1 I agree with Steevy.

2 First?  Hobbits rule!  Even when they misspell their names.

3 1 About the SCoaMF?

4 Jeeze Steevy, it's been 4 minutes already.

5 Bring it Brother.

6 Outstanding!

7 Obams is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure.I would vote for a ham sandwich with spoiled mayonnaise on it instead of Obama.

8 Too bad they just can't taze them.

9 How about wading into the audience and bitch-slapping the living shit out of the heckler? Would that work?

10 Let's kneecap the guy who won't win to make the eventual candidate (Perry) look even stronger. Great liberal strategy!

11 I heard this same line from a colleague today - to the effect of "how dare Republicans ask for hurricane aid when they want to cut federal spending". It's a child's argument but apparently has some resonance with people that are brainwashed. This particular person listens to NPR and MSNBC.

12 I heard this exchange tonight on Hugh Hewitt and it reinforced why I don't like Romney in this race: He's too nice of a fucking guy to deal with all the shit they're gonna throw at him. This situation badly needed a Chris Christie to put that fucking bint on the defensive and get her to shut her simple hole. Sorry but Mitt is just a beta when an alpha is what is needed.

13 In fact, if they can get past the legal problems, I will volunteer to taze libtards at political rallies. It would be a sacrifice but I would do it.

14 If this is liberal strategy its a bad one, because he actually looks more presidential when he is slapping these people around.  I think he looks better when he is arguing.

15 Mitt needs lessons from Christie, here's how you handle these fools:

http://tinyurl.com/3ts569j

16

Sorry but Mitt is just a beta when an alpha is what is needed.

We could re-designate hecklers as "coyotes".

17 It's not like a taser is a deadly weapon, it's not. But there is the "assault" thing, but not assault-assault.

18 Anyone think the hecklers are too obvious?  Even when they're not wearing their gang union colors?

Oh yeah, I agree with #7.

19 17 They kill a percentage of the people hit by them every year.

20 “He came through human-like,” said a woman who attended one of his events yesterday.




Especially when he clicked his head to one side and asked, "What is this e-mo-tion you hu-mans call Love?"

21 Coulter is on Hannity now.

22 Why not cut the mike after the first question?

Let Romney answer, turn her mike back on.

Oh, and my response, "Madam, if the government thinks it can afford to pay for cowboy poetry slams, I'm sure the there is plenty of fat to be cut. Americans work to hard to see the Obama Administration spend their money so poorly. "

23

In fact, if they can get past the legal problems, I will volunteer to taze libtards at political rallies. It would be a sacrifice but I would do it.

Need some backup security when you do that?  I'd be happy to oblige

24 This is war to them; treat them like the enemy.

take no prisoners.......

25 Get ready. The dirty tricks arsenal will be wide open for business over the next 14 months. It will astound you.

26 That's a great plan, Ace. How do you come up with such great ideas on how to filter questions for candidates? Like you, I too believe that the best way to vet a candidate is to plant friendly supporters at their events.

And you know - If this running-for-president thing gets too rough on the old "Rom", he could stop giving interviews to any news organizations  but Fox.

That was used to great effect by our other candidates - Sarah Palin and Sharon Angle. Both good republicans.

27 They can say anything they want, just don't ask me about my Temple Underwear.

We cultist don't need any shit.

28 If I remember correctly, the liberal leaders shouted down the Tea Partiers and didn't let them speak when the roles were reversed. Funny how liberals never seem to want conservatives to speak...

29 Fight we much!!!

30

It will astound you.

I expect them to jump up and down and throw their own poo while screeching. Then I expect them to have sex with whatever is closest and then kill their offspring. I expect them to kill one another and blame us and invite in their enemies and then throw more poo.

Then I expect them to devolve into liberals...

31

Get ready. The dirty tricks arsenal will be wide open for business over the next 14 months. It will astound you.

I said it the other day.  You think you've been called a racist yet?

You ain't seen nothing yet.  You're gonna hear that shit so often in 2012 you'll think that they're holding Slave Auctions instead of Farmer's Markets every Saturday.

32 27 They can say anything they want, just don't ask me about my Temple Underwear.

We cultist don't need any shit.

Posted by: Mitt at August 25, 2011 09:21 PM (0xpPd)

Oh look the stupids are coming out

33 OH.MY.GOD!

34 Until they're stopped, they will do this again--and again.

It's like training a dog--only dogs are more intelligent and loyal, etc

and smell better than most leftoids

35 OH.MY.GOD!

Throw another rat on the barbee.

36

ok. please remind me how Romney is Awesome and worth talking about, let alone voting for?  Just another RINO.  Next.

37 You think you've been called a racist yet? You ain't seen nothing yet. You're gonna hear that shit so often in 2012 you'll think that they're holding Slave Auctions instead of Farmer's Markets every Saturday. If I can buy a slender gingeress, I'm so in.

38 We are going to see more and more of this because when GOP candidates start highlight Captain Kickass's pitiful record, liberals have to come up with something.  Given that, the basic strategy should be for all candidates to answer the question, if they are interrupted let the questioner speak then attempt to answer the question, when it happens for a third time, tell them "thank you" and move on to the next person.  If they make a scene, have them removed.

Libs are going to do this because they know how it will play in the media...exactly like it played today for Romney.  He 'went after a poor, poor constituent that just wanted to understand the mean ol GOP's position".  As much as I would like to see the Christie route taken, it won't work for a presidential election.

39 @32

You can get your own!  BUT you must be in the registry.

http://tinyurl.com/2pjymn

The stupids?  Read this stupid.

40 Freedom of speech to a liberal is their freedom to stomp on your free speech.

41 Liberals are such little bitches.

42 Read this stupid.

Is there some other way to read it besides stupid?

We can only hope to get the A-team axeltrolls at some point this cycle.  The b team sux.

43 O/T:   Have been preoccupied last 48 hours.  Just watched Marco Rubio's speech at the Reagan library and wow, was that some speech. 

44 This lady knows the right Mormon to vote for. Maybe if Mittens came more to the left, he'd get some respect.

45 Speaking of cellphones an camera phones, Steve Chabot is on my shit list.

He beclowned himself the other night.

46 I guess a punch in the face is no longer considered civil. Sigh.

47

 

I have to admit that if some fat, gray-haired, liberal bitch starting heckling me, I might just have a Howard Dean moment.

 

With blood though.

48 I hate rude behavior in a Liberal. I won't tolerate it.

49

@38

 

I disagree.

 

I think the average viewer knows that the lady who won't shut up is a bitch and they like it when Mitt, or any politician for that matter, shuts them up.

50 Posted by: Cooter at August 25, 2011 09:31 PM (4RDlt) You may be stupid but you ain't dumb. Btw, this thread smells as terrificly as the last Ace post.

51 I think you can expect this to start happening to Perry as well.  Romney was the frontrunner so it made sense to start sticking these hecklers into events with him.  Perry now being the frontrunner can expect it as well.  I'd expect them to keep it up on Romney as well just for them to cover both their bases.

52 I think Romney did well...he got his answer out while politely tell the wacko to shut the hell up...

53 I think you can expect this to start happening to Perry as well.

It already has. But in a very different and peculiar way.

54 The key to ending this crap is for supporters to shout down the plant when they start interrupting.

55 I'd handle this by having a book handy, just start reading and stop paying attention to the questioner who won't shut up. WHen they stop, or pause long enough to wonder why you are paying attention anymore, I would ask them if they were done yet, since you got a few more pages to go and you really think it WAS the butler after all.

56 Hey Ace!

Speaking of that ridiculous "Gov Perry's Real Record" forum that the idiots in Chicago thought up, what are the chances you can coordinate and we can craft some ridiculously intricate and psychologically believable stories* to mix in with a deluge of crap - they would never be able to keep up. An Operation Chaos of sorts.

If you support Perry or Romney, keeping the op research guys busy on false positives helps everybody. And the boys on 223 Michigan are almost functionally retarded, their idea of opposition research is based on facebook and google.

* believable if you're a liberal or frequent Obama2012.com while waiting for a spot in the Whole Foods parking lot.

57 Another of my pupils doing great deeds.

58 Hey -  let's just hope that none of these plants ask about Perry's scheme to get retired teachers to sign up for life insurance policies for Swiss bank UBS.

It could get embarrassing if one of these liberals ask about the $50 to $100 teachers were offered to sign up for the policies.

Damn liberals. Can't a governor help wall street gamblers get a little death action? What's so wrong with that? Sheesh!

59 Jason Bateman is married to Paul Anka's daughter. Did we know this?

60 Don't just eject them. Get their information. Post it on your website. Make sure your security team has their picture. And make sure your grassroots supporters are watching them closely enough to dime them out when they commit one of their three felonies a day.

61 "You ain't seen nothing yet. You're gonna hear that shit so often in 2012 you'll think that they're holding Slave Auctions instead of Farmer's Markets every Saturday." We need to co-opt it. "What up, my main racist?" And when one of your friends rants too long about that stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure, Barack Obama, just say "Racist, please."

62 Yeah! How the heck did we ever get stuck with the racist tag anyway?

???How dat happen???

63

 

I think there's an easier answer to the problem than immediately forcibly ejecting questioners who try to talk over the speaker's answer.

Turn up the speaker's mic.  Loud.

Loud enough to where it basically completely drowns out the questioner.  And the speaker tells the crowd you'll turn the mic back down as soon as the person lets them finish answering the question.

It would really help if they could actually make a sound system without horrible feedback upon changing the volume.  I know it can be done, but so rarely is it.

If a mic is given to the person, at that point where the speaker gestures for the volume to go up, the mic is taken away.  If the questioner refuses to give up the mic, -then- the staff would have every right in the world to eject them, IMO.  That's basically directly interfering with their legitimate jobs.

 

64

Er, I kinda forgot to important part:

And the speaker tells the crowd you'll turn the mic back down as soon as the person lets them finish answering the question.  And then the speaker answers the question and easily talks right over the now-heckler.

But wait, lemme guess, there's a regulation as to how loud you're allowed to turn them up and it's barely louder than shouting.

65 10 Let's kneecap the guy who won't win to make the eventual candidate (Perry) look even stronger. Great liberal strategy! Posted by: liontooth at August 25, 2011 09:10 PM (9wLy+) Wow, exactly my thoughts. They think Perry is a troglodite that thinks dinos were being ridden by the Jesus Battle Cats. They think getting rid of Romney is going to help them. Hahahahah!!!! They have come FULL circle, and now believe their own bullshit that they used to feed to us.

66 Tom is trying so hard. Should we?

67 Shall we dance, Tom?

68 Gee Mitt (above) you seem to have a real fixation on male underwear! Should we read anything in to that? Really who cares what someone wears under their clothes except maybe a pervert?

69 Sean Bannion, our old thread got nuked before I got a chance to finish picking your brain.  If you don't mind, continuing here.  Link to old thread: http://tinyurl.com/3dzengc

70

Sean Bannion, Did I say it wasn't worth looking at? Good grief, why so polarized? I simply said it was before my time. I wasn't there during this time, so I was fully acknowledging in advance that my familiarity with some of this history may be incomplete. What's really interesting to me is that you associate Islam with socialism only between 1947 and 1990? What about the last 21 years? What about the 1300+ years before 1947? As someone who has a tremendous amount of modern experience with Islam and the Middle East, why would I assume some drastic change in 1990? History is of course relevant, but so is the proper context in which it existed.

You go on to point out the tribal nature of Middle Eastern culture. I'm confused by your point here though, because you seem to be introducing this as if it's something new to me. Did you not read my post 220 in its entirety? I pre-emptively brought this up (before you) because I suspected that's where you might go. And now that indeed seems to be the case. And in so doing what you also completely failed to do was draw any parallels between the tribal nature of Arabic culture and socialism. How are these tribal tendancies any different than the same sort of familial biases that exists in the Chrisitan world, including the USA?

Are you of the mindset that family units are socialist? One or two parents work, put money into a common account, and then those resources are dulled out to support the family. Parents pay for their kids college. Or grandparents will. In-laws float a down payment on a house. Dad pulls some favors to help his kid find a job. Is this socialism? I would like to see you explain how the "tribalism" that exists in Arabic culture is any different.

I would agree with you that Gamel Nasser was a socialist, but did I ever say there are no examples of muslim socialists? The issue we're discussing here is whether Islam, as a faith, leans towards socialism. I can name plenty of Christian socialists throughout history. In fact, I feel confident enough to even go so far as to say that I can show you several Christian socialists for every one Muslim you can name. Would you like to go there? Does this mean we should fear Christianity?

We aren't discussing individuals, but an entire religion and culture. Gamel Nasser was arguably a socialist, but really that was more at the start than anything. He was part of revolutionizing Egypt away from a monarchy. In practice he seemed more like a dictator than anything, and the socialist party he founded was quickly absolved after his demise. Labels are not always accurate.

In modern times I know of no socialism in the ME except in Israel. Even take examples like Halliburton. They moved from TX to Dubai. Why? Certainly not to get closer to socialism, lol. Dubai is much more free market than the USA is at this point. Sadly so.

Another commenter made a remark about Saudi buying off the locals to prevent a potential uprising. What goes on over there is completely different than socialism. Saudi is a monarchy, and a very unpopular illegitimate one. Also important to point out that it is to a large extent in power because of the US. We defend them militarily, we maintain the status quo all throughout that region. Not saying it's wrong, just saying that's how it is. Obviously we do it for economic reasons. Interestingly this is actually how Bin Laden started out, he was at odds with the House of Saud more than anything. His hatred of the USA developed from this. In his mind it would never be possible to oust the various puppet rulers in the ME, especially the House of Saud, until first destabalizing the USA. It does without saying Bin Laden was a terrorist dog, I in no way mean to defend him. But from a strictly strategic perspective, with the ultimate goal of topping the Saudi regime, he was right. And with our debt being so crazy now, his goal may well be realized after a while.

I'm happy to hear that you've served in the Islamic world. I'm sure we have a lot in common. And don't take this the wrong way, but I hope your perspective isn't strictly from the military. I know that for myself, my experiences in the middle were vastly different as a civilian than in the military. As a civilian I was able to actually develop relationships with people, even stay with friends in their homes in places like south Lebanon and Yemen. It goes without saying, the military experience is a lot different.

71 You seem to have a troll- this goes to the Bamster's site:

53 I think you can expect this to start happening to Perry as well.

It already has. But in a very different and peculiar way.

72 How is it that the Moron in Chief here either does not know or -- what is more likely -- does not dare identify this as agit-prop? And then goes on to fret that his prescribed course of actions would look bad. Is that the extent of your analysis Ace? Dare not look bad at all costs? Perhaps you've been made an offer you cannot refuse.

73 But wait, lemme guess, there's a regulation as to how loud you're allowed to turn them up and it's barely louder than shouting.

Well, yeah, it's often called 'acoustic feedback'...

74 My response to Copperheads asking why my state takes Federal money is always:

"When the Feds stop stealing from me, my governor won't have to work on stealing it back from them. Until then, I want my share too!"

75 yeah, thanks for noticing this, Ace. I don't see why it's so important to pretend to care what hecklers have to heckle. The crowd is there to hear and to interact with the organizer, not to support the heckler. If the heckler is so important, he can get his own tent. Kick the disruptive out, arrest them. There is a line, I know that Dems will be happy to arrest TP's who ask "mean" questions, but there's a line where a follow up question becomes just an attempt to filibuster. So, fuck them.

76 I am not clear if I totally understand the full thought pattern behind this.