February 23, 2011
— Open Blogger Like many an AoSHQ moron, I was dismayed when Gov. Mitch Daniels of Indiana in effect condoned the actions of the Indiana Dems who fled the state rather than vote on right-to-work legislation:
First of all, just to affirm, the activities of today are perfectly legitimate part of the process. Even the smallest minority – and that’s what we’ve heard from the last couple days - has every right to express the strength of its views and I salute those who do.
Seriously? Fleeing to another state to avoid voting on legislation they don't like? That's legitimate, particularly when the Indiana Legislature only has four (4) months to work on legislation?
On the other hand, Avik Roy over at NRO puts forth a spirited defense of Daniels, noting among other things:
Mitch Daniels decertified all public unions, entirely rescinding their collective-bargaining rights, on his first day in office in 2005. . . . In other words, Mitch Daniels has already done more on the issue of public-sector unions than Scott Walker is even attempting. . . .. . . the Democratic minority in the Indiana legislature wields considerable power that Daniels has no choice but to deal with. . . .
. . . the Indiana minority can block all legislation. IndianaÂ’s legislative calendar is only four months long, meaning that other pressing reforms that Daniels campaigned on will wither. . . .
. . . In 2011, Daniels’s rhetoric has been more conciliatory, likely because he knows from his experience in 2005 that he needs seven Democrats in the House to get anything done. Jim Geraghty asks, “If the Indiana House Democrats get what they want through this tactic, what’s to prevent them from using it again and again every time they think they’ll lose on a big issue?” The answer is, they already have, and Republicans can’t do much about it. . . .
It's worth reading the entire thing; Roy's arguments deserve full consideration. But, unless there's something I'm not understanding (always a real possiblity), I come back to this question: if the Democratic minority can block legislation the Indiana House anyway, why did they run away? Why not just stay?
If on the other hand their only option in blocking this legislation is to flee the state of Indiana, then (IMHO) Daniels should very much hold their feet to the fire and make it clear to the citizens of Indiana just who is shirking their individual and collective responsibility.
I appreciate Roy's defense of Daniels, and I could even defend myself Daniels' refusal to send the state police after the missing legislators. But Daniels seems to be remarkably tone-deaf to what's happening in other states and thus undermines those efforts. A wrong choice, in my opinion; your mileage may vary (though knowing the AoS crowd, I doubt it will vary by much). ..fritz..
Posted by: Open Blogger at
07:49 AM
| Comments (99)
Post contains 496 words, total size 3 kb.
No on Mitch Daniels 2012.
Posted by: EC at February 23, 2011 07:52 AM (mAhn3)
Posted by: Mr. Miyagi at February 23, 2011 07:52 AM (NS2Mo)
Optics. They're running away because Wisconsin Dems have run away and it makes them look good to their base to play hardball, even when they don't need to.
Posted by: Caiwyn at February 23, 2011 07:53 AM (ttktr)
Bullshit, The dem speaker of the house was just on tv saying that he knows Daniels caved on the right to work law but now they have 10 other bills they don't like and they will stay out until he caves on those too.
Daniels is a weak fucking squish.
Posted by: robtr at February 23, 2011 07:54 AM (hVDig)
What we are looking for is a leader, and Daniels fell miserably short yesterday. And I say that as someone who planned to support Daniels, until yesterday. There is going to have to be a much better explanation than I've seen so far.
Posted by: pep at February 23, 2011 07:54 AM (GMG6W)
Mitch the chamberlian of our times. Anyone have any faith that Mitch would not call for a truce with china, Russia, muslim brotherhood, islamists. Hell of Sweden attacked us I wouldn't be surprised to see Mitch call for a truce.....
Posted by: unseen at February 23, 2011 07:55 AM (aVGmX)
If we know ONE thing about Republicans, it is:
a) they are not wily
b) they are always one step behind the Democrats
c) lazy
d) all of the above
Posted by: Soothsayer, Republican Whip at February 23, 2011 07:55 AM (uFokq)
Mitch....bold leadership from the rear.....
Posted by: unseen at February 23, 2011 07:56 AM (aVGmX)
Posted by: The United Right To Work States of America at February 23, 2011 07:57 AM (xs5wK)
Posted by: alppuccino at February 23, 2011 07:58 AM (ifexK)
Posted by: Rocks at February 23, 2011 07:58 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: Slublog at February 23, 2011 07:58 AM (0nqdj)
If, however, they believe Daniel's and his jedi thinking are a serious threat to BtotheO in 2012, they'll shred him. In that case we should probably re-examine.
Posted by: The Hammer at February 23, 2011 07:59 AM (dja/g)
799 re Daniels
I admit it, I'm greedy. When I see the kind of actions that Walker or Christie are doing, I get hungry for more. When I see Allen West stare down and put down people I have no respect for, I want more of it. When I see political leaders say what they mean, and mean what they say, dammit I get wood.
I was raised to believe a bunch of stuff, and while I've rejected some of it much has stuck for life. One of those things that stuck is 'your word is your bond'. Maybe that is why I'm so enamored with The Outlaw Josey Wales, my favorite movie. In the meeting between Josey and Ten Bears, the chief says:
"It is a shame that the white man is chiefed by the doubletongues. No signed paper can keep the peace."
I reckon so.
Most politicians would rather lie to you 50 times before breakfast than tell you one thing straight. Our bumbler in chief is a case in point, though Nancy P. never saw two words that she couldn't put together in the wrong order either.
So when I see someone with principle and backbone and sticktoitiveness, I get greedy and want them ALL to be like that. Now here comes Daniels. He's done some good stuff, no denying it. If he was the best I've seen, I'd probably be shouting his praise from the rooftops. But he has a case of politician's disease. It isn't a bad case, and a few injections of Tea Party antibiotics might clear it up, but still he raised doubts yesterday.
I'm resigned to accept that whoever emerges to challenge The Bumbler will be a weak tea brew designed to reach more pragmatic types than myself.
But I sure hope they can at least be a (wo)man of their word.
Unleashing my inner Gordon Gekko, this kind of greed is good.
Posted by: GnuBreed at February 23, 2011 03:55 AM (h0RtZ)
Posted by: GnuBreed at February 23, 2011 08:00 AM (h0RtZ)
hey, Ben, what's with this? All that's missing is a 'meow' at the end. You feel me, brah?
Look, I hate Mike Castle as much as most everyone here, but how can you still like this woman? [Ben]
Posted by: Soothsayer, Republican Whip at February 23, 2011 08:01 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: joe klein at February 23, 2011 08:03 AM (7H/n0)
Posted by: Olliander at February 23, 2011 08:04 AM (6uiF7)
Posted by: JackStraw at February 23, 2011 08:05 AM (TMB3S)
Ok, I accept that rescinding an executive order requires courage in some measure.
WI was the first state in the union to grant collective bargining to state employees in '59.
Rust-belt states have half of their teachers ready to retire in coming decade on defined benefit pensions.
IN has the third least funded pension system in the nation.
If Daniels is leading, he's setting a tepid pace-he'll be gone before this race is run.
Posted by: gary gulrud at February 23, 2011 08:06 AM (/g2vP)
The Reduction of Mitch Daniels.
Daniels is a conservative's conservative
Daniels is a stalwart on fiscal issues.
Daniels is pretty good on some budget and tax issues.
Posted by: Soothsayer, Republican Whip at February 23, 2011 08:08 AM (uFokq)
If Daniels is listened to on this, it will set a precedent that will be used in the future to thwart the will of the majority and of the people. Either side will be able to use this stalling tactic, not as a "perfectly legitimate part of the process," but to interrupt the process. The stalling side will depend on the short memory of the masses and reliable partisan voters to continue them in power.
This tactic needs to be rejected, denounced publicly, and then punished. These flee-baggers are AWOL from the job the voters hired them to do, and like anyone else who abandons their job, they need to be summarily fired and replaced. Declare their offices vacant and call for a special election to replace them.
Posted by: Keith Arnold at February 23, 2011 08:08 AM (Jdtsu)
Posted by: Scott Walker at February 23, 2011 08:09 AM (h0RtZ)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at February 23, 2011 08:09 AM (Cm66w)
hey, Ben, what's with this? All that's missing is a 'meow' at the end. You feel me, brah?
Look, I hate Mike Castle as much as most everyone here, but how can you still like this woman? [Ben]
I was on the O'Donnell side of the argument during the election, but the more I read about this woman the more I can't stand her. Sorry if that bothers you but that how I feel.
Posted by: Ben at February 23, 2011 08:10 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: What Abraham Lincoln didn't say about Ulysses S. Grant at February 23, 2011 08:10 AM (GqM5k)
What I can't fathom is him saying that the Democrats abdicating their responsibility and refusing to actually do their jobs is a legitimate part of the process.
Absolutely ridiculous.
Posted by: hueydiamondpooty at February 23, 2011 08:10 AM (ymBfa)
if they leave they shouldn't get paid....
Posted by: phoenixgirl at February 23, 2011 08:10 AM (Cm66w)
Good point. Also gives more "cover" for Dems in states such as Ohio to flee when this issue inevitably comes up.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 23, 2011 08:10 AM (9hSKh)
I know this blog gets clogged up with "rino vs purity" threads/flame-wars all the time. I get that no one is perfect and Ace's post the other day that having a politician that speaks like Limbaugh at the top of the ticket probably won't happen and that may not be a bad thing.
However, we need more R's who are the thermostat, not the thermometer...and unfortunately, Daniels in this case is neither. He doesn't really even have to lead very much...just hitch a ride on the Walker train.
And, as a side note...The Big Guy from NJ...despite all his fiscal chops, has too many seriously rino positions for me to consider. Coulter really stepped on herself recommending him and someone Mark Levin, who I do find grating at times, called her on it very effectively.
There are about 5 things you cannot be wrong on and still be a conservative...Life, income redistribution, 2nd amendment, amnesty, and defense. Christy fails the test on at least 3 of those...sorry, no sale here. And with his Truce Tour, Daniels is racing down the same road.
Posted by: The Hammer at February 23, 2011 08:13 AM (dja/g)
on topic, yeah the dems in Indiana don't want to deal with 10 other bills either, if the repubs and daniels could just learn the lesson from neville chamberlain. appeasment won't work.
hell, maybe they should just learn from wilt chamberlain and dunk it, hook it or otherwise score.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at February 23, 2011 08:13 AM (xdHzq)
What is it with Republicans named Mitch?!?
btw, the picture of this Mitch at HA looks like Bill Maher's little brother. yikes!
Posted by: snort! at February 23, 2011 08:14 AM (K/USr)
Posted by: CurlyHumphreys at February 23, 2011 08:14 AM (skb7c)
Squish Daniels, this is how you do it.
Walker says doctors giving fake excuses will be investigated and any state employees using them will be fired.
Posted by: robtr at February 23, 2011 08:15 AM (hVDig)
I can't stand the Fantasy Presidential Candidate Leauge threads but I'll say this in defense of Chris Christie: He might be a little left-leaning on some key issues, but he doesn't strike me as a man who makes foolish decisions.
In other words, I'd expect a limit to his left-leaning tendencies, especially if they translated into bad policy.
Posted by: Soothsayer, Republican Whip at February 23, 2011 08:17 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: Laughing in Texas at February 23, 2011 08:17 AM (dL9LY)
Rode forth from Indianapolis.
He was not afraid to die,
Oh brave Mitch Daniels.
He was not at all afraid
To be killed in nasty ways.
Brave, brave, brave, brave Mitch Daniels.
He was not in the least bit scared
To be mashed into a pulp.
Or to have his eyes gouged out,
And his elbows broken.
To have his kneecaps split
And his body burned away,
And his limbs all hacked and mangled
Brave Mitch Daniels.
His head smashed in
And his heart cut out
And his liver removed
And his bowls unplugged
And his nostrils raped
And his bottom burnt off
And his pen--
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at February 23, 2011 08:18 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Ted Kennedy's Gristle Encased Head at February 23, 2011 08:18 AM (+lsX1)
It's really, IMO, that simple. So they try to create ways to divert/distract and be seen as the adult in the room, rather than be too closely tied to the TP.
Posted by: The Hammer at February 23, 2011 08:18 AM (dja/g)
Seriously?? These are public employees - where do corporations enter the picture?
Posted by: sock puppeh at February 23, 2011 08:19 AM (VcPAo)
Posted by: SurferDoc at February 23, 2011 08:20 AM (o3bYL)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at February 23, 2011 08:21 AM (mHQ7T)
You should send Dick 'In My Ass' Durbin a cleaning bill for having to fumigate your inbox. What a load of shit.
Posted by: GnuBreed at February 23, 2011 08:22 AM (h0RtZ)
Posted by: Drider at February 23, 2011 08:22 AM (HaJD9)
Posted by: JackStraw at February 23, 2011 08:25 AM (TMB3S)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at February 23, 2011 08:25 AM (mHQ7T)
They got it by promising to do the big 3 on the Daniels list. They all campaigned for it.. Daniels did radio commercials for EACH of them asking for a majority to get it done.
They get sworn in and immediately forget all the promises and start going down the checklist of conservative dreams. Gay marriage.. ect. (which is redundant since we have had a ban for years)
Meanwhile... we are all pissed off that they arent doing what needs to be done to help our jobs situation.
We already kicked unions out of our public sector.
We arent debating what WI is doing.. we already did it. We are onto job creation and the republicans ..after a mere 40 days.. forgot all about those pesky promises.
Daniels is the best Governor in the country. I personally, dont give a rats ass what the rest of the screwed up states are doing. I want to move Indiana forward with job creation. While everyone else is trying to do what Daniels already did 6 years ago... we have moved on.
Freakin republicans.. their own worst enemy. Had they stuck with the mandate dems would have no voice because of the overwhelming vote of confidence for Daniels and their promises.
Daniels is 110 % right.
I guess he could pick a big public fight with the dems over an issue that is nowhere near a priority in Indiana... and derail his entire last 2 years.
I guess that would make a bunch of you in screwed up states happy. He got to be an ass and get nothing done. Whooppie. What a hero he would be.
Or.. he could be the freakin adult and steer the direction he and his new found majority promised and were elected to do.
Unreal... conservatives eating their own. Wake up. Pay attention to what that man has done here in this state. When you look at his record.. get back to me with a valid excuse for calling him a rino.
Posted by: Timbo at February 23, 2011 08:25 AM (ph9vn)
Daniels Backtracks On Support Of Democrats Walkout
Gov. Mitch Daniels now concedes his supportive remarks of House Democrats' decision this week to walk out on their jobs and flee to the Land of Lincoln in an effort to kill right to work legislation were premature after seeing the full list of demands House Democratic Leader Pat Bauer (D-South Bend) that must be met before his caucus returns to the State House. He now says his words of praise for the move by House Democrats were "careless." Star political columnist Matt Tully tweets this morning:
Gov. Daniels just called. Re: Dem calls to kill other bills, particularly on education: "We're not doing that. Those are my priorities."
Daniels said he was "careless with my words yesterday." When he praised actions by critics he was referring to protesters not House Dems.
advanceindiana
Daniels is also continuing the "I was talking about the protesters" spin, which is simply a lie.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at February 23, 2011 08:27 AM (bOKG+)
Posted by: The United Right To Work States of America at February 23, 2011 08:27 AM (xs5wK)
Posted by: Oschisms at February 23, 2011 08:29 AM (GqM5k)
Posted by: Mitch E. Daniels (the "E" is for an erection lasting more than 4hrs) at February 23, 2011 08:33 AM (pr+up)
Here's the laundry list of the terrorists demands:
Education
HB 1002
Charter School Expansion.
HB 1003
School Vouchers. Allows a family of four making over $80,000 a year to receive taxpayer dollars to send their children to a private school.
HB 1479
Private Takeover of Public Schools. Allows the state of Indiana to take over poorly performing schools and for these schools to be managed by for-profit companies. It removes local decision making in schools.
HB 1584
Public School Waiver of State Laws. Allows school boards to seek waivers of almost any school law or regulation.
Labor
HB 1468
"Right to Work."
HB 1216
Public Works Projects and Common Construction Wage.
HB 1203
Employee Representations. Ends employee rights to join a union by secret ballot and opens employees up to retaliation and firing by an employer who finds out they are trying to use their right to bargain. This is preempted by federal law. Will require the state to use taxpayer dollars to defend this legislation.
HB 1450
Unemployment Insurance.
HB 1585
"Right to Work" for Public Employees. Removes collective bargaining rights at the local level.
HB 1538
Minimum Wages.
HB 1001
Budget Bill.
Advanceindiana
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at February 23, 2011 08:34 AM (bOKG+)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at February 23, 2011 08:35 AM (b6qrg)
Daniels is "very supportive of our position to come in and try to do our work. He was not pleased that the Democrats werenÂ’t here to do their work."
Posted by: Timbo at February 23, 2011 08:36 AM (ph9vn)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at February 23, 2011 12:35 PM (b6qrg)
Yeah.. thats fantastic.. but Indiana already drained that public union swamp in 2005.
Posted by: Timbo at February 23, 2011 08:38 AM (ph9vn)
Posted by: Spike at February 23, 2011 08:39 AM (wtnmC)
Great job republicans.. you retards.
Posted by: Timbo at February 23, 2011 08:40 AM (ph9vn)
Posted by: Spike at February 23, 2011 08:42 AM (wtnmC)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at February 23, 2011 12:21 PM (mHQ7T)
How in the hell did he undermine his party? They undermined him. They only got the majority because MITCH promised if he had a majority he could enact signature legislation. Then 40 days after being sworn in.. they bail on him and start with nonsense that NOBODY in this state ever heard of until now.
Daniels is on RECORD of supporting Scott Walker. See politico from a couple days ago.
Walker has been in office a month and now he is the candidate.. good Lord.. how about prove you can do something before we all start buying a campaign button.
Posted by: Timbo at February 23, 2011 08:44 AM (ph9vn)
Posted by: Spike at February 23, 2011 12:42 PM (wtnmC)
Good fuckin luck passing it now since democrats are now laughing that they convinced republicans Daniels is horrible.
Republicans.. too stupid to see they are their own worst enemy.
Daniels had a clear freakin mandate. A freakin mandate. Republicans blew it because of arrogance. They have acted like children so excited they finally have a majority. They are stupid. They will be voted out by the dems that put them in office to give Daniels his priorities.
And all we will hear is republicans arent serious about jobs.
Posted by: Timbo at February 23, 2011 08:52 AM (ph9vn)
Posted by: bigred HO HO HEY HEY HOW MANY JOBS BARACK KILL TODAY? at February 23, 2011 08:55 AM (cX9pO)
Senate President Pro Tempore David Long, R-Fort Wayne, said that he, House Speaker Brian Bosma, R-Indianapolis, and Gov. Mitch Daniels all agree that the matter instead should be studied by a legislative committee later this year.
Dems 1 - Reps 0
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at February 23, 2011 08:56 AM (bOKG+)
Posted by: Jazz at February 23, 2011 09:01 AM (XNVJP)
Posted by: bigred HO HO HEY HEY HOW MANY JOBS BARACK KILL TODAY? at February 23, 2011 09:02 AM (cX9pO)
"Walker spokesman Cullen Werwie confirmed Walker took the call, which will only heighten widespread suspicions that brothers David and Charles Koch are pulling strings in Wisconsin's battle as part of a conservative agenda to limit the unions' power."
this is bad.
OMG, Rush is talking about it now.
Posted by: curious at February 23, 2011 09:08 AM (p302b)
Didn't see that coming.
Posted by: RarestRX at February 23, 2011 09:09 AM (/eIgc)
As I said on the other Squishy Mitch thread:
Mitch Daniels: Chickenshit Through and Through For You! ™
Now, there's a catchy campaign slogan!
If the mostly stupid a**holes who run the GOP want to do an experiment to see how many conservative voters will pull the level for a 3rd party candidate, just go right and nominate Truce Boy or some other rotting corpse of a RINO just as bad.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at February 23, 2011 09:13 AM (02KaY)
I can not wait for the comment spin, regarding the IN reps folding.
Posted by: Reality at February 23, 2011 09:27 AM (Bs8Te)
Posted by: bigred HO HO HEY HEY HOW MANY JOBS BARACK KILL TODAY? at February 23, 2011 09:27 AM (cX9pO)
Daniels has been a conservative Governor with a good fiscal record and he came out in strong support of Walker from the git go. He never wavered in that support. Sometimes it seems to me that some people on the right, especially pundits would prefer a failure as a Governor with very few accomplishments who jumped on every band wagon that came along to a thoughtful and serious administrator who did just what he said he would do.
I think some people have been unfair to Daniels and much of that has come about because they don't understand the way things work in Indiana.
Posted by: Terrye at February 23, 2011 09:28 AM (bNnwW)
I have travelled thru IN and to the Hoosier state to visit shirt-tail relatives, to vacation at Beverly Shores, on business trips.
What I'd like to know, following six years of the Little General, have they painted the houses yet? Has Gary been bulldozed?
If IN is in such great shape one would expect it to sparkle.
How come we have to wait 'til today to find that Daniels rescinded State employees 'right' to collective bargaining via prior executive order. We see all these fabulous achievements dribbled out, piecemeal, without hard data on the financial result.
Sure seems like spin.
Posted by: gary gulrud at February 23, 2011 09:42 AM (/g2vP)
If on the other hand their only option in blocking this legislation is to flee the state of Indiana, then (IMHO) Daniels should very much hold their feet to the fire and make it clear to the citizens of Indiana just who is shirking their individual and collective responsibility.
I appreciate Roy's defense of Daniels, and I could even defend myself Daniels' refusal to send the state police after the missing legislators. But Daniels seems to be remarkably tone-deaf to what's happening in other states and thus undermines those efforts. A wrong choice, in my opinion; your mileage may vary (though knowing the AoS crowd, I doubt it will vary by much). ..fritz..
They only had until the end of the day for heavens sake. Bringing them back the next day would not have helped and like it or not it is not illegal for them to leave, stupid maybe, but it is not a crime. What was he supposed to do have them shackled? How crazy would that have looked to hoosiers?
Posted by: Terrye at February 23, 2011 09:43 AM (bNnwW)
Posted by: bigred HO HO HEY HEY HOW MANY JOBS BARACK KILL TODAY? at February 23, 2011 09:43 AM (cX9pO)
Sure seems like spin.
Gary, it's hard enough for most people to keep track of their own states, let alone the other 57. A lot of people wonder if Walker will hold strong, but those of us in SE Wis. have seen him in action for a decade and are less worried than someone who just heard of him last week.
Posted by: bigred HO HO HEY HEY HOW MANY JOBS BARACK KILL TODAY? at February 23, 2011 09:53 AM (cX9pO)
Gov. Daniels just called. Re: Dem calls to kill other bills, particularly on education: "We're not doing that. Those are my priorities."
Now, maybe he should have sent the State Troopers after them the night before, or the day they fled.
But he was so sure they'd do the right thing. The question is, will he learn?
And what is he gonna do about it now?
If he wants to demonstrate he has POTUS potential, find a way to crush them. Be unorthodox. Be creative. Be confrontational. Bend rules if neccessary but hit hard with the force to win. And then pass the RTW bill and the other bills too. Show us you can 'get things done'. Not what the democrats want, by surrendering, but what the country needs, by winning.
He tried the modest, polite, well-mannered concillatory approach. He appealed to their better natures.
Be copy now to men of grosser blood and teach them how to war.
Posted by: Entropy at February 23, 2011 10:00 AM (eL+YD)
79. Having lived in SE WI 4 decades, stayed in Harvard IL for my niece's Lake Geneva wedding, etc., I'm relatively well-informed on Midwest economics generally.
IN legislative vagaries aside, these statements of support for Daniels do little to itemize the benefits.
I've had eight with TPaw vs. DFL Senate and House--two publicly funded stadia, Ethanol whore, no show on light rail, pimped public gaming but a fairly adept obstructionist of rabid Dimmis.
Why do we need him in the WH with GOP majorities? We don't.
Why can't Hoosiers be half as candid about their Elitist?
Posted by: gary gulrud at February 23, 2011 10:07 AM (/g2vP)
Miss Marple put some knowledge on the first thread yesterday about this: from what she was saying, it appears as though Daniels may not have been so terribly wrong in his actions and perhaps deserves a bit of leniency on this one.
As for Dick -- well, one of the good things to come about thanks to his endless assholery is that many in his state don't believe a word he says anymore (except for those who still cling to some denial driven wishful thinking that one day Dick will come through for something other than the Machine, and himself). I think he's going to have a hard time getting re-elected (unless you know where comes through for him...).
I"m guessing he's going to use this Madison situation like a cheap prostitute to drum up some support for himself...because goodness knows he's managed to piss just about everyone off, even his base doesn't much care for him anymore.
Posted by: unknown jane at February 23, 2011 10:12 AM (5/yRG)
Hmmm, after thinking about this for a bit -- maybe it is good strategy to allow these Dems to throw a pissy fit and run off, and not be too quick to force them back. Think about it: 1)the longer they pull this shit while the Reps look reasonable the more people are going to get fed up with them, especially with their shenangians while on the lam; 2) look where they are running to. Like I said yesterday: tie these stupid bastiges to the Chicago Machine and it really won't look good -- hell, my state has a bad rep nationwide (if not globally), how do you think it looks to the voters of WI and IN, who know the facts on the ground even better?
And as I stated yesterday: it does not help Quinn out at all (who is in deep shit...and will be in deeper trouble soon given some of the realities he will have to address, and has a bad track record of addressing so far).
Posted by: unknown jane at February 23, 2011 10:28 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: Randall Hoven at February 23, 2011 10:55 AM (goI7h)
I give Mitch Daniels credit for decertifying the public unions and taking away their collective bargaining rights, but isn't it just a temporary measure. He did this by issuing an executive order. The next time a Democrat is elected governor, they will simply rescind that order, and they won't need any help from the legislative branch to restore collective bargaining. But a right-to-work bill, would require the Democrat to take the Senate, House, and Governorship in order to reverse it. I know it would not necessarily affect public unions, but it would be a concrete Rublican victory. Seems to me, Daniels executive order concerning public union bargaining rights was just another one of his famous truces, since it can easily be reversed. Am I missing something?
Posted by: Buckeye Tom at February 23, 2011 11:41 AM (7CdAO)
Posted by: Randall Hoven at February 23, 2011 02:55 PM (goI7h)
No, he did not side with the Democrats for Chrisake, that is just ridiculous. He pointed out the obvious, they could not get the bill passed by the end of the day and after that it was done. This is how it is done in Indiana, it is absolutely false to claim that Daniels sided with the Democrats. And you know what? Back in 2001 the Republicans did the same thing when they were in the minority, they took off for 2 and a half days. If this tactic is going to change, both parties have to be willing to change the rules. And they are not doing that.
Posted by: Terrye at February 23, 2011 01:34 PM (tYKoa)
Gov. Daniels just called. Re: Dem calls to kill other bills, particularly on education: "We're not doing that. Those are my priorities."
Now, maybe he should have sent the State Troopers after them the night before, or the day they fled.
But he was so sure they'd do the right thing. The question is, will he learn?
And what is he gonna do about it now?
So, should the previous Governor have sent the state troopers after the Republicans when they took off in 2001? So, what happens if they don't want to come back...do we put them in shackles...force them to vote at gun point..what if they leave when they get here? The truth is the idea that any Governor is going to send the law {probably part of a union themselves} to drag a bunch of politicians back to the state house strikes me as bizarre, I can just see the Democrats singing We shall Overcome as they are frog marched into the Chamber, just change the rules..make it so that any deliberate attempt to leave as a group just to avoid a quorum..renders the need for a quorum null and void. Say that the people remaining can vote without them.
Posted by: Terrye at February 23, 2011 01:40 PM (tYKoa)
Posted by: Terrye at February 23, 2011 01:44 PM (tYKoa)
No, he did not side with the
Democrats for Chrisake, that is just ridiculous. He pointed out the
obvious, they could not get the bill passed by the end of the day and
after that it was done. This is how it is done in Indiana, it is
absolutely false to claim that Daniels sided with the Democrats. And
you know what? Back in 2001 the Republicans did the same thing when
they were in the minority, they took off for 2 and a half days. If this
tactic is going to change, both parties have to be willing to change
the rules. And they are not doing that.
Posted by: Terrye at February 23, 2011 05:34 PM (tYKoa)
yep.
Pisses me off.. 2 freakin days of republicans trashing a true PROVEN conservative when they have no freakin idea how Indiana works. You would think republicans could at least learn a little before they trash yet another conservative.
Posted by: Timbo at February 23, 2011 02:18 PM (ph9vn)
Squish.
Posted by: KB at February 23, 2011 04:13 PM (YeiuA)
How? Give me one example of his RECORD that tells you he is a squish?
Do you know of any? Give me one. Look at his 6 year record and tell me where he is a "squish".
Posted by: Timbo at February 23, 2011 02:19 PM (ph9vn)
LOL. Careful. Last guy who said that. Got his paw or hoof or whatever its called stuck in the grill. Had to hack it off....with Ma's knife...what a mess...
Posted by: Tommy Devito at February 23, 2011 02:27 PM (Xv7f/)
On the plus side, though, they've shown what a phalanx of idiots they are, and with their overwrought baying over this, have managed to undercut anything they have to say about the man going forward. To the extent Daniels will actually suffer any damage from this, it will be extremely temporary and all these idiots will be busy wiping the egg from their faces for quite a while.
Posted by: Walt Gilbert at February 23, 2011 02:28 PM (OLomk)
Just hand Obama a second term, republicans.
Posted by: Timbo at February 23, 2011 02:39 PM (ph9vn)
1) Mitch Daniels has been nothing but a model conservative the past six years as the governor of Indiana. Lowest property taxes in the nation, running a surplus, etc. all look great on his resume.
2) Voters in Indiana elected a Republican majority in both houses in order to give Daniels the power he needs to enact more changes. However, there is still a powerful Democratic minority.
3) Since Daniels has long since crippled the power of unions in Indiana, the Right to Work bill is unnecessary, at least right now when he needs a quorum to push through legislation that is more important to Indiana, namely the school vouchers bill.
4) The problem here is that Indiana has a short legislative calender, and the Republicans didn't consider the need to keep Democrats appeased to maintain a quorum and pass legislation that would move Indiana forward, as opposed to shoving through what is, at this time, largely fringe and unnecessary legislation in the name of conservative purity or whatever.
5) Because Daniels recognized the need to convince the Democrats to return to Indiana so that his legislation can get passed, he has now been labeled as a RINO and, according to most posters here, is no longer a serious presidential candidate although there isn't a Republican politician in the country who has a better track record. Apparently his credibility is out the window because he's playing the political game to pass more conservative legislation that actually addresses the needs of his state.
What a shitty governor, eh?
Posted by: RAWN PAWL at February 23, 2011 11:19 PM (4dDvj)
Posted by: NHLJersey at February 24, 2011 12:17 AM (+yYdw)
1. Property taxes are levied by local government. Reverse transfers of income and sales taxes back to property owners, directly or via education funding is a 'Big Government' initiative, and is not conservative.
2. Oh, really. Please note WI is now ready in under a week to suspend debate and begin voting. Possibly the result of a need to pay staff, pay the wife, 2 senators have had recall efforts launched in court,..., i.e., pressure applied by citizens and the Governor.
3. Daniels reversed an executive order giving State employees rights in collective bargaining. Local government employees were not affected.
4. Many states have 'short legislative calendars', they are part-time for good reason. MN adjourns in June.
5. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, poops green like a duck, it might just be a duck.
Posted by: gary gulrud at February 24, 2011 09:07 AM (/g2vP)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3011 seconds, 227 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Ben at February 23, 2011 07:51 AM (wuv1c)