December 27, 2011
— Ace When I saw the headline, I thought, How fun, and how right up my alley, because I'm an Intelligent, Creative Person who is Quick-Witted and can easily answer such questions and make millions of dollars. So everything's looking up for ol' Ace.
But they all left me stumped. In a real interview, I would have babbled.
Question 5, which should, according to my own self-conception, play right into my self-perceived strengths, leaves me with my mouth hanging open in stupidity.
I'm just never going to get a real job, am I?
More at the WSJ, and answers (whether real "this is correct" answers or interesting answers for a question without a real answer) here.
A friend went through these questions when he was seeking work as a consultant. Apparently these questions have been standard in that business for a while. Among the questions I remember him mentioning was the now-infamous Monty Hall question, and "Estimate the mass of an empty 747."
My only insight into that one is that a 747 floats, and I can guess that it would sink approximately one third of the way down, and then I guess you could estimate its gross volume and then multiply by the mass of water, x 1/3. I don't know if that's the right answer. (He wasn't sure about his own answer -- he just guessed and babbled -- and no one ever told him the right answer.)
Posted by: Ace at
09:18 AM
| Comments (137)
Post contains 252 words, total size 2 kb.
Hmmm, a question and an answer rolled into one.
Posted by: Hrothgar at December 27, 2011 09:21 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: nevergiveup at December 27, 2011 09:23 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: Brendan at December 27, 2011 09:24 AM (2jQGY)
Posted by: andycanuck at December 27, 2011 09:25 AM (sHY5w)
Posted by: ace at December 27, 2011 09:25 AM (nj1bB)
You line all three up side to side and fire one shot through the heads of all three. You use the 2nd shot to "unlock" the door.
Posted by: Dwight Schrute at December 27, 2011 09:27 AM (Sh42X)
Posted by: ace at December 27, 2011 09:27 AM (nj1bB)
No I don't.
Posted by: eleven at December 27, 2011 09:27 AM (lU2av)
Posted by: ace at December 27, 2011 09:28 AM (nj1bB)
I will use one shot to shoot Hitler in the face, the other to shoot Stalin in the dick while simultaneously shooting the progressive liberal in the face.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at December 27, 2011 09:28 AM (tf9Ne)
How is it that a company that self righteously assumes the motto "Don't be evil," helps a repressive regime like China censor political dissent on the internet?
Answer: Google is run by a bunch of fascist dickbags who will gladly record, store, and misuse your personal information anytime you use any of their applications.
Seriously, fuck Google. It is the most untrustworthy company on the planet. I never use ANY of their shit.
Posted by: Warden at December 27, 2011 09:30 AM (qHAbo)
Posted by: booger at December 27, 2011 09:30 AM (EjNp5)
That, my friends, is pretty fucking dumb.
Posted by: © Sponge at December 27, 2011 09:31 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: andycanuck at December 27, 2011 09:31 AM (sHY5w)
Posted by: nevergiveup at December 27, 2011 01:23 PM (i6RpT)
I'd line em up front to back and hopefully take em all out with one shot.
Posted by: © Sponge at December 27, 2011 09:32 AM (UK9cE)
But seriously, I am damn surprised they get away with those questions and don't get sued to death by the NAACP.
My old company doesn't even do job applications anymore.
Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2011 09:32 AM (YdQQY)
What's a henway?
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, President, Curmudgeon's Union Local 427 at December 27, 2011 09:32 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: ace at December 27, 2011 09:33 AM (nj1bB)
20+ years ago when I was asked to interview for a job at Microsoft, I was asked why man hole covers were round and how many gas stations there were in the United States.
I had heard the man hole question before so shot off about 8 really good answers and replied to the gas station question with a free market capitalist response of there is not a set number as new ones keep opening and closing due to market dynamics, blah, blah, blah. The lady who asked, who I think had majored in interpritive dance, did not seem to get that answer.
Bottom line, they offered a job and I turned it down. And that is why I am not currently work optional.
Posted by: AndrewsDad at December 27, 2011 09:33 AM (C2//T)
So they're looking for an employee that can make a wild assed guess rather than just look up a simple fact?
Posted by: nickless at December 27, 2011 09:34 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: ace at December 27, 2011 09:34 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at December 27, 2011 09:35 AM (npr0X)
Posted by: ace at December 27, 2011 01:33 PM (nj1bB)
But you'd really need the circumference, would you not? And a 747 isn't round, so there will be a variant from the actual circumference, but may get you close.
Posted by: © Sponge at December 27, 2011 09:35 AM (UK9cE)
1. How many sick days do I get? Am I allowed to call in sick if I'm hungover or will I need to lie about it?
2. Your secretary is pretty hot. Is she single? Does she enjoy a finger in her ass during sex? If so, how far in?
3. Do you do a lot of team projects, and if so, can you point out any perfectionists on staff who will pick up the slack for me during March Madness?
4. Are you wearing that cheap looking suit because they don't pay you enough? Because I want to get paid a lot.
5. Can I borrow a pen? I only like the kind with black ink and a gradual taper toward the tip. Go ahead and let whoever orders that shit know so I don't have to yell at anyone on my first day.
Posted by: Warden at December 27, 2011 09:35 AM (qHAbo)
I'm just never going to get a real job, am I?
Why on earth would you want one of those?
I don't mind these type of questions as much as I do the whole interview tricks to see how you handle stress. Years ago, I was going to a second interview that I had been told three or four times would be only with person X. I specifically asked if it would be a group interview and was told it would not. As I was being escorted down the hall to the interview, I was told "oh person X is in court so it'll be a group interview". I very nearly turned around and walked out but I decided what the hey might as well go through with it. When it came time for me to ask questions, the first thing I asked was "I'm curious, do you think that I do not read the same interviewing articles that you do that say to tell someone it's going to be a solo interview and then throw them into a group interview to see how they react?" There was a good few seconds of blank stares and then some embarrassed laughter. I ended up turning down that job offer and one of the reasons I gave was that if this is how I was being treated in an interview, I did not want to think about the games that would be pulled on me as an employee.
Posted by: alexthechick at December 27, 2011 09:36 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Xander Crews at December 27, 2011 09:36 AM (ht6OV)
Posted by: Dale Doback at December 27, 2011 09:36 AM (Sh42X)
A train leaves the station at 3:15 Friday afternoon with an Ewok, a Thai tranny, a big bottle of Valu-Rite and a case of pudding cups.
How long will it take the bailbondsman to arrive at Precinct 113?
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, President, Curmudgeon's Union Local 427 at December 27, 2011 09:37 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: ace at December 27, 2011 09:37 AM (nj1bB)
I actually had a team meeting that I called to address some issues, and one guy didn't bring in anything but a pen and a piece of paper. The paper wasn't for notes, it was his bracket. He couldn't understand why I wasn't very pleased about that.
Posted by: © Sponge at December 27, 2011 09:38 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: Wall_E at December 27, 2011 09:38 AM (48wze)
I have the answer to question 5.
5. A man pushed his car to a hotel and lost his fortune. What happened?
It was a Chevy Volt that ran out of charge after 30 miles. He pushed it to the hotel's parking garage, where it still had enough residual charge to catch fire and burn the place down, resulting in a huge judgement against him. What do I win?
Posted by: pep at December 27, 2011 09:38 AM (6TB1Z)
Just resigned the gig I hate this morning.
Have to be in South Carolina by 1/16/2012.
Posted by: Scott J at December 27, 2011 09:38 AM (KC2BE)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at December 27, 2011 09:38 AM (8y9MW)
Don't look good for Oprah. Just sayin.
Posted by: eleven at December 27, 2011 09:39 AM (lU2av)
What? The interview is over? What the hell, dude! I haven't even given my answer yet!
Posted by: Warden at December 27, 2011 09:39 AM (qHAbo)
Was there an answer to the blender question? If you're the size of a nickel, why wouldn't you just lay down on your side? You would be under the revolving blades.
Posted by: Ben at December 27, 2011 09:39 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: ace at December 27, 2011 09:40 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, President, Curmudgeon's Union Local 427 at December 27, 2011 09:40 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: Dale Doback at December 27, 2011 01:36 PM (Sh42X)
Fuck Martha, kill the wife and marry Oprah. Money makes the world go round, my friend, and you'll never have to fuck Oprah. You can come up with why the wife dies, I'm sure.
Posted by: © Sponge at December 27, 2011 09:41 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: Dale Doback at December 27, 2011 09:41 AM (Sh42X)
5 years ago I interviewed with Microsoft, and they asked me this good one, which I thought I nailed, but alas, no callback:
We are making glass balls and we want to know how much they can take before they break. We have a 100-story building, and we'd like to know the exact floor from which, if you drop them, they will break. You have 2 balls at your disposal. How would you test them so that you conduct the fewest number of tests.
After I gave the correct answer, he asked me to prove mathematically that my solution was the best. (Nailed that, too.)
Posted by: JoeInMD at December 27, 2011 09:42 AM (Xwgt3)
Posted by: brak at December 27, 2011 09:42 AM (giiOr)
>>Ben that's what I thought, but seems pretty boring.
I guess the real question is if you're a silver nickel or a new money nickel?
That changes everything.
[taps finger on nose three times]
Posted by: Ben at December 27, 2011 09:42 AM (wuv1c)
Probably something like length x pi x r^2. where r is the radius of the base.
That doesnt account for the tail, wings, etc, though. Guess you'd have to add that in. A 747 also has the bubble thing on top for the first class, so that'd add to the volume.
The questions are simply designed to make you look at a problem from all possible angles, Especially number 1. Most people will try and deduce a pattern from the numbers (obvious). Others will derive a mathematical formula from them (are they logs? square roots?) - less obvious. The correct answer there is weird. I wouldn't have thought of that one in my lifetime.
Posted by: lorien1973 at December 27, 2011 09:42 AM (usXZy)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at December 27, 2011 09:43 AM (8y9MW)
After a half hour, he got up and told the secretary he was leaving because he didn't want to work for a company that didn't respect people's time.
He said he got a call back from them the next day offering him a position.
That was a long time ago, though, when some people had a bit more class.
Posted by: Warden at December 27, 2011 09:43 AM (qHAbo)
Brainteaser-style questions were all the rage in software company interviews until about 5 years ago, when people started realizing they weren't particularly good predictors of job performance. That whole approach is frowned upon now: if you want to know if someone can code, ask them to code. The few brain-teasers I heard on my last interview cycle were clearly coding questions in disguise: where solving the problem required determining and solving the problem in it's simplest form, then solving the "+1" case.
I guess I'm not surprised this is taking off in other places, now that it's pretty much discredited. After all, if you reject popular approaches to management problems merely because they don't work, you problably wouldn't enjoy a career as a big-company manager in the first place!
Posted by: lgw at December 27, 2011 09:44 AM (XkPIA)
WTF? I'm applying for the janitorial position.
Question: Do you know not to mix Chlorine and Ammonia?
Posted by: Ben at December 27, 2011 09:44 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: I'm the Honey Badger, BITCH! at December 27, 2011 09:45 AM (fJhBR)
There is enough convection from the blades that that wouldn't work. Unless, of course, you removed your pants and relied on pucker power to hold you to the bottom.
Posted by: pep at December 27, 2011 09:45 AM (6TB1Z)
Although I took a whole test of these sort of things as part of an interview back in Nov.
It's 85 questions timed and designed to get you rattled to see how you react under pressure.
They wouldn't share score but I was told I did very well.
Posted by: Scott J at December 27, 2011 09:46 AM (KC2BE)
If I get this job and I'm confronted with a real life situation...hmmm.
I think I'll walk over and grab a cup of coffee and stare at the female employees' asses in a discrete way while pretending to rifle through a large stack of paper in my hands until lunch.
Then I'll send an email to whatever superior that is least likely to check their email before quitting time.
By 9 o'clock tomorrow I'll have forgotten about the whole thing.
Posted by: sifty at December 27, 2011 09:47 AM (WsOiK)
Posted by: Morgan at December 27, 2011 09:48 AM (+CZpT)
I get the feeling it's not about the right answer; but how long you'd spend trying to figure it out. If you are like I don't know immediately, then you aren't a problem solver. If you give it a shot, from different angles - even if you get it wrong - then you are.
Posted by: lorien1973 at December 27, 2011 09:49 AM (usXZy)
Yeah, I've had those. Gotten call-backs, too. The thing about them is they're not good predictors, either.
I like the idea (in IT, at least) of a basic function-based interview, then a one-month "contract-to-hire" period. Then, when it doesn't work out (most won't), you just don't extend the contract or a perm offer.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at December 27, 2011 09:49 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Eirik at December 27, 2011 09:49 AM (VYGYG)
Posted by: Wall_E at December 27, 2011 09:49 AM (48wze)
At all.
However, thanks to Butch, I can now proclaim, "Really, if you want someone who is proficient at Fermi questions, I'm not your person."
That makes me feel more... competent strangely enough.
Posted by: shibumi at December 27, 2011 09:50 AM (z63Tr)
Yeah, but sometimes being a problem solver is being able to look at a question, say "this is stupid," and move on.
My real problem with "brain teasers" is that they're exactly the wrong sort of question to ask for problem-solving. Give me logic puzzles, or actual (sanitized) edge-case scenarios from your business. But brain-teasers just aren't useful.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at December 27, 2011 09:51 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: The Poster Formerly Known as Mr. Barky at December 27, 2011 09:51 AM (qwK3S)
Posted by: ontherocks at December 27, 2011 09:51 AM (HBqDo)
Posted by: Warden at December 27, 2011 09:51 AM (qHAbo)
Posted by: Wall_E at December 27, 2011 09:52 AM (48wze)
Posted by: Wall_E at December 27, 2011 01:49 PM (48wze)
Mass is independent of gravity. You must be thinking of weight.
Posted by: JoeInMD at December 27, 2011 09:53 AM (Xwgt3)
That's a little more democratic than I'm thinking, but it's part of the equation I think managers should consider when offering (or declining to offer) the extension or permanent status in my scenario. Nothing but them interacting is going to tell you how this candidate and your current team will interact.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at December 27, 2011 09:53 AM (8y9MW)
It's easy to memorize a bunch of crap off the internet and answer tech questions.
The hard part is gauging their analytical skill since any new language or tech can usually be picked up if you have the right mind for it.
Posted by: Scott J at December 27, 2011 09:53 AM (KC2BE)
Posted by: Pipe Holder at December 27, 2011 09:53 AM (VTeUD)
Posted by: Warden at December 27, 2011 01:51 PM (qHAbo)
Such a novel approach. I mean, allowing workers to prove their skills in an OJT setting and seeing how they get along with others.
Posted by: © Sponge at December 27, 2011 09:53 AM (UK9cE)
The hard part is gauging their analytical skill since any new language or tech can usually be picked up if you have the right mind for it.
Posted by: Scott J at December 27, 2011 01:53 PM (KC2BE)
Geez, man. Way to demean every tech job out there.
That being said, no...no it's not.
Posted by: © Sponge at December 27, 2011 09:55 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: Buzzsaw at December 27, 2011 09:55 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: Wall_E at December 27, 2011 09:56 AM (48wze)
Posted by: nickless at December 27, 2011 09:57 AM (MMC8r)
Exactly. One of the better interviews I had over the Summer was with a company who's software calculates commission on insurance sales.
So they had several various commission calc scenarios for non-insurance industry for you to write how you'd approach solving the problem and what info not given you might need.
Posted by: Scott J at December 27, 2011 09:57 AM (KC2BE)
Posted by: Wall_E at December 27, 2011 09:59 AM (48wze)
You know why more companies don't do this? Because it takes power away from the managers.
I think that any company's annual employee performance reviews should be at least partially generated from anonymous peer to peer evaluation. If you throw out some of the highs and lows to accommodate for grudges and friendships, you would have a far more accurate measure of employee performance than you would from one manager's opinion.
Posted by: Warden at December 27, 2011 09:59 AM (qHAbo)
Sounds like this approach might not be amenable to quota enforcement!
Posted by: Eric "Red" Holder at December 27, 2011 10:02 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: mpfs, I hate my neighbor who parks in my spot at December 27, 2011 10:04 AM (iYbLN)
And since they don't test any damn thing except answering brain teasers, they're just a cruel taunt to people.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at December 27, 2011 10:04 AM (r4wIV)
So what is wrong with asking questions pertaining to the actual job? Like the ones I got asked applying for my first auto repair position?
In particular, "This car doesn't run. How would you go about determining why?" Much more illuminating than determining the mass of a 747,imho.
Posted by: irongrampa at December 27, 2011 10:07 AM (SAMxH)
It doesn't get you free headlines/PR.
Posted by: Warden at December 27, 2011 10:09 AM (qHAbo)
I would ask them... If I pulled a pistol right now would you
A. Try to reason with me
B. Try to run away
C. Sit there and get shot
Oh, and when can I start ?
Posted by: the Jackhole at December 27, 2011 10:09 AM (nTgAI)
"Is the pellet with the poison in the vessel with the pestle? Or does the chalice from the palace have the brew that is true?"
You've got 5 seconds to answer. Go!
Posted by: mpfs, I hate my neighbor who parks in my spot at December 27, 2011 10:14 AM (iYbLN)
Posted by: garrett at December 27, 2011 10:16 AM (ZQz4W)
Second question does not give enough info, it depends on whether the balloon is tied to the INSIDE, or OUTSIDE of the door... somthing the question does not state.
Question about the book is also imcomplete, because they 'normaly' do not Number Title Pages and such... so without that info the answer would be incomplete...
Posted by: Romeo13 at December 27, 2011 10:22 AM (NtXW4)
"Is the pellet with the poison in the vessel with the pestle? Or does the chalice from the palace have the brew that is true?"
You've got 5 seconds to answer. Go!
Posted by: mpfs, I hate my neighbor who parks in my spot at December 27, 2011 02:14 PM (iYbLN)
Its the Flagon with the Dragon not the Vessel of the Pestle... Geeezzzzz....
Posted by: Romeo13 at December 27, 2011 10:23 AM (NtXW4)
Posted by: Bob Saget at December 27, 2011 10:33 AM (SDkq3)
Without doing any calculations whatever, I guessed that a empty 747 weighed 200 tons; turns out to be about 300 tons.
What do I win?
Posted by: Jay Guevara at December 27, 2011 10:34 AM (au6dB)
No no.
At first it was the pellet with the poison is in the vessel with the pestle, the chalice from the palace has the brew the is true. Then oops! The pellet with the poison is in the flagen with the dragon, the vessel with the pestle has the brew that is true!
Presto Chango!
Posted by: mpfs, I hate my neighbor who parks in my spot at December 27, 2011 10:37 AM (iYbLN)
Posted by: Unemployed Guy
Look in Michael Moore's toilet that should give you an idea.
Posted by: mpfs, I hate my neighbor who parks in my spot at December 27, 2011 10:37 AM (iYbLN)
Posted by: Jay Guevara at December 27, 2011 10:45 AM (au6dB)
So 40,000 pounds.
Fail. Congratulations on your new job as deputy 2nd assistant backup janitor. 4th class.
BTW, depending on the model, the empty weight varies from roughly 400,000 to 600,000 lbs.
Posted by: Job Interviewer #6 at December 27, 2011 10:47 AM (uehxp)
Posted by: Jay Guevara at December 27, 2011 10:49 AM (au6dB)
BTW, depending on the model, the empty weight varies from roughly 400,000 to 600,000 lbs.
So ... 200 tons was right on the money, for some models. Woot!
Posted by: Jay Guevara at December 27, 2011 10:50 AM (au6dB)
Posted by: Alice's Clone Army at December 27, 2011 10:51 AM (awkov)
How about these questions:
1. In what country is Auschwitz?
2. How many states are there?
3. How do you pronounce "c-o-r-p-s-m-a-n?"
Posted by: Jay Guevara at December 27, 2011 10:53 AM (au6dB)
Posted by: mikey at December 27, 2011 10:59 AM (GSeVd)
Posted by: Unemployed Guy at December 27, 2011 02:26 PM (DQHjw)
Duh.... its a State where they do things the Right Progresive Way!
Posted by: Liberal Moonbat at December 27, 2011 11:11 AM (NtXW4)
Posted by: Reno_Dave at December 27, 2011 11:30 AM (OL4L4)
You line all three up side to side and fire one shot through the heads of all three. You use the 2nd shot to "unlock" the door.
Posted by: Dwight Schrute at December 27, 2011 01:27 PM (Sh42X)
You guys above think you're so creative. Hitler and Stalin are dead; that means you're in Hell and no gun is going to do you any good.
Posted by: boy did you flunk the interview at December 27, 2011 11:41 AM (whMsz)
Posted by: © Sponge at December 27, 2011 01:44 PM (UK9cE)
Well, it doesn't really matter, does it, since I said "the size of a nickel," not "the properties of a nickel." Hope you enjoy your future in shreds at the bottom of the blender.
Posted by: smug interviewer, who couldn't answer a brain teaser to save his life, checking you off his hire lis at December 27, 2011 11:46 AM (whMsz)
Posted by: Jaimo at December 27, 2011 12:08 PM (9U1OG)
BTW, depending on the model, the empty weight varies from roughly 400,000 to 600,000 lbs.
Posted by: Job Interviewer #6 at December 27, 2011 02:47 PM
They may have been wrong as to the actual weight but they had the correct concept of estimating. That is to take something you know and apply to the problem. They just thought too small and should have used a larger object whose dimensions and weight they knew.
Posted by: Deanna at December 27, 2011 12:10 PM (pEGBw)
It's your JOB! to handle problems. That is what EVERY non-union job requires. That you fix problems, and MOST times, non-traditional methods are applied to make the fix. The answers grant an "insight" into your work method, which is of course, bullshit. People who break the mold tend to be jerks, and jerks make lousy employee's in most cases.
Posted by: Douglas at December 27, 2011 12:27 PM (YKOnu)
Posted by: Douglas at December 27, 2011 12:28 PM (YKOnu)
How to estimate mass of an empty 747
Measure the tire pressure in psi. Measure the tire contact area (in inches) with the tarmac. Multiply.
Posted by: Rmoney Voter at December 27, 2011 01:49 PM (7MFxV)
Definitely flawed questions. Series questions are classic. In math class (college level) they explained how if you start of with a bunch of numbers, than you can come up with a pattern that can - quite literally - lead to any number you want next. Motion of a helium balloon? That depends on the reference frame (relative to the car? to the ground? to the rail car the car might be parked on?). The hotel thing? Sounds like a Netflix commercial - complete nonsense. Even the suggestion that you had bought a fortune cookie, put the fortune in your pocket, and it fell out along the way would be legit.
It's remarkable how even the private sector still gloms onto all these stupid little trick that have a proven track record of complete failure, as far as hiring a good employee. It seems to be an "Emporer's New Clothes" situation - the companies have no clue how to do it, so they listen to some idiot with a sales pitch that appeals to their lust for feeling powerful (by bullying and hazing defenseless people).
Posted by: Optimizer at December 27, 2011 01:53 PM (As94z)
You are welcome HR Depts of the inter-tubes!
Posted by: MoJoTee at December 27, 2011 03:38 PM (e1kfW)
I got all five of the later ones right without looking. #1 took a minute or so of testing and calculation before shifting to a more horizontal approach, and I was rather incensed at the poor phrasing of the question, since it is not "the" next number in the sequence, but a set of possible answers. 2 was pretty trivial from personal experience, but I've also explained it before to others.
3 took about 30 seconds or so of playing with combinations, 4 was an extremely trivial calculation, and 5 is the sort of puzzle that I love, so it only took me a few moments to realize the pivot words. If there are any of you who like those sorts of puzzles (like "Johnny wants to go home, but he can't, because the man in the mask is waiting for him. Explain."), then I can strongly recommend the game "MindTrap". It contains about 500 of those sorts of puzzles, and builds a game around answering them.
The blender one struck me as fairly obvious, if only because I've been a critic of bad movie physics for decades, and one of the classic foul-ups is neglecting to account for the square-cube law, and I've loved playing with these sorts of thought experiments for nearly my entire life. But the answer I came up with wasn't to simply jump out blindly, since I value my own life, and I doubt I could accurately estimate where I would be likely to come down, so I wasn't keen on the notion of going out of the frying pan and into the fire.
So I estimated that, given only 60 seconds to figure out the best course, my most prudent solution was to find a location below the blades where I could wedge myself in, to counteract any prevailing wind from the motion of the blades, and deal with testing the implications and effects of my new-found powers after the blades were turned back off. But hey, survival is kind of a big deal to me. Your mileage may vary and all. Hopefully, if I had been in that interview, the interviewer would have taken into account that I recognized the "best" answer and chose to go a step further in the process.
This sort of interview approach makes a lot of sense to me, especially for companies like Google, who would seem to be the sort who are looking for people who know how to reason well, can think laterally and creatively, and who like to seek out the edges of a given problem.
Posted by: VekTor at December 27, 2011 03:46 PM (N7DZ0)
Posted by: Hidden Summit epub at December 27, 2011 03:49 PM (KDUx0)
Strikes me as a rather useful discriminator for certain companies.
Posted by: VekTor at December 27, 2011 04:02 PM (N7DZ0)
"Does a blender do any damage to a nickel?"
I don't know about damage to the nickel but the nickel sure plays hell with the blender's glass container. I once left a spoon in th blender and turned it on. Mega hole in the side.
Posted by: BarbaraS at December 27, 2011 04:07 PM (a+bNG)
Posted by: Death Benefit ePub at December 27, 2011 04:07 PM (G70AV)
A train leaves the station at 3:15 Friday afternoon with an Ewok, a Thai tranny, a big bottle of Valu-Rite and a case of pudding cups.
How long will it take the bailbondsman to arrive at Precinct 113?
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, President, Curmudgeon's Union Local 427 at December 27, 2011 01:37 PM (d0Tfm)"
BackwardsBoy, you owe me a new screen. I can't see through the tears.
btw: Thank you. Snorking my after dinner coffee always gives me a good warm fuzzy feeling.
Posted by: Blacksmith8✡ at December 27, 2011 04:50 PM (Q1qy3)
Posted by: Down the Darkest Road ePub at December 27, 2011 08:53 PM (f2BIN)
Posted by: Deep Sky AudioBook at December 27, 2011 09:07 PM (23sJq)
Posted by: deadrody at December 28, 2011 03:44 AM (aT8Zk)
Posted by: Immolate at December 28, 2011 10:00 AM (0pB27)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2381 seconds, 265 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Barack Hussein Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure.
I denounce myself.
Posted by: Alte Schule at December 27, 2011 09:20 AM (MLJu8)