September 23, 2011
— Ace Can he say something to help his cause?
One thing that bothers me: Some are saying Perry isn't a good debater. I don't really care about that. About not being good with the zingers, about being glib and smooth in a give-and-take.
Sure, I'd like someone who's good at that, but frankly, as a Republican, I've rather gotten accustomed to candidates who aren't good at the mechanics, the technical style-points, of debating.
What bothers me is that many of these questions are just an invitation to supply a canned, planned answer. Most of these questions are perfectly predictable, and a good answer can be written and rehearsed ahead of time.
It's not like the in-state tuition thing was some kind of out-of-the-blue, unexpected question.
Or... was it?
So, Hannity will, I trust, ask a perfectly predictable question. This really is not a gotcha. It's an opportunity to make the best possible case for oneself. It's a pitch you see coming a mile away.
I don't mind getting all twisted up on corkscrew pitches. But the ones you know are coming -- you have to make contact with the ball.
Thanks to JohnE.
And... He does in fact sound far better on Hannity. He points out that anyone living in Texas for three years gets the in-state tuition, including people from Oklahoma.
That doesn't mean that in-state tuition for illegals is right; but it's false that they're getting "preferential treatment" over citizens of other states. Citizens of other states get the same in-state tuition rates, so long as they have the three-year residency requirement met.
None of this wins him the issue. He loses it. He always will lose it. But there are ways to barely lose an issue.
Here's The Bigger Issue... He finally does what he should have done early and often -- blame the federal government for not enforcing the border, and noting that governors like himself are left to make sense out of a bad situation.
Is that entirely true? It may not be entirely true but it's a good debate answer.
And by the way, Rick Santorum is a yipping, ill-informed demagogue.
Posted by: Ace at
12:01 PM
| Comments (416)
Post contains 368 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Johnny (John E.) at September 23, 2011 12:03 PM (nRTou)
Posted by: Blue Hen at September 23, 2011 12:03 PM (326rv)
Posted by: Rick Perry at September 23, 2011 12:03 PM (q177U)
Posted by: Y-not at September 23, 2011 12:03 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: RON PAUL!!! at September 23, 2011 12:03 PM (gA69l)
Can Perry help himself? Maybe, it seems like the problem right now is that he keeps getting in his own way.
Posted by: Conservative Crank at September 23, 2011 12:04 PM (vNpDB)
>>>Hannity said he was going to press Perry on some of the things we've all been complaining about.
And then throw a red, white and blue football at him in a playful and non agressive manner
Posted by: Ben at September 23, 2011 12:04 PM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Y-not at September 23, 2011 12:04 PM (5H6zj)
I'm amazed that Perry falls asleep during the second half of debates, you would think given his proximity to mexico that he could get his hands on some columbian marching powder at a low cost.
Posted by: Ben at September 23, 2011 12:06 PM (wuv1c)
Hi. My name is Rick Perry and I know Sarah Palin.
"I was put on eath to kick ass and chew bubblegum, and I'm all out of bubblegum?" Might work. Beats talking about liquid whore and Romneycare.
Posted by: Sub-Tard at September 23, 2011 12:06 PM (0M3AQ)
Posted by: sonnyspats at September 23, 2011 12:07 PM (I/MzF)
Posted by: Arcadehero at September 23, 2011 12:07 PM (mmHDH)
Posted by: Sub-Tard at September 23, 2011 12:07 PM (0M3AQ)
Posted by: Rick Perry at September 23, 2011 12:07 PM (gA69l)
Posted by: Lincolntf at September 23, 2011 12:07 PM (RD/KP)
Indeed Ace, how he doesn't have canned answers for Gardisil, in state tuition, Social Security and Romneycare is beyond me.
Either his debate team sucks or he can't remember the debate prep.
Posted by: Ben at September 23, 2011 12:07 PM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Zombie Hunter Thompson at September 23, 2011 12:08 PM (GOG1H)
THIS!!!
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at September 23, 2011 12:08 PM (gA69l)
Posted by: nevergiveup at September 23, 2011 12:10 PM (aYQHH)
Posted by: steevy at September 23, 2011 12:10 PM (fyOgS)
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 23, 2011 12:11 PM (D9z3D)
Posted by: Dr Spank at September 23, 2011 12:11 PM (BcpOa)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 23, 2011 12:11 PM (UlUS4)
Posted by: Lincolntf at September 23, 2011 12:11 PM (q1Tbv)
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at September 23, 2011 12:11 PM (uVlA4)
Perry- Not tax subsadies involved in tuition breaks for illegals
Posted by: sonnyspats at September 23, 2011 12:11 PM (I/MzF)
WTF are you talking about?
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 23, 2011 12:11 PM (D9z3D)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 23, 2011 12:12 PM (UlUS4)
Posted by: BurtTC at September 23, 2011 12:12 PM (TOk1P)
Posted by: Joffen at September 23, 2011 12:12 PM (EPcuy)
I always defend Hannity for the simple reason that he serves his purpose. He's no great thinker or even a great broadcaster, but he presents the conservative opinion in a simple and concise way for fence-sitting squishy indys to understand.
"He bangs the drum"
Posted by: Johnny (John E.) at September 23, 2011 12:12 PM (nRTou)
Posted by: Ben at September 23, 2011 12:13 PM (wuv1c)
That concerns me.
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at September 23, 2011 12:13 PM (uVlA4)
Posted by: Lincolntf
I am a witch. ....Howz that?
Posted by: Rick Perry take #2 at September 23, 2011 12:13 PM (6rX0K)
Posted by: Joffen at September 23, 2011 12:13 PM (EPcuy)
I guess that transcript "leak" worked though because people say they think he's dumb.
Posted by: Y-not at September 23, 2011 12:13 PM (5H6zj)
He can debate better than he has during the last 3 debates.
Posted by: Miss80sBaby at September 23, 2011 12:13 PM (o2lIv)
Wait, we're getting to the "constantly interrupting" point. That's dickish.
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 23, 2011 12:14 PM (D9z3D)
Posted by: A Jihdi With A Can Up His Ass at September 23, 2011 12:14 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Dave at September 23, 2011 12:14 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: Joffen at September 23, 2011 12:14 PM (EPcuy)
This kills me. He just gave a great answer. Why can't he say that during a debate. I don't agree with it entirely, but he's not some idiot that he appears to be at the debates.
Maybe we can have a debate that is a phone interview format
Posted by: Ben at September 23, 2011 12:14 PM (wuv1c)
Posted by: ace at September 23, 2011 12:14 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Y-not at September 23, 2011 12:14 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Zombie Hunter Thompson at September 23, 2011 12:14 PM (GOG1H)
Listen to his show and drink every time he says, "literally." You'll be drunk before the first commercial break.
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at September 23, 2011 12:14 PM (gA69l)
Posted by: Dave at September 23, 2011 12:15 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: BOB NW at September 23, 2011 12:15 PM (td+Bp)
Yeah, but by definition that's false. If the illegal kid in-state isn't paying full freight, some legal out-of-state kid IS paying full-freight in return. The money comes from somewhere.
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 23, 2011 12:15 PM (D9z3D)
I have more confidence than ever that Romney could defeat Obama, but less confidence than ever that would mean any significantly positive for the country.
Posted by: Paper at September 23, 2011 12:15 PM (IvlIt)
Posted by: Dr Spank at September 23, 2011 12:15 PM (BcpOa)
Posted by: Joffen at September 23, 2011 12:16 PM (EPcuy)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 23, 2011 12:16 PM (UlUS4)
Posted by: Jimmah at September 23, 2011 12:16 PM (F13r2)
"Whichever state Santorum is from." <-- Is that an insult or does he not actually know he's from Pennsylvania?
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 23, 2011 12:16 PM (D9z3D)
Its Texas' choice to make. They also give a break to Sooners. That's Texas' business.
Posted by: Y-not at September 23, 2011 12:16 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Rick Perry at September 23, 2011 04:02 PM (q177U)
You never cease to amaze buddy! That one line right there will carry you to the White House.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at September 23, 2011 12:16 PM (jx2j9)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 23, 2011 12:17 PM (UlUS4)
Posted by: Joffen at September 23, 2011 12:17 PM (EPcuy)
Posted by: oleg at September 23, 2011 12:17 PM (tazG1)
Posted by: Dave at September 23, 2011 12:17 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at September 23, 2011 12:18 PM (jiVmv)
>>>"Whichever state Santorum is from." <-- Is that an insult or does he not actually know he's from Pennsylvania?
shhhhhh! We Pennyslvanians don't want that getting out.
Posted by: Ben at September 23, 2011 12:18 PM (wuv1c)
Even though the Texas miracle is less miracle than the predictable result of steady conservative leadership.
God help America then.
Posted by: traye at September 23, 2011 12:18 PM (7tiOs)
He'll never beat Romney on style, but I've seen him do better. As some others have said, he is primarily skilled oratorically when it comes to interviews, speeches, and personal interaction with voters.
Posted by: Miss80sBaby at September 23, 2011 12:18 PM (o2lIv)
Yep. Those are the same answers that Romney has been using in defending RomneyCare. If it isn't good enough for Romney, it shouldn't be good enough for Perry.
Posted by: Paper at September 23, 2011 12:18 PM (IvlIt)
Posted by: Dave at September 23, 2011 04:17 PM (Xm1aB)
---
He is governor of a state.
Do you believe that President Perry would strengthen the Dept of Education and force this policy on all states?
Posted by: Y-not at September 23, 2011 12:19 PM (5H6zj)
Not from the out-of-state kid. If he's actually going to Texas, he's paying the out-of-state costs anyway; OR he's not going at all because the class is full up.
If you want to argue that the out-of-state kid is more deserving, that's a different argument.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at September 23, 2011 12:19 PM (bjRNS)
Posted by: Joffen at September 23, 2011 12:19 PM (EPcuy)
Posted by: Rick Perry at September 23, 2011 12:20 PM (WCm02)
He managed to suppress his disdain for Israel, and not mention how he thinks it's cool if a regime known for terrorism by suicide bombing acquires atomic weapons. If I didn't already know him I wouldn't know he is crazy.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at September 23, 2011 12:20 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Dave at September 23, 2011 12:20 PM (Xm1aB)
P.S. Go Herman Cain
Posted by: elliot m at September 23, 2011 12:20 PM (zPich)
Posted by: Holly at September 23, 2011 12:21 PM (nqctR)
Posted by: joncelli at September 23, 2011 12:21 PM (RD7QR)
Posted by: ParisParamus at September 23, 2011 12:21 PM (+9Tp2)
The legislature finally passed it this year.
Posted by: Miss80sBaby at September 23, 2011 12:21 PM (o2lIv)
He does in fact sound far better on Hannity. He points out that anyone living in Texas for three years gets the in-state tuition, including people from Oklahoma.
Who wants to go to school in Texas anyway? Sheesh!
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at September 23, 2011 12:21 PM (UnAol)
Posted by: Dave at September 23, 2011 12:21 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: RioBravo at September 23, 2011 12:21 PM (eEfYn)
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at September 23, 2011 12:21 PM (aOjfG)
Posted by: robtr at September 23, 2011 12:21 PM (MtwBb)
Just stick to pointing out the complexities of the National/State border issues and say you did the best you could given the current state of federal involvement.
Posted by: Johnny (John E.) at September 23, 2011 12:22 PM (nRTou)
Posted by: Erick Erickson at September 23, 2011 12:22 PM (le5qc)
Posted by: Joffen at September 23, 2011 12:22 PM (EPcuy)
Debate question Rick.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at September 23, 2011 12:22 PM (jx2j9)
Fucking read.
Posted by: A Jihdi With A Can Up His Ass at September 23, 2011 04:14 PM (nj1bB)
WTF? I can't be responsible to read every post. Some of these threads scream by so fast its hard to respond to my own posts. I'll look for it on the next livestream.
Posted by: sonnyspats at September 23, 2011 12:22 PM (I/MzF)
Is he backing off the "heart" bullshit?
I want a full apology for that shit.
Posted by: Dave at September 23, 2011 04:15 PM (Xm1aB)
Irony is he can't. I'm sure Mitt already has the Perry waffles e-mail ready to hit send
Posted by: Jollyroger at September 23, 2011 12:22 PM (NCw5u)
Posted by: Lincolntf at September 23, 2011 12:23 PM (FzVlt)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at September 23, 2011 12:23 PM (jiVmv)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 23, 2011 12:23 PM (UlUS4)
Posted by: USS Diversity at September 23, 2011 12:23 PM (aD5Kx)
Let's not panic at the disco, yet.
We can stick a fork in Perry when his people start telling us that pandering to hispanics is a shrewd and calculated political move.
Until then, it's still copacetic in Liddsville.
Posted by: Soothsayer at September 23, 2011 12:23 PM (sqkOB)
Posted by: Sean Hannity's brain a full half-step ahead of Mike Gallagher's at September 23, 2011 12:23 PM (hyP1j)
He's speaking more quickly and clearly now than he did at the debates. What gives? Pawlenty seemed to have the same problem of performing poorly in a debate format... though he's clever and witty outside of it.
Posted by: theCork at September 23, 2011 12:23 PM (zL5Q1)
Hallelujah. I've only said this 100 times
Posted by: Andy at September 23, 2011 12:23 PM (5Rurq)
Holly, He's a moderate on immigration and conservative on all else.
I think that's why people support Perry.
It's not the swagger or Texan thing.
He's conservative on economics, defense, healthcare, etc.
So it's not like a southern twang is getting him votes, it's his record and conservative stances.
Posted by: Ben at September 23, 2011 12:23 PM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 23, 2011 12:23 PM (D9z3D)
Posted by: Dave at September 23, 2011 12:23 PM (Xm1aB)
---
Based on what?
Based on a policy that the people of Texas support overwhelmingly about how much tuition ~1% of their university students pay?
Look, it's not a choice I'd make, but apparently the State of Texas' economy is strong enough to give up whatever the amount of money <1% of out of state tuition payments constitutes.
There is nothing about this that suggests Perry is going to be a problem on the federal level vis a vis immigration.
Posted by: Y-not at September 23, 2011 12:24 PM (5H6zj)
Austin yes. College Station, not so much.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at September 23, 2011 12:24 PM (jx2j9)
Perry needs to stress that it's not "Free Tuition".....which is what a lot of people think is what they're talking about.
I had Megyn Kelly's show on earlier. ...She had a group of people on there and asked them what they thought about Perry's "have a heart" remark. .....They were incensed that illegals were getting 'free tuition'.....and Megyn didn't correct them!
If you're a resident of Tx, been going to highschool there for 3 years....then you qualify to pay the in-state rate, like all the other residents. ...That's it.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at September 23, 2011 12:24 PM (gZO5m)
Posted by: Bernard Shaw at September 23, 2011 12:24 PM (bN5ZU)
Posted by: phoenixgirl work computer at September 23, 2011 12:24 PM (IpiZb)
If Perry can cram for the primary exams, he'll be OK. He's not faring well now, but there were a) unfoundedly high expectations for him to be a savior and b) a giant target painted on him from both debate moderators (who want him down or out) and his political peers. If he can tap into the Tea Party sentiment more and articulate a bit more/better, he'll recover and prosper.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at September 23, 2011 12:24 PM (r4t7/)
Posted by: Joffen at September 23, 2011 12:24 PM (EPcuy)
The first crush is always the hardest.
Posted by: ronno at September 23, 2011 12:24 PM (nQR0p)
Posted by: sleepy-beans at September 23, 2011 12:25 PM (5617J)
Posted by: Lincolntf at September 23, 2011 04:23 PM (FzVlt)
Yup, get out the emminent domain pen and start condemning private property. It's doable, you just have to take some citizens property is all.
Posted by: robtr at September 23, 2011 12:25 PM (MtwBb)
Posted by: theCork at September 23, 2011 12:25 PM (zL5Q1)
Posted by: Ben at September 23, 2011 12:25 PM (wuv1c)
Posted by: phoenixgirl work computer at September 23, 2011 12:25 PM (IpiZb)
Damn it.
I was trying to pick between "I can see Mexicans from my heart" and "I can heart Mexicans from my house [or maybe 'heavily guarded capitol fortress']." Had 'em both typed, was picking what to delete. Then...this.
Y'know, I was really enthusiastic about me when I first came on to the scene, but now that I've seen me up close, I just can't in good conscience vote for myself, because I'm just too unprepared and Bushy.
Posted by: no on oblig. at September 23, 2011 12:25 PM (xvZW9)
Posted by: Dave at September 23, 2011 12:25 PM (Xm1aB)
Satellites come in more sizes than that. There are some that are the size of bread boxes.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at September 23, 2011 12:25 PM (bjRNS)
Posted by: toby928™ at September 23, 2011 12:25 PM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Lincolntf at September 23, 2011 04:23 PM (FzVlt)
Someone needs to point out to Rick that the Great Wall of China is made of heavy stones, built over mountainous terrain, and was done without the aid of modern materials or equipment.
Then the Chinese manned it with their Army.
No Rick, a wall isn't effective. A wall replete with guys armed with M4s and shoot-to-kill orders? Well, THAT is very effective.
Posted by: blindside at September 23, 2011 12:25 PM (x7g7t)
Posted by: ace at September 23, 2011 12:25 PM (nj1bB)
No, its not false, they're illegal, so it is preferential treatment. Why should any illegal take the place of a citizen?
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at September 23, 2011 12:26 PM (jiVmv)
I wish I could say otherwise but that's just the way he is.
Posted by: Miss80sBaby at September 23, 2011 12:26 PM (o2lIv)
He'll do the same thing in the general, and I think it is a completely open question as to what his policy preferences will be. I could see him supporting amnesty or some sort of partial amnesty.
Posted by: Paper at September 23, 2011 12:26 PM (IvlIt)
Yep. Easy to do. Just like that Trans-Texas Corridor.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at September 23, 2011 12:27 PM (bjRNS)
I assume that American citzens from Oklahoma who move to Texas are still American citizens.
A Mexican National is not an American citizen after three years or 100 years unless they follow the laws that make you an American citizen.
So yes it does give perferiental treatment to non-American citizens as opposed to actual citizens of the United States of America.
This is actually the whole Texan problem in a nut shell. Spending time in Texas does not (or should not) confer the rights of a citizen on Mexican Nationals who are here illegally.
Somehow they don't seem to get that in Texas.
Posted by: petunia at September 23, 2011 12:27 PM (hgrmi)
Posted by: ace at September 23, 2011 12:27 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Dr Spank at September 23, 2011 12:27 PM (BcpOa)
Really?? Please tell me where I can find that specific disdain for Israel, or how Paul has supported terrorists acquiring atomic bombs. I need that specific proof, I'm weird that way...
Posted by: Zombie Hunter Thompson at September 23, 2011 12:27 PM (GOG1H)
Posted by: Joffen at September 23, 2011 12:27 PM (EPcuy)
Posted by: PR at September 23, 2011 12:27 PM (8a0kZ)
I KNOW YOU'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT MY WOMAN!!!
Posted by: Brad Pitt at September 23, 2011 12:28 PM (gA69l)
Is he sitting down? I'm starting to wonder if his back is really killing him, and he's having to medicate for two hours of standing.
Posted by: toby928™ at September 23, 2011 12:28 PM (GTbGH)
No, no. That's space junk. Refrigerators and school buses. That's it dammit.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at September 23, 2011 12:28 PM (jx2j9)
Someone needs to point out to Rick that the Great Wall of China is made of heavy stones, built over mountainous terrain, and was done without the aid of modern materials or equipment.
Then the Chinese manned it with their Army.
No Rick, a wall isn't effective. A wall replete with guys armed with M4s and shoot-to-kill orders? Well, THAT is very effective.
Posted by: blindside at September 23, 2011 04:25 PM (x7g7t)
You should visit the great wall of china sometime or read about on the innerwebs.
The great wall of china is not a continuous wall but a series of short walls.
Posted by: robtr at September 23, 2011 12:28 PM (MtwBb)
Posted by: Lincolntf at September 23, 2011 04:23 PM (FzVlt)
I'll make a deal. We can if we can stop pretending a 1,200 miale static wall will stop people from jumping, climbing, tunneling, or being smuggled through checkpoints.
The key is to hit the companies hiring and stop the handouts. No jobs+ no welfare= no illegals
Posted by: Jollyroger at September 23, 2011 12:28 PM (NCw5u)
When has someone gotten elected President in the last 30 to 40 years by saying how they are going to be "tough on illegals"?
Really. ...When has that worked? For either a Democrat or a Republican.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at September 23, 2011 12:29 PM (gZO5m)
Posted by: Holly at September 23, 2011 04:21 PM (nqctR) Nope. The problem with people from the North East is that they are people from the North East, essentially they are from a population which is assoiciated with anti-federalism, extreme liberalism, immigrant inflitration, ivy league smarminess, dense urbanization and arrogant condescension. The swagger and twang reveal that the bearer is the opposite at first glance then he may be looked at more thoroughly. Perry is not doing as well as I had hoped but the rest.........well, either they just can't get there (Caine) or they have their own histories (Newt).
Posted by: dagny at September 23, 2011 12:29 PM (Ayvi1)
And they literally sacrificed workers and buried them in the foundations to support it with their spirits. And it never really stopped anybody.
(And the really, cool, impressive part is only the part they show off to tourists. It's actually a pretty lame wall in places.)
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at September 23, 2011 12:29 PM (bjRNS)
Posted by: CoolCzech at September 23, 2011 12:29 PM (niZvt)
Posted by: Joffen at September 23, 2011 12:29 PM (EPcuy)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 23, 2011 12:30 PM (UlUS4)
Posted by: Dave at September 23, 2011 12:30 PM (Xm1aB)
Actually, Perry is pretty liberal with healthcare. Giving illegal immigrants a free college education is far beyond being 'moderate,' on the topic. I haven't even heard Barack Obama propose that. Seriously.....free college??? I can't afford to send my kids to Texas A&M, why should non citizens who have broken our laws get a free ride like that? How heartless is it the law abiding legal citizens?
Posted by: Holly at September 23, 2011 12:30 PM (nqctR)
Posted by: USS Diversity at September 23, 2011 12:31 PM (aD5Kx)
That's what I was going to say. Discretion and all that.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at September 23, 2011 12:31 PM (jx2j9)
Posted by: sleepy-beans at September 23, 2011 12:31 PM (5617J)
Meanwhile, Sarah Palin's voice can shatter glass and warp stone.
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 23, 2011 12:31 PM (D9z3D)
You are behind the times. There's a whole series of the itty-bitty things recently launched by the military.
There were also experimental packages that were dropped off by one shuttle and retrieved by another. They, too, were satellites the size of bread boxes. And cheap.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at September 23, 2011 12:31 PM (bjRNS)
lincolntf
it's not impossible it's just not practical.....you still have to have agents on the border.....the illegals have been known to hop the fence...........they've also been know to dig under it...............
Posted by: phoenixgirl work computer at September 23, 2011 12:31 PM (IpiZb)
Posted by: dagny at September 23, 2011 12:31 PM (Ayvi1)
"Giving illegal immigrants a free college education is far beyond being 'moderate,' "
Thankfully Perry has never tried to do that.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at September 23, 2011 12:31 PM (kaOJx)
Posted by: Dr Spank at September 23, 2011 12:32 PM (BcpOa)
Posted by: Joffen at September 23, 2011 12:32 PM (EPcuy)
Perry, being a devoutly religious man, may have not an intelligence problem but a humility problem. It may, in fact, be against his nature to proclaim his own achievements and tear down the accomplishments of others.
The fact then, that the debate forum requires him to go against his core principles would, in fact, exhaust him and provide a halting performance.
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at September 23, 2011 12:32 PM (uVlA4)
Posted by: dagny at September 23, 2011 12:33 PM (Ayvi1)
Posted by: CoolCzech at September 23, 2011 12:33 PM (niZvt)
I made this point with Vic yesterday. While all bold is more sophisticated than ALL CAPS, it still makes you look like you're shouting. Some of us skip posts like that.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at September 23, 2011 12:33 PM (bjRNS)
Posted by: joncelli at September 23, 2011 12:33 PM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Dave at September 23, 2011 12:33 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: Y-not at September 23, 2011 04:16 PM (5H6zj)
They feel safe with that. They know it's a zero-expenditure offer.
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at September 23, 2011 12:34 PM (UnAol)
--
On virtually every level.
Masscare was a failure. It was a failure economically and it was a failure from the standpoint of health care accessibility (wait times have increased significantly). Romney left his state with that albatross and he has not used the intervening years to do anything to undo that mess or to even dissect how it was a mess. He's a rich, smart guy. He could have started a think tank on health care or a private foundation seeding pilot projects on a free market approach or been an adviser of some sort. He still has not said it was a disaster. All he says is Repeal and Replace -- with no indication of what Replace would be. And Masscare was a model for Obamacare. So thanks to this experiment in MA which Romney refuses to disavow we're stuck with Obamacare.
The issue in Texas is very different. Perry has tried to get the Feds to enforce immigration laws and secure the border. They simply won't. So TX has all these illegals and the kids they brought with them. For whatever reason, the people of Texas think that those kids, now young adults, will have a better shot at not being drains on society if they get college educations. So, given that Texas' higher ed system allows in state tuition waivers within their region (including OK and LA, iirc), they decided to extend that to include a subset of illegals who came here as minors and are living in Texas. It hasn't hurt Texas. Texas can afford it. And there is no indication that Gov. Perry, if elected president, would decide to make that a policy for hte whole countyr. In fact, I don't know how he could. What I do know is taht Perry would not strengthen the dept of education and I suspect he'd weaken it.
Posted by: Y-not at September 23, 2011 12:34 PM (5H6zj)
>> He does in fact sound far better on Hannity. He points out that anyone living in Texas for three years gets the in-state tuition, including people from Oklahoma.
Last time I checked, you establish residency in Texas for 12 months, you or your children qualify for resident tuition rates. That was at UT, I checked about 6 months ago.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at September 23, 2011 12:34 PM (WvXvd)
I can't afford to send my kids to Texas A&M, why should non citizens who have broken our laws get a free ride like that? How heartless is it the law abiding legal citizens?
Not free. In-state tuition. And any student can get a loan for instate tuition.
Posted by: dagny at September 23, 2011 12:34 PM (Ayvi1)
Perry's almost as tedious as Hannity. If he's the best we got, we're phuqued!
Christie/Rubio, bitches, or don't even bother ringing me.
Posted by: JDW at September 23, 2011 12:34 PM (uw+0A)
I'll make a deal. We can if we can stop pretending a 1,200 miale static wall will stop people from jumping, climbing, tunneling, or being smuggled through checkpoints.
The key is to hit the companies hiring and stop the handouts. No jobs+ no welfare= no illegals
Perry goes for the false choice. He says that a wall is not as good as boot on the ground (and says it and says it and.....). He doesn't explain why you can't do both, which is the best solution.
Do you really believe that a high wall won't slow folks down? Of course it will, making it much easier for ICE to then catch them or prevent them from crossing at all. This isn't new technology.
Posted by: pep at September 23, 2011 12:35 PM (6TB1Z)
Speaking of facts, where did Romney get his figure on tuition? I went to a state school in Texas and y undergrad was only about 4 grand a semester (Hah! only) and for law it was around 8.
I don't think illegals would pay that much more
Posted by: Jollyroger at September 23, 2011 12:35 PM (NCw5u)
Now, about that Vosges Mountains campaign...
Posted by: RioBravo at September 23, 2011 12:35 PM (eEfYn)
Sarah Palin is not a politician to you, she's an object of fan-love like Angelina Jolie.
Posted by: ace at September 23, 2011 04:27 PM (nj1bB)
I dun good her in Tejas. Thats my jobs plan.
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at September 23, 2011 12:35 PM (aOjfG)
Posted by: Joffen at September 23, 2011 12:35 PM (EPcuy)
The fact that anyone with three years' residency gets in-state tuition is an opportunity to reshape the issue: "Should Texas universities be responsible for verifying and enforcing citizenship laws or should the federal government ?"
It's not a win, but it would put some ketchup and pepper on the shit sandwich.
Too bad he went "compassionate conservative" instead. He should have hired Newt along with Newt's staffers.
Posted by: SocietyIs2Blame at September 23, 2011 12:35 PM (yK8YH)
Posted by: Lincolntf at September 23, 2011 12:35 PM (hiMsy)
Posted by: Dave at September 23, 2011 12:36 PM (Xm1aB)
Right, but that's because no Oklahoman is in any danger of breaking 1000 on the SATs. The NEW SATs.
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 23, 2011 12:36 PM (D9z3D)
No what someone needs to point out is the Great Wall of China was wholly unsuccessful at stopping invasion.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at September 23, 2011 12:36 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at September 23, 2011 12:36 PM (aOjfG)
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 23, 2011 04:15 PM (D9z3D)
The money comes from the PUF. West Texas Intermediate extracted from university land and sold on the market.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at September 23, 2011 12:36 PM (ItDg4)
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at September 23, 2011 04:31 PM (bjRNS)
Space junk, and I'll not hear another word!
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at September 23, 2011 12:36 PM (jx2j9)
Giving illegal immigrants a free college education is far beyond being 'moderate,'
For the zillionth time, it is not free. They pay in-state tuition. So do residents of Texas border states, including New Mexico, Oklahoma, Arkansas and Louisiana.
Posted by: Avogadra at September 23, 2011 12:36 PM (dtIOD)
That perception is always in his mind and will be in the general. On this issue, expect him to be just like Bush.
Posted by: Paper at September 23, 2011 12:37 PM (IvlIt)
Posted by: Dr Spank at September 23, 2011 12:37 PM (BcpOa)
That's still a more articulate argument than any I've seen Sarah Simpleton put together over the past three years.
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 23, 2011 12:37 PM (D9z3D)
On border enforcement, I like his ideas of boots on the ground and air assets as part of a bigger plan, especially if that is used to stop armed cartels.
I think Perry might have an advantage in expanding on how the feds aren't enforcing current laws.
Perry needs to come out and say, 0bama and J nap are willfully ignoring current immigration laws on the books. As president, I plan to enforce current laws and stop wasting taxpayer money on giving tax refunds/welfare payments to illegals..blah..blah..
Posted by: Willy at September 23, 2011 12:38 PM (Ja9VH)
Ah, I'm sorry. I didn't realize my sarcasm detector wasn't working.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at September 23, 2011 12:38 PM (bjRNS)
Posted by: Joffen at September 23, 2011 12:38 PM (EPcuy)
Posted by: toby928™ at September 23, 2011 12:38 PM (GTbGH)
175-- Oh my gosh!!!!
Rick Perry is completely full of himself. He makes Obama look humble!
That is what I noticed first, and why I can not stand the man!
Posted by: petunia at September 23, 2011 12:38 PM (hgrmi)
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 23, 2011 04:37 PM (D9z3D)
uh huh
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at September 23, 2011 12:38 PM (aOjfG)
Posted by: Dave at September 23, 2011 12:39 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: PR at September 23, 2011 04:36 PM (8a0kZ)
Compared to out of state or private tuition it is DIRT cheap. In fact, it is lower than catholic high school tuition. It's nothing in the world of college tuition.
Posted by: dagny at September 23, 2011 12:39 PM (Ayvi1)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at September 23, 2011 12:39 PM (jx2j9)
Rick Perry is completely full of himself. He makes Obama look humble!
That is what I noticed first, and why I can not stand the man!
Posted by: petunia at September 23, 2011 04:38 PM (hgrmi)
Go sniff Romney's shit. The man is one of the most arrogant out there.
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at September 23, 2011 12:39 PM (aOjfG)
Posted by: Dr Spank at September 23, 2011 04:37 PM (BcpOa)
Exactly, no one would mind that. It would be great!!
Posted by: robtr at September 23, 2011 12:39 PM (MtwBb)
Posted by: UGrev at September 23, 2011 12:39 PM (yBuLL)
Posted by: Dave at September 23, 2011 12:40 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: joncelli at September 23, 2011 12:40 PM (RD7QR)
>>>Posted by: Flapjackmaka at September 23, 2011 04:38 PM (aOjfG)
"Crony capitalism, Sean, you betcha!"
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 23, 2011 12:40 PM (D9z3D)
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at September 23, 2011 04:38 PM (bjRNS)
Go to your room!
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at September 23, 2011 12:40 PM (jx2j9)
He says the right things about Social Security but he doesn't have a solution in mind? It's like he hasn't thought one of his major issues through in any substantive way.
Anyone can get up and say "Social Security is a Ponzi scheme", hell I did it right here over two years ago. To be taken seriously as a candidate you have to be able to go to the next level and say, "here's what we do". Perry says, "we need a conversation about it". Really?
Let me ask this in all sincerity of a Perry supporter. He says denying these kids in-state tuition is heartless. But it's ok to deny them the chance to put that degree to use in a job? How do you square that circle?
Posted by: DrewM. at September 23, 2011 12:41 PM (dw7rB)
This is actually the whole Texan problem in a nut shell. Spending time in Texas does not (or should not) confer the rights of a citizen on Mexican Nationals who are here illegally.
Somehow they don't seem to get that in Texas.
Posted by: petunia at September 23, 2011 04:27 PM (hgrmi)
-----
Getting a degree from a Texas university does not make you a citizen or improve your chances.
You do not have to be a US citizen to study in Texas.
All that is happening is taht the state of Texas has decided that they will collect less revenue from a specific subset of Mexicans than they might otherwise. It has not hurt the Texas economy. It has not hurt Texas universities. In fact, it sounds as if Texas universities are so robust that Perry is pressuring them to trim the fat in their operations so that they can lower tuition.
Posted by: Y-not at September 23, 2011 12:41 PM (5H6zj)
Yes, the Hispanic vote is crucial for the GOP's future, however, that can be taken care of with a VP Rubio. There are better ways to win over Hispanic voters without throwing principals out the window.
Posted by: Holly at September 23, 2011 12:41 PM (nqctR)
Compared to whom? Mittens? That's laughable; Newt? That's even funnier, Foster Mom? at that point your point is absolutely F*ing hilarious.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at September 23, 2011 12:41 PM (0q2P7)
At this point, I'll vote for him in the general if I have to. Same with Romney.
Posted by: Dave at September 23, 2011 04:21 PM (Xm1aB)
I'd rather have some kind of half assed amnesty than Obamacare any day.
on the other hand amnesty could lead to another version of obamacare since they'll all vote democrat as soon as they are citizens. LOL
Posted by: Max Power at September 23, 2011 12:41 PM (q177U)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at September 23, 2011 12:41 PM (jiVmv)
There were actually many walls in northern china and were quite successful over many years in preventing successful invasions from the north. For example as late as the 17ty century, the Manchu invasion was held off from 1600 to 1644.
Posted by: RioBravo at September 23, 2011 12:41 PM (eEfYn)
Why start out life 100k in the hole?
Or go instate and only start out 40K in the hole and that's if you don't work and your parents don't pay shit. You probably wouldn't have to pay that much if you aren't getting parental support. If you have decent high school grades, go in-state, don't have parental help, and have a part time job you can get through in-state tuition being only about $25K in the hole--the price of a nice used car.
Posted by: dagny at September 23, 2011 12:42 PM (Ayvi1)
Posted by: Zombie Hunter Thompson at September 23, 2011 12:42 PM (GOG1H)
>> If the illegal kid in-state isn't paying full freight, some legal out-of-state kid IS paying full-freight in return. The money comes from somewhere.
If you're talking about the difference betwen resident tuition rates and non-resident,
a. property taxes
b. sales taxes
c. other general revenues
Mostly b.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at September 23, 2011 12:42 PM (WvXvd)
Posted by: Lincolntf at September 23, 2011 12:43 PM (uIz80)
Posted by: Joffen at September 23, 2011 04:38 PM (EPcuy)
Someone... last night said Romney actually vetoed the Dream Act equivelent in MA.
I get so tired of everyone saying... Romney would do some stupid thing when his record is every bit as conservative as some stupid squish like Perry.
You were all sold a bill of goods.
Rick Perry is no conservative. He is a pay for play politician and he does what ever he needs to get power.
Texas is conservative, so Perry looks conservative too. But he is just another politician with no moral core.
Posted by: petunia at September 23, 2011 12:43 PM (hgrmi)
Christie/Rubio, bitches, or don't even bother ringing me.
Posted by: JDW at September 23, 2011 04:34 PM (uw+0A)
They aren't running, asswipe. Go outside and look around at reality for a change.
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at September 23, 2011 12:43 PM (UnAol)
Posted by: Breaker19 at September 23, 2011 12:43 PM (WCm02)
No, and for a veteran politician, that's a problem. But there's still lots of time. He'll have to work much harder than people thought he would; and maybe that explains why his decision to enter took so long. He may not have been suitably prepared for a run but was essentially drafted by cheerleaders who just "hated" everyone who had already declared. He jumped in prematurely though that might seem counterintuitive since OMG!! he has to declare nownownow!! the window is closing!! etc. The fierce urgency of now 365 days/year of campaigning spurred him in... and probably too soon.
Plus fanbois had ridiculous expectations. A letdown was inevitable.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at September 23, 2011 12:43 PM (r4t7/)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at September 23, 2011 04:41 PM (jiVmv)
I don't live in Texas but if it's ok with Texans then I really don't care. Providing what you say is happening.
Posted by: robtr at September 23, 2011 12:44 PM (MtwBb)
Posted by: Dr Spank at September 23, 2011 12:44 PM (BcpOa)
175.....SOMETHING NO ONE IS CONSIDERING:
Perry, being a devoutly religious man, may have not an intelligence problem but a humility problem. It may, in fact, be against his nature to proclaim his own achievements and tear down the accomplishments of others.
The fact then, that the debate forum requires him to go against his core principles would, in fact, exhaust him and provide a halting performance.
Posted by Bill Mitchell
------------
I have been thinking much the same thing. ....Last night it was like Perry was really having to force himself to attack Romney back. So consequently he sucked at it.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at September 23, 2011 12:44 PM (gZO5m)
The Dems already dominate Houston and Austin. These are large cities. Lots of votes. The left in Texas is just as left as any big city in America.
The future demographics of Texas are such that the Left hopes they can start a big fight between whites and hispanics.
And if the Dems turn Texas blue then it's game over for a generation.
Posted by: Clubber Lang at September 23, 2011 12:44 PM (QcFbt)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 23, 2011 12:44 PM (UlUS4)
I think because to qualify for in-state tuition as an illegal, you have to be pursuing citizenship.
Posted by: Johnny (John E.) at September 23, 2011 12:45 PM (nRTou)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 23, 2011 12:45 PM (UlUS4)
So they had to *ahem* man the wall for it to be useful? When after it was finally finished was near impossible thanks to being broke from having built it?
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at September 23, 2011 12:45 PM (0q2P7)
Shove a bottle up my butt and call me a heartless bigot.
Posted by: elliot m at September 23, 2011 12:45 PM (zPich)
Sales taxes, which, incidentally, everybody who buys something here pays.
Full ride at Texas is about $7,000-$8,000 a semester (tuition, room and board, books). Which I know cause I paid it for a kid for 3 and a half years (she graduated early, God bless her!)
Posted by: Dave in Texas at September 23, 2011 12:45 PM (WvXvd)
" Romney would do some stupid thing when his record is every bit as conservative as some stupid squish like Perry."
Except for raising taxes, starting a socialized medical program, and supporting TARP, amongst other things.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at September 23, 2011 12:45 PM (kaOJx)
Posted by: Lincolntf at September 23, 2011 04:43 PM (uIz80)
A wall wouldn't be any solution, other than to deny property owners their rightful access to water.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at September 23, 2011 12:45 PM (ItDg4)
Posted by: Joffen at September 23, 2011 12:46 PM (EPcuy)
Texas is conservative, so Perry looks conservative too. But he is just another politician with no moral core.
Posted by: petunia at September 23, 2011 04:43 PM (hgrmi)
You must think mitt romney is satan then if we're talking about moral cores.
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at September 23, 2011 12:46 PM (aOjfG)
The first election isn't until January 31st and they run through June. Why would we have to select someone currently in the race? All these debates at this point are as useless as they are annoying. It does make for lively blog comments though.
Posted by: RioBravo at September 23, 2011 12:46 PM (eEfYn)
As the big names people wanted to jump in (Daniels, Christie, Ryan, etc.) decided to stay on the sidelines, many important conservative donors/politicos started looking around for an alternative to Romney.
Perry, who didn't really look like he wanted to run, bought into all of the narratives for running that these people fed him (Texas jobs, Hispanic votes, winner...whatever). He assumed that he just had something that would easily translate.
He doesn't. He can't run for this like this is another Texas gubernatorial election, and I don't think he is nimble enough to shift gears quickly.
Posted by: Paper at September 23, 2011 12:47 PM (IvlIt)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at September 23, 2011 04:41 PM (jiVmv)
They don't. They just get the same rate.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at September 23, 2011 12:47 PM (ItDg4)
If you're talking about the difference betwen resident tuition rates and non-resident,
a. property taxes
b. sales taxes
c. other general revenues
Mostly b.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at September 23, 2011 04:42 PM (WvXvd)
You forgot d. the Texas tuition fund set up in the early 1900s for Texas and A&M.
The state granted a metric shit ton of land to the schools that at the time didn't look to have value. Turns out though, that under that land was a lot of oil. Oil the schools now own. I have to lease from the schools from time to time and they are dicks. They always want a premium bonus, (in some places $3,000 an acre) plus 25% royalty
Posted by: Jollyroger at September 23, 2011 12:47 PM (NCw5u)
Well, in Texas' case, it's because the bottom occasionally falls out of the "Permanent Fund" that's generated from Texas' public lands. (Oil is the biggie.)
When I went to school, the PF was flush, and in-state tuition was ridiculously cheap. (It's also worth noting that the UT football program actually paid the school $5 million last year.)
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at September 23, 2011 12:47 PM (bjRNS)
Posted by: PR at September 23, 2011 12:47 PM (8a0kZ)
Well, at least you are being honest finally that your reasons are emotional, not rational.
Posted by: Y-not at September 23, 2011 12:48 PM (5H6zj)
The Permanent Fund was actually established in 1854.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at September 23, 2011 12:48 PM (bjRNS)
"Creased pants" vs. the wrong "canned answer."
It's the same vapid, packaged stuff. You're essentially just complaining he doesn't dissemble well enough to allow you to ignore the evidence he's not a mere pragmatist, but rather another open borders ideologue. Or at least boost him to those who need to be convinced.
If he could, you'd still be on the bandwagon.
Posted by: Lurker at September 23, 2011 12:48 PM (gQceP)
How do you think community colleges are funded?
Posted by: Y-not at September 23, 2011 12:48 PM (5H6zj)
Ask yourselves this: Is Rick Perry ready for prime time?
Right now there are only two candidates who are, Newt, and Romney. Romney is a non starter. He's got until next year before I have to answer that question definitively. Issues are important right now, because that tells me if I like him, competence is important later, he's allowed to get better as he goes along so long as he is up to snuff come primary day.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at September 23, 2011 12:49 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Johnny (John E.) at September 23, 2011 04:45 PM (nRTou)
I covered that after the last debate (scroll down a bit to see it). It strikes me that he's stretching the definition of "pursuing" citizenship.
Posted by: DrewM. at September 23, 2011 12:49 PM (dw7rB)
Seeking residency.
Posted by: RioBravo at September 23, 2011 12:49 PM (eEfYn)
Posted by: RioBravo at September 23, 2011 04:41 PM (eEfYn)
Actually Hadrian's Wall was quite successful at keeping the Scots out of Roman Britain too.
Strong walls make good neighbors. There is a fense between my neighbor's houses and mine. My dogs dont' eat their chickens. Works great, we talk over the fense...Life is easier with walls. On the other side their cat does come inside my house if I leave the door open. But I like their cat so it's okay.
Posted by: petunia at September 23, 2011 12:49 PM (hgrmi)
See 190. It isn't either/or.
Are you suggesting that building the wall would bankrupt the country, especially in comparison to the cost of dealing with 20M+ illegals?
Posted by: pep at September 23, 2011 12:49 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at September 23, 2011 12:49 PM (jiVmv)
Oh, I know it would be stretching. I was just giving you what I believed his response would be.
Posted by: Johnny (John E.) at September 23, 2011 12:50 PM (nRTou)
---
Admissions != Tuition charges
Posted by: Y-not at September 23, 2011 12:50 PM (5H6zj)
Google "San Diego Tunnel". If your neighbor sucks, the wall doesn't magically transform them.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at September 23, 2011 12:51 PM (bjRNS)
>> You forgot d. the Texas tuition fund set up in the early 1900s for Texas and A&M.
I know about the Permanent University fund but it muddies the waters because it's only for the Texas and Texas A&M systems and obviously we have more state universities than those, plus it's not abundantly clear to me those funds cover the operating expenses of students, they're more geared toward facility expansion.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at September 23, 2011 12:51 PM (WvXvd)
Dicks yes. Stupid dicks - not so much.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at September 23, 2011 12:51 PM (jx2j9)
244...... I think Perry jumped into the race before he was ready, he should have waited. All he would have missed were a few meaningless debates. ....Posted by Dr. Spank
---------
I dunno. Perry needs the name recognition. All this controversy, good or bad, is accomplishing that.
If he had waited, he would've also missed out on securing some of the fundraising that has been going on since he got in.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at September 23, 2011 12:51 PM (gZO5m)
buy his book
Posted by: Breaker19 at September 23, 2011 12:52 PM (WCm02)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at September 23, 2011 04:49 PM (jiVmv)
When I was in school, anyone in the top 10% of their class was welcome - no limitations on number of students.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at September 23, 2011 12:52 PM (ItDg4)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at September 23, 2011 12:52 PM (jiVmv)
I'm guessing he's not considered viable by many but Herman Cain has been pretty good on immigration. Enforce the laws on the books and use the path to citizenship is essentially what he says when asked about amnesty.
Posted by: Arcadehero at September 23, 2011 12:52 PM (mmHDH)
226 - Drew, you're right. The problem is what he did, not how he describes it.
Perry, like W/Jeb, clearly believes that illegal immigration amounts to a net plus for America. Frankly, so did Reagan. It's only become a fringey position over the last 10 years. The "Texas DREAM Act" is something he clearly supports ideologically and emotionally and is personally invested in, thus his ham-fisted defense last night. He waffled through excuses, then his true instincts won out and he started to defend the act as the right and good thing to do.
To answer your question: as a Perry supporter, I think he'd give them a chance to use that degree. I think Perry's a pro-Hispanic-outreach-via-amnesty - ironically putting him in the same camp as Karl Rove. It's his major issue failing and it has nothing to do with messaging or delivery. Both his heart and mind are committed to a "special relationship" between Mexico and the US (see bi-national health care) including a DADT attitude about illegal immigration at best (I suspect he's even more open borders than that but knows it would be a political coup de grace to say so).
Posted by: SocietyIs2Blame at September 23, 2011 12:52 PM (zjyVR)
Posted by: Avogadra at September 23, 2011 12:53 PM (dtIOD)
Isn't 10% a limitation in that case?
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at September 23, 2011 12:54 PM (jiVmv)
I know about the Permanent University fund but it muddies the waters because it's only for the Texas and Texas A&M systems and obviously we have more state universities than those, plus it's not abundantly clear to me those funds cover the operating expenses of students, they're more geared toward facility expansion.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at September 23, 2011 04:51 PM (WvXvd)
Yeah, thats the fund. I went to UH, so no fund for us. (Many of the legislators are Ags or Horns so I don't expect a change here). It really doesn't matter how the money is allocated. Its still a slush fund so the schools can allocate elsewhere.
And my tuition was lower than the other schools anyway
Posted by: Jollyroger at September 23, 2011 12:54 PM (NCw5u)
Posted by: elizabethe at September 23, 2011 12:55 PM (WIwyd)
(And the really, cool, impressive part is only the part they show off to tourists. It's actually a pretty lame wall in places)
So you're saying it's the OK Wall of China.
Posted by: eleven at September 23, 2011 12:55 PM (fsLdt)
You should visit the great wall of china sometime or read about on the innerwebs.
The great wall of china is not a continuous wall but a series of short walls.
Posted by: robtr at September 23, 2011 04:28 PM (MtwBb)
Already knew that. Does that somehow invalidate my point that the Chinese built long, thick walls over mountainous terrain without the aid of modern equipment and materials. Does it somehow prove that a 1200 mile long wall over relatively flat terrain is impossible to build?
Posted by: blindside at September 23, 2011 12:55 PM (x7g7t)
Isn't 10% a limitation in that case?
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at September 23, 2011 04:54 PM (jiVmv)
It can be. I had 30 people in my graduating class. So .3 of us were given a pass to the big schools. The rest....
Posted by: Jollyroger at September 23, 2011 12:55 PM (NCw5u)
Posted by: Frank and Joe Hardy at September 23, 2011 12:56 PM (BeCiC)
276 - So don't build a wall because we can't "magically transform" Mexico ? That leaves us with a) simply living with the present out-of-control border or b) doing something more "active" to transform Mexico. Option a) isn't working well at all. How do you propose to accomplish b) ?
Posted by: SocietyIs2Blame at September 23, 2011 12:56 PM (zjyVR)
Posted by: Breaker19 at September 23, 2011 12:56 PM (WCm02)
Thanks.
I think you're right but he simply can't say it. I can't hold what I think he really believes against him but his language and the intensity of his passion for it lead that way.
Posted by: DrewM. at September 23, 2011 12:56 PM (dw7rB)
Posted by: Lincolntf at September 23, 2011 12:58 PM (hiMsy)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at September 23, 2011 04:54 PM (jiVmv)
It is a limitation based on intelligence or expected success, not background.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at September 23, 2011 12:58 PM (ItDg4)
Posted by: Jollyroger at September 23, 2011 12:58 PM (NCw5u)
Posted by: Mandy P. refuses to watch the SCOAMF at September 23, 2011 12:59 PM (qFpRI)
I don't live in Texas but if it's ok with Texans then I really don't care. Providing what you say is happening.
Posted by: robtr at September 23, 2011 04:44 PM (MtwBb)
But MA choosing their own healthcare plan is a problem. I see. Because.... Obama said it was your problem. And you always believe Obama.
Someone else said TARP. Rick Perry would be nowhere without taking stimulus dollars. His budget doubled... that means he got the money to lure illegals to his state... that is 81% of the jobs he is bragging about, they weren't for Americans either... anyway... Rick Perry got the numbers he brags about from Obama cash.
So to repeat at the national level... he is going to need China Cash, only funny thing--China wants paid back.
Rick Perry's solutions for Texas are the same solutions that Obama used nationally. Only, Perry used his easy money to pay illegals to move to Texas and provide jobs for them.
You were all sold a bill of goods. Perry is not conservative and he is not successful.
Posted by: petunia at September 23, 2011 12:59 PM (hgrmi)
Posted by: Joffen at September 23, 2011 01:00 PM (EPcuy)
Posted by: Lincolntf at September 23, 2011 04:58 PM (hiMsy)
We do need to protect or border. We don't need the wall, we just need the people to man it.
Posted by: Jollyroger at September 23, 2011 01:00 PM (NCw5u)
True but every candidate has that problem, it's not unique to Perry.
Still, there's ways to argue in favor of what he believes with going to the "bigot!" card not once but twice. It's what he really believes.
Posted by: DrewM. at September 23, 2011 01:00 PM (dw7rB)
All these problems with illegal aliens is from one thing and one thing only. The fed government absolutely refuses to protect our borders and/or stem the flow of these people into the US.
Every state is dealing with this fact as well as they can. Some dealing with it better than others.
Perry says, as president, he'll secure the borders. IMHO, that's the first thing we have to do. Everything else could be argued at a later date.
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at September 23, 2011 01:01 PM (UnAol)
Posted by: Lincolntf at September 23, 2011 04:58 PM (hiMsy)
The entire Texas border with Mexico is water.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at September 23, 2011 01:01 PM (ItDg4)
Already knew that. Does that somehow invalidate my point that the Chinese built long, thick walls over mountainous terrain without the aid of modern equipment and materials. Does it somehow prove that a 1200 mile long wall over relatively flat terrain is impossible to build?
Posted by: blindside at September 23, 2011 04:55 PM (x7g7t)
Would the Chinese have built the wall if there was a river they wanted to have access too along the site?
Posted by: buzzion at September 23, 2011 01:02 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: Lincolntf at September 23, 2011 04:58 PM (hiMsy)
Alligators. Lots and lots of alligators. And sharks. With lasers.
Posted by: ErikW at September 23, 2011 01:02 PM (CB4n3)
That is what the federal policy is likely to be over the next 5 years regardless of who is elected. Might as well ... enjoy it.
Posted by: RioBravo at September 23, 2011 01:02 PM (eEfYn)
" Obama said it was your problem. And you always believe Obama."
Unless you can prove Obama was lying when he said Romneycare was the blueprint for Obamacare, I'll have to take his word on that. Romney has never denied it.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at September 23, 2011 01:02 PM (kaOJx)
Yeah, this. It's like when the coverup is worse than the crime. The In-State tuition thing is small potatoes, but implying that I'm a bigot torques my jaw.
Posted by: toby928™ at September 23, 2011 01:02 PM (GTbGH)
Turns out, that term "Crony Capitalism" came from a Soros-funded org some time back.
Mark Theissen had an op-ed about it in the Washington Post yesterday.
The term 'Cronyism' has been around for a while, but linking 'Capitalism' to it is a liberal construct. ....I knew there was something bugging me about that term.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at September 23, 2011 01:02 PM (gZO5m)
Posted by: Mandy P. refuses to watch the SCOAMF at September 23, 2011 01:04 PM (qFpRI)
Posted by: DrewM. at September 23, 2011 04:56 PM (dw7rB)
Given his track record, I assume Perry's a fairly astute campaigner. If he was acting out of pure political calculation, he would handle this issue differently.
That leaves only personal convictions as an explanation. He even defended himself today (vis a vis Romney) by claiming he was the one standing up for principles and what he believes.
I think it's pretty safe to assume that Perry thinks what he's done with Hispanic issues in his state is the right thing to do, and we should expect him to lean that way in the White House.
Hate to say it, but those of us who are anti-amnesty and don't support a US-Mexico "co-prosperity" pact are going to need Congress to rein him in if we elect him (which I still support).
Posted by: SocietyIs2Blame at September 23, 2011 01:05 PM (zjyVR)
Masscare is a failure. It was known to be a failure a couple of years ago (Heritage or CATO did an analysis) and it is still a failure. It is an economic failure and it's a failure in terms of health care accessibility.
There is nothing that I've seen that suggests that this tuition program, which was instituted ten years ago and has been tweaked (but retained) since then, is a failure for Texas. Texans are happy with it. Texas universities are excellent. And Texas can afford it.
Posted by: Y-not at September 23, 2011 01:05 PM (5H6zj)
Yeah, the Rio Grande has altered its bank location more than once, causing border renegotiation. Portions of the fence were built inland, sometimes problematically on private property. And along Colonia border communities there'd need to be facile legal crossings. Besides, there's the sentiment from US citizens to look the other way rather than get caught in cross fire or victimized by theft, etc. given the human smuggling and drug trade from Mexico. Residents live there after politicians change their policies after all. Nonetheless, no fence presents a much more massive problem along the Mexican border. So would the massive Trans Texas Corridor without patrolled entry inspections that NAFTA interests lobbied to prevent.
All of the above border patrol efforts combined should work. /Overkill.
Posted by: Dollar Value at September 23, 2011 01:05 PM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at September 23, 2011 04:14 PM (gA69l)
Same with 'et cetera'. I can't listen.
Posted by: observer at September 23, 2011 01:06 PM (xSxLR)
Texas is conservative, so Perry looks conservative too. But he is just another politician with no moral core.
Posted by: petunia at September 23, 2011 04:43 PM (hgrmi)
This from a Romney person. The irony. It burns.
Posted by: Mandy P. refuses to watch the SCOAMF at September 23, 2011
Is it harder to be a conservative in MA or Texas.
If Romney was a Democrat, or agreed with Democrats, why would he choose to crusade against Ted Kennedy as a Republican in MA? Why not be a Democrat in MA? Why not make friends with Kennedy, instead of try to get him out of power?
On the other hand if one wanted power in Texas, which party would be the mostly likely to give it to you?
One is a Conservative, because it was the quick route. The other is Conservative because it is right.
Posted by: petunia at September 23, 2011 01:07 PM (hgrmi)
Already knew that. Does that somehow invalidate my point that the Chinese built long, thick walls over mountainous terrain without the aid of modern equipment and materials. Does it somehow prove that a 1200 mile long wall over relatively flat terrain is impossible to build?
Posted by: blindside at September 23, 2011 04:55 PM (x7g7t)
Well, heh ... you can "build" anything.
Whether it works or not is quite another question.
In fact - if the Feds ever DO build this wall you cherish - you can bet they'll wash their hands of it once it's completed and announce 'Mission Accomplished'. Seriously - when Mitt is President he'll build that wall - and then point at it and say ... "See, problem solved!"
Meanwhile - MILLIONS of illegal's will be pouring through that wall. Climbing over that wall. Cutting through that wall and digging under it.
And when governors complain about illegal immigration - ole Prez'dent Mitt will tell 'em - "What illegal immigration? I built a wall down there!"
Perry is against a CONTINUOUS wall because it's impractical and will only give people a false sense of security. The guy's backed walls over certain areas, farking PREDATOR DRONES over others, and technology over others. He's backed sending more manpower to patrol ALL areas of the border. That's really the answer - MANPOWER.
Posted by: HondaV65 at September 23, 2011 01:07 PM (8X9tr)
Posted by: Lincolntf at September 23, 2011 01:09 PM (uIz80)
Would the Chinese have built the wall if there was a river they wanted to have access too along the site?
Posted by: buzzion at September 23, 2011 05:02 PM (GULKT)
You can, like put points in the wall that allow water access - guess where people trying to cross will naturally head to. The wall by itself is not effective - I'm under no illusion that putting up a wall will magically prevent people from trying to get over it, but it slows them down and channels them to other areas that are more easily crossed.
Do you lock the doors to your house when you leave or when you go to bed? Why?
Posted by: blindside at September 23, 2011 01:09 PM (x7g7t)
You're not going to like the answer. Your choices include some or all of the following:
* Legalize drugs.
* Militarily intervene in Mexico.
* Extend asylum to most every Mexican.
The crap going on on the other side of the border is really that bad.
(There was a theory floated that Gunwalker was a way to supply one cartel against the Zetas, so the Zetas wouldn't overthrow the government of Mexico. Obviously, with the operations in Florida and Illinois, this doesn't seem reasonable, but the theory was floated before we knew about them.)
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at September 23, 2011 01:09 PM (bjRNS)
Obama already declared mission accomplished on the border. So there - good as done. Move On.
Posted by: RioBravo at September 23, 2011 01:10 PM (eEfYn)
Re: 'troops and UAVs on the border'
Uh-huh, because I'm supposed to believe that the guy who thinks it is heartless to not give in-state tuition to illegals is now going to allow the military to use lethal force to kill them as they cross the border.
We had 130,000 troops in Iraq - we never came close to closing the country's borders with either Syria or Iran. And that was with wartime-level rules of engagement and operating restrictions. In this instance, they're talking about putting a mere couple thousand, operationally nerfed troops on a 1,200 mile border.
Nevermind that a majority of illegals now get here by plane. Nevermind that they're going to be deployed at a few select bases, leaving the rest of the border empty. Nevermind that they're not trained to detain people, and aren't going to be given the authority to shoot people.
"Troops and UAVs on the border" is just another shiny thing for the politicians to distract the voters with while not addressing the problem. It's the slightlmore concrete version of the "virtual fence." I.e., an expensive but ineffective boondoggle. Speaking as someone who believes in border enforcement, we'd actually be better off just leaving it open and not spending the money, than buying that dog and pony trick.
Posted by: Lurker at September 23, 2011 01:10 PM (gQceP)
Agreed.
Anyone who has been Governor for 10 years and has another 10 years in office before that is simply going to have things some people don't like.
I could honestly get passed that.
I might, might, be able to get passed the bigot stuff.
It's just add that to his general lack of depth on policy and I'm not buying him. Mostly I'm pissed off because I wanted him to be the guy everyone was saying he was. He's just not. It's not his fault he was over hyped but he took the good side of being the out of the box front runner, now he gets the downside.
I'll vote for him over Obama but it'll be out of obligation like with McCain. I was just hoping for more. Serves me right for thinking a politician might be more than that. They never are.
Posted by: DrewM. at September 23, 2011 01:10 PM (dw7rB)
If Perry reveresed his stances on immigration, tuition, and social security that have been mentioned, wouldn't that effectively end any chance he has for the nomination?
I'm sort of glad to see a politician say something and stick with his statement. Regardless of said statement.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at September 23, 2011 01:11 PM (kaOJx)
Posted by: Kaitian at September 23, 2011 01:11 PM (w+Au4)
THAT is fair - arguing about if it is effective is different than making the statement it can't be done.
Like I said, I'm under no illusion that putting up a wall finishes the job - it is ONE layer of security. Any security requires multiple layers, which means any wall needs to be manned/monitored aggressivle.
Posted by: blindside at September 23, 2011 01:11 PM (x7g7t)
Posted by: Jean at September 23, 2011 05:09 PM (WkuV6)
I had proposed that earlier, but our cows can't read the location maps.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at September 23, 2011 01:12 PM (ItDg4)
The limit of which -- where there's all water -- is Perry's position.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at September 23, 2011 01:13 PM (bjRNS)
Do you lock the doors to your house when you leave or when you go to bed? Why?
Posted by: blindside at September 23, 2011 05:09 PM (x7g7t)
To keep our wives from leaving us?
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at September 23, 2011 01:13 PM (UnAol)
Well then I guess we need to add security at the airports. ?
Posted by: RioBravo at September 23, 2011 01:13 PM (eEfYn)
Foolishly, this round of potus candidates are failing as a group to rally around the Congressional Caucus of Physicians' presentation on C-SPAN during the ObamaCare "debate" -- federally legislated measures to actually lower the cost of medical insurance policies available across the nation.
Posted by: Dollar Value at September 23, 2011 01:13 PM (lpWVn)
Posted by: akak at September 23, 2011 01:14 PM (xbuAS)
Ok because I need to be able to draw water at any time.
Posted by: RioBravo at September 23, 2011 01:14 PM (eEfYn)
Posted by: Jean at September 23, 2011 01:15 PM (WkuV6)
Uh-huh, because I'm supposed to believe that the guy who thinks it is heartless to not give in-state tuition to illegals is now going to allow the military to use lethal force to kill them as they cross the border.
But you're most definitely not heartless. I can see that.
Posted by: eleven at September 23, 2011 01:15 PM (fsLdt)
Posted by: Mandy P. refuses to watch the SCOAMF at September 23, 2011 01:16 PM (qFpRI)
Maybe we can just discourage a few by making it a wee bit harder to get it.
Posted by: RioBravo at September 23, 2011 01:16 PM (eEfYn)
Posted by: The Guy Who Says Bullshit A Lot at September 23, 2011 05:07 PM
I'm a fan of land grant universities. They were started for the right reasons 150+ years ago and I think that they provide benefit to the citizens of the states they serve. The point of those universities was to provide practical educations -- in stark contrast to the "classical" educations provided by the elite colleges to elite students.
I'm not a big fan of community colleges, frankly. The teaching quality is low and they are less likely to be self-sustaining (or even close to that) because there are so few revenue streams. There's no research to attract extramural funding, there's no professional education of note (because the faculty are not up to delivering that sort of curriculum), and there aren't even wealthy alumni to make huge gifts to build an endowment. They really seem like big high schools.
I think the best model is a comprehensive university. One that encompasses both trades and "community college" style remedial/general studies as well as full university curricula, including post-graduate programs. The university should address the needs of its community as much as possible, but it should also strive for national (and international) excellence in some areas so that they have a chance to attract extramural support and provide outstanding educations to students.
Anyway, I've been at both types of institutions - private and public - and I vastly prefer public... even thought they are mis-named and find most of their support from revenue streams other than state appropriations. I'm not sure the typical figure now, but I don't know that I have heard of any state school receiving more than 40% of their funding from their states. I think most are in the 30% and some are lower.
Posted by: Y-not at September 23, 2011 01:16 PM (5H6zj)
You can, like put points in the wall that allow water access - guess where people trying to cross will naturally head to.
To a place that they can make their own way through so they can avoid the "expected route" that has been set up for them to be caught trying to use.
Do you lock the doors to your house when you leave or when you go to bed? Why?
Posted by: blindside at September 23, 2011 05:09 PM (x7g7t)
And nope. Because I don't currently live in a place where that is a concern. Hell my car is outside with the keys in the ignition.
Posted by: buzzion at September 23, 2011 01:17 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: sonnyspats at September 23, 2011 01:17 PM (I/MzF)
Who the hell is talking about using lethal force on the border?
Posted by: DrewM. at September 23, 2011 01:17 PM (dw7rB)
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at September 23, 2011 05:09 PM (bjRNS)
I'm OK with #1, actually. Legalization carries its own baggage, but it shrinks the black market substantially and puts more of the black marketeers under our thumb rather than the kleptocrats and feckless narco-toadies of Mexico City.
As for #2, that's obviously a last resort, but we should make sure that the cartels and their enablers in the Mexican government know that it's always on the table - including making the occasional raid into Mexico to prove our point when circumstances justify it. The political impracticality of launching a full-blown invasion is why I'm for a wall as a helpful tool in the toolbox for all that it's not a panacea.
#3 Asylum is the de facto strategy right now anyway.
FWIW, the Zetas might as well be the government of Mexico. They probably prefer their present position as shadows behind the throne since Zedillo and his cronies take the heat for how shitty Mexico is while the cartels enjoy the real fruits of power.
Posted by: SocietyIs2Blame at September 23, 2011 01:19 PM (zjyVR)
I think the guy who mentioned the Berlin Wall yesterday.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at September 23, 2011 01:19 PM (bjRNS)
Posted by: Dollar Value at September 23, 2011 01:19 PM (lpWVn)
And nope. Because I don't currently live in a place where that is a concern. Hell my car is outside with the keys in the ignition.
Posted by: buzzion at September 23, 2011 05:17 PM (GULKT)
Heh, true country Ohioan, right there.
Posted by: ErikW at September 23, 2011 01:22 PM (CB4n3)
And very good at it.
--
Spell check keeps highlighting 'Obama' when I enter it. It suggests SCOAMF instead.
Posted by: RioBravo at September 23, 2011 01:23 PM (eEfYn)
US Border Patrol Agents being shot at by Mexican Military and by cartel soldiers using machine guns.
US citizens attacked by Mexican cartel thugs while traveling near the border.
Americans visiting our own state/national parks near the border being shot at by Mexicans.
Posted by: Dollar Value at September 23, 2011 01:24 PM (lpWVn)
20 million illegals may be a bit high, so let's crunch the numbers for 10 million of the little buggers, assuming $1000/year for average marginal cost per illegal.
1x107 * 1x103 = 1x1010 dollars.
Yup, I can build and man a kick-ass fence for that.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at September 23, 2011 01:25 PM (LH6ir)
347: Zedillo and his cronies
Oops. Then again, I can excuse my anachronism by saying that Zedillo, Fox, Calderon et al are just interchangeable cogs in a one-party junta that's run Mexico since they kicked out the Spanish (who weren't any better).
Posted by: SocietyIs2Blame at September 23, 2011 01:25 PM (zjyVR)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at September 23, 2011 01:26 PM (21lBC)
Posted by: Lincolntf at September 23, 2011 01:26 PM (uIz80)
" Obama said it was your problem. And you always believe Obama."
Unless you can prove Obama was lying when he said Romneycare was the blueprint for Obamacare, I'll have to take his word on that. Romney has never denied it.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at September 23, 2011 05:02 PM (kaOJx)
No the issue is, why is that Romney's problem? Romney didn't help Obama, but Obama tried to damage Romney by giving him credit after the fact.
Romney didn't tell Obama to use his plan and add 2000 pages of pork. And then force it down America's throat against their Will.
Romney didn't tell Obama to go against the U.S. Constitution and the will of the American people. Obama did that, and blamed it on Romney, who was no where near it.
What Romney did do was, have a constituency that demanded a state healthcare plan. He gave them what they asked for. He vetoed the plan after it was changed, then the legislature over rode his veto...
Romney's real mistake was in deciding to take credit for a bill he vetoed. That was stupid. And he is paying for it.
But Romney never shoved anything down anyone's throat. And Romney followed the MA Constitution. And Romney used the conservative idea that states are the best place to test things like healthcare plans.
And his idiot MA constituency still says that plan is what they wanted and they still like it. It polls well, no matter how many headlines against it the press writes to damage Romney.
The only thing the two situations have in common is they both deal with healthcare.
But one plan was the will of We the People. And the other one was against the will of We the People.
And the Republicans were so afraid of Obama that they let Obama tell them who they could nominate and who they couldn't.
Posted by: petunia at September 23, 2011 01:26 PM (hgrmi)
Some idiot up-thread wants the border manned with two soldiers/mile, with plenty of ammo and night vision equipment (And it isn't even reactionary!).
You do the math.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at September 23, 2011 01:27 PM (LH6ir)
They seem to be having a problem at this time with the cracking down stuff.
Posted by: RioBravo at September 23, 2011 01:27 PM (eEfYn)
Yeah, I noticed that. On the other hand, he writes well and certainly bitch-slapped Santorum!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at September 23, 2011 01:28 PM (LH6ir)
What does that have to do with lethal force? Let's place 1 unarmed border peaceman every ten miles along the border. Maybe that will help.
Posted by: RioBravo at September 23, 2011 01:29 PM (eEfYn)
>> Perry used his easy money to pay illegals to move to Texas and provide jobs for them.
You're talking out of your ass. Total bullshit.
See, US Census, 2010, and Congressional Apportionment.
Ninny.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at September 23, 2011 01:29 PM (WvXvd)
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at September 23, 2011 01:30 PM (UnAol)
Posted by: Joffen at September 23, 2011 01:34 PM (EPcuy)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at September 23, 2011 01:35 PM (LH6ir)
That's all good to proclaim verbally but the border will likely not be secured any time soon. Amnesty: now that is possible.
Posted by: RioBravo at September 23, 2011 01:35 PM (eEfYn)
"but make hiring an illegal punishable with prison time for the people who hire and a fat fine for the company."
Best idea of the say by far.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at September 23, 2011 01:36 PM (kaOJx)
Nice thought but will never happen...
Posted by: RioBravo at September 23, 2011 01:37 PM (eEfYn)
RioBravo, Perry said no immigration reform without securing the border in that June Houston Chronicle interview.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at September 23, 2011 01:38 PM (kaOJx)
Bob Perry (Mr. Swift Boat) won't like that. No can do.
Posted by: RioBravo at September 23, 2011 01:39 PM (eEfYn)
Posted by: Joffen at September 23, 2011 01:39 PM (EPcuy)
I've seen this movie before, when it was called teh Fred.
Good luck with Mr. Gardner ACE.
Posted by: flyonthewall at September 23, 2011 01:41 PM (vouNK)
or rule of law
worth sacrificing a few lives for a banquet burger ain't it
Posted by: akak at September 23, 2011 01:42 PM (xbuAS)
Posted by: Mandy P. refuses to watch the SCOAMF at September 23, 2011 05:16 PM (qFpRI)
As always you vastly over state Romney's positions.
When Romney was a brand spanking new politician... never ran for dog catcher before he ran against Kennedy and almost won... he took some stupid stands, trying to unseat THE liberal icon of American government, in a very liberal state.
He found he had a talent for politics... so they asked him to run for governor. He had little chance to win, he did not think through all the issues yet, and decided that in MA he had to live with the realities of politics in MA.
As he became an actual governor, he got more and more conservative in his statements. Romney grew into a Conservative. At first he was just annoying the liberals in MA. He didn't think he could win.
Turns out Romney was one businessman with great political skill. When Romney got serious about politics he became as conservative as you can be in MA.
Once again, if he was really a Democrat why isn't he actually a Democrat. He'd go far in that party with his clean living and political talent.
Why be a Republican in Massachusetts if you don't believe deeply in the principles of conservatism? Why bother?
The logic that Romney is a stealth Democrat is illogical. It flies in the face of reason.
On the other hand, Perry is much more likely a stealth Democrat, since he only became a Republican to win elections in very Republican Texas.
Posted by: petunia at September 23, 2011 01:42 PM (hgrmi)
I like his statements as made as much as you do and I have been a Perry cheerleader. However, I suspect what it all actually means is that there will be a new law regarding securing the border along with an amnesty plan. The amnesty plan will be implemented, The border will somehow end up not being secured. As history is our guide...
Posted by: RioBravo at September 23, 2011 01:43 PM (eEfYn)
Apparently it's more "purist" to pander to the debate audience now than to stick to what you've been preaching for 10 years. I wasn't at the meeting, but apparently a new rule was passed that requires conservatives to support the candidate that tells them what they want to hear.
Maybe somebody else here has the minutes from the meeting.
Posted by: prettypinkfluffypanties at September 23, 2011 01:43 PM (TllhK)
Does no one understand the whole undocumented concept? It's not just for aliens anymore.
Posted by: RioBravo at September 23, 2011 01:46 PM (eEfYn)
1. How much do you think a 1200 mile fence would cost?
2. Who is going to pay for it?
Answers:
1. A bajillion
2. All of you
Still want to build a wall?
Posted by: Honda at September 23, 2011 01:49 PM (ladck)
Ace and all the rest.
You are talking yourselves into supporting a loser.
Perry will not win. He is a horrible candidate in more ways than debates...
He also, lied about being lobbied by the cancer victim. He didn't meet her until the executive order was done. Then they became friends. It was on Drudge this morning.
So he plays fast and easy with the truth. In a debate, before a national audience. Not a good sign.
He can barely put a sentence together. His grammer can be worse than a 4th grade hilly billy.
His record of pay for play puts Chicago to shame.
Don't talk yourselves back into liking him. He isn't the energy.
Cain was good last night... I know Romney is he who must never be given a break... but Cain was good.
Posted by: petunia at September 23, 2011 01:53 PM (hgrmi)
1. How much do you think a 1200 mile fence would cost?
2. Who is going to pay for it?
Answers:
1. A bajillion
2. All of you
Still want to build a wall?
Yes. In places along the border. For objections:
1. Use illegal alien labor to build it to lower cost and borrow the rest of the money.
2. Just borrow another 1/4 bajillion. That will only loser the credit rating to A+ and we all know we will still be a AAA country as The One said.
Posted by: RioBravo at September 23, 2011 01:53 PM (eEfYn)
She's concerned, toby.
Anybody but Perry. He's extremely dangerous. Those poor people in Texas. I only hope they manage to escape before President Romney puts the wall up.
Posted by: Y-not at September 23, 2011 01:56 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: JDW at September 23, 2011 01:58 PM (+sjlp)
How is that not anything other then income redistribution©?
---
I'm not sure what your point is, but funding higher ed is no more income redistribution than funding secondary ed, particularly for folks like me who have no kids.
Posted by: Y-not at September 23, 2011 01:59 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: JDW at September 23, 2011 02:00 PM (+sjlp)
You can, like put points in the wall that allow water access - guess where people trying to cross will naturally head to.
To a place that they can make their own way through so they can avoid the "expected route" that has been set up for them to be caught trying to use.
Do you lock the doors to your house when you leave or when you go to bed? Why?
Posted by: blindside at September 23, 2011 05:09 PM (x7g7t)
And nope. Because I don't currently live in a place where that is a concern. Hell my car is outside with the keys in the ignition.
Posted by: buzzion at September 23, 2011 05:17 PM (GULKT)
Clearly because you don't *think* you have to lock your doors (because bad guys NEVER travel looking for easy targets), locks serve no purpose.
For the last time..I am not saying build a wall then just leave it. That won't work. It has to be manned. Believe it or not, history proves that walls with guards ARE very effective at keeping things you don't want inside out. I'm not even sure why some of you are trying to argue the point.
Posted by: blindside at September 23, 2011 02:01 PM (x7g7t)
If you can make it to the northern border, I'll drive down to pick you up. We are setting up an underground railroad of sorts here in Utah to save all of you unfortunate Texans living under the thumb of that "hilly billy" Perry.
Signed,
Your friend in Utah
Posted by: Y-not at September 23, 2011 02:01 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Y-not at September 23, 2011 02:01 PM (5H6zj)
Oh hey, News Max says Christe is considering... they even have a quote...
I say, Christie will disappoint as well. He isn't all that conservative either.
So... they may bring some more gladiators against Romney... but it will be in vain.
Because Romney is very good. And he is right. And he is the only one who can lead the country and the world out of this financial mess.
The stakes are so much bigger than the future of the Republican Party.
But the next, not-Romney is Christie. So you can feel good about dumping Perry.
Posted by: petunia at September 23, 2011 02:01 PM (hgrmi)
Posted by: David Rodaxel at September 23, 2011 02:01 PM (kKWmw)
If you can make it to the northern border, I'll drive down to pick you up. We are setting up an underground railroad of sorts here in Utah to save all of you unfortunate Texans living under the thumb of that "hilly billy" Perry.
Signed,
Your friend in Utah
Nice and friendly.
then eat a bag of dicks.
Not nice and friendly, I think. Can't we all just get along?
Posted by: RioBravo at September 23, 2011 02:03 PM (eEfYn)
Posted by: JDW at September 23, 2011 02:04 PM (+sjlp)
For the last time..I am not
saying build a wall then just leave it. That won't work. It has to be
manned. Believe it or not, history proves that walls with guards ARE
very effective at keeping things you don't want inside out. I'm not even
sure why some of you are trying to argue the point.
Worked for us. Well..............
Posted by: East Germany at September 23, 2011 06:03 PM (OWjjx)
I know you are trying to be clever and funny but guess what: It ACTUALLY did. People were STREAMING out of the Soviet side of East Berlin and East Germany. Then the walls and fencing with ARMED GUARDS went up, and, surprise surprise, the number of people who actually left dropped precipitously.
Why do you think they put walls with guards around prisons, embassies, and nuclear power plants?
Posted by: blindside at September 23, 2011 02:06 PM (x7g7t)
I really like Christie. I grew up in the region (MD) and I'm super comfortable with his personality and style. His priorities line up well with mine. I think he's been doing great where he is.
But I don't want him to run. I think it'd be a waste of time because there's just too many core GOP voters who would not go for him. And, unlike Romney who has the money and time to run for President as a full-time occupation, Christie has a job to do - one that he really just started. A losing run for the presidency would just weaken his position in NJ.
Posted by: Y-not at September 23, 2011 02:08 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: RebelCowboy at September 23, 2011 02:13 PM (AulBp)
404 are you saying there is open range along the border?
There is with Canada. Or there was in the 70s... the last time I knew someone well who ran cattle on open range.
Posted by: petunia at September 23, 2011 02:19 PM (hgrmi)
Posted by: stace, teahadi extremist bitch at September 23, 2011 02:51 PM (lYlx9)
Rebelcowboy is correct. When my dad was a young lawyer, he was sent to work water rights cases on the Rio Grande. There were murders.
One thing people need to know about TX is that illegal immigration is a big problem, but the top three issues in TX are:
1. water
2. water
3. water
Posted by: stace, teahadi extremist bitch at September 23, 2011 02:56 PM (lYlx9)
if this was palin, who performed so poorly in the debate, he would be screaming for her to leave the planet and declaring her finished.
You morons think you can rescue this turd that you tried to convince everyone is chocolate cake? newsflash?
he is done along with his boots and his toupe
Now its time for the fat man to jump in and crash and burn next.
Obama wins second term thanks to you all.
Posted by: Jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka at September 23, 2011 03:09 PM (bs3JI)
Well, I have live about half my life in AZ. And... water is the top three issues there as well.
I personally think, the Rio Grande is a fence. And better than some because it is hard to tunnel under a river.
However, once a fence is built and proper attention to border security is given, including many more boots on the ground... but not on the bottom of the Rio Grande... of course. Only then, can we begin to control our own borders.
We don't have any control right now. It is a huge task, which is why, even though that was a condition to the 1986 amnesty, the border was never controlled.
And since the amnesty has now become a very real possibility because we did it before... it is a magnet.
Therefore, controlling the border must be the iron clad condition on which we begin any conversations about the Mexican Nationals who have lived lives in the United States waiting for the next amnesty.
And Rick Perry's Dream Act undermines the attempt to ever get control of our borders. We have to be tough as nails or it will never happen.
If Rick Perry wanted a long term solution to the problem of illegal immigration. If he wanted the future not to be like this. He needed to hang tough, not give an inch, until the border is under control.
Then.... my guess is, if we ever get control, which most countries do have control, at least better than us... then let's talk about what to do.
We have to learn from 1986 if this problem is ever going to be fixed.
Posted by: petunia at September 23, 2011 03:18 PM (hgrmi)
It was an overwhelming vote in favor of the act by the state legislature saying 'YES' to the 'hispanic lobby' and a gigantic F**** YOU to Texans in favor of immigration control.
Posted by: RioBravo at September 23, 2011 03:47 PM (FXk42)
Posted by: Kim Priestap at September 23, 2011 03:54 PM (N7xJb)
In a speech today he said " Don't elect smooth debaters" classic Perry swipe at Mitt and Obama.
On Hannity he said "An unmanned obstacle isn't an obstacle" He the explained the reality of the terrain along the border gave enough facts.
Perry is always better in interviews and with voters...not stylized debates. He'll be better to face Obama if he gets the nomination but he's Rick Perry and won't try to be something he's not.
These are the kinds of classic Perry statements that sink into voters. Everybody else is playing to the media...and Perry is talking to voters. It's how he campaigns & the media will hate it. It's worked everytime.
Last night he sealed Hispanic votes not by pandering but defending a Texas decision on the #1 issue for Latino voters which is education. This counts in FL. and could count in California.
He also showed up Mitt who is willing to torch the GOP to win.
Posted by: workingclass artist at September 23, 2011 04:35 PM (tBMfq)
Posted by: workingclass artist at September 23, 2011 04:45 PM (tBMfq)
Posted by: Dave at September 23, 2011 04:48 PM (a5Y+2)
Posted by: Thorvald at September 23, 2011 04:55 PM (OhenJ)
Posted by: Thorvald at September 23, 2011 05:13 PM (OhenJ)
Posted by: Durka at September 23, 2011 07:49 PM (QjrRF)
2) That petunia is a f'ing loon for Mittens.
3) I keep telling you all--the Mormon issue is a 100%, absolute killer. And I say this as one who was pissed when he lost FL last year. Mitt is dead, dead, dead in the general. I say this knowing many, many Mormons and I can tell you as sure as the sun rises tomorrow the attacks of Fuckabee will have been child's play compared to what will be unleased against Mittens. Religious bigotry is very, very potent. Jesus and Satan brother? Just scratching the surface. There is a lot worse out there; and the Dems will be dancing naked in the streets if Mittens get the nomination. Just like it is a cold, hard truth that some of us don't want to hear, that Sarah is unelectable, the same is true of Mittens. Just educate yourself by doing a search "are Mormons Christian?" and you'll be amazed at the amount of anti-Mormon gold mines out there. I don't like it, most of it is vile, but it exists and we have to recognize it's power.
Posted by: jimmuy at September 23, 2011 08:14 PM (ibeMV)
Posted by: ELVISNIXON.COM at September 24, 2011 08:54 AM (Kq4Yo)
Posted by: Texan Economist at September 24, 2011 01:30 PM (TC/9F)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3171 seconds, 544 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Rick Perry at September 23, 2011 12:02 PM (q177U)