August 06, 2011
— andy I heard this ad from the American Postal Workers Union (APWU) on the way to work the other day and about wrecked the car:
Seems Darrell Issa didn't care for it much either.
Not a single cent of taxpayer dollars, huh? Then how do you explain this, you lying bastards?
The US Postal Service warned on Friday that it could default on payments it owes the federal government, just days after the US government itself narrowly averted a default.The government's mail service said it lost $3.1 billion in the period from April to June, blaming "the anemic state of the economy" and the growing popularity of electronic communications over old-fashioned letters.
As a result of its mounting losses, the US Postal Service said it would not be able to make a legally required $5.5 billion payment in September to a health-benefits trust fund.
Oh. The federal government just fronts the USPS workers' (read APWU members') health benefits with taxpayer dollars that the USPS can't reimburse.
Got it!
The entire bloated, corrupt enterprise that is our federal government is about to unravel in front of us. And it's going to be ugly.
More to come.
Update: By comparison, while the USPS was busy losing $3.1 billion, FedEx made $865 million pre-tax in its fourth fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2011.
Posted by: andy at
09:15 AM
| Comments (246)
Post contains 236 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: RightWing Prof, managing partn, Bacon & Cleavage LLC at August 06, 2011 09:19 AM (UOcNk)
can't get much worse........
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at August 06, 2011 09:20 AM (UqKQV)
The entire bloated, corrupt enterprise that is our federal government is about to unravel in front of us. And it's going to be ugly.
Youuuuuu said it!
(*Little Rascals nod*)
Posted by: FireHorse at August 06, 2011 09:22 AM (gTGz3)
Posted by: cherry π at August 06, 2011 09:22 AM (OhYCU)
hey how about we produce a USPS Letter Carrier Calendar?
Who doesn't want to see a frumpy unshaven tattooed middle-aged guy wearing shorts and an untucked shirt?
Posted by: USPS at August 06, 2011 09:23 AM (P/N2O)
USPS - just one more example of Dim empowered union leaches, sucking America dry.
Hell yes privatize them. First fire them all, then let them interview for jobs with whoever gets the charter/contract. Let them work for compensation like UPS & FedEx.
Posted by: flyby at August 06, 2011 09:24 AM (ucq49)
Posted by: U.S. Postal Workers Union at August 06, 2011 09:24 AM (m6OUa)
Congress itself does bear some role in their failure; they stopped efforts by the USPS to close facilities or cut the delivery days, but then again that is what Congress does. Time after time.
There can be no cuts anywhere ever unless they find their nuts firmly in a vise and the lever being turned towards 'tighten'.
Posted by: GnuBreed at August 06, 2011 09:24 AM (ENKCw)
Posted by: ronno at August 06, 2011 09:25 AM (nQR0p)
Imagine giving a salary, pension, and full benefits to the person who delivers the Coupon Pak to you every day.
Posted by: soothie at August 06, 2011 09:26 AM (P/N2O)
Posted by: cherry π at August 06, 2011 09:26 AM (OhYCU)
Posted by: 80sBaby at August 06, 2011 09:27 AM (o2lIv)
Posted by: ErikW at August 06, 2011 09:29 AM (sxI83)
The postmaster at my local P.O. told me a few years ago that three-quarters of the USPS's revenue is from direct-mail advertising. Mail delivery isn't so much a government function as it is a government function wrapped in a commercial enterprise -- and their primary offering is junk-mail.
The Postal Service also considers the recipients of mail to be their customers, not the senders who are their paying customers. So it's a commercial enterprise in which they serve customers who don't pay for the service and hate most of the product.
Does this strike anyone as a flawed business model?
Posted by: FireHorse at August 06, 2011 09:31 AM (gTGz3)
It's too bad the APWU doesn't have to live by the rules of evil corporations. If a pharmaceutical tried an ad that misleading, the FDA would have them jumping through rings of fire.
Posted by: arhooley at August 06, 2011 09:32 AM (npmom)
Let them work for compensation like UPS
sorry dude, worked for a while for UPS. They are firmly in the "good" hands of the fucking teamsters
Posted by: Ma Bell at August 06, 2011 09:33 AM (iCMfM)
Posted by: Lauren at August 06, 2011 09:34 AM (HsfLZ)
Of course, like every other real 'fix" for our bloated government that will take any Art V convention. The commies will never allow it and the Repubs would just negotiate it away for a "vote" and a bag of "magic beans".
Posted by: Vic at August 06, 2011 09:35 AM (M9Ie6)
And, again, what's breaking our back in this country is trying to pay people NOT to work. Public and private pensions (SS), and medical care, for people leaving the workforce is the biggest financial challenge we're facing.
Posted by: nickless at August 06, 2011 09:35 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Red Shirt at August 06, 2011 09:36 AM (FIDMq)
I doubt that my story is atypical.
Posted by: Captain Hate at August 06, 2011 09:36 AM (houma)
Posted by: Lauren at August 06, 2011 09:36 AM (HsfLZ)
Posted by: richard mcenroe at August 06, 2011 09:36 AM (qvify)
Posted by: richard mcenroe at August 06, 2011 01:36 PM (qvify)
So does Perez Hilton.
Posted by: Andrew Sullivan's Throbbing Cock at August 06, 2011 09:39 AM (CbVHZ)
Looking at you Bachmann...
Posted by: weft cut-loop at August 06, 2011 09:40 AM (DEcmU)
President Dinglebarry Hemorrhoid likes to go after the evil private sector. The uncontrolled greedy evil and nasty private sector. Government agencies, like the USPS are precious and sweet. They nurture and help the citizens of our country. Private Sector = greedy liars and drain on society..Federal Government = honest, upright, helpful, cost effective, and overall much more smarter than any private business.
Posted by: Sparky at August 06, 2011 09:41 AM (MqT/F)
We keep encountering those three words that can explain the vast majority of this nation's financial woes. And those words are: Public employee unions.
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at August 06, 2011 09:41 AM (4Mft3)
The postmaster at my local P.O. told me a few years ago that three-quarters of the USPS's revenue is from direct-mail advertising. Mail delivery isn't so much a government function as it is a government function wrapped in a commercial enterprise -- and their primary offering is junk-mail.
The Postal Service also considers the recipients of mail to be their customers, not the senders who are their paying customers. So it's a commercial enterprise in which they serve customers who don't pay for the service and hate most of the product.
Does this strike anyone as a flawed business model?
Posted by: FireHorse at August 06, 2011 01:31 PM (gTGz3)
we're the government, we don't need no stinking business model...
Posted by: U.S. Postal Workers Union at August 06, 2011 09:43 AM (m6OUa)
LOL that reminds me of a really small town near here that I go through on the way to a rural restaurant that my wife and I like to hit every now and then. This town has a total population of 269 as of the last census. It also has a post office.
The Post Office tried to close it several years ago and the town screamed to the congress critters. The post office is still open and I'll bet it is on that list.
Posted by: Vic at August 06, 2011 09:44 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Truman North at August 06, 2011 09:45 AM (K2wpv)
To tell you how screwed up the Post Office pay structure is, when I was a kid in GA rural route postman was a "political job". You could not get that job unless you "knew" someone.
People here in SC still fight over jobs at the post office.
Posted by: Vic at August 06, 2011 09:47 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Ronster at August 06, 2011 09:48 AM (Oz+gx)
Charlie Gasparino on Monica. Wow I didn't realize that the first thing that BO said after the bill passed was that he wanted to raise taxes and he wants to create an "infrastructure bank" which everyone is warning cause the demise of several banana republics in South America.
Posted by: curious at August 06, 2011 09:49 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: Teamsters union at August 06, 2011 09:49 AM (4Mft3)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 06, 2011 09:50 AM (7utQ2)
Posted by: Ronster at August 06, 2011 01:48 PM (Oz+gx)
someone on here the other day noted that every time he visit a company it goes out of business. And every time he picks your team, you cry. Maybe he should just not get involved?
Posted by: curious at August 06, 2011 09:50 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: curious at August 06, 2011 09:52 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: Teamsters union at August 06, 2011 09:54 AM (4Mft3)
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at August 06, 2011 09:57 AM (4Mft3)
Posted by: Conservative Crank at August 06, 2011 09:58 AM (s3JuV)
Still, I have planned ahead and tolerate the later delivery for the $5 savings. It's not all savings though. UPS, not finding you at home, will deliver anyhow on your front porch (and take the risk I guess that you claim it musta been stolen cuz I didn't get it). The USPS will leave you a note and tell you which PO to pick up from. So I have to drive to the PO to get the package usually.
Posted by: GnuBreed at August 06, 2011 09:58 AM (ENKCw)
Posted by: Sparky at August 06, 2011 09:59 AM (MqT/F)
Posted by: pawn at August 06, 2011 10:06 AM (1Ol6/)
“It’s no longer acceptable in mixed company, meaning bipartisan company, to use the goddamn word climate. It is not acceptable. They have polluted it to the point where we cannot possibly come to an agreement on it.” — Al Gore
This is a perfect example of a politician who thinks the other guy is always wrong. It’s the “why won’t the other guy give in ?” mentality. We used to call that sort of behavior (i.e. not giving in) as a “principled stand,” but now their “evil” or “terrorists.” The corollary to this is “bipartisanship” when it means the “other guy finally agrees with you.”
Posted by: Barney Frank at August 06, 2011 10:07 AM (e8kgV)
First time I sent a care package to our son, I dealt with one of the rudest, snarkiest people I've ever had the misfortune to deal with.
I go to my local UPS Store now and have stuffed shipped. They couldn't be nicer. (One of the owners is retired from the CIA.)
Posted by: Jane D'oh, wearing a cute, pink suicide vest at August 06, 2011 10:08 AM (UOM48)
Our mail carriers and postal employees are great people. But, they are way over paid for the job they do.
Posted by: Vic at August 06, 2011 10:10 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: USS Diversity at August 06, 2011 10:10 AM (KbEJl)
Posted by: Ronster at August 06, 2011 01:48 PM (Oz+gx)
You are correct. You get a cookie, and a brownie for the creative nic for Dear Leader.
Posted by: Jane D'oh, wearing a cute, pink suicide vest at August 06, 2011 10:10 AM (UOM48)
My mail carrier is the nicest guy in the world. However, cretins who work the counter at my local Post Office are the slowest, laziest, nastiest jackasses I've ever dealt with.
I had to go to the Post Office to pick up a package I recieved from Israel, which for some strange reason they couldn't deliver to me directly.
The friendly gentleman who helped me had forgotten to get some ones for his cash drawer and when he asked the supervisor to assist him, the nasty scrunt loudly berated him in front of everybody in line.
I felt so sorry for the guy and gave him a "It's no big deal, dude," but he just shook his head.
Something about the P.O. must attract some serious assholes.
Posted by: ErikW at August 06, 2011 10:14 AM (sxI83)
Posted by: Ronster at August 06, 2011 10:15 AM (Oz+gx)
Thank you for allowing me imagine all the welfare goons turning on the government's union goons.
Now that Social Security does direct deposit, don't have to worry about grandma starving or being held hostage by USPS either!
Posted by: The Donkey Show at August 06, 2011 10:15 AM (ijjAe)
I'm not going out there, it's raining!
Posted by: Postal Employee Newman at August 06, 2011 10:15 AM (KbEJl)
Cheer me up: any examples of countries who dialed it back before they went over to the financial abyss?
Bueller?
Anyone?
Posted by: PJ at August 06, 2011 10:24 AM (FlVA8)
omg... you know, I have just had a thought which may have been obvious to the rest of you:
The Democrats may have wanted the debt to be downgraded in order to demand ther GOP raise taxes.
Posted by: Truman North at August 06, 2011 10:24 AM (K2wpv)
Posted by: joeindc44 at August 06, 2011 10:24 AM (u9B7L)
Two of perhaps the most important pieces ever written over at Zero Hedge - One written today at 12:20 and the other yesterday at 13:06.
The economic catalyst to worldwide contagion is set within the Euro Zone and Germany is realizing to backstop it's fellow Eurozone signatories i.e. the PIIGS, will lead to one thing, their own demise.
I will tell you and listen up. When you are at the store, buy an extra gallon of water and canned goods because not to understand the esoteric nature of this is no excuse for not heeding sound advice.
Now carry on my fellow morons And have a nice day.
Posted by: journolist at August 06, 2011 10:25 AM (Fb9Q0)
Posted by: Dang at August 06, 2011 10:26 AM (TXKVh)
Estonia!
Posted by: The Donkey Show at August 06, 2011 10:27 AM (ijjAe)
No country has ever survived printing money. The governments all collapsed and descended into anarchy. Some were taken over by communist/fascist dictators for life. Others eventually recovered under a different government aided by the U.S. and other Western nations.
There will be no "aid" for us.
Posted by: Vic at August 06, 2011 10:27 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: curious at August 06, 2011 10:29 AM (k1rwm)
Zerohedge* is reporting that Germany is not going to go through with the Italian bailout.
"German Govt: EFSF Should Only Help Small, Mid-Size Countries - Spiegel"
Shit just keeps getting more real.
*Just a gentle reminder; whatever you do, do not read the comments there. You lose IQ points for every comment.
Posted by: weft cut-loop at August 06, 2011 10:29 AM (DEcmU)
The Democrats may have wanted the debt to be downgraded in order to demand ther GOP raise taxes.
Posted by: Truman North at August 06, 2011 02:24 PM (K2wpv)
Raising taxes will cause an even worse economic forecast and probably cause a further downgrade of our credit rating. But that won't stop the Democrats from trying it.
Posted by: The Donkey Show at August 06, 2011 10:30 AM (ijjAe)
Geez thank God. I thought all common sense had left Angela's brain. why would you put yourself on the line for 133% of your GDP which shrunk last time? It made no logical sense.
Posted by: curious at August 06, 2011 10:31 AM (k1rwm)
omg... you know, I have just had a thought which may have been obvious to the rest of you:
The Democrats may have wanted the debt to be downgraded in order to demand ther GOP raise taxes.
Posted by: Truman North at August 06, 2011 02:24 PM (K2wpv)
Here, have a nice warm, fresh-out-of-the oven chocolate-bacon brownie.
Posted by: Jane D'oh, wearing a cute, pink suicide vest at August 06, 2011 10:33 AM (UOM48)
BO is going to have to make good on his promise of using a scalpel on everything. And they are going to have to make him accountable for the reasons why he's cutting what he's cutting. There have to be cuts, there has to be austerity, there has to be accountability. And, the republicans, except for Bachman and Pawlenty are strangely silent, well, vacay is important???
Posted by: curious at August 06, 2011 10:33 AM (k1rwm)
Canada just had a labour issue with the Canadian Postal Service. The Canadian Postal Service went on 'strike' but it was only in one city at a time - a rotating strike. Like many government departments, I think they know that if they were on strike for any extended period of time, people would make due and realise they aren't worth the cost.
The only issues were for some people getting pension checks from the United States and some businesses that rely on Canada Post. My sister in law had to get something from the government Fed-Exed to her relating to her dental hygenist certification. But aside from that, we could live without.
Posted by: Stateless Infidel at August 06, 2011 10:33 AM (GKQDR)
The Democrats may have wanted the debt to be downgraded in order to demand ther GOP raise taxes.
Posted by: Truman North at August 06, 2011 02:24 PM (K2wpv)
Barky's been trying to destroy the economy for about three years now..
What's a little downgrade?
Posted by: Dave C at August 06, 2011 10:33 AM (rus4r)
Posted by: Andy at August 06, 2011 10:34 AM (veZ9n)
Posted by: USS Diversity at August 06, 2011 10:34 AM (KbEJl)
I agree that if they are costing the taxpayer bucks, their business model needs review, but in small towns, this is a way to handle bills and payments and get delivery of purchased items. I also deal with UPS and they are ultra-reliable.
Once we are herded into the camps/cities though, we won't need USPS.
Posted by: Hrothgar at August 06, 2011 10:35 AM (yrGif)
Zerohedge* is reporting that Germany is not going to go through with the Italian bailout.
"German Govt: EFSF Should Only Help Small, Mid-Size Countries - Spiegel"
Good call by Merkel. Reality will force the Euros who to survive to realize the folly that is the EU.
Posted by: 80sBaby at August 06, 2011 10:35 AM (o2lIv)
I'm listening today and what I'm hearing is getting scary. they are all over the blogs saying stuff like "republicans have you learned that we don't operate in a vacuum and that the world is judging us, this is a test". They are really laying on the "the S&P guys say it is the result of the bush tax cuts and not BO's policies that got us here" meme. By the end of today, unless the republicans start some ravel rousing, blame will be squarely on them. It's frightening.
Posted by: curious at August 06, 2011 10:37 AM (k1rwm)
ooo I'm sensing anger in the faithful?
Posted by: curious at August 06, 2011 10:41 AM (k1rwm)
S&P essentially just confirmed that the GOP budgets and other austerity measures were sound ones. One of their representatives even said the House R budget would have allowed us to keep our credit rating. So who are the bad guys again?
Posted by: 80sBaby at August 06, 2011 10:42 AM (o2lIv)
Our mail carriers and postal employees are great people. But, they are way over paid for the job they do.
I was a carrier about 25 Years ago - we really weren't paid that much, about $12.50 an hour, but the health benefits were only $1.65 every two weeks.
Posted by: Tunafish at August 06, 2011 10:44 AM (GNJrt)
yes, yes we know this but they seem to have an army out there today and these are the times I wish the republicans or the tea party or someone had an army out there right behind them refuting them as soon as they put down the thought. Tyler is doing a great job but you have to know to go there. Even in odd places like the fashion sites they are insidiously putting information that is wrong. And I hate to refute people on a fashion blog for God's sake, I mean is nothing sacred?
Posted by: curious at August 06, 2011 10:45 AM (k1rwm)
Also, anyone want to opine on what happens in a society when a political party i.e. the democrats engages in class warfare and dehumanizes it's political opponents? Once the dehumanizing aspect of political epithets enters the common lexicon as it has..... guess what happens?
Christians and Conservatives now are being fitted as the liberals' dehumanized enemy. Even though Christians and Conservatives simply want to represent moral values and fiscal and social responsibility in a peaceful way.
This is where past becomes prologue where a strawman is raised under pretense.
Posted by: journolist at August 06, 2011 10:45 AM (Fb9Q0)
Posted by: Genetic Tunder at August 06, 2011 10:45 AM (dbYHP)
omg... you know, I have just had a thought which may have been obvious to the rest of you:
The Democrats may have wanted the debt to be downgraded in order to demand ther GOP raise taxes.
Posted by: Truman NorthI wouldn't put it past the geniuses at the WH but they're backed into a corner. The ratings agencies are political animals. They are responding to some pressure, I'm just not sure from where. (Glenn Beckian over the top speculation: CHINA, SOROS?? )
We're near a new recession or already in one. Raising taxes in a downturn, as Obaka admitted, is dangerous stupid. Further, if he does force a tax increase, the economy is not going to react well, extending this shitty economy into 2012.
Posted by: weft cut-loop at August 06, 2011 10:48 AM (DEcmU)
Posted by: curious at August 06, 2011 10:48 AM (k1rwm)
1. Fed Ex handles a large chunk of their Priority Mail.
2. To drum up postal service business, you can order FREE shipping boxes from them in a variety of sizes. Since 25 of a similar size shipping box costs me about $20.00 at a local supplier, figure out how much they are subsidizing small businesses and independent sellers with this. Not that I am complaining, but it does cost them a lot of money.
3. At an auction house I frequent, box lots are often offered in those same FREE boxes.
4. Stamps do not have an expiration date. If you have a 1972 6 cent stamp you can combine it with other old stamps to make the current postage.
Posted by: Miss Marple at August 06, 2011 10:48 AM (Fo83G)
Posted by: weft cut-loop at August 06, 2011 02:48 PM (DEcmU)
< This ain't no recession. Don't kid yourself.
Posted by: journolist at August 06, 2011 10:49 AM (Fb9Q0)
Posted by: Postmaster General Henry Atkins at August 06, 2011 10:50 AM (GZitp)
Posted by: Y-not at August 06, 2011 02:44 PM (5H6zj)
It's rut you ruse when you rall rourt into ression.
Posted by: Supreme Court Justice Scooby Doo at August 06, 2011 10:52 AM (sxI83)
In my friend's apartment building area where they keep the mail, they have installed a shredder. So you can open your mail down there and stick all the junk mail right in the shredder. They did it to cut down on the costs of garbage pick up. My friend says it is absolutely brilliant. the entire building is using it and this way you aren't throwing a lot of paper in your personal garbage.
Posted by: curious at August 06, 2011 10:52 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: nerdygirl at August 06, 2011 10:53 AM (fHjuj)
Tomorrow is Sunday, and the Republicans are sending-out the fiscal cons. Everyone else knows what to say from the budget debate, which was to start next month but will now start this month. So you can stop with the "concern".
Posted by: 80sBaby at August 06, 2011 10:53 AM (o2lIv)
I don't know, I'm an independent and the republicans look awfully weak to me and I'm not alone. so far only Bachman and Pawlenty and in small measure Palin have stepped up to the plate on this.
You think like a conservative I don't and I'm not impressed with the republicans at all.
Posted by: curious at August 06, 2011 10:55 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: Ronster at August 06, 2011 01:48 PM (Oz+gx)
someone on here the other day noted that every time he visit a company it goes out of business. And every time he picks your team, you cry. Maybe he should just not get involved?
Posted by: curious at August 06, 2011 01:50 PM (k1rwm)
How could you know that you little troll? I'm the one that said it.
Posted by: buzzion at August 06, 2011 10:56 AM (GULKT)
Posted by: nerdygirl at August 06, 2011 10:57 AM (fHjuj)
More euphemistically: "The action by S&P reaffirms the need for a balanced approach to deficit reduction that combines spending cuts with revenue-raising measures like closing taxpayer-funded giveaways to billionaires, oil companies and corporate jet owners. This makes the work of the joint committee all the more important, and shows why leaders should appoint members who will approach the committeeÂ’s work with an open mind - instead of hardliners who have already ruled out the balanced approach that the markets and rating agencies like S&P are demanding."
Posted by: 80sBaby at August 06, 2011 10:57 AM (o2lIv)
Posted by: curious at August 06, 2011 10:57 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at August 06, 2011 10:58 AM (bxiXv)
Posted by: FedEx at August 06, 2011 10:59 AM (/WZ6r)
Make sure to eat a really heavy meal and drink about 10 tequila shooters before you go into the pool.
Posted by: Y-not at August 06, 2011 10:59 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: steevy at August 06, 2011 10:59 AM (mnAIU)
Posted by: D. Hopper Badger at August 06, 2011 10:59 AM (qPTz0)
Posted by: formwiz at August 06, 2011 11:00 AM (Kv1kb)
I don't know, I'm an independent and the republicans look awfully weak to me and I'm not alone. so far only Bachman and Pawlenty and in small measure Palin have stepped up to the plate on this.
You think like a conservative I don't and I'm not impressed with the republicans at all.
Aw, does somebody need a box of tissues?
Posted by: 80sBaby at August 06, 2011 11:00 AM (o2lIv)
Posted by: steevy at August 06, 2011 11:01 AM (mnAIU)
Posted by: Kramer at August 06, 2011 02:58 PM (FZZ94)
You don't listen very well do you son?
Posted by: Postmaster General Henry Atkins at August 06, 2011 11:01 AM (GZitp)
Posted by: buzzion at August 06, 2011 11:03 AM (GULKT)
Posted by: Drider at August 06, 2011 11:03 AM (uJSfP)
FYI curious, I'm not very impressed with you.
Posted by: Ronster at August 06, 2011 11:06 AM (Oz+gx)
Even in odd places like the fashion sites they are insidiously putting information that is wrong. And I hate to refute people on a fashion blog for God's sake, I mean is nothing sacred?
Posted by: curious at August 06, 2011 02:45 PM (k1rwm)
Posted by: Jane D'oh, wearing a cute, pink suicide vest at August 06, 2011 11:07 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: curious at August 06, 2011 02:57 PM (k1rwm)
I'll bet.
Posted by: Jane D'oh, wearing a cute, pink suicide vest at August 06, 2011 11:08 AM (UOM48)
FedEx made $865 million pre-tax in its fourth fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2011.
What!? That's not fair! Take their money and give it to the USPS. Also, unionize FedEx employees, order them to drive solar-powered vehicles, prosecute them for ableism (I've never seen a wheelchair person delivering packages) and force them to relocate their headquarters from Tennessee to California so we can give tons of jobs to illegal aliens.
There!
Posted by: arhooley at August 06, 2011 11:08 AM (npmom)
Posted by: nerdygirl at August 06, 2011 11:09 AM (fHjuj)
Personally I'm okay with that - there are plenty of economic advantages to living rural, and anyway in this country where you live is a choice. But in terms of political will there's no way this service is going to be eliminated and replaced by commercial delivery.
Posted by: Ace's liver at August 06, 2011 11:10 AM (/gOMq)
S&P essentially just confirmed that the GOP budgets and other austerity measures were sound ones. One of their representatives even said the House R budget would have allowed us to keep our credit rating.
Nice. Got a link? I hope our fiscons pound that on the Sunday shows.
Posted by: arhooley at August 06, 2011 11:11 AM (npmom)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at August 06, 2011 11:13 AM (bxiXv)
FedEx made $865 million pre-tax in its fourth fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2011.
And in the eyes of Democrats and Obama, every dollar FedEx created was an affront to their gods, if they had them.
Posted by: Stateless Infidel at August 06, 2011 11:14 AM (GKQDR)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at August 06, 2011 11:15 AM (bxiXv)
I don't know, I'm an independent and the republicans look awfully weak to me and I'm not alone. so far only Bachman and Pawlenty and in small measure Palin have stepped up to the plate on this.
You think like a conservative I don't and I'm not impressed with the republicans at all.
HAHAHAH!!!!!!!! I got a laugh out of this one.
Posted by: Max Power at August 06, 2011 11:15 AM (q177U)
And in the eyes of Democrats and Obama, every dollar FedEx created was an affront to their gods, if they had them.
Posted by: Stateless Infidel at August 06, 2011 03:14 PM (GKQDR)
They do. Back in the day, he was called Baal.
Posted by: ErikW at August 06, 2011 11:16 AM (sxI83)
Posted by: rplat at August 06, 2011 11:16 AM (4vq8i)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at August 06, 2011 11:16 AM (bxiXv)
Harry Reid knows he can say whatever he likes without being personally held accountable at the ballot box. The only reason he ever compromises is for electoral purposes on behalf of his colleagues (ensuring control of the Senate) and the WH (so that Obama appears more conservative than he is).
Posted by: 80sBaby at August 06, 2011 11:16 AM (o2lIv)
Why, oh why, couldn't this have been the EPA?
Or the NEA? Or the CPB? Or any number of useless, redundant federal agencies that cost us a fortune, are staffed with union thugs and don't really care if they work or not, they just show up and mark time until they retire?
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at August 06, 2011 11:17 AM (d0Tfm)
With the incredibly well run smear campaign by the handsome Democrats, IÂ’m very worried the evil republicans might not be successful in their campaign to destroy America?
How can we get our message out about how we want to wheel granny into a BBQ pit and feast on her roasting corpse?
Posted by: Kinda Curious! at August 06, 2011 11:20 AM (q177U)
I hope some enterprising young moron or moronette can find the video of Cavuto talking to Rep Steven Cohen (D) just now on Fox. Cohen just compared himself to a bank robber in his quest to raise taxes on the rich.
Compared himself to a bank robber.
Posted by: Truman North at August 06, 2011 11:23 AM (K2wpv)
Posted by: Kinda Curious! at August 06, 2011 11:23 AM (q177U)
Talking about if we should have a postal service is one thing; talking about if the costs are worth the services that are provided above and beyond what FedEx provides, the whole thing.
But trying to say that it loses money while FedEx, which does not have to do what USPS has to do, makes money is a little bit disingenuous.
Posted by: Enigmaticore at August 06, 2011 11:24 AM (lxLgN)
And I've put all of you h8trs on my super secret comment filter. So there.
Posted by: insanely curious at August 06, 2011 11:25 AM (UOM48)
Compared himself to a bank robber.
Posted by: Truman North at August 06, 2011 03:23 PM (K2wpv)
He shoulda used Robin Hood, it would have played better to the base.
Or maybe not.
Posted by: ErikW at August 06, 2011 11:26 AM (sxI83)
By the end of today, unless the republicans start some ravel rousing, blame will be squarely on them. It's frightening.
Posted by: curious at August 06, 2011 02:37 PM (k1rwm)
"Rabble" rousing, as in stirring up the street thugs, not "ravel".
Curious has been full troll today, huh? Libtard "friends" in full throat.
Posted by: dagny at August 06, 2011 11:26 AM (HdvWq)
Posted by: CMU VET at August 06, 2011 11:26 AM (01k95)
Posted by: stillwater at August 06, 2011 11:27 AM (0GpN4)
“If you get to $4 trillion mentioned by the President in an April 13 speech, by the Bowles-Simpson commission and by Congressman Paul Ryan, that along with economic growth would’ve done the trick” to preserve the triple-A, [John Cambers] told Cavuto.
Last part is the catch, of course. But they always specified what they wanted and last night's statement was more in-line with what the Rs are advocating than the Ds (austerity and growth). But how do we get there? That has been and remains the problem.
Posted by: 80sBaby at August 06, 2011 11:27 AM (o2lIv)
Posted by: nerdygirl at August 06, 2011 11:28 AM (fHjuj)
I don't know, I'm an independent and the republicans look awfully weak to me and I'm not alone. so far only Bachman and Pawlenty and in small measure Palin have stepped up to the plate on this.
The stupid is painful in this one,.............
Posted by: dagny at August 06, 2011 11:28 AM (HdvWq)
We have decided it is in our best interests to subsidize your trip to the Hamptons. Have a nice time there.
Posted by: Citizens of Zurich at August 06, 2011 11:28 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at August 06, 2011 11:29 AM (/kd4o)
Posted by: fluffy at August 06, 2011 11:30 AM (4Kl5M)
Compared himself to a bank robber.
They speak like this on the House and Senate floors.
Posted by: 80sBaby at August 06, 2011 11:31 AM (o2lIv)
Posted by: 80sBaby at August 06, 2011 11:32 AM (o2lIv)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at August 06, 2011 11:33 AM (UOM48)
Actually, he said something about the USPS always having troubles, while FedEx and UPS did OK. He was trying to defend government-run health care with this weird fucking example. One more reason to suspect he might not be the giant-brained genius the MFM pretends he is.
Posted by: Waterhouse at August 06, 2011 11:33 AM (P57Q4)
Posted by: stillwater at August 06, 2011 11:35 AM (0GpN4)
Posted by: arhooley at August 06, 2011 11:36 AM (npmom)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at August 06, 2011 11:36 AM (UOM48)
Actually, he said something about the USPS always having troubles, while FedEx and UPS did OK. He was trying to defend government-run health care with this weird fucking example.
That does ring a bell. Now I must give up my cookie but not the brownie for I have eaten it.
Posted by: Ronster at August 06, 2011 11:36 AM (Oz+gx)
Don't forget, you're the fucking imbecile who assured us that, because of all you were hearing, and the cocky attitude of your "friends", something big was up, and the Republicans were going to get owned in the 2010 elections.
How'd that work out? You fucking dipshit.
Posted by: Waterhouse at August 06, 2011 11:37 AM (P57Q4)
Posted by: Marybel at August 06, 2011 11:39 AM (Hic+o)
Posted by: Marybel at August 06, 2011 03:39 PM (Hic+o)
Yes. I immediately developed a girl crush.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at August 06, 2011 11:40 AM (UOM48)
Srsly, Jane. I would buy tix for that face2face.
Posted by: Marybel at August 06, 2011 11:41 AM (Hic+o)
How is any business of "the world", which I assume you mean Europeans? Fuck them.
Posted by: Ace's liver at August 06, 2011 11:42 AM (/gOMq)
This is a monumental loss.
Posted by: As IF... at August 06, 2011 11:48 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Ronster at August 06, 2011 11:51 AM (Oz+gx)
Do I detect a bit of disdain cropping up vis-a-vis Curious? Maybe getting caught up with the role-playing?
You know, if y'all are getting socked, it'll make AJ look like a child trying to play with the adults.
Just sayin.....
Posted by: irongrampa at August 06, 2011 11:52 AM (ud5dN)
Posted by: 80sBaby at August 06, 2011 11:53 AM (o2lIv)
Posted by: 80sBaby at August 06, 2011 11:54 AM (o2lIv)
Then the weeping turds there and here will say it was the "best deal we could get" and we'll fight on the next hill.
And best of all, only a "moderate" can turn PA red.
Posted by: Vic at August 06, 2011 11:57 AM (M9Ie6)
Actually, he said something about the USPS always having troubles, while FedEx and UPS did OK. He was trying to defend government-run health care with this weird fucking example.
That does ring a bell. Now I must give up my cookie but not the brownie for I have eaten it.
Posted by: Ronster at August 06, 2011 03:36 PM (Oz+gx)
Yeah it was some dumb example to explain how private companies can do just fine when dealing with the same stuff as a government run entity. The problem with this is that the Post Office is run really shittily so it a poor example to show that the government could run healthcare. And Fex Ex and UPS are forbidden by law to actually be in competition with the Post Office so while they are in similar types of work they aren't in the exact same work like government run healthcare would be with private insurers.
Posted by: buzzion at August 06, 2011 11:57 AM (GULKT)
Posted by: CMU VET at August 06, 2011 11:59 AM (01k95)
Posted by: Adrian Belew at August 06, 2011 11:59 AM (4Kl5M)
Then the weeping turds there and here will say it was the "best deal we could get" and we'll fight on the next hill.
And best of all, only a "moderate" can turn PA red.
Unless the congressional Dems get frightened enough to change their stripes-- which they could, given how much elections mean to them -- this panel will end in gridlock and the sequester "forgotten".
Posted by: 80sBaby at August 06, 2011 12:03 PM (o2lIv)
Posted by: Mama AJ at August 06, 2011 12:04 PM (XdlcF)
I'm assuming he meant to say Robin Hood. Could be a Freudian slip, their real intent is to rob from taxpayers, producers.
No, he said he robbed banks because that's where the money is=== tha's why he is hitting up the rich
Posted by: Truman North at August 06, 2011 12:05 PM (K2wpv)
Perhaps he's like a little kid, who believes if he pretends something didn't happen, then it didn't.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at August 06, 2011 12:05 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: Nickie Goomba from the People's Republic of California at August 06, 2011 12:05 PM (cZYBb)
Posted by: some German taxpayer at August 06, 2011 12:06 PM (sOXQX)
Posted by: United Brotherhood of RINO Straw Men #303 at August 06, 2011 12:06 PM (T0SnK)
He's been trying to do that with the 2010 elections.
Posted by: Methos at August 06, 2011 12:07 PM (sOXQX)
Not a chance. Pelosi and Reid will appoint 5 hardcore commies from totally safe blue districts/States. All it will take is one RINO and it is a tax hike or automatic defense cuts and SS/Medicare cuts.
The conservative wing of the Republican Party has been totally nullified.
Posted by: Vic at August 06, 2011 12:08 PM (M9Ie6)
Perhaps he's like a little kid, who believes if he pretends something didn't happen, then it didn't.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at August 06, 2011 04:05 PM (UOM4
He completely buys into the idea that if he doesn't talk about it then its not a crisis.
Posted by: buzzion at August 06, 2011 12:08 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: Presidebt Petey at August 06, 2011 04:02 PM (AnTyA)
MAMBO!
Posted by: Joey Biden in flip flops and and oversized sombrero at August 06, 2011 12:08 PM (sxI83)
Posted by: Nickie Goomba from the People's Republic of California at August 06, 2011 12:09 PM (cZYBb)
The conservative wing of the Republican Party has been totally nullified.
Judging by the names being floated for the committee-- if it still happens-- I disagree. Also remember that any suggestion must come before the whole Congress for a vote. Furthermore, sequestration is not binding in the sense that it must be self-enforced (though the president plays a part, too). But it's rarely worked.
Posted by: 80sBaby at August 06, 2011 12:13 PM (o2lIv)
He completely buys into the idea that if he doesn't talk about it then its not a crisis.
Posted by: buzzion at August 06, 2011 04:08 PM (GULKT)
Or that the world magically transforms the instant the bullshit leaves his mouth.
His arrogance is astounding to the point of being baffling. I've stopped trying to figure him out.
Posted by: ErikW at August 06, 2011 12:15 PM (sxI83)
So, just like the underlying bill, whatever crap comes out of the committee is passed with the wupport of socialist RINOs and Democrats. Yippee.
Posted by: Methos at August 06, 2011 12:16 PM (sOXQX)
C'mon, baby...do the Dougie..
...go M'chelle
...go M'chelle
...go M'chelle
Posted by: Presidebt Petey at August 06, 2011 12:26 PM (AnTyA)
So, just like the underlying bill, whatever crap comes out of the committee is passed with the support of socialist RINOs and Democrats. Yippee.
I doubt tax increases will pass the House. Actual tax reform by lowering rates, yes, but not hikes. The baseline is also a safeguard (Section 308 of the '74 Budget Act-> FY 2011 CR baseline).
Posted by: 80sBaby at August 06, 2011 12:26 PM (o2lIv)
Tim Geithner is personally responsible for the downgrade. He should be fired. And Obama's next appointment should be raked over the coals for weeks just to embarrass Obama.
Posted by: soothie at August 06, 2011 12:28 PM (P/N2O)
Remember the rules for this crap and the committee. Its an up or down vote only and if either house defeats it we get the automatic cuts.
This is not like previous committees and all it will take is one Republican on that committee "crossing over" for a deal.
Posted by: Vic at August 06, 2011 12:29 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Vic at August 06, 2011 12:30 PM (M9Ie6)
here's a quick snapshot of Boy-genius' greatest hits:
July 2009: Tim Geithner Not Worried About Dollar Weakness
February 2011: Geithner Not Worried About Oil Prices
March 2011: Sec Geithner Not Worried About Japan Selling US Bonds
April 2011: Geithner: No Risk US Will Lose AAA Rating
Posted by: soothie at August 06, 2011 12:31 PM (P/N2O)
Posted by: soothie
Daaaamn good thing the GOP has a pro-forma House session in effect. Otherwise we might have woken up on Monday to a new appointee.
Posted by: weft cut-loop at August 06, 2011 12:32 PM (DEcmU)
Does this strike anyone as a flawed business model?
Not in the least.
Posted by: US Department of Education at August 06, 2011 12:32 PM (hZqYp)
here's the kicker:
August 2011: Tim Geithner Not Worried About Losing His Job Even Though He Sucks And Should Be Tarred & Feathered And Run Out Of The People's Government
Posted by: soothie at August 06, 2011 12:32 PM (P/N2O)
Posted by: chillin the most at August 06, 2011 12:36 PM (6IV8T)
yes.
Posted by: The Chicken at August 06, 2011 12:40 PM (BSWJE)
On the upside, Obama will have someone else to try to blame for the crash Monday.
Posted by: Methos at August 06, 2011 12:42 PM (sOXQX)
He should be in the pen getting ass-raped.
He worked for Rubin at the Fed and was his protege. After Rubin was awarded his position at Citigroup for getting Glass Steagall repealed, Turbo Tax was given the position as head of the NY Fed.
This is Chicago-style corruption of exponential orders of magnitude.
Timmy was widely known as the heir apparent to Rubin at Citigroup...basically because he did Wall St's bidding.
Timmy was rushed into the Treasury position. Why? Remember the fucking idiot GOPers who voted for his confirmation because he was supposedly "uniquely qualified"?
HORSESHIT. He was put there to try to cover the tracks of the fucks in the Treasury, in the Congress, at the ratings agencies, and in the Congress who fucking murdered our economy and made themselves filthy rich
Posted by: beedubya at August 06, 2011 12:43 PM (AnTyA)
7/12 of the committee must agree and they have a further list of rules. Also, while it is an up-or-down vote, Congress is only to sequester by way of honor. Discretionary caps are far harder to overturn, but a sequester that takes place starting in 2013 is much easier.
This is not like previous committees and all it will take is one Republican on that committee "crossing over" for a deal.
We have had over a dozen joint select committees in the past 70yrs. The only difference from some of those others is that this one can report legislation, but there is nothing that forbids it. This is like the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy (JCAE).
Posted by: 80sBaby at August 06, 2011 12:43 PM (o2lIv)
I took pictures.
Posted by: nickless at August 06, 2011 12:47 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Larry Dickman at August 06, 2011 01:17 PM (4t9J5)
We never have had a committee that has an automatic trigger like this. Even the base closing commission has no automatic triggers.
AND yes they can call for tax increases, every Democrat that has talked about this committee has said so as well as numerous Republicans.
Posted by: Vic at August 06, 2011 01:18 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Neal Marks - Washington Correspondent at August 06, 2011 01:21 PM (ZgvjV)
Posted by: No Whining at August 06, 2011 01:25 PM (G67w7)
All they did was add the latest "new and improved" version of Gramm-Rudman-Hollings, which was and still is a joke. Who is actually going to enforce it?
AND yes they can call for tax increases, every Democrat that has talked about this committee has said so as well as numerous Republicans.
The Democrats and Lindsay Graham types can argue that they have permission to use an alternate baseline that would allow them to raise rates but the reference to Section 308 of the '74 Budget Act is in the bill.
Posted by: 80sBaby at August 06, 2011 01:28 PM (o2lIv)
Posted by: No Whining at August 06, 2011 01:30 PM (G67w7)
(ii) CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE ESTIMATES. — The Congressional Budget Office shall provide estimates of the legislation … in accordance with sections 308(a) and 201(f) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974[.]
Section 308(a)(1)(A) and Section 308(a)(1)(B)-- emphasis mine:
(A) comparing the levels in such measure to the appropriate allocations in the reports submitted under section 302(b) for the most recently agreed to concurrent resolution on the budget for such fiscal year (or fiscal years);
(B) containing a projection by the Congressional Budget Office of how such measure will affect the levels of such budget authority, budget outlays, revenues, or tax expenditures under existing law for such fiscal year (or fiscal years) and each of the four ensuing fiscal years, if timely submitted before such report is filed; and...
Posted by: 80sBaby at August 06, 2011 01:31 PM (o2lIv)
Posted by: 80sBaby at August 06, 2011 01:36 PM (o2lIv)
http://is.gd/uvRnge
And the Republicans are NOT the Lindsay Graham types, in fact it the opposite of the RINO types.
Posted by: Vic at August 06, 2011 01:39 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Jean at August 06, 2011 01:40 PM (pawS5)
http://is.gd/uvRnge
And the Republicans are NOT the Lindsay Graham types, in fact it the opposite of the RINO types.
They can say that but we have a 3rd party, which is CBO. The CBO is bound by law. How would they get around this?
Posted by: 80sBaby at August 06, 2011 01:48 PM (o2lIv)
Posted by: Larry Dickman at August 06, 2011 01:49 PM (4t9J5)
That's a great update, Andy. Let me ask you something: Is FedEX tasked with delivering mail 6 days a week to EVERY SINGLE MAILBOX in America?
They are forbidden by law from doing somethins such as this. You're as ignorant as Obama.
Posted by: buzzion at August 06, 2011 01:51 PM (GULKT)
No, because that's an obvious waste of resources.
Posted by: stirren' the pot at August 06, 2011 01:51 PM (sOXQX)
Posted by: Larry Dickman at August 06, 2011 01:53 PM (4t9J5)
Posted by: buzzion at August 06, 2011 05:51 PM (GULKT)
That's like the atom bomb of insults
Posted by: beedubya at August 06, 2011 01:54 PM (AnTyA)
http://is.gd/pMjDJR
And that stuff from the bill does not say they are prohibited from raising taxes. It only states how CBO will score their "cuts" which the targeted cuts really aren't cuts anyway AND everybody agrees on that.
Posted by: Vic at August 06, 2011 01:55 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Larry Dickman at August 06, 2011 01:57 PM (4t9J5)
They can pick and choose HOW they do it and WHO they want to do it for them..and they can can the dead weight.
Profit motivation is the mother of innovation and efficiency
Posted by: beedubya at August 06, 2011 01:58 PM (AnTyA)
Posted by: Ohio Dan at August 06, 2011 01:59 PM (KdI6b)
Posted by: Larry Dickman at August 06, 2011 01:59 PM (4t9J5)
Posted by: Larry Dickman at August 06, 2011 02:05 PM (4t9J5)
Are you suggesting that FedEx would just LOVE to deliver mail to 10 mailboxes spread over 10 miles, but they are prohibited by law from doing so?
You are an idiot.
Posted by: Larry Dickman at August 06, 2011 05:59 PM (4t9J5)
Mail is so much heavier than the packages they already deliver there, huh?
Posted by: beedubya at August 06, 2011 02:05 PM (AnTyA)
I'm suggesting that they are forbidden from competing with the USPS so for you to suggest they would like to do it is immaterial. They cannot do it in any capacity so they are forbidden from attempting it in any way that would be proven to be cost effective. Of course they wouldn't being doing it six days a week. They're not even allowed to ty doing it one day a week because the federal government is potecting its worthless money pit.
Dipshit.
Posted by: buzzion at August 06, 2011 02:07 PM (GULKT)
So Larry...what do you do for the USPS..amd are you gonna go all you-know-what on us?
Posted by: beedubya at August 06, 2011 02:08 PM (AnTyA)
http://is.gd/pMjDJR
And that stuff from the bill does not say they are prohibited from raising taxes. It only states how CBO will score their "cuts" which the targeted cuts really aren't cuts anyway AND everybody agrees on that.
Cuts from the rate of growth, yes.
Whether or not the Dems can raise tax rates and count that towards deficit reduction is dependent on the baseline. From Keith Hennesey:
"The key technical detail is that the CommitteeÂ’s recommendations on taxes will be measured against a current law baseline for taxes. Under current law, certain taxes are scheduled to go up in 2013, most notably the individual income tax rates and rates on capital gains and dividends. Normally Republicans dislike a current law baseline on taxes, but in this case it helps them."
They can eliminate loopholes and deductions with both counting towards deficit reduction, but not rates, capital gains and dividends, AMT, or tax extender-like provisions. So they can propose increases but those do not count towards the committee's goal, leaving the Dems boxed-in by the baseline.
Posted by: 80sBaby at August 06, 2011 02:12 PM (o2lIv)
Regulated industries tend to get fat and lazy. I can buy electricity for 5.7 cents per 1000 kilowatts from national suppliers as opposed to 9.3 cents from Duke, the local regulated generator. Duke can sell it elsewhere for the reduced price. Duke is losing customers left and right in its protected area.
The Post Office's cure for losing money has traditionally been go ask for a raise on postage from Congress. What connection to market forces has Government ever shown.
Go to the 3 day delivery. Shut down unprofitable branches and services. Find new revenue generators. The Post Office is an incredible entity but it has a choice, compete or die. It works in nature. It works in business and it is the reality the Post Office has to deal with.
Posted by: Ohio Dan at August 06, 2011 02:16 PM (KdI6b)
The Post Office must be privatized. Let the U.S.P.S. compete with U.P.S. and Fed Ex and anyone else who wants to enter the market. But we will need a federal agency to police the private carriers.
Posted by: Charles at August 06, 2011 03:19 PM (y85Ph)
Posted by: Eating the Dinosaur Audiobook at August 06, 2011 10:32 PM (X1M4g)
The Post Office has overpaid in to the civil service retirement system (which no one has been enrolled in to since 1982) approximately 75 Billion dollars. When the GAO told the feds they need to return the overpayment, the feds offered 6 Billion to be paid back over 30 years to even the balance sheet.
The Post Office is required by law to pre-fund retiree health benefits, something no other federal agency is required to do. That yearly payment alone is the cause of the net loss every year.
FedEx and UPS have both done studies to see how much they would have to charge to do the same (as required by law) 100% address delivery for a first class letter of one ounce or less. 44 cents for the Post Office, just under 3 dollars for FedEx or UPS.
Now on the flip side of things, there is a lot of fat cutting that does need to be done at the Post Office. Industry standard for employee to supervisor ratios is typically around 20:1. At the Post Office it's closer to 7:1 due to nepotism and getting a promotion "down on your knees" with completely unqualified people being put in charge as a reward. At my facility there are supposed to be 2 operations managers, but on any given day there will be anywhere from 5 to 8 managers on the floor.
What do you call 5 managers of distribution operations standing in a circle? A waste of a half million dollars...
Posted by: GatewayFossil at August 07, 2011 02:13 AM (XKEP4)
Posted by: Jean at August 07, 2011 07:36 AM (3FXA5)
Posted by: Rich Rostrom at August 08, 2011 03:51 PM (A9eiU)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.1986 seconds, 374 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Utah sucks!
Posted by: Gary Gilmore at August 06, 2011 09:18 AM (P/N2O)