January 12, 2011
— Gabriel Malor If you haven't seen it yet, Sarah Palin's video statement on the Arizona mass murder, "America's Enduring Strength," is tucked below the fold. Definitely watch it when you get a chance. I'm going to mention only one part of it right now and maybe come back for the rest of it later because liberals are, once again, having a contrived conniption.
Partway through the statement, Palin condemns the Democratic and media attempt to claim that the shooting is the fault of the Tea Party.
Vigorous and spirited public debates during elections are among our most cherished traditions. And after the election, we shake hands and get back to work, and often both sides find common ground back in D.C. and elsewhere. If you donÂ’t like a personÂ’s vision for the country, youÂ’re free to debate that vision. If you donÂ’t like their ideas, youÂ’re free to propose better ideas. But, especially within hours of a tragedy unfolding, journalists and pundits should not manufacture a blood libel that serves only to incite the very hatred and violence they purport to condemn. That is reprehensible.
This paragraph is fairly unobjectionable for most people. As we saw yesterday, a majority of Americans recognized and rejected the disgusting attempt to link Jared Loughner with Sarah Palin and the Tea Party.
I think many liberal commentators realize that the slime job isn't working. So they have decided to simply deflect and object to something else about Palin. Now they're claiming that there is an "uproar" that she used the term "blood libel".
First, there's no uproar. Yes, the objection appears in a NYTimes blog and all over Daily Kos. But that's it. Because even their own definition of "blood libel" includes the manner in which Palin used the term.
Here's the NYTimes; I have emphasized the key word:
By using the term “blood libel” to describe the criticism about political rhetoric after the shootings, Ms. Palin was inventing a new definition for an emotionally laden phrase. Blood libel is typically used to describe the false accusation that Jews murder Christian children to use their blood in religious rituals, in particular the baking of matzos for passover. The term has been used for centuries as the pretext for anti-Semitism and violent pogroms against Jews.
Typically. Typically, but not exclusively, blood libels have been accusations against Jews. But blood libels have also been made historically against Christians -- including Catholics and the Knights Templar -- witches and pagans, and, more modernly, Satanists.
Liberals need something to mumble about, so goshdarnitow sometime between yesterday and today the term came to apply only to the Jews. They'd like you to believe this is "another" example of Palin's ignorance, even though, as I said, by their own definition her use of the term is appropriate. As with their response to the Arizona shooting, facts-be-damned they've got a story and they're sticking to it.
Anyway, the video is below the fold. You can get a transcript over here. Don't let any libtards you run into today redefine the term "blood libel" for the sole purpose of bashing Palin. They don't own the words and their attempt to redefine the term demonstrates their own ignorance, not hers.
And that should be the response. The next person who tells me that Palin shouldn't have said it because blood libels only are used against the Jews is going to get an incredulous: "Are you stupid? Historically...and etc."
This is willful ignorance so liberal commentators can feel good about themselves. Their slander over the weekend didn't stick, so now it's on to a new one. Notice, they can't claim not to have made the false accusation that the Tea Party caused the Arizona shooting. So instead of defending it, which they can't, they'll just quibble about the words Palin used.
Sarah Palin: "America's Enduring Strength" from Sarah Palin on Vimeo.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
05:52 AM
| Comments (256)
Post contains 657 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: Bob at January 12, 2011 05:55 AM (QAxJ3)
How much more explicit do they want to get before we're allowed to call them on it.
Oh, yeah. I forgot. "Shut up."
Posted by: brian at January 12, 2011 05:55 AM (y05cf)
They are scared to death of her.
Posted by: Vic at January 12, 2011 05:56 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: nickless at January 12, 2011 05:58 AM (MMC8r)
Sarah lays out a suit of clothes, and the Left shrieks that it's cut to fit.
Guilty conscience anyone?
Posted by: toby928™ at January 12, 2011 05:59 AM (S5YRY)
They don't own the words and their attempt to redefine the term demonstrates their own ignorance, not hers.
Not their ignorance but their evil intent. They change the meaning of words to suit their political agenda.
Posted by: Pierre at January 12, 2011 06:00 AM (52h7T)
Posted by: nickless at January 12, 2011 06:01 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: SurferDoc at January 12, 2011 06:02 AM (o3bYL)
Posted by: toby928™ at January 12, 2011 06:02 AM (S5YRY)
Posted by: Palerider at January 12, 2011 06:02 AM (FBj6Z)
Posted by: nickless at January 12, 2011 06:03 AM (MMC8r)
Perfect tone and delivery, on point content.
Compassion, leadership, patriotism.
Character.
You know it was very good, because the KosFucks and Humpington post are absolutely freaking the fuck out already.
Home run, bases loaded Sarah.
Posted by: Brian72 at January 12, 2011 06:04 AM (yhJiT)
Posted by: people watcher at January 12, 2011 06:04 AM (0AkWH)
/s/
MFM
I'm sorry my nose got in the way of your fist.
/s/
GOP Cocktail Circuit
[kick to the crotch; punch in the throat]
How'd you like that?
/s/
Palin
Posted by: Jimmuy at January 12, 2011 06:05 AM (ets+s)
Meanwhile TPaw is soiling himself with concern about crop-marks resembling gunsight scribes.
Where are all those other GOP POTUS hopefuls? Keeping their little heads down so their silky-pony-hairdos don't get mussed?
Posted by: gary gulrud at January 12, 2011 06:05 AM (/g2vP)
Control the language, control the debate... its been going of for years.
They lost the debate, so now they must try to regain control of the language...
Don't let them.
Posted by: Romeo13 at January 12, 2011 06:06 AM (AdK6a)
Posted by: Drew in MO at January 12, 2011 06:07 AM (ltqwL)
After all the shit they spewed the last few days, they get the vapors over THIS?
I think they are simply latching onto it so that they don't have to pull out their assumptions and examine them. It's much easier on the ego that way. Change is hard.
Posted by: Jeff Weimer at January 12, 2011 06:09 AM (tuOLO)
Posted by: GaryM at January 12, 2011 06:10 AM (/s9Ci)
The word originally referred to the walled-off communities of jews in Europe (such as the Warsaw Ghetto). I didn't see anyone complaining about that change in meaning.
David Corn was on Twitter this morning saying that Palin was cmparing herself to Holocaust victims.
This crap needs to be stopped, right now. Palin will get my vote because she is the ONLY GOP figure who has demonstrated courage against the press.
And Pawlenty is worthless, and should try for a consulting job with one of his pet ethanol companies.
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 12, 2011 06:10 AM (Fo83G)
Nope. She's comparing THEM to Nazis.
Posted by: nickless at January 12, 2011 06:11 AM (MMC8r)
The name of the holiday should be capitalized. Can't even proofread their own bullshit? Or subtle jab?
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 12, 2011 06:12 AM (4ucxv)
Posted by: Percopius at January 12, 2011 06:14 AM (rrs4u)
Posted by: AmishDude at January 12, 2011 06:14 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Bob at January 12, 2011 06:14 AM (QAxJ3)
Hey, shades of Loughner there. If I set the terms, if I set the definitions, if I say A -> B, B -> C, therefore A -> C, I mold minds. I win! And by I, I mean the NYFishwrap.
Well played, Blood Libelists Krugman et al. Only now, an Army of Davids (Hi, Gabe!) is around to check your bullshit.
And well said, Sarahcuda. Naturally.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at January 12, 2011 06:14 AM (swuwV)
I keeeeel you!
Posted by: Achmed the Dead Acorn Pollster at January 12, 2011 06:15 AM (NFPBT)
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 12, 2011 06:15 AM (olKiY)
Posted by: Drew in MO at January 12, 2011 06:15 AM (ltqwL)
"I am worried that she says too much. People are just going to point and piss that Palin thinks its all about her for daring to respond to these lies. Everyone on the right should be railing against the entire premise that any rhetoric caused this. When we move past that point or concede it to the left they will just grin and push further. It pains me to see some conservatives buying into this argument about rhetoric."
They're going to point and piss at SP no matter what she does. If it's a shorter response, they'll bitch about it being meaningless. If it's no response, they'll see it as a tacit admission of their warped idea of guilt.
Not exactly sure what you think the appropriate reponse is other than "sit there and take it in the ass". Because railing against a "premise" while the left is targeting specific groups and individuals just ain't gonna cut it.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at January 12, 2011 06:16 AM (fLHQe)
Posted by: Drew in MO
We are learning what sort of leaders we do, and do not possess. The cowards that are providing soundbites and silence now will come out from the baseboards and demand your support in 2012. Others will demand that you shut up and provide that support (think McCain in 200
.
This is an ugly trial by fire, and we're learning who among us are leaders (Boehner seems to be resisting the stampede of stupidity) and who would gladly pay tribute to stay alive another day (Pawlenty).
Posted by: Blue Hen at January 12, 2011 06:16 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: joeindc44@aol.com at January 12, 2011 06:17 AM (Du09Y)
Posted by: Drew in MO
Others as in whom? Pawlenty?
Posted by: Blue Hen at January 12, 2011 06:17 AM (R2fpr)
As I said while campaigning for others last March in Arizona during a very heated primary race, “We know violence isn’t the answer. When we ‘take up our arms’, we’re talking about our vote.”
YES. This. This is what needs to be done. If the MFM says, "Sarah Palin told her followers to take up arms!" the right needs to respond, "And then she said, 'Violence isn't the answer. We're talking about our vote.'" Excellent jab, Mrs. Palin. (OOH! Inflammatory pugilist rhetoric! I denounce myself.)
Just days before she was shot, Congresswoman Giffords read the First Amendment on the floor of the House. It was a beautiful moment and more than simply “symbolic,” as some claim, to have the Constitution read by our Congress. I am confident she knew that reading our sacred charter of liberty was more than just “symbolic.” But less than a week after Congresswoman Giffords reaffirmed our protected freedoms, another member of Congress announced that he would propose a law that would criminalize speech he found offensive.
BINGO, BINGO, BINGO.
President Reagan said, “We must reject the idea that every time a law’s broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions.”
I pray most days that we'll find another leader with the grace, sense, and resolve of Reagan to lead us out of these dark days under the Bammy hammer. Listening to his speeches today, it's like he's speaking ABOUT today, not the world thirty years ago. I love Palin, but I don't know if she's the one to take up after Reagan. Then again, maybe she is. Reagan was the Great Communicator for a reason; he knew how to say what needed to be said in words that were accessible to anyone who bothered to listen. I think Palin has that same ability. Chris Christie does, too. Others?
Posted by: MWR at January 12, 2011 06:17 AM (4df7R)
Just as anti-Semites believe that everything that goes wrong is the fault of "the Jews" the modern left puts every real and imagined tragedy at the feet of conservatives. Insane lefty shots his congresswoman?
The Conservatives cabal made him do it!
Global Warming/Cooling/Change/Not Change/Disruption? The Conservative cabal is responsible!
Communist flies into an IRS building? THE CONSERVATIVE CABAL!
Mismanaged city floods during a historic hurricane and people die? Its the fault of the conservative cabal.
Etc..
Posted by: 18-1 at January 12, 2011 06:18 AM (bgcml)
Posted by: dogfish at January 12, 2011 06:18 AM (1CF0Z)
Sarah Palin: "People are saying mean things about me!"
MSM: "Mean, nazis were mean. Palin = nazi!"
She's focked whatever she says.
Posted by: T at January 12, 2011 06:18 AM (GvhMc)
Posted by: dagny at January 12, 2011 06:19 AM (+Z6ve)
Posted by: Drew in MO
They are calling her out personally. And the Republican party as a whole is not known for its bravery or ability to competently respond to media feeding frenzies...
Posted by: 18-1 at January 12, 2011 06:20 AM (bgcml)
gary gulrud: "Where are all those other GOP POTUS hopefuls? Keeping their little heads down so their silky-pony-hairdos don't get mussed?"
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at January 12, 2011 06:20 AM (swuwV)
Blood libel is typically historically used to describe the false accusation that Jews murder Christian children to use their blood in religious rituals, but typically now used by Muslims, in particular the baking of matzos for pPassover.
FIFT
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at January 12, 2011 06:20 AM (xQAv5)
Posted by: Mr. Sar Kastik at January 12, 2011 06:20 AM (70v0o)
Posted by: Drew in MO at January 12, 2011 10:15 AM (ltqwL)
Oh fuck off. After 3 entire news cycles of being called an accessory to mass murder, she should now just shut the fuck up about it?
I suppose a woman being raped should just appreciate the attention, because it would be rude to interrupt the rapist while he's fucking you against your will.
What a load of shit.
Posted by: Brian72 at January 12, 2011 06:21 AM (yhJiT)
It was understandable (but disappointing) to me that Giffords' husband would lash out at the nebulous dark forces that "made" Loughner do this, and it was gratifying to hear the little girl's dad make his remarks about not using this event to restrict peoples' freedoms, but I have yet to hear a peep from the judge's family.
I understand (from the MSM, so who knows) that the judge had made a ruling over a case involving illegal aliens that angered conservatives, but other than that I don't know anything about him. Are the family blaming the anti-illegal immigration movement?
Posted by: Y-not at January 12, 2011 06:21 AM (pW2o8)
Posted by: lions at January 12, 2011 10:16 AM (lW97b)
Palin isn't a perfect standard bearer by any means...but dammit she is one of the precious few conservative politicians willing to fight.
Posted by: 18-1 at January 12, 2011 06:21 AM (bgcml)
Posted by: AmishDude at January 12, 2011 06:22 AM (T0NGe)
"shut up and take it"?
That ain't Palin.
I'm still not convinced that she has the background to be President but she's showing that she's got the character to be one.
Posted by: RayS at January 12, 2011 06:22 AM (2oRAd)
So true.
Posted by: Bill Clinton at January 12, 2011 06:22 AM (bgcml)
Posted by: eman at January 12, 2011 06:22 AM (0aJSF)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at January 12, 2011 06:23 AM (xQAv5)
Posted by: Lincolntf at January 12, 2011 06:23 AM (hUf/c)
They ain't too crazy about Jews themselves, either.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 12, 2011 06:23 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: AmishDude at January 12, 2011 10:22 AM (T0NGe)
Dude, that's what we do. Since when did the right to free speech mean you could say things we don't like?
Posted by: The Left at January 12, 2011 06:23 AM (bgcml)
Posted by: Drew in MO
I wouldn't say conservatives are buying into the argument; quite the opposite. Any conservative worth his or her salt knows this is nothing but media-manufactured, democrat-sanctioned bullshit.
And I would argue that Palin's response only briefly touched on her own savaging by the MFM. It was largely a refudiation (yeah, I used it) of the despicable tactics that leftist political opportunists have used in the wake of this tragedy to exploit death, injury and mayhem for political gain. She spoke of "we" as in "we Americans," not "me" as in, "me, Sarah Palin."
Posted by: MWR at January 12, 2011 06:23 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: KG at January 12, 2011 06:24 AM (DeCj1)
Posted by: AmishDude at January 12, 2011 10:23 AM (T0NGe)
Hey we love Jews. As long as they don't actually follow Judaism and/or try to live in their historical homeland. Oh, and as long as they agree with us.
Otherwise, they can go to hell, uh, Poland.
Posted by: The Left at January 12, 2011 06:24 AM (bgcml)
Posted by: Bugler at January 12, 2011 06:24 AM (VXBR1)
Posted by: rockmom at January 12, 2011 06:25 AM (w/gVZ)
Posted by: Nathan at January 12, 2011 06:26 AM (mDd1w)
Posted by: Shiela at January 12, 2011 06:27 AM (sdE/I)
Hence the use of the term 'blood libel.'
Posted by: nickless at January 12, 2011 06:28 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: rockmom at January 12, 2011 06:28 AM (w/gVZ)
She slammed dunked this shit.
Posted by: Zakn at January 12, 2011 06:28 AM (zyaZ1)
They may have created the monster they feared most . . . .
Posted by: Jimmuy at January 12, 2011 06:28 AM (ets+s)
Posted by: TexMex at January 12, 2011 06:28 AM (WZnD8)
Posted by: eman at January 12, 2011 10:27 AM (0aJSF)
Would adding, "I aim to misbehave" be considered inflammatory rhetoric?
Posted by: MWR at January 12, 2011 06:29 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at January 12, 2011 06:29 AM (6SIms)
Mentioned in the thread below is the Left's/Media's embargo of the 'first latina' governor.
But here's what's worse: Why isn't OUR SIDE talking about this?
I don't mean us. I mean the GOP leaders who should know enough to publicize this and score political points and raise awareness -- which is their job.
Posted by: Soothsayer3P0 at January 12, 2011 06:29 AM (NwOSU)
Posted by: Donald Kotowski at January 12, 2011 06:29 AM (7Zhs1)
Whats really fun is the perfect timing of Sarah putting this out now. She really does understand the news cycle.
She did not come out immediatly with a response, she let it "simmer" for a bit... and then counterpunched.
So, on one hand we have Obama calling a Sheriff whose failure in Office contributed to this horror, to congragulate him on his politization of the incident..
And on the other a reasoned response to continued attacks directed at Sarah herself...
Which one looks like the adult...
And remember... what matters for the future is how this plays to INDEPENDENTs and Moderates... not the party base of either party...
Sarah's Riposte was well timed IMO.
Posted by: Romeo13 at January 12, 2011 06:30 AM (AdK6a)
That is how they justify the systematic anti-white discrimination in admissions to college and hiring in government jobs. They will openly say white people owe black people. They believe that a white person born in 1992 shares guilt for the sins of a slave-owner in 1850.
This is an evil, despicable, anti-American idea. The American ideal is that the individual bears responsibility for their actions. I bear no more responsibility for slavery than Obama does for OJ's murders. But that's not what the leftists believe.
And, of course, they've perverted this even more. Because now they've moved onto the holy "diversity". So now asians are discriminated in college admissions even more than whites, for what I don't know. And a Mexican-American kid born in American in 1993 -- in those dark, racist times when America was ruled by not Klansman Bill Clinton. -- gets preferential treatment when applying to college over the white or asian kid.
The entire system of systematic, government-based racial discrimination which we live under is based on a blood libel at it's core. All white people for all time bear responsibility for the sins of unrelated whites 200 years ago. They've expanded the categories to include hispanics and asians, but the core idea is simple -- all whites are guilty and deserve to suffer.
Moved here from Ireland in 1860 -- and immediately joined the civil war fighting to end slavery? Too bad, fuck you, you're guilty.
Moved here in 1900 from Italy? Too bad, fuck you, you're guilty.
Moved here in 1950 from Russia? Too bad, fuck you, you're guilty.
At the festering core of the progressive, leftist, maggot-filled mind lies that blood libel. The modern left is, literally, evil at it's core and is based on one of the most wicked violence-justifying ideas -- the blood libel.
Posted by: bobbo at January 12, 2011 06:30 AM (QcFbt)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at January 12, 2011 06:31 AM (eOXTH)
THE LEFT'S COLLECTIVE RESPONSE has been one of deplorable desperation, intentioned deceit and base hate-mongering.
The media have been supplied an agenda, not the facts.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at January 12, 2011 06:31 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: MFM at January 12, 2011 06:31 AM (FcR7P)
You know, I'd say when Obama calls, just don't pick up the phone.
Posted by: Michael Vick at January 12, 2011 06:32 AM (bgcml)
Hey we love (insert group here). ...as long as they agree with us.
Posted by: The Left at January 12, 2011 10:24 AM (bgcml)
The same goes for women. And blacks. And hispanics. And Muslims. And Catholics. And Atheists. And farmers. And law enforcement. And the military. And (continue ad infinitum).
Posted by: The Left at January 12, 2011 06:32 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: jjshaka at January 12, 2011 06:32 AM (4YYCH)
Jane Fonda, the baby killer, and the creeps and the hack ultra-left-wing site Huffington Post and places like the Democrat Newsweek are some of the worst perpetrators of blood libel.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at January 12, 2011 06:33 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at January 12, 2011 06:33 AM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: rockmom at January 12, 2011 10:28 AM (w/gVZ)
That? Is an awesome typo.
Posted by: The Left at January 12, 2011 06:33 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: huerfano at January 12, 2011 06:34 AM (QgmBR)
Furthermore, the GOP should make it its mission to make sure every single black man woman and child knows Col West is in Congress.
It's not exploitation, it's awareness.
For fuck's sake, don't keep it a secret.
I'm sick of being a member of the shy, take-the-high-road, lazy-ass party.
Posted by: Soothsayer3P0 at January 12, 2011 06:34 AM (NwOSU)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at January 12, 2011 06:34 AM (eOXTH)
You don't know how badly I want her to run for President. Not only is she far and away the best option of a very weak field (Romney? Huckabee? Really?), but she irritates all the right people so incredibly very much.
I'm not convinced she'll run-- heck, no one knows what she'll do or not do-- but she'd do really well in the debates.
Even if she's not the nominee, fine, at least she'll focus attention on the right issues.
So there's my Palinbot cheerleading. Denounce away.
Posted by: Lance McCormick at January 12, 2011 06:34 AM (zgHLA)
Posted by: blood libel at January 12, 2011 06:35 AM (h0RtZ)
...on the very day that Obama was scheduled to give his own address. Very carefully done.
Sarah is like Bush in one thing. She knows how to play poker. She's willing to fold some bad hands to wait for the pocket aces.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 12, 2011 06:35 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Y-not at January 12, 2011 06:35 AM (pW2o8)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at January 12, 2011 06:36 AM (eOXTH)
Ariiana Huffinton promotes ultra facsit left-wing libel. for emotional reasons. It feels good, huh Arriana?
You fucking left wing ugly leftwinger leftwinger leeftwinger bitch.
Posted by: Juji Fruit at January 12, 2011 06:36 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: The Plague Fairy at January 12, 2011 06:37 AM (Kjsfe)
Posted by: Zakn at January 12, 2011 06:37 AM (zyaZ1)
Posted by: TexMex at January 12, 2011 10:28 AM (WZnD
I am scared to death for her because of it. Much as the lefties want to accuse the right wing of being violent, crazy maniacs, we all know it's the left wing that's most likely to sprout some crazy who thinks assassinating Palin is the only way to assure a communist Utopia under the benevolent dictatorship of Lord Obama. I pray for her safety, and the safety of her family and those close to her. She needs all the protection she can get, both earthly and heavensent.
Posted by: MWR at January 12, 2011 06:37 AM (4df7R)
I was thinking the same. What's more, she preempted "Obama's big speech." She's leading the news cycle and Obama has to exceed it later today. Her content was quality, her timing impeccable.
That doofus snowbilly sure knows how to get the most out of her yokel-college degree.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at January 12, 2011 06:37 AM (swuwV)
It is a blood libel. And they are talking about me and you. That was their choice to make.
Every additional idiotic unfounded assertion on this matter by the Left, such as this new, constrained definition for "blood libel," digs them in deeper.
They are preaching to a shrinking audience of the faithful and driving away the rest.
Posted by: Howard Johnson at January 12, 2011 06:37 AM (5YgO+)
Posted by: t-bird at January 12, 2011 06:38 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Y-not at January 12, 2011 10:35 AM (pW2o
Hey, I'd trade Bambi for Col West or Thomas Sowell in a heartbeat. Hell I'd have traded either Pres Bush.
Posted by: 18-1 at January 12, 2011 06:38 AM (bgcml)
Myself, I had never heard the term before. I really don't understand it. In the 20th century, the term "blood libel" has been used mostly to describe a vicious lie originally circulated by opponents of Zionism that suggests Jews have for centuries killed Christian (and later Muslim) children and used their blood to make ceremonial unleavened bread called matzo. This seems so absurd to any Western mind that it is impossible for us to believe that anyone would take it seriously, but millions of Muslims today believe it, and it appears from time to time in otherwise legitimate articles and books printed in the Muslim world. But the figurative term "blood libel" has been used before and since, to describe any organized attempt to hold innocent parties responsible for bloodshed, whether during war or in an individual act of violence. It may be a little extreme to use it in this circumstance, but since Glenn Reynolds already did it wuith little fanfare, it's ridiculous for liberals to now jump on Sarah Palin for using it.
Posted by: rockmom at January 12, 2011 06:39 AM (w/gVZ)
Hell, I'd trade him for a President Steele.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 12, 2011 06:39 AM (T0NGe)
It was a great speech and Palin's timing was perfect. The leftist media can't take too much time talking about it and immediately jumping on it because it would take away from their Obama worship today, so it will sit out their and let people make up their own minds.
That's dangerous for the media.
Posted by: robtr at January 12, 2011 06:40 AM (hVDig)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at January 12, 2011 06:41 AM (6SIms)
Because we don't measure people's importance by their skin color, ethnic background, genitalia, or who they fuck?
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 12, 2011 06:41 AM (4ucxv)
I guess in a way I'm a little more concerned for Boehner, Cantor, and some of our other congressional leaders.
Posted by: Y-not at January 12, 2011 06:41 AM (pW2o8)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at January 12, 2011 06:41 AM (eOXTH)
Hey, I'd trade Bambi for Col West or Thomas Sowell in a heartbeat. Hell I'd have traded either Pres Bush.
Posted by: 18-1 at January 12, 2011 10:38 AM (bgcml)
Oh my God. Pres. Thomas Sowell and VP Allen West....
I'll be in my bunk.
Posted by: MWR at January 12, 2011 06:42 AM (4df7R)
Anyone notice how she looks straight ahead throughout - not side-to-side like someone else I could mention. Maybe she's got a better teleprompter. And then, again, maybe she really means what she's saying - and doesn't need a teleprompter?
You know, the way she speaks - you get the feeling she really believes it. That means she has real values - ones she doesn't need scripted out all the time.
Tingle in my leg . . .
Posted by: Roger at January 12, 2011 06:42 AM (tAwhy)
Yet crickets from the MFM when Daisy Khan compared GZM opposition to antisemitism, implying Islamophobia could lead to a Muslim Holocaust.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at January 12, 2011 06:43 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: nickless at January 12, 2011 06:43 AM (MMC8r)
I'll be in my bunk.
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at January 12, 2011 06:43 AM (eCAn3)
Posted by: Barack Obama Responds with Soaring Rhetoric at January 12, 2011 06:44 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: AmishDude at January 12, 2011 06:44 AM (T0NGe)
We are better than the mindless finger-pointing we endured in the wake of the tragedy.
When I read that the first time my mind replaced the word "mindless" with "middle".
Posted by: Islamic Rage Boy at January 12, 2011 06:44 AM (tvs2p)
It was a great speech and Palin's timing was perfect. The leftist media can't take too much time talking about it and immediately jumping on it because it would take away from their Obama worship today, so it will sit out their and let people make up their own minds.
That's dangerous for the media.
Yesterday, someone pointed out that not a single GOP leader was coming forward to show strength and leadership.
Well, it just happened....SP is a leader, the strongest person I know and she has my respect.
And right now, the cute GOP'er crowd with their hands crossed over their privates--- has my disgust. And never my vote.
Posted by: ¤§EZB§¤ at January 12, 2011 06:44 AM (Ty06w)
I tell you what, if that happens, God forbid, the gloves will really come off in this country and all hell will break loose.
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at January 12, 2011 06:45 AM (eCAn3)
Hezbollah bloc resigns, forcing government to collapse
Posted by: Tami at January 12, 2011 06:45 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: sayoung at January 12, 2011 06:45 AM (3nDF5)
Your obviously a very stupid person who doesn't understand the subtleties of politics. Equating my comments to not defending a woman against rape? Brian72, are you fucking mentally ill?
Posted by: Drew in MO at January 12, 2011 06:45 AM (ltqwL)
Posted by: rockmom at January 12, 2011 10:39 AM (w/gVZ)
They can't help themselves, and she knows it. She plays them brilliantly.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at January 12, 2011 06:46 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Barack Obama's Teleprompter Responds with Soaring Rhetoric at January 12, 2011 10:44 AM (FcR7P)
FIFY.
Posted by: MWR at January 12, 2011 06:46 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: AmishDude at January 12, 2011 10:39 AM (T0NGe)
Are you down with the the Lesbian Strip Clubs Stimulus Act of 2011? I'm really excited about it. I think it will really get parts of our economy humming.
Posted by: President Michael Steele at January 12, 2011 06:47 AM (bgcml)
I have my doubts about her but all the right people do hate her.
The Left's instincts are scary accurate.
Posted by: RayJ at January 12, 2011 06:47 AM (2oRAd)
Posted by: eman at January 12, 2011 06:47 AM (0aJSF)
Either West or Sowell would be better than both Bushes. One of either kind would trump the pair, as it were. West and Sowell are conservative. Family Bush? Not nearly as much.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at January 12, 2011 06:48 AM (swuwV)
Posted by: Tami at January 12, 2011 10:45 AM (VuLos)
Iran really wants that natural gas discovered in Israel. Cue the fireworks.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at January 12, 2011 06:48 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Dave at January 12, 2011 06:48 AM (Nssy9)
My own stupid boyfriend tried that shit on me--"no one ever cared about federal spending until there was a black president" and refused to believe that his ignorance of events (I have a hard drive full of political cartoons, there was plenty of bitching about spending during the Bush years) doesn't mean they didn't happen. Plus, it's not really about spending. Because Keith Olbermann said so.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 12, 2011 06:48 AM (4ucxv)
Posted by: Markos Moulitsas at January 12, 2011 06:48 AM (o2QOm)
Organized anarchy to follow.
Posted by: nickless at January 12, 2011 10:46 AM (MMC8r)
Purge of Christians in 5... 4... 3...
Posted by: Romeo13 at January 12, 2011 06:48 AM (AdK6a)
Palin's biggest strength as a political force seems to be that she knows her opponents are going to overreact to anything she does or says. And, rather than try to pull back to keep them happy as too many GOPers would do, she doesn't fear that and diverts their overreaction to her advantage.
Posted by: nickless at January 12, 2011 06:49 AM (MMC8r)
"That's pure crap and you know it. Shame on you."
Posted by: eman at January 12, 2011 10:47 AM (0aJSF)
I heard a couple of people talking about this in the line at the grocery store the other day. I honestly laughed, they sounded so foolish. I don't think they understood what I was laughing about, but I like to think they got to their car(s), turned the ignition, drove away, and then went, "Wait, WTF? Was she laughing at ME?"
Yes. My answer is yes. You made me laugh. Because you are RIDICULOUS.
Posted by: MWR at January 12, 2011 06:50 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Drew in MO at January 12, 2011 10:45 AM (ltqwL)
Oh, come on. It's not like it was blood libel-blood libel.
Posted by: Whoopi Goldberg at January 12, 2011 06:50 AM (T0NGe)
Organized anarchy to follow.
Posted by: nickless at January 12, 2011 10:46 AM (MMC8r)
Or even disorganized anarchy.
Meanwhile, Southern Sudan is still voting on whether to form its own country, separate from the Islamist north. I pray they succeed.
Posted by: MWR at January 12, 2011 06:51 AM (4df7R)
"That's pure crap and you know it. Shame on you."
Posted by: eman at January 12, 2011 10:47 AM (0aJSF)
This is why I have a new greeting for liberals I meet.
"Oh, you're a liberal? I thought you were just mentally retarded. You could understand my confusion. Now, fuck off."
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at January 12, 2011 06:51 AM (eCAn3)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 12, 2011 10:48 AM (4ucxv)
Perception is their reality... and the MEDIA by and large did not talk about spending problems until the TEA party protests made it impossible to ignore...
Kinda like Perot and the balanced budget... the MEDIA was not talking about it, until Perot ran and became too big to ignore...
So, from your BFs perspective, it was NOT an issue, because the Media did not cover it... even though many of us were out here screaming our heads off.
Posted by: Romeo13 at January 12, 2011 06:51 AM (AdK6a)
Posted by: Temper Tantrum at January 12, 2011 06:51 AM (bAL0J)
Posted by: Mitt Romney at January 12, 2011 06:52 AM (0aJSF)
Posted by: Dave at January 12, 2011 10:48 AM (Nssy9)
SP didn't make this about her, the MFM and the unhinged Left did. She had to respond, and she did so with grace.
Posted by: Gran at January 12, 2011 06:52 AM (kmmbv)
1. Someone else used the expression "blood libel" in an article denouncing what was being done against Palin. Even if her use if not defensible someone else came up with it first and she was echoing that other writer.
2. "Eliminationism/ist". Reason.com has a great article getting into the history of that term. Its roots are in works describing Nazi Germany and the Holocaust. The next person to use it was - this could be wrong but the article implies it - Paul Krugman.
Dear G-d these people are so clueless.
Posted by: Rick67 at January 12, 2011 06:52 AM (Pq+/6)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at January 12, 2011 06:53 AM (eOXTH)
Posted by: SurferDoc at January 12, 2011 06:53 AM (o3bYL)
The fact that Palin spoke first and that her speech will undoubtedly outclass whatever Obama recites off the teleprompters in Arizona is incredibly significant. Voters take note.
Palin teaches. The wise learn. The rest can kiss my ass.
Posted by: Crusty at January 12, 2011 06:54 AM (GvSpB)
Posted by: Mitt Romney at January 12, 2011 06:55 AM (0aJSF)
Dave, the real problem being highlighted by the term 'blood libel' is that we have a Democratic Media happily parroting what they're fed by the likes of DailyKos. Decry the rhetoric all you want, but when the single force that's supposed to be the impartial gateway of information is a rank propaganda organ, you'll never get that dispassionate introspection that you're hoping for.
Posted by: nickless at January 12, 2011 06:55 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Dave at January 12, 2011 10:48 AM (Nssy9)
You lost Dave, get over it. Your attempts to smear people that had nothing to do with it backfired. The reason this animal had a gun is because the Sherriff you worship so much dropped the ball and didn't intervene when he had several opportunities to do so. There are already laws preventing people that make death threats from owning guns.
Palin pointed out exactly what you were doing and now you have been outed and you are rightfully embarrassed.
Posted by: robtr at January 12, 2011 06:55 AM (hVDig)
I have been wracking my brain trying to recall where I first encountered that. Feel like it was a science-fiction novel I read. Does anyone remember where that comes from?
Posted by: Rick67 at January 12, 2011 06:55 AM (Pq+/6)
I like to think about what it'd be like if Sarah Palin were a Democrat and held the EXACT same ideological views.
They would adore her and call her a working-class hero. (BTW, note how many of the Dem elites are Ivy League law grads from relatively privileged backgrounds.)
In this incident, they would be praising her use of a clever metaphor.
(Of course, "blood libel" is literally a metaphor to begin with.)
Posted by: AmishDude at January 12, 2011 06:55 AM (T0NGe)
May I offer a suggestion?
Posted by: AmishDude at January 12, 2011 10:52 AM (T0NGe)
Ditto?
Also, AmishDude... has your hash tag always been "T0NGe?" Because I have always felt you have good taste.
(Yes, I love puns. I denounce myself)
Posted by: MWR at January 12, 2011 06:56 AM (4df7R)
Meanwhile the AP says that Barry is going to make everything alright
Obama to be nation's consoler
WASHINGTON – Searching for unity out of tragedy, President Barack Obama will honor the victims of the Arizona mass shooting in personal terms and remind those in grief that an entire nation is with them. The president is again stepping into his role as national consoler, a test of leadership that comes with the job.
His mission at Wednesday's memorial is to uplift and rally, not to examine political incivility.
Bullshit. Barry is a political hack and rabble rouser not a leader. He'll turn it into a political event because that's all the asshole knows
Posted by: TheQuietMan at January 12, 2011 06:56 AM (1Jaio)
Kinda like Perot and the balanced budget... the MEDIA was not talking about it, until Perot ran and became too big to ignore...
*giggle* Okay, I'm sorry. I just had a mental image of a 50ft tall Ross Perot storming Washington D.C., like Godzilla with glasses and big ears. That gave me a happy. :-D
Posted by: MWR at January 12, 2011 06:57 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Mr. Sar Kastik at January 12, 2011 06:57 AM (70v0o)
Ass still sore from November is it?
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at January 12, 2011 06:57 AM (eCAn3)
Posted by: Percopius at January 12, 2011 10:14 AM (rrs4u)
A friend on FB wrote that CA and NY should secede from the union to be run by gay communists and SP should be barred from crossing the border. She also said SP should be dropped from a plane in Waziristan and left to fend for herself. The tears, if this woman wins the presidency, would be so worth it.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at January 12, 2011 06:57 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Drew in MO at January 12, 2011 10:45 AM (ltqwL)
I don't understand the subtleties of politics, huh?
Is there anything remotely subtle about this weekend long assault on Palin, accusing her of mass murder incitement?
Just how the fuck is it ever going to be an advisable action to sit back and take this kind of shit without standing up for yourself? Never, that's when.
Let me clue you in on a "subtlety of politics".
When the other side is allowed to define you to the public and you take no corrective action, you fucking lose, every damn time. Understand that little "subtlety"?
Your suggestion was stupid, nonsensical and bad advice.
If you didn't like my rape analogy, well too bad, wrap it up in a sausage and fuck yourself with it. It is entirely appropriate given the public bloody fucking these media jackals have tried to administer to Sarah Palin this weekend.
That was effectively combated today with this video.
Those are a few "subtleties" of politics you might want to think about.
Posted by: Brian72 at January 12, 2011 06:58 AM (yhJiT)
The liberals had a cow when Sarah used the term "death panels" to describe end-of-life treatment under ObamaCare. Yet the term was accurate and it has stuck.
They are having another cow now that she has used the term "blood libel" to describe the accusation that she is responsible for the Arizona shootings. My guess: the public will regard the term to be accurate and it will stick.
The liberals have expended hundreds of thousands of words trying to link Sarah Palin to this tragedy. With two words (and the truth), she has defeated them.
Posted by: Avogadra at January 12, 2011 07:00 AM (dtIOD)
In Flyover Country, No One Could Hear You Scream.
Posted by: Ridley Scott's Audience at January 12, 2011 07:00 AM (swuwV)
Posted by: Helen Thomas at January 12, 2011 07:00 AM (MadRw)
"Shout out to Sherrif D" Clownbama is rewriting his speech right now
Posted by: Flammenwerfer at January 12, 2011 07:01 AM (FIDMq)
Posted by: Phil Dayton at January 12, 2011 07:01 AM (AChK6)
A friend on FB wrote that CA and NY should secede from the union to be run by gay communists and SP should be barred from crossing the border. She also said SP should be dropped from a plane in Waziristan and left to fend for herself. The tears, if this woman wins the presidency, would be so worth it.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at January 12, 2011 10:57 AM (mHQ7T)
I assume "friend" is only a term of Facebook convenience in this case, and not a factual reality? Because she sounds like a granola-crunching asscan with breasts.
She also said SP should be dropped from a plane in Waziristan and left to fend for herself.
The woman shoots caribou and clubbed a halibut on national television. I think she'd do fine, ne?
Posted by: MWR at January 12, 2011 07:02 AM (4df7R)
I'd like to believe it, but I'd liken it to trying to house-break a yak. If you could, it would be great, but, more likely, there will be a helluva mess.
Posted by: nickless at January 12, 2011 07:03 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Mike F'n Castle at January 12, 2011 07:03 AM (Qj27d)
Again we see that Palin is the ONLY viable Republican candidate for2012. Picture any of the others or Hussein giving such a moving, deep speech.
And yes, Palin continues to seize the dialog by her canny use of language.
Posted by: Harold at January 12, 2011 07:03 AM (11fR7)
Please provide how each of the "facts" you assert and imply are any different than in any other time in our history.
Then, explain how your "final solution" will increase liberty and freedom rather than curtail and hinder.
Better yet: Fuck off you liberal piece of shit.
Posted by: Jimmuy at January 12, 2011 07:04 AM (ets+s)
Yeah that whole Second Amendment is such a buzzkill, and omfg open a history book, you ignorant fucking libtards.
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at January 12, 2011 07:06 AM (eCAn3)
His mission at Wednesday's memorial is to uplift and rally, not to examine political incivility.
Um, Obama's sole mission is "Make Obama Look Awesome." The speech will be all about him, with some lip service paid to the victims.
"When I took office in 2008, I did so with promises of hope and change. This violent (political) action has not dampened my desire nor my resolve to bring positive change to our troubled nation."
Just mark my words.
Posted by: MWR at January 12, 2011 07:07 AM (4df7R)
Au contraire. Mine was a positive post about Sowell and West and the comment perfectly accurate. Thanks to the stylings of the Bush family, the likes of a Palin must fight Statism that much harder.
But thanks for all your concern.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at January 12, 2011 07:09 AM (swuwV)
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at January 12, 2011 11:06 AM (eCAn3)
A what? History started when I was born man!
Posted by: Clueless Fucktard at January 12, 2011 07:09 AM (FIDMq)
Posted by: Holger at January 12, 2011 07:10 AM (YxGud)
The striking similarity between "blood libel" and "death panel" immediately stood out to me, as well, and by the media drawing attention to her comment, they reinforce the validity of both comments. They lend Palin credibility. It was a genius comment from her, and she has her mojo back.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at January 12, 2011 07:10 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at January 12, 2011 07:11 AM (eOXTH)
Posted by: Holger at January 12, 2011 11:10 AM (YxGud)
How's the rash?
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at January 12, 2011 07:11 AM (eCAn3)
Growing and oozing puss.
Posted by: Holger at January 12, 2011 07:12 AM (YxGud)
Posted by: Wiki at January 12, 2011 11:11 AM (vUdSP)
This page was last modified on 12 January 2011 at 16:10.
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at January 12, 2011 07:12 AM (eCAn3)
Posted by: Holger at January 12, 2011 11:12 AM (YxGud)
Have you named it yet?
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at January 12, 2011 07:12 AM (eCAn3)
Referring to the 2008 campaign would be epically stupid.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at January 12, 2011 07:13 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Jesse Jackson at January 12, 2011 07:13 AM (qwK3S)
Have you named it yet?
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at January 12, 2011 11:12 AM (eCAn3)
Yes, I named it Obama.
Posted by: Holger at January 12, 2011 07:13 AM (YxGud)
Posted by: bobbo at January 12, 2011 07:14 AM (QcFbt)
Posted by: Mr. Barky at January 12, 2011 07:19 AM (qwK3S)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at January 12, 2011 11:13 AM (mHQ7T)
I hope that he does ramble on about himself and try to score political points. No matter what he says the MFM will hail it as the most wonderful speech ever but it would be nice if he can't help himself and show what a shallow, self-absorb, arrogant, petty little shit he is
Posted by: TheQuietMan at January 12, 2011 07:20 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at January 12, 2011 07:22 AM (Dks0L)
Before she returned to grad school during the 2008 election, she wasn't that political. She ignored the Bush years (like me, except I liked him better when he was gone.) But she warmed up to Obama then fell heavy in love. I couldn't end our friendship, but you start seeing people differently.
The woman shoots caribou and clubbed a halibut on national television. I think she'd do fine, ne?
Another friend said something to me after Obama won in 2008, and he asked about it when I saw him recently after two years. I told him then, "Sarah Palin will survive the zombie wars." My faith has been vindicated.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at January 12, 2011 07:22 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Theresa D is NOT a spammer at January 12, 2011 07:22 AM (2hQbY)
And Pawlenty is worthless, and should try for a consulting job with one of his pet ethanol companies.
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 12, 2011 10:10 AM (Fo83G)
Newt just posted something. But yes, it's a sad day in the GOP when we see just how cowardly our guys really are.
Piss on them.
Posted by: ¤§EZB§¤ at January 12, 2011 07:22 AM (Ty06w)
Posted by: Dave at January 12, 2011 10:48 AM (Nssy9)
No, Dave. No one here thought he might be culpable or that Sarah Palin or the Tea Party might be culpable. We all thought the motherfucker who pulled the trigger was culpable. And then the blaming began, not from the right, but from the left. As always.
FYNQ
Posted by: huerfano at January 12, 2011 07:23 AM (QgmBR)
Now THAT you can bank on. But he will avoid reminding voters of his failed campaign promises, which would mean personal accountability.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at January 12, 2011 07:24 AM (mHQ7T)
I hope that he does ramble on about himself and try to score political points. No matter what he says the MFM will hail it as the most wonderful speech ever but it would be nice if he can't help himself and show what a shallow, self-absorb, arrogant, petty little shit he is
Posted by: TheQuietMan at January 12, 2011 11:20 AM (1Jaio)
There's no doubt in my mind he'll make an ass out of himself. He's had plenty of opportunities in the past to give a gracious speech and it never happens; after a point you know what to expect without exception.
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 12, 2011 07:24 AM (olKiY)
Posted by: Donald Kotowski at January 12, 2011 10:29 AM
She so gets it. Can you imagine how cool it would be to have her in the White House?
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at January 12, 2011 07:25 AM (Dks0L)
Posted by: Mr. Barky at January 12, 2011 07:25 AM (qwK3S)
Posted by: 4rc at January 12, 2011 07:27 AM (xCWwQ)
Posted by: Kaitian at January 12, 2011 07:28 AM (yFt7r)
It is morally wrong to end an unborn human life by abortion. It is also morally wrong to take the taxpayer dollars of millions of pro-life Americans and use them to promote abortion at home or abroad.
Last year, Planned Parenthood received more than $363 million in revenue from government grants and contracts. During that same time, they performed an unprecedented 324,008 abortions.
The largest abortion provider in America should not also be the largest recipient of federal funding under Title X.
The Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act will prevent any family planning funds under Title X from going to Planned Parenthood or other organizations that perform abortions. It will ensure that abortion providers are not being subsidized with federal tax dollars.
I am grateful for the support of more than 122 original co-sponsorsÂ….
Make sure your congressman is a cosponsor here!
Posted by: Dan at January 12, 2011 07:28 AM (9L1z6)
"That's pure crap and you know it. Shame on you."
Yeah, but can you imagine Romney saying this? Pawlenty? Or (giggle) Huckabee?
Me, neither.
Posted by: OregonMuse at January 12, 2011 07:30 AM (ixLpQ)
Posted by: mikey at January 12, 2011 07:30 AM (GSeVd)
MSM "corrupt bastards"
Posted by: maverick muse at January 12, 2011 07:31 AM (H+LJc)
Two years ago his party was victorious. Last November, the other party won.
Hmmm.... not OUR party won, but the OTHER Party won...
Intentional? or a little "slip"...
Posted by: Siggy Freud at January 12, 2011 07:37 AM (AdK6a)
Posted by: Dave at January 12, 2011 07:37 AM (Nssy9)
Posted by: TOTUS at January 12, 2011 07:37 AM (Qj27d)
Posted by: Dave at January 12, 2011 11:37 AM (Nssy9)
Duh, this is AOS dude! It's just the mild mannered grannies here right now. Wait until the really mean guys arrive!
Posted by: ¤§EZB§¤ at January 12, 2011 07:40 AM (Ty06w)
Posted by: Drillanwr at January 12, 2011 07:41 AM (3W/YL)
Posted by: Siggy Freud
I noticed that, too. Definitely a deliberate word choice. It was a nice touch in that she didn't presume to speak for a Party in which she holds no office or title. She has very good instincts for that kind of thing.
Posted by: Lincolntf at January 12, 2011 07:41 AM (hUf/c)
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 12, 2011 07:42 AM (olKiY)
Posted by: carrot at January 12, 2011 07:47 AM (W8gPP)
Posted by: Mitt Romneycare at January 12, 2011 07:48 AM (Qj27d)
Posted by: Kaitian at January 12, 2011 07:48 AM (yFt7r)
Posted by: Inspector Asshole at January 12, 2011 07:51 AM (thGxc)
Thank you for the civil discourse, and good day.
Posted by: Brian72 at January 12, 2011 07:54 AM (yhJiT)
Posted by: Kaitian at January 12, 2011 08:00 AM (yFt7r)
it occurred at a time in our history where over-the-top rhetoric supersedes thoughtful discourse.
I approve this message.
Posted by: 54 - 40 or fight! at January 12, 2011 08:05 AM (R2fpr)
it occurred at a time in our history where over-the-top rhetoric supersedes thoughtful discourse.
I second this message!
Posted by: Remember the Maine! at January 12, 2011 08:06 AM (R2fpr)
hm.
No single class of victims owns a monopoly on "blood libel". Claiming the "victim" monopoly card is itself a show of insensitivity for others.
Those who demand perpetual special status (the Democrat Platform) are tiresome social ankle biting political pickpockets, regardless of education, ideology, socio-economic bracket, or racial component.
It isn't realistic for anyone to expect PC mandated public patience while the public is being abused by an insanely convoluted dogmatic federal state, blaming the conservative victims of this really insanely motivated crime or murder.
America is emotionally and economically bankrupted by the Left. Voting taxpayers want responsible constitutional governance, the right of American citizenship.
/Even GWBush encouraged Americans to get past the deaths of over three thousand Americans on 9/11/01.
Posted by: maverick muse at January 12, 2011 08:08 AM (H+LJc)
Also, AmishDude... has your hash tag always been "T0NGe?" Because I have always felt you have good taste.
Posted by: MWR at January 12, 2011 10:56 AM (4df7R)
Only at work, but it's my favorite hash.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 12, 2011 08:10 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Jaynie59 at January 12, 2011 08:13 AM (YjQWV)
Posted by: Jaynie59 at January 12, 2011 12:13 PM (YjQWV)
They've inducted him into JournoList 2.0
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at January 12, 2011 08:36 AM (mHQ7T)
These are the same Jews who supported Obama in 2008 and believe Israel is conducting genocide against the Palestinians, aka atheists of Jewish descent who see Israel as some misbegotten Disneyland that nobody needs anymore, because Iran doesn't really mean it when they say they'll drive the Jews into the sea like a herd of swine.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at January 12, 2011 08:41 AM (mHQ7T)
This man is a Jew!
Posted by: Uber Mensch at January 12, 2011 08:48 AM (S5YRY)
Posted by: Buckshot Bill at January 12, 2011 08:55 AM (rSvmM)
"The term has been used for centuries as the pretext for anti-Semitism and violent pogroms against Jews."
No, the term has been used to describe the false claims that have been used as the pretext. Stupid NYT, they seem to think that the people who claim Jews kill Christian children are the ones who use the term "blood libel."
Posted by: SD at January 12, 2011 09:08 AM (w4D33)
Posted by: Dave at January 12, 2011 11:37 AM (Nssy9)
You know what? Somebody needs to point out the obvious here. YOU do not get to sit back and watch three fucking days of vitriolic, irrational, hateful attacks on an innocent person, and then, when the reasonably respond, say that everyone is the fucking same.
It's a God-Damned lie and you know it, you passive-aggressive spiteful sack of shit.
We didn't prove your point, you proved ours - y'all will take NO responsibility for your own actions, EVER, and will lie at every opportunity because all you want is to win, at any cost.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at January 12, 2011 09:37 AM (bxiXv)
Seems like the term blood libel has grown in usage to include any false accusations of murder, more than ritual religious murder accusations. Instead of "the" blood libel you read it as "another" or "akin to" blood libel.
And it's not right to say blood libel is only properly applied to the Passover matzoh story. It's older. And in some cases a blood 'libel' would be true, cf: Aztecs, sacrifices to Molech.
Posted by: Beagle at January 12, 2011 09:38 AM (sOtz/)
Like, seriously, I'm supposed to believe that the NYT board gives a shit about Jews? Seriously?
The same NYT that blames Israel for every conflict in the damned Middle East, sides with terrorists against Jews at every opportunity, and invites the Israeli ambassador for an interview and then ambushes him with vitriolic spew and won't even let him get a word in edgewise?
*That* NYT? Yeah, I may be stupid but I'm not that stupid.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at January 12, 2011 09:40 AM (bxiXv)
"Let His blood be upon us, and our children"
Posted by: Oldcat at January 12, 2011 10:25 AM (z1N6a)
Posted by: jakestalope at January 12, 2011 10:25 AM (JXTIv)
So Palin is terribly wrong for using 'blood libel', but Krugman and many others on the left are given a free pass for using the term 'eliminationism'.....and no one sees the hypocrisy? Seriously?
I can't say I'm a Palin supporter, frankly I'm not, but I find the almost wilding that surrounds the discussion of her to be sickening. We've had politicians of all stripes and all degrees of ability and corruption but NO ONE has ever had such a steady drumbeat from the establishment(right and left) to simply shut up, don't speak, say nothing, go away...and worse still, on countless blogs are images of her hung, raped, shot, punched and humiliated. Easy to say it's because she's stupid when you're wilding but pause for a moment if you think you have half a brain and question the narrative that urges you on.......
Stupid gets you chuckles on late night cable, stupid gets your name as a punch line.....very rarely does stupid get a fiery need to shut you up forever.
I don't think the term blood libel is so far off here.....not at all.
Posted by: carrot at January 12, 2011 10:44 AM (W8gPP)
I can't say I'm a Palin
supporter, frankly I'm not, but I find the almost wilding that surrounds
the discussion of her to be sickening.
I don't think the term blood libel is so far off here.....not at all.
Posted by: carrot at January 12, 2011 02:44 PM (W8gPP)
Jesus Christ, if even after this you need to put her name in qualifiers for political reasons, maybe you need to take a look at your priorities.
Posted by: Oldcat at January 12, 2011 10:47 AM (z1N6a)
Posted by: F.B. at January 12, 2011 10:53 AM (oLRg0)
But for a bunch of phonies who claims they love Jews and hate anti-semites, she just pushed away more of few Jews left on her side.
I doubt it. The conservative Jews who are on her side are capable of the critical thing and sound reasoning that led them to be on her side in the first place.
Posted by: Speller at January 12, 2011 11:26 AM (J74Py)
Lie down with terrorists and you wake up with Ayers and Pali all over you.
Posted by: DANEgerus at January 12, 2011 11:42 AM (e3/KR)
I don't think the term blood libel is so far off here.....not at all.
Posted by: carrot at January 12, 2011 02:44 PM (W8gPP)
"Jesus Christ, if even after this you need to put her name in qualifiers for political reasons, maybe you need to take a look at your priorities."
Posted by: Oldcat
Actually Oldcat, I don't think I need to look at my priorities, and I don't think I was putting her name in qualifiers at all. Just the opposite. I find Palin an interesting and important voice in our political dialogue. Someone I actually admire. Maybe it's because I don't totally mesh with her stands that I can see something is really wrong with the constant criticism against her. Can anyone else remember a single other politician who was urged to shut up, not speak, go away? I mean every time she speaks someone is there to pronounce her dead and irrelevant. And when she rises once more, the vitriol becomes almost barbaric.
I think she's far more important than people think.
Posted by: carrot at January 12, 2011 12:40 PM (W8gPP)
Posted by: baldilocks at January 12, 2011 12:48 PM (T2/zQ)
Sarah Palin gave a measured and well thought through response using a term above most of the media pundits and well above you commenting rabble. Way to show how much of a mindless mob you are. You are all so busy criticizing a single term that the eloquence of the message sailed right over your heads. Of course, I am used to reading your idiocy so no harm no foul.
Posted by: Craig Rainey at January 12, 2011 04:01 PM (hQIxm)
Posted by: jakestalope at January 12, 2011 02:25 PM (JXTIv)
Well, isn't it nice to have a neutral, objective opinion.
Hey Jaketard, if "blood libel" isn't accurate, what the fuck do you call false accusations of complicity in mass murder?
"Cupcakes?"
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at January 12, 2011 09:12 PM (bxiXv)
I've seen the Larry Grathwohl interview; I know how Bill Ayers' demonic band of nihilist revolutionaries planned to "eliminate" me and 25 million other Americans...
http://tinyurl.com/5zjabu
And I know that not only did that same Bill Ayers sponsor Barack Obama's entry into politics, but the two of them also shared an office for three years...
http://tinyurl.com/67wb3q
And I know very well what Barack Obama thinks of middle-aged, white, rural, Christian, small-business-owning women. I'm on his hate list in every category.
And though I may not know history very well, I do know of a certain fire at the Reichstag....
And frankly, I'm terrified.
And yes, I admire, cherish and am grateful to Sarah Palin more than ever.
Thank You, thank You, God, for this brave woman who stands for me!
Posted by: Kathy from Kansas at January 12, 2011 10:36 PM (yJlU8)
Posted by: hair extensions suppliers at January 18, 2011 01:43 PM (tpvde)
solar panelThe main products we manufacture and export as below:
Monocrystalline silicon solar panel, polycrystalline silicon solar panel, solar power system.
solar street light, wind solar hybrid street light, solar garden light, solar sensor light, solar lawn light.
LED lamp for solar garden light, solar brick light, solar street lightsolar post cap, solar road stud, other solar lights and accessories
Posted by: jb at February 27, 2011 09:20 PM (rsXld)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3051 seconds, 384 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Holger at January 12, 2011 05:54 AM (YxGud)