Ace of Spades HQ

June 09, 2011

Jon Huntsman's Non-Aggressive, Non-Starter Campaign
— Gabriel Malor

I love when would-be "political consultants" get cute. You understand, these folks will be working for one campaign or another, or one press shop or another, or one pollster or another, regardless of who actually wins or loses. Politics is their career. So it doesn't actually bother them much to try out hare-brained ideas like, for example, advising their client to simply not mention the name of his opponent.

Jon Huntsman is trying out a novel strategy: running for president without criticizing the incumbent by name.
Since returning from his post as ambassador to China last month, Huntsman has made scant mention of the man who appointed him in May 2009Â—President Barack Obama. And his would-be campaign officials say that wonÂ’t change when the former Utah governor officially launches his campaign.

What gain by not referring to the President by name? Try this one on for size: "Jon Huntsman, the Republican Presidential Candidate Not Explicitly Running Against the President." Oooh, it gives ya goosebumps, doesn't it? That there is a man with the gumption to be a contender.

Aside from the substantive problem with Huntsman's non-aggression non-strategyÂ—which even his political so-called specialists admit can only last until the Obama team decides he is more than a two-bit player in this little drama and swats him like a bugÂ—there's a bigger problem. One (or more) of these political geniuses was so enamored of this imbecilic strategy that he just had to boast of it to a reporter.

Which is why the chattering classes today are not talking about Huntsman's bold (I'm assuming it would be bold; I don't know the man from Adam) stand for or against whatever it is he's for or against and pushing that out to the voting public. Instead they're talking about "Huntsman's name gimmick." Great job, would-be Huntsman campaign officials. I can't wait for the second round of process stories when the campaign decides to drop the Epic No-Name Strategy.

I've got to hand it to them, "Jon Huntsman, A Man Who Has Trouble With Names", is without-a-doubt a "novel" campaign slogan.

Okay one more: "Jon Huntsman Has No Name Recognition." Literally. Hah. I crack myself up.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at 05:00 AM | Comments (98)
Post contains 371 words, total size 2 kb.

1 my novel new strategy is not to comment on the stupidity of the political class.

Posted by: negentropy at June 09, 2011 05:06 AM (27KAF)

2 It felt good to get out of the rain

Posted by: A horse at June 09, 2011 05:07 AM (Fr8N6)

3 Jon That Dog Don't Huntsman;

Because SOMEBODY has to get the nomination!

Posted by: kbdabear at June 09, 2011 05:07 AM (so1xa)

4 This strategy got blasted in an episode of The West Wing. And they tried to present many stupid liberal ideas there as good.

Posted by: Tom In Korea at June 09, 2011 05:08 AM (5+ozD)

5 None of the Above!

Posted by: Monty Brewster at June 09, 2011 05:09 AM (so1xa)

6 This strategy got blasted in an episode of The West Wing. And they tried to present many stupid liberal ideas there as good.

Oh, man, I forgot all about that. Yeah, it was some advice Bartlet's early advisors gave him so he fired them all.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at June 09, 2011 05:10 AM (XVaFd)

7 I imagine after hearing this news David Frum had to call a jizzmopper.

Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at June 09, 2011 05:12 AM (FkKjr)

8 Gabriel, to be fair, no one was really talking about huntsman's policies either. At least a dumb process story (and the inevitable backpedaling) gets his name in the paper.

Posted by: Tom In Korea at June 09, 2011 05:12 AM (5+ozD)

9 I'd kind of like the job if it's available, and if that other guy doesn't really want it.

Vote for ME, nobody hates me like they do that woman with the glasses

Posted by: Jon That Dog Won't Huntsman at June 09, 2011 05:12 AM (so1xa)

10 I have yet to see ANY poll where he gets above 1% or 2%. Even Ron Paul is beating the crap out of him.

Posted by: Vic at June 09, 2011 05:13 AM (M9Ie6)

11 Maybe he will endorse obama like McCain did. That was a novel approach also and sure worked out great ha?

Posted by: nevergiveup at June 09, 2011 05:13 AM (i6RpT)

12 Can people stop speaking about Huntsman with regards to the primary? It's a waste of time. He is a nothing. A loser. A non-entity. An Obamabot. An idiot. No conservative takes him seriously and no one takes anyone who takes him seriously, seriously.

Yeah, but that's who the MFM wants.

Posted by: Sukie Tawdry at June 09, 2011 05:14 AM (MPtFW)

13 THIS is the guy that the MBM says Jugears fears the most? Talk about the MBM tipping its hand

Posted by: kbdabear at June 09, 2011 05:14 AM (so1xa)

14 BTW, Gabe, are you going to talk to us about the 11th yesterday?

Posted by: Sukie Tawdry at June 09, 2011 05:14 AM (MPtFW)

15 @9 What's a jizzmopper?

Posted by: Dante Hicks at June 09, 2011 05:16 AM (MOqbH)

16 What's a jizzmopper? Posted by: Dante Hicks at June 09, 2011 09:16 AM (MOqbH) If you don't know that, you really don't want to know.

Posted by: nevergiveup at June 09, 2011 05:17 AM (i6RpT)

17 I'm Jon Huntsman and I approve this message; if you know, it doesn't offend or come off as too aggressive or upsets anyone and especially if it is critical at all of our fantastic president!

Posted by: Sgt. Fury at June 09, 2011 05:17 AM (LXPet)

18 Jeez, what a loser. No wonder the usual suspects inside the Beltway Talking Head Set keep trying to sell this guy as a "serious candidate"...he's just as useless and stupid as they are.

Posted by: davidinvirginia at June 09, 2011 05:18 AM (mJewH)

19 20 Jeez, what a loser. No wonder the usual suspects inside the Beltway Talking Head Set keep trying to sell this guy as a "serious candidate"...he's just as useless and stupid as they are.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at June 09, 2011 09:18 AM

Of course he's a serious candidate, the most serious of the whole lineup.

Why, look at his pants crease! I'm sure he picked that up from our pants presser in chief, and I know he's the right pick to lose with dignity because he talks like us

Posted by: David Brooks at June 09, 2011 05:22 AM (so1xa)

20 Joe Huntsman: Tiny footnote (2 sentences) in the annals of 2012 also-rans.

Posted by: maddogg at June 09, 2011 05:22 AM (OlN4e)

21 Romney/Huntsman '12 Running on the "Wobbly" ticket.

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 09, 2011 05:23 AM (UlUS4)

22 I still think he's only in the race (has he announced yet?) to try to screw up Mitt. I don't think it will work -- partly because Mitt is shooting himself in the foot enough already and also because Huntsman has a character issue. I think Mitt backers would shit to T-Paw or possibly Cain, not Huntsman.

Posted by: Y-not at June 09, 2011 05:23 AM (TFxd0)

23 Give Huntsman a chance, I know the Bushes like him

I don't play any favorites, I'm just an analyst doing my job

Posted by: Karl Rove at June 09, 2011 05:24 AM (so1xa)

24 I think Mitt backers would shit to T-Paw or possibly Cain, not Huntsman.

Wow. That's a funny typo. I mean "shift to T-Paw."

Posted by: Y-not at June 09, 2011 05:24 AM (TFxd0)

25 I'm thinking that Obama is paying Hunstman to run against him (not that he really needs the money anyways so maybe Huntsman is just doing it for his good friend and glorious Dear Leader). While I'm not into conspiracy theories, it's the only thing that would make any sense as to why Huntsman is running. That or he's as delusional as Anthony Weiner is about his political career

Posted by: ArcadeHero at June 09, 2011 05:26 AM (tUq+p)

26 no thank you jon.........

Posted by: mitt- t-paw coalitioin at June 09, 2011 05:27 AM (eOXTH)

27 25 Give Huntsman a chance, I know the Bushes like him

Well, if George "senior" likes him, that'd make sense. I don't quite see W going for him.

Speaking of which, have there been any really good Presidents who rose up through the State Department ranks? It seems to me that the qualities that might make one an effective ambassador are not one you'd want in a POTUS.

Posted by: Y-not at June 09, 2011 05:27 AM (TFxd0)

28 Amazing. This douchetoast actually found a strategy that will be LESS effective than sending pictures of his dick to random college girls.

Posted by: Empire of Jeff at June 09, 2011 05:29 AM (lbo6/)

29 Can people stop speaking about Huntsman with regards to the primary? It's a waste of time. He is a nothing. A loser. A non-entity. An Obamabot. An idiot. No conservative takes him seriously and no one takes anyone who takes him seriously, seriously.

This is so good I just wanted to repeat it in bold

Posted by: laceyunderalls at June 09, 2011 05:30 AM (pLTLS)

30 What I want to know is where is the "h" in Jon Huntsman.

Posted by: Ben at June 09, 2011 05:31 AM (wuv1c)

31 Ha! That's nothin'.

I officially entered the race 3 weeks ago and my strategy is for no one in the country to know my name or that I am even running!

I'll show that Huntsman other guy!

_{*names redacted so as not to offend anyone}

Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at June 09, 2011 05:31 AM (qsodE)

Next to Huntsman, Romney is looking pretty good.

Still - I have hope for T-Paw.

Posted by: Lemon Kitten at June 09, 2011 05:31 AM (0fzsA)

33 Posted by: laceyunderalls
.......
The libs want him to run.. so yeah.. I embrace the dude as the next saviour of the GOP!

Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at June 09, 2011 05:32 AM (qsodE)

34 There's a lot of buzz around Lenny this year.

Posted by: Ben at June 09, 2011 05:32 AM (wuv1c)

Apparently there is a New Hampshire Republican Primary debate next tuesday.

When do the primaries start? like 7 months?

Posted by: Ben at June 09, 2011 05:33 AM (wuv1c)

36 Every Huntsman ad ends '"I'm Barack Obama and I approve this message."

Posted by: nickless at June 09, 2011 05:33 AM (MMC8r)

I think the left are playing a game of reverse psychology. The dominate leftard media are saying they are afraid that Huntsman could be the man to beat Obama. Please. and now this.

Huntsman is the shill who will get Obama back in the WH for 4 more years.

Posted by: Lemon Kitten at June 09, 2011 05:33 AM (0fzsA)

38 You have nothing to fear from another four years of what's-his-name.

Posted by: John Huntsman at June 09, 2011 05:34 AM (mrsvK)

Still - I have hope for T-Paw.

Posted by: Lemon Kitten
.......
It really does seem it down to those two, doesn't it? I've predicted for a long time it will be the Mittster, but I sure do like what Pawlenty's campaign is sending out.. He doesn't seem to be getting much traction with it, however.

Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at June 09, 2011 05:34 AM (qsodE)

40 Maybe his plan is not to use the President's name, but always to refer to him as the Weiner Party candidate. That would be clever.

Posted by: President Obama at June 09, 2011 05:37 AM (l5dj7)

41 Ironic sock

Posted by: blaster at June 09, 2011 05:38 AM (l5dj7)

42 If you can't name the President, you can't name the problem.* *Answers to both: Obama

Posted by: t-bird at June 09, 2011 05:40 AM (FcR7P)

43 ........so how does he identify the incumbent with out using his name?....... that tall basketball playing...golf putting....vacation taking....anti american ......commie? or does he use charades? how about saying....BARAK HUSSEIN OBAMA

Posted by: phoenixgirl at June 09, 2011 05:40 AM (eOXTH)

44 Can I yell "that Jug-Eared Fuck!" and still be playing by our campaign rules?

Posted by: Jon Huntsman at June 09, 2011 05:42 AM (FcR7P)

45 Is that like not saying Yahweh?

Posted by: dogfish at June 09, 2011 05:42 AM (NuPNl)

46 Even Ron Paul is beating the crap out of him.

Posted by: Vic at June 09, 2011 09:13 AM (M9Ie6)

Ouch.

Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at June 09, 2011 05:43 AM (LH6ir)

47 I think Mitt backers would shift to T-Paw or possibly Cain, not Huntsman.

Interesting. I can see T-Paw because they are close to each other on a lot of the issues while they were both gov. But why Cain? Cain's stance on issues (per his plank) is almost diametrically opposed to Romney's.

Posted by: Vic at June 09, 2011 05:43 AM (M9Ie6)

48 Wow, I got an autograph from The Other Guy!

Posted by: Elaine Benes at June 09, 2011 05:43 AM (so1xa)

49 Speaking of which, have there been any really good Presidents who rose up through the State Department ranks?

Wasn't Thomas Jefferson an ambassador? (But I don't think we had a State Department then)

Posted by: Vic at June 09, 2011 05:44 AM (M9Ie6)

50 This douchetoast actually found a strategy that will be LESS effective than sending pictures of his dick to random college girls.

Hahahaha

Spit all over the screen.

Posted by: Vic at June 09, 2011 05:45 AM (M9Ie6)

51 Politics is their career. Not for long.

Posted by: t-bird at June 09, 2011 05:45 AM (FcR7P)

52 46 Can I yell "that Jug-Eared Fuck!" and still be playing by our campaign rules? Posted by: Jon Huntsman at June 09, 2011 09:42 AM

Who are you kidding, Jon? You wouldn't yell that if they pumped molasses up your ass and sat you on a hill of fire ants

Posted by: kbdabear at June 09, 2011 05:46 AM (so1xa)

53 Posted by: Vic at June 09, 2011 09:44 AM (M9Ie6)

Jefferson was the first secretary of State. 1788? 1789? Just a guess.

I don't know when the State Department became a sewer. But it sure is full of shit today.

Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at June 09, 2011 05:49 AM (LH6ir)

54 I'm really uncomfortable doing this, because I know people are only voting against the guy who currently has the job because they're racists

Posted by: Jon That Dog Won't Huntsman at June 09, 2011 05:49 AM (so1xa)

55 He's really just in it hoping someone will name him VP. He's dying to be VP.

"Pleeeeeeeease, somebody make me VP. I won't step on toes or anything! Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeease."

Posted by: rdbrewer at June 09, 2011 05:50 AM (Om8Tn)

56 OK CBD you have forced me to go Bing

He was first Ambassador to France, then Secretary of State, then VP, then President.

Posted by: Vic at June 09, 2011 05:52 AM (M9Ie6)

57 BTW, Ace is up and posting new Weinerdic post.

Posted by: Vic at June 09, 2011 05:53 AM (M9Ie6)

58 Is "Huntsman" a typo?

Posted by: andycanuck at June 09, 2011 05:58 AM (DUOUR)

It really does seem it down to those two, doesn't it? I've predicted for a long time it will be the Mittster, but I sure do like what Pawlenty's campaign is sending out.. He doesn't seem to be getting much traction with it, however.

It's still so early. Romney has the name recognition and the money. T-paw has a good message. *sigh*. I think we have learned, however, that we must stand behind the nom - because this nation cannot afford 4 more years of Obozo.

Posted by: Lemon Kitten at June 09, 2011 06:06 AM (0fzsA)

60 Don't worry - Rick Perry will soon jump in with his Kicking Obama's Ass campaign.

Posted by: izoneguy at June 09, 2011 06:07 AM (i6Neb)

61 @#21...LOL...sorry, don't know how I could have forgotten to factor in the Must Have Sharp Pants Crease demographic. So, now Huntsman gets 3 votes instead of 2? Assuming his wife will vote for him? :-)

Posted by: davidinvirginia at June 09, 2011 06:07 AM (mJewH)

62 Huntsman wants to run against Bush and Sarah Palin.

Posted by: Jack at June 09, 2011 06:13 AM (kCT7A)

63 He's taking John McCain's strategy one step further.

Posted by: Jack at June 09, 2011 06:15 AM (kCT7A)

64 My friends, what I intend to do in this campaign is to be even nicer than my good friend John McCain was in 2008. That was the problem, we were so mean back then and didn't treat our Dear Leader with the proper respect of someone who was entitled to win. I agree with President Quadaffi that the current White House resident should not only remain there for the next four years but stay there for life!

Thank you for your consideration and look forward to your vote going to The One with a D next to his name on a ballot.

Posted by: Jonnie Huntsman at June 09, 2011 06:15 AM (tUq+p)

65 Huntsman is obviously a Dem stalking horse.

Posted by: glowing blue meat at June 09, 2011 06:16 AM (K/USr)

66 John Huntsman and the Harry Potter approach to politics: He who must not be named.

Posted by: Jack at June 09, 2011 06:16 AM (kCT7A)

67 The absolute worst person running is Huntsman. Good Lord. "Oh I can haz ambassadorship to biggest superpower rival to America! lolzthxO!...*months later* O u is no popular nemoar? I quit and run against you!" Idiot. His own state hates him, what does that tell ya?

Posted by: CAC at June 09, 2011 06:19 AM (JEVge)

68 45 ........so how does he identify the incumbent with out using his name?.......

that tall basketball playing...golf putting....vacation taking....anti american ......commie? or does he use charades?

how about saying....BARAK HUSSEIN OBAMA

Posted by: phoenixgirl at June 09, 2011 09:40 AM (eOXTH)

I won't tolerate anyone demeaning my good friend the Mr. Obama. He is a good man. No need to criticize his policies, they are the same ones that I would have done, only in a more bipartisan manner. I welcome the opportunity to reach across the aisle to help create a path to citizenship.

More of our Republican Leaders should be more like Mr. Huntsman and openly work for the Democratic Party.

Posted by: Juan McCain, War Hero at June 09, 2011 06:20 AM (w5RwR)

69 Maybe he doesn't want to mention Obama by name because it will remind people that he was Obama's ambassador to China?

Posted by: radar at June 09, 2011 06:26 AM (GygAv)

70 The absolute worst person running is Huntsman.

I don't know about that. The "rent's too high" guy will give him a run for the money on that score.

Posted by: Vic at June 09, 2011 06:26 AM (M9Ie6)

71 I also would like to get this out there before the Nicest Inclusive Campaign EverÂ™ gets fully underway that all donations made to my campaign for President will be forwarded to the Wonderful Man I will be running against.

Posted by: Jonnie Huntsman at June 09, 2011 06:28 AM (tUq+p)

72 So Huntsman won't mention Obama but you can bet your ass every other Republican contender is going to mention that Huntsman worked for Obama.

What can you say though, he is the MSM's Republican of choice.

Posted by: Lemmiwinks at June 09, 2011 06:30 AM (pdRb1)

73 I don't know about that. The "rent's too high" guy will give him a run for the money on that score. Posted by: Vic at June 09, 2011 10:26 AM (M9Ie6) Ok, edited: He is the absolute worst person running that the media seems to give any attention to.

Posted by: CAC at June 09, 2011 06:30 AM (JEVge)

74 So his campaign geeks have taken an episode of the West Wing and brought it to life....BRILLIANT!

Posted by: Robert Woolwine at June 09, 2011 06:35 AM (V+ylD)

75 Strategy only makes sense if he is running for VP, or a Cabinet position, and/or pumping his name for the future. He sells out to winner of SC for a major job; then becomes the "nice, clean Republican face on TV - with nicely creased pants" who does the passive-aggressive judo attack on Obama: We worked hard to make his policies help America; I know the man ...; From the inside, the decision ..., etc.

Posted by: Jean at June 09, 2011 06:37 AM (WkuV6)

76 But he is sooooo ELECTABLE!!!!! /

Posted by: Big T Party at June 09, 2011 06:41 AM (93ObH)

77 actually, the point I was making is that it is only obvious to the people here. I just had to tell my friend not to fill up her car until later in the week, to just put in enough gas to tide her over since gas prices have to come down since oil is going down. She literally had no idea. corsets Replica Handbags Replica Handbags

Posted by: Sexy corsets at June 09, 2011 06:48 AM (FZtCu)

78 Huntsman is a former member of the Obama administration. He can't run against him. He's even more tied to Obama's policies than Romney.

Posted by: Rob Crawford at June 09, 2011 06:49 AM (ZJ/un)

79 He is the absolute worst person running that the media seems to give any attention to.

LOL, I can't believe he has the stones to run under a Republican ticket. There should be some kind of a rule that you be a member of the Party that you are running under.

Posted by: Vic at June 09, 2011 06:52 AM (M9Ie6)

Isn't this the Karl Rove strategy?

W rarely, if ever, mentioned his opponents' name. He would always say "my opponent wants to take...".

It's good strategy too. Kerry wasn't a great candidate, but the left was steroid pumped about beating Bush in '04 when he was probably at his weakest point. Kerry still lost.

Posted by: wtfci at June 09, 2011 06:56 AM (qITbz)

81 pseudo-candidate wannabe-Confucius Huntsman

Posted by: dammit at June 09, 2011 07:16 AM (H+LJc)

82 Perhaps Huntsman should hire Ed Rollins to help his current campaign manager. Ed will be looking for a job soon and his skill set is a perfect match for this campaign.

Posted by: Vic at June 09, 2011 07:17 AM (M9Ie6)

My favorite Huntsman story? When he was captured by the North Vietnamese and housed at the Hanoi Hilton for 3+ years. If he has a big boned daughter that doesn't like Republicans that's just a bonus.

Posted by: East Bay Jay at June 09, 2011 07:25 AM (svwGR)

84 'He Who Must Not Be Named', what a novel idea.

Posted by: Voldemort at June 09, 2011 07:26 AM (ZbuGo)

85 He's even more tied to Obama's policies than Romney.

Perhaps more tied to Obama personally, but no tighter knot ties Huntsman to Obama than ties Romney to Obama's policies shared in common.

From Mark Levin:

Mitt's Three Strikes Out, NOT a "conservative" candidate:

1. pro-mandated universal health care State & Federal; 2, big spender rather than budget cuts pro-Ethanol tax subsidies; and 3, proponent of fraudulent man-made Global Warming with that religious movement's gargantuan international spending and mandate heist hurting humanity's Liberty.

Mark Levin turned the tables on the Mitt die hard caller last night, demanding to know exactly what it is that defines Mitt as "conservative" even while the "yute" from Ft.Worth continued to spew further adoration of Mitt as "the only real candidate".

Mark Levin asked the "yute" to define Mitt's policy on emigration reform, only to hear that Mitt would suggest that the illegal aliens go home and return legally, but is not prepared to deport illegal aliens, and would place the entire burden of identifying illegal aliens on employers mandated by executive order or by legislation to perform the identity verification of documents presented by illegals, to determine whether the documentation is real or fraudulent.

Mark Levin pointed out that this Republican Primary is the most important time for voters to realize who is actually a conservative prepared to fight and achieve budget cuts and constitutional governance, because once the primaries are over, we're stuck banding together with who's left standing, and damned if that's to be another "winnable" loser (meaning a gopper RINO establishment figure replicating the Democratic opposition "common values").

Posted by: maverick muse at June 09, 2011 07:40 AM (H+LJc)

86 Posted by: maverick muse at June 09, 2011 11:40 AM (H+LJc)

More than 3 strikes. More like 5 with the 6th being a foul ball. See my write up from yesterday on Mitt.

Mitt review from yesterday

Posted by: Vic at June 09, 2011 07:44 AM (M9Ie6)

87 I note also in the sidebar posted by Ben that Joe Wilson has endorsed T-Paw.

Posted by: Vic at June 09, 2011 07:45 AM (M9Ie6)

88 Huntsman was on HH last night... couldn't get myself to listen to the interview on the Hughniverse, but I did listen to the callers afterwards.... Non starter... Hugh has been calling Huntsman one of the serious candidates, but by the sounds of it, even he'll put him with down with the C team after his performance....

Posted by: phreshone at June 09, 2011 08:16 AM (T3vCe)

89 Huntsman is banking on teabagger scorn to position him for 2016 or the nomination. He knows he's public enemy #1 to Romney/Pawlenty supporters. Either they win then nomination, the GOP loses and the nuts can pipe down next time. Or there is more sanity in the silent majority than the establishment knows, and he wins without having to run like Nixon.

Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at June 09, 2011 08:29 AM (mHQ7T)

90 Btw, no actual tea party would support Romney or Pawlenty. Neither will repeal Obamacare.

Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at June 09, 2011 08:33 AM (mHQ7T)

91 Hey, the No Name Defense worked for us in 1972.

Posted by: Miami Dolphins at June 09, 2011 08:41 AM (mHQ7T)

know what the real problem with Huntsman is?

same as with Pawlenty,

they are both Big Gov. progressive republicans trying to masquarade as real conservatives....

WE. ARE. NOT. AMUSED.

Posted by: Sgt. Batguano at June 09, 2011 09:18 AM (jdOk/)

93 Has anybody seen Jon's brother Mike? Could you page him?

Posted by: Guy who remembers all the jr. high jokes at June 09, 2011 10:09 AM (CzyDl)

94 anyone who believes in AGW is not a conservative, Levin is correct now, he was mistaken before.

Posted by: Sgt. Batguano at June 09, 2011 10:17 AM (jdOk/)

"Hi, I'm running for President because the country can't take four more years of that incompetent assclown."

"Hi. Vote for me because that douchenozzle in the White House is ruing our economy."

No? That's not what they meant he would do? Damn.

Posted by: Penultimatum at June 09, 2011 10:28 AM (dJ7er)

96 Not to defend Mr Huntsman AT ALL, but for the record, the late great Ronald Reagan (almost?) never mentioned his opponents by name. It was always "our opponents" "the other side" and other vague, gentle euphemisms. Just sayin'. But his critiques were neither vague nor gentle.

Posted by: jewishodysseus at June 09, 2011 11:27 AM (93YMp)

97 He makes the rest of Congress look just as disgusting by his continued presence in the same room. swf to video converter
Will a wildfire be blamed? hard drives and air chillers wind down i feel the solar wind video to ipad converter
pdf to flash converter

Posted by: chaeli at June 10, 2011 01:11 AM (H6JXe)

98 ghd hair and CHI flat irons are sold online at good prices and beautiful quality. cheap ghd Mini Styler, Purple Cheap GHD Hair Straighteners

Posted by: haomai at June 21, 2011 01:34 AM (fOq3O)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.

114kb generated in CPU 0.1103, elapsed 0.25 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.219 seconds, 226 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.