December 06, 2011
— Ace It's not true. Sure, any successful new industry tends to destroy some jobs. But successful industries also create their own new jobs, and further, new efficiencies in the economy create completely unrelated jobs, products and services that can now be profitably offered because people have a bit more wealth, and hence can spend a bit on things they hadn't spent on before.
Obama only focuses on the first part: Internet sales has destroyed a good many brick-and-mortar sales positions. This is true (and I think something we need to look at as regards the disparate tax treatment of internet and local sales; either end the tax for both or impose it on both).
But in any growing economy, efficiencies would create wealth which would lead to other jobs.
His problem, then, is that he simply has a stagnant economy and diminishing wealth.
Not the internet.
But he needs a new villain because ATMs and robots were last season's villains.
Posted by: Ace at
11:14 AM
| Comments (205)
Post contains 175 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: profligatewaste at December 06, 2011 11:17 AM (kUFvz)
I don't understand...aren't there lots of jobs in Intertube factories?
Posted by: Ted Stevens at December 06, 2011 11:18 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at work at December 06, 2011 11:18 AM (s+J9D)
I think it is BS. What has destroyed brick and mortar sales positions is a shitty economy combined with shitty local government.
And id localities want to compete on sales tax with the internet they need to quit raising damn sales tax through the roof. When I first moved here 38 years ago sales tax was 3% Statewide.
It is now 10.5% in the city and 8.5% outside in the county. Piss on them.
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2011 11:18 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2011 11:19 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at December 06, 2011 11:19 AM (p7SSh)
Posted by: joeindc44 at December 06, 2011 11:20 AM (QxSug)
Blaming the internet for pointing out the truth about him is his real agenda. So he has to build a strawman (the internet destroys jobs) to attack. As if he gives two shits about jobs.
Posted by: tubal at December 06, 2011 11:20 AM (BoE3Z)
Posted by: Patrick Leahy at December 06, 2011 11:20 AM (e8kgV)
That's the problem. He'd prefer you work for the government (both literally as a civil "servant" leach, and figuratively as taxes increase).
Posted by: angler at December 06, 2011 11:20 AM (SwjAj)
Posted by: Adjoran at December 06, 2011 11:20 AM (VfmLu)
Posted by: Joffen at December 06, 2011 11:20 AM (zLeKL)
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2011 03:19 PM (YdQQY)
Double check the latest tax bill, and make sure it's not a sock.
Posted by: ontherocks at December 06, 2011 11:21 AM (HBqDo)
Posted by: Y-not, job killer at December 06, 2011 11:22 AM (5H6zj)
Left out the most important one 3) SCOTUS has ruled it unconstitutional unless the merchant has a "presence" in the State.
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2011 11:22 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Wall-E at December 06, 2011 11:23 AM (48wze)
Posted by: Burt TC at December 06, 2011 11:24 AM (TOk1P)
Posted by: Ohio Dan at December 06, 2011 11:24 AM (JKNDp)
Posted by: Al Gore at December 06, 2011 11:24 AM (iGvQ1)
Somebody really ought to tell him that this kind of stuff is called .. get this .. "Change"
Posted by: Patrick Leahy at December 06, 2011 11:24 AM (e8kgV)
Posted by: Charlie Gibson at December 06, 2011 11:24 AM (51Nv7)
Posted by: Ohio Dan at December 06, 2011 11:27 AM (JKNDp)
Posted by: Brick and Mortar Record/Cassette/CD Store On Every Block at December 06, 2011 11:27 AM (JVEmw)
Posted by: ontherocks at December 06, 2011 11:27 AM (HBqDo)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at December 06, 2011 11:27 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 06, 2011 11:27 AM (vzFJV)
Posted by: buzzion at December 06, 2011 11:27 AM (GULKT)
Posted by: Ohio Dan at December 06, 2011 11:28 AM (JKNDp)
Posted by: Fritz in his underwear with a beer and a smoke at December 06, 2011 11:28 AM (FabC8)
Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston training for the ONT mudwrestling match at December 06, 2011 11:28 AM (ijjAe)
Posted by: cajun carrot at December 06, 2011 11:29 AM (zHl9z)
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2011 11:30 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: blaster at December 06, 2011 11:30 AM (7vSU0)
Yes. We know.
Posted by: Tower Records at December 06, 2011 11:31 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: blaster at December 06, 2011 11:31 AM (7vSU0)
SockPuppehts are the bane of our economy!
Posted by: Barack Hussein Obama at December 06, 2011 11:31 AM (/d7Qz)
Posted by: Cue Card Holder Guy at December 06, 2011 11:31 AM (GULKT)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 06, 2011 03:27 PM (vzFJV)
Stop it, EOJ, the thought of Bugs in drag sends a tingle up my leg.
Posted by: Burt TC at December 06, 2011 11:31 AM (TOk1P)
It's psychedelic pandemonium!
Ah ha ha ha ha ha! I, am "the Guiding Light," ha ha!
at least that's what Captain Lou says
Posted by: StrategicCPLUSMC at December 06, 2011 11:31 AM (DH7A2)
Posted by: Michael at December 06, 2011 11:31 AM (eA6i/)
The SCOAMF knows absolutely nothing about economics.
Absolutely. Nothing.
Boy, we (as a nation) sure know how to pick 'em, don't we?
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at December 06, 2011 11:31 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: joeindc44 at December 06, 2011 11:32 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: blaster at December 06, 2011 03:30 PM (7vSU0)
you've got your movies mixed up
Posted by: The Dude at December 06, 2011 11:32 AM (M8yfa)
Posted by: Obama staffer with a raging boner at December 06, 2011 11:32 AM (BbX1b)
Posted by: blaster at December 06, 2011 11:32 AM (7vSU0)
Posted by: Rosie the Riveter at December 06, 2011 11:32 AM (QKKT0)
The survivors of the nuclear fire called the war Judgment Day. They lived only to face a new nightmare – the war against the ATMs.
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at December 06, 2011 11:33 AM (1hM1d)
Except IIRC, this is a growth sector expecting 6% more jobs next year. Have you seen how many banks are opening mini-branches in grocery stores, etc. lately? Someone needs to fill those positions.
Posted by: CUS at December 06, 2011 11:33 AM (84pE9)
Posted by: Pissy Pessimist at December 06, 2011 11:33 AM (ndp2I)
Posted by: pep at December 06, 2011 11:34 AM (YXmuI)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at December 06, 2011 11:34 AM (+lsX1)
Posted by: joeindc44 at December 06, 2011 11:35 AM (QxSug)
The internet is indeed killing the pron industry. With all the free, amateur stuff available, who needs 'actors'?
Posted by: CUS at December 06, 2011 11:35 AM (84pE9)
Posted by: President Hot Tip at December 06, 2011 11:35 AM (FabC8)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at December 06, 2011 11:35 AM (p7SSh)
Posted by: al-Cicero, Tea Party Jihadist at December 06, 2011 11:35 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: joeindc44 at December 06, 2011 11:36 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: Buggy Whip Industry at December 06, 2011 11:36 AM (BHM5V)
Posted by: Joffen at December 06, 2011 11:36 AM (zLeKL)
Posted by: joeindc44 at December 06, 2011 11:36 AM (QxSug)
Actually, it would be remarkably easy for a government agency to track, charge, collect and monitor compliance of a tax on retail goods and services on the internet, regardless of where the seller or buyer are located. If the US Postal Service, UPS, FedEx and DHL were included in the mix with the payment of a “tax stamp” to verify that taxes were paid on the item being delivered, the systems would be fairly hard to circumvent.
Consumption taxes are a far better way to fund a government than income taxes. They allow for more privacy and restrict the governmentÂ’s tendency to try to manipulate behavior.
Posted by: jwest at December 06, 2011 11:36 AM (qeYI9)
Posted by: Pissy Pessimist at December 06, 2011 11:37 AM (ndp2I)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 06, 2011 11:37 AM (XE2Oo)
Given Obozo's concept of economics, I'm truly surprised that he hasn't tried to increase employment a la Krugman by hiring federal workers to go out and break windows.
Shhh. Don't give that idiot any more ideas.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at December 06, 2011 11:37 AM (d0Tfm)
You do know that that is a union job.
Posted by: SEIU goon squad at December 06, 2011 11:37 AM (84pE9)
Posted by: Barack Hussein Obama with a brick at December 06, 2011 11:37 AM (/d7Qz)
Posted by: cajun carrot at December 06, 2011 03:29 PM (zHl9z)
He put address verification workers out of a job.
Posted by: buzzion at December 06, 2011 11:37 AM (GULKT)
Posted by: kathysaysso at December 06, 2011 11:37 AM (ZtwUX)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at December 06, 2011 11:38 AM (+lsX1)
Hackers, pirates, pron, blogs, online businesses, researchers, musicians & video producers won't be taking to kindly to that declaration.
Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston training for the ONT mudwrestling match at December 06, 2011 11:38 AM (ijjAe)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at December 06, 2011 11:38 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: toby928© stickin' it to THE MAN at December 06, 2011 11:38 AM (IfkGz)
Relying on cheap, low-quality pr0n actresses may save you money in the short run, but in the long term it'll cost you more in unproductive additional time spent fapping.
Posted by: The American Association of Pr0n Professionals at December 06, 2011 11:38 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Cyberdyne Industries at December 06, 2011 11:38 AM (yj3V2)
Posted by: joeindc44 at December 06, 2011 03:36 PM (QxSug)
I owe you a Coke, or a beer. Or a capfull of Valu-Rite, before it decomposes.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at December 06, 2011 11:39 AM (d0Tfm)
It's been a real boost to our careers, believe us!
Posted by: Hot Assassin/Bodyguard Twins at December 06, 2011 11:39 AM (GBXon)
He directly blamed the Bush tax cuts for the current economic crisis. Also, ATMs. And the Internet. And the wealthy. And the lack of high speed train building. And... well, just about everything other than his own failed policies.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 06, 2011 11:40 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: toby928© stickin' it to THE MAN at December 06, 2011 11:40 AM (IfkGz)
the I B PEW headquarters will be located in McPherson SquareWashington DC
Posted by: StrategicCPLUSMC at December 06, 2011 11:40 AM (DH7A2)
Posted by: Buggy Whips at December 06, 2011 11:40 AM (H/kgP)
Posted by: Finely Creased Pants Inc. at December 06, 2011 11:41 AM (yj3V2)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at December 06, 2011 11:41 AM (QF8uk)
Sorry. Those tax cuts have his name on them, now.
Posted by: CUS at December 06, 2011 11:41 AM (84pE9)
Posted by: Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain at December 06, 2011 11:41 AM (bj+Nc)
Posted by: garrett at December 06, 2011 11:41 AM (/d7Qz)
The more Obama speaks, the more I realize he fancies himself a Napolean Bonaparte.
Obama would love to rule a 19th century empire.
Think about it.
Posted by: soothsayer at December 06, 2011 11:41 AM (sqkOB)
Now, 50 years later, it's normally standing room only at lunchtime. He's since added a bunch of tables. Between lunch and his catering, he spends his time cooking and his wife runs the store. His reputation is far and wide. People who come to town always want to go to his store for lunch. He accomplished all this because he innovated instead of whining.
Posted by: Zombie John Gotti at December 06, 2011 11:41 AM (Gkhxf)
Posted by: auscolpyr at December 06, 2011 03:22 PM
One of those 57 states with the bitter clingers. Don't nitpick, I've got important work to focus on, like deciding which college basketball game to watch tonight
Obama to Kansas Supporters: “It’s Great to be Back in Texas!”
Posted by: King Barry the Geography Genius at December 06, 2011 11:42 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: Jesus at December 06, 2011 11:42 AM (yj3V2)
Same damn movie.
And Brian Dennehy was awesome in both.
Posted by: Hot Assassin/Bodyguard Twins at December 06, 2011 11:43 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: Bob Saget at December 06, 2011 11:43 AM (SDkq3)
The SCOAMF really is a one trick pony, isn't he? Everything is just not his fault! He did everything his Marxist professors told him would establish utopia.
We bitter, clingers just can't stand to see a [half] black succeed. I denounce myself.
Posted by: Retired Buckeye Cop at December 06, 2011 11:44 AM (M0NzJ)
Wait. What?
A Consumption tax "restrict
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at December 06, 2011 11:44 AM (8y9MW)
It would be difficult, though, because it would mean a downward pressure on state and local sales taxes, and a boon on creating businesses in states with no sales tax. California would not like that solution, for example.
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at December 06, 2011 03:41 PM (QF8uk)
I think California and Illinois have attempted to impose taxes on Amazon haven't they? And didn't Amazon say "fuck you" and took their business out of those states?
Posted by: buzzion at December 06, 2011 11:44 AM (GULKT)
Posted by: Telebrands at December 06, 2011 11:44 AM (yj3V2)
"Wolfie's fine, honey, Wolfie's just fine. Where are you"
Posted by: Dr. Varno at December 06, 2011 11:45 AM (QMtmy)
Obama would love to rule a 19th century empire.
Think about it.
You send him anywhere near here and I'm going to have a little chat with my BFF, the Yellowstone Caldera. So. Help. Me.
Posted by: St. Helena at December 06, 2011 11:45 AM (GBXon)
The brick and mortar places do have a valid complaint about internet businesses not paying sales taxes. My simple solution is that it is a flat 3% internet sales tax. The Feds get .1% for managing it and the states get a proportional amount based the percentage of sales for that state. This eliminates the chaos of businesses trying to figure out what the sales tax is for Backwoods, AL and levels the playing field.
Posted by: Chris at December 06, 2011 11:46 AM (lS0gj)
Posted by: Dept. of Agriculture Food Stamp Program at December 06, 2011 11:47 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: joeindc44 at December 06, 2011 11:47 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: auscolpyr at December 06, 2011 03:22 PM
One of those 57 states with the bitter clingers. Don't nitpick, I've got important work to focus on, like deciding which college basketball game to watch tonight
Obama to Kansas Supporters: “It’s Great to be Back in Texas!”
Posted by: King Barry the Geography Genius at December 06, 2011 03:42 PM (Y+DPZ
Apparently he's trying to channel Roosevelt today according to the short blurb I saw. No not that one, the one that could walk.
Posted by: buzzion at December 06, 2011 11:47 AM (GULKT)
“…they've shown no compunction against treating different industries and/or products differently as regards to "consumption taxes."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at December 06, 2011 03:44 PM (8y9MW)
True enough. I was speaking in terms of the Fair Tax, but I didnÂ’t spell that out in my comment.
Tax all retail goods and services, no exceptions.
Posted by: jwest at December 06, 2011 11:48 AM (qeYI9)
Posted by: Canada at December 06, 2011 11:48 AM (yj3V2)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at December 06, 2011 11:48 AM (QF8uk)
The Internet hasn't "destroyed" one single fucking job. The simple fact is that some jobs have become irrelevant, less important or obsolete, which is a natural progression of economies. SCOAMF makes it sound like The Internet (cue ominous music) is Shiva, Destroyer Of Worlds.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at December 06, 2011 11:48 AM (G+B5p)
Posted by: A Rich, Tonsil-Grabbing Doctor at December 06, 2011 11:49 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston training for the ONT mudwrestling match at December 06, 2011 11:49 AM (ijjAe)
Posted by: joeindc44 at December 06, 2011 11:50 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: kbiel at December 06, 2011 11:50 AM (T5155)
Posted by: joeindc44 at December 06, 2011 11:50 AM (QxSug)
Like actually having a job? Maybe he hasn't noticed, but the last 3 years have been a catastrophe for many people. Myself included. He's been insulated from it all, and has no right to comment on it.
Does he think the current way things are, are better now? I've never been so destitute in my life. Things were great right until he was elected... Then, everyone stopped buying. Incredible. 100 yr old business gone in 3 months of Obama. This motherfucker has a lot of nerve even hinting that things are 'better' than before. FUCK HIM
Posted by: What a Jerk at December 06, 2011 11:51 AM (bcmD0)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at December 06, 2011 11:51 AM (QF8uk)
Posted by: Bank Teller at December 06, 2011 11:52 AM (2jQGY)
One of the few things that is currently slowing my transition into Full Curmudgeonhood is the fact that, regardless of how many obstacles the idiots we've somehow mangaged to stupidly elect put in the way of the economy, we free people can find a way through them, as Zombie John Gotti points out above.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at December 06, 2011 11:53 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at December 06, 2011 11:53 AM (+lsX1)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at December 06, 2011 11:53 AM (SB0V2)
Posted by: wtfci at December 06, 2011 11:53 AM (yj3V2)
Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston training for the ONT mudwrestling match at December 06, 2011 11:54 AM (ijjAe)
Posted by: K-Tel Records at December 06, 2011 11:55 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: President Super Genius Mensa Member with no paper trail at December 06, 2011 11:55 AM (yj3V2)
Posted by: That annoying liar guy on SNL at December 06, 2011 11:56 AM (71LDo)
Consumption taxes are a far better way to fund a government than income taxes.
Indeed. And the constituency for raising them is not like it is with income taxes. If you consume, you don't want higher taxes.
Posted by: spongeworthy at December 06, 2011 11:56 AM (puy4B)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at December 06, 2011 11:57 AM (p7SSh)
Obama told an audience in Kansas today-
“It’s great to be back in Texas.”
Yeah. One of our 57 states.
Posted by: Lanny Davis at December 06, 2011 11:57 AM (e8kgV)
That is the true conservative way.
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2011 11:57 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Caddie Manager at Andrews Air Force Base at December 06, 2011 11:58 AM (yj3V2)
I think California and Illinois have attempted to impose taxes on Amazon haven't they? And didn't Amazon say "fuck you" and took their business out of those states?
Posted by: buzzion at December 06, 2011 03:44 PMThey killed my calendar sales! Those bastards !!!
Posted by: Cahrsel Jhonsno at December 06, 2011 11:59 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: Plastic Security Devices that Wrapped your CDs in the store at December 06, 2011 11:59 AM (yj3V2)
Posted by: Killerdog at December 06, 2011 12:01 PM (CZrbJ)
Posted by: Wall-E at December 06, 2011 12:02 PM (48wze)
Oh, that's not factually true?
Well the internet and computers are always a drag on the economy; which is why Clinton had that "dot com recession" and the economy got worse from the mid-90's to now.
Oh, it was a "dot com boom" and the economy really didn't have issues until the 2008 crash?
Well that was FAKE FINANCIALS for over a decade PUSHED by both Clinton and Bush pretending computers weren't causing problems ALL TO MAKE THE BLACK MAN LOOK BAD! The ECONOMY was an INSIDE JOB!
What? I'm still trying to avoid calling Obama an idiot; that would be racist. Apparently the only way to get there is to use bugnut crazy conspiracy theories.
Let me guess; realizing that Obama can't be defended by a rational logical argument is also racist?
Yeah, I figured as much.
Posted by: gekkobear at December 06, 2011 12:03 PM (gZhya)
Posted by: wtfci at December 06, 2011 12:04 PM (yj3V2)
Consumption taxes are a far better way to fund a government than income taxes.
*ahem*
Rule Number One of Conservatism (since you don't appear to know what that is): If you want less of anything, tax it.
How about we, oh, I don't know, start electing real, live, people who believe that government should be as small and unobtrusive as possible, and will start acting towards that goal by eliminating as much of it as possible? That way, taxes will automatically be down where they belong and won't be such a burden.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at December 06, 2011 12:05 PM (d0Tfm)
There's just no compassion with that guy!
Posted by: Phinn at December 06, 2011 12:07 PM (KNtHw)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at December 06, 2011 12:08 PM (p7SSh)
Posted by: blue star at December 06, 2011 12:08 PM (wMV/W)
Posted by: joeindc44 at December 06, 2011 12:12 PM (QxSug)
Speaking of GGW, the sidebar article about the bassist who owns an old Greyhound bus also links his clothing company.
You boys will be pleased.
Posted by: Walmart's Evil $4 Teaser Drugs at December 06, 2011 12:13 PM (piMMO)
Rule Number One of Conservatism (since you don't appear to know what that is): If you want less of anything, tax it.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at December 06, 2011 04:05 PM (d0Tfm)
So, as a good conservative, you would like to see less income? Also, as an all-seeing conservative thinker, can you explain how it is conservative to believe the government should know what we do for a living or how much money we make?
A consumption tax is far more conservative in principle than any income tax.
Posted by: jwest at December 06, 2011 12:14 PM (qeYI9)
So, on a $15 dollar order I have to pay 16% delivery charge and a tip?
No thank you.
Posted by: Walmart's Evil $4 Teaser Drugs at December 06, 2011 12:17 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: Killerdog at December 06, 2011 04:01 PM
We expect we'd have to lay some folks off too
Posted by: Ammo manufacturers at December 06, 2011 12:18 PM (Y+DPZ)
I don't buy from Amazon because their price is 8% lower (the sales tax here), I buy from Amazon because they have a way larger selection, I can read reviews, and the price is 20% to 30% or more lower.
Look, you going to tell me it was the internet that caused Blockbuster to go bankrupt? And not the fact that they charged over $3 to rent something for 2 days that cost them less than $10 to purchase? Along with late fees and that they could and did rent out over and over? NO. They were selling a product at far more than it's actual cost, they had a limited selection, and they refused to listen to the customer. The only way they were able to stay in business is because they had a monopoly--more or less--on new movie rentals.
So, it'd be nice if we'd not repeat that lie, that the internet has killed local businesses. It's a type of leftie smear right up there with the anti-Walmart shit.
Posted by: jimmuy at December 06, 2011 12:19 PM (/JzSK)
His problem, like all liberals, is that he views the economy as having static size, so that the only way someone gets a bigger piece of the pie is by taking away from someone else.
Static analyses and static perspective is the characteristic of liberals' world view.
Posted by: No Whining at December 06, 2011 12:22 PM (0AClR)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at December 06, 2011 12:22 PM (bxiXv)
“…they charged over $3 to rent something for 2 days that cost them less than $10 to purchase”
Posted by: jimmuy at December 06, 2011 04:19 PM (/JzSK)
Having owned a video rental store back in the heyday of VHS, I can tell you that new releases were in the $70 - $100 range, even buying in quantity. Out of 4600 square feet, the 10 x 12 ft. “adult” room in the back of the store outperformed the regular movies by a wide margin.
Posted by: jwest at December 06, 2011 12:27 PM (qeYI9)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at December 06, 2011 12:27 PM (i0App)
Posted by: Emperor Barry at December 06, 2011 12:28 PM (X3lox)
Posted by: DavidM at December 06, 2011 12:31 PM (R/e5b)
Having owned a video rental store back in the heyday of VHS, I can tell you that new releases were in the $70 - $100 range, even buying in quantity. Out of 4600 square feet, the 10 x 12 ft. “adult” room in the back of the store outperformed the regular movies by a wide margin.
Posted by: jwest at December 06, 2011 04:27 PMHow did the fast-forwarding on those tapes affect margins?
Posted by: Pre-internet fappers at December 06, 2011 12:31 PM (Y+DPZ)
“What do you think the *actual* chances that you will get a simple, non-manipulative consumption tax without an additional income tax?”
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at December 06, 2011 04:22 PM (bxiXv)
It would be the hardest thing ever attempted, but if there was a groundswell of public opinion, it could happen. Even the authors of the Fair Tax plan said they wouldnÂ’t implement it if the income tax isnÂ’t constitutionally repealed.
The only way something this radical is appealing to the masses is when the economy is way down and people recognize that big changes are needed to keep and create jobs in the U.S. The Fair Tax would make the economy take off like a rocket.
Posted by: jwest at December 06, 2011 12:32 PM (qeYI9)
Posted by: ATM at December 06, 2011 03:17 PM (/d7Qz)
In my experience, the internet has made you unprofitable as well.
Posted by: Jasmine Byrne at December 06, 2011 12:34 PM (vjyZP)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at December 06, 2011 12:36 PM (1Jaio)
Posted by: t-bird at December 06, 2011 12:37 PM (FcR7P)
How would you rate your instructor's knowledge of grantwriting?
No
Response Poor Fair Good Excellent How would you rate your instructor's knowledge of grantwriting?
100% How would you rate your instructor's presentation?
100% How would you rate the workshop manual?
17% 83% How would you rate the overall workshop experience?
100%
100%
Press Contact: Spike Dolomite Ward
Company Name: Families Against Climate Crisis
Posted by: Spike Dolomite Ward at December 06, 2011 12:37 PM (e8kgV)
How did the fast-forwarding on those tapes affect margins?
Posted by: Pre-internet fappers at December 06, 2011 04:31 PM (Y+DPZ)
Back in the day, it was a great business to be in. All cash, lots of fun.
Posted by: jwest at December 06, 2011 12:40 PM (qeYI9)
Posted by: Rosie the Riveter
Why would go to war against movie theaters?
Posted by: Clueless High School Student at December 06, 2011 12:40 PM (iYbLN)
Also, make paying property tax a condition for voting in local elections. That was the way it was in early America.
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2011 12:41 PM (YdQQY)
In order to justify states collecting taxes on internet transactions, you have to start with the premise that states are entitled to take our money for no apparent reason.
Instead, let's suggest that your average brick and mortar joint better start up an internet sales department if it wants to compete in the 21st century, and if the state still wants to tax them for business they're doing within that state's borders, well that's between them and their state.
Posted by: Burt TC at December 06, 2011 12:59 PM (TOk1P)
Posted by: NC Ref at December 06, 2011 01:04 PM (/izg2)
Posted by: Justamom at December 06, 2011 01:32 PM (Sptt8)
Posted by: Sgt. York at December 06, 2011 01:45 PM (H3Kr3)
Posted by: Jordan at December 06, 2011 02:09 PM (XJYf4)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at December 06, 2011 02:20 PM (p7SSh)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie Manboobs at December 06, 2011 03:21 PM (Ec6wH)
Posted by: The Probability of Miracles ePub at December 06, 2011 04:51 PM (RT/8X)
Posted by: Pretty Little Liars 10: Ruthless epub at December 06, 2011 05:13 PM (/Xfyg)
Posted by: A Conflict of Interest AudioBook at December 06, 2011 05:27 PM (7cL99)
Posted by: Death Comes to Pemberley ePub at December 06, 2011 05:41 PM (MOnEB)
Posted by: A King’s Ransom ePub at December 06, 2011 07:05 PM (wSrXY)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.1846 seconds, 333 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: sydney jane at December 06, 2011 11:17 AM (zYWPO)