August 09, 2011
— Ace Kaus writes about almost exactly what I've been thinking about.
Regarding Obama's statement yesterday that, in both the area of defense and non-defense domestic spending, there is "not much further we can cut."
Really?
Kaus actually writes more (including on Medicaid cuts) so make sure you click over. Then maybe the DC won't mind a lengthier excerpt.
“Not much further we can cut” seems like a hanging curve ball, an open invitation for ongoing ridicule–the sort of naive assertion that might come easily to someone who had never worked in the federal government, who only realized after promoting his half-trillion-dollar public works-based stimulus plan that there was “no such thing as shovel-ready projects.” Or someone who doesn’t want to know. Or who wants to act as if he doesn’t know.
Here is the official list of federal job openings. [Link omitted; find it at the original article-- ace.] They are still hiring. Sure, big enterprises keep hiring essential employees even in tough times. But these aren’t essential jobs. Many of them seem like the sort of job a private firm, in a financial crisis like the feds are in, would consolidate with another job or leave unfilled. (The first one that jumps out is the “Associate Administrator for Administration” at the Department of Transportation, which pays $119,554 to $179,700. It seems that this person will do administrative work to maintain the layer of bureaucracy that “coordinates” the DOTs research programs. The new hire will also give “advice and assistance in directing, coordinating, controlling” etc. this little fiefdom. You don’t have to be Peter Drucker to realize that this position does not have to exist.)
Part of the problem, of course, is that since it is virtually impossible to fire an actual underperforming federal employee, conscientious administrators have to hire new people (or consultants) to actually do the work the unfireable employees arenÂ’t doing.
But there’s no sense, reading through this list, that the federal bureaucracy knows it is in crisis–a crisis that might one day cause a GS-12 or GS-15 somewhere in the D.C. metro area to actually lose his or her job in the sort of streamlining layoff private firms routinely go through. ...
In any case, a politician who says “there’s not much further we can cut” is blundering into trouble. Don’t voters want a President who spends a year or two at least trying to wring the fat out of government before he jumps to the conclusion that he needs to extract more in taxes? …
Exactly. Exactly.
Exactly.
Let me note the dog that didn't bark.
Have you heard any stories of older, more expensive federal employees losing their jobs during this budget crisis -- as corporations typically do when they are hemorrhaging money?
Have you read any stories about departments drastically cutting back and looking for money-saving solutions -- doing more with less, as they say, or "working smarter, not harder"?
Has the media been full of stories by weary bureaucrats complaining, like teachers are apparently instructed by their unions to claim, that they have to buy their own supplies to properly do their jobs?
Has there been any grousing that federal employees are missing expected pay raises and promotions, being forced to work at their old salaries through this crisis?
The answer is no.
While the country is teeters on the verge of a Depression (if it has not tottered over already), the federal bureaucracy remains gold-plated and immune to cutbacks.
They have plenty. They have enough money to hire "Associate Administrators for Administration" (Good God All Might!). There is no change from business as usual. When they want a new bureaucrat, to make sure the workloads of the already-serving bureaucrats are not unduly increased, they hire a new bureaucrat.
There are no consolidations, no reorganizations, no firings of redundant or little-needed middle managers.
There are no firings of long-serving bureaucrats -- this always sucks, and I'm not loving doing this as a general matter, but the fact is that the older workers make higher salaries than younger ones, and stressed corporations often find this to be a sad but necessary area for saving money.
No wave of negotiated/ordered early retirements?
Where is the evidence -- even the anecdotal evidence -- that the federal bureaucracy (and the domestic spending it oversees) is in any manner part of this "balanced approach" in which we "all" are expected to "sacrifice" for the good of the nation?
Medicaid: Medicare is available to all seniors; they qualify when they're 65.
Medicaid, on the other hand, is available to the qualifying poor.
Any time there's a system in which benefits accrue to anyone who simply avers the right things on an application, it's open to abuse and gaming.
Now, have we heard of the federal bureaucracy making a concerted effort to block fraudulent Medicaid claims? Or uncover false billing?
No, we haven't. In fact, James O'Keefe's gang just stung state-level Medicaid intake bureaucrats, catching them advising clearly-criminal fraudulent applicants on how to defraud the government.
Any effort to reduce this form of stolen tax money? Are administrative judges who rule on denials of application being accused of tightening up their standards for overruling a denial?
Is there any evidence whatsoever that the government is actually trying to save money in any account?
Posted by: Ace at
11:59 AM
| Comments (259)
Post contains 898 words, total size 6 kb.
Yes...they announced they were ordering office supplies in bulk to save money. So there!
Posted by: Tami at August 09, 2011 12:03 PM (X6akg)
Posted by: Dieter Obama at August 09, 2011 12:04 PM (4YUWF)
Posted by: dagny at August 09, 2011 12:04 PM (BOMhW)
Posted by: Lorena Bobbit at August 09, 2011 12:05 PM (kUaEF)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 09, 2011 12:05 PM (lbo6/)
This is why the BBA is required- because, even if we have the votes, now*, to enact a balanced budget, we won't always.
This is also why a "Zero based/Zero base-line" budget should be part of that BBA.
What these people are doing to my children's future is unacceptable and untenable.
*- now, of course, being "any given point in time"
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at August 09, 2011 12:06 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: associated administrator for administration at August 09, 2011 12:07 PM (YCW1b)
Balance.
Posted by: SlavDog - Demigod and Underlord of Kittehs at August 09, 2011 12:07 PM (9fDAi)
Posted by: Telephone Sanitizer's Local #7 at August 09, 2011 12:07 PM (mRapQ)
Posted by: Y-not at August 09, 2011 12:08 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 09, 2011 12:08 PM (lbo6/)
This is why the BBA is required- because, even if we have the votes, now*, to enact a balanced budget, we won't always.
California has a BBA and it doesn't even stop them. The fact is, the other side doesn't want to play by the rules when they aren't in their favor, and any judges affiliated with the other side will find wiggle room to do whatever they wat.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at August 09, 2011 12:08 PM (FkKjr)
Posted by: The Senior Aide to the Junior Vice-Deputy Associate Administrator for the Administration at August 09, 2011 12:08 PM (QKKT0)
God-boy spoke from the sky, "Hear me. Be like the Navy Seals or be like the Green Bay Packers. Work as a team for the common purpose."
Posted by: soothsayer at August 09, 2011 12:09 PM (G/zuv)
Posted by: Signed, the entire 27 person staff of Michelle Obama at August 09, 2011 12:09 PM (le5qc)
Posted by: Vashta.Nerada at August 09, 2011 12:09 PM (UhTsC)
Here at my office, we're cancelling the water cooler service, bringing in our own coffee, reusing every folder and other bits of office supplies we can, we've let go a third of the staff, hell, we got rid of our receptionist and we're all taking shifts answering the phone. We're taking a survey to determine if we can cut back on phone lines. For pity's sake, it's stupid hot down here and we're not even turning on the a/c until absolutely necessary to try to hold down the electric bill. Why? Because needs must.
Tell me one government agency, just one, that's actually lost 1% of its workforce. Nothing to cut my lily white ass.
Posted by: alexthechick at August 09, 2011 12:10 PM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Executive Assistant to the Associate Administrator for Administration at August 09, 2011 12:10 PM (lbo6/)
Same with "environment protection." and a host of other things.
I just had a thought though- Constitutional brains please correct me on this:
Congress passes the budget, which the President signs. However, the agencies which spend the money are Executive Branch agencies, and therefore answer to the President, not (directly, at least) to Congress.
So what if a President (obviously a Conservative, but specifics don't matter) issued an executive order that all executive departments would spend no more than, say, 85% of the amount authorized to them by Congress?
How do you think that would go over? I know he couldn't let them spend more, but could he require them to spend less?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at August 09, 2011 12:10 PM (8y9MW)
Remind me again why we can't return to, say, 2007 levels of funding for 2012, then 2002 levels for 2013, then burn it all down (eliminating worthless departments) in 2014.
What's that short list for 95-100% cuts? Dept of Education, subsidy programs, HUD...
Any Republican candidates that get this need to scream from the mountains how much we'd save by going to previous years' levels and/or cutting the Federal bloat down to size.
The MFMocrats will call them terrorists, but they're doing that already.
Posted by: Lance McCormick at August 09, 2011 12:11 PM (zgHLA)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 09, 2011 12:11 PM (kUaEF)
Posted by: joeindc44 at August 09, 2011 12:12 PM (QxSug)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 09, 2011 12:12 PM (kUaEF)
Posted by: joeindc44 at August 09, 2011 12:12 PM (QxSug)
Posted by: Executive Assistant to the Associate Administrator for Administration at August 09, 2011 12:13 PM (2tTzd)
God-boy's people listen as He teaches with a parable, "My children, if there’s a blue pill and a red pill, and the blue pill is half the price of the red pill and works just as well, why not pay half price for the thing that’s going to make you well?”
Posted by: soothsayer at August 09, 2011 12:13 PM (G/zuv)
Posted by: U.S. Board on Geographic Names at August 09, 2011 12:13 PM (QKKT0)
The current BBA on the table is rather stronger than the CA BBA, I imagine. Also, some District Court judge might try to see things their way, but even liberal Supreme Courts have (traditionally) blanched (not that it always stops them, but they do at least pause first) at actively opposing something written in the Constitution or Amendments.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at August 09, 2011 12:13 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: awkward davies at August 09, 2011 12:14 PM (YCW1b)
Posted by: polynikes at August 09, 2011 12:15 PM (ufGlD)
Posted by: The Department of Redundancy Elimination Department at August 09, 2011 12:15 PM (kUaEF)
Posted by: Waterhouse at August 09, 2011 04:12 PM (pdCUF)
It was too oversold. Stocks are behaving like commodities these days. Actually, that makes sense - the companies have value, it is just that they are measured in devaluing dollars.
Posted by: Vashta.Nerada at August 09, 2011 12:15 PM (UhTsC)
Posted by: t-bird at August 09, 2011 12:16 PM (FcR7P)
Posted by: joeindc44 at August 09, 2011 12:16 PM (QxSug)
Posted by: toby928™ Acting Deputy Assistant to the Traveling Undersecretary of Travel Services at August 09, 2011 12:16 PM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Baseline Budget at August 09, 2011 12:16 PM (piR98)
To the moon baby. I doubt that new debt limit will make it thru next summer.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at August 09, 2011 12:16 PM (4nfy2)
Posted by: RichBitchPriusWitch at August 09, 2011 12:16 PM (QcFbt)
No.
Does that help?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at August 09, 2011 12:17 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: joncelli at August 09, 2011 12:17 PM (RD7QR)
Not much further we can cut?
Department of Homeland Security
TSA (both of these were created by the evil Bush, so I can't see the libs having a problem)
National Endowment for the Arts
National Endowment for the Humanities
Corporation for Public Broadcasting
Put in a flat tax and fire about 90% of the Internal Revenue Service
Department of Education
Remove American troops from South Korea and Japan
End the war in Libya.
That's 30 seconds of thought. And I'm just a stupid hobbit. I think the President can do better than that.
Posted by: Palandine at August 09, 2011 12:18 PM (g7D8V)
Posted by: joeindc44 at August 09, 2011 12:18 PM (QxSug)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 09, 2011 12:18 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 09, 2011 12:18 PM (kUaEF)
Posted by: WalrusRex at August 09, 2011 12:18 PM (Hx5uv)
Bureaucracies are good at one thing: perpetuating bureaucracies. It has been since Clinton that there has been any downsizing in government employment. ThatÂ’s a long time (in bureaucrat years) for a bureaucracy to get out of control. I would be willing to wager that there are at least 1.5 government employees for every employee actually needed in government. A multi-year hiring freeze should be implemented across the board and a mechanism should be implemented to bring government pay and benefits into line with civilian pay and benefits.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 09, 2011 12:19 PM (jx2j9)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at August 09, 2011 12:19 PM (4nfy2)
I'm one of those senior people in the private sector. And I'm taking it one day at a time. In days like these, one never knows what tomorrow will bring. I've been expecting to be layed off ever since the last of 2009.
One of the most obvious signs of impending unemployment is when a company doesn't replace a person who either quits or retires. It means that they have cut everything to the bone and now they have to start taking a look at their biggest expense. Senior employees.
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at August 09, 2011 12:20 PM (pcFc3)
Ooh, yeah, foreign aid. Massive opputunity for cut-demogoging there.
And, yes, I'm serious. I want to be pandered and demegoged to. Liberals do it on every issue, it's time we started adopting some of those rules.
Bang the drum every time a drunk illegal alien runs someone over. Every piece of waste and fraud. Every thing that kind of looks bad-- demonize it.
Go on the offensive. Start offending the MFMocrats.
Posted by: Lance McCormick at August 09, 2011 12:20 PM (zgHLA)
Unrelated but I think it's about 9pm in England right now and tonight the riots seem to have spread even more.
Seems more rioting has started all over London, and in Manchester, Birmingham, Nottingham, Liverpool and Bristol.
Posted by: Entropy at August 09, 2011 12:20 PM (IsLT6)
no obvious reason.
The fed just cashed in over a year and a half of announcements for that little rally.
Posted by: garrett at August 09, 2011 12:20 PM (mRapQ)
And yet, in the USAF, majors that have been passed over twice were suddenly told that they're being ousted. True, their getting a decent package in most cases ($100,000 payout) but none of them will qualify for that pension, even though some are within three years of their 20 years of service. The Navy is proceding with reducing by thousands of enlisted ranks.
You want to solve this? Have the Feds treat the rest of the government the same way they do DoD. If they were treated half as bad as the military, we'd see costs go down. Health care costs too high? Veterans are told that their families are no longer entitled to health care. Still too high? Tell veterans the deal's been changed again; unless the problem is 'service related', you have to pay. Still too high? All dependents are herded into CHAMPUS and then something called Trident (not too sure; this was after I got out). This allowed them to reduce facilities that were trying to serve both active duty personnel and their dependents.
Meanwhile, PA is handing out cell phones as a welfare benefit.
Posted by: Blue Hen at August 09, 2011 12:20 PM (326rv)
Headed by Warren Buffet and Jeffry Imelt.
Reports will be released in 2013.
Posted by: Associate Assistant Auditor of Audit Efficiency Auditors at August 09, 2011 12:20 PM (ECjvn)
Posted by: alexthechick at August 09, 2011 04:10 PM (VtjlW)
Back in Ohio, I knew my IT company wasn't doing too well when the hanging medicine kits on the walls were no longer being restocked.
Posted by: Stateless Infidel at August 09, 2011 12:21 PM (GKQDR)
I work for the DoD (civilian). There's a LOT than can be cut before we harm the troops.
For example, travel. We all get separate hotel rooms. Two people of the same gender should room together, in a room with two beds. That would halve hotel costs.
We get to keep what we don't spend on our per diem expenses. Let's end that.
Let's end a lot of the travel and do more video teleconferencing.
It's a start.
Posted by: Palandine at August 09, 2011 12:21 PM (g7D8V)
Unrelated but I think it's about 9pm in England right now and tonight the riots seem to have spread even more.
Seems more rioting has started all over London, and in Manchester, Birmingham, Nottingham, Liverpool and Bristol.
Posted by: Entropy at August 09, 2011 04:20 PM (IsLT6)
I have no sympathy left for them. They won't even squirt the rioters with a garden hose fergodssake.
Posted by: Tami at August 09, 2011 12:21 PM (X6akg)
Seems more rioting has started all over London, and in Manchester, Birmingham, Nottingham, Liverpool and Bristol.
Posted by: Entropy
This is not my work.
Posted by: Rob N. Hood at August 09, 2011 12:22 PM (326rv)
I cannot tell a lie. We spend long hours, performing vital work, for very little compensation.
Posted by: Associative Administrative Associate for Association, $170,000/yr at August 09, 2011 12:22 PM (w41GQ)
Posted by: Sub-Tard at August 09, 2011 12:22 PM (0M3AQ)
Posted by: ParisParamus at August 09, 2011 12:23 PM (bN5ZU)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 09, 2011 12:24 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 09, 2011 12:24 PM (kUaEF)
I work for the DoD (civilian). There's a LOT than can be cut before we harm the troops.
For example, travel. We all get separate hotel rooms. Two people of the same gender should room together, in a room with two beds. That would halve hotel costs.
We get to keep what we don't spend on our per diem expenses. Let's end that.
Let's end a lot of the travel and do more video teleconferencing.
It's a start.
Palladine - you are talking crazy talk. Only green suits bunk together. Its called being on active duty.
Posted by: Sub-Tard at August 09, 2011 12:24 PM (0M3AQ)
Posted by: joeindc44 at August 09, 2011 12:25 PM (QxSug)
TSA's been unionized, so now it's a sacred Democrat constituency. Kinda like how Nixon was prepared to pass full-on single payer health care and Ted Kennedy blocked it because the Dems didn't want the GOP to get the welfare mooch vote.
Posted by: Ian S. at August 09, 2011 12:25 PM (tqwMN)
"In these challenging times, when we are facing both rising deficits and a sinking economy, budget reform is not an option. It is an imperative," Obama said. "We cannot sustain a system that bleeds billions of taxpayer dollars on programs that have outlived their usefulness, or exist solely because of the power of a politicians, lobbyists, or interest groups. We simply cannot afford it. This isn’t about big government or small government. It’s about building a smarter government that focuses on what works. That is why I will ask my new team to think anew and act anew to meet our new challenges.... We will go through our federal budget – page by page, line by line – eliminating those programs we don’t need, and insisting that those we do operate in a sensible cost-effective way."
God-boy
November 24, 2008
Posted by: soothsayer at August 09, 2011 12:25 PM (G/zuv)
Department of Homeland Security
TSA (both of these were created by the evil Bush, so I can't see the libs having a problem)
You'd be wrong. With them in power they absolutely love agencies like this. Its like everything else they claim is evil or hate. They only say that because they're not in charge of it.
Posted by: buzzion at August 09, 2011 12:25 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: Associate Assistant Auditor of Audit Efficiency Auditors at August 09, 2011 12:25 PM (ECjvn)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at August 09, 2011 04:19 PM (4nfy2)
C'mon, man. We have to keep their ICBMs serviced.
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at August 09, 2011 12:26 PM (pcFc3)
Posted by: Hairy Reid at August 09, 2011 12:26 PM (Hx5uv)
I think there's a chance that you don't get much savings there, because of the added paperwork needed to document travel expenses.
Posted by: Y-not at August 09, 2011 12:26 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Mr. Pink with nothing new to add at August 09, 2011 12:26 PM (VidfH)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 09, 2011 12:26 PM (kUaEF)
Posted by: polynikes at August 09, 2011 12:27 PM (ufGlD)
They are super!
Posted by: Vic at August 09, 2011 12:27 PM (M9Ie6)
And alienate those abusing public aid, or God forbid SEIU? HahahaHAHAHA!!!!
HAHAHAHAHA!
HAHAHAHA!
Whom do you think Obama is counting on in 2012? He's lost so many already; Risk losing his two most reliable groups? No possible way. That means no cuts to government jobs, no possible action against entitlements to trim costs. Which means the marginal majority of producers in this country will hear only one solution from Obama to the debt crisis. They have to pay more.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at August 09, 2011 12:28 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: joeindc44 at August 09, 2011 12:28 PM (QxSug)
It's funny that Ace should say, "There is no change from business as usual."
Because Obama went on to say, "We are not going back to business as usual when it comes to the budget."
Posted by: soothsayer at August 09, 2011 12:28 PM (G/zuv)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 09, 2011 12:28 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: Waste,Fraud & Abuse at August 09, 2011 12:29 PM (oH/mH)
We don't want to harm it. We want to help you make it better.
Posted by: The Federal Council for Oversight of Cowboy and Native American Poetry Standards and Conventions at August 09, 2011 12:29 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: yinzer at August 09, 2011 12:30 PM (/Mla1)
@82, it makes me sick of the waste every time I travel for my job (which admittedly, had been cut back quite a bit of late).
We're on a 2-year cost of living freeze, but I do recognize we are still overpaid. I work hard to give good value on what I earn, though. If a conservative ever comes to the Presidency and wants to cut federal wages, I won't complain. It's a good life.
Posted by: Palandine at August 09, 2011 12:30 PM (g7D8V)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at August 09, 2011 04:28 PM (0q2P7)
Love the psycho font there. How'd you do that?
Posted by: Insomniac at August 09, 2011 12:30 PM (v+QvA)
I think there's a chance that you don't get much savings there, because of the added paperwork needed to document travel expenses.
More crazy talk. Lets just close the Commerce Department and Department of Education. Hell, defund NPR. Fucking with my per diem will only cause me to insure I spend it all. My wife looks forward to her per diem bonuses. Do you want to make her mad or something?
Posted by: Sub-Tard at August 09, 2011 12:30 PM (0M3AQ)
Add West Bromwich, Wolverhampton and Salford apparently.
Posted by: Entropy at August 09, 2011 12:30 PM (IsLT6)
Posted by: CoolCzech's last roommate at August 09, 2011 12:31 PM (RD7QR)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at August 09, 2011 12:31 PM (pLTLS)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 09, 2011 12:31 PM (kUaEF)
Posted by: Executive Assistant to the Associate Administrator for Administration at August 09, 2011 12:33 PM (lbo6/)
Bye-bye NPR, EPA DoE and on and on and on....
Likewise, presidential Councils, Administrators for the White House Office of Talking on the Internet and the like are to be fired immediately. All political business to be moved out of the White House and remaining political employees to be paid by the president's reelection campaign or political party. First Lady's staff (except one secretary) to be eliminated.
Congressional staffs reduced to 1960 levels. All future travel by common carriers (coach class), all expenses but genuine official business phone and mailing cut.
Pensions? Perks? Gone, all of them. No elected official shall be allowed to get rich while in office.
Finally, we need a law that requires Congress members to personally make up any and all budget shortfalls and, if taxes are raised, they pay taxes at a rate double that imposed on private citizens.
Time clocks installed in White House and Congress. All pay to henceforth be at an hourly rate. Absences are docked.
Put all these in place -- along with brooming OsamaObamaCare -- and we will have made a good start at returning to sanity.
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 09, 2011 12:33 PM (YjjrR)
I know ship repair money is being slashed to the bone.
I agree that Enlisted ranks are being decimated.
Ships being limited to a max transit speed of 15 knots IOT conserve fuel.
Ships being told "This is your fuel ration for the quarter, don't waste it, as there ain't no more"
Ships having to decide between buying paint and toilet paper.
Yes, for major action, there is money. But the money for day to day operation of units has been slashed to the bone.
If the rest of the federal Government were tightening their belt like the military, you would see a serious drop in budget need.
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at August 09, 2011 12:33 PM (vuvrk)
Early on, she told her boss that she didn't feel right about doing nothing...and he told her to keep quite because he didn't want an audit of his dept.
Apparently, he didn't do shit either.
Posted by: beedubya at August 09, 2011 12:33 PM (AnTyA)
And don't forget the invisible bureaucracy. For every Assistant Administrator of Administration, there are probably 2 - 3 contractors working existing right along side; being paid the same amount, or more, to do the same job description.
Back in the Building, I watched senior officers from all services who had fearlessly fought and defeated Nazis, Japs, ChiComs, Viet Cong, you name it, turn to jello at the very hint that some do nothing civilian might file a grievance. (oh the horror).
My point is, the roots of this disaster run very deep and there will be no quick fixes.
Posted by: VADM (Red) Cuthbert Collingwood RN at August 09, 2011 12:33 PM (hZqYp)
Obama is intentionally stoking the flames by using his 'pay their fair share' crap which is code for whites. Beck hit on this yesterday, and I never thought I'd here it. The story he told about his time at the new planet of the apes movie was chilling. Black couples yelling without shame and calling people around them 'crackers' and saying that the movie was going to play out in real life. Crazy. The thing in Wisconsin with 'youts' attacking whites, and the black flash mobs are no coincidence. They are being encouraged by their leaders.
London is burning because the cops killed a thug that shot at them when they pulled him over. You know it was justified because most police in Britain don't even carry guns! They had to call a special squad in! So 'youts' riot when we defend ourselves? What kind of bullshit is this?
Scary times folks
Posted by: Uhhh uhh uhhhh uhhh errrr errrr uhhh mommy said i'm smart! at August 09, 2011 12:35 PM (eXQfZ)
The ISFL is meant to cut down on greenhouse gas emissions and allow all Americans to help shoulder the burden of government.
You will have to provide your own sneakers.
That's all. Thank you.
Posted by: Associate Administrator for Administration, Department of Transportation at August 09, 2011 12:35 PM (oUG6f)
Well, it was a good idea. Stupid reality anyway.
Who on earth thought that law was good and/or proper? Why would you require a government agency to spend everything allocated? Or is it just (as would make much more sense) a 'use it or lose it' kind of law?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at August 09, 2011 12:35 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Barry XVI at August 09, 2011 12:35 PM (FcR7P)
That's what the Government thinks a Doc should make. A person with somewhere in the neighborhood of $400K in student loans. Frito-Lays is hiring certified Diesel Mechanics (=associate degree, more or less) for $54K a year and that person might not have any student loan debt at all.
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at August 09, 2011 12:35 PM (DoA72)
Posted by: yinzer
For the same reason we held a global warming conference in Tahiti. There was an urgent need.
And shut up peasant.
Posted by: The Goracle at August 09, 2011 12:36 PM (6rX0K)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at August 09, 2011 12:36 PM (AEA92)
There was a time in human history (beggining of time - 1960s) when you were motivated to work hard and mark smart fiscal and personal choices because if you didn't, you died.
If you spent all your money on clothes, you starved to death because the government didn't hand out food stamps(which are actually credit cards now).
If you didn't save for retirement, you lived in the streets like a hobo or with your family if they would have you.
Now there is no consequence to any bad decision and we're surprised people keep making them?
What happens in America if you spend all of your income on drugs? Well you can get a free Section 8 voucher for housing, you can get food stamps to feed yourself, and almost every city offers money to the poor in some fashion or another. If you're older you can get on Medicare whether or not you paid anything into it, or you can side up for Medicaid without paying jack shit.
I think it's time we revert to a society in which people pay for their mistakes. You will find they make less of them.
Before someone calls me heartless(which i am in many ways), I'm not talking about the people who can't take care of themselves. I have no problem with out society paying for the mentally and physically disabled, but we can't continue in a society where 50% of us are considered the "least among us" who need state aid.
Posted by: Ben at August 09, 2011 12:36 PM (wuv1c)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 09, 2011 12:36 PM (kUaEF)
MS Office, on recent releases, realizes when it is being pasted into a web composition and tries to insert the HTML coding needed to maintain formatting where allowed by HTML.
Easy answer: compose in MS Word copy and paste into comment box. Works for some fonts, and font sizes, not all.
Your mileage may vary. Past performance is no guarantee of future returns. Not valid in Botswana, Lithuania, or Taiwan. Some restrictions may apply.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at August 09, 2011 12:36 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 09, 2011 12:37 PM (AZGON)
Congressional staffs reduced to 1960 levels.
Why not just have each state fund its Congressional Delegation? Then they can spend as little or as much as they like.
Posted by: nickless at August 09, 2011 12:37 PM (MMC8r)
The first day that groups of white British subjects arm themselves and clash with the looters and thugs will be the day the Met gets over their fear of using water cannons and tear gas.
As long as the correct people are victimized, the British government will sit on its hands.
As soon as the victims start fighting back the Met will start cracking skulls.
That country whole continent is suicidal.
Posted by: sifty at August 09, 2011 12:37 PM (ECjvn)
"Indeed, it is worth recalling Marx’s colourful description in The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon of how that French ruler cynically built his power base amongst parts of the bourgeoisie and sections of the lumpenproletariat, so that ‘ruined and adventurous offshoots of the bourgeoisie rubbed shoulders with vagabonds, discharged soldiers, discharged jailbirds, swindlers, pickpockets, tricksters, gamblers, brothel-keepers, organ-grinders, ragpickers, knife-grinders, tinkers, beggars… and from this kindred element Boneparte formed the core of his [constituency], where all its members felt the need to benefit themselves at the expense of the labouring nation.’ In very different circumstances, we have something similar today – when the decadent commentariat’s siding with lumpen rioters represents a weird coming together of sections of the bourgeoisie with sections of the underworked and the over-flattered, as the rest of us, ‘the labouring nation’, look on with disdain."
Seems Marx was describing Obama's crowd.
Posted by: Sub-Tard at August 09, 2011 12:38 PM (0M3AQ)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 09, 2011 12:39 PM (AZGON)
When civilisation rebuilds, one thing I'd really like to see is a rule that no one can work in any combination of government jobs for more than 7 years total in a lifetime. After 7 years at the government tit, you get to expand your horizons and be freed of the drudgery of government work.
There would be obvious exceptions to this like military, computer hackers and very specialised people.
Posted by: Stateless Infidel at August 09, 2011 12:39 PM (GKQDR)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at August 09, 2011 04:31 PM (pLTLS)
Honey? Honey? Wake up. Do you smell smoke?
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at August 09, 2011 12:40 PM (pcFc3)
Yeah I want government running my healthcare.
Posted by: lowandslow at August 09, 2011 12:40 PM (GZitp)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 09, 2011 12:40 PM (kUaEF)
Posted by: t-bird at August 09, 2011 12:40 PM (FcR7P)
Really?"
Yes, really; I already said that everything had been cut to the bone. Yes, budgets have expanded a bit in the years since, but still, we run as lean a government as is possible.
Posted by: Tom DeLay at August 09, 2011 12:41 PM (xy9wk)
Posted by: Dave at August 09, 2011 12:41 PM (Xm1aB)
Attrition is getting ready to go way up in the military. Already is in places (USAF passed-over MAJs). I'm an O4 in the Navy with 14 years, first look at O5 is next year. I guarantee I'm more nervous about the future than any non-military federal employee.
Posted by: Bomber at August 09, 2011 12:43 PM (qzoN5)
I like that idea.
Well, modified slightly. Cut House staff down to 1960 levels, and have States fund their Senators. It might (might) take us a tiny step back to the days when the House of Representatives was "the People's House" and the Senate was "the States' House."
I would really love to see those days return. I realize, now, that my parents didn't even know them...
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at August 09, 2011 12:43 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Dickens at August 09, 2011 12:44 PM (oH/mH)
I agree that Enlisted ranks are being decimated.
Ships being limited to a max transit speed of 15 knots IOT conserve fuel.
Ships being told "This is your fuel ration for the quarter, don't waste it, as there ain't no more"
Ships having to decide between buying paint and toilet paper.
Yes, for major action, there is money. But the money for day to day operation of units has been slashed to the bone.
If the rest of the federal Government were tightening their belt like the military, you would see a serious drop in budget need.
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice
I didn't know that things were this bad. I still stand by my idea that we should treat the rest of the government half as badly as we do the DoD. I also think that anyone suggesting bullshit like 'closing loopholes', and 'ending that silly home mortgage interest deduction' can go straight to Hell. This beast does NOT need more money. We need to do at the Federal level what Michigan did to 30,000 shits fraudently taking food stamps.
Posted by: The Goracle at August 09, 2011 12:44 PM (326rv)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 09, 2011 12:44 PM (AZGON)
The headline -- Busing members in for Boehner jobs rally.
Heh.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at August 09, 2011 12:44 PM (pLTLS)
that's exactly what we need right now -- an alien invasion Mech metal bullets
FIFM
Posted by: Buzzsaw at August 09, 2011 12:44 PM (tf9Ne)
"Before this last election, I was called a Citizen, Taxpayer, and a Veteran"
Posted by: elspeth at August 09, 2011 12:45 PM (0AkWH)
Does that REALLY sound so "24 carat plated" to you?
I hope you're joking, I really really do. Because compared to what I have? Yes.
Posted by: alexthechick at August 09, 2011 12:45 PM (VtjlW)
136 Do you guys read the article about shutting down the Congressional Page program? It was costing 5 million per year. That's to house, feed and oversee 70 kids. They're not paid mind you, that's 5 million dollars for 70 kids.
Yeah I want government running my healthcare.
You do know that Barney Frank is always cruising for new meat? $5M is a small price to pay to insure Barney's ass can talk.
Posted by: Sub-Tard at August 09, 2011 12:45 PM (0M3AQ)
________
Not even with shares of stock? That's brutal!
Posted by: Milo Minderbinder at August 09, 2011 12:45 PM (xGZ+b)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at August 09, 2011 12:46 PM (4nfy2)
Posted by: joeindc44 at August 09, 2011 12:47 PM (QxSug)
Is there any evidence whatsoever that the government is actually trying to save money in any account?
Yes, Ace, in DoD.
SecDef Gates thought he'd get ahead of the curve when he saw the budget writing on the wall. He started cutting last year. He cancelled several weapons procurements, and eliminated an entire combatant command (which officially folded its flag last week BTW) among other redundancies.
But in the wider Federal government? No, you're spot on.
Just like always, they come looking to DoD for cuts first.
It will be the same this time too.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 09, 2011 12:47 PM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Dave at August 09, 2011 12:47 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: George Orwell
Thank you sir. I can be incredibly wrong, but I think that Daley moved into the White House for a reason. I think that he's the one who's going to make the call.
Posted by: Blue Hen at August 09, 2011 12:47 PM (326rv)
Posted by: The Department of Innovation at August 09, 2011 12:47 PM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Jean at August 09, 2011 12:48 PM (WkuV6)
For all that's holy, buy the toilet paper.
Posted by: lowandslow at August 09, 2011 12:48 PM (GZitp)
-- my wife and I talk about that frequently.
Back then we literally raided the penny jar to be able to eat on Friday.
As a result, we scrimped, saved, taught that stuff to the kids, etc.
We now own a house (free and clear), clear title to both vehicles, and have 3 mayonnaise jars of pennies saved up.
We keep the penny jar for "just in case".
Posted by: jwb7605 at August 09, 2011 12:48 PM (+KHIt)
As long as the correct people are victimized, the British government will sit on its hands.
As soon as the victims start fighting back the Met will start cracking skulls.
Already begun. 70 or so 30-40 year old white men chased off a bunch of ethnic youths in Enfield, with reports of racial slurs and vigilantism. Cops broke it off.
Watch what happens to Enfield tonight. Apparently some people have had enough of waiting for the cops.
Posted by: Entropy at August 09, 2011 12:48 PM (IsLT6)
Food Stamps are now known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. What part of SUPPLEMENTAL do people not understand?
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at August 09, 2011 12:48 PM (DoA72)
Money that we borrow?
It seems there's a good place to start.
Posted by: nickless at August 09, 2011 12:49 PM (MMC8r)
I agree that Enlisted ranks are being decimated.
Ships being limited to a max transit speed of 15 knots IOT conserve fuel.
Ships being told "This is your fuel ration for the quarter, don't waste it, as there ain't no more"
Ships having to decide between buying paint and toilet paper.
Yes, for major action, there is money. But the money for day to day operation of units has been slashed to the bone.
If the rest of the federal Government were tightening their belt like the military, you would see a serious drop in budget need.
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice
You should have been around during Carter. All tanks in Germany were limited to 30 minutes of fuel per month. Crews were able to fire their main gun once a year. This, BTW, was during the Cold War. Readiness in Korea was worse. Thankfully our enemies didn't know how bad things were.
Posted by: Sub-Tard at August 09, 2011 12:49 PM (0M3AQ)
Posted by: palerider at August 09, 2011 12:50 PM (dkExz)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 09, 2011 12:50 PM (kUaEF)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 09, 2011 12:51 PM (AZGON)
Food Stamps are now known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. What part of SUPPLEMENTAL do people not understand?
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at August 09, 2011 04:48 PM (DoA72)
Awww snap, we love our S.N.A.P.!!!
Posted by: Obama Voter at August 09, 2011 12:51 PM (/Mla1)
"A thrill-seeking Florida stripper and her AK-47-toting siblings on a multistate crime spree yesterday ignored their heartsick mother's plea to give themselves up, authorities said"
http://tinyurl.com/3znl6pl
Posted by: The Robot Devil at August 09, 2011 12:51 PM (b8ZHX)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 09, 2011 12:52 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: Dave at August 09, 2011 12:52 PM (Xm1aB)
that's exactly what we need right now -- an alien invasion Mech metal bullets
FIFM
Posted by: Buzzsaw
"An RPG in America, with a beautiful handcrafted charge made in a busted up school. What to do with it? I know! I'll try to shoot down a moving air/space/alien/craft coming in for a landing hundreds of feet over my head. First time for everything don't ya know....."(makes no effort to track or lead target)
BOOM
"Gee; piece of cake."
Hurray for Hollywood or Vancouver, judging from the accents.
Posted by: Blue Hen at August 09, 2011 12:52 PM (326rv)
Posted by: Socratease at August 09, 2011 12:53 PM (vaIln)
Posted by: beedubya at August 09, 2011 12:53 PM (AnTyA)
Okay, CC, I have to educate you. I love you like a fake internet brother, but you're wrong on a few levels.
As a former BCBS Employee (not on the Federal side, but I had friends there, so I know what the benefits were years ago, and I doubt they've been reduced terribly) anyone else- in the private sector- would be paying (depending on Employer contribution) between $550 and $1000/mo or so.
The rest of us ALSO have to invest around 15% of our income if we wish to retire, because SS isn't going to be there for us, either (no matter what the Federal Government would have us believe). The major difference there is that we're already having 6.5% (really 13%) of our income confiscated because of that ponzi scheme, so it's more like we're investing 28% of our income so we can retire.
Finally, the thing with those "median" and "mean" income numbers is that they're averages- which are never very accurate. You have to compare apples to apples. That said, they are a pretty good indicator of the entire public sector vs. the entire private sector. So public CPAs may not be doing so well (in actual salary) as private CPAs, but public bus drivers, or janitors, or whatever, probably make much more than private bus drivers, or janitors, or whatever.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at August 09, 2011 12:53 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: soothsayer at August 09, 2011 04:41 PM (G/zuv)
We would need a significant increase in our annual budget to address an alien invasion. And even if we got it, those bastards over at the Federal Agency for Development of Strategies Concerning Non-Terrestrial Beings would still try to horn in on our turf.
Posted by: The National Bureau for the Management of Domestic Alien Invasions and Pacific Islander Affairs at August 09, 2011 12:54 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Vic at August 09, 2011 12:54 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Chellita at August 09, 2011 12:55 PM (MT+0i)
Posted by: Dave at August 09, 2011 12:56 PM (Xm1aB)
Yeah looked up what max benefit was on that 200$ a month. I could feed myself 2 months on that kind of money if I had to. And that's moose level calorie counts and vitamin needs. It does nothing to introduce reality to those who need to revise the methods with which they make decisions in their life.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at August 09, 2011 12:57 PM (0q2P7)
Naaa. Just move that one under DoD, where it belongs. Our Tanks still run on diesel, after all.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at August 09, 2011 12:57 PM (8y9MW)
Now the cops will be able to fight back against those evil vigilantes.
Posted by: sifty at August 09, 2011 12:57 PM (ECjvn)
Steyn on Rush the other day was reading a story about how a federal employee was more likely to die than to be fired--whole agencies with employees in the 1000s where not one single fucking person was fired in a whole year!
Think about that, that not one person screwed up, lied, stole showed up drunk, etc., etc. out of thousands?
Posted by: Jimmuy at August 09, 2011 12:58 PM (QY0N1)
185
I want the President to explain to me how gutting the Dept. Of Education would actually cause harm to the nation as a whole.
I don't care about the jobless bureaucrats, but the country as a whole.
Are you serious in your desire to hear Sparky opine on this? Fairness my good man, fairness. The less I hear Sparky talk the better off I am. Please, don't feed the bears.
Posted by: Sub-Tard at August 09, 2011 12:58 PM (0M3AQ)
Posted by: mrshad at August 09, 2011 12:58 PM (Xqfwb)
Now get off my lawn. Posted by: George Orwell at August 09, 2011 04:44 PM
And we should adopt the UK Parliament's "Question Time" format. I'd be glued to the TV watching a teleprompter-less Traitor-in-Chief stammering through real questions while being badgered by the opposition to a background of cries of "No!," "shame!" and "resign!"
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 09, 2011 12:58 PM (YjjrR)
President Downgrade has increased federal spending by 30% so clearly there is no room for cuts.
None.
Posted by: Warden at August 09, 2011 12:58 PM (HzhBE)
The question that I'm surprised that no one has asked yet is: Are we, as taxpayers who fund government, getting any positive return on our investment? That is the point at which we start looking at cuts in government. We need to completely cut anything that isn't advocating the constitutional rights of states and individuals. This is where the government has jumped the rails.
I liked the idea of a commentor upthread (sorry, can't remember your nic) that proposed that government be trimmed back to early 1960's levels. That would be a good starting point.
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at August 09, 2011 12:58 PM (pcFc3)
I hadn't seen the entire show just to the part where they were making bullets. I'll assume they formed the metal over the pointy end of the RPG and ignored that RPGs are effective because of the Shaped Metal charge inside.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at August 09, 2011 12:59 PM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: Dave at August 09, 2011 12:59 PM (Xm1aB)
I want the President to explain to me how gutting the Dept. Of Education would actually cause harm to the nation as a whole.
Oh, he'd make you believe that those Federal dollars coursing through the veins of DoEd are the only thing standing between you and a nation of sub-literate morons. Remember, it's "for the children."
Of course, since we already have a nation of sub-literate morons, thanks to teacher's unions, he'd lose that argument to anyone who pays attention to politics. You know, like us.
Since most of the country does not give a shit about politics, he'd win that argument.
Ain't fair, ain't right, but it is what it is.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 09, 2011 01:00 PM (sbV1u)
Posted by: a prototypical calm, rational liberal at August 09, 2011 01:00 PM (AZGON)
My family would save over $1000 a month with that deal. Yes, you are gold plated AND diamond encrusted.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at August 09, 2011 01:00 PM (4nfy2)
That way new nuclear power plant construction becomes a national security issue and not subject to a thousand lawsuits by the motherfucking Sierra Club maggots.
Posted by: sifty at August 09, 2011 01:00 PM (ECjvn)
Posted by: joeindc44 at August 09, 2011 01:01 PM (QxSug)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 09, 2011 01:01 PM (kUaEF)
Ain't too smart, you know. Actually, kinda dumb.
Dumbest preznint evah? Maybe.
Posted by: I'm in a New York state of mind at August 09, 2011 01:01 PM (4sQwu)
One thing I'm always wondering is, just when in the DOOM scenarios, do huge numbers of government employees start to get let go? At what point do the European countries finally start to get rid of all of the government departments? Do they have to hit official bankruptcy before major reforms happen?
Posted by: Stateless Infidel at August 09, 2011 01:01 PM (GKQDR)
We don't fill as many positions as are lost, but yeah, I don't know anyone who has been laid off.
Posted by: mrshad at August 09, 2011 01:01 PM (Xqfwb)
Posted by: nickless at August 09, 2011 01:01 PM (MMC8r)
I hadn't seen the entire show just to the part where they were making bullets. I'll assume they formed the metal over the pointy end of the RPG and ignored that RPGs are effective because of the Shaped Metal charge inside.
Posted by: Buzzsaw
I was dazzled at the previously undicovered anti-aircraft capabilities of what was principally a cheap anti-armor/light fortification weapon. If I was standing near the tarmac or a landing zone I'd have a decent chance of ruining someone's day while landing or taking off. But if said land-ee was about 20 stories up, my chances for glory diminish somewhat.
Posted by: Blue Hen at August 09, 2011 01:02 PM (326rv)
Limit per diem to actual expenses, and I guarantee you that every last traveling employee will skip McDonald's and head for the full service sit down place and your savings will be exactly zilch.
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 09, 2011 04:36 PM (kUaEF)
My school changed from a $40 per diem to all receipts. It wastes a ton of time because secretaries now have to pour over these receipts. Eat at a Chinese buffet? Out of luck, that hand-written receipt with the non-Roman character doesn't count.
And this is their accounting procedure, even if the source of the money is perfectly happy with per diems.
But you're right. I get bottled water at the airport and care nothing for the cost of the meals. On the other hand, I'd be perfectly happy with a $25 per diem just to not have to deal with the trouble of receipts.
Posted by: AmishDude at August 09, 2011 01:02 PM (73tyQ)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 09, 2011 01:02 PM (AZGON)
Someone above mentioned foreign aid.
Oh God, cut it. At least cut it to dirtbag countries that hate us. We give aid to 174 of the 192 countries in the world. Charities and individuals should give to whom they choose, but governments should look out for their interests. Obama was trying to increase military aid to Libya a month before he went to war with it.
In Atlas Shrugged, one of the characters was a pirate who attacked ships carrying US aid to the socialist states of Europe. He was one of my favorite characters.
Posted by: Palandine at August 09, 2011 01:02 PM (g7D8V)
Posted by: TBJK at August 09, 2011 01:02 PM (3NXMO)
http://tinyurl.com/3lwxemh
Burgess calls for Impeachment.
Yes, it would gain the SOB sympathy, just when he's doing such a fine job of sinking himself. OTOH, he's sinking the country, and has a year & a half to do more damage. Tough call.
Posted by: backhoe at August 09, 2011 01:03 PM (rFdqZ)
Posted by: Dave at August 09, 2011 01:05 PM (Xm1aB)
Make food more expensive.
Make farming more costly.
Although the FDA helps out a bunch with those items.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at August 09, 2011 01:06 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: nickless at August 09, 2011 05:01 PM (MMC8r)
We commission beautiful murals showing corn and wheat and shit. You should come to D.C. and see our lobby some time.
Posted by: The U.S. Dept. of Agriculture at August 09, 2011 01:06 PM (QKKT0)
What does the Department of Agriculture do, other than hand out money?
Their research function is valuable.
After that...not much. I'd cut everything else.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 09, 2011 01:06 PM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at August 09, 2011 01:08 PM (4nfy2)
You should have been around during Carter. All tanks in Germany were limited to 30 minutes of fuel per month. Crews were able to fire their main gun once a year. This, BTW, was during the Cold War. Readiness in Korea was worse. Thankfully our enemies didn't know how bad things were.
Posted by: Sub-Tard at August 09, 2011 04:49 PM (0M3AQ)
Trust me. They knew. They just waited too long. They were so shocked by Reagan's aggressiveness, that many plans were immediately dumped. They knew with him in power, they would be paying a much much higher price for their "excursions".
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at August 09, 2011 01:09 PM (pcFc3)
Posted by: backhoe at August 09, 2011 05:03 PM
Not so tough, unless you're an "in fairness" guy like Ed "poppin' Fresh" Morrissey or one of those thoughtful dudes at NRO.
Treason is a crime, and a good argument can be made that a number of Osama Obama's actions -- and very likely some instigated by him through agencies like the DoJ -- reach that bar.
As I recall, impeachment can be instituted for "high crimes and misdemeanors." Add a few felonies along the way (in his campaign, perjurious statements, etc.), and you'd have enough for the Chicago Jesus to leave the White House in manacles.
Remember that Nixon would have been impeached for less, and only avoided that fate by resigning. Of course Congress was full of patriotic Americans back then....
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 09, 2011 01:10 PM (YjjrR)
I know! I'll try to shoot down a moving air/space/alien/craft coming in for a landing hundreds of feet over my head. First time for everything don't ya know....."(makes no effort to track or lead target)
When he could have just aimed at the fucking structure.
Full episodes available at TNT! New season next fucking summer!
Posted by: Mama AJ, who watched every episdode just to be annoyed by it or something at August 09, 2011 01:10 PM (XdlcF)
Posted by: Oldsailors poet at August 09, 2011 01:13 PM (ZDUD4)
Foreign aid and defense. Cut them both and voila, problem solved.
Easy peasy. Now, can't we just get a nice bipartisan agreement on this?
WTF reason for all this chit-chat?
Posted by: Typical low-info voter who actually votes at August 09, 2011 01:14 PM (4sQwu)
Hey, I travel to countries where McDonalds is a treat. Go ahead a cut the per diem, but I want $50 a day for immodium. I also want business class tickets for flights of 8 hours and more. You try flying for 20 hours plus a day and see how you like it.
Posted by: Sub-Tard at August 09, 2011 01:14 PM (0M3AQ)
Oh boy, do I remember the Carter years.
Went to Boot Camp 01 December 1977
Retired August of last year.
But no matter how deeply we were cut in budgets, failure to perform the mission was never an option for us.
Someone upthread said to declare a snow emergency, and have non-essential federal personnel stay home.
I would love to see that.
But then again, there just has to be some self esteem issues at home when someones child naturally sees them as a hero, and then finds out that their job position is "Non-Essential"
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at August 09, 2011 01:14 PM (vuvrk)
What does the Department of Agriculture do, other than hand out money?
Discriminate!
Oh, wait, that's just a way to make sure we have to hand out money later.
Posted by: Dept. of Ag. at August 09, 2011 01:15 PM (XdlcF)
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 09, 2011 05:10 PM (YjjrR)
Nixon was a Republican, they're not invulnerable to impeachanite.
Posted by: Vic at August 09, 2011 01:19 PM (M9Ie6)
Remember when, for many people, the most striking aspect of the Clarence Thomas hearings was the discovery of how thick the bureaucracy in Washington was, as evidenced by the references to "assistant to the assistant undersecretary of ..." in the testimony?
Most people have no idea.
Posted by: Michael Smith at August 09, 2011 01:19 PM (2Oas0)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 09, 2011 01:20 PM (lbo6/)
Posted by: Sub-Tard at August 09, 2011 01:20 PM (0M3AQ)
How many private sector jobs have been lost in the past three years? How many Federal sector jobs.
Try reducing Federal level employment to 2000 levels for a starter. Eliminate the massive numbers of contractors , who do the work of the Federal government since Federal workers just gather dust. Or fire the Feds and replace them with the contractors.
The first step is to institute some sort of civil service exam so the government no longer serves as an affirmative action program. If you look at the per centage of minorities employed by the Federal government the numbers are so out of whack its incredible.
The waste in SSI is incredible and Medicaid is a joke. Abolish food stamps and SSI.
Then cut off federal research grants and business subsidies, finally end federal loan guaranties of any type.
I guarantee you the budget would balance. But our politicians will not stop spending. Its the source of their power.
We need term limits and a balanced bnudget amendment that would if violated (unless there is a declaration of war-not a funding of kinetic energy, a foodfight resolution etc) would result in the immediate scheduling of elections which the sitting members of the government would not be eligible to stand for, including the president.
One term is enough. Further we should insure Congress does not assemble for more than one month each year. This would prevent the constant expansion and overreach that tells us the kind of light bulb we need, or the kind of toilets, or if we can drink soda.
Posted by: Molon Labe at August 09, 2011 01:21 PM (g5MrG)
We seem to have forgotten an important meme in all this discussion:
What if Bush did this or it happened on his watch?
Enjoy...
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at August 09, 2011 01:22 PM (d0Tfm)
Seems the Olympic Committee doesn't like rednecks. Shoosh, Greece is bankrupt and the IOC is suing rednecks. WTF?
Posted by: Sub-Tard at August 09, 2011 01:24 PM (0M3AQ)
Posted by: FU52 at August 09, 2011 01:26 PM (EaimS)
I think what you'd find is that the costs in terms of personnel (and some costs associated with document storage/management) for verifying/tracking the actual expenditures might be more or about the same as the $10 or $15/day that a traveler might manage to go under on a per diem.
Maybe not, but I suspect it doesn't represent a big savings.
Aside from the doom and gloom aspects of all this, it is interesting to see how different organizations approach cost-cutting. (I'm not saying the feds are even trying, btw.) Some organizations preserve personnel but try to run lean, so you have people scrounging for office supplies or whatnot. Other organizations will cut personnel, but they may differ on which type of personnel -- do you cut out admins or do you cut professionals and use consultants? I think that any given organization the answer may differ.
I was in a B-school during a big budget crunch and our dean (an organizational mgmt specialist as it happened) chose to reduce personnel costs by not replacing people who left/retired, but he kept our operations budgets pretty much intact. So at least the folks who remained were not wasting time scrounging for paperclips. In a way I think it was better for morale. Of course, his strategy worked because they had good budget projections and knew to start well before the rest of the bone-headed deans who spent like drunken sailors until they hit a crisis. Oh, and our dean also increased revenues by leaning on (and ultimately replacing/upgrade) our education program staff.
Posted by: Y-not at August 09, 2011 01:30 PM (5H6zj)
fifme
Posted by: Y-not at August 09, 2011 01:31 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: FU52 at August 09, 2011 01:32 PM (EaimS)
Plus one of the actors (Drew Roy) is from a little town about 45 minutes from me, so I have to cheer for the home team
Posted by: Lone Marauder at August 09, 2011 01:35 PM (/bVuS)
So cutting costs is OK, so long as it's not *your* ox that gets gored?
Posted by: Lone Marauder at August 09, 2011 01:37 PM (/bVuS)
I think he was being facetious in response to my suggestion that eliminating flat rate per diems might not represent a big savings.
Posted by: Y-not at August 09, 2011 01:38 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Y-not at August 09, 2011 01:40 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Sobbing Department of Agriculture Agent at August 09, 2011 01:40 PM (GTbGH)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 09, 2011 04:40 PM (kUaEF)
Um, actually, yes. That's a pretty good deal.
Posted by: Insomniac at August 09, 2011 01:48 PM (v+QvA)
Posted by: FU52 at August 09, 2011 01:58 PM (EaimS)
It's way the fuck better than "pretty good."
I'm not on my wife's policy, because I'm rich, bitch, but if she got pregnant, thereby automatically kicking in a "family" policy (that still doesn't include me), her required monthly contribution would increase by more than twice $270.
Of course there's no reason anyone who works for the government would know how horribly they're ass-raping everyone outside it, every day, over and over again. Parasites' odds of survival would be hindered by empathy, so they don't have it.
Posted by: oblig. at August 09, 2011 02:03 PM (xvZW9)
A quote I read this morning from Mark Twain's Life on the Mississippi (he was talking about the Vicksburg National Cemetery)--it was all I could do not to scare the commuters around me from my laughter:
"The grounds are nobly situated; being very high and commanding a wide prospect of land and river. They are tastefully laid out in broad terraces, with winding roads and paths; and there is profuse adornment in the way of semi-tropical shrubs and flowers,' and in one part is a piece of native wild-wood, left just as it grew, and, therefore, perfect in its charm. Everything about this cemetery suggests the hand of the national Government. The Government's work is always conspicuous for excellence, solidity, thoroughness, neatness. The Government does its work well in the first place, and then takes care of it."
Posted by: keninnorcal at August 09, 2011 02:05 PM (DnNn/)
@133: "Cigar... do you prefer EMS or maduro? You win the largest prize."
Please, every one knows to ask for a Le Winsky. It's a presidente.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at August 09, 2011 02:08 PM (xy9wk)
They'll have to do what East Dublin, GA did. Change the name to "redneck games".
Posted by: Vic at August 09, 2011 02:10 PM (M9Ie6)
How come the mainstream media doesn't notice the same lack of evidence of a federal government bureaucracy cut to the bone? Oh, right, because they, like an adversary in litigation, are too busy zealously advocating for their client, which in this case is Obama or, more precisely, Big Government, Inc.
Posted by: The Regular Guy at August 09, 2011 02:11 PM (qHCyt)
Posted by: keninnorcal at August 09, 2011 02:17 PM (SDc54)
@207: "I was dazzled at the previously undicovered anti-aircraft capabilities of what was principally a cheap anti-armor/light fortification weapon. If I was standing near the tarmac or a landing zone I'd have a decent chance of ruining someone's day while landing or taking off. But if said land-ee was about 20 stories up, my chances for glory diminish somewhat."
We respectfully disagree.
Posted by: Mike Durant, Zombie Cliff Wolcott at August 09, 2011 02:20 PM (xy9wk)
Posted by: Jimmuy at August 09, 2011 02:34 PM (QY0N1)
No, not really... there's some hope that someone might miss a hanging curve ball; not much but some.
It's more like putting a tee out on the plate and setting the ball on it... anyone from the age of 6 and up can come have a swing and be pretty confident of smacking something here.
Posted by: gekkobear at August 09, 2011 02:34 PM (X0NX1)
Posted by: Domestic Violets Audio Book at August 09, 2011 03:28 PM (rmJsH)
Posted by: SpartanWoman at August 09, 2011 06:32 PM (lWqYU)
Years later, after it was too late, I got a letter saying "Ooops, we weren't supposed to take that 3d, you have until {date that had already come and gone} to file and get it back.
While I was getting my medical discharge, I saw healthy E-5's and up getting MORE {don't know their formula} to either separate/not re-up. And they changed the rules re; VA health care - the ONE thing I didn't get screwed over on!!!
This decimated our military, and set us up for 9/11 IMO. And I predicted elsewhere that they would repeat this under Pres. Obama. Sounds like I was right, sad.
If they attempted this with unionized Fed. workers? Yes, it would help, but because they are unionized, they'd raise SUCH a stink, it would be chealer to just keep them!!!
Attrition is {IMO} the only way to resolve this imbalance, but since Pres. Obama changed the baseline, it wouldn't make much difference.
Posted by: Amy Shulkusky at August 10, 2011 02:28 AM (F6MXO)
It's not that they don't TRY to weed out the fraud, it's that they don't have the personnel/resources to thoroughly vet every application.
I once had to have a kidney operation. I was broke and in a low paying job, no liquid assets, no family and no credit.
I also had previous bills for the hospital stay that discovered the need for this operation. (unpaid)
This qualified me for medicaid. You have to be in arrears for medical services (which isn't as easy as you might think) to a certain amount AND be indigent AND need the procedure (no free boob jobs or penis implants).
Again, I qualified. Still I was visited by an investigator because I owned a decrepit sail boat (bad shape, unable to sell and unable to scrap as it cost more than I could afford to pay. Enviro concerns ya know) and it was registered in another state.
I had to jump through hoops to show that I did live where I said I did AND the condition of the boat etc.
I was surprised by the visit as like most everyone, I assumed that unless you gave and address in a well to do neighborhood or tried to say you earned less than you actually did, they pretty much approved anything without oversight. Well they do.
However given the time this inspector had to take just more my piddling little case, I can see how they wouldn't be able to look at every app only the ones with discrepancies and probably not all of those.
Posted by: Sock Puppet Du Jour at August 10, 2011 03:44 AM (KelWf)
"Has there been any grousing that federal employees are missing expected pay raises and promotions, being forced to work at their old salaries through this crisis?"
Actually, federal salaries (at least in my Department) are frozen for the next three years. No salaries increases.
Not hearing any/much grousing? Probably because we know it's necessary during these tough economic times.
Posted by: Consul-At-Arms at August 10, 2011 04:01 AM (Cv0P2)
"Shared Sacrifice",
How bout we start w/ the politicians in D.C.
Cut there benefits, make them pay for everything.
Stop their pay until our credit rating is back to AAA.
Then drop their pay down to $100,000.....it is almost $200,000....which is about 4 times what the average American makes.
Get rid of some of Obama's Czars.....
Plenty of other places we could cut.
Posted by: MightyMax at August 10, 2011 05:23 AM (ZZSkG)
Your pay may be frozen...but can you move up a pay grade??
Or up a step level within your pay grade??
GS11 to GS12 perhaps??
So yes your pay is frozen at GS11, but if you get promoted to GS12, well you got a pay raise.
Posted by: MightyMax at August 10, 2011 05:25 AM (ZZSkG)
Bullshit.
I can think of five things to eliminate right off the top of my head: Dept of Energy, Dept of Education, HUD, and DHS.
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at August 10, 2011 11:06 AM (1rHeD)
Posted by: MICHAEL ROLOFF at August 10, 2011 12:10 PM (qjmbG)
"Your pay may be frozen...but can you move up a pay grade??
Or up a step level within your pay grade??
GS11 to GS12 perhaps??
So yes your pay is frozen at GS11, but if you get promoted to GS12, well you got a pay raise."
Actually, since I'm an FSO, I'm on the FS payscale, which (like the military) is an up-or-out system. Promotions aren't frozen (just like the military) and I think step increases are still possible, but no cost-of-living, &tc. annual increases. As for the civil service folks on the General Schedule (GS) payscale, rank is in position rather than person. That is, you get paid at the grade of the job position you hold. In only relatively few jobs is it possible to get promoted within a position; those I've heard of have been in the 9 to 12 range where a recent graduate is put through a sort of training and apprenticeship and they receive promotions up to the higher grade limit of the job. Otherwise, if a GS civil service employee wants a higher paygrade, they have to find a job vacancy at that grade and apply for the job. In the Foreign Service, like the military, assignments are for a set number of years/months and then you move on, usually to another foreign deployment but spending (on average) about one-third of your career in a domestic assignment. The maximum time you can spend in the U.S. at a stretch is, I believe, five years. There remains a shortage (dating back to the "peace dividend" of the Clinton administration) of officers in the middle grades of the Foreign Service, so stopping promotions would be rather stupid actually.
Posted by: Consul-At-Arms at August 10, 2011 01:18 PM (Cv0P2)
Posted by: Angler at August 11, 2011 07:19 AM (Tm4n1)
tera rmt|tera ¥Æ¥é ¾tºÃµÄ¤ÊÇéˆó¥µ¥¤¥È¤Ç¤´¤¶¤¤¤Þ¤¹
Posted by: terarmt at August 12, 2011 11:18 PM (235qB)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2345 seconds, 387 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Cutting is complete.
Now for the taxes!
Posted by: soothsayer at August 09, 2011 12:01 PM (G/zuv)