September 13, 2011
— Ace Allah's pretty psyched.
He thinks that campaigning will be less thorough in Pennsylvania because of this, because, if it's not winner take all, but mostly divided, campaigns may say "eh."
I don't know about that, but I just began thinking about it like two seconds ago.
Question: Generally we sort of assume Pennsylvania's 20 EV's will go to Obama. Because they always go Democratic.
What happens to the electoral math if Pennsylvania is instead something like a 12-8 split?
Isn't that a very, very serious problem for Barack Obama?
Obama would have virtually no chance to capture anything like all 20 EVs. As liberal wags like to say, Pennsylvania is Philadelphia and Pittsburgh surrounded by miles and miles of Alabama.
So, he can forget capturing much more than a bare majority of the EVs. Pennsylvania essentially becomes a split.
And now you see the brilliance of Obama's proposed seven bonus states, huh?
Posted by: Ace at
03:45 PM
| Comments (59)
Post contains 166 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Rick Fucking Perry at September 13, 2011 03:47 PM (fj/P0)
Posted by: Dante at September 13, 2011 03:49 PM (ZacuO)
Posted by: observer at September 13, 2011 03:49 PM (IrjV9)
Posted by: Jose at September 13, 2011 03:50 PM (WTNJJ)
Posted by: Raoul Ortega at September 13, 2011 03:51 PM (GUxTi)
Not gonna happen in any D-controlled state. How often does someone sign off on their own death warrant. Well, aside from Obamacare.
Posted by: pep at September 13, 2011 03:53 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at September 13, 2011 03:54 PM (5Z/+/)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 13, 2011 03:55 PM (QxSug)
Posted by: I'm in a New York state of mind at September 13, 2011 03:57 PM (4sQwu)
Posted by: Funk Doctor at September 13, 2011 03:58 PM (UsDKB)
Posted by: Stu-22 at September 13, 2011 04:04 PM (k4bdL)
Obama won't carry more than 9 electoral votes in this situation, Ace.
11 of the districts are R or R leaning and will go to the Republican.
Only 5 are hard Democratic- PA14, PA1, PA2, PA 13, PA 17. PA 4 is slightly so, so maybe he snags that one as well. PA-7 would be pushing it given the current political climate there.
That plus the 2 for statewide win, and he gets between 7-8, but lucky if he even hits 9. Thats of course if there is tremendous fraud in Philly and he carries the state, which at this point I don't think he does.
If this goes into effect for 2012 (doubtful), add 10 EV's to the Republicans instantly, with another 2-3 fairly likely to go R as well.
Posted by: CAC at September 13, 2011 04:04 PM (LdSq+)
Posted by: I'm in a New York state of mind at September 13, 2011 04:04 PM (4sQwu)
unfortunately it'll never happen. Our Republicans are spineless. In the past few decades we've given the world Rick Santorum and Arlen Specter. Just think about that. Those were our best options to run for senate in our state. That means they were the best republicans we could find.
The only exception is Pat Toomey, and it's taken him a long time and a wave election to just barely sqeek out a win.
We're a shit state let's face it. We've got awesome football and hockey teams, but politically we suck ball bit time.
Posted by: Ben at September 13, 2011 04:04 PM (tEGzl)
Posted by: Ben at September 13, 2011 04:06 PM (tEGzl)
#18
PA-12 is Republican leaning during Presidential races, PA-4 a swing.
So basically any Democrat is stuck with 5 districts and (again assuming overwhelming fraud wins the state) the 2 STATEWIDE-TO-THE-VICTOR EV's, just 7. They would have to fight tooth and nail for new district 4 and PA7. Nothing else is really viable for them.
Posted by: CAC at September 13, 2011 04:08 PM (LdSq+)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at September 13, 2011 04:08 PM (cSkZ5)
I think a lot of liberals are initially thinking, "This is a great idea," but they tend to get in line pretty fast when their bosses crack the whip.
Posted by: AmishDude at September 13, 2011 04:09 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 13, 2011 04:09 PM (DiqH3)
Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston training for the ONT mudwrestling match at September 13, 2011 04:11 PM (ijjAe)
[Al Gore is the latest to win the popular vote (assuming that there was no democratic voter fraud) but lose the electoral college count]
Posted by: Mark E at September 13, 2011 04:11 PM (RJ4o5)
PA-12 is Republican leaning during Presidential races, PA-4 a swing.
I live in PA-4. We've been getting more and more D as people move out of Pittsburgh because of high taxes and continue their dumbshit voting trends here
PA-12 is so republican leaning that they've elected a D Rep for my entire life.
PA-4 and PA-12 may vote Republican in Presidential races most of the time, but they're not R leaning on a local level.
Posted by: Ben at September 13, 2011 04:12 PM (tEGzl)
Hey Ben, don't forget the cheesesteaks! You got that going too!
Yeah and we put fries on our sandwiches. How retarded it that? I mean I know it's a big deal and I'm supposed to have pride in it, but I love fries. I like eating them one by one. Why in the fuck would I want to jam them all onto my sandwich and lose the pleasure of eating them one at a time?
Posted by: Ben at September 13, 2011 04:14 PM (tEGzl)
Pennsylvania
and a smile comes to my face and my weepy eyes
Posted by: Yip in Texas at September 13, 2011 04:14 PM (Sh+fu)
PA-4 and PA-12 may vote Republican in Presidential races most of the time, but they're not R leaning on a local level.
Posted by: Ben at September 13, 2011 08:12 PM (tEGzl)
Since this only affects Presidential races, thats why I broke it down that way. I am well aware PA-4 and PA-12 voters are exposed to Gardisil vaccines when they touch the "congressional" part of the ballot.
Posted by: CAC at September 13, 2011 04:16 PM (LdSq+)
Posted by: ginaswo at September 13, 2011 04:18 PM (fSaqa)
Since this only affects Presidential races, thats why I broke it down that way. I am well aware PA-4 and PA-12 voters are exposed to Gardisil vaccines when they touch the "congressional" part of the ballot.
heh. I just reread you post and I noticed that.
It's tough to explain. It's just the Democrat is bred into people here when it comes to local politics. I guess part of it is that our Democrats are more socially conservative than National Republicans, but on economic issues they're gardisil tards like every other democrat.
Posted by: Ben at September 13, 2011 04:18 PM (tEGzl)
am telling ya PA is going red in 12 even if this isn't changed. I know I'm hopelessly positive but '10 showed what was possible and we will surpass what we did last go round
Ace called the tipping point and there is IMO a media caused Bradley effect in polling on obamas likeability. It won't save him
One and done
PA is never going red again for one reason. Filthadelphia. Everyone other area can go red but if Philly has big turnout, then it doesn't matter.
Also they're freaking awesome at cheating. They would give Chicago a run for it's money on cheating. Pittsburgh is kinda that way too.
Posted by: Ben at September 13, 2011 04:19 PM (tEGzl)
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at September 13, 2011 04:20 PM (dIHHd)
Ben, we also have the best team in baseball, but if you're in Western PA, I can understand why you might forget that....
baseball, what is this baseball you speak of?
Posted by: Ben at September 13, 2011 04:23 PM (tEGzl)
Posted by: Elize Nayden at September 13, 2011 04:25 PM (v49dF)
Isn't that a very, very serious problem for Barack Obama?
Yes, and it's because he would no longer get the individual EVs from districts that he did not win. A 12-8 split turns PA's 20 EVs into 2 smaller states, one of which JEF did not win. Where does JEF make up the deficit? He can't print EVs.
Giving the district EV to the winner in that district minimizes the possibility of winning 51% by 2 points, losing 49% by 15 points, and still getting all ... it's still there, but very hard to do.
Posted by: Arbalest at September 13, 2011 04:26 PM (twE6E)
Posted by: Wyatt Earp, Stuck In Philly at September 13, 2011 04:28 PM (7Ivpj)
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at September 13, 2011 04:32 PM (dIHHd)
Posted by: proudonkey at September 13, 2011 04:38 PM (NadeK)
I know.. the districts are based on population.... I think I saw an article laying all this out a few years back showing how a 'by district" layout would work...hmmm
Posted by: Yip in Texas at September 13, 2011 04:44 PM (Sh+fu)
Posted by: Jeb at September 13, 2011 04:44 PM (sO5os)
Posted by: Larry Rupert at September 13, 2011 04:59 PM (8xYyJ)
If this happens, it doesn't matter if Obama "wins" the state outright since he will lose over half the electoral votes anyway.
2 "OVERALL WINNER" votes.
Pitt, Philly 1 Philly 2 Philly Burb 1(cd13) PA-17, possibly Philly Burb 2 (cd7).
8 out of 12, including "the 2 state wide winner" points. Thats with philly fraud churning and churning.
If we pull it off and beat him to carry the total state pop vote, we will lose roughly the same 5-6 congressional district EVs and carry the other 14.
win-win
Posted by: CAC at September 13, 2011 05:00 PM (LdSq+)
Now, that list doesn't break down by EV's. A commenter added it up manually and figured that Obama still would have won by a 301-237 EV margin.
But it would have spared us the bullshit in 2000..Bush would have had 297 EVs.
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at September 13, 2011 05:03 PM (dIHHd)
Posted by: Jordan at September 13, 2011 05:12 PM (4z6KA)
Could be that the dems are afraid that PA will go republican in 2012 and they are trying to eke out whatever EVs they can get.
Posted by: RETIRED MILITARY at September 13, 2011 05:14 PM (kZW4U)
"And now you see the brilliance of Obama's proposed seven bonus states, huh?"
WHOA There Boy!
Does this then mean that the many fictional congessional districts that Obama claimed had jobs saved or created now each have an electoral vote for Obama in 2012?????
Posted by: Thresherman at September 13, 2011 05:36 PM (ifu6y)
Posted by: Jayne Cobb at September 13, 2011 06:06 PM (jG6y3)
Posted by: Lewis at September 13, 2011 07:33 PM (6TClq)
Posted by: horn at September 13, 2011 07:48 PM (ZjP0F)
Posted by: Francis at September 13, 2011 08:22 PM (rCMaG)
1r0719,0020922801,5i-8670x,sakura filter china 2934053
mann filter w67/1,mann filter wd13145/3,901-048 perkins,caterpillar 199
fuel wather separator brands on the market
Posted by: christine at September 13, 2011 08:39 PM (RkJ5/)
This is on my list for a US Constitutional Amendment - doing it for all states, that is. That, and getting rid of the actual electors, who literally have the power to vote however the hell they want (even though they rarely do). I think I had a couple more electoral college items, but I forget, offhand.
Oh, and you might want to note that PA has been officially a Red State since the 2010 election. Majority in the House, Repub Gov, Repub state legislature. Only the Senate is even.
Posted by: Optimizer at September 13, 2011 10:58 PM (As94z)
But I wouldn't want to bet on this as a long term situation.
We're going to beat Obama anyway. Let's not hurt ourselves long term to get a short term win we're already going to get.
Posted by: Greg Q at September 14, 2011 05:53 AM (/0a60)
And I hate Corbett's idea. It feels like cowardice, like the state party giving up, going turtle, locking in a loser's moiety.
Posted by: Mitch H. at September 14, 2011 07:29 AM (jwKxK)
Posted by: kohler at September 14, 2011 03:22 PM (sh9Tb)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2006 seconds, 187 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: steevy at September 13, 2011 03:45 PM (fyOgS)