August 01, 2011
— Ace First theory: the drenching of the world in pornography might actually be reducing sexual assault. (Full article at Townhall.)
I have to note this is actually an old, old article by Steve Chapman, from 2007. It seems to have been republished now because Chapman is on vacation, and they're printing some old, less-time-sensitive columns.
[I]n the past two decades, we have essentially conducted a vast experiment on the social consequences of such material. If the supporters of censorship were right, we should be seeing an unparalleled epidemic of sexual assault. But all the evidence indicates they were wrong. As raunch has waxed, rape has waned.This is part of a broad decrease in criminal mayhem. Since 1993, violent crime in America has dropped by 58 percent. But the progress in this one realm has been especially dramatic. Rape is down 72 percent and other sexual assaults have fallen by 68 percent. Even in the past two years, when the FBI reported upticks in violent crime, the number of rapes continued to fall.
...
In a paper presented at Stanford Law School in 2006, he reported that, after adjusting for other differences, states where Internet access expanded the fastest saw rape decline the most. A 10 percent increase in Internet access, Kendall found, typically meant a 7.3 percent reduction in the number of reported rapes.
For other types of crime, by contrast, he found no correlation with Web use. What this research suggests is that sexual urges play a big role in the incidence of rape -- and that pornographic websites provide a harmless way for potential predators to satisfy those desires.
I'd skip republishing an old piece except that Naomi Wolfe is writing about porn too. She claims the ubiquity of hard-core pornography is making men crazy, or at least screwing with their brains to de-sensitize them to normal (and real) sex.
She alludes to the Internet adventurism of Anthony Weiner and Chris Lee -- why are what appear to be normal men taking what would previously be thought to be insane risks?
Six years ago, I wrote an essay called “The Porn Myth,” which pointed out that therapists and sexual counselors were anecdotally connecting the rise in pornography consumption among young men with an increase in impotence and premature ejaculation among the same population. These were healthy young men who had no organic or psychological pathology that would disrupt normal sexual function.The hypothesis among the experts was that pornography was progressively desensitizing these men sexually. Indeed, hardcore pornography’s effectiveness in achieving rapid desensitization in subjects has led to its frequent use in training doctors and military teams to deal with very shocking or sensitive situations.
Given the desensitization effect on most male subjects, researchers found that they quickly required higher levels of stimulation to achieve the same level of arousal. The experts I interviewed at the time were speculating that porn use was desensitizing healthy young men to the erotic appeal of their own partners.
Both claims make sense to me. Not that any policy implications flow from that -- a study may be true, and yet no law or government program need be created due to the consequence of that study being true.
It's odd that I have to say that, but we are in an age when the default assumption seems to be "We have a study, now we need a law."
The nation has become itself addicted to such instant-gratification, impulse-driven political pornography.
Not every damn problem requires the intervention of the state.
This is actually something I've begun internalizing, based on commenters' arguments, over time. My first impulse used to be to make arguments based on the futility or imprudence of such measures. Little by little I've begun beginning with the more elemental question: What business is this of the state? Who authorized the state to patrol for this? Where did we collectively agree to even entertain a state function in such affairs?
It's a good starting question. One that I've only lately begun to start with.
I used to deem these sorts of questions "theoretical" rather than practical. Well, they are theoretical. But they're also foundational.
Posted by: Ace at
09:58 AM
| Comments (182)
Post contains 707 words, total size 5 kb.
I agree with you about this.
Personally, I think consuming a lot of pornography is not a good thing. Neither is eating a lot of cheetos. And I'm pretty sure if you do both, you wind up with an orange dick.
Posted by: Y-not at August 01, 2011 10:02 AM (5H6zj)
You may have a point, we'll form a committee and study it.
Posted by: Congress at August 01, 2011 10:02 AM (GZitp)
Congress should pass a resoulution acknowledging that not every damn problem requires the intervention of the state.
Posted by: FireHorse at August 01, 2011 10:04 AM (gTGz3)
Posted by: Larry Dickman at August 01, 2011 10:04 AM (O0Wa5)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at August 01, 2011 10:05 AM (pLTLS)
You may have a point, we'll form a committee and study it.
......from my cold, dead hands, you bastards.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at August 01, 2011 10:05 AM (71Fka)
Posted by: buzzion at August 01, 2011 10:05 AM (oVQFe)
Posted by: Mr Pink at August 01, 2011 10:06 AM (IE82C)
Posted by: rick perry's hair at August 01, 2011 10:06 AM (GTbGH)
look at it another way: women girls are giving it up a lot easier now
people don't even 'date' anymore; they hook up
Posted by: Soothsayer at August 01, 2011 10:06 AM (G/zuv)
Posted by: Ben at August 01, 2011 10:07 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Ben at August 01, 2011 10:07 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: IllegalslovePerry at August 01, 2011 10:08 AM (G/JLJ)
There's a new movie out right now.
It's called I Fuck For The Fun Of It.
Or Friends With Benefits. I can't remember.
Posted by: Soothsayer at August 01, 2011 10:08 AM (G/zuv)
Porn: Like rape, only more convenient.
Posted by: The Pornography Marketing Council at August 01, 2011 10:08 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Captain Hate at August 01, 2011 10:08 AM (zsvKP)
Posted by: steevy at August 01, 2011 10:09 AM (UR4hV)
Posted by: taylork at August 01, 2011 10:09 AM (5wsU9)
Posted by: stuiec at August 01, 2011 10:10 AM (Di3Im)
Posted by: logprof at August 01, 2011 10:10 AM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: joncelli at August 01, 2011 10:10 AM (RD7QR)
You know, I have no idea what other wives are doing with their hubbies, but my guy tells me that if a guy gets really into porn in a big way, no amount of bedroom gymnastics is going to solve that. I mean, even for men sex is only partly physical. So much of it is the fantasy aspect, how could any real person compete with that?
But honestly I have no idea.
Posted by: Y-not at August 01, 2011 10:10 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: fozzy at August 01, 2011 10:10 AM (FEzSe)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at August 01, 2011 10:11 AM (/62i9)
Porn: Like rape, only more convenient.
Posted by: The Pornography Marketing Council at August 01, 2011 02:08 PM (QKKT0)
Porn: It's What's Instead of Dinner.
Posted by: stuiec at August 01, 2011 10:11 AM (Di3Im)
>> Or Friends With Benefits. I can't remember.
It's like No Strings Attached but without Natalie Portman. It can't be all bad. I mean, it doesn't have Natalie Portman in it.
Posted by: FireHorse at August 01, 2011 10:12 AM (gTGz3)
Posted by: joncelli at August 01, 2011 10:12 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Roman Polanski at August 01, 2011 10:13 AM (BP6Z1)
Even when a problem might seem to possibly call for a policy to address it, rest assured the government will royally fuck it up. The list is endless....
Posted by: Alamo at August 01, 2011 10:13 AM (m/tN9)
...and there may be merit to the dysfunction aspect as well. Last week the smokin' hot pizza delivery girl did not drop to her knees and give me a hummer when I made a suggestive remark ("How would YOU like an Italian topping?").
So reality differs greatly from the reality that is portrayed in porn.
This will all be explained in my upcoming documentary "Searching for Edward Penis-hands". Look for it in small, coin-operated theaters.
Posted by: Sgt. York at August 01, 2011 10:14 AM (QHzLG)
**warning** graphic and nsfw:
no joke, we have a generation of kids (girls and boys) growing up right now who think sex is banging the shit out of your women, pulling out, and blowing a nut in her face.
Posted by: Soothsayer at August 01, 2011 10:14 AM (G/zuv)
Posted by: DMXRoid at August 01, 2011 10:14 AM (tjc9E)
A 10 percent increase in Internet access, Kendall found, typically meant a 7.3 percent reduction in the number of reported rapes.
Correlation doesn't necessarily equal causation.
I've never liked these published social science studies because they always seem to be designed (and published) with a purpose of advancing some kind of law or agenda. Kinda like the "video games cause kids to become more violent" studies.
23 Why would desensitivation cause premature ejaculations?Shouldn't it cause the opposite? That's what I was thinking, unless that mechanism of release is the reverse of something more well-known like alcohol tolerance. I really don't know, that's just my WAG.Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at August 01, 2011 10:15 AM (9hSKh)
>> Or Friends With Benefits. I can't remember.
It's like No Strings Attached but without Natalie Portman. It can't be all bad. I mean, it doesn't have Natalie Portman in it.
Posted by: FireHorse at August 01, 2011 02:12 PM (gTGz3)
Justin Timberlake seems like he'd be more fun to hang out with than Ashton Kutcher too. Hell his pushing is what got Mila Kunis to agree to the Marine Ball.
Posted by: buzzion at August 01, 2011 10:15 AM (oVQFe)
Same result when you sodomize an Oompah Loompah...
...or so I've heard.
Posted by: Sgt. York at August 01, 2011 10:15 AM (QHzLG)
Posted by: Rebar at August 01, 2011 10:16 AM (uPpYX)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 01, 2011 10:16 AM (AZGON)
1. Online access has made people more lazy - some of the folks on the margins are too lazy to go out and rape.
2. Moral decay is accelerating in our society to the point that getting laid doesn't even require one dinner, so there are more alternatives to rape.
Posted by: Vashta.Nerada at August 01, 2011 10:16 AM (eW+UG)
Posted by: nerdygirl at August 01, 2011 10:16 AM (g8JDc)
But honestly I have no idea.
Men are visual creatures. Give them a limitless supply of visuals, they are lost.
Posted by: mpurinTexas supports Rick Perry, bitch at August 01, 2011 10:17 AM (ignDe)
Posted by: DMXRoid at August 01, 2011 10:17 AM (tjc9E)
I used to deem these sorts of questions "theoretical" rather than practical. Well, they are theoretical. But they're also foundational.
Why, yes, yes they are. I will be the first to admit that I far prefer theory to reality but if first principles are not in place, nothing will stand. This is why I get so testy when arguments are principle are treated dismissively.
Now, let's get back to the important point of discussing porn. My response to the Naomi Wolfe article is "and?" And what's the point of it, other than as an interesting intellectual exercise? Sure, I have massive, massive problems with the pornification of, say, seven year olds *koff* Abercrombie *koff* but other than that, so what. Making sure my partner wants to bang me like a drum is not the government's business.
Or, tl;dr version, you'll pry my pron from my cold sticky fingers.
Posted by: alexthechick at August 01, 2011 10:18 AM (VtjlW)
Not every damn problem requires the intervention of the state.
But when you continue to increase the number of public servants, you have people that have to do SOMETHING to justify their job.
Case in point. Someone I know is becoming a dental hygenist and just graduated. Instead of a resume, she has to keep a portfolio detailing everything she ever does related to dentisty, everything she's read, everything. She told me that it'll cost about a couple grand just to keep it together over time. All because, one rabid civil servant thought this was a brilliant idea and stuck with it until it was implemented.
Coming out of dental school, she was lucky this portfolio was part of the instruction. Older out of school dental hygenists can travel to Ottawa and pay money to take a course on how to assemble their portfolios. All because of one civil servant.
I've come to believe that most government is the enemy of the people.
Posted by: Stateless Infidel at August 01, 2011 10:18 AM (GKQDR)
Yeah....wait, what? There's another way?
Posted by: Sgt. York at August 01, 2011 10:18 AM (QHzLG)
Posted by: DMXRoid at August 01, 2011 02:14 PM (tjc9E)
He questions the role of the state. Many of us do that here. We're not advocating its dissolution of it like you do you retarded dimwit.
Posted by: buzzion at August 01, 2011 10:18 AM (oVQFe)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at August 01, 2011 02:05 PM (pLTLS)
women in committed relationships who are PROUD of themselves for not givin it up to the SO in my opinion are way more demented than the poor guy wondering what the hell to do in that fix hes in, after committing to said witch.
if he just turns to porn, she is lucky.
Seriously. Whats wrong with makin the poor guy happy? and besides you keep giving them BJs , feeding them steak and makin them pie once in a while, and they worship you. Throw in some naughty outfits (they really dont CRE what shape youre in if they get that BJ) and act like you like it and dont expect treats and presents for doing this...
... and you will prolly get treats and presents.
serious. Its strange.
Posted by: Gushka still hasnt settled down at August 01, 2011 10:19 AM (QNeKQ)
Posted by: porn 'stache at August 01, 2011 10:19 AM (GTbGH)
If youÂ’re not willing to have somebody hauled off at gunpoint over the project, then itÂ’s probably not a legitimate concern of the state. - Kevin D. Williamson
Something tells me that's not a big deal to our betters in DC.
Such as dept of Ed swat team/debt collectors.
Posted by: Randy M at August 01, 2011 10:19 AM (vI8R6)
Posted by: DMXRoid at August 01, 2011 02:17 PM (tjc9E)
--See, zealous Libertarians can be old sticks in the mud as well as any spinster Christian. . . .
Posted by: logprof at August 01, 2011 10:19 AM (BP6Z1)
The nation has become itself addicted to such instant-gratification, impulse-driven political pornography.
But isn't that exactly what this blog is?
hey don't get me wrong, I like it.
Posted by: Tom Servo at August 01, 2011 10:19 AM (T1boi)
Posted by: MostlyRight at August 01, 2011 10:20 AM (ZG8Ti)
Posted by: nevergiveup at August 01, 2011 10:20 AM (i6RpT)
Porn in one form or another has been around since cave men started drawing on walls. It causes nothing but excessive fapping.
The only thing that has changed has been the quality of the porn and the shape of the women that the men liked.
Posted by: Vic at August 01, 2011 10:20 AM (M9Ie6)
Three words: "Slave Leia Costume".
Posted by: Sgt. York at August 01, 2011 10:20 AM (QHzLG)
I like tranny, midget, mexican porn...does that make me wierd?
It definately keeps me from raping the tranny, midget, mexicans in my neighborhood.
Posted by: dananjcon at August 01, 2011 10:22 AM (8ieXv)
Posted by: Vic at August 01, 2011 02:20 PM (M9Ie6)
--Heh. "Our forefathers."
Posted by: logprof at August 01, 2011 10:23 AM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: joncelli at August 01, 2011 10:23 AM (RD7QR)
:-)
OK, but when do the men start dressing for us?
How many of you morons have consistently, I don't mean just for an anniversary "date" or whatever, incorporate getting dolled up for your wimmens as part of foreplay?
Posted by: Y-not at August 01, 2011 10:23 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: nerdygirl at August 01, 2011 10:23 AM (g8JDc)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 01, 2011 10:23 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: DMXRoid at August 01, 2011 10:23 AM (tjc9E)
somewhat related to kneejerk reactionary policy...
About a week ago a tanker truck carrying fuel overturned on a highway north of Boston. It exploded in what witnesses describe as something you see in a movie.
So now Boston's mayor Mumbles Menino wants to ban ALL fuel tanker from the streets of Boston unless they are making a delivery in Boston.
Posted by: Soothsayer at August 01, 2011 10:23 AM (G/zuv)
Posted by: joncelli at August 01, 2011 10:24 AM (RD7QR)
The Naomi Wolfe excerpt is riddled with errors in logic. It is worthless.
"anecdotally connecting"
"The hypothesis"
"experts ... were speculating"
"hardcore pornographyÂ’s effectiveness in achieving rapid desensitization in subjects has led to its frequent use in training doctors and military teams to deal with very shocking or sensitive situations."
Anecdotes and speculation and a hypothesis. Worthless.
And WTF? Sex pictures make people insensitive to images of things completely different from sex? There's an official porno training technique used on doctors and soldiers? What? What?
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at August 01, 2011 10:24 AM (w41GQ)
Every day. You can't really want us walking around starkers. Trust me, the googles will do nothing.
Posted by: toby928™ at August 01, 2011 10:24 AM (GTbGH)
If youÂ’re not willing to have somebody hauled off at gunpoint over the project, then itÂ’s probably not a legitimate concern of the state. - Kevin D. Williamson
PJ O'Rourke nailed in it Parliament of Whores when he was balancing the budget - would I shoot grandma in the head for this. After all, don't pay taxes and ultimately someone is going to get shot.
RE: BJ's, I can't remember where I read/heard it but it's true. If you're not giving your guy head, then someone is.
You know something that drives me nuts? How the male sex drive is utterly mocked. Think about how many sitcoms have as a running joke how the husband/boyfriend wants sex all the time. What the hell is wrong with wanting your partner? Isn't that a good thing?
Posted by: alexthechick at August 01, 2011 10:24 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Ben at August 01, 2011 10:25 AM (wuv1c)
somewhat related to kneejerk reactionary policy...
About a week ago a tanker truck carrying fuel overturned on a highway north of Boston.
---
Hey, I took my hands off of the wheel. So sue me!
Posted by: Boston trucker watching porn on his iPhone at August 01, 2011 10:25 AM (5H6zj)
I don't think porn is really all that desensitizing. Not in moderation.
Time to change the batteries in the vibrators, wash the ball gags and tune up the sybian. Dang it, I forgot I need more rope.
Posted by: Stateless Infidel at August 01, 2011 10:26 AM (GKQDR)
You know something that drives me nuts? How the male sex drive is utterly mocked. Think about how many sitcoms have as a running joke how the husband/boyfriend wants sex all the time. What the hell is wrong with wanting your partner? Isn't that a good thing?
Posted by: alexthechick at August 01, 2011 02:24 PM (VtjlW)
Married...With Children is the cure for this idiotic "standard" sitcom joke.
Posted by: buzzion at August 01, 2011 10:27 AM (oVQFe)
Posted by: NEO-pervert at August 01, 2011 10:27 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: stalin peel at August 01, 2011 10:28 AM (31g9b)
Posted by: Ben at August 01, 2011 10:28 AM (wuv1c)
How about we just buy our men their own 'vacuums'. If blowing your pipes is that important to your relationship's well being, maybe you should back off the porn or marry that Hoover.
Posted by: beasn at August 01, 2011 10:29 AM (aiWtu)
Plain common sense:
1. Moderation in all things, anything to an extreme can become a problem
2. Too difficult to draw a line and say, this is porn, this isn't
3. We don't need more gubmint programs, laws, regulation, we need to return to personal responsibility
We've replaced personal responsibility with, nanny statism, instant gratification, extreme self indulgence
Posted by: nerdygirl at August 01, 2011 02:16 PM (g8JDc)
You are just so old fashion. Just think. We wouldn't have the wonderful fed government we have now if we went the "personal responsibility, hard work, moral living" pathway. You can thank your lucky stars that our government will always intervene between us and any negative consequences or societal judgements.
Posted by: Soona at August 01, 2011 10:29 AM (l5xDa)
Posted by: DMXRoid at August 01, 2011 02:14 PM (tjc9E)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 01, 2011 10:29 AM (LH6ir)
Porn in one form or another has been around since cave men started drawing on walls. It causes nothing but excessive fapping.
Ogg like. Like better if lady have bigger hooters and doing buffalo.
Posted by: Ogg at August 01, 2011 10:29 AM (QKKT0)
We need a law to stop legislatures from making a damn law every time some study comes down the pipe.
The thing is that this is how they justify themselves. Lawmakers are expected to make laws.
Maybe, as a start, we should stop calling them that.
Posted by: FireHorse at August 01, 2011 10:30 AM (gTGz3)
Posted by: NEO-pervert at August 01, 2011 10:30 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: steevy at August 01, 2011 10:30 AM (UR4hV)
This. The author clearly has a confused understanding of statistics. To wit:
This is part of a broad decrease in criminal mayhem.
Which destroys her thesis. If there has been a broad decrease in crime (value=true) and if rape is a crime (value=true), then you need to look for confounding variables.
Posted by: countrydoc at August 01, 2011 10:30 AM (131HS)
RE: BJ's, I can't remember where I read/heard it but it's true. If you're not giving your guy head, then someone is.
There was an episode of Tales from the Crypt where a less-than-upstanding private-eye played by Sam Waterston told a suspicious husband, (played by "That Guy" Hector Elizondo), "If you're not getting it, someone else is".
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at August 01, 2011 10:30 AM (9hSKh)
And then suddenly everyone would have a burning desire to see snuff films.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 01, 2011 10:31 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Ben at August 01, 2011 02:25 PM (wuv1c)
My eyes!! Noooooooo! [closes open tabs]
Posted by: Count de Monet at August 01, 2011 10:33 AM (4q5tP)
Dear wimmin - Give a BJ occasionally and maybe your man won't be addicted to pron. Not always. But let's not assume that men always have a screw loose where pron consumption is involved.
Every man wants a woman who is a lady in the drawing room, and a whore in bed. Plain and simple. Wild sex can make us feel like a man again, especially when the world seems to be against us. Give him that and you're 80% of they way to success.
Regarding the article, as others have pointed out, causation does not equal correlation. I suspect that demographic changes have more to do with the drop in crime rates than the easy access to porn. Fewer 20 something men and women running around means fewer assaults.
Posted by: Alex at August 01, 2011 10:33 AM (/TevE)
Posted by: DMXRoid at August 01, 2011 02:23 PM (tjc9E)
You are little more than a dimwitted child engaging in mental masturbation. If we ask you a question about how your world view would apply to a historical situation you throw a hissy fit about how that situation wouldn't exist if your fantasy could be enacted. And when we are willing to engage your stupid little fantasy world and point out how it would not work due to human behavior you have another hissy fit about it. Either way you're whining like a baby about how dare we ask how something that has happened would be handled by you or whining like a bitch about how dare we call bullshit on your fantasy world that cannot exist.
Posted by: buzzion at August 01, 2011 10:33 AM (oVQFe)
That depends. You want us to grow beards and dress up like Ryan Gosling in The Notebook? Screw that. However, if you have some sort of fantasy that involves being extra grateful to batman for rescuing you... we're totally on board with that.
"How many of you morons have consistently, I don't mean just for an anniversary "date" or whatever, incorporate getting dolled up for your wimmens as part of foreplay? "
Well, see here's where inequality comes into play. We guys don't want you getting "all dolled up"...we're happy with a one or two piece set of lingerie. easy to put on, easy to take off. "Dolled up" for women usually means putting on a tux or a nice suit, fixing the hair, and incorporating one or two nice-smelling male hygiene products. All that work just to take all that clothing off again?
Screw that!
If your man's foreplay activities go beyond a couple of vigorous gropes to your upper torso, he's ahead of the curve and you are WAY ahead of the general female populace.
Posted by: Sgt. York at August 01, 2011 10:33 AM (QHzLG)
Seriously. Whats wrong with makin the poor guy happy? and besides you keep giving them BJs , feeding them steak and makin them pie once in a while, and they worship you. Throw in some naughty outfits (they really dont CRE what shape youre in if they get that BJ) and act like you like it and dont expect treats and presents for doing this...
... and you will prolly get treats and presents.
serious. Its strange.
Posted by: Gushka still hasnt settled down at August 01, 2011 02:19 PM (QNeKQ)
How do women not get this?
Posted by: Confused and abused (not the good kind) at August 01, 2011 02:24 PM (bZ8J6)
ok i admit i had an ex husband that was really hard to please but he had mental issues and wanted it from guys. So he really did want it, just not always from ME. But they all want the BJ. Never met one that didnt.
OTOH... since i have been with other people, i have discovered that any normal straight male really just wants a friend who will understand hes not a perv but that at least once a week a BJ for no reason at all is appreciated. Throw in reasonable meals, non martyred sex, and some thoughtful treats occasionally, and if you want to go crazy--sexy outfits and "Baby you really turn me on" once in a while and the normal male will generally be pretty damn content.
I seriously believe people who meddle in others lives knowing it will make them less happy ARE NOT GETTING THESE THINGS. Call it sort of an "if i cant be happy, neither can you" theory.
Posted by: Gushka still hasnt settled down at August 01, 2011 10:34 AM (QNeKQ)
101 The best way to end all porn would be for the state to declare that only politicians can appear in porn
Look for people to elect the likes of Mary Carey to office in response.
At least then we'd have a visual metaphor of all politicans being whores.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at August 01, 2011 10:34 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: steevy at August 01, 2011 10:35 AM (UR4hV)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 01, 2011 10:36 AM (AZGON)
Just don't put it on Carrie Fisher... in 2011."
I think I just "turtled".
Posted by: Sgt. York at August 01, 2011 10:36 AM (QHzLG)
Married...With Children is the cure for this idiotic "standard" sitcom joke.
I was going to mention that Married With Children is the only show I can think of off hand where the opposite was the joke.
I'm not counting Sex In The City because my life is so much better when I pretend that show doesn't exist.
I feel bad for young girls now.They have no concept of ladylike.Cursing and getting covered in tats and getting nutted on like whores.Not all of them of course,but too many.
I was reading some article discussing how holding hands is now considered far more serious than actually having sex with someone. That made me terribly sad.
Posted by: alexthechick at August 01, 2011 10:36 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Oldsailors poet at August 01, 2011 10:37 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 01, 2011 10:37 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: nevergiveup at August 01, 2011 02:20 PM (i6RpT)
And force insurance companies to not charge a co-pay or deductable. Unreal. Although I hope birth control is used in overwhelming numbers by libs and Dems in fact they should go straight to sterlization
Posted by: TheQuietMan at August 01, 2011 10:38 AM (1Jaio)
Hi, I'm one of the original Tea Party members.
I have to be honest, this bill goes too far. The cuts are draconian. And I'm afraid that voters in 2012 will remember how the Republicans kept the economy hostage. Sorry, but it's true.
Posted by: long time Tea Partier at August 01, 2011 10:38 AM (G/zuv)
Posted by: steevy at August 01, 2011 10:39 AM (UR4hV)
Ahh, no. Not unless she's including those "sex therapists", which are not really doctors but are in a...umm...different sort of profession.
Posted by: countrydoc at August 01, 2011 10:39 AM (131HS)
Possibly my favorite joke from the series "Frasier":
Roz is accused of using sex to get what she wants, she then complains about men never being accused of the same thing. Frasier angrily responds:
"Of COURSE we men don't use sex to get what we want! Sex IS what we want!"
Posted by: Sgt. York at August 01, 2011 10:40 AM (QHzLG)
I have to be honest, this bill goes too far. The cuts are draconian
So now we're discussing cut v. uncut pron?
Also, a Concerned Christian Conservative troll comment on a porn thread is what makes this place so fantastic.
Posted by: alexthechick at August 01, 2011 10:40 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: nerdygirl at August 01, 2011 10:41 AM (g8JDc)
irony!
Posted by: Gushka still hasnt settled down at August 01, 2011 10:41 AM (QNeKQ)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 01, 2011 10:41 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Soona at August 01, 2011 10:42 AM (l5xDa)
Posted by: Oldsailors poet at August 01, 2011 10:42 AM (ZDUD4)
Yes...
...and purely out of intellectual curiosity, where would these particular women be found?
Posted by: Sgt. York at August 01, 2011 10:43 AM (QHzLG)
Posted by: nerdygirl at August 01, 2011 10:43 AM (g8JDc)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 01, 2011 10:44 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Oldsailors poet at August 01, 2011 10:44 AM (ZDUD4)
Oh hell yeah. You know how they say "Happy wife equals happy life?"
Happy husband equals happy wife.
Posted by: Sgt. York at August 01, 2011 10:45 AM (QHzLG)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 01, 2011 10:45 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Oldsailors poet at August 01, 2011 10:46 AM (ZDUD4)
Have you been on the internet?
You know it's out there; Rule 34. Or, if not, now that you have mentioned it you are required to create it.
Rule 34 is inexorable.
Posted by: George Orwell at August 01, 2011 02:44 PM (AZGON
Proposed corrolary. If a term does not describe a sex act(ie Dirty Sanchez), you must invent a sex act to go with the term.
Posted by: buzzion at August 01, 2011 10:47 AM (oVQFe)
Posted by: Oldsailors poet at August 01, 2011 10:48 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: Soona at August 01, 2011 02:42 PM (l5xDa)
Morality of pornography aside, are you sure they broke up over porn, or was that just a symptom of a troubled marriage? Options are pretty limited for a guy whose wife won't give him the time of day sexually anymore, but who doesn't want to have an affair either.
Posted by: Insomniac at August 01, 2011 10:49 AM (v+QvA)
Is this about the new San Francisco circumcision law?
Posted by: Sgt. York at August 01, 2011 10:49 AM (QHzLG)
Women should be so grateful our end of the relationship deal is to work with people so easy to please. I could never be a lesbian because dating girls is SCARY. you never know where you really stand with them. Hell i know, i am one and all my friends are girls and WE dont even know what we want, half the damn time.
Guys just want BJs, good things to eat, and to not be yelled at too much. Seems easy to me. Thats why even if i liked girls i wouldnt go near them. Men are a good deal.
Posted by: Gushka still hasnt settled down at August 01, 2011 10:50 AM (QNeKQ)
Posted by: Oldsailors poet at August 01, 2011 10:51 AM (ZDUD4)
Wow a concern troll posting on the wrong thread.
No real concern troll could be that half-assed. It's gotta be a sock.
Posted by: Cicero at August 01, 2011 10:53 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Gushka still hasnt settled down at August 01, 2011 10:54 AM (QNeKQ)
No real concern troll could be that half-assed. It's gotta be a sock.
Robo-troll. It was only a matter of time.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at August 01, 2011 10:54 AM (bjRNS)
Can't be. A judge actually kept it from being added to the referendum -- something about "the State of California has already taken the power to approve/deny medical procedures."
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at August 01, 2011 10:56 AM (bjRNS)
Posted by: Gushka still hasnt settled down at August 01, 2011 02:54 PM (QNeKQ)
It's astonishing how many people are blind, willfully or otherwise, to the glaringly obvious.
Posted by: Insomniac at August 01, 2011 10:58 AM (DrWcr)
Then you can think of five marriages where a man was not being physically satisfied and his wife was not performing her marital duties.
Since those five wives were clearly unwilling to give themselves to their husbands, they should have been grateful their men were merely indulging in porn to meet their unsatisfied physical needs, instead of physically seeking out another woman to help.
Any woman who disapproves of her husband looking at porn while simultaneously refusing him adequate has severe control issues.
...and don't tell me "immorality has its price". Divorce is far more immoral than looking at a naked chick every now and then.
Posted by: Sgt. York at August 01, 2011 10:58 AM (QHzLG)
If you are not already married, then your eventual husband will be one seriously happy and lucky bastard...
...and your book would be a bestseller.
Posted by: Sgt. York at August 01, 2011 11:00 AM (QHzLG)
Can't be. A judge actually kept it from being added to the referendum"
I make joke.
Posted by: Sgt. York at August 01, 2011 11:01 AM (QHzLG)
look at it another way: women girls are giving it up a lot easier now
people don't even 'date' anymore; they hook up
Posted by: Soothsayer at August 01, 2011 02:06 PM (G/zuv)
Yes, but why? There's more than one factor at work here. A big part of it is probably the glorification of sex in the culture - when you watch a movie and the romance starts the sex scene follows immediately.
But for my money the biggest part is the lack of men in college. A 10% skew in sex ratios means a lot of competition for available men. Add to that the fact that guys with low self esteem are gonna sit at home and fap to porn instead of asking anyone out. That adds up to a lot of pressure on the women.
Posted by: Ace's liver at August 01, 2011 11:01 AM (XIXhw)
Posted by: nerdygirl at August 01, 2011 11:08 AM (g8JDc)
I have never done that, but there have been a lot of times when I suited up to go out to a formal or semi-formal outing at request of wifey.
In fact, some of these involved driving for an hour and a half to get to an exclusive "out of the way word of mouth" place. Now to me driving an hour and a half after getting dressed in uncomfortable crap is really beyond the call.
Posted by: Vic at August 01, 2011 11:09 AM (M9Ie6)
Morality of pornography aside, are you sure they broke up over porn, or was that just a symptom of a troubled marriage? Options are pretty limited for a guy whose wife won't give him the time of day sexually anymore, but who doesn't want to have an affair either.
Posted by: Insomniac at August 01, 2011 02:49 PM (v+QvA)
All five men that I knew were married to good looking (two gorgeous) women who loved them very much. Porn made their sexual spirit wander, and with that, it took their attentions and time away from their wives, who probably would have done anything to make them happy. They eventually cheated on them. Watching porn is a precursor, if not, an act of adultery.
What ever happened to the "for better or for worse" clause in the marriage vows? So what if the wife doesn't give bj's anymore. Marriage shouldn't be about just "you" anyway. Do what makes her happy. She might have something better than a bj to thrill you with.
Posted by: Soona at August 01, 2011 11:09 AM (l5xDa)
Given the desensitization effect on most male subjects, researchers found that they quickly required higher levels of stimulation to achieve the same level of arousal. The experts I interviewed at the time were speculating that porn use was desensitizing healthy young men to the erotic appeal of their own partners.
Beat It! [ooooohhhhh!!!!]
Posted by: Michael Jackson at August 01, 2011 11:10 AM (4q5tP)
If you are not already married, then your eventual husband will be one seriously happy and lucky bastard...
...and your book would be a bestseller.
Posted by: Sgt. York at August 01, 2011 03:00 PM (QHzLG)
Mr. Grimm seems satisfied when he is home. When hes unhappy he makes sure to tell me often and sincerely its never because of me. But we talk TO each other, not AT each other and try to remember at all times that our partner is only human and so are we.
This is a good starting point... "wow I could be wrong, so i will talk to my partner and see whats up."
you find out some very interesting things that way.
Posted by: Gushka still hasnt settled down at August 01, 2011 11:17 AM (QNeKQ)
We are seldom fed porn here at the HQ (and why not?), but many of us spend hours here every day.
I would venture a guess that the internet in all shapes and forms; political blogs, gaming, gambling, fantasy sports leagues, and shopping have all led to a less-than-functional family units in those inclined to obsessive or compulsive behavior. Rapists have, ahem, poor impulse control.
And the argument that rape is about sex is a bullshit argument. Men can pay for sex. Rape is about power and intimidation and fear. It is not about sex.
As for porn desensitizing men and raising the ante for what turns them on, ask any woman with a vibrator whether the lowest speed setting still sees any use.
Posted by: As IF... at August 01, 2011 11:18 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: some "reproductive rights" scrunt at August 01, 2011 11:23 AM (RN90h)
You should ask those five wives that question.
Posted by: Sgt. York at August 01, 2011 11:33 AM (QHzLG)
Posted by: Soona at August 01, 2011 03:09 PM (l5xDa)
What about what makes him happy?
Posted by: Insomniac at August 01, 2011 11:42 AM (DrWcr)
None of the objections over Porn have anything to do with "rape" - that's just the excuse.
The real reason that peeps keep trying to outlaw pron - is the same reason that prostitution is outlawed ...
It is the goal of certain segments of society to rob women of the use of their sexual power.
Dead serious here. Most all pron involves women - if it only involved men there'd be no problem with pron. No one would be upset by it merely existing. Sure - you don't want someone wagging Anthony's Weiner in your face - but no one would be upset by others looking at it.
Pron and Prostitution give women the ability to make a very good living on their sexual power. Women hold ALL the sexual power. A male will go to extraordinary lengths to be with a sexually desirable female. This is the way nature intended it to be ...
But the Neo-feminists and the Judeo-Christians are in an unholy alliance to rob women of their sexual power - and subject it to the control of the church and state. Neo-femists believe that men and women are born the same - it's just society's "grooming" of them when they are young that makes kids self-identify as "masculine" or "feminine" - but this has been proven incorrect. They also believe that every act of consensual sex is actually the male committing "rape". Seriously - read what these witches write on this subject.
Archeo-Feminists believe that men, naturally, are born to be masculine - while women are born to be feminine. You cannot turn a woman into a "man" - or vice versa. They believe - that men and women are born essentially equal - until LAWS start coming into play to tip the scales. Men have physical power - while women have sexual power. It's women who dictate when and where the sex act occurs - and under what circumstances it will ocurr - not the male.
Think about it - we tell women they can do anything they please in this world - but damn it - "DO NOT attempt to use your own sexuality for your benefit - especially monetary benefit". Hell, I'm 6'2" and weight 210 pounds - and it's all muscle. I've made my entire living on my physical and athletic abilities - these are male traits I was born with. But - women aren't allowed, or are shunned, for attempting to use their sexual power for their own benefit.
Posted by: HondaV65 at August 01, 2011 11:52 AM (8NiWI)
This.
Unless it involves something immoral or illegal, each should make the effort to accommodate the other.
Men and women claim to be too tired or too busy to have sex but have plenty of time for t.v. and blogging and Xbox. Frankly, no matter how tired I've been, I've never regretted plowing through and having sex anyway.
No person can be sad while listening to zydeco music and no person having sex of their own free will can be sad while doing so.
It has always turned my frown upside down.
Posted by: As IF... at August 01, 2011 11:52 AM (piMMO)
It has always turned my frown upside down.
Posted by: As IF... at August 01, 2011 03:52 PM (piMMO)
THIS.
Besides it means you are wanted. Afterwards you are appreciated. Seriously, Give your husband three simple things and he will be SO DAMN HAPPY. Sex or BJs, Something he likes to eat, and dont pick on him. If you want to go overboard tell him you appreciate what he does for you and tell him hes your hero when he does those nice things for you.
its not demeaning. Think about how you would feel as a woman. I think everyone wants to feel wanted, appreciated, and like someone remembered you liked lemon squares or that butter scotch cookie, once in a while.
and orgasms relax and make normal people feel better for up to a day after having one. Its the release of certain happy hormones.
Posted by: Gushka still hasnt settled down at August 01, 2011 12:03 PM (QNeKQ)
Posted by: Gushka still hasnt settled down at August 01, 2011 12:13 PM (QNeKQ)
Posted by: Vic at August 01, 2011 12:14 PM (M9Ie6)
I can't imagine any woman not enjoying that. THAT is a couple who has fun together!
And, there's just something about a man in a starched white shirt and a cowboy hat.....
Posted by: As IF... at August 01, 2011 12:19 PM (piMMO)
I can't imagine any woman not enjoying that. THAT is a couple who has fun together!
And, there's just something about a man in a starched white shirt and a cowboy hat.....
Posted by: As IF... at August 01, 2011 04:19 PM (piMMO)
I take it you're not using the low setting while looking at that.
Posted by: buzzion at August 01, 2011 12:21 PM (oVQFe)
And, let's not kid ourselves here. Women, maybe not all women (just like not all men) enjoy porn as well.
What will put a very big dent in the online porn scene will be that law requiring ISPs to keep a record of our online histories.
If I were a more cynical person, I might wonder whether Big Porn didn't have a hand in coming up with that legislation.
Posted by: As IF... at August 01, 2011 12:23 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: As IF... at August 01, 2011 04:23 PM (piMMO)
I see what you did there...
Posted by: Insomniac at August 01, 2011 12:24 PM (DrWcr)
Posted by: buzzion at August 01, 2011 12:32 PM (oVQFe)
wanna know the single coolest thing a man can wear that makes me really LOVE who he is?
Shirt-stays.
It means hes prolly prior or current military, and shows hes detail oriented about his appearance and doesnt mind a little extra fuss and trouble to make sure he always looks right when he removes his jacket. I know they are fuss and trouble in the mens room, but when Grimmy goes out with me he always go to the trouble to really look right, and i think thats kinda awesome. Most people would just say "To hell with the damn things!"
I love being worth a little extra trouble.
clean shave fresh haircut and shirt stays. lol extra points for cool cowboy boots. Hat optional.
Posted by: Gushka still hasnt settled down at August 01, 2011 12:57 PM (QNeKQ)
Posted by: Alec Rawls at August 01, 2011 01:01 PM (kTTUz)
Shirt-stays.
Love the crisp look, hate the shirt-stays themselves.
Then again, I love red-headed men, glasses, and bowties, so, who am I to talk?
Posted by: Dog with his head tilted slightly at August 01, 2011 01:25 PM (piMMO)
A free people must exercise self-control if they want to stay free.
Posted by: AmericanWoman at August 01, 2011 02:49 PM (SQvIY)
"The experts I interviewed at the time were speculating that porn use was desensitizing healthy young men to the erotic appeal of their own partners."
I'm sure of course that the increasingly probable morbid obesity of their partners was completely irrelevant...
Posted by: DAve at August 01, 2011 03:20 PM (rgIL5)
Look, I been in the military a coupla/three years. I've seen a lot of shocking and sensitive situations. No one has ever slung porn at me to get me to chill out.
Just sayin'.
Posted by: Boss Mongo at August 01, 2011 09:34 PM (fo4tK)
Let the wankers muddy up their keyboards. They won't father children and our gene pool will be the better for it.
Posted by: Lee Reynolds at August 01, 2011 10:56 PM (zkRoG)
Kind of like saying the pencil creates illiteracy, isnt it?
Porn has never really done it for me, warm, female, and cooperative certainly does...but if porn is, according to these folks, lessening rapes committed, I mean, wouldn't that be a good thing?
Rape isn't about sex anyway..its about control and being able to take what hasnt been freely offered you, in order to demean the person being raped.
Tell you what though....get caught 'at it' around 90% of the people (guys) I know and you'll only be caught once! With all the whores, crack heads, liberal skank and free, indiscriminent sex going on out there, if you have to take it...well...thats not saying a whole lot for you, is it?
And its a quickest way I know to find yourself with a smoking hole in your forehead.....
Posted by: Kell at August 02, 2011 06:53 AM (2cl91)
Posted by: GHD at August 14, 2011 02:19 AM (UDaJ+)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.4083 seconds, 310 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Huh? Someone say something???
Posted by: Navin R Johnson at August 01, 2011 10:01 AM (HpT9p)