Ace of Spades HQ

September 14, 2011

Nate Silver: Four Special Election Races Show 2010 Republican Wave Still Cresting
— Ace

To save time, I will just say he includes a lot of caveats. And they're not fake caveats; they're real this-may-not-mean-anything caveats.

But caveats aside:

The Republican Mark Amodei, however, leads by 22 points as of this writing, an easy victory, meaning that he overperformed the P.V.I. [Partisan Voter Index, aka, Party advantage] by 12 points.
Meanwhile, Mr. TurnerÂ’s winning margin in the New York district, 8 percentage points as of this writing, represents a 18-point G.O.P. swing from the P.V.I.-projected results.
[Then add in Democrats overperforming in NY-23 by 17 points, but Republicans overperforming in that California race we lost, but not by all that much.]
... Republicans have overperformed the P.V.I. baseline by an average of 7 percentage points across the four races. That squares with what we saw in 2010, when Republicans won the popular vote for the House by an aggregate of 7 percentage points.

In other words, the four special elections, taken as a whole, suggest that Democrats may still be locked in a 2010-type political environment.

This, he says, probably wouldn't mean too many Republican pick-ups, as we've picked up most of the ones we can realistically grab. (But there is that cute scientist woman in Arizona who deserves a seat...)

But the real problem comes in Senate races. The Democrats have, once again, twice as many senators up for reelection than we do, and on top of that, they have a lot of blue senators in red states up for reelection.

He concludes:

Based on multiple regressions of the data, the evidence is suggestive, if not yet conclusive: President Obama is a stuttering clusterf*** of a miserable failure.

Okay, he didn't conclude that. But let's not split hairs.

Posted by: Ace at 06:04 AM | Comments (84)
Post contains 278 words, total size 2 kb.

1 First - Screw You!

Posted by: Sub-Tard at September 14, 2011 06:07 AM (0M3AQ)

2 the president is stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure.....

Posted by: phoenixgirl at September 14, 2011 06:07 AM (eOXTH)

3 "...there is that cute scientist woman in Arizona who deserves a seat..."

This is the kind of trenchant political analysis that I find invaluable: recognition of what is most important in our political choices!

Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative)) at September 14, 2011 06:08 AM (LH6ir)

4 No wave!

Of course, what we really need is movement in the Senate and the White House. I hope after this period of "vetting" Rick Perry, the POTUS candidates can settle down and stick to selling themselves as better alternatives to the SCOAMF.

Posted by: Y-not at September 14, 2011 06:08 AM (5H6zj)

5 >>But the real problem comes in Senate races. The Democrats have, once again, twice as many senators up for reelection than we do, and on top of that, they have a lot of blue senators in red states up for reelection.

Not to worry, Ace. I'm absolutely certain that we'll nominate plenty of unemployed marketing consultants who oppose Gardasil on mental retardation grounds to "punish the establishment" and keep those races off the table.

Posted by: Lou at September 14, 2011 06:08 AM (0F3ej)

6 So, is what hope feels like? Its been so long, I can't recall exactly...

Posted by: Grey Fox at September 14, 2011 06:08 AM (nEMLy)

7 No back soaping yet.

Posted by: toby928™ at September 14, 2011 06:09 AM (GTbGH)

8 Would the New York 9th district be one we could "reasonably" grab? Nope. It was a rotten borough, a Democratic fortress seat. And it just went big for Turner.

The rule book has gone out of the window. Three years of Obama has done what we thought impossible: people are realizing that the Democratic Party is nothing but a gigantic criminal enterprise devoted to looting the country and the taxpayers.

ALL Democrat seats are now "in play."

Posted by: Trimegistus at September 14, 2011 06:09 AM (/7xxR)

9 6 So, is what hope feels like? Its been so long, I can't recall exactly...

Posted by: Grey Fox at September 14, 2011 10:08 AM (nEMLy)

A billboard with the word 'hope' on it and the 'miss me yet' stamped in the corner

Posted by: Red Shirt at September 14, 2011 06:10 AM (FIDMq)

10 "San Francisco has always been a challenge for our party...." //Debbie W-S

Posted by: sven10077 at September 14, 2011 06:10 AM (hbf8D)

11 Nate Silvers last Paragrah At the very minimum, they imply a reduction in the odds that after three consecutive Â“waveÂ” elections, 2012 will show a tidal shift back toward Democrats. These people are all drug addicts with an Income tax check. When they hit bottom, look out.

Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 14, 2011 06:10 AM (ZDUD4)

The DNC has a new numeric computer model (designed by Al Gore) that predicts the expected voting results very accurately.

The latest runs keep coming up with a very strong prediction that the 2012 election contest in all races for Democrats will be a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure.

Posted by: Roy at September 14, 2011 06:11 AM (VndSC)

13 Barack Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure.

And I can't wait for a solid conservative to replace Kay Bailey in 2013. That will be quite refreshing.

Unfortunately, we have to wait until '14 to get rid of Cornyn...

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at September 14, 2011 06:11 AM (8y9MW)

14 Wow, now all we have to do is prevent a Squish in the WH and we could actually do something with a Senate/House majority. I am chilled at the idea of a Romney having free reign for 2 years. Not so much a Perry. Think a Gringrich would prove remarkably interesting. Imagine Newt completing the Contract with America II from the WH? I am pretty sure there would be less Federal Governemnt if that were to happen.

Posted by: Sub-Tard at September 14, 2011 06:11 AM (0M3AQ)

15 There may be hope for me after all!

Posted by: The Chicken at September 14, 2011 06:11 AM (j5CHE)

Look, we all know NY-9 is and has always been a deep red district so it doesn't really count as a loss.

Posted by: Debbie Washedup-Shitforbrains at September 14, 2011 06:12 AM (nxptv)

17 ALL Democrat seats are now "in play."

You have no idea.

Posted by: Barney Frank (D), MA-4 at September 14, 2011 06:12 AM (4Kl5M)

18 ~ tap tap tap tap tap ~ This microphone? It is alive? Yes? Okay, it is just that this microphone makes Hadji-adji-adji sound like today is Sunday-unday-unday and it is only Wednesday - endsday ... ... nevermind. Roses are Red So is a Congressional District in New York City. Hadji, He is the Mark Shields of Political Humor. tip your waitresses.

Posted by: Hadji the Muslim Comic at September 14, 2011 06:13 AM (h6mPj)

LOL

Lie about your lord and king? Off with your head!

Posted by: Lemon Kitten at September 14, 2011 06:13 AM (0fzsA)

20 A wave? President Obama's economic policies will bear fruit next year, and all of your vaunted gains will disappear in November 2012. He has stopped the catastrophic rise in unemployment (don't believe me? Just look at the data) that was a result of Bush's stupidity, and has turned his attention to creating a more fair tax system. The rich don't pay enough, and they admit it. Why can't you wannabes recognize that the progressive agenda is unstoppable because the people want government to do more. The time of the robber barons is over. You just haven't figured it out yet.

You people are insane.

Posted by: Lucy'sRabbit (NJProgressive) at September 14, 2011 06:14 AM (LH6ir)

21 10 sven when i heard her say that about ny-9.....i was shocked....there is no lie big enough that they won't tell......

Posted by: phoenixgirl at September 14, 2011 06:14 AM (eOXTH)

22 Ace and Hadji, so early in the day! This is a treat.

Posted by: FireHorse at September 14, 2011 06:14 AM (F5OMl)

23 when i heard her say that about ny-9.....i was shocked....there is no lie big enough that they won't tell......

Posted by: phoenixgirl at September 14, 2011 10:14 AM (eOXTH)

Wait...she actually said that?!

Posted by: Tami at September 14, 2011 06:16 AM (X6akg)

24 Someone noticed that the new jobs bill has a ton of money for Tester's state. I'm sure that isn't political and is in the best interests of the country

Posted by: Ben at September 14, 2011 06:16 AM (wuv1c)

President Obama is a stuttering clusterf*** of a miserable failure.

Posted by: Ace at 10:04 AM

Consider yourself reported citizen. Vee are vatching your every move with greeeaaaaat interest.

Posted by: AttackWatch for SCOAMF at September 14, 2011 06:16 AM (nxptv)

26 I call bs. Obama will win reelection we much.

Posted by: marie at September 14, 2011 06:16 AM (W7Seu)

27 It's nice to know that there are still some jews who have a conscience.

Posted by: dagny at September 14, 2011 06:16 AM (JeSIQ)

28 tami.....yes

Posted by: phoenixgirl at September 14, 2011 06:17 AM (eOXTH)

Ace, thank you for all you do and for helping flame the wiener roast. Love ya and love all morons and 'ettes.

This is just a small taste of how we will feel once he is defeated in 2012. I can't get this smile off my face since I woke up to the news of the GOP wins.

Posted by: ChristyBlinky at September 14, 2011 06:18 AM (baL2B)

One guy who can't wait until the 2012 election is Fritz Mondale.

Because legacy is a bitch.

Posted by: Roy at September 14, 2011 06:18 AM (VndSC)

(But there is that cute scientist woman in Arizona who deserves a seat...)

Sarah Palin is a scientist???

Posted by: Elize Nayden at September 14, 2011 06:19 AM (v49dF)

32 Posted by: Lucy'sRabbit (NJProgressive) at September 14, 2011 10:14 AM (LH6ir)

You need more coffee, CBD. That one was weak.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at September 14, 2011 06:20 AM (8y9MW)

33 tami.....yes

Posted by: phoenixgirl at September 14, 2011 10:17 AM (eOXTH)

HOLY.........CRAP!

Posted by: Tami at September 14, 2011 06:20 AM (X6akg)

34 I'd toss the two NY races because they both followed resignations of sitting reps. On second thought, the resulting +13 point net swing would leave me soaping my own back.

Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at September 14, 2011 06:20 AM (cbyrC)

35 WSJ Debbie Wasserman-Schultz: NY-9 is Â“a very difficult district for DemocratsÂ” Democratic party leaders insisted the loss wasnÂ’t a harbinger of things to come. Â“ItÂ’s a very difficult district for Democrats,Â” said Democratic National Committee chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, noting its Democratic margins there tend to be the second lowest of all the districts in New York City. House Speaker John Boehner (R., Ohio), dismissed that idea. Â“This is a very seriously Democrat district,Â” Mr. Boehner said. Â“This is not a district that Republicans have any right to believe we could win.Â”

Posted by: phoenixgirl at September 14, 2011 06:20 AM (eOXTH)

36 @34 I meant resignations due to creepy scandals.

Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at September 14, 2011 06:20 AM (cbyrC)

37 Posted by: dagny at September 14, 2011 10:16 AM (JeSIQ)

Realistically, the Jews who seem to be first in line to drink the progressive Kool-Aid are not real Jews. Their great grandparents were socialists, there grandparents were communists, their parents were liberals and they have embraced their new religion with a messianic fervor that would be terrifying if it weren't so laughably stupid.

The real Jews are what many call "Modern Orthodox."

Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative)) at September 14, 2011 06:23 AM (LH6ir)

38 I don't think I need a statistician to tell me whats happening. Or to put it in terms Obama can identify, you don't need to be a weatherman to see which way the wind is blowing.

Posted by: JackStraw at September 14, 2011 06:23 AM (TMB3S)

39 Ruth McClung!! I think.

Posted by: jeannebodine, sum b*tch at September 14, 2011 06:23 AM (nvlAW)

40 did they waste 600 k dnc funds?

Posted by: willow at September 14, 2011 06:23 AM (h+qn8)

41 This, he says, probably wouldn't mean too many Republican pick-ups, as we've picked up most of the ones we can realistically grab.

I haven't read the Silver post, yet, but did he mention the effects of re-districting?

Posted by: mrp at September 14, 2011 06:24 AM (HjPtV)

42 I meant resignations due to creepy scandals.

I'm not sure how much that would sway voters. I don't think it helped Weprin's Grade Stupid that Weiner supported him, but don't think people voted against him just because he was running to replace Weiner.

Even the ABC correspondent I heard today was saying that, straight up, people voted R because they were upset with Obama's economic policies and stance on Israel. The media isn't even trying to pretend to believe the crap coming out of the mouth of DWS.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at September 14, 2011 06:24 AM (8y9MW)

43 I don't think we could make a better plant to head up the party of victims than Debbie Washmyhair-Scruntz. That pear shaped idiot is dumber than the lice that live in that rancid filth on top of her dome.

Posted by: Captain Hate at September 14, 2011 06:24 AM (RKzwg)

Sarah Palin is a scientist???

Sarah was a scientist,
Sarah is no more;
For what she thought was H₂0
Was H₂SO₄.

Posted by: FireHorse at September 14, 2011 06:25 AM (F5OMl)

45 I haven't read the Silver post, yet, but did he mention the effects of re-districting? That's not math, that's geography.

Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 14, 2011 06:25 AM (ZDUD4)

46 Btw has curious weighed in on what her imaginary friends think about this?

Posted by: Captain Hate at September 14, 2011 06:26 AM (RKzwg)

47 You don't think a lunatic with Tourettes roaming the countryside & randomly shouting out "Pass the bill!" and "Pass it!" will be enough to turn the tide?

Posted by: jeannebodine, sum b*tch at September 14, 2011 06:27 AM (nvlAW)

48 Read it - didn't see any reference to re-districting in his post.

Posted by: mrp at September 14, 2011 06:27 AM (HjPtV)

49 Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at September 14, 2011 10:20 AM (8y9MW)

My apologies. I'll go sniff some glue, bang my head against a wall and smoke a bowl. That should prepare my critical thinking faculties for a progressive rant.

Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative)) at September 14, 2011 06:28 AM (LH6ir)

50 ~ tap tap tap tap tap ~ What? Of course Hadji taps the microphone before commencing with the merriment ... Hadji is a professional. Hadji is a professional with OCD, but at least Hadji has a job .. ... a sexy sexy job. You are hearing me you infidel whores? Hadji is quite the catch so show Hadji some love .... no? .. okay, then, show Hadji some ankle, some well-turned infidel ankle ... oh yes, that is the stuff .... Sorry - What does Debbie Wasserman-Shultz use to manage her hair? أبجدية عرب - it is a shampoo that we use for camels. It keeps the camel spiders at bay and leaves the camels with the sexy sexy manageable hair. Speaking of which: What is the difference between of Debbie Wasserman-Shultz and a camel? A camel can be taught to not spit on you. Why does Debbie Wasserman-Shultz through the parking lot of a shopping center at an angle so that she spends a great deal of time preventing the passage of automobiles rather than walking to one side or the other and allowing traffic to move efficently? She is oblivious and inconsiderate. thank you, you have been an audience.

Posted by: Hadji the Muslim Comic at September 14, 2011 06:28 AM (h6mPj)

51 Captain don't know, But i imagine it would go something like this.

My friends and I shed our differences of opinions and decided to do this one thing for NY, and drag Turner over the line.
You can thank me now.

Posted by: willow at September 14, 2011 06:28 AM (h+qn8)

52 31 Sarah Palin is a scientist???

No, but Michele Bachmann is a medical doctor.

Posted by: Lou at September 14, 2011 06:29 AM (0F3ej)

53 21 PhxGrl, Indeed...... "Washington DC has always ben deep red...." DWS

Posted by: sven10077 at September 14, 2011 06:29 AM (hbf8D)

Debbie WhatsHerName Stupid thinks that NY-9 is a difficult district for dems to win? NY-9 has been in democrat hands for the last 91 years according to pundits I heard this am on the radio.

Also the Obama Jobs Bill contains language that makes being unemployed a protected class. So if you are unemployed, apply for a job, and don't get hired, you can sue!!!! Because you were discriminated against!! So it really is a Jobs Bill, for lawyers anyway.

Posted by: Boots at September 14, 2011 06:29 AM (neKzn)

55 it's funny I'm actually shocked at these results and finally feel hope that i had misplaced somewhere around 2009.

Posted by: willow at September 14, 2011 06:30 AM (h+qn8)

56 Debbie Stabanaugh in Michigan would be an easy pick up. She has NO support.

Posted by: chillin the most for Perry at September 14, 2011 06:30 AM (6IV8T)

57 Or to put it in terms Obama can identify, you don't need to be a weatherman to see which way the wind is blowing.

Posted by: JackStraw at September 14, 2011 10:23 AM (TMB3S)

Yeah no kidding. Which is why the ubiquitous Rodney King-esque poster that pops up in every primary thread is quite puzzling to me.

"Why can't we just get along guys? Obama is a SCOAMF!"

Yes, I heard water is dihydrogen monoxide as well.

Posted by: Yoshi, Aggrieved Victim of the White Man at September 14, 2011 06:30 AM (of0xp)

58 Um. Nate Silver is really reaching with this analysis. I'm not even going to go deep into his numbers. The Dems just lost a seat they had held for 90 years. The GOP is wave isn't cresting, it's still gathering strength, and is now doing so in districts it had no chance in just a generation ago. This is a huge problem for the Dems, but I won't say that too loudly, because wall-eyed analysis like this just means more pickups from an opponent that just doesn't get it.

Posted by: alexthedude at September 14, 2011 06:31 AM (3L0Bq)

59 47 You don't think a lunatic with Tourettes roaming the countryside & randomly shouting out "Pass the bill!" and "Pass it!" will be enough to turn the tide?
LOL - good one.

Posted by: Sub-Tard at September 14, 2011 06:32 AM (0M3AQ)

Defeat the Demunists, Crush the Commiecrats! Thanks SCOAMF.

Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 14, 2011 06:34 AM (ujg0T)

61 If you look closely at these Obama town halls, you will see that there is not enough people there to fill a Cracker Barrel. Not that he would go to Cracker Barrel, the Cracker in the name and all.

Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 14, 2011 06:34 AM (ZDUD4)

62 "I don't think it helped Weprin's Grade Stupid that Weiner supported him, but don't think people voted against him just because he was running to replace Weiner." The Weiner and Lee scandals were particularly tawdry, and I think the resulting disgust depresses the hell out of the "home team" vote that is ignorant of any issues but otherwise show faithfully for their D or R team.

Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at September 14, 2011 06:35 AM (cbyrC)

If you're trying to avoid real work for a bit, search twitter for #attackwatch and laugh your ass off at the comments. My fave so far:

Orwell's 1984 was a warning, not a how to guide.

Posted by: Ms Choksondik at September 14, 2011 06:35 AM (nxptv)

64 On the bright side, the Pro Shop in Hell just announced a new product line of Obama Signature Series ball retrievers, so Barky's legacy won't totally be without merit.

Posted by: Fritz at September 14, 2011 06:35 AM (/ZZCn)

Realistically, the Jews who seem to be first in line to drink the progressive Kool-Aid are not real Jews. Their great grandparents were socialists, there grandparents were communists, their parents were liberals and they have embraced their new religion with a messianic fervor that would be terrifying if it weren't so laughably stupid.

The real Jews are what many call "Modern Orthodox."

What a shame. As I told my nephew's jewish (it's a race too) yet atheist wife at the occassion of their pretend-wedding: 5000 years of history, well, I guess you know better.

I wonder if more of them have sold their souls to Marx than died in WWII. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz is a prime example.

Posted by: dagny at September 14, 2011 06:36 AM (JeSIQ)

66 This morning I've moved the odds of Obama not running for re-election or facing a serious primary candidate from 10-1 to 5-1.

Posted by: Countrysquire at September 14, 2011 06:38 AM (1hLHC)

67 How's Obama doin' on InTrade?

Posted by: Mister Christopher at September 14, 2011 06:40 AM (cjGZv)

This morning I've moved the odds of Obama not running for re-election or facing a serious primary candidate from 10-1 to 5-1.

But whom might that primary challenger be?

So long as the African American vote breaks 90/10, I doubt it.

Sensible Democrats (there are some left) might be disgusted, but the race-Commiecrat faction and the decadent-Commiecrat faction would never leave their Obamessiah and will punish any who suggest otherwise.

Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 14, 2011 06:45 AM (ujg0T)

69 I feel ignorant commenting on this issue until I hear what curious' jew friends think about it.

Posted by: yinzer at September 14, 2011 06:46 AM (/Mla1)

70 "But there is that cute scientist woman in Arizona who deserves a seat..."

Pics or she doesn't exist.

_{(has it been mentioned that Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure?)}

Posted by: Xoxotl at September 14, 2011 06:47 AM (3AOLv)

71 Ruth McClung http://video.foxnews.com/v/4382724/rocket-scientist-running-for-congress/

Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 14, 2011 06:54 AM (ZDUD4)

72 We are looking at Senate pickups in: Montana North Dakota Nebraska Missouri Virginia Wisconsin with possibles in Pennsylvania Ohio Michigan Florida New Mexico Hawai'i

Posted by: CAC at September 14, 2011 06:56 AM (JEVge)

73 Didnt we screw up NY23 something fierce.

Posted by: Jean at September 14, 2011 06:56 AM (WkuV6)

74 "Didnt we screw up NY23 something fierce.

Posted by: Jean at September 14, 2011 10:56 AM (WkuV6)"

That tends to happen when there are traitors in the party leadership.

Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 14, 2011 06:58 AM (ujg0T)

75 I still can't help but think that the media is loving this, because it sets them up for the Big Obama Comeback Story.

Posted by: arminius at September 14, 2011 07:08 AM (wYNHS)

I still can't help but think that the media is loving this, because it sets them up for the Big Obama Comeback Story.

Which is why 2012 must make 2010 look small.

Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 14, 2011 07:10 AM (ujg0T)

So long as the African American vote breaks 90/10, I doubt it.

Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 14, 2011 10:45 AM (ujg0T)

I have a feeling that democrats will have a hard time for years to come getting the turnout to win the presidency without a black candidate, yet this particular candidate is poison, so they are boned.

Posted by: Vashta Nerada at September 14, 2011 07:19 AM (ItDg4)

78 I think the biggest news out of last night is that Mediscare and Social Security as an untouchable third-rail is dead, dead, dead.

Here's the thing: For 30 years, since the end of the Carter Recession, the left and the Democratic Party have been shouting and fear-mongering every election that we must have these "social safety nets" in case of the hard times (that are always part of a Republican administration). And people kinda believed them, "sure, times are good now, we can afford to set a bit aside and help those in need." But now, the oft-predicted-yet-never-materialized hard times are here and there ain't jack-diddly-shit for those who paid and paid over the years.
Think about it: You paid your dues, did what you were told, worked hard and were told that for a little extra taxes, if you ever fell on hard times, all these great social programs you were paying for would be there when you needed them. And now you are out of a job and the same party that promised they'd be there for you when you needed them is out there saying they need half-a-trillion dollars more and then they might can help you.
"Fuck that," is the attitude, "You guys are trying to sell me ice cream when I can't even afford to put a loaf of bread on the table."

Posted by: Jimmuy at September 14, 2011 07:29 AM (2BZHK)

I have a feeling that democrats will have a hard time for years to come getting the turnout to win the presidency without a black candidate, yet this particular candidate is poison, so they are boned.

I wonder if Toni Morrisson and the gang will try to have an "honorary black president" again.

Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 14, 2011 07:35 AM (ujg0T)

80 "We'll see how long Rep.-Elect Turner lasts.

Posted by: N.Y. Legislature working on eliminating NY District-9 at September 14, 2011 07:45 AM (sOwyO)

81 We'll see how long Rep.-Elect Turner lasts.

Posted by: N.Y. Legislature working on eliminating NY District-9

True, that. Still, one less Commiecrat is one less Commiecrat.

If we could just get national voter ID and stop counting illegal aliens in the Census, we could remove at least four sitting Commiecrats in California.

Posted by: Curmudgeon at September 14, 2011 08:05 AM (ujg0T)

82 Oh salty-sweet, crunchable yet chewy freudenschade, how I love thee!

For 6 months after Obama was elected, all I heard from punditry was "how I needed to be 'less conservative' to have my views heard" and how "conservatism was dead in America."

I hate to be vulgar (OK, no I don't), but to them I say, "Fuck you until you die bleeding out the eyes you prejudiced, smarmy, condescending, arrogant, elitist bastards." Nothing the left has proposed has worked. The entire exercise is an abject failure and everyone paying attention knows it.

The pendulum has swung. Suck it, bitches.

Posted by: Richard (Don't call me Dick) Cheney at September 14, 2011 08:48 AM (pVvkk)

83 Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure.

Posted by: steevy at September 14, 2011 01:12 PM (fyOgS)

84 11708550 15460-12170 p822686 1r0773

Posted by: christine at September 14, 2011 10:03 PM (UUR7d)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.

115kb generated in CPU 0.0327, elapsed 0.2245 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.2019 seconds, 212 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.