June 20, 2011

Obama To Announce Afghanistan Drawdown Plan On Wednesday
— DrewM

The long expected second act to Obama's December, 2009 new Afghanistan speech. Not surprisingly....we're drawingdown.

The president must decide the pace and size of reductions to a 30,000-strong troop escalation which he ordered surged into the conflict in December 2009, a deployment which brought the US garrison to 100,000 soldiers.

Some analysts also expect him to chart a clear glidepath of withdrawals which will lead up to the planned assumption of security control of Afghanistan by the country's nascent defense forces in 2014.

Obama will also be expected to explain to Americans that his surge has wrought slow, but significant progress, particularly in southern Afghanistan against the Taliban and foreshadow operations in key eastern districts.

White House officials also say that since Obama came to office, and poured new resources into a war that they say was neglected by the George W. Bush administration, there has been significant progress against Al-Qaeda.

In December 2009, Obama laid out a new war strategy designed to disrupt, dismantle and defeat Al-Qaeda, break the momentum of the Taliban and to offer the Afghan government space to move towards a security takeover.

"We have made significant progress towards achieving those goals," White House spokesman Jay Carney said Monday.

"Obviously, the most sensational and significant data point in that progress, of that progress, is the elimination of Osama bin Laden," he said.

"But there has been enormous progress in disrupting and dismantling al-Qaeda in the Afghanistan-Pakistan region beyond and below Osama bin Laden."

So, we're declaring victory and coming home? Meh, it was always going to be this way. I just hope that there was enough progress in the last year and a half to justify the sacrifice of life and cost.

We went to Afghanistan to capture or kill those responsible for 9/11 and ensure that the country couldn't be the launching point for more attacks. From that stand point, we've probably done as much as we really can. We're not going to be pulling out completely any time, so we'll still be able to kill as many jihadis as possible there and in Pakistan.

If victory is defined as turning Afghanistan into something approaching a normal country...I'm not sure there's much of an appetite in this country for much more of that.

It will be interesting to see how Obama actually frames this in his speech.

Posted by: DrewM at 04:48 PM | Comments (116)
Post contains 408 words, total size 3 kb.

1 When does he announce the drawdown plan for Libya?

Posted by: dogfish at June 20, 2011 04:29 PM (N2yhW)

2 McCain decries Obama's isolationism.

Ace, I never make the quantity, so couldn't you have a remarked upon?

Posted by: Jack at June 20, 2011 04:30 PM (kCT7A)

3 Yeah, but what does John McCain think? 

Posted by: Lady in Black at June 20, 2011 04:30 PM (kOtPb)

4

When does he announce the drawdown plan for the White House?

Posted by: dogfish at June 20, 2011 08:29 PM (N2yhW)

 

FIFY.

Posted by: CAC at June 20, 2011 04:30 PM (z3U5n)

5 I approve of getting the fuck out.

Posted by: steevy at June 20, 2011 04:31 PM (FlgcF)

6

The president must decide the pace and size of reductions

Aw shit.

Posted by: Wm T Sherman at June 20, 2011 04:31 PM (C0Z3w)

7 5 I approve of getting the fuck out.

That's what she said?

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at June 20, 2011 04:32 PM (c0A3e)

8 Good....bring my son home.

Posted by: Tami at June 20, 2011 04:33 PM (X6akg)

9 8 Good....bring my son home.

Posted by: Tami at June 20, 2011 08:33 PM (X6akg)


This.  And don't send my son this winter.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 20, 2011 04:37 PM (UOM48)

10 Ace has a thread up showing the genius that is our CiC. 

Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 20, 2011 04:39 PM (UOM48)

11 There is no victory over Afghanistan. (This should be a nonpartisan point.)

Over al-Qaeda, the road to victory is paved with strontium-90, through the ISI's headquarters in Pakistan.

Posted by: Zimriel at June 20, 2011 04:39 PM (+MKxi)

12 Some people say we don't need to be in Afghanistan - that we can keep droning away and blowing up the Islamists in their Pakistani (and soon, perhaps) and Afghan bases. Ahem. Just where do you think those drones bombing over Pakistan are based?! In Afghanistan. No Afghan bases, no drone war!

Posted by: Comrade Arthur at June 20, 2011 04:41 PM (KOAYS)

13 12 Time for an alliance with India.(not that Obama will do it)

Posted by: steevy at June 20, 2011 04:42 PM (FlgcF)

14

I'm all for getting out of A-stan. We killed Osama, displaced alqaeda, and delt a blow to the taliban.

Let's get the f out and head home.

 

I'm of the opinion that nukes will be used in Pakistan sooner or later, if not by us then by India, so it'd be better if our troops weren't in the area when that shit goes down.

Posted by: Ben at June 20, 2011 04:53 PM (DKV43)

15

Ahem. Just where do you think those drones bombing over Pakistan are based?! In Afghanistan. No Afghan bases, no drone war!

We'll ask India to let us use their bases, I'm sure they'd be amenable to it.

Our future lies with India anyway, not Pakistan.

Posted by: Ben at June 20, 2011 04:54 PM (DKV43)

16 Well, we may be "drawing down" in July, but a bunch of Marines are going over this winter. 

Barry's all for show for his base. 

Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 20, 2011 04:58 PM (UOM48)

17 15

Ahem. Just where do you think those drones bombing over Pakistan are based?! In Afghanistan. No Afghan bases, no drone war!

We'll ask India to let us use their bases, I'm sure they'd be amenable to it.

Our future lies with India anyway, not Pakistan.


Thank you, Ben.  This.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 20, 2011 04:59 PM (UOM48)

18 Good. Get us the fuck out.

Posted by: ErikW at June 20, 2011 05:05 PM (aBXWt)

19 As I've always said, Uh Um if the tollybon guy from Uh Pookeestan wants to pick up my daughter after drinking a beer, Uh My guys will Uh shoot him...

Posted by: JEFIC at June 20, 2011 05:06 PM (ZUWaD)

20 We should pull out of New York.

Posted by: Dr Spank at June 20, 2011 05:06 PM (1fB+3)

21 Yeah he's going to try to frame the words "we're surrendering the place and running away to award victory to terrorist enemies and leave the place to turn back into Taliban-control again" into something positive. And a lot of alleged conservatives will cheer at soldiers dying for nothing while terrorists cheer at proof that if you last long enough, America will give up.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at June 20, 2011 05:07 PM (r4wIV)

22 We can absorb another terrorist attack.....

Posted by: Barky of the new Camel Lot at June 20, 2011 05:08 PM (ZUWaD)

23

Yeah he's going to try to frame the words "we're surrendering the place and running away to award victory to terrorist enemies and leave the place to turn back into Taliban-control again" into something positive. And a lot of alleged conservatives will cheer at soldiers dying for nothing while terrorists cheer at proof that if you last long enough, America will give up.

What's the end game in Afghanistan exactly?

A modern functioning democracy? How many centuries do you think that would take?

It's just not going to happen.

We went there to kill and displace, well mission accomplished.

It's only Bush who declared a democratic form of government there was part of the "victory".  I think a lot of people shook their heads and played along, but A-stan isn't Iraq, it's a backwater shithole that will always be a backwater shithole in the modern world.

Posted by: Ben at June 20, 2011 05:10 PM (DKV43)

24 21 How long do you want to stay in Afghanistan?Seriously,how much longer to make a civilized nation out of it?

Posted by: steevy at June 20, 2011 05:11 PM (FlgcF)

25 This isn't just about the election. It's also about the fact that Obama and the rest of the Democrats want to give the terrorists a victory, so they'll make another 9/11-type attack and he can declare a state of emergency.

Posted by: Ken at June 20, 2011 05:11 PM (JYADs)

26

They're a buncha damned rock worshipping animals that have to concept of anything decent anyway.

They'll probably continue to plot terrorist attacks against us but maybe next time we can just flatten them.

Give it to Israel, they could probably do something useful with it.

 

Posted by: ErikW at June 20, 2011 05:11 PM (aBXWt)

27 Camel Lot

har har

Posted by: Cherry π the unbanned at June 20, 2011 05:11 PM (OhYCU)

28 New York City is not even civilized yet

Posted by: Cherry π the unbanned at June 20, 2011 05:12 PM (OhYCU)

29 Our future lies with India anyway, not Pakistan.

no kidding - especially if your computer breaks down

Posted by: chemjeff homeowner at June 20, 2011 05:12 PM (QAJGa)

30 So glad my bro served in IRoA so that Prez McFuckups could fuck it up.

Posted by: Nora at June 20, 2011 05:14 PM (VxqUc)

31 And a lot of alleged conservatives will cheer at soldiers dying for nothing while terrorists cheer at proof that if you last long enough, America will give up.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at June 20, 2011 09:07 PM (r4wIV)

That's BS, we went there in the first place to kill Al Queda and Bin Laden. That's done now. No one said we were going there to turn Afghanistan into a functioning democracy. That position evolved over time and most people think is unrealistic. I originally thought we would only be their a couple of months.

That being said Obama isn't going to pull out now. He can't afford the chaos during an election season so more people will die to try and help him get reelected.

Posted by: robtr at June 20, 2011 05:14 PM (MtwBb)

32 28 New York City is not even civilized yet



shhhhh!  Don't wake her.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 20, 2011 05:15 PM (UOM48)

33 Finally someone is listening to me!

Posted by: Ron Paul at June 20, 2011 05:16 PM (VxqUc)

34 I don't consider any place that tolerates Democrats to be civilized. If you're a Republican in a Democrat-ruled city, they will fire you from your job, break up your marriage, and sic their kids on your kids. Why do Republicans allow them to do these things?

Posted by: Ken at June 20, 2011 05:17 PM (JYADs)

35

Our future lies with India anyway, not Pakistan.

no kidding - especially if your computer breaks down

Posted by: chemjeff homeowner at June 20, 2011 09:12 PM

 

So you are saying to me you suffered an EMP attack?

 Please you are telling me what screen you are seeing?

 

Posted by: Sanjay the Tech guy named "Bob" at June 20, 2011 05:17 PM (ZUWaD)

36 Who let crazy Ron Paul out of his straightjacket?

Posted by: Dr Spank, Squatter at June 20, 2011 05:17 PM (1fB+3)

37 Well, I'm off to finish my Vince Flynn novel, where the good guys win and the evil guys end up with their teeth on the sidewalk.  Or much worse.


Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 20, 2011 05:19 PM (UOM48)

38

Did you have a bad day Ken?

You seem a little tightly wound....

Posted by: KZnextzone at June 20, 2011 05:19 PM (ZUWaD)

39

Well, I'm off to finish my Vince Flynn novel

Which one?

Posted by: USS Diversity at June 20, 2011 05:21 PM (RPYjQ)

40 I'd like to introduce you to our new best friend India who also likes to dabble in nuclear armament. 

Posted by: no good deed at June 20, 2011 05:22 PM (MZSfb)

41 Did you have a bad day Ken? You seem a little tightly wound.... Every day is a bad day if you're a patriot in this nation.

Posted by: Ken at June 20, 2011 05:22 PM (JYADs)

42 39

Well, I'm off to finish my Vince Flynn novel

Which one?


Pursuit of Honor.

I just picked up Brad Thor's Foreign Influence.  I actually like his writing style better.  More funny banter in between the killin'.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 20, 2011 05:23 PM (UOM48)

43 Try being conservative in California...

Posted by: KZnextzone at June 20, 2011 05:23 PM (ZUWaD)

44 No one said we were going there to turn Afghanistan into a functioning democracy.

Um, quite a lot of idealists did support turning Afghanistan into a Western democracy from 1990something to 2003. Those were the "neo-cons" allied with some liberals like in The New Republic. I'm in my late 30s and I remember. You might laugh at them now as being clowns in mags no-one reads like Commentary; but I assure you that back in 2002 they had George W Bush's ear.

I mean, David Frum was Bush's speechwriter for God's sake.

Posted by: Zimriel at June 20, 2011 05:24 PM (+MKxi)

45

Geez Rush is selling tea and now Dennis Miller is selling "A Google a Day".

WTF indeed.

Posted by: KZnextzone at June 20, 2011 05:26 PM (ZUWaD)

46 Every day is a bad day if you're a patriot in this nation.

Ken. Lighten up. Plz. You're acting like a caricature.

Posted by: Zimriel at June 20, 2011 05:26 PM (+MKxi)

47 Do you realize that it's effectively impossible to get married and have kids if you love your country, and you're not already married. I see a pretty woman, and immediately I see Bill Maher above her holding her puppet strings, cackling with glee. I hate those fucks.

Posted by: Ken at June 20, 2011 05:26 PM (JYADs)

48 Someone give Ken a hug.

Posted by: Zimriel at June 20, 2011 05:27 PM (+MKxi)

49 Maybe it's time to up your meds, Ken.  Seriously.

Posted by: no good deed at June 20, 2011 05:28 PM (MZSfb)

50 Ken. Lighten up. Plz. You're acting like a caricature. Sometimes you have to act like a caricature to get people to realize you're for real. Look at NRO for the opposite effect--a bunch of wimps debating fine points, and no one can read a full article without falling asleep.

Posted by: Ken at June 20, 2011 05:29 PM (JYADs)

51 I just picked up Brad Thor's Foreign Influence.  I actually like his writing style better. 

Man, that does not say much for Vince Flynn.

I've just finished reading the first three Brad Thor books, and the guy's writing seems to be getting worse as he goes along.

Posted by: Waterhouse at June 20, 2011 05:30 PM (/BXzv)

52 Don't do it Ken

Posted by: Bud Dwyer at June 20, 2011 05:30 PM (ZUWaD)

53 oh when the ants...go marching in....oh when the ants go marching in......

Posted by: phoenixgirl at June 20, 2011 05:30 PM (eOXTH)

54 48 Someone give Ken a hug.

But if I do, he'll get all tangled up in Bill Maher's puppet strings! 

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at June 20, 2011 05:30 PM (c0A3e)

55 Good thing about both Thor and Flynn, people always get their comuppances.

Posted by: USS Diversity at June 20, 2011 05:32 PM (RPYjQ)

56 More rubble, less trouble.
We can't afford any more nation building anyway.
Next time some 3rd world hellhole attacks us, just hellfire their entire leadership and let some new warlord take over. If he behaves, fine. If not, then blow him up. Repeat until they behave.

Much cheaper. Won't bankrupt us. And politically supportable.

This strategy mainly requires a strong navy with long range drones.

Posted by: Clubber Lang at June 20, 2011 05:33 PM (QcFbt)

57 Sometimes you have to act like a caricature to get people to realize you're for real.

I admire, and aspire to be, the strong silent type.

Posted by: fluffy at June 20, 2011 05:33 PM (SwkdU)

58

More rubble, less trouble

Come for the Rubble and stay for the Trouble

 

Posted by: Detroit City Chamber of Commerce at June 20, 2011 05:35 PM (ZUWaD)

59 we should break up Afghanistan and partition it out on tribal/ethnic lines, ala the old Yugoslavia...

that and deploy the troops there home through Iran. 

the one's in Iraq can leave via Syria.

Posted by: redc1c4 at June 20, 2011 05:35 PM (d1FhN)

60 51 I just picked up Brad Thor's Foreign Influence.  I actually like his writing style better. 

Man, that does not say much for Vince Flynn.

I've just finished reading the first three Brad Thor books, and the guy's writing seems to be getting worse as he goes along.

Posted by: Waterhouse at June 20, 2011 09:30 PM (/BXzv)

Well, sue me.  I'm up to my neck with political books.  Brad's one book I just read was exciting and fun. 

I've got a lib sister who's a writer.  I'm sure she'd sneer at my book selections.  I've read more history and conservative commentary than I can stomach right now.  Every now and then I pick up a P. J. O'Rourke off the bookshelf just to lower my blood pressure.


Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 20, 2011 05:35 PM (UOM48)

61 59, Joe Biden, is that you?

Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at June 20, 2011 05:36 PM (NtTkA)

62 I wonder if this will change my brother's planned deployment next year. He wanted to go to Afghanistan instead of somewhere safe and dull, but with his first child due a few months before he is slated to go, I bet he might not be heartbroken to have his orders changed.

Posted by: Grey Fox at June 20, 2011 05:36 PM (K7hz4)

63 And now I'm off.

Be nice to Ken.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 20, 2011 05:36 PM (UOM48)

64 I admire, and aspire to be, the strong silent type. Short answer: So did George W. Bush. Long answer: Strong silent types were mainly for impressing men, not women. Men supported the strong silent types like Eisenhower, and women obediently voted the way their men told them to vote. Nowadays, women voters want "bad boys" who seem like they're one stare away from killing someone.

Posted by: Ken at June 20, 2011 05:36 PM (JYADs)

65

More rubble, less trouble

This has many applications...

Posted by: Bedrock Chamber of Commerce at June 20, 2011 05:37 PM (ZUWaD)

66 "Try being conservative in California..."

been doing that all my life, and having great fun in the process.

Posted by: redc1c4 at June 20, 2011 05:37 PM (d1FhN)

67 It will be interesting to see how Obama actually frames this in his speech. Let me be perfectly clear. . .

Posted by: Barry O at June 20, 2011 05:37 PM (x9YN5)

68 Where will Obama hang his mission accomplished banner?

Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at June 20, 2011 05:38 PM (NtTkA)

69 Nowadays, women voters want "bad boys" who seem like they're one stare away from killing someone.

You call me "Killer!"

Posted by: Barry 'Francis' O'Bama at June 20, 2011 05:39 PM (SwkdU)

70 #62, no, it's me: i don't post a whole lot, but i'm not a sock.

Posted by: redc1c4 at June 20, 2011 05:39 PM (d1FhN)

71 "Next time some 3rd world hellhole attacks us, just hellfire their entire leadership and let some new warlord take over. If he behaves, fine. If not, then blow him up. Repeat until they behave." No shit. In the finest examples of putting the cart before the horse, the US has been bending over backward to push Marshall Plans even before the enemy has been beaten in the field. Has anyone else here ever seen _The_Mouse_That_Roared_?

Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at June 20, 2011 05:39 PM (cbyrC)

72 "Let them hate so long as they fear." Going all Caligula on Afghanistan.  I don't think you can call it a war if there are no boots on the ground.  That's the new standard. 

Posted by: no good deed at June 20, 2011 05:39 PM (MZSfb)

73 You call me "Killer!" Obama and McCain were both wimps, so women voted for the one who kissed up to the rioters.

Posted by: Ken at June 20, 2011 05:40 PM (JYADs)

74 I don't think you can call it a war if there are no boots on the ground.

Why the hell not??

Posted by: zombie Curtis LeMay at June 20, 2011 05:41 PM (SwkdU)

75

This is all great, but what happens when you start pulling them out and the Taliban starts feeling more bold?  

Any time you start pulling Marines/Soldiers out are the ones left not in more danger?

Frankly, with the fuckwit in charge of this it scares the hell out of me.

Posted by: Steph at June 20, 2011 05:41 PM (AkdC5)

76 "Where will Obama hang his mission accomplished banner?" Heh. Sounds like a job for Weiner after his mentally sick ass gets booted out of the people's house.

Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at June 20, 2011 05:42 PM (cbyrC)

77 Obama and McCain were both wimps, so women voted for the one who kissed up to the rioters.

Why do you want to be a crowd pleaser?

Posted by: fluffy at June 20, 2011 05:43 PM (SwkdU)

78 Man this could catch on!!

Posted by: Mecca Chamber of Commerce at June 20, 2011 05:43 PM (ZUWaD)

79

we should break up Afghanistan and partition it out on tribal/ethnic lines, ala the old Yugoslavia...

We didn't do that. They did that themselves.

 

Posted by: Ben at June 20, 2011 05:43 PM (DKV43)

80 How about a big drawdown in the public schools?

Posted by: Pissy Pessimist at June 20, 2011 05:45 PM (4sQwu)

81 I read one of Brad Thor's books: The Last Patriot. Think of it as "Da Vinci Code" for the kuffar.

Thor has written at MyPetJawa and I would not be shocked to hear that he is a lurking moron as well. So it might work to be polite when talking about his books here.

I don't know if Thor wants to become a better writer; but in case he does, right now, he's been lazy. He's got good ideas and, maybe more importantly, he's got courage. He needs to take a further step into writing better characters.

There's another author going for the same audience - whom I know has posted here - Robert Ferrigno. Ferrigno had the idea to make his setting a character. I recommend "Prayers for the Assassin" highly.

Posted by: Zimriel at June 20, 2011 05:45 PM (+MKxi)

82 Why do you want to be a crowd pleaser? I don't. I want to get back at these parasites for what they've done to America. But it will also help us politically to do so.

Posted by: Ken at June 20, 2011 05:46 PM (JYADs)

83 Where will Obama hang his mission accomplished banner?

Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at June 20, 2011 09:38 PM (NtTkA)

 

Does Joint Base Andrews have a hot dog stand?

Posted by: ErikW at June 20, 2011 05:46 PM (aBXWt)

84 Sorry Zombie General LeMay, our current President thinks it's not a war if the Army ain't ground poundin'.  Feel free to come back and eat his brains.

Posted by: no good deed at June 20, 2011 05:46 PM (MZSfb)

85 You all realize, don't you, that we won't be turning it into a parking lot? "Get tough or get out" always turns into "get out."

Posted by: Ken at June 20, 2011 05:47 PM (JYADs)

86 okay, Ken has to be a moby
his rantings are getting to be just ridiculous now

Posted by: chemjeff homeowner at June 20, 2011 05:48 PM (QAJGa)

87 83 Isn't Thor the one who is dyslexic?If so,it may account for his failings as a writer.

Posted by: steevy at June 20, 2011 05:48 PM (FlgcF)

88 Then give me something better, chemjeff.

Posted by: Ken at June 20, 2011 05:48 PM (JYADs)

89 90 Then give me something better, chemjeff.

Posted by: Ken at June 20, 2011 09:48 PM (JYADs)



Okay, how about: "I want to leave Afghanistan but I won't descend into conspiracy-mongering, fake-50s-nostalgia idiocy"?  Hmm?  Think about it

Posted by: chemjeff homeowner at June 20, 2011 05:50 PM (QAJGa)

90 Like an enema, Ken?

Posted by: Jack Nicholson at June 20, 2011 05:50 PM (MZSfb)

91 FWIW, I didn't intend to boldface all of post # 87, and in the process gave the wrong impression. I'm as sick of David Frum's wars as anyone else. But I just don't see how getting out can be anything but a humiliating defeat for America which will result in further attacks--exactly what the Democrats want.

Posted by: Ken at June 20, 2011 05:51 PM (JYADs)

92 Where will Obama hang his mission accomplished banner?

Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at June 20, 2011 09:38 PM (NtTkA)

At the first completed shovel read high speed rail station of course!

Winning The Future!!!!!

Posted by: Joe Biden at June 20, 2011 05:53 PM (4Cs89)

93 If we aren't there to do whatever is necessary to kill every fucking terrorist we can find, we should get the fuck out.

That said, this, along with BO's recent praise of Egypt's (Muslim Brotherhood's) uprising, his complete support for Palistinians, his complete ignoring of the shit happening in Syria, his selling of our soverignty to the UN, his support for Russia, his funding of foreign countries to drill in the Gulf, etc., shows that he is destroying America and weakening Her power.

Here is a great article on this topic.(Jerusalem Post) I think it is a real eye opener/must-read.

Posted by: momma at June 20, 2011 05:55 PM (nWikJ)

94 Dyslexia is a bitch, and I sympathise if it afflicts him; but it doesn't account for unreal characterisation and lazy plotting. You do outlines, notes, and rough draughts for the story itself. Spellcheck and editors deal with the dyslexia.

It would be like me blaming poor eyesight for bad programming.

Posted by: Zimriel at June 20, 2011 05:56 PM (+MKxi)

95 "It would be like me blaming poor eyesight for bad programming." Heh. I've spent the last couple of weeks fixing a whole lotta shit a guy who wore coke bottle bottoms on wire frames wrote. Are you sure there isn't a link?

Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at June 20, 2011 05:59 PM (cbyrC)

96 #61 #81

Jeez, Reagan and Gorbachev eliminated ALCM's a long time ago, and we ripped the arming circuits out of our strategic bombers back in the mid-90's.

"You've broken the trans-axle. You're just grinding metal."

Posted by: KirkCameronLeftMeBehind at June 20, 2011 05:59 PM (iZ6fL)

97 You don't think a mushroom cloud rising above Kabul on the 12th of September 2001 wouldn't have been a crowd pleaser? Bush kept us from showing the world what can happen when they attack us, and consequently they haven't learned a thing, like the lessons the Japanese learned. It would have been politically acceptible, as I recall there was almost no one in this country who was not affected by that attack to some degree. Oh, I see where we had a disconnect. Actually, I have no problem with what you're saying. But I wasn't talking about Afghanistan in that post. I was talking about getting tough with the Democrat traitors in this country.

Posted by: Ken at June 20, 2011 06:02 PM (JYADs)

98

Nuke em til the sand turns to glass and then we can see where to drill for the oil

H/T Howard Stern

Posted by: KZnextzone at June 20, 2011 06:07 PM (ZUWaD)

99 Thousands if not tens of thousands of Afgans that helped the US are going to be slaughtered when we leave. Should that be a reason to stay? Nope. But it is what happens when you try to fight a politically correct war with no concrete objective. 10+ years of let's be nice to them, give them money, modern medicine, show them that treating women like cattle and sodomizing little boys is bad. Show them freedom and democracy, they will want to live just like us. How completely fucking arrogant. 10 years ago they had a Gov. that supported the 9/11 terrorists. When we found out we should have conducted the proper war. We should have killed everything that moved, Pols, soldiers, civillians, farm Animals and left no structure standing. When what was left said "We are sorry, We will give you anything you want just please stop" then the war is over. It is this type of activity that protects your children. It instructs the world we will not be fucked with. Instead we have allowed the killing and maiming thousands of our own men and women, the best and brightest America has to offer. For what? The History books will lump this in with the soviet invasion. Another failed foreign policy debacle. It's disgusting. Is it completely without merit? Nope. It's a good tune up for the next war. China.

Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at June 20, 2011 06:09 PM (NtTkA)

100 If victory is defined as turning Afghanistan into something approaching a normal country...I'm not sure there's much of an appetite in this country for much more of that.

To actually turn A-stan into a normal country you'd have to destroy the existing culture(s), rebuild them, and plough in trillions of dollars into infrastructure.  It would take two generations, minimum.  Even assuming it's morally right to remake the Afghans in our image (you can argue both sides of that one), we can't afford it.  It just isn't an option, with 10% support or 100%.

As long as cousin marriage is an accepted part of the culture, and as long as the local warlords can use the terrain to hold off central government armies ten times as powerful as their own, A-stan will not be a country the way you and I think of countries.  It never was.  Even in its 1970s period of relative peace and prosperity Afghanistan's central government didn't have anything approaching a monopoly on the use of force.

Posted by: Ace's liver at June 20, 2011 06:10 PM (QgI7g)

101 94, LOL

Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at June 20, 2011 06:11 PM (NtTkA)

102 Let's get real ... the White House has already announced it.

Posted by: Islamic Rage Boy at June 20, 2011 06:14 PM (e8kgV)

103

Unfortunately I fear that Barry's lttle soire' into a military action that called him off the back nine, He did kill Osama after all, has shown him a facet of the Presidency that he had ignored from a predisposed lack of intellect.

Now he see's they have to go where he says and they can in fact keep secrets, he realized they are a weapon.

Things are going to get ugly I fear...

Posted by: KZnextzone at June 20, 2011 06:24 PM (ZUWaD)

104 DrewM.: "If victory is defined as turning Afghanistan into something approaching a normal country...I'm not sure there's much of an appetite in this country for much more of that."

No, there isn't. Next time -- should 9/11 repeat -- Americans will be demanding the largest instantaneous formation of glass since the home of Godzilla got uppity.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at June 20, 2011 06:25 PM (1yViP)

105 I'll bitch slap both you MFrs.

Posted by: Cheap P Diddy Apparel at June 20, 2011 06:32 PM (NtTkA)

106 It's a good tune up for the next war. China.

Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at June 20, 2011 10:09 PM (NtTkA)

They don't know how to play football, fuck them. They lose.

Posted by: ErikW at June 20, 2011 06:38 PM (aBXWt)

107 Admiral "Minuteman" Poindexter: "Maybe increasing values in Windex Stock would be a good signal that we are not to be trifled with."

That and ashtrays. The future won't be Plastics.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at June 20, 2011 06:42 PM (1yViP)

108 The initial invasion was warranted, the nation building never had a chance in that hellhole.  Fuck Karzai, he calls the Tyrant of Tehran a friend.  A guy who has been directly responsible for American deaths and wants to exterminate the Jews. He is now calling use "occupiers" while our men die to keep him in power. 

The best case scenario for that place is a primitive, oppressive Islamic state operating under Sharia Law that hates our guts.  I would not send my son to fight for that and I cannot in good conscience ask others to do the same.  Time to go.  If we get a chance to kill some high value targets later on, we should do so.

Posted by: Ken Royall at June 20, 2011 07:13 PM (9zzk+)

109 The traitors within have neutered us to the extent that another attack here will result in nothing significant in the way of a response.  The elites will worry about the lack of muslim sensitivity.  The DoS will worry about funneling money through their fellow elites in the foreign aid "trade" to corrupt US-hating leites in yet another foreign country.  The TSA will grope everyone harder, unless they are muslim with a cultural sensitivity.  After months, if not years, we will respond with a UN approved military action, complete with a set of ROE that sacrifice even more of our patriots.

There was a reason for that phrase "all enemies, foreign and domestic", but we didn't pay enough attention to it while we could have done something about it.

Posted by: Hrothgar at June 20, 2011 07:20 PM (yrGif)

110 leites<-elites

Posted by: Hrothgar at June 20, 2011 07:22 PM (yrGif)

111 Great post,I will read your post time to time.thank you!

Posted by: Jersey at June 20, 2011 07:54 PM (14Ahw)

112 oakley sunglasses,cheap oakley sunglasses,sale oakley sunglasses,oakley sunglasses sale,sunglasses oakley,oakley sunglass,designer sunglasses,discount sunglasses,wholesale sunglasses,oakley sunglasses online,Oakley Antix,Oakley Gascan,Oakley Hijinx,Oakley Jury,Oakley Monster Dog,Oakley Scapel,Oakley Straight Jacket,Oakley Active Sunglasses,Oakley Fives,Oakley Flak Jacket,Oakley Jawbone,Oakley Juliet,Oakley Life Sunglasses,Oakley M Frame,Oakley New Arrivals,Oakley New Popurzed,Oakley Oil Drum,Oakley Radar Path,Oakley Radar Range,Oakley Radar Xl Blades,Oakley Rig,Oakley Sideways,Oakley Sport Sunglasses.

Posted by: Oakley Sunglasses Sale at June 20, 2011 09:37 PM (h9REV)

113 "I just hope that there was enough progress in the last year and a half to justify the sacrifice of life and cost." Well, maybe if they were ready to start landing men on the Moon, or maybe if it was even possible for little girls to go to school without being murdered, maybe then yes. Nope, no Moon program, no little girls consistently going to school in safety. Not enough progress for the blood it has cost.

Posted by: Errol at June 20, 2011 10:07 PM (uAzAD)

114

Asics Running Shoes are your best sport shoe at Asicsrunningshop,Inc..

Posted by: Asics Running Shoes at June 21, 2011 12:34 AM (N9FIP)

115

Winning wasn't the goal anyway.

http://tinyurl.com/6xzujyn

Posted by: SFC MAC at June 21, 2011 05:10 AM (WB46i)

116 I'm vert glad to find your nike air max blog. It's very useful. Thank you!We are a professional foreign trade website, mainly engaged in all kinds of air max shoes.

Posted by: ftguru at June 23, 2011 06:20 PM (bSdU9)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
128kb generated in CPU 0.0662, elapsed 0.2173 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.1909 seconds, 244 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.