January 21, 2011
— DrewM Good luck to him.
From the release.
House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) and Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) announced today that House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) will deliver the Republican address following the President’s State of the Union address to Congress on January 25, 2011. Last year – in an unprecedented failure – Congressional Democrats chose not to pass, or even propose a budget, punting on a duty that represents the most basic responsibility of governing. Chairman Ryan will deliver the Republican address Tuesday night from the House Budget Committee hearing room, where the Democrats’ spending spree will end and the Republicans’ push for a fiscally responsible budget that cuts spending will begin.In making the announcement, the GOP leaders noted that Chairman Ryan is a leading voice for fiscal discipline and common-sense solutions to cut spending and create jobs. Known for his thoughtful and detailed critiques of big-government policies, Ryan has helped put to rest the Democrats’ argument that more government spending and higher taxes is the answer to most of our nation’s ills. His commitment to free enterprise and limited government make him the right choice to outline a vision for how a smaller, less costly government will help create the right conditions for the creation of good, private sector jobs.
“Paul Ryan is uniquely qualified to address the state of our economy and the fiscal challenges that face our country,” said Speaker Boehner. “We’re broke, and decisive action is needed to help our economy get back to creating jobs and end the spending binge in Washington that threatens our children’s future. I’m pleased that Paul will be outlining a common-sense vision for moving our country forward.”
A very good choice I'd say. Ryan is an up and coming star who is now head of the House Budget Committee, so yeah, fiscal issues are going to be the main thrust of his talk.
The last time Ryan went up against Obama was at the "Health Care Summit" and he pretty much schooled him.
Still, I wouldn't get my hopes up to much that his response will have much impact. It's really unfair to expect anyone in this spot to look very good compared to any President. The visuals are simply a mismatch. The President is the center of attention in a House chamber filled with members of Congress, the cabinet, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Supreme court, the Diplomatic Corps and on and on. The responder is usually someone sitting or standing by themselves, talking into a camera. It's not an even match.
Either way, no one ever really remembers the State of the Union, let alone the response. Unless you're Bobby Jindal and then you wish everyone would.
Posted by: DrewM at
07:28 AM
| Comments (177)
Post contains 475 words, total size 3 kb.
I think it would be pretty effective if Paul Ryan gave his response with his kids in the background, each one sitting on a pile of $1 bills equivalent to their share of the national debt.
Posted by: pep at January 21, 2011 07:33 AM (GMG6W)
Don't know if Ryan can pitch fiscal discipline in the right way or not. But certainly he knows his stuff and can show the danger of following Obama's patch to budget oblivion.
Speaking of Jindal, I like how he's pretty much ignored how that SOTU response was panned. He simply moved on and continued doing a great job, didn't let it discourage or slow him down one little bit. Still has a great future...
Posted by: Kortezzi at January 21, 2011 07:36 AM (piR98)
So what if a lot of people actually know this but go along with it anyway because, you just try getting a job that's not flipping burgers without a freaking certified piece of paper that claims you have some kind of training. Back in the day a kid with half a brain and lots of gumption could become an apprentice. They learned the job while working the job. Who does that now? So some joker with the know-nothing degree gets the high paying job instead of the guy who has has been around a lot longer and knows a lot more but doesn't have the piece of paper.
Posted by: katya, the designated driver at January 21, 2011 07:36 AM (ZePpz)
I'm not sure he's that rich.
Of course, he could always just cut green paper into strips the size of dollar bills. That's essentially what the Fed is doing now, anyway...
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at January 21, 2011 07:37 AM (8y9MW)
Prager has mentioned may times that in the House Chamber, it says in large, bold letters In God We Trust--and it's never EVER shown on television.
Posted by: ParisParamus at January 21, 2011 07:37 AM (bN5ZU)
Posted by: Nighthawk at January 21, 2011 07:38 AM (02uN6)
If Obama and the dems gets their way you would have to take that shot from space
Posted by: Buzzsaw at January 21, 2011 07:39 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 21, 2011 07:39 AM (tJjm/)
Ummm... that's how I got my job. It's not fantastic, but it pays pretty well.
The idea that you "need" a college education is, in many cases, a myth perpetuated by those who went to college themselves, or by the colleges and universities. Work hard, show that you know your stuff, and you can get just about any job you want.
You may not be able to swing Head Engineer of Aerodynamic Development with Lockheed Martin, but Lead Software Developer for [insert company here] is certainly doable.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at January 21, 2011 07:40 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Paul Ryan at January 21, 2011 07:40 AM (zgZzy)
For background visuals, he might contact Sheila "Recover the Moon Flags on Mars" Jackson Lee - I understand she's a wizard at arranging to use high quality, high impact backgrounds.
Posted by: ya2daup at January 21, 2011 07:40 AM (UzjcV)
Yeah, the deck is going to be stacked in the media, too. They are on over-drive since this shooting thing in AZ.
Nevertheless, I hope Ryan delivers, both on substance and on style, irrespective of what the immediate spin is from the MSM. A few people will pay attention and it would be great if Ryan looked good so we could think of him as an option down the road.
Posted by: Y-not is happy it's Friday at January 21, 2011 07:41 AM (pW2o8)
Unless the POTUS does something incredibly assholish, like calling out SCOTUS because they interpreted in the Constitutution in a way he didn't like.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 21, 2011 07:41 AM (4ucxv)
President Obama delivered a stirring State of the Union speech that could be compared to the skilled oration of JFK or Martin Luther King. Some attendees were visibly moved to tears of admiration.
In the Republican response, Paul Ryan was a big fat meenie. And possibly racist.
Posted by: The MFM at January 21, 2011 07:41 AM (plsiE)
Posted by: A.G. at January 21, 2011 07:42 AM (oAVyq)
Posted by: Barack Obama at January 21, 2011 07:42 AM (zgZzy)
The SOTU does not have to be delivered in person. The president can just send a letter to Congress and have it read into the record.
Posted by: Nighthawk at January 21, 2011 11:38 AM (02uN6)
That was pretty much the way it was always done until recently. Once the Big Eye became available, the POTUS started delivering the Address himself. I can't say that was progress.
Posted by: ya2daup at January 21, 2011 07:43 AM (UzjcV)
He is big on math. Maybe he can borrow Ron Johnson's white board and put some f'n numerical knowledge to us.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 21, 2011 07:44 AM (4ucxv)
Posted by: Rush Limbaugh and Glen Beck at January 21, 2011 07:44 AM (02uN6)
Chris Matthews (spit) derided him for doing so, 'pretending' to be a little president or something along those lines.
Posted by: Dave C at January 21, 2011 07:44 AM (G89dS)
Posted by: MīcÞeMūß at January 21, 2011 07:44 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: motionview at January 21, 2011 07:45 AM (zRbkQ)
If Mr Ryan gets too technical and starts throwing a bunch of numbers around, people's eyes will glaze over.
He has to keep it simple.
Posted by: Soothsayer has a problem with Wang Dong at January 21, 2011 07:45 AM (WmBF6)
They need to go.
boehner has a long way to go to change my mind...
Posted by: LtT26 at January 21, 2011 07:46 AM (QUdKy)
I'm planning to do a takeoff of Heath Ledger's joker by lighting a pile of money on fire and explaining that this is what Obama is doing every minute of every day.
I wish i knew how to make videos.
Someone needs to sync up obama video and selected pictures with the song "Cult of Personality". It even has a line about the Nobel prize.
Posted by: Ben at January 21, 2011 07:46 AM (wuv1c)
didn't Alito say he is no longer going to SOTU speeches?
Posted by: Ben at January 21, 2011 07:47 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Nighthawk at January 21, 2011 07:48 AM (02uN6)
Posted by: angler at January 21, 2011 07:48 AM (SwjAj)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 21, 2011 07:48 AM (plsiE)
Yeah who exactly thought the Fred Rogers approach was the best way Jindal could go.
Posted by: MīcÞeMūß at January 21, 2011 07:49 AM (0q2P7)
Didn't the MFM also complain about McDonnell having non-white people in the building with him? As I recall, they were all elected or appointed VA officials...
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 21, 2011 07:49 AM (4ucxv)
Posted by: ace at January 21, 2011 07:49 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: ace at January 21, 2011 07:50 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Fritz at January 21, 2011 07:50 AM (GwPRU)
Posted by: The MFM at January 21, 2011 07:51 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: CDR M at January 21, 2011 11:49 AM (5I8G0)
Together We're In Debt Up to our Ears.
Posted by: Tami at January 21, 2011 07:51 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: Nighthawk at January 21, 2011 07:52 AM (02uN6)
"My President spent my great-great-grand children into perpetual debt, and all I got was this stupid T-Shirt."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at January 21, 2011 07:53 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: jjshaka at January 21, 2011 07:53 AM (0p/25)
Right now the only negative I see is that he is in the House and tradition does not favor the House. But that falls under the old electability saw which I hate so no points off for that.
That last goes double for Michelle Bachman who has a rating of 100/100.
Posted by: Vic at January 21, 2011 07:53 AM (M9Ie6)
He has to keep it simple.
Posted by: Soothsayer has a problem with Wang Dong at January 21, 2011
11:45 AM (WmBF6)
Do you remember that video of Herman Cain at Clinton's healthcare townhall back in the 90s? He was throwing around numbers, fractions, and percentages like noones business... I was surprised the people there didn't all fall off their chairs in slumber.
Maybe people are ok with numbers as long as its about the pocketbook.
Posted by: KG at January 21, 2011 07:54 AM (DeCj1)
Posted by: MīcÞeMūß at January 21, 2011 07:54 AM (0q2P7)
Having a Republican speak in opposition to President Obama after the State of teh Union speech is unconstitutional.
Posted by: Sheila Lee Jackson at January 21, 2011 07:55 AM (6f9ix)
Posted by: Nighthawk at January 21, 2011 07:55 AM (02uN6)
According to the Morons here from LA he has wrecked it by his actions at home.
Posted by: Vic at January 21, 2011 07:55 AM (M9Ie6)
"Everything that guy just said is bullshit. Thank you."
Posted by: Steve L. at January 21, 2011 07:55 AM (Gkhxf)
I don't mind being likened to Paul Ryan. I'm sure Mrs Meanie would appreciate the comparison. His eyes are like pools of quiet fire.
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at January 21, 2011 07:55 AM (8lCJT)
Is it too early to nominate a thread winner?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at January 21, 2011 07:56 AM (8y9MW)
No dude should talk about another dude's eyes. Especially not in poetic terms.
Just sayin'
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at January 21, 2011 07:57 AM (8y9MW)
I disagree. Those groups, esp the CoC, are demonized in the press, so why give the MSF another shot to make Republicans seem like they only care about business=evil instead of about regular people? Also, the idea of Ryan delivering his speech to applause seems bad to me. We want no appearance of pandering.
I would choose some public space, starkly empty, that represents where Congress does the will of the people. I guess the floor of the House wouldn't be available, but perhaps he could pull off doing it on the steps of the Capitol. He's a young man. Standing out in the cold with the people's house in the background could be powerful. It would also help him keep the speech short.
Posted by: Y-not is happy it's Friday at January 21, 2011 07:57 AM (pW2o8)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at January 21, 2011 07:58 AM (8lCJT)
Having a Republican speak in opposition to President Obama after the State of teh Union speech is unconstitutional.
Posted by: Sheila Lee Jackson at January 21, 2011 11:55 AM (6f9ix)
And racist!!
And fascist, like Pol Pot!
Posted by: Dick Durbin at January 21, 2011 07:59 AM (6f9ix)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at January 21, 2011 08:00 AM (xdHzq)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 21, 2011 08:00 AM (plsiE)
I nominate Rhetoric and Tone.
Posted by: Dave C at January 21, 2011 08:00 AM (G89dS)
Posted by: Meremortal at January 21, 2011 08:01 AM (6f9ix)
Daily Caller:
Though he talks like Nobel Prize-winning economist Milton Friedman, some of Ryan’s most high-profile votes seem closer to Keynes than to Adam Smith. For example, in the span of about a year, Ryan committed fiscal conservative apostasy on three high-profile votes: The Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP (whereby the government purchased assets and equity from financial institutions), the auto-bailout (which essentially implied he agrees car companies — especially the ones with an auto plant in his district—are too big to fail), and for a confiscatory tax on CEO bonuses (which essentially says the government has the right to take away private property — if it doesn’t like you).
While RyanÂ’s overall voting record is very conservative, the problem with casting these high-profile votes is that they demonstrate he is willing to fundamentally reject conservatism when the heat is on.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at January 21, 2011 08:03 AM (4oFvc)
A total charisma-free zone who also seems to be somewhat less than competent is "our best hope?"
Not so much.
The SoTU "response" and his whiny and pretty much ineffective appearances during the oil spill have done him in for higher office, IMO.
Charisma alone doesn't make a winner (something the Palin fanboiz should consider). Neither does competence. But we don't need another dead fish in the White House.
Posted by: MrScribbler© at January 21, 2011 08:03 AM (Ulu3i)
So some joker with the know-nothing degree gets the high paying job instead of the guy who has has been around a lot longer and knows a lot more but doesn't have the piece of paper.
I remember when the 'help wanted' classified ads would read something like:
"___yrs experience required....willing to consider education in lieu of experience..." Now all they want is one or the other degree and usually no other experience. (Sometimes a couple of years experience will substitute for associate degree.)
Will all these educated people everywhere, you'd think our country would be in better shape, no?
Posted by: Stillwater at January 21, 2011 08:04 AM (0GpN4)
The DC: IÂ’ve also started to see some critical comments of you from the right over your votes for TARP, the auto bailout, and the tax on CEO bonuses. How often do you hear that in your home state, how often do you hear it on the Internet, and what do you tell people when they criticize you on those things?
Ryan:
You know I donÂ’t hear it here at home that much. YouÂ’ve got to remember
Obama won my district. Dukakis and Gore won my district. Clinton won my
district. So I donÂ’t come from, you know, a red area. So I think itÂ’s
important to keep in mind where I come from. I donÂ’t hear that here.
Profile in courage.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at January 21, 2011 08:04 AM (4oFvc)
While RyanÂ’s overall voting record is very conservative, the problem with casting these high-profile votes is that they demonstrate he is willing to fundamentally reject conservatism when the heat is on.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix
Concern!
Posted by: I'm Very Concerned at January 21, 2011 08:05 AM (6f9ix)
Posted by: Tom at January 21, 2011 08:07 AM (MWXXs)
Addition to the drinking game: Finish your drink if Boehner cries.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 21, 2011 08:08 AM (4ucxv)
Posted by: GuyfromNH at January 21, 2011 08:09 AM (kbOju)
"I'm just looking forward to NOT seeing Granny Botox jumping up and down behind Teh One at the SOTU."
Who is gonna blink the text of Necronomicon in morse code to me now?
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at January 21, 2011 08:10 AM (HaYO4)
I would choose some public space, starkly empty, that represents where Congress does the will of the people.
I'd recommend the vault at Fort Knox. He could start out with "We're broke".
Posted by: Derak at January 21, 2011 08:10 AM (CjpKH)
Posted by: CDR M at January 21, 2011 11:36 AM (5I8G0)
That isn't too hard to do with Toonces, especially with Ryan. The hard part is getting the FiftyTwo Percenters to realize their messiah has been schooled.
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd at January 21, 2011 08:12 AM (eCAn3)
"The last time Ryan went up against Obama was at the "Health Care Summit" and he pretty much schooled him. "
The bizarre thing is that, while you're right and anyone with half a brain and cursory knowledge of the numbers would agree that you are, liberals watch the same clip and think Barky is the one who did the schooling.
Being right, correct, logical, and in command of the facts is just not good enough.
Never was, never will be.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at January 21, 2011 08:12 AM (A/oSU)
Posted by: Fritz at January 21, 2011 08:12 AM (GwPRU)
Unless the POTUS does something incredibly assholish, like calling out SCOTUS because they interpreted in the Constitutution in a way he didn't like.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 21, 2011 11:41 AM (4ucxv)
Yea, cuz that wasn't divisive or vitriolic at all.
Aw, good times, good times.
Posted by: prettypinkfluffy at January 21, 2011 08:14 AM (yTIlT)
Posted by: maddogg at January 21, 2011 08:14 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2011 08:15 AM (p302b)
Posted by: maddogg at January 21, 2011 12:14 PM (OlN4e)
I'll do it for free.
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd at January 21, 2011 08:16 AM (eCAn3)
Posted by: kansas at January 21, 2011 08:16 AM (mka2b)
Posted by: Jumbo Osaka at January 21, 2011 08:17 AM (x06nX)
If we use "rhetoric" and "tone" as drink cues it's going to be like a game of Thumper. And that may not be all bad.
Ryan is a good choice, IMHO. Hopefully he will keep it short, sweet, and just wonky enough to let people know he has the facts at his command.
It may be off script for an "official" Republican response, but I would not mind him blasting in no uncertain terms the "party of 'No'" meme, and referencing his plan as convincing evidence that the Party is already bringing concrete ideas to the table. He can stress that it is still just a starting point, but refined enough to advance the ball ahead with. Refer to a website (on-screen) for all those interested in knowing more details. Wrap up by saying that the R's invite comment and look forward to a discussion and debate on the path foward.
This is just one idea, and I know the R's may not be enthusiastic since it might infer an endorsement it doesn't have. But it is crucial for the R's to demonstrate convincingly that in addition to serving as a check on unvarnished liberalism, they have positive ideas they are moving ahead with. SOTU response is a good opportunity to do that.
Posted by: RM at January 21, 2011 08:19 AM (GkYyh)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at January 21, 2011 08:20 AM (8lCJT)
Meh.
I don't think it matters much.
People are too busy muting the tv waiting for American Idol or some other nonsense to come back on the tv.
Only political wonks watch the speeech, let alone the response.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at January 21, 2011 08:21 AM (bKr+V)
Posted by: dagny at January 21, 2011 08:21 AM (MYJl4)
And then he married that hot babe and he sorta lost interest and that was that...
That's what Bill Clinton was avoiding. Brillant choice.
Posted by: dagny at January 21, 2011 08:23 AM (MYJl4)
I think he should do it live at a university that will not have boo and hiss students but serious financial and economics majors and a blackboard. I think he should use a blackboard to get things across. There are a lot of people out there that a visual learners and need to see something concrete for it to get in.
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2011 08:24 AM (p302b)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 21, 2011 08:24 AM (4ucxv)
Posted by: robtr at January 21, 2011 08:24 AM (hVDig)
Posted by: Out of Money at January 21, 2011 08:27 AM (V92KK)
Like this?
Not too much math, just enough to get the point across.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 21, 2011 08:27 AM (4ucxv)
I wonder if he will talk about the proposal being considered by congress to allow states to declare bankruptcy like GM, et. al. did. Sounds like we will all get to own California's and Illinois' pension plans!
We are so fortunate.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at January 21, 2011 08:27 AM (r1h5M)
Posted by: waiting at January 21, 2011 08:28 AM (dX5s2)
Posted by: huerfano at January 21, 2011 08:28 AM (QgmBR)
Posted by: Nighthawk at January 21, 2011 08:29 AM (02uN6)
98 If got anywhere near a blackboard the media would make the stupids think that Paul Ryan is actually Glen Beck who, btw, is a wild gun totin crying nazi. I think Paul Ryan is brave to do this since what happened to McDonnell and Jindel after they did it.
Perhaps Boston Harbor with people dressed up like Indians walking behind him with boxes of tea. Then the Chinese could show up and take the tea. Visuals, visuals, we need visuals.
Posted by: dagny at January 21, 2011 08:30 AM (MYJl4)
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at January 21, 2011 08:30 AM (w41GQ)
Yeah, I like that idea, too.
Posted by: Y-not is happy it's Friday at January 21, 2011 08:30 AM (pW2o8)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 21, 2011 08:31 AM (4ucxv)
Posted by: MissTammy at January 21, 2011 08:32 AM (BebB7)
Oddly enough, yesterday I was reading an article about the kid who solved her own kidnapping and finally, at 23 found her birth mother and I thought it was so odd that she said "she always wondered why she couldn't get her birth certificate" and it made me think how important it is to have a birth certificate and we all take them for granted..
and the kid who was finally allowed back into the country where the family was going to sue cause he is "an American citizen". I wondered if he was born here and they produced a birth certificate, cause after the threat to sue, he was back in the USA this morning.
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2011 08:32 AM (p302b)
I'd put Ryan in front of the mural depicting the meeting of the Continental Congress
Continental what?! LOL!
Posted by: Ezra Klein at January 21, 2011 08:32 AM (bKr+V)
That's a good idea. Is George Washington University somewhat conservative? I thought I read their law school is.
Posted by: Y-not is happy it's Friday at January 21, 2011 08:34 AM (pW2o8)
Posted by: joncelli at January 21, 2011 08:34 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: dagny at January 21, 2011 08:34 AM (MYJl4)
Ryan will deliver GOP response from the House Budget Committee hearing room
Also, What Should I Do?
Posted by: Brett Favre at January 21, 2011 08:34 AM (vxZXK)
Gold Standard now supported by Alan Greenspan.
And a further stunner: Greenspan himself wonders if we really need a central bank.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at January 21, 2011 08:35 AM (xdHzq)
Use the textbook name it's the "you lie" response.
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2011 08:35 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Stillwater at January 21, 2011 08:35 AM (0GpN4)
Funny, I remember Sen. Fred Thompson giving a response to one of Bill Clinton's SOTU and thinking, wow, *that* guy belongs in the Oval Office.
And then he married that hot babe and he sorta lost interest and that was that...
What happened to Fred last time around. He seemed to be doing resonably well. I know that that ass Cameron from Fox did a hit job on him, but after that, he just tucked tail and slid off the stage. What really happened? I really thought he had the makings of a real leader. I've asked this question several times here, but I've never gotten an answer. Maybe someone Moron here now can address this.
Posted by: havedash at January 21, 2011 08:36 AM (sFD5n)
I think it would be pretty effective if Paul Ryan gave his response with his kids in the background, each one sitting on a pile of $1 bills equivalent to their share of the national debt bale of hay, wearing rags and displaying dirty faces. He could then proceed to tell the audience to get used to the way his kids look, since everyone's kids are looking at tax rates of 66% and 80% (if they're bidness owners).
FIFM
Posted by: RushBabe at January 21, 2011 08:36 AM (urYpw)
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2011 08:36 AM (p302b)
What color tie? He tends to wear purple (SEIU) a lot. Very odd.
Or will he wear red to pretend he's a Republican (and as an homage to the Chinese)?
Posted by: Y-not is happy it's Friday at January 21, 2011 08:37 AM (pW2o8)
Posted by: dagny at January 21, 2011 08:37 AM (MYJl4)
Why can't Paul Ryan give his rebuttal in an auditorium full of conservatives? He could even attach his own seal to the podium like obama did while campaigning.
"THE OFFICE OF THE STATE OF THE UNION RESPONDER"
TOOTSOFTUR
I like it. With a big Reagan silhouette. And a bullseye--just to be dicky.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 21, 2011 08:38 AM (B+qrE)
I remember reading over at HotAir, mostly, that Fred was only in it to draw votes away from someone... can't remember who, maybe Mitt?... and to help McCain.
I never saw any evidence presented, however.
Posted by: Y-not is happy it's Friday at January 21, 2011 08:38 AM (pW2o8)
Posted by: havedash at January 21, 2011 08:39 AM (sFD5n)
Rubio and Pence are hawter.
Posted by: Y-not is happy it's Friday at January 21, 2011 08:40 AM (pW2o8)
Only political wonks watch the speeech, let alone the response.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at January 21, 2011 12:21 PM^^ This right here ^^
I've seen more than enough SoTU gabfests to last me several lifetimes. Same for responses, which are usually no more than preaching to the other choir. Dimbulb A says things will be fine if only Congress does what he wants -- while providing a few pathetic human examples to look at instead of charts -- and Dimbulb B says A is essentially full of shit.
I won't be watching either the Mohammedan Mouthpiece or Ryan. When you know what they'll see in advance, and know what the responses will be, it's a poor alternative to watching a rerun of, say, Pawn Stars.
Posted by: MrScribbler© at January 21, 2011 08:40 AM (Ulu3i)
There will be Together We Thrive Tee's placed over the congressional seats before the speech. Oh, and tubes of vaseline too.
Posted by: Barbarian at January 21, 2011 08:41 AM (EL+OC)
Fred would make a great President. I even believe he would make a great nominee. He is one butt-lousy primary candidate, though. I will once again throw out the "lazy" word.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 21, 2011 08:42 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: Pegs Noonan at January 21, 2011 08:43 AM (EL+OC)
Posted by: dagny at January 21, 2011 08:43 AM (MYJl4)
I can't think of a top school in Wisconsin (that's Ryan's home state, right?) that would be a good choice.
Posted by: Y-not is happy it's Friday at January 21, 2011 08:43 AM (pW2o8)
BTW, I don't think Ryan is hawt. I don't see it. He has an odd hairline and kind of severe features.
Rubio and Pence are hawter.
He's kind of cute, reminds me of a Kennedy (sorry Paul). Rubio? Oh hell yes!
Posted by: jewells45 at January 21, 2011 08:43 AM (l/N7H)
you don't think he hot?
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2011 08:44 AM (p302b)
He is not running this time. If brought up at all it should only be done as another example of why nominal Republicans should NEVER believe a damn word anyone in the media, including Fox, says about a conservative Republican.
Posted by: Vic at January 21, 2011 08:45 AM (M9Ie6)
Besides, a guy doesn't have to be teh hawt, but if he' smart?? I find really smart sharp guys to be very sexy.
Posted by: jewells45 at January 21, 2011 08:45 AM (l/N7H)
I find really smart sharp guys to be very sexy.
So we know that you don't come here for "stimulation" then.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 21, 2011 08:47 AM (B+qrE)
That's true.
Mostly I was just responding to the buzz out there in the intertubes that he's some sort of hottie. To me, I don't see it. He's a little gaunt for my taste.
I know this is shallow, but I wish we could run a handsome, youngish man against Obama this time. If we could run someone who looks virile and is attractive, I think that'd make it easier for some of the shallow Indies to vote for him, especially the women.
Posted by: Y-not is happy it's Friday at January 21, 2011 08:47 AM (pW2o8)
Posted by: RushBabe at January 21, 2011 08:48 AM (urYpw)
I'm with you, I find brains uber sexy. Any guy can be cleaned up in a suit or a uniform or a tux. But a brain, you can't find if it isn't there.
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2011 08:48 AM (p302b)
I remember reading over at HotAir, mostly, that Fred was only in it to draw votes away from someone... can't remember who, maybe Mitt?... and to help McCain.
I never saw any evidence presented, however.
Interesting...thanks for the info. His whole demeanor was half-hearted. Not what I would have expected based on his videos and speeches. I loved his video response to Michael Moore...totally classic. That Fred never showed up on the campaign trail.
Posted by: havedash at January 21, 2011 08:49 AM (sFD5n)
I find really smart sharp guys to be very sexy.
So we know that you don't come here for "stimulation" then.
*hearty guffaw*
Posted by: RushBabe at January 21, 2011 08:49 AM (urYpw)
I know this is shallow, but I wish we could run a handsome, youngish man against Obama this time. If we could run someone who looks virile and is attractive, I think that'd make it easier for some of the shallow Indies to vote for him, especially the women.
Screw that. I want a direct-speaking, no-nonsense candidate and I don't care if it's the giant eye of Sauron.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 21, 2011 08:49 AM (B+qrE)
I don't know how these things get started.
Wiki has the roll calls.
Posted by: Y-not is happy it's Friday at January 21, 2011 08:50 AM (pW2o8)
Fred! voted guilty on both counts.
I don't know how these things get started.
Whew! That's a relief.
Posted by: RushBabe at January 21, 2011 08:51 AM (urYpw)
The same way "Barack Obama is a great speaker and really smart" and "Sarah Palin shot Gabrielle Giffords" do...because no one calls BS.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 21, 2011 08:52 AM (B+qrE)
I want to get Obama out of the WH. If we can find a candidate who is the total package, instead of some doddering old albino, then we should factor that in.
Posted by: Y-not is happy it's Friday at January 21, 2011 08:52 AM (pW2o8)
141 Took the boy to George Mason for a tour last year. The newspaper was pretty conservative and the school is supposed to be because it hires faculty like Walter Williams. The girl giving the first half of the tour had spiked pink hair and about a dozen piercings including her lips. The next guy was gay and dressed like it with his own piercings and peace shirt. The third fat girl had tatoos on her ankles, was an uptalker, and mentioned that Obama had come to speak there 4 times. She might have mentioned it again if I hadn't told her that she should know that the reference made some people nauseated.
Couldn't get out of there fast enough.
Posted by: dagny at January 21, 2011 08:52 AM (MYJl4)
Posted by: dagny at January 21, 2011 08:55 AM (MYJl4)
I think we have to stay away from the old bald guys.
Hmmm....MIKE PENCE MIKE PENCE MIKE PENCE MIKE PENCE
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 21, 2011 08:57 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: dagny at January 21, 2011 12:55 PM (MYJl4)
Can't believe you are saying this and not waiting for the mainstream media to tell you who your candidate is and not waiting for the whiners on here to tell you about he next old white guy's whose turn it is to vie for the presidency. I mean I read on some blog that I clicked on from malkin's blog roll that mcshame is thinking of running again....nearly lost my lunch....
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2011 08:57 AM (p302b)
I can imagine several factors for that. One is that those students may have been on student aid and were tour guides run out of the Admissions or Dean of Students offices. Those admins tend to be rather liberal at most places, I find.
Also, you can't always judge a book by its cover. I was on the radio station the first couple of years of school and shopped at consignment shops, but I was very conservative even back then.
The other may be that the undergrad population is liberal, but the professional and grad schools are conservative. U of Chicago was like that back in the day. The ranking I had was based on the B-school and law school.
I can see a problem with the blackboard/classroom motif. Could look too much like those horrid UPS ads.
Posted by: Y-not is happy it's Friday at January 21, 2011 08:57 AM (pW2o8)
Anyway...I think Pence is a good choice...w Ryan or Rubio.
And before I get the "where's the women" stuff...Michelle Bachman is great. Love her. We have a very deep bench w Repub women.
Posted by: LtT26 at January 21, 2011 09:00 AM (QUdKy)
153 - I think it gets twisted because Fred voted against conviction after the impeachment.
Thompson was one of 10 Republican senators to vote against convicting President Bill Clinton after the House impeachment for perjury, but he did vote to convict on the obstruction of justice charge. (This is from what I gather to be a lefty blog.)
Posted by: RushBabe at January 21, 2011 09:01 AM (urYpw)
The other day one of the talking heads was saying how jeb will be president in 2016 and there will be a lot of contenders but that, now that sarah palin has only helped the president's poll numbers and inadvertently served as a foil for him, well, she is not longer viable. So you know they aren't thinking she's the challenger. They ahve brought up Pence so to me, he's out.
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2011 09:03 AM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2011 01:03 PM
Isn't disqualifying someone because they've been mentioned in the media just another way of letting the media choose the candidate?
I honestly don't get this strategy.
The pundits are out there trying to seem relevant, so they toss out names they've heard or suggest strategies. It's just chatter and noise, not necessarily some big strategy on their part to pick our candidate.
If someone, for whatever reason (either because they're photogenic, give good sound bites, or well-connected), gets play in the media, that should be a good thing. It doesn't mean you choose them - you need to choose based on qualifications and ideology - but it doesn't disqualify them. Free positive media coverage is good, even if it does get taken away as that person becomes a viable challenger to Obama.
Posted by: Y-not is happy it's Friday at January 21, 2011 09:08 AM (pW2o8)
Ryan is an obviously bright conservative who, however, has a history of getting his arm twisted on the big votes. I think he's perfect as head of the Budget Committee, where his alpha-wonkiness can shine.
On national TV, can he put the wonkiness aside and sell conservative values to the "indie" mushheads who swing elections? Who knows. Anyway, he seems as good a choice as any other. Can't do any worse than Jindal, the last "brilliant" wonk who flopped in the post-SOTU.
Posted by: right field bleachers at January 21, 2011 09:09 AM (K/USr)
I forgot Allen West. That's a good man there.
The R women are pretty much newcomers. That's great. Kristi Noem, Nikki Haley, and I saw Mary Fallon yesterday and I think she's pretty sharp too.
But I was a Rudy guy...like Dennis Miller said, "I want the guy who's gonna croak the most terrorists"...
but the economy is the thing now...unless we get hit again.
Posted by: LtT26 at January 21, 2011 09:13 AM (QUdKy)
The R women are pretty much newcomers.
Yeah, but West is also a newcomer. 2016 should be interesting. 2012 still worries me.
Posted by: Y-not is happy it's Friday at January 21, 2011 09:16 AM (pW2o8)
Posted by: LtT26 at January 21, 2011 09:19 AM (QUdKy)
Posted by: Jeff B. at January 21, 2011 11:31 AM (NjYDy)
Nope. Didn't upset me too much either. It didn't matter if the right had had someone as erudite as Buckley and as telegenic as Palin. Nothing was going to outshine the first black President giving his first SOTU address to a joint session of Congress. Under those circumstances, the Republican speaker and his venue mattered little.
Posted by: Book Geek at January 21, 2011 09:27 AM (1+OO5)
Therefore, I am waiting for actual campaigns and debates in order to make up my mind. (Unless you people start harping about certain candidates again, forcing me to choose early.)
Posted by: Miss Marple who has a science degree and is getting quite aggravated at January 21, 2011 09:37 AM (Fo83G)
Okay I'll jump in with the 'ettes....I like Ryan for his big, dreamy eyes (just like Big Fat Meanie said) and his brains.....but the eyes get me.
Above all I want a candidate that is not only smart (not 'Obama Smart' but, ya know, actually smart and competent) but has BALLS to stand for his/her convictions on what this country was founded on, etc.
McCain was disgusting with his feeble sound bites and reluctance to engage Toonces.
Posted by: Cheri at January 21, 2011 09:46 AM (oiNtH)
Now what should the t-shirts say?
Posted by: CDR M at January 21, 2011 11:49 AM (5I8G0)
I'm in hock for over $40,000 and all I get is this lousy t-shirt? Thanks, Obi-Won!
Posted by: ya2daup at January 21, 2011 10:02 AM (HmCnI)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 21, 2011 12:31 PM (4ucxv)
I like your phraseology!
Posted by: ya2daup at January 21, 2011 10:14 AM (HmCnI)
Posted by: ya2daup at January 21, 2011 10:15 AM (HmCnI)
Posted by: robtr at January 21, 2011 12:24 PM (hVDig)
Somebody upthread suggested the Vinnie Gambini (Joe Pesci) response: "Everything that guy just said is bullshit."
Would be pure gold...
Posted by: Nighthawk at January 21, 2011 12:29 PM (02uN6)
I sense some homemade YouTube mashups coming.
Posted by: grognard at January 21, 2011 10:29 AM (NS2Mo)
As for what he should do, a bit surprised about the speech location-- since it's rather empty and austere-- but maybe that's the point. With regards to reaching people, he should try to be less wonkish and act like the American people are his constituents in Janesville. After all, he must have some small-town America appeal since he has such high approval ratings there. Whether he remembers that remains to be see.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at January 21, 2011 10:38 AM (sZ+lP)
It would illustrate a powerfully mannered style should Boehner arrange for Ryan's response delivered from the House Speaker's Chair, requiring the SOTU event remain in session with all in attendance to remain seated and the media remain silent until the oppositional response from the Speaker's Chair is completed.
...change we can believe in...
Posted by: Why Me? at January 21, 2011 10:45 AM (H+LJc)
I am waiting for clarification, because if she thinks she can do this when Ryan has been given the responsibility, we are talking about heading towards loonytune territory.
Posted by: Miss Marple who has a science degree and is getting quite aggravated at January 21, 2011 11:01 AM (Fo83G)
Key words there.
Posted by: Vic at January 21, 2011 11:11 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Kortezzi at January 21, 2011 11:25 AM (piR98)
Posted by: Shoey at January 21, 2011 11:26 AM (ehKDD)
Posted by: Brian at January 21, 2011 12:27 PM (sYrWB)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2494 seconds, 305 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Jeff B. at January 21, 2011 07:31 AM (NjYDy)