February 17, 2011
— Ace Very good point from an Instapundit reader. After quoting a story about the Make Believe Media ready, willing, and eager to undertake its customary duty of talking up the pain of budget cuts while failing to note the just-as-real pain of inevitable fiscal disaster, ...
Reader Dave Gamble notes an inconsistency in terms of how the politico/media establishment deals with the budget crisis — certain to come — versus global warming — a possibility: “Somehow protecting future generations from possibly having to endure the hardship of an extra tenth of a degree over the next century is a high moral calling, while fighting against the certainty of mortgaging their financial future with trillions in government debt is the work of the devil. Odd."
Yes, it is odd -- the science is settled but it appears the unavoidable and simple arithmetic is infinitely mutable and open to question.
Why are those who claim that math has suddenly stopped functioning in 2010 not deemed to be "anti-math"? (Or just anti-science, as math is the handmaiden of the sciences.) Why are those who deny fiscal reality not termed Financial Catastrophe Denialists, on par with Holocaust Denialists?
I mean, unlike the Holocaust, math is real.
No but seriously, isn't it pretty obvious which defects of thinking the media is God-sworn to combat? I just watched a Sunday talk show in which the host -- David Gregory, I think -- would not stop asking Boehner to swear to a fact about which he knows nothing (Obama's citizenship). Even after Boehner said "I believe he's a citizen." That wasn't enough for Gregory; he demanded that Boehner swear to facts he knows nothing about.
Over at Hot Air, Stephanopolous similarly demanded that Bachmann swear that Obama is a Christian and a citizen.
One may feel that these subjects are beyond dispute and therefore it's fair game to ask public officials to deny or affirm them. But when did the media ever ask Democrats to explicitly deny Trutherism? Or to demand they stop calling Bush a war criminal, as he's, you know, provably not, the way they continue demanding that Republicans swear Bam-Bam is not a socialist (which is actually is)?
(By the way, Bill Maher, a lefty in good standing, just proclaimed Obama was lying about being a Christian, calling him a secularist and agnostic who just pretends to be a Christian for political reasons. I agree. But I'd be badgered about this by Stephanopolous, whereas Bill Maher would just be asked to list the ways in which Tea Partiers are Nazis.)
So here we have a genuine, provable calamity on the horizon (and by "horizon," I mean 3-5 years), and the media fails to take to task those who deny we have a serious problem, permitting them to speak in gibberish and evasions rather than commit to staving off financial Armageddon.
NBC has a Green Week. Think they'll start a Solvency Week? To similarly raise awareness?
Don't count on it. While the media is eager to expose what it believes is erroneous thinking that hurts the liberal cause, they have no desire at all to cure erroneous thinking that helps the liberal cause.
Even if it destroys the country. And not in goddamned 2115 but in 2015.
Posted by: Ace at
09:16 AM
| Comments (107)
Post contains 555 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: Taking It Back at February 17, 2011 09:20 AM (HqFeB)
Posted by: Typical Leftard talking point at February 17, 2011 09:21 AM (FIDMq)
O is trying to do and end run around that question, because valuable electoral college votes are at stake.
Posted by: Taking It Back at February 17, 2011 09:23 AM (HqFeB)
Posted by: IreneFingIrene at February 17, 2011 09:23 AM (JKe0g)
Posted by: CAC at February 17, 2011 09:23 AM (lV4Fs)
Posted by: AmishDude at February 17, 2011 09:23 AM (BvBKY)
Posted by: maddogg at February 17, 2011 09:25 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: AndrewsDad at February 17, 2011 09:25 AM (C2//T)
The media has always been biased and unprofessional in its presentation of news. The difference between today and the past is that today, people who care to find out the truth are no longer forced to seek it from a monopoly of TV networks, newpaper and magazine publishers.
It seems that the loss of the monopoly has driven the journalism elites to conclude that the solution is to double down on the stupid. As if becoming more shrill and obviously biased is going to restore their dominance.
And as a result, they're all headed for bankruptcy.
Posted by: Cicero at February 17, 2011 09:25 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Dr Spank at February 17, 2011 09:25 AM (t60fX)
Posted by: JackStraw at February 17, 2011 09:25 AM (TMB3S)
Posted by: Hous Bin Pharteen at February 17, 2011 09:26 AM (nRF6+)
Posted by: AndrewsDad at February 17, 2011 01:25 PM (C2//T)
I prefer "goddess" but I have a vested interest so won't quibble.
Posted by: AmishDude at February 17, 2011 09:27 AM (BvBKY)
Wow...no dems showed up in the WI state senate...so no vote can take place
The gov has the cops looking for them
Posted by: beedubya at February 17, 2011 09:27 AM (AnTyA)
There's another problem too. The problem is specific to the knucklehead worldview. For the knucklehead, in a time of recession defined by shrinking private investment and rising unemployment, the best way to solve the problem is to increase the problem: contract government revenues and spending at a time when the government is the only resource for economic stimulus. Doing so is suicidally stupid. But knuckleheads are stupid.
One thing to admire about the United States capitalist class is that they are absolutely masters at convincing the middle class and working poor that they should suffer the aims of austerity, while the rich sacrifice nothing, ever. I know because fuck the rich, even though 50% of the public pays NOTHING in taxes but hey...facts don't matter.
Knuckleheads hate themselves.
Posted by: some holocaust denying liberal who shits bubblegum and farts kisses at February 17, 2011 09:27 AM (LhS5j)
Posted by: AmishDude at February 17, 2011 09:27 AM (BvBKY)
Posted by: IreneFingIrene at February 17, 2011 01:23 PM (JKe0g)
Not at the affirmative action law school he attended...Where's the Columbia and Occidental transcripts Barry?
Posted by: Hedgehog at February 17, 2011 09:28 AM (Rn2kl)
Posted by: CAC at February 17, 2011 09:28 AM (lV4Fs)
Posted by: AmishDude at February 17, 2011 09:29 AM (BvBKY)
Posted by: Luca Brasi at February 17, 2011 09:29 AM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: toby928™ at February 17, 2011 09:29 AM (GTbGH)
I don't think that the 'political class' believes that there is really an immidiate crisis. Japan has trudged along like a zombie for decades with little to no growth, debt over 200% of GDP, and even more severe demographic problems.
Posted by: Paper at February 17, 2011 09:30 AM (VoSja)
Posted by: nickless at February 17, 2011 09:30 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: IreneFingIrene at February 17, 2011 01:23 PM (JKe0g)
I'd like to know what the Indonesian Illiterate is well educated in. In addition to math (as in elementary arithmetic), he doesn't know a damn thing about history, constitutional law, English (he regularly doesn't conjugate verbs correctly) or science.
Posted by: Captain Hate at February 17, 2011 09:31 AM (eh+ki)
I don't think that the 'political class' believes that there is really an immidiate crisis. Japan has trudged along like a zombie for decades with little to no growth, debt over 200% of GDP, and even more severe demographic problems.
Just hold it off for 2 more years...just 2 more years...
Posted by: The MBM at February 17, 2011 09:31 AM (BvBKY)
Posted by: joncelli at February 17, 2011 09:31 AM (RD7QR)
The US government is the bond market. You know who owns most of the government's debt? We do, the American people. Expect inflation to keep ramping up as we but more of our own debt with little growth to show for it.
Posted by: Dr Spank at February 17, 2011 09:31 AM (t60fX)
Posted by: maddogg at February 17, 2011 09:32 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Nighthawk at February 17, 2011 09:32 AM (RSqz2)
Posted by: Chairman LMAO at February 17, 2011 09:33 AM (9eDbm)
Posted by: joncelli at February 17, 2011 09:33 AM (RD7QR)
Quit saying he's unlearned in math.
Everyone knows he was right when he said that by passing Obamacare we'd see our premiums decrease by 3,000%.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at February 17, 2011 09:34 AM (pLTLS)
Answer to all questions about the Blood Libel Media: because they are socialist propagandists.
Next thread.
Posted by: snort! at February 17, 2011 09:34 AM (K/USr)
I'd like to know what the Indonesian Illiterate is well educated in. In addition to math (as in elementary arithmetic), he doesn't know a damn thing about history, constitutional law, English (he regularly doesn't conjugate verbs correctly) or science.
Ask him about Reinhold Niebuhr, man. He knows the shit! And did you check out those trouser creases?
Obama is natural aristocracy.
Posted by: David Brooks at February 17, 2011 09:34 AM (QKKT0)
http://tinyurl.com/4gyp2y7
Posted by: mpfs at February 17, 2011 09:35 AM (iYbLN)
This is why I always laugh when I hear the "reality-based community" canard being thrown out by lefties. In fact, I've found out that many leftists in private will admit that our fiscal house is doomed to collapse; but they view this as a desirable outcome (so long as we're all equally broke, they don't mind).
The grimly hilarious part of it all is that the most obstinate and reality-denying segment of the leftist population are the very people most at risk from collapse: Boomers on the cusp of retirement. These are the 60's hippies and flower-children* who are now desperately trying to ignore the evidence of a conflagration that they themselves had a significant hand in starting.
Leftists, and Democrats more generally, live in a fantasy-land where wealth can simply be brought into being ex nihilo, or appropriated from the producers and creators of the world with no repurcussions. It is magical thinking of the very worst kind, but few leftists seem to be immune from it.
*Yes, I know not all Boomers are hippies and flower-children. Please route all hate-mail to /dev/null.
Posted by: Monty at February 17, 2011 09:36 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: joncelli at February 17, 2011 09:36 AM (RD7QR)
They will be written in Mandarin.
Posted by: toby928™ at February 17, 2011 09:36 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Paper at February 17, 2011 09:36 AM (VoSja)
I am afraid 2015 is optimistic, we are seeing stagflation in todays unemployment and inflation reports. At the same time we are seeing the middle east blow up.
Jimmy Carter II anyone?
Posted by: robtr at February 17, 2011 09:36 AM (hVDig)
Posted by: maddogg at February 17, 2011 09:37 AM (OlN4e)
If they had any grasp of mathematics, they would have had more career choices than Pravda Parrot.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at February 17, 2011 09:38 AM (nAOMZ)
Posted by: Billy Joel, et al. at February 17, 2011 09:38 AM (RD7QR)
I'm wish I was alive in 300 years to read history books about this time period.
300 years after Rome, literacy was a precious luxury. Just sayin'.....
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 17, 2011 09:38 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: Hous Bin Pharteen at February 17, 2011 09:38 AM (nRF6+)
Posted by: Jarod at February 17, 2011 09:39 AM (f4rWB)
They are good at hiding it behind flawed computer models.
/Math, what's that? Oooh, a shiny computer screen!
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 17, 2011 09:39 AM (9hSKh)
You know who owns most of the government's debt? We do, the American people.
Yeah...not so much. And less so as time goes by.
Posted by: Monty at February 17, 2011 09:39 AM (4Pleu)
It will be successful in this country because they are God and their Communist efforts will be "all smart" and "all powerful" and a new utopia will blossom forth and all will be lollipops and skittles.
This despite every State in the union that has a major socialist/communist bent to it is failing miserably. The heavier the city or State is invested in communism, the bigger the failure.
I think they are insane. Their disillusions have finally wiped their brains such that they can not determine the difference between fairy tales and reality.
Posted by: Vic at February 17, 2011 09:40 AM (M9Ie6)
The grimly hilarious part of it all is that the most obstinate and reality-denying segment of the leftist population are the very people most at risk from collapse: Boomers on the cusp of retirement. These are the 60's hippies and flower-children* who are now desperately trying to ignore the evidence of a conflagration that they themselves had a significant hand in starting.
Consider simply: inflation. Those of us who are working won't be hit too much by inflation, but if you're living off of some sort of retirement account or even a pension, guess what? Even the Social Security index for inflation, if it remains, will be a fraction of real inflation.
And even if you think you'll escape all that, there'll be bracket creep, not to mention that Bill Clinton raised taxes on Social Security.
Posted by: AmishDude at February 17, 2011 09:40 AM (BvBKY)
300 years after Rome, literacy was a precious luxury. Just sayin'.....
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 17, 2011 01:38 PM (B+qrE)
So, why don't we ever get any credit? Rampaging Germans? Pfffttt...
Posted by: Byzantium at February 17, 2011 09:40 AM (7BU4a)
Posted by: Algore at February 17, 2011 09:41 AM (vvAsp)
Posted by: Former smelly hippies, et al. at February 17, 2011 09:41 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Wisconsin High School Economic Teachers at February 17, 2011 09:42 AM (jGXQI)
Well, it took Michael Mann something like a decade to fudge the numbers to give us the Hockeystick of Global Warming Doom so, I'd say, no, math isn't his strong point.
Posted by: 18-1 at February 17, 2011 09:42 AM (7BU4a)
at a time when the government is the only resource for economic stimulus.
Indeed. Now think about that thought just a couple of steps ante and proximo, come on, twizzler brain, you can do it.....
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 17, 2011 09:42 AM (B+qrE)
That 'stimulative' government spending that didn't do shit.
Meanwhile, the government continues to swallow up future growth by spending, spending, spending, and adding all that money (plus interest) to the money pit that's going to swallow us all up.
And this empty-suited imbecile proposes 'high-speed rail' and government-subsidized windmills as the future, rather than just downsizing the outsized government and letting the people who make the real (not the artificial, politicized, wasteful, bureaucratic, and credit-card funded) economy use their resources to actually build something that stands on it's own.
You're the hypocrite, erg.
Posted by: nickless at February 17, 2011 09:42 AM (MMC8r)
Isn't the AMT supposed to catch almost everyone with a job Real Soon Now?
Posted by: HeatherRadish at February 17, 2011 09:43 AM (nAOMZ)
Government canceled war contracts, and its spending fell from $84 billion in 1945 to under $30 billion in 1946. By 1947, the government was paying back its massive wartime debts by running a budget surplus of close to 6 percent of GDP. The military released around 10 million Americans back into civilian life. Most economic controls were lifted, and all were gone less than a year after V-J Day. In short, the economy underwent what the historian Jack Stokes Ballard refers to as the "shock of peace." From the economy's perspective, it was the "shock of de-stimulus."
Leo Cherne of the Research Institute of America and Boris Shishkin, an economist for the American Federation of Labor, forecast 19 and 20 million unemployed respectively — rates that would have been in excess of 35 percent!
After the Second World War, unemployment rates, artificially low because of wartime conscription, rose a bit, but remained under 4.5 percent in the first three postwar years — below the long-run average rate of unemployment during the 20th century. Some workers voluntarily withdrew from the labor force, choosing to go to school or return to prewar duties as housewives.
But, more importantly to the purpose here, many who lost government-supported jobs in the military or in munitions plants found employment as civilian industries expanded production — in fact civilian employment grew, on net, by over 4 million between 1945 and 1947 when so many pundits were predicting economic Armageddon.
Household consumption, business investment, and net exports all boomed as government spending receded. The postwar era provides a classic illustration of how government spending "crowds out" private sector spending and how the economy can thrive when the government's shadow is dramatically reduced.
Posted by: Hedgehog at February 17, 2011 09:44 AM (Rn2kl)
I often had liberals tell me they believe that the world will end soon from an unavoidable environmental catastrophe - so they will tell you nothing really matters except the very here and the very now.
Posted by: 18-1 at February 17, 2011 09:45 AM (7BU4a)
Posted by: robtr at February 17, 2011 09:46 AM (hVDig)
Even the Social Security index for inflation, if it remains, will be a fraction of real inflation.
Yep. Consider: the Fed considers inflation "low" now...unless you need to buy food or gas for your car. You can't pump a shitload of funny-money into the economy and not get inflation, especially in a recessionary environment. (If you increase money but not GDP, all you're doing is watering down the currency still further. "Money" is not the same as "wealth".)
Posted by: Monty at February 17, 2011 09:47 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: 18-1 at February 17, 2011 01:45 PM (7BU4a)
If they believe this shit, fine ruin your own PERSONAL finances and leave the public ones to the responsible adults.
Posted by: Hedgehog at February 17, 2011 09:47 AM (Rn2kl)
There was a tremendous pent up demand coming out of the war years. Think about how many people wanted new automobiles.
Posted by: toby928™ at February 17, 2011 09:48 AM (GTbGH)
There was a tremendous pent up demand coming out of the war years.
There was also the fact that the United States was pretty much the only industrial power left standing with an intact physical plant and enough investment capital to provide loans to the rest of the world. By 1970, all those advantages had pretty much disappeared -- which, not coincidentally, is when the "industrial belt" in the US started turning into the "rust belt".
Posted by: Monty at February 17, 2011 09:50 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: toby928™ at February 17, 2011 01:48 PM (GTbGH)
There is also the little talked about fact that collectively we destroyed the industrial output of the rest of the world.
Posted by: robtr at February 17, 2011 09:51 AM (hVDig)
A related story .....
So, we're to believe that Bill Clinton didn't inhale, and Scott Brown didn't swllow?
Posted by: Brian at February 17, 2011 09:51 AM (sYrWB)
If they believe this shit, fine ruin your own PERSONAL finances and leave the public ones to the responsible adults.
Posted by: Hedgehog at February 17, 2011 01:47 PM (Rn2kl)
Well, that's a hallmark of liberalism. Consider that they forced Obamacare on us instead of the Obama Health Group.
Essentially to eat, drink, and be merry they are going to have to take your money...now. But again, since we are all dead in the near term anyway, who cares, right?
Posted by: 18-1 at February 17, 2011 09:52 AM (7BU4a)
So, we're to believe that Bill Clinton didn't inhale, and Scott Brown didn't swllow?
Posted by: Brian at February 17, 2011 01:51 PM (sYrWB)
Dude that joke sucked.
Posted by: Monica Lewinsky at February 17, 2011 09:52 AM (7BU4a)
Fan: Ooh, i just love your work. It's like you can see what's in my heart. How do write about liberals/the MBM so well?
Nicholson: Well, I take a conservative, strip away all logic and reasoning, then think about what they would say or do.
Fan: :sad: frowns
Note that the actual subject he was deriding was, er, different, and is much more apropos this way. In fact, as originally written it made no sense whatsoever. Really. Pinkie swear.
Posted by: GnuBreed at February 17, 2011 09:53 AM (h0RtZ)
Posted by: nickless at February 17, 2011 09:54 AM (MMC8r)
Household consumption, business investment, and net exports all boomed as government spending receded.
Back then, there was a "real" economy in the sense that the housing market and the business environment were not intermixed with government subsidization. Education was (the GI Bill of 1946), but very few were going to college prior to the war.
Until government stops subsidizing industry, edcuation, and the housing market, it doesn't matter how much government spends elsewhere. We're boned.
Posted by: The Q at February 17, 2011 09:56 AM (AXHCj)
It's probably best for the MFM to sit out the economic news regardless. They have no hope of getting it right. They'll just push us into bad decisions.
Of course, I do think that while the over-spending is indeed quite bad we tend to get a little hysterical about it on our side as well. Government spending misallocates resources, and creates inflation when excessive, and that's why it's bad. But people talk about China "calling in their debt" as if it were secured by some kind of collateral. They say the government will run out of money and default. They compare US inflationary forces to those of Weimar Germany and Zimbabwe, which are totally different scenarios. Stuff like that. This creates panic thinking, and is unhealthy.
The US government neither has nor doesn't have money. Money isn't backed by anything. You can't go to the government and ask for anything other than dollars when a T-bill matures. And what happens? Someone goes to a computer and zeros move around, or are created from nothing. Just like when I pay my taxes - the number in my account goes down. Not much else. We're taxed to create/sustain dollar demand, not to directly fund the government. As for Zimbabwe and Germany - they were having to print money to obtain other currency to pay their debts. Germany's WW1 war reparations were payable in gold, and the payment terms impossible, so the German govt had to print more and more money to try to buy more and more gold. Zimbabwe's situation was similar in that their money was backed by dollars. They can't create more dollars and more than Germany could create gold.
Posted by: Reactionary at February 17, 2011 09:59 AM (xUM1Q)
#81.
Exactly. Few people know that the majority of the GI Bill for education went to vocational schools and employer training as well. This fantasy of riches because 70% of the population has a watered down education or social science degree is insane.
Posted by: Paper at February 17, 2011 10:00 AM (VoSja)
There was a tremendous pent up demand coming out of the war years. Think about how many people wanted new automobiles.
Posted by: toby928™ at February 17, 2011 01:48 PM (GTbGH)
Bingo.Because of rationing there was lots of stuff people couldn't buy even though they could afford it. So there was lots of savings as well as pent up consumer demand.
Most people never consider those facts.
Posted by: Ed Anger at February 17, 2011 10:04 AM (7+pP9)
Until government stops subsidizing industry, edcuation, and the housing market, it doesn't matter how much government spends elsewhere. We're boned.
Posted by: The Q at February 17, 2011 01:56 PM (AXHCj)
I agree in many respects with this - especially housing & education, since the government created the bubbles in those two. However, many production industries are subsidized by our foreign competitors' governments. If domestic industry is thrown to the wolves to compete unaided against subsidized enterprises they will go down. Then our enemies corner the market for that product once our domestic means of production is destroyed. Meanwhile US buying power is undermined because productive employment is diminished.
Posted by: Reactionary at February 17, 2011 10:07 AM (xUM1Q)
However, many production industries are subsidized by our foreign competitors' governments. If domestic industry is thrown to the wolves to compete unaided against subsidized enterprises they will go down. Then our enemies corner the market for that product once our domestic means of production is destroyed. Meanwhile US buying power is undermined because productive employment is diminished.
Posted by: Reactionary at February 17, 2011 02:07 PM (xUM1Q)
The way to deal with that is to use tariffs to level the playing field.Posted by: Ed Anger at February 17, 2011 10:15 AM (7+pP9)
GnuBreed: You realize that was Julie Benz he was insulting? Marvin Udall was later found to be drained of all blood.
Posted by: moi at February 17, 2011 10:15 AM (Ez4Ql)
Dude, tongue, cheek....some assembly required.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 17, 2011 01:53 PM (B+qrE)
Take your own advice...
Posted by: Hedgehog at February 17, 2011 10:15 AM (Rn2kl)
Ratings bonanza I say!
Posted by: Hedgehog at February 17, 2011 10:17 AM (Rn2kl)
Posted by: tommylotto at February 17, 2011 10:29 AM (oHIHU)
Posted by: ace at February 17, 2011 10:44 AM (nj1bB)
There is no incosistency in the commnist dominated media. They hate the US, capitalism and success.
New Green = Old Red
Their goal is that everyone freezes to death in the dark so that Mother Earth may be purified. Budgetry insanity and climate insanity are convenient means to this end.
Posted by: Dennis at February 17, 2011 10:51 AM (sb8LP)
Why are those who claim that math has suddenly stopped functioning in 2010 not deemed to be "anti-math"?
If I may ...
There are different kinds of math. There's the math that scientists use, and there's the math that accountants use. Science math is complicated. It has numbers and letters and upper-case Greek letters and lower-case Greek letters and arrows and configurations with dots and rectangles and arrows, and it's all very confusing. This kind of math is best left to the experts, and we're better off just trusting them with it.
Accounting math, however, is very simple. It's just numbers and mostly addition. Because anyone can understand accounting math, anyone can do it. I mean, this is basically a sixth-grade discipline, when you get right down to it. And so what if you do badly at it? You already have a law degree. Besides, this isn't the kind of math that they use to comes up with those tiny iPod things, so it isn't really important anyway. It's better to be creative and express yourself.
Posted by: FireHorse at February 17, 2011 10:58 AM (k3RPu)
Not only is this a joke it's an old, old, hack joke. Comics say this a lot.
My dog wouldn't acknowledge the Holocaust. Then I spilled some spot remover on him. Now he's gone.
Posted by: Steven Wright Copycat Holocaust Comic at February 17, 2011 11:03 AM (k3RPu)
Yeah, these cocksuckers whine and cry and piss all over themselves about spending cuts, but NEVER EVER have a single notion about questioning a gigantic increase in SPENDING.
It is fucking incredible.
Posted by: Rev Dr E Buzz at February 17, 2011 11:08 AM (tcSZb)
People think collapse can't happen.
In 1914 Germany was one of the strongest nations on earth. So strong it attacked both France (knowing that Britain would align with France too) and Russia pretty much simultaneously (and Russia with millions of soldiers on the German border).
About 10 years later the German currency collapsed and inflation was so high (from Defying Hitler, by Sebastian Haffner) that when the middle class got paid, typically once a month then, families bought all their food for the entire month immediately. Why? In a few days that same money wouldn't even buy a day's worth of food.
Go another 10 years and you see what's possible ANYWHERE. The Germans aren't anymore predisposed to facism then Egyptians or Americans. The Germans were strong, but then collapsed. In that wake, is it really odd that a politician might rise with a message centered on identifying the 'other' within? Hell, in the Middle East they have every day shitty conditions but no real movement one way or the other and they gladly blame the Jews. How much easier for a society, once great, to find an 'other' to blame?
Posted by: East Bay Jay at February 17, 2011 11:11 AM (ocHBO)
That should be a "collapsed society, once great".
In the same vein, I wonder how many educated, smart folks that read the paper everyday could get this one right:
In an attempt to determine the present value of future pension obligations that California is currently obligated for, i.e. benefits earned only up to that time, the state contracted with Stanford University to estimate this number. Stanford estimated that this obligation amounted to more than $500 billion.
If California stopped all of it's payments to state workers, state contractors, bond holders - literally a full stop on all payments, but continue to collect taxes - and just put money in the bank to fill this $500 billion 'hole', how long would it take?
a) six days
b) six months
c) six years
d) six decades
e) Palin's an idiot! Rush is mean!
Posted by: East Bay Jay at February 17, 2011 11:22 AM (ocHBO)
And this is exactly why I read about national news from bloggers like you as opposed to the over-produced, under-researched, disingenuously compiled tripe the David Gregory's of America shill. This is not hyperbole. I abandoned the MBM /MFM over a decade ago and only regret that I didn't start the boycott a decade earlier. You morons are infinitely more honest and direct despite your somewhat gamey bouquet and hairy knuckles (or hump).
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at February 17, 2011 11:27 AM (swuwV)
Fiscal Fantasy Island (FFI) is a statist government, where there is very little that the host, Mr. O'Barack cannot provide. Thus worthy visitors have adventures in financial shenanigans that should be impossible, but this government can accommodate them via taxpayer-financed bailouts for any failed private enterprise deemed worthy and to engage anyone they need to fulfill their requests (such as getting Ben Bernanke to print untold gazillions of dollars for their get-rich-at-taxpayers'-expense schemes). A repeated and annoying buzzkill on FFI is Mr. O'Barack's mental midget of an assistant, Joe "Babaloo" Biden, who, upon hearing of incoming fiscal supplicants, runs up to the bell tower to ring the bell and shout "De high-speed trains!, De high-speed trains!"
Posted by: ya2daup at February 17, 2011 12:01 PM (0AClR)
He's probably too weak for that.
Actually that would be a good Moron, Biker Mythbusters test. Would a sufficient vacuum pull the exhausting cylinder up fast enough to spin through the following compression and then fire?
No way I'm Googling "suck start" though.
Posted by: Dave at February 17, 2011 12:03 PM (FbRAx)
Logan was on Charlie Rose, saying it would not be smart for her to return because of the circumstances existing in Egypt, and that unless she had an interview with the President Mubarak, she wouldn't return.
"[Logan] was not in the country for long -- she'd been thrown out, if you remember -- and had just gone back in," one source said. "She had security with her, but it wasn't enough." In Friday's attack, she was separated from her colleagues and attacked for between 20 to 30 minutes, receiving serious injuries.
So who sent her back? She didn't have an interview arranged with anyone, but was covering the mob on the street, the exact thing she had admitted on air was "stupid" for her to be doing again, that she wouldn't do again. So CBS ordered her back on the scene with inadequate security measures.
Posted by: by any other name at February 17, 2011 01:18 PM (H+LJc)
Posted by: Michael Gersh at February 17, 2011 07:58 PM (n1PBa)
Posted by: Spurwing Plover at February 18, 2011 06:57 AM (vA9ld)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2409 seconds, 235 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








The MFM will ask the Dems and their assorted political branches to end such childish, grandstanding behavior on the 12th of Never.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 17, 2011 09:19 AM (9hSKh)