November 09, 2011
— Ace Who to root for?
Via Jammie Wearing Fool, who catches OWS letting their hair down about the real 1% they hate -- Jews.
Posted by: Ace at
10:58 AM
| Comments (75)
Post contains 44 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 09, 2011 11:00 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at November 09, 2011 11:01 AM (npr0X)
Posted by: toby928© Perrykrishna with tattooed knuckles at November 09, 2011 11:02 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: toby928© Perrykrishna with tattooed knuckles at November 09, 2011 11:02 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at November 09, 2011 11:04 AM (npr0X)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at November 09, 2011 11:05 AM (npr0X)
..besides. Image of BBW used without her permission = lawsuit big enough to put Madison out of business.
Posted by: Sgt. York at November 09, 2011 11:06 AM (EIAxq)
Posted by: dagny at November 09, 2011 11:06 AM (+msAv)
Posted by: Bob Zionist Saget at November 09, 2011 11:06 AM (SDkq3)
Posted by: t-bird at November 09, 2011 11:08 AM (FcR7P)
No orange stained dick for me today.
Posted by: GnuBreed at November 09, 2011 11:08 AM (ENKCw)
Posted by: Truman North at November 09, 2011 11:10 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: dagny at November 09, 2011 11:10 AM (+msAv)
Posted by: t-bird at November 09, 2011 11:10 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Andy at November 09, 2011 11:12 AM (DbiEg)
Posted by: WalrusRex at November 09, 2011 11:12 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: lauren at November 09, 2011 11:12 AM (VKD8C)
Posted by: Z Ryan at November 09, 2011 11:14 AM (tsC/8)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at November 09, 2011 11:14 AM (AdRY3)
There is being fat. And there is being deformed.
If your ass is so big that you can't fit into a regular chair, you have a big problem.
If you're so fat that you can lift up your stomach roll, you have a big problem.
If your arms and legs don't look like arms and legs anymore, stop eating.
Posted by: soothie at November 09, 2011 11:14 AM (sqkOB)
Posted by: WalrusRex at November 09, 2011 11:15 AM (Hx5uv)
I like the way that first guy in the video talks about how everything should be free because everything comes from the Earth.
In other words, this dope thinks he's entitled to the fruits of your labor.
Posted by: soothie at November 09, 2011 11:16 AM (sqkOB)
So to speak.
Posted by: nickless at November 09, 2011 11:16 AM (/K3BV)
Posted by: lauren at November 09, 2011 03:12 PM (VKD8C)
I don't think so. They were hated before oppressed muzzies. Historically there were problems with usury--essentially people hate their loan shark but there seems to be more to it than that.
Posted by: dagny at November 09, 2011 11:17 AM (+msAv)
I've noticed the MFM coverage of their Occupy brethren has gone down quite a bit since the rapes and other crimes have come to light. Not that the MFM would cover that news but just ignore it and move on
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 09, 2011 11:19 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: joncelli at November 09, 2011 11:19 AM (RD7QR)
Maybe not that big, but certainly she needs to be compensated however the precedents suggest she should be. The fact that they shamed her in publishing her photo, as well as used her as an advocate for infidelity, which she is opposed to, should be aggravating factors in whatever judgement she receives or settlement she deigns to accept.
She was wronged, definitely.
As for the niche served by Ashley Madison itself, I have no problem with it. I do have a problem with telling little boys and girls that they will grow up to be monogamous and happy for life after they find "the one", and women are such princesses, aren't they? and other inaccurate, harmful, ultimately hurtful BS their heads are filled with.
Posted by: Random at November 09, 2011 11:20 AM (YiE0S)
I do have a problem with telling little boys and girls that they will grow up to be monogamous and happy for life after they find "the one", and women are such princesses, aren't they? and other inaccurate, harmful, ultimately hurtful BS their heads are filled with.
Whoa. Bitter much?
Posted by: dagny at November 09, 2011 11:22 AM (+msAv)
Posted by: Not Drinking Nearly Enough at November 09, 2011 11:23 AM (HtUdo)
Posted by: HondaV65 at November 09, 2011 11:25 AM (8X9tr)
Posted by: Sassy at November 09, 2011 11:27 AM (iazkq)
That was an unexpected bit of projection.
Posted by: Z Ryan at November 09, 2011 11:28 AM (tsC/8)
Posted by: yomomma at November 09, 2011 11:29 AM (DKLl9)
Hey, I *like* a little bounce but holy cow...
As for the OWS jew haters... Come get some bitches, I do need to invest a little time in a target rich enviorment to sharpen my skills for the zombie apocalypse.
Posted by: Gmac at November 09, 2011 11:31 AM (k2Fyd)
Posted by: Z Ryan at November 09, 2011 11:34 AM (tsC/8)
I do have a problem with telling little boys and girls that they will grow up to be monogamous and happy for life after they find "the one", and women are such princesses, aren't they? and other inaccurate, harmful, ultimately hurtful BS their heads are filled with.
Whoa. Bitter much?
Twice actually. Yeah, I'm a slow learner.
Posted by: rickb223 at November 09, 2011 11:35 AM (zji3t)
Posted by: Pooter Hound at November 09, 2011 11:51 AM (le5qc)
A few reasons for that include that Ashkenazi Jews had, due probably mainly to social pressures and unique memes of Judaism, evolved a greater IQ than any known population, and other than the normative, juvenile thing where those with higher IQ are often little loved, they frequently outcompeted locals in certain industries such as banking, accounting, select businesses, science, and, yes, the media.
Further, the Jews as a group had, in the Torah, developed a unique, monotheistic, and multi-ethnic group of memes long before these became popular in Europe and the wider world. They pioneered the idea of an individual with unique worth, judged as an individual, pursuing their own path to God.
This often was in direct, if little appreciated, opposition to the tribal, nationalistic kin-selective values more normal in the countries where the Jews resided. This valuing of individualism eventually led to a schism and the development of Christianity proper. Jesus expressed disdain for the traditional families, and advised individual people to cleave to him, not to their families. This genetically maladaptive, but memetically successful strategy, ultimately undermined and then co-opted the Roman empire, traditional Roman society itself being based on an extreme application of altruistic, biological kin-selective values.
So Judaism, and Christianity, were about individual relationships with God, as opposed to being as opposed to being collective and altruistic in nature, although both contained some elements of that in practice, particular Judaism.
But most Europeans were xenophobic tribalists, believing their race or group superior, whereas Jews were more internationalists, focussing on their individual relationships with their creator, rather than kin-selective values and their nation states.
Enter Nietzsche and other Germanic philosophers.
Nietzche spoke out eloquently against Christianity as supporting the weak and disabled, etc., as opposed to the strong and survival of the fittest a la Darwin. Christianity was in opposition to Nietzche's racial Supermen.
Hitler and the Nazis bought into these ideas, that Christianity and individualism weakened them. Nominally a Catholic, frequently using Christian rhetoric in his speeches and writings for political reasons, the Nazis nonetheless clearly and obviously used biological values as their touchstone, unlike the west which had since largely eschewed biology-based values following the Enlightenment and then the birth of America, with its ideals of inalienable individual human rights. On the contrary, the Nazis believed in eugenics, killing the weak and mentally disabled (the Nazi membership rate was huge in the medical and especially psychiatric professions -- higher than amongst any others) in an effort to develop a race of Supermen.
They also believed in conquest and spreading their genes throughout Europe. Fundamentally, the Germanic peoples will and destiny had been thwarted by the ideas of Christianity, as the Nazis saw it, and all of the individualism and human rights that followed that. When the Roman empire fell and Germany seemed poised to come into its own, Christianity had undermined their rise, from the Nazi perspective.
Hitler sought to remove the Jews as the beginners of this, from their perspective, tragic outcome; and also because the Jews, with their non-nationalistic but pro-God monotheistic (non-Germanic pagan) values and high IQs could not be Nazified en mass. At the same time, through breeding programs, smaller extermination programs at hospitals and psychiatric hospitals, etc., the Nazis sought to enhance Germanic biological gene expression.
But the industrial capacity provided by capitalism and the free market, themselves the result of individualism and human rights, stemming from Judaism then Jesus's teachings and Christianity, but coming to the as the fore during the Enlightenment and birth of America (themselves a memetic ideological progressive reaction via the Magna Carta, English Civil War, etc., by the Saxon people to being humiliated and genetically outcompeted by their Norman conquerors) was sufficient to crush the Nazis and their allies.
And thus the remainder of Europe, genetically and biologically on the decline, not reproducing themselves at replacement rate, and importing peoples and genes from around the world; goes on, free.
Posted by: Random at November 09, 2011 11:52 AM (YiE0S)
Here, have a spoonful of this free dirt for lunch, maggot.
Oh, you want a sandwich? A sandwich made from wheat that somebody had to risk capital to plant, grow and harvest the wheat?
Fuck off.
Posted by: al-Cicero, Tea Party Jihadist at November 09, 2011 11:57 AM (QKKT0)
I see casting has begun for the 2013 remake of The Blob
Posted by: CAC at November 09, 2011 12:00 PM (Lossf)
It really isn't tolerable in society. It's like we are a crumbling culture.
If your wife looks pretty fat, my guess is she had a ton of kids.
It's not OK to let yourself go like that. But nobody is perfect, and the argument Madison is making isn't funny. Every organization running their ads, or affiliated with them, fundamentally doesn't care about their society. They are nihilist to the ultimate point, like a Seinfeld joke, only it's not a joke in this case.
Posted by: Dustin at November 09, 2011 12:05 PM (rQ/Ue)
Posted by: FireHorse at November 09, 2011 12:13 PM (m27MR)
Posted by: C. S. P. Schofield at November 09, 2011 12:22 PM (FEolo)
Meh. For how many women (at least some) men were meant to screw in their lives, including at roughly the same time, see Old Testament.
Posted by: Random at November 09, 2011 12:39 PM (YiE0S)
"I have to stand with the pornographer. I don't necessarily want to bed her, but ...."
I love that qualifier: "necessarily". ("Well, you know, maybe, if the opportunity arouse and no one noticed.")
Posted by: Random at November 09, 2011 12:41 PM (YiE0S)
Posted by: steevy at November 09, 2011 12:41 PM (7WJOC)
Meh. For how many women (at least some) men were meant to screw in their lives, including at roughly the same time, see Old Testament.
Posted by: Random at November 09, 2011 04:39 PM (YiE0S)"
"Meant"?
I just disagree.
You do realize that there are rougly the same amount of women and men, right? In polygamy situations, you have a ton of guys who do not get laid or have a stake in a family. That's a big problem in ... places Al Qaida thrives. Makes perfect sense to me.
I get it, though. We have the animal desire to sleep with lots of women. Of course.
And yet we should control ourselves. I'm not trying to be judgey. I think this is an imminently necessary part of having the best life. Just pure utility.
It really does help society a ton if marriages work out, and people control their desire to cheat on their fat wife.
This is the difference between civilization and the zoo. The nuclear family is a discarded element at this point, so I'm just tilting at a windmill here. And I'm not pretending to be superior to those who suffer normal human failings. I'm talking about a practical tip for society and individuals to be much better off.
Posted by: Dustin at November 09, 2011 12:50 PM (rQ/Ue)
Heh, Random's releasing some turgid mind-thoughts there.
Posted by: bonhomme at November 09, 2011 12:52 PM (9VSWS)
Posted by: Live Free Or Die at November 09, 2011 01:31 PM (96FSJ)
"Meant"?
I just disagree.
You do realize that there are rougly the same amount of women and men, right? In polygamy situations, you have a ton of guys who do not get laid or have a stake in a family. That's a big problem in ... places Al Qaida thrives. Makes perfect sense to me.
Yeah, I understand what you're saying. There are some definite advantages to monogamy in a social sense. There is a reason why the Romans used it, and it probably was a factor in their success over other tribes and peoples, including the polygamous Jews.
One of its main benefits is it makes it possible for lower status males to find mates. This is also its main disadvantage. It reduces competition where lower status males' genes are sexually selected against, weeding them out of the genetic pool.
My point is that our inclinations and instincts clearly show men crave multiple females (and to a lesser degree, women crave multiple males) sexually, while we also maintain a longing in our heart for deep romantic love with one person. This situation results in, for many many men, any of the following:
Polygamy with a main wife, and others.
Monogamy, with unrequited desire for others.
Social monogamy, with sexual affairs.
Serial monogamy: having one spice, eventually the passion fading, finding another and marrying or forming a long term relationship with her, finding another and marrying or forming a long term relationship with her.
Giving up on both social and sexual monogamy, and staying single, but somewhat promiscuous (more than one lifetime partner, often several).
All of these behaviors derive naturally from our evolved instincts. These are the sorts of behaviors we see in the real world.
Occasionally you see this one:
Monogamy, no desire to stray.
But that's pretty rare. It usually has to be enforced, by threat of stoning, difficulty of divorce laws, social opprobrium, etc. And even then, the desire is usually present ... but yes, some people fall on the Bell curve in such a way that they don't want to stray, just as some fall out further on the extremes of the Bell curve that they don't want to mate, period ... or they just want to mate and couldn't care less about a relationship.
But the norms are the behaviors I listed up top.
So I would say biologically humans are "meant" to have more than one partner, social advantages (and disadvantages) of absolute monogamy, not withstanding.
Posted by: Random at November 09, 2011 01:50 PM (YiE0S)
Posted by: Random at November 09, 2011 01:51 PM (YiE0S)
Heh, Random's releasing some turgid mind-thoughts there.
Woo hoo.
Posted by: Random at November 09, 2011 01:51 PM (YiE0S)
I do feel, though, that eventually, this biologically weakens a species, as people with lesser genetics mate with others with lesser genetics, and this effect multiplies down generations, particularly now that we've arrested natural selection with human rights combined with medical technology and the wealth produced by capitalism as distributed by charity or socialism. There is a good reason our "animal instincts" evolved: to produce fitter animals.
Posted by: Random at November 09, 2011 01:57 PM (YiE0S)
Posted by: Pad on The Shellac at November 09, 2011 04:24 PM (hTd0z)
Posted by: sTevo at November 09, 2011 04:34 PM (VMcEw)
Posted by: How to Listen to Radio on iPad at November 09, 2011 05:17 PM (d5kJe)
Posted by: Download android ebooks at November 09, 2011 06:09 PM (kpPaf)
We are mainly engaged in production and development all kinds of air filters,oil filters,fuel filters for constrcuctionmamchinery,heavyvehicle,agricultural machinery,truck,car,ship and engineering machine etc.
Posted by: christine at November 09, 2011 08:15 PM (Dy/KL)
Posted by: The battle of the crater epub at November 09, 2011 09:06 PM (jwvze)
swf video converter video to flash converter flash video creator
Posted by: doumaduo at November 09, 2011 10:26 PM (hsXs9)
Who to root for?
I don't understand, Ace, why you are so diametrically opposed to pornographers. It's a consensual activity. It brings people pleasure. It reduces rape, it appears, according to the data. Even if it has negative effects, you have a semi-porn theme here for the website. You have Dave's tasteful, yet hot and sexy, photos of young women on a regular basis. And so on. She's engaged in consensual activity with consensual people. It's up to married folk and others if they wish to watch (alone or as a couple). She isn't forcing it on anybody, and she opposes infidelity, she says, as well as Ashley Madison.
Posted by: White House at November 10, 2011 01:43 AM (YiE0S)
@25
Hey, babe, take a walk on the Walid side,
And the Mo'heims say, "Jew, JewJew, Jew, JewJewJew, Jew, JewJew, Jew,
Jew JewJew...."
Posted by: 666chevelle at November 10, 2011 06:00 AM (QjSgY)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2409 seconds, 203 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: katya, the designated driver at November 09, 2011 11:00 AM (kpb4T)