August 14, 2011
— andy Tim Pawlenty acknowledged the obvious this morning:
Speaking to ABC's "This Week," Pawlenty said his campaign needed a lift in the straw poll."The pathway forward for me doesn't really exist and so we're going to end the campaign," he said.
Now we have to wait to see who picks up the coveted Pawlenty endorsement. Or not.
Posted by: andy at
05:36 AM
| Comments (407)
Post contains 69 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 14, 2011 05:39 AM (kUaEF)
Posted by: Silvio Berlesconi at August 14, 2011 05:39 AM (hbAPu)
Posted by: In Exile at August 14, 2011 05:39 AM (RC2bI)
To his credit, he decided to move on rather than waste everyone's (and his own) time.
Good luck governor. I'd say you'd be missed, but, meh.
Posted by: CausticConservative at August 14, 2011 05:40 AM (gT3jF)
Gee, that was unnecessarily snotty.
I saw it on the local news myself.
Posted by: Y-not at August 14, 2011 05:41 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Andy at August 14, 2011 05:42 AM (veZ9n)
Posted by: Jon at August 14, 2011 05:42 AM (Cu7Ii)
Kudos to Pawlenty for dropping out sooner rather than later.
Cain, Newt, and Santorum need to go next or at least after SC.
Huntsman will hang on some as will soon-to-be-former Congressman Ron Paul.
Bachmann's the wild card.
Posted by: Y-not at August 14, 2011 05:43 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Y-not at August 14, 2011 05:44 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: CausticConservative at August 14, 2011 05:46 AM (gT3jF)
Ha, way OT
What if you climb a tower and no one gives a shit.
Just saw on fox, guy climbs tower two days ago. Cops say they don't know why. Finally he asks for a cigarette and a hamburger. They say come down and get it.
Posted by: Jimmah at August 14, 2011 05:46 AM (TfRqk)
Posted by: SurferDoc at August 14, 2011 05:47 AM (STdkO)
Posted by: Joffen at August 14, 2011 05:50 AM (EPcuy)
Posted by: Spiker at August 14, 2011 05:50 AM (4t9J5)
Pawlenty has an excellent record, but he was lacking the "it" factor. There was also a question, legitimate in my opinion, as to how he would be perceived internationally--he just seemed too nice a guy. Had he pounced on the Obamney Care meme at the New Hampshire debate, he might have answered those questions and we may not be having this conversation today.
He was my early favorite, but now I'd probably have to go with Perry. Hopefully we haven't seen the last of Pawlenty on the national stage--maybe he can run for Senate, he'd sure as hell be an upgrade over Franken...
Posted by: Conservative Crank at August 14, 2011 05:51 AM (1zwZo)
Men have been killed for better puns than that. Good men.
Posted by: countrydoc at August 14, 2011 05:52 AM (Fwb9h)
Cain
Santorum
Gingrich
Hunstman
Paul
Bachmann
Palin: Won't Run.
Are these your preferences or the order you expect them to drop out?
Posted by: CausticConservative at August 14, 2011 05:54 AM (gT3jF)
Posted by: Captain Smith at August 14, 2011 05:54 AM (Pjih7)
That was a stand up thing for Pawlenty to do. I'm sure it's motivated by the grim reality that he is no longer able to raise money, but alot of other self absorbed pols would have stayed in anyway.
Hopefully, like some other big name governors, he will get behind Perry in the coming months.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at August 14, 2011 05:55 AM (dWPyO)
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at August 14, 2011 05:55 AM (E7Z1r)
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 05:55 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: somebody else, not me at August 14, 2011 05:57 AM (7EV/g)
Posted by: Joffen at August 14, 2011 05:57 AM (EPcuy)
Posted by: Joffen at August 14, 2011 05:59 AM (EPcuy)
Posted by: Michael Rittenhouse at August 14, 2011 05:59 AM (2Oas0)
Posted by: Spiker at August 14, 2011 06:00 AM (4t9J5)
Posted by: Angela Merkel at August 14, 2011 06:00 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: al at August 14, 2011 06:00 AM (4nxhP)
They were reporting yesterday that he needed to come in at 1 or 2. He spent a ton of money and had a very weak 3rd.
He just could not get any traction. As I said in the other thread, he moved hard to the right flip-flopping as bad as Romney but he just didn't have the name recognition to overcome that.
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 06:00 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at August 14, 2011 06:00 AM (qj784)
Posted by: T-Paw Campaign Spokesperson at August 14, 2011 06:00 AM (6UZWM)
I think she can beat him because she will energize the base and help the GOTV effort. The so-called MFM candidate would be the opposite of that.
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 06:01 AM (M9Ie6)
O/T (kinda) I would love to have an honest discussion with people who think that Bachmann could defeat Obama. Seriously
I think she could possibly narrowly defeat him, if things stay as bad or get worse. However I want OWaffle repudiated and crushed like as bug.
So she's a no go for me. I'm not a huge fan of hers anyway.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at August 14, 2011 06:02 AM (dWPyO)
Posted by: Greek Einstein at August 14, 2011 06:02 AM (kUaEF)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 14, 2011 06:02 AM (kUaEF)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at August 14, 2011 06:03 AM (UTq/I)
Now was the time for TP to decide, because the next major opportunity to winnow the field is going to be a ways off, and his campaign was going to need to sustain itself until then. No energy boost out of the Straw Poll puts that in major jeopardy.
Today, he has a reason to leave the race. Better to do that than in a month or two when he's completely dry of campaign donations and borrowed to the hilt. It sucks that this is how the nomination process goes, but that's how it works.
Posted by: CausticConservative at August 14, 2011 06:03 AM (gT3jF)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at August 14, 2011 10:00 AM
I could dig that. Despite some gaffes -- and the scorn of the Serious Political Junkies -- I really like the guy.
But what about LTC West? Now there's a straight shooter. Apparently in more than one way.
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 14, 2011 06:03 AM (YjjrR)
T-Paw is quitting, stolen like everything else here from HA
Breaking news being carried by most of the services AND T-paw gave notice yesterday that he was going to annouce something this morning and somehow this is stolen from Hot Air?
You must be a liberal.
Posted by: gdonovan at August 14, 2011 06:03 AM (5n9VY)
Posted by: texette at August 14, 2011 06:03 AM (8sD9j)
Posted by: Joffen at August 14, 2011 06:03 AM (EPcuy)
We need to keep our conservative congressmen in congress.
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 06:04 AM (M9Ie6)
It goes with the Republican 'narrative'. Moderate support for immigration, plus an eye to future electoral success with Hispanic voters.
Posted by: Paper at August 14, 2011 06:04 AM (IvlIt)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 14, 2011 06:05 AM (kUaEF)
According to the polls her chances are the same as Perry's.
Posted by: Jon at August 14, 2011 06:05 AM (Cu7Ii)
Pawlenty is the Good Guy Greg of 2012.
Posted by: Michael Rittenhouse at August 14, 2011 06:05 AM (2Oas0)
Posted by: texette at August 14, 2011 10:03 AM (8sD9j)
Northern semi-moderate to balance Southern semi-conservative.
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 06:05 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Joffen at August 14, 2011 06:07 AM (EPcuy)
Posted by: Vic
.........
How big do you think that "base" is, Vic?
And.. "energize" the base? If the thought of that clusterfuck of a President inhabiting the White House for four more years ain't enough to energize the "base", then we've already lost.
Bachmann cannot win against him. Period. The base ain't a big enough portion of the electorate to elect anyone on their own, and they would be the only ones voting for her.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at August 14, 2011 06:07 AM (UTq/I)
As the field starts to narrow I'll state the obvious for any trolls new here:
1) If the field is now down to 18.....that's 19 who would be smarter and do a better job than BO. (IE: including the candidate "anybody BUT BO")
2) While very few see their dream candidate in this field, a large majority can see several candidates they could settle on.
3) The joke about yesterday's straw pole being for the position of Perry's VP is more true than joke. Whoever emerges should be able to begin the "coalition building process" simply by picking someone else from these ranks. Reagan's old rule of "say no bad about a fellow republican" should be brought out and dusted off IMMEDIATELY. The left is surely geared up to Palin-ize anyone they consider a threat. (And these are ALL threats!)
4) The primary and ultimate goal of all of these candidates should be not only winning the Presidency, but the dismantling of the nanny state that has led to the current sad state of affairs. That's 1 thing Perry got right in his speech yesterday and ALL the candidates should be piling on that theme. It will take the combination of their campaigning voices to be heard over the shrill cacophony of MSM voices predicting the end of the world if we don't "stay the course" .....like lemmings right off the cliff.
5) Newsweek's cover of Bachman has pretty much shown how low the MSM is willing to go and set the tone for the media coverage to follow. It will take more than the rage of the Tea Party organizers to overcome this George Soros (organized and funded) leftist media. The gloves are off. Bodies will be burried AFTER the election. The rules are : There are no rules.
Pudding and vodka for everyone while you're reloading your arms.
Carry on.
Posted by: MrObvious at August 14, 2011 06:07 AM (qwhLZ)
I want West as VP with Perry.
Posted by: museisluse at August 14, 2011 06:08 AM (4Lj43)
Posted by: Old grizzled gym coach at August 14, 2011 06:09 AM (QBQcg)
Men have been killed for better puns than that. Good men.
Puns do not kill people. People kill people.
looks like someone brought a knife to a punfight.
Posted by: mark c at August 14, 2011 06:09 AM (SBIko)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 14, 2011 06:10 AM (kUaEF)
On top of that add in that the Tea Party will likely run a 3rd Party candidate after which 18% of the normal Republican voters would vote 3rd party.
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 06:10 AM (M9Ie6)
"Maybe that straw poll had more meaning than we thought?
Or maybe not. Know who won the first Iowa poll in 1979? George HW Bush. And Reagan went on to win the nomination. I think something like two of the poll winners have gone on to win the nomination, or some ridiculous number like that.
The poll did its job, which in my opinion was to give those who think they are serious lay out their case to the faithful. At the end of the day, they want to be enthusiastic, as GOP voters across the country want to be, and T-Paw just doesn't cut it.
Oh, and buh-bye to Newt too...
Posted by: T-Paw Campaign Spokesperson at August 14, 2011 06:11 AM (6UZWM)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 14, 2011 06:11 AM (kUaEF)
If that means needle dick butt fucker, then yeah.
Posted by: SCRednek at August 14, 2011 06:12 AM (1dCTA)
On top of that add in that the Tea Party will likely run a 3rd Party candidate after which 18% of the normal Republican voters would vote 3rd party.
The main threat to a Romney nomination is exactly this. There will be a third party challenge that will permit Obama to win. This is not the year to do the usual "next man in line" nomination process by the GOP!
Posted by: CausticConservative at August 14, 2011 06:12 AM (gT3jF)
Posted by: Paper at August 14, 2011 06:13 AM (IvlIt)
In November 1980, Pee Wee Herman wanking in an X-Rated theater could have defeated Carter in a landslide.
Don't kid yourself: Obama will be weaker than Carter come November 2012.
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 14, 2011 10:10 AM (kUaEF)
You have a good point, but don't underestimate what can happen when your opposition gets energized.
The left was enraged by Sarah Palin. It's impossible to separate the numbers to determine how much of O's margin was due to him, and how much was due to "STOP THAT WOMAN!" Probably not a big number because she was the VP candidate.
But as a presidential nominee, a pro-life, conservative woman would ignite the left. Might be exactly what they need to counter their own malaise over O's failure to fulfill their dreams.
Posted by: Michael Rittenhouse at August 14, 2011 06:14 AM (2Oas0)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 14, 2011 06:15 AM (kUaEF)
Posted by: polynikes at August 14, 2011 06:16 AM (F1lOF)
Reagan only won around 50% of the vote in 1980. Carter only had around 41% of the vote, but part of that was due to a third party candidate who pulled votes away from Carter, especially in the NE.
Had it been a two party election, Carter would have won around 45% of the vote, even with the terrible economy.
Posted by: Paper at August 14, 2011 06:17 AM (IvlIt)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 14, 2011 06:17 AM (kUaEF)
I think there is a chance as well that Perry could rile up liberals like Romney can't because of his similarities to Bush.
Posted by: Paper at August 14, 2011 06:19 AM (IvlIt)
Posted by: PaleRider at August 14, 2011 06:19 AM (vL0Nv)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 14, 2011 06:19 AM (kUaEF)
On top of that add in that the Tea Party will likely run a 3rd Party candidate after which 18% of the normal Republican voters would vote 3rd party.
Posted by: Vic
............
Everyone has their shortcomings.. NE liberal will alienate the South.. Texas gov will alienate Independents and moderates..
That's why we have primaries..
So whoever gets the nominations, I'll vote for.. I just don;t think it will be Bachmann.. nor do I think she is capable of beating Obama.. that is not a comment on any other candidate.
But I will tell you this.. If the Tea Party tries to run a third party, thus losing the election for us, they will be permanently on the shit list of several million conservatives in this country and will be the cause of a whole lotta misery coming from four more years of that JEF occupying the WH. They better not try that shit.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at August 14, 2011 06:19 AM (UTq/I)
I think there is a chance as well that Perry could rile up liberals like Romney can't because of his similarities to Bush.
Posted by: Paper at August 14, 2011 10:19 AM (IvlIt)
Ooh, good work getting those memes out there. Progs aren't going to be riled up by anyone else?
Posted by: museisluse at August 14, 2011 06:21 AM (4Lj43)
Posted by: polynikes at August 14, 2011 06:22 AM (cDwCa)
There were exit polls done that asked about people's second choices. Though you are absolutely right that some would have stayed home, the majority would have gone to Carter.
It also speaks to an interesting fact about the political system in the US. Even though we all know that third parties don't ever win in national elections, large amounts of people are willing to vote for candidates even if they recognize that it might hurt someone allied with their party affiliation.
Posted by: Paper at August 14, 2011 06:22 AM (IvlIt)
How about being a competent spokesman and replacement for the President if something should happen?
Posted by: lowandslow at August 14, 2011 06:22 AM (GZitp)
The left was enraged by Sarah Palin. It's impossible to separate the numbers to determine how much of O's margin was due to him, and how much was due to "STOP THAT WOMAN!"
I know several people who voted FOR Mclame because he brought Sarah on board. Till then his campain was slack and listless.
Posted by: gdonovan at August 14, 2011 06:24 AM (5n9VY)
Posted by: Joffen at August 14, 2011 06:24 AM (EPcuy)
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 06:24 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 14, 2011 06:25 AM (kUaEF)
We are on a message board for a conservative website talking about the election, and I don't know about you, but I'm not affiliated with any campaign.
This is something that I haven't been able to stand about talking about the election. There is an external reality that exists outside of 'spin' and 'memes'. Sometimes it is picked up well in polls, sometimes not, but it exists. Politics isn't just spin and PR. There are demographic, geographic, and historical fundamentals that determine elections.
Posted by: Paper at August 14, 2011 06:25 AM (IvlIt)
[Rubio as VP] goes with the Republican 'narrative'. Moderate support for immigration, plus an eye to future electoral success with Hispanic voters.
If the GOP can't tell the difference between Cuban and "Hispanic," it deserves the hilarious death its cunning plan will bring.
In 2010—the wave!—Rubio almost won the Latino vote in Florida. Where all the Cubans are. He only lost it by about 10 points.
No GOP candidate got close to that anywhere else. Even where they ran stereotypically Mexican-named candidates who won, they got less than a third. Hard ceiling.
Even 100% of the Hispanic vote wouldn't offset the crackaz they'll lose if that's the "narrative." I'm not sure it would even make up for the ones they've lost since 2010.
Posted by: oblig. at August 14, 2011 06:25 AM (xvZW9)
Posted by: De' Debil Hisself at August 14, 2011 06:25 AM (lpWVn)
She'll be easy to beat.
Posted by: Barky O, and I am not a stuttering sibilant clusterfuck of a failure at August 14, 2011 06:26 AM (yrGif)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at August 14, 2011 06:26 AM (qj784)
Posted by: Joffen at August 14, 2011 06:28 AM (EPcuy)
Posted by: GK Chesterton at August 14, 2011 06:28 AM (3Sb+0)
My cellphone gets blocked every other comment, so someone may already have said this.
Vic, when Reagan picked Bush Sr., Bush Sr. had a huge block of support and big money donors. Pawlenty has neither.
Standing next to Rick Perry, Pawlenty would look even more washed out than he does standing next to Bachman.
Simply put, Pawlenty would dilute the brand. Dilute, not balance.
I think Perry will look for supplement, not balance, anyway. An Austin writer called Perry a "hard man", and, oh my Lord, he is. I can support him wholeheartedly, but I don't think ya'll realize, as most Texans don't actually realize, exactly what kind of man stepped up yesterday.
Posted by: texette at August 14, 2011 06:29 AM (qADaD)
I agree.
It is also hard to predict what circumstances will encourage a third party. Why Perot in 1992/1996 yet not someone similar in 2004 or 2008?
So much of it comes down to personal resources and motivations. One person (like Ron Paul) could change the entire electoral map for the Republicans from good to nightmarish.
Posted by: Paper at August 14, 2011 06:29 AM (IvlIt)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 14, 2011 06:29 AM (kUaEF)
Here's why I believe Tim Pawlenty dropped out so soon.
1. It was killing him to pander to the base of the GOP. He hated it because he, like a lot of Republicans, holds the party's conservative base in contempt.
2. He was scared to death of criticizing Obama.
So, in conclusion, good riddance, T-Pod.
Posted by: my left nut at August 14, 2011 06:29 AM (HY/zQ)
Reagan also hated Bush Sr. and I think picking him up was a big damn mistake.
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 06:32 AM (M9Ie6)
I've tried to communicate that for a while, but it falls on deaf ears.
The problem is that long-term, Republicans have to at least split the Hispanic vote to win national elections. They can't win the current percentages as the US changes demographic composition and win elections in the future.
There is still a four to (maybe) eight year window where they can edge out national elections without a large number of Hispanic votes.
Posted by: Paper at August 14, 2011 06:32 AM (IvlIt)
It didn't help that Michelle could take a Corn Dog like a pro and he's anti Corn Dog
Posted by: Beto Ochoa at August 14, 2011 06:33 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Joffen at August 14, 2011 06:33 AM (EPcuy)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at August 14, 2011 06:33 AM (qj784)
1) His weak sounding name.
2) His weak mouth.
3) His droopy eyes.
Smart capable guy that just came across so meh no matter how hard he tried. Would make a nice Secretary of something though.
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at August 14, 2011 06:33 AM (uVlA4)
Posted by: polynikes at August 14, 2011 06:36 AM (xhupI)
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at August 14, 2011 06:36 AM (uVlA4)
Posted by: Joffen at August 14, 2011 06:37 AM (EPcuy)
My personal biggest concern with Bachmann is lack of executive experience--that is a big red flag. Who was the last president elected without some sort of prior executive experience, either political or military--aside from Obama? And yes, before the Bachmann supporters jump down my throat, I am not saying she is Obama 2.0, but there is that similarity there and it is not a trivial concern.
My other big concern is, can a woman win the general election, especially a conservative woman? Even after 8 years of W leaving the left begging for an alternative, Hillary! still couldn't get the nomination over Obama from the Democarats--and I find it hard to believe that a Republican woman in the general election will fare better than a moderate-liberal woman in the Democratic primary. Too many feminists will brand her a traitor, too many troglodytes on both sides won't vote for her because she is a woman...I just don't see it happening right now.
Posted by: Conservative Crank at August 14, 2011 06:37 AM (1zwZo)
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 10:32 AM (M9Ie6)
As usual, Reagan was right. The Bush empire (NE RINO elite at heart) participated in creating and enhancing a lot of the liberal infrastructure that is screwing us over today
Posted by: Hrothgar at August 14, 2011 06:38 AM (yrGif)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at August 14, 2011 06:38 AM (5I0Yr)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 14, 2011 06:39 AM (H/Wdv)
Posted by: Joffen at August 14, 2011 10:37 AM (EPcuy)
Posted by: Hrothgar at August 14, 2011 06:40 AM (yrGif)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 14, 2011 06:41 AM (H/Wdv)
Did you hear the same speech I read?
Aside from the "making the DC inconsequential in your lives" line, the thing I remember most about Perry's recent interviews and speech is the "predictable regulatory environment" idea. Shit, that could be coming out of any sensible politician's mouth. That's not a populist sentiment. That's a play for people who are pro-business and growth.
Posted by: Y-not at August 14, 2011 06:42 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Hrothgar at August 14, 2011 06:42 AM (yrGif)
Posted by: polynikes at August 14, 2011 06:43 AM (Vdd8W)
Posted by: CoolCzech at August 14, 2011 10:10 AM (kUaEF)
--
One would hope so, but he isn't now. I checked the numbers and Carter was already in the 30s by this point in his term.
Posted by: Y-not at August 14, 2011 06:43 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 14, 2011 06:43 AM (H/Wdv)
Posted by: Joffen at August 14, 2011 06:44 AM (ym2cX)
Posted by: Joffen at August 14, 2011 10:37 AM (EPcuy)
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha... (cough, cough) HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Posted by: Osama bin Truck Monkey, TEArrorist at August 14, 2011 06:44 AM (jucos)
No one in GOP field is Obama.
Posted by: ronno at August 14, 2011 06:44 AM (nQR0p)
Posted by: Tjexcite at August 14, 2011 06:45 AM (/QtpF)
Perry will play well in Virginia. We have a very right wing, religious fundamental attorney General--yep, Cuccinelli who is leading national charge against Obamacare--who lead the ticket 2 years ago.
however, i think Va. will come out the same % for any Republican. Virginia's outcome is dependent on the economy, not the Republican nominee.
Posted by: kelley in virginia at August 14, 2011 06:46 AM (VIqi1)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 14, 2011 06:46 AM (H/Wdv)
Posted by: joe biden at August 14, 2011 06:46 AM (eOXTH)
Bush Sr was also director of the CIA and likely played a role in those Iranian hostages being released the first day Reagan was in office. Quid pro quo, darling.
You bought that leftists tripe? Good luck eating it.
Posted by: garrett at August 14, 2011 06:47 AM (Fp9VM)
I agree with you that that has hurt her. What also hurts her, imho, is the fact that she's really failed to build a coalition or power base of note in the House. She may be the TP front-woman, but she's not a leader amongst her peers. It always seems like she's yelling "me too! include me! listen to me!" to the folks in Congress.
Leadership is something she can develop, but she needs to tone down the spotlight grabbing efforts. That alternate POTUS rebuttal move she made was really bush league.
I actually think she has a future - more so than I believe about Palin at this point. But I think she's got to learn the politicking part of politics. And I think she'd be better served outside the House, perhaps in the Senate or as Secretary of State (depending how that position is in MN) or governor.
Posted by: Y-not at August 14, 2011 06:48 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Spiker at August 14, 2011 06:48 AM (4t9J5)
Posted by: Joffen at August 14, 2011 06:48 AM (ym2cX)
& any negative about Texas that Bambi wants to fling at Perry, Bambi first has to address himself & his actions in our economy.
& may I say that looks matter?
Posted by: kelley in virginia at August 14, 2011 06:49 AM (VIqi1)
Posted by: Hrothgar at August 14, 2011 10:42 AM (yrGif)
It can't be very good. He probably eats bean sprout sandwiches made with flax seed bread.
Posted by: ErikW at August 14, 2011 06:49 AM (c5AEh)
I go to a tea party group, adopted my family and really like what Bachmann stands for. I would rather have her as a neighbor instead of Perry. But the media has only just begun to paint her as a "one note" unhinged extremist. So I guess I agree with Delta Smelt that instead of a nail biter it would be nicer just to nuke the situation from orbit.
Besides the big job, there will be a need for coattails to pull in as many senators as possible.
Posted by: AE at August 14, 2011 06:49 AM (YYjeh)
Posted by: polynikes at August 14, 2011 06:50 AM (aPEuQ)
Perry slammed AGW alarmists a day or two ago. I'll see if I can find the quote. It was the strongest I've seen from any of the current or possible candidates.
Posted by: Y-not at August 14, 2011 06:50 AM (5H6zj)
It can't be very good. He probably eats bean sprout sandwiches made with flax seed bread.
Posted by: ErikW at August 14, 2011 10:49 AM (c5AEh)
You're damn right and my colon is clean as a whistle!
Wanna see?
Posted by: David Gregory at August 14, 2011 06:50 AM (c5AEh)
Romney is the current front-runner because he has the highest profile. Name recognition it's probably a toss-up between him and Newt, but Romney has been campaigning for the last 2 years, whereas outside of watching Fox news no one had seen Newt in a dog's age. As the Q factor of Perry and Bachmann continues to increase, and other fringe candidates drop out and their supporters move to the more conservative survivors, Romney's front-runner status will fall away.
Posted by: Conservative Crank at August 14, 2011 06:50 AM (1zwZo)
Posted by: kelley in virginia at August 14, 2011 06:51 AM (VIqi1)
Palin has more executive experience than Bachmann and also reads the writing on the wall and is keeping her powder dry
Hahahahaha...
how'd that Governorship turn out?
Posted by: garrett at August 14, 2011 06:52 AM (+bpeR)
yeah, Newt is gone. is he staying for SC because he thinks as a neighbor from Ga, that he will do well?
he hasn't been a Georgian for a long time--he's been all DC for 20 years.
Posted by: kelley in virginia at August 14, 2011 06:53 AM (VIqi1)
Unfortunately, none of that is even remotely enough to get elected, something you constantly ignore. The CANDIDATE herself matters. And Bachmann, to whatever extent she is even able to appealingly articulate these values, is a horrible vessel for them. A three-term Congresswoman with no experience and no accomplishments whatsoever, just an ability to say nice things without any responsibility for leading (at the precise moment we're trying to point out to moderates and independents that Obama is such a terrible fucking President because he had no experience and accomplishments whatsoever when he was elected, just an ability to say nice things without any responsibility for leading). A woman with a voluminous history (accumulated in only three terms!) of abandoning her job, alienating her staffers and employees, failing to create working relationships with any of the sorts of people she would need as a President, and saying and doing kooky, crazy things. Oh, and her husband is a massive liability -- a lisping manchild whose primary claim to fame is running a counseling center wherein he promised to "pray away the gay" of his clients' kids.
This is a person who is unelectable BEFORE we have discussed her ideological and political liabilities, but let's briefly summarize those too: she is far too unyieldingly extreme. In a nation where the Tea Party is now a far more toxic brand than Obama, due to their insanity over the debt ceiling issue, it would seem crazy to nominate a woman who S&P actually singled out as being a major part of the responsibility for the downgrade merely two days ago. (Their spokesmen said that the cavalier attitude towards default by some in the GOP -- in particular the Congresspersons who said it would perfectly okay to move past the deadline without a raise in the ceiling -- was a key part of their decision. Guess who that refers to? Yup, it was Michele Bachmann who was saying stupid shit like that for vulgar electoral advantage among financially illiterate morons in Iowa.)
Furthermore, she has evinced absolutely no understanding of what it takes to accomplish anything on Capitol Hill. "Leading from behind" the way she claims to have done -- by opposing anything and everything, now and forever -- is one thing when you're an incompetent junior back-bencher in Congress, but the job of President of the United States requires an ability to bring people together and (yes, I know it's such a hateful word, but it's fucking true) COMPROMISE. What happens if the GOP loses the House again next year because of the Tea Party's unpopularity, as now looks possible in Gallup's poll? How is Michele Bachmann going to face down all these massive issues in America with a Democratic congress? Will she just do nothing and blame them for everything? Congratulations, you've elected the new Obama! Which we all said she was!
Posted by: Jeff B. at August 14, 2011 06:53 AM (hIWe1)
Posted by: Beto Ochoa at August 14, 2011 06:53 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Joffen at August 14, 2011 06:56 AM (ym2cX)
Perry calls global warming "all one contrived phony mess that is falling apart under its own weight.
Bachmann also has a strong attack on the AGW scam.
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 06:56 AM (M9Ie6)
Romney is dubbed the front-runner because the MSM says so.
His performance in yesterday's straw poll is reality.
Posted by: Beto Ochoa at August 14, 2011 06:58 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: ErikW at August 14, 2011 06:58 AM (c5AEh)
Posted by: Joffen at August 14, 2011 07:01 AM (ym2cX)
Posted by: Conservative Crank at August 14, 2011 07:01 AM (1zwZo)
I didn't call her a follower.
You're too unhinged to comprehend what anyone who disagrees with you is saying. Take a pill.
Posted by: Y-not at August 14, 2011 07:01 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: SurferDoc at August 14, 2011 07:02 AM (STdkO)
Posted by: Joffen at August 14, 2011 07:02 AM (ym2cX)
Posted by: polynikes at August 14, 2011 07:03 AM (vzfrq)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at August 14, 2011 07:03 AM (qj784)
Michele Bachmann
Cap and Trade/AGW
Bachmann has always been a very outspoken opponent of Crap and Tax and she hasnÂ’t minced words on it either. Her deeds also match the words as she voted against the crap and tax bill. (Note there were 8 Republican DIABLO traitors who crossed the aisle to vote for that bill allowing it to pass. 50 Democrats voted against it)
Here is a column from Hotair on the passing of that bill
Although AGW itself wasnÂ’t mentioned in the last debate she threw this little bit of red meat out there:
HereÂ’s the other thing. Every time the liberals get into office, they pass an omnibus bill of big spending projects. What we need to do is pass the mother of all repeal bills, but itÂ’s the repeal bill that will get a job killing regulations. And I would begin with the EPA, because there is no other agency like the EPA. It should really be renamed the job-killing organization of America .
She isnÂ’t afraid to attack the things conservatives hate. This is probably her biggest strength with conservatives.
She gets a big plus on this score
Gun ControlBachmann is solidly pro-second amendment in words and votes. She has received the endorsement of the NRA and has an “A” rating from them.
She gets a plus here
Small government in general (spending and regulation)
On taxes, what can you say, she set up the Tea Party Caucus in the House. She is also a former tax lawyer so you could say she is an expert on taxes. She has been roundly attacked for her call to repeal ALL capital gains taxes. She has consistently voted to lower taxes and to try to make them more fair. From what I can tell from the On the Issues site she would like a flat tax:
Adopt a simple and fair single-rate tax system by scrapping the internal revenue code and replacing it with one that is no longer than 4,543 words--the length of the original Constitution.
On spending she is mostly good. She voted against the original porkulous package but she voted for the “additional stimulus” later in July. She voted no on the GM/Chrysler bailouts, she voted no on cash for clunkers, she voted no on the 60B “jobs” bill. In fact, it looks like she has voted against every spending bill the Dems have pushed other than the second stimulus package in July 2009. One wonders what was in that bill? She is also signed on to the balanced budget amendment pledge. Overall she is a budget hawk.
On government regulations she has consistently voted against increased regulation. The quote above on the EPA is a perfect example. She has advocated ALL federal agencies be audited for reform or total elimination. (Damn she sounds a lot like me).
On FNS she did walkback her 10th amendment stance on the gay marriage issue.
She tried to take both sides of the issue. This takes back some of her small government stuff, but not enough to walk it all the way back totally.
Overall she is exactly what you would expect from a Tea Party advocate. She gets a plus here.
Socialized HealthcareLOL, she has been a strong advocate of total repeal of Obamacare. She also voted against SCHIP. A prime quote from the debate:
I was the very first member of Congress to introduce the full-scale repeal of Obamacare. And I want to make a promise to everyone watching tonight: As president of the United States , I will not rest until I repeal Obamacare. ItÂ’s a promise. Take it to the bank, cash the check. IÂ’ll make sure that that happens.
She gets a plus here.
Border control/AmnestyShe has consistently called for closing the borders and spoken out against amnesty. I could find nothing on the 2006 McCain-Kennedy amnesty bill but that isnÂ’t surprising. That bill really started in 2005 and she didnÂ’t enter the House until 2006. In addition, when it became apparent that the Republican base was up in arms over that bill and even the Dems were not happy with it it was never brought to the floor in the House.
IÂ’ll give her a plus here.
AbortionShe is firmly and totally prolife. She had the best statement I have ever heard from a candidate when the CNN asshole tried to trip her uip on that score:
BACHMANN: I am 100 percent pro-life. IÂ’ve given birth to five babies, and IÂ’ve taken 23 foster children into my home. I believe in the dignity of life from conception until natural death. I believe in the sanctity of human life.
And I think the most eloquent words ever written were those in our Declaration of Independence that said itÂ’s a creator who endowed us with inalienable rights given to us from God, not from government. And the beauty of that is that government cannot take those rights away. Only God can give, and only God can take.
And the first of those rights is life. And I stand for that right. I stand for the right to life. The very few cases that deal with those exceptions are the very tiniest of fraction of cases, and yet they get all the attention. Where all of the firepower is and where the real battle is, is on the general — genuine issue of taking an innocent human life. I stand for life from conception until natural death.
She gets a plus here
SummaryShe is plus in all 6 categories and is easily the most conservative candidate based on the above 6 issues. Ron Paul also had pluses on the above issues but Bachmann is stronger than Paul and doesnÂ’t have the major negatives that Paul drags with him. She currently has only one negative that I count and that is her campaign manager.
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 07:05 AM (M9Ie6)
Bachmann and Palin are very weak organizationally.
Posted by: Beto Ochoa at August 14, 2011 07:05 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Tami at August 14, 2011 11:03 AM (X6akg)
Word.
Posted by: ErikW at August 14, 2011 07:06 AM (c5AEh)
As it stands now, mine is Perry >>>> Romney > Bachmann >> Santorum.
Posted by: Y-not at August 14, 2011 07:07 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Rhiannon at August 14, 2011 07:07 AM (qR9y8)
I see no prospect of her being the next Speaker.
Let me be clear. There are things I like about Bachmann and I think she has improved her campaign. She's just not prepared to be President yet. I'm not sure staying in the House as the minority voice of true conservatism is the path to becoming prepared, either.
Posted by: Y-not at August 14, 2011 07:09 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 14, 2011 07:09 AM (H/Wdv)
Posted by: Spiker at August 14, 2011 07:09 AM (4t9J5)
Posted by: Joffen at August 14, 2011 11:02 AM (ym2cX)
Apparently their weakness is their reproductive organs. To some.
Posted by: ronno at August 14, 2011 07:10 AM (nQR0p)
Posted by: Tami at August 14, 2011 11:03 AM (X6akg)
Judging by the economic and political events of the last 10 days, a very, very, very loooooong 15 months.
Posted by: Count de Monet at August 14, 2011 07:10 AM (4q5tP)
Posted by: Joffen at August 14, 2011 11:06 AM (ym2cX)
She speaks her mind w/o hitting the assholes like Wallace who never pose anything but "gottcha" questions. Even Newt has started firing back at that.
You will notice that we have had 3 debates now and not a single damn question on AGW. One wonders why that is?
She also voted for the second stimulus (as did a lot of Republicans) but that goes against everything she stands for. (She did vote against the first)
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 07:10 AM (M9Ie6)
1) MSM hatred and
2) General mysogyny
I do think they can win is spite of both because Obungler doesn't learn from mistakes and doubles down on his worst moves. He will have put himself even deeper in the shitter by Election Day.
Posted by: SurferDoc at August 14, 2011 07:10 AM (STdkO)
Posted by: kelley in virginia at August 14, 2011 07:11 AM (VIqi1)
Posted by: Y-not at August 14, 2011 07:11 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Joffen at August 14, 2011 07:11 AM (ym2cX)
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 07:13 AM (M9Ie6)
What? You think Hot Air broke some super-secret story?
Posted by: Lo and Behold! at August 14, 2011 07:13 AM (piMMO)
I believe tittehs were also cited as a weakness.
Also, that both men and women "hate" them because they have tittehs.
But they've got the amoeba vote sewn up.
Posted by: Y-not at August 14, 2011 07:13 AM (5H6zj)
You will notice that we have had 3 debates now and not a single damn question on AGW. One wonders why that is?
The debate is over. The science is settled! And bullshit!!
Posted by: ManBearPig at August 14, 2011 07:13 AM (4q5tP)
The asshole can be pretty relentless when going after a conservative, can't he?
I thought she handled the interview well.
Posted by: I'm in a New York state of mind at August 14, 2011 07:13 AM (4sQwu)
In fact, I think that will be the ticket for the GOP this time around.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at August 14, 2011 07:13 AM (99AU/)
I don't have time to ready all the pithy comments here...So, let me just say that the sooner the Republicans neck this posse down to the one or two who have a chance, the better. Grandstanders, attention whores, and rent-seekers need to get out for the good of the country...Then we can go to work on Obozo with a giant set of pliers and blowtorch! Teach that pencil-kneck maoist a lesson he will never forget! Now, my apologies if this has been covered...
Posted by: Nozzle at August 14, 2011 07:14 AM (wrGst)
governors are generally the ones elected to the WH. Bambi is an exception but he is sooooooooooo cool, plus he has that black/foreign thing that the young & the liberal just love.
ok, so who does that leave: Romney, Perry,--who am I forgetting?
Posted by: kelley in virginia at August 14, 2011 07:14 AM (VIqi1)
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 07:14 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 14, 2011 07:15 AM (H/Wdv)
Posted by: Old grizzled gym coach at August 14, 2011 07:16 AM (QBQcg)
Posted by: Joffen at August 14, 2011 07:16 AM (ym2cX)
Posted by: Y-not at August 14, 2011 07:16 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: kelley in virginia at August 14, 2011 07:16 AM (VIqi1)
Posted by: Jeff B. at August 14, 2011 07:16 AM (hIWe1)
159It's gonna be a loooooong 15 months.....
---
Not as long as the last time around. I seem to remember there was about a 3 minute pause in campaigning after Bush won the second term.
Posted by: Jimmah at August 14, 2011 07:16 AM (TfRqk)
Posted by: mpurinTexas, Evil Conservanatrix, supports Rick Perry, bitch at August 14, 2011 07:16 AM (J4Pnx)
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 07:17 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at August 14, 2011 07:17 AM (qj784)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at August 14, 2011 07:17 AM (4nfy2)
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 07:18 AM (M9Ie6)
194 And anyone who thinks Bachmann will be on either one of those guys' tickets as VP is smoking something.
--
Damn bogarters!
Posted by: Jimmah at August 14, 2011 07:18 AM (TfRqk)
I hate myself.
Or I'm an ugly jealous feminist.
Or something.
It couldn't possibly be that Perry is better prepared for the presidency based on his experience, accomplishments, and campaign style.
You know, I seriously doubt that Rep. Bachmann would accuse me of sexism if we sat down and talked about her candidacy.
Posted by: Y-not at August 14, 2011 07:19 AM (5H6zj)
Romney is now the third option for the GOP.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at August 14, 2011 07:19 AM (99AU/)
Posted by: kelley in virginia at August 14, 2011 11:16 AM (VIqi1)
You should be for Bachmann then. She is the only candidate who has called for abolishing the EPA and Obamacare.
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 07:19 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at August 14, 2011 07:19 AM (eOXTH)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 14, 2011 07:20 AM (H/Wdv)
For every dollar I contributed to Teh Fred last time it was one less dollar I had to spend on other candidates or races.
Tpaw would make a fine VP.
Posted by: Lo and Behold! at August 14, 2011 07:20 AM (piMMO)
Nothing like ramen noodles for breakfast, sprinkled with a very slight dusting of crushed bhut jalokia. mmmm
As you were....
Posted by: Jimmah at August 14, 2011 07:20 AM (TfRqk)
Posted by: Joffen at August 14, 2011 07:20 AM (ym2cX)
The elections will be about jobs. Not the EPA. Nor Obamacare.
Jobs. Period.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at August 14, 2011 07:20 AM (99AU/)
Posted by: texette at August 14, 2011 07:20 AM (qADaD)
We're trying to win an election, not a debate--rules of fair play do not necessarily apply, and almost certainly don't running against an incumbent who believes in BOTH Chicago ways (vote early and often, and the whole Untouchables thing) and will have the MBM on his side. Concerns about whether sexism would make Bachmann unelectable cause Bachmann to lose may prove to be wrong, but they are not unfounded, nor should they be dismissed out of hand. I stand by my concerns, and anyone who calls me out as sexist a) is wrong; and b) missed the whole point of why I am concerned.
I like a lot of her stances on issues--but being a rep in the House, even if leading the Tea Party caucus, is not on par with serving as governor. Executive experience does matter, and she does not have enough of it from where I'm sitting.
Posted by: Conservative Crank at August 14, 2011 07:20 AM (1zwZo)
I'm not so sure he didn't destroy himself.
Posted by: Lo and Behold! at August 14, 2011 07:21 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: kelley in virginia at August 14, 2011 11:14 AM (VIqi1)
Gary Johnson was gov. of New Mexico. He ought to be a stronger candidate (on paper, anyway) but he has a number of RINO positions and a whole lot of dope-smoking standing in his way.
Posted by: fiatboomer at August 14, 2011 07:21 AM (0Wf6c)
Yes there was a second stimulus and they are trying for a third.
About time. We didn't spend nearly enough the first two times around. This was Obama's only real failure in his First Term.
Posted by: Juan Williams at August 14, 2011 07:21 AM (+bpeR)
But most voters will. That's the point, Vic.
It is foolish to run against Obama's experience now that he's the incumbent. We have to run on results. Perry has the best results to counter Obama.
I am picturing, with glee, the moment when Obama rattles off "jobs created" numbers and Perry corrects those to remove the Texas jobs AND puts up his own numbers.
No legislator can point to that the way a governor can.
Posted by: Y-not at August 14, 2011 07:21 AM (5H6zj)
207Now a few more of them need to drop out as well. They will continue to spend precious GOP bucks and divide the loyalties to the ultimate cause of kicking the crap out of The Won.
For every dollar I contributed to Teh Fred last time it was one less dollar I had to spend on other candidates or races.
Tpaw would make a fine VP.
----
I thought the GOP waited until primaries were over to unload the bank.
Posted by: Jimmah at August 14, 2011 07:22 AM (TfRqk)
Posted by: packsoldier at August 14, 2011 07:22 AM (LrB03)
I did answer it.
As for "don't like her" no. She is a little more religious than me but that doesn't bother me a bit.
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 07:22 AM (M9Ie6)
>>>Romney is now the third option for the GOP.
No, Romney is the first choice for the GOP, still, and Perry is a strong second who may well soon push his way into first. Bachmann is no more in the "top two choices" for the GOP than Mike Huckabee was in 2008. If you recall, he actually WON the IA caucuses (something which Bachmann has yet to do) and was quickly sidelined as the race became McCain vs. Romney.
Posted by: Jeff B. at August 14, 2011 07:23 AM (hIWe1)
Posted by: Tami at August 14, 2011 07:23 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 11:17 AM (M9Ie6)
Would someone tell this cocksucker to get his feet off me?
Posted by: The Resolute Desk at August 14, 2011 07:23 AM (c5AEh)
"T-Paw would make a fine VP"
---
If being seen and not heard was the criteria. I'd rather have Rubio, now that Borack has set the precedence that you don't need to be a natural born citizen, and no one has standing to even ask.
Posted by: Jimmah at August 14, 2011 07:24 AM (TfRqk)
It's not like the guy has never won an election.
Well, I'm wondering if Perry's handlers could improve his performance. Unlike McCain, Perry won't muzzle his pit bull, but will encourage him with lots of red meat.
Posted by: mpurinTexas, Evil Conservanatrix, supports Rick Perry, bitch at August 14, 2011 07:25 AM (J4Pnx)
Posted by: chemjeff at August 14, 2011 07:25 AM (s7mIC)
Nothing like ramen noodles for breakfast, sprinkled with a very slight dusting of crushed bhut jalokia. mmmm
As you were....
Posted by: Jimmah at August 14, 2011 11:20 AM (TfRqk)
Where'd you pick up the ghost pepper?
Posted by: ErikW at August 14, 2011 07:25 AM (c5AEh)
Posted by: chemjeff at August 14, 2011 07:25 AM (s7mIC)
No. And I also signed up at the Americans for Perry website. That one was specifically for volunteering. I'm concerned about that group - and hope Perry's org steps up quickly and replaces that one - because their web form was all screwed up. There was no space to enter city, for example, and there were some other weird things about it (such as requiring "organization or company"). So they had a kid or someone who knows nothing about databases design their form.
Posted by: Y-not at August 14, 2011 07:25 AM (5H6zj)
In both cases I think Pawlenty is less valuable than someone like Rubio, who as a hispanic and as Senator from Florida brings two key electoral advantages, and who looks to be a much better 'message guy' on the hustings.
Posted by: Jeff B. at August 14, 2011 07:26 AM (hIWe1)
I'm not so sure pulling Rubio out of congress right now would be such a good idea. We need those guys, too.
Posted by: mpurinTexas, Evil Conservanatrix, supports Rick Perry, bitch at August 14, 2011 07:26 AM (J4Pnx)
Romney could not win the nomination over McCain.
Perry is significantly more formidable than McCain, in case you haven't noticed that fact.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at August 14, 2011 07:27 AM (99AU/)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 14, 2011 07:28 AM (H/Wdv)
Absolutely fucking right. Goal #1 is to get rid of Obama. We need to put someone up there who actually has executive experience.
Posted by: chemjeff at August 14, 2011 07:28 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: kelley in virginia at August 14, 2011 07:28 AM (VIqi1)
nominate a woman who S&P actually singled out as being a major part of the responsibility for the downgrade merely two days ago. (Their spokesmen said that the cavalier attitude towards default by some in the GOP -- in particular the Congresspersons who said it would perfectly okay to move past the deadline without a raise in the ceiling -- was a key part of their decision. Guess who that refers to? Yup, it was Michele Bachmann who was saying stupid shit like that for vulgar electoral advantage among financially illiterate morons in Iowa.)
Cram it up your cramhole, JeffB.
So Bachmann & the rest of the Tea Party reps were playing "bad cop" in the debt debate, and you're going to the Axelrod talking points to blame them for the downgrade? And if they'd chimed in that raising the ceiling was more important than actually achieving ANY fucking spending cuts, you would credit them for playing good politics? Sometimes you have to forego the safe play to do what's right.
Posted by: Russ from Winterset at August 14, 2011 07:29 AM (/MEFr)
His blandness was also a strength in that he would have been difficult to Alinsky.
Posted by: Jose at August 14, 2011 07:29 AM (WTNJJ)
Posted by: Joffen at August 14, 2011 07:29 AM (ym2cX)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 14, 2011 07:29 AM (H/Wdv)
That's because it is for fundraising.
Posted by: chemjeff at August 14, 2011 07:29 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 14, 2011 07:30 AM (H/Wdv)
Posted by: Spiker at August 14, 2011 07:30 AM (4t9J5)
Posted by: kelley in virginia at August 14, 2011 07:30 AM (VIqi1)
Posted by: Y-not at August 14, 2011 11:25 AM (5H6zj)
I signed up at rickperry.org but I just went and looked at the 'Americans for Perry' website. Under the 'Get Involved' tab there is a 'Volunteer your Time' option. It does ask for your complete address.
Posted by: Tami at August 14, 2011 07:31 AM (X6akg)
Fuck you. You are an idiot troll. Your questions have been answered several times and you are either too stupid or too biased to read the answers.
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 07:31 AM (M9Ie6)
Perry plays on that very well.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at August 14, 2011 07:31 AM (99AU/)
Ace banned someone for socking a regular (himself) and that person had actually modified the nic slightly (by capitalization, which ace usually doesn't do).
Stop socking regulars (Joffen).
Posted by: Y-not at August 14, 2011 07:32 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: still_grizzled at August 14, 2011 07:32 AM (n6+CD)
Posted by: kelley in virginia at August 14, 2011 11:28 AM (VIqi1)
From where I am in NE Central Ohio, religion plays just fine. In fact, almost all surrounding suburbia is red. Columbus itself is a lost cause.
Posted by: ErikW at August 14, 2011 07:32 AM (c5AEh)
Yes, but look at the fields and tell me how you do a normal mail-merge using their form.
Also, it kicks you out if you don't enter an organization.
Posted by: Y-not at August 14, 2011 07:33 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 07:35 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: chemjeff at August 14, 2011 11:25 AM (s7mIC)
What? A VP candidate or the actual VP? Cause the actual VP doesn't have to be anything other then informed and competent to stand in for the Pres.
Posted by: lowandslow at August 14, 2011 07:35 AM (GZitp)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at August 14, 2011 07:35 AM (eOXTH)
Posted by: Y-not at August 14, 2011 11:33 AM (5H6zj)
Can you just put the word 'Individual' in that field? Or blank spaces?
Posted by: Tami at August 14, 2011 07:35 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: chemjeff at August 14, 2011 07:35 AM (s7mIC)
Nah, you're arguing with Joffen. Meatball was #239.
Posted by: Y-not at August 14, 2011 07:36 AM (5H6zj)
Her gaffes weren't really gaffes in my opinion. As for "hiding in the bushes" are we going to start another COD set of lies?
You got a link to a primary source?
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 07:37 AM (M9Ie6)
Glad Pawlenty dropped out, seems like a nice man, but if he can't even muster up a fight now, what would he have done against a chicago thug?
As for Bachmann, I hope she doesn't get the nomination, too many unknowns, is she qualified over Barry, heck yea, but she will not win against him once all her past statements are brought out, and all that campaign time is spent explaining them.
Romney, eh, I would vote for any repub candidate next year, but with Romney, he seems too slick, too much of a scared man sometimes, will he fight back hard? I don't see it. I remember in 2008, in the repub primaries, Mccain and he were sitting around a table during a debate, and Mccain made some harsh comment, and Romney stuttered, couldn't fight back. This is not someone I see fighting back hard against the Chicago thug.
That leaves Perry, I really liked his speech, simple and to the point, he's from a dirt poor family, father a veteran, and best of all, I see in him the ability and desire to fight hard and often. Heck his speech yesterday itself, he was going after Barry very harshly, and that was just one speech. Also, he was a conservative dem in the 80's, I think many independents can relate to that, and so can many dems.
I wants someone who can beat President Man-child, I think Perry is that person, I don't think Romney, Bachmann can, if either wins the nominee instead of Perry, I plan on campainging for them, fundraising for them, voting for them. Not really tied to any one candidate, more concerned about making sure Barry is kicked out of the WH next november 2012.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EXdem at August 14, 2011 07:38 AM (ACkhT)
Yeah, it'll take "none." Nothing kicks it out.
The lack of city line is more of an issue (their address labels will be wonky), but the other thing is symptomatic that they don't have the person using the data working with the person making the form.
Anyway, I expect soon that group will be replaced by a Perry volunteer management presence.
I'm looking forward to volunteering. Even though we are red here, Utah could be in play because it tilts so heavily Romney.
Posted by: Y-not at August 14, 2011 07:39 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 07:40 AM (M9Ie6)
What is impressive about her background? She was a junior tax attorney/collector for the IRS (!) before becoming a back-bencher in the MN state house and then a back-bencher in Congress. I just don't see it. Her supporters keep saying stuff like this as if they think that, by repeating it often enough, they can affect perceptions to the point where it will suddenly become magically true. But the truth is that there is nothing in her background that is particularly impressive from the point of view of someone who would be PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.
Posted by: Jeff B. at August 14, 2011 07:41 AM (hIWe1)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at August 14, 2011 07:41 AM (eOXTH)
He's not kidding. Do it again and you're going to get banned.
Posted by: Jeff B. at August 14, 2011 07:42 AM (hIWe1)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 14, 2011 07:42 AM (H/Wdv)
Posted by: Joffen at August 14, 2011 07:43 AM (ym2cX)
Unfortunately YOUR opinion isn't the standard we're using here. They were gaffes in the opinion of enough people who are voters (including a significant amount of conservatives and Republicans, which is telling).
Posted by: Jeff B. at August 14, 2011 07:43 AM (hIWe1)
Posted by: museisluse at August 14, 2011 07:44 AM (4Lj43)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at August 14, 2011 07:45 AM (eOXTH)
He would, however, be effective in the VP slot.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at August 14, 2011 07:45 AM (99AU/)
"did you vote for obama? "
No. I voted for Hillary in the primaries, and then went to campaign for Mccain/Palin, voted for them. I'm a pretty conservative democrat, or rather was one, voted for Bill Clinton both times, I voted for Reagan both times. Now I'm just an independent, the "democratic" party is extremely left now, in the marxist region, there is no place for moderates, let alone conservative dems. People don't realise how small the number of dems have gotten, so the lunancy is getting more concentrated, anyone with any level of sanity or independence have already fled the party.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EXdem at August 14, 2011 07:45 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 14, 2011 07:46 AM (H/Wdv)
The consensus seems to be he's too valuable where he is (something I don't ever hear about Bachmann, btw) and some concern that he's politically toxic. I actually don't buy the second argument myself.
Posted by: Y-not at August 14, 2011 07:46 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: museisluse at August 14, 2011 11:44 AM
Bring him on!
Posted by: Sheriff Joe at August 14, 2011 07:46 AM (kD+se)
I wish you and Michele Bachmann luck in trying to convince independent voters with your frothy-mouthed rant. As far as they're concerned -- and I know this pisses you off, just as it pisses me off to a certain extent -- the Tea Party and its GOP congressional representatives share responsibility for the downgrade with Obama.
And S&P's quote about "certain members of Congress talking openly about the desirability of missing the debt ceiling" is going to fit very nicely next to Michele Bachmann's many quotes and unconscionably stupid votes to that extent (this is a woman who voted against CUT CAP & BALANCE FOR FUCK'S SAKE) in a campaign ad. A devastatingly effective ad.
Your rant won't.
Posted by: Jeff B. at August 14, 2011 07:48 AM (hIWe1)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 14, 2011 07:48 AM (H/Wdv)
Posted by: Spiker at August 14, 2011 07:48 AM (4t9J5)
Yeah, all Newt brings is facts and stuff. People hate that shit.
Besides, the unwashed masses don't need to know what real, effective, change would entail (as far as actual policy goes).
Better to have Palin.
Posted by: garrett at August 14, 2011 07:49 AM (+bpeR)
Posted by: Dick Nixon at August 14, 2011 07:50 AM (99AU/)
http://tinyurl.com/5fs8lx
Also:
she confused John Wayne with John Wayne Gacy
she mistook John Quincy Adams for a Founding Father
she thought Lexington and Concord, of Revolutionary War fame, were in New Hampshire
sure these are all mistakes that can be easily explained away but collectively they create a Biden-esque impression
Posted by: chemjeff at August 14, 2011 07:51 AM (s7mIC)
They are getting their money from dollars directed to GOP causes. Presently, those dollars are being split amongst several candidates who have no shot. Whatever the method or source of distribution, in this economy, there are just so many of those dollars anyone can part with.
Somebody, somewhere down the line, is paying for their scooting around the country. When the POS in charge is going to run a $1B dollar campaign, we need to be frugal with how and where our dollars are spent.
Posted by: Lo and Behold! at August 14, 2011 07:51 AM (piMMO)
The Newsweek cover photo and the David Gregory attack-interview this morning on MTP are just mild foretastes of the shitstorm of attacks the JEF's campaign and his MFM collaborators would throw at her. She would fare worse than McCain in the electoral vote count.
We need someone that can win, and I'm leery of Mitten's prospects for that, also.
Can Perry win? Time will tell. It is far too early to say, just one day after his announcement.
Posted by: I'm in a New York state of mind at August 14, 2011 07:54 AM (4sQwu)
Barbour is pretty tight with Perry. Plus Perry had a ton of supporters with money in Texas.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at August 14, 2011 07:54 AM (99AU/)
Newt really brought the facts when he made that commercial with Pelosi.
Are you fucking serious? Nobody is saying Newt can win. Or that he's a preferred candidate.
However, as a Primary opponent, Newt brings real policy to the debate. Name one other candidate that has a cogent plan, their own, for turning the economy around.
Newt is a net bennefit as a candidate.
Sarah is a net loss. She's a lot llike Ron Paul. She's polarizing and ineffectual outside of social media.
Posted by: garrett at August 14, 2011 07:54 AM (+bpeR)
Posted by: chemjeff at August 14, 2011 11:25 AM (s7mIC)
A VP candidate, you mean. Yeah, but Perry has that ruthlessness and he may choose not to be Good Cop in this particular campaign. I know it goes against Conventional Wisdom. He may feel like he has to take it to Obama himself and the VP would be the Good Cop.
I don't remember the 1980 campaign (I was 7) but it seems to me that Reagan was the conservative stalwart and Bush was the squishy moderate and that Reagan was on record eviscerating Carter. But Bush actually attacked Reagan in a devastating way (he coined the term "voodoo economics") so maybe he was off bashing Carter.
Perry would like to have somebody who reassures people who are turned off by a Texan and a midwesterner would be a boost. As far as ruthlessness, Pawlenty would be given the lines to say and would be coached on how to say it, he's not bad at this and could be trained.
You know who would be great for VP? Thad McCotter. You just can't hate the guy and when he gets going, he has real passion. He had a great speech, but unfortunately, it was after almost everyone had voted (and followed by an even better speech by Cain).
Bobby Jindal would be a nice choice for Perry, maybe even Mitch Daniels. I don't think Paul Ryan would take the job, but if you're going to be tagged with the Ryan plan, why not have the one guy on board who can explain it?
Romney would need a stalwart conservative firebrand.
Posted by: AmishDude at August 14, 2011 07:54 AM (73tyQ)
How many times do you think Obama's team is going to run the photo seen in your link, of Bachmann KISSING GEORGE W. BUSH FULL ON THE LIPS?
Damn, that's...really, really strange. In terms of inconvenient political symbolism, it also happens to be even worse than the infamous "hug" pictures that got Joe Lieberman and Charlie Crist destroyed in their primaries.
Posted by: Jeff B. at August 14, 2011 07:55 AM (hIWe1)
Posted by: Spiker at August 14, 2011 07:55 AM (4t9J5)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at August 14, 2011 07:58 AM (eOXTH)
Posted by: museisluse at August 14, 2011 11:44 AM
He's more valuable where he is than as a neutered statesman.
Posted by: Lo and Behold! at August 14, 2011 07:58 AM (piMMO)
god I didn't even notice that it was a kiss with Bush
oh my freakin lord
Posted by: chemjeff at August 14, 2011 08:00 AM (s7mIC)
But that's just not true as a factual matter. We have ~$15T in debt. Not all of it was run up by Obama.
Posted by: chemjeff at August 14, 2011 08:02 AM (s7mIC)
>>>oh my freakin lord
That, to me, is pretty much as close to an "automatic campaign fatality" as Newt Gingrich sitting down next to Nancy Pelosi to endorse climate change legislation.
She really is a weird, weird person. And not Mitt Romney "weird," but authentically bizarre. I loved the other photo, of her crouching in the bushes and hiding from the gay pride parade.
Posted by: Jeff B. at August 14, 2011 08:03 AM (hIWe1)
Posted by: museisluse at August 14, 2011 11:44 AM
He's more valuable where he is than as a neutered statesman.
Posted by: Lo and Behold! at August 14, 2011 11:58 AM (piMMO)
Okay then, how about Thune?
Posted by: museisluse at August 14, 2011 08:04 AM (4Lj43)
Posted by: Y-not at August 14, 2011 11:51 AM (5H6zj)
That was excellent Y-not, thanks for posting the link.
West must be involved in the next Republican Administration.
Posted by: ErikW at August 14, 2011 08:05 AM (c5AEh)
Feel dumb yet? no? wait til we show our economic shows with the 'democratic strategist' on the panel! We try to shove as much stupid in as possible! (but why not! everyone knows econ 101 says you give free shit to everyone! tell me were i'm wrong!)
Fair and Balanced ...... with stupid
Ohhh wrong thread! darn i'm retarded
Posted by: Jaimie Colby, the happy sunday facelift host who delivers news of death and destruction with a laugh at August 14, 2011 08:05 AM (eXQfZ)
Well, she can pick up a club and brain a 150 lb. halibut a-flopping in a boat. No mean feat, that.
Posted by: mrp at August 14, 2011 08:06 AM (HjPtV)
Nothing like ramen noodles for breakfast, sprinkled with a very slight dusting of crushed bhut jalokia. mmmm
As you were....
Posted by: Jimmah at August 14, 2011 11:20 AM (TfRqk)
Where'd you pick up the ghost pepper?
---
Grew it from seed, dried out and crushed the first harvest last night in the oven. Don't recall what site I got the seeds from. The stuff is DEADLY. Half hour later I can still feel it and I put just a miniscule amount in. Good taste, no aftertaste like habanero.
But to get already grown peppers I think this site is legit
Posted by: Jimmah at August 14, 2011 08:06 AM (TfRqk)
______________
Does your chewing gum lose its flavor on the bedpost overnight?
When your mother says "don't chew it", do you swallow it in spite?
(And you catch it on your tonsils and you heave it left and right)
Does your chewing gum lose its flavor on the bedpost overnight?
Posted by: Anachronda at August 14, 2011 08:08 AM (6fER6)
Posted by: Jimmah at August 14, 2011 12:06 PM (TfRqk)
Good stuff, thanks Jimmah. I'm a big time foodie so by nature, I must have this.
Posted by: ErikW at August 14, 2011 08:09 AM (c5AEh)
here's what one of the powerline guys thinks about Pawlenty's decision to quit
(via Instapundit)
Posted by: chemjeff at August 14, 2011 08:09 AM (s7mIC)
Well, she can pick up a club and brain a 150 lb. halibut a-flopping in a boat. No mean feat, that.
Are you fucking joking?
I mean, at least she was able to hit the Halibut...but really?
This impresses you? Why?
Posted by: Skylined Caribou at August 14, 2011 08:09 AM (+bpeR)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at August 14, 2011 08:10 AM (eOXTH)
"I loved the other photo, of her crouching in the bushes and hiding from the gay pride parade."
Is this really true? is there a link to this photo?
Posted by: johnc_recent_EXdem at August 14, 2011 08:11 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at August 14, 2011 08:12 AM (eOXTH)
Posted by: chemjeff at August 14, 2011 11:51 AM (s7mIC)
No she didn't. This one is the dirtiest and nastiest of lies. This was invented, I believe, by Carl Cameron.
John Wayne's parents were born in Bachmann's hometown of Waterloo, Iowa. She said that Wayne "came from" Waterloo, but by the time he was born, the family had moved to Winterset.
My guess is that she had grown up hearing the story that Wayne had roots in Waterloo and by the time she'd become an adult had conflated it in her mind. It was Cameron (or somebody else) who found out that Gacy had lived for some time in Waterloo (but lived most of his life in Chicagoland, both before and after his sojourn to Iowa) and made the connection.
It was a ridiculous slur and, as you can see, it became an urban legend.
The other two are, yes, gaffes, although technically she only thought Concord, NH was the revolutionary Concord, MA. I don't think she said anything about Lexington.
But for a long time as a teenager, I thought that Concord, NH (the only one you've ever heard of) was the Revolutionary war Concord. I don't think I ever learned any corrections in school.
But, hell, I just blame my ignorance on my public school education. If I were Bachmann, I'd do that. I'd just blame all of my gaffes on American public education.
Posted by: AmishDude at August 14, 2011 08:13 AM (73tyQ)
she mistook John Quincy Adams for a Founding Father
she thought Lexington and Concord, of Revolutionary War fame, were in New Hampshire
She didn't confuse those two people, she confused the towns where they were born.
In any case you think Romney doesn't misspeak like that as well? These folks on the campaign trail speak 8 - 12 hours a day 7 days a week during campaign season. They are going to have an occasional lapse like this that is essentially meaningless.
Its just that during the primaries you only hear about it from the conservative candidates. Now I do differentiate these from Cain's stuff with the Muslims.
Initially those were billed as gaffes and I said at the time he was OK with appointments on that. But he continued to dig that hole even further (with the help of asshole Wallace). So Cain has dropped significantly on my short list. In fact he is just about off of it all together.
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 08:14 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Jeff B. at August 14, 2011 12:03 PM (hIWe1)
Sure it's fatal for a Presidential run but to serve in the House, so what? The left can have all kinds of whack jobs, Sanders, Waters, Hank Johnson, McKinney, Lee, etc. etc. and no one blinks an eye. No one is going to tell me Bachmann rises to the level of bat shittyness of those people.
Posted by: lowandslow at August 14, 2011 08:15 AM (GZitp)
Posted by: chemjeff at August 14, 2011 08:16 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at August 14, 2011 08:18 AM (eOXTH)
#322 Thanks. Yes, weird. the thing is, that's just the what's known, what else is unknown -- she is still very new to the politican scene, there is something about her that makes me think there is much more of that from the past. Yes, it can be explained away, but do I really want a candidate where most of the campaign time is spent explaining their past words, behavior rather than attacking Barry's destructive presidency?
Romney or Perry, my pick, seem much better choices.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EXdem at August 14, 2011 08:19 AM (ACkhT)
Expect the MFM to start hitting him hard now. And I include Fox in that category.
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 08:19 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 08:20 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: chris wallace at August 14, 2011 08:21 AM (+bpeR)
Posted by: Dick Nixon at August 14, 2011 08:22 AM (99AU/)
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 12:19 PM (M9Ie6)
I expect Bachmann to start hitting Perry.
Her only path to the White House is as Romney's VP.
Posted by: AmishDude at August 14, 2011 08:22 AM (73tyQ)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 14, 2011 08:22 AM (H/Wdv)
So was Reagan.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EXdem at August 14, 2011 12:21 PM (ACkhT)
Yeah, what is funny about that is Perry has been a Republican longer than Reagan was when he ran as a Republican.
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 08:23 AM (M9Ie6)
Of course not. Fox doesn't like conservatives at all.
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 08:24 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Damiano at August 14, 2011 08:26 AM (A2+pr)
seems to me that Fox likes Romney, never noticed it until just recently, they don't like Palin, they don't seem to like Perry either.
oh and Perry as a conservative dem (when there were still such creatures) was more conservative than Romney as a republican.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EXdem at August 14, 2011 08:26 AM (ACkhT)
Only if you hold Obama 100% responsible. I agree that he deserves a lot of the blame. I'm just saying, look at the big picture. We wouldn't have a debt-to-GDP ratio of 100% in the first place if we hadn't had decades of overspending by both parties.
Posted by: chemjeff at August 14, 2011 08:27 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: at August 14, 2011 08:28 AM (T3vCe)
Posted by: Spiker at August 14, 2011 08:28 AM (4t9J5)
They don't like Palin? You mean, other than they paying gig they gave her?
Posted by: Lo and Behold! at August 14, 2011 08:29 AM (piMMO)
Not to that degree, no. I think we would have heard about it if he had.
Posted by: chemjeff at August 14, 2011 08:29 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 14, 2011 08:29 AM (H/Wdv)
All the MFM want to see Romney as the Republican. They see at the minimum a 3rd party candidate from the Tea Party if he is.
But if by some unfortunate thing he does win the primary they will on turn on him like rabid dogs. It will be McCain all over again, except Romney will not even have the military background to help him with the base.
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 08:30 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Oldsailors poet at August 14, 2011 08:33 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 08:35 AM (M9Ie6)
Martha MacCallum is the best they've got over there. Alison Camerota is pretty good too but, every now and then, says something that makes you shake your head.
A couple of weeks ago she was interviewing a guy who had crashed landed his plane in Lake Huron(?). He tread water for about 16 hours before being rescued. The interview was going well when, at the end of the interview, she asked him if he would ever fly his plane again.
"My plane is at the bottom of the lake"
Oops!
Posted by: Lo and Behold! at August 14, 2011 08:35 AM (piMMO)
actually it is a beautiful day here in flyover country
I may actually log out and... take a walk! *gasp*
Posted by: chemjeff at August 14, 2011 08:36 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: Spiker at August 14, 2011 08:36 AM (4t9J5)
Posted by: Oldsailors poet at August 14, 2011 08:37 AM (ZDUD4)
Expect the MFM to start hitting him hard now. And I include Fox in that category.
Posted by: Vic at August 14, 2011 12:19 PM (M9Ie6)
It seems to me that Fox has taken a definite turn to the left in the last 3 months or so. I wonder if this is the reason Beck left? Fox won't even let him use audio from any of his shows, so I don't believe his whole 'it was my decision to leave' completely. It may have been, but probably because he worked in a hostile environment. I don't think he had many friends there besides O'reilly. Hannity wouldn't even mention his name, and I've heard a few jabs from people on 'the five' that were about ratings and losing his show... funny coming from such a weak show.
Anyway.. has there been a change in upper management at Fox recently? Somethings off. The 'allstar' panel now repeats democrat talking points as if they are true now, like tax cuts 'add to the deficit', and 'eric holder makes decisions in a vacuum! you really think Obama tells him what to do? you're crazy!' and 'the gov't will DEFAULT!!! unless we get a deal'
That nonsense would have been laughed off the panel 2 years ago, now its common knowledge
Posted by: Billy Barty at August 14, 2011 08:39 AM (eXQfZ)
357 I may actually log out and... take a walk! *gasp*
would you rather take a cab? (eyes chemjeff's appleby cash)
Posted by: navycopjoe aka Palinista Extremo at August 14, 2011 08:40 AM (R7NIt)
Would he be an improvement over Obama? Bill Clinton's crab lice would be an improvement over Obama.
So if Romney's the nominee I'll support him, but I'm still looking for an alternative.
Perry may be it.
Palin is not; she's right on (almost) everything and is potentially a strong leader but she's still damaged goods as a candidate.
Bachmann? Sorry, no.. Policy's not bad but not convinced regarding executive skills or electability.
The rest of the GOP would-bes have shot their bolt.
Posted by: JEM at August 14, 2011 08:42 AM (o+SC1)
Posted by: Joffen at August 14, 2011 08:42 AM (PBnLr)
Posted by: chemjeff at August 14, 2011 12:27 PM (s7mIC)
I think it's like "partially blaming" yourself for going once to the corner grocery store because the tank is empty even though 7/8ths of it was burned by the teenager on a joyride.
I'm not saying that post-9/11 Bush was not irresponsible, but if you look at the deficit charts for the 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 deficits, the budget was due to be balanced in 2009. The 2008 budget (he first crafted by Pelosi and Reid) ballooned to insane proportions and then Obama made it astronomical in 2009.
The orders of magnitude are simply not comparable.
Posted by: AmishDude at August 14, 2011 08:43 AM (73tyQ)
Posted by: Spiker at August 14, 2011 08:43 AM (4t9J5)
Umm I'm not paying for a cab ride from Hawaii to Missouri, sorry
Posted by: chemjeff at August 14, 2011 08:47 AM (s7mIC)
The 2008 budget (he first crafted by Pelosi and Reid) ballooned to insane proportions and then Obama made it astronomical in 2009.
It looks like a Honeymoon Pecker!
Posted by: grandma always said... at August 14, 2011 08:47 AM (+bpeR)
Why do you hate Sarah so much? She's a star! She's not retreating, she's reloading. Wait until she really starts running, and you'll see! People have been wrong about her, and she's going to convince them all otherwise!
Posted by: Jeff B. at August 14, 2011 08:48 AM (hIWe1)
wait, Glenn Beck is a Jew now? I thought he is Mormon
Posted by: chemjeff at August 14, 2011 08:48 AM (s7mIC)
I have a random OT question for the morons who have spent time overseas.
I'm attempting to subscribe to the Vatican Library's private online area and it requires all sorts of information. It's a bit odd because it asks for "Nation" but under that it asks for "Country."
Then it asks for "Address" but under that it asks for "Home Number" which I thought was a phone number but under that it asks for "Telephone."
I'm guessing that there's a difference in the way Americans and Europeans present their private info.
Posted by: ErikW at August 14, 2011 08:49 AM (c5AEh)
Santorum's methodical takedown of the Paulbots in the debate Thursday night is a good snapshot of what you need in a VP candidate. He's also from an important swing state, like T. McCotter, who has been trolling for some attention as well. Not suggesting either will be the VP nominee, but I don't think either have any real Presidential expectations this go round, so what else is there?
Posted by: CausticConservative at August 14, 2011 08:51 AM (gT3jF)
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 14, 2011 12:48 PM (G/MYk)
Wasn't Obama leaning on the ratings services the same way he leaned on the CBO?
I thought the White House was reportedly in contact with them prior to the deal being inked.
Posted by: garrett at August 14, 2011 08:53 AM (+bpeR)
---------------------------------------------------
Beck was losing it at the end. Thank God he left Fox and discovered judaism. He seems more at peace now. s/
Beck was ousted because he couldn't bring in ad revenue in his time slot. THe show was popular with viewers, but he had made enough commentary that was controversial to scare advertisers away.
TV news is about money you know.
Posted by: CausticConservative at August 14, 2011 08:54 AM (gT3jF)
Posted by: Joffen at August 14, 2011 08:59 AM (PBnLr)
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 14, 2011 12:56 PM (G/MYk)
Oh, I think you are 100% correct in your asessment.
What Obama did was tantamount to buzzing Wall Street in his Corporate Jet...he wanted to see panic on the people's faces.
Posted by: garrett at August 14, 2011 09:00 AM (+bpeR)
---------------------------------------------------
Beck was losing it at the end. Thank God he left Fox and discovered judaism. He seems more at peace now. s/
Posted by: Spiker at August 14, 2011 12:43 PM (4t9J5)
Yeah Beck has been a little strange lately with his whole 'first they came for t-paw, and we did nothing' stuff with the Jews. Not that I don't agree with him mostly, he's just going way overboard.
Becks show is strange in a lot of ways (how someone like him can put out 4 books a year is.... curious). He thinks out loud too much and thinks these thoughts are book worthy, which they aren't. 'Broke' was such a bland political book I couldn't even finish it.
But he's one of the more outspoken conservatives, and in the end he's one of us. We need all the help and allies we can get. God help us if an idiot like Pelosi can take us unchallenged over the cliff she herself knows we'll go over.. she just hopes shes dead when it happens. We need to stop the 'shovel the money into the furnace FASTER!' democrats. They are suicidal
Posted by: Billy Barty at August 14, 2011 09:00 AM (eXQfZ)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 14, 2011 09:01 AM (byHBh)
Posted by: Jeff B. at August 14, 2011 09:02 AM (hIWe1)
I have just a few questions for Perry though before I open the checkbook. What's the deal with him being Al Gore's manager or something in 2000 and what's the deal with the illegal aliens getting cheap instate tuition and his reluctance to support Arizona's law on illegal aliens?
But, for the moment I am very happy with Perry/Pawlenty ticket, no to Herman Cain, sorry but he's a doofus, I'd rather see Allen West.
Perry is the only one who can stick it to Obama, Romney can't and won't and Huntsman is a non-starter and although I like Bachman, she always looks like a deer with it's eyes caught in the headlights of an oncoming semi.
Posted by: jaimo at August 14, 2011 09:05 AM (8Mnyu)
S&P's using the fight over raising the debt ceiling as one of the reasons was subjective and I believe negotiated into there memo by Obama. They said the main reason was existing debt and runaway entitlements.
Without the big fight in Washington the defict wouldn't have been dealt with at all. Entitlements still weren't dealt with but the fact remains that the deal that was struck was the biggest debt increase in history and the most cuts to government spending in history.
Yeah they fought over it but they did it. S&P is giving downgrades for fighting now? I guess with London being burnt to the ground they should be getting their C rating any day now.
Posted by: robtr at August 14, 2011 09:06 AM (MtwBb)
Attacking Bachmann was a major mistake. He acted like he needed to beat Bachmann first because they were both from Minnesota. This isn't March Madness, where you have to win your regional before going to the National tournament. Pawlenty should have ignored Bachmann and continued running against Romney and Obama. At any rate, if he's this stupid and gives up this easily, then it's better he's out of the race (to the extent he was ever really IN).
Posted by: OCBill at August 14, 2011 09:07 AM (MiSre)
Posted by: Jeff B. at August 14, 2011 01:02 PM (hIWe1)
Sorry my italics aren't working on my laptop for some reason.
I thought Rubio couldn't be President or something because he parents weren't born here and he isn't a natural born citizen. Albeit that didn't matter with Obozo and his British born father, but I'm sure it won't set precident or anything because Rubio is a Republican.
Posted by: jaimo at August 14, 2011 09:08 AM (8Mnyu)
Posted by: Rex the Wonder God at August 14, 2011 09:09 AM (NHeC0)
He was Al Gore's state campaign manager in 1988, not 2000.
Posted by: chemjeff at August 14, 2011 09:12 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: packsoldier at August 14, 2011 09:16 AM (LrB03)
Lying brazenly and often. Oh, and stealing credit for others work. Inflaming racial tensions while claiming to be "post-racial" in outlook.
Want any more?
Posted by: Deathknyte at August 14, 2011 09:19 AM (VwUPm)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 14, 2011 09:22 AM (byHBh)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 14, 2011 09:24 AM (H/Wdv)
My thoughts exactly. The night of the debate when he started attacking bachman I was like dude what the fuck are you thinking? Bachman may not have a shot, but people like her.
Posted by: Berserker at August 14, 2011 09:31 AM (FMbng)
Posted by: Spiker at August 14, 2011 09:39 AM (4t9J5)
My thoughts exactly. The night of the debate when he started attacking bachman I was like dude what the fuck are you thinking? Bachman may not have a shot, but people like her.
Unfortunately, the way he had his campaign built--with Iowa front and center and no Plan B--he had to try to suppress her there. He was playing from behind.
Posted by: CausticConservative at August 14, 2011 09:50 AM (gT3jF)
Maybe its escaped notice, but Bachmann's polls have tanked. She's now back around 8% in the national polls, where she was before all the hoopla.
The straw poll may provide a temporary bump, but the trend line is negative.
She now polls consistently behind the undeclared Palin.
But Romney has been using his stalking horse to keep a steady 10% or so separation from Palin, until ol Rick got involved, that is.
Perry has divided Romney's support and brought him back to within 5 points of the undeclared candidate, while being in no stronger a position himself.
Thanks Rick!
As Rick's record is vetted and the begged for Palin endorsement doesnt arrive, his trajectory will follow Bachmann's. Once Palin is in, she'll squeeze to life out of them both and then fell Romney.
From the Palinista standpoint, its been a very good week.
And just a reminder, Ricksters, before all the f-bombing starts (does Pastor Rick know the kind of language his flock uses?):
Your sputtering indignation lilts musically.
Posted by: njinfl at August 14, 2011 10:02 AM (M2X9r)
Posted by: James at August 14, 2011 10:16 AM (1kwr2)
Pawlenty wasn't going to win the nomination, anyway. His debate performances were horrible, and he never put forth a convincing reason why he should be the nominee instead of someone else.
Palin isn't going to run and her supporters are becomine more annoying than the Paultards. And I used to be a big Palin supporter, although I'm sure her kooky cultists will accuse me of suffering from PDS. Up until late July, I was being pateint, believing she would get in the race. Then July came and went without a word from her camp about her intentions.
Now, it's mid-August and we have a serious, electable, authentic conservative in the race (Perry). Palin's act is getting old. Showing up in Iowa this week was an obvious ploy to redirect attention from the straw poll to herself and stir up another week of will she/won't she stories in the press...only this time, no one even cared, because they were too excited about Perry announcing on Saturday. Your window is closed, Sarah. Go home.
If you're a conservative, Perry is the only credible choice in this race. Newsweek didn't have to work too hard to make Bachmann look like a flake (because she is), Cain has shown on multiple occasions he isn't ready for prime time, Gingrich sitting on the couch with Nanzi Pelosi rules him out, and Romney is a pandering opportunist squish who will say whatever he thinks people want him to say.
Perry/Rubio 2012.
Posted by: DRayRaven at August 14, 2011 10:18 AM (uLwlw)
Posted by: Oldsailors poet at August 14, 2011 10:22 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 14, 2011 10:25 AM (H/Wdv)
Okay.
Well, it looks like ace's political acumen is as keen as ever.
Oh, you meant "T-Paw."
Posted by: Megan at August 14, 2011 10:28 AM (BNv9H)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 14, 2011 10:31 AM (H/Wdv)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 14, 2011 02:25 PM (H/Wdv)
And as Pawlenty pointed out, Bachmann also has a record of accomplishing absolutely nothing.
Anyone can rant, rave, and complain, but actually leading is a totally different thing. Bachmann's not a leader, and I doubt she would accomplish much even if she did become president. She has no executive experience, and even worse, she has no record of accomplishments. Just a bunch of house floor speeches bitching and raising hell. We might as well nominate Michael Savage.
Posted by: DRayRaven at August 14, 2011 10:31 AM (uLwlw)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 14, 2011 10:32 AM (H/Wdv)
Posted by: Oldsailors poet at August 14, 2011 10:35 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 14, 2011 10:41 AM (H/Wdv)
Posted by: Joffen at August 14, 2011 12:42 PM (PBnLr)
Does this answer your question?
Posted by: navycopjoe aka Palinista Extremo at August 14, 2011 12:40 PM (R7NIt)
Yeah, he's a Democrat.
Posted by: Steph at August 14, 2011 10:54 AM (7X6Yz)
404:
I am not a Palin representative and I used no coarse language, but I'm not a prude and I dont mind if you do.
Its aces' blog and he can ban whomever, if failing to worship ol Rick and doing poll analysis are banable, so be it.
Presumably foul mouthed , threatening rants arent. Again, Palin supporters are used to that. You dont seem like a Palin supporter; apparently youre a Rickster newbie, with skin that thin.
You lilt muscially, scooter.
407:
Your response makes no logical sense regarding Palin, and regarding Perry, you support my own point: They are dividing the same voter pool.
So I must not be too far out of my effing mind, right?
Posted by: njinfl at August 14, 2011 10:56 AM (M2X9r)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 14, 2011 11:22 AM (H/Wdv)
Posted by: Oldsailors poet at August 14, 2011 11:28 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 14, 2011 11:29 AM (H/Wdv)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 14, 2011 11:31 AM (H/Wdv)
Posted by: The guy who comments without reading all the other comments. at August 14, 2011 11:48 AM (6sVF8)
Tattoo:
The polling trends which include both Perry and Romney bear out that they divide the same voter pool.
Why does that fact devastate you so? Proably because it highlights Perry's dependence on Palin's endorsement to avoid poll stagnation, an endorsement which isnt coming.
The tough cowpoke cant do it alone, the dumb Barbie wont do the right thing and give it to him, so somebody's got to get f-bombed.
Calling Dr. Freud!
Old Sailor:
Never been to Kos, but apparently you have. Are they stealing my tag lines over there?
Posted by: njinfl at August 14, 2011 11:55 AM (M2X9r)
Posted by: richard mcenroe at August 14, 2011 12:16 PM (qvify)
The left was enraged by Sarah Palin. It's impossible to separate the numbers to determine how much of O's margin was due to him, and how much was due to "STOP THAT WOMAN!" Probably not a big number because she was the VP candidate.
But as a presidential nominee, a pro-life, conservative woman would ignite the left. Might be exactly what they need to counter their own malaise over O's failure to fulfill their dreams.
Not to worry. The Grand Old Porkbarrell has it covered. We nominate TheeRomney. Simple. No one gets enraged or excited. The left and the right stay home and its down to the independents sacred independents choosing between the first Black president and some rich White guy with Brilcream hair. Easy call that one: Obama loses in a landslide.
P.S. We need to elect as many RINOs as possible to the Senate so we can have the committee chairs, K Street will return our calls again, and we won't have to use the small restrooms.
Posted by: RNC Chief Strategist at August 14, 2011 12:42 PM (hZqYp)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 14, 2011 01:07 PM (H/Wdv)
Posted by: For the Love of Physics AudioBook at August 14, 2011 03:56 PM (c6hKN)
Posted by: Doom at August 14, 2011 04:43 PM (1awZ0)
Tattoo:
Sorry to check in late, had to wash my motorcycle.
Your italics at 423 are understood to be quotations from my earlier post(s), in which case you are deliberately inventing something I did not say.
But that's what losers do.
Does Pastor Rick know you lie as well as cuss?
Posted by: njinfl at August 14, 2011 05:01 PM (M2X9r)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at August 14, 2011 05:34 PM (H/Wdv)
Posted by: TheThinManReturns at August 14, 2011 05:55 PM (/2ODN)
Of course, around here and HA, "loyal and dedicated" means "freakishly obsessed stalker type one phone call away from a TRO" . . .
Posted by: Adjoran at August 14, 2011 06:28 PM (VfmLu)
I am certainly thankful to you for providing us with this invaluable information. Intimately, the article is actually the sweetest on this deserving topic. I agree with your conclusions and will thirstily look forward to your upcoming updates.
Posted by: watches forum at August 14, 2011 10:50 PM (ZwWgA)
#50
Cool Czech. Stop with the sock puppets you loser.
Now that Pawlenty's gone, Romney and his pal Perry need to go cry in their beer at the RINO country club and leave the party to real conservatives.
Posted by: Molon Labe at August 14, 2011 11:39 PM (t57Qv)
Bachmann has those things. She believes what she says and is genuine.
Can she successfully handle a job like the presidency? What sane person who isn't an incredibly experienced leader, thinks they can? The government is unweildly and the effort to fix that is like a snow man herding cats made of plasma.
Bachmann knows we're in deep trouble, so even a desperate gambit to be there to fix it is justified. But I don't think she is ready. That is not a slight against her. It's like saying Lance Armstrong and his bike aren't ready for the Indy 500.
I think Rick Perry, with all his experience and reputation for hard work, and his handling of a variety of hardships without resorting to intrusive government, is ready.
I've voted for Perry every time he's run for Governor, but I can't say I ever really thought of him as a national level politician. I never really associated him with any major success. I think that's the key. He's just an experienced leader who doesn't want government to be the answer to my problems.
It's infinitely easier for a politician of low executive experience to say all the right things. Mitt Romney, without experience as governor, would probably look awesome. Without Bachmann being a governor, I do not know how she will handle impossible situations.
Posted by: Dustin at August 15, 2011 05:11 AM (519+h)
Give us a break all you sock puppets. Pawlenty will probably endorse Obama, followed by Romney and then Perry. I mean RINOs have to stick together, and the next best thing to a RINO is a full bloooded Marxist.
Its awfully hard to support a Romney given his pathetic record. Perry has a better record but is hardly a conservative no matter how much he pretends. He is a Bushite RINO.
I would like to know if anyone would buy a used car from Romney or from Perry
Posted by: Molon Labe at August 15, 2011 06:50 AM (t57Qv)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2974 seconds, 535 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Billy Bob, the guy who drinks in SC at August 14, 2011 05:38 AM (BcHHb)