December 23, 2011
— andy Good guest post by Willis Eschenbach over at Watts Up With That
... “Sustainable Development” is just an airy-fairy moonbeam fantasy, a New Age oxymoron. In the real world, it can’t happen. I find the term “sustainable development” useful for one thing only.
When people use it, I know they have not thought too hard about the issues.
Finally, there is an underlying arrogance about the concept that I find disturbing. Forty percent of the worldÂ’s people live on less than $2 per day. In China itÂ’s sixty percent. In India, three-quarters of the population lives on under $2 per day.
Denying those men, women, and especially children the ability to improve their lives based on some professed concern about unborn generations doesn’t sit well with me at all. The obvious response from their side is “Easy for you to say, you made it already.” Which is true. The West got wealthy by means which “sustainable development” wants to deny to the world’s poor.
Damned straight. Read the whole thing, as they say.
This echoes a point we've made here at the HQ on many occasions when greenies get all warm and fuzzy cuddling their Chevy Volts and Nissan Leafs (or is it Leaves? ... no matter).
Just where do they think that electricity comes from? Oh, right ... the magic holes in the wall.
I hate to break it to them, but in the U.S. about 90% of the juice that powered their toys in 2010 came mainly from natural gas, coal, and nuclear power plants with the remainder from renewables.
Of course, a third of that renewable total was from hydroelectric power. Try to get a dam built and see how far the greens let you go with it. It's the ugly stepsister of renewable energy that they just keep around to pad the stats.
Wind and solar? Tiny - around 1.5% of total. But even then, where do they think the wind turbines and solar panels came from? More magic, I guess.
The simple fact of the matter is, like Willis said, when you hear someone blathering on about things like "sustainable development" and "clean energy", he might as well have a big red sign on his forehead that says "DUNCE".

Posted by: andy at
04:06 AM
| Comments (195)
Post contains 380 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Mike Hunt at December 23, 2011 04:12 AM (G6kli)
Posted by: Tami at December 23, 2011 04:12 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: Mike Hunt at December 23, 2011 04:13 AM (G6kli)
Posted by: Shaven Haven at December 23, 2011 04:19 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 23, 2011 04:23 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: USA at December 23, 2011 04:25 AM (6Cjut)
Posted by: toasted poaster at December 23, 2011 04:25 AM (3OCZw)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at December 23, 2011 04:25 AM (KxyHe)
Actually, adopting a white baby can be difficult. Demand is very high for the obvious reason that the adoption does not appear apparent. The supply of minority babies is much higher.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 23, 2011 04:28 AM (FkKjr)
So he's complaining and feeling guilty, and I turn around and say, "John. They're trees. They grow back." He looked like I'd kicked his puppy.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at December 23, 2011 04:30 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 23, 2011 04:31 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: Trimegistus at December 23, 2011 04:32 AM (rCEvh)
Posted by: jjmurphy at December 23, 2011 04:34 AM (xjEAl)
Posted by: Andy at December 23, 2011 04:35 AM (XG+Mn)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 23, 2011 04:36 AM (niZvt)
The proper terminology is subsidymobiles
And subsidies are eternally sustainable, are they not?
Posted by: Jeremiad was a Bullfrog at December 23, 2011 04:36 AM (Og1Kk)
Actually no. The group with the highest abortion rates are African Americans, which is by design (Margaret Sanger's brainchild Planned Parenthood sees to that).
The reason is most infertile couples are white. Or to be more accurate, most infertile couples with the capacity to adopt are white. So demand is high for white babies, higher than the supply.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 23, 2011 04:38 AM (FkKjr)
It makes me quietly furious. Yep, napkins come from trees. Trees grown specifically for that purpose. If by some miracle we all stopped using paper and the demand for pulpwood went down, the result would not be forests left pristine and untouched. It would be forests getting cleared off so the land can be used for something profitable.
Plus, the napkins are mostly made of evil CARBON, sucked right out of the atmosphere by those trees. When they're dirty they go in the landfill where they are buried. If greenies really don't like carbon in the atmosphere, they should each try to use about a ton of napkins per day.
Needless to say, of course, trees and the environment really have nothing to do with this situation. The coffeeshop owners just don't like spending money on napkins and came up with an effective technique to keep their hippie customers from taking too many. Because hippies love not paying for stuff almost as much as they love trees.
Posted by: Trimegistus at December 23, 2011 04:39 AM (rCEvh)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 23, 2011 04:39 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: goddessoftheclassroom at December 23, 2011 04:39 AM (3uwbp)
Posted by: Trimegistus at December 23, 2011 08:32 AM (rCEvh)
On a planetary level, they are the majority.
Posted by: Jeremiad was a Bullfrog at December 23, 2011 04:40 AM (Og1Kk)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 23, 2011 04:41 AM (niZvt)
That man is wearing a black tie. It's pronounced 'doon-say'.
Posted by: Cicero Kid at December 23, 2011 04:42 AM (a/mzt)
Posted by: Trimegistus at December 23, 2011 08:39 AM (rCEvh)
Oh, for the days when we made floats for the Homecoming parade out of wood, chicken wire and napkins. It would be such a treat to hit up businesses like those for donations of paper products.
Posted by: Jeremiad was a Bullfrog at December 23, 2011 04:43 AM (Og1Kk)
Posted by: Yes, I vacation in the hemptons at December 23, 2011 04:45 AM (N+y8t)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 23, 2011 04:50 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 23, 2011 04:50 AM (niZvt)
They great thing was the sad puppy look on his face when he said, "Well, at least it's recycled," and I rejoined with, "Oh, so it costs more and isn't as good. Good to know."
I hate the "green" movement with a hot hot hate. All of them- every single one- is either a crypto-Marxist (sometimes not so 'crypto') or someone who wants to see the "stain" of humanity wiped from the earth. It makes me sick.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at December 23, 2011 04:52 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: USS Diversity at December 23, 2011 04:53 AM (PddVe)
Define "worse." At least we're aware from the outset that Democrats aren't on our side.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at December 23, 2011 04:53 AM (8y9MW)
The idea was that to make Vitamin B12 (C63H88CoN14O14P), for example, you'd use nothing more than sixty-three atoms of carbon, eighty-eight atoms of hydrogen, one atom of cobalt, and so forth. Which would be a really neat trick, because actual synthesis of such compounds usually requires adding, and later removing, protective groups at reactive locations in the final product where you didn't want something to happen during the synthesis.
There were a few successes, if I recall correctly. But the movement hasn't taken the industry by storm (yet, if ever).
Posted by: Jeremiad was a Bullfrog at December 23, 2011 04:55 AM (Og1Kk)
Which make the Rs that much more traitorous.
And by this I mean the politicians not the citizenry. Or as Washington thinks of them, peasantry.
Posted by: USS Diversity at December 23, 2011 04:56 AM (PddVe)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 23, 2011 04:56 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: President Chet Roosevelt at December 23, 2011 05:01 AM (+ZeZ4)
If it weren't for the "dunce" tatoo I think I would have spewed my coffee at the site of Goracle, this early (for me on this particular day).
Way past correct on the post. The products used in the manufacture of solar and wind programs contain literally tons of metals, fiber glass, chemical bonding agents, plastic insulations, all of which take megawatts of electricity to produce themselves.
Always remember: bacon will only make more bacon.
Posted by: Robert17 at December 23, 2011 05:02 AM (LaaRT)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 23, 2011 08:56 AM (niZvt)
The companies that "go green" are ahead of the curve and most likely have written the new rules that they're encouraging the government to foist upon their industry, especially their competitors who didn't get there "firstest with the mostest".
In earlier times, this was called by its proper name, restraint of trade. Now, it's called being corporately responsible.
Posted by: Jeremiad was a Bullfrog at December 23, 2011 05:02 AM (Og1Kk)
Posted by: maddogg at December 23, 2011 05:03 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Greg at December 23, 2011 05:04 AM (H0lcY)
Posted by: AllenG
(Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at December 23, 2011
08:30 AM (8y9MW)
Heh...I love to tell my (v few) liberal friends about the 'targets' that move into my yard....they look confused and ask, targets? Then I explain 'targets' is a euphemism for ground hogs...they move in, dig their own graves, I kill them and God provides me with more targets. The looks I get from that are priceless...
Posted by: billygoat at December 23, 2011 05:05 AM (xTmUr)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 23, 2011 05:06 AM (niZvt)
Greenies love to show you pictures of an old-growth hardwood forest and then say "recycle paper, save a tree". Paper is made from pulpwood forests which are harvested and replanted every 25 years (pine) to 45 years (aspen).
Prime example of this ploy was choosing between wiping your butt with a spotted owl or tissue.
Posted by: Cicero Kid at December 23, 2011 05:08 AM (a/mzt)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 23, 2011 05:09 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: maddogg at December 23, 2011 05:09 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 23, 2011 05:10 AM (niZvt)
....I gave up buying coffee from any of the usual suspect places...but I do admit, CC, it is awfully fun to f with the employees with comments such as yours!
Posted by: billygoat at December 23, 2011 05:11 AM (xTmUr)
Posted by: Dredd at December 23, 2011 05:12 AM (a/mzt)
The left want to destroy the oil/gas/coal industry before we have the "new energy economy" in place. Meanwhile, our tax dollars are paying for solar companies to go bankrupt.
Clean energy must compete and be viable to act as a real alternative. Until then - the left are not only DUNCE - they are hypocrites. As they speed off with a carbon producing machine to another Al Gore conference in some exotic locale.
Posted by: whatever at December 23, 2011 05:17 AM (O7ksG)
You're leaving out the most important part of the story, namely was she hot?
Posted by: Waterhouse at December 23, 2011 05:17 AM (rOPwp)
Posted by: Ian S. at December 23, 2011 05:18 AM (Lpdzt)
Posted by: learflyer at December 23, 2011 05:19 AM (9vscO)
Well, this is yet another thing we did to ourselves through electing idiots to high orifice.
The Clean Air and Clean Water Acts are the legal bludgeons that are now being used by the EPA and the Socialist-Green Movement to drastically restrict how, where, and by what methods we can create energy. These two terrible pieces of legislation have resulted in an unelected minority of fringe, leftist radicals to dictate our national energy policies.
They should be repealed, with the responsibility going to the individual states, which is only logical, given the physical diversity of land above and below ground. However, logic is a foreign concept to those who seek control: all that matters is their power, everything else is dismissed, the ends always justify the means, with the end being them in power.
When will we start being smarter about whom we elect? There are plenty of people out there with commons sense who could be running, but we keep electing lying, power-mad narcissists to office who don't have a clue how the world actually works, currently embodied in El SCOAMF and his band of Merry Marxists.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, President, Curmudgeon's Union Local 427 at December 23, 2011 05:20 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: Ian S. at December 23, 2011 05:21 AM (Lpdzt)
Posted by: sTevo at December 23, 2011 05:21 AM (FzVlt)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 23, 2011 05:22 AM (niZvt)
...but who do not want to have their lives torn apart by the ravenous twin wolf packs of the press and opposition research.
Posted by: Jeremiad was a Bullfrog at December 23, 2011 05:24 AM (Og1Kk)
Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston training for the ONT mudwrestling match at December 23, 2011 05:27 AM (ijjAe)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 23, 2011 05:27 AM (niZvt)
Well done. This is the liberal conceit that irks me the most (and there are many that irk me plenty!).
My particular interest is the production and distribution of food, which is unbelievably efficient. I can buy pork ribs here in NJ, raised, slaughtered and butchered in Iowa, and shipped here for $2/lb. But the locavores and the cooperative farm loons and the green cocksuckers want me to drive to Western NJ (burning nasty fossil fuels) and buy $12/lb. local pork that was raised by an unrepentant hippie.
Oh, and that amazing production and distribution system could feed the world effortlessly if it weren't for our politicians. Imagine an Africa without a starving child! But it wouldn't be sustainable and green, so we should let the little bastards starve.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at December 23, 2011 05:27 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: sTevo at December 23, 2011 09:24 AM (q1Tbv)
Greatest scientific-sounding name, ever, for a deus ex machina device in movies!
Posted by: Jeremiad was a Bullfrog at December 23, 2011 05:27 AM (Og1Kk)
$4 for a cup of coffee???? Be the fucking day I ever pay that for a stupid cup of caffein.
No, never been to Starbucks or any of the plethora of coffee houses. And won't be going.
Posted by: irongrampa at December 23, 2011 05:28 AM (SAMxH)
Posted by: blaster at December 23, 2011 05:28 AM (7vSU0)
57@55: in fairness to electric cars, having 100% of torque at 0 RPM is pretty awesome. It's just the energy storage problem is nowhere near solved to make that practical.
I get all that, but I guess i'm too much of a muscle car guy to ever appreciate that electric bullshit. Give me a Cutlass Supreme with a 3 stage chip in it or a Chevelle anyday...
Posted by: learflyer at December 23, 2011 05:29 AM (9vscO)
I get all that, but I guess I'm too much of a muscle car guy to ever appreciate that electric bullshit. Give me a Cutlass Supreme with a 3 stage chip in it or a Chevelle anyday...
Posted by: learflyer at December 23, 2011 09:29 AM (9vscO)
Imagine a NASCAR race in which all vehicles are electric. Imagine pigs flying. (Visualize whirled peas.)
Posted by: Jeremiad was a Bullfrog at December 23, 2011 05:33 AM (Og1Kk)
Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston training for the ONT mudwrestling match at December 23, 2011 05:36 AM (ijjAe)
There's a pretty cool diesel-electric hybrid that passes close to our place 8 or 10 times a day.
Norfolk and Southern.
Posted by: Cicero Kid at December 23, 2011 05:36 AM (a/mzt)
Posted by: Lincolntf at December 23, 2011 05:38 AM (uIz80)
Posted by: Waterhouse at December 23, 2011 09:17 AM (rOPwp)
This is why I despair for America. Nobody focuses on the important things any more.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at December 23, 2011 05:38 AM (nEUpB)
...but who do not want to have their lives torn apart by the ravenous twin wolf packs of the press and opposition research.
Definitely this. The only thing that's stopping me from going Full-Curmudgeon is the hope that one day, someone will step forward and run for office that isn't afraid of the Soros media. Someone who will plainly state the truth and never back down from any scurrilous attack.
However, that hope is fading quickly, and I'm not to far away from telling the whole world to get off my lawn (except for Morons, of course).
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, President, Curmudgeon's Union Local 427 at December 23, 2011 05:38 AM (d0Tfm)
There is 1 ting which I believe is entirely sustainable :
Google "stuttering cluster miserable failure"
454000 hits. I know for a fact we can sustain that.
Posted by: Cu'Chulainn at December 23, 2011 05:38 AM (lOnIe)
I have a job offer, folks. Matched my current salary and giving me 5K to spend on relocation (5 hours from where I am now).
I finally get to escape this place I hate and walk away from banking. I hope for the last time.
Posted by: Scott J at December 23, 2011 05:39 AM (KC2BE)
Posted by: jjmurphy at December 23, 2011 08:34 AM (xjEAl)
Alas - they took over the public schools. They don't have to reproduce. They just indoctrinate everyone else's kids.
Also, the underclass created by the social policies of rich white libtards continues to grow. Those people are even worse, because they're fairly useless and nearly unfixable.
Posted by: Reactionary at December 23, 2011 05:40 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 23, 2011 09:27 AM
Ya know how long I've been tellin' that to Capt. Cocksman? The guy pushes a button on his Barca-lounger, barks an order to Sulu, and thinks that's all it takes to make the Enterprise do warp 9 to happy hour on some Orion nudie bar
Posted by: Montgomery Scott at December 23, 2011 05:42 AM (Y+DPZ)
They are amazing, aren't they?
During Christmas season at my old job (UPS in CA) we would get an outbound train on property with five 4000+HP engines. When they tested them before pulling out the entire building would shake and rumble.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at December 23, 2011 05:42 AM (nEUpB)
One of the sweetest sounds is a BIG V-8 working hard to make power. Nothing else like it.
Posted by: irongrampa at December 23, 2011 09:41 AM
Except a small block V-8
Posted by: kbdabear at December 23, 2011 05:43 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: Scott J at December 23, 2011 09:39 AM (KC2BE)
Congrats, and did you hug your recruiter?
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at December 23, 2011 05:44 AM (mFxQX)
How is it that AoSHQ is not #1 on that search?...as Rev. Al would say, "Prepostermuch!".
Posted by: billygoat at December 23, 2011 05:44 AM (xTmUr)
Posted by: randolph Duke at December 23, 2011 05:45 AM (AH8RI)
It's been 5 years now and I still miss it.
Posted by: Scott J at December 23, 2011 05:45 AM (KC2BE)
Posted by: Lincolntf at December 23, 2011 05:45 AM (hiMsy)
Posted by: Scott J at December 23, 2011 05:46 AM (KC2BE)
"Just where do they think that electricity comes from? Oh, right ... the magic holes in the wall."
Keep calling them 'coal powered cars'
Posted by: TANSTAAFL at December 23, 2011 05:47 AM (KVi4X)
One of the sweetest sounds is a BIG V-8 working hard to make power. Nothing else like it.
Posted by: irongrampa at December 23, 2011 09:41 AM (SAMxH)
....were talking about NHRA TFuel rails yesterday...nothing like it, indeed!!!
Posted by: billygoat at December 23, 2011 05:47 AM (xTmUr)
Posted by: 2549 at December 23, 2011 05:48 AM (kvxPn)
Posted by: Jeremiad was a Bullfrog at December 23, 2011 05:48 AM (Og1Kk)
Posted by: randolph Duke at December 23, 2011 09:45 AM
Multiply that by 10 and you're pretty close. Not a bad haul for basically running an exchange whose commodities are paperwork and air
Posted by: kbdabear at December 23, 2011 05:50 AM (Y+DPZ)
"Rich, white liberals aren't reproducing. So we do have that going for us."
Think of it as evolution in action.
Posted by: TANSTAAFL at December 23, 2011 05:50 AM (KVi4X)
Moving from the Birmingham, AL area to Seneca, SC (or nearby).
Leaping from banking to learning and doing ERP software for a tool manufacturer.
Posted by: Scott J at December 23, 2011 05:51 AM (KC2BE)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at December 23, 2011 05:51 AM (0GA/I)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at December 23, 2011 09:27 AM (nEUpB)
Not effortlessly. It's not just a spigot that turns on and off - it takes a lot of work and, more importantly, intelligence to run the modern food distribution system.
Even given nearly ideal political arrangements, it would only work for a while. There will never be a day when there isn't a starving child in Africa (or several other places for that matter). Some cultures are simply rapacious. They will consume all that is available and continue to grow more numerous until whatever production they have is no longer enough, and the starvation cycle begins anew.
The sustainable population of any region is not infinite. When the culture is crude and ignorant, that max number is much lower than it would otherwise be.
Posted by: Reactionary at December 23, 2011 05:52 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: Lincolntf at December 23, 2011 05:52 AM (hiMsy)
_______
I was under the impression that one of Tesla's innovations was using induction motors.
Posted by: Anachronda at December 23, 2011 05:53 AM (6fER6)
Posted by: irongrampa at December 23, 2011 09:41 AM
This is for you, a 68 GT Mustang is included
Posted by: kbdabear at December 23, 2011 05:58 AM (Y+DPZ)
Slow day! Only 101 comments in two hours? Is everyone on the road for the long weekend?
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at December 23, 2011 05:58 AM (4df7R)
Interesting headline from Yahoo
A new survey ranks the positions in which women feel most satisfied and successful.
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at December 23, 2011 05:59 AM (mFxQX)
Yep, I have. Most of my racing has been straight line, 1/4 mile at a go.
Long time back, our local strip had Don Garlits guesting. When he fired that dragster up, it sounded like canvas being ripped. Iirc, he was using the 392 Hemi. Unforgettable sound, and watching him launch and go raised my neck hair.
Scary fast.
Posted by: irongrampa at December 23, 2011 06:00 AM (SAMxH)
Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston training for the ONT mudwrestling match at December 23, 2011 06:00 AM (ijjAe)
Posted by: Lincolntf at December 23, 2011 06:02 AM (hiMsy)
"Rich, white liberals aren't reproducing. So we do have that going for us."
Think of it as evolution in action.
That's why the statists want to grab and indoctrinate your kids as early as possible through the schools
If the kids think they can lord it over you by threatening to rat you out for not separating your glass from metals, tell them of the tender mercies of the foster care system
Posted by: kbdabear at December 23, 2011 06:03 AM (Y+DPZ)
Well, I guess I should be pleased that you didn't say that the only solution for starvation in Africa was strategic nuclear weapons.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at December 23, 2011 06:05 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: Lincolntf at December 23, 2011 06:07 AM (hiMsy)
Try this, are the gains in Afghanistan and Iraq "long term sustainable?" Will they stay that way without US military and taxpayer propping it up each day? The honest answers are -to some degree -maybe so maybe no -after 9/11we had to try and -it was worth a try -we had to do something -we are the only ones trying to do something about it.
These same responses fit the lefts view of gm, ge, wind, solar, the volt, etc...
Explaining why these things are expensive boondoggles or government quagmires has as much effect on them as when they use the same language against your support for Iraq and Afghanistan.
(yes I get the difference between 9/11 and a billion+ person religion at war with the west...against sob stories about polar bears probably caused by the suns fluctuations..... but they don't)
As a young man I read Dale Carnegies "How to Win Friends and Influence People." In it he had a whole chapter which he summaried thus, "Learn to put yourself in other peoples shoes and you will succeed at anything you do."
Posted by: Shiggz - Newt (Warp 6.3) at December 23, 2011 06:08 AM (RfvTE)
my recruiter is in another state. We've never met face to face. How about that?
My last three jobs were like that. One of the things about the 21st century I can actually understand.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 23, 2011 06:08 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston training for the ONT mudwrestling match at December 23, 2011 06:08 AM (ijjAe)
Posted by: Shiggz - Newt (Warp 6.3) at December 23, 2011 06:09 AM (RfvTE)
I feel like I have won a Ferrari but have to push it home from the dealership before I get any fuel for it.
We've been in our current community since 2002. We have put down roots, both our children were born here. It's going to be rough but we're people of faith and believe God makes things happen for a reason.
Posted by: Scott J at December 23, 2011 06:10 AM (KC2BE)
My last three jobs were like that. One of the things about the 21st century I can actually understand.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 23, 2011 10:08 AM (/kI1Q)
I rarely if ever meet the people I place.
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at December 23, 2011 06:11 AM (mFxQX)
That's pretty normal nowadays. The recruiter that got me my current job earlier this year first contacted me via LinkedIn and I never met him.
Posted by: Ian S. at December 23, 2011 06:13 AM (Lpdzt)
Posted by: MAX WEDGE! at December 23, 2011 06:14 AM (xTmUr)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at December 23, 2011 10:05 AM (nEUpB)
If the Africans as a group were a constant threat/nuisance, that would be exactly the right solution. Happily, at this time they are not an existential threat. If Islam is allowed to take over, that may change.
You know what the real solution is? To stop giving a fuck about people who are too culturally primitive to take care of their own shit. It's not our job to feed the Africans, except to the extent that they are willing to trade with us for food.
It's annoying that so many people want to fix the Africans' problems as if they were helpless children and we were the parents. They're grown ups like everyone else. They have resources available to them. Colonialism is not to blame for their current state, nor is the slave trade. We don't owe them jack, and it's a waste of pity and anxiety to worry about them.
Posted by: Reactionary at December 23, 2011 06:14 AM (xUM1Q)
That video makes me want to go down to the garage and dust off the Toy. With the weather we have currently, driving it wouldn't be out of the question.
Sorta bored, anyway.
Posted by: irongrampa at December 23, 2011 06:15 AM (SAMxH)
This may seem like a strange proposal from a small government conservative, but following the logic of the interstate highway program, I believe the best stimulus for the U.S. economy would be free electrical energy.
A trillion dollar program to immediately build 500 AP1000 style reactors in communities that vote to host them, government owned and private utility run, with the only cost to the end user being the cost of transmission. The closer you live to a reactor, the cheaper the power.
The reasoning behind government ownership of the nuclear plants is the elimination of the regulatory, security and liability costs associated with this type of power.
Posted by: jwest at December 23, 2011 06:16 AM (8moZm)
That Pappa Bush endorsed Mitt, was not a surprise to me they have old associations. When Romney gave his 07 speech on religion in America Pappa Bush hosted it at the "Bush Library."
Ahh 07 back when the left - had something besides the religion and race card to say even if it was the venal "hope and change." Romney was the conservative hope because none of us yet knew what a monster his health care overhaul had created.
Posted by: Shiggz - Newt (Warp 6.3) at December 23, 2011 06:18 AM (RfvTE)
Posted by: Ian S. at December 23, 2011 06:18 AM (Lpdzt)
Did I say that we should feed them for free?
Is our agricultural distribution system part of the government?
If it weren't for our politicians, Africa could be fed effortlessly by the market.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at December 23, 2011 06:19 AM (nEUpB)
The reasoning behind government ownership of the nuclear plants is the elimination of the regulatory, security and liability costs associated with this type of power.
Posted by: jwest at December 23, 2011 10:16 AM (8moZm)
Would you want the Obama administration to be responsible for the safe operation of a nuclear reactor in your town?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at December 23, 2011 06:20 AM (nEUpB)
Would you want the Obama administration to be responsible for the safe operation of a nuclear reactor in your town?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at December 23, 2011 10:20 AM (nEUpB
government owned and private utility run
Posted by: jwest at December 23, 2011 06:22 AM (8moZm)
67
The next couple of decades are going to suck power wise if we don't end this fetish.
The "green" lifestyle isn't going to be so appealing to the bulk of Americans when they are shivering in the cold darkness. If the Marxists running the "enviromental" movement are successful, there will have to be a totalitarian government to keep such a charade going (yeah, I know, that is their objective).
Kratos is correct ... in the end there will be chaos.
Posted by: Retired Buckeye Cop at December 23, 2011 06:22 AM (M0NzJ)
The reasoning behind government ownership of the nuclear plants is the elimination of the regulatory, security and liability costs associated with this type of power.
Posted by: jwest at December 23, 2011 10:16 AM (8moZm)
It's tempting on the face of it, but I don't trust it. I've seen how "free government electricity" works. They've got that in the Domincan Republic. It's on a 4 hour up/down schedule in much of the country because they can't keep it running and it's not funded.
Plus, free always translates into "wasted." People (and businesses) would consume it without regard for production costs.
Posted by: Reactionary at December 23, 2011 06:23 AM (xUM1Q)
Yes, that's why they're doing it. They don't actually give a shit about Gaia or carbon or ozone holes, only power.
Posted by: Ian S. at December 23, 2011 06:24 AM (Lpdzt)
Reactionary at December 23, 2011 10:14 AM
I agree with CBD that the technology exists to feed the world, and that culture and politics are the cause of malnutrition and starvation around the world. I am an agriculturist and have been involved in food production for 25 years. I know what we are capable of.
To your point, unless a culture is capable of adopting free market principles and establsih property rights, they will not become self-sufficient. There was an interesting and very controversial essay published a while back ( I wish I had saved it) that summarized the net effect of food aid to the horn region of Africa. In essence the author demonstrated that by saving a million people from imminent starvation, twenty years later there were now 6 million starving. The net effect, six times the misery. As I said it was controversial but the facts and logic were (are) irrefutable.
Posted by: Alamo at December 23, 2011 06:25 AM (wQmDt)
Liberals never quite understand that if you subsidize something you get more of it.
Posted by: Ian S. at December 23, 2011 06:26 AM (Lpdzt)
Only in comparison to Juan ("American's don't want to work", "vote for me, I was a POW", "there is no immigration problem", "Don't you dare use my opponent's middle name", "I'm going to suspend my campaign for the duration of the crisis", "My fellow senator is an honorable man and there is no reason not to vote for him", "You really don't need to say anything about a candidate 90 days before an election") McCain.
Posted by: Mark E at December 23, 2011 06:28 AM (BVr5N)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at December 23, 2011 10:19 AM (nEUpB)
When you say "our" I trust you include "their" politicians as well. As bad as things are here, the kleptocracies in Africa are far worse.
That said, what do they have to offer us? Some areas have oil, and that would be nice to get. There are some mines. But other than that, the place is not exactly a productive powerhouse, and much of what actually is productive is already owned by Westerners. With Islam spreading around the place that will only improve very slowly, if at all.
Posted by: Reactionary at December 23, 2011 06:29 AM (xUM1Q)
Isn't that why all the plans to make the cost of electricity "necessarily skyrocket" include subsidies for households already getting some form(s) of welfare? Gotta keep your guaranteed voters happy until you've completed cemented your power and can do away with elections altogether.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 23, 2011 06:30 AM (/kI1Q)
Plus, free always translates into "wasted." People (and businesses) would consume it without regard for production costs.
Posted by: Reactionary at December 23, 2011 10:23 AM (xUM1Q)
Wasting energy is the primary reason for this plan.
For real advancement, the mindset must be the same as the highways. No one thinks twice about whether they are using the highways 20 hours a day or only once a week. It simply isnÂ’t a factor. The highway is there for everyone to use as much or as little as they want, but eventually it benefits everyone.
If someone wants to heat their home electrically and leave the windows and doors open all winter, thatÂ’s ok. Once this becomes the reality, new processes will flow for everything from steelmaking to how coffee is brewed. It would give the U.S. an amazing competitive advantage.
Posted by: jwest at December 23, 2011 06:32 AM (8moZm)
Posted by: Alamo at December 23, 2011 10:25 AM (wQmDt)
Interesting stuff. If you happen across that study at some point I hope you'll post the link. I think it's relevant for us here - our social policies are essentially doing this very thing in the US.
Posted by: Reactionary at December 23, 2011 06:32 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 23, 2011 06:33 AM (l9zgN)
You are more trusting than I of our government.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at December 23, 2011 06:34 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 23, 2011 10:33 AM (l9zgN)
Using the Alexander the Great approach to the Gordian knot?
Posted by: The Robot Devil at December 23, 2011 06:35 AM (136wp)
You are more trusting than I of our government.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at December 23, 2011 10:34 AM (nEUpB)
Until IÂ’m declared King, itÂ’s all we have to work with.
Posted by: jwest at December 23, 2011 06:36 AM (8moZm)
Posted by: jwest at December 23, 2011 10:32 AM (8moZm)
I guess I'm missing the link here. How would abundant free energy lead to new processes? Just because we could dump a lot more energy into new concepts? To me, that sounds like a great reason to just go with what we already have, or to bring back cheaper, more wasteful processes of the past. There would be competetive advantages to US business, but only in that their energy costs would be wholly subsidized.
Let's not forget that while it would be "free" to the consumer, it would still come with costs. Transmission is part of it, but there's also fuel inputs and labor costs to run the places, plus maintenance and waste disposal. That all has to be covered somehow.
I'm a huge fan of nuclear power, especially the new pebble bed reactor design, but it comes with its own set of costs and complications.
Posted by: Reactionary at December 23, 2011 06:37 AM (xUM1Q)
Like the child workers in China who assemble and pack toys for my children, their nimble little fingers torquing down those wire ties with lacing pliers until they're so tight I can't get a pair of side-cutters in, and then tying the ends in a complicated knot, so I rip my fingers apart trying to untwist them.
Ha Ha suck it, Capitalist Pig Dog!
Posted by: Chinese Kid at December 23, 2011 06:38 AM (PddVe)
Until IÂ’m declared King, itÂ’s all we have to work with.
Posted by: jwest at December 23, 2011 10:36 AM (8moZm)
Have you formed an exploratory committee yet? I'll help, if when you are King, I get the coveted job of "Kicking old Liberals in the Balls"
Posted by: The Robot Devil at December 23, 2011 06:39 AM (136wp)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 23, 2011 06:40 AM (0yt4x)
Posted by: The Great SDatan's Ghost at December 23, 2011 06:42 AM (08Pe8)
Until IÂ’m declared King, itÂ’s all we have to work with.
Posted by: jwest at December 23, 2011 10:36 AM (8moZm)
Uh oh. Are we going to be looking at some kind of civil war between the EoJ regime and the Kingdom of Jwest?
Personally, I'm going to have to stick with EoJ for now. His plans seem suitably brutal to me, and I can get behind that with enthusiasm. Perhaps after a time of purging (vigorous, vigorous purging) there could be a transition to a kinder, gentler autocracy.
Posted by: Reactionary at December 23, 2011 06:44 AM (xUM1Q)
In 1979, in the wake of Three Mile Island, James Taylor, Graham Nash and various and sundry other liberloons gathered at Madison Square Garden for a hootenanny they called the "No Nukes Concert".
It was far from "unplugged". Electric guitars, synthesizers, amps, hair dryers, etc., were in abundance.
Then, as now, the Indian Point nuclear plant provides much of the juice used in Manhattan.
Posted by: I. Buttocks at December 23, 2011 06:44 AM (Xv7f/)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 23, 2011 10:40 AM (0yt4x)
Wouldn't it be easier and cheaper just to quit buying the kids toys?
Posted by: Reactionary at December 23, 2011 06:45 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: jwest at December 23, 2011 10:16 AM (8moZm)
Not no, but HELL NO! Over my rotting and maggot infested corpse!
Posted by: maddogg at December 23, 2011 06:49 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Ian S. at December 23, 2011 06:49 AM (Lpdzt)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 23, 2011 06:50 AM (niZvt)
How would abundant free energy lead to new processes?
Posted by: Reactionary at December 23, 2011 10:37 AM (xUM1Q)
Just as most people in the ‘70s couldn’t imagine who would want or need a cheap personal computer, once something becomes cheap and abundant people find new uses.
There would still be a cost to electrical energy consisting of the operation and transmission from the plants, so a California community that opted to refuse locating one there would pay more than a Midwest town that voted for it.
Posted by: jwest at December 23, 2011 06:50 AM (8moZm)
Posted by: Barney Frank at December 23, 2011 06:51 AM (niZvt)
Theres an online dating site where people can ask questions that others can answer publicly...
One question was: Which is more important?
A. People
B. Animals
C. Equaly important
The VAST MAJORITY of ladies on that site ansered the Question C... which stunned me... are we so brainwashed that people now think Animal Life, that we F'n EAT, is as important as a Human Life?
Have we gone so far down the path of PC indoctrination that people do not even bother to CONSIDER questions anymore?
Posted by: Romeo13 at December 23, 2011 06:52 AM (NtXW4)
Posted by: Lokki at December 23, 2011 06:53 AM (a5F9g)
The Obamas' hubris is infinitely sustainable.
Posted by: Fritz at December 23, 2011 06:53 AM (/ZZCn)
Have we gone so far down the path of PC indoctrination that people do not even bother to CONSIDER questions anymore?
Posted by: Romeo13 at December 23, 2011 10:52 AM (NtXW4)
That kind of crapthink is why I argue that "the middle ground" has been pulled far to the left end of the political spectrum. I was mainstream 30 years ago, but the leftards, through control of government, media, and education have managed to pull the middle right to the very edge of socialism. Fuck that.
Posted by: maddogg at December 23, 2011 06:55 AM (OlN4e)
The VAST MAJORITY of ladies on that site ansered the Question C... which stunned me... are we so brainwashed that people now think Animal Life, that we F'n EAT, is as important as a Human Life?
Posted by: Romeo13 at December 23, 2011 10:52 AM (NtXW4)
It was a dating site. More than half those ladies were sitting at home with their 12 cats, their sole companions.
But thank God almighty for that wonderful 19 Amendment, right? Things got WAY better after that. /sarc
Posted by: Reactionary at December 23, 2011 06:56 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: Comanche Voter at December 23, 2011 06:57 AM (3ESDJ)
Posted by: Reactionary at December 23, 2011 10:44 AM (xUM1Q)
Sadly, much as Rome once needed a Cincinatus to restore the Repbulic... You may need a dictator to restore the Republic as well...
Remeber, I can be a real Biatch if you don't listen to me...
Posted by: History at December 23, 2011 06:57 AM (NtXW4)
His plans seem suitably brutal to me, and I can get behind that with enthusiasm. Perhaps after a time of purging (vigorous, vigorous purging) there could be a transition to a kinder, gentler autocracy.
Posted by: Reactionary at December 23, 2011 10:44 AM (xUM1Q)
Although IÂ’m promoting the waste of energy, when purging liberals I canÂ’t stand to waste bullets. They would be dealt with using my squad of Malleteers.
Posted by: jwest at December 23, 2011 06:58 AM (8moZm)
Posted by: Lokki at December 23, 2011 10:53 AM (a5F9g)
I know it's not your main point, but I felt the need to point out that biofuel is only a small part of the increase in corn demand. The generally higher level of prosperity in the 3rd world is creating greater demand for meat (particularly beef). That's a much bigger issue. Gotta feed them cows.
Posted by: Reactionary at December 23, 2011 06:59 AM (xUM1Q)
Personally, I'm going to have to stick with EoJ for now. His plans seem suitably brutal to me, and I can get behind that with enthusiasm. Perhaps after a time of purging (vigorous, vigorous purging) there could be a transition to a kinder, gentler autocracy.
Posted by: Reactionary at December 23, 2011 10:44 AM (xUM1Q)
Give them a whiff of grapeshot!
Posted by: Napoleon at December 23, 2011 07:00 AM (DrWcr)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 23, 2011 07:00 AM (0yt4x)
It was a dating site. More than half those ladies were sitting at home with their 12 cats, their sole companions.
Posted by: Reactionary at December 23, 2011 10:56 AM (xUM1Q)
I actualy kind of confronted one about that question I talked to on there...
Asked her if a Deer sitting out in the Woods, was as important as my Daughters Life... she said 'well of course not'...
So I asked her why she answered the question that way then....
and her response? Because she did not want to 'seem mean'....
I then cut off the conversation, as she had no spine...
Posted by: History at December 23, 2011 07:00 AM (NtXW4)
Although IÂ’m promoting the waste of energy, when purging liberals I canÂ’t stand to waste bullets. They would be dealt with using my squad of Malleteers.
Posted by: jwest at December 23, 2011 10:58 AM (8moZm)
LOL. Greatest job ever. Physical exercise coupled with tremendous feelings of accomplishment and satisfaction.
Posted by: Reactionary at December 23, 2011 07:01 AM (xUM1Q)
I bought some artichoke hearts that said "sustainable agriculture" on it. Well good for them! They can grow more artichokes next year! What do I care?
Posted by: bernverdnardo at December 23, 2011 07:01 AM (xXhWA)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 23, 2011 11:00 AM (0yt4x)
Parsimonious bastard! I wanted some more!
Posted by: Oliver Twist at December 23, 2011 07:02 AM (DrWcr)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 23, 2011 11:00 AM (0yt4x)
By your command, Imperious Leader.
Posted by: Reactionary at December 23, 2011 07:03 AM (xUM1Q)
C. Equaly important
The VAST MAJORITY of ladies on that site ansered the Question C... which stunned me... are we so brainwashed that people now think Animal Life, that we F'n EAT, is as important as a Human Life?
Have we gone so far down the path of PC indoctrination that people do not even bother to CONSIDER questions anymore?
Posted by: Romeo13 ati like people. but i love steak.
Posted by: willow at December 23, 2011 07:05 AM (h+qn8)
Posted by: Barney Frank at December 23, 2011 07:07 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: SDN at December 23, 2011 07:08 AM (NTrIC)
So.... if'n a farmer plants, grows and sells Green Leaf Lettuce, but uses Pesticides... can he sell it as GREEN Leaf Lettuce?
What about GREEN Beans?
If I buy a new Hot Rod Camarro SS, but its painted Green... can a get a Green Car Subsidy???
The bureu of sillyness really wants to know...
Posted by: Accountant, BOS (Bureu of Silly) at December 23, 2011 07:11 AM (NtXW4)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 23, 2011 07:12 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: Entropy, and if you don't agree you hate America and want Obama to win at December 23, 2011 07:14 AM (AuQqX)
The Magic Washing Machine:
http://tinyurl.com/46dqtzc
And yes, there will be chaos when the ruling econazis start really reducing our energy, which is going to happen in CA starting January 1. For one thing, every commercial building owner or tenant has to report its energy use to the State. No kidding. They're already starting on private homes by the Smart Meters they installed.
Posted by: PJ at December 23, 2011 07:34 AM (DQHjw)
Posted by: ontherocks at December 23, 2011 07:38 AM (HBqDo)
It's even worse than what you proposed for Volt/Leaf/Pry-Ass vehicles.
If you make the basic assumption that the grid always preferentially selects wind power, hydro, or Care-Bear energy, then any increased demand on the system is ONLY supplied by coal or gas.
Posted by: GandalfGoneBad at December 23, 2011 09:20 AM (1Ap7+)
Posted by: sistrum at December 23, 2011 09:50 AM (AyryN)
Posted by: deadrody at December 23, 2011 10:29 AM (eOvu0)
Posted by: deadrody at December 23, 2011 10:36 AM (eOvu0)
It's cool.
Posted by: Toronto Maple Leafs [sic] at December 23, 2011 11:27 AM (4GWvE)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at December 23, 2011 12:09 PM (r4wIV)
"Of course, a third of that renewable total was from hydroelectric power."
Maybe you meant to say 2/3. That web site says 6% of electricity comes from hydro.
Which makes more sense. You had me wondering where the other 10% was coming from, if only 3% was from hydro.
I wonder if we should really even trust the govt numbers on how much wind & solar contributes. I guess it's reasonable that wind is starting to amount to something, but wind & solar are intermittent and inefficient. There should be a place for both - in certain situations - but I can't see them ever providing even 1/5 of the nation's electricity, much less its total energy.
Posted by: Optimizer at December 23, 2011 01:46 PM (As94z)
Posted by: The Duke Is Mine epub at December 23, 2011 04:21 PM (xr+rC)
Posted by: Silver-Tongued Devil epub at December 23, 2011 04:51 PM (SYiYL)
Posted by: Snowdrops ePub at December 23, 2011 05:13 PM (QlqE4)
Posted by: The Dead Witness ePub at December 23, 2011 06:18 PM (V+/ig)
I have to tell you, the apparatchiks themselves, and certainly the flaks, were VERY cynical about the "sustainability" of development, and would laugh up their sleeves about it. I was naive at the time, and quite shocked.
IOW, they know they're peddling nonsense, but it works to get funding from the "donor nations" (that's the Civilized World, as we used to call ourselves) -- who are likewise in on the gag. It's for pacifying the eco-nazis, mostly.
Posted by: Beverly at December 23, 2011 11:46 PM (F43vJ)
The Un-men did, however, realize that even that pace is, in the long run, "unsustainable." The only way to avoid using more resources is to stick with the status quo ante.
Posted by: Beverly at December 23, 2011 11:48 PM (F43vJ)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2947 seconds, 323 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: phoenixgirl at December 23, 2011 04:10 AM (Ho2rs)