August 12, 2011
— Open Blogger The United States Postal Service has made it clear that they need to reduce their overhead, 80% of which is employee salary and benefits. FYI, the postal service is 60% unionized with an average hourly income of $41.15.[Update: I want to make note I think this includes benefits, but I'm not certain]
Their plan is twofold. First up on the chopping block are 120,000 employees that need to be laid off by 2015. Then, in order to further reduce operating costs they need to withdraw from the federal healthcare system imposed on them by Congress.
But not to worry, they have plenty of time to implement this plan. Wait, did I say plenty of time? I meant to say one month.
The Postal Service said, “We will be insolvent next month due to significant declines in mail volume and retiree health benefit pre-funding costs imposed by Congress.”
The biggest obstacles to reform and layoffs are the American Postal Workers Union and Congress. The APWU has a clause in their contract that prohibits layoffs. This agreement can only be voided by congress. It seems unlikely Democrats will support such an action, but they might not have much of a choice:
How Congress will respond to the postal proposals remains to be seen. Many Republicans, including those who have sponsored legislation that labor considers anti-union, may support the plan. Some Democrats probably would back union opposition. But the Postal ServiceÂ’s critical financial situation could make Democrats have second thoughts.
The USPS hasn't been a profitable organization for some time(if they ever were). As a matter of fact in the past four years they've run up a 20 Billion dollar deficit. In 2010 alone they lost 8.5 billion.
It's easier to understand how they could lose so much money when you consider they have 600,000 employees and 480,000 pensioners. I reckon it's hard to be profitable when you have (almost) a 1:1 ratio of retirees to employees.
I can only surmise that along with layoffs, we'll be seeing higher stamp prices and shortened delivery weeks.
Now you know why you've been seeing these Postal Workers Union commercials on TV.
[Update] It should be noted that Andy wrote a great post on the APWU ads about a week ago.
Posted by: Open Blogger at
06:45 AM
| Comments (232)
Post contains 374 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: izoneguy at August 12, 2011 06:48 AM (i6Neb)
Posted by: EC at August 12, 2011 06:48 AM (GQ8sn)
Oh, and do you know they have to have postal inspectors who hide out in catwalks to patrol above the sorting floor during tax refund season?
Posted by: Jimmuy at August 12, 2011 06:48 AM (JRjWw)
So they lay off 120,000 and go right to 1:1. Seems like they should be working on that second number somehow. Oh yeah, that's what Obamacare is for.
Posted by: Bomber at August 12, 2011 06:49 AM (qzoN5)
Posted by: EC at August 12, 2011 10:48 AM (GQ8sn)
Don't be silly. All the Constitution says is that Congress has the power to regulate Commerce between the states. I mean, that pretty much lets it do anything anyway.
Posted by: The Supreme Court at August 12, 2011 06:50 AM (FkKjr)
1. Steal more packages than you already do.
2. Sell those Gamefly and Netflix discs that "go missing" on eBay.
3. Profit!
Posted by: Newman at August 12, 2011 06:50 AM (c45xH)
40 fucking dollars per hour to deliver the fucking mail?
Well that's the average for all postal workers, so it includes the useless and redundant managment who probably makes big bucks(100s of thousands i'm guessing) and I believe that number also includes benefits.
Still, it's a fairly high number when compared to private sector package delivery services that are profitable.
Posted by: Ben at August 12, 2011 06:50 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: uncle joey biden, biden my time til 2016, i'm available at August 12, 2011 06:52 AM (AT52Q)
Posted by: Chas at August 12, 2011 06:52 AM (6n2I1)
$41 an hour my ass. They added the cost of benefits to that figure.
How many employees and pensioneers does the Defense Department have? I don't see the Postal Service buying up $900 hammers.
Posted by: Spiker at August 12, 2011 06:53 AM (u2rWt)
"Prohibits layoffs." Absolutely amazing.
Posted by: kevlarchick at August 12, 2011 06:53 AM (TNuqz)
Two words. Company picnic.
Two more words. Warm mayonnaise.
Posted by: Y-not at August 12, 2011 10:51 AM (5H6zj)
Is it too wate to get a job in male dewivewy?
Posted by: Bawney Fwank at August 12, 2011 06:53 AM (v+QvA)
A Post Office in every g-ddamn town paired with a "decrease" in overall mail volume, yet it still takes a fricking week for my sister's birthday card to travel from Concord, NH, to Hershey, PA.
Efficiency!
Posted by: MWR, proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at August 12, 2011 06:54 AM (4df7R)
Problem solved. Duhhh.
Posted by: VA Gator at August 12, 2011 06:54 AM (ZZiTD)
So they lay off 120,000 and go right to 1:1. Seems like they should be working on that second number somehow. Oh yeah, that's what Obamacare is for.
Well, I think the WAPO article I read implied that it was going to try to buy out the 120,000, which I think implies no pension, but instead a one time lump sum payment.
The days of pensions are over, people need ot understand that. Companies can't continue to pay people who aren't working. We're already seeing it with IRAs, 401K, 403B, and other forms of "pension-like" programs.
The federal government, as is always the case, is slow to catch up with the economic realities.
Posted by: Ben at August 12, 2011 06:54 AM (wuv1c)
$41 an hour my ass. They added the cost of benefits to that figure.
How many employees and pensioneers does the Defense Department have? I don't see the Postal Service buying up $900 hammers.
Posted by: Spiker
I agree. let's change the subject to another department.
Posted by: so what if I'm amoney pit? I'm a government money pit! at August 12, 2011 06:55 AM (6rX0K)
Or,
So the hammers that the post office uses to break fragile objects cost less than $900? I feel so much better now about that $20 billion dollar debt .
Posted by: so what if I'm a money pit? I'm a government money pit! at August 12, 2011 06:56 AM (6rX0K)
There's a nice metaphor in there.
Posted by: Andy at August 12, 2011 06:57 AM (5Rurq)
Posted by: Jimmah at August 12, 2011 06:57 AM (TfRqk)
Posted by: fluffy at August 12, 2011 06:57 AM (4Kl5M)
The letter arrived with a flag sticker where the stamp should have been.
Heh.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at August 12, 2011 06:57 AM (UOM48)
41 an hour my ass. They added the cost of benefits to that figure
I thought that would be understood, but I've made note of it in the main post anyway.
I looked at the website and it says the starting average salary is 19 dollars an hour(just salary, no benefits)
Posted by: Ben at August 12, 2011 06:58 AM (wuv1c)
I don't know if they added the cost of benes to that or not (though I doubt it), but I do know that a fairly average postal worker in the DFW Metroplex (1 year on the job) was making about $15.00/hr 13 years ago. Willing to bet that's at least $20.00/hr now? That was a normal delivery driver.
Also, the Constitution just mandates (IIRC) that Congress has to ensure the mail is delivered. The USPS is not, itself, mandatory- as proven by the fact it didn't always exist. Remember the Pony Express? The correct answer is to remove the law that says that ONLY the USPS can deliver normal mail, divorce them from the federal dole, and make them compete with UPS, FEDEX, and DHL for all postal business.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at August 12, 2011 06:58 AM (8y9MW)
Not sure if serious.
The Constitution says (I forget which article) that the federal gov will create and operate a postal system. So for any of this to change, we need that edited out.
Posted by: EC at August 12, 2011 06:58 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Arcade Hero at August 12, 2011 06:58 AM (du74H)
Posted by: Krazy Kat at August 12, 2011 06:58 AM (A23u6)
$41 an hour my ass. They added the cost of benefits to that figure.
How many employees and pensioneers does the Empire have? I don't see the Postal Service buying up 900-quadrillion-dollar Death Stars.
Posted by: Look, over there, something shiny! at August 12, 2011 06:58 AM (c45xH)
Posted by: Lauren at August 12, 2011 06:58 AM (cVIY5)
Posted by: Bomber at August 12, 2011 07:00 AM (qzoN5)
$41 an hour my ass. They added the cost of benefits to that figure.
How many employees and pensioneers does the Defense Department have? I don't see the Postal Service buying up $900 hammers.
---
Just talked to a relative yesterday who works there. $30 something an hour not including benefits. She tells me she's working mandatory 50+ hours a week. How does this square with the articles contention that they're grabbing rooms to look busy?
Posted by: Jimmah at August 12, 2011 07:00 AM (TfRqk)
Posted by: silverpie at August 12, 2011 07:00 AM (LbwgI)
Wow. $40k/year is a great starting salary.
I'm not a fan of reporting salary plus benefits together. When you recruit someone for a job, they focus on salary. Yeah, we all try to use benefits to sweeten the pot IF the salary is too low.
Go ahead and report it if you like, but you have to report salary separately, imho.
Posted by: Y-not at August 12, 2011 07:01 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Lauren at August 12, 2011 10:58 AM (cVIY5)
You forgot to factor in "rattling around forgotten in the back of a delivery truck for two weeks before getting crushed under a thirty pound box of designer stencils" time when sending your package. We can't be responsible for that.
Posted by: The USPS at August 12, 2011 07:01 AM (4df7R)
When my mom died, all the cards I received were comforting. Also, I really hate those e-cards for birthdays, Christmas, etc.
The amount of junk mail we receive is ridiculous. Having to haul it to the recycling center is a pain in the ass.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at August 12, 2011 07:01 AM (UOM48)
The Constitution says (I forget which article) that the federal gov will create and operate a postal system. So for any of this to change, we need that edited out.
article 1 section 8 i think
Posted by: Ben at August 12, 2011 07:01 AM (wuv1c)
The problem with everything is defined benefit plans, both for private and public sectors. If there were no defined benefit plans, the post office wouldn't be having these problems.
You can also argue the real problem for the US debt is the same.
Has anyone speculated as to what might have happened if Bush's plan to partially privatize SS had passed? What would that have done to our current problems?
Posted by: The Voice of Reason at August 12, 2011 07:03 AM (UpqKo)
Ok, if it doesn't mandate them, then what law says that only the Postal Service can handle delivery of first class mail?
Posted by: EC at August 12, 2011 07:03 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Krazy Kat at August 12, 2011 07:03 AM (A23u6)
I love the post office.
Use it all the time and have nearly no problems to report. None. Ever. Hundreds of Records shipped/received a year. Hundreds of paper transactions. The check is always in the mail and always arrives where it's going.
UPS and Fed Ex used for shipping larger items, but nobody beats the PO for shipping anything smaller than a bread box.
...and I have had a lot more problems with UPS and Fed Ex than I have ever had with the PO.
Posted by: garrett at August 12, 2011 07:04 AM (Vwq6Q)
Incorrect.
Article 8 says, "The Congress shall have the Power ... To establish Post Offices and post Roads;"
This provision does not mandate the creation of a postal system, it simply authorizes congress to do so.
Posted by: Andy at August 12, 2011 07:04 AM (5Rurq)
Anyhow, this one time only he delivered my mail along with a note saying it won't happen again unless I fix the problem. The problem? The road crew had scraped a pile of ice in front of my box. A fucking grader couldn't dislodge this massive ice lump in the street. Yup, all my fault....including the late fees I paid for late bills that were never delivered.
Postal? You want postal bitches? Bring it!
/mild rant mode off
Posted by: GnuBreed at August 12, 2011 07:04 AM (ENKCw)
Posted by: Jimmah at August 12, 2011 07:04 AM (TfRqk)
I would like to point out that I've had nothing but good experience with the USPS. I don't hate them, but it's clear we can't maintain it as it currently exists.
It's hemorraging money. Something has to give. I know the libs love all government institutions, but we have to at least have a couple that are running under or on budget, no?
They can't all be losing hundreds of millions, billions and tens of billions of dollars.
Posted by: Ben at August 12, 2011 07:04 AM (wuv1c)
Everywhere its the same story. It's crazy to pay people not to work. Unless the individual has been paying up over the years to fund themselves, you run short of enough payers to fund the takers. It just can't work demographically.
And, given what can be done to sweeten the payout, particularly in places like California for public employees, its far beyond the point of sanity.
Posted by: nickless at August 12, 2011 07:05 AM (MMC8r)
The Constitution says (I forget which article) that the federal gov will create and operate a postal system. So for any of this to change, we need that edited out
Constitution, smonstitution. Dude, that thing is like 100 years old - who cares what it says.
Posted by: little ezra klein at August 12, 2011 07:05 AM (AT52Q)
I remember Dick Cheney (PBUH) talking about this. He said a voluntary 3% of your income will go to a private account that you control just like a 401k. 3%!!!
Posted by: EC at August 12, 2011 07:05 AM (GQ8sn)
You don't have to be registered at HA to cast a "ballot."
Posted by: Y-not at August 12, 2011 07:06 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: woody at August 12, 2011 07:07 AM (FduBR)
When my mom died, all the cards I received were comforting. Also, I really hate those e-cards for birthdays, Christmas, etc.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at August 12, 2011 11:01 AM (UOM4
Ditto. But I also use USPS for delivering packages to my friends and family who have a PO box. My sister and b-i-l live in an apartment and they've seen more than one UPS or FedEx delivery box just sitting beside the security door, waiting for literally anyone to come along and grab it. I think that says more about the particular FedEx and UPS delivery guys than it does about the actual FedEx and UPS services, but they still prefer it if I send things to them via the Post Office.
Posted by: MWR, proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at August 12, 2011 07:07 AM (4df7R)
46Well in all fairness, I once had a mailperson actually put his truck into reverse once after delivering my mail. You see, if they cannot reach your mailbox without putting their vehicle in reverse, then they don't have to deliver. Even worse, they don't notify you that they aren't delivering. So those bills and checks you were expecting? Too bad.
Anyhow, this one time only he delivered my mail along with a note saying it won't happen again unless I fix the problem. The problem? The road crew had scraped a pile of ice in front of my box. A fucking grader couldn't dislodge this massive ice lump in the street. Yup, all my fault....including the late fees I paid for late bills that were never delivered.
Postal? You want postal bitches? Bring it!
----
Same here. PostMASTER showed up at my house saying the 4 cars in my 2 wide driveway didnt allow the mail lady to deliver mail at the curb, and use my driveway to turn around.
I needed to move or sell a car, or go to the post office to get my mail going forward.
Posted by: Jimmah at August 12, 2011 07:07 AM (TfRqk)
Just talked to a relative yesterday who works there. $30 something an hour not including benefits. She tells me she's working mandatory 50+ hours a week. How does this square with the articles contention that they're grabbing rooms to look busy?
Posted by: Jimmah
Some areas may be busier than others, particularly if they serve business clients. And there is also the factor of people having to work to cover the senior union and minority types who don't work and cannot/will not be fired. A friend of mine in the mid 1980s worked like hell to get in there and left after a year because of it (granted; this is his story). If there are layoff, then they will likely axe the junior employees first (senority rules) so they'll be left with the older, higher paid workers.
Posted by: so what if I'm a money pit? I'm a government money pit! at August 12, 2011 07:07 AM (6rX0K)
From the The About.Com Website:
Under federal law, only the Postal Service can handle or charge postage for handling letters...
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at August 12, 2011 07:08 AM (8y9MW)
@ 44, Garrett, I'm in you're boat. I have had nothing but good experience with the post office (i sent checks and invoices mostly), however we've been receiving a service at a price welll below what we should be paying for it(what it costs to send it).
So while I think its awesome I can send out my business mail for 0.44 cents a pop, it's only because the USPS is keeping the postage artificially low. And they can't continue to do so anymore.
As i said above, I'm guessing we go to a 4-5 days delivery week and a massive increase in stamp prices, probably incrementally though. Maybe 60 cents and then slowly working its way up to a dollar over a few years
Posted by: Ben at August 12, 2011 07:09 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: ryukyu at August 12, 2011 07:09 AM (MOHSR)
The Postal Act of 1845.
That's right. Eighteen. Fucking. Forty-five.
The buggy whip industry was also thriving then.
Posted by: Andy at August 12, 2011 07:10 AM (5Rurq)
Posted by: ahem at August 12, 2011 07:11 AM (1SRzT)
I love the post office.
-----
The bill-paying is partly because we've been in transition, financially and physically. I find it easier to track expenses and control which pot of money is being used by doing it on paper. And I'm a dinosaur. If my hubby were doing the bill-paying right now, we'd be more paperless.
I've had mixed results with the mail carriers. Current crop is not that great. I actually had better luck in California, amazingly enough. Same problems with "blocked" mailbox claims, as well as leaving packages in the rain (when a covered porch was steps away) and that sort of thing. Our UPS guy, in contrast, was lovely. Veteran.
Now in terms of special services, my experience with the P.O. has been pretty bad. I tried using them for registered mail / confirmed delivery on a couple of correspondences when we were in dispute with companies and the tracking was useless, plus they first claimed they could not deliver. In general the desk clerks are AT BEST slow but vaguely pleasant, but more often than not they are SLOW and UNpleasant.
Posted by: Y-not at August 12, 2011 07:13 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: MAJHAM at August 12, 2011 07:14 AM (RnY/N)
Posted by: Kos is my homepage at August 12, 2011 07:14 AM (iRlbA)
Posted by: junk mail hater at August 12, 2011 07:14 AM (GMG6W)
That's right. Eighteen. Fucking. Forty-five.
The buggy whip industry was also thriving then.
Then that's the law that needs changing.
Posted by: EC at August 12, 2011 07:14 AM (GQ8sn)
60Posted by: EC at August 12, 2011 11:03 AM (GQ8sn)
From the The About.Com Website:
Under federal law, only the Postal Service can handle or charge postage for handling letters...
----
Congress let them farm out some of the "unprofitable" package deliveruy, and UPS was born. How are they doing running all that unprofitable frieght?
Posted by: Jimmah at August 12, 2011 07:16 AM (TfRqk)
You don't have to be registered at HA to cast a "ballot."
Posted by: Y-not at August 12, 2011 11:06 AM
Yeah...yet another chance for a 1000-comment Palin-pumping thread, which Tepid Air revels in when "the Captain" and his Groan Room Stars are not pimping T-Paw.
I mean, I'd vote for Palin in a heartbeat if she's the nominee, but the drooling love for her over there is worthy of inclusion in Penthouse Letters. When, that is, the True Believers aren't calling anyone who dares question Her Divinity assholes.
Back on topic: I'm a freelance writer, and my current clients will only pay via paper checks sent in the mail. So I'm a big fan of the post office. For now, anyway.
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 12, 2011 07:17 AM (YjjrR)
The postal service is not mandated by the Constitution. All it says is that congress has the power to establish post offices and post roads.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 12, 2011 07:17 AM (LH6ir)
Let's look at some of them:
1) They are partially funded by the US Govt. This removes much of the motivation any other private organization would have to maximize efficiency, since they can just go back to uncle sugar for more, if they have to. Expect Congress just to bail them out, at least in the short term, by the way.
2) They are required not to make a profit. Even "non-profit" or "not for profit" (two different designations) entities are allowed to make profits. Indeed, it is the profit motive that causes many of them to exist. Being required not to make a profit is also a negative incentive away from maximum efficiency.
3) They are forced to work with a union- in their case, a Government union (which is worse than a private one, as we've discussed before).
4) They are required, by law, to provide one of the most generous healthcare packages available in America. I've mentioned before that I'm familiar with the Federal Employee Program health benefits- let me assure you, they're very nice.
$0.44 per oz might be enough to cover costs, if the post office were also run more efficiently. It is not, however, and so that postal rate won't work.
So, again, I say the correct answer is to divorce them completely from the US Government, Repeal the Postal Act and replace it with something that is more sane, and then let multiple companies compete for that business.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at August 12, 2011 07:18 AM (8y9MW)
First, I believe Postal Service is a legitimate gov't function, so whether it is "profitable" or not is not really the sole issue (I doubt the Postal Service ever really made a profit, and if it did, it was more than 30 years ago).
However, the Postal Service is wayyyy to generous with pay and benefits, including pension and that needs to end. There is absolutely no reason that a mail carrier should make more than about $20/hour (and even that seems high to me). It is not a difficult job, it doesn't take any brains, it doesn't take any skill, it doesn't take any particular education or training, and it doesn't even take stamina as they mostly drive and don't even walk and carry the mail. I suppose they need to be able to read and that is about it.
The postal service is actually a case-book in how bad unions are in the public sector. Pay and benefits wayyy out of proportion to the work. Pensions that are ridiculous compared to what 90% of the population gets. An anti-layoff provision? It's outrageous.
I have no problem with layoffs, and delivery limited to 3 days per week. With electronic mail, faxes, and private delivery there is no need for 6 day a week mail delivery. And, raising the price of stamps doesn't bother me either. Back when people did a lot of mailing, it might have been a hardship for stamps to get expensive. Now, what does the average person mail - maybe 2 or 3 things per week? $0.10/stamp more is not going to break the bank.
I still think there is a place for gov't postal service, b/c I don't see fedex or UPS or any other outfit gearing up to deliver regular daily mail - b/c I doubt you could ever make it very profitable.
Posted by: Monkeytoe at August 12, 2011 07:18 AM (sOx93)
Some areas may be busier than others, particularly if they serve business clients. And there is also the factor of people having to work to cover the senior union and minority types who don't work and cannot/will not be fired. A friend of mine in the mid 1980s worked like hell to get in there and left after a year because of it (granted; this is his story). If there are layoff, then they will likely axe the junior employees first (senority rules) so they'll be left with the older, higher paid workers.
This. I bitch and moan about the USPS because they DO drive me crazy with their inefficiency and their rules regarding when they will and will not deliver (my family has had the same issue as GnuBreed regarding snow and ice in front of our mailbox), but I also understand that in certain areas and at certain times of year, postal workers really are painfully busy. My father continually gripes about how long it takes for bills and letters to reach their destination around Christmas time, and I always try to remind him that everyone is sending things at Christmas time, and the post office has people who take time off to visit family at the holidays, just like everywhere else. It's irritating as hell sometimes, but when I know that they're actually working, I can understand it.
It's when I go to a post office with three or four employees, all of them standing around doing nothing, that I get justifiably pissy. Small towns should not all need their own post office. Anywhere with a population below 1,000 should club in its lot with a neighboring town or towns for postal services.
Posted by: MWR, proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at August 12, 2011 07:18 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 12, 2011 07:18 AM (jx2j9)
I had a problem last fall with them leaving "come get your package" cards instead of delivering packages. Got a real snotty note when I filled out the online form asking them to please deliver my packages and leave them in the locked package box if that was easier than walking to my apartment door.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at August 12, 2011 07:19 AM (0vDuM)
Geeze, the post office still delivers to your door down there?...they haven't done that up here for 20 years. There are neighborhood boxes at the end of streets, entrances of developments etc that they put our mail in.
Small corner stores can be postal outlets, they put a parcel card in your box saying you have a package at the corner store and you go get it.
Not exactly the ultimate service but it all works pretty well...they go on strike often though and I prefer to get paid electronically.
Posted by: CanaDave at August 12, 2011 07:19 AM (IuNVR)
On this point there is also no mention of delivery to your door either.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at August 12, 2011 07:19 AM (tf9Ne)
Closest small town: Population "about 400". Rural Route Delivery within the county includes "about double that....maybe 800 total".
Postmaster's job involves supervision of 2 delivery people both working 4 hour days to run their rural route delivery routes, and personally manning the post office (for PO Box pickup and delivery) while they are out on their delivery routes. The post office is only open 8am to 3 weekdays and 8 til noon on saturdays not including federal holidays.
Postmaster's Salary: $165,000 plus standard federal benefits and heathcare and 100% pension after 20 years. His salary alone exceeds all other civic employees in this town combined, including the other postal employees, our Mayor, one police officer and volunteer fire dept.
I. Sh*t. You. Not.
Posted by: MrObvious at August 12, 2011 07:20 AM (qwhLZ)
Depends on the position in private industry. UPS package drivers (the brown trucks) probably make more than that including benefits. And the semi drivers make even more.
But they are held to standards of productivity that would stun the post office.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 12, 2011 07:20 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Olliander at August 12, 2011 07:20 AM (6uiF7)
GnuBreed at August 12, 2011 11:04 AM (ENKCw)
That is correct. When a utility crew was working on my street and making it difficult to drive through, I did not receive any mail for two days. When I called to complain, I was told that there was no requirement for the USPS to deliver my mail.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at August 12, 2011 07:21 AM (UhTsC)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at August 12, 2011 07:22 AM (0vDuM)
WATCH OUT!!! ["Danger Will Robinson. Danger!"]
The key phrase here was dropping the "retiree health benefit pre-funding costs imposed by Congress". That means they have to put the money in the pot for the retirees' health care. If they skate out on this one what will happen is that those costs will fall back on the government's retirement plan rescue program (for all comers). In other words, they will dump their health care costs on the taxpayers not the people paying for mail.
It's a scam and a fraud.
Posted by: chuck in st paul at August 12, 2011 07:22 AM (EhYdw)
This is true. But if there were competition to handle mail, we'd still get door (or at least curb) delivery.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at August 12, 2011 07:22 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: GabeS at August 12, 2011 07:22 AM (ZaNql)
Sort of. What I heard on the radio today was they were just asking congress for permission to do the layoffs. No mention was made of them actually asking to remove the pre-funding requirement.
It's the Union that's saying, "No, no, no: just remove that pre-funding requirement, and everything will be hunky-dory!"
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at August 12, 2011 07:24 AM (8y9MW)
67My shrew of a sister in law works at the PO. When I mentioned a couple of weeks ago to her that the Post Master General was talking about going to a 3 delivery day week, she squealed "We'll just see about that" in her best I'm a union hag voice. I'll have to ask her what she thinks about this latest development.
---
Reminds me of the state run toll roads (pre-Ez pass). The toll person would wait until I pulled up and stopped before putting down her book and coming to the window to get my money. Always acting like she just noticed me there. She's gone now.
Posted by: Jimmah at August 12, 2011 07:24 AM (TfRqk)
Depends on the position in private industry. UPS package drivers (the brown trucks) probably make more than that including benefits. And the semi drivers make even more.
But they are held to standards of productivity that would stun the post office.
Oh right, I'm sure they get paid more than that including benefits, but as you said, the company has to be profitable first.
Posted by: Ben at August 12, 2011 07:25 AM (wuv1c)
So they lay off 120,000 and go right to 1:1. Seems like they should be working on that second number somehow.
_________
CAROUSEL! RENEW! RENEW!
Posted by: Anachronda at August 12, 2011 07:25 AM (IrbU4)
It's not. They do get Govt. Support. And they go back with their hands out fairly regularly.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at August 12, 2011 07:25 AM (8y9MW)
Olbermann on Current TV. Ratings juggernaut!
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 12, 2011 07:26 AM (jx2j9)
OPTION 1: I can write out a check, enclose the check with the bill in an envelope, put a $0.44 cent stamp on it, mail it, and then wait two days to a week (for local delivery, no less).
OPTION 2: I can log in to the cable company's website and pay my bill electronically in about five minutes.
This is why the US Postal Service is doomed. Its business model is obsolete, and fixed labor and retiree costs are killing it dead, dead, dead. There is no 'fixing' the USPS. It is insolvent and has no future. Let it die with whatever dignity it has left.
Posted by: Monty at August 12, 2011 07:26 AM (/0a60)
Down 8 points in NJ since May
Now under water in NY
Posted by: Johnny at August 12, 2011 07:27 AM (iT/Iy)
---
More like "Teen Beat." It is a squeaky clean site, after all.
I hope to goodness that the next time Gabe does the poll here he posts the responses over time to the last poll to show the effect of an Instalanche of Palin and Paul supporters on the results. I don't care about who can win the poll as much as I care about what the opinions of real morons are. The best way to do that is to track the results over time so that you can distinguish between a random sampling of site visitors and folks who descend on the site to win a poll.
Posted by: Y-not at August 12, 2011 07:27 AM (5H6zj)
92On this point there is also no mention of delivery to your door either.
This is true. But if there were competition to handle mail, we'd still get door (or at least curb) delivery.
---
Yep, unless they changed the law, anyone inside a certain distance from the post office enjoys the "privilege" of having the mail delivered to their house. At least thats what they told me when my car was in my driveway, preventing them from using it the driveway to turn around.
Posted by: Jimmah at August 12, 2011 07:27 AM (TfRqk)
Oh, and speaking of "they don't have to make a profit" it still pisses me off that they used to give Lance Armstrong millions of dollars while they were losing money and raising rates. If his cycling team wants a federal pork grant, they should go get it from Congress like the teapot museums and gay penis researchers.
But don't you realized the increased business the USPS got from that endorsement?
How many young kids out there thought to themselves, "Wow, Armstrong is so inspiring, I need to get down to the Post Office and pick up 20 books of forever stamps!"
Step 1: Spend millions in advertising even though you don't have any competition for sending snail mail letters
Step 2: ????
Step 3: Profit
Posted by: Ben at August 12, 2011 07:28 AM (wuv1c)
My Rottweiler is in the corner, despondent.
My collie amuses herself by alerting me to every yard worker, sprinkler, and air conditioner in the neighborhood.
Posted by: Y-not at August 12, 2011 07:29 AM (5H6zj)
102I need to pay my cable bill.
OPTION 1: I can write out a check, enclose the check with the bill in an envelope, put a $0.44 cent stamp on it, mail it, and then wait two days to a week (for local delivery, no less).
OPTION 2: I can log in to the cable company's website and pay my bill electronically in about five minutes.
This is why the US Postal Service is doomed. Its business model is obsolete, and fixed labor and retiree costs are killing it dead, dead, dead. There is no 'fixing' the USPS. It is insolvent and has no future. Let it die with whatever dignity it has left.
----
Dem solution:
Tax online payments and use that money to subsidize the post office.
Posted by: Jimmah at August 12, 2011 07:29 AM (TfRqk)
The letter arrived with a flag sticker where the stamp should have been.
_________
Dementia like a fox!
Posted by: Anachronda at August 12, 2011 07:29 AM (NmR1a)
The lazy, rude bastards behind the counter at the PO are another story. First time I sent a package to our boy, I politely asked the bored employee how long he thought it would take to get to him. His reply, "Who knows?"
This, after standing in line for at least half an hour. I was seething when I left.
I now use my UPS Store. Great people, and they have all my information on their computer, fill out the customs form with it, and I'm in and out of there in minutes.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at August 12, 2011 07:29 AM (UOM48)
yup - it's stupid
I wonder, what are the commercial rates for sending bulk mail?
Posted by: chemjeff at August 12, 2011 07:29 AM (s7mIC)
What. The. Hell.
What rational company can expect to *never* lay off anyone, ever? Hell, my company sheds between 2% - 5% employees every year to boost year-end numbers.
On a side note, I despise working for a publicly traded company. Causes myopic management.
Posted by: Lone Marauder at August 12, 2011 07:30 AM (/bVuS)
Posted by: supercore23 at August 12, 2011 07:30 AM (bwV72)
Posted by: Minnie Rodent at August 12, 2011 07:30 AM (S3rrR)
Posted by: Beckster at August 12, 2011 07:32 AM (VjJAc)
________
And the other fourth are bills I don't want to pay...
Posted by: Anachronda at August 12, 2011 07:32 AM (NmR1a)
I think it's been pointed out on this website before, but when customers began complaining about the wait time in the post offices, the USPS fixed it by getting rid of all the clocks.
So next time you are in your local post office check to see if there are any clocks there
Posted by: Ben at August 12, 2011 07:32 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at August 12, 2011 11:18 AM (8y9MW)
Interesting idea. But that would suppose that there are companies that can deliver to every address in the United States, and can handle both parcels and letters. They would have to have existing networks of planes, trucks, trains and small delivery vehicles, and the sorting facilities to handle millions of pieces each day. They would also have to be technologically advanced to maintain robust tracking and confirmation systems.
Obviously those companies don't exist, so this is all a pipe dream.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 12, 2011 07:33 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: GabeS at August 12, 2011 11:22 AM (ZaNql)
They have 'a line of credit' from the US Treasury. They have borrowed up to their max on it. I'm sure Congress, in their infinite wisdom and total disdain for our money, will just up the number. It's what they always do.
Regardless of my previous rant, I don't have a real problem with the USPS in general....I just think they should be run like a private business. They are mostly irrelevant to me any more, as I've mailed out one item in the past year. I get my bills online and pay them that way too.
Posted by: GnuBreed at August 12, 2011 07:33 AM (ENKCw)
Posted by: nickless at August 12, 2011 07:34 AM (MMC8r)
10 Too many pensioners?
Two words. Company picnic.
Two more words. Warm mayonnaise.
Two more words. Meat grinder.
Posted by: Y-not at August 12, 2011 07:34 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at August 12, 2011 07:35 AM (IpiZb)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at August 12, 2011 11:29 AM (UOM4
I use UPS to send packages to my son too but I've found that not all UPS stores have the computerized custom forms. The one closest to me does not. I went to another one that I use to go to all the time (before we moved) and they have it computerized. I don't get that. Wouldn't all UPS computer systems be the same? Or is the one I'm going to lying to me because they don't want to bother filling in the custom form fields on the computer so they make me do it by hand?
Posted by: Tami at August 12, 2011 07:35 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: Y-not at August 12, 2011 07:35 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: WalrusRex at August 12, 2011 07:35 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Beckster at August 12, 2011 07:35 AM (VjJAc)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at August 12, 2011 07:35 AM (IpiZb)
Posted by: supercore23 at August 12, 2011 07:36 AM (bwV72)
Posted by: polynikes at August 12, 2011 07:36 AM (1hMOs)
Posted by: Mr. Fire at August 12, 2011 07:37 AM (TOk1P)
Posted by: supercore23 at August 12, 2011 07:37 AM (bwV72)
We're desperately trying to get all of our customers set up for paperless billing so we don't have to send out as much postage.
Here's a hint from the consumer side - I refuse to agree to paperless billing because it is way way way too damn easy for the company to claim "oh hey yeah we totally sent out that email sorry it got spammed and you got hit with a $25 late fee lol". That actually happened to me in the middle of the Adelphia/Comcast merge and Comcasstic's response was hey you should have known that the bill was due. When I politely pointed out that I couldn't log into the website to see what I owed or pay the bill since the website was down due to the merger, the response was a shrug.
Funnily, when I mentioned that I would be more than happy to start up a class action suit, that fee got waived.
Posted by: alexthechick at August 12, 2011 07:37 AM (VtjlW)
How Congress will respond to the postal proposals remains to be seen.
-----
I sense another terroristic GOP hostage event, followed by a speech from the president.
Posted by: Jimmah at August 12, 2011 07:38 AM (TfRqk)
No, the pensions will get paid. They will get bailed out by the government. That is how public employee union logic works. They push for the maximum demands, completely going over the line from "reasonable" to "batshit insane", threaten strikes and bedlam if they don't get their way, with absolutely no worries in the world because they know that their completely unreasonable demands will be met by tax hikes and government bailouts in the end.
Posted by: chemjeff at August 12, 2011 07:38 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: Democrat Party & Media Fellaters at August 12, 2011 07:38 AM (EmQvy)
Government doesn't like competition.
Posted by: EC at August 12, 2011 07:38 AM (GQ8sn)
Many of the worries that rural areas would lose mail service altogether are probably overstated, and I'd be willing to bet that lots of people would compete for private contracts to deliver mail to rural areas (some already do that for UPS and FedEx way out in the boonies).
Posted by: Monty at August 12, 2011 07:39 AM (/0a60)
The ones I hate are the companies that do auto-bill and make it really hard to turn it off. I got zapped by Angie's List doing that. My impression of that enterprise was already going negative, but that sealed it.
Posted by: Y-not at August 12, 2011 07:40 AM (5H6zj)
Oh I only wish that I had a UPS store here. Instead, I have some lackey in a trailer that is only open about 3 hours per day, always with long lines to get and send packages.
Posted by: chemjeff at August 12, 2011 07:41 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: Tami at August 12, 2011 07:41 AM (X6akg)
First off, there are at least 2 that have (between them) 100% coverage. So, yes, there could be competition. Second, I don't need 100% coverage. What you might well see spring up are regional carriers which then form coalitions to deliver cross-country. Say a TX/OK/AR Carrier vs a TX/NM/CO Carrier vs a TX/LA/MS Carrier and then various other combinations. Then, If I want to send something from Hawaii to NY, I select one of the national carriers (the new USPS, UPS, FEDEX) or I select a regional carrier that has business partners that can get it all the way where it needs to go.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at August 12, 2011 07:41 AM (8y9MW)
I don't think it's just the unions you have to worry about. The USPS is probably the largest employer of minorities. It's the third rail on steroids for Dems.
You can expand that statement to include essentially any and all forms of governent employment. You can't expect Dems to reduce the size of government anywhere, because your federal, state and local goverment workers are the people who vote them into office.
Posted by: Mr. Fire at August 12, 2011 07:41 AM (TOk1P)
You could hire a highly educated lawyer, accountant, or engineer for this hourly rate.
Posted by: cherry π at August 12, 2011 07:41 AM (OhYCU)
That would only work if all companies were required to provide a 14 day billing cycle to account for the lag in service at both ends and delivery time. A lot of them don't. The phone companies seem to be particularly guilty of quick turn-arounds on billing.
Posted by: Y-not at August 12, 2011 07:41 AM (5H6zj)
It's all junkmail and redundant bills I've already paid.
USPS could cease operations tomorrow and I wouldn't notice.
Posted by: Clubber Lang at August 12, 2011 07:42 AM (QcFbt)
The amount of junk mail we receive is ridiculous. Having to haul it to the recycling center is a pain in the ass.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at August 12, 2011 11:01 AM (UOM4
What? I don't haul my trash anywhere regardless of how much gas costs. If they don't make recycling stupid simple - ie, pickup at my curb. I don't do it. If I have to read signs to figure out where something goes, it goes into the receptacle nearest to me.
I've got better things to do than waste time with trash. That includes Liberals.
Posted by: blindside at August 12, 2011 07:42 AM (x7g7t)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 12, 2011 07:43 AM (lbo6/)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 12, 2011 11:38 AM (LH6ir)
I'd be a big, ugly, bearded bitch!
Posted by: garrett at August 12, 2011 07:43 AM (Vwq6Q)
Posted by: chemjeff at August 12, 2011 07:43 AM (s7mIC)
WEll, I have had the opposite problem than some of you...I HATE dealing with the Post Office and have had nothing but problems with them. Their "tracking system" is a total joke. If I order from Amazon or another web site I makle sure that they aren't using USPS, or I pay extra for 2-day delivery. USPS has lost and inordinate amount of packages over the past few years, and there's no customer service to complain to, or incentive for them to improve. And don;t start me on the retail locations, where the clerks smugly go to lunch as the line starts to build.....
Fedex is best, followed by UPS. DHL is best for overseas work.
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at August 12, 2011 07:43 AM (YmPwQ)
I was being sarcastic.
Obviously UPS and FedEx have the existing networks to deliver 1st class mail and all of the packages that the USPS deals with. The bulk mail? I doubt it.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 12, 2011 07:43 AM (LH6ir)
I don't know, mine is kinda hawt actually
(she's clearly not a carnie)
Posted by: chemjeff at August 12, 2011 07:44 AM (s7mIC)
145Do we really need daily mail service? I certainly don't. I could easily get by with twice-a-week delivery
---
Works for me. Thats about how often I check the mail and still there's nothing worth getting. It helps that when I moved in January I took the mailbox out of the ground, and didn't do the change of address thing.
The only person who got excited was the bank who suddenly started getting "return to sender" on their statements (that I put straight into the shredder anyway).
Posted by: Jimmah at August 12, 2011 07:44 AM (TfRqk)
Posted by: nerdygirl at August 12, 2011 07:45 AM (EmQvy)
This.
I will pay my bill online, but I want a paper bill. Or, at least, I want a simple and convenient way to view my bill online, and a reminder that the bill is available.
And, no, I will not set up automatic payments. You may not keep my credit card number and just bill my card- I will pay you when I'm good and ready. If that means I have to pay a late fee, that's on me, isn't it?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at August 12, 2011 07:45 AM (8y9MW)
Perfectly! I know this is bad, but I couldn't find my meat thermometer, so I "winged" it. It was a 10lb turkey that I'd taken out of the fridge early, then stuffed just before cooking. I did it at 325 for 3 hours. Breast meat is good enough for even me to eat (I'm a dark meat gal... no, no, not THAT!).
Of course slathering it with butter at the start and basting every 20 minutes probably helped.
I could have gotten the breast skin a tad darker, but I was worried about drying it out so I tented it about halfway through.
Came in handy that night. Hubby had a crapola day and was sort of dreading having to work from home after dinner. He opened the door and was greeted to the aroma of turkey dinner. Happy man!
Posted by: Y-not at August 12, 2011 07:45 AM (5H6zj)
The UPS guys on the other hand....
I worked for UPS for a long time, and I had drivers who did very, very well on their suburban delivery routes.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 12, 2011 07:46 AM (LH6ir)
Or set up a system to deliver to a gas station or grocery store where you could pick up your mail from. Just like the general store did in all the westerns I've seen. It would minimize stops and in a privatized system I'm guessing stores would fight over the privilege of providing that service in town.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at August 12, 2011 07:46 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: Johnny at August 12, 2011 07:46 AM (iT/Iy)
We showed that video a head honcho at the post office to get him on board for the prosecution. He looked at the video then signed off the the guy was truly disabled. end of prosecution and everybody was happy. Well, not me or the inspectors so much.
Posted by: WalrusRex at August 12, 2011 07:47 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: nerdygirl at August 12, 2011 07:47 AM (EmQvy)
OPTION 2: I can log in to the cable company's website and pay my bill electronically in about five minutes."
Yeah, my wife is still paranoid of Option 2 and insists on mailing nearly every bill in. .20 for the check, .05/envelope (or w/e they cost now), and .43 for the stamp. Plus time to write all of that out.
And then, she is surprised when someone calls to say 'why didn't you pay your bill'. 'Because the post office ate it. duh.'
Nearly free, instantaneous delivery, but she insists on doing it the expensive, time-consuming, and unreliable way because she 'feels better about it'.
If she weren't married to me, I'm almost certain she would vote Democrat.
Posted by: blindside at August 12, 2011 07:47 AM (x7g7t)
I refuse.
_________
I don't go paperless because I use the pile to remind me when it's time to pay the bills. When I'm having trouble stuffing the bills into their nook, it's time to pay them.
Posted by: Anachronda at August 12, 2011 07:47 AM (xGZ+b)
Sorry. Sometimes tone-of-voice doesn't come over so well.
As for handling bulk mail- I think they'd be fine. It would probably cost more per ounce (but you'd probably pay based on your actual usage, not a minimum of 1 oz), but I bet they could do it. I think FedEX has even said they have plans to that effect, just in case the opportunity comes up.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at August 12, 2011 07:48 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: The LoLPostman at August 12, 2011 07:48 AM (kaOJx)
Here's a novel thought...USPS handles trunk route, regional and local delivery is contracted out to private firms. Where no firms exist to handle given routes and distribution, retain existing staff and facilities until such time as they exist.
Possible alternative/additional idea, spin the existing staff, facilities etc. off as private firms. Have contracts come up for review and renewal every five years or so. USPS handles complaints about contractors, giving at least the potential for accountability.
Probably at least a dozen problems with the plan, but it's a start...
Posted by: F--- Nevada! (I'm AoSHQ's DarkLord©, and I approve this message) at August 12, 2011 07:48 AM (GBXon)
My neighbor is a postal worker with 30 years in. He is the laziest piece of shit that I have ever known. About 10 years ago he started having "back problems". He was off work for about a year, no surgery but damn if he don't dig on the pain killers. Since then he's probably averaged 10 work days a month ( I'm not shitting you here ). He has no problem getting out and mowing the lawn, bar-b-queing and laying in the sun. According to his wife he's hated at work because of the extra burden they have to cover his route, but his supervisors can't touch him because of his seniority and the union. He makes 54,000 a year just in salary as a letter carrier.
And on a side note....registered dem....go figure.
Posted by: bosk at August 12, 2011 07:49 AM (n2K+4)
Mine is actually a very nice young lady (she looks like she's about 12). But she's new; the old guy looked like an alky coming off of a four-day bender.
Posted by: Monty at August 12, 2011 07:50 AM (/0a60)
Posted by: Blue Hen at August 12, 2011 07:52 AM (326rv)
I don't get why people go to each merchant's site to pay their bills. How many logins does that require?
Why not set them up as payees at your bank website? Then it's one login for paying all bills.
Posted by: Tami at August 12, 2011 07:53 AM (X6akg)
To all morons: Always click on an Obama or DNC ad when you see them. It'll be one less ad in their inventory.
Posted by: Johnny at August 12, 2011 07:53 AM (iT/Iy)
eh - mine was still the scary looking grandpa dude about mortgage refinancing.
Something tells me you were surfing recently about fleas and ticks...
Posted by: chemjeff at August 12, 2011 07:53 AM (s7mIC)
Nor interesting topic. An inefficient government agency staffed by union members going broke due to labor and pension costs is only marginally interesting in that they are actually considering laying off someone. (The horror. Expect protests)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at August 12, 2011 07:54 AM (0q2P7)
But not a Milwaukee Public School teacher....
Posted by: HeatherRadish at August 12, 2011 07:54 AM (0vDuM)
well, not all banks are this organized.
I bank at a regional bank here (I refuse to go to one of the mega-banks). Their website is a bit on the primitive side. It is fine for balancing my checkbook and transferring funds between accounts, but it isn't good for much more than that.
Posted by: chemjeff at August 12, 2011 07:55 AM (s7mIC)
Lots of companies won't allow second-party payment. (Verizon won't, for example, or at least it didn't the last time I tried to set it up.)
Posted by: Monty at August 12, 2011 07:55 AM (/0a60)
Replacement windows (Nope didn't look for em, and don't need em)
And
Web hosting? (Similarly disinterested)
Laser guided ads missed target by a mile.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at August 12, 2011 07:56 AM (0q2P7)
_________
That's the way I do it. For some reason, the bank can't make my car payment automatically, so they have to actually mail a check. It takes anywhere from 5 days to three weeks for that payment to go through.
I don't think it's all on the USPS end, though; other payments that the bank has to mail (plumber, etc.) always seem to go through in no more than a week.
Posted by: Anachronda at August 12, 2011 07:56 AM (NmR1a)
Posted by: Monty at August 12, 2011 11:55 AM (/0a60)
I've been paying my Verizon bill for years through my online banking.
Posted by: Tami at August 12, 2011 07:56 AM (X6akg)
They're very nice. (He is also former military, and looks like he could kill Jesse Ventura with his bare hands.)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at August 12, 2011 07:57 AM (UOM48)
---
Has your company seen a effect in collections from this?
A few years ago I had a discussion with a vendor who had gone to paperless billing complain that their collection costs had gone up as a result. Making the customer responsible for printing e-mailed invoices meant they didn't get into the payables system as promptly thus delaying payment.
Posted by: Retread at August 12, 2011 07:58 AM (G+7cD)
___________
Odd. I pay my Verizon bill from my bank every month. My wife set it up, though, so I don't know if there was some special magic she had to use.
Posted by: Anachronda at August 12, 2011 07:58 AM (NmR1a)
Posted by: Y-not at August 12, 2011 07:58 AM (5H6zj)
Why yes, yes there was.
Posted by: horny Verizon billing agent at August 12, 2011 07:59 AM (5H6zj)
I'll make dinner for you.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at August 12, 2011 07:59 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at August 12, 2011 08:00 AM (tUv2Y)
Posted by: Jimmah at August 12, 2011 08:01 AM (TfRqk)
Does that mean all emails will be loaded on thumb drives and delivered to my mailbox?
Posted by: Buzzsaw at August 12, 2011 08:01 AM (tf9Ne)
That's the way I do it. For some reason, the bank can't make my car payment automatically, so they have to actually mail a check. It takes anywhere from 5 days to three weeks for that payment to go through.
I don't think it's all on the USPS end, though; other payments that the bank has to mail (plumber, etc.) always seem to go through in no more than a week.
Posted by: Anachronda at August 12, 2011 11:56 AM (NmR1a)
The only bills I pay through USPS are city property tax bills and that's because they REQUIRE you to do it that way. Heaven forbid they get rid of someone opening up an envelope.
For at least 10 years I have paid all my bills through online banking.
Posted by: Tami at August 12, 2011 08:01 AM (X6akg)
Where? There's two in this city open past 4:30 on weekdays, conveniently located 20-45 minutes away from my work. If I have anything larger than a Netflix envelope, my choices are FedEx, UPS, and "wait until Saturday."
Posted by: HeatherRadish at August 12, 2011 08:02 AM (0vDuM)
It's quite possible that I was just dealing with an idiot (hardly rare for my bank). I should go back and see if someone competent can set it up. Almost all my other bills are electronic by now.
I do agree with the "no autopay" option, though. I pay when *I* want to, not when the company wants me to.
Posted by: Monty at August 12, 2011 08:03 AM (/0a60)
I'll make dinner for you.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at August 12, 2011 11:59 AM (UOM4
I'll do it. Just tell me what a vacuum cleaner looks like.
Posted by: The Mega Independent at August 12, 2011 08:04 AM (tUv2Y)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 12, 2011 08:05 AM (lbo6/)
Oooh, something even I can do!
Oh wait, I'm several hundred miles away. Sorry Mrs. D'oh,
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at August 12, 2011 08:05 AM (9hSKh)
You know, does it seem to you that there are just more and more idiots out there? I can't call customer service for any company hardly and not talk to a goddamn idiot, after wading through the retarded phone computer system. Where did all the non-idiots go?
Posted by: chemjeff at August 12, 2011 08:07 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 12, 2011 12:05 PM (lbo6/)
Well? How was she in the sack?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 12, 2011 08:08 AM (LH6ir)
I'd make a suggestive comment here but I don't want to get yelled at by Mama Grizzly D'oh
Posted by: chemjeff at August 12, 2011 08:08 AM (s7mIC)
The only bills I pay through USPS are city property tax bills and that's because they REQUIRE you to do it that way. Heaven forbid they get rid of someone opening up an envelope.
Lol! The Philadelphia Water Dept. charges $4 to make an online payment. So, this is the only bill we mail every month. A book of stamps lasts me almost 2 years. My checkbook collects dust.
If Iran ever gets that EMP strike off, we're boned.
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at August 12, 2011 08:09 AM (YmPwQ)
They were culled (thru indoctrination) by the public school system.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at August 12, 2011 08:10 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: MrObvious at August 12, 2011 08:11 AM (qwhLZ)
It's quite possible that I was just dealing with an idiot (hardly rare for my bank). I should go back and see if someone competent can set it up. Almost all my other bills are electronic by now.
Wait...you have to have someone at your bank set up your online payees or am I misunderstanding what you're saying?
I set mine up myself....online.
Posted by: Tami at August 12, 2011 08:12 AM (X6akg)
USPS carriers are a pretty scurvy-looking lot.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 12, 2011 11:43 AM (lbo6/)
I see you have met my brother-in-law. Except he is just a lazy, whiny alcoholic and not a registered sex offender- as far as I know.
Posted by: Museisluse at August 12, 2011 08:16 AM (4Lj43)
They are very cost-competitive in some areas of package shipment. In a lot of cases they're the only reasonable game in town for shipping stuff overseas.
First-class mail exists now only for things that absolutely, positively must have a paper trail. Or at least it would be if there weren't still a few entities who either won't do electronic payment or try to stick you with a bunch of fees for doing so.
Posted by: JEM at August 12, 2011 08:19 AM (o+SC1)
Posted by: nerdygirl at August 12, 2011 08:19 AM (EmQvy)
Posted by: goddessoftheclassroom at August 12, 2011 08:20 AM (ympbj)
Here's my experience:
Mrs. MCPO - Retired worked for the Post Office for awhile. They have this HR model that gets around the benefits issue. They are hiring what they call Temporary City and Temporary Rural Carriers. Hourly wage, no benes. Not required to be in the union. The temporary carrier has to take two or three weeks off at the end of their hiring year in order not to be a full time employee - and thus be paid benefits. The Mrs. was both a city carrier and a rural carrier. City carrier paid about $23/hr and rural paid about $18. The work was not easy. In my biased opinion, she earned her paycheck. (Also, being a city carrier is a great way to lose weight and get in shape! - but I digress).
She basically lost her job when she got a new postmaster that didn't like the Temporary Carrier program and started gradually pushing them out, even those who had worked the position for many years. Oh well, it was a pretty good gig while it lasted.
Posted by: MCPO - Retired at August 12, 2011 08:21 AM (zh60d)
Posted by: Jean at August 12, 2011 08:22 AM (kUxiO)
Posted by: cherry ð
You went public with this? I thought that what we had was special. It was certainly non-refundable.
Posted by: Blue Hen at August 12, 2011 08:24 AM (6rX0K)
But the problem is as you worded it with the "public school system." The indoctrination is fed out to the schools by govt/NEA and no single teacher can overcome the damage it causes. There are good people that work throughout the govt but do I have to mention that constantly in any complaint.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at August 12, 2011 08:26 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: supercore23 at August 12, 2011 08:53 AM (bwV72)
Posted by: Stella at August 12, 2011 08:58 AM (tYR6e)
Posted by: Chuckit at August 12, 2011 09:26 AM (Ha4cV)
Posted by: Call me Ishmael at August 12, 2011 09:54 AM (hZqYp)
Posted by: polynikes at August 12, 2011 10:35 AM (1hMOs)
Posted by: curious at August 12, 2011 11:03 AM (k1rwm)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_Express_Statutes
(As for sponsoring a cycling team, my understanding is that that was for the purpose of advertising to Europeans, for whose business they do have to compete.)
Posted by: silverpie at August 12, 2011 11:23 AM (LbwgI)
Posted by: Kbob at August 12, 2011 11:58 AM (059EH)
Posted by: The Hare with Amber Eyes AudioBook at August 12, 2011 03:28 PM (8Dm6R)
Posted by: GHD at August 14, 2011 02:15 AM (UDaJ+)
Posted by: Louis Vuitton For Sale at August 19, 2011 12:15 AM (XQYWG)
county, a total of more than 727000 people are evil.Zhejiang province was established as the flood relief will raise, invite Cheap MBT Chiang kai-shek, ZhangJingJiang, YuQia qing, WangXiao, HuangJinRong, which DuYueSheng, GHD Sale UK such as ZhangXiaoLin 64 people as a committee member, and raise relief established in Shanghai office in Shanghai, the YuQia qing, DuYueSheng, ZhangXiaoLin, which WangXiao etc to members.This time mainly adopted relief programme, help relief way to raise, all play coupon total sales coupon endowment is 40578 yuan, GHD Hair including DuYueSheng have pin coupons, plan alone 11235 yuan, accounting for more than a quarter full.Therefore, zhejiang flood relief will raise and based in Shanghai office to deliver the expertise to DuYueSheng board, MBT as a little encouragement.
Posted by: GHD Straighteners at August 19, 2011 01:12 AM (ZzqXu)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2889 seconds, 360 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Y-not at August 12, 2011 06:46 AM (5H6zj)