June 14, 2011
— Ace Steven Crowder got rejected in his bid to be a conservative pundit on the Daily Show. (Not sure if he pitched himself as a one-shot or an ongoing thing; probably the former with an eye to the latter, if he performed.)
Here's the tricky thing: Crowder runs the peril of seeming jealous/pissy/etc. due to his rejection.
But he navigates this perfectly. Because he points out that Stewart expressly holds himself out as, if you can stand to hear this without laughing your eyes out of your skull, non-partisan, the reasonable man floating above the fray.
So is he?
Well, his producer's letter to Crowder's manager said Crowder was talented and funny, however, they have a blanket policy of absolutely no conservative-leaning pundits, period.
So, like every other liberal occupying a position in the media, he poses as non-partisan when in fact being partisan as all hell.
A liar, put briefly.
I have to say one thing here.
I find it sad that conservatives continue watching this semi-talented Clapper Comic. I find it even sadder that they continue to root, with their little hearts, that Stewart will say something vaguely conservative, as if it matters a loose stool whether Jon Stewart validates them.
I saw this with the Weiner thing, when I saw conservatives crossing fingers that tonight be the big night.
You know how he covered Weiner? First night, he made light of it (naturally), then praised blogs for breaking important stories, like "journalists" are supposed to.
You know which blogs he praised? Gawker and the Daily Kos and HuffPo (forget the exact ones) for breaking the story, basically, that Breitbart might have set up Weiner or actually hacked him.
Even after he said this, I saw, I'm sorry to say, a semi-praising post about it at one of Breitbart's own blogs.
Look: I get it. You like him. You want him to like you back.
I don't know why you like him, because he's not terribly funny, and his stock in trade is the cutesy mugging that Letterman used to do when Letterman was still bothering to even phone it in, back in the mid-90s, but I do get it, you like him.
But he doesn't like you back. Period. And you sound a little sad, desperate, and needy hoping for some Jon Stewart validation.
Jon Stewart is a loud and proud left liberal. Period. He is not fair, he is not balanced, and he is not, as the New York Times and other left-liberal organs constantly allege, "The most important, impartial voice in journalism."
He is a barely-funny TV clown who is left-liberal like the rest of them, only a little more arrogant and dishonest about that. At least other left-liberals occasionally roll their eyes at their own Nutty-Granola point of view, acknowledging, in a human, honest way, "Oh, there I go again, with one of my liberal jags."
Stewart never does that. He lies straight to your face and tells you he's some kind of non-partisan, objective neutral referee.
And actually I think he's so cocooned in his own partisanship and bullshit I think he might even believe that.
So can we please stop giving him credit he does not earned?
If you like him, fine. But maybe you shouldn't parade that around so damn much. It's a little shameful to be in so one-sided a relationship.
Jon Stewart doesn't matter now, the same as he didn't matter when he was on MTV.
He's a clown. A clown may be funny but a clown isn't important.
Posted by: Ace at
01:44 PM
| Comments (161)
Post contains 597 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: WalrusRex at June 14, 2011 01:48 PM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at June 14, 2011 01:48 PM (lbo6/)
Because if you are, you may be giving him too much credit.
Posted by: AoSHQ's *second* worst commenter, DarkLord© at June 14, 2011 01:48 PM (GBXon)
Posted by: somebody else, not me at June 14, 2011 01:49 PM (7EV/g)
It's not the caps that make you look crazy. It's the crazy that makes you look crazy.
Posted by: AoSHQ's *second* worst commenter, DarkLord© at June 14, 2011 01:49 PM (GBXon)
Posted by: mAc Chaos at June 14, 2011 01:51 PM (6s7n2)
Not possible. See, I have a clown nose. It's like a "get out of jail" card except substitute the word "jail" for "lying."
Posted by: Stewart the Clown at June 14, 2011 01:51 PM (1yViP)
What's a Clapper Comic?
Clown nose on (clap clap)
Clown nose off (clap clap)
Clown nose on, clown nose off, The Clapper Comic.
Posted by: FireHorse at June 14, 2011 01:51 PM (peN5l)
FML.
Posted by: toby928™ at June 14, 2011 01:52 PM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Speaker Cryin John at June 14, 2011 01:52 PM (fsJbX)
Posted by: toby928™ stealing others schtick and beating it to death long after it's funny at June 14, 2011 01:53 PM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Dr. Varno at June 14, 2011 01:53 PM (QMtmy)
Instead of commenting on this post, I'll just raise my eyebrows and gesture with my hands a little bit at it.
Posted by: Lance McCormick at June 14, 2011 01:54 PM (zgHLA)
Is the clapper referring to his 'clown nose on, clown nose off' line?
He seems just like every other 'journalist.' Lib as the day is long, and professing to be objective the same long day. Its a shame that the comedy industry is so partisan because Ø has provided a lifetime of material for them if they would use it. Its like ANWAR of jokes.
Posted by: The Schwalbe: © at June 14, 2011 01:54 PM (UU0OF)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 14, 2011 01:54 PM (i6RpT)
Yeah, no. I couldn't give a flying fuck about that "news" hound and where his clown nose leads him.
Comedy Central is for South Park. And that is all Comedy Central is for.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at June 14, 2011 01:55 PM (1yViP)
Posted by: PaleRider at June 14, 2011 01:55 PM (dkExz)
Posted by: Mr Pink at June 14, 2011 01:55 PM (VidfH)
Posted by: ace at June 14, 2011 01:55 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Grey Fox at June 14, 2011 01:56 PM (DpNOw)
Posted by: real joe at June 14, 2011 01:57 PM (SlSoO)
I give one thing to Stewart, he's funnier than Maher.
The funniest thing that ever came out of Maher's mouth was Kathy Griffen's cock. And to note, it too has never been funny.
Posted by: Jollyroger at June 14, 2011 01:57 PM (NCw5u)
He was good on the Daily Show, briefly, until Bush got elected in 2000, and he got all pissy about it.
He needs to take a hint from Colin Quinn's defunct "Tough Crowd," and play his show for LAUGHS, not CHEERS.
Posted by: wooga at June 14, 2011 01:57 PM (2p0e3)
Posted by: buzzion at June 14, 2011 01:58 PM (oVQFe)
Stewart's the love-object of every chick in the People's Republic of California. I only watch him if I'm getting sex for it. Does that make me wrong ?
Posted by: SocietyIs2Blame at June 14, 2011 01:58 PM (srV3y)
Somehow, Special Olympics comes to mind
and again, I denounce myself.
Posted by: toby928™ at June 14, 2011 01:58 PM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at June 14, 2011 01:58 PM (lbo6/)
Posted by: PaleRider at June 14, 2011 01:59 PM (dkExz)
Posted by: toby928™ stealing others schtick and beating it to death long after it's funny at June 14, 2011 05:53 PM (GTbGH)
He did that long ago. That is why he is always full of shit. I watched his show one time a long long time ago. Turned it off after a few minutes.
Posted by: Vic at June 14, 2011 01:59 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Dave C at June 14, 2011 01:59 PM (eEUFS)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at June 14, 2011 01:59 PM (npr0X)
I talk to a few Libs who reference Stewart and Maher so regularly it's as if they're in trances. I never watch either of them so I always ask for examples of their great wit and insight. Blank stares all around.
OT-Althouse breaking possible Sup. Ct. victory for Walker/GOP over the Fleebaggers/Teacher's Unions.
Posted by: Lincolntf at June 14, 2011 02:00 PM (Z05lF)
Stewart is so one-note. Every story is approached with the same tone. It's Maureen Dowd cookie-cutter column-writing applied to political comedy.
"Semi-talented" = one or two notches above mediocre. Yep.
Posted by: Nicholas Kronos at June 14, 2011 02:00 PM (ak08F)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at June 14, 2011 05:47 PM (lbo6/)
When you depend on the audience to clap at your jokes instead of laugh because it's about the message not being funny.
Posted by: mAc Chaos at June 14, 2011 05:51 PM (6s7n2)
I think this has been part of the weakest thing Conan has had on his new show with his comedian choices. He's had on some legitimate funny comics, but he's had on at least 3 Clapper Comedians I've seen. Unfunny liberal dickbags that do nothing but rant
Posted by: buzzion at June 14, 2011 02:01 PM (oVQFe)
Politically Incorrect with Bill Maher used to run on Comedy Central too.
Posted by: weew at June 14, 2011 02:02 PM (l8YWh)
Now I'm off to get drunk at a neighbor's party. I'll attempt to keep any videos from appearing on Youtube.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 14, 2011 02:02 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: weew at June 14, 2011 02:03 PM (l8YWh)
Posted by: arhooley at June 14, 2011 02:03 PM (elBGR)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at June 14, 2011 02:04 PM (yQWNf)
Posted by: Liberal Pinhead at June 14, 2011 02:04 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: EM August at June 14, 2011 02:04 PM (zeBNm)
Posted by: kathysaysso channeling her inner 6-year old at June 14, 2011 02:05 PM (ZtwUX)
WI Supreme Court just threw out Sumi's ruling on the collective bargaining law. Making it effective.
Posted by: GMan at June 14, 2011 02:05 PM (jQZpg)
Posted by: doug at June 14, 2011 02:05 PM (iq/yq)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at June 14, 2011 02:05 PM (lbo6/)
Posted by: Grayson at June 14, 2011 02:05 PM (A4+zN)
I did happen to catch Bill Maher's show on HBO a few years ago in, of all places, Jamaica.
Up late and waaaaayyyyy too interested in TV I flipped upon the show to see Maher "interviewing" David Frum and Natalie Maines.
I actually watched the whole thing without even blinking I think.
When done, I never felt dumber. Natalie Maines is perhaps the most amazingly stupid person I have ever seen.
Posted by: Dave at June 14, 2011 02:06 PM (HPcQF)
While debating OR is like arguing with a footstool, I was amazed at how awed they were at Stewart's "brilliant" debating style.
What was it? He basically made the same kinds of counterpoints that anybody could and does do, usually the "what abouts" so common with ordinary thinkers
Posted by: kbdabear at June 14, 2011 02:06 PM (so1xa)
Posted by: wooga at June 14, 2011 05:57 PM (2p0e3)
1.) Tough Crowd ruled. Replacing it with that one note hack Colbert was a travesty.
2.) This is just more evidence that Red Eye is simply a better show. Yeah, they're mostly right/libertarian, but they bring liberals on the show on a consistent basis, and non-douchey ones at that (Paul Provenza being the exception).
Posted by: Hoss Fuentes at June 14, 2011 02:06 PM (UVYPD)
Posted by: The Dueceman at June 14, 2011 02:06 PM (HwE/1)
Eveyone around me thinks just like me... therefore I MUST be a Moderate!
Heck, even John Stewert, who SAYS hes a moderate, thinks like I do... and I know that he would never LIE to me!
Posted by: Humanities Student, Berkley Calif. at June 14, 2011 02:06 PM (NtXW4)
I give one thing to Stewart, he's funnier than Maher.
You could say the same for me. Have you heard me imitate my mother? "Margalet, you no mally White man!"
Posted by: Margaret Cho, funny like bone cancer at June 14, 2011 02:06 PM (tSxym)
Posted by: Jack at June 14, 2011 02:07 PM (kCT7A)
Yeah he annoys the hell out of me. Angry, ranting, vaguely drunken comedy takes a deft touch; which he lacks utterly.
Posted by: Grayson at June 14, 2011 02:07 PM (A4+zN)
Posted by: ErikW at June 14, 2011 02:08 PM (koLd7)
Posted by: Dave C at June 14, 2011 02:08 PM (eEUFS)
Posted by: motionview at June 14, 2011 02:09 PM (i+DU3)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at June 14, 2011 02:10 PM (y/+eD)
Posted by: Jane D'oh
Here's hoping you fail spectacularly.
Have fun.
Posted by: Morons everywhere at June 14, 2011 02:10 PM (fPOY0)
Posted by: Skookumchuk at June 14, 2011 02:11 PM (btzPD)
Posted by: LizLem at June 14, 2011 02:11 PM (lSuMX)
Posted by: buzzion at June 14, 2011 02:11 PM (oVQFe)
Posted by: Dave C at June 14, 2011 02:11 PM (eEUFS)
Posted by: ace at June 14, 2011 02:12 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Iowa Bob at June 14, 2011 02:12 PM (RJ+Yj)
Posted by: todler at June 14, 2011 02:12 PM (fPOY0)
Posted by: doug at June 14, 2011 06:05 PM (iq/yq)
As guests? Or as a regular correspondent doing 'special' reports?
Posted by: Dave C at June 14, 2011 06:08 PM (eEUFS)
Yeah, who is a conservative pundit employed by the Daily Show? Or are they Dave Weigel "conservative pundits" maybe?
Posted by: buzzion at June 14, 2011 02:13 PM (oVQFe)
Posted by: Charlie Gibson at June 14, 2011 02:13 PM (ihSHD)
I don't know why you like him, because he's not terribly funny, and his stock in trade is the cutesy mugging that Letterman used to do when Letterman was still bothering to even phone it in, back in the mid-90s, but I do get it, you like him.
I attempted to watch his show but quickly changed channels. These oh-to-be-so-smart-hip assholes like stewart, maher, letterman, et. al. are not only not funny but tedious. The anti-funny. The fact that some people watch these shows to get their national information is just another peg in the idiocracy wall.
Posted by: Cheri at June 14, 2011 02:14 PM (oiNtH)
Here's the thing I don't understand. He's a liberal host of a left leaning show that caters to a liberal audience. Why waste time trying to install yourself as a conservative pundit? Of course they won't hire Crowder. The Daily Show is not a fucking public utility, it's a television show created for the purpose of making money. This whole attempt is kind of stupid.
Posted by: Ted Kennedy's Gristle Encased Head at June 14, 2011 02:14 PM (+lsX1)
"But he doesn't like you back. Period. And you sound a little sad, desperate, and needy hoping for some Jon Stewart validation."
Can I get an "AMEN!"
Posted by: Nora at June 14, 2011 02:15 PM (VxqUc)
Posted by: Iowa Bob at June 14, 2011 06:12 PM (RJ+Yj)
Because he's been on for over a decade, so all the little kids that started watching him as teens and are now in their 20's and 30s considered him a news guy, and they still watch him because they have no clue.
Posted by: buzzion at June 14, 2011 02:16 PM (oVQFe)
Posted by: huerfano at June 14, 2011 02:16 PM (izDdO)
@57: "Lewis Black is the worst of the clapper dickbags on that channel."
Black is sometimes funny. His bit on Ron White's Celebrity show was good, and he appeared pretty genuinely moved when talking about military families.
*shrug*
His 2000 election show wasn't bad, either. 15 minutes ripping on Bush, the GOP, and the Right, and then 15 ripping on Gore, the Dems, and the Left. It was funny to watch the crowd reactions change. You could feel the Lefties seething when he started to go after their sacred cows.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at June 14, 2011 02:18 PM (xy9wk)
No, you don't get it. He has on conservative INTERVIEW SUBJECTS. He does not have on conservative PUNDITS to do their own stories or cut their own videos or offer their opinions.
He has conservative GUESTS on in a situation in which he guides (and restricts) the terms of engagement.
One of the few times I actually watched Jon Stewart was when he had John Yoo on (who was one of the lawyers in the Bush administration that came up with appropriate interrogation techniques of terror suspects). Yoo completely pwned him. Stewart didn't know what hit him (and he looked like a total smirking dumbass). Yoo was calm, articulate and smart. He was smiling the entire time he was sticking the knife into Stewart and eviscerated his lameass arguments. It was a thing of beauty. That and the time Lynn Cheney took down Wolfe Blitzer are two of my favorite MFM interviews of conservatives.
Posted by: runningrn at June 14, 2011 02:19 PM (ihSHD)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 14, 2011 02:19 PM (i6RpT)
Here's the thing I don't understand. He's a liberal host of a left leaning show that caters to a liberal audience. Why waste time trying to install yourself as a conservative pundit? Of course they won't hire Crowder. The Daily Show is not a fucking public utility, it's a television show created for the purpose of making money. This whole attempt is kind of stupid.
Posted by: Ted Kennedy's Gristle Encased Head at June 14, 2011 06:14 PM (+lsX1)
Because Crowder is a comedian that probably does a lot of political humor and probably thought he could get in there for exposure and using his humor and political interests like others do.
Posted by: buzzion at June 14, 2011 02:19 PM (oVQFe)
Posted by: chazmartel at June 14, 2011 02:20 PM (OV2xF)
Bingo. Funny's got nothin' to do with it. It's naked aggression carefully dressed in funny clothes. And generous helpings of Liberal dog-whistle.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at June 14, 2011 02:21 PM (1yViP)
Posted by: Dave C at June 14, 2011 02:22 PM (eEUFS)
Posted by: JackStraw at June 14, 2011 02:23 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: AndrewsDad at June 14, 2011 02:23 PM (C2//T)
Posted by: Dr Spank at June 14, 2011 02:26 PM (k0TKJ)
You know, the actual hell.
Posted by: K~Bob at June 14, 2011 06:17 PM (TlLbZ)
Sooo.... three Congressmen get sent to hell.... oh wait... thats not the punch line folks... why are you applauding???
Posted by: Shecky Flamebut, Demonic Comic at June 14, 2011 02:26 PM (NtXW4)
I was kind of a fan, back in...ought ninety-three or so? Of his standup. I don't remember when exactly. Rudy days.
Then there was a moment on his MTV show (in '94 or '95, I think?) that made me go "Ah fuck, he's not funny anymore. He's pro."
What happened was, Mark Leyner was the guest, and he was reading a sentence about...Peggy Fleming? maybe?...getting fired from a nurse-volunteer gig for housing medical equipment in her vagina, or something like that, and Stewart clown-nose-offed in panic to cut off the line and go to commercial a few seconds early, mortified and/or afraid to have someone go that far into non-clapper territory on his showbiz ass-kissing show. He sort of played it off like his OMG STOP was part of the show—a little off-mic ha-ha you understand shoulder-slap thing—but it wasn't. Dude can't act.
 —
Any of you who don't know what a "clapper" is, simple rule for our times: A 'tard or incest joke that culminates in "Palin" is a clapper. The same 'tard or incest joke tagged with "Obama" is edgy/daring/art/etc (or a clapper, if it's for an audience that wants Obama-'tard-incest jokes, regardless of quality). A 'tard-incest joke with no audience-bonding exit anywhere in it—that implicates not reassures the crowd, drawing individual not social laughs, from surprise not camaraderie—is comedy of the kind that Stewart/Cross/Garofalo/et al claim to do. And they don't.
Posted by: oblig. at June 14, 2011 02:26 PM (xvZW9)
Posted by: mAc Chaos at June 14, 2011 02:27 PM (6s7n2)
Posted by: nine coconuts at June 14, 2011 02:27 PM (uz3hs)
Like I said, kind of stupid. It's not a match. It would be like me applying for a dancing job at a titty bar. I'm a good dancer and have a spectacular ass, but the customers, due to their particular proclivities, wouldn't want to watch.
Posted by: Ted Kennedy's Gristle Encased Head at June 14, 2011 02:28 PM (+lsX1)
I still say that somebody in the entertainment industry is missing out on a really serious gold mine. I mean, the President orders an attack on a small arab country, pretty much because he feels like it, and then skips off on vacation? You just can't make that stuff up. Spending a trillion dollars to lower unemployment, unemployment goes up, and you propose doing it again? Pretending to care about the oil spill, and then doing nothing but strongarming the oil company to do what it what already doing? Stopping domestic drilling, and then loaning another country money to do it (while there's ramant unemployment, and the debt is out of control)? Getting dragged off the golf course to witness the Bin Laden raid? It just goes on and on - it SCREAMS for parady.
And - c'mon! Joe Biden, too? Wow - does somebody have to slap them upside the head? Even Hillary adds to the farce (remember the doofy "Reset button" for Russia that didn't translate to what it was supposed to?).
Posted by: Optimizer at June 14, 2011 02:28 PM (F56VB)
Posted by: seattle slough at June 14, 2011 02:30 PM (JRGA6)
Sooo John Stewart, Lewis Black, and Jannine G. are all sent to hell to give a show...
Come on folks... THATS NOT THE PUNCH LINE!!! Quit applauding.... GEEZZZZZ...
Posted by: Shecky Flamebut, Demonic Comic at June 14, 2011 02:30 PM (NtXW4)
He is also part of what I call "cocoon" media. Political news for people who just want to be told stories at night about monsters who their Mom for just 70% of their allowance and unquestioned loyalty in any argument with their father will gladly protect them from all these monsters that are most definitely not made up and just some ugly way to scare her you unto supporting her.
Posted by: shiggz at June 14, 2011 02:31 PM (mLAWK)
Posted by: Jaynie59 at June 14, 2011 02:31 PM (4zKCA)
So which of you people is going to get off your ass and start a cable channel that features conservative comedians so I can be entertained?
I am waiting.
Posted by: AndrewsDad at June 14, 2011 02:32 PM (C2//T)
There does seem to be some inadvertent mis-communication (at best) or some fact twisting (at worst) going on here. The letter Crowder flashes in his video pretty clearly is in response to a request to be booked as a sit-down guest, while the complaint seems to be that he was not given a shot as a performer on the show (what Stewart calls "correspondent", not "pundit" -- which, yecch -- which may be the source of the confusion). And the while the wording of "we never book conservative pundits" is stupid (considering that they have), it seems to me an attempt at a nice-ish way to say "don't call us, we'll call you".
And, while I can't disagree with your estimation of Stewart's politics (his clear statements of abject disappointment in Obama to follow through on some of his most liberal promises reveal both his leanings and his willingness to attack any moving target), I think dismissing him as not mattering is wishful thinking -- remember that there is a whole generation to whom Stewart's show IS the news, and, not coincidentally, Obama's outfit pulled a big hunk of that generation into the process in '08.
Posted by: JGM at June 14, 2011 02:32 PM (zw8QA)
Most conservatives can stomach that sort of respected difference quite well.
Posted by: shiggz at June 14, 2011 02:34 PM (mLAWK)
Not to put too fine a point on it, but if that's where they're getting their "news", they're fucking stupid.
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at June 14, 2011 02:41 PM (1rHeD)
Posted by: Turd Ferguson at June 14, 2011 02:44 PM (KTtrN)
One of the few times I actually watched Jon Stewart was when he had John Yoo on (who was one of the lawyers in the Bush administration that came up with appropriate interrogation techniques of terror suspects). Yoo completely pwned him. Stewart didn't know what hit him (and he looked like a total smirking dumbass). Yoo was calm, articulate and smart. He was smiling the entire time he was sticking the knife into Stewart and eviscerated his lameass arguments. It was a thing of beauty. That and the time Lynn Cheney took down Wolfe Blitzer are two of my favorite MFM interviews of conservatives.
Yeah i saw that one it was freaking awesome. I caught that on youtube. Worth putting up. Yoo made Stewart look like the half informed CNN hacks Stewart always makes fun of.
Posted by: Ben at June 14, 2011 02:47 PM (DKV43)
The funniest thing I remember was this big annoucement saying Stweart had renewed his contract and would be around till the 2004 election, as if there was some doubt. I mean what the hell else does Stewart have to do anyway? Like he had a standup career? He was the guy who couldn't even land the gig following Letterman which is how he ended up on The Daily Show.
Posted by: Rocks at June 14, 2011 02:48 PM (th0op)
His reliance on sarcasm is way past comedy to some point of illness (his own). I've never found sarcasm to be the same thing as comedy, and rarely laugh at it for that reason -- sarcasm is emitted from bitterness and lack of insight and Stewart has simply made a bed for himself out of being a Sarcasm Prince among the sarcasm-greedy. He's not funny, he's desperate on a personality level, he's not someone I watch or even respect, nor never have.
Crowder appearing on his broadcasts would have quickly shown-up Stewart because Crowder, unlike Stewart, is actually funny, has not based his reports and comments on sarcasm and the humiliation of human beings (which Stewart has done), and Crowder appearing on any Stewart broadcasts would quickly show any audience tuned-in that Stewart isn't funny, he isn't insightful, he isn't inventive, he isn't creative, while Crowder is all that.
Posted by: -S- at June 14, 2011 02:48 PM (ZfjCR)
I think my program of brane-cell reduction is working, coz I still don't get it.
I think a "clapper" is one of those things that helps you turn off the lights from your craftmatic adjustable bed.
Posted by: K~Bob at June 14, 2011 02:49 PM (TlLbZ)
That "whole generation" reveals itself in our nation's dive in achievement levels, intellect and plummeted conditions. What our nation has today is a "whole generation" of people who think Stewart is funny, that he reports "news" and a number of other failed assumptions and beliefs many of them hold.
Posted by: -S- at June 14, 2011 02:55 PM (ZfjCR)
Posted by: Anony at June 14, 2011 03:01 PM (Yigvc)
Honestly, Breitbart is funnier than Crowder, and he isn't a comic.
As for the "really talented" quote by the Daily Show producer, they say that about every one they reject.
Evan Sayet has been funny. That guy who talked about Obama's ears and how the MSM treats him as developmentally disabled was funny too. I can't be bothered to look him up on Youtube though.
Posted by: Jack at June 14, 2011 03:08 PM (kCT7A)
Posted by: ontherocks at June 14, 2011 03:12 PM (HBqDo)
Ace, thank you for pointing out how unfunny Stewart is. His funniness is a myth, like that of the horribly unfunny Tina Fey. Have you seen her show? Wow, that's hilarious...make another kooky-racist Tracey Morgan skit, and then have Puffy-Baby Baldwin attempt to curb his rage for another zany good time, while I put my head in the oven here...shit, it's electric.
I want you to watch the documentary "American," about Bill Hicks the anti-American comedian who is also the darling of the left and the America-hating world. Wait until you get to the part where he finds himself wildly popular in the UK, hating on America to the applause of packed halls. What a great person! What a splendid...American. The doc was made by Brits, of course.
Posted by: garycooper at June 14, 2011 03:14 PM (beegY)
Posted by: Jack at June 14, 2011 03:27 PM (kCT7A)
Posted by: Erik Larsen at June 14, 2011 03:27 PM (jbWs+)
Posted by: Mr. Hathaway (aka jcjimi) at June 14, 2011 03:34 PM (ay6+/)
Posted by: Raoul Ortega at June 14, 2011 03:35 PM (GUxTi)
I am glad to know that I am not the only one who doesn't get the whole Jon Stewart thing. He is as irrelevant to the political conversation as Anthony Weiners towel is to the gym prick pics. And I don't find him nearly as funny as he thinks he is. Contrast. Dennis Miller is funny in a "my friend's drunk grandpa" kind of way and he is actually very knowledgable about current events. Jon Stewart is funny in a "my dog just took a loose crap on my white carpet" and does not even have a grasp on reality.
My $0.02 only.
Posted by: i <3 Ace at June 14, 2011 03:36 PM (YA6+6)
Posted by: i <3 Ace at June 14, 2011 03:41 PM (YA6+6)
Posted by: Bender Bending Rodriguez at June 14, 2011 03:42 PM (1H47k)
As for Stewart, I think Treacher summed it up best. Clown nose on, clown nose off.
Posted by: Rex Harrison's Hat at June 14, 2011 03:44 PM (4136b)
Posted by: Bender Bending Rodriguez at June 14, 2011 03:44 PM (1H47k)
Posted by: jonny stewart at June 14, 2011 03:46 PM (kZ5Ek)
Posted by: West at June 14, 2011 03:49 PM (l7djG)
Posted by: iowahawk at June 14, 2011 03:56 PM (veL4N)
Even appearances on O'Reilly require the crack Fox graphics team to conjure up some flashy new logo for it. And of course O'Reilly uses snippets of said interview for filler for the rest of the week.
But to be fair, do I gag when I empty the litter box.
Posted by: Rex Harrison's Hat at June 14, 2011 03:57 PM (4136b)
Posted by: madamex at June 14, 2011 03:58 PM (ice9D)
Stewart is not funny. He's a smug, pretentious asshole who pretends at funny in order to appeal to the mindless MTV generation. I was always unable to watch his bullshit mockery of a show.
Last election, when kids started saying they get all their news from The Daily Show, I just about lost all hope for the future generations of this country. These kids will never wake up when they are coddled by entertainment into their fully enclosed liberal cocoons. They won't watch "real news," but regard hacks like Stewart and Colbert as gods among men. eugh.
Why do conservatives and Republicans want to cozy up to these people? To make themselves cool?
Why do people always want to be accepted by the bitchy popular cliques? Here is some advice: Start your own!
Rebel! Say, "no more!"
Doesn't anyone watch those feel good teen movies where the mousy kids rebel against the popular groups and win out in the end? It won't happen in the real world, but we could always try.
Instead, the conservatives and Republicans are willing to lie back and think of England, if it means they get a tiny in with the cool kids. "Abuse us," we say, "as long as you mention our names on national televison."
Posted by: soulpile is... at June 14, 2011 04:01 PM (Mk/IQ)
Posted by: steevy at June 14, 2011 04:02 PM (6urrj)
At a certain point we have to stop bitching and moaning about the meanie media and create our own.
Posted by: iowahawk at June 14, 2011 07:56 PM (veL4N)
This. A whole lot more concise and coherently put than my own rabid screed above.
Posted by: soulpile is... at June 14, 2011 04:02 PM (Mk/IQ)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at June 14, 2011 04:06 PM (bxiXv)
The decided lack of the latter which Stewart so obviously shares with his audience, disqualifies each for the former.
Posted by: ontherocks at June 14, 2011 04:17 PM (HBqDo)
Posted by: Jim_from_NJ at June 14, 2011 04:22 PM (WV8m9)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at June 14, 2011 04:30 PM (8JpQH)
Posted by: UGAdawg at June 14, 2011 04:38 PM (/VjHB)
Posted by: Silverfox at June 14, 2011 04:41 PM (XFR6H)
Where I saw him live was in Houston's July 2009 Tea Party, and he stunk up the joint with clapper shite like "Obama is a photo negative of Alfred E Newman".
Crowder's best work has been "I Gots a Peace Prize" and the Detroit documentary. The first was like Idiocracy: a biting and effective satire, but not something you could really laugh at. The documentary of course wasn't even supposed to be funny.
At this point I'd say the Right needs him in a John Stossel / Breitbart capacity. He should host investigative reports. Keep him out of comedy.
Posted by: Zimriel at June 14, 2011 04:52 PM (pl1+G)
Posted by: doug at June 14, 2011 05:13 PM (iq/yq)
While true, the bigger picture is the default taken that liberal shows -- even "news" shows delivered as comedy -- are nonpartisan. It's the same path we grant too freely, and consequent via years of indoctrination, to the MBM. We went decades under the illusion that information was unbiased to the point that Walter Cronkite and Dan Rather were the faces of journalistic integrity. We were ignorant because the conduits were restricted and controlled. And now more of us know better. We've become sophisticated about their regulated craft.
And that's the offense. Not that they are biased (everyone has them)... but that they claim to be that which they are not: unbiased. They should be out and proud and argue from principle rather than disguise their bias and have that bias perpetuated as fair, straight down the middle analysis delivered either as news or as comedy. The real fault with us is to accept the premise that these outlets are fair and nonpartisan. Only after killing that myth first will we decide that that media is to be either disregarded or, better yet, circumvented through a novel, "conservative" media.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at June 14, 2011 05:22 PM (1yViP)
Posted by: Clubber Lang at June 14, 2011 05:35 PM (QcFbt)
Posted by: fused at June 14, 2011 06:15 PM (LawKN)
Posted by: cheshirecat at June 14, 2011 07:03 PM (r2SLq)
Posted by: sexypig at June 14, 2011 07:46 PM (aTgq2)
Holy fuck, I'm late to the thread. Nobody is still here, but the point still needs to be made:
You've got it mixed up. Stewart is a leftist hack but still a comedian who will go where the comedy takes him.
Colbert is a useless cocksucker who deserves all the bad things in the world (and only him). These Anthony Weiner jokes are, literally, the first sustained and serious jokes he's made about a Dem in the six years of his show.
For the general population: Stewart has always been liberal and never appeared not to be. He is more even-handed than that cockholster Colbert.
Posted by: The Q at June 14, 2011 08:58 PM (NdE8F)
I don't watch Jon Stewart but I think it is kinda funny that he knows Weiner and gave money to Weiner's campaign. Tells you what he knows about politics right there.
The Onion News on the IFC channel is funny. And of course South Park. Red Eye is good. Heck, there is a lot of funny here at the AoS.
Posted by: Case at June 15, 2011 01:54 AM (0K+Kw)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2779 seconds, 289 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Empire of Jeff at June 14, 2011 01:47 PM (lbo6/)