June 21, 2011

Plunge: Obama Drops Net Nine in One Day
— Ace

I don't know why Drudge is linking this, except it's fun to beat up on a dope.

A one-day swing like that is almost certainly noise.

But, it's fun to think about.

I have always thought that when opinion changes on Obama, it will change suddenly. That part of what's going on with his approval rating is Preference Falsification, a phenomenon of group psychology in which people don't express their true preference (or belief) because they think it is forbidden to think it or is strongly disfavored by the group. When the group starts talking more freely, however, people realize their true, suppressed (counterfeited) preference is in fact widely shared, and suddenly begin expressing their true preference.

As Glenn Reynolds' article on it noted, this is called a Preference Cascade.

That said, I don't think this occurs in a single poll in a single day. My idea of "sudden shift" in this context is a month or two.

Posted by: Ace at 11:08 AM | Comments (141)
Post contains 174 words, total size 1 kb.

1
Hockey and the Right are to blame!

Posted by: gainsayer at June 21, 2011 11:09 AM (G/zuv)

2 I hated Obama before hating Obama was cool.

Posted by: Mr Pink at June 21, 2011 11:10 AM (Y9yNj)

3 I don't know, man, it might be significant.  I mean I like him about nine points less today than I did yesterday, too.

Posted by: Kensington at June 21, 2011 11:10 AM (uaEZS)

4
Gas is closer to $4 than to $3.

Food is going up, up, up.

People are getting laid off.

People are in a long line of applicants for crappy jobs to hold them over until things improve.


Posted by: gainsayer at June 21, 2011 11:10 AM (G/zuv)

5 The shift has started.

Posted by: USA at June 21, 2011 11:11 AM (6Cjut)

6 Noise but accurate

Posted by: tachyonshuggy at June 21, 2011 11:11 AM (DZcRU)

7 Plunge: Obama Drops Net Nine in One Day

I don't know why Drudge is linking this, except it's fun to beat up on a dope.

A one-day swing like that is almost certainly noise.

No science!!!Trendz!!!!
HAHAhAHA!
His approval will be less than 0 before the end of JULY!!!!

Posted by: MikeTheMoose who has been reading IPCC reports. at June 21, 2011 11:12 AM (0q2P7)

8 Black Irishman down! Black Irishman down!

Posted by: No Whining at June 21, 2011 11:12 AM (dWOwL)

9 I'd like him just fine if he'd hurry up and pay my mortgage and put gasoline in my car like he said he would.

Posted by: Peggy Joseph at June 21, 2011 11:12 AM (uaEZS)

10 Hey moonbats, everyone knows Obama sucks but you.  So what's the deal?

Posted by: Cicero at June 21, 2011 11:13 AM (QKKT0)

11 I don't think any of those daily tracking polls are worth a shit. They have changed so much in the past with zero logic.

Posted by: Vic at June 21, 2011 11:13 AM (M9Ie6)

12
and I think people are getting sick and tired of Obama's ugly [redacted] and her friggin lecture-vacations.

Lectations?

Vectures?


Posted by: gainsayer at June 21, 2011 11:13 AM (G/zuv)

13 I wonder if the Friday War Powers Act deadline has anything to do with this?

Naaah.  Everybody's forgotten, and Gallup is notoriously unreliable.

Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at June 21, 2011 11:13 AM (FkKjr)

14 There could be 14 trillion reasons for the drop.

Posted by: USA at June 21, 2011 11:13 AM (6Cjut)

15 Can we get the pollsters to open a new category below "Strongly Disapprove" but above report IP to USSS?

Posted by: Jean at June 21, 2011 11:13 AM (WkuV6)

16 King Putt

Posted by: Cherry π the unbanned at June 21, 2011 11:13 AM (OhYCU)

17 It's all because that Irish golfer won the US Open in a racist fashion and drove Tiger Woods into irrelevancy. Or that a Scandi led a team from Texas to the NBA title. Or something.

Posted by: Confused Obtuse Liberal at June 21, 2011 11:14 AM (YmPwQ)

18 Maybe we could extend the Weiner distraction for a few months?

Posted by: King Barry I "Piehole" at June 21, 2011 11:14 AM (QKKT0)

19 Imagine what his poll numbers would look like if people were actually honest with the pollster.

Posted by: laceyunderalls at June 21, 2011 11:15 AM (pLTLS)

20 You will eat healthier!

Posted by: Michelle Obama, Taking The Cheeseburger Out Of Your Hands at June 21, 2011 11:15 AM (uaEZS)

21 People are in a long line of applicants for crappy jobs to hold them over until things improve.

How is this different than last week?  Or last year?

The only real scandal out there right now is OFF,  and I think in the absence of some kind of damning memo Obama supporters will be content to blame it on rogue/incompetent agents at ATF.

Ace is right.  It's just noise in the numbers.

Posted by: Ace's liver at June 21, 2011 11:15 AM (QgI7g)

22 I blame George W. Bush

Posted by: taylork at June 21, 2011 11:15 AM (5wsU9)

23 We're talking golf, right?

Posted by: mpurinTexas supports Rick Perry, bitch at June 21, 2011 11:15 AM (5d6vv)

24 It's Gallup' they'll make sure to fix this "noise" tomorrow.

Posted by: Jack Bauer's Dad at June 21, 2011 11:16 AM (YulS3)

25 They're just setting us up for the "Comeback Kid" stories.

Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at June 21, 2011 11:16 AM (YmPwQ)

26 My personal approval rating for Odumdum crashed through the earth's crust a couple of years back, while the disapproval level is screaming upward in the stratosphere.

Statisticians are currently working on a charting system where both levels are represented that fits inside a structure smaller than the Superdome.  

Posted by: ontherocks at June 21, 2011 11:17 AM (HBqDo)

27

Actualy, a single authoritarian voice can change the outcry of a huge crowd.

Its MOB psychology... when emotions are almost all that is in play... when reason is already not part of the equation, you can suddenly get lynch  mobs, or witch burnings, out of what would be a normaly rational group.

Americans have been angry for years... and our Government and media have been trying to squelch that anger (like the ban on 9/11 pictures of people jumping out of windows or the towers coming down)...

But things are worse now than before... we've been at War in foreign Nations for 10 years... scene our Young wounded and Killed... with no REAL Victory in sight because our Government won't ALLOW them to really win.

Our Economy is horrid... yet all we see are more Government Largese to Large Companies... the same Banking/Government Cabal who helped create the probelm...

America has been simmering... just under the boiling point for years... and is about to OVER React...

Posted by: Romeo13 at June 21, 2011 11:17 AM (NtXW4)

28 What's going on?

Posted by: No Whining at June 21, 2011 11:17 AM (dWOwL)

29 OK, who made a racist comment and got the thread deleted?

Posted by: Bob Saget rides the short bus at June 21, 2011 11:17 AM (F/4zf)

30

Drudge also had a piece on Barky claiming he'd created 2.1 million jobs.  The UTrib here in San Diego ran a piece from Newsweek yesterday pushing the "structural unemployment" canard, clearly aimed at shoring up Obama's ridiculous ATM/kiosk talking point.  And Zero's own economic guru called his policies "indefensible."  

Maybe Americans have finally hit their bullshit limit on the jobs issue.   But I'm not counting any chickens just yet.

Posted by: SocietyIs2Blame at June 21, 2011 11:18 AM (ovfV8)

31

I'm still amazed that his approval rating is as high as it is- what hasn't he managed to screw up?

Republicans really need to work a bit harder not just at beating on Obama, but explaining what specifically they propose needs to be done.  Vague statements about reducing regulations isn't good enough.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at June 21, 2011 11:19 AM (SY2Kh)

32 Preference Cascade or Preference Falsification is happening.  In my neck of the woods, "hating Obama before it was cool to hate him" is the new change we can believe in.  People I suspected - due to their demographics - would support him are now openly bashing him. 

Posted by: Suzy at June 21, 2011 11:24 AM (kIqtx)

33

Gee you mean even some on the left are starting to figure it out?

Bummer has lost independents. His enthusiasm gap is low. He will never get the "aura" he had in 08. People now realize how full of shit he truly is, I'd like to welcome them to reality.

 I think he's a one termer. But leave it to the Reps to screw up a one person parade. We have got to nominate a good candidate.

Crazy idea but if his numbers get low enough would Barry not run for the nomination? I highly doubt it since he's the most narccasitic person on the planet. Just throwing the idea out there.

Posted by: Bruce The Robert at June 21, 2011 11:28 AM (unPln)

34 Racist index..

Posted by: Temper Tantrum at June 21, 2011 11:32 AM (bAL0J)

35 Nothing but nuts net.

Posted by: andycanuck at June 21, 2011 11:34 AM (c5Nbw)

36 >>>Crazy idea but if his numbers get low enough would Barry not run for the nomination? I highly doubt it since he's the most narccasitic person on the planet. Just throwing the idea out there.

You can bet Ace a pie for it...

....What plans does ace have for all these pies anyway. 

Posted by: taylork at June 21, 2011 11:35 AM (5wsU9)

37 When my approval rating started at about 10 (I do give him some points for seeming to be a fairly involved father) there's not much room to move down.  What's more emphatic than "strongly disagree"?

Posted by: someone at June 21, 2011 11:35 AM (bqjJT)

38 I'm still amazed that his approval rating is as high as it is- what hasn't he managed to screw up?

I don't think it is. I think in a phone conversation with a person they don't know they're going to give deference to him. But in their private conversations (or behind a voting booth... *fingers crossed*) I think it will be a different story.

I cannot wait for the exit polls next year. They won't even come close to matching the end results. That's my guesstimate anyway.

This Presidency is still historic to a lot of folks. They don't want to be "that guy" that criticizes him and shits all over the first black President. At least publicly. But they'll have their say when they cast their votes.

I don't know - maybe I'm just projecting here but I don't think so.

Posted by: laceyunderalls at June 21, 2011 11:36 AM (pLTLS)

39 #33

Obama is running again NOW.

Even with only 40% popularity, he isn't going to stop.

The only way Obama won't run again is if it becomes painfully obvious he had absolutely zero chance of winning.

Short of a major major scandal, I doubt things will get that bad for him, even with the economy.



Posted by: looking closely at June 21, 2011 11:37 AM (6Q9g2)

40 Let's see...

Could it be his handling of the War Powers Act?  The Weiner roast in Congress?  Fast And Furious?

Christ, like there aren't a ton of reasons for him to start seeing a major drop.

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at June 21, 2011 11:38 AM (UvFnc)

41 Considering I would crawl over broken glass covered in chicken feces to vote against Obama, I think we need a catagory below strongly disaprove.

Posted by: Mr. Pink at June 21, 2011 11:38 AM (VidfH)

42 You all need to realize that, like, Obama is the "cool" candidate, and, like, the whole republican field, like, can't approach his level of, like, awesomeness.  K?

Posted by: Megaton McCans at June 21, 2011 11:38 AM (yQWNf)

43

Short of a major major scandal, I doubt things will get that bad for him, even with the economy.

It's amazing to me that he's gotten this far without there being a major scandal.

It's almost as though the media is covering for him

Posted by: George Bluth at June 21, 2011 11:38 AM (wuv1c)

44 yeah, and I expect to see a preference cascade by the administration towards massive amnesty of new gullible voters.

Posted by: joeindc44 at June 21, 2011 11:38 AM (QxSug)

45

except it's fun to beat up on a dope.

 

Actually it is not really that fun to beat up on a run of the mill dope,but beating up a sacntimonious  Harvard trained dope who thinks he always the smartest guy in the room is loads of fun

Posted by: kj at June 21, 2011 11:38 AM (Q1Okj)

46

33 Bruce - I've daydreamed about that happening, both with or without a Ted Kennedy-style primary challenge.  Obama doesn't deal with adversity, critcism or losing well.  If he's taking a daily beating from the public for weeks on end, would he just throw in the towel ?

Not likely, of course.  But I can't help but wonder what Hillary! will be thinking in the unlikely event that Zero's popularity is sub 40% before the primary season.

Posted by: SocietyIs2Blame at June 21, 2011 11:39 AM (ovfV8)

47 Mr. Pink is so romantic!

Posted by: Moronettes at June 21, 2011 11:39 AM (6Cjut)

48 A variation of the David Dinkins theory. No NY'er wanted to look like a racist when polled. Rudy G was projected to lose in a landslide. Didn't matter NY's murder rate was in the thousands, and uptown Manhattan was an open air crack cocaine supermarket under Dinkins. Can't wait for the J E F 1st fraud Chi-town hustler to go down. Hard. Just for the cryin' from the talking heads. Maybe it will kill Bob Scheiffer on air.

Posted by: Pecos Bill at June 21, 2011 11:39 AM (TZnRC)

49 This is Gallup trying to recalibrate their poll during the dog days of summer when no ones watching. They would hate to be caught red handed recalibrating pumped teh won numbers once the campaigns officially begin. BTW, hasn't Gallup always skewed in favor of Dems (well at least until election day when they find things pretty even with the pubbie polling well).

Posted by: Sub-Tard at June 21, 2011 11:40 AM (Q5+Og)

50 a major scandal like giving guns to mexican drug lords in an effort to provide an incident to spark the banning of guns in America?

Posted by: joeindc44 at June 21, 2011 11:40 AM (QxSug)

51 38: If the stupid party doesn't blow it the poll booth with show --and I think people will refuse to answer exit polls so they can duck lying OR admitting they voted the marxist out. the GOP needs to hammer and hammer and hammer that Barry is failing because of all the marxist views he holds , all the marxist advisors he appointed....... Its OK to be anti-communist in America

Posted by: PaleRider at June 21, 2011 11:40 AM (dkExz)

52 Outlier, I'm sure.

Posted by: toby928™ at June 21, 2011 11:41 AM (GTbGH)

53 I love this kinda post!

Posted by: LennonLenin at June 21, 2011 11:41 AM (xKHyK)

54 The weather has sucked around the country.

Gas and food prices are going up.

Jobs are hard to come by and really crappy compared to a few years ago.

Government employees and unions are laughing in taxpayers faces.

It's yet another summer where people haven't had the money to maybe take a vacation, yet Barry has taken maybe a hundred in three years.

Barry got us involved in other war or two.

We are now bailing out assholes everywhere and fucking over citizens and allies alike.

People are getting tired of the situation and being lied to by the media every fucking day that were are in a recovery. The media doesn't have a strawman to protect their boyfriend with either. There's no George Bush to bash. the Democrats own their fuckups.

Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston at June 21, 2011 11:41 AM (ijjAe)

55 "I don't think it is. I think in a phone conversation with a person they don't know they're going to give deference to him. But in their private conversations (or behind a voting booth... *fingers crossed*) I think it will be a different story."

I hope you're right, but there was a lot of speculation back in 2008 that his support wasn't as high as the polls indicated because people didn't want to admit that they didn't like him.

And look what happened.  No, I think there are plenty of stupid people who see the country collapsing around them and just refuse to blame him for any of it.

Posted by: Kensington at June 21, 2011 11:41 AM (uaEZS)

56 Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at June 21, 2011 03:38 PM (UvFnc)

But the same thing was true 18 months ago. I think it is just the never-ending cascade of stupidity coupled with the overweening pride and arrogance. Americans are a very forgiving people, but once you shit on them enough...

Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at June 21, 2011 11:41 AM (LH6ir)

57 Even with only 40% popularity, he isn't going to stop.

I've thought a lot about this as he's recently stepped up his reelection game.

I don't know if he's running - I think he may be trying to rehab his image.

If he steps aside now he can always say, with the help of the media, "Look, I only had four years to clean up that mess. DC is toxic. The Republicans didn't do a damn thing to help me the last two years. I tried. And now it's time for someone else to take a shot at it."

He no longer has that cover if he stays in eight years and then without a doubt he goes down as the worst President that ever was and will ever be.

He can't have that. His narcissism trumps everything else.


Posted by: laceyunderalls at June 21, 2011 11:41 AM (pLTLS)

58 If he were a hobo as well as a dope, we could beat up two birds with one stone. 

Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at June 21, 2011 11:41 AM (jx2j9)

59 Its OK to be anti-communist in America

It used to be expected.

Posted by: Buzzsaw at June 21, 2011 11:41 AM (tf9Ne)

60
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Joe Biden to attend midget tossing contest in the battleground state of Indiana. The Vice President, Democrat members of Congress, and other dignitaries will travel to the fairgrounds in Jeffersonville on Sunday. "We've been looking forward to this event all year," said Biden's chief of staff. The annual event is a popular local attraction. "I love midgets. These little people are what make America great," Biden said. "I'm feeling strong, so with some luck I'll launch one of these little bastards all the way to my hometown of Scranton, Pennsylvania."


Posted by: gainsayer's fake but accurate news at June 21, 2011 11:42 AM (G/zuv)

61 By the way, speaking of food increases, one of my hobbies lately has been trying to find hidden price increases at the grocery story.

Two weeks ago, there used to be six granola bars in a box.

Today, for the same price, there are only five bars.

Posted by: Kensington at June 21, 2011 11:42 AM (uaEZS)

62 50 Joe - The best we'll get out of that mess is forcing them to toss Holder along with the ATF head and maybe Gropey Janet as well.  The economy is what will do him in.

Posted by: SocietyIs2Blame at June 21, 2011 11:43 AM (ovfV8)

63

Isn't this sort of thing why Obama (broadly speaking) won the caucuses and Hillary! won primaries?  In a primary, it's just you in the voting booth.  In a caucus, it's you and a bunch of other people, and unless you really hate them or have a lot of personal courage, you'll probably just go along with the crowd.

See also Howard Dean's incredible collapse in the '04 elections.  That was a sight.

In other words, the more the media says that it's okay to dislike the guy, the more people will decide either that they actually do or they'll be more comfortable saying so.

(It's odd that it's happening now, though-- aren't gas prices dropping?)

 

Posted by: Lance McCormick at June 21, 2011 11:43 AM (zgHLA)

64 Gallup has been a bit erratic lately, but I think this is at least partially correlated with the revelation of Obama stepping over his lawyers on Libya, which occurred three days ago.  This does mark the highest level of disapproval since April.

Posted by: JonathanEllis at June 21, 2011 11:43 AM (BdzEV)

65 Uh, just ignore my first line, it doesn't even make sense to me.

Posted by: PaleRider at June 21, 2011 11:44 AM (dkExz)

66

I've thought a lot about this as he's recently stepped up his reelection game.

I don't know if he's running - I think he may be trying to rehab his image.

If he steps aside now he can always say, with the help of the media, "Look, I only had four years to clean up that mess. DC is toxic. The Republicans didn't do a damn thing to help me the last two years. I tried. And now it's time for someone else to take a shot at it."

He no longer has that cover if he stays in eight years and then without a doubt he goes down as the worst President that ever was and will ever be.

He can't have that. His narcissism trumps everything else.


Unless, he decided to run for non consecutive terms. It's been done

Posted by: George Bluth at June 21, 2011 11:45 AM (wuv1c)

67 I really enjoyed Rush playing that bit of Reagan's Presidential announcement where he took it to Carter. I had never heard that before and it's refreshing to hear if not a little eerie by the fact that you can switch Carter to Obama and there would be zero difference.

Whoever the Republican candidate is should memorize that speech, maybe it give it a slight twist of their own and pound that into people's heads every day until election day. But I only have faith that two or three of the current candidates would have half the balls needed to do that.

Posted by: ArcadeHero at June 21, 2011 11:45 AM (mmHDH)

68 52
Outlier, I'm sure.
Posted by: toby928™ at June 21, 2011 03:41 PM (GTbGH)

I'm in the "outed liar" camp.

Posted by: No Whining at June 21, 2011 11:45 AM (dWOwL)

69 I thought this was about golf.

Posted by: blaster at June 21, 2011 11:45 AM (l5dj7)

70 Punch Down!

Posted by: brando at June 21, 2011 11:46 AM (IPGju)

71 Drudge has been linking racist articles about Obama's grand economy for the last few days.  Maybe it's sinking in.

Posted by: Cherry π the unbanned at June 21, 2011 11:46 AM (OhYCU)

72 I wonder how seeing Michelle with the children draped in South African flags is going to poll? (Hopefully I have not crossed the Ace line with this question). I just don't get using a nations country's flag as a wrap as either fashionable or respectful. But then I didn't go to an Ivy League school.

Posted by: Sub-Tard at June 21, 2011 11:47 AM (Q5+Og)

73 Polls? Those aren't cool. You should probably ignore them and focus on cool things... like Obama.

Posted by: David Axelrod at June 21, 2011 11:47 AM (1yViP)

74 The question is now, if the worst does come to pass, and things are so bad that even Obama bails, who in the Dem party would take his place? Six Dem Senators have already bailed. I kept thinking that Evan Bayh would step in, but now I wonder why anyone would, especially on the Dem side. Unless they find another Bill Clinton, who was adept at taking credit for things a Republican House and Senate did.

Posted by: Blue Hen at June 21, 2011 11:47 AM (6rX0K)

75

Come to think of it, if Obama didn't run for a second term, he would then automatically be the front runner in every democratic primary for the rest of his life.

It would be a ticket to non stop media adulation for the rest of his life, above and beyond what is accorded to an ex president.

Posted by: George Bluth at June 21, 2011 11:47 AM (wuv1c)

76 Whoever the Republican candidate is should memorize that speech, maybe it give it a slight twist of their own and pound that into people's heads every day until election day. But I only have faith that two or three of the current candidates would have half the balls needed to do that.

I proposed about a week or two ago that someone pick up the entire Reagan playbook from '80 and run it from now until November 2012, especially harping on "Are you better than you were four years ago?" and the recession / depression / recovery bit saying that "a recovery is when Jimmy Carter loses his job".

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at June 21, 2011 11:48 AM (UvFnc)

77 Preference Falsification, a phenomenon of group psychology in which people don't express their true preference (or belief) because they think it is forbidden to think it or is strongly disfavored by the group.

Ah, nice one- a very learned way to say that all the kids are getting sick of the bully taking their lunch money and shoving them around, and pretty soon they're going to band together and kick his ass out on the playground during recess. All it's gonna take is the first kid to say something...

Well that, or an intellectual treatment of "the Emperor's New Clothes".

Either one works. 

Posted by: Chariots of Toast at June 21, 2011 11:48 AM (XyjRQ)

78

"But I only have faith that two or three of the current candidates would have half the balls needed to do that. "

And the media reminds us daily that none of them are electable. Go figure.

Posted by: Sub-Tard at June 21, 2011 11:48 AM (Q5+Og)

79 The results of Barry's policies are holding steady at -31.5% disapproval.

Posted by: toby928™ at June 21, 2011 11:49 AM (GTbGH)

80 Dude, where's my poll numbers?

Posted by: King Barry I "Piehole" at June 21, 2011 11:49 AM (QKKT0)

81

Even if Obama wins a second term, who's his successor?  Biden?

Hahahahaha no way.  Either Obama replaces Biden with someone, or the Dems have to find a new guy in '16 either way.

Posted by: Lance McCormick at June 21, 2011 11:50 AM (zgHLA)

82 He could stand a "sudden shift" to unemployment.

Posted by: Talibill at June 21, 2011 11:50 AM (WEWGu)

83 Short of a major major scandal, I doubt things will get that bad for him, even with the economy.

Yoo hoo!

Posted by: fastly and furiously walking guns... at June 21, 2011 11:50 AM (XyjRQ)

84 O/T, but I just read on AboveTopSecret.com, that yesterday the federal court ruled that BP is not responsible for any damage done to the Gulf region.  Has anybody else heard this?  I find it shameful.

Posted by: chillin the most at June 21, 2011 11:50 AM (6IV8T)

85

Obama wants to be the Grover Cleveland of our time.

 

Actually, they may be setting up for a "comeback kid" campaign. No matter how ridiculous it will seem when the only thing "coming back" will be 2008-era talking points.

Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at June 21, 2011 11:51 AM (YmPwQ)

86

What?!  Did he lose his teleprompter?  Did he forget how to pose?  Did people quit believing his lies?

This could be bad!

Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at June 21, 2011 11:51 AM (jx2j9)

87 Its funny, but everytime I think of teh Won I scratch my face with my middle finger. So he has had a lasting impact on me. Tuetonic shifts and transformating.

Posted by: Sub-Tard at June 21, 2011 11:52 AM (Q5+Og)

88

Rassmussen has him as 38% very negative, 25% believing he is the second coming---minus 14, with an overall negative of 53%.

Myself, if it's not Paul or Johnson (the latter a very remote possibility), I'm voting/contributing R. Paul never supports his fellow Republicans anyway, and he's a dhimmi on foreign policy, so turnabout is fair play.

Posted by: Occam's Tool at June 21, 2011 11:53 AM (OcQfO)

89

Obama wants to be the Grover Cleveland of our time.

 Actually, they may be setting up for a "comeback kid" campaign. No matter how ridiculous it will seem when the only thing "coming back" will be 2008-era talking points.

Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet

Actually, there was talk last week about Obama not running as an incumbent. It sounds crazy. For that to work, you'd need a lethargic, ill-educated populace and a complicit media.

Posted by: Blue Hen at June 21, 2011 11:53 AM (6rX0K)

90 Jimmuh is smiling like a jackass eating sand burrs.

Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at June 21, 2011 11:53 AM (jx2j9)

91 a major scandal like giving guns to mexican drug lords in an effort to provide an incident to spark the banning of guns in America?

Posted by: joeindc44 at June 21, 2011 03:40 PM (QxSug)

I hope you're right and the masses of  'apolitical' voters that typically don't pay attention until late in the game are waking up, but the ATF scandal doesn't really seem to have hit the big time media yet does it?  I haven't heard any water cooler talk about it.  

Posted by: someone at June 21, 2011 11:53 AM (bqjJT)

92 Could it be his handling of the War Powers Act?  The Weiner roast in Congress?  Fast And Furious?

We find all that stuff outrageous.  The Obama supporters I talk to just wave it off.  Every president accumulates a few scandals by reelection time, and so this is small potatoes.  It probably does hurt him, a bit, in a drip-drip-drip Chinese water torture kind of way, but over a much longer horizon.

I agree with people who say the economy is Obama's biggest problem.  But you're not gonna get a huge one week drop like that unless there's a market crash, or bank defaults, or... something big and newsworthy.

Posted by: Ace's liver at June 21, 2011 11:53 AM (QgI7g)

93 Posted by: Megaton McCans at June 21, 2011 03:38 PM (yQWNf)

Honey I think this latest decline is all your fault.

Posted by: Bob Saget rides the short bus at June 21, 2011 11:54 AM (F/4zf)

94 Did the idiot American electorate get real smart all of a sudden?

Posted by: Very old National Lampoon at June 21, 2011 11:54 AM (ttZKH)

95 "But I only have faith that two or three of the current candidates would have half the balls needed to do that. "

The woman (or women if Palin hops in) running have no balls, but unlike their male counterparts have a legitimate medical excuse, and more than make up for it in tenacity.

Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston at June 21, 2011 11:54 AM (ijjAe)

96

Not sure what the point is about this drop being recent. Obama approval/disapproval was running about 42/50 all through April. Bin Laden was killed on May 2, and his approval spiked by about 8 points, 50/42. This simply drops him to where he was before.

Then we had 6 straight weeks of the DJIA dropping, a spike in unemployment, and now lower home sales, and his numbers drop back to where they were in April.

People were already realizing he's a fraud. It's not a one day thing.

Posted by: Wilson at June 21, 2011 11:55 AM (+/VZz)

97 Preference Cascade

pfft. Once you realize your girlfriend has been screwing all your friends, it's more like a waterfall.

Posted by: Cherry π the unbanned at June 21, 2011 11:56 AM (OhYCU)

98 Giving a shit about your children's future is racist!

Posted by: TexasJew at June 21, 2011 11:56 AM (ttZKH)

99

Actually, there was talk last week about Obama not running as an incumbent. It sounds crazy. For that to work, you'd need a lethargic, ill-educated populace and a complicit media.

Check.

Check.

Uh-oh.

Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at June 21, 2011 11:56 AM (YmPwQ)

100 Barry will have to vote out the incumbent citizens and get new fresh faces in there.

Posted by: toby928™ at June 21, 2011 11:58 AM (GTbGH)

101 Kind of a reverse hockey stick effect..

Posted by: TexasJew at June 21, 2011 11:58 AM (ttZKH)

102 Time for more golf!

Posted by: TexasJew at June 21, 2011 11:59 AM (ttZKH)

103 Joe Biden to attend midget tossing contest in the battleground state of Indiana.

So why is Joey Choochoo only attending, and not participating?

Oh wait- they're tossing actual midgets, not mental midgets.

My bad.

Posted by: fastly and furiously walking guns... at June 21, 2011 12:00 PM (XyjRQ)

104 @100, indeed, some (i.e., the wrong kind) of Americans bitterly cling to things like their jobs and history.

Posted by: joeindc44 at June 21, 2011 12:00 PM (QxSug)

105 JEF has set affirmative action back at least 100 years.  He has also sullied the reputation of Columbia and Harvard Law.  All in all, he's done an awesome job in trashing their already sullied reputations.  Am I allowed to say this still? 

Posted by: Truck Monkey at June 21, 2011 12:01 PM (yQWNf)

106

Sorry, wanted to edit my above post:

Not sure what the point is about this drop being recent. Obama approval/disapproval was running about 44/48 all through April. Bin Laden was killed on May 2, and his A/DA spiked to 50/42. Then we had 6 straight weeks of the DJIA dropping, an inrease in unemployment, and now lower home sales. He's simply back to where he was in April. People were already realizing he's a fraud. It's not a one day thing.

Posted by: Wilson at June 21, 2011 12:04 PM (+/VZz)

Posted by: Vic at June 21, 2011 12:04 PM (M9Ie6)

108 73 Polls? Those aren't cool. You should probably ignore them and focus on cool things... like Obama.

Posted by: David Axelrod at June 21, 2011 03:47 PM (1yViP)

Yeah!

Posted by: Meghan McCain at June 21, 2011 12:04 PM (oVQFe)

109 105 JEF has set affirmative action back at least 100 years.  He has also sullied the reputation of Columbia and Harvard Law.  All in all, he's done an awesome job in trashing their already sullied reputations.  Am I allowed to say this still?      I agree, but think Ace will call you a racist. Noticing such things in not permitted. Supporting affirmative action is a sacremental requirement for the enlightened. Anyone who disagrees is to be shamed and punished.

Posted by: Sub-Tard at June 21, 2011 12:07 PM (Q5+Og)

110 Barry just doesn't have the gas mileage that we need in this economy.  Its time we take his advice and get a new president.

Posted by: buzzion at June 21, 2011 12:08 PM (oVQFe)

Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at June 21, 2011 12:09 PM (jx2j9)

112 look for Gallup to correct in the other direction by 12, tomorrow.

Posted by: FlashBangBallz at June 21, 2011 12:10 PM (K/USr)

113 I think people are getting tired of Moochelle.  The vacations, the food police, the silly comments about how hard he works, it is getting old.  That, plus food prices rising and the lack of interest Obama shows about the wildfires and tornados, make people wonder what he thinks his role is.  Did anybody see the article on the AboveTopSecret.com blog that a court ruled that BP is not to blame for any damage done to the coast in the Gulf of Mexico?  Things are piling up, and even the libs know he is not even taking a passing interest in America.

Posted by: chillin the most at June 21, 2011 12:11 PM (6IV8T)

114 The oceans are plunging also.  Coincidence? I think not.

Posted by: Cherry π the unbanned at June 21, 2011 12:11 PM (OhYCU)

115

a phenomenon of group psychology in which people don't express their true preference (or belief) because they think it is forbidden to think it or is strongly disfavored by the group.

CoughCoughPalinCough

Posted by: Max Entropy at June 21, 2011 12:12 PM (lH6z9)

116 I don't know why Drudge is linking this, except it's fun to beat up on a dope.

If you can't kick a man when he's down, you don't deserve to kick him.

Posted by: dfbaskwill at June 21, 2011 12:12 PM (71LDo)

117 Opinion polls generally have a 95% confidence level. What that means is, one in twenty polls is absolute shit. Utterly baseless crap. Just sayin'.

Posted by: Seriously at June 21, 2011 12:12 PM (QjrRF)

118

I'm sure that a $14T debt, forcing a government takeover of GM, Chrysler, the healthcare system and the student loan industry against the will of the country, Cash 4 Clunkers, the failed Porkulus debacle, bowing to foreign leaders, 57 states, after a while you've made enough money, doctors yanking tonsils and lopping off legs for more profit, making everyone's energy bills necessarily skyrocket, violating not one but two court orders, an illegal drilling moratorium in the Gulf, a boot on the throat of BP, knowing whose ass to kick, punishing our enemies, not securing the Mexican border, Operation Fast and Furious that resulted in the death of Border Patrol agents, peace talks with the Taliban, endorsement of the 9/11 mosque, America is a downright mean country, doubling the unemployment rate, a real 10% inflation rate and police acting stupidly had absolutely nothing to do with the falling poll numbers.

Nothing at all.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy at June 21, 2011 12:12 PM (d0Tfm)

119
But Intrade has Obama up by 20%!!!!!!!!

Posted by: In before the troll at June 21, 2011 12:13 PM (8rHXV)

120 It is my belief that a Democrat President, particularly a black Democrat President, cannot really fall below 40% approval. 13% of the population is black. Blacks support Democrat candidates about 90% of the time. So there is a built-in 12% support level right there. 20% of the population considers themselves to be "liberal." Most of these people are probably communists, socialists, Marxists, and the like. Almost 100% of these people will support a Democrat, except in those rare cases where there is a "credible" third party candidate running to the left of the Democrat (Nader in 2000, for example). So. 12% plus 20% equals 32%. Of course, that's not exactly right because there is some overlap between those two groups, but still. Throw in easily duped "moderates" who are referred to as "low information voters" by pollsters who are too polite to call them what they are (dumb fucks), throw in Hispanics who have become convinced (due to endless MSM propaganda) that the GOP hates them, throw in public sector employees who rather enjoy the gravy train, throw in people paid by ACORN to vote, etc., and you have a minimum of 40% of the public who will vote Democrat, no matter the candidates, no matter the circumstances. IMHO.

Posted by: Seriously at June 21, 2011 12:21 PM (QjrRF)

121 Probably the Huntsman announcement.

Posted by: blaster at June 21, 2011 12:21 PM (l5dj7)

122
Probably the Huntsman announcement.

Posted by: blaster at June 21, 2011 04:21 PM (l5dj7)




Just because I'm blue collar doesn't mean I don't understand sarcasm.....

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at June 21, 2011 12:23 PM (8rHXV)

123 When one of the Chicago democrats' most practiced and skillful liars, Obama's Chief-of-Staff, Daley, is at a complete loss for words, even a drop of net 18 is indefensible.

Suck it, Dems.

Posted by: Fritz at June 21, 2011 12:28 PM (GwPRU)

124 Ace said: I have always thought that when opinion changes on Obama, it will change suddenly

IIRC, in 1980 the internals showed a relatively tight race until the weekend prior at which point Carter fell off the electoral cliff.

I would not be surprised to see similar dynamics at work in 2012 against a feasible candidate.

Posted by: Uriah Heep at June 21, 2011 12:35 PM (bxm6L)

125 Trust me, wingnuts, Obama will be comfortably re-elected, and the Dems will take the House back. Then we can see what true competence is.

Posted by: Gerg at June 21, 2011 12:35 PM (YmPwQ)

126

As I stated earlier, truth brings perspective.  ThatÂ’s a good thing.

Key quote: (We leave aside for now the complete reversal of then Senator Obama who stated in no uncertain terms in December of 1997 when asked if President Bush had the authority to bomb Iran without seeking explicit authorization from Congress that, "The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation,"

Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at June 21, 2011 12:36 PM (jx2j9)

127

Guess who...

Two top senators on Tuesday introduced a resolution giving President Obama explicit authorization to continue aiding the NATO mission in Libya, seeking to strengthen the White HouseÂ’s hand at a key moment in the brewing constitutional tug of war with Congress.

John Riceinmyassgetsyouapurpleheart Kerry & John mydaughterisadumbass McCain.

“This is not a blank check for the president. This resolution authorizes the limited use of American forces in a supporting role,” Mr. Kerry said in a floor speech to the Senate. “It says specifically that the Senate does not support the use of ground troops in Libya. And it authorizes this limited use of American forces for a limited duration — it would expire in a year.”

http://tiny.cc/tfwmb

 

Posted by: Steph at June 21, 2011 12:40 PM (AkdC5)

128

#127 wrong thread...Sorry.

Posted by: Steph at June 21, 2011 12:42 PM (AkdC5)

129 IIRC, in 1980 the internals showed a relatively tight race until the weekend prior at which point Carter fell off the electoral cliff.

I would not be surprised to see similar dynamics at work in 2012 against a feasible candidate.

Posted by: Uriah Heep at June 21, 2011 04:35 PM (bxm6L)

Yeah, we were all laughing at the polls, because everyone outside the beltway knew what was coming down.

Posted by: Oldcat at June 21, 2011 12:43 PM (z1N6a)

130 this could be the opening howard dean has been waiting for...yaaaayayayaaaaghaggh

Posted by: infidelphia at June 21, 2011 12:45 PM (kKWmw)

131 Yeah, McCain has a new 6 year lease on RINO life, Maybe God will call him home before then.

Posted by: Vic at June 21, 2011 12:46 PM (M9Ie6)

132

Something is changing. I was out-of-pocket for about three weeks starting on Memorial Day. I had time-limited internet access, so I glanced at my favorite sites but did not read the comments.

Before I left, conservative sites like Lucianne.com had lots of commenters who thought that BHO was leading a socialist takeover of the U.S. When I came back the majority seemed to be of the opinion that BHO wasn't leading anything. He was just along for the ride--unqualified, incompetent, lazy, petulant, a puppet of the people who put him into office and not particularly smart. In just three weeks there was a noticeable change in the way the majority of these conservatives talked about BHO. It will take longer for moderates and liberals to see that BHO's performance falls far short of the brilliance that the media likes to claim for him, but the tide is turning.

I like Glenn Reynolds' idea of a Preference Cascade. From my limited viewpoint, it looks like it's beginning to form.

Posted by: Avogadra at June 21, 2011 12:49 PM (dtIOD)

133 IMHO.

Posted by: Seriously at June 21, 2011 04:21 PM (QjrRF)

You need to study the turnout percentages in those groups to understand the results.

You also need to study the phenomenon of "Lying to the pollster".  There's a number of people who won't be heard saying they disapprove of Obama lest they be accused of racism, but likely will not be pulling the lever for him again, if they did the first time.

Posted by: Oldcat at June 21, 2011 12:49 PM (z1N6a)

134 If that was a net -9 in a three day running average, then that should be at least eleventy in the daily swing.

Posted by: Roy at June 21, 2011 12:50 PM (VndSC)

135 This kind of jump is often double-noise.  The polls up until now have been overestimating and the current one is underestimating his support.

Posted by: AmishDude at June 21, 2011 12:56 PM (T0NGe)

136
Ace is right.  It's just noise in the numbers.

That is, how shall I say? an awful lot of noise. I won't disagree that they don't reflect reality, but I suspect they do reflect an issue with how the polling data itself.

Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at June 21, 2011 12:57 PM (1hM1d)

137

C'mon......everybody knows that opinions of Obama arhave always been at least 10 points lower than ever shown in any poll.

I don't want to get banned so I will let you figure out why! 

Posted by: Jimi at June 21, 2011 01:01 PM (JMsOK)

138 Some polling "noise".  Especially when it's a 3 day rolling average.  That said, I don't care. 0bama is awesome. /obot mode

Posted by: observer at June 21, 2011 01:05 PM (5yMpj)

139 I'm not saying they are unelectable but certainly the Nice Campaigntm by types like Romney/Huntsman or the cut-and-run Pawlenty isn't going to get us where we need to be. Sure they take jabs at him(well, except for Huntsman) but the real enthusiastic jabs are coming from Bachman or Cain and I think they need to keep that up, if not crank it up a few notches. Obama is landslidable just like The Jimmy was but that isn't going to happen unless someone is willing to make him own the mess that is everything right now in every answer they give. And I want to see a real landslide, not a close call like we've seemed to have had in recent presidential elections.   Let the message be loud and clear that this crony capitialism/fascism/socialism or whatever you want to label it is dead in America.

Posted by: ArcadeHero at June 21, 2011 01:23 PM (mmHDH)

140 #137 Wrong Jimi. The Bradley Effect you are trying to hint at is irrelevant to Obama. Many of the same people saying his numbers were high in October 2008 was because of the same effect-but it never translated into the final numbers. Obama simply was that popular. His numbers across the board are inflated by many pollsters still using a Dem skewed average. The nation is likely D+2 at best right now, but they are going for D+5 to D+10. Adjust all polling to D+2 to give Obama a ton of good faith, and he sinks like a stone into the low 40s across the board. Obama has the support of at least 42-44% of the American public, as tough as that is to believe. the question is now whether the other 56-58% want him gone badly enough to pull R. Right now, I would say yes. He loses the electoral vote (and thus the election) to a generic Republican by at least 268-270, probably 239-309. Btw, I can pull "the Bradley Effect" theory without bannage because my RaceCard Gold membership went Platinum last year.

Posted by: CAC at June 21, 2011 02:04 PM (SG/1T)

141 Don't forget the brand of  canada goose anyway. It is because Canada goose clothes could bring you all that you really need in the chilly winter. A nice canada goose coat absolutely brings a funny winter life. Canada goose label also earns great admiration and appreciation, which other winter coats cannot gain from customers. Perhaps you could experience canada goose clothing in order to learn well about this style of winter clothing. Then, you can leave your own comments on canada goose coats on the website. Of course, you also could find out other comments and reviews on Canada goose from the Internet.(yang)

Posted by: canada goose at July 05, 2011 12:44 AM (jQnVI)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
145kb generated in CPU 0.0909, elapsed 0.2429 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.2034 seconds, 269 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.