Ace of Spades HQ

February 26, 2011

Kathleen Parker's Exit
— rdbrewer

Ace called it correctly a long time ago:

We liveblogged the first show and it was pretty clear that Kathleen Parker 1, had nothing much to say except about her One Big Topic of Sarah Palin (and nothing new there, either), and, even if you're whoring for ratings, you can't talk about her every night, can you?, and 2, was a wallflower without any command of the studio and without the sort of aggressive confidence needed to be a broadcaster.

John Ziegler makes similar points in this piece for Meidaite. Ziegler was the guest several months ago who confronted Parker about her role in the "assassination" of Palin as a candidate during the 2008 election cycle and elicited the odd response from Parker that she "didn't take part in [the assassination]; she led it." (Video below the fold.) He predicted the failure of the show then.

But the primary reason why the program couldnÂ’t work is also the very reason Parker got the gig in the first place. She was clearly hired because she was perceived as a Â“conservativeÂ” who was willing to vigorously attack Palin, while not holding any particularly strong conservative opinions which might offend the largely liberal CNN audience. It is hardly a secret that the best (and perhaps only) way for an unknown or career-challenged conservative to achieve mainstream media acceptance is to be a sellout to their supposed cause (just ask Arianna Huffington, Peggy Noonan, David Brooks, David Frum, Michael Smerconish, or Joe Scarborough, to name only a few).
Criticizing Palin (along with endorsing Obama) has quickly become the most reliable path to instant notoriety/credibility for ambitious Â“conservatives,Â” and Parker became the poster child for this phenomenon. . . .
However, there is apparently a downside side to getting a show this way. Much like a guy who spends all his cash to get the girl and has nothing left to keep her, Parker had no capital with which to make the show a ratings success. . . .
With no spark, no friction, no talent, and no audience base, Parker brought nothing to the table, and the show was clearly doomed.

(Emphasis mine.) As Ace said during the liveblog that first night, it was almost like Parker was right there and part of the action.

More at the link, including some first-class snark. Like Ziegler says, the show's failure wasn't an Earth-shattering prediction. I think we all knew it was going to be a dud. What is strange is that CNN wasn't able to foresee the outcome

Posted by: rdbrewer at 04:57 PM | Comments (90)
Post contains 428 words, total size 3 kb.

1 Was she Spitzed out?

Posted by: Have Blue at February 26, 2011 05:05 PM (mV+es)

2 Too bad she didn't take Spitzer with her.

Posted by: moi at February 26, 2011 05:05 PM (Ez4Ql)

3 So, no more Swallow? Just Spit?

Posted by: Holger at February 26, 2011 05:08 PM (YxGud)

4 You "led it" huh bitch?Enjoy your ride back down to completely irrelevant.

Posted by: steevy at February 26, 2011 05:12 PM (1knYj)

5 Kathleen's 'exit' can also comfortably accommodate a juggling circus midget on a unicycle.

Posted by: Janet Napolitano on a unicycle at February 26, 2011 05:12 PM (38mCL)

6 how's about moammaoar kadaffy and charlie sheen hooking up and doing a talk show on hbo?

Posted by: Uncle Jed at February 26, 2011 05:13 PM (qPTz0)

7 So, what will Parker do now? Does Kaddafi need another "nurse"?

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 26, 2011 05:13 PM (G/uDq)

8 Can anyone pronounce "Mediaite"?

Posted by: rdbrewer at February 26, 2011 05:13 PM (lXCHg)

9 Watching this bitch try to falsify her own position in re Palin whilst defended by a guy that actually pays to choke out women is simply priceless.

Posted by: Fat Bald & Sassy at February 26, 2011 05:13 PM (3PyqP)

10 I remember when they announced the show. I was wondering who was going to represent the right. And I thought it was a big, unnecessary risk for Parker. Much to lose, little to gain.

Posted by: rdbrewer at February 26, 2011 05:14 PM (lXCHg)

11 I have absolutely no earthly idea of who Kathleen Parker is. Guess living in a cave has its advantages...

Posted by: Nighthawk at February 26, 2011 05:15 PM (3kefp)

12 Much to lose, little to gain.
Posted by: rdbrewer

Last I checked, Brooks and Frum are still employed. They're doing a tour of the Left Coast and HotAir.

Posted by: goldbricker esq at February 26, 2011 05:16 PM (S59+B)

8 Can anyone pronounce "Mediaite"?

I believe it's Media-ite. Oh, and fuck Michael Smerconish. Sellout prick.

Posted by: Wyatt Earp at February 26, 2011 05:16 PM (zgZzy)

14 Last I checked, Brooks and Frum are still employed. They're doing a tour of the Left Coast and HotAir.

Brooks and Frum aren't doing a show on CNN with Elliot Spitzer.

Posted by: rdbrewer at February 26, 2011 05:18 PM (lXCHg)

15 What's Monica Lewinsky doing these days?

Posted by: huerfano at February 26, 2011 05:18 PM (2pEj7)

16 Earp, "eat" or "ite"?

Posted by: rdbrewer at February 26, 2011 05:19 PM (lXCHg)

17 Earp, "eat" or "ite"?

Posted by: rdbrewer at February 26, 2011 09:19 PM (lXCHg)

I always said 'ite'....not that I said it that much.

Posted by: Tami at February 26, 2011 05:20 PM (VuLos)

18 16 Earp, "eat" or "ite"?
Rush always says, "ite."

Posted by: Wyatt Earp at February 26, 2011 05:20 PM (zgZzy)

19 There's a comfortable niche for "house" conservatives.Parker will probably continue to write columns.

Posted by: steevy at February 26, 2011 05:22 PM (1knYj)

20 I think we all knew it was going to be a dud. What is strange is that CNN wasn't able to foresee the outcome.

Their knowledge of the reading habits and views of the right is nil, so they didn't know what was patently obvious to all of us: That she had no following or credibility among the right whatsoever.

Posted by: AD at February 26, 2011 05:27 PM (9r1ux)

21 According to the MFM, are we supposed to look up to Parker as one of those "smart conservatives"? I guess so, after all she was smart enough to make her regular TV debut co-hosting with a guy who pissed away his political career for unprotected, socked, buttsecks. I can't believe that anyone with an IQ above a cocker spaniel would think that this show was a good idea.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at February 26, 2011 05:31 PM (9Lm5R)

22 They knew. And they ran it anyway. Now....why?

Posted by: Burn the Apostrophers at February 26, 2011 05:31 PM (DLxD/)

23 Parker will probably continue to write columns.

See, this is the funny thing. It seems ridiculous to us that she would continue to right write columns. Nobody on our side reads her or had even heard of her before Palin. However, the woman now has a Pulitzer.

As far as the Washington Post is concerned she's a big deal and given how many other big name columnists have been phoning in it for years, she can probably live off that for a very long time. To make it even more insane they picked her up as a safe conservative, so they view employing her as a way to show their balance.

Posted by: AD at February 26, 2011 05:34 PM (9r1ux)

24 zzz

Posted by: Chuckit at February 26, 2011 05:34 PM (qXCt5)

25 so close to avoiding a typo "right write..."

Posted by: AD at February 26, 2011 05:35 PM (9r1ux)

26 This is for the news feed at the right. Mr. Ed was of course a horse. If you read the linked article, at the end it invites you to click to read more and then says that this is a fake urban legend that they put in to trap plagiarists.

Also a horse: Kathleen Parker.

Posted by: House of Payne at February 26, 2011 05:37 PM (z79gW)

27 ditz on day 1 should have been a palinite. would of f@@ked up cnn.

Posted by: newrouter at February 26, 2011 05:38 PM (nfC5u)

28 Oh, get this. Those lefties at Mediaite felt it necessary to put in a disclaimer that these were Ziegler's views and not those of Mediate:

The views expressed in this guest column are those of John Ziegler alone.

Like we didn't know. Notice they don't say "not necessarily." Funny slip-up, since Mediaite is about as left as you can clumsily get. Here is what they should have said:

The views expressed in this guest column are indeed from a guest writer and not one of the staff liberals at Mediaite, so don't even think for a second that anybody, anybody here could possibly ever take such a viewpoint. Here at Mediaite, we strive to bring you slanted news because, hey, we know we're part of the with-it crowd, noble, heroic, and honorable--just like the cool kids in seventh grade. And, it is in that spirit that we decline to be clever about our bias. We like it to be obvious to the extent it is frequently gratuitous and turns people off. Actually, that might be a bit of a post-hoc rationalization, since the truth is our objective reality-testing skills are limited. So it's probably too much to ask for us as children inhabiting large bodies to be professional and adult in our delivery of the news. Just remember, we would never have a conservative-sounding take on anything. Ever.

That would be a better, even safer disclaimer for Mediaite.

Posted by: rdbrewer at February 26, 2011 05:38 PM (lXCHg)

29 Ziegler: "If I [worried] about ratings, I wouldn't be going on this show."

hahaha

Posted by: baldilocks at February 26, 2011 05:38 PM (T2/zQ)

I don't know of anyone who didn't see this coming.

Spitzer is a life-long Democrat and is going to defend the Democratic position. Sure, he might occasionally disagree but c'mon, that's what he'll do (my guess is that he still thinks he has a career in politics but that's another matter).

So, Spitzer defends the liberal view and Parker is going to do what? Well, she's known for criticizing Palin and conservatives. That's her MO.

And that's what she'll do.

Who wants to watch a show where one viewpoint is defended and the opposing viewpoint criticized?

Not to mention that she came across as a wooden mannequin.

Posted by: Areopagitica at February 26, 2011 05:40 PM (fqNwI)

31 >>11 I have absolutely no earthly idea of who Kathleen Parker is. Guess living in a cave has its advantages...<< Dude, you could have been banging Kathleen Parker on a street corner in midtown Manhattan in broad daylight and said the same thing. She is a nothing. An op-ed writing version of Tina Fey - unknown if it weren't for Sarah Palin. Sadly, she won't be the last. Fuck her and the white limousine that she rode to the studio in.

Posted by: turfmann at February 26, 2011 05:40 PM (l4J9G)

32 Probably putting on black armbands over at the National Review as we speak.

Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at February 26, 2011 05:43 PM (DsqGb)

33 If they want to replace Kathleen Parker with another feminine view, maybe they can get Ron Reagan Jr.

Posted by: nerdygirl at February 26, 2011 05:45 PM (bnhUq)

34 Posted by: nerdygirl at February 26, 2011 09:45 PM (bnhUq)

Oh no you didn't girlfriend!

Posted by: Ron Reagan Jr. at February 26, 2011 05:46 PM (YxGud)

35 Now they need another punching bag conservatives who is obsessed over Palin. Brooks? Noonan? Frum?...

Posted by: Flapjackmaka at February 26, 2011 05:48 PM (c5RQr)

36 What is strange is that CNN wasn't able to foresee the outcome

Or more likely it was a reward for the woman who played such a large part in the Palin takedown.

The left is pretty good about paying off traitors - see David Brock...

Posted by: 18-1 at February 26, 2011 05:48 PM (bgcml)

37 I'm sure that Kathleen will get plenty of spots on Tweety's weekly panel show where she can be teh "conservative" voice when Brooksie and Andi are off cornholing each other.

Is it true that Client 9 was dropping hints that he did better ratings wise when Porker was on vacation? I'm sure he didn't feel comfortable being in the extended company of a woman who didn't have a cash basis relationship with him.

Posted by: Captain Hate at February 26, 2011 05:49 PM (kKA7V)

38 "Also a horse: Kathleen Parker." Hey, that's my gig.

Posted by: nerdygirl at February 26, 2011 05:49 PM (bnhUq)

39 Oops, that was supposed to be sockpuppeted "Sarah Jessica Parker.

Posted by: nerdygirl at February 26, 2011 05:50 PM (bnhUq)

40 Tears came twice.

First, when John McCain hushed his booing crowd to acknowledge the significance of this nationÂ’s electing an African-American to the presidency.

Second, when Barack Obama delivered his acceptance speech:

Â“If there is anyone out there who still doubts that America is a place where all things are possible, who still wonders if the dream of our founders is alive in our time, who still questions the power of our democracy, tonight is your answer.Â”

Amen, brother.

Kathleen Parker
Conservative Commentator
November 7, 2008

Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at February 26, 2011 05:51 PM (DsqGb)

41 A talentless pet con whore with nothing on her resume save Palin character assassination. She won't be missed, and her MFM sponsors will soon forget her.

Posted by: Fat Bald & Sassy at February 26, 2011 05:52 PM (3PyqP)

42 Or more likely it was a reward for the woman who played such a large part in the Palin takedown.

The left is pretty good about paying off traitors - see David Brock...

Posted by: 18-1 at February 26, 2011 09:48 PM (bgcml)

Muhahaha and Palin's still standing.

Posted by: Flapjackmaka at February 26, 2011 05:53 PM (c5RQr)

That's just mean nerdygirl.

You magnificent ...er...nerd?

Come & sit by me.

Posted by: rickinstl at February 26, 2011 05:54 PM (7unIp)

44 Kathleen, you ignorant slut.

Posted by: dan akroyd at February 26, 2011 05:55 PM (9Pzy7)

45 Oops, that was supposed to be sockpuppeted "Sarah Jessica Parker. Posted by: nerdygirl

The Morons are way ahead of you. Either SJP or Joolia Roberts.

Posted by: goldbricker esq at February 26, 2011 05:59 PM (S59+B)

46 The Morons are way ahead of you. Either SJP or Joolia Roberts.

Posted by: goldbricker esq at February 26, 2011 09:59 PM (S59+B)

You also forget Helen Hunt.

Posted by: Holger at February 26, 2011 06:00 PM (YxGud)

47 50 The Morons are way ahead of you. Either SJP or Joolia Roberts.

Posted by: goldbricker esq at February 26, 2011 09:59 PM (S59+B)

You also forget Helen Hunt.

Posted by: Holger at February 26, 2011 10:00 PM (YxGud)

What am I, chopped liver?

Posted by: John Kerry at February 26, 2011 06:02 PM (9Pzy7)

You also forget Helen Hunt.

Posted by: Holger

Hmm, don't see it. I'd believe Minnie Driver before Hunt.

Posted by: goldbricker esq at February 26, 2011 06:02 PM (S59+B)

49 I've always had this suspicion that the show was always just about Elliot Spitzer. Parker was ust window dressing.

Had CNN debuted a show exclusively hosted by Elliot Spitzer, they would have come under heavy fire for giving a disgraced whoremonger an hourlong five nights a week to expound on his bullshit. Throw in some kinda sorta wishy washy "conservative" co-host, someone too wholesome to criticize, and voila! In the clear. Ask her to do it for a few months, just enough time for Spitzer to build some credibility, and then let her split when it suits her.

And wouldn't ya know it they've already got Spitzer's new show titled and formatted and ready to go less then a week after Parker's announcement. No fuss, no muss.

Posted by: Robert at February 26, 2011 06:02 PM (4q6A5)

YooHoo,

I'm available and I'm hungry.

Posted by: Megan "conservative hottie" McCain at February 26, 2011 06:05 PM (Mm3xj)

51 A whore is a whore of course, of course....

Posted by: jewells45 at February 26, 2011 06:05 PM (Z71Vg)

Muhahaha and Palin's still standing.

Posted by: Flapjackmaka at February 26, 2011 09:53 PM (c5RQr)

Perhaps, but absent the media hitjob, Palin would be VP today.

As an interesting question, would we be going into 2012 with VP Palin perched to take on McCain in a primary fight?

Posted by: 18-1 at February 26, 2011 06:06 PM (bgcml)

53 Can I say it any more clearly? Fuck Kathleen Parker and her representation of the republican party. Who the fuck is she anyway? I am so sick of people defining the party with these fucking idiots. She has served her purpose for CNN and I guess she feels good about cashing her paycheck ... bitch.

Posted by: gesc at February 26, 2011 06:07 PM (AIIyH)

You also forget Helen Hunt.

Posted by: Holger

Hmm, don't see it. I'd believe Minnie Driver before Hunt.

Posted by: goldbricker esq at February 26, 2011 10:02 PM (S59+B)

Shit. I gotcha' all beat. Assholes.

Posted by: Princess Camilla at February 26, 2011 06:07 PM (+yLk4)

55 Just in case anyone was wondering...Yes, I am a dumb fucking cocksucker. But at least I have all my hair.

Posted by: Elliot Spitzer at February 26, 2011 06:11 PM (azgo2)

56 What is strange is that CNN wasn't able to foresee the outcome Our press releases said the show would be great!

Posted by: CNN at February 26, 2011 06:12 PM (4Kl5M)

57 How little credibility CNN has....they hire the disgraced Elliott Spitzer after they hire the ridiculously stupid Joy Behar. Can you say FAIL!?!

Posted by: Sponge at February 26, 2011 06:14 PM (CdX98)

As an interesting question, would we be going into 2012 with VP Palin perched to take on McCain in a primary fight?

Posted by: 18-1 at February 26, 2011 10:06 PM (bgcml)

You think he'll run again?

Posted by: Flapjackmaka at February 26, 2011 06:15 PM (c5RQr)

59 Hey ladies!!! I'm available...
gimmie some sugar!!!

Posted by: Elliot Spitzer at February 26, 2011 06:16 PM (azgo2)

60 I heard Katie Couric is always looking for a new manager with a strong hand.

Could Spitzer possibly step up and fulfill that role, or would the grind be too much for him?

Posted by: Fritz at February 26, 2011 06:16 PM (/8mBu)

61 I wonder how many sexist charges we would have seen if Rush was the host and forced some liberal chick off the air?

Posted by: robtr at February 26, 2011 06:17 PM (hVDig)

You think he'll run again?

Posted by: Flapjackmaka at February 26, 2011 10:15 PM (c5RQr)

If he had won in 2008? Yes.

Posted by: 18-1 at February 26, 2011 06:19 PM (bgcml)

If he had won in 2008? Yes.

Posted by: 18-1 at February 26, 2011 10:19 PM (bgcml)

oh. well in a way im glad he did not. He might've passed the public option.

Posted by: Flapjackmaka at February 26, 2011 06:20 PM (c5RQr)

64 DYI ONT:

Um, hello?!?

Posted by: Hot Air at February 26, 2011 06:20 PM (bgcml)

>>DYI ONT

Do Yourself In ONT?

Posted by: 7 Chinese Spammers at February 26, 2011 06:22 PM (SMqnS)

Do Yourself In ONT?

Posted by: 7 Chinese Spammers

Just trying to maintain the standards here.

Posted by: goldbricker esq at February 26, 2011 06:24 PM (S59+B)

67 Ace comes after 2pm posts 2 hooker posts and then leaves. Good work if you can get it.

Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 26, 2011 06:24 PM (qIHlG)

68 The only reason Kathleen lasted past the first week was the fact that I needed to have her bent over that desk at least 5 times a day. In my mind.

I'm a Sexual Tyrantosarous!!! Call me.

Posted by: Elliot Spitzer at February 26, 2011 06:25 PM (azgo2)

69 Your no sex poodle Elliot.

Posted by: ManBearPig at February 26, 2011 06:27 PM (qIHlG)

70 Goddamit!!! TyrantOSaur!! What's this poodle shit??? You envy my good looks and thick wavy hair right??? RIGHT???

Posted by: Elliot Spitzer at February 26, 2011 06:29 PM (azgo2)

71 TyrantOSaurs have a large carbon footprint, and the earth has a fever.

Posted by: ManBearPig at February 26, 2011 06:30 PM (qIHlG)

72 CNN and all media lies, i think this is bullshit. Anywy it's interesting to see what people comment!! Australian Free Directory

Posted by: sam.j at February 26, 2011 06:33 PM (geNJV)

73 We got large lots of things.....

Posted by: Elliot Spitzer at February 26, 2011 06:35 PM (azgo2)

74 Kind of confused here ... Did Kathleen Parker quit or was she fired? If she quit, she's no better than Palin, especially since the "heat" associated with being on some lame-ass talk show with Cretin Spitzer couldn't nearly be what Palin had to endure as former Governor of Alaska. If she was fired, however, all the worse. What a fucking sack of shit - adolescence incarnate.

Posted by: Bill Carson at February 26, 2011 06:45 PM (ii5TW)

75 Spitzer was more conservative then Parker was -which tells you something.

Posted by: Jimmy Page at February 26, 2011 08:36 PM (ychgM)

76 One can easily imagine the jejune Parker dreamily doodling on napkin while lunching with her BFFs
Mr & Mrs. Barack Obama,
Kathleen & Barack Obama,
Mrs. Kathleen P. Obama,
Ms. Kathleen Parker-Obama.

Posted by: NC Mountain Girl at February 26, 2011 08:48 PM (Et0pc)

77 Also a horse: Kathleen Parker.

Posted by: House of Payne at February 26, 2011 09:37 PM (z79gW)

No, not a horse. A nag. Hard to tell when the show you're looking at is all filmed through a blue filter, though.

Posted by: Bill H at February 26, 2011 08:52 PM (q8CmE)

78 Yeah, but she still got paid big girl money for a few months, so her treachery against conservatism remains unavenged.

Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at February 26, 2011 08:53 PM (0IPsJ)

79 F You Parker. U Slut Ho.

Posted by: MrScribbler's Proctologist at February 26, 2011 09:10 PM (p6fOG)

80 Heh. Parker "the Quitter" since she wasn't "fired." She didn't even need to face an avalanche of SLAPP suits, either, to seek the refuge of writing a column. Apparently, she's a one-trick pony that had zero pull and had to ride the coattails of her lesser. Parker will probably start making Palin voodoo dolls now, sticking pins in it between shots of whiskey.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at February 26, 2011 11:04 PM (swuwV)

81 CNN couldn't figure out that show was doomed for the bin. Hell, it probably bid for HuffingGlue, too, but AOL had a string of bad moves it didn't want to break.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at February 26, 2011 11:08 PM (swuwV)

82 nice work.plz keep it away.happy new year.

Posted by: maplestory mesos at February 26, 2011 11:52 PM (YLorm)

83 I suspect CNN foresaw the outcome. Parker couldn't have cost them much, they got their shots on Palin, and tossed their tool to the curb when they were done with her.

All this is speculation. I'm guessing somebody watched the show, but it wasn't me. I've no use for Parker and less for our vicious, lying, hypocritical ex-governor.

Posted by: MarkD at February 27, 2011 04:27 AM (6CLxP)

Years ago I read her columns, and thought they were pretty good and an easy, relaxing read with a cup of coffee. Since she insulted all Conservatives and Christians, I have ignored any column she wrote. I did not watch her recent flirtation with fame and a man who consorted with prostitutes (with his socks on). This Parker/Spitzer show was a desperate shot at best and she failed.

Over the years, when she sought to be relevant, her columns became trite, cutesy and always, always a beat or a week behind other opinion columnists. Her columns were often a retread of other's opinions and rarely her own ideas. You see, she did not appear to actually form an opinion until she saw the lay of the land or where the wind was blowing (sort of like her great and articulate Dear Leader of a President who flew her during the campaign as she swooned like a teenager). She immediately got on the "I hate Palin" bus with personal attacks (due to her husband's comments that Palin had good legs or was good looking). Very high school "mean girl" behavior, and that of an insecure woman.

The Palin attacks fed her middle-aged ego. She was being noticed! She busily collected the emails sent to her from the knuckle-dragging conservatives, tallied them with the pro emails from the brilliant liberals and moderates from their caves at the Democrat Underground. She'd found her new sweet spot being a conservative basher, which (she thought) might continue to lead to White House dinners and Georgetown cocktail parties, and a new career as a TV pundit.

The problem was this: she did not consider the risk if the Obummer Administration nosedived, or that there would ever be a conservative cover she could not mea culpa back into. Townhall booted her to the curb. National Review will occasionally list her column, but she is no longer part of the A team, except with a few who seem willing to forgive her as she is so "talented." If FOX News hires her to be a milquetoast place holder, then whatevah. She simply cannot compete with the likes of Megyn Kelly, Ann Coulter, Laura Ingraham and others.

She needs to keep writing her little ditties for the WaPo and polishing her Pulitzer that she obtained for the thirty pieces of silver---the price of the conservatives she threw to the wolves. May her Pulitzer keep her warm at night.

Posted by: ChristyBlinky at February 27, 2011 06:26 AM (oTjfX)

85 So does this "conservative" scrunt go back to writing for the National Topsider? Ahoy Christo!

Posted by: some dope at February 27, 2011 08:46 AM (BZEkR)

86 I remember Parker's meanspirited (and yet, strangely inept gven that she was a syndicated writer) attacks on Palin in 2008. That was enough to turn me off. To hear her described years later as a "conservative" simply did not make sense to me, given my recollection of her columns. And I can remember when Huffington spoke like a conservative. My God, I'm old: /

Posted by: banshee at February 27, 2011 08:58 AM (viAWf)

87 "I remember Parker's meanspirited (and yet, strangely inept gven that she was a syndicated writer) attacks on Palin in 2008."

Yeah Parker is like the tease that shows the crowd everything she had and wonders why no one is interested anymore, the mystery is over!

Posted by: Africanus at February 27, 2011 09:30 AM (EDjAd)

88 CNN dont give a fat fuck if she succeeded or not . If she made a few bucks for them and twisted a few brains along the way its all good. If not then she slides under the bus and on to the next dumbass psudo con on the list. Calling conner Freiderdork.

Posted by: Rich K at February 27, 2011 10:30 AM (X4l3T)

Robert at #53

spot on analysis.

Posted by: canuk at February 27, 2011 10:35 AM (XnGFh)

90 No anyalisis needed, simple explanation: shitty show on crappy network with insanely jealous idiot female and scumbag idiot male host.

Posted by: Ex Dem at February 27, 2011 05:50 PM (LO+hL)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.

112kb generated in CPU 0.1332, elapsed 0.3938 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.3257 seconds, 218 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.