June 19, 2011
— Gabriel Malor Yes, yes, he would have made a better President than Obama. Undeniably. That doesn't mean he's not an idiot; pickings were slim in 2008.
This morning Sen. McCain opined that the folks competing to beat the man he could not are behaving in an isolationist manner by insisting that Obama get congressional authorization before waging wars overseas.
"This is isolationism. There's always been an isolation strain in the Republican party, that Pat Buchanan wing of our party," McCain told "This Week" anchor Christiane Amanpour. "But now it seems to have moved more center stage."At the first major Republican presidential primary debate in New Hampshire last week, several candidates criticized U.S. military involvement in Libya, while on Afghanistan former Mass. Governor Mitt Romney said, "It's time for us to bring our troops home as soon as we possibly can" based on the advice of military commanders.
"I wonder what Ronald Reagan would be saying today?" questioned McCain, saying the isolationism is a stark departure from traditional Republican foreign policy positions. "That is not the Republican party that has been willing to stand up for freedom for people for all over the world."
McCain's inexhaustibly stupid premise that it is "isolationist" to expect Congress to have a say in the wars American Service Members fight was parroted by that other mincing ninny, Sen. Graham:
On Meet the Press this morning, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.) said “Congress should sort of shut up and not empower Qaddafi” by discussing the possibility of cutting off funding for military operations there.He also said it was a mistake for Republican presidential hopefuls to think that getting “to the left” of President Obama on national security is a path to victory in the GOP primary. He warned that any candidate evincing skepticism about our military mission in Afghanistan and elsewhere the Middle East would face strong “headwinds” from the party.
With very little respect: Senators, you're wrong. It does not "empower Gadhafi" to behave as if we actually believe the words written in our own Constitution, nor can any of the GOP candidates, except that mutant subcreature Ron Paul, be fairly called "isolationist." I'm just going to say it: I'm not 100% convinced McCain even knows what isolationism is.
The Libya War is being waged without even the token cover of the War Powers Resolution. It is not constitutionally kosher, even according to President Obama's lawyers. So whether or not the United States should "be willing to stand up for freedom" in Libya is only relevant to the question of whether Congress would approve intervention in Libya. Since Congress obviously won't, McCain, Graham, and President Obama have decided to forgo that constitutionally-mandated step. Shame on them.
And shame on McCain for calling it isolationism. If he has nothing to say other than pathetically inaccurate name-calling, perhaps he should take Graham's advice and shut up.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
02:37 PM
| Comments (213)
Post contains 503 words, total size 3 kb.
Can't we send him on a permanent "Habitat for Humanity Project" with Jimmy "Second Worst President" Carter and be done with him?
Posted by: shibumi at June 19, 2011 02:39 PM (z63Tr)
2010 did not come close to cleaning it out, and 2012 won't be enough either. It's a long road back...
Posted by: KG at June 19, 2011 02:40 PM (LD21B)
Posted by: twiceblessedmom at June 19, 2011 02:40 PM (HjxoE)
Posted by: Speedy Gonzalez at June 19, 2011 02:44 PM (+kznc)
Now all I'm hearing is "President Wing-it has made such a hash of things that you cannot possibly do anything right or it'll throw him off his stride."
Posted by: cthulhu at June 19, 2011 02:50 PM (kaalw)
Posted by: Adolf Oliver Borders at June 19, 2011 02:53 PM (iHSFS)
Posted by: Clueless at June 19, 2011 02:56 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: RJ at June 19, 2011 02:57 PM (QjrRF)
Posted by: Adolf Oliver Borders at June 19, 2011 02:58 PM (iHSFS)
Posted by: AmishDude at June 19, 2011 02:58 PM (73tyQ)
You might be right. He could do a Zell Miller. After all, he's good for the next 6 years, and after that, he'll probably retire.
Posted by: pep at June 19, 2011 02:59 PM (6TB1Z)
But we only have 2 more years of Lindsay. Next year you'll see him start playing to the base just like McCain did.
Posted by: Vic at June 19, 2011 02:59 PM (M9Ie6)
It's not even about the substance of the post. It's about the pattern. I'm just sick and damn tired of him.
Posted by: jcjimi at June 19, 2011 03:01 PM (N5zvq)
Posted by: Clueless at June 19, 2011 03:01 PM (piMMO)
Whats really troubling is that "IF" Congress allows Obama to get away with this, using the Pretext that the UN authorized it, so he does not need Congress's approval, it sets a VERY dangerous Precedent for future Presidents.
Especialy seeing as how the UN itself did not follow its OWN RULES. The UN Charter specificly says they cannot interfere in Internal rebellions within a Member State, and Libya IS a member State.
ergo, this is the US President, taking us into an illegal war, at the behest of an illegal order from the UN.
Posted by: Romeo13 at June 19, 2011 03:02 PM (NtXW4)
Perfect timing.
War Hero McCain apparently doesn't understand the difference between a retaliatory attack --- which is what Reagan did to Qaddafi in response to the latter's killing of our servicemen in Berlin --- with engaging in sustained combat in support of what is essentially a civil war.
60 days after that 1986 attack we weren't still engaging in military activities in/over Libya, so the War Powers act didn't even apply.
Additionally, aside from maybe Ron Paul, the GOP candidates are generally not calling for all US troops to come home from all combat areas. Nor do they seek to have our foreign bases closed.
You know, the kind of stuff isolationists have historically argued for.
Posted by: Jim Sonweed at June 19, 2011 03:03 PM (FVhEi)
5 years of which will be spent "Reaching Across the Aisle".
Be prepared to see him sabotage us even if we do win the WH.
Posted by: jcjimi at June 19, 2011 03:03 PM (N5zvq)
Grampy McBackstabber is just doing what the McCain family does best: betray their own, in hopes of favorable publicity.
Posted by: Sam Adams at June 19, 2011 03:04 PM (mREG5)
Whut, is that a post that was deleted already?
Posted by: Moist Towelette at June 19, 2011 03:04 PM (1FXwP)
Posted by: Zimriel at June 19, 2011 06:57 PM (JdM1M)
Hmmm...I'm not 100% sure. But I do know that one of the following three will be: John McCain, Meggy Mac and Lindsay Graham.
Lindsay still has his tendrils in SC politics, but I can't see him surviving a primary anymore. I think it's entirely likely that he'll run as a Dem next time. McCain will be 75 by then, maybe he wants to be one of the Senate corpse corps but I'm thinking that he's going to retire in 2016 if he's even able to run by then. Surely there will be somebody better than JD to run against him. Meggie is just itching to get a pat on the head from her gay hairdresser.
Posted by: AmishDude at June 19, 2011 03:04 PM (73tyQ)
Not going to vote for a shit sandwich this time should another establishment liberal win the GOP nomination.
If you say you will vote for the establishment pick no matter what, you have bargained away any leverage to keep a liberal from winning the nomination.
It took a Carter to give us Reagan. Don't fritter away this opportunity with the establishment pick.
Posted by: Drake Tungsten at June 19, 2011 03:05 PM (9/lhd)
Read this latest dropping by Fareed Zakaria in Time:
How Today's Conservatism Lost Touch With Reality.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at June 19, 2011 03:05 PM (c0A3e)
McCain also said something about evidence linking the fires in AZ to illegals.
Some a-hole refuted McCain and said he didn't know what McCain was talking about.
Posted by: leftover soothsayers at June 19, 2011 03:05 PM (gnq2n)
Whut, is that a post that was deleted already?
The WSJ/Gunwalker post.
Posted by: Clueless at June 19, 2011 03:07 PM (piMMO)
"That is not the Republican party that has been willing to stand up for freedom for people for all over the world."
Yeah, about that.
1. This is a myth. A myth created by Republicans and lobbyists to use patriotism to spend our national treasure.
2. Even if this wasn't a myth, it'd be an asinine plank of the Republican party's platform and it should be jettisoned.
Posted by: leftover soothsayers at June 19, 2011 03:10 PM (gnq2n)
Yeah, I don't know if that's such a good idea.
Posted by: Arlen Specter at June 19, 2011 03:10 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: RJ at June 19, 2011 03:11 PM (QjrRF)
Maybe we and NATO should go to Vancouver and teach those Canucks fans a thing or two, Senator McDunce?
Posted by: leftover soothsayers at June 19, 2011 03:11 PM (gnq2n)
McCain doesn't have any idea of the danger this country is in, thanks to idiots like him.
Posted by: Lee at June 19, 2011 03:12 PM (BD1aO)
Posted by: Zimriel at June 19, 2011 03:14 PM (JdM1M)
Posted by: Steph at June 19, 2011 03:14 PM (AkdC5)
This idiot shithead loser McCain didn't just lose North Carolina. He lose Florida.
He lost Indifuckingana.
He lost New Hampshire.
He lost Ohio.
Posted by: leftover soothsayers at June 19, 2011 03:15 PM (gnq2n)
That precedent was set long ago by Harry Truman.
Posted by: Vic at June 19, 2011 03:15 PM (M9Ie6)
This McCain turd should 've been shunned from the party. He should be persona non grata.
The nerve of this failure to speak in public makes me sick.
Posted by: leftover soothsayers at June 19, 2011 03:16 PM (gnq2n)
He lost New Hampshire.
He lost Ohio.
And then he'll go to Washington DC to lose the White House --- YEAAAAAHGH!
Come to think of it, PJ O'Rourke has compared Dean to McCain before.
Posted by: Howard Dean at June 19, 2011 03:18 PM (JdM1M)
How Today's Conservatism Lost Touch With Reality.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at June 19, 2011 07:05 PM (c0A3e)
I'm tempted to but no thanks. My blood pressure is high enough as it is.
Posted by: ErikW at June 19, 2011 03:18 PM (zZRYY)
He'd just shake his head and say, "You're and idiot, John."
Posted by: chewydog at June 19, 2011 03:19 PM (vBmDY)
How do you lose to an anti-American political neophyte college lecturer rabblerouser with the middle name Hussein?
Posted by: leftover soothsayers at June 19, 2011 03:19 PM (gnq2n)
"I wonder what Ronald Reagan would be saying today?" questioned McCain, saying the isolationism is a stark departure from traditional Republican foreign policy positions. "That is not the Republican party that has been willing to stand up for freedom for people for all over the world."
Sorry McCain but most Americans including republicans have decided to take a break from traveling the world with our freedom army while forcing our own country closer to bankruptcey.
If we can manage to fix things here and get out of debt than maybe we can try and free the world, not now though.
Posted by: robtr at June 19, 2011 03:20 PM (MtwBb)
John McCain has done a lot for liberalism. He continually reaches across the aisle, calls despicable liberals 'my friends', and humped Cindy McCain to produce Meggy "Miss Hooter's" McCain, the liberals newest and bestest friend.
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at June 19, 2011 03:21 PM (cwFVA)
Posted by: RJ at June 19, 2011 03:21 PM (QjrRF)
Posted by: Mangas Colorados at June 19, 2011 03:22 PM (ye/nf)
That was my exact thought. Sometimes I just have to stop (even coming here - my last refuge) or I'll end up angry and posting useless shit. Well, more useless and more angry than normal. God bless the commenters that keep me laughing through it, though.
Posted by: jcjimi at June 19, 2011 03:22 PM (N5zvq)
Posted by: Duke Lowell at June 19, 2011 03:22 PM (TUQLe)
----
On an OT sidenote, I'd like to introduce exhibit #2,570,302 in the Death of Britain:
Christians are more militant than Muslims, says UK's Equality Chief (link to the Telegraph)
Muslims are integrating into British society better than many Christians, according to the head of the British Government's equality watchdog.
The mind. It boggles.
(H/T Weasel Zippers)
Posted by: MWR at June 19, 2011 03:23 PM (CA2NO)
btw, just today NATO expressed "regret" for killing civvies in Tripoli.
This news came almost simultaneously as McCain and Graham were doing Obama's bidding.
Interesting because supposedly Obama put us in Libya to protect Libyan civilians from Kaddafi.
Whose protecting them from Obama?
Posted by: leftover soothsayers at June 19, 2011 03:24 PM (gnq2n)
Posted by: ontherocks at June 19, 2011 03:24 PM (HBqDo)
So, um... sorry. (Again.)
Posted by: Zimriel at June 19, 2011 03:25 PM (JdM1M)
Posted by: Constitutional Conservatism at June 19, 2011 03:25 PM (9/lhd)
Posted by: Constitutional Conservatism at June 19, 2011 03:26 PM (9/lhd)
Good point.
Perhaps this shall help you bury any vestige of rage you might have had even glancing upon the link?
Once an exhibitionist.... Geri Halliwell struggles to hide her ample assets as she publicly strips off on a yacht in France
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at June 19, 2011 03:28 PM (c0A3e)
so McCain and Graham wake up and say, "Hey, I think we'll undermine Speaker Boehner and the Republicans today!"
these two dopes need their heads banged together 3 stooges style
Posted by: leftover soothsayers at June 19, 2011 03:28 PM (gnq2n)
I've always said, and I stand by it, that McCain is "damaged."
I appreciate the sacrifice he made for our country, but he is not fit to be a Senator.
Posted by: Y-not is pretty tipsy at June 19, 2011 03:31 PM (TFxd0)
Posted by: Duke Lowell at June 19, 2011 03:32 PM (TUQLe)
Posted by: No Whining at June 19, 2011 03:32 PM (2TDnN)
Posted by: Zimriel at June 19, 2011 07:25 PM
Jeez, I hope you're not apologizing to me. I get it.
I'm not an eleoquent off-the-cuff writer and even less so when pissed, so I rarely post on the important "news of the day" threads. I'm too pissed to taske the time at work to craft anything more eloquent than "er...F**k you libtards!".
Posted by: jcjimi at June 19, 2011 03:34 PM (N5zvq)
53
How do you lose to an anti-American political neophyte college lecturer rabblerouser with the middle name Hussein?
Posted by: leftover soothsayers at June 19, 2011 07:19 PM (gnq2n)
By not actually running against him.
Posted by: davidt at June 19, 2011 03:34 PM (GfhFm)
I kind of thought that when he was running for president, but now I'm sure of it.
He's out to get us every bit as much as they are.
Posted by: Alana at June 19, 2011 03:35 PM (/N/wg)
Since none of our elected reps give a fuck about the Constitution, why don't we just replace it with a dry erase board with an eraser and colored markers?
They can hang it up behind the Speaker's chairs in the House and Senate and create a living facsimile at the National Archives, much like a leaderboard at a golf tournament.
Paid volunteers can run back and forth changing the text as libtards change the rules as they go.
Posted by: ErikW at June 19, 2011 03:35 PM (zZRYY)
Mainly because they're worried Joe Biden will walk by
Posted by: Zimriel at June 19, 2011 03:36 PM (JdM1M)
Posted by: USS Diversity at June 19, 2011 03:36 PM (RPYjQ)
I appreciate the sacrifice he made for our country, but he is not fit to be a Senator.
Posted by: Y-not is pretty tipsy at June 19, 2011 07:31 PM (TFxd0)
I think any public office holder should be forced to retire at a certain age. This shit of staying in well past the onset of dementia, which it appears McCain is afflicted with, is just so much bullshit.
Posted by: Steph at June 19, 2011 03:38 PM (AkdC5)
Posted by: pep at June 19, 2011 03:39 PM (6TB1Z)
but he doesn't even do it for money. He bends over and does it to be popular and mavericky.
Posted by: jcjimi at June 19, 2011 03:39 PM (N5zvq)
Posted by: ontherocks at June 19, 2011 07:24 PM (HBqDo)
Well... he did loose a total of 5 Aircraft during his flying days...
Yep, only Congressman I know of who is an ENEMY ACE!
Posted by: Romeo13 at June 19, 2011 03:39 PM (NtXW4)
Posted by: pep at June 19, 2011 07:39 PM (6TB1Z)
I feel sorry for not one of the asswipes that is helping in the demise of this country.
Posted by: Steph at June 19, 2011 03:41 PM (AkdC5)
Posted by: Cooter at June 19, 2011 03:41 PM (O924f)
I'd feel sorry for McCain if the majority of his decisions didn't lead to fiascos such as this one over Libya.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at June 19, 2011 03:42 PM (c0A3e)
That "OMG, we're effing screwed" feeling?
Yeah, that was pretty awful.
Palin helped a little, but who ever really thought we weren't screwed once he become the guy?
Posted by: Kensington at June 19, 2011 03:43 PM (uaEZS)
A predictable weekend, to be sure.
But great? Not so much.
Posted by: DocJ at June 19, 2011 03:44 PM (AWzOz)
On a non snarky note...
We do need to take a good hard look at our commitments, and WHY we are involved in them, considering we're BROKE.
We still have troops in Europe... and Japan... and Korea... heck we even have troops sitting in Egypt... while our own borders are overrun with Coyotes and Drug dealers.
Is it Isolationist to believe that we are OVER commited? or as I believe, do we need to find some balance between our overseas involvment, and what we can afford...
Posted by: Romeo13 at June 19, 2011 03:45 PM (NtXW4)
Posted by: shiggz at June 19, 2011 03:45 PM (mLAWK)
Yeah, I never really meant it.
Posted by: John McCain at June 19, 2011 03:47 PM (uaEZS)
McCain has done a lot of damage over the years and can still do more.
As McCain's protege, Grahams damage is limited only by having been in office a shorter time.
Who is worse, the Sith Lord or his Apprentence?
Posted by: davidt at June 19, 2011 03:48 PM (GfhFm)
Posted by: sablegsd at June 19, 2011 03:48 PM (AKS75)
Posted by: USS Diversity at June 19, 2011 03:49 PM (RPYjQ)
What about me? I'm a bigger crapweasel than either of those two.
Posted by: Arlen Specter at June 19, 2011 03:51 PM (uaEZS)
The GOP ought to tell those states to close their primaries, or lose their favored position.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at June 19, 2011 03:52 PM (cSkZ5)
I don't really feel sorry for the guy. I was being cute. Unsuccessfully it seems.
Posted by: pep at June 19, 2011 07:44 PM (6TB1Z)
Tensions are a bit high nowadays. Don't take offense, just roll with it.
Posted by: ErikW at June 19, 2011 03:52 PM (zZRYY)
Posted by: The United States Economy at June 19, 2011 03:52 PM (uaEZS)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at June 19, 2011 03:54 PM (SB0V2)
Fair-play is a good thing, but he extended his hand in every conceivable way without regard for the consequences. Further, he uses his war hero status like a shield... Don't be mean to the war hero!
McCain, hands down.
Posted by: Clueless at June 19, 2011 03:55 PM (piMMO)
I think any public office holder should be forced to retire at a certain age. This shit of staying in well past the onset of dementia, which it appears McCain is afflicted with, is just so much bullshit.
Posted by: Steph at June 19, 2011 07:38 PM (AkdC5)
I think that if the founders had thought that there would exist people who's only job was "politician" then they would have put in term limits. I don't think they saw an issue with a guy being able to always be elected because it was never meant to be his only job. They had fought a war against a King and also the nobility and wrote a system that was not supposed to have any of that. But the politicians have found a way around it, and can survive solely on being in politics and essentially being immune to their own bullshit.
Posted by: buzzion at June 19, 2011 03:57 PM (oVQFe)
Stand up for freedom? Nobody we're supposedly helping gives a shit about our ideas of freedom. Ten years on and nobody seems to grasp that.
Posted by: lowandslow at June 19, 2011 03:57 PM (GZitp)
Posted by: doug at June 19, 2011 04:00 PM (iq/yq)
Posted by: someguy at June 19, 2011 04:01 PM (iIQ0a)
Posted by: davidt at June 19, 2011 07:48 PM (GfhFm)
Palin supported McCain's re-election.
I don't care why.
Posted by: Rodent Liberation Front at June 19, 2011 04:01 PM (lgw0N)
Indiana joined the Union in December 1816. It has been primarily Republican throughout its history, and today is the “reddest” state in the Midwest. Since 1940, it has only voted Democratic in 1964, when Lyndon Johnson won a landslide over Barry Goldwater and again in 2008, when Barack Obama edged John McCain 50% to 49%, in the 3rd closest race of the election (behind Missouri and North Carolina).
John McCain: The Republican who managed to loose Indiana.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at June 19, 2011 04:01 PM (EeYDk)
Posted by: lowandslow at June 19, 2011 07:57 PM (GZitp)
I've believed for quite awhile that the "spread of Democracy" should NOT be our goal...
It should be the spread of Freedom... ie that every country we help, as a condition OF that help, must enshrine in its founding documents a Bill or Rights containing Freedom of Speech, Press, Association, Religon AND Gun and Property Rights.
The idea that the Iraqi Constitution specificly talks about Sharia law is an abomination.
Posted by: Romeo13 at June 19, 2011 04:03 PM (NtXW4)
The GOP ought to tell those states to close their primaries, or lose their favored position.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at June 19, 2011 07:52 PM (cSkZ5)
I really don't think this will be as big a problem this time around. Huntsman doesn't have near the name recognition McCain does even with his ties to Obama. I really can't see it being as big an influence this time around.
So won't be a problem this time around, but it should never ever even be brought up as a possible problem. Close the primaries.
Posted by: buzzion at June 19, 2011 04:03 PM (oVQFe)
"There's no honor in fragging your own side."
This.
What John McCain forgot is that these sorts of criticisms are not to be made on national television.
It is dishonorable.
he should be ashamed of himself and we should shame him by telling hiim SHAME every time he's encountered.
If John McCain has a problem with the direction of the Republican Party he's free to fucking join the Democrats (officially).
We don't WANT John McCain in our party.
Posted by: someguy at June 19, 2011 04:04 PM (iIQ0a)
On what fucking planet?
Can we please have periodic mental competency exams for public servants?
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at June 19, 2011 04:05 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: euzkadi at June 19, 2011 04:06 PM (YNit+)
Posted by: Papa Editor at June 19, 2011 04:07 PM (FZZ94)
Juan's been a cranky old bastige since the GOP backed Bush instead of him.
It's my turn I tell you! My turn!
Posted by: RushBabe at June 19, 2011 04:07 PM (Ew27I)
Like, how much of McCain's Wife's Money is tied directly or indirectly to Soros?
Because McCain-Feingold was about the biggest birthday gift that Soros ever had, it put him in charge of the far left's fundraising organizations.
Coincidence? Oh, Hell, why not ask about coincidences?
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at June 19, 2011 04:09 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: someguy at June 19, 2011 08:04 PM (iIQ0a)
Dude.
You have a catchphrase for this.
Don't deny us.
Posted by: garrett at June 19, 2011 04:09 PM (Y7qU9)
Remember that he "won" with 70% of the voters opposing him. The same thing is likely to happen with Romney this time.
And Huntsman is dead meat.
Posted by: Vic at June 19, 2011 04:11 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at June 19, 2011 04:11 PM (VidfH)
Remember that he "won" with 70% of the voters opposing him. The same thing is likely to happen with Romney this time.
And Huntsman is dead meat.
Posted by: Vic at June 19, 2011 08:11 PM (M9Ie6)
Would still really like it if the possibility of them having an effect on who wins removed by closing the primaries.
Posted by: buzzion at June 19, 2011 04:15 PM (oVQFe)
It should be the spread of Freedom... ie that every country we help, as a condition OF that help, must enshrine in its founding documents a Bill or Rights containing Freedom of Speech, Press, Association, Religon AND Gun and Property Rights.
The idea that the Iraqi Constitution specificly talks about Sharia law is an abomination.
Yet there are people that think we can actually spread some sort of western democracy and freedom in Islamic counties. Hell most the people in the GOP think that.
We would be better off going back to our old policies of covertly helping the least pathetic Islamic leaders instead of this delusional policy we have been following.
Posted by: lowandslow at June 19, 2011 04:16 PM (GZitp)
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at June 19, 2011 04:17 PM (0fzsA)
Well, don't look now, but our so-called betters in the Republican Party are pissing on Perry.
Few Republicans will say it publicly, but many party elites believe Perry would have difficulty moving beyond the sort of sharply-delivered platitudes heÂ’s honed before TexasÂ’s conservative electorate.
Even in the Lone Star State, many GOP insiders donÂ’t think their governor has the chops to take his game to the national stage.
I guess only Romney has the chops right? Or Huntsman?
Posted by: Steph at June 19, 2011 04:18 PM (AkdC5)
Now, I'm somewhat conflicted as to whether or not Jonny's daughter, Titsy, is the one with all of the brains in the family.
We need to isolate those breasts and study them independently, for the good of the state of Arizona and the United States at large.
Posted by: Fritz at June 19, 2011 04:19 PM (p2IBw)
She's just drinking the adolescent version of his Kool-Aid, IMHO.
Posted by: jcjimi at June 19, 2011 04:22 PM (N5zvq)
Posted by: Curmudgeon at June 19, 2011 04:23 PM (w7K7d)
The States control that, not the Party. The State GOP has sues multiple times here to close the Primaries and has lost every time. The courts have long ruled that if the State provides any part of the primary then they can regulate it.
What I don't understand is why since the Republicans here control both houses of the legislature why they don't vote to close it. That's how it got opened to begin with. The Dems used to control the legislature and it was they who voted to make it open.
It could also be that a healthy percentage of the Republicans in the legislature are former Dems.
Posted by: Vic at June 19, 2011 04:24 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: chillin the most at June 19, 2011 04:24 PM (6IV8T)
Two McCains. One cup.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at June 19, 2011 08:25 PM (G/MYk)
Is that the Vessel of the Pestle? or the Flagon of the dragon?
Posted by: Romeo13 at June 19, 2011 04:28 PM (NtXW4)
Posted by: Burn O'Donnel At The Stake at June 19, 2011 04:28 PM (BcR3C)
Posted by: Barb the Evil Genius at June 19, 2011 04:30 PM (MyByM)
Is that the Vessel of the Pestle? or the Flagon of the dragon?
I thought it was the Chalice from the Palace?
Posted by: garrett at June 19, 2011 04:36 PM (Y7qU9)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at June 19, 2011 04:36 PM (yQWNf)
Posted by: Curmudgeon at June 19, 2011 04:39 PM (w7K7d)
Hey Jon Stewart ----- did you write your own material today ---- or was that just a bulge in Weiner's pants, you threw under the bus today?
Heh, what are freinds for ---- if not a great ostensible escape hatch from one's own intellectual dwarfism.
Posted by: Journolist at June 19, 2011 04:44 PM (QM8jX)
Hey Jon Stewart ----- did you write your own material today ---- or was that just a bulge in Weiner's pants, you threw under the bus today?
Heh, what are freinds for ---- if not a great ostensible escape hatch from one's own intellectual dwarfism.
Posted by: Journolist at June 19, 2011 08:44 PM (QM8jX)
< oops, wrong thread.
Posted by: Journolist at June 19, 2011 04:44 PM (QM8jX)
Posted by: TimothyJ at June 19, 2011 04:49 PM (w7YPP)
Posted by: Rex Harrison's Hat at June 19, 2011 04:50 PM (K+B+d)
Could Obama have been elected in a nation of people truly like us? Hence, the genius behind the American public school system the Progressives forced on this country a hundred years ago. Genius for them, very bad for us.
Posted by: KG at June 19, 2011 04:53 PM (LD21B)
Posted by: Rex Harrison's Hat at June 19, 2011 04:56 PM (K+B+d)
30 OT - Want to get more infuriated?
Read this latest dropping by Fareed Zakaria in Time:
How Today's Conservatism Lost Touch With Reality.
Hi! Thanks for letting me into your country, which I will now proceed to fuck up. Oh, and by the way, where's the nearest bathhouse? Toodles!
Posted by: Fareed Zakaria at June 19, 2011 04:58 PM (PnMCW)
Assumes facts not in evidence. McCain is mentally ill.
Posted by: FeralCat at June 19, 2011 04:58 PM (fRSUC)
And yes ------ the new Jon Stewart app is powered by virtual intelligence.
Posted by: Journolist at June 19, 2011 04:59 PM (QM8jX)
Someone on this site once pointed out that she sounds like she's chewing caramels when she talks. Perfect.
Posted by: pep at June 19, 2011 05:00 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: FeralCat at June 19, 2011 05:00 PM (GZmsj)
Posted by: ErikW at June 19, 2011 05:01 PM (zZRYY)
Posted by: FeralCat at June 19, 2011 05:02 PM (GZmsj)
Posted by: PaleRider at June 19, 2011 05:03 PM (ITaIZ)
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at June 19, 2011 05:03 PM (ER8/J)
Posted by: Cherry π the unbanned at June 19, 2011 05:05 PM (OhYCU)
Ya'll racist, ya hear?
Posted by: War Protester if President was a Republican and not black at June 19, 2011 05:05 PM (YnaBl)
There has always been something consistently very wrong with McCain’s character. Through it all, this lying unreliable self-aggrandizing megalomaniac poses as a “straight talker", and is so sick, he probably believes it himself, because he is JOHN MCCAIN !!!!!!!!!!!!, son snd grandson of ADMIRALS.
Posted by: FeralCat at June 19, 2011 05:06 PM (NmAt0)
Isolate the shit out of them.
Posted by: lowandslow at June 19, 2011 05:07 PM (GZitp)
Posted by: Rex Harrison's Hat at June 19, 2011 05:07 PM (K+B+d)
Posted by: Ken at June 19, 2011 05:07 PM (fFh95)
Posted by: Journolist at June 19, 2011 05:08 PM (QM8jX)
Posted by: Woodrow Wilson at June 19, 2011 05:09 PM (YnaBl)
Posted by: LBJ at June 19, 2011 05:10 PM (NmAt0)
Posted by: Journolist at June 19, 2011 05:10 PM (QM8jX)
Posted by: Journolist at June 19, 2011 05:14 PM (QM8jX)
Posted by: LBJ at June 19, 2011 05:14 PM (NmAt0)
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at June 19, 2011 05:15 PM (ER8/J)
Posted by: Barry Soreto at June 19, 2011 05:16 PM (NmAt0)
I'm not sure whether this gives us any new information past what we had before. John McCain has built his career as "the good Repub" in the MBM for his penchant for saying stupid, harmful things about other Republicans. He basically ran on this in 2000 and 2008. And Lindsay is Lindsay. So, ok, go for it. The two of you can take turns playing cholostomy bag caddies for each other.
What it does do is remind me why I hate open primaries so much.
Posted by: Truman North at June 19, 2011 05:16 PM (K2wpv)
Jon Stewart ------- stop performing without writers ------- listen to your agent!
Posted by: Journolist at June 19, 2011 05:17 PM (QM8jX)
And anyone who says otherwise is an isolationist! OMFG, if we could just fight the Dems without having half the fucking "Rinoblicans" in the Senate fighting on their side!
I would sooo like to see Arahsay Alinpay tell McCain to smarten-Up or STF-Up!
Posted by: sherlock at June 19, 2011 05:24 PM (UeZGr)
You know, early in 2008, I had to write a paper taking these premises: Hillary Clinton and John McCain won the two party nominations, and I was to write a strategy paper for Hillary in the general election.
While the assignment was only supposed to be 10 pager long, I ended up needing 30 pages. It was really strangely easy to take the position of a Clinton strategist, for two reasons: McCain was truly effed even as early as Super Tuesday when he all but clinched, and he's really an awful, unlikeable guy.
Posted by: Truman North at June 19, 2011 05:26 PM (K2wpv)
Posted by: Nozzle at June 19, 2011 05:33 PM (sE08M)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at June 19, 2011 05:34 PM (KaAC5)
Posted by: Datou at June 19, 2011 05:35 PM (W//wl)
Posted by: lauren at June 19, 2011 05:36 PM (bYpI/)
From Barbarian's link:
The Obama administration has warned it will run out of money to pay the nation's bills if Congress does not raise the $14.3 trillion debt limit by August 2 -- a prospect that could push the country back into recession and upend global financial markets.
Emphasis mine
Posted by: Truman North at June 19, 2011 05:39 PM (K2wpv)
Hehehe, well lookie here, McCain and I agree on a whole lot of issues...hehehe...
Jesus Christ LBJ, you are seriously full of shit. McCain should be thanking me!
Posted by: JFK at June 19, 2011 05:42 PM (YnaBl)
If it's big enough to think about over 3 weeks vs. blow a lot of shit up overnight and done, it's big enough for Congress.
I get Tranzi UN loving & arrogance & maybe just stupid enough to think it'd be over before it became an issue but didn't anybody at WH ask "What if this takes > 60, 90, x days; > umpteen billion $; > insignificant collateral civilian casualties; > "advisers" on the ground;
Posted by: Dave at June 19, 2011 05:59 PM (I6a9c)
Happy FatherÂ’s Day to our wonderful morons! I hope that you all had a good day and have an even better night ~ Wink Wink
Posted by: Cheri at June 19, 2011 06:04 PM (BA8k3)
cholostomy bag caddies for each other.
Is that an I see what you did there re. Juan y cholo or just a typo?
Either way colostomy bag caddies is funny. Picture Scott Glenn in The Right Stuff only they're holding the other guys enema bag.
Posted by: Dave at June 19, 2011 06:06 PM (I6a9c)
Perhaps if Senators McCain and Graham would just come out and state that the WPA is unconstitutional and encourage Chocolate Jesus to do the same we could avoid this stupidity. As it is the WPA is law and as such the president is obliged to follow it. He instructed his Justice Dept to not defend DOMA so it's pretty clear he doesn't have a problem with disregarding that which he deems unworthy. There are a number of people both Left and Right that think the WPA is unconstitutional so it's not like he would be out there all by his lonesome. So why not just make it easy? Well I suppose it would make him appear to be some cowboy flaunting the law in order to get around the constitutional process in order to prosecute a war which is as unpopular with the Right as it is with the Left. And we can't have that. We have elections to consider. Freaking coward.
Posted by: Preznit with no name at June 19, 2011 06:13 PM (g4IrW)
Posted by: Rich at June 19, 2011 06:25 PM (x4lWK)
That's all that needs to be said for his philosophical incoherence.
Posted by: MlR at June 19, 2011 06:26 PM (isNKI)
Posted by: Rich at June 19, 2011 10:25 PM (x4lWK)
Worse than that, he's essentially saying we should do this at the whim of the President without consultation with the Congress.
He and Lindsey are traitors of the first order in my opinion.
Posted by: Hrothgar at June 19, 2011 06:29 PM (yrGif)
Posted by: red speck at June 19, 2011 06:29 PM (hcRaZ)
Whats really troubling is that "IF" Congress allows Obama to get away with this, using the Pretext that the UN authorized it, so he does not need Congress's approval, it sets a VERY dangerous Precedent for future Presidents.
Especialy seeing as how the UN itself did not follow its OWN RULES. The UN Charter specificly says they cannot interfere in Internal rebellions within a Member State, and Libya IS a member State.
ergo, this is the US President, taking us into an illegal war, at the behest of an illegal order from the UN.
Posted by: Romeo13 at June 19, 2011 07:02 PM (NtXW4)
I hate to break it to you Romeo, but that precedent was already set in 1950 by Truman.
Johnson invaded the Dominican Republican in 1965 with 20,000 troops based only on authorization from the Organization of American States. (Hello, Arab League.)
GHWB sent thousands of troops to defend Saudi Arabia for Desert Shield without authorization (i.e., before Desert Storm), and against (at the time) 90% of the American public.
That's just three of many examples. Indeed, we've had an often lawless executive when it comes to foreign policy for some time now. Obama's just particularly brazen and hypocritical about it.
Posted by: MlR at June 19, 2011 06:39 PM (isNKI)
Posted by: jp at June 19, 2011 07:17 PM (SV1nj)
The WPA is beside the point. Constitution itself says only Congress has the power to declare war. The WPA was an move by Congress to reassert its war powers after Vietnam. Or do you like the idea of a President just deciding to take us to war because he feels like it?
Reagan had a muscular foreign policy and a military buildup because he had dragons to slay in the form of the Soviet empire.
But McCain using Reagan to bolster his case is pathetic. Does he really think that large conventional forces intervening to right every wrong on the globe are necessary or even desirable to fight Islamic terror?
Hey, Mr. Senator-who-never-saw-a-war-you-didn't-like, what the hell are our vital interest and strategic aim in Afghanistan? Libya? Can you tell me? Oh, and how exactly are we going to pay for all these adventures and still protect our country from, say, the collapse of Mexico right next door?
Huh, I thought not. Jerk.
Posted by: Arms Merchant at June 19, 2011 07:43 PM (NZMKc)
I've never been as anti-McCain as many conservatives have become. But I do notice that the less I hear from him, the more I like him.
Posted by: Adjoran at June 19, 2011 08:04 PM (VfmLu)
Posted by: jp at June 19, 2011 08:15 PM (SV1nj)
Posted by: drfredc at June 19, 2011 08:33 PM (iNKlO)
Neither lasted 60 days.
Posted by: Barry Soreto at June 19, 2011 08:48 PM (NmAt0)
We have been in Afcrapistan for 10 years, so how could leaving now be "bugging out"? Do you think we have to stay there for 100 years to not be "bugging out"? 1000 years?
Posted by: FeralCat at June 19, 2011 08:50 PM (cY9nU)
Posted by: FeralCat at June 19, 2011 08:52 PM (cY9nU)
Posted by: FeralCat at June 19, 2011 08:54 PM (cY9nU)
Posted by: John McCain at June 19, 2011 09:10 PM (qdI7N)
thanks
<a title="Movers Toronto" href="http://www.metropolitanmovers.ca " target=_blank">Movers Toronto</a>
Posted by: shery at June 19, 2011 09:38 PM (Eak6F)
Posted by: Oakley Sunglasses Sale at June 19, 2011 11:01 PM (nd8Zp)
Posted by: Ïå·®SEO at June 19, 2011 11:02 PM (nd8Zp)
Posted by: Sgt. Batguano at June 20, 2011 07:45 AM (m6OUa)
McCain's inexhaustibly stupid premise that it is "isolationist" to expect Congress to have a say in the wars American Service Members fight
Well not entirely. For one thing, Huntsman, Bachmann and Paul all want to end any kind of military action in Libya and Paul and Huntsman want to pull out of Afghanistan. McCain might have a point about some of that. If they want to cut off funding, they can. Congress always has that kind of authority. They are not without recourse here.
And it was not all that long ago that a lot of conservatives {not all of course} were treating Obama like a wimp because he let Sarkozy take the lead in the beginning. Overall, they supported the idea of going after Gaddafi. Not a lot of questions back then.
And the truth is all presidents have had conflicts with Congress over the War Powers Act. In fact Reagan was accused of being in violation of the act in three different parts of the world. And I know that it is expected that we are all supposed to say this is a war we are fighting with Libya..but was it a war when Reagan bombed Libya? Or what about Operation Preying Mantis when our navy sank about half of the Iranian navy back in the late 80s..or operations in Honduras and Grenada and Somalia and Lebanon? I guess when I think of a war I think of conflicts where our people are being shot at. This seems odd to me, it reminds me of the kind of operations Clinton used to do when he bombed Afghanistan and Iraq or even Sudan. Military operations vs war.
I think people are seeing the poll numbers and they think it might be good for them politically to go after Obama on this. I get that. But at the same time, I hate Gaddafi. The murdering bastard.
Posted by: Terrye at June 20, 2011 03:55 PM (bNnwW)
Posted by: Matt at June 21, 2011 04:44 AM (c4srZ)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3227 seconds, 341 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Papa Editor at June 19, 2011 02:39 PM (FZZ94)