October 06, 2011
— Guest Blogger In a Sisyphean effort, Gov. Rick Perry issues a flat denial:
“I think there were very much some strong inconsistencies and just misinformation in that story,” Perry told Fox News Channel reporter Juliet Huddy in an interview this morning. “I know for a fact that in 1984, that rock was painted over. It was painted over very soon, my family did that.”“We painted over that rock and it stayed that way. I have no idea where or why people would say that they had seen that rock, because that’s just not the fact,” he added.
Video at the story.
And for the record? Democrats painted over a racist fossil for decades.
(you can follow me on Twitter at @CuffyMeh)
Posted by: Guest Blogger at
11:58 AM
| Comments (370)
Post contains 138 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 06, 2011 11:59 AM (jx2j9)
Posted by: The Great Satan's Ghost at October 06, 2011 11:59 AM (08Pe8)
Posted by: lu at October 06, 2011 11:59 AM (pLTLS)
MFM in unanimous in saying that they see no problem with that.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 06, 2011 12:00 PM (jx2j9)
uhhh. this is going to be 20 minutes of the next debate. There are times where i hate politics.
We're never going to discuss issues that matter in the primaries
Posted by: Ben at October 06, 2011 12:01 PM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Joffen at October 06, 2011 12:02 PM (EPcuy)
Posted by: EC at October 06, 2011 12:02 PM (GQ8sn)
I'm such a bastid that I didn't even think to denounce myself.
Posted by: fluffy at October 06, 2011 12:02 PM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at October 06, 2011 12:03 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Dave at October 06, 2011 12:04 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: Heartless Janitors_4_Jesus at October 06, 2011 12:05 PM (tazG1)
Posted by: steevy at October 06, 2011 12:05 PM (fyOgS)
Posted by: @CuffyMeh at October 06, 2011 12:06 PM (rqzCR)
Yeah, as much I'm annoyed with Perry for saying that things like sovereignty and the rule of law are heartless and bad, the lack of pictures of this so-called rock, plus my distrust of the MFM lead me to conclude that there's nothing here.
I mean-- this is all they have? A painted-over rock? Desperate. Weaksauce.
Posted by: Lance McCormick at October 06, 2011 12:06 PM (zgHLA)
Posted by: Heartless Janitors_4_Jesus at October 06, 2011 12:06 PM (tazG1)
Posted by: buzzion at October 06, 2011 12:06 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: steevy at October 06, 2011 12:06 PM (fyOgS)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at October 06, 2011 12:06 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: the greaseman at October 06, 2011 12:07 PM (eOXTH)
Posted by: anybody but perry at October 06, 2011 12:08 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: steevy at October 06, 2011 04:06 PM (fyOgS)
FTFY
Posted by: buzzion at October 06, 2011 12:08 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: Heartless Janitors_4_Jesus at October 06, 2011 12:08 PM (tazG1)
I've climbed around monkey face on smith rock.
Even though it's got nothing to do with a race or even human beings, can I still consider myself racist?
Posted by: imp at October 06, 2011 12:09 PM (UaxA0)
Perry's still my guy (and he's flat apologized for that several times- do need a direct (to you) written apology in blood?), but Cain seems to be surging.
I have problems with his gafftasticness, and I don't think he's had any hard interviews since he became the latest media darling (after playing the race-card all-too-willingly on Perry), so I'm not sold. And I won't be until Perry really falls out of the race- if that happens.
On the other hand, look at our other options:
RomneyCare
"Tardisil" Bachman
Newt
Those are really it ("other" options, I'd already discussed Perry and Cain).
So, of the 5 (3, really- Newt and Bachman are functionally out of it, baring some miracle), who's your choice?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at October 06, 2011 12:09 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: lu at October 06, 2011 12:09 PM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Dave at October 06, 2011 12:09 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: The Schwalbe : © at October 06, 2011 12:10 PM (UU0OF)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at October 06, 2011 12:10 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: t-bird at October 06, 2011 12:11 PM (FcR7P)
it's all good....
Posted by: ontherocks at October 06, 2011 12:11 PM (HBqDo)
Posted by: Dave at October 06, 2011 12:11 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: Mom at October 06, 2011 12:11 PM (AZGON)
I saw it. It now says Obama=SCOAMF.
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at October 06, 2011 12:12 PM (OhYCU)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at October 06, 2011 12:12 PM (eOXTH)
Posted by: lu at October 06, 2011 04:09 PM (pLTLS)
Fuck him. Talk about being a petulant dickbag. No wonder he's being all buddy-like with Romney.
Posted by: buzzion at October 06, 2011 12:12 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: Joffen at October 06, 2011 12:12 PM (EPcuy)
But his comment about 'insensitivity' burned. That is just another example of him not being careful. I think this is a very good reason why he should have run for a lower office, such as Governor or Senator, to improve his skills sufficiently.
I say that even though Perry is not the exemplar of slickness. His gaffes, however, are not in the same category, IMO.
I am carefully watching these two. I will almost certainly vote for one of them, but I respect both of them.
Posted by: Dustin at October 06, 2011 12:12 PM (fF625)
"Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. (D-Ill.) introduced a resolution in the House demanding that Perry apologize for not immediately removing the offending rock; the measure was blocked in a vote mostly down party lines."
Are you fucking kidding me? The whole fucking country is falling apart and that worthless piece of shit has the gall, the unmitigated gall, to waste everyone's time by introducing THAT? A fucking rock on someone else's land over 30 years ago--and he is to apologize today? He wants the United States House of Representatives to officially call Rick Perry a racist over a fucking rock he had nothing to do with???!!!!
By all means, let us play fucking nice with these guys, let us go to their debates, let us have them set the agenda and topics, let us buy into every fucking thing they print and say with no hesitation.
I hope you people supporting Cain and Romney realize just how badly your guys have willingly--willingly--played into the media's hands.
Posted by: Jimmuy at October 06, 2011 12:13 PM (ibeMV)
Posted by: lu at October 06, 2011 04:09 PM (pLTLS)
Say good night, Herman. You apparently don't understand how this game works.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at October 06, 2011 12:13 PM (D5iHx)
Go to Yidd with Lidd: he's got a link to an interview where Perry does just that. Says it was "unfair to those who oppose the law." You can't get much more of an apology than that.
Of course, it'll never get played, because a) it's from a right-wing interview and b) the whole point of these interviews is to be giant "gotcha" sessions.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at October 06, 2011 12:13 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: WalrusRex at October 06, 2011 12:14 PM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 06, 2011 12:15 PM (aYQHH)
Can we move the ghey-ass Steve Jobs pick down the queue?
It's not as if anyone in the world is unaware of his dying.
Smug liberal hipster douchebags don't need a patron saint.
Posted by: imp at October 06, 2011 12:15 PM (UaxA0)
Posted by: @CuffyMeh at October 06, 2011 12:15 PM (rqzCR)
Posted by: steevy at October 06, 2011 12:15 PM (fyOgS)
Cain's a joke. I know, I know he's got good numbers now, but that won't last.
Since the race is now Perry v Romney, I'm on team Perry.
I dislike Romney and if Perry is the only real alternative who could win the generals, then I'm with him despite his views on immigration
Posted by: Ben at October 06, 2011 12:16 PM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Dave at October 06, 2011 12:16 PM (Xm1aB)
"Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. (D-Ill.) introduced a resolution in the House demanding that Perry apologize for not immediately removing the offending rock; the measure was blocked in a vote mostly down party lines."
Text of privileged resolution and video of floor speech
Posted by: Miss80s at October 06, 2011 12:16 PM (d6QMz)
Posted by: The Schwalbe : © at October 06, 2011 04:10 PM (UU0OF)
Of course not. If you read the WaPo story they claim to have seen photos of it, and you can make out an the N and the 2 G's and that's about all it said. It could destroy the efforts if they actually had to show it.
Posted by: buzzion at October 06, 2011 12:16 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at October 06, 2011 12:16 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: lu at October 06, 2011 04:09 PM (pLTLS)
Oh, he's much more of an asshole than most people realise. JUST WAIT untill after the primaries when he keeps going all McCain (or worse) just to stay relevant and get invited back on TV for the Sunday news shows. This is just the tip of the asshole.
Posted by: Max Power at October 06, 2011 12:16 PM (Hucnr)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at October 06, 2011 12:17 PM (eOXTH)
Posted by: That Rock at October 06, 2011 12:17 PM (GvYeG)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 06, 2011 12:18 PM (aYQHH)
Posted by: © Sponge at October 06, 2011 12:18 PM (UK9cE)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at October 06, 2011 12:18 PM (B0ebt)
Perry is soft on one aspect of immigration, but he's not soft on border enforcement. He's actually put resourced into that specific issue, and his immigration policy centers around controlling the border.
I don't agree with the tuition stance, but it's not a deal breaker because there is a practical reasoning behind it, and Texas is left with no good solutions because the border is not secure enough.
Cain needs to drop this subtle 'he's racist' thing.
Perry is simply not racist. He's worked with a huge number of blacks, and unlike some pols, he doesn't care that they are black. They aren't there as tokens. They are there because Texas attracts great people, some of whom are black, and Perry relies on them. Even for our top state court, where Perry appointed the first black man.
But again, not because he was black. Because he was the best. Perry is being treated very unfairly by Cain. I hope this is just the press taking Cain's words apart to split the right, and Cain isn't treating Perry differently in this case because he's a white guy. I really like Cain and see him as a genuine guy, but he's acting so strange lately, like he's got an alliance with Romney in exchange for a VP slot.
Anyone preferring Romney to Perry is not a reliable conservative, IMO.
Posted by: Dustin at October 06, 2011 12:18 PM (fF625)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at October 06, 2011 12:18 PM (eOXTH)
Posted by: JackStraw at October 06, 2011 12:19 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at October 06, 2011 12:19 PM (OhYCU)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 06, 2011 12:19 PM (aYQHH)
Posted by: Heartless Janitors_4_Jesus at October 06, 2011 12:19 PM (tazG1)
Posted by: steevy at October 06, 2011 12:19 PM (fyOgS)
Cain let teh n-head thing drop. The national Journal is stirring up shit. He doesn't want to be Perry's running mate because in his words:
Cain said his concerns about Perry include "being soft on the border, issues relative to tuition for children of illegal aliens."
Now Herman Cain shouldn't be going after anyone who's soft around the middle ... oh that was the Nation's border! Never mind.
but it was the NJ that threw in the negrohead stuff, not Cain.
Posted by: imp at October 06, 2011 12:20 PM (UaxA0)
Posted by: t-bird at October 06, 2011 04:13 PM (FcR7P)
Can you SMELL what I'M COOKIN!?!
Posted by: Dwayne Johnson at October 06, 2011 12:20 PM (UK9cE)
Senator Al Gore Sr voted against the 1964 Civil Rights Act
Posted by: kbdabear at October 06, 2011 12:20 PM (Y+DPZ)
Those pretending this is how democrats govern today are idiots. This is exactly what I want from a candidate on the most critical issue of the day.
Perry is also much better on foreign policy than his competitors.
He just needs to get that weird skill where you can overcome a liberal democrat asking a gotcha question in 30 seconds, even though most of the other debaters will also be attacking Perry. I don't know how that's done, but at the very least, Perry needs to stop saying stupid things even if it's a bad situation to be in.
Posted by: Dustin at October 06, 2011 12:21 PM (fF625)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 06, 2011 12:21 PM (aYQHH)
Perry is soft on one aspect of immigration, but he's not soft on border enforcement. He's actually put resourced into that specific issue, and his immigration policy centers around controlling the border.
I don't agree with the tuition stance, but it's not a deal breaker because there is a practical reasoning behind it, and Texas is left with no good solutions because the border is not secure enough.
He's soft on an issue that wouldn't even be an issue if the federal government actually did its job, a job he wants them to do.
Posted by: buzzion at October 06, 2011 12:21 PM (GULKT)
Of course I now must denounce myself because I used to go there...
Posted by: The terrorist Hobbit formerly known as Donna at October 06, 2011 12:21 PM (5Wl/f)
Posted by: buzzion at October 06, 2011 04:06 PM (GULKT)
This.
The land is OWNED by the Hendrick Home for Children.
Will somebody please denounce them first?
Posted by: AmishDude at October 06, 2011 12:21 PM (T0NGe)
Which it might well have been, in that part of Texas.
Why is it every comment calling Perry pretty much a Democrat (ok 90% of those) or saying they rather let Obama win than vote for Romney come from a fucking name I have never seen before?
"Trollin', trollin', trollin'. Keep them comments trollin..."
Yeah- there's a reason I'm "tired beyond tired" of the trolls. Actually several- that's just one.
BTW- I wasn't on the "Palin isn't running" thread, and haven't checked. Did the Cult4Palin crowd jump in? If so, were their tears tasty?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at October 06, 2011 12:21 PM (8y9MW)
Yeah, a great fucking capitalist:
JOBSÂ’ FAVORITE POLS -- Steve Jobs made some significant political donations. In 1997, Jobs shipped $15,000 to the DNC and in 1998, he gave $1,000 to Nancy Pelosi for Congress. In 1999, Bill Bradley got $500 and Sen. Ted Kennedy got $2,000 from Jobs. On Nov. 1, 2000, he gave $50,000 in soft money to the DNC and in 2004, , he gave $1,000 to Rham Emanuel. In 2006, he have $26,700 to the DCCC.
Posted by: imp at October 06, 2011 12:22 PM (UaxA0)
Posted by: @CuffyMeh at October 06, 2011 12:22 PM (rqzCR)
Posted by: AmishDude at October 06, 2011 12:22 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 06, 2011 12:22 PM (aYQHH)
Posted by: steevy at October 06, 2011 12:23 PM (fyOgS)
Posted by: mallfly at October 06, 2011 12:23 PM (bJm7W)
That is slightly homo. But seriously—
It wasn't his rock. He wasn't even renting it. It was just...around. Why's he fucking with it?
And who paints a rock? Is his "family" all idiots?
Everything about this story, except what was painted on the stupid rock, is completely insane. I get "LOL teh blax." The rest is madness.
Posted by: oblig. at October 06, 2011 12:23 PM (xvZW9)
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at October 06, 2011 12:23 PM (OhYCU)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at October 06, 2011 04:21 PM
Be nice, we'll need everyone we can get to show up at the polls in November 2012 to vote for whatever we put up against the SCOAMF
Posted by: The MBM at October 06, 2011 12:23 PM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: The terrorist Hobbit formerly known as Donna at October 06, 2011 12:24 PM (5Wl/f)
Posted by: Mandy P. refuses to watch the SCOAMF at October 06, 2011 12:24 PM (qFpRI)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 06, 2011 12:24 PM (aYQHH)
Posted by: Jimmuy at October 06, 2011 12:25 PM (ibeMV)
Yeah, I guess so- it would help if they weren't, by and large, complete jerks.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at October 06, 2011 12:25 PM (8y9MW)
2008: McCain, 2012: Romney -- squish frontrunner
2008: Romney, 2012: Perry -- more conservative running to frontrunner's right
2008: Huckabee, 2012: Cain -- insurgent candidate with charisma who cannot possibly win the nomination, but willing to serve as a vote-splitter to elect the squish frontrunner
Posted by: AmishDude at October 06, 2011 12:25 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Dave at October 06, 2011 12:25 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: Penfold at October 06, 2011 12:25 PM (1PeEC)
Posted by: Mitt Romney, Human Weathervane at October 06, 2011 12:26 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Mandy P. refuses to watch the SCOAMF at October 06, 2011 04:24 PM (qFpRI)
So was "macaca". It was amazing to behold the WaPo contorting themselves to make it into a racial slur that nobody'd ever heard before.
Posted by: AmishDude at October 06, 2011 12:26 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 06, 2011 12:27 PM (aYQHH)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at October 06, 2011 04:18 PM (B0ebt)
Your tax dollars at work
Posted by: OFA - Stimulus funded since 2009 at October 06, 2011 12:27 PM (D5iHx)
Posted by: Dave at October 06, 2011 12:27 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at October 06, 2011 12:28 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: Sen. Robert Byrd at October 06, 2011 12:28 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: joncelli at October 06, 2011 12:28 PM (RD7QR)
Posted by: That Rock at October 06, 2011 12:28 PM (GvYeG)
Posted by: Vito Corleone at October 06, 2011 12:29 PM (aYQHH)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at October 06, 2011 12:29 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: Dave at October 06, 2011 12:29 PM (Xm1aB)
Really.
What the hell is Perry doing?
Posted by: Dave at October 06, 2011 04:27 PM (Xm1aB)
Seriously? It's "punching down".
Cain desperately wants Perry to acknowledge him. If this becomes a Perry/Cain fight, Romney wins. You can only attack somebody if they're ahead of you or it's a two-man race.
Posted by: AmishDude at October 06, 2011 12:29 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Bob Saget at October 06, 2011 12:29 PM (F/4zf)
It, according to the MFM, had the word "N_gg_rhead" (where the underscores are vowels you can buy) painted on it. Of course, the mountains/hills/whatever-they-technically-are in the area are (still) called the N_gg_rheads. It's probably not nice, but there you go.
According to the story- its on land that Perry's dad leased and (gasp) Perry's dad wasn't vociferous enough in demanding that the rock be removed (or whatever).
So, basically, "We need dirt on Perry, and there just isn't any, so we'll use guilt-by-association squared to make him guilty by being associated with his dad who is associated with someone who owns property on which a rock sits."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at October 06, 2011 12:29 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at October 06, 2011 12:30 PM (B0ebt)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at October 06, 2011 12:30 PM (eOXTH)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 06, 2011 12:30 PM (aYQHH)
Robert Byrd can effing run his regional KKK unit and be forgiven and revered. Ted Kennedy can kill someone and attain godlike status. But Perry can't lease a parcel of land that had a rock with a dirty word on it 25 years ago.
Posted by: MissTammy at October 06, 2011 12:31 PM (SsG4J)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 06, 2011 12:31 PM (aYQHH)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at October 06, 2011 12:31 PM (B0ebt)
Posted by: Dave at October 06, 2011 12:31 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at October 06, 2011 12:32 PM (eOXTH)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 06, 2011 12:32 PM (aYQHH)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at October 06, 2011 04:30 PM (B0ebt)
No federal funds to any university with a journalism school.
Or, for that matter, a law school. Hmmm...
Posted by: AmishDude at October 06, 2011 12:32 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: White self hater at October 06, 2011 12:32 PM (SPVfc)
The MFM always has the marxists' back. It's how they roll over.
Posted by: ontherocks at October 06, 2011 12:32 PM (HBqDo)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at October 06, 2011 12:33 PM (AZGON)
2008: McCain, 2012: Romney -- squish frontrunner
2008: Romney, 2012: Perry -- more conservative running to frontrunner's right
2008: Huckabee, 2012: Cain -- insurgent candidate with charisma who cannot possibly win the nomination, but willing to serve as a vote-splitter to elect the squish frontrunner
Posted by: AmishDude at October 06, 2011 04:25 PM (T0NGe)
Holy shit, the hairs on the back of my neck just got all goosebumpy. Very
Posted by: Max Power at October 06, 2011 12:33 PM (Hucnr)
That's tu quoque, and doesn't mean anything. Really, the issue resolves very simply:
1) the rock was painted over when he noticed; and
2) the land is owned by the Hendrick Home for Children, so it's a great way to go huntin' *and* support a charity.
If that ain't good enough for you, then you're trollin'.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at October 06, 2011 12:33 PM (bjRNS)
Or, for that matter, a law school. Hmmm...
Posted by: AmishDude at October 06, 2011 04:32 PM (T0NGe)
Awww....that would mean I would not have gone to law school...only the libs would have gone.
Posted by: giftogab at October 06, 2011 12:33 PM (SPVfc)
Posted by: steevy at October 06, 2011 12:33 PM (fyOgS)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at October 06, 2011 12:34 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: Y-not at October 06, 2011 12:34 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 06, 2011 12:34 PM (jx2j9)
Posted by: Dr Spank at October 06, 2011 12:35 PM (OGQrv)
Posted by: Dave at October 06, 2011 12:35 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: steevy at October 06, 2011 12:35 PM (fyOgS)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at October 06, 2011 12:36 PM (AZGON)
Awww....that would mean I would not have gone to law school...only the libs would have gone.
Posted by: giftogab at October 06, 2011 04:33 PM (SPVfc)
No, it just wouldn't have received federal funding. Like how the divinity schools have to be technically off-campus.
Posted by: AmishDude at October 06, 2011 12:36 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Dave at October 06, 2011 12:36 PM (Xm1aB)
Sambo was Indian (dot, not feather) so you're off the hook.
Posted by: The Official AoSHQ Arbiter of Racism at October 06, 2011 12:37 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Dave at October 06, 2011 12:37 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: steevy at October 06, 2011 12:37 PM (fyOgS)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at October 06, 2011 12:37 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at October 06, 2011 04:34 PM (AZGON)
There is the true travesty right there. A beautiful story...absolutley wonderful story reduced to a few butt hurt bed wetting liberals taking it away from eveyone because of their desire to be offended by EVERYTHING!
Posted by: giftogab at October 06, 2011 12:38 PM (SPVfc)
Go check out the guy on your box of rice and then file a full report.
Posted by: The Official AoSHQ Arbiter of Racism at October 06, 2011 12:38 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: t-bird at October 06, 2011 12:38 PM (FcR7P)
I want proof. I want to be offended.
Next we will all hear that there is a rock in the backyard of Obama's house on the South Side of Chicago that has "Hab SoSlI' Quch!" painted on it.
Posted by: Islamic Rage Boy at October 06, 2011 12:38 PM (e8kgV)
Posted by: Lady in Black at October 06, 2011 12:39 PM (ycuSb)
Posted by: Dave at October 06, 2011 12:39 PM (Xm1aB)
It's one of Obama with Malik Zulu Shabazz.
Malik Zulu Shabazz is so anti-Semitic that Hitler would have told him to dial it back a notch.
Posted by: AmishDude at October 06, 2011 12:39 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: joncelli at October 06, 2011 12:40 PM (RD7QR)
Posted by: steevy at October 06, 2011 12:40 PM (fyOgS)
Re: The 2012 Republican Field.
You sit on the toilet with the ass-crack you have, not the ass-crack you want.
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at October 06, 2011 12:41 PM (w41GQ)
Posted by: BHO at October 06, 2011 12:41 PM (aYQHH)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at October 06, 2011 12:41 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: steevy at October 06, 2011 12:41 PM (fyOgS)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 06, 2011 12:42 PM (aYQHH)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at October 06, 2011 12:42 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: AmishDude at October 06, 2011 12:42 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: The Official AoSHQ Arbiter of Racism at October 06, 2011 04:37 PM (QKKT0)
Sambo is a South Indian boy who encounters four hungry tigers, and surrenders his colourful new clothes.
=
Sammy was a South Central boy in the hood who encountered 4 angry Bloods and surrendered his colorful new Nikes.
Posted by: Social Engineering at October 06, 2011 12:43 PM (SPVfc)
Perry loves illegal aliens!
Perry hates social security!
Perry loves Big-Tardisil!
What the fuck? I'm about ready to check out of this entire retarded spectacle. The intelligence surrounding this primary makes those douchebags on Lizard Lick Towing look like Carl Sagan and Stephen Fucking Hawking.
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at October 06, 2011 12:43 PM (+lsX1)
You know the MFM is really really really shoving up against the NY Times v. Sullivan line. If I were Perry, I would respond to any questions about this by asking "Before I answer, I would like to see a picture of the rock post 1984. I would like the names of those claiming to have seen the rock since that time. If you refuse to provide that, then I am left with no choice but to assume that you are lying about this."
Related, I think Random House is going to discover its in a universe of hurt over Palin's stalker's book.
Posted by: alexthechick at October 06, 2011 12:43 PM (VtjlW)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at October 06, 2011 04:42 PM (8y9MW)
Oh, it's the gay Amish.
There's also a band that goes around doing interior decorating.
Posted by: AmishDude at October 06, 2011 12:44 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: JackStraw at October 06, 2011 12:44 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: USS Diversity at October 06, 2011 12:44 PM (aD5Kx)
OT: First Solyndra-related resignation- Head of DOE Loan Program to step-down
Posted by: Miss80s at October 06, 2011 12:45 PM (d6QMz)
Conservatives in Texas don't hate it, apparently.
Posted by: Y-not at October 06, 2011 12:45 PM (5H6zj)
were very much some strong inconsistencies...
I still think you are very much some strong RACIST!!11!
And resist we much.
Posted by: Rev Al. Sharpie sniffer at October 06, 2011 12:45 PM (8ieXv)
Posted by: al-Cicero, Tea Party Jihadist at October 06, 2011 12:45 PM (QKKT0)
Romneycare. And that's only the tip of the iceberg.
Posted by: AmishDude at October 06, 2011 12:45 PM (T0NGe)
Can you do that and still be Amish?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at October 06, 2011 12:46 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Dave at October 06, 2011 12:46 PM (Xm1aB)
I'd like Governor Perry to explain the dead Native Americans that you just know are buried somewhere on the land that his family leased.
Posted by: wiserbud at October 06, 2011 12:46 PM (3Okgs)
Are you suggesting that there is so little difference between Romney's record and Perry's that you have to base your decision on a debate? Many people here have posted that Perry does well in longer interviews without time-limited answers but, damn it, if he can't think up a folksy quip in a debate setting then I'm going for the RINO. I just don't get that.
I supported Perry before he entered the race and I continue to support him but, then again, I don't think Romney is to Perry's right on immigration or anything else.
Posted by: Laughing in Texas at October 06, 2011 12:46 PM (dL9LY)
Posted by: dr kill at October 06, 2011 12:47 PM (le5qc)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at October 06, 2011 04:46 PM (8y9MW)
They decorate in all grays.
Posted by: AmishDude at October 06, 2011 12:48 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Red Shirt at October 06, 2011 12:48 PM (FIDMq)
Perry was from the abstaining Democrat wing.
Posted by: al-Cicero, Tea Party Jihadist at October 06, 2011 12:48 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Old Texas Chick at October 06, 2011 12:48 PM (lLXZV)
Posted by: joncelli at October 06, 2011 12:49 PM (RD7QR)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at October 06, 2011 04:34 PM
Well, Sharpton will have to take an IOU because I can't even afford to buy him a haircut right now
Posted by: kbdabear at October 06, 2011 12:49 PM (Y+DPZ)
Well, at least Rick has a decade of practice making some conservatives happy. Mitt has yet to demonstrate the willingness or aptitude to make any conservatives happy.
Posted by: Y-not at October 06, 2011 12:49 PM (5H6zj)
Wasn't a fan of Perry, but I am thinking about hopping on board just to stop obamny.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at October 06, 2011 12:49 PM (qpKJT)
Posted by: Dave at October 06, 2011 12:49 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: buzzion at October 06, 2011 12:49 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: steevy at October 06, 2011 12:49 PM (fyOgS)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at October 06, 2011 12:49 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: JackStraw at October 06, 2011 12:50 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at October 06, 2011 12:50 PM (B0ebt)
I'm trying to ascertain how charging in-state tuition to a few thousand college students increases the pool of cheap illegal labor. Perhaps you can explain.
Posted by: Y-not at October 06, 2011 12:51 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Dave at October 06, 2011 12:52 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: steevy at October 06, 2011 12:52 PM (fyOgS)
Neither does the MBM
Posted by: kbdabear at October 06, 2011 12:53 PM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: steevy at October 06, 2011 12:54 PM (fyOgS)
Posted by: King Barry the Blameless at October 06, 2011 12:54 PM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: Herman Cain at October 06, 2011 04:48 PM (8ieXv)
Nuclear?
Posted by: joncelli at October 06, 2011 04:49 PM (RD7QR)
No...GARDASIL!!
Posted by: Herman Cain at October 06, 2011 12:54 PM (8ieXv)
I get it, they never had any intention of supporting anyone but a liberal to begin with.
Posted by: Vic at October 06, 2011 12:54 PM (M9Ie6)
Citation please.
But I'm still wondering how a kid studying at UT is making a major impact on Texas labor.
Posted by: Y-not at October 06, 2011 12:54 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: JackStraw at October 06, 2011 12:54 PM (TMB3S)
Totally. You always see a spike in border jumping just before rush week.
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at October 06, 2011 12:54 PM (+lsX1)
An Amish hair-cutting gang led by a man named Sam Mullett.
It doesn't get much better than that.
Posted by: MissTammy at October 06, 2011 12:55 PM (SsG4J)
Posted by: Mandy P. refuses to watch the SCOAMF at October 06, 2011 12:56 PM (qFpRI)
Posted by: Y-not at October 06, 2011 04:54 PM (5H6zj)
Actually, they're not.
Barring illegals from UT is good for them.
Posted by: AmishDude at October 06, 2011 12:56 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at October 06, 2011 12:56 PM (DNTer)
Posted by: AmishDude at October 06, 2011 04:29 PM (T0NGe)"
Yup. we know the facts. Perry has a strong record and is clearly not a racist to those who actually are honest about his record. Perry should barely even dignify this crap.
If Cain wants Romney to be the nominee, that's something to keep an eye on. But I think the ball is in Cain's court to dispel the notion he's just a spoiler.
I am not itching for Perry to take Cain on. That could burn Perry's support with those who don't trust Romney.
I've noticed that Perry's worst issues came first. I've heard some people muse that this is Perry's strategy. His rapid loss in support was, then, as aspect of his strategy. Sounds kinda stupid to me, but maybe it was inevitable.
Romney's flip flops are no longer newsworthy. Many have accepted them years ago. Perry's problems need a little time to be accepted.
Obviously this is just one part of the issue. Perry's lost support because of his gaffes, and that's no plan at all. But those counting Perry out are completely wrong, and some of them, at least, are doing this as a strategy to boost Romney.
Posted by: Dustin at October 06, 2011 12:56 PM (fF625)
Posted by: Heartless Janitors_4_Jesus at October 06, 2011 12:56 PM (tazG1)
Reid wants to pass his rewrite of Obama's proposals.
Dem leaders to meet with Obama at 5:30pm
Posted by: Miss80s at October 06, 2011 12:56 PM (d6QMz)
Posted by: steevy at October 06, 2011 12:56 PM (fyOgS)
I just can't see how anyone can support Romney after he created the blue print for Obamma care. The number one goal in this country should be repealing Obamacare. Thats the lynch pin holding this big shit pile together. If we can get rid of that, then this country has a chance of staying more or less the land of the free.
Romney doesn't even list it as his top 5 post election plans. He won't get rid of Obama care, he'll just roll it back a little and "fix it"
Posted by: Max Power at October 06, 2011 12:56 PM (Hucnr)
191 How so,lawsuit?
Yup. There's at least one email in which that vermin tells a source that he needs facts and proof of the rumors because the lawyers want that since right now all anything is is a rumor. No facts or proof were provided but the rumors were printed anyway. If that's not reckless disregard and actual malice, well, it's impossible to think what would be.
Posted by: alexthechick at October 06, 2011 12:57 PM (VtjlW)
Also: How is it possible that Perry is a racist for walking by a rock on someone else's land but Romney is not for belonging to a church that didn't give full membership to blacks until 1978?
If Perry is a racist for that, then that makes Romney the current head of the KKK. And you need to ask yourselves--Cain and Romney supporters--why that is not a story right now. Why are they holding that back? 'Cause they sure as shit didn't hold back on the religious bashing last go-round when it was Huckabee helping McCain.
Posted by: Jimmuy at October 06, 2011 12:57 PM (ibeMV)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at October 06, 2011 12:57 PM (l9zgN)
Posted by: Mandy P. refuses to watch the SCOAMF at October 06, 2011 04:56 PM (qFpRI)
He was just too eager to bash Perry. Herman should realize that our #1 enemy is the media and if you aid and abet them, you start losing conservative support.
Posted by: AmishDude at October 06, 2011 12:57 PM (T0NGe)
Perry, at least, has for the past several years consistently called for the Feds to deal with the border. I'd prefer that he was a wholehearted supporter of E-Verify but I can live with that. And all of that is better than a guy that I don't believe would do anything at all to remove ObamaCare.
Further, the attacks that Romney and Cain have made on Perry show them to be people who will do anything to win and I don't want people like that near the White House.
Posted by: Laughing in Texas at October 06, 2011 12:57 PM (dL9LY)
Being generous, it's the idea that they're here illegally, and so shouldn't get any of the benefits citizens do. Something with which I more or less agree, actually. That is, it's part of the "draw" to come across the border.
Honestly, though, I doubt many people coming across illegally are persuaded by the prospect that their kids, 3+ years in the future, will be eligible for in-state tuition.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at October 06, 2011 12:58 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: steevy at October 06, 2011 12:58 PM (fyOgS)
Posted by: Heartless Janitors_4_Jesus at October 06, 2011 12:58 PM (tazG1)
You put the "N" word on a rock??!! Can you even tell me what the "N" word on a rock does for my campign??!! Of all the stupid....
Posted by: Herman Jackie Childs Cain at October 06, 2011 12:59 PM (8ieXv)
Posted by: real joe at October 06, 2011 12:59 PM (xovnt)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at October 06, 2011 12:59 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: Laughing in Texas at October 06, 2011 01:00 PM (dL9LY)
Posted by: steevy at October 06, 2011 01:00 PM (fyOgS)
Cain = Huckabee
Romney = McCain
Perry = Romney
Then who is Sarah Palin?
Posted by: The Robot Devil at October 06, 2011 01:00 PM (DNTer)
You know the MFM is really really really shoving up against the NY Times v. Sullivan line. If I were Perry, I would respond to any questions about this by asking "Before I answer, I would like to see a picture of the rock post 1984. I would like the names of those claiming to have seen the rock since that time. If you refuse to provide that, then I am left with no choice but to assume that you are lying about this."
Related, I think Random House is going to discover its in a universe of hurt over Palin's stalker's book.
Posted by: alexthechick at October 06, 2011 04:43 PM (VtjlW)
As Rush has said, repubs should not even accept the premise of many of these accusations. Donald Rumsfield is the master at this.
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at October 06, 2011 01:00 PM (Bx5t7)
I am waiting for someone to actually call him out on it, but as long as we continue to debate worthless shit in 30 sec sound bites it will never come up. Maybe that is the point.
Posted by: Vic at October 06, 2011 01:00 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at October 06, 2011 01:00 PM (xFdca)
It seems to me the context is that Romney has never had to govern in a way that pleased conservatives. He was a one and done govern of a lefty state. During that time, he oversaw the implementation of a massive government intervention in health care. Since that time, he has refused to admit that it was a disaster for that state both in terms of economics and health care delivery. But we're supposed to trust that he's going to govern as a conservative?
Posted by: Y-not at October 06, 2011 01:01 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: steevy at October 06, 2011 04:56 PM (fyOgS)
One thing about Perry that you can't say about Romney or even Cain, he won't spend one second trying to curry the favor of the WaPo or NYT.
I'm concerned about how the candidate will react to problems we don't know about yet. What are his leanings? What are his tendencies? Romney definitely wants the Smart Set to like him.
Posted by: AmishDude at October 06, 2011 01:01 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: JackStraw at October 06, 2011 01:01 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: Y-not at October 06, 2011 05:01 PM (5H6zj)
That's his biggest problem. He hasn't even given conservatives a reach-around during this campaign.
Posted by: AmishDude at October 06, 2011 01:02 PM (T0NGe)
But doubling down with the heartless crack is what cost him and continues to cost him.
Posted by: JackStraw at October 06, 2011 04:50 PM (TMB3S)
No, he is not "doubling down." He has apologized for that comment. Others here have pointed that out. That you refuse to accept it says more about you and your willingness to burn an overall conservative over nothing than it does about him.
Posted by: Jimmuy at October 06, 2011 01:03 PM (ibeMV)
Would this the right time for a bit of Alabama history concerning what was once a compliment?
At one time, when one *ahem* _ _ _ _ _ _- rigged a piece of farm equipment, it was done in the field as a quick fix, on the cheap, to get the job done. In short, it worked until proper repairs could be done, and was a point of pride and admiration
Today? Not so much.
And I already pre- and post-denounced myself.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, Tea Party SOB at October 06, 2011 01:03 PM (d0Tfm)
I'm just wondering how many hours several thousand university students account for in the labor market when they're taking classes.
I can see people believe that this law enticed people over the border, but I see no evidence that that is the case.
Posted by: Y-not at October 06, 2011 01:04 PM (5H6zj)
You've got it exactly backwards. Governors reflect their constituents. If Romney had been "Conservative!!!11!!1!" he would never have been elected Governor of Massachusetts. On the other hand, if Perry weren't pretty Conservative, he wouldn't have been elected Governor of Texas.
The reason Democrat Governors (which, by the way, it's been nearly a Generation since we've had one. Perry for 11 years so far (if I'm counting right) and Bush for 6) have been fairly conservative in Texas is that the liberal ones didn't win.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at October 06, 2011 01:04 PM (8y9MW)
I am waiting for someone to actually call him out on it, but as long as we continue to debate worthless shit in 30 sec sound bites it will never come up. Maybe that is the point.
Posted by: Vic at October 06, 2011 05:00 PM (M9Ie6)
If you've heard a position of Romney's that you don't like. Just look for a source 8 months later or 8 months before. You'll probably find him giving an answer that you do like for it.
Posted by: buzzion at October 06, 2011 01:04 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: Dave at October 06, 2011 01:05 PM (Xm1aB)
Sorry, JackStraw, but one of our most vocal Mitt supporters has repeatedly brought this issue up as one of judgment.
The same judgment criterion could easily be applied to Mitt.
Posted by: Y-not at October 06, 2011 01:06 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Mandy P. refuses to watch the SCOAMF at October 06, 2011 01:06 PM (qFpRI)
Why should illegal residents get to attend a TX state university at all? Let them attend UNAM (Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico). There is a campus in San Antonio.
Let them travel to Mexico or wherever they came from. That would allow them to experience the rich cultures of those countries instead of having closed-minded education here in the New Aztlan.
Posted by: RioBravo at October 06, 2011 01:06 PM (eEfYn)
Posted by: JackStraw at October 06, 2011 04:54 PM (TMB3S)"
That's why I think Perry and Texas's near unanimous view is wrong. But then, the facts show this didn't make a big difference. States without this policy have seen a large increase in illegals. There appears to be no correlation on this issue, and I think it's pretty unlikely even one single person illegally came to Texas specifically so their kid can one day pay in state tuition, who would otherwise not have come.
they come because they want to feed their families, and Mexico is hell.
"The worst part about it to me is that Cain wasn't bothered at all about the racist crap the Dems and the left have been throwing his way. Every time he's asked about it, he shrugs it off. But that he thinks he has to chime in on this obvious smear is troublesome. Posted by: Mandy P. refuses to watch the SCOAMF at October 06, 2011 04:56 PM (qFpRI"
Ouch. That's a good point, too.
Posted by: Dustin at October 06, 2011 01:07 PM (fF625)
You aren't. It's a dumb issue. Perry is not a racist. What you will see is people pointing out that Perry is not handling controversies well.
Posted by: JackStraw at October 06, 2011 05:01 PM (TMB3S)
Tell that to polynikes, who was pushing this hard yesterday. Demanding Perry's supporters offer an explanation. He of course was next to clueless about the story beyond hearing about there being a rock with an offensive word on a property Perry has hunted on.
Posted by: buzzion at October 06, 2011 01:07 PM (GULKT)
Dave at October 06, 2011 05:05 PM
Ah, the chief Mittens for POTUS poster is full speed ahead here today.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at October 06, 2011 01:07 PM (kaOJx)
Posted by: JackStraw at October 06, 2011 01:08 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: RioBravo at October 06, 2011 01:09 PM (eEfYn)
On to the next debate.
Posted by: Y-not at October 06, 2011 01:10 PM (5H6zj)
Their "MOB RULE" is still in action right now in NYC. Never mind that "Wall Street" gave all of their money to Barak Oba-mobster.
Posted by: hous bin pharteen at October 06, 2011 01:10 PM (mwEw5)
Posted by: Dave at October 06, 2011 05:05 PM (Xm1aB)"
OK.
But in favor of whom? A race card player? Romney, who has no ideology to speak of and is probably weaker on border control (I ignore everything Romney says)?
In 2008, the right rejected candidate after candidate for being 90% or 75% on our side. And we wound up with Mccain, who is on our side 50% of the time on domestic policy.
If you're rejecting Perry, you might get Romney. That is a bad result. Perry does have the problem. Perry does need to fix it. You are right. Frankly, anyone who can't beat Romney with the facts we've got may be a terrible national politician.
Posted by: Dustin at October 06, 2011 01:10 PM (fF625)
We don't do that, though: we point out- patiently and correctly, that he's apologized. You (or those on your side) ignore that just say it again, and again. We don't have a problem that his "heartless" comment made you mad- it didn't make us happy, either. We have a problem that you seem to have made it your "hill to die on" where you'd rather let Mittens win the nomination than accept the numerous apologies Perry has offered.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at October 06, 2011 01:10 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at October 06, 2011 01:11 PM (Bx5t7)
Overall conservatives do not prefer Romney to Perry on ideology That's just a fact. It's not open to discussion.
Posted by: Dustin at October 06, 2011 01:11 PM (fF625)
Posted by: chillin the most for Perry at October 06, 2011 01:11 PM (6IV8T)
Posted by: JackStraw at October 06, 2011 01:11 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at October 06, 2011 05:11 PM (Bx5t7)"
Every time a hard issue has come up, Romney has been MIA until it's resolved. All the leaders fight it out. Paul Ryan, Palin, Cantor, and then after it's done, here comes Romney with a statement that happens to be exactly what we wanted to hear a month back.
Perfect strategy for the guy who thinks it's his turn to be our nominee, but the opposite of leadership.
Posted by: Dustin at October 06, 2011 01:12 PM (fF625)
Would this the right time for a bit of Alabama history concerning what was once a compliment?
At one time, when one *ahem* _ _ _ _ _ _- rigged a piece of farm equipment, it was done in the field as a quick fix, on the cheap, to get the job done. In short, it worked until proper repairs could be done, and was a point of pride and admiration
Today? Not so much.
Right. that was not too different from American know how. But thaty's an outdated concept, too.
Posted by: WalrusRex at October 06, 2011 01:12 PM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: JackStraw at October 06, 2011 05:08 PM (TMB3S)
Spoken like a true community organizer.
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at October 06, 2011 01:14 PM (Bx5t7)
If you're rejecting Perry, you might get Romney.
Posted by: Dustin at October 06, 2011 05:10 PM (fF625)
You will get Romney. Cain just shot himself in the foot head today with his comments on possibly being Perry's VP. Based on money and support, it is a two man race from here on out.
Posted by: OFA - Stimulus funded since 2009 at October 06, 2011 01:14 PM (D5iHx)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at October 06, 2011 01:16 PM (l9zgN)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at October 06, 2011 01:17 PM (3YCP0)
Posted by: JackStraw at October 06, 2011 01:18 PM (TMB3S)
Yes, and you as one of Perry's most vocal supporters here do it all the time. I'm pretty sure most people now know that the Mormon church didn't allow blacks to be leaders of the church 30 years ago. Blacks got bad treatment in many places 30 years ago and less.
It's not a good issue for anyone to try and score points off.
Posted by: JackStraw at October 06, 2011 05:11 PM (TMB3S)
God you're full of it. Y-Not never mentioned that until the Romney-bots started going Full-Bachman about the rock.
Posted by: buzzion at October 06, 2011 01:18 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: Dave at October 06, 2011 01:19 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at October 06, 2011 01:20 PM (vzFJV)
Bill Ayers has written a manifesto for the Wall Street hooligans.
That is less of a manifesto, and more of a nebulous, rambling, incoherent list of complaints.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at October 06, 2011 01:20 PM (D5iHx)
Posted by: hous bin pharteen at October 06, 2011 01:21 PM (mwEw5)
Totally. Until he comes clean with exactly how many coats of paint were used, I don't know how America could be comfortable with him. Also, why didn't he sandblast the rock before painting? Was the paint made in America?
Did the color used to paint the rock have any racist overtones? Does he still eat Brazil nuts? A lot of really important questions still out there America.
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at October 06, 2011 01:24 PM (+lsX1)
Posted by: JackStraw at October 06, 2011 01:25 PM (TMB3S)
HAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHA
Campaigned harder? No one has campaigned harder than Mitt Romney? What did he have to say about Obamacare before it passed? What did he have to say about finance reform before it passed? Where was this guy when the debt ceiling #compromise issue came up?
He was nowhere!
Yes, Romney has great skill with raising money. He is incredibly well connected and hails from a dynasty family that has been close with one of the other GOP dynasties since the Nixon admin. His mom was a major candidate. His dad was a major politician and repeat governor. He has all the right phone numbers to raise money.
That Is Not Leadership.
It's great that Romney has raised money. That's important too. But the idea you can't take someone seriously for stating the absolute truth that Romney has been MIA on the debates of the past five years shows you're not handling Romney criticism fairly.
Romney deserves that criticism so very much.
Posted by: Dustin at October 06, 2011 01:25 PM (fF625)
---
Campaigning is not a resume-builder for the office of president.
It wasn't for Obama. It wasn't for Palin. And it's not for Romney.
To be frank, even when I was vocally backing Romney, I was uncomfortable with his increasingly dusty resume. He didn't even have to win an election to do so. Romney certainly had the time and resources to do something like Jack Kemp and start a think-tank. It could have focussed on health care, which is supposed to be Romney's area of expertise. Hell, he could have started a charitable foundation that seeded pilot projects in communities to try innovative solutions to health care access or costs. Shit, I would have been happy with a 160-page long dissection on the failures of Masscare. He's done none of that. He defends Masscare and he doubled-down on ethanol. He's still weak on the second amendment and an AGW believer (his quotes on the desirability of us trying to emulate the Euros and Japanese on energy consumption sound straight out of the Obama administration.)
But the thing (aside from Masscare and ethanol) that has me most pissed off is his scare-mongering on Social Security. That's unforgivable because it hamstrings anyone's attempts at reforming it.
Posted by: Y-not at October 06, 2011 01:27 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: that really old joke at October 06, 2011 01:27 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: Jordan at October 06, 2011 01:28 PM (XJYf4)
Why? What if the hunting was good there? It was just graffiti.
"Guess what? Perry has done a shit job since he got into the race saying dumb things and giving weak answers."
He's only had a few gaffes, and I think he wants these issues to come out as early as possible so he can build up, instead of be clobbered at the last second. I think Perry is a much smarter man than Mitt Romney, and that's why Perry has won so many elections, and Romney's lost most of his. It's also why Perry has governed effectively and Romney was simply awful.
Did Romney's leadership greatly harm gun rights? yes. He banned some guns and increased the MA gun tax by 400% to $100 per gun, leading democrats to cheer how gun registration under Romney plummeted. Wow, what an asshole.
Did Romney's leadership move MA to the left? Romney helped force people to buy health insurance because the government thinks that's the government's decision, not yours. MA's spending went up, as did taxes, and Romney's excuse is that he doesn't call it a tax increase then citizens and businesses are paying the government much more money.
Perry, on the other hand, cut spending and ran an effective administration for a long time, having gotten there by being highly effective on appropriations as a fiscal conservative, and being highly effective as ag commish, leading him to be the first Republican LT Gov, where Perry began a long term campaign to change Texas's constitution for massive tort reform.
Now, Perry wants a balanced budget amendment added to the US constitution, and major reforms to entitlements, and a secure border with realistic measures.
He's a cut above Romney.
Posted by: Dustin at October 06, 2011 01:31 PM (fF625)
" I'm pretty sure most people now know that the Mormon church didn't allow blacks to be leaders of the church 30 years ago."
I really didn't know that there are members of the LDS church that are non white.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at October 06, 2011 01:31 PM (kaOJx)
Oh bullshit. There are a couple "Romneybots" here. 98% Perrybots. Nobody went nuts on Perry calling him a racist. Y-Not has been slamming Romney since the day she came out for Perry. Who cares. It's a blog.
Apparently you care. And yeah there are so few Romneybots here, so when they start throwing out the stuff it gets noticed.
And really I must ask why is Romney so interested in moving to a city where the football team uses a pejorative term for a mascot? Didn't his political advisors tell him how bad that looks to be persuing a residence in an area with such an insensitive association?
Guess what? Perry has done a shit job since he got into the race saying dumb things and giving weak answers. It's being pointed out everywhere not just by a couple Romneybots here. And if Romneybots went Full-Bachman on this issue as you claim then finding a couple examples must be easy to find.
Posted by: JackStraw at October 06, 2011 05:25 PM (TMB3S
Yeah Perry's given some weak answers. But I think he could at least answer if he loved his mother in less than a minute and you would know whether he does or not. Mitt Romney couldn't.
Posted by: buzzion at October 06, 2011 01:33 PM (GULKT)
I think the point is that I never raised the issue of Romney's church's teachings on men of African descent fitness to serve in the priesthood until his supporters decided to make an issue of this rock thing.
Posted by: Y-not at October 06, 2011 01:34 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: JackStraw at October 06, 2011 01:35 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: JackStraw at October 06, 2011 01:39 PM (TMB3S)
The idea that politicians aren't going to attack each others previous positions or actions is absurd. You don't seem t have any problem with Perry attacking Romney. Why doesn't Romney get to do the same to Perry?
Posted by: JackStraw at October 06, 2011 05:35 PM (TMB3S)
Well for one, Perry is attacking Romney from a conservative position. Romney is attacking Perry like a Democrat. Or at least he is this month. He might have changed his mind by December.
Posted by: buzzion at October 06, 2011 01:40 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: Jordan at October 06, 2011 01:41 PM (XJYf4)
I think they do it by demonizing the very folks Romney needs, hoping to divide us to the point where we have to choose Romney as a last resort.
It's quite arrogant.
Donate to Perry if you give a crap about this. $20. Skip a few drinks and do something for the country.
Posted by: Dustin at October 06, 2011 01:41 PM (fF625)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at October 06, 2011 01:42 PM (3YCP0)
Posted by: Jordan at October 06, 2011 05:41 PM (XJYf4)"
It is not a lie, Jordan, and I am not a liar. Go to the Texas comptroller and see how practically every single Texan agency's budget has been cut. Even education has been cut, and Texan education remains highly effective. In fact, improving. Sometimes, government is actually more effective with less money.
If you remove the federal mandates Texas has no control over, indeed, Perry is the first post WWII governor to see our per capita government shrink.
"Texas has grown in that time and her government has grown with her."
LOL. I see what you did there. Texas spends $45 for every $1000 I earn. That number has gone DOWN under Perry's leadership. That number went UP under Romney's, to over $65, which means MA is 50% worse than Texas and Romney was part of the problem while Perry was part of the solution.
These are simply facts. Not lies. Sophistry to try to confuse people into giving up an analysis is the only Romney argument. Perry gets no credit, or Romney was in a blue state so he can't be blamed... crap like that.
The idea no one is familiar with the THOUSANDS of cuts to Texas agencies in the past eleven years is sad. Just sad. Anyone saying that didn't do enough homework to speak about this issue.
Texas factbook, or Texas comptroller's website. Do your homework and see if I'm telling the truth.
Posted by: Dustin at October 06, 2011 01:46 PM (fF625)
Well:
302 Yeah I'd figure the same people would accuse me of inferring Perry was a racist.I said I questioned Perry's judgement as a politician to continue to renew this hunting lease at a camp that continued to be known as N-head even after the offending rock was painted over.
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at October 06, 2011 05:17 PM (3YCP0)
Oh wait you created a strawman where you assumed I was claiming that it was claims that Perry was a racist. No wonder you like Romney, you want to argue like a democrat.
I'm sorry. I didn't do that. Polynikes wants to claim that. But that wasn't what was done. I was talking about the retarded (full-bachman) actions of Romney-bots going after Perry for this. Because if Romney supporters want to make an issue of this, I find joining a church that excluded blacks to be much worse than Perry hunting on a property owned by a children's charity.
Posted by: buzzion at October 06, 2011 01:47 PM (GULKT)
Meanwhile, MA's stagnant population added very few jobs.
Texas grew because MA businesses and jobs came to Texas because Texas is led with conservative policy. Those bashing this are actually bashing conservatism.
Posted by: Dustin at October 06, 2011 01:50 PM (fF625)
Posted by: JackStraw at October 06, 2011 01:52 PM (TMB3S)
Yep, we're wrong for talking about how Romney is too chickenshit to call Obama a socialist or not. We're wrong for talking about how Romney still supports MassCare. We're wrong for calling Romney a flip-flopper.
Clearly we're wrong for thinking that a 3 term governor from a Red State would be a better Republican President than a 1 term governor from a Blue State.
Posted by: buzzion at October 06, 2011 01:56 PM (GULKT)
Overall conservatives do not prefer Romney to Perry on ideology That's just a fact. It's not open to discussion.
Posted by: Dustin at October 06, 2011 05:11 PM (fF625)
Exactly. You don't get to say, "I'm an overall conservative and I support Romney over Perry because of illegal immigration."
Perry > Romney when it comes to being tough on illegal immigration. And for that matter, Cain's support of Romney based on this specific issue also makes it Perry > Cain when it comes to being tough on illegal immigration.
As was said above: Are we really going to burn a guy who is with us 75% to 95% of the time in favor of the guy who might be with us 50% of the time? Just like we did in 2008, that massive success?
Posted by: Jimmuy at October 06, 2011 01:58 PM (ibeMV)
Posted by: Jordan at October 06, 2011 02:05 PM (XJYf4)
Posted by: JackStraw at October 06, 2011 02:05 PM (TMB3S)
I assume you do.
But it's a different strategy. We want conservatives to support the more conservative and much more accomplished leader.
"Unbelievable. Perry supporters have been relentless and often wrong in their attacks on Romney"
No, Romney really is a liberal tax and spend gun banning asshole who increased the gun tax 400% to $100 as democrats cheered gun registration plummeting. And spending went up too. There are so many reasons for a conservative to reject Romney. We are not wrong about this at all.
Granted, it's ugly to have so much fighting. I know a lot of Romney's fans really just want to beat Obama. Let's not take it personally, OK? We are on the same side for the most part.
Posted by: Dustin at October 06, 2011 02:05 PM (fF625)
Plus his healthcare plan killed 18k jobs.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at October 06, 2011 02:10 PM (JH50M)
I'm in Missouri, so my primary vote is rather meaningless, however I suppose I would vote Perry over Romney at his point.
However, the insufferable vitriol of Perry true-believers could always change that.
Seems there were a lot of folks turned off Sarah because some of her supporters were hysterical. Same with Paul.
Seems like Perry, and some of his supporters, are intent on alienating potential voters with unecessary and inflammatory rhetoric.
Posted by: Dave at October 06, 2011 02:10 PM (HPcQF)
Posted by: Jordan at October 06, 2011 02:10 PM (XJYf4)
Posted by: JackStraw at October 06, 2011 02:12 PM (TMB3S)
In inflation adjusted per capita dollars, he is the ONLY modern governor in Texas history to reduce the cost of our government.
Period.
Sheesh. This actually is one of Bachmann's favorite lies.
Perry has been governor for a long time, because unlike Romney, Perry was able to do this thing call 'be reelected'. Inflation over a decade is a lot. Success over a decade will mean massive changes in the number of people who want to live in the state Perry is government.
It's a big deal, and it's a BIG reason to support Perry, rather than a reason to play sophist.
Posted by: Dustin at October 06, 2011 02:13 PM (fF625)
You're free to keep going over the same issues over and over and over. But so far, Romney is winning. Seems like he may not get your vote but he's getting a whole lot more than Perry.
Posted by: JackStraw at October 06, 2011 06:05 PM (TMB3S)
Winning by talking about the same issues over and over and over again. Never saying anything new, because he's McCain 2.0. He's not interested in gaining more support beyond squishy north eastern types and moderates so he'll never actually really say anything in a debate beyond what he thinks people already know about him. Can't even say anything of substance when he's answering a yes or no question and uses a full minute to do it.
And I'll vote for him one time. And only one time. And I'm hoping to God that I don't have to do that. Just like I was thinking for McCain 4 years ago.
Posted by: Mitt Romney at October 06, 2011 02:13 PM (GULKT)
PATHETIC.
They are AWESOME. Romney INCREASED SPENDING, Perry CUT SPENDING.
If you don't like Perry's fiscal record, you're crazy. Why not try the other Romney argument, that Perry's success was automatic and easy (despite no one else doing nearly as well).
Posted by: Dustin at October 06, 2011 02:14 PM (fF625)
Posted by: Jordan at October 06, 2011 02:17 PM (XJYf4)
That's a lot to ask.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at October 06, 2011 02:17 PM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Jordan at October 06, 2011 02:22 PM (XJYf4)
Posted by: JackStraw at October 06, 2011 02:24 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: buzzion at October 06, 2011 02:27 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: Jordan at October 06, 2011 02:33 PM (XJYf4)
Posted by: JackStraw at October 06, 2011 02:42 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: Jordan at October 06, 2011 02:46 PM (XJYf4)
Are you suggesting that Perry never raised fees or business taxes during his time in Texas? You probably shouldn't. He did.
He also was a big supporter of ethanol and farm subsidies when he was Agriculture secretary. He's since "flip flopped" on that.
Or doesn't it count when Perry does it?
Posted by: JackStraw at October 06, 2011 06:42 PM (TMB3S)
I doubt Perry raised a fee by as much people are saying Romney raised gun licensing. But then again its quite typical of you to be unable to talk about your candidate without bring up any other candidate.
Posted by: buzzion at October 06, 2011 02:49 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: JackStraw at October 06, 2011 02:58 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: buzzion at October 06, 2011 02:58 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: buzzion at October 06, 2011 03:01 PM (GULKT)
But it wasn't a racist rock, it was a racist rock lobster!
Posted by: FireHorse at October 06, 2011 03:01 PM (gyHyY)
Posted by: JackStraw at October 06, 2011 03:05 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: Ted Nugent at October 06, 2011 03:06 PM (XJYf4)
Posted by: Reggie1971 at October 06, 2011 03:14 PM (0DGtF)
But I was not discussing Perry. You couldn't answer my post only. I was responding only to your covering of Romney, and that's all I mentioned and really all you talked about. But because you couldn't just leave it that Romney was conducting an assault on the second amendment, you needed to bring in Perry's increasing of some taxes too. Which is very typical of you. You were doing it last year too.
And yes Romney is doing so awesome that everyone has been looking for anyone else to run. And playing the John McCain 2008 strategy at that too, which was a definite winner. When is the next speech by President McCain anyways?
Posted by: buzzion at October 06, 2011 03:14 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: JackStraw at October 06, 2011 03:20 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: Ted Nugent at October 06, 2011 03:24 PM (XJYf4)
You wanted to talk about Romney being against bailing out the auto industry after he was for it. And to do that you had to talk about Sarah Palin. Almost a year ago.
The whole context of this discussion is who is more conservative, Perry or Romney. You picked one issue and claimed I wouldn't say Romney raised gun fees when I was listing other fees. I then said, yes, Romney did raise gun fees as well as other fees and closed some loopholes but by far the biggest thing he did was cut spending. He didn't tell the legislature to do it, he did it himself.
I read your comment and noticed that you didn't mention Perry's liberal act of a major increase in gun licensing. And hey you answered that, but of course you couldn't shut up beyond just that.
But again, the overall thrust of this entire thread is Perry vs Romney. If you think you are free to take shots Romney and I am not allowed to respond by comparing his record to Romney's then your in for a disappointment. I will continue to do it.
And its not an issue of back and forth. I have no problem with back and forth. I can talk about Perry. I can talk about Romney. I can talk about Perry and Romney. The thing that you have seemed to have a problem with is talking about Romney. Which I guess I can't really blame you. Why would you only want to talk about the guy most people go "well I guess I'll vote for him if the guy I actually want doesn't win."
Posted by: buzzion at October 06, 2011 03:32 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: buzzion at October 06, 2011 03:37 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: JackStraw at October 06, 2011 03:38 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: Christina Hendricks' Swollen Jugs at October 06, 2011 03:40 PM (lNGfM)
Posted by: Christina Hendricks' Swollen Jugs at October 06, 2011 03:43 PM (lNGfM)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 06, 2011 03:49 PM (lNGfM)
Posted by: JackStraw at October 06, 2011 03:54 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: Heartless J_4_J at October 06, 2011 04:04 PM (/IuX+)
Posted by: The Dovekeepers Epub at October 06, 2011 04:58 PM (1Sw89)
Posted by: The Death Cure epub at October 06, 2011 05:12 PM (V7J0u)
Posted by: The Ballad of Tom Dooley AudioBook at October 06, 2011 05:37 PM (SpVD8)
I am done with Romney in the primary. He is more on the side of big government:
(1) Romneycare
(2) He was on the same side with Obama in 2009 in terms of government bailing out or taking over GM. He praised Obama for it. No matter how you spin it, government takeover (or spinning as rescuing) is not conservative. And it is not a solution by any means
(3) His people are comfortable with leftist talking points and tactics: Social Security demagoguery and the race card (his campaign continued to use "insensitivity" against Perry 's rock on Monday after Cain 's stupid fumble).
I am not excited about Romney and dead set against him in the primary. If he can fire some top campaign people, then I can take another look.
Posted by: LAI at October 06, 2011 06:13 PM (AB+aO)
@ Ted
Thanks.
We've got to do what we can. I'm hopeful we don't end up in full blown socialism. But I really don't know.
Posted by: Reggie1971 at October 06, 2011 06:41 PM (0DGtF)
"Cain said, “Quite frankly, based upon Governor Perry’s position on some issues, I would not be comfortable being his vice presidential nominee.
Cain said his concerns about Perry include "being soft on the border, issues relative to tuition for children of illegal aliens." As governor, Perry supported legislation offering in-state college tuition for the children of illegal immigrants, which has become a flash point in the campaign. "And I havenÂ’t totally gone through all of his positions, but a lot of positions I have questions with," Cain said.
Wow, rough stuff!! How does that tall tough-talkin' Texan manage to endure it all!! Race-baiter, race-baiter!!
Posted by: JewishOdysseus at October 06, 2011 08:24 PM (Z7ypG)
Posted by: The Great Enigma ePub at October 06, 2011 08:30 PM (sNViZ)
Cain said his concerns about Perry include "being soft on the border, issues relative to tuition for children of illegal aliens." As governor, Perry supported legislation offering in-state college tuition for the children of illegal immigrants, which has become a flash point in the campaign. "And I havenÂ’t totally gone through all of his positions, but a lot of positions I have questions with," Cain said.
Wow, rough stuff!! How does that tall tough-talkin' Texan manage to endure it all!! Race-baiter, race-baiter!!
-----------
I really like Cain, but this is lame. This is not what we are talking about. Cain was sandbaged over the weekend by the rock story by the leftists. And he felt for it twice. The difference is that he walked it back. Romney team played the same "insensity card" on Monday after Cain walked it back. Don't know why you are so thin-skinned. This was a dumb move on Cain 's part if he wants to take Perry out. He singled out Perry as someone he doesn't want to run with. So he is comfortable with Romney?
Posted by: LAI at October 06, 2011 08:49 PM (nLTW4)
Posted by: JewishOdysseus at October 07, 2011 05:41 AM (Z7ypG)
Posted by: Free Speech at October 07, 2011 10:42 AM (2r5dH)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3423 seconds, 498 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Herman Cain at October 06, 2011 11:57 AM (Xm1aB)