October 20, 2011
— Ace Crazy.
House bill 195 basically says those who buy and sell second hand goods cannot use cash to make those transactions, and it flew so far under the radar most businesses don't even know about it."We're gonna lose a lot of business," says Danny Guidry, who owns the Pioneer Trading Post in Lafayette. He deals in buying and selling unique second hand items.
"We don't want this cash transaction to be taken away from us. It's an everyday transaction," Guidry explains.
...
The law states those who buy or sell second hand goods are prohibited from using cash. State representative Rickey Hardy co-authored the bill.
Hardy says, "they give a check or a cashiers money order, or electronic one of those three mechanisms is used."
Hardy says the bill is targeted at criminals who steal anything from copper to televisions, and sell them for a quick buck. Having a paper trail will make it easier for law enforcement.
"It's a mechanism to be used so the police department has something to go on and have a lead," explains Hardy.
Here's the thing: The State could pass a lot of laws to make sure the police always "have a lead" when there is a crime. The State could, if it were permitted to do so, make virtually everything an onerous task involving a digital trail.
Hey, why not mandate that all cars have a chip in them that reports, in real time, the vehicle's position to a central police computer? That would make it easier for the State to prove a case in some situations.
They don't see the problem here? Perfect law enforcement is not the end-goal of the State. Guaranteeing freedom is. And yes, that means that some laws you could possibly pass to make it easier to lock up criminals can't be passed, because you can't burden a thousand people and reduce their liberty to make sure you have a better criminal case against one thief.
This is also a frightening trend which is accelerating in America. Is it too hard to effectively prosecute the law against some real criminal behaviors? Well, okay, we've got a fix for that! We'll just outlaw all the non-criminal behavior which may be used, occasionally, in furtherance of the criminal behavior we're actually trying to stop. Now any criminal will be walking a legal minefield even trying to carry out the most basic formerly non-criminal functions necessary to complete his crime!
Uh, yes, and everyone else too.
ScottJ. sent this tip. Another person in the email chain, GregD., noted this quote attributed to Hitler.
"It is convenient to have a system of laws where everyone is a criminal."
Indeed it is.
Posted by: Ace at
09:21 AM
| Comments (269)
Post contains 470 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 20, 2011 09:23 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 20, 2011 09:24 AM (i6RpT)
As friggen nuts as this is, we can plainly see at the Federal, State and Local level they continue trending toward absolute statism.
Lest tax revenues be threatened, ban money.
Posted by: Entropy at October 20, 2011 09:24 AM (XxXUI)
But it was still a black day when it actually slipped into law.
Posted by: John Morris at October 20, 2011 09:25 AM (sCRhB)
Posted by: BuddyPC at October 20, 2011 09:25 AM (nSkOL)
Posted by: right at October 20, 2011 09:25 AM (pMGkg)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at October 20, 2011 09:25 AM (+lsX1)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 20, 2011 09:25 AM (i6RpT)
Be a lot faster and easier just to chip people.
Posted by: Ken at October 20, 2011 09:26 AM (7yb9x)
Posted by: cherry pi at October 20, 2011 09:26 AM (OhYCU)
We don't want this cash transaction to be taken away from us.
This is a squish comment.
It is long past time everyone realized the only proper response to this is "Fuck you, you can't do that, and I won't comply".
Posted by: Entropy at October 20, 2011 09:26 AM (XxXUI)
I'd love to see them try enforcing this one.
Government, making criminals out of ordinary citizens, one law at a time.
Posted by: Gmac at October 20, 2011 09:27 AM (UhSYI)
...or some things and other things less than a certain amount or...
Posted by: RioBravo at October 20, 2011 09:27 AM (eEfYn)
Posted by: cherry pi at October 20, 2011 09:27 AM (OhYCU)
Posted by: Bryant Gumble at October 20, 2011 09:27 AM (8ieXv)
Posted by: Federal Reserve Note at October 20, 2011 09:27 AM (ieDPL)
This way people could still pay in cash, most wouldn't be affected by the law, but in extreme cases there would be a way to track it?
Posted by: Benson at October 20, 2011 09:27 AM (qzcNU)
As the acknowledged Cutting Edge Laboratory for Insane New Laws, I should have thought of this first.
Posted by: California at October 20, 2011 09:28 AM (QKKT0)
"Hey, why not mandate that all cars have a chip in them that reports, in real time, the vehicle's position to a central police computer? That would make it easier for the State to prove a case in some situations."
The tiny ballerina who runs Chicago now wants to complement all the red light cameras with speed-trap cameras.
But if you film the police, they'll arrest you, because that's illegal.
Posted by: Entropy at October 20, 2011 09:28 AM (XxXUI)
In one fell swoop, Louisiana has made it illegal to sell second hand goods in their state.
Posted by: JSchuler at October 20, 2011 09:28 AM (SmZQt)
This should make for a good conservative vs. libertarian dust-up
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at October 20, 2011 09:28 AM (UqKQV)
Pawn shops have been forced to keep records of their clients for years. However under this bill they are still allowed to deal in cash.
I wonder how they got themselves exempted...
Posted by: spongeworthy at October 20, 2011 09:28 AM (puy4B)
Is a tramp in the French Quarter considered a second hand good?
Posted by: Pedro at October 20, 2011 09:29 AM (NHNJt)
Posted by: John Morris at October 20, 2011 09:29 AM (sCRhB)
Posted by: mpurinTexas, Evil Conservanatrix, supports Rick getyourpawsofoffmeyoudamndirtyape Perry at October 20, 2011 09:29 AM (cRsT+)
Haven't heard from him yet.
Has no one filed for an an injuction?
Posted by: SOYLENT GREEN at October 20, 2011 09:30 AM (M/WbE)
Posted by: Dave at October 20, 2011 09:30 AM (Xm1aB)
meanwhile, Khaddaffiiiiii is still dead
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at October 20, 2011 09:31 AM (UqKQV)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at October 20, 2011 09:31 AM (ieDPL)
Ahem*bullshit*cough.
What's LA's sales tax rate?
Posted by: Entropy at October 20, 2011 09:31 AM (XxXUI)
Posted by: yankeefifth at October 20, 2011 09:31 AM (loM0R)
Posted by: IC at October 20, 2011 09:31 AM (jZNCU)
You know, like pawn shops--where the lazy fucking police never step foot to find stolen good.
Posted by: Jimmuy at October 20, 2011 09:31 AM (hROVJ)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at October 20, 2011 09:33 AM (QF8uk)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at October 20, 2011 09:33 AM (ieDPL)
http://tinyurl.com/3hengjj
sigh.
I realize good governors sign bad laws all the time, but it's still disappointing.
Posted by: Y-not at October 20, 2011 09:33 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: MDH3 at October 20, 2011 09:33 AM (4u+LN)
Another example of legislation making it onerous for law abiding citizens in order to supposedly catch criminals is the national database for the purchase of sudafed and other OTC drugs with pseudoephedrine in them.
Posted by: ParanoidStillAGirlInSeattle at October 20, 2011 09:33 AM (RZ8pf)
__Sheriff Joe
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at October 20, 2011 09:33 AM (UqKQV)
Are we really this hard up for revenue?
We have to resort to this, not to mention state-run casinos?
Posted by: soothie at October 20, 2011 09:34 AM (sqkOB)
Posted by: right at October 20, 2011 09:34 AM (pMGkg)
Posted by: cherry pi at October 20, 2011 09:34 AM (OhYCU)
Posted by: Phelps at October 20, 2011 09:34 AM (ltit6)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at October 20, 2011 09:34 AM (l9zgN)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at October 20, 2011 09:34 AM (ZDUD4)
I posted it in the comments early this morning and don't know if anyone else followed up but...
Did you hear about the bill that Schumer and Mike Lee are pushing to grant visas based upon a $500k real estate spend in the U.S.?
Screw the poor. Screw the huddled masses. Screw those who've waited on-line to do the right thing.
It's for the housing market, a know.
Posted by: Jay-Z at October 20, 2011 09:34 AM (LyOUH)
Jindal may have little choice in the matter.
Posted by: mpurinTexas, Evil Conservanatrix, supports Rick getyourpawsofoffmeyoudamndirtyape Perry at October 20, 2011 09:34 AM (cRsT+)
It's getting harder and harder to take the Republicans seriously as an alternative to the Democrats. Even Obama hasn't gone this far yet. Wait till they see it -- RomneyCare spawned ObamaCare, and Lousisana's fascist law will spawn something even worse in DC.
These guys are really insane.
Posted by: CatoRenasci at October 20, 2011 09:34 AM (PSUua)
Posted by: yankeefifth at October 20, 2011 09:34 AM (loM0R)
A great big round of WTF's all around!
Posted by: DarkLord© sez Obama is a stuttering clusterf--- of a miserable failure
Oh, and F--- Nevada! at October 20, 2011 09:34 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: robtr at October 20, 2011 09:35 AM (MtwBb)
Posted by: GUM department store at October 20, 2011 09:35 AM (+lsX1)
Rearden: "But, after all, I did break one of your laws."
Ferris: "Well, what do you think they're there for? .... Did you really think that we want those laws to be observed? We want them broken. You'd better get it straight that it's not a bunch of boy scouts you're up against . . . We're after power and we mean it. You fellows were pikers, but we know the real trick, and you'd better get wise to it. There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced nor objectively interpreted - and you create a nation of law-breakers - and then you cash in on guilt. Now that's the system, Mr. Rearden, and once you understand it, you'll be much easier to deal with."
Posted by: Alex at October 20, 2011 09:35 AM (/yzYn)
Posted by: Y-not at October 20, 2011 01:33 PM (5H6zj)
You have a real gift for stating the Obvious, hon.
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at October 20, 2011 09:35 AM (UqKQV)
Posted by: Dave at October 20, 2011 09:35 AM (Xm1aB)
We really need a conservative who will actively work to repeal laws, not tinker around the edges. And Mitt will fuck you with 59 new regulations and laws for every speech he gives.
Posted by: Jimmuy at October 20, 2011 09:35 AM (hROVJ)
Oh I have a whole list of those. My personal peeve.
Open container laws. What huh? You can't carry alcohol in a non sealed container in a car because...Someone might drink it? That someone might be the driver? The driver might become impaired? And then if impaired might be involved in an accident? God how many links do we need from action to injury? Makes for real stupidity like I can't legally ride in a car with a full hip flask even if I am both just a passenger, and, I have no intention of drinking from it while in the automobile, because it's an "open" container.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at October 20, 2011 09:36 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Mikey NTH at October 20, 2011 09:36 AM (hLRSq)
2) His endorsement of Perry should be of questionable value, and it would be a good thing if someone cornered Perry on where he stands on this.
3) There are the La. equivalent of Revenoo-ers who are going to meet with gators in a bayou, I predict. Cajuns can be a bloody minded lot.
4) There are four precious metals that are the ultimate legal tender.
5) On April 19, 1775 the Brits thought that they would just have a quiet stroll to Concord and Lexington to seize the people and munitions they were after. That did not quite work out for them the way they thought it would, because they had already stomped on the locals' last nerve. Someday, a garage sale, a Goodwill, or some such may turn out the same way.
Subotai Bahadur
Posted by: Subotai Bahadur at October 20, 2011 09:36 AM (l1dw/)
Look for the slot in the back *wink, wink*. Giggity, giggity!
Posted by: Quagmire at October 20, 2011 09:36 AM (MiRr5)
Posted by: RINO Vice President For Life AuthorLMendez, Formerly YRM, Who Supports The Ban Of Curious at October 20, 2011 09:36 AM (yAor6)
Louisiana HB195
Provides relative to the purchase of junk or used or secondhand property
2011-06-08 - Senate Vote on HB 195, (Y: 34 N: 1 NV: 0) [PASS]
2011-05-16 - House Vote on HB 195, (Y: 97 N: 0 NV: 0) [PASS]
Action: Signed by the Governor. Becomes Act No. 389.
Ah, sweet sweet bi-partisanship.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at October 20, 2011 09:36 AM (/qkBU)
Posted by: anything for a buck at October 20, 2011 09:37 AM (Wqfrr)
Posted by: DarkLord© sez Obama is a stuttering clusterf--- of a miserable failure
Oh, and F--- Nevada! at October 20, 2011 09:37 AM (GBXon)
And in regard to car chips, most new cars already have that capability, as does OnStar in older cars. The only missing piece is the law allowing law enforcement to collect that data. Which I suspect is coming at some point.
Not to mention the monitoring in place on your gas and electric meters now that is sending real time information to the power company, the future of that is that the power company will be able to turn your power off and on depending on your usage.
America=China they don't have to invade us, we're taking care of it ourselves.
Posted by: ParanoidStillAGirlInSeattle at October 20, 2011 09:37 AM (RZ8pf)
A great big round of WTF's all around!
---
That seems to happen a lot here in my new state (Utah). I don't know if LA's legislature is part-time, but ours is and the net effect is that they rush things through so that even the reps themselves don't know what's going on half the time. They did some bone-headed things with our budget last time as well as putting even more restrictions (as if that's possible) on liquor sales at restaurants that afterward, when called on it, the legs claimed a big oopsie on.
In general I try to give elected officials the benefit of the doubt, but I'm starting to really dislike local pols and state legs. They seem like self-important clowns.
Posted by: Y-not at October 20, 2011 09:37 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: at October 20, 2011 09:38 AM (GvYeG)
And Jindal went for this? Simply amazing. Keep guns away from Republicans because they always end up shooting themselves in the foot.
Posted by: Havedash at October 20, 2011 09:38 AM (sFD5n)
Some Ivy League cocksucker in a $1000 suit is working up a law right now to establish how many chickens to the hog and how many .223 rounds per bale of alfalfa.
And, of course, what the government's cut will be.
Bet on it.
Posted by: sifty at October 20, 2011 09:38 AM (4CSeG)
Posted by: I'm Your Host Joe Biden, Welcome To Rape Talk. at October 20, 2011 09:39 AM (MaA4d)
Whiskey. Tango. Foxtrot. Oscar?!?
Posted by: DarkLord© sez Obama is a stuttering clusterf--- of a miserable failure
Oh, and F--- Nevada! at October 20, 2011 09:39 AM (GBXon)
Can you still use cash to buy a second hand debit card, which only works in one of those job-stealing ATMs?
Posted by: Roy at October 20, 2011 09:39 AM (bm4vI)
Posted by: yankeefifth at October 20, 2011 09:39 AM (loM0R)
Posted by: logprof at October 20, 2011 09:39 AM (CE2wR)
When I saw this story at Drudge yesterday I was gobsmacked. How could this POSSIBLY be a law? How can it be enforced? How can it be LEGAL?
Of course the answer is, “It can’t.”
ItÂ’s the invention of a whole new level of bureaucracy to deal with criminals who arenÂ’t going to care about obeying the law anyway, and will find a way to circumvent it.
It’s also a money maneuver. Everyone has heard of the “shadow economy” of cash-only transactions that take place “off the books.” These are perfectly legal, but because they’re done in cash, it’s much easier for individuals and businesses to “hide” that income from the government. Hidden income means less paid in taxes, and we KNOW how the government feels about not getting its “fair share” of the people’s money.
LA conservatives and libertarians had better get on this FAST and get it repealed. Otherwise you can expect the bureaucrats to show up in droves at all of the following places and demand to see your “papers:”
- Garage, moving, and yard sales
- Flea markets
- Used book stores
- Thrift shops
- Secondhand clothing stores
- Pawn shops
- Music, video, and video game resellers (the entertainment industry HATES resellers)
- Auctions
And what about individuals who may use secondhand goods as part of their work? I’m thinking primarily of artists and professional crafters who may use scrap metal or other preused materials to make their product. Can I not spend $5 of ready cash to buy the cute drink coaster made from an old Van Halen CD because it’s “secondhand”? Do I have to put that on my credit card?
This is the stupidest law since that one in NY that makes it illegal for a donkey to sleep in your bathtub in Brooklyn.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at October 20, 2011 09:40 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: IC at October 20, 2011 09:41 AM (jZNCU)
"It is convenient to have a system of laws where everyone is a criminal."
isn't Lou. a conservative state, i mean don't the Repubs run things down there?
and they did this?
Welcome to Americka, comrade.
Posted by: shoey at October 20, 2011 09:41 AM (m6OUa)
Posted by: Clenched Sphincter at October 20, 2011 09:41 AM (EL+OC)
It will completely bankrupt the Pancakes for Poonanny Ponzi Scheme Ace has going.
Posted by: sifty at October 20, 2011 09:41 AM (4CSeG)
Posted by: cherry pi at October 20, 2011 09:42 AM (OhYCU)
Amen to this. Great post on one of my pet peeve topics.
Tom Sowell and others have addressed aspects of this and some of the "penumbras".
One tangent is that laws that are passed like this inevitably are used to go after people who may not have even been envisioned with the original law. Do I mind if the RICO statutes are used to go after drug cartels, and even the Mafia? No. Kudos to giuliani and his team, they did some good work back in the 80's.
So then how about groups like the Hells Angels? Uh, that gets dicier. Where does it end and where do you draw the lines? Read a book about a big undercover operation against them a few years back. Lots of $ spent, lives of agents risked, and my read was all they got was some seemingly (to me) relatively minor convictions. Some pretty scary guys? For sure. A menace to society overall? Not so much.
I know this is not totally analogous to the post, and I'm all for prosecuting the bad guys. If they break the law, prosecute em', and if they keep doing it, put em' far, far away for a real long time so they won't bother anyone again. But the constant government overreach without any thought to what it does to people's basic freedom is a real concern.
Posted by: RM at October 20, 2011 09:42 AM (TRsME)
(AP) Oct. 12, 2015 -- GOP Presidential hopeful Bobby Jindal finds himself on the defensive again over his signing of House Bill 195 in 2011.
"That is an awful law and you should not have signed it," said frontrunner Sen. CJ (R-PA) in last night's charged debate, moments before being carried off the stage by cheering audience members and the debate moderator.
Posted by: CJ at October 20, 2011 09:42 AM (9KqcB)
"It is convenient to have a system of laws where everyone is a criminal."
isn't Lou. a conservative state, i mean don't the Repubs run things down there?
and they did this?
Welcome to Americka, comrade.
Posted by: shoey at October 20, 2011 01:41 PM (m6OUa)
almost forgot, Vote Romney!
Posted by: shoey at October 20, 2011 09:42 AM (m6OUa)
Posted by: Jay-Z at October 20, 2011 09:42 AM (LyOUH)
Posted by: Dave at October 20, 2011 09:42 AM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at October 20, 2011 09:42 AM (vzFJV)
Posted by: yankeefifth at October 20, 2011 09:42 AM (loM0R)
Posted by: Andy at October 20, 2011 09:43 AM (5Rurq)
Posted by: RINO Vice President For Life AuthorLMendez, Formerly YRM, Who Supports The Ban Of Curious at October 20, 2011 09:44 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: sifty at October 20, 2011 09:44 AM (4CSeG)
Posted by: Dave at October 20, 2011 09:45 AM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at October 20, 2011 09:45 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: Joe Biden at October 20, 2011 09:45 AM (4YUWF)
They do realize that ALL second-hand goods have already been taxed once, right?
The lady who watches our daughter in the afternoon caught that one right away, then said "A lot of people don't even HAVE bank accounts, and a law like this is going to cause a lot of places to go out of business."
But Democrats love poor people -
Or something.
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at October 20, 2011 09:46 AM (0xqzf)
If you outlaw cash, only criminals will have sex with prostitutes.
Posted by: Entropy at October 20, 2011 09:46 AM (XxXUI)
Richardson serves on three House committees: (1) Civil Law and Procedure, (2) Education, (3) Municipal, Parochial and Cultural Affairs.
He seems like a busy body. Time for him to find new employment.
Posted by: Y-not at October 20, 2011 09:46 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: yankeefifth at October 20, 2011 09:46 AM (loM0R)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at October 20, 2011 09:47 AM (+lsX1)
Posted by: kj at October 20, 2011 09:47 AM (RqRG6)
Posted by: sifty at October 20, 2011 09:47 AM (4CSeG)
Text is at the link. The 'claimed' reason is to crack down on the whole no-questions-asked sale of copper (often ripped out houses or unattended machinery). The sheer volume of stupid involved in the execution is mind-boggling.
In short, apparently he is. Not to mention the rest of the Louisiana legislature.
Posted by: DarkLord© sez Obama is a stuttering clusterf--- of a miserable failure
Oh, and F--- Nevada! at October 20, 2011 09:47 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: Dave at October 20, 2011 09:47 AM (Xm1aB)
isn't Lou. a conservative state, i mean don't the Repubs run things down there?
I don't even know who is running against Jindal because I have never seen a sign for any of the Democrats...I don't know what to make of this.
Probably it was passed as a law and order issue. That would make it very popular.
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 20, 2011 09:47 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: yankeefifth at October 20, 2011 09:48 AM (loM0R)
Posted by: al-Cicero, Tea Party Jihadist at October 20, 2011 09:48 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: DarkLord© sez Obama is a stuttering clusterf--- of a miserable failure
Oh, and F--- Nevada! at October 20, 2011 09:48 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: joeindc44 at October 20, 2011 09:48 AM (u9B7L)
Obama's America...
- rape is good
- cash is bad
Don't fuck with me Cherry Pi!
I never said "rape". I never said the word "rape". I said "rape is up". I said rape is up 3 times. Rape and murder.
And cash is down.
Who the hell are you with? Who sent you? Did you come to rape me?
Posted by: Sheriff Joe Biden at October 20, 2011 09:48 AM (XxXUI)
Posted by: DarkLord© sez Obama is a stuttering clusterf--- of a miserable failure
Oh, and F--- Nevada! at October 20, 2011 09:49 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at October 20, 2011 09:50 AM (qx7YW)
Posted by: Clenched Sphincter at October 20, 2011 09:50 AM (EL+OC)
I never said the word rape once.
Someone asked me what was up and I said rape.
Don't screw with me.
Posted by: Sheriff Joe Biden at October 20, 2011 09:50 AM (XxXUI)
Posted by: tsj017 at October 20, 2011 09:50 AM (4YUWF)
There has got to be something else to that bill. Jindal is not THAT stupid. Is he?
We might need to get a little more info before drawing any sweeping conclusions. Since this report indicated the law has not been previously reported, it could have been signed in the middle of a legislative frenzy without the Gov being told that such a provision was added. His staff could have screwed up.
Posted by: CJ at October 20, 2011 09:50 AM (9KqcB)
There's a big problem with robberies here where the stuff gets fenced for cash immediately. The thought, what little there is of it, is that the cops want to be able to track down the thief based on the recovered goods. Paying by check or electronically makes it easy to track down the culprit.
Baton Rouge in particular has gotten bad about this kind of stuff. The local FYE where I trade in old DVDs lost its pawnbroker license for almost a year because they unknowingly bought stolen DVDs and their paperwork wasn't in exact order when the cops came calling.
They got their license back since then, but the cops put a LOT of restrictions on them, such as the hours when they can start taking back items, the amount of stuff they can pay cash for from one individual, the amount of time they have to keep the stuff on-hand in case the cops determine that the items were stolen, etc.
Shit like this is why I'm transitioning to eBay to get rid of my legitimately obtained DVDs.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 20, 2011 09:50 AM (VZ10+)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at October 20, 2011 09:50 AM (ZDUD4)
Sometimes you just don't know what's in a bill until you pass it.
Posted by: Nancy Pelosi at October 20, 2011 09:50 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Dave at October 20, 2011 09:50 AM (Xm1aB)
So if that gov't doesn't want businesses to report that they got cash for purchases, I bet businesses are just going to stop reporting cash sales.
BRB, need to open a thrift shop...
Posted by: Mama AJ, Going Galt Thrift Store at October 20, 2011 09:51 AM (XdlcF)
I immediately start to wonder how much money the banking industry lobbied FOR this. They're currently making percentages off both ends of virtually every credit card transaction, just think of how many millions more it would generate if they eliminated all the cash competition.
Posted by: MrObvious at October 20, 2011 09:51 AM (2uovW)
Posted by: HeartlessBlackOrchid at October 20, 2011 09:51 AM (SB0V2)
Posted by: shoulda listened to theTea Party... because here comes The David Banner Party at October 20, 2011 09:51 AM (pMGkg)
So if that gov't doesn't want businesses to report that they got cash for purchases, I bet businesses are just going to stop reporting cash sales.
BRB, need to open a thrift shop...
So long tax revenue.
Posted by: Jay-Z at October 20, 2011 09:52 AM (LyOUH)
BTW - the Louisiana primary is Saturday Oct 22. Apparently Jindall gets re-elected in a walk, open primary bay-bee, with $6 million left in the kitty.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at October 20, 2011 09:52 AM (/qkBU)
Posted by: Spiker at October 20, 2011 09:52 AM (MaA4d)
Posted by: Dave at October 20, 2011 09:52 AM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: yankeefifth at October 20, 2011 09:52 AM (loM0R)
Posted by: joeindc44 at October 20, 2011 09:52 AM (u9B7L)
Clusterfuck Deux.
Posted by: sifty at October 20, 2011 09:52 AM (4CSeG)
Unintended consequences strike again.
Posted by: al-Cicero, Tea Party Jihadist at October 20, 2011 09:52 AM (QKKT0)
It wouldn't be the first time that legislators pulled a fast one to get something underhanded passed during Jindal's term.
One particular piece of shit brought up a bill for a vote, telling everyone it was an honorary measure for something like Best Hamburger in Baton Rouge, to get a unanimous vote. It turned out it was a bill to override Jindal's attempt to refuse stimulus money from the Feds, as he had refused the unemployment money because the Feds were requiring the state to raise its payments by far more than the amount of money being disbursed to it through the bill.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 20, 2011 09:53 AM (VZ10+)
Unfortunately, from time to time he pushes legislation that is completely idiotic, and this is one of those times. I have no doubt that Rickey had the best of intentions with this, but it's still wrong and destructive bullshit and he's gonna hear it from me next time I talk to him. This is the kind of thing that has made Louisiana a national laughingstock.
As for Jindal, he'll sign this, because Jindal would sign anything. As an absentee governor he hasn't been particularly attentive to or discriminating in such matters, and his first term has amounted to jack and shit (and Jack left town, much as we expect Bobby to do at his earliest opportunity). He's been a disgrace, a failure as a "reform" governor, belongs nowhere near a national ticket, and will not have my vote this Saturday.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at October 20, 2011 09:53 AM (5zBzg)
Posted by: Rex the Wonder God at October 20, 2011 09:53 AM (vahvH)
I'll tell you what I am - I'm the damn paterfamilias! You can't marry him!
I'm a Dapper Dan man.
Posted by: Sub-Tard at October 20, 2011 09:54 AM (0M3AQ)
Out here in CA, there is a sentiment that police are now using traffic infractions to sustain their existence. A $150 fine for using a cell comes across to some people as oppressive and money grubbing. We know in our hearts that this is not a public safety issue, but rather a revenue enhancement. A nice cocktail of businesses getting favorable laws from a pliable and buyable legislator, enforced by the police state.
Of course, all rational citizens support police enforcment of real crimes (I'm talking rape Sherrif Joe), but I hope we are reaching a point where citizens realize they have a govenment they do not want.
We do not want to be banned form using cash to buy stuff at a garage sale or thrift shop.
We want our kids to be able to have lemonade stands.
We want to be able to chose what types of food we eat, what types of cars to drive, and in general, we want to have the freedom to live our lives in a manner that we see fit, provided it doesn't harm anyone.
I hope we wake up and insisit on a govenrment that protects liberty, because as Herm said "Stupid people are ruining America."
Posted by: California Red at October 20, 2011 09:54 AM (7uWb8)
Hmm, you what might help with this illegal activity?!?!?
You know what I'm going to say, don't you?
EFFING BORDER CONTROL
The problem isn't illegals in this case.
It's mainly tweakers looking for drug money.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 20, 2011 09:54 AM (VZ10+)
Posted by: Dell at October 20, 2011 09:54 AM (3S10h)
Me: Probably it was passed as a law and order issue. That would make it very popular.
Brandon: This law is a mess waiting to happen, but I know why it passed.
There's a big problem with robberies here
We might just be on to something here. But still...
Posted by: Mama AJ, Going Galt Thrift Store at October 20, 2011 09:55 AM (XdlcF)
You know what I'm going to say, don't you?
EFFING BORDER CONTROL
Committing the crimes Americans won't?
Posted by: DarkLord© sez Obama is a stuttering clusterf--- of a miserable failure
Oh, and F--- Nevada! at October 20, 2011 09:55 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: Dave at October 20, 2011 09:56 AM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: at October 20, 2011 09:57 AM (Wqfrr)
Shit like this is why I'm transitioning to eBay to get rid of my legitimately obtained DVDs.
Thank god the criminals will never think of that.
Posted by: Sheriff Joe Biden at October 20, 2011 09:57 AM (XxXUI)
Posted by: joncelli at October 20, 2011 09:57 AM (RD7QR)
Now we see how The Newt's strategy works: do nothing for years, and the opposition has nothing to use against you!
Seriously, I suspect any halfway intelligent appeals court -- or circuit court -- will toss this POS in a heartbeat.
Except, maybe, in Louisiana.
Of course that wonderful Beacon of Democracy, Chuckie Shoo-muh, is cosponsoring a bill that makes immigration free & easy for aliens who have $500K to drop on real estate. Guess we won't hear about that, though. Expect a new $500K/illegal alien "real-estate stimulus" bill from the SCoaMF in 5...4...3...2....
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 20, 2011 09:57 AM (YjjrR)
Tell me about it. The traffic fines here in CA are a scandal, IMO. My daughter paid nearly $700 on a speeding ticket for a 55 in a 35 zone. This crap is as regressive a tax as there is, devastating the budget of a working class family.
I loathe our fucked up legislature. This state has gone completely into the shitter.
Posted by: al-Cicero, Tea Party Jihadist at October 20, 2011 09:58 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: yankeefifth at October 20, 2011 09:58 AM (loM0R)
Posted by: Dave at October 20, 2011 09:58 AM (Xm1aB)
Oh yeah, that's a detail I'd want to be on. Don't know if you'd be in more danger from the proprietors or the other customers.
Posted by: DarkLord© sez Obama is a stuttering clusterf--- of a miserable failure
Oh, and F--- Nevada! at October 20, 2011 09:59 AM (GBXon)
Of course that wonderful Beacon of Democracy, Chuckie Shoo-muh, is cosponsoring a bill that makes immigration free & easy for aliens who have $500K to drop on real estate.
So, you mean, a bill that makes immigration free & easy for aliens who have access to a Bank of America branch?
Posted by: Entropy at October 20, 2011 09:59 AM (XxXUI)
The shitter. The only way to get to the ocean in E. Colifornia without a three hour traffic jam.
Posted by: sifty at October 20, 2011 09:59 AM (4CSeG)
Probably it was passed as a law and order issue. That would make it very popular.
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 20, 2011 01:47 PM (XdlcF)
i just don't see how anyone can believe this would pass constitutional muster, does the Constitution even matter to them anymore, or has it become merely an obstacle that the poor, put-upon Ruling Class has to get around for our own good?
but it's a "law and order" issue, so it's ok?
and people are buying that?
it makes me want to shake them and yell "don't you give away my freedom, you f-ing a-hole!"
i get frustrated with people sometimes, but it's really not their fault, they are being decieved and manipulated...
Posted by: shoey at October 20, 2011 10:00 AM (m6OUa)
For this to get through says that Jindal either supports the law or is inept.
Posted by: MrCaniac at October 20, 2011 10:01 AM (eKuOw)
§ 5103. Legal tender United States coins and currency (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks) are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues. Foreign gold or silver coins are not legal tender for debts.
Posted by: kj at October 20, 2011 10:02 AM (RqRG6)
Personally, I don't think he cares one way or another. Jindal was never serious about actually doing the job of governor; he's a ladder-climber and the job was just another rung toward his national aspirations.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at October 20, 2011 10:03 AM (5zBzg)
Now we know.
Posted by: sifty at October 20, 2011 10:04 AM (4CSeG)
Whiskey. Tango. Foxtrot. Oscar?!?"
Republican politicians are (with few exceptions) big fans of an ever-growing police state. Where have you been?
Posted by: Jason at October 20, 2011 10:06 AM (/Mtjv)
Posted by: mr bumble at October 20, 2011 10:06 AM (OKhgI)
Posted by: SFGoth at October 20, 2011 10:07 AM (dZ756)
Paypal will likely be requesting tax ID's from most people in the US, due to the recent IRS changes. I sell on Etsy [and Ebay] and numerous sellers on Etsy received emails from PP requesting tax ID yesterday and today.
Posted by: Carolyn at October 20, 2011 10:07 AM (CQId4)
but it's a "law and order" issue, so it's ok?
No, I wasn't saying that I think it's okay, just that the legislators went "oh, it's for the children for law enforcement and didn't think it through.
The quote in the post says
Hardy says the bill is targeted at criminals
It's like they want to believe it's narrow and targeted.
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 20, 2011 10:07 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: yankeefifth at October 20, 2011 10:09 AM (loM0R)
They do realize that ALL second-hand goods have already been taxed once, right?
LOL! Carry that thought on out:
Second hand goods paid a sales tax once as they were bought by money that was taxed as income when it was earned. During it's useful life many second hand goods were also taxed as "inventory" or "property" taxes while on the vendor's shelves. They may also have been taxed at the point of sale for targeted luxury items like cars, or planes, or those pesky private jets.
JUST ONCE I'd like the average American to be forced to tally up all the taxes he's paid over the course of a year and be confronted with the actual percentage Uncle Sam requires of his efforts to earn a living. When you talk with people they think that total is somewhere around 30-40%. But when you actually do the math...go through and figure out what percentage you pay for gas is taxes. Add up the income, sales, property, road use, licensing, Federal, State and all the local taxes people are stunned to find out that sooner or later the Govt. is getting 60-80% of what they have produced. That really only 20-40% gets to the farmer for their food or the UAW worker that built their car.
If the actual percentage was common knowledge we'd be dealing with insurrection in the streets and revolutions AGAINST the clowns involved with OWS....and many of our govt authorities.
Posted by: MrObvious at October 20, 2011 10:10 AM (2uovW)
I worked in the Governor's Office in my state over 20 years ago. Trust me, every bill that comes through was thoroughly read and vetted by staffers and the Attorney General's Office.
Yeah, I was reaching a bit. I'm always careful not to draw sweeping conclusions based on a single media report. Having said that, I read the bill and it's pretty clear.
Odd, it still requires the buyer to record all kinds of information on the seller, but strikes the part about height, weight and race.
Posted by: CJ at October 20, 2011 10:11 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: izoneguy at October 20, 2011 10:11 AM (i6Neb)
Legislators don't worry about Constitutional issues anymore. They think that's the business of the Courts only.
Posted by: fozzy at October 20, 2011 10:12 AM (FEzSe)
Whiskey. Tango. Foxtrot. Oscar?!?"
Republican politicians are (with few exceptions) big fans of an ever-growing police state. Where have you been?
In Louisiana, "Republican" pretty much means "not black" and "in power" at this point when it comes to politicians. It doesn't necessarily mean "conservative".
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 20, 2011 10:12 AM (VZ10+)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of Duh at October 20, 2011 10:12 AM (bxiXv)
but it's a "law and order" issue, so it's ok?
No, I wasn't saying that I think it's okay, just that the legislators went "oh, it's for the children for law enforcement and didn't think it through.
The quote in the post says
Hardy says the bill is targeted at criminals
It's like they want to believe it's narrow and targeted.
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 20, 2011 02:07 PM (XdlcF)
no, i understood you were saying that, wasn't attacking you.
... just folks in general.
Posted by: shoey at October 20, 2011 10:13 AM (m6OUa)
Just today? I've been embarrassed by this f'n state for more years than I can count. Moronic "legislators," sub-moronic clerks in stores and at the Post Office and any state or city department, streets like cracked neglected toenails, idiots who love hot sticky weather and are willing, nay, eager to sit out in it pulling red-black insectoids (crawfish) apart for a flake of meat -- the list of horrors goes on and on.
I managed to flee to CO for a while, but The Swamp dragged me back, so to speak, and I haven't been able to escape since.
Every day here is like being screwed with a fresh cactus smeared with salsa and chili peppers. This is only the latest outrage. . . .
Posted by: Benzadmiral at October 20, 2011 10:13 AM (WuRdj)
Posted by: Dang at October 20, 2011 10:14 AM (BbX1b)
...as of this year, for the first time since Reconstruction. And only because a bunch of Democrats switched parties after 2010, in anticipation of getting wiped out during La.'s legislative elections this year.
Nearly all Republicans in Louisiana over the age of 50 are former Democrats. Probably 2/3 or more over 40 are.
And Louisiana has NEVER been a conservative state by any stretch of the imagination. We're evangelical populists, and y'all had better believe we'll stick our collective hand in the national pocket every chance we get.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at October 20, 2011 10:14 AM (5zBzg)
Posted by: SFGoth at October 20, 2011 10:15 AM (dZ756)
Posted by: izoneguy at October 20, 2011 10:15 AM (i6Neb)
Posted by: SFGoth at October 20, 2011 10:16 AM (dZ756)
RACIST!
Posted by: Dang at October 20, 2011 10:17 AM (BbX1b)
I've escaped a couple of times now, but family brought me back. I'll be getting out again before long, though, and this time I swear to God I'm never looking back. This state is hopeless.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at October 20, 2011 10:18 AM (5zBzg)
Posted by: What?? at October 20, 2011 10:19 AM (rj5Ii)
So Jindal actually signed it?
Louisiana residents: You would do well to take note of this. Especially as Election Day approaches.
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at October 20, 2011 10:20 AM (1rHeD)
Seller: Really officer, it is new.
Buyer: Officer, I believe this man. This item certainly looks new to me. ( Here's your money, bro. )
Posted by: Dang at October 20, 2011 10:22 AM (BbX1b)
" and it would be a good thing if someone cornered Perry on where he stands on this."
Why should it make any difference? This was a Louisiana bill, from the Louisiana Legislature, signed by a Louisiana Governor. What does Rick Perry have to do with it?
If you are saying Perry needs to explain why Jindal did this due to a endorsment for POTUS, well, that is pretty pathetic even for a Romney fan.
The bill is stupid and Jindal should be the one explaining his approval of it, not Perry.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at October 20, 2011 10:24 AM (kaOJx)
Posted by: Dave at October 20, 2011 10:30 AM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of Duh at October 20, 2011 02:12 PM (bxiXv)
No, but I did.
Posted by: MrCaniac at October 20, 2011 10:30 AM (eKuOw)
I'm increasingly on board with Joe Huffman's Jews In The Attic Test for any new legislation. Note the last example.....
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at October 20, 2011 10:30 AM (o1ki4)
Posted by: SFGoth
Seller: Dude, here's that thing you wanted.
Buyer: Thanks, bro. How much do I OWE you?
Seller: Dude, you are currently in debt to me for $20.
Buyer: Cool, bro. I understand my debt, seeing as how I now own this thing I wanted. Here is some currency which states that it is in fact legal for paying off my debt to you since we are standing here in the US of A.
Seller: Thanks, dude.
Buyer: No problem, bro.
Posted by: Dang at October 20, 2011 10:34 AM (BbX1b)
Posted by: yankeefifth at October 20, 2011 02:09 PM (loM0R)
Drug addicts trade anything for drugs. 15 years ago my sister's house was broken into, 6 months later the cops raided a crack house and found her stereo and cordless phone. Most crimes are committed by drug addicts, not professional criminals.
Posted by: MrCaniac at October 20, 2011 10:37 AM (eKuOw)
Posted by: yankeefifth at October 20, 2011 01:48 PM (loM0R)
I looked it up. The entire bill is only a couple of pages long, and it was a stand-alone bill. It was NOT hidden in a larger bill. Jindal and the Republicans who are the majority in both houses of their legislature own this. Screw the lot of them, 4 ways: long, wide, deep, and continuous.
Subotai Bahadur
Posted by: Subotai Bahadur at October 20, 2011 10:40 AM (l1dw/)
I'm gonna do like the sailor in the old story, who retired after 40 years at sea. He took an oar and started walking inland. When he got to a place where nobody knew what the oar was for, that was where he settled down.
In my case I'll bring a picture of a crawfish.
Posted by: Benzadmiral at October 20, 2011 10:42 AM (WuRdj)
Posted by: yankeefifth at October 20, 2011 10:44 AM (loM0R)
Posted by: yankeefifth at October 20, 2011 10:46 AM (loM0R)
Posted by: Deanna at October 20, 2011 10:48 AM (xXR78)
Posted by: DarkLord© sez Obama is a stuttering clusterf--- of a miserable failure
Oh, and F--- Nevada! at October 20, 2011 10:50 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at October 20, 2011 10:56 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Teleprompter at October 20, 2011 11:05 AM (NbmYl)
Hold your damn horses; we're still processing the request for a 9.0 earthquake in California.
Posted by: GodCorp©, Political Retributions Division at October 20, 2011 11:08 AM (5zBzg)
Article I, Section 10
No State shall . . . make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts;
It is blatantly unconstitutional.
How do they come up with this nonsense?
Posted by: Sam at October 20, 2011 11:09 AM (V9Tsq)
My old man used to tell me (circa 1980) that because there were so many laws in our country, everyone is a criminal (the tax code alone insures this). It's just a matter of when they choose to enforce them.
Learn the meaning of this phrase: "jury nullification".
Posted by: rockhead at October 20, 2011 11:13 AM (ZMHGo)
Posted by: Chairman Mao and/or Thomas Friedman at October 20, 2011 11:14 AM (T3KlW)
This is known as a "cellular telephone." Hate to break it to you. At least until US v. Jones sorts out Fourth Amendment jurisprudence (and possibly after, if that case doesn't make major changes), you'd be surprised at what cops can get away with.
Posted by: Sayyid at October 20, 2011 11:16 AM (t4NZ2)
If we are going to get insulting, then I have to answer. For the record, I supported Palin until she declined to run, now support Cain; but will vote for the eventual nominee unless it is Paul or Romney. On a good day, with a downhill run, and a blazing tailwind; Romney is this year's version of John McCain in 2008. It is not a good day, the run is uphill, and into the wind.
That said:
1) Perry [who I could vote for if he wins] got the benefit of Jindal throwing his support to him. This was particularly applicable to segments of the TEA Party that wanted Jindal to run early on. Perry happily accepted that support and endorsement.
2) Jindal's statist idiocy therefore does have some reflection on Perry, unless Perry disavows it. Just as those #Occupy anal orifii are tainted by the declarations of support by both the CPUSA and American Nazi Party, not to mention Buraq Hussein.
3) If Perry is asked about it and distances himself, all to the good. That will help mobilize resistance against it. And that will boost his popularity with the Patriot movement. Which boost would be deserved.
4) If he doesn't distance himself, or tapdances around it, then that tells us things we would need to know about him. Myself, I'm hoping he tells Jindal to take his no cash transactions for second-hand goods, fold it until it is all corners, and shove it somewhere darker than Buraq Hussein's heart.
5) And I am not at all averse to having all those running, including Cain, asked the same question. For the same reasons. It will increase pressure on Jindal and the sogannante Republicans in La.; and it will help us disqualify those who try to talk around it. Support for this should be disqualifying. But, they are second in line for questioning, because Jindal did not endorse them.
Subotai Bahadur
Posted by: Subotai Bahadur at October 20, 2011 11:25 AM (l1dw/)
Posted by: Chuckit at October 20, 2011 11:45 AM (MdQ2m)
Posted by: John P. Squibob at October 20, 2011 11:50 AM (kqqGm)
You are aware that this is a State of Louisiana issue that Rick Perry had nothing to do with and that nobody even knew about until this week, don't you Freedom Fighter?
Still ass-hurt over Palin, eh?
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at October 20, 2011 11:51 AM (5zBzg)
"I'm gonna do like the sailor in the old story, who retired after 40 years at sea. He took an oar and started walking inland. When he got to a place where nobody knew what the oar was for, that was where he settled down."
Here in Colorado we have a similar story, but the guy puts a snowplow on his truck and drives south til somebody asks "What the hell is that?".
Posted by: gebrauchshund at October 20, 2011 11:51 AM (iYwUw)
Posted by: Ken at October 20, 2011 11:55 AM (7yb9x)
Sometimes you have to wonder just what goes through these people's heads when they do shit like this.
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at October 20, 2011 11:56 AM (1rHeD)
Laws are only for little people.
Up the tyrants arses!
There's going to be a fight.
Lets Win.
Posted by: Mt Top Patriot at October 20, 2011 12:01 PM (5CusZ)
Posted by: Benzadmiral at October 20, 2011 02:42 PM (WuRdj)
I'm pretty sure that Hell is a eternal crawfish boil. At least for me, it will be.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at October 20, 2011 12:02 PM (5zBzg)
Posted by: Don Quinine at October 20, 2011 12:09 PM (dB02l)
Posted by: Alec Rawls at October 20, 2011 12:14 PM (kTTUz)
Posted by: Auntie Doodles at October 20, 2011 12:18 PM (6uXZa)
I have to bring a musical note to this discussion: If you check Frank Zappa's Joe's Garage, the main premise is that everything is illegal. IIRC, he also mentioned it in his Playboy interview shortly before he died.
It is me, or is everything going to shit faster and faster every single day?
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at October 20, 2011 12:31 PM (d0Tfm)
All cellphones capable of working with the current networks have location ability. There is the coarse cell tower location data that the cell networks generate constantly based on triangulating your signal to the various towers in your area. They store that information even if your phone can't even request a copy of the data. Then there is actual GPS information that every phone is capable of receiving but most dumb or feature phones only do it if you call E911, probably because the patent royalties are less expensive if it is only used for that one government mandated purpose. Then many feature phones and pretty much all smart phones expose the GPS information to the user AND the network provider at various times. They don't track it all the time because leaving the GPS radio enabled all the time is a significant battery drain. But there is almost certainly a backdoor way for the cell provider to request a GPS fix, especially in carrier locked phones. That means law enforcement can also get at it with a court order.
So the bottom line is everyone should consider themselves lo-jacked at all times if they have an operating cell phone on their person. You don't need to remove the battery though, just switching it off or putting it into airplane mode should be enough to stop most tracking. Would the government risk inserting a hack to defeat airplane mode? Not unless you were UBL or perhaps a leader of a major crime family.
Posted by: John Morris at October 20, 2011 12:31 PM (sCRhB)
Posted by: Chuckit at October 20, 2011 12:39 PM (MdQ2m)
Posted by: T at October 20, 2011 12:57 PM (HkOmO)
#5 & #7:
Signed by Executive on Jul 1, 2011
Action: Signed by the Governor. Becomes Act No. 389.
Date: Jul 11, 2011
Yeah, he did. :-(
Posted by: IRS Agent at October 20, 2011 12:58 PM (zji3t)
Posted by: That's Mr Hobbit to you at October 20, 2011 01:04 PM (sbaXF)
Seller: Really officer, it is new.
If it's new to you, it's new. Fuck em.
Posted by: kansas at October 20, 2011 01:05 PM (nNgbi)
I cant imagine Jindal actually signing something so obviously fascist but it would be an enlightening look if he did as to who he really is politically.
I did better today, Im i the 200s,not the 300s.Weee!
Posted by: Rich K at October 20, 2011 01:08 PM (X4l3T)
Posted by: Clubber Lang at October 20, 2011 01:10 PM (QcFbt)
Posted by: A.G. at October 20, 2011 01:24 PM (myTwx)
Posted by: steevy at October 20, 2011 02:06 PM (fyOgS)
Posted by: When Elves Attack ePub at October 20, 2011 04:46 PM (OMloq)
Posted by: Steve Jobs iBooks at October 20, 2011 05:16 PM (OMloq)
Posted by: Bright Lights, Dark Shadows AudioBook at October 20, 2011 05:45 PM (2CDMi)
But stuff getting stolen for scrap was a big-ass problem at Polk. In between rotations, the locals (the Pitkin Bandits) drove into the training area and stole EVERY fucking air conditioner off one of the forward operating bases. People would drive out into the impact area to cut up old target vehicles for scrap. I had a couple old M113 APCs I used to drive past. One time over a four-day weekend the tail ramps, probably a half-ton piece of aluminum plate, vanished off all three of them. That's pretty fuckin' ambitious right there. Kinda had to admire it a little though.
Posted by: SGT Dan at October 20, 2011 05:45 PM (3Z9LX)
Posted by: Tamora Pierce Mastiff ePub at October 20, 2011 07:14 PM (wkzne)
Posted by: doug at October 20, 2011 07:46 PM (gUGI6)
"There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power government has is the power to crack down on criminals. When there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws."
- "Atlas Shrugged" by Ayn Rand
Posted by: TimInVirginia at October 21, 2011 08:16 AM (8NiWI)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2744 seconds, 397 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








New Orleans completes its collapse in 3...2...1...
Posted by: DarkLord© sez Obama is a stuttering clusterf--- of a miserable failure
Oh, and F--- Nevada! at October 20, 2011 09:23 AM (GBXon)