August 09, 2011
— Open Blogger A few years ago, the city came by my quiet neighborhood and installed 4 wheelchair ramps at 4 corners.Here are those ramps.
I live in Hollywood, CA. Part of Los Angeles. LA is Broke. California is Boned. And the USA Borrows 40% of every dollar it spends. So, no matter what part of govt. paid for these ramps, it involved borrowing money.
Not too far from those ramps are perfectly serviceable driveways which are an adequate substitute for wheelchair ramps.
I noticed that a few years ago when the ramps were installed and went, "eh, govt. What can you do?"But today I noticed something else. There are 21 homes in the double cul-de-sac that make up my quiet neighborhood. Take a look at 3 very typical examples.
*
**
The other 18 homes share the same feature. None of them are wheelchair accessible!
Ace pointed out today that Pres. Obama said "in both the area of defense and non-defense domestic spending, there is "not much further we can cut."We need to do more than just cut spending. We need to change the attitude where govt. functionaries Just Don't Care how they spend money. It's one thing to waste money on 4 useless wheelchair ramps. But to borrow money to do it is CRAZY. Electing Tea Party types to Congress is a step in the right direction. But, assuming good results in the 2012 elections, there's a lot of work to do reforming the way govt. functions.Here's the deal. You have people in charge of building wheelchair ramps. They're spending somebody else's money on something that has no effect on them. This is not likely to result in thrifty money management! Some people look at that and say, "Reform! Let's make the system work better!". I appreciate the sentiment but the reality is that taking that approach Never Works. There's too much inertia to overcome.What about limiting govt? Hey, there's an idea! If it isn't the govts. job to bestow wheelchair ramps upon the nation, they won't waste money building unneeded wheelchair ramps. Take another look at the above pictures. This is a reasonably affluent neighborhood. If we REALLY wanted ramps, we would be able to build them ourselves - assuming we hadn't lost the money in taxes to the wheelchair ramp commission. And we wouldn't build ramps with usable driveways just feet away.Govt. is good for a lot of things but efficiency isn't a quality ususally associated with it. The more you limit govt. the less ability it has to waste stuff.
*My humble abode.
Posted by: Open Blogger at
09:49 PM
| Comments (75)
Post contains 489 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: Village Idiot at August 09, 2011 09:54 PM (utXSy)
Posted by: Curbside Elevator Comissioner at August 09, 2011 09:55 PM (ZgvjV)
Posted by: soulpile is... expendable, gop b., s.a. at August 09, 2011 09:56 PM (afWhQ)
Imagine my disappointment at no Naomi Watts/Laura Harring action. Imagine!
Posted by: Waterhouse at August 09, 2011 09:57 PM (zz0ma)
Posted by: navybrat at August 09, 2011 09:57 PM (MVMNg)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at August 09, 2011 09:58 PM (AEA92)
Posted by: soulpile is... expendable, gop b., s.a. at August 10, 2011 01:56 AM (afWhQ)
Probably the stimulus dollars finally getting spent. Here in the Bay Area they've been tearing up medians all over the place for the past couple years.
Posted by: KG at August 09, 2011 09:59 PM (LD21B)
-Shhhh! Don't give them any ideas! You don't want to end up with a ramp mandate!
Posted by: tomg at August 09, 2011 10:00 PM (XfSMN)
You just need that trolley Dr. Lecter used in Hannibal. Problem. Solved.
Posted by: Waterhouse at August 09, 2011 10:02 PM (zz0ma)
Posted by: Max Entropy at August 09, 2011 10:09 PM (NwTXA)
Posted by: chemjeff at August 09, 2011 10:10 PM (s3Qvq)
Posted by: Vitalis at August 09, 2011 10:14 PM (LE6cZ)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 09, 2011 10:21 PM (AZGON)
The Road to Hell is paved with good intentions and is also wheel chair accessible!
Posted by: TP partier at August 09, 2011 10:21 PM (aWcLl)
Posted by: lowandslow at August 09, 2011 10:23 PM (GZitp)
Posted by: Anonymoose at August 09, 2011 10:27 PM (ZgvjV)
Yeah, what he said. Our neighborhood got the fancy ramps with the yellow rumble strips, clearly your bureaucrats are just lazy and slothful since they didn't figure out the more expensive way to build them.
The ramps also benefit parents of small children in strollers, and the elderly who might not be in a wheelchair but do have mobility issues. And makes it easier to ride one's bicycle on the sidewalk when traffic gets heavy.
However, it isn't possible to have everything that's nice to have. Regarding the post below about the public not wanting to hear the truth about how our spending habits have put us in the position of drowning in debt, this is yet another example of ways that bureaucrats who shouldn't have jobs in the first place waste money in order to justify their own existence.
Posted by: Boots at August 09, 2011 10:32 PM (neKzn)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 09, 2011 10:34 PM (AZGON)
Thanks President Obama! AA+ work there!
Posted by: LizLem at August 09, 2011 10:40 PM (kDzQY)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 09, 2011 10:44 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: Ann d'Mestik at August 09, 2011 10:46 PM (GyUK3)
Posted by: Daybrother at August 09, 2011 10:50 PM (mexsR)
My pet peeve is speed bumps aka "traffic calming devices" across county roads and city streets. A local govt flyer proudly revealed that these humps of blacktop cost $250K to build.
More than 50% of the local transportation budget goes to bikes and buses. Nice pot holes though.
Posted by: The Poster Formerly Known as Mr. Barky at August 09, 2011 10:54 PM (b1fi8)
Best part -- the blind and the wheelchair bound folks get in an argument over these ramps because the blind want a curb to feel with the cane, so they put those little domes on them so they might be able to feel them. Every couple of years, the argument results in some change in the standard details for the ramps so they just built have to be removed and rebuilt.
Best-est part, there's legal racket suing governments and businesses that haven't gotten around to wasting money on this shit. So, if a state DOT or city is going to just repave a street, they often rebuild all the ramps -not cuz they need to be rebuilt - they do it just to avoid lawsuits.
Posted by: jc at August 09, 2011 10:56 PM (ZNLu7)
NoKo and South Korea exchanged arty.
Also, NoKo agents tried to assassinate the SoKorean Def. Minister today.
Shit is becoming non-artificial.
Posted by: weft cut-loop at August 09, 2011 11:02 PM (DEcmU)
Posted by: Mature Republicans wielding the levers of power at August 09, 2011 11:02 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 09, 2011 11:05 PM (AZGON)
Rotting from the inside out.
Posted by: Mature Republicans wielding the levers of power at August 10, 2011 03:02 AM (AZGON)
In 2007, there were 60 lawyers in the U.S. Senate. Give or take, there are 300 million Americans. Last time I looked it up, there were about 900,000 lawyers on the bar.
So, rounding off some, a proportional representation would be about 1/3 of one Senator. They are over-represented by about 180 times. If you ever watch CSPAN, sometimes you can have real fun when all the various races and religions of lawyers congratulate themselves on how diverse they are.
Imagine if any other profession was over-represented by 180 times. If 60 nurses were Senators, I would put big money on the first bill being the "Bedpan Act of 2012."
Posted by: jc at August 09, 2011 11:10 PM (ZNLu7)
Posted by: No Whining at August 10, 2011 12:27 AM (CESpn)
Posted by: Case at August 10, 2011 12:32 AM (FD6YW)
Posted by: Jean at August 10, 2011 12:35 AM (7P7Ij)
Were you really, insanity workout dvds? Why it's almost as if this commenter hadn't really the top post or something ....
Posted by: Blacksheep at August 10, 2011 01:34 AM (P+0qO)
Posted by: BigDaddy at August 10, 2011 01:35 AM (4AvvR)
Posted by: Blacksheep at August 10, 2011 01:38 AM (P+0qO)
Posted by: beanervt at August 10, 2011 01:46 AM (KZLoo)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at August 10, 2011 01:56 AM (UlUS4)
Just in case you think I'm joking - that's exactly what they did in my rural Montgomery Co. MD home town (I don't live there any more - thank God - but I still have family there).
I've never seen a person in a wheelchair go down that sidewalk, and I would bet money that there isn't a blind person in the neighborhood - but they did it anyways. It's not just adhesive strips either - they have to jackhammer the center of it to install special ceramic tiles.
Posted by: VT_02 at August 10, 2011 02:02 AM (bKEHh)
And yet, in the USAF, majors that have been passed over twice were suddenly told that they're being ousted. True, their getting a decent package in most cases ($100,000 payout) but none of them will qualify for that pension, even though some are within three years of their 20 years of service. The Navy is proceding with reducing by thousands of enlisted ranks.
You want to solve this? Have the Feds treat the rest of the government the same way they do DoD. If they were treated half as bad as the military, we'd see costs go down. Health care costs too high? Veterans are told that their families are no longer entitled to health care. Still too high? Tell veterans the deal's been changed again; unless the problem is 'service related', you have to pay. Still too high? All dependents are herded into CHAMPUS and then something called Trident (not too sure; this was after I got out). This allowed them to reduce facilities that were trying to serve both active duty personnel and their dependents.
Meanwhile, PA is handing out cell phones as a welfare benefit.
Posted by: Blue Hen at August 09, 2011 04:20 PM (326rv)
Blue Hen - I was in {USN} until '91, when I got a medical discharge: base pay x 2 x years of service. Lump sum under $30,000, of which the IRS took a 3d of off the top. I had over 11 years in and was an E-5 - a BU2.
Years later, after it was too late, I got a letter saying "Ooops, we weren't supposed to take that 3d, you have until {date that had already come and gone} to file and get it back.
While I was getting my medical discharge, I saw healthy E-5's and up getting MORE {don't know their formula} to either separate/not re-up. And they changed the rules re; VA health care - the ONE thing I didn't get screwed over on!!!
This decimated our military, and set us up for 9/11 IMO. And I predicted elsewhere that they would repeat this under Pres. Obama. Sounds like I was right, sad.
If they attempted this with unionized Fed. workers? Yes, it would help, but because they are unionized, they'd raise SUCH a stink, it would be chealer to just keep them!!!
Attrition is {IMO} the only way to resolve this imbalance, but since Pres. Obama changed the baseline, it wouldn't make much difference.
Posted by: Amy Shulkusky at August 10, 2011 02:26 AM (F6MXO)
Posted by: Laura Castellano at August 10, 2011 02:29 AM (fuw6p)
Posted by: Amy Shulkusky at August 10, 2011 02:30 AM (F6MXO)
Let me see if I have this right.
The Vapid One© gets in office, he and his handmaidens in Congress waste $800B on the Porkulus, billions more on the takeovers of car companies, the student loan industry, OCare, and a few dozen other debacles. All that money spent on one-time projects is now a permanent part of the budget.
And he says there's nothing to cut: no waste, no fraud, no abuse. He speaks of a "balanced approach" yet there are no beauraucrats losing their jobs or even having their departments cut back. None of his signature laws are on the table and nothing he's done is scaled back in any way. And he now demands more of our money to piss away.
And that's balance? We pay, he gets to keep everything he's done?
We are well and truly boned. With a pineapple. And sand.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at August 10, 2011 02:37 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: Corona at August 10, 2011 03:13 AM (fh2Y7)
They're doing this ramp stuff in my suburb at this very moment. I wondered why - at least now I know it's lawyer induced. Better to waste a little money now than to waste a LOT later on.
Part of my problem with it in my specific area is that I have tried to walk to places I need to buy stuff. Overall sidewalk coverage is piss poor. Rather than make the very limited sidewalk system more accessible, it might have been more effective to actually have sidewalks that go to places people need to go. The expansions could have been made accessible as they were built.
The A.D.A., which could have been reasonable and a positive thing for the future, was instead made into a destructive thing in many ways. How many older, perfectly good buildings have had to be abandoned above the first floor? Elevator refits aren't cheap. In the little towns in my area the old brick buildings on the main strips are largely abandoned now above ground level.
Posted by: Reactionary at August 10, 2011 03:16 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: chazmartel at August 10, 2011 03:18 AM (OV2xF)
The local community pool in my neighborhood needed patched (it is was 50 years old). The city was informed that any upgrades such as patching would require it to comply with current mandates including being handicap accessible, different drainage etc. The original patching and painting which has had to be done every spring somehow cost $20,000.
Long story short - it wasn't feasible to repair the pool and comply with all of the new mandates so the pool was shut down. Cost to replace the pool $12,000,000. The entire annual budget for the city.
Posted by: Jimmah at August 10, 2011 03:26 AM (TfRqk)
Posted by: Jean at August 10, 2011 03:31 AM (7P7Ij)
ADA was Bush Seniors gift to the lawyers and a farewell FU to the population.
I remember when I was growing up, we had a girl in high school that was wheelchair bound and the school had two stories. Whenever she needed to change floors, four boys pick her and the chair up and moved her to the floor she needed to be on. Those days are gone, now it would be four lawyers waving summonses
Posted by: Hrothgar at August 10, 2011 03:45 AM (yrGif)
Posted by: Mueller at August 10, 2011 04:05 AM (/AU3V)
Here's something I've been dealing with. Yes it's real, and it's been delaying a project for almost 2 years. A project that will be built in exactly the same manner it would have been in the absence of this bureau - just 2 years sooner - and tens of thousands cheaper. If you wonder why your cell phone bill is high, or why you still get dropped calls - here's exhibit 1:
Posted by: forest at August 10, 2011 04:09 AM (9FWy4)
Posted by: blaster at August 10, 2011 04:14 AM (Fw2Gg)
I'm guessing sand would actually smooth the ride of a pineapple.
Posted by: DaveA at August 10, 2011 04:22 AM (eBfsm)
Posted by: tomc at August 10, 2011 04:34 AM (wAMWl)
Cost: $0.00
Benefit: Priceless good relations.
Posted by: jwb7605 at August 10, 2011 04:43 AM (Qxe/p)
Posted by: Boris at August 10, 2011 04:53 AM (xYS/t)
Thank you for illustrating (literally) the anti-thought of regulations.
Just last week I was in a Texas airport getting breakfast before my flight. Behind the food kiosk's counter, on public display (as required by law in every establishment that serves alcohol), there was a sign stating that the unlicensed possession of firearms on the premises was punishable by fines/imprisonment.
This was in the secured area of the airport. But the law still required that the sign be posted. So the restaurateur had to spend money on that thing and take up his wall with it, even though it served absolutely, positively no purpose.
Like those wheelchair ramps.
That's why so much "regulation" sets my teeth on edge.
Posted by: Michael Smith at August 10, 2011 05:02 AM (2Oas0)
Posted by: The Accident Audio Book at August 10, 2011 05:05 AM (DhB/L)
Posted by: All I know is at August 10, 2011 05:25 AM (4Lm0w)
Clearly, these homeowners aren't doing their fairshare to contribute to society. They must be made to install wheelchair accessible entrance in their home to correct this grave injustice.
I'll bet these people also use corporate jets.
Posted by: blindside at August 10, 2011 05:30 AM (x7g7t)
What's funny is that we lived in California for ~4 years and during that time my husband and I both remarked on how wheel chair inaccessible (or unfriendly) most of the places we visited were. And I don't mean just old private structures like peoples' homes, but at all sorts of venues and events. It was odd.
Posted by: Y-not at August 10, 2011 06:04 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Speller at August 10, 2011 06:42 AM (J74Py)
Tony Villar's city wins the prize for Most Likely To Be Boned.
LA is Detroit with palm trees and sombreros. The only time I force myself to drive south into the LA Basin is when I'm being paid to do so.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at August 10, 2011 07:28 AM (YUYZd)
Posted by: Alex at August 10, 2011 07:28 AM (4nDb6)
Posted by: sablegsd at August 10, 2011 07:38 AM (AKS75)
Posted by: runningrn at August 10, 2011 08:04 AM (jfHyQ)
Bike lanes, my ass. Here in Seattle, we have "bike boxes" painted boxes at intersections. Yellow paint on pavement that cost the city $15,000 each. If a bike is in the bike box, cars are not allowed to make a free right turn on red. From the Seattle PI:
Each bike box costs about $15,000 to install, he said (UPDATE: the paint is actually an aggregate of crushed rock set in epoxy and costs about $10,000. It requires special skills to put down correctly, which results in $5,000 for labor, according to SDOT).
Posted by: runningrn at August 10, 2011 08:11 AM (jfHyQ)
Posted by: drocity at August 10, 2011 08:41 AM (mefTt)
Posted by: 11B40 at August 10, 2011 09:12 AM (qhY1t)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at August 10, 2011 09:49 AM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Cynthia Yockey at August 10, 2011 12:00 PM (4U6ri)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2049 seconds, 203 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Comrade Arthur at August 09, 2011 09:51 PM (AEA92)