March 22, 2011
— Open Blogger All I can do is quote Richard Cohen, as dependable a liberal columnist as the WaPo has ever had:
The change that Obama promised has settled on us all like an irritating drizzle. His ideas were untested by either age or experience. It is one thing to decry American unilateralism and quite another to await international action when time is of the essence. It is not necessary for America always to lead, but it is sometimes necessary for it to do so — and always necessary for the president to know when that moment has arrived. Obama seems not to know. He often solves problems by ignoring them.
Cohen makes the obligatory liberal swipe at Bush towards the end of the column, but he's mostly going through the motions. And, yes, Richard, a lot of Americans knew that Candidate Obama -- not just his ideas, but the man himself -- was "untested by either age or experience", which is why a lot of Dems voted to nominate Hillary and why a lot of Americans voted to elected McCain. But thanks to the anointing of the Chosen One by the mainstream media -- you listening, Richard? -- no real due diligence of Candidate Obama was done, and we ended up with President Feckless.
Votes have consequences, but so does biased media coverage. How's that hope and change working out for you, Richard? ..fritz..
Posted by: Open Blogger at
06:21 AM
| Comments (90)
Post contains 247 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Trimegistus at March 22, 2011 06:24 AM (myYF0)
I thought we had something special, Dick. Come back to me, bro. Golf tomorrow?
Posted by: Barry at March 22, 2011 06:25 AM (hAXZJ)
Posted by: Bandit 6 at March 22, 2011 06:27 AM (ijjAe)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 22, 2011 06:28 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 22, 2011 06:29 AM (UOM48)
I think Obama's reaction to Russia's invasion of Georgia in 2008 told everyone evething they needed to know about Obama's decision making skills.
It was there for everyone to see.
Posted by: Ben at March 22, 2011 06:31 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: polynikes at March 22, 2011 06:31 AM (yKP4s)
Posted by: Methos at March 22, 2011 06:31 AM (uqJo6)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 22, 2011 06:33 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: Bandit 6 at March 22, 2011 06:33 AM (ijjAe)
Not all change is good, Dick.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at March 22, 2011 06:34 AM (9hSKh)
I'm just wondering. Suppose there was a large anti-war protest in D.C. Man would that fry Obama. I'm just curious as to how he would react.
My guess, not well at all.
Posted by: HH at March 22, 2011 06:34 AM (6oDXl)
Posted by: Methos at March 22, 2011 10:31 AM (uqJo6
After the 'reporting' done by FNC during the last crisis of DOOM, I'm taking anything they say with a block of salt
Posted by: Red Shirt at March 22, 2011 06:35 AM (FIDMq)
Posted by: Oprah Winfrey at March 22, 2011 06:36 AM (xs5wK)
THIS WILL BE DONE UNDER THE MORAL AUTHORITY OF JUSTICE AND FAIRNESS SINCE ALL THEIR ILL-GOTTEN WEALTH WAS STOLEN FROM BROWN PEOPLE.
http://tinyurl.com/64u29
Posted by: KayInMaine at March 22, 2011 06:37 AM (d85Ri)
In the Oval Office, President Obama keeps busts of his heroes — Abraham Lincoln and Martin Luther King Jr. He should add one of Milton Berle, the so-called Mr. Television of the 1950s. Berle used to signal his studio audience to both continue and stop applauding by holding up one hand to wave them on and another to quiet them. This is the president’s Libya policy in a nutshell.
Forgot to mention getting rid of the bust of Churchill.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 22, 2011 06:37 AM (UOM48)
Um, isn't Cohen trying to salvage his favorite old 60s ideas from the disaster that is O'Bumbles? Wasn't Teh Won really the same old, musty wine in a new bottle? Wasn't that what the Cohens and other self-regarded elites celebrating - that their rusty old ideology was gaining purchase with a slick marketing campaign in the form of the bi-racial, multi-ethnic, transnational, and bipartisan superman? Howard Dean, but affable and charming? O'Bumbles was going to bring 'humility' to American foreign policy, I recall. Cohen needs to own this shitpie.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at March 22, 2011 06:38 AM (IVQSY)
Rush plays it all the time.
Posted by: the kitty at March 22, 2011 06:38 AM (penCf)
Posted by: Bandit 6 at March 22, 2011 06:38 AM (ijjAe)
Posted by: MJ at March 22, 2011 06:39 AM (BKOsZ)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 22, 2011 06:39 AM (0GFWk)
IIRC, Brokaw - not long after the election.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at March 22, 2011 06:40 AM (IVQSY)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at March 22, 2011 06:40 AM (1Jaio)
deeprock7Sounds like a "blood for oil war".
You sound surprised, Mr. Cohen. Don't be. We knuckledragging conservatives saw Obama for what he was in 2008...an untested, empty suit puppeted by a souless anti-American (as we know it) who employed his lofty rhetoric and decades of liberal white guilt to get elected on the promise of hope and change.
No wonder con artists thrive in the US...half the USA voted for one.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 22, 2011 06:40 AM (UOM48)
Exactly. The left gambled big with Obama. "Hope" was as much a rationale for their vote as it was a campaign slogan. They thought his ability to sway people with his rhetoric and charisma* would offset his lack of experience. His speeches made him sound decisive, when in reality he was and is just a shameless liar.
I honestly don't know whether Obama will even run in 2012. His re-election efforts seem unusually half-hearted at this point. Of course, that may be more incompetence than anything else.
*Note: that was their belief, not mine. Obama has virtually no charisma to speak of that I can detect.
Posted by: Slublog at March 22, 2011 06:45 AM (0nqdj)
Good to know.
Posted by: Methos at March 22, 2011 06:45 AM (uqJo6)
Posted by: Old Texas Turkey at March 22, 2011 06:46 AM (6iGxw)
Uh-oh. It's gotten loose again.
Really, Ace, Co-bloggers: does anyone have an idea of who this is? She might hurt herself one day.
As for this War... Since the President didn't actually supply any objective, measurable goals, I have three:
1) Remove Mommar Kadhafi from power in Libya.
2) After (1), Immediately cease all military involvement in Libya.
3) Impeach the President for opening hostilities absent a formal declaration of war, an existing state of war (remember, folk, Iraq had already violated the cease-fire), or a 'Clear and Present Danger' to the national security of the United States.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at March 22, 2011 06:47 AM (8y9MW)
IIRC, Brokaw - not long after the election.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at March 22, 2011 10:40 AM (IVQSY)
I think it was Brokaw on the Charlie Rose borefesttm
Posted by: Hedgehog at March 22, 2011 06:47 AM (Rn2kl)
Bunch of us were talking about the mess in DC, and came up with a couple of possible conclusions.
One of them was the question seen increasingly, that if Obama were actively trying to inflict damage would he do anything different
The other, ( I think more accurate), is this is a graphic example of the inherent flaw in the progressive policy. In other words, what we see is that this system simply CANNOT work. Never has yet, no matter who has tried.
Just my two cents.
Posted by: irongrampa at March 22, 2011 06:48 AM (ud5dN)
Posted by: Penfold at March 22, 2011 06:51 AM (1PeEC)
It's sort of like socialism in that way. Wait a second...
Posted by: Johnny at March 22, 2011 06:52 AM (mhmc7)
Cohen's article last week was even better. He was pissed that Obama hadn't acted yet on K'daffy because he had a relative on the Lockerbie flight or something and wanted revenge.
Remember, military action in response to terrorism is bad, m'kay. Except in the cases where I am personally affected, then of course, it's good.
Posted by: mugiwara at March 22, 2011 06:53 AM (W7ffl)
Republican: House Foreign Affairs Chairman: U.S. Must Withdraw from U.N. Human Rights Council
Democrats:
US demanding gay rights support at UN body
Posted by: momma at March 22, 2011 06:56 AM (penCf)
The notion that the Arab League’s endorsement of the “no fly” zone is somehow vindication for a desperately stupid foreign policy gives one pause for cause. Are our current crop of politicos and advisors unaware there is little love lost between Gaddafi and the Arab League? When you see Arab leaders, crying for western military might in Islamic countries, doesn’t anyone become the least bit suspicious?
Posted by: momma at March 22, 2011 06:57 AM (penCf)
This isn't new, you ignorant liberal sucking dickwad.
Posted by: momma at March 22, 2011 07:01 AM (penCf)
Conservatives, on the other hand, seem to be in one of two camps- both of which can be defended fairly logically.
Group A seems to think that the war is a good thing, and that this is one of the times today that Barak "Broken Clock" Obama will be right.
Group B seems to think that the war is a bad thing, because (insert reason here: the two I'm hearing most are- no national security interest in Libya and "we're broke.")
Both groups make good, cogent arguments in their favor (I tend to side with Group B, over all, but I can also see Group A's points) and both (as far as I can tell) have a real problem with a) the way we entered the war (it's not a No-Fly Zone, no matter what they want to call it) and/or b) the lack of leadership as far as setting goals and explaining exactly why this affects our national interests.
Liberals, not having a coherent world-view to ground them, are just lashing out. This one hates the new war, and now hates BHO for entering it. This other one things this is a "just war" because.... Democrat President. Yet a third thinks the war is probably a good idea, but really hates that the President didn't dot his I's and cross his T's.
And vitriol? It's like a nice, sweet glass of schadenfreude.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at March 22, 2011 07:02 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: momma at March 22, 2011 10:57 AM (penCf)
Note how the Arab League led the first attacks.
Heyyy, wait a minute...
And where's my wallet?
Posted by: HH at March 22, 2011 07:02 AM (6oDXl)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 22, 2011 07:03 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at March 22, 2011 07:03 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Anna Puma at March 22, 2011 07:07 AM (Qdl3h)
Posted by: Soothsayer at March 22, 2011 07:08 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: FireHorse at March 22, 2011 07:08 AM (k3RPu)
Nah Kratos, Reichstag in Arabic is "Allahu Ackbar! Long live the Muslim Brotherhood."
Posted by: Anna Puma at March 22, 2011 07:08 AM (Qdl3h)
Posted by: MJ at March 22, 2011 07:09 AM (BKOsZ)
Posted by: Spurwing Plover at March 22, 2011 07:09 AM (vA9ld)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 22, 2011 07:10 AM (0GFWk)
FROM: Editor in Chief, Washington Post
TO: Manager, Janitorial Services
MEMO: Grim Milestones
Please consult you records to identify the location where these objects were put in storage in January of 2009, and prepare to have them cleaned-up and made presentable.
Posted by: sherlock at March 22, 2011 07:10 AM (BKPeM)
Posted by: Soothsayer at March 22, 2011 07:11 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: MJ at March 22, 2011 07:11 AM (BKOsZ)
No one could be that foolish in real life. Not even a liberal.
Posted by: Trimegistus at March 22, 2011 07:12 AM (1AUna)
I just got word from Fox News that a U.S. plane crash landed in Libya.
happened earlier, it was a malfunction, and the pilots are in our hands.
Posted by: Ben at March 22, 2011 07:12 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Anna Puma at March 22, 2011 07:13 AM (Qdl3h)
Posted by: Soothsayer at March 22, 2011 07:13 AM (uFokq)
happened earlier, it was a malfunction, and the pilots are in our hands.
Good good good. Thanks for the follow up.
Posted by: FireHorse at March 22, 2011 07:14 AM (k3RPu)
Nah Kratos, Reichstag in Arabic is "Allahu Ackbar! Long live the Muslim Brotherhood."
If the consequences of that sentiment weren't so grim, I would lol.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at March 22, 2011 07:15 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: sixpckr at March 22, 2011 07:15 AM (bKmGD)
Posted by: Anna Puma at March 22, 2011 07:16 AM (Qdl3h)
You won't believe what BO told Brazil this weekend:
“We want to work with you. We want to help with technology and support to develop these oil reserves safely, and when you’re ready to start selling, we want to be one of your best customers,” Obama told a group of business leaders Saturday. “At a time when we’ve been reminded how easily instability in other parts of the world can affect the price of oil, the United States could not be happier with the potential for a new, stable source of energy.”
...
PLUS:
We just gave Petrobras, you know the BRAZILIAN oil company, permission to drill in the gulf of Mexico. Only 2 permits for US companies since the BP spill but now we give a fucking permit to Petrobras!?? What.the.fuck.
Posted by: Hedgehog at March 22, 2011 09:26 AM (Rn2kl)
Posted by: momma at March 22, 2011 07:17 AM (penCf)
Any conservative that sits out the next election, knowing what Obama is how much more damage he could do, does not have the best interests of the country at heart.
Posted by: Slublog at March 22, 2011 07:19 AM (0nqdj)
Didn't some influential American leftist just invest heavily in Petrobras?
Posted by: Johnny at March 22, 2011 07:22 AM (mhmc7)
Isn't Soros a big investor in Petrobras?
Posted by: Ian S. at March 22, 2011 07:22 AM (p05LM)
Here's a question for Obama the next time he ventures in front of the media: How do your policies and actions reflect the influences of your heroes?
Posted by: NC Ref at March 22, 2011 07:26 AM (/izg2)
Posted by: Johnny at March 22, 2011 11:22 AM (mhmc7)
Yeah, I think Obama budgeted about $2 billion American tax-dollars for them. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Posted by: NC Ref at March 22, 2011 07:28 AM (/izg2)
Posted by: Roy at March 22, 2011 07:29 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: Roy at March 22, 2011 07:30 AM (VndSC)
Cohen was down with the fact that we didn't know much about Obama back in 2008. He even called it "troubling". Yet while he came ever so close to making the correct logical conclusion -- he had to go and do this:
Eleanor Roosevelt, playing off the title of Kennedy's Pulitzer Prize-winning book, airily dismissed him as more profile than courage. Similarly, it was Walter Lippmann's enduring misfortune to size up FDR and belittle him: Roosevelt, he wrote, was "a pleasant man who, without any important qualifications for office, would very much like to be president." Lippmann later recognized that he had underestimated Roosevelt.
My guess is that Obama will make a fool of anyone who issues such a judgment about him.
Posted by: hit and run at March 22, 2011 07:30 AM (ihLiz)
re: Strike Eagle down. The E model has a designed airframe life of 16,000 hours as opposed to the F-15C which was designed for 8,000 hours.
All we know right now is the plane went down for apparent mechanical issues and the crew was rescued.
Posted by: Anna Puma at March 22, 2011 07:31 AM (Qdl3h)
His ideas were untested by either age or experience.
WRONG. WRONG. COSMICALLY EFFING WRONG.
The lefty, blame America, "let's pretend the world in warm and fuzzy" ideas were well-known and they have not, are not, and will not work.
Obama was untested by either age or experience.
Cohen and the rest of the brilliance hoard cannot bring themselves to the event horizon of honesty.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at March 22, 2011 07:32 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at March 22, 2011 11:03 AM (pLTLS)
Sad to say, based on some of her screechings in the past, she's more fertile than sane and has polluted the gene pool with some random experiments.
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 22, 2011 07:33 AM (cQH/d)
Eh, in the end they'll resolve to blame the trivaginate of Valkyries (Clinton/Rice/Power) for their bellicosity in starting it, hate Uncle Sam and the baby-murdering troops for trumped up civilian casualties and a 'display of hegemony,' and then credit Obama for saving the lives of innocent civilians, 'leading' a multilateral coalition from the aft, and cement his legacy as the father of the 'Arab Awakening.' All this will be nicely rolled together by the Make Believe Media in time for 2012.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at March 22, 2011 07:38 AM (IVQSY)
Posted by: Anna Puma at March 22, 2011 07:40 AM (Qdl3h)
@72
Soros disinvested in Petrobras after that "crazy conspiracy theorist" Glenn Beck revealed Soros's involvement.
Scoff at Beck all you want, but I think he's more often correct than not.
Posted by: Retired Buckeye Cop at March 22, 2011 07:42 AM (S2+uh)
Posted by: Bandit 6 at March 22, 2011 10:27 AM (ijjAe)
Worse. Obama has the same sort of authoritarian belief that Hoover (and most of the intellectuals of his day) that one could simply manipulate economies into doing what you wanted. And also human nature.
Of course, the one thing Hoover had going for him is that he was actually an engineer. And the naive view of the 20s and 30s was that engineering brought so much progress that it could be applied to economics and social policy.
That philosophy never died on the Left, especially among liberals who couldn't quite go full Marxist.
But Obama's no engineer. He's a lawyer. He thinks if he creates the right committee of the smartest experts that they can simply solve the problem. E.g., green jobs. The laws of thermodynamics be damned, the scientists just aren't working hard enough.
At least Hoover had some excuses, history hadn't proven him wrong and he was actually a smart person. Obama, not so much.
Posted by: AmishDude at March 22, 2011 08:06 AM (T0NGe)
I would quibble with the description of Obama as a "lawyer," in the sense that it implies that he engaged in a significant career practicing law. It is true that he is law-trained, and true that he spent a few short years at a law firm, and perhaps then as a "guest lecturer" in Constitutional Law while an elected official, but we don't see much evidence of Obama working as a lawyer for any substantial period of time. What I see is the arrogance of an academic or intellectual, which I think is the proper characterization.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at March 22, 2011 08:24 AM (IVQSY)
Well, I call him a "nonmathematician" but that doesn't carry the insult for others that it does for me.
Posted by: AmishDude at March 22, 2011 08:46 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: joncelli at March 22, 2011 09:56 AM (RD7QR)
Well, I call him a "nonmathematician" but that doesn't carry the insult for others that it does for me.
Posted by: AmishDude at March 22, 2011 12:46 PM (T0NGe)
I'll settle for "mashed up bag of mongrelized meat" ...
Posted by: ya2daup at March 22, 2011 10:33 AM (UzjcV)
Posted by: ya2daup at March 22, 2011 10:36 AM (UzjcV)
Posted by: Jade Sea at March 22, 2011 10:41 AM (GPzB2)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3787 seconds, 218 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.









Posted by: andycanuck at March 22, 2011 06:23 AM (/wCSE)