August 04, 2011
— Ace We're still waiting on Obama's 2008 vetting, but do remember they spent all that time vetting a plumber. So.
Politico writes the opposition research is about to drop:
Perry would also have to answer for parts of his record that have either never been fully scrutinized in Texas, or that might be far more problematic before a national audience.Veterans of Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison’s unsuccessful 2010 primary challenge to Perry recalled being stunned at the way attacks bounced off the governor in a strongly conservative state gripped by tea party fever. Multiple former Hutchison advisers recalled asking a focus group about the charge that Perry may have presided over the execution of an innocent man — Cameron Todd Willingham — and got this response from a primary voter: “It takes balls to execute an innocent man.”
I've looked into that, a bit. The man, Williamson, escaped from a burning house, leaving his children inside to die in the fire. His ex-wife claimed he'd done it (though she didn't have any evidence of that). Experts forwarded evidence post-conviction suggesting the evidence of deliberate arson presented at trial was faulty.
But it's not as if there was evidence presented to prove his innocence -- rather that the technical evidence of arson presented was weak.
Having only skimmed the matter, the case bothers me as some Texas executions do -- not enough people on the execution review board are taking their duty to halt improper executions seriously. The mandate they have assumed seems to be expedited executions, not insuring no innocent man is put to death.
Proponents of the death penalty do not seem to comprehend that they are precisely one dead innocent man away from an end to executions. Sometimes I wonder which side of the debate some of us are really playing for.
That said, it's really a case of poking holes in the case presented at trial, rather than proof of innocence. The circumstantial evidence -- a man escaping a fire in his home uninjured, while leaving his children to burn -- is pretty damning.
The Willingham case is just one episode in PerryÂ’s gubernatorial tenure that could be revived against him in the very different context of a national race, potentially compromising him in a general election. The opposition research file on Perry is huge and goes well beyond the best-known Perry controversies.But even the greatest hits reel is bad enough: Perry issued a 2007 executive order mandating the human papillomavirus vaccine for sixth-grade girls, while PerryÂ’s former chief of staff lobbied for Merck, the only provider of the vaccine. He spent hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars on a rental mansion while the governorÂ’s residence underwent repairs. During his administration, the whole board of the state juvenile justice system resigned over allegations of covering up sexual abuse in detention centers. And thatÂ’s before delving into a shaky state budget, which has included to-the-bone cuts in education and other programs suburban swing voters care about.
All that means Perry is hardly the “generic Republican” who President Barack Obama struggles to beat in polls. That’s what concerns Republicans who think nominating him instead of a blander, more stylistically mainstream candidate like Mitt Romney or Tim Pawlenty would be a gift to the incumbent.
So here comes the media assault on Perry. But their first attack seems to be a misfire.
Texas Gov. Rick Perry wages an assault on stateÂ’s university establishment
The print edition of the paper has an even harsher headline:
Gov. Perry wages war on TexasÂ’s ivory tower
War? Assault? Nice headlines, huh? Here are the details of this assault-slash-war -- contained in the article itself.
Are you ready for the horrors contained herein?
[Perry's Higher Education Summit] marked the beginning of an effort — spearheaded by the governor, one of his six-figure campaign donors and a conservative think tank — to re-engineer Texas’s leading public universities to become more like businesses, driven by efficiency and profitability.The initiative stayed pretty much under the radar until last fall, when it became public that Perry’s alma mater, Texas A&M University, had compiled a spreadsheet ranking faculty members according to whether they were earning their keep or costing the school money. The university already had rankled professors with a program that paid bonuses based on anonymous student evaluations.
More recently, Perry has proposed that the state’s top colleges come up with a four-year degree that costs no more than $10,000 — a goal that skeptics say cannot be achieved without sacrificing academic quality and prestige.
As the governor edges toward running for president, with an announcement likely in the next few weeks, his embrace of those ideas — and the furor that has followed — tells much about his populist political impulses.
The rest of the article details further the general outline of this "assault." You will be horrified to learn that an ally of Perry's questioned professors spending more time doing abstract research than teaching students (a criticism, by the way, made all the time by reformers in the university system).
Pretty damning stuff, huh?
Stanley Kurtz of NRO wonders where the WaPo was in 2008, when this headline could have run, but did not:
Obama funded ChicagoÂ’s hard-left
Referring to Obama's membership on the leftwing Annenberg Challenge (I think).
Kurtz goes on to wonder exactly what the WaPo thinks it's accomplished with this piece on Perry, and its risible headline:
[W]hile liberal readers will be horrified, I suspect many Americans will be delighted by Perry’s “war” with the Ivory Tower.
The article itself isn't a bad one. It explains what Perry did, and offers some quotes criticizing him, and a couple defending him.
But look at what they did with the headline.
You know how every political ad features headlines from newspapers attacking a candidate? I think this is the WaPo's deliberate effort to provide Obama with one of those perfect-for-an-advertisement headline.
Even though the main thrust of the actual story is that he wants reform, and he'd like the state university system to provide, as was its original charter, and affordable education for citizens of Texas.
Posted by: Ace at
11:19 AM
| Comments (387)
Post contains 1027 words, total size 7 kb.
And hey, if Perry implodes, there's still always Pawlenty, workin' that McCain '08 primary strategy (from dead in the water to least-worst choice)!
Posted by: Jeff B. at August 04, 2011 10:40 AM (D9z3D)
Posted by: Jeff B. at August 04, 2011 10:40 AM (D9z3D)
Posted by: Long-time Commenter, First-time Reader at August 04, 2011 10:42 AM (Jbj03)
On the execution issue, is it the governors job to review the case before execution?
I don't really know the process. I thought there was a trial, conviction, sentencing, appeals process and then execution.
Where does the governor fit in other than authorizing(or not pardoning) the person who is executed?
Posted by: Ben at August 04, 2011 10:42 AM (wuv1c)
How so? Justice is not perfect, and CANNOT be. And why is the correlary not as accurate? How many murders, rapists, and the like have to be set free on technicalities before it is an indictment on the leniency of the current system?
I've always thought the traditional notion of "guilty beyond a reasonable doubt" was a fair one, but for most crimes* we are far into the realm of ANY doubt being sufficient....
*tax crimes, hate crimes, etc excluded.
Posted by: 18-1 at August 04, 2011 10:48 AM (7BU4a)
I think the state should execute one innocent person a year, sort of like in the Shirley Jackson short story "The Lottery". Keep the proles on their toes, know what I mean?
I'm kidding! Only the political class and punditocracy should be eligible.
Posted by: Sharkman at August 04, 2011 11:22 AM (wMsKw)
It moved.
Posted by: toby928™ at August 04, 2011 11:22 AM (GTbGH)
every word, every image, every rumor, every hint allegation smear..........
Posted by: SantaRosaStan, Urban Proctologist at August 04, 2011 11:23 AM (UqKQV)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 04, 2011 11:23 AM (jx2j9)
Perry issued a 2007 executive order mandating the human papillomavirus vaccine for sixth-grade girls.
How does this bother anyone but the Paulbots?
Posted by: dagny at August 04, 2011 11:24 AM (5NVOF)
Posted by: curiously stupid at August 04, 2011 11:24 AM (oVQFe)
Guess who else was in town that night?
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at August 04, 2011 11:25 AM (agD4m)
Ace, didn't you have an entire thread where we argued about your premise? You should link that in so we don't have to reargue out points.
Posted by: toby928™ at August 04, 2011 11:25 AM (GTbGH)
soon. please. Who is he schtupping at Fox? Or who's schtupping him?
There must be some reasonable explanation for this Turd being there
Posted by: SantaRosaStan, Urban Proctologist at August 04, 2011 11:26 AM (UqKQV)
Posted by: Bob Saget! at August 04, 2011 11:26 AM (F/4zf)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 04, 2011 11:26 AM (jx2j9)
This is always the test of a serious candidate, potential or otherwise. Let's see what they've got--and how he deals with it.
Posted by: F--- Nevada! (I'm AoSHQ's DarkLord©, and I approve this message) at August 04, 2011 11:26 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 04, 2011 11:26 AM (kUaEF)
Posted by: torabora at August 04, 2011 11:27 AM (9wRik)
I resemble that remark.
Posted by: Mike Huckabee at August 04, 2011 11:28 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: izoneguy at August 04, 2011 11:28 AM (i6Neb)
Rick Perry wanted to vaccinate girls against cancer! News at 11!
Let's contrast that against the fact that Texas has been pretty much the only thing keeping our economy afloat since '08.
Spin all you want, MSM, it's not going to stick.
Posted by: Lauren at August 04, 2011 11:28 AM (qgh2P)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 04, 2011 11:29 AM (kUaEF)
Posted by: LGoPs at August 04, 2011 11:29 AM (6e/5m)
Posted by: blaster at August 04, 2011 11:29 AM (l5dj7)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 04, 2011 11:30 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Bob Saget! at August 04, 2011 11:30 AM (F/4zf)
Posted by: Ian S. at August 04, 2011 11:30 AM (tqwMN)
Posted by: Your Inner Voice at August 04, 2011 11:30 AM (yVY3O)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 04, 2011 11:31 AM (kUaEF)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 04, 2011 11:31 AM (7utQ2)
Posted by: torabora at August 04, 2011 11:31 AM (9wRik)
Posted by: Yoda at August 04, 2011 11:32 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Ms Choksondik at August 04, 2011 11:32 AM (sVk8z)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 04, 2011 11:32 AM (kUaEF)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 04, 2011 11:32 AM (7utQ2)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 04, 2011 03:31 PM (kUaEF)
Are we talking about shots, or Lindsey Lohan?
Posted by: SantaRosaStan, tiant detector at August 04, 2011 11:32 AM (UqKQV)
"You tell the rest of the curs I'm coming. And my Immaculate Presidential Hair. And Hell's coming with me boys, Hell is coming with me!!!!"
Posted by: Rick Perry at August 04, 2011 11:33 AM (kaOJx)
Yes, that's exactly what we're saying.
Intentionally dense is no way to go through life, son.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 04, 2011 11:34 AM (7utQ2)
http://tinyurl.com/4ywrp7l
A glimpse of the future that the left is going to F'ing Hate! South Americans have been fighting pure Marxism for most of a century. They got no post soviet "break" either like we thought we took.
Posted by: Shiggz at August 04, 2011 11:34 AM (v8Pb8)
Posted by: Ian S. at August 04, 2011 03:30 PM (tqwMN)
The answer is just make them owe you $10k and you give them a sheepskin. They get to work paying YOUR social security 4 years earlier.easy peasy...lemon squeezy!
Posted by: torabora at August 04, 2011 11:34 AM (9wRik)
Cheez n fuckin crackers
Did McConnell make another shitty deal with Reid over the FAA?
Please don't tell me they agreed to a so-called 'clean' bill.
Posted by: Soothsayer at August 04, 2011 11:34 AM (sqkOB)
No, he's good because he's good. Texas is humming along largely thanks to his efforts. Is he perfect? No, but he is the best candidate we have.
Posted by: Lauren at August 04, 2011 11:35 AM (qgh2P)
How many death-penalty opponents vote Republican?
He could move into a tent on the lawn for the duration of the campaign to kill the rental house issue, if it ever gained any traction.
I agree, his treatment of higher education will cost him all of the professional class votes he would have otherwise received, all three.
How exactly is a pro-abortion left going to attack him on the inoculation thing?
Sex abuse in prison - the duece you say.
He cut the budget too much, well that will cost him some RINO votes. F--- 'em.
Posted by: Jean at August 04, 2011 11:35 AM (7P7Ij)
Posted by: joncelli at August 04, 2011 11:35 AM (RD7QR)
Good evening, ladies and gentlemen.
Texas has created 265,000 jobs in the last two years and has a balanced budget.
Thank you and good night.
Posted by: Rick Perry's Stump Speech at August 04, 2011 11:36 AM (GTbGH)
The execution thing is the most damning, but again, without proof of innocence in the man's behalf, a jury of his peers, who heard all the evidence, convicted him and sentenced him to death.
Nowhere was this man proven innocent and Perry given that proof. The governor isn't a super 13th juror sitting around to give thier opinon after the fact.
Weak.
Posted by: Jollyroger at August 04, 2011 11:36 AM (NCw5u)
Please don't tell me they agreed to a so-called 'clean' bill.
The fate of the Republic depends on Murtha's empty-ass airport and Jay Rockefeller's personal airstrip in Morgantown.
Terrorist.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 04, 2011 11:36 AM (7utQ2)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 04, 2011 11:36 AM (AZGON)
One guess; it ain't Rick Perry and his war on ivory towers.
In fact, the next crisis to hit will be in education and education financing. Perry is probably out front on this.
Posted by: Obama and The Dem's at August 04, 2011 11:36 AM (CHrmZ)
Hmm. Let me make sure I understand...
A Presidential Party nominee who refused, during his time as a Senate Senator, to acknowledge by law the rights of human beings born alive after horrifically botched abortions gets zero mention from the press. But we have a Governor, not even in the Presidential race yet, that signed an executive order (which provided an an opt-out for parents) requiring a certain type of child vaccine. We're to be more outraged by the latter rather than the former? Okay got it.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at August 04, 2011 11:37 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at August 04, 2011 11:37 AM (VidfH)
Posted by: Rick Perry, the awesome One at August 04, 2011 11:37 AM (kaOJx)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 04, 2011 11:37 AM (kUaEF)
Posted by: Bob at August 04, 2011 11:37 AM (CPiDn)
Posted by: Thelma and Louise at August 04, 2011 11:38 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: SantaRosaStan, mobile ( but not Air Cav ) at August 04, 2011 03:36 PM (UqKQV)
We also had Lincoln & Kennedy killed, framed Ted Kennedy, started the black plaque and killed the dinosaurs.
Posted by: The Tea Party at August 04, 2011 11:38 AM (sVk8z)
I must be missing the part where helping girls not get cancer and helping kids get a degree without going into a mountain of debt are bad things.
----------
Worst things, best intentions, yada, yada.
Even the progressives have good intentions when trying to mandate one thing or another to individuals. I mean isn't this Obama's go-to schtick for O-care? His forcing people to buy insurance actually helps all of us in the long run? Just saying...
And I like Perry and will probably vote for him.
Posted by: Rich at August 04, 2011 11:38 AM (wnGI4)
Posted by: Jean at August 04, 2011 11:38 AM (7P7Ij)
Governor Perry convening a panel to suggest modest reforms to make state universities more efficient: Slash and Burn!!!1!!111!!1!
Posted by: logprof, late of al-Reagan Martyrs Brigade at August 04, 2011 11:39 AM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: The Tea Party at August 04, 2011 11:39 AM (sVk8z)
Posted by: joeindc44 at August 04, 2011 11:39 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: Barru O. at August 04, 2011 11:39 AM (kUaEF)
I, too, inherited an economy from George W. Bush.
Texas has created 265,000 jobs in the last two years and has a balanced budget.
Thank you and good night. Posted by: Rick Perry's Stump Speech
---
Minor edit.
Posted by: Retread at August 04, 2011 11:39 AM (BO5ap)
I'd honestly vote for a crab infested pubic hair over the current wrecking ball in the White House, so Perry should bring it. His state is pretty much one of the few, the proud that doesn't suck ass right now. I'd say there's something to that.
Posted by: © Sponge at August 04, 2011 11:39 AM (p/9rC)
My thought at the time was the guilty crowd was more convincing and the innocent crowd were just grasping for something to use against Perry since most seemed more interested in bitching about some panel ruling in the case that they claimed Perry was behind, or something, i can't remember exactly, but it boiled down to a conspiracy by Perry (of course) to frame an innocent man so he could look tough for the hicks. In other words, same old bullshit.
Posted by: booger at August 04, 2011 11:39 AM (9RFH1)
Reverend Wright vs. Perry's Pastor
Perry's job creation vs Obama's
Perry's friends vs Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorn
Can we start the campaign today? It's going to be like a carnival.
Posted by: Obama and The Dem's at August 04, 2011 11:40 AM (CHrmZ)
Posted by: Rick f'n Perry at August 04, 2011 11:40 AM (ENKCw)
Posted by: Wooga at August 04, 2011 11:40 AM (WLirs)
Posted by: The Law of Unintended Consequences at August 04, 2011 11:40 AM (1+CnU)
Oh, I get it: manufacturing a wedge issue to convince social conservatives that 0bama is the cool moderate.
Good luck with that.
Posted by: logprof, al-Reagan Martyrs' Brigade at August 04, 2011 11:41 AM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: CoolCzecj at August 04, 2011 11:41 AM (kUaEF)
I will be an enthusiastic support if Gov. Perry gets in.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 04, 2011 11:41 AM (jx2j9)
I wouldn't have done it, but I at least understand why Perry did it.
Perry's not a perfect candidate, but he is (so far) the best of the bunch.
Most important thing is to get rid of Obama next year.
Posted by: Naqamel at August 04, 2011 11:41 AM (UMwMT)
Nobody is 'attacking' them; the colleges and Us are getting a lotta money
Posted by: SantaRosaStan, mobile ( but not Air Cav ) at August 04, 2011 11:41 AM (UqKQV)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 04, 2011 11:41 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: The Tea Party at August 04, 2011 11:42 AM (sVk8z)
Posted by: Average Voter Fed Up With Crime at August 04, 2011 11:42 AM (Xm1aB)
I'm reluctantly, and conditionally, against the death penalty. However, it's pretty much dead last on my priority list, so it never makes a difference in terms of my vote.
Posted by: Lauren at August 04, 2011 11:42 AM (qgh2P)
Posted by: ace at August 04, 2011 11:42 AM (nj1bB)
"Kay Bailey Hutchison Shocked That Lifetime Strategy of Being a Bitch Doesn't Work"
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 04, 2011 11:42 AM (7utQ2)
O'Reilly is now bashing the Tea Party, and when Ingraham fills in on friday, she's turned strangely to the left as of late. Her behavior during the last debt ceiling crap was bizarre to say the least. Made me sick that I actually bought her book. I guess i should've seen that coming, I mean she lives in D.C., goes out with libs (I cannot understand this, unless she's a professional repuke), and last week was hailing Boehner as a genius who used the Tea Party as a foil or something. I don't get it. oh well
Posted by: Airhead Teleprompter tech at August 04, 2011 11:43 AM (eXQfZ)
(a) Murder trial in Texas.
(b) Man is convicted and sentenced to death.
(c) Appeals
(d) Appeals
(e) Appeals
(f) The defense takes the case to the media who laps it up because there is no opposition.
(g) It goes to the Texas review board.
(h) The governor can stay the execution 60 days and send it back to the review board.
(i) Last minute claims of innocence and new evidence even though we're now over a decade after the original trial.
(j) Execution
(k) Years later, after evidence has blown away and everyone's forgotten about the case, the Left dredges up some picayune problem with the case and trumpets it as the possible execution of an innocent man.
That's what happened here. This guy was executed in 2004, 12 years after his trial. That's right, 2004. The New Yorker expose that re-opened the case happened in 2009. Five years later. Five years. And, of course, it resulted in an "award-winning documentary film."
Of course. Facts, meh, but propaganda films? Well, let's just say that Leni would be very proud.
The Wiki article has an interesting quote:
When asked if he had a final statement, Willingham said: "Yeah. The only statement I want to make is that I am an innocent man convicted of a crime I did not commit. I have been persecuted for 12 years for something I did not do. From God's dust I came and to dust I will return, so the earth shall become my throne. I gotta go, Road Dog. I love you, Gabby."Note: No mention of his three children who died in the fire that he did not set.
He then addressed his ex-wife, Stacy Kuykendall, who was watching about 8 feet away through a window. Willingham said, "I hope you rot in hell, bitch; I hope you fucking rot in hell bitch; You bitch; I hope you fucking rot, cunt. That is it." and then attempted to maneuver his hand, strapped at the wrist to the execution gurney, into an obscene gesture. Kuykendall showed no reaction to the outburst. While she initially believed in her husband's innocence, following the trial she told him she no longer believed him and publicized her change of heart.
Posted by: AmishDude at August 04, 2011 11:43 AM (T0NGe)
We won't hear from the MSM or RINOs that Perry loved NY's gay marriage law or was one of Gore's 1988 campaign managers. Or that Perry stance on illegal immigration pays homage to McCain.
The usual suspects will call him a conservative. A conservative in the Bush mold.
The only thing Perry has going for him is that the Texas Bush faction hates him.
This means he can't be all bad. Just 99% so.
Posted by: Molon Labe at August 04, 2011 11:43 AM (g5MrG)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 04, 2011 11:43 AM (kUaEF)
Posted by: t-bird at August 04, 2011 11:43 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: SantaRosaStan, mobile ( but not Air Cav ) at August 04, 2011 03:36 PM (UqKQV)
We also had Lincoln & Kennedy killed, framed Ted Kennedy, started the black plaque and killed the dinosaurs.
Posted by: The Tea Party at August 04, 2011 03:38 PM (sVk8z)
We should probably dial that stuff back for a few months, huh?
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 04, 2011 11:44 AM (jx2j9)
Posted by: The Tea Party at August 04, 2011 11:44 AM (sVk8z)
Posted by: blaster at August 04, 2011 11:44 AM (l5dj7)
Posted by: polynikes at August 04, 2011 11:44 AM (ufGlD)
Posted by: buzzion at August 04, 2011 11:44 AM (oVQFe)
Posted by: izoneguy at August 04, 2011 11:44 AM (i6Neb)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 04, 2011 11:44 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 04, 2011 11:44 AM (jx2j9)
Posted by: Sybil at August 04, 2011 11:45 AM (pLTLS)
Palin is the only potential candidate we have that has been through the level of vetting thatÂ’s going to happen in this election.
What will come out against Perry (or any other candidate) will cause our side to spend most of the next election cycle denying and correcting the record/perception.
Posted by: jwest at August 04, 2011 11:45 AM (qeYI9)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 04, 2011 11:45 AM (kUaEF)
Do you even read this blog?
Posted by: The Tea Party at August 04, 2011 11:45 AM (GTbGH)
However, the governor appoints all the members of the board.
Yeah, that's what the "innocent" crowd was complaining about, Perry appointed the people on the board, the board declined to hear new evidence, therefore it's all a conspiracy by Perry. I don't know, i'd have to go back and re-read everything which i really don't want to do, i'll just say that the innocent crowd was less than convincing when i was following it at the time.
Posted by: booger at August 04, 2011 11:45 AM (9RFH1)
Verbal: You know a religious guy named John Paul?
Dave Kujan: You know Ruby's in Attica?
Verbal: He didn't have my lawyer.
===
Why dial "that stuff" back, Hussein???
Posted by: SantaRosaStan, mobile ( but not Air Cav ) at August 04, 2011 11:45 AM (UqKQV)
Posted by: Captain Obama, USS Titanic at August 04, 2011 11:46 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 04, 2011 11:46 AM (kUaEF)
They will not do "all they got" until the person in question is the nominee.
Posted by: The Mega Independent at August 04, 2011 11:46 AM (IxDxe)
If this is the worst the media has then Perry should be alright. I seem to recall there being an issue about Bush possibly executing a retarded man too. That didn't exactly pan out.
And as has been pointed out in the comments, while the HPV vaccine thing was stupid, he does have a great one liner retort in ,"Yeah I wanted young girls to get a cancer vaccine, a huge error on my part" It may not be factually accurate but it would work in a debate.
Posted by: Ben at August 04, 2011 11:46 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: izoneguy at August 04, 2011 11:47 AM (i6Neb)
Popcorn futures are going to go through the roof.
Posted by: Hobbitopoly at August 04, 2011 11:47 AM (h1p5V)
Perry believes (correctly, IMHO) that marriages are a STATE, not a FEDERAL issue.
The usual suspects will call him a conservative. A conservative in the Bush mold.
No - I live here in TX. Perry's to the right of both Bushes.
Posted by: Naqamel at August 04, 2011 11:47 AM (UMwMT)
http://tinyurl.com/4ywrp7l
A glimpse of the future that the left is going to F'ing Hate! South Americans have been fighting pure Marxism for most of a century. They got no post soviet "break" either like we thought we took.
Posted by: Shiggz at August 04, 2011 03:34 PM (v8Pb
Experience is something not taught in College!!!
BTW the video is dated 2010 ?
Posted by: Krazy Kat at August 04, 2011 11:47 AM (A23u6)
The Baton Rouge media hates him and has been wishcasting for a long time that someone will beat him or, at the least, that he'll do something that will bar him from being a player in the 2012 national elections. Ain't gonna happen, as he's got approval rates so high and enough of a warchest that no one is willing to challenge him. He's probably going to win 70-30 in October, with the 30 being in the "Anybody But Bobby" camp rather than behind any one candidate.
This kind of stuff is why they've been attempting to hit him on things like funding for education, as Jindal cut spending across the board in the state several times in lieu of raising taxes. This included him telling LSU to make cuts rather than giving in to the incessant whining they do whenever they don't get a huge budget increase.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at August 04, 2011 11:47 AM (JqpkY)
108 We also made Russel Brand a star.
Posted by: Tea party at August 04, 2011 03:44 PM (Nspp5)
But we're working on offing that Lohan chick to atone- give us a few months.
Posted by: The Tea Party at August 04, 2011 11:47 AM (sVk8z)
Proponents of the death penalty bloggers do not seem to comprehend that they are precisely one dead innocent man three corrupt governors and counting away from an end to executions. Sometimes I wonder which side of the debate some of us are really playing for
All ya need are liars in government who can sell out to pressure groups. Ask Richardson in New Mexico, Ryan in Illinois and Corzine in NJ. The only good news is that that bastard Ryan still went to jail for his corruption.
Posted by: MFM at the drawing board at August 04, 2011 11:47 AM (6rX0K)
Why can't I get the skinny on this guy?
Posted by: nonpartisan voter just looking for work at August 04, 2011 11:47 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: independent voters at August 04, 2011 11:47 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: izoneguy at August 04, 2011 11:48 AM (i6Neb)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 04, 2011 11:48 AM (kUaEF)
This is all they got .... might as well go with President-Elect Perry.
Ooooooo. Can I help design the seal? I have several ideas.
Posted by: dagny at August 04, 2011 11:48 AM (5NVOF)
Posted by: John Boehner at August 04, 2011 11:48 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Average Voter Fed Up With Crime at August 04, 2011 11:49 AM (Xm1aB)
How many death-penalty opponents vote Republican?
Are we talking in the womb or after they've committed some horrible crime, because it depends.
Posted by: Ben at August 04, 2011 11:49 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 04, 2011 11:49 AM (kUaEF)
Oh you're forgetting about meeeeeeeeeee!!!1!1!!
Posted by: MFM rumors reported as truth that he may be a Friend of Dorothy at August 04, 2011 11:49 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: izoneguy at August 04, 2011 11:49 AM (i6Neb)
Posted by: Retread at August 04, 2011 11:49 AM (BO5ap)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 04, 2011 11:50 AM (kUaEF)
1. Marriage is a state thing. That is his position. And he is right.
2. 1988 Al Gore was not batshit crazy.
3. Exactly what is that stance? Funny, I haven't seen a policy paper.
Weak tea there, bwana.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 04, 2011 11:50 AM (7utQ2)
Posted by: t-bird at August 04, 2011 11:50 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: joncelli at August 04, 2011 11:50 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 04, 2011 03:29 PM (kUaEF) "
They wanted us to give this garbage to our daughter at birth. It only lasts 5-10 years. Chance of side effects, etc. Insanity.
Of course, that doesn't compare with what Obama has done to my children (fiscal child abuse) so I wouldn't lose perspective over this stupid decision of Perry's.
Posted by: Randy M at August 04, 2011 11:50 AM (vI8R6)
So the 10th Amendment stuff only travels so far with Rick.
??? Is there some kind of conflict here?
Posted by: toby928™ at August 04, 2011 11:50 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: dagny at August 04, 2011 11:50 AM (5NVOF)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 04, 2011 11:50 AM (kUaEF)
We won't hear from the MSM or RINOs that Perry loved NY's gay marriage law or was one of Gore's 1988 campaign managers. Or that Perry stance on illegal immigration pays homage to McCain.
--------
No, seriously, the 1988 campaign manager stuff is just a total joke. David Horowitz was a fucking communist for a good portion of his life, and has since become one of the leading intellectuals of the right.
So tired of these idiotic arguments that people who were once liberals can never, ever be true blood conservatives. If that's the case, then we are totally screwed because 90% of the youth is liberal.
Posted by: Rich at August 04, 2011 11:51 AM (wnGI4)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at August 04, 2011 11:51 AM (pLTLS)
Bastards!
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 04, 2011 11:51 AM (jx2j9)
Posted by: President Barak (Dick) Obama at August 04, 2011 11:51 AM (kUaEF)
Perry usually doesn't hold back, so if and when he gets in, it should be interesting.
Posted by: © Sponge at August 04, 2011 11:51 AM (p/9rC)
If the guy came out of a burning house, with clean hands, coifed hair, and clean feet. He was lying. In my case, I learned to do that when I was told by a woman that she was single, but I see the indent or paleness on the ring finger. or the dirt on the shoes when some grifter is saying he needs gas, or that, "I tried to help you but I couldn't get there." after I got my ass kicked, but his hair is untouched.. And then you look them in the eyes, and they tell you without saying a word.
Posted by: Douglas at August 04, 2011 11:51 AM (YKOnu)
That is some funny shit (not the comment -- I didn't read it -- the name!)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 04, 2011 11:51 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Average Voter Fed Up With Crime at August 04, 2011 11:52 AM (Xm1aB)
Any repub in the presidential race is going to get the media fisting (it's not even an anal exam anymore) They figure it worked with Sarah, why not every opponent of the chosen one.
This election will probably be one of the ugliest if not the ugliest in our nation's history. And it's not going to be just the media. The unions, particularly the SEIU have had four years of this regime's blessing to plan the chaos that, they think, it will take to get Dick re-elected.
It really begins in January.
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at August 04, 2011 11:52 AM (0D0gY)
Posted by: Randy M at August 04, 2011 03:50 PM (vI8R6)
You could have opted out of the shots, yes? And unlike Obama, they're gone
Posted by: SantaRosaStan, mobile ( but not Air Cav ) at August 04, 2011 11:52 AM (UqKQV)
Posted by: steevy at August 04, 2011 11:52 AM (Nspp5)
Posted by: SantaRosaStan, mobile ( but not Air Cav ) at August 04, 2011 11:52 AM (UqKQV)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 04, 2011 03:50 PM (kUaEF)
He's still got time!
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 04, 2011 11:52 AM (jx2j9)
Posted by: Sistrum at August 04, 2011 11:52 AM (rltQl)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 04, 2011 11:53 AM (7utQ2)
Posted by: President Pez Dispenser at August 04, 2011 11:53 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 04, 2011 11:53 AM (kUaEF)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at August 04, 2011 11:54 AM (IxDxe)
Posted by: steevy at August 04, 2011 11:54 AM (Nspp5)
Posted by: Vic at August 04, 2011 11:54 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 04, 2011 11:54 AM (kUaEF)
Posted by: t-bird at August 04, 2011 11:55 AM (FcR7P)
Which is a constitutional way to address the issue, no?
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 04, 2011 11:55 AM (7utQ2)
Posted by: weft cut-loop at August 04, 2011 11:55 AM (DEcmU)
Posted by: Concerned Christian Conservative at August 04, 2011 11:55 AM (jkSbV)
Posted by: booger at August 04, 2011 11:55 AM (9RFH1)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 04, 2011 11:55 AM (TMB3S)
I normally eschew CNBC, but I am certainly tuning into Jim Cramer tonight. I want to see that jackass try to spin this crap.
Buy! Buy! Buy!
Posted by: Ben at August 04, 2011 11:56 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Barry XVI at August 04, 2011 11:56 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Dave at August 04, 2011 11:56 AM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: joncelli at August 04, 2011 11:56 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: blaster at August 04, 2011 11:57 AM (l5dj7)
Perry just explicitly state he favors a federal amendment on the marriage and abortion issues.
So the 10th Amendment stuff only travels so far with Rick.
??? Is there some kind of conflict here?
---------------
No, there isn't. It appears a great many people can't square this stance when it isn't that hard to understand.
I'm going to try to help the not-so-bright.
He's a constitutionalist. That means he believes in the constitution..ALL ASPECTS. Which not only includes the 10th ammendment, but the ammendment process.
Therefore, he can easily understand that right now, the 10th ammendment has granted states control of an issue like marraige. Now, just because Rick Perry might not like the idea of legalized gay marraige, he understands that the law forbids him, as President, from doing much of anything about it. That's called believing in the rule of law. Just because you don't like an aspect of the law doesn't mean you can just go around it. That includes the President and the federal government.
However, in this society we do have a way to completely change the law of the land. It's called a consitutional ammendment. And this process would then grant the federal government the power to enforce marriage laws.
So if I'm a constitutionalist running for President that believes gay marraige is some sort of societal problem, I have one solution: ammend the constitution. Otherwise, the 10th ammendment forbids the feds from getting involved. This isn't in anyway, shape, or form contradictory.
Posted by: Rich at August 04, 2011 11:57 AM (wnGI4)
Posted by: nickless at August 04, 2011 03:56 PM (MMC8r)
PE Ratios? We still have those?
Posted by: Obama and The Dem's at August 04, 2011 11:57 AM (CHrmZ)
Not to defend Williamson in other than the general sense, but I missed the part where we adopted the Code Napoleon, pard.
Posted by: Ken at August 04, 2011 11:57 AM (fFh95)
That actually makes me hot.
Posted by: dagny at August 04, 2011 11:57 AM (5NVOF)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 04, 2011 11:57 AM (kUaEF)
Posted by: Oil at August 04, 2011 11:58 AM (BO5ap)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at August 04, 2011 03:51 PM (pLTLS)
If Dick is the nominee, there will be no debates. The DNC knows this guy is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure. There will be a crisis, yeah, that's it, which will prevent the prez tearing himself away from presidentin'.
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at August 04, 2011 11:58 AM (0D0gY)
Posted by: t-bird at August 04, 2011 11:58 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 04, 2011 11:58 AM (kUaEF)
Posted by: The Tea Party at August 04, 2011 11:58 AM (4136b)
Why not? I'm a federalist and yet I like the 2nd Amendment.
Posted by: toby928™ at August 04, 2011 11:59 AM (GTbGH)
The man jogs *packing*.
What more do you need to know?
Posted by: blaster at August 04, 2011 03:57 PM (l5dj7)
Perry is gonna need that skill when he gets to the White House and jogs around DC.
Posted by: Obama and The Dem's at August 04, 2011 11:59 AM (CHrmZ)
Posted by: joncelli at August 04, 2011 03:56 PM (RD7QR)
This is "slow-motion"???
Posted by: robviously at August 04, 2011 11:59 AM (TQbuA)
I caught Cramer for 30 seconds on CNBC today and he was laughing and smiling. My God, the man is vile.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 04, 2011 11:59 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: blaster at August 04, 2011 11:59 AM (l5dj7)
Posted by: Barry The Oconomist at August 04, 2011 11:59 AM (FcR7P)
I've driven through there.
Not that that matters any, but just so all you morons know that's an actual town in Texas.
Posted by: © Sponge at August 04, 2011 12:00 PM (p/9rC)
Yes. You can't claim in one breath that you are a federalist and then in the next say you favor Constitutional amendments on the vary same topics in the next.
He was doing fine with the federalist approach. He should have quit there.
------------
Yes..you can. What the hell? If this is the case than why have an ammendment process at all. After all, the constitution basically covers everything with 10th ammendment. Anything not granted the feds or prohibited to the states is left to the states. Anything. So, no need for any of the voting right's ammendments, shit should be left to the states. Do I have this about right?
They put the ammendment process in the document for a reason. If society as a whole decides to change the basic function of the federal government, it can do so with this process. This normally results in the taking of power from the States and giving it to the feds. Normally.
Posted by: Rich at August 04, 2011 12:00 PM (wnGI4)
Posted by: joncelli at August 04, 2011 12:00 PM (RD7QR)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 04, 2011 12:00 PM (kUaEF)
Posted by: izoneguy at August 04, 2011 12:00 PM (i6Neb)
The f...?
Posted by: The Mega Independent at August 04, 2011 03:54 PM (IxDxe)
Yeah, clean up on aisle 148......stat.
Posted by: Rick f'n Perry at August 04, 2011 12:01 PM (ENKCw)
Posted by: buzzion at August 04, 2011 12:01 PM (oVQFe)
So if I'm a constitutionalist running for President who believes gay marriage is some sort of societal problem, I have one solution: amend the constitution. Otherwise, the 10th ammendment forbids the feds from getting involved. This isn't, in any way, shape, or form, contradictory.
*Ding ding ding*
You win the cookie.
However no one gets this and hence we have federally mandated abortion "freedom".
Posted by: dagny at August 04, 2011 12:01 PM (5NVOF)
Posted by: Chris Matthews at August 04, 2011 12:01 PM (kUaEF)
Dow closes -515
Good news! The Washington establishment managed to cut something during this Congress after all.
Posted by: Blue Hen at August 04, 2011 12:01 PM (326rv)
Posted by: izoneguy at August 04, 2011 12:02 PM (i6Neb)
Not that that matters any, but just so all you morons know that's an actual town
Posted by: © Sponge at August 04, 2011 04:00 PM (p/9rC)
Ahem
Posted by: Truth or Consequences, N.M. at August 04, 2011 12:02 PM (UqKQV)
Posted by: blaster at August 04, 2011 12:02 PM (l5dj7)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 04, 2011 12:02 PM (7utQ2)
Posted by: izoneguy at August 04, 2011 04:00 PM (i6Neb)
Yes, shitface, I do.
Posted by: The Mega Independent at August 04, 2011 12:02 PM (IxDxe)
Posted by: izoneguy at August 04, 2011 12:02 PM (i6Neb)
Runs on European banks, margin calls, and crappy fundamentals.
That will do it.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 04, 2011 12:03 PM (7utQ2)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 04, 2011 12:03 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at August 04, 2011 12:03 PM (SB0V2)
Posted by: Chris Matthews at August 04, 2011 12:03 PM (kUaEF)
Posted by: Mature politicians wielding the levers of power at August 04, 2011 12:03 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: Russell 2K at August 04, 2011 12:03 PM (BO5ap)
Posted by: blaster at August 04, 2011 12:04 PM (l5dj7)
Posted by: © Sponge at August 04, 2011 04:00 PM (p/9rC)
Ahem
Posted by: Truth or Consequences, N.M
Hi folks!
Posted by: Floyd's Knob IN at August 04, 2011 12:04 PM (326rv)
Posted by: Dave at August 04, 2011 12:04 PM (Xm1aB)
Actually, all of us have a problem with it. We frown on neo-nazi cocksuckers joining our little block party. There are plenty of places you can go to satisfy your cravings.
Just don't do it here.
Leave.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 04, 2011 12:04 PM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Chris Matthews at August 04, 2011 12:05 PM (kUaEF)
Posted by: Donna at August 04, 2011 12:05 PM (OVCfn)
You win the cookie.
However no one gets this and hence we have federally mandated abortion "freedom".
--------
Correct. State issue that was taken away from the states w/o an ammendment. That's the wrong way to go about it.
The right way would have been for the pro-choice crowd to push an ammendment, otherwise the 10th ammendment supercedes any of their wishes. Or it should have been anyway...until the USSC stuck it's nose where it didn't belong.
Posted by: Rich at August 04, 2011 12:05 PM (wnGI4)
Posted by: eleven at August 04, 2011 12:05 PM (7DB+a)
My stop loss triggers went off a week ago. I am kinda happy I only lost about 20%, hellova thing to be happy about.
Posted by: robtr at August 04, 2011 12:06 PM (MtwBb)
Boy, that town sounds like it could sure use a good polish!
Posted by: Chris Matthews
We put the bypass in for a reason. Use that.
Posted by: Floyd's Knob IN at August 04, 2011 12:06 PM (326rv)
I had a great shoulder holster for my 1911 that kept it nice and snug, even when I was jogging. Made by Uncle Mike's I think.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 04, 2011 12:06 PM (LH6ir)
So today, on his birthday, it goes down 500.
Karma for a Jug-Eared Fuck.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at August 04, 2011 12:06 PM (D4RBs)
Posted by: Rick Perry at August 04, 2011 12:06 PM (kaOJx)
Posted by: buzzion at August 04, 2011 12:07 PM (oVQFe)
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at August 04, 2011 12:07 PM (0D0gY)
WooooooooooooooHooooooooooooooo...DOW only down 512 points........... Yea Baby, Recovery Summer...Barack Hussien Obamaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa !!!
Posted by: The Little Rascal at August 04, 2011 12:07 PM (48wze)
Posted by: © Sponge at August 04, 2011 04:00 PM (p/9rC)
Ahem
Posted by: Truth or Consequences, N.M
Hi folks!
Posted by: Floyd's Knob IN at August 04, 2011 04:04 PM (326rv)
Greetings!
Posted by: Climax, GA at August 04, 2011 12:07 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: t-bird at August 04, 2011 12:07 PM (FcR7P)
Posted by: blaster at August 04, 2011 03:57 PM (l5dj7)
The caliber. Posted by: buzzion
Here you go:
http://tinyurl.com/3wankvu
Posted by: Retread at August 04, 2011 12:07 PM (BO5ap)
You could have opted out of the shots, yes? And unlike Obama, they're gone
Posted by: SantaRosaStan, mobile ( but not Air Cav ) at August 04, 2011 03:52 PM (UqKQV)
I'm not in Texas. I'm suspicious of the vacine and that a short term STD prevention shot would be presented to infants.
But my point is that while, yes, I think mandating this is a small knock against Perry it is insignificant in comparison to Obama.
Posted by: Randy M at August 04, 2011 12:07 PM (vI8R6)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 04, 2011 12:08 PM (jx2j9)
He was doing fine with the federalist approach. He should have quit there.
The problem with the federalist approach is the equal protection clause- at some point SCOTUS is going to have to decide whether a gay marriage granted by one state has to be recognized by the others.
Honestly, I'd have a tough time trying to come up with a rationale how a non-gay marriage state could constitutionally refuse to acknowledge a legally performed and sanctioned marriage issued by another state.
One could still maintain his federalist cred by passing an amendment that didn't ban gay marriage outright, but also allows individual states the right not to acknowledge them as legit.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at August 04, 2011 12:08 PM (SY2Kh)
Not to defend Williamson in other than the general sense, but I missed the part where we adopted the Code Napoleon, pard.
Ken my lad, once the jury says "guilty" the burden of proof shifts to the defendant. At that point yes, he is required to prove his innocence.
Posted by: real joe at August 04, 2011 12:08 PM (lE2EP)
Thanks for that confirmation that the financial genius sector of the economy is alive and stupid.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 04, 2011 12:08 PM (7utQ2)
Posted by: S&P
Gawddamn, I hate when it appears that the zerohedge loons may actually be right. Large numbers, coincidences everywhere, but bang on the nose of a support line?
Posted by: weft cut-loop at August 04, 2011 12:08 PM (DEcmU)
Not the same thing. When asked, Perry said he absolutely supported NY's gay marriage bill because it was a state issue and should be decided by each state individually. He then turned right around and said that he favored federal amendments to ban gay marriage and abortion because, well presumably because he was against both or they were no longer state level issues.
Holy Shit, what about the consitition do you not get? You can be in favor of states rights as defined in the constitution and STILL BE FOR AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION. That's how it works.
The constitution is a Negative document----it says what the feds cannot do and how everything else is reserved to the states. If the people find that in a particular issue that this does not work they amend the constitution which requires the partisipation of the states or an overwhelming majority in congress, et al.
There is no conflict here.
Posted by: dagny at August 04, 2011 12:09 PM (5NVOF)
Ohhhhhh, Magic Bus!
Posted by: Jay the Carney barker at August 04, 2011 12:09 PM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: Debbie Wasserman-Schultz at August 04, 2011 12:09 PM (kUaEF)
There is some serious, weapons-grade stupid there. "Best president evah!!1111!"
Posted by: Jane D'oh at August 04, 2011 12:09 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: Intercourse, PA
Ever since your golf course closed you have been nothing but pushy and demanding.......No foreplay.
Posted by: Floyd's Knob IN at August 04, 2011 12:09 PM (326rv)
Who are you calling inconsequential?
Posted by: Blue BAll, PA at August 04, 2011 12:09 PM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Dave at August 04, 2011 12:10 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: blaster at August 04, 2011 03:57 PM (l5dj7)
The caliber. Posted by: buzzion
Here you go:
http://tinyurl.com/3wankvu
Posted by: Retread at August 04, 2011 04:07 PM (BO5ap)
I've got a Taurus - virtually identical. Less scratch too.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 04, 2011 12:10 PM (jx2j9)
Posted by: LaTonya Pullerstein at August 04, 2011 12:10 PM (48wze)
Obama Attended Anti-Semitic Church for 20 Years.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at August 04, 2011 12:10 PM (4QeK8)
Oh, wait... that was my cooter...
Posted by: Debbie Wasserman
Just what we needed; economic prolapse pron
Posted by: Floyd's Knob IN at August 04, 2011 12:10 PM (326rv)
Honestly, I'd have a tough time trying to come up with a rationale how a non-gay marriage state could constitutionally refuse to acknowledge a legally performed and sanctioned marriage issued by another state.
One could still maintain his federalist cred by passing an amendment that didn't ban gay marriage outright, but also allows individual states the right not to acknowledge them as legit.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at August 04, 2011 04:08 PM (SY2Kh)
Thats the problem. Now you have a state like Massachusetts telling a state like Texas what marriage is. I think the best compromise would be for the states to recognize the contractual aspect of marriage only (a quasi civil union) which is the only part of marriage the state can grant.
Posted by: Jollyroger at August 04, 2011 12:11 PM (NCw5u)
Posted by: King Barry at August 04, 2011 12:11 PM (IxDxe)
Posted by: ButFuk, Africa at August 04, 2011 12:11 PM (kUaEF)
It's fine to say some issues are federal issues and some are state level. It's not so fine to same the same issue is both in the span of a day or two. Some candidates get tagged with the flip flopper or panderer labels when they do that.
----------
No, man, it's called respecting the rule of law. Because of the 10th ammendment it IS a state issue. Now, Ricky Perry can ackownledge that and then say he supports an ammendment so it no longer is a state issue. But when asked about New York, today, he is right in claiming it's a state issue. It is. But an ammendment would change that and would be the correct way to go about changing it, as opposed to the feds just mandating in places they don't have the power to mandate.
And I'm not actually saying I support a marriage ammendment. I just do not see the conflict here.
Posted by: Rich at August 04, 2011 12:11 PM (wnGI4)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff, Jesusland Liberation Army - Political Terror Brigade at August 04, 2011 12:11 PM (lbo6/)
Posted by: Bird-in-Hand, PA at August 04, 2011 12:12 PM (FcR7P)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 04, 2011 12:12 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 04, 2011 12:12 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: David Brooks at August 04, 2011 12:13 PM (v8Pb8)
That's our Sister Town!
Posted by: ButFuk, Africa at August 04, 2011 04:11 PM (kUaEF)
How's the junk-washing lessons going?
Posted by: Jane D'oh at August 04, 2011 12:13 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: buzzion at August 04, 2011 04:07 PM (oVQFe)
Don't drag me into this!
Posted by: Horny Hobo without standards at August 04, 2011 12:13 PM (vI8R6)
Posted by: Dave at August 04, 2011 12:14 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: ButFuk, Africa at August 04, 2011 12:14 PM (kUaEF)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 04, 2011 12:14 PM (AZGON)
NASDAQ is a mug's game. It's lost 40% of it's value every decade or so since it opened in '71. Yeah, the other markets aren't looking so hot but NASDAQ is the place for volatility.
Posted by: weft cut-loop at August 04, 2011 12:17 PM (DEcmU)
The problem with the federalist approach is the equal protection clause- at some point SCOTUS is going to have to decide whether a gay marriage granted by one state has to be recognized by the others.
Honestly, I'd have a tough time trying to come up with a rationale how a non-gay marriage state could constitutionally refuse to acknowledge a legally performed and sanctioned marriage issued by another state.
One could still maintain his federalist cred by passing an amendment that didn't ban gay marriage outright, but also allows individual states the right not to acknowledge them as legit.
-----------
When you move to a new state, do you not have to eventually get a new driver's license that reflects that you ar enow a resident of said state? You can't continue to use your old state's license. Or am I wrong about this? Have lived in one state my whole life.
Anyway, if a state can force you to get a new license upon becoming a resident in their state ( I guess not force you...you can aalways choose to not drive) can they not do the same with marriage licenses if you become residents of a state that doesn't support gay marriage?
Posted by: Rich at August 04, 2011 12:17 PM (wnGI4)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 04, 2011 12:18 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: Dave at August 04, 2011 12:18 PM (Xm1aB)
How about
PERRY ESCALATES AUSTIN ANSCHLUSS
Republican Governor Wages Blitzkrieg against University Reserch, Creates Lebensraum for Conservative Agenda
Posted by: FireHorse at August 04, 2011 12:19 PM (gTGz3)
Posted by: Dave at August 04, 2011 12:20 PM (Xm1aB)
We're still waiting on Obama's 2008 vetting, but do remember they spent all that time vetting a plumber.
That's because Joe (and they went after his name too) was so vital to the political process because he did the job of asking Barry a question that they wouldn't
Posted by: TheQuietMan at August 04, 2011 12:20 PM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Dry Beaver Creek, AZ at August 04, 2011 04:18 PM (UOM4
When I went to College at UofA we called it Laney beaver Creek in honour of a friend's girlfriend who never left home without a tube of KY!
Posted by: Barack Obama at August 04, 2011 12:20 PM (/GX8/)
I take it reading comprehension is not one of your strong suit. It was Perry himself who one day stated that gay marriage was a state issue and then the next said it was a federal issue. Got it? Him, not me.
If you have a problem with that, take it up with him.
--------------
Yea, but this is all how the question is asked. I'm a federalist and an opponent of gay marraige. So, now if someone asks me "do you support gay marriage" and I say no, well then they can take that to mean I'm all for the federal government cracking down on the practice as they see fit. And that wouldn't be the case.
And then if someone asked me if gay marriage is a state issue I would say yes that the fed has no power to enter into, I'd answer yes. Because that is what the law says, today. That does not mean, however, that I wouldn't support the law eventually saying that, via an ammendment. It's just me acknowledging the fact that as of right now, the law says it is a state issue.
Posted by: Rich at August 04, 2011 12:22 PM (wnGI4)
Posted by: Left Hand, WV at August 04, 2011 12:22 PM (UOM48)
The answer probably has to do with the fact that driving is considered a "privilege" as opposed to a right.
----------
Is marriage a right? I mean that seriously.
Posted by: Rich at August 04, 2011 12:23 PM (wnGI4)
Who are you calling inconsequential?
Posted by: Blue BAll, PA at August 04, 2011 04:09 PM (LH6ir)
Really subtle, guys...
Posted by: Bird-in-Hand, PA at August 04, 2011 04:12 PM (FcR7P)
That's funny because I know where all of those places are, and they're all a short drive from each other.
Posted by: AmishDude at August 04, 2011 12:23 PM (T0NGe)
I have moved all over the country many times. EVERY State requires you to get a new driver's license and registration for your car within a certain number of days of moving to the State.
The only exceptions are military (federal law) and temporary workers who are not making the State a permanent resident. (But better be prepared to prove you are temporary)
Posted by: mavericky Mccainite Nutbag at August 04, 2011 12:27 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Dave at August 04, 2011 12:27 PM (Xm1aB)
A state can't ban people with licenses issued by other states from driving in their own state. If you choose to live there they can require you to get an in-state license, but they still acknowledge as valid those issued by other states.
Posted by: Embarrass, MN at August 04, 2011 12:30 PM (SY2Kh)
Honestly, I'd have a tough time trying to come up with a rationale how a non-gay marriage state could constitutionally refuse to acknowledge a legally performed and sanctioned marriage issued by another state.
It's called "choice". If you're galy married in one state and want that to be recognised, then you stay in that state. Simple.
It's one of the beautiful things about federalism. If you hate the societal morals, politics, or taxes in one state, you can pack up and move to a state that better fits your beliefs.
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at August 04, 2011 12:32 PM (0D0gY)
Posted by: jpintx at August 04, 2011 12:33 PM (qiO8E)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 04, 2011 12:35 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: Dave at August 04, 2011 12:36 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: Tightwad, Missouri at August 04, 2011 12:40 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: Humptulips, Washington at August 04, 2011 12:41 PM (pMGkg)
Posted by: The Schwalbe : © at August 04, 2011 12:42 PM (UU0OF)
Posted by: Spunky Puddle, Ohio at August 04, 2011 12:43 PM (pMGkg)
Perry needs to consult with a certain Alaskan about how to handle the upcoming firestorm from the media.
Posted by: irongrampa at August 04, 2011 12:43 PM (ud5dN)
How -- by resigning half way through his first term?
Posted by: Typical troublemaking moron at August 04, 2011 12:44 PM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Liberal, Kansas at August 04, 2011 12:44 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: Dyckesville, Wisconsin at August 04, 2011 12:47 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: Blowing Rock, North Carolina at August 04, 2011 12:50 PM (pMGkg)
Any Republicans that take this crap from Politico seriously should be horse-whipped.
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at August 04, 2011 12:50 PM (1rHeD)
If you have a problem with that, take it up with him.
Posted by: JackStraw at August 04, 2011 04:12 PM (TMB3S)
No. I do get it. You don't. That's not what he said. He said it was a state issue but he was for a federal amendment to combat it. That means he's a constitutionalist. You probably need to go find a high school civics text book and read up on the constitution, federalism, states rights, and amendments to the constitution.
Posted by: dagny at August 04, 2011 12:53 PM (5NVOF)
You know what else that conjures? The mass murderer Charles Whitman sniping from the Library Tower on UT's campus. You think that isn't profound imagery? Or accidental?
Historical incident. Texas. School. Tower. Violence. War. Military. Perry. Otherwise known as word association.
The fact that this story was headlined this way shows only a lack of subtlety in their approach. The MFM is the nation's enemy within regardless of what anyone thinks of Perry... or Palin, Bachmann, T. Paw, or Ron Paul.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at August 04, 2011 12:54 PM (r4t7/)
Posted by: The Poster Formerly Known as Mr. Barky at August 04, 2011 12:54 PM (qwK3S)
Posted by: David Brooks at August 04, 2011 12:58 PM (hbAPu)
The double standard lives. Try googling Ricky Rector.
The execution the left jumped GWB for involved a woman who had found Jesus.
Posted by: The Poster Formerly Known as Mr. Barky at August 04, 2011 01:18 PM (qwK3S)
Posted by: SDN at August 04, 2011 01:27 PM (Oo0v4)
We also had Lincoln & Kennedy killed, framed Ted Kennedy, started the black plaque and killed the dinosaurs.
Posted by: The Tea PartyBut can you keep the metric system out?
Posted by: The StoneCutters at August 04, 2011 01:28 PM (pnDL7)
They will come up with something about any of our candidates. Perry is the 'inflate and invent' mode.
I mean, the state democrat convention coincided with the governor's mansion being burned down, and they criticize Perry for using tax dollars on a different residence? They get to burn his house down and leave the man homeless, or it's an attack on him? Of course he needs an expensive home. It's got to be secure from violent democrats.
If a democrat's governor's mansion burned down, the story would be presented as though the governor was a lion/victim (they manage to make that work somehow).
Meanwhile, Perry just says the word 'jobs'. They are scared to death of this guy.
Posted by: Dustin at August 04, 2011 02:54 PM (519+h)
take it reading comprehension is not one of your strong suit. It was Perry himself who one day stated that gay marriage was a state issue and then the next said it was a federal issue. Got it? Him, not me.
If you have a problem with that, take it up with him.
Posted by: JackStraw at August 04, 2011 04:12 PM (TMB3S)
No. I do get it. You don't. That's not what he said. He said it was a state issue but he was for a federal amendment to combat it. That means he's a constitutionalist. You probably need to go find a high school civics text book and read up on the constitution, federalism, states rights, and amendments to the constitution.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Uum, if Perry said (and meant) it was a states' rights issue, then he can't support a Federal Constitutional amendment that would make it a Federal issue. An amendment to the US Constitution would mean that no state could make its own decision on the issue.
What Perry said doesn't make him a Constitutionalist. It makes him a moron.
Posted by: Jim at August 04, 2011 02:54 PM (YwDKF)
Who are you calling inconsequential?
Posted by: Blue BAll, PA at August 04, 2011 04:09 PM (LH6ir)
Really subtle, guys...
Posted by: Bird-in-Hand, PA at August 04, 2011 04:12 PM (FcR7P)
That's funny because I know where all of those places are, and they're all a short drive from each other.
----------------------------------
Hey, cum see me when you're ready.
Posted by: Climax, Michigan at August 04, 2011 02:56 PM (YwDKF)
If Perry thinks states should set their individual courses on social issues, he shouldn't then say our constitution should set their courses.
I grant it's better for social engineering to come from constitutional amendments than judicial fiat or other overreach, but the ultimate issue is whether Perry wishes to have a truly federalist system that permits different states to do things their own way, or if he doesn't. What results did he have in mind?
I liked his original states-rights answer, but he is being a politician in his latter approach. I am willing to get over it because I want an electable president who can run the government well, but we do need to be wary about this stuff.
I need to see Perry's agenda plainly laid out.
Posted by: Dustin at August 04, 2011 03:07 PM (519+h)
Posted by: Jim at August 04, 2011 06:54 PM (YwDKF)
You're the moron, moron. In order for an amendment to pass, is must be approved by the states. Which, you know, kinda requires the states to make a decision....
Posted by: Pilfy at August 04, 2011 03:26 PM (mbVBF)
Posted by: Cooter at August 04, 2011 04:59 PM (C06Qq)
Posted by: Cooter at August 04, 2011 08:59 PM (C06Qq)"
I know, right?
And for the record, Perry is not talking about getting rid of super awesome prestigious educations. He and his allies on this are recognizing that in the information age it probably should be a lot cheaper to teach willing adults. We can use the internet and classrooms and high standards without needing $100,000.
UT Austin and TAMU would still have prestigious programs. Rice, Baylor, SMU wouldn't even be affected as they are private. He would simply save the financial future of the majority of students, is all.
" In order for an amendment to pass, is must be approved by the states. Which, you know, kinda requires the states to make a decision....
Posted by: Pilfy at August 04, 2011 07:26 PM (mbVBF)"
Bullshit. Sorry. If my state disagrees with a majority if states, it has to abide by the other states. That is the very freaking opposite of federalism and limited government. The constitution should not be used to deal with questions like that. Let the states handle it. Perry said he agreed with that concept. He changed his position to one where the states decide to let the federal government control us? I think that's a waffle for social cons.
Oh well. This is how it works. If I find a better candidate I will vote for him or her instead. Right now I still like Perry.
Posted by: Dustin at August 04, 2011 06:55 PM (519+h)
Reverent Wright Jesus Moses & Buddha vs. Perry's Pastor
Perry's job creation vs Obama's Bush's
Perry's friends vs Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorn Hollywood
FIFY.
Posted by: The Media at August 05, 2011 12:25 AM (ppP4i)
Posted by: Jim at August 04, 2011 06:54 PM (YwDKF)
You're the moron, moron. In order for an amendment to pass, is must be approved by the states. Which, you know, kinda requires the states to make a decision...
--So 75% of the states can tell the other 25% what to do? That's not states' rights for that 25%..
Posted by: Jim at August 05, 2011 06:30 AM (YwDKF)
#159
In other words you can't deny the truth of any of these statements.
Typical communist.
Perry was one of Gore's 1988 campaign managers.
He supports queer marriage.
He spends like a drunken sailor.
He's an amnesty supporter.
He isn't a conservative.
But the joke is someone like you demonstrating exactly how a community organizer operates. Can't refute the truth? Call it a joke.
Something like Obama is a constitution professor-bbaaaaahahahahahhaahahaha
Posted by: Molon Labe at August 05, 2011 08:38 AM (g5MrG)
Wading through all these responses, I have not seen one fact about Cameron Todd Willingham mentioned that showed exactly what kind of guy he was. Willingham had a record and was known as a "bad" boy. Prior to his murder trial, he was arrested for beating his wife so badly that she miscarried.
And let's not forget who jumped on this case with his "free murderers" movement; Barry Scheck, the very man that helped O.J. Simpson walk scott free. Maybe old Barry is trying to rehabilitate his conscience. Willingham went through all the appeals granted him by state law. He lost all of them, another fact never mentioned and not something that Perry would have had any say over. In each appeal, the death penalty was upheld and the SCOTUS refused to hear the case. End of story. A very bad dude was put down like the rabid dog he was.
Now, one other thing: in 1845, when Texas became a state, state land was set aside for education to be sold off for the next two centuries in order to make ALL public education free to the citizens of Texas. Due to mismanagement, the Democrat leadership of the past managed to squander those land sales, and now, due to Democrat leadership of the past, we pay property taxes to fund our schools. Perry is right; professors need to teach, not hide in their offices writing research papers that are never peer reviewed or read by another living soul.
I live in Texas and I am perfectly happy with Perry's leadership. And while there are those who say they will never vote for another Texan, damn good thing the rest of the nation doesn't feel that way about New York, Virigina, or Illinois. But everytime a Perry article appears, the left, along with the Paulbot, come out in full force wielding the sharp knives. Guess they think that will help Ron Paul. It won't.
Posted by: retire05 at August 05, 2011 12:17 PM (hzv+T)
A Texas governor cannot grant clemency for death sentence except upon the recommendation to do so by the state Board of Pardons and Paroles. Without that he can only grant a 30 day clemency. Perry's granted to clemency both times it's been recommended.
Posted by: meandad at August 05, 2011 12:30 PM (WclPy)
If there are executions, occasionally an innocent (of the specified crime) will be executed.
If there are no executions, some psychopaths will kill again, be it another prisoner (who may be innocent), a prison guard, or after release.
Posted by: Bob Redman at August 05, 2011 12:43 PM (tEFOD)
Posted by: Dallas at August 05, 2011 01:23 PM (cELaR)
Posted by: LDRider at August 05, 2011 02:15 PM (Nrogw)
Posted by: LDRider at August 05, 2011 02:21 PM (Nrogw)
Posted by: ford the IINO. Independent in name only at August 05, 2011 06:33 PM (Ki7fm)
Posted by: FRANK at August 05, 2011 08:16 PM (mEZlJ)
Over 1,000 people are migrating to Texas everyday while they move out of CA, IL & all the liberal states.
Rick Perry balances budgets, Obama bankrupts them.
Rick Perry's executive order will go well with women voters, it will go over as compassionate. As will his signing of the Texas Dream Act, which will earn him points with Hispanic Voters. Obama has done nothing for women & Hispanic Voters.
Obama ran a dirty 2008 campaign, Rick Perry simply does not care being seen as running a dirty campaign, charges of racism will not fly, especially after nominating Wallace Jefferson & Eva Guzeman to the Texas Supreme Court.
The job market will be bad, as will the debt & unemployment will be high, all work against Obama in 2012.
Vice President Rubio. Vice President Rubio. Vice President Rubio.
Posted by: Blackrepublican at August 05, 2011 10:22 PM (hhNoo)
Posted by: tpaine at August 29, 2011 02:30 PM (V10eh)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3066 seconds, 515 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Mjim at August 04, 2011 10:37 AM (rN9Na)