February 01, 2011
— DrewM When the people are no longer afraid of an authoritarian government, that government is not long for the world.
A massive and highly expectant crowd of pro-democracy demonstrators converged on this capital city's central plaza Tuesday, energized by the belief that their week-old movement is on the verge of ousting President Hosni Mubarak.By late afternoon, hundreds of thousands of cheering people packed every inch of Tahrir Square, with supporters still streaming in from every direction and filling the surrounding broad avenues of downtown. Similar protests were underway in cities across Egypt.
Mubarak has announced that he wants to open negotiations with the opposition about reforms but it seems like they are really only interested in accepting his surrender. The only question is likely whether he is going to be arrested or shipped out of the country with his family and some stolen money. I hear Jeddah is lovely this time of year.
But demonstrators on Tuesday were already looking past Mubarak, saying they would not accept any of his inner circle - including Suleiman - as their new leader. They are instead calling for the creation of a transitional government, followed soon after by elections.Such a scenario would have been virtually inconceivable before last Tuesday, when the demonstrations began, but is now seen by protesters as inevitable.
"Even if I have to die tomorrow, I have lived today as a free man," said Khalid el-Hosary, 39, who said he hails from the same home town as the president. "Mubarak's not gone yet, but we're the ones who are directing events, not him. These people all around us are the ones who are going to determine the future of the Middle East."
Let's hope Mr. el-Hosary's freedom survives the aftermath of this revolution. Remember, it isn't always the ones who topple the government who wind up in control after the original government is gone. There's usually a pretty nasty group waiting in the wings to knock off the happy talking reformers and re-institute tyranny, just with another name.
As for what comes next...Egypt is a stew of beliefs and attitudes that seems to defy efforts to get a handle on it. That's really not to surprising considering the nature of the government and how it choked off any opposition groups for generations. When people can't express their views or have them tested in the market place of ideas, they can be warped and contradictory. It's simply going to take time for Egyptians to sort out what kind of politics and society they want.
Added: US pushes Mubarak a little further under the bus.
US Ambassador in Cairo Margaret Scobey spoke on the phone today with Mohamed ElBaradei
Meanwhile...King Abdullah of Jordan can smell what's cooking in Cairo all the way back in Amman.
Jordan's King Abdullah II fired his government Tuesday in the wake of street protests and asked an ex-prime minister to form a new Cabinet, ordering him to launch immediate political reforms.The dismissal follows several large protests across Jordan— inspired by similar demonstrations in Tunisia and Egypt — calling for the resignation of Prime Minister Samir Rifai, who is blamed for a rise in fuel and food prices and slowed political reforms.
...The king also stressed that economic reform was a "necessity to provide a better life for our people, but we won't be able to attain that without real political reforms, which must increase popular participation in the decision-making."
He asked al-Bakhit for a "comprehensive assessment ... to correct the mistakes of the past." He did not elaborate. The statement said Abdullah also demanded an "immediate revision" of laws governing politics and public freedoms.
Jordan isn't Egypt but clearly people want more. Abdullah's moves though may be too late, too late to hold back the tide sweeping the Mideast. Remember, about 1/3 of Jordan's population is Palestinian and there has been, unpleasantness there before.
Want more? Some Syrian opposition groups are calling for protests this weekend. I hope this isn't some sort of false flag operation by the Syrian security forces to smoke out would-be opponents because Syria doesn't play when it comes to this stuff.
Interesting times, to say the least.
Posted by: DrewM at
06:53 AM
| Comments (175)
Post contains 713 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: EC at February 01, 2011 06:56 AM (mAhn3)
Posted by: toby928™ at February 01, 2011 06:58 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Ben at February 01, 2011 06:59 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: nickless at February 01, 2011 06:59 AM (qdtoY)
At least I won my bet that Mubarak would hang on until at least this week. Looks like the MB has decided to make a push for the whole of the ME...and our government (at least certain factions of it) is all gung ho to see this happen. Interesting times.
But the optimist in me sees opportunity...lots of it, and not just in the ME.
Posted by: unknown jane at February 01, 2011 06:59 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: Dr. Strange at February 01, 2011 07:00 AM (69xDW)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at February 01, 2011 07:04 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: nevergiveup at February 01, 2011 07:04 AM (0GFWk)
The Israelis will be twitchy enough with Lebanon, Syria, and probably Egypt hostile to them. If Jordan flips, then they're back to the days of the 60s and 70s where they've got enemies on all sides.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at February 01, 2011 07:04 AM (iBaup)
Posted by: Former Emperor Jimmah Palpatine at February 01, 2011 07:04 AM (qdtoY)
Posted by: nevergiveup at February 01, 2011 07:06 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: Who Me, MB? at February 01, 2011 07:06 AM (pRKLf)
Posted by: nevergiveup at February 01, 2011 07:07 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: Ben at February 01, 2011 07:07 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: nevergiveup at February 01, 2011 07:07 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at February 01, 2011 07:08 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: John Blutarsky at February 01, 2011 07:08 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: eman at February 01, 2011 07:08 AM (n0WLs)
Never say never, Ben. Most of the Jordanian population is "Palestinian" and would love to see the Hashemite regime go so they can pursue their grand pan Arab-Islamic pipe-dream.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 01, 2011 07:08 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: negentropy at February 01, 2011 07:09 AM (27KAF)
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at February 01, 2011 07:11 AM (NmKUg)
Tehran does good work.
Posted by: nickless at February 01, 2011 07:11 AM (qdtoY)
Posted by: Lincolntf at February 01, 2011 07:11 AM (hUf/c)
I don't know where you got that figure. Jordan is majority Palestinian, something like 65%. I think you are only counting those that are termed "palestinian refugees" by the asinine UN, who came later from the West Bank.
Posted by: iknowtheleft at February 01, 2011 07:13 AM (N49h9)
Posted by: nevergiveup at February 01, 2011 07:13 AM (0GFWk)
That's where his Mom is from, certainly.
Quick check the crease on his pants!
Posted by: David Brooks at February 01, 2011 07:13 AM (Jb3+B)
That something's coming to call
Death and darkness are rushing forward
To stamp light from the wall!
Oh! You've nothing to say
They'll drag you away!
If you listen to fools,
The mob rules, the mob rules
Kill the spirit and you'll be blinded
The end is always the same
Play with fire, you'll burn your finger
And you'll get hold of a flame, oh!
It's over, it's done
The end is begun
If you listen to fools,
The mob rules
You've nothing to say
Oh, They're breaking away
If you listen to fools
Break the circle and stop the movement
The wheel is thrown to the ground
Just remember it might stop rolling
And take you right back around!
You're all fools!
The Mob Rules! - Black Sabbath
Posted by: Max Entropy at February 01, 2011 07:15 AM (lH6z9)
Posted by: nevergiveup at February 01, 2011 07:15 AM (0GFWk)
Well, since conventional wisdom seems to be that Egypt is a crapshoot right now, I'll go ahead and predict a sharp rise in radical Islam. Their economy will get even shittier, their large numbers of poor will get poorer and, true to form, Islamists will come in and keep them poor and pissed at the West.
It's easy to stoke anti-western sentiment there. It's the only thing many of those countries have to keep them from imploding under their own incompetence. Islam is the most effective at placing blame elsewhere, because in the end, blame is the #1 commodity most of these countries have.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at February 01, 2011 07:16 AM (A/oSU)
Posted by: Vic at February 01, 2011 07:17 AM (M9Ie6)
The West is what is preventing the return of the Caliphate where all good muzzies will live in peace and harmony, share in the bounty that allah will provide, and be free to kill Jews and Christians all the livelong day. What a wonderful future awaits us!
Posted by: Hrothgar at February 01, 2011 07:19 AM (alr7n)
Posted by: CJ at February 01, 2011 07:19 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: Jordanian bedouin at February 01, 2011 07:20 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: justin cord at February 01, 2011 07:21 AM (2C3OH)
Posted by: nevergiveup at February 01, 2011 07:22 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 01, 2011 07:22 AM (SJ6/3)
What other language should a plea for freedom be couched in?
Arabic?
Puhleeze!
They don't even have the fucking vocabulary.
Posted by: David Brooks at February 01, 2011 07:22 AM (Jb3+B)
Posted by: boniface ballers at February 01, 2011 07:24 AM (bPbwB)
Posted by: Beagle at February 01, 2011 07:25 AM (sOtz/)
Oy. Arab views are warped and contradictory when they are allowed to be expressed publicly. I think you just fail to understand the major and monumental differences between arab culture and Western culture. Arabs are not Westerners. They have a totally different culture that is beyond the grasp of most in the West. What you consider contradictory, they have no problem with ... just as with Western leftists, who are allowed to express their idiotic and contradictory views of everything.
Posted by: iknowtheleft at February 01, 2011 07:25 AM (N49h9)
Posted by: Ben at February 01, 2011 07:25 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 01, 2011 07:25 AM (SJ6/3)
Israel has no control over internal Jordanian politics and wouldn't even try to do anything.
Posted by: iknowtheleft at February 01, 2011 07:27 AM (N49h9)
Posted by: eman at February 01, 2011 07:28 AM (n0WLs)
Posted by: nevergiveup at February 01, 2011 07:30 AM (0GFWk)
No wait, I predict a peaceful transfer to an open and free society.
No wait, I predict a tumble into the abyss of Islamic tyranny.
No wait, I predict mass suicide and Egypt is abandoned for all time.
I predict the average Egyptian is screwed but good no matter what!
Where's my pundit check?
Posted by: eman at February 01, 2011 11:28 AM (n0WLs)
FIFY
Posted by: Hrothgar at February 01, 2011 07:32 AM (alr7n)
Posted by: Yellowstone caldera at February 01, 2011 07:32 AM (RD7QR)
I didn't think End of Days would be like waiting in line at the DMV to renew your license. Get on with the Apocalypse already! Jeesh!
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at February 01, 2011 07:33 AM (NmKUg)
Posted by: Mr. Sar Kastik at February 01, 2011 07:34 AM (8fiyZ)
I hate to confuse you, but my mother was born in Palestine. She was a Palestinian until 1947 when the Palestinians took back their country from the British and fought off the invading Arabs. Now of course they call themselves by their original name: Israelis.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at February 01, 2011 07:36 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: eman at February 01, 2011 07:37 AM (n0WLs)
We have two choices: get involved in Egypt's situation and use our resources to find and establish leaders there who have some vague idea of what "democracy" means, or STFU and let them deal with their own issues.
Sadly, the Mohammedan Mouthpiece (ours, that is) seems to want to let the Muzzie Bros take power. What a shocker, right? Fatheads like Mutt are being Useful Idiots, just like Jerry Rivers and other commentators.
I have a feeling we'll be involved militarily in Egypt before long, either to quell the "democracy-loving" Egyptians' rioting and destruction or to protect Israel when Osama Obama's Muzzie pals make their moves from their new country.
Posted by: MrScribbler© at February 01, 2011 07:37 AM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 01, 2011 07:37 AM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: justin cord at February 01, 2011 11:21 AM (2C3OH)
I disagree.
First, a couple of hundred thousand people breaking the law and attacking the regime with impunity is important. It shows that the ability of the regime to enforce its will has disappeared. That's all a government's like Mubarak's has or rather had.
Second, the future belongs those who show up. Very few political/military revolutions (including the American) invovle a majority of the population. It's usually a highly motivated and active minority that makes something happen. 250,000 people doing something often overcomes millions doing nothing. Also, Cairo is the largest but just one city. There are similar protests across the country in cities like Alexandria and Suez.
Third, a lot of the real action is behind the scenes. If the US pulls the rug out from Mubarak (bye-bye $ Billion/year) and the Army continues to refuse to come to his aid...he's got nothing. People in the streets creates political pressure to move the US away from him.
I'm not saying it ends well but I don't think you can discount the 2nd and 3rd order effects of what the street protests make possible.
Posted by: DrewM. at February 01, 2011 07:38 AM (HicGG)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 01, 2011 11:25 AM (SJ6/3)
I hate to confuse you, but my mother was born in Palestine. She was a Palestinian until 1947 when the Palestinians took back their country from the British and fought off the invading Arabs. Now of course they call themselves by their original name: Israelis.
Yeah, in the originally 1948 partitian, the Jews were refered to as "Palestinians" and the Muslims were the "Arabs".
The British Mandate of Palestine included modern Jordan as well.
Posted by: Ben at February 01, 2011 07:38 AM (wuv1c)
How long is long? I can't imagine Barry sending in troops anywhere, certainly not to aid our traditional allies.
Posted by: toby928™ at February 01, 2011 07:39 AM (GTbGH)
http://bit.ly/i3Xrxc
All of this "stimulus" and printing money in the developed world has caused sever inflated food prices, even in places like Laos which are net food exporters.
Posted by: Arms Merchant at February 01, 2011 07:41 AM (VKRmb)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 01, 2011 07:41 AM (SJ6/3)
All my pre-Israel geography books are packed away so I'm relying on faulty memory here, but I seem to recall that "Palestine" was a marked region on the map but not really a nation in the modern sense with a central government. Wasn't it administered by the Brits?
Seems to me the nations of the ME were mainly established in modern times. Before that was "Arabia," "Trans-Jordan," "Persia," etc.
Posted by: MrScribbler© at February 01, 2011 07:41 AM (Ulu3i)
It would kinda suck for them if all of Egypt's phat American military hardware spare parts pipeline suddenly dried up. Shit happens...
I'm just saying...
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 01, 2011 07:41 AM (wdPVD)
'Syria doesn't play when it comes to this stuff.'
No, but that was with Pops. Junior Opthalmologist is in charge now.
We'll find out how well he can see what's coming.
I don't think the fundies have any love for the Ba'ath leadership, as in Iraq. Secular dictators are probably at as much risk now as pro-western democracies in the ME.
Posted by: phineas gage at February 01, 2011 07:41 AM (c+3Qr)
Posted by: Bob Bork at February 01, 2011 07:42 AM (xs5wK)
16 If Jordan flips...
Not to worry: Barry the Crease has been assured by Geography Czar Joe Biden that Jordan is not an island like Guam, so this can't happen. Whew.
Posted by: sherlock at February 01, 2011 07:42 AM (81ia8)
Jordan won't fall. The Israelis will never let it happen
I dunno. Jordan exists today as it is today because they were semi-autonomous under the mandate giving a sense of "legitimacy" of the Hashemite government. And, much of the population was Bedouin and were not so dependent on the government.. They were happy running around with their goats and the Abdullahs left them alone.
In '67, a slew of Palestinian refugees settled in Jordan. Abdullah kept them controlled through largesse. They lived better than the refugees in Lebanon, but the antipathy toward Israel never left...nor that toward their host country who supported the right of Israel to exist. Now they see what's happening around them...and the lack of response by Ogabe and will likely be very encouraged to start shit.
Israel would be VERY hesitant to involve itself in Jordan given the certain repercussions......and Ebola will likely warn them to stay out and will not support them
Posted by: beedubya at February 01, 2011 07:42 AM (AnTyA)
Posted by: Tantor at February 01, 2011 07:42 AM (blNMI)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 01, 2011 07:42 AM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 01, 2011 07:43 AM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: phineas gage at February 01, 2011 07:44 AM (c+3Qr)
Posted by: toby928™ at February 01, 2011 11:39 AM
If the Traitor-in-Chief sees the Muzzie Bros losing out, I can see him sending in military to "protect" the Egyptians.
On the other hand, if he acts like he's willing to let Israel be overrun, I wouldn't be surprised if Congress rose up and demanded troops/supplies be sent.
In either case, he doesn't seem unduly worried about American casualties. Or even basic decency.
Posted by: MrScribbler© at February 01, 2011 07:44 AM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 01, 2011 07:44 AM (SJ6/3)
Seems to me the nations of the ME were mainly established in modern times. Before that was "Arabia," "Trans-Jordan," "Persia," etc.
Posted by: MrScribbler© at February 01, 2011 11:41 AM (Ulu3i)
Jews born in the mandate were called "Palestinians" and called themselves that at times. You can even see remnants of this in the movie Exodus, where Paul Newman is called Palestinian, being what we now call a Sabra.
Posted by: iknowtheleft at February 01, 2011 07:45 AM (N49h9)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 01, 2011 07:45 AM (wdPVD)
Posted by: justin cord at February 01, 2011 07:46 AM (2C3OH)
Posted by: Helen Keller's Iron now with call waiting at February 01, 2011 07:46 AM (SJ6/3)
Well played. Heh.
Posted by: Derak at February 01, 2011 07:46 AM (CjpKH)
Iranian protests: good thing, they could not be worse than the regime.
Egyptian protests: hard to tell, probably a bad thing because of the likelihood that the Muslim Brotherhood will emerge from the mess.
Jordanian protests: bad thing, Abdullah is the most Western-oriented ruler of a major Muslim country. He'd be replaced with Hamas or worse.
And where is Obama? At home, washing his tights.
Posted by: AmishDude at February 01, 2011 07:47 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: B. Hussein Obama at February 01, 2011 07:47 AM (AZGON)
who is blamed for a rise in fuel and food prices
See... ethanol... and no offshore drilling??? I'll take credit for this!
Posted by: Barrak Hussein Obama at February 01, 2011 07:48 AM (AdK6a)
Bullshit. Colonialism offered much of the world access to the most advanced of mankind. It was the peoples in different parts that failed to take advantage of what colonialism made available to them. These places were messes before colonialism (or just primitive places totally removed from modern life or any access to it).
Posted by: iknowtheleft at February 01, 2011 07:49 AM (N49h9)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 01, 2011 07:50 AM (wdPVD)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 01, 2011 07:50 AM (SJ6/3)
Could be. There were also reports that the Army had closed some roads off to prevent people from getting there.
I guess it depends on how you look at it..did it fall short of what organizers called for? Or was it the largest anti-government rally of Mubarak's term?
I could be both.
Posted by: DrewM. at February 01, 2011 07:51 AM (HicGG)
English colonialism maybe. The Belgians, Germans and the French made a hash out of their colonies. The Belgians in the Congo were as bad as the Nazis.
Posted by: toby928™ at February 01, 2011 07:52 AM (GTbGH)
Israelis shocked by Obama’s “betrayal” of Mubarak
I'm shocked that they're shocked. What else is Obama supposed to do? Explain to me what the United States gains by sticking with Mubarak at this point, or what it would even mean to “stick with him” now.
A point to ponder as you watch Netanyahu address the crisis: Some U.S. hawks think that Islamist democracy may be an inevitable stage in the evolution of some Arab countries from dictatorship to something more modern and liberal. Iranians have already learned the hard way what works and what doesnÂ’t. Egypt hasnÂ’t yet, and it may be that the only way to find out is to experience it firsthand.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at February 01, 2011 07:52 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 01, 2011 07:52 AM (SJ6/3)
If you were lucky enough to be a British colony, yea. The others? Not so much...they were more into simply draining wealth than any notions of cultural advancement.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 01, 2011 07:53 AM (wdPVD)
"Poppin' Fresh" over at TepidAir is washing Osama Obama's tights for him.
In a painful, perverse sense, I love watching the squish-cons' knee-jerk reactions to calls for "democracy" from the fellaheen. It's so touching for them, like that weird, ugly, Statue of Liberty-inspired "Goddess of Democracy" that appeared briefly in Tienanmen Square years ago when the Chi9nese were demanding "democracy."
That worked out damn well, didn't it?
Posted by: MrScribbler© at February 01, 2011 07:53 AM (Ulu3i)
'These places were messes before colonialism'
You'll note that my original post made the same point.
The larger point was that, by arbitrarily drawing border lines on the map, colonial powers created the basis for long-standing problems that continue today. It does not excuse the people there themselves for behaving like primitive barbarians rather than solving their problems.
Posted by: phineas gage at February 01, 2011 07:53 AM (c+3Qr)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 01, 2011 07:54 AM (SJ6/3)
Nice, succinct and to the point.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at February 01, 2011 07:54 AM (mHQ7T)
King Abdullah II is the world's only monarch with a walk-on acting part in Star Trek. He married an American, his mom is an American, as far as I'm concerned he's OK in my book. I hope he hangs on.
Posted by: SGT Dan at February 01, 2011 07:55 AM (GgXZc)
Posted by: toby928™ at February 01, 2011 11:52 AM (GTbGH)
Meh. Even those other empires introduced primitive nations to modernity. Africa never lacked its own mass murderers, and tribes in Africa have been happy to hack the shit out of each other at the drop of a hat - though they didn't even have hats before they were colonized.
Colonialism was brutal, but no more brutal for most places than the indigenous populations were to each other, anyway. Colonialism still showed the populations what first-world administrations looked like, introduced much of modern civilization, and governing sturctures that they could copy when colonialism ended.
Posted by: iknowtheleft at February 01, 2011 07:56 AM (N49h9)
Posted by: Moses at February 01, 2011 07:56 AM (xs5wK)
I've been seeing Obama = Carter again.
Obama loses Egypt the way Carter lost Iran.
Obama's anemic economy = Carter's stagflation.
I say BS. Carter is a piker compared to this poisonous marxist.
He is too scary too be called a clown.
He will be remember for (just to name a few):
-Losing the entire Middle East region.
-Turning the US into an economic banana republic if Cap&Trade/Obamacare are realized.
-Rendering us vulnerable ballistic missile threats.
-Drove the stake through NASA's heart (EPA and OSHA will prevent any serious development of private aerospace).
I'm just getting started- but you get the idea.
Posted by: Cluebat from Exodar at February 01, 2011 07:56 AM (JSetw)
The Spaniards brought VD and looted your treasuries.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 01, 2011 07:56 AM (wdPVD)
It's all these people know.
The killings won't end, just a different group will be killed.
Posted by: Dustoff at February 01, 2011 07:57 AM (6rLSO)
The Belgians in the Congo were as bad as the Nazis.
I dunno. If not for the Belgians, Pygmy Stew would still be a staple of the Congolese diet
Posted by: beedubya at February 01, 2011 07:58 AM (AnTyA)
Then they bray on about how staunchly conservative they are in regards to our own politics. HotAir commenters have elevated ass-elbow-hole-in-the-ground confusion to an art, and it's only going to get worse when Poppin Fresh comes right out and endorses T Paw.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at February 01, 2011 07:59 AM (mHQ7T)
Ok folks... history time...
What prompted the French Revolution? Wasn't it food prices?
What prompted Hitlers rise to power? Bank Failures which hit Food prices?
Russian Revolution? Food shortages caused by disruptions from the War...
Food prices have skyrocketed worldwide in the last year, due to poor weather (not global warming), rising fuel prices, and ethanol subsidies...
So... "IF" the historical trend is followed, because no new Government is going to be able to do anything about food prices... their will continue to be problems, and succesive governments, until a Strong Man comes in and restores order through force...
"Those who do not read history, are doomed to repeat it"
Posted by: Romeo13 at February 01, 2011 07:59 AM (AdK6a)
Damn few revolutions turn out as the naive and enthusiastic participants in the masses expect. The American revolution was one of the very few that was even kinda close.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 01, 2011 07:59 AM (wdPVD)
Posted by: ParisParamus at February 01, 2011 08:00 AM (bN5ZU)
The larger point was that, by arbitrarily drawing
border lines on the map, colonial powers created the basis for
long-standing problems that continue today.
Posted by: phineas gage at February 01, 2011 11:53 AM (c+3Qr)
Eh. The same exact thing was done in post-WWI Europe. Many like to blame that for WWII, but it wasn't that. It was the people, not the borders. Europeans had been used to having their borders drawn and redrawn for many other times, as is also true of the rest of the world. The introduction of the nation-state was an advancement that helped stability, which old tribal boundaries never did much to support. I think that is true the world over. If those people didn't appreciate the nation-state concept, then that is because of their problems. Indian and Pakistan (i.e. Hindus and Muslims) would be fighting no matter where the border of Pakistan, India, and the Kashmir region were drawn, or even not drawn.
Posted by: iknowtheleft at February 01, 2011 08:01 AM (N49h9)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 01, 2011 08:02 AM (SJ6/3)
Cluebat from Exodar at February 01, 2011 11:56 AM (JSetw)
Well stated. I would add deliberately causing the collapse of the domestic energy industry, with all the economic repercussions that entails.
And making us the laughingstock of much of the world, wearing the foolscap for communist China.
Posted by: phineas gage at February 01, 2011 08:04 AM (c+3Qr)
It wasn't all rosy. Raising massive armies capable of mass destruction and death in the millions wasn't something possible in diffused tribal structures.
Tribes would never advance enough to construct the modern machinery of death nation states are capable of.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 01, 2011 08:04 AM (wdPVD)
Posted by: ParisParamus at February 01, 2011 12:00 PM
Well, there is a photo of some fellah holding a poster of Hose-knee with a drawn-on bullet hole and Star of David on his forehead.
If the freedom-loving Egyptians aren't blaming the Jooos in general and Israel in particular at this very moment, you can bet they're working up to it....
Posted by: MrScribbler© at February 01, 2011 08:06 AM (Ulu3i)
So we stopped at the Jordan. We fucked up. The biblical land of Israel included land east of the Jordan, so....
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at February 01, 2011 08:06 AM (LH6ir)
I'm in Amman--have been since 2007--and any talk of Jordan "flipping" is, at least for now, wildly exaggerated. And there's no significance to King Abdullah firing the cabinet. He disbanded the entire parliament for two years, and they just had national elections back in November, with pretty much the exact same people being elected again, to pretty much the bored contempt and laughter of the populace. They know that it's the king's show in the end, and that in most things, the king is actually less corrupt than the elected officials, who are largely elected on tribal and family lines. During November's elections, when I asked friends and colleagues who they were voting for, they mostly just laughed in my face.
The "Palestinian" population of Jordan are almost completely meaningless in terms of real social or political power, as almost none of them come from the important tribes or families. They will be the ones doing construction or driving taxis, but the major players, in business at least, will be Jordanian, and quite often, I've found, Jordanian Christians.
And King Abdullah has, in what is one of the worst-kept secrets around, a very close econonic and diplomatic relationship with Israel, and if you ever want to see someone cracking some Palestinian heads, check out the Jordanian police in the West Bank.
Frankly, I think most Jordanians would love to see an attempted Palestinian uprising, so they could get rid of them once and for all. And that's exactly what would happen. Look, Jordanians aren't Westerners, but I've lived in Turkey and in Jordan for nearly 15 years, and if one has to live in this region, Amman is the place. And they are proud of that--of having an active Christian population--I could take you to 7-8 Christian churches any time you want to visit, and I hear the bells of the Greek Orthodox Church every Sunday morning. Christians have Easter off--as Sunday is a workday--by government mandate, while the Moslems do not. And there are a certain number of seats in Parliament reserved for Christians. And most Jordanians have come to terms with their government being a friend to Israel, as part of being a forward-thinking, Western-aspiring country. So my point is that there simply will not be enough popular support to become an Islamic hellhole, and any real attempt, from so-called Palestinians or from an outside group, will be put down pretty hard. That's the only real potential for violence, and that's not something I myself would lose sleep over.
Posted by: MikeinAmman at February 01, 2011 08:08 AM (elcpe)
Posted by: t-bird at February 01, 2011 08:10 AM (FcR7P)
68 That would be correct sir -- it wasn't that long ago that the Palestine (as opposed to just "Palestine") was a large and largely unihabited area made up of a mish mash of peoples of differing tribal/racial/social/religious groups, all of which have very fierce loyalties to themselves and shifting allegiances to each other.
It's pretty mixed up, and an appropriate illustration of the middle eastern situation.
Posted by: unknown jane at February 01, 2011 08:11 AM (5/yRG)
Purp, it wasn't all rosy but the alternative would almost certainly have been worse. Colonial powers -- well, at least the Brits -- left a great deal of infrastructure and other life-enhancements behind when they left. I'm not saying they were 100% benevolent, but imagine what Africa would be like today sans past colonialism.
And don't forget our oil companies ensuring the obscene wealth of a bunch of former camel-drivers in the ME by developing oil wells and attendant facilities that the Arabs could seize....
Posted by: MrScribbler© at February 01, 2011 08:11 AM (Ulu3i)
Wow, the crowds are getting larger, they now have 0.003 percent of the population protesting, demading a new leader and we have Democratic Senators on the tube saying that their people are demanding that he should step down so he has to.
Last time I checked, we have far more than 0.003 percent of our population wanting Obama to step down. Maybe he and his cohorts in D.C. should do the right thing and resign.
Posted by: Doug at February 01, 2011 08:12 AM (gUGI6)
At first I thought you were joking, but now I am not so sure you understand. You do realize that my mother was born in the British Protectorate of Palestine and has a greater right than the current "Palestinians" to call herself a Palestinian?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at February 01, 2011 08:12 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Romeo13 at February 01, 2011 11:59 AM (AdK6a)
I'd like to subscribe to your papyrus scroll.
Posted by: Moses at February 01, 2011 08:13 AM (xs5wK)
Thanks, t-bird. I go through most neighborhoods in Amman in the course of an normal week--working, shopping, and the like--and if I didn't read it in the news, I would have no clue that anything is happening here. It's as quiet and flat-out boring as ever.
Posted by: MikeinAmman at February 01, 2011 08:14 AM (elcpe)
Posted by: MikeinAmman at February 01, 2011 12:08 PM (elcpe)
Thanks to puttin' us to some f'n learnin.
Can you say what you do? Work for Hillary, do ya?
Posted by: beedubya at February 01, 2011 08:14 AM (AnTyA)
Posted by: moki at February 01, 2011 08:15 AM (dZmFh)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at February 01, 2011 08:15 AM (DPM1U)
Tribes would never advance enough to construct the modern machinery of death nation states are capable of.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 01, 2011 12:04 PM (wdPVD)
Human advancement is a drive for more energy. Any energy production is
capable of being used to build or destroy in greater ways. The same way
that millions of deaths weren't possible before, many of the billions
who now exist on Earth wouldn't have been able to be supported, either. Half of the world's population, by my estimate, wouldn't even be able to exist were it not because of the advances of the West and their spread to the rest of the world.
You kinow, China didn't have much of an expansionary motive. It kept to itself for most of its history. Because of that, even though China had many of the most important developments long before anyone else, it wasn't China that brought them to the world, but the Europeans.
The problem is that the West became timid and refused to just smack down nations that used modern advancements in order to destabilize the civilized world - as with the arabs taking over the gulf oil fields (which they never had any use for, themselves, as they have no industry) and using the power and money of the fields to do nothing but cause problems and build sinking skyscrapers in the sand. The second part, at least, didn't threaten anyone.
Posted by: iknowtheleft at February 01, 2011 08:16 AM (N49h9)
The outcome of Colonialism depends on who colonized you--if you were colonized by Britain, you fared pretty well; if you were colonized by France, not so well; if you were colonized by Portugal, you were pretty screwed; if you were colonized by Belgium (more specifically, King Leopold), you were fucked.
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at February 01, 2011 08:18 AM (DPM1U)
And when he was a youth he would visit friends from private school at their Ivy League frats and get hammered with them.
Posted by: Fly On The ΑΔ Wall at February 01, 2011 08:19 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Obamandias at February 01, 2011 08:20 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at February 01, 2011 08:21 AM (yQWNf)
The Spanish weren't slouches at destroying their colonies.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at February 01, 2011 08:21 AM (LH6ir)
beedubya, if I worked for State, I'd never be on a site like this--I'd be a liberal undermining commonsense foreign policy every chance I got, and then crowing about my advanced degrees at dinner parties while my policies destroyed lives all over the world.
Actually, after getting out of the Marines in 1995 and getting my Doctorate, I've been working largely in academics, in a liberal arts field, no less, at different universities in Ankara, Istanbul, and now Amman.
Posted by: MikeinAmman at February 01, 2011 08:21 AM (elcpe)
"It's easy to stoke anti-western sentiment there."
Remember, these are the people who believed that story about Israeli sharks in the Red Sea.
These are also the people who, in the 1960s, kicked out the Jews - a community that, in Alexandria, at least, had been established for millenia.
I don't think it's possible to misunderestimate the potential in a Muslim population for superstition, hysteria, and violence.
Posted by: Brown Line at February 01, 2011 08:23 AM (VrNoa)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at February 01, 2011 12:21 PM (yQWNf)
That was Black September. The Palis then went to Lebanon and caused massive problems there, as they have caused problems everywhere they touch.
Posted by: iknowtheleft at February 01, 2011 08:24 AM (N49h9)
Posted by: Paladin at February 01, 2011 08:24 AM (WujO7)
Posted by: MikeinAmman at February 01, 2011 08:25 AM (elcpe)
The "Palestinians" killed Hussein's grandfather. There is definitely no love lost between the Hashemites and the "Arab interlopers."
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at February 01, 2011 08:25 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at February 01, 2011 12:18 PM (DPM1U)
Mark Steyn has some great points about the lasting (but maybe for not much longer) positive legacy of British colonialism - the US, India, Australia, Canada, some parts of Africa, etc- in this otherwise depressing article
Posted by: beedubya at February 01, 2011 08:27 AM (AnTyA)
He also seems to think that hey, that might not be all bad....
Good ol' TepidAir, finding little chunks of moderate goodness in a flood of steaming, runny shit.
When will he echo President Huey P. Newton Osama Obama and start talking about the "legitimate grievances of the people?"
Posted by: MrScribbler© at February 01, 2011 08:27 AM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 01, 2011 11:56 AM (wdPVD)
I thought it was the other way around. The Spaniards picked up VD from the natives and brought it back to Europe.
Posted by: Vic at February 01, 2011 08:27 AM (M9Ie6)
I think they brought syphilis, in exchange for gonorrhea.
Posted by: toby928™ at February 01, 2011 08:28 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: rockhead at February 01, 2011 08:32 AM (RykTt)
The Pillsbury Doughboy -- and soon-to-be-worker for T-Paw now seems to believe the Muzzie Bros' participation in Egypt's government is now inevitable.
He also seems to think that hey, that might not be all bad....
Admiral Eddie doesn't know anything that the MFM doesn't tell him. At the risk of coming close to violating Godwins Law, Hitler...and especially Mussolini got positive press here.
Frank Gaffney had a good article on the MB at one of Breitbart's sites this morning.
Posted by: beedubya at February 01, 2011 08:32 AM (AnTyA)
Posted by: moki at February 01, 2011 08:33 AM (dZmFh)
Posted by: unknown jane at February 01, 2011 08:33 AM (5/yRG)
In order to stay ahead of the crisis in Egypt, the Obama administration yesterday signaled that it supports the participation of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egyptian politics as long as they renounce violence and commit to democracy.
I support giving your toddlers a venomous cobra for Christmas, as long as it abstains from biting and chooses a vegetarian diet.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at February 01, 2011 08:34 AM (mHQ7T)
Israel in particular would be of no help in pacifying the country for the government. Their army could kick ass and take names, but it then has to go away and go back to work. A long term occupation of a seething populace just isn't what they can do, even ignoring the jew hatred they invoke.
Posted by: Oldcat at February 01, 2011 08:41 AM (z1N6a)
Nice.
Posted by: toby928™ at February 01, 2011 08:42 AM (GTbGH)
I support giving your toddlers a venomous cobra for Christmas, as long as it abstains from biting and chooses a vegetarian diet.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at February 01, 2011 12:34 PM (mHQ7T)
That worked so well with Arafat.
Posted by: Oldcat at February 01, 2011 08:42 AM (z1N6a)
Rep. Ron Paul, R-Lake Jackson, is blaming U.S. policy for the upheaval in Egypt.
"This is a typical example of what happens when we run on intervention-type foreign policies. We get in the middle of these fights. We've been in the middle of this for 30 years now. We've given Mubarak $60 billion. We're responsible for a lot of the mess that is over there," Paul said this afternoon on FOX News Channel's Your World with Neil Cavuto.
Paul, a potential Senate candidate in Texas next year, is a longstanding critic of foreign entanglements, and probably Congress' leading isolationist. His son, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., caused a stir in recent days by advocating for the cutoff of aid to Israel, in the context of a broader push to eliminate all foreign aid. It's a goal he shares with his father.
"I wouldn't just cut off Egyptian aid. I'd cut off all aid to the Middle East and maybe that whole area would be better off for it," the congressman told Fox.
As for concerns that the fundamentalist Muslim Brotherhood, or even Al-Qaeda, would fill the power vacuum if Mubarak is forced out, Paul said the real problem stems from a U.S. habit of propping up authoritarian leaders. Both Mubarak and the deposed Shah of Iran became targets of popular revolt because they were "our puppet government," he said.
"There was a blowback to us and you had an unintended consequence," he said. "Yes, I think we have to worry about the radicals, but we have to understand how they get their motivation."
and then he drank a glass of fluoridated tap water and dissolved before our very eyes....
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at February 01, 2011 08:46 AM (NmKUg)
The outcome of Colonialism depends on who colonized you--if you were colonized by Britain, you fared pretty well; if you were colonized by France, not so well; if you were colonized by Portugal, you were pretty screwed; if you were colonized by Belgium (more specifically, King Leopold), you were fucked.
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at February 01, 2011 12:18 PM (DPM1U)
There are basically two kinds of colonies - exploitation, where the colonialists are looting to go back home, and settlement, where you intend to stay there. Exploitation colonies are pretty bad, pretty much regardless of who sets them up.
Posted by: Oldcat at February 01, 2011 08:47 AM (z1N6a)
Whenever I hear Ron Paul talk, I always think he is only a milisecond away from saying, "And yes, aliens DO walk among us in disguise..."
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at February 01, 2011 08:48 AM (TpXEI)
Posted by: MikeinAmman at February 01, 2011 12:21 PM (elcpe)
heh! Couldn't the same be said about those in academia??
Posted by: beedubya at February 01, 2011 09:09 AM (AnTyA)
136, I WAS WRONG
I half-remembered some shit about he met his wife when he went to college in the States, and I knew his mom wasn't from there. I should have Googled it first.
But the acting credit for Star Trek is legit.
Posted by: SGT Dan at February 01, 2011 09:16 AM (QUuUE)
Posted by: ahem at February 01, 2011 09:27 AM (cnL0B)
Posted by: moki at February 01, 2011 09:38 AM (dZmFh)
Posted by: apodoca at February 01, 2011 09:39 AM (C4Y9x)
Posted by: Adriane at February 01, 2011 09:43 AM (dIik4)
As one of our more renown morons is wont to say, this will only lead to chaos!!!
Posted by: mastour at February 01, 2011 09:48 AM (ml4hB)
Posted by: moki at February 01, 2011 09:49 AM (dZmFh)
Posted by: emdfl at February 02, 2011 05:17 AM (6WZOE)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2774 seconds, 303 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at February 01, 2011 06:56 AM (LH6ir)