November 18, 2011
— Ace Finally? Finally.
He called Fast and Furious a “bureaucratic bungling” that had made guarding the border “substantially more dangerous.”“Our own federal government provided more than 2,000 firearms to some of the most dangerous criminals in North of America, many of which are still unaccounted for,” Perry told the audience at the annual Federal Law Enforcement Foundation luncheon, held at a hotel in New York City.
“Federal law enforcement officials deserve an attorney general who displays the same courage and the sense of responsibility with which they serve,” he added. “And America deserves a president and a Congress willing to give law enforcement officials the support they need to truly secure our borders.”
People following the story closely probably won't be happy that he called it "bungling," as many people seem convinced that there was some kind of They Meant This To Happen plot. (But bear in mind the Prosecutor's Rule: It's not about what I believe, it's about what I can prove.)
But, still. It can't hurt to have a candidate pushing this, as well as the case against Eric "Pardon Me" Holder.
Thanks to Ben Domenech and his daily political intelligencer, The Transom.
Posted by: Ace at
11:28 AM
| Comments (298)
Post contains 209 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 11:30 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Anita Perry at November 18, 2011 11:30 AM (aXtIQ)
Posted by: al-Cicero, Tea Party Jihadist at November 18, 2011 11:31 AM (QKKT0)
Has anyone heard an official explanation from the DOJ of the goal of FnF?
Has anyone in the media asked about the goal?
Posted by: AndrewsDad at November 18, 2011 11:32 AM (C2//T)
Posted by: joncelli, reluctant Perry supporter at November 18, 2011 11:32 AM (RD7QR)
Honestly, I don't mind a candidate for President "soft-selling" this. There are more people in the electorate like you, Ace, who don't believe that F&F was designed to fail than people like me who believe the entire point was to limit my 2nd Amendment rights (and that, while not planned, they were willing to except "cracking some eggs" like the murder of Agent Terry).
Given that (more of you than me), it makes sense for a Presidential Candidate to say "bungling" instead of "criminal conspiracy."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 11:32 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at November 18, 2011 11:32 AM (aXtIQ)
Perry must be reading PalinÂ’s facebook page for clues on what to talk about.
Posted by: jwest at November 18, 2011 11:33 AM (qeYI9)
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2011 11:34 AM (Xm1aB)
Perry must be reading PalinÂ’s facebook page for clues on what to talk about.
Ouch. That's gonna leave a mark.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at November 18, 2011 11:34 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at November 18, 2011 11:34 AM (pLTLS)
I'm unhappy with the term bungling because it's not a severe enough term. A bungling is when your order accidentally gets put on the wrong budget, or some other irritating thing that pales in comparison. This was a weapons grade fuck up at the very least.
Posted by: taylork at November 18, 2011 11:34 AM (5wsU9)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at November 18, 2011 11:35 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: mpurinTexas, Evil Conservanatrix, supports Rick Perry at November 18, 2011 11:35 AM (bvfSj)
He's still got time, War. Don't fret- I suspect you'll have more time to hate on Rick Perry in the coming months.
For all the "not Romney's" out there, he's the only one I see for whom the damage is both a) self-inflicted {which is sometimes less bad than when it's dealt by an opponent} and b) relatively minor (I've heard lots of people- and not exactly on the band-wagon- concede that debating isn't really going to be part of the President's job).
If he can survive through January (and, honestly, I suspect just through December) I suspect it'll be a Romney/Perry race, and I give Perry at least a 48% chance of winning that one.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 11:35 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2011 11:36 AM (Xm1aB)
You can't caucus from Jamaica.
Though you may be able couscous, and that might be close enough, for some.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 11:37 AM (8y9MW)
Let me know when Perry needs boots on the ground in Hawaii.
Posted by: mpurinTexas, Evil Conservanatrix, supports Rick Perry at November 18, 2011 11:38 AM (bvfSj)
Though you may be able couscous, and that might be close enough, for some.
Nope. Jamiaca is out.
You can only couscous from Algeria.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at November 18, 2011 11:38 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at November 18, 2011 11:39 AM (p7SSh)
Posted by: pashmr at November 18, 2011 11:39 AM (3aNC4)
I can send a strikeforce for your team anytime you want.
Posted by: The Todd at November 18, 2011 11:42 AM (aXtIQ)
But, still. It can't hurt to have a candidate pushing this, as well as the case against Eric "Pardon Me" Holder.
Right. Maybe, just maybe, Perry's mention of this will provide a bit more impetus for getting rid of Holder, even if it would be due to Obama seeing Holder more as a liability than an asset.
Posted by: Knife-Wielding West Virginian Women at November 18, 2011 11:42 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: The Pirates Your Mom Feared at November 18, 2011 11:42 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at November 18, 2011 11:42 AM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: laceyunderalls keeping my eye on the ball at November 18, 2011 11:42 AM (pLTLS)
I was glad to read some Mexican official said the Extradition word. I really want to see them just special rendition his ass. I don't think our system will ever effectively deal with them and even trying is liable to suck all the O2
Posted by: DaveA at November 18, 2011 11:45 AM (u70JJ)
The plan itself was outright treason, and to allow for any assumptions that there was anything accidental about guns walking with no active tracing in place favors politics over truth at the worst possible time.
Posted by: ontherocks at November 18, 2011 11:45 AM (HBqDo)
Eh, I switch from "felony-stupid" to "felony" on this about as often as Cain amends his public announcements.
But this always bears repeating - Watergate didn't have a body count.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 18, 2011 11:45 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Sub-Tard at November 18, 2011 11:45 AM (0M3AQ)
Posted by: Burt TC at November 18, 2011 11:45 AM (TOk1P)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 18, 2011 11:46 AM (eCnLg)
I'm not dead yet. Actually, I'm feeling much better...
Posted by: Rick Perry at November 18, 2011 11:46 AM (8y9MW)
"ATF: always siding with life".
Posted by: Ruby Ridge and Mt. Carmel at November 18, 2011 11:47 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2011 11:47 AM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: ace at November 18, 2011 11:47 AM (nj1bB)
Perry needs more funding. He needs a $20 bill from everyone here if he's to spread this point to the country.
My estimate is that Perry might go down in flames after the left reacts harshly to the truth he's telling, and this will help shield Newt so he can be nominated. I prefer Perry to Newt, but Newt is OK with me.
Either way, I'm happy to send Perry a small donation again, and I hope those who have been frustrated in their hopes to see the country learn about Fast and Furious support Perry right now.
Posted by: Dustin at November 18, 2011 11:47 AM (rQ/Ue)
Barack Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure.
Watergate didn't have a body count.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 11:48 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at November 18, 2011 11:48 AM (XE2Oo)
Posted by: © Sponge at November 18, 2011 11:49 AM (UK9cE)
The missed the ones out at sea returning to port later.
Posted by: Ruby Ridge and Mt. Carmel at November 18, 2011 11:49 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: kansas at November 18, 2011 11:49 AM (mka2b)
Posted by: ace at November 18, 2011 11:49 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 11:50 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Cherry pi at November 18, 2011 03:50 PM (OhYCU)
This happened in Happy Valley?
Posted by: dagny at November 18, 2011 11:51 AM (LVDiz)
Posted by: Sub-Tard at November 18, 2011 11:52 AM (0M3AQ)
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2011 11:52 AM (Xm1aB)
God knows only Saint Sarah of Wasilla mentions all the big stories that are on every single rightwing blog.
Posted by: ace at November 18, 2011 03:47 PM (nj1bB)
I wish Sarah could give Perry some advice on what to do when youÂ’re at 7 or 8 percent in the polls, but I donÂ’t think she was ever that low.
DonÂ’t worry, the other 92% will come along someday.
Posted by: jwest at November 18, 2011 11:52 AM (qeYI9)
Did I miss a comment where someone said that Rick Perry should have pushed the Reichstag scenario? The harshest I've seen is that they didn't think "bungling" was quite harsh enough.
That is: I think we agree with you- this is the smart move, however much we believe F&F was designed from the beginning to pave the way for more gun restrictions.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 11:53 AM (8y9MW)
Good for him that's what our candidates need to be doing. Attacking Obama and demoralizing his supporters. Make the press spend their time defending Obama instead of attacking our guys.
When our guys attack each other they are demoralizing the wrong people and giving the press freebies.
Posted by: robtr at November 18, 2011 11:53 AM (MtwBb)
you probably saw this already but...
Uncle Ubungo was in court again fighting his DUI. He says the cop had no right/reason to stop him in the first place.
Posted by: soothsayer at November 18, 2011 11:53 AM (sqkOB)
Posted by: ace at November 18, 2011 11:53 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: t-bird at November 18, 2011 11:54 AM (FcR7P)
Ouch! That must hurt. lololol
Posted by: Cherry pi at November 18, 2011 11:54 AM (OhYCU)
What's the over/under on the WaPo using that reasoning to call Rick Perry racist for this comment?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 11:55 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: ace at November 18, 2011 11:55 AM (nj1bB)
Perry must be reading PalinÂ’s facebook page for clues on what to talk about.
She's probably sending him emails.
Posted by: toby sunshine at November 18, 2011 11:55 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Herman Cain at November 18, 2011 11:55 AM (ETt0x)
Posted by: Cherry pi at November 18, 2011 11:56 AM (OhYCU)
Dude, that's one seriously accomplished retarded 3 year old. Most kids can't tie their own shoes until they're 5 or 6.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 11:56 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at November 18, 2011 11:56 AM (pLTLS)
You should see how fast they move away when they think I'm talking to my crank.
Posted by: Doofus at November 18, 2011 11:56 AM (4WhSY)
FIFY
Posted by: Cherry pi at November 18, 2011 11:57 AM (OhYCU)
70 Posted by: t-bird at November 18, 2011 03:54 PM (FcR7P)
What's the over/under on the WaPo using that reasoning to call Rick Perry racist for this comment?
Were there any rocks painted with N words on them in FnF? Just askin.
Posted by: Sub-Tard at November 18, 2011 11:57 AM (0M3AQ)
Posted by: Joe Biden at November 18, 2011 11:57 AM (QKKT0)
People following the story closely probably won't be happy that he called it "bungling," as many people seem convinced that there was some kind of They Meant This To Happen plot. (But bear in mind the Prosecutor's Rule: It's not about what I believe, it's about what I can prove.)
Exactly, Ace.
Bungling? .....I'll take "bungling". It's good to see Perry tackling this one....since the lib-media have been ignoring it.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at November 18, 2011 11:58 AM (H/0mM)
Posted by: ace at November 18, 2011 11:58 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Herman Cain at November 18, 2011 11:58 AM (ETt0x)
Because jwest is still a member of her cult, apparently. If she says it, and then someone else says it later, they must have gotten it from her, and not- you know- the news.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 11:58 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Burt TC at November 18, 2011 11:58 AM (TOk1P)
Apparently since Rick Perry has talked about getting tougher with Iran, he must have cribbed that off Palin too...seriously Palinestias, obsess much?
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 18, 2011 11:59 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: ace at November 18, 2011 11:59 AM (nj1bB)
When Perry does the obvious shit, he says "bungled".
Posted by: Cherry pi at November 18, 2011 11:59 AM (OhYCU)
Newt just tweeted he can hold his breath underwater for 2 minutes and challenges Obama to do the same.
Posted by: soothsayer at November 18, 2011 11:59 AM (sqkOB)
Posted by: Han Solo at November 18, 2011 11:59 AM (QKKT0)
FIFY
Posted by: Cherry pi at November 18, 2011 03:57 PM (OhYCU)
If so, since he is the only only one doing this, what does that say about the other candidates?
Posted by: Grey Fox, twirling his whiskers like Snidely Whiplash at November 18, 2011 11:59 AM (MSCON)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at November 18, 2011 11:59 AM (0yt4x)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at November 18, 2011 03:34 PM (pLTLS)
Already there.
Posted by: AmishDude, IA caucus vote for Perry at November 18, 2011 11:59 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Sub-Tard at November 18, 2011 11:59 AM (0M3AQ)
Posted by: © Sponge at November 18, 2011 12:00 PM (UK9cE)
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2011 12:00 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: Conan the kilt wearing Honey Badger at November 18, 2011 12:00 PM (GvYeG)
She ran for the Presidential nomination when?
Oh, that's right, she explained she can accomplish more by NOT being the chief executive of the planet's most powerful nation state.
Posted by: Waterhouse at November 18, 2011 12:00 PM (SPC42)
Posted by: Conan the kilt wearing Honey Badger at November 18, 2011 12:00 PM (GvYeG)
Posted by: Boone at November 18, 2011 12:00 PM (Jl3Mu)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 18, 2011 12:01 PM (9hSKh)
So Obama and Holders stealth plan to create an alynski style crisis to acheive rifle control, with murdered Mexicans and Border agent and plenty more to come....then.... Perry surrenders that whole issue and puts it at the level of of the government paying 200$ for a hammer.
Did I miss something?
Posted by: Shiggz at November 18, 2011 12:01 PM (I9fXA)
Ace,
I and a few others took a lot of shit as Palin supporters a few months ago, so itÂ’s time for a little good-natured fun at the expense of poll basement dwellers who have no chance of ever being the nominee.
Although you convinced yourself that everyone who backed her was an unthinking cult member, it will eventually occur to you that a thoroughly vetted reformer might have been just the ticket for 2012. Failing that, you can jump on board my new horseÂ…
Gary Johnson.
Posted by: jwest at November 18, 2011 12:01 PM (qeYI9)
I really think people need to examine whether they are interested in politics for tangible change, or if they're in it for some kind of soft, self-esteem boosting validation
Well ace, it ceratinly ain't for an ego boost. The last few elections I've gone something like 0-15 for National and Statewide seats. Living in CT as a conservative will do that to you. Shit, I think the last time anyone won that I voted for was when Lieberman was running against that commie Ned Lamont back in '06. Yeah, I voted for the lesser of two evils. The republican didn't even show up to the party.
Hell, I even voted for Romney back in the '08 prinmary. The State went for McCain. I wrote in Norm Root in the General. It didn't matter who I voted for because Obama won huge.
Posted by: The Outlaw in the Heavenly Hall at November 18, 2011 12:02 PM (E0EDC)
When Perry does the obvious shit, he says "bungled".
And one of them is a candidate for President, and the other is a seldom-seen-at-her-purported-paying-gig talking head. Who posts on Facebook. Like some tween gossip-junky.
Seriously, folks, Palin is not the only one who has been saying this, and Rick Perry is the only Candidate who has. So which one actually deserves some credit, here?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 12:02 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 03:56 PM (8y9MW)
My daughter was 4.......but she's above average.
Posted by: © Sponge at November 18, 2011 12:02 PM (UK9cE)
I was beginning to fear we'd start investigating totally unimportant issues such as bizarre, completely ridiculous and baseless rumors that may have begun to crop up for no reason whatsoever that a handsome young man with a bright screen future might possibly maybe theoretically at some point in time have doused a still-hot-and-fuckable star actress with steak sauce and tied a bag over her head and wrapped an anchor around her neck before pushing her over the side of a boat.
I heard Robert Wagner was heavily involved with this totally hypothetical stuff that didn't actually happen and no one needs to look into any further, but you didn't hear it from me.
Posted by: Christopher Walken at November 18, 2011 12:02 PM (aXtIQ)
Posted by: ace at November 18, 2011 12:02 PM (nj1bB)
There may not be enough evidence yet for a Grand Conspiracy to Grab Guns and 90% BS stats prosecution or Major candidate statement but there's plenty that it's more than just a bungle. A bungle is retrying GunWalker with 1 rifle, no tracking and saying Doh!
Posted by: DaveA at November 18, 2011 12:02 PM (u70JJ)
No. The moment someone thinks you're talking like a crank they move away from you and dismiss you.
Huh? Now you tell me...
Posted by: Michele Bachmann at November 18, 2011 12:03 PM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Conan the kilt wearing Honey Badger at November 18, 2011 12:03 PM (GvYeG)
Posted by: ace at November 18, 2011 12:03 PM (nj1bB)
I like them both. I hope they keep firing.
Posted by: Cherry pi at November 18, 2011 12:04 PM (OhYCU)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 18, 2011 12:04 PM (eCnLg)
Posted by: dagny at November 18, 2011 12:04 PM (LVDiz)
Posted by: Tami at November 18, 2011 12:04 PM (X6akg)
Posted by: PugBoo TeaPug Jihadist and Level Two Escroter at November 18, 2011 12:04 PM (ig4Pz)
Boob Schieffer is an old funny bastard.
This morning he predicted that everyone in congress, both right and left, will be thrown out in the next election.
Posted by: soothsayer at November 18, 2011 12:04 PM (sqkOB)
Good for Perry. Been waiting for one of the candidates to really go after this. Maybe I'll give him a 10th look.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at November 18, 2011 12:05 PM (JYheX)
Apparently the part where Rick Perry is a candidate for President, and therefore not really free to say the same kinds of things we are- no matter how much he may or may not believe them.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 12:05 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Cherry pi at November 18, 2011 12:05 PM (OhYCU)
Posted by: ace at November 18, 2011 12:05 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Sub-Tard at November 18, 2011 12:06 PM (0M3AQ)
Posted by: It's a gasser..get it? Gasser! at November 18, 2011 12:06 PM (NUigW)
Posted by: Cherry pi at November 18, 2011 12:06 PM (OhYCU)
Posted by: Conan the kilt wearing Honey Badger at November 18, 2011 12:06 PM (GvYeG)
Yes you missed the part where 95% of the country is not at all like you, despite your solipsistic insistence that it is.
Posted by: ace at November 18, 2011 04:05 PM (nj1bB)
I am the 5%!
Posted by: AmishDude, IA caucus vote for Perry at November 18, 2011 12:06 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: ace at November 18, 2011 12:07 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 12:07 PM (8y9MW)
Newt challenges Pelosi to an old fashioned Indian Leg Wrestle.
Best two of three.
Loser gets a five second Indian Burn and a Purple Nerple.
Posted by: garrett at November 18, 2011 12:08 PM (pXSf+)
125
Boob Schieffer is an old funny bastard.
This morning he predicted that everyone in congress, both right and left, will be thrown out in the next election.
That's what Dems and MSM always say when they've be beaten like a rented mule. They all be bums. Good deflection and projection at teh same time.
Posted by: Sub-Tard at November 18, 2011 12:08 PM (0M3AQ)
Posted by: ace at November 18, 2011 12:08 PM (nj1bB)
Ouch. Ace. Your words are hurtful.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 04:07 PM (8y9MW)
That was really low. Are you ok Allen? Need some ice?
Posted by: dagny at November 18, 2011 12:08 PM (LVDiz)
Posted by: Boone at November 18, 2011 12:08 PM (Jl3Mu)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 12:08 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at November 18, 2011 12:09 PM (l9zgN)
Luckily, I always wear my cup when I'm at the HQ.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 12:09 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: ace at November 18, 2011 12:10 PM (nj1bB)
Ah, well then her cowardice is even more objectionable for bailing out of a race she could have easily won.
Posted by: ace at November 18, 2011 04:07 PM (nj1bB)
Which is exactly why I donÂ’t light all the candles in my Sarah Palin shrine each day.
Posted by: jwest at November 18, 2011 12:10 PM (qeYI9)
Maybe we should all give Michelle Bachman another look because according to her she has been Gaff Free.
Posted by: robtr at November 18, 2011 12:10 PM (MtwBb)
Republicans don't "run" with anything. They poke it carefully and then jump back.
Posted by: dagny at November 18, 2011 12:10 PM (LVDiz)
We will continue to pray that Her divine providence will sweep over your hardened black soul.
Posted by: Cherry pi at November 18, 2011 12:10 PM (OhYCU)
Posted by: ace at November 18, 2011 12:10 PM (nj1bB)
What if Perry had refused to go on any debates and had only done TV Adds and interviews from the get go?
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 18, 2011 04:04 PM (eCnLg)
Every single response from the candidates would have included a slam at Perry. Instead of just every 3rd response.
Posted by: buzzion at November 18, 2011 12:11 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: ace at November 18, 2011 12:11 PM (nj1bB)
I don't necessarily have a problem with the bungle word, its just a speech, however there is actual testimony of the higher ups saying don't follow the weapons. And video with the perps driving away after loading their weapons, then not being followed.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at November 18, 2011 12:11 PM (JYheX)
When does this Only Real Fighter start fighting anywhere but fucking Facebook?
Doen't she tweet too?
Posted by: The Outlaw in the Heavenly Hall at November 18, 2011 12:11 PM (E0EDC)
Posted by: Shiggz at November 18, 2011 12:11 PM (I9fXA)
No. The moment someone thinks you're talking like a crank they move away from you and dismiss you.
Ron Paul vehemently disagrees.
Posted by: mpurinTexas, Evil Conservanatrix, supports Rick Perry at November 18, 2011 12:11 PM (bvfSj)
Posted by: AmishDude, IA caucus vote for Perry at November 18, 2011 12:12 PM (T0NGe)
Who would listen to a conservative blogger!! Man, that's nuts.
Posted by: Cherry pi at November 18, 2011 12:13 PM (OhYCU)
It's her supporters I have a problem with. No matter what bad decision she makes (such as, I'm told, being too cowardly or money-hungry to enter a presidential race she could win, when the Nation Needs Her), it always seems to be the fault of other people, like me, for Not Believing In Her Divinity Hard Enough. Ace clue me in here. Several months ago you saying Perry couldn't win and one of your wonkish accountants was the way to go. Now Perry is polling in the single digits, launching desparate broadsides with wiggle room and you are pumping him. WTF over? Do you just like latching on to sinking ships to demonstrate your strong swimming skills? I am honestly confused.
Posted by: Sub-Tard at November 18, 2011 12:13 PM (0M3AQ)
Because that's what I want in a candidate, someone who needs me to fight her battles, rather than someone who fights mine.
Posted by: ace at November 18, 2011 04:10 PM (nj1bB)
Republicans eat their own. Probably descended from gerbils. Who do we defend?
Posted by: dagny at November 18, 2011 12:13 PM (LVDiz)
You have got to be fucking kidding me.
What next? Cain comes out and says he's the most knowledgeable candidate, especially with respect to foreign policy?
Posted by: Hollowpoint at November 18, 2011 12:13 PM (SY2Kh)
Only because he's so surrounded by pot-head cultists that he doesn't notice the normal people edging away slowly, and not making any sudden moves.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 12:14 PM (8y9MW)
Against the SCOAMF debating skill won't matter, because the GOP nominee will be playing in a rigged game.
Analogous to baseball, it would be saying we can't put Perry in there because he's prone to wildness while Newt throws strikes. Doesn't matter because the MBM will be the umpires and anything the SCOAMF throws that doesn't hit the dirt or the batter will be called a strike, and the GOP nominee will have to throw it in a tiny movable zone to get the call
Posted by: kbdabear at November 18, 2011 12:14 PM (Y+DPZ)
Ouch. That sounded like my dating life.
Posted by: Cherry pi at November 18, 2011 12:14 PM (OhYCU)
you guys are still hoping for that Perry comeback huh?
*eyes show disbelief*
are the 8% who support him all on here?
Posted by: AuthorLMendez Is Offering $ To ace If He Bans Curious/Sky at November 18, 2011 12:15 PM (yAor6)
Would Bachman make a good AG? I think she would, and she does have what it would take to get the DOJ back to normal.
The "bungled" word does not seem too weak. There are people-I have met them-who have not heard of F&F, so by having a presidential candidate even mention it will get more people hearing about it. I don't think it was an oversight that F&F, Solyndra and the debt have not been brought up in the debates. The MSM is doing their best to keep the public uninformed, so for our candidates to bring these issues up is a good way to get them discussed.
Posted by: chillin the most for Perry at November 18, 2011 12:15 PM (6IV8T)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 04:07 PM (8y9MW)
Better put some ice on that.
Posted by: mpurinTexas, Evil Conservanatrix, supports Rick Perry at November 18, 2011 12:15 PM (bvfSj)
Posted by: AmishDude, IA caucus vote for Perry at November 18, 2011 12:15 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 18, 2011 12:15 PM (eCnLg)
It's just me and I understand Ace's point of view, but he could have added, even as kind of a back-scatter comment, that this operation had all the elements in it for the SCOAMF regime to possibly abridge our 2d amendment rights.
I mean, come on, almost everyone knows that the leftists have been wanting to do this for a long long time.
Posted by: Soona at November 18, 2011 12:15 PM (Au6cR)
Newt suggests that all GOP candidates join him for a seance tonight to consult the Founding Fathers.
Posted by: Soothsayer at November 18, 2011 12:16 PM (sqkOB)
Posted by: Cherry pi at November 18, 2011 04:15 PM (OhYCU)
I know...that was just cruel of Cavuto.
Posted by: Tami at November 18, 2011 12:16 PM (X6akg)
The Outlaw in the Heavenly Hall
Norm Root?
Heh. I'm a big fan of the Licoln Highway.
Where the hell did I dig up that name?
I meant Wayne Root.
Posted by: The Outlaw in the Heavenly Hall at November 18, 2011 12:16 PM (E0EDC)
I think you misread some posts. Ace has been Pro-Perry since shortly before he entered the race. He did lose his faith for a while, there, but he has rejoined the rest of us realizing that Perry is the best of a not-perfect (but far better than Barack Obama, who is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure, and RINO Romney, who was liberal enough to get elected governor in Massachusetts) lot.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 12:16 PM (8y9MW)
There will be no presidential debates no matter who is the GOP nominee.
There. I said it. Mark it down. Obama will duck them all.
Posted by: AmishDude, IA caucus vote for Perry at November 18, 2011 12:17 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: AmishDude, IA caucus vote for Perry at November 18, 2011 04:15 PM (T0NGe)
AmishDude we have primaries not caucuses in FL, is it from your experience that there's bullying in caucases at all? Im just curious (spit) to know OH and do polls for cauceses mean nothing as folks can persuade someone on election day to change their vote?
Posted by: AuthorLMendez Is Offering $ To ace If He Bans Curious/Sky at November 18, 2011 12:17 PM (yAor6)
that this operation had all the elements in it for the SCOAMF regime to possibly abridge our 2d amendment rights.
That would be a crazy, paranoid..... ummmm...... conspiracy.....
Posted by: fixerupper at November 18, 2011 12:17 PM (C8hzL)
Posted by: Wall-E at November 18, 2011 12:18 PM (48wze)
Posted by: Cherry pi at November 18, 2011 12:18 PM (OhYCU)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 18, 2011 12:18 PM (eCnLg)
Posted by: © Sponge at November 18, 2011 12:18 PM (UK9cE)
Posted by: AmishDude, IA caucus vote for Perry at November 18, 2011 04:17 PM (T0NGe)
If he pulled that I think it would hurt him, this isn't 1964 and Obama ain't a strong incumbent
Posted by: AuthorLMendez Is Offering $ To ace If He Bans Curious/Sky at November 18, 2011 12:18 PM (yAor6)
Posted by: dagny at November 18, 2011 12:19 PM (LVDiz)
“…it always seems to be the fault of other people, like me…”
When I think of poor Sarah reading AoSHQ each day looking for one word of encouragement from you, and the tears she must have cried from all the hurtful things you saidÂ…. Well, how could you blame her for not running?
Yes, my friends, it was all AceÂ’s fault.
When the country goes down in flames, we know who to point the finger at.
Posted by: jwest at November 18, 2011 12:19 PM (qeYI9)
He certainly could have, and it may not have been a bad move. But by leaving that alone, he leaves himself room to maneuver. He also keeps his powder dry for if SCAOMFOTUS tries to respond directly.
That is: I don't think it significantly weakens his attack to hold it back, and it may give him some room to ramp it up later, if that becomes a good option.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 12:20 PM (8y9MW)
Ironically enough, I always felt like I was channeling you. Have you ever actually read the tone of a lot of your comments?
"I learned it from YOU, Dad! I learned it from you!"
Posted by: Jeff B. at November 18, 2011 12:20 PM (K+pvw)
Posted by: mpfs, I'll Save a Horse & Ride Rick Perry at November 18, 2011 12:20 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: rabidfox at November 18, 2011 12:20 PM (pLEsh)
Baaa haaa haaaa. She is a religious looney that wants to make the 10 commandments law (go look it up as I am not posting a tiny url). Even I am not that crazy.
Posted by: Herman Cain at November 18, 2011 12:21 PM (UtT5R)
Posted by: Bizarro AoSHQ Content Complainer at November 18, 2011 12:22 PM (Y+DPZ)
"Safe" or not.
Posted by: The Pirates Your Mom Feared at November 18, 2011 12:22 PM (lpWVn)
I'm not sure if I'm honored by that, or not...
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 12:23 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Cherry pi at November 18, 2011 12:23 PM (OhYCU)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at November 18, 2011 12:23 PM (l9zgN)
195 There will be no presidential debates no matter who is the GOP nominee.
There. I said it. Mark it down. Obama will duck them all.
Posted by: AmishDude, IA caucus vote for Perry at November 18, 2011 04:17 PM (T0NGe)
even obama would get destroyed for trying to do that even by the MSM
---------
The MSM will just cover for him, like they did before.....except this time they will say that "he's too busy presidenting and doing important presidential stuff".
I agree with AmishDude. ....Obama will probably duck any debate.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at November 18, 2011 12:23 PM (H/0mM)
There will be no presidential debates no matter who is the GOP nominee
Barry will be much to busy dealing with the Middle East war he formented worked so hard to deter.
Posted by: toby928© Perrykrishna with tattooed knuckles at November 18, 2011 12:23 PM (GTbGH)
175 Analogous to baseball, it would be saying we can't put Perry in there because he's prone to wildness while Newt throws strikes. Doesn't matter because the MBM will be the umpires and anything the SCOAMF throws that doesn't hit the dirt or the batter will be called a strike, and the GOP nominee will have to throw it in a tiny movable zone to get the call.
kbdabear, this is what I have been saying all along. This is not an election between two candidates or two parties, its an election between normal Americans and the media. Obama is a dead man walking that his true believers (or should I say creators) refuse to let decompose. This situation means the race is fought between media and teh pubbie candidate. Of those pubbies on parade, there is only one that knows how to triangulate the media and win votes from the middle - thats Newt. Romney' plan is to lay low and sabotage other pubbies making him the last man standing. He thinks he will get a pass from the media since he is really a liberal and understanding of NE Faggotry. McCain thought this way too.
Posted by: Sub-Tard at November 18, 2011 12:24 PM (0M3AQ)
You make an intriguing point.
More Katy Perry posts, Ace. Let me recommend Christina Hendricks as well.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 12:24 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: fixerupper
Push the button MAX!!!
Posted by: mpfs, I'll Save a Horse & Ride Rick Perry at November 18, 2011 12:24 PM (iYbLN)
The MSM will say he won the debate regardless what happens. And. we. will. go. along.
Posted by: Cherry pi at November 18, 2011 12:24 PM (OhYCU)
I was referring to Ace, not you. I mean, I'm sorta kidding, but then again it's always amused me how he often adopts exactly the same tone as I do (except nastier and funnier, because he's better at this shit) and yet I'm the one who catches all the flak.
I guess that's the difference between being the owner of the blog and just another random RINO douchebag commenter.
Posted by: Jeff B. at November 18, 2011 12:25 PM (K+pvw)
I think you almost have to include Obama in that, given that he was in national office for something like 90 days before he started running for President.
Posted by: Ian S. at November 18, 2011 12:25 PM (Lpdzt)
Posted by: ace at November 18, 2011 04:05 PM (nj1bB)
I have faults times many,, but thinking the whole country thinks like me is very much not one of them. I know you have a lot of commentators and the endless socks cant help. I think my comments collectively show quite the opposite. Nearly all my posts are about strategies of managing biased media and the ensuing reactions of the uninformed.
Did democrats call Iran - Contra "bureaucratic bungling." If Bush had called called those pre 9/11 memos about "Bin Laden - looking to strike on US soil" Bureaucratic Bungling, would it have been wrong for the left to pounce on it? I don't think so, even if its whole the story.
My point which you did not address and I doubt you disagree with is that when there is literally blood in the streets and more to come "bureaucratic bungling" is a poor and even incorrect way to describe such an event.
Posted by: Shiggz at November 18, 2011 12:26 PM (I9fXA)
The MSM will just cover for him, like they did before.....except this time they will say that "he's too busy presidenting and doing important presidential stuff".
I agree with AmishDude. ....Obama will probably duck any debate.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at November 18, 2011 04:23 PM (H/0mM)
There will be a manufactured crisis mid to late August that he will have to focuse on through September. And of course as you know after every single crisis Obama must finally turn his focus to jobs (for the 400th time).
Posted by: buzzion at November 18, 2011 12:26 PM (GULKT)
I only had two litmus tests for supporting a GOP primary candidate: he or she couldn't be Ron Paul and he or she must mention Fast & Furious in a public forum of some kind, whether debate or interview or press release, I didn't care. I understand why Perry would not assert what Ace calls the Big Theory, to which I happen to ascribe. Like Ace, he may not buy it or he may think it sounds tinfoil-hat conspiratorial to go that far with it. No matter. I've liked Perry throughout, in spite of his poor debate performances. I'm going all in.
As an aside, I cannot for the life of me understand Newt! mania any more than I could Cain! mania. Both Gingrich's and Cain's shortcomings seem so blatantly obvious to me. Oh, well.
Posted by: troyriser at November 18, 2011 12:26 PM (vtiE6)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 12:26 PM (8y9MW)
213 @ Sub-Tard,
Explain to me how it is possible for them to jump from the private sector to the White House.
Simple, they win an election. Shit Sparky did it so we know its not that hard. As I recall Nixon did it. Same with Roosevelt. Pretty sure Wilson did it. Dittos Lincoln and Jackson. I could go on EOJ.
Posted by: Sub-Tard at November 18, 2011 12:27 PM (0M3AQ)
There will be no presidential debates no matter who is the GOP nominee
Barry will be much to busy dealing with the Middle East war he formented worked so hard to deter.
Posted by: toby928© Perrykrishna with tattooed knuckles at November 18, 2011I hope that works better than my Rose Garden Strategy worked in 1980
Posted by: Jimmy Carter at November 18, 2011 12:27 PM (Y+DPZ)
>>>The MSM will just cover for him, like they did before.....except this time they will say that "he's too busy presidenting and doing important presidential stuff".
>>>I agree with AmishDude. ....Obama will probably duck any debate.
You're both completely wrong. But dear god I hope he DOES try to do this. He'll get massacred, not only by the media -- who, yes, will flay him for this one, as it's an insult to them as well -- but the masses as well.
No President has been able to avoid debating his opponent since (I believe) the Eisenhower administration. And that was in the Stone Age, in terms of media. Obama, as a near-historically weak incumbent seeking reelection, will not have that option. He ain't Ike, after all.
Seriously: you need to be more realistic and less paranoid-conspiracy about things.
Posted by: Jeff B. at November 18, 2011 12:28 PM (K+pvw)
Posted by: mpurinTexas, Evil Conservanatrix, supports Rick Perry at November 18, 2011 12:28 PM (bvfSj)
AmishDude we have primaries not caucuses in FL, is it from your experience that there's bullying in caucases at all? Im just curious (spit) to know OH and do polls for cauceses mean nothing as folks can persuade someone on election day to change their vote?
Posted by: AuthorLMendez Is Offering $ To ace If He Bans Curious/Sky at November 18, 2011 04:17 PM (yAor6)
I was at the caucuses in 2008. It is different for the Democrats, but here's how it worked for me:
On a dark and cold evening (somebody offer me a job in the desert southwest please) you gather at a specific place at a specific time. Mine was an elementary school gym at, I think, 7pm. There are many more of these places than polling precincts in my town. There were several rooms in the school that were used for caucusing, R & D.
In the R room, some GOP functionary like a precinct captain calls everybody to order. There is at most one representative for every candidate. They are given a few minutes to discuss their candidate. They are instructed to only speak about their candidate and not denigrate the others. At my caucus, they were very good about this, there weren't even backhand attacks against the other candidate, it was all about how awesome your guy was and how he was for what we all want.
Then, there was a secret ballot. The results were tallied right there. I am given to understand that on the Dem side, they actually go to different sides of the room and there's pressure and bullying to move people.
In 2008, I was surprised that Huck got so many votes, but it was clear that he was lobbying the evangelical churches and associated groups and organizations directly and he managed to GOTV pretty well.
So, to answer your question, there wasn't bullying. Every candidate's representative -- even Ron Paul's -- was treated very respectfully.
By the way, at the end of the thing, they choose delegates to the statewide convention and other party positions. So if you don't like the way the GOP does things, this is how you do it, get involved in the micro level. Look at NY. Those people who do the drudgery are the ones who actually make the state parties work and when it comes time to do important things, they are in the driver's seat.
Posted by: AmishDude, IA caucus vote for Perry at November 18, 2011 12:28 PM (T0NGe)
People get too wrapped up in the whims of year-before-the-election polls, when most of the "straight" people aren't even paying attention. The reason Perry is going to be there in the end is because he has the resume, and now that he's gotten good press for being a likeable goof, he's bringing the hammer on a dislikeable set of goofs in the current Administration.
Perry might not get the nomination, but he will finish either first or second, and Obama WILL NOT be reelected. You can say you heard it here first, and you're welcome to tell me how brilliant I am 12 months from now.
Posted by: Burt TC at November 18, 2011 12:30 PM (TOk1P)
If he pulled that I think it would hurt him, this isn't 1964 and Obama ain't a strong incumbent
Posted by: AuthorLMendez Is Offering $ To ace If He Bans Curious/Sky at November 18, 2011 04:18 PM (yAor6)
Carter.
I'm betting he'll find an excuse for missing the first (1.3 richter earthquake in Podunk, Ohio) and then will just skip out on the rest after the media has laid down the meme of excuses.
Posted by: AmishDude, IA caucus vote for Perry at November 18, 2011 12:30 PM (T0NGe)
There. I said it. Mark it down. Obama will duck them all.
Posted by: AmishDude, IA caucus vote for Perry at November 18, 2011 04:17 PM (T0NGe)
That has always been my contention. The SCOAMF regime has nothing, and I mean nothing. Alan Greene could win a debate against them. And if Newt gets the go-ahead, the deal is sealed. No debates.
Posted by: Soona at November 18, 2011 12:30 PM (Au6cR)
Posted by: Cherry pi at November 18, 2011 12:32 PM (OhYCU)
let's go Rick ... time to nut up or shut up ...
Posted by: Conan the kilt wearing Honey Badger at November 18, 2011 12:32 PM (GvYeG)
Perry might not get the nomination, but he will finish either first or second, and Obama WILL NOT be reelected. You can say you heard it here first, and you're welcome to tell me how brilliant I am 12 months from now.
Posted by: Burt TC at November 18, 2011 04:30 PM (TOk1P)
And I will add that Mitt Romney will not be our nominee.
Posted by: Soona at November 18, 2011 12:33 PM (Au6cR)
Yes, but he works in Austin. It's kind of exactly the opposite from the Aggies Girls championship team (Softball? Basketball?) that Obama hosted recently giving him a jersey. I'm sure they WANTED to put the name SCOAMF on the back, but refrained, and even praised the President. Because that's what you do on those occasions.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 12:35 PM (8y9MW)
As an aside, I cannot for the life of me understand Newt! mania any more than I could Cain! mania. Both Gingrich's and Cain's shortcomings seem so blatantly obvious to me. Oh, well.
Posted by: troyriser at November 18, 2011 04:26 PM (vtiE6)
Ditto. I don't get it. Look, I can see even a rock-ribbed conservative liking Romney more than Perry for a variety of reasons, but I can't see how the others are a viable alternative. They won't get nominated (i.e., beat Romney) and certainly won't get elected. This ain't Baskin Robbins, where you get your own flavor. We all get the same one and that's why it's either vanilla or chocolate.
And with that, I denounce myself.
Posted by: AmishDude, IA caucus vote for Perry at November 18, 2011 12:35 PM (T0NGe)
231....Seriously: you need to be more realistic and less paranoid-conspiracy about things.
Very well, JeffB.....how many times did Obama debate McCain?
I seem to remember some cancelled debates in 2008. And the O wasn't even president then, but the media covered for him.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at November 18, 2011 12:35 PM (H/0mM)
Posted by: Cherry pi at November 18, 2011 04:18 PM
Good thing I didn't show up, it would have been horrifying
Posted by: Occupy Denver Dog at November 18, 2011 12:35 PM (Y+DPZ)
No President has been able to avoid debating his opponent since (I believe) the Eisenhower administration
I think Nixon avoided McGovern in 1972
Posted by: AuthorLMendez Is Offering $ To ace If He Bans Curious/Sky at November 18, 2011 12:35 PM (yAor6)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at November 18, 2011 12:35 PM (0yt4x)
Posted by: Cherry pi at November 18, 2011 04:18 PM
Good thing I didn't show up, it would have been horrifying
I'm betting on Justin Bieber posters. Just sayin.
Posted by: Sub-Tard at November 18, 2011 12:36 PM (0M3AQ)
With this Fast and Furious situation, its tempting to think of it as another "bureaucratic bungling" by big government. It unthinkably is already linked to over 200 murders in Mexico and a US border control agent. We already have the brave testimony of those inside the department who were punished for speaking out against it. This is as tragic as it is horrifying and those who encouraged, defended, and covered it up, have blood on their hands and I will not rest until those survivors of the victims and the American people see those hands in cuffs and the truth exposed to the light of day.
Posted by: Shiggz at November 18, 2011 12:36 PM (I9fXA)
Come on over, I've got pizza, a fridge full of beer, and new crotchless panties
Posted by: Ann Coulter at November 18, 2011 12:38 PM (Y+DPZ)
245 194 I snuck into ace's room while he was at Blog Con. Nothing but Palin posters and empty Valu-Rite bottles.
Posted by: Cherry pi at November 18, 2011 04:18 PM
The posters weren’t “sticky”, were they?
Posted by: jwest at November 18, 2011 12:39 PM (qeYI9)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at November 18, 2011 04:35 PM
Word !!!
Posted by: Ezra Klein at November 18, 2011 12:39 PM (Y+DPZ)
Perry is not soft on border issues.
Posted by: Pecos, All Perry, all the time at November 18, 2011 12:40 PM (2Gb0y)
Perry/Gingrich 2012!
Posted by: davidinvirginia at November 18, 2011 12:40 PM (haFNK)
Very well, JeffB.....how many times did Obama debate McCain?
I seem to remember some cancelled debates in 2008. And the O wasn't even president then, but the media covered for him.
I dont know if the media will cover for him but I highly doubt he'll avoid debates, he'll be hurt massively if he looks like the weak incumbent avoiding a debate. if Bush avoided Kerry in 04 it would have ended in Kerry as President
Posted by: AuthorLMendez Is Offering $ To ace If He Bans Curious/Sky at November 18, 2011 12:41 PM (yAor6)
No President has been able to avoid debating his
opponent since (I believe) the Eisenhower administration. And that was
in the Stone Age, in terms of media. Obama, as a near-historically
weak incumbent seeking reelection, will not have that option. He ain't
Ike, after all.
Seriously: you need to be more realistic and less paranoid-conspiracy about things.
Posted by: Jeff B. at November 18, 2011 04:28 PM (K+pvw)
I am being realistic. Carter (granted, he lost) skipped out on at least 1 debate.
The visuals are just all wrong for Obama. Debates would make him look weak, especially next to debate-man Newt, central-casting Romneyhair and I'll-take-care-of-this-coyote Perry.
Obama's not a great debater, although he will have some knowledge of facts. But at a debate, his opponent will challenge him and he doesn't need to be reminded of 9% unemployment, etc. If he doesn't go to a debate, nobody will ever ask him about the failures of his presidency.
He's going to play the Great And Powerful Oz strategy. He's going to hide behind the curtain and project a big giant head, ephemeral and artificial.
Posted by: AmishDude, IA caucus vote for Perry at November 18, 2011 12:41 PM (T0NGe)
Yeah, that makes sense. And if Obama were as well-situated against the GOP nominee as Nixon was against McGovern, then I could see him avoiding debates. But Carter (who is a much better analog) tried this stunt with Reagan and eventually was forced to agree to one debate.
Obama may well only agree to one debate. But he has to do at least one.
Posted by: Jeff B. at November 18, 2011 12:41 PM (K+pvw)
Woodrow Wilson was Gov of NJ at the time
Nixon had already been VP
FDR was gov of New York
Lincoln and Jackson are too far back to matter.
Thanks for nothing.
Sorry EOJ. Wilson and Roos where indeed sitting Govs. I would add Reagan to the list from private life to WH though.
Posted by: Sub-Tard at November 18, 2011 12:42 PM (0M3AQ)
Erm...they debated three times. Which is a completely normal number. I think your memory has failed you, which is why you're making this silly argument.
Posted by: Jeff B. at November 18, 2011 12:42 PM (K+pvw)
Posted by: AmishDude, IA caucus vote for Perry at November 18, 2011 04:28 PM (T0NGe)
thanks for the insight
Posted by: AuthorLMendez Is Offering $ To ace If He Bans Curious/Sky at November 18, 2011 12:43 PM (yAor6)
ItÂ’s time for a truce between Ace and me.
HeÂ’s backing someone whoÂ’s barely registering in the polls and I like someone who isnÂ’t even running. LetÂ’s split the difference and go with someone in the middle.
Gary Johnson.
Posted by: jwest at November 18, 2011 12:44 PM (qeYI9)
Posted by: Jeff B. at November 18, 2011 12:44 PM (K+pvw)
261 >>>Very well, JeffB.....how many times did Obama debate McCain?
Erm...they debated three times. Which is a completely normal number. I think your memory has failed you, which is why you're making this silly argument.
C'mon, nobody debates with McCain, they just let teh press ask him uncomfortable questions and watch him squirm. He's a maverick don't you know?
Posted by: Sub-Tard at November 18, 2011 12:45 PM (0M3AQ)
1.) No, he won't, and I would be willing to bet money on it. Real money. Care to?
2.) If he did, it would be the greatest thing ever to happen to us. It would guarantee his loss.
3.) Don't get me wrong -- he WILL attempt to minimize the number of debates. He has everything to lose and nothing to gain from them. But he must participate in them. It's a different era now. No candidate will ever be able to avoid debates completely again.
Posted by: Jeff B. at November 18, 2011 12:46 PM (K+pvw)
Gary Johnson.
Posted by: jwest at November 18, 2011 04:44 PM (qeYI9)
if he was more common sense on foreign policy, was more quiet about being for thinsg social conservatives are against, and had a personality that was that other of a nervous guy who just left the local sanitarium, Johnson would be great.
Posted by: AuthorLMendez Is Offering $ To ace If He Bans Curious/Sky at November 18, 2011 12:46 PM (yAor6)
What I would do if I were Obama is demand some ridiculous moderator, like Chris Matthews. The GOP candidate can either say no, in which case -- debate off -- or propose other weird demands.
But I think he'll just pull the "presidential emergency" card.
Posted by: AmishDude, IA caucus vote for Perry at November 18, 2011 12:47 PM (T0NGe)
He's willing to hit hard, on general points.
And there probably will be very, very few debates.
Perry criticizing Cain on spending? Kinda hard to do. Perry criticizing Cain on foreign policy? Not sure precisely where to start. Perry criticizing Obama for his deficits and lack of a budget? Simple.
No, Perry would not do as well as Newt or Romney in the debates, but he would do well, and then the real part of the campaign would suit him even better, because Perry can sell himself as the jobs candidate with loads of success running government. And his commercials have always been outstanding.
Posted by: Dustin at November 18, 2011 12:47 PM (rQ/Ue)
Posted by: Sub-Tard at November 18, 2011 12:48 PM (0M3AQ)
259.....Obama may well only agree to one debate. But he has to do at least one.
And you would be surprised if that 'one debate' got cancelled at the last minute?....Because of some important presidential stuff that came up, of course.
None of us know if that is what will happen, JeffB. .....All I am saying is that the chances of it happening are pretty good.....and if it does, the media will cover for him like they always have.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at November 18, 2011 12:48 PM (H/0mM)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at November 18, 2011 12:49 PM (XE2Oo)
Posted by: Jeff B. at November 18, 2011 04:46 PM (K+pvw)
I would ($50: $25 to Ace, $25 to the nominee) but I know I will forget by September.
Look, I know I'm going out on a limb and I'm much more confident he will skip one of them than I am that he'll skip all three, but it may just be the case that his numbers are so horrible that he's 95% sure he'll lose and so it can't hurt to be bold.
Posted by: AmishDude, IA caucus vote for Perry at November 18, 2011 12:51 PM (T0NGe)
I think they are largely easy to alleviate, since debating Obama from the right is so much different than debating Bachmann and Santorum from the right.
Perry gives a good stump speech. In a debate with just two people, he can sell the general concepts a lot more easily than he can when there are six nearly identical stump speeches.
But Perry really is better because he's walked the walk, has experience, as is far less vulnerable to a third party than Romney.
I still like Newt too, though.
Posted by: Dustin at November 18, 2011 12:51 PM (rQ/Ue)
Plus, if he is nominated, he's pulled the perfect hustle. "OK, now that I've shown my incompetence, let's play for money."
Posted by: AmishDude, IA caucus vote for Perry at November 18, 2011 12:53 PM (T0NGe)
I would be stunned. It will not happen. If for some reason it DID happen (like, say, a GENUINE emergency like a sudden Iranian attack on Israel, etc.) then it would be rescheduled. It would be campaign suicide otherwise. Even if the media WANTED to cover for him, they wouldn't be able to. Why do you insist on ascribing magical all-encompassing godlike powers of suppression and persuasion to a media that has singularly failed to convince America that Obama is a-okay-awesome despite their best efforts?
>>>None of us know if that is what will happen, JeffB. ....
No. I know that won't happen. I mean, I suppose I don't know in the same sense that I can't be sure that, if I jump out my office window, that the laws of gravity won't suddenly cease to operate, but I can be pretty darn sure.
>>>.All I am saying is that the chances of it happening are pretty good.....and if it does, the media will cover for him like they always have.
And I am saying that the chances of it happening are either zero or near-zero. To suggest ANYTHING otherwise is merely to let your irrational paranoia conquer your brain. Again: we should WELCOME Obama trying to do this -- it would redound immensely to our benefit. Which alone indicates that it won't happen.
Posted by: Jeff B. at November 18, 2011 12:54 PM (K+pvw)
if he was more common sense on foreign policy, was more quiet about being for thinsg social conservatives are against, and had a personality that was that other of a nervous guy who just left the local sanitarium, Johnson would be great.
Posted by: AuthorLMendez Is Offering $ To ace If He Bans Curious/Sky at November 18, 2011 04:46 PM (yAor6)
Hey, this is no time to get picky. WeÂ’re running out of candidates.
Posted by: jwest at November 18, 2011 01:00 PM (qeYI9)
Interesting point!
I really was shocked Perry has been so lame in the debates because I remember him crushing Tony Sanchez. No apology whatsoever... just 'you are shit, this is why, and that's that'. He managed to present this without looking like a bastard or a kook. He presented his facts, and expressed his disgust, and it was perfect.
Now, he's not doing so well against people he has many reasons for not attacking. It's a different game.
I think you're right. Against Obama, Perry can show the comfortable 'that's pathetic' tone that works well for him. That should comfort even Perry's loudest detractors.
Posted by: Dustin at November 18, 2011 01:00 PM (rQ/Ue)
Where was the non-Mitt candidate taking the battle to the SCOAMF Administration?
Is this the same guy who was trying to pee on Mitt's shoes in the debates?
Is this the same guy who couldn't say three words about Texas immigration law without pissing off 42 other states' voters?
I've said it from the beginning - he, or any dominant non-Mitt, needed to solidify the non-Mitt vote on anti-Obama policy. He didn't need to run against Romney, or Bachmann, or anyone else. He needed to run as if he were already the candidate of a party called "Not Mitt", and wait for the "Mitt Party" candidates to drift over.
But he didn't, and he probably torpedoed his candidacy in the process.
I'd like to see him come back, I think of all the candidates in the GOP field he's probably the best leader. He may have shot off too many toes, though.
Posted by: JEM at November 18, 2011 01:03 PM (o+SC1)
I agree Allen, it probably was smart of him to leave some rhetorical room for the future as more things come out. Assuming he will continue to hammer this and as governor of Texas he would be justified in complaining about border violence.
Even though I have never been tongue tied in my life, Perry's marble mouth personally didn't bother me. Obviously it would be a huge possibly fatal liability if he won the Nom.... Even Moses was
Exodus 4:10
And Moses said unto the LORD, O my Lord, I am not eloquent, neither before, nor since you have spoken unto your servant: but I am slow of speech, and of a slow tongue.
That's why his big brother Aaron was his mouthpiece. Moses did handle the important "let my people go" part himself.
Posted by: Shiggz - Newt (for now) at November 18, 2011 01:06 PM (I9fXA)
Posted by: steevy at November 18, 2011 01:06 PM (7WJOC)
Perry's been bashing Obama very harshly for YEARS.
Such as the run up to Obamacare passing. Perry was loudly condemning Obama's path. On a host of issues, Perry's been willing to come out and call Obama out.
He's much better on offense.
I get your point, but Perry's always been bashing Obama. It's bewildering why he wouldn't have been over Fast and Furious, I agree.
Posted by: Dustin at November 18, 2011 01:09 PM (rQ/Ue)
Posted by: Elize Nayden, Newtist at November 18, 2011 01:11 PM (/TSnh)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at November 18, 2011 01:16 PM (bxiXv)
Talked to Mike on the phone earlier today. He's kind of proud of that one.
Posted by: Scott J at November 18, 2011 01:18 PM (KC2BE)
Only over your dead body will I allow that vaccine pimp and Mexican appeaser to be my nominee. The key objective in any primary contest, chumps, is to purge the GOP of all RINOs. The wimp king of the left-wing State of Taxes is an uberRINO. Nobody in my family or in my church pew will be voting for him.
Cain-Gingrich-Gingrich-Cain, '12. Our supporters put the 'dope' back into rope-a-dope!
Posted by: Totally Irrational Political Malcontent at November 18, 2011 01:18 PM (f8XyF)
Seems like it.
I do think they meant to track them prior to Fast and Furious, unless I'm mistaken. That's the point where they just decided to study the crime scenes.
It's insanity. There is no excuse. Even if they can prove that Holder and Obama had no clue, that is no excuse (and it's not true... they both knew about this).
Posted by: Dustin at November 18, 2011 01:18 PM (rQ/Ue)
Are you joking? I see you say this stuff and assume you're kidding.
I mean, Perry's the best candidate on border control. He's walked the walk. He's not perfect, but he's no appeaser either.
Posted by: Dustin at November 18, 2011 01:23 PM (rQ/Ue)
Posted by: Scott J at November 18, 2011 01:24 PM (KC2BE)
278.....And I am saying that the chances of it happening are either zero or near-zero. To suggest ANYTHING otherwise is merely to let your irrational paranoia conquer your brain. Again: we should WELCOME Obama trying to do this -- it would redound immensely to our benefit. Which alone indicates that it won't happen.
Yeah, it would be great if he tried to do this. .....Except if we had nominated a candidate like Newt solely on his great performances in the debates, only to get torn to shreds by the media and then he never gets the chance to debate Obama.
"irrational paranoia".....?
No. Not irrational and not paranoia. ....I've simply watched how Obama does things that we thought "oh, he wouldn't dare do that"....and watched how the media covers it over and ignores it.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at November 18, 2011 01:39 PM (H/0mM)
Posted by: Scott J at November 18, 2011 05:24 PM (KC2BE)"
I'm pretty stupid, huh?
It's because I'm drunk.
Posted by: Dustin at November 18, 2011 01:44 PM (rQ/Ue)
Posted by: tasker at November 18, 2011 01:47 PM (rJVPU)
Posted by: tasker at November 18, 2011 01:49 PM (rJVPU)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at November 18, 2011 02:02 PM (bxiXv)
Oh, I know. It's not even debatable. Just being flippant about a horrible crime that resulted in hundreds of deaths. Was that wrong?
Posted by: Dustin at November 18, 2011 02:04 PM (rQ/Ue)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at November 18, 2011 02:11 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at November 18, 2011 02:12 PM (bxiXv)
The Dems are trying to make it "go away" with the help of the MSM. They don't need any more help.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at November 18, 2011 06:11 PM (bxiXv)"
I guess I'm sufficiently sheltered from the MSM that I don't even realize this is in question.
Posted by: Dustin at November 18, 2011 02:43 PM (rQ/Ue)
Posted by: Tricia at November 18, 2011 02:45 PM (gqG91)
amv converter for mac
Posted by: nanonu at November 18, 2011 06:06 PM (qW+9F)
Posted by: Michael Crichton Micro ePub at November 19, 2011 03:37 AM (7+Xxi)
IÂ’ve been looking everywhere for this! Thank goodness I found it on Bing.Thx
Posted by: Karen Kingsbury Longing epub at November 19, 2011 04:41 AM (XbzaH)
Perhaps it was Holder's personal secretary - after all has that person denied being involved? Well there you go then; we have our suspect. I'm sure the internal IG inspection in DOJ will arrive at the same conclusion. Well I'm actually sure that the IG report will say "We are unable to find our butt with both hands state conclusively how the regrettable bureaucratic bungling in this botched operation accidentally occurred."
I'm also sure that the person at the White House who arranged for the 10 million in special ATF financing on page 16 of the economic stimulus bill was not Teh Won (who has also denied being involved in Fast and Furious) but Zut Alors Pierre the tricky White House French Pastry Chef. I'm sure that same rascal changed policy at the ATF so that his Fast and Furious operation could occur by pretending to be Teh Won.
By the way how exactly was $10,000,000 to the ATF supposed to stimulate the economy? Oh right, it subsidized the sale of 2000 firearms to the Mexican Drug Cartels since US guns were otherwise too expensive for the Cartels to buy. So - therefore the gun dealers benefited economically. How silly of me to miss that.
Wait a second, wouldn't that money prove that the government didn't expect to seize the weapons, but meant for them to walk all along - since if they meant to seize them they wouldn't have actually had to pay for them and would have traded them back to the gun dealers for their seed money - the way they always have in the past? See, there I go following where the evidence leads - sorry, how stupid of me. I denounce my self.
I'm also sure that the people behind Fast and Furious expected the Mexican drug cartels to use the 2000 weapons to swat gaily colored Pinatas while blind folded - so I guess the 200+ counts of depraved indifference felony murder are off the table also.
Got it - nothing to see here - everybody move along. Inspector Clouseau Prosecutor Ace is on the case.
Posted by: An Observation at November 19, 2011 07:16 AM (ylhEn)
Posted by: How I Got This Way ePub at November 19, 2011 03:39 PM (fzSH3)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3167 seconds, 426 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 11:29 AM (8y9MW)