee. It wouldn't be so bad if we had NFL Football on year round. Absent that, die hard and fast.
Posted by: Ginormous at April 20, 2011 11:56 AM (Q5+Og)
ten years later: Eggs are an excellent source of protein!
Posted by: Soothsayer 6 of 8
Preach it egghead.
Posted by: butter at April 20, 2011 11:56 AM (6rX0K)
No matter what you do, no matter what you eat, no matter how much you exercise...
...you're going to die anyway.
Posted by: AmishDude at April 20, 2011 11:57 AM (T0NGe)
Dr. Atkins killed my father.
He was a huckster. An incompetent pseudo-scientist snake oil salesman that was only interested in selling books and bilking patients. My father had undiagnosed congestive heart failure while a patient under his care. (It was diagnosed when his heart stopped) (Atkins was a cardiologist)
His diet may or may not work for losing weight, but it is certain death for heart patients. His kelation crap was just a way to steal from patients. A provably ineffective treatment for the problems caused by his diet.
Posted by: nine coconuts at April 20, 2011 11:57 AM (uz3hs)
Posted by: Penfold at April 20, 2011 11:58 AM (1PeEC)
Posted by: The guy on his third brandy and coke. at April 20, 2011 11:58 AM (cDRYC)
I've had two heart attacks and croaked once already.
I find that Honey Badger fellow intriguing...
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at April 20, 2011 11:58 AM (d0Tfm)
Last time I was there it did. Kosher Coke also has real sugar in it.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at April 20, 2011 11:59 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: Bob Saget at April 20, 2011 11:59 AM (F/4zf)
No matter what you do, no matter what you eat, no matter how much you exercise...
...you're going to die anyway.
Posted by: AmishDude at April 20, 2011 03:57 PM (T0NGe)
The deuce you say!
Posted by: MWR at April 20, 2011 11:59 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Syracuse1989 at April 20, 2011 11:59 AM (Q6ZUl)
Posted by: Ben at April 20, 2011 11:59 AM (wuv1c)
...you're going to die anyway.
Posted by: AmishDude at April 20, 2011 03:57 PM (T0NGe)
Arg! Where's the spoiler warning??
Posted by: KG at April 20, 2011 11:59 AM (4L0zr)
Bacon > Eggs. You can't lube nothin' with an egg.
Posted by: garrett at April 20, 2011 12:00 PM (0oUd+)
And hey - gotta die of something. I'd like to see a diet that promises me a massive heart attack or stroke in my early-to-mid 70's. My Grandad is 90 now, and it ain't looking like a great deal. I'd rather check out ahead of that.
Posted by: Reactionary at April 20, 2011 03:49 PM (xUM1Q)
That's what I used to think, until I started approaching that age. Trust me. Your perspective will change.
Posted by: Soona at April 20, 2011 12:01 PM (2ryjh)
Where does doing the nasty with 5 lithesome cheerleaders fit in to your die quick scheme?
Posted by: CUS at April 20, 2011 12:02 PM (wOGfT)
Bacon is great but all that fat is not conducive with erectile function.
You aren't telling me anything I didn't know already.
Posted by: Kirstie Allie at April 20, 2011 12:02 PM (0oUd+)
Listen up morons. I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night and I can tell you this...eat, drink and be merry for tomorrow you shall die. Words to live by.
Enjoy your life, quit worrying about every goddamn thing. Geez, isn't Ofuckstick enough torture for a lifetime?
Posted by: mpfs at April 20, 2011 12:02 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 20, 2011 12:03 PM (Y0wFY)
Hey, it's vaguely sugar-related. Fake sugar, sure. Still. Be sure to watch to the end for Elliott's awesome scream, and everyone's reaction.
Posted by: Waterhouse at April 20, 2011 12:03 PM (Q95Dr)
OT
I'm somewhat torn, I guess this is cool, but the inability to climb, take off on his own power, or do any power manuevers makes this look like a partially powered ultralite. So the coolness is more like mehness for me.
Posted by: maddogg at April 20, 2011 12:03 PM (OlN4e)
The rest finish your Doritos and Dr. Pepper and get to work. These used comics and VHS tapes won't sort themselves.
Posted by: My Sharia Moor at April 20, 2011 12:03 PM (ZY+lZ)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at April 20, 2011 12:03 PM (cDRYC)
I like my tea like half sweet and half unsweet.
Posted by: Dr. Varno at April 20, 2011 12:03 PM (QMtmy)
Which brings up the old vegetable joke:
Vegetables are not food
Vegetables are what food eats
Fish are fast vegetables
Fruit are vegetables that fool you by tasting good
Mushrooms are what grows on food after it dies
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 20, 2011 12:04 PM (sBoN3)
OT, but why do liberals find it permissable to savage a young child with Down Syndrome?
Leading Leftie Blog (Wonkette) Mocks Sarah PalinÂ’s Handicapped Baby on His Birthday (link is to Gateway Pundit)
I mean, yes, okay, I get that the left has no shame, class, or sense of decorum, but seriously? SERIOUSLY?
Forget sugar being toxic. You want real toxicity, I give you THE LEFT WING.
Posted by: MWR at April 20, 2011 12:04 PM (4df7R)
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at April 20, 2011 03:55 PM (Ilc9V)
Many thanks for the info. I was always more of a physics guy than a chemistry guy.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at April 20, 2011 12:04 PM (d0Tfm)
Two years ago I weighed 250 pounds and got the speech from my doctor about how I was pre-diabetic. I went on an Atkins diet. I now weigh 162 pounds and my insulin resistance is 100% gone. Period. I have been at a stable low weight for more than a year and a half.
Atkins most definitely is NOT bollocks. Reducing carbs in your diet works!. And my blood chemistry is in great shape as well.
I am not suggesting Taubes is definitely 100% right about everything, but what he has to say is something you definitely ought to consider if you are looking at losing weight.
By the way, I live to eat, so I still eat just about everything. I just have to limit certain things to more special occaisions.
Posted by: doug at April 20, 2011 12:05 PM (uIGjr)
Its when you do the opposite of all that that you get into trouble. I know. I smoked 3 packs of cigs a day. Drank beer out the kazoo every Friday. Ate like a horse and after I retired got little exercise and gained 10 pounds.
Wasn't long after I retired that I had a heart attack.
Posted by: Vic at April 20, 2011 12:05 PM (M9Ie6)
Wow, alot of judgement from many who haven't watched or read.
These guys are decidedly NOT food nazis. Yes, people have a right to eat poorly, but they should have all the information when doing so.
And morons, please, exercise is a terrible way to lose weight. One mile of running is roughly equal calorically to a slice of bread. You won't make it that way, guaranteed.
But you'd know that if you watch the video and read Taubes' material.
Posted by: Gabriel Syme at April 20, 2011 12:06 PM (g84Si)
Oh yeah something else to worry about, third hand smoke. Can you fucking believe it????
Posted by: mpfs at April 20, 2011 12:06 PM (iYbLN)
Where does doing the nasty with 5 lithesome cheerleaders fit in to your die quick scheme?
I did say better go out mid stroke than wither. What about mid-stroke confused you?
Posted by: Ginormous at April 20, 2011 12:06 PM (Q5+Og)
Posted by: The Mega Indepedent at April 20, 2011 12:07 PM (I9hG4)
Calm down guys. I've looked into the matter and it's really not at all hard to figure out: Most people eat too much sugar and too many carbs. Most people eat too many calories. Most people are therefore overweight/downright fat.
Though going totally no-carb/no-sugar isn't really sustainable, sometimes the "crash" aspect of such a diet can help a person realize how much damn sugar they were really eating everyday (this was my case). Once you start eating the carbs and sugar again, you realize you really don't need to have some kind of sweet with every. single. meal.
Then when you start to pay even a little attention to total calories, you begin to realize that you've been eating enough for a 6' 5" 20 year old professional athlete, and maybe if you scaled the quantity back a wee bit, you can maintain a healthy weight.
Finally, you begin to realize all the "But we're all gonna die anyway" arguments are also crap, because most people when they finally lose weight don't say "Great! Now I can live another 10 years!" but rather they say "Great! Now I feel normal again, and I look good for once in the last 15 years!"
This isn't rocket science, everyone knows, or can find out, what to do to look and feel like they're 18 again.
Posted by: The Voice of Reason at April 20, 2011 12:08 PM (UpqKo)
Posted by: maddogg at April 20, 2011 12:08 PM (OlN4e)
Ah. So you come and go at the same time.
Gotcha.
Posted by: CUS at April 20, 2011 12:08 PM (wOGfT)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at April 20, 2011 12:08 PM (71LDo)
To all the chemist-types here: isn't alcohol a sugar?
No, although there are sugar alcohols, which are basically sugars with an OH attached to them
(The OH functional group is what makes an alcohol an alcohol).
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at April 20, 2011 12:08 PM (9hSKh)
Posted by: 3.14159 at April 20, 2011 12:08 PM (tTlIu)
And it's just not debatable that millions of us can't and don't process carbohydrates well, and the evidence is overwhelming that the government food pyramid is a extremely harmful for many of us.
Posted by: Lyford at April 20, 2011 12:09 PM (51M0i)
Bacon is great but all that fat is not conducive with erectile function.
Well, my personality inevitably leads me into celibacy so Mr. Winky is kind of on funemployment.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 20, 2011 12:09 PM (sBoN3)
Posted by: McDonald's at April 20, 2011 12:09 PM (uHiEX)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at April 20, 2011 12:10 PM (9hSKh)
Posted by: doug at April 20, 2011 12:10 PM (hD/NZ)
In sufficient quantity, WATER is toxic.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 20, 2011 03:45 PM (Y0wFY)
Yup. Wee for Wii radio stunt that killed a woman because she kept drinking water.
Posted by: buzzion at April 20, 2011 12:11 PM (oVQFe)
Here's the Executive Summary:
- People eat way more fructose than they used to, because it's in damn near everything, and that leads directly to our national health issues.
- Fructose is metabolized only by the liver, just like ethanol (with similar results, hence the "toxin" comment). A vastly higher percentage of fructose is converted to fat than glucose (which is metabolized everywhere).
- There is no real difference metabolically between sucrose and HFCS. So "real sugar" is just as bad for you.
- If you're going to eat fructose, eat it in whole fruit because the fiber mitigates some of the negative effects of the fructose. Plus, vitamins and whatnot.
- You should exercise, as you'll be healthier and a faster metabolism helps mitigate the problem.
That's it. He doesn't say we should ban anything or whatever. He's just saying that you and your kids are fat and have the diabeetus because you eat and drink too much sugar. Why this is offensive I have no idea.
Posted by: Henry at April 20, 2011 12:11 PM (cnieV)
That's basically Weight Watchers--with the points and all.
Posted by: CUS at April 20, 2011 12:11 PM (wOGfT)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at April 20, 2011 12:11 PM (71LDo)
Posted by: PatriotWI at April 20, 2011 12:11 PM (BqdfG)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at April 20, 2011 12:11 PM (cDRYC)
According to a University of Syracuse study jogging 1 mile burns 124 calories. A slice of bread is 67 calories.
But the purpose of exercise is not so much to lose weight, although it does help with that. It is to keep your heart healthy.
Posted by: Vic at April 20, 2011 12:12 PM (M9Ie6)
Personally, I'd prefer to die at the sexual mercy of whichever set of twins were in Playboy the last time.
They'd never get the casket lid shut all the way. Or get the smile off my face.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at April 20, 2011 12:12 PM (d0Tfm)
I've done a diet for candida before which is pretty much a gluten free diet, no sugars at all or even starches that break down into sugar.
I'm not a large guy and didn't have much excess weight to lose at the time, but the pounds just flew off.
Posted by: Canadian Infidel at April 20, 2011 12:13 PM (GKQDR)
We're not poo pooing the good doctor for his position on sugar.
We're poo pooing the fact that people make a big deal about diets when it really just comes down to common sense.
Posted by: Soothsayer 6 of 8 at April 20, 2011 12:13 PM (uFokq)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 20, 2011 12:14 PM (IXLvN)
Much as I want to judge fat people as weak, because it makes me look good, I think I believe him that there are some bodies that just have to work much much harder to remain lean, and that they absolutely cannot do so by moving more and eating less. They have to eat less of the stuff that keeps their insulin levels elevated so their fat retention regulation is constantly storing fat and never has the opportunity to release it....
Posted by: doug at April 20, 2011 12:14 PM (MQlzc)
Yup. Wee for Wii radio stunt that killed a woman because she kept drinking water.
She must have gotten hyponatremic.
Posted by: runningrn at April 20, 2011 12:14 PM (ihSHD)
Posted by: The Voice of Reason at April 20, 2011 12:15 PM (UpqKo)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 20, 2011 03:49 PM (Y0wFY)
Yeah, but who wants to get humped by a dinosaur?
Posted by: tcn at April 20, 2011 12:16 PM (QuGK2)
Posted by: mpfs at April 20, 2011 12:17 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at April 20, 2011 12:17 PM (cDRYC)
Posted by: kathleen at April 20, 2011 12:17 PM (U9C39)
Posted by: hinky at April 20, 2011 12:17 PM (hG22m)
Posted by: lauren at April 20, 2011 12:17 PM (2kaVc)
All you youngsters will find that after you cross 30 the weight goes on a lot easier and comes off a lot harder because your metabolism changes. It gets worse the older you get. When you cross 50 it becomes a losing cause unless you diet and exercise literally all the time.
Posted by: Vic at April 20, 2011 12:17 PM (M9Ie6)
this might be a good thread to say the replacement weather-babes on Fox have been giving me eye-boners.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 20, 2011 12:17 PM (IXLvN)
Ace didn't really expect us to watch this. He just pretends like he did
Ignorance is truly bliss, in this case.
Posted by: momma at April 20, 2011 12:17 PM (penCf)
One mile of running is roughly equal calorically to a slice of bread.
According to a University of Syracuse study jogging 1 mile burns 124 calories. A slice of bread is 67 calories.
But the purpose of exercise is not so much to lose weight, although it does help with that. It is to keep your heart healthy.
I don't know anyone that just runs 1 mile (unless it's a track meet).
And yeah, running/exercise isn't just good for your heart, it's good for your mind and soul as well. You get the old endorphin release, and it's all good. Plus, it's a great stress reliever, a great social activity, and it's just a lot of fun. The hardest part is getting started.
Posted by: runningrn at April 20, 2011 12:17 PM (ihSHD)
It's a simple machine.
Posted by: sifty at April 20, 2011 12:17 PM (+cmP9)
Posted by: Dr. Varno at April 20, 2011 12:17 PM (QMtmy)
Posted by: Soona at April 20, 2011 12:17 PM (2ryjh)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 20, 2011 03:49 PM (Y0wFY)
Yeah, but who wants to get humped by a dinosaur?
Posted by: tcn
Yeah, did you every see how little their arms are? Fucking goofy looking.
Posted by: mpfs at April 20, 2011 12:18 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: kathleen at April 20, 2011 12:18 PM (U9C39)
Posted by: Michelle Obama at April 20, 2011 12:18 PM (UciSl)
Posted by: Gault Falcon at April 20, 2011 12:18 PM (reZBO)
Posted by: Ginormous at April 20, 2011 12:18 PM (Q5+Og)
Posted by: Dr. Varno at April 20, 2011 12:19 PM (QMtmy)
I belong to Planet Fitness, which I call Planet Fatness because I'm clever.
Anyway, everyday I see a bunch of really fat women on the treadmills and elipticals and they never make any improvements. Why?
Because after spending two hours at the gym and burning 200 calories and sweating 3lbs of water from their ass-cracks, they never make any improvements because after they go to Dunkin Donuts and eat a 600 calorie donut and a Diet Coke.
Posted by: Soothsayer 6 of 8 at April 20, 2011 12:19 PM (uFokq)
Posted by: mpfs at April 20, 2011 12:19 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 20, 2011 12:20 PM (FI38b)
Posted by: kathleen at April 20, 2011 12:20 PM (U9C39)
Posted by: Count de Monet at April 20, 2011 12:20 PM (XBM1t)
Yeah,there is that too. I do two miles every morning that weather permits but I do it at a fast walk (Dr. Detroit). Sports doctors recommend that once you cross 40 that you switch to fast walking because it is too hard on your joints and ankles.
Posted by: Vic at April 20, 2011 12:20 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: raven at April 20, 2011 12:20 PM (uK3qk)
"Yeah, did you every see how little their arms are? Fucking goofy looking."
Yeah, no shit, and nasty feet the size of a Rambler. They remind me of Janet Reno.
Posted by: Ginormous at April 20, 2011 12:21 PM (Q5+Og)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at April 20, 2011 12:21 PM (cDRYC)
What national health issues? The fact that life expectancy is higher now than when people were 'fit' fifty years ago?
I buy that sugar and everything else is bad for you, but is this really a problem?
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at April 20, 2011 12:21 PM (TpXEI)
Yes.
Posted by: booger knows this to be true at April 20, 2011 03:57 PM (9RFH1)
Oh crap. My son is 100% Mayan Indian. I'm living with a little alien.
Posted by: tcn at April 20, 2011 12:21 PM (QuGK2)
I don't know anyone that just runs 1 mile (unless it's a track meet).
Every Saturday I run 1 mile at 7:30 or less.
Posted by: Soothsayer 6 of 8 at April 20, 2011 12:21 PM (uFokq)
He's looking down at us from his throne of bones and shaking his head while he pets his armored Honey Badger.
Posted by: sifty at April 20, 2011 12:22 PM (+cmP9)
Posted by: Valiant at April 20, 2011 12:22 PM (9/lhd)
Exercise builds muscle, which weighs more than fat.
Stop it. A pound of muscle weighs exactly the same as a pound of fat. The fat takes up more volume, though.
Posted by: CUS at April 20, 2011 12:22 PM (wOGfT)
Posted by: doug at April 20, 2011 12:22 PM (+C5m6)
Sprinkle some sea salt on the caramel just before it is completely cool. The contrasts of the salt, the fat, and the sweet is marvelous.
In fact, dip the caramels in dark chocolate, and then sprinkle the sea salt on them; that's even better.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at April 20, 2011 12:23 PM (LH6ir)
"Because after spending two hours at the gym and burning 200 calories and sweating 3lbs of water from their ass-cracks, they never make any improvements because after they go to Dunkin Donuts and eat a 600 calorie donut and a Diet Coke."
A Diet Coke can fix anything. It's like the duct tape of diet.
Posted by: Ginormous at April 20, 2011 12:23 PM (Q5+Og)
Posted by: mpfs at April 20, 2011 12:23 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: Aqua Buddha at April 20, 2011 04:04 PM (0oUd+)
Dude I HATE it when that happens! It fucking pops and shoots out and lands on my hoodie and burns a hole through it and I'm all like WHOA! did you see that seed fucking pop? It was like a little evil Viet Cong in my bowl that's launching mortars at me and trying to kill me!
Posted by: Guy who smokes way too much weed at April 20, 2011 12:24 PM (voX7b)
Tomorrow on Ace: Grooming Your Ewok -- Do's & Don'ts
Posted by: Dr. Varno at April 20, 2011 12:24 PM (QMtmy)
Posted by: Ed Schultz, SooperGenius at April 20, 2011 12:24 PM (XBM1t)
Do you have a problem with thunder thighs or chunkiness? Join me and the other fags in Sweatin' to the Oldies.
Posted by: Miss Richard Simmons at April 20, 2011 12:24 PM (ZHsNw)
A Diet Coke can fix anything. It's like the duct tape of diet.
When I worked at BK during my tumultuous teenage years, I never failed to gleam amusement from the people who ordered a large double whopper with cheese meal with a Diet Coke, heh.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at April 20, 2011 12:25 PM (9hSKh)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at April 20, 2011 12:25 PM (qIHlG)
Posted by: buzzion at April 20, 2011 12:25 PM (oVQFe)
I volunteer for that experiment. Get one pound of bacon, crisp. Add 5 lithesome cheerleaders...
Posted by: CUS at April 20, 2011 12:25 PM (wOGfT)
Guess what? Now you do.
Every Saturday I run 1 mile at 7:30 or less.
Well, you are the first then. Do you warm up? Do you cool down? And you would be burning more calories than a slice of bread; body weight and intensity figure into that calculation too.
Posted by: runningrn at April 20, 2011 12:25 PM (ihSHD)
Posted by: If you are stupid and ignorant, thank a (union) teacher at April 20, 2011 12:25 PM (LH6ir)
Gatorade is awful stuff. So is Vitamin Water.
All fruit juice is crap. Even a glass of fresh squeezed OJ is loaded with sugar (carbs). Just eat a friggin orange or two.
Posted by: Soothsayer 6 of 8 at April 20, 2011 12:25 PM (uFokq)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at April 20, 2011 12:26 PM (cDRYC)
Tomorrow on Ace: Grooming Your Ewok -- Do's & Don'ts
Brain bleach needed. The first thing I thought of was "landing strip".
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 20, 2011 12:26 PM (sBoN3)
Posted by: mpfs at April 20, 2011 12:26 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: polynikes at April 20, 2011 12:26 PM (7sQ6G)
Posted by: Count de Monet at April 20, 2011 12:26 PM (XBM1t)
http://tinyurl.com/44bmfj7
Posted by: Sockless Joe at April 20, 2011 12:27 PM (nECOk)
And yeah, running/exercise isn't just good for your heart, it's good for your mind and soul as well. You get the old endorphin release, and it's all good. Plus, it's a great stress reliever, a great social activity, and it's just a lot of fun. The hardest part is getting started.
Right, but it is not a good way to lose weight. For most, it is simply impossible to exercise off excess calories. Consumption increases to match exenditure. Not for all, but for most. Weight loss is 80%+ diet-related.
Posted by: Gabriel Syme at April 20, 2011 12:27 PM (g84Si)
"Stop it. A pound of muscle weighs exactly the same as a pound of fat. The fat takes up more volume, though."
Yes, but fat will float, muscle not so much. This is fact you may wish to consider in your Tsunami survival plans.
Posted by: Ginormous at April 20, 2011 12:27 PM (Q5+Og)
Dad: "Grab that pick and shovel. In one week I want one acre of that alfalfa field broken up and double dug and then raked smooth."
Me: "But Dad, this field is a mile from the house."
Dad: "Yep. And then you get to make the rows and dig a ditch around it. Now qit your bitchin' about your weight or get to work"
Posted by: sifty at April 20, 2011 12:27 PM (+cmP9)
They've done just about everything with bacon.
Now they just need to weaponize it. (We are currently in a war, btw...)
Posted by: Dr. Varno at April 20, 2011 12:28 PM (QMtmy)
Posted by: mpfs at April 20, 2011 12:28 PM (iYbLN)
Sugar can be accessed for energy far more easily with proper exercise.
Eliminate processed foods and soft drinks as they have HFCS (because it's cheaper than sugar) and when you start looking at ingredients as I had to because of a health problem, you'll find HFCS is in everything due to cost.
That is what needs to be avoided, sugar not so much.
And yes Mexican Coke has beet sugar and the illegals will go the extra mile to get it.
Posted by: ontherocks at April 20, 2011 12:28 PM (HBqDo)
Doug #154, the reason people eat a lot is because it makes them feel good to eat (evolution is hard to beat). The reason there are more fat people than ever before is because food is cheaper than ever relative to the average american income. Historically, only the rich could afford enough food to get fat, which is why it has always been synonomous with being rich. By almost any historical or global standard, even the poor in america is rich, relatively speaking.
It's as simple as this: Cheap food = fat people.
Posted by: The Voice of Reason at April 20, 2011 12:28 PM (UpqKo)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at April 20, 2011 12:28 PM (qIHlG)
Why, so my ulcer can start digesting my stomach again? No thank you.
Must have something in stomach at all times.
Posted by: CUS at April 20, 2011 12:28 PM (wOGfT)
So in case of a plane crash into water or a Tsunami, Moochelle's ass can be used as a flotation device?
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at April 20, 2011 12:28 PM (9hSKh)
Posted by: CUS at April 20, 2011 04:22 PM (wOGfT)
It's called density. Fat is less dense than muscle, so if you build muscle, while burning fat, there's a chance you won't lose any weight while shedding fat inches.
I'm just sayin....
Posted by: © Sponge at April 20, 2011 12:28 PM (UK9cE)
Over 3/4 of you in your Moms' basements have dicky do's. That's your fat belly sticks out more than your tiny prick does. It's not fun having metabolic syndrome. Can lead to diabetes. Plus rather sucks not being able to see your pudding dipper. You probably pee all over the toilet cause it's too hard to see where you are aiming with that big gut of visceral fat obstructing the view. Plus sex has to suck, I bet you get out of breath whacking the bishop. That is sad. Or if married and living in your in-law's basement, you probably always have sex with her on top doing all the work. Is nice, but guys come on. She deserves better.
Let's not beat each other up. Long as you are conservative, I'd like to see you change your life around. If you are a lib, well keep shoving that sugar down your pie hole.
Posted by: PatriotWI at April 20, 2011 12:28 PM (BqdfG)
Posted by: Jean at April 20, 2011 12:29 PM (0rXxT)
Stop it. A pound of muscle weighs exactly the same as a pound of fat. The fat takes up more volume, though.
True dat. I always wish people could come to surgery and see the difference. Fat is nasty, slimey, yellow blobs of grease. When we used to fillet the entire leg open to harvest leg vein for bypass surgery, gobs of fat used to fall out of the heavier people's thighs. We had to wipe them off the floor with alcohol so that people wouldn't slip and fall. Now we're doing endoscopic vein harvesting, that's not such a problem any more. It was a real safety issue back in the day.
Posted by: runningrn at April 20, 2011 12:29 PM (ihSHD)
Don't bother with actual facts; he's a concern troll.
Posted by: If you are stupid and ignorant, thank a (union) teacher at April 20, 2011 12:29 PM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 20, 2011 04:20 PM (FI38b)
I know that it may be outside the paradigm of most people, but yes, exercise is not that proficient at losing fat. It's all about caloric intake and how many calories a person burns during a normal day. Contrary to popular belief, exercise, as people understand it today, really doesn't burn that many calories.
Posted by: Soona at April 20, 2011 12:29 PM (2ryjh)
Do you warm up? Do you cool down? And you would be burning more calories than a slice of bread; body weight and intensity figure into that calculation too.
Yes and yes, but just briefly. I'm not in the gym to lose weight. I do just a little cardio on Wednesdays and Saturdays. Other days I'm training with weights.
Posted by: Soothsayer 6 of 8 at April 20, 2011 12:29 PM (uFokq)
Christina Hendricks will never drown. For this I am thankful.
Posted by: Count de Monet at April 20, 2011 12:30 PM (XBM1t)
Posted by: t-bird at April 20, 2011 12:30 PM (FcR7P)
Posted by: mpfs at April 20, 2011 12:30 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at April 20, 2011 04:27 PM (qIHlG)
Wow. That was intense. I've never seen so much meaning in so much nothingness. It's like when I read what you didn't say, my third eye opened to the universe.
Posted by: Guy who smokes way too much weed at April 20, 2011 12:30 PM (voX7b)
Care to back up any of your blather with actual facts; rather than the made-up ones that you seem to prefer?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at April 20, 2011 12:31 PM (LH6ir)
Spoken by another lean person whose never had a weight issue and doesn't understand the subject.
Virtually every fat person you've ever seen has done the whole "eat less, eat in moderation, exercise" bit with limited, or no, success. Some people's metabolism can not sustain a low-fat diet such as the government and diet experts recommend. I can't go a month on a low-fat diet of fewer than 2500 calories a day, because I'm starving the whole time. My blood sugar goes through the roof, my insulin goes way up, my fat stores all of the energy, and I haven't got any left for living. But on a virtual-no-carb diet, I'm quite comfortable on 1700-1800, and the weight just falls off.
Yeah, it sounds simple to say "eat less, exercise more" but for most people, there's more to it - a lot more to it - than that.
Posted by: Lyford at April 20, 2011 12:31 PM (51M0i)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 20, 2011 12:31 PM (FI38b)
Posted by: doug at April 20, 2011 12:31 PM (Lf1Ga)
Any pro and amatueur bodybuilder will tell you, (and these people are the experts), that diet is 75% of their regimen. The rest is weight-resistance training and cardio.
Posted by: Soothsayer 6 of 8 at April 20, 2011 12:31 PM (uFokq)
Posted by: the Chicken at April 20, 2011 12:31 PM (6rX0K)
I thought CUS just said that.
Posted by: Archimedes at April 20, 2011 12:31 PM (wOGfT)
Posted by: lauren at April 20, 2011 12:32 PM (2kaVc)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at April 20, 2011 12:32 PM (qIHlG)
Tomorrow on Ace: Pudding Recipes with Kathie Lee
Posted by: Dr. Varno at April 20, 2011 12:32 PM (QMtmy)
Posted by: sifty at April 20, 2011 12:33 PM (+cmP9)
It's like you're looking into my soul.
Posted by: booger at April 20, 2011 12:33 PM (9RFH1)
Posted by: ontherocks at April 20, 2011 04:28 PM (HBqDo) Mexican Coke is amazing. It kicks regular coke's ass. Seriously.
Posted by: Ms Choksondik at April 20, 2011 12:33 PM (UciSl)
Posted by: Vic at April 20, 2011 04:20 PM (M9Ie6)
Tell that to my dad. He took up mountain running when he was 68 because he was tired of having to get a physical every year to keep his pilot's license. He's 81 now, has his own age group so he wins everything. He lost about 30 lbs, got very buff for an old guy. He went in for his stress test and the doc finally gave up. He just kept on going. We figure he won't die of anything specific, just one day on the trail he will sort of implode and that will be the end. Probably sometime in his 90's.
Posted by: tcn at April 20, 2011 12:33 PM (QuGK2)
You can gain a full optical inch by shaving off your man-bush.
So that makes you four inches Jeff?
Posted by: mpfs at April 20, 2011 12:33 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at April 20, 2011 12:33 PM (cDRYC)
I'm not one of the food Nazis and don't give a damn what people eat.
I do like to look into people's shopping carts though when grocery shopping. You can pretty much guess just by looking at people what's going to be in their cart.
I'm pretty happy with fruits, vegetables, rice, fish and nuts. Occasionally chicken, hamburgers, steaks and pizza.
When I busted my elbow in South Korea, I was in the hospital for 17 straight days. Every meal was a bowl of white rice, a bowl of soup, and four little side dishes (one always Kim Chi). I LOVED THAT!! I still miss the hospital food.
Posted by: Canadian Infidel at April 20, 2011 12:33 PM (GKQDR)
Posted by: Ellen Lewin at April 20, 2011 12:34 PM (GwPRU)
Posted by: Count de Monet at April 20, 2011 12:34 PM (XBM1t)
There is some interesting research into walking as exercise that shows that varying the pace is extremely effective in increasing fitness and calorie use. The study I read broke it down into slow (1-1.5 mph) medium (2-3 mph) and fast (3-4 mph). Those are manageable speeds, even for someone as ancient as you (I kid).
We used to call that interval training or fartleks. Nothing has changed.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at April 20, 2011 12:34 PM (LH6ir)
#204 Lyford, the main reason you can be comfortable on a 18K no carb diet is protein takes longer to digest than carbs. If you try to make it on 25K heavy carb diet, not only will your stomach be empty a lot sooner, but your blood sugar will spike then crash, making your body crave more food/carbs, and sooner or later you binge (again on high carbs) and that's that for the diet.
Cars also increase seritonin for a while, which is why they are good comfot food. When you're hooked on that feeling, you crave them more.
Like I said, this aint' rocket science, anyone, ANYONE, can learn it and lose weight.
Posted by: The Voice of Reason at April 20, 2011 12:34 PM (UpqKo)
Don't forget the steroids and bull semen.
Bodybuilders. Let me shoot this shit I bought online in Burma into my delts and then when I'm finished I'll lecture you about making good choices at Whole Foods.
Posted by: sifty at April 20, 2011 12:35 PM (+cmP9)
When I worked at BK during my tumultuous teenage years, I never failed to gleam amusement from the people who ordered a large double whopper with cheese meal with a Diet Coke, heh. "
As I said Diet Coke can fix anything. Tastes like shit, but it can fix anything.
Posted by: Ginormous at April 20, 2011 12:36 PM (Q5+Og)
Posted by: Blue Hen at April 20, 2011 12:36 PM (6rX0K)
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano's outgoing communications chief is known for his combative style. But in a confrontation that was undisclosed until now, he once threatened to "f---ing decapitate" the staff at the immigration office press shop.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 20, 2011 12:36 PM (IXLvN)
Posted by: Speller at April 20, 2011 12:36 PM (J74Py)
Posted by: Blackford Oakes at April 20, 2011 12:36 PM (Klxrr)
As I said Diet Coke can fix anything. Tastes like shit, but it can fix anything.
Posted by: Ginormous at April 20, 2011 04:36 PM (Q5+Og)
It's an excellent cleaning agent for corroded car battery terminals.
Posted by: Count de Monet at April 20, 2011 12:37 PM (XBM1t)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at April 20, 2011 12:38 PM (qIHlG)
Posted by: Count de Monet
The day after tomorrow on Ace: What to do when your 'package' is damaged during shipping (and handling)
Posted by: Blue Hen at April 20, 2011 12:38 PM (6rX0K)
"When I busted my elbow in South Korea, I was in the hospital for 17 straight days. Every meal was a bowl of white rice, a bowl of soup, and four little side dishes (one always Kim Chi). I LOVED THAT!! I still miss the hospital food."
You are seriously twisted.
Posted by: Ginormous at April 20, 2011 12:38 PM (Q5+Og)
Posted by: Splinterhead at April 20, 2011 12:39 PM (MFBDm)
Taubes is likely wrong about a number of things, but the one thing he is right about is that the diet industry is bullshit. It isn't your friend. Start learning why people REALLY get fat and get back to enjoying real food. I am also reading "In defense of food" by Pollan. I think he is a bit of a liberal Dbag, but the book seems to be on the mark for the most part.
Posted by: doug at April 20, 2011 12:39 PM (Bk8Wa)
The day after tomorrow on Ace: What to do when your 'package' is damaged during shipping (and handling)
But mostly handling.
Posted by: meekrob at April 20, 2011 12:39 PM (cFF/w)
Charlie Brown: Read the book and watch the video. They are more than adequately annotated.
No need for prickishness.
Posted by: Gabriel Syme at April 20, 2011 12:39 PM (g84Si)
Posted by: mpfs at April 20, 2011 12:39 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 20, 2011 12:39 PM (FI38b)
Posted by: runningrn at April 20, 2011 04:29 PM (ihSHD)
Also, what many people don't understand about the "pot belly" is that much of the fat causing that appearance is not under the skin, but behind the abdominal muscles snuggled next to the intestines. It's called the omentum. And it can be huge as I learned cutting autopsies for school money. Plus the fat of that omentum is the hardest to lose by whatever method of diet one chooses.
Posted by: Soona at April 20, 2011 12:39 PM (2ryjh)
"Carb" is a shortcut terminology. Carbohydrates can be of variably-lengthed carbon chains with extensive three-dimensionality. We have various enzymes (3D proteins themselves) that must be able to bind (fit like lock-n-key) and cleave those carbohydrates down, and there is variability in the metabolic pathways to achieve that binding/cleaving. Some pathways are more efficient than others. The body differentiates, so to speak, due to the enzymatic capabilities of different organs and constituent cells.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at April 20, 2011 12:40 PM (Ilc9V)
Posted by: tcn at April 20, 2011 12:40 PM (QuGK2)
I think High Fructose Corn Syrup is the devil.
Life expentency has only gone up 7 years since it was introduced.
Posted by: robtr at April 20, 2011 12:40 PM (MtwBb)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at April 20, 2011 04:38 PM (qIHlG)
Interesting theory. Would that be along the lines of grain fed beef?
Posted by: ErikW at April 20, 2011 12:40 PM (voX7b)
Posted by: McDonald's at April 20, 2011 12:40 PM (uHiEX)
Don't forget the diuretics.
Posted by: CUS at April 20, 2011 12:40 PM (wOGfT)
Posted by: Waterhouse at April 20, 2011 12:40 PM (Q95Dr)
Posted by: mpfs
Where does that leave us?
Posted by: Blue Hen at April 20, 2011 12:41 PM (6rX0K)
It's an excellent cleaning agent for corroded car battery terminals.
And it's good for cleaning love bugs from the front of your car.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at April 20, 2011 12:42 PM (d0Tfm)
Don't listen to runningrn. She's a giant fatass. Probably from all the exercise.
Aw geez, Jeff! Why don't you just tell everybody who I really am? A 400 lb., unemployed truck driver with a face that resembles Helen Thomas except I'm a white man.
Posted by: runningrn at April 20, 2011 12:42 PM (ihSHD)
Posted by: andycanuck at April 20, 2011 12:42 PM (Y1DZt)
Posted by: mpfs at April 20, 2011 12:42 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: Splinterhead at April 20, 2011 04:39 PM (MFBDm)
.....or solent green.
Posted by: Soona at April 20, 2011 12:42 PM (2ryjh)
Posted by: meekrob at April 20, 2011 12:42 PM (cFF/w)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at April 20, 2011 12:42 PM (qIHlG)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 20, 2011 03:49 PM (Y0wFY)
Jeff, I think you have exercise mixed up with Red Man chewing tobacco.
Posted by: maddogg at April 20, 2011 12:42 PM (OlN4e)
"Also, what many people don't understand about the "pot belly" is that much of the fat causing that appearance is not under the skin, but behind the abdominal muscles snuggled next to the intestines. It's called the omentum. And it can be huge as I learned cutting autopsies for school money. Plus the fat of that omentum is the hardest to lose by whatever method of diet one chooses."
Thanks Soona. Between Omentum and Obama I think I am completely fucked.
Posted by: Ginormous at April 20, 2011 12:43 PM (Q5+Og)
Posted by: CanaDave at April 20, 2011 12:43 PM (VqWKK)
Aw geez, Jeff! Why don't you just tell everybody who I really am? A 400 lb., unemployed truck driver with a face that resembles Helen Thomas except I'm a white man.
Posted by: runningrn
Hah! Jeff pay up! You owe me $5.
( I am sooo going to be in trouble now)
Posted by: Blue Hen at April 20, 2011 12:43 PM (6rX0K)
I'm sick of condescending do gooders fucking around with what I eat...I hope there's a special circle of hell reserved just for them.
THIS!!!
Posted by: meekrob at April 20, 2011 12:43 PM (cFF/w)
Don't forget the diuretics.
Posted by: CUS at April 20, 2011 04:40 PM (wOGfT)
Or the topically applied Prep H to really make the muscle definition "pop"!
Why are 90% of the ads in the local "Health & Fitness" magazine for cosmetic surgery and dental work?
Posted by: Count de Monet at April 20, 2011 12:44 PM (XBM1t)
Aw geez, Jeff! Why don't you just tell everybody who I really am? A 400 lb., unemployed truck driver with a face that resembles Helen Thomas except I'm a white man.
Posted by: runningrn at April 20, 2011 04:42 PM (ihSHD)
Heh, you couldn't tip 400 lbs. if there were 6 of you. Now go eat some cheezeewiz
Posted by: robtr at April 20, 2011 12:44 PM (MtwBb)
Posted by: homer simpson at April 20, 2011 12:44 PM (Y1DZt)
Climb down off your pompous high horse and I'll be less prickish. Unsupported statements and acts about a complex system such as human metabolism is what has gotten this country into its obesity mess.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at April 20, 2011 12:45 PM (LH6ir)
Most Hispanic markets carry the Mexican coke/pepsi.
There's one about a block from me.
Posted by: Dr. Varno at April 20, 2011 12:45 PM (QMtmy)
Posted by: Barry and Mookie Obama at April 20, 2011 04:43 PM (vbh31)
You mean there are folks out there eating something else?
Posted by: tcn at April 20, 2011 12:45 PM (QuGK2)
The other two days a week are weights, but the benefit is that it cranks your metabolism for longer while building muscle.
Lean muscle mass burns calories at rest. It increases your basal metabolic rate.
Posted by: runningrn at April 20, 2011 12:45 PM (ihSHD)
People have been eating fruit sugar for MILLIONS OF YEARS!!!
Not at our current rates of consumption. Hence the issue discussed.
Posted by: Gabriel Syme at April 20, 2011 12:45 PM (g84Si)
Posted by: meekrob at April 20, 2011 12:46 PM (cFF/w)
LOL, I shoot for < 2000 calories per day. Miss it some times but generally that's what I hit. I'll lose weight in the non-Winter months because I do get more exercise. And yes, since I quit smoking I am hungry all the time.
Tell that to my dad. He took up mountain running when he was 68 because he was tired of having to get a physical every year to keep his pilot's license.
I take it he is running on dirt and not the road. But regardless, the sports Drs don't recommend jogging when you get older. Fast walking is just about as good. The real key is to get your heart rate up.
The study I read broke it down into slow (1-1.5 mph) medium (2-3 mph) and fast (3-4 mph).
The plan I follow was from the Mayo Clinic. I do two miles and shoot for 30 min or less.
Posted by: Vic at April 20, 2011 12:46 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 20, 2011 12:46 PM (FI38b)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at April 20, 2011 04:29 PM (qIHlG)
And use. The lotion. With. The motion.
IYKWIMAITYD
Posted by: Jesse J. at April 20, 2011 12:47 PM (pr+up)
Heh, you couldn't tip 400 lbs. if there were 6 of you. Now go eat some cheezeewiz
I'm bigger than I look! (Or at least I think I am taller than I am!)
It was great to meet you last Friday, robtr! And to think, you live just down the street from us!
Posted by: runningrn at April 20, 2011 12:47 PM (ihSHD)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at April 20, 2011 12:47 PM (qIHlG)
I think High Fructose Corn Syrup is the devil.
Life expentency has only gone up 7 years since it was introduced.
It doesn't burn off with exercise and sugar does, but HFCS is cheaper so that's what is added to processed food.
Do a quick search and you'll see.
Posted by: ontherocks at April 20, 2011 12:48 PM (HBqDo)
Posted by: meekrob at April 20, 2011 12:48 PM (cFF/w)
It was great to meet you last Friday, robtr! And to think, you live just down the street from us!
Posted by: runningrn at April 20, 2011 04:47 PM (ihSHD)
You too it was fun. We will do it again soon I am sure.
Posted by: robtr at April 20, 2011 12:48 PM (MtwBb)
Superficiality. (is that a word).
All is vanity. That and the first place girls lose fat is in their boobs, so they go get fake ones.
BTW: Did you know there's fake boobs for men? Designed to look like pecs? And fake calf 'muscles'?
Posted by: CUS at April 20, 2011 12:48 PM (wOGfT)
Posted by: Ted Kennedy's Gristle Encased Head at April 20, 2011 12:48 PM (+lsX1)
Dad mostly trains in the city and runs his big races in the boonies, so, both. You should see him in those lycra tights and tshirt. Scary for an old guy.
Rules don't always apply, and that's why government rules about diet and exercise are going to be just plain crap.
Posted by: tcn at April 20, 2011 12:48 PM (QuGK2)
Why are 90% of the ads in the local "Health & Fitness" magazine for cosmetic surgery and dental work?
Posted by: Soothsayer 6 of 8 at April 20, 2011 12:48 PM (uFokq)
I was in the crawl space of my house a few years ago putting in new cables for the tv and found an old Dr Pepper can that looked like it was from the 50's or older. It had a stick figure guy on it urging people to try Dr Pepper hot.
Posted by: booger at April 20, 2011 12:48 PM (9RFH1)
They've done just about everything with bacon.
Now they just need to weaponize it. (We are currently in a war, btw...)
Posted by: Dr. Varno at April 20, 2011 04:28 PM (QMtmy)
An idea whos time has come, for the wars with Muslims.
Posted by: Jackhole at April 20, 2011 12:49 PM (+qHxi)
Posted by: t-bird at April 20, 2011 12:49 PM (FcR7P)
That's the advantage of exercise that some of the simpletons up-thread don't understand. Yes, you burn calories during exercise, but you also build muscle and increase the metabolic requirements of your body. Because muscle at rest uses more energy than fat at rest, your baseline caloric demands increase. And regular exercise resets the thermostat of your body, increasing the baseline again. It's like magic.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at April 20, 2011 12:49 PM (LH6ir)
They've done just about everything with bacon.
Now they just need to weaponize it. (We are currently in a war, btw...)
Posted by: Dr. Varno at April 20, 2011 04:28 PM (QMtmy)
An idea whos time has come, for the wars with Muslims.
Bacon Grease NAPALM and BACON BOMBS
Posted by: Jackhole at April 20, 2011 12:50 PM (+qHxi)
Posted by: Count de Monet at April 20, 2011 12:50 PM (XBM1t)
Posted by: CUS at April 20, 2011 04:48 PM (wOGfT)
Bull. My 42 D's haven't changed one iota from 110 lbs to 170 lbs, and frankly, that's disturbing.
Posted by: tcn at April 20, 2011 12:50 PM (QuGK2)
2 Atkins is bollocks. The solution is to get off your fat ass and exercise.
All exercise does is make you hungry. If you reduce the amount of intake, you'll lose weight even without exercise. And, if you exercise and fail to control your intake, you'll maintain your weight, or actually increase it.
Also, I'm losing weight just by eating less and more proteins and fewer carbs/sugars.
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at April 20, 2011 12:51 PM (1hM1d)
Posted by: t-bird at April 20, 2011 04:49 PM (FcR7P)
You do know that back when we didn't have access to fruit year around we lived to be about 45 don't you?
Posted by: robtr at April 20, 2011 12:51 PM (MtwBb)
My 42 D's haven't changed one iota from 110 lbs to 170 lbs, and frankly, that's disturbing.
Yes, a 42-inch ribcage on someone who weighs 110 would be.
Posted by: meekrob at April 20, 2011 12:52 PM (cFF/w)
It had a stick figure guy on it urging people to try Dr Pepper hot.
Had a friend of mine whose granny would make that for us. Hot, with a slice of either lemon or orange, I forget which.
Awfully good in the wintertime, but that was back in the early '70's. I think they still used sugar in it then, but I'm not sure of that either.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at April 20, 2011 12:52 PM (d0Tfm)
Tomorrow on Ace: Turning vice into virtue; that cheese puff dust can be your spring tan base!
Posted by: Blue Hen at April 20, 2011 12:52 PM (6rX0K)
Posted by: CUS at April 20, 2011 04:48 PM (wOGfT)
Bull. My 42 D's haven't changed one iota from 110 lbs to 170 lbs, and frankly, that's disturbing.
Fructose or sugar / fake boobs or real... who cares I'm in either combo works for me.
Posted by: Jackhole at April 20, 2011 12:52 PM (+qHxi)
Posted by: kathleen at April 20, 2011 12:53 PM (U9C39)
This is the judge candidate in WI.
Hopefully the fix isn't in and she's just wasting tax dollars.
Posted by: AmishDude at April 20, 2011 12:53 PM (T0NGe)
haha @ simpletons
it's funny because the words you and Jeff are looking for are anabolic and catabolic.
Posted by: Soothsayer 6 of 8 at April 20, 2011 12:53 PM (uFokq)
That's the advantage of exercise that some of the simpletons up-thread don't understand."
Well, I have understood that quite well for a very long time, and yet I still read an increasing number of articles that talk about the evidence for the assertion that exercise leads to weight loss. Apparently there is somewhat of a paucity of compelling data on the subject. But as I said, I exercise anyway, because it has other benefits.
Posted by: doug at April 20, 2011 12:53 PM (+C5m6)
Posted by: booger at April 20, 2011 12:53 PM (9RFH1)
How many calories, Charlie? And after the magic happens, how many additional calories on average will the average person consume to offset the increase in base metabolism?
There is no magic. Exercise is the smaller portion of the weight loss equation.
Posted by: Gabriel Syme at April 20, 2011 12:53 PM (g84Si)
I didn't know that.
Decisions decisions fake pecs or a Barrett 107A1?
I'm getting the Barrett.
Posted by: The Chicken at April 20, 2011 12:53 PM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: meekrob at April 20, 2011 12:54 PM (cFF/w)
Yes, a 42-inch ribcage on someone who weighs 110 would be.
Posted by: meekrob at April 20, 2011 04:52 PM (cFF/w)
Was 38 then, but still D. So, go figure. It ain't the boobs that disappear.
Posted by: tcn at April 20, 2011 12:55 PM (QuGK2)
I'll go yell at every women I've ever seen complain about this--why they have to keep three sizes of bras. "I can't go on a diet, then I'll go back to an A cup."
I'm sure you are well liked by the womens </sarc>.
Posted by: CUS at April 20, 2011 12:55 PM (wOGfT)
Posted by: Vic at April 20, 2011 04:46 PM (M9Ie6)
Yeah. That's about right. Twenty minutes to get the heart rate up and ten minutes to maintain it.
Posted by: Soona at April 20, 2011 12:55 PM (2ryjh)
I take it he is running on dirt and not the road. But regardless, the sports Drs don't recommend jogging when you get older. Fast walking is just about as good. The real key is to get your heart rate up.
Doctors, schmocters. Tell that to Sister Madonna Buder, Ironman competitor and nun, who didn't start running til she was 48 years old:
on August 30, 2009, Sister Madonna completed Ironman Canada (Penticton, British Columbia) in a time of 16:54:30. This accomplishment broke her own record of being the oldest female to complete the Ironman distance at 79 years old. In fact the Iron Man organization has had to add new age brackets as the nun gets older! Unfortunately, although Sister Madonna started the 2010 Ironman Canada competition at the age of 80 she was unable to complete the course due to a wetsuit issue. She has registered for the 2011 Ironman Canada competition and is still active. She is an avid athlete participating in numerous marathons and triathlons in addition to being a senior Olympian. She holds several records in various distances
Tell that to Ed Whitlock who was the first person over 70 to run a marathon under 3 hours (2:59) in 2003 and then went on to run "his best time, 2:54:48 at age 73, the world record for men 70 to 74; if age-graded this time is equivalent to a 20-year-old running 2:03.57.
"On September 26, 2010, Whitlock ran the Toronto Waterfront Half Marathon in 1:34:23.4.
After turning 80, Whitlock improved the Marathon world record for his age category with almost 15 minutes to 3:25:43 at the 2011 Rotterdam Marathon on April 10, 2011.
Whitlock also competes on the track, he currently (2009) holds 12 world age group records ranging in distances from 1500m to 10,000m and age groups 65+, 70+ and 75+."
Posted by: runningrn at April 20, 2011 12:56 PM (ihSHD)
for decades surgeons have been cutting up weiners making them into fake vaginas and pec implants surprise you?
Posted by: Soothsayer 6 of 8 at April 20, 2011 12:56 PM (uFokq)
Actually no, I wasn't looking for those words. But please, go right ahead with your jargon.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at April 20, 2011 12:56 PM (LH6ir)
Posted by: t-bird at April 20, 2011 12:57 PM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Fritz at April 20, 2011 12:57 PM (GwPRU)
BTW: Did you know there's fake boobs for men? Designed to look like pecs? And fake calf 'muscles'
There are also silicone "six-pack abs" implants too.
Posted by: runningrn at April 20, 2011 12:57 PM (ihSHD)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 20, 2011 12:58 PM (FI38b)
For the other 1%:
A) The Dreaded High-Fructose Corn Syrup is 55% fructose. The World Savior Cane Sugar in your "throwback" sodas is 50% fructose.
B) You can't catch diabetes from soda.
C) Search for junk food science blog. It has references.
D) Other than that, don't believe internet posters on medicine. Including me.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at April 20, 2011 12:58 PM (bxiXv)
for decades surgeons have been cutting up weiners making them into fake vaginas
Posted by: Soothsayer 6 of 8 at April 20, 2011 04:56 PM (uFokq)
OWOWOW!!!
Why did you have to go and do that?
Posted by: ErikW at April 20, 2011 12:59 PM (voX7b)
do all you want, however you want...heck, justify it however you would like, while you are at it.
Your Genetic Lottery Ticket has more to do with it than any of the nonsense put forth on this thread.
Posted by: garrett at April 20, 2011 12:59 PM (0oUd+)
You are confused. A rational long-term exercise program will help most people to lose weight. If some of those people use it as an excuse to eat even more, and offset the weight loss from exercise? Well, that's not the issue.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at April 20, 2011 12:59 PM (LH6ir)
Posted by: sifty at April 20, 2011 04:58 PM (+cmP9)
The best exercise is the push-aways. Push-away from the table after one plate.
Posted by: CUS at April 20, 2011 12:59 PM (wOGfT)
People have been eating fruit sugar for MILLIONS OF YEARS!!!
But not lots of it, every day of the year, washed down with juice and followed with a bunch of carbs.
I feel so much better and have so much more energy with very little carbs. Do I miss them? Yeh. But I love feeling better, so it's worth it. If you aren't having problems, then I don't know if it would be worth. We don't know enough to be sure.
I haven't lost as much weight as I'd like, but I look so different. I looked at my military ID today and my face doesn't even look like it belongs to the same person.
Posted by: Mama AJ at April 20, 2011 12:59 PM (XdlcF)
If any of you are ever in a situation where you would have to cannibalize me, IÂ’d like to note that youÂ’ll find the prime cuts of Meanie to be in the lower back. My shoulders are rather muscular, so slow cooking would render them quite tasty. DonÂ’t bother with the liver, and I think my pancreas and gall bladder are pretty much spent. Everything else can be rendered into sausage.
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at April 20, 2011 12:59 PM (81qtQ)
Sounds pretty much like my dad. He even has groupies who call him asking for running tips and advice. Groupies in their 30's. Mom thinks it's cute. Of course, she does the walking group while the guys go running, so she is looking pretty good for 80, too.
We should be so lucky.
Posted by: tcn at April 20, 2011 12:59 PM (QuGK2)
Posted by: polynikes at April 20, 2011 01:00 PM (7sQ6G)
No, you don't understand. People were eating fructose with fiber. Like if you grab a sugar cane and eat it, you just ate a stick.
We actually did not evolve eating this purified sweet food that is empty of raw material like fiber, and it's proven that our body does not process that in a good way. It clogs your arteries and makes your ass big.
Watch the video. The reason he's talking about fructose is not because it's worse than other sugars, but because many compare HFCS to regular sugar in a fruit, which is true as long as you ignore the rest of the fruit. In that sense, sure, fructose from an Apple is just like HFCS, but it will kill you.
Yes, exercise and moderate diet are the real keys to a healthy life, but there is reason Atkins works for losing weight. Understanding that is not a good reason to practice Atkins, but once you understand it, you will eat more fiber, and not eat so much pure sweet crap.
Posted by: Dustin at April 20, 2011 01:00 PM (Q3nWV)
"That's average life expectancy. If you made it thru the broken bones and infections of childhood, warrior-hood, and your tribe kept on winning, you'd live to a normal age."
This is true. Also true, you would be one skinny arthretic toothless old fuck gumming your dinner and cackling like a hen if someone threw you a bone to gnaw on. Good times.
Posted by: Ginormous at April 20, 2011 01:01 PM (Q5+Og)
Yes, but how many joint issues/problems have they had?
Yes you can still jog and run above 40, but you have to be very very careful The older you get the more likely joint damage is to occur.
Posted by: Vic at April 20, 2011 01:02 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: CanaDave at April 20, 2011 01:02 PM (VqWKK)
A rational long-term exercise program will help most people to lose weight.
I don't argue that point. I am saying that exercise is the smaller end of the wedge. Proper diet will have a much larger impact for "most people" trying to lose weight. The body is brilliantly adaptable, and in "most people" it adapts to increased caloric demands by...wait for it...demanding increased calories.
Posted by: Gabriel Syme at April 20, 2011 01:03 PM (g84Si)
Yes, you burn calories during exercise, but you also build muscle and increase the metabolic requirements of your body. Because muscle at rest uses more energy than fat at rest, your baseline caloric demands increase. And regular exercise resets the thermostat of your body, increasing the baseline again.
I also eat less when I'm exercising more. Something to do with the fact that I'm exercising instead of eating. And not eating as much when I'm tired because I exercised. Plus the emotional feeling of "I'm exercising and wannna loose weight, so I'm not going to fuck it up by eating back all the calories I burned."
Gotta run...tho' not literally...
Posted by: Mama AJ at April 20, 2011 01:04 PM (XdlcF)
Posted by: Vic at April 20, 2011 05:02 PM (M9Ie6)
This is true if you are going to get joint problems, period. For those of us who aren't, it just isn't an issue.
Mostly depends on genetics.
Nobody in my family is going to win any races on speed, but given enough distance we can all do very well, thank you. That's the same genetics that means we might have kidney stones but our joints and bones are just fine. And, like my dad, by the time we hit 80 or so, we can will all of the races, all of the time.
Posted by: tcn at April 20, 2011 01:05 PM (QuGK2)
Posted by: Count de Monet at April 20, 2011 01:06 PM (XBM1t)
It is absolute nonsense. Monosaccharides (the common ones in the diet are glucose, fructose, and galactose, either aldosugars or ketosugars) are all converted upon absorption by the biochemical factories of your body known as cells into glucose. Glucose is the major fuel of the body.
Not having enough glucose forces the liver metabolism to get creative to synthesize it via alternate pathways because guess what? The brain only uses glucose and it uses a lot of it, all the time. Severe hypoglycemia equals unconsciousness, coma, and death. If the body has to get too creative to make glucose, primarily from fat stores, large amounts of organic acids called ketone bodies spill into the blood, causing a potential fatal acid/base imbalance.
The signature characteristic of your body metabolism is flexibility--it was a significant evolutionary advantage because it meant that early humans could subsist on widely varying foods, which probably varied from day to day. People get by on dramatically different diets--Inuit eat tremendous amounts of fish protein, southeast Asians consume tremendous amounts of plant carbohydrate, yet neither group is unhealthy.
Bottom line is it is best to remember the rule of moderation-- eat sensibly and let your remarkable metabolism do the rest. Just don't be stupid. Too much of anything is not good and will cause problems. Trying to paint sugars as evil and eliminate them from the body is not only foolish, but futile. Your body merrily converts excess fat and protein to glucose, and vice-versa.
Same deal with vitamins, by the way--either potentially toxic (fat-soluble vitamins) or a waste of money (as you flush the excreted water-soluble vitamins, you may as well directly flush your cash). Sensible diet, that is all.
Posted by: phineas gage at April 20, 2011 01:08 PM (Xo8GE)
Posted by: mexican pusher of the white death at April 20, 2011 01:08 PM (Y1DZt)
People have been eating fruit sugar for MILLIONS OF YEARS!!!
Not at our current rates of consumption. Hence the issue discussed.
Posted by: Gabriel Syme at April 20, 2011 04:45 PM (g84Si)
Allright, egghead -- what were the primary sugar sources for homosapien sapiens for the last 200,000 years or so. Hint -- they feasted on all the fruit they could find.Posted by: Ed Anger at April 20, 2011 01:09 PM (7+pP9)
Yes you can still jog and run above 40, but you have to be very very careful The older you get the more likely joint damage is to occur.
You'd be surprised how many Masters athletes (over 40 years old) that compete at a really high level still. And yeah, you need to pay more attention to stretching and recovery, but a lot of people can still run high mileage and quality runs as they get older. I run with (and behind!) a lot of them. You'd be amazed to see how many 50 Staters (people who've run marathons in every state) there are who are older and retired (you almost have to be, to do all the traveling). I know 60+ year olds who can run sub 20 minute 5k's.
I'm not saying everyone can run like that, but there are a lot of people who can.
Posted by: runningrn at April 20, 2011 01:10 PM (ihSHD)
Hint -- they feasted on all the fruit they could find.
All year round? I bet not.
In handy aluminum cans? I bet not.
Wrapped in colorful wrappers or boxes, with cute cartoon characters promoting their merits? I bet not.
Consumed? Yes. Feasted? Sure, when available. Today's quantities? Not a chance.
Posted by: Gabriel Syme at April 20, 2011 01:15 PM (g84Si)
301 People have been eating fruit sugar for MILLIONS OF YEARS!!!
Please. Look outside your window. Do you see any fruit trees with fruit on them? Were there ever fruit trees in your area that had fruit on them today, April 20th, when you got hungry?
Posted by: t-bird at April 20, 2011 04:49 PM (FcR7P)
Drying fruit is an ancient technology.And believe it or not, parts of the world are warm year-round. So warm, in fact, you can pick fresh fruit year round. Like in Africa, where humans evolved from.
Posted by: Ed Anger at April 20, 2011 01:15 PM (7+pP9)
Posted by: Soona at April 20, 2011 01:15 PM (2ryjh)
Hint -- they feasted on all the fruit they could find.
All year round? I bet not.
Ever hear of the tropics, dumbass?
Posted by: Ed Anger at April 20, 2011 01:17 PM (7+pP9)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at April 20, 2011 01:17 PM (qIHlG)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 20, 2011 01:17 PM (OW0nw)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at April 20, 2011 01:18 PM (qIHlG)
'Another thing I've learned is that young women who run marathons or otherwise exercise hard on a daily basis have a precipitous loss of estrogen production.'
That is because of decreased leptin secretion by vastly diminished fat stores. Leptin is permissive for the female menstrual cycle. Doesn't make sense for the body to get pregant if it doesn't have the on-board reserves to sustain the pregnancy to completion. Low leptin=amennorhea. No menstrual cycle, no ovulation, no developing ovarian follicles each month=low estrogen. And that means things like osteoporosis developing in a young woman.
Posted by: phineas gage at April 20, 2011 01:18 PM (Xo8GE)
Posted by: polynikes at April 20, 2011 01:18 PM (7sQ6G)
Posted by: kathleen at April 20, 2011 01:20 PM (U9C39)
So what is nonsense? You know the video explained this too.
Sure, you've been eating fruit, but that's not the end all be all of fructose.
Eating fructose in an apple means your body has to process that apple. It handles that in a different way from fructose without fiber. The video is extremely well argued. So glucose is the fuel of your body, but there's a process that gets there, and by the process we develop cholesterol.
Posted by: Dustin at April 20, 2011 01:20 PM (Q3nWV)
I believe Fixx had an undetected congenital heart abnormality.
Examples of well-conditioned athletes dropping dead of cardiac arrest due to these abnormalities, like extended QT, are fairly common.
Posted by: phineas gage at April 20, 2011 01:21 PM (Xo8GE)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at April 20, 2011 01:21 PM (qIHlG)
Posted by: phineas gage at April 20, 2011 01:22 PM (Xo8GE)
Posted by: kathleen at April 20, 2011 01:26 PM (U9C39)
Ever hear of the tropics, dumbass?
Granting that:
Just from HFCS (not including any other sources of dietary sugar):
40 lbs/year HFCS average consumption per person
22 lbs fructose in 40 lbs HFCS
454 grams per pound = 9,988 grams from fructose
One apple: 2.0 grams fructose = 4,994 apples equivalent
14 apples per day
You really think anyone ate 14 apples every day? If so, you're the dumbass.
I'll say it again: fructose yes, but not in today's quantities.
Posted by: Gabriel Syme at April 20, 2011 01:28 PM (g84Si)
People have not been doing anything for millions of years.
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at April 20, 2011 05:18 PM (qIHlG)
Hominids have. and if you check my post #361 I shortened the time span to modern humans.Posted by: Ed Anger at April 20, 2011 01:31 PM (7+pP9)
Posted by: kathleen at April 20, 2011 05:20 PM (U9C39)
Please. Fructose is fructose. Your body metabolizes it the same no matter where it comes from.
I will ask the same question that another commentor/s said upthread. Why is our life expectancy still rising nationally? It's not all just good medical treatment. And just to add to that. I've been to many other countries and Americans are always taller and bigger boned (healthywise) than most anybody else in the world.
Quit reading all the scare-tactic bullshit and open your eyes and look around. Americans are pretty fucking healthy compared to most people in the world.
Posted by: Soona at April 20, 2011 01:33 PM (2ryjh)
Posted by: Aunt Cranky at April 20, 2011 01:37 PM (aibIg)
Not true at all. That's just medical fact. Watch the 90 minute video. It's very easy to understand, even though it takes forever. The speed with which your body metabolizes something has consequences. For example, the size of the lipids in your blood.
seriously, eat more fiber. If you want sugar, get it from fruit.
Posted by: Dustin at April 20, 2011 01:38 PM (Q3nWV)
There are lots of misconceptions about what we should eat out there. Where do the standards for eating coming from? The government? Enough said.
Posted by: lilliew at April 20, 2011 01:38 PM (+pyyc)
This was a good discussion when it involved sugar and tits. Now it's worthless.
Posted by: Jackhole at April 20, 2011 01:40 PM (+qHxi)
This was a good discussion when it involved sugar and tits. Now it's worthless.
Posted by: Jackhole at April 20, 2011 05:40 PM (+qHxi)
oh yeah and bacon
Posted by: Jackhole at April 20, 2011 01:43 PM (+qHxi)
And then the rub is that when you make this kind of objection to such hyperventilation, people say you're "ignoring" the facts or "denying" SCIENCE, when in face there never would've been a problem with the discussion if they've have been honest in their common language usage to begin with.
Posted by: JeremiadBullfrog at April 20, 2011 01:48 PM (Y5I9o)
One apple: 2.0 grams fructose = 4,994 apples equivalent
14 apples per day
You really think anyone ate 14 apples every day? If so, you're the dumbass.
I'll say it again: fructose yes, but not in today's quantities.
Posted by: Gabriel Syme at April 20, 2011 05:28 PM (g84Si)
I just weighed an apple -- it weighed 250 grams.Apples = 5.9 grams fructose/100 grams
One apple = 15 grams (roughly) of fructose.
So you're already off by a factor of about seven, dumbass.
Throw in some figs, grapes, pears, bananas, kiwi fruit, raspberries, oranges, pineapples, melons and whatever else is available and 22 lbs. of fructose/year from natural sources isn't a stretch.
Posted by: Ed Anger at April 20, 2011 01:51 PM (7+pP9)
Posted by: yip at April 20, 2011 02:16 PM (SyLEU)
Posted by: kathleen at April 20, 2011 02:21 PM (U9C39)
If you were at JFK, or anywhere in NYC then you weren't seeing Americans.
Posted by: Vic at April 20, 2011 02:23 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: kathleen at April 20, 2011 02:25 PM (U9C39)
Posted by: kathleen at April 20, 2011 02:27 PM (U9C39)
Posted by: bilal at April 20, 2011 02:28 PM (YGNGw)
Posted by: Thorvald at April 20, 2011 02:49 PM (YH3ph)
Posted by: t-bird at April 20, 2011 02:49 PM (FcR7P)
I've seen the entire 90 minute video from Dr. Lustig and found it disturbingly fascinating. Even though I haven't cut soft drinks out totally......he was right about his information forever changing how I viewed HFCS and I have to agree it IS horrible stuff.
I still drink an occasional Cherry Dr Pepper, but I cut way back.
I won't drink the diet version cause that's sweetened with aspartame and I don't TOUCH that crap.
Posted by: SB Smith at April 20, 2011 02:52 PM (s8cFo)
It's not 22 lbs per year, still-a-dumbass. That's just from HFCS, and doesn't include sucrose, other fruits consumed, whatever other sources.
To my point:
You are saying that our ancestors ate the same amount or more fructose than we do.
I say we eat more than they did.
You like to call strangers dumbasses.
I say that's a bad habit to get in to.
You say there once existed a place where there was never any drought, or insects, or birds or primates that competed for scarce SEAONAL fruit - even in the tropics.
I say existence was more hardscrabble than that, and that our ancestors, being smart, knew that fat and protein were better and longer lasting food sources and so only supplemented with fruit, rather than making it their dietary cornerstone, especially to the tune of 50+ pounds per year. (HFCS + sucrose + other sources).
You say that our ancestors ate so much fruit that they must have spent all their time shitting and being miserable.
I say you probably eat so much fruit that you spend all your time shitting and being miserable.
Posted by: Gabriel Syme at April 20, 2011 02:55 PM (kRlhD)
So, in spite of myself, instead of proving to her that the diet didn't work, I proved to myself that it did.
Posted by: Buford Gooch at April 20, 2011 03:19 PM (gozNQ)
Buford... mmmmm a meat feast! I'll add this. I had the same mindset and tried a no carb diet, and though I didn't lose as much as you did, I lost 30 lbs in 6 months.
Now I've gained a little back, but I eat few carbs, more meat. My weakness is a beer or a cocktail. That unneccesary input of carb/sugars makes up for eating ice cream or pizza, but I loves me a good drink...
Posted by: yip at April 20, 2011 03:33 PM (SyLEU)
Other things you'll learn just before you die:
Cholesterol doesn't cause heart disease
Saturated animal fat is your body's preferred fat
Posted by: runninrebel at April 20, 2011 04:22 PM (i3PJU)
Okay, I'm a Ph.D. biochemist and here's my take for what it's worth (sorry if all these points have been stated upthread, but I couldn't wade(wait) through all of that to get to the end). It is known that the liver's primary source for raw material to make fatty acids (many of which will end up as stored triglycerides; i.e. fat) is excess dietary glucose. Your body will only store so much glucose, and it's not a lot. For a couple of reasons, fat is a much better storage form of fuel than carbohydrate. Your body can and very happily will take excess dietary carbohydrate and squirrel it away as fat.
Fructose, when metabolized in the liver, is converted into an intermediate in the process of metabolizing glucose and so in effect uses the pathway for metabolizing glucose. The problem is that it feeds into the pathway for glucose metabolism past the major regulatory step of the pathway (phosphofructokinase-1 for all you hardcores). To an extent, fructose metabolism in the liver (not in other tissues) proceeds somewhat unregulated. It also occurs faster than glucose utilization because the aforementioned PFK-1 step of the glucose pathway is the bottleneck of the pathway, determining the overall rate at which glucose is broken down. For this simple biochemical reason, fructose cannot be considered to be just the same as glucose. The full implications of this remain unclear (the body is a very complex system).
Does the Atkins diet work? Yes. But not the same for everyone (the body is a very complex system). It is very tempting to take individual biochemical facts and draw sweeping conclusions about the body as a whole. The body is a very complex system (did I mention that before?). Many other factors bear on the overall effects of such things as how much carbohydrate is in your diet. I firmly believe that generally reducing carbs will help you to lose weight, but not everyone will see the same effects. It's not unlike determining the behavior of CO2 in the lab, and then going from that to New York City being underwater in 2112 (when the Elder Race will return to tear down the Temples of Syrinx). It's too complex a system to have any confidence whatsoever in such predictions.
Posted by: Crimso at April 20, 2011 04:29 PM (UJYXL)
Posted by: Crimso at April 20, 2011 08:29 PM (UJYXL)
Thread winner! And about fucking time.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at April 20, 2011 05:37 PM (LH6ir)
Posted by: GolfBoy at April 20, 2011 06:24 PM (WGL5k)
Posted by: doug at April 20, 2011 07:01 PM (dDxif)
Posted by: Spurwing Plover at April 21, 2011 07:22 AM (vA9ld)
Posted by: Running Hobo at April 21, 2011 09:20 AM (l1oyw)
Posted by: D1 at April 21, 2011 07:36 PM (XGvPE)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2742 seconds, 538 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








LOOK AT MY CHART!!!!!!!!!
THERE ARE LINES ON IT!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Ed Schultz at April 20, 2011 11:44 AM (d0Tfm)