March 21, 2011
— Dave in Texas It's not much of a point, this post, now that the CIC finally got around to telling Congress about the intervention. Mostly just an excuse to post this awesome p-shop by Stoaty Weasel.
This glued up, mucked up who "knows what the hell policy is actually in play" is now our official mission. For a few days it seems.
The nation is mobilized.

I haven't been this inspired since the night Geraldo opened "the vault".
via Andy who also posts killer headline stuff here.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at
07:04 PM
| Comments (71)
Post contains 95 words, total size 1 kb.
The only good news is that Obama has driven me to drink, and I will be eternally grateful for that (apologies to WC Fields).
Posted by: Hrothgar at March 21, 2011 07:14 PM (DCpHZ)
Posted by: Jehu at March 21, 2011 07:16 PM (YtoR3)
Posted by: eman: Japanese Babe Rescue Team at March 21, 2011 07:18 PM (G8NKv)
Posted by: Johnny at March 21, 2011 07:18 PM (mhmc7)
Posted by: Rocks at March 21, 2011 07:19 PM (th0op)
Posted by: Jehu at March 21, 2011 07:21 PM (YtoR3)
Posted by: eman: Japanese Babe Rescue Team at March 21, 2011 07:21 PM (G8NKv)
Jim McDermott (D- WA) wants to give Gaddafi safe passage to Venezuela.
Gaddafi's Billion$ and Terrorist connections all bundled up for Comrade Hugo Chavez.
What could go wrong?
Posted by: Gerry Owen at March 21, 2011 11:08 PM (4ABat)
That's the really surreal thing here. Daffy is an avowed socialist. At the very least he throws them a lot of cash. He's basically the George Soros of the VERY far left. They must be squealing right now.
Posted by: Rocks at March 21, 2011 07:22 PM (th0op)
Talk about backing into a war. We're in number three, and no fanfare, no brass band, no Congress, no nutten'...
When Kucinich starts to make some sense, you know that you've really fallen down the rabbit hole.
Do they even know who in the hell the 'rebels' are? Could we be 'supporting' AQ? Is the administration really that stupid? I keep trying to keep myself from asking questions, but this is the most f'd up bag of manure that I've seen from this guy so far and that's certainly saying something after the last two years.
This ain't going to be Bosnia, not even the previous Iraq NFZ. I predict that it's not going to end well, and can guarantee that it's going to be EXPENSIVE in life and treasure...
Posted by: JR at March 21, 2011 07:22 PM (u/+WC)
Posted by: Jehu at March 21, 2011 07:23 PM (YtoR3)
Come on. Since when have these Dems been stingy with the air travel?
Posted by: nickless at March 21, 2011 07:25 PM (MMC8r)
Yeah.
That would be sweet.
Posted by: Shibumi at March 21, 2011 07:27 PM (OKZrE)
Posted by: nerdygirl at March 21, 2011 07:27 PM (e11O8)
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at March 21, 2011 07:29 PM (py9B+)
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at March 21, 2011 07:29 PM (py9B+)
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at March 21, 2011 11:29 PM (py9B+)
I predict this war will end like every other democrat started war which is Balkanization leading to permanent border skirmishes.
Posted by: Rocks at March 21, 2011 07:33 PM (th0op)
Who led this unprecedented (TM) international action? Was Obama thoughtfully cautious in his deliberation of this serious multinational effort or is he heading the action to free the oppressed people of the world through strong international leadership?
It's funny how it changes depending on whether the media wants him to appear "thoughtful" or "strong".
Posted by: Johnny at March 21, 2011 07:34 PM (mhmc7)
The advance has clearly stalled.
What is the withdrawal date?
Does everyone and everything have adequate armor?
What about the Global Test?
Where are the WMD's?
Posted by: sifty at March 21, 2011 07:37 PM (Vw9EX)
I think it's really nice of us to create a replacement Lawless Oil State for Al Qaeda since we were so mean and took away Afghanistan.
Posted by: sifty at March 21, 2011 07:40 PM (Vw9EX)
Posted by: 141Driver at March 21, 2011 07:42 PM (/E3ql)
Posted by: Bagger Vance Obama at March 21, 2011 07:42 PM (rrkE9)
Obama: "I gave explicit orders of which targets were to be off limits. Absolutely no golf courses were harmed by the bombing. Everything else, not so much."
Posted by: Filthy Sockpuppet at March 21, 2011 07:44 PM (1kwr2)
Posted by: Mick at March 21, 2011 07:51 PM (rrkE9)
Posted by: Damiano at March 21, 2011 07:52 PM (3nrx7)
Posted by: Joe Biden at March 21, 2011 07:54 PM (SBIko)
Posted by: dagny at March 21, 2011 07:55 PM (pOVW6)
Posted by: David Brooks at March 21, 2011 08:05 PM (swuwV)
Posted by: nerdygirl at March 21, 2011 08:06 PM (e11O8)
http://tinyurl.com/46o8h5c
Two of the most depressing:
Ham was asked what U.S. forces are instructed to do when they encounter pro-Gadhafi military units that are heavily armed but arenÂ’t actually attacking civilians... He described a hypothetical situation in which an American pilot spotted a Libyan unit south of Benghazi. If the pilot determined the unit was moving toward the city, he could attack. If he determined the unit was setting up some sort of position, he could also attack. But if he determined the unit was moving away, then he couldnÂ’t attack.
Confusion within Britain’s political and military leadership opened up as David Cameron and cabinet colleagues argued the Libyan leader, Muammar Gaddafi, may be a legitimate target while the Chief of the Defence Staff, Sir David Richards, said he was ‘absolutely not’.
Posted by: Llarry at March 21, 2011 08:09 PM (SI/pw)
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX
Not so much Libya, but rather Libya plus Egypt plus Yemen plus all the rest. Basically everything between The Pillars of Hercules and the Radcliffe Line going up in Muslim revolution all at once.
Pretty clear analogy to what happened in South East Asia, with events in Vietnam triggering more Communist fun in Laos and Cambodia.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 21, 2011 08:13 PM (MF4YG)
Posted by: nerdygirl at March 21, 2011 08:13 PM (e11O8)
Have you seen the latest results of the U.S. citizenship test (Newsweek's Take the Quiz: What We Don't Know - 3/20/11)?
IOW, yes.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at March 21, 2011 08:17 PM (swuwV)
Posted by: CMU VET at March 21, 2011 08:38 PM (dExXN)
Posted by: James Madison, spinning like a top at March 21, 2011 08:39 PM (YxscT)
Nerdygirl rules. Gestures like that are one reason I like this site so much.
Posted by: Catholic living in a modern world at March 21, 2011 08:41 PM (YxscT)
I told Barry he'd better get rid of those damn planes!
Posted by: Claire McCaskill at March 21, 2011 08:48 PM (vUpp0)
Top. Men.
Posted by: It's not "war war" at March 21, 2011 08:51 PM (YxscT)
Posted by: XBradTC at March 21, 2011 08:53 PM (X0Ona)
Posted by: alexander at March 21, 2011 08:56 PM (1BToE)
Posted by: nerdygirl at March 21, 2011 08:57 PM (e11O8)
Posted by: Baracket O'B-Ball at March 21, 2011 08:58 PM (FcR7P)
I see conservatives with authority are taking the "I support the mission, but it's being handled incompetently and/or illegitimately" approach". That's probably the right tack , or close to it as far as P.R goes. When objecting to it later, cons are better off objecting to a third war rather than getting into the nuances of American interests. Independents are too stupid to understand the distinction, they'll think we're playing games to justify other wars.
I'd also rip on the lack of congressional involvement. We need to be precise on why we think this is an overreach if we're going to make this a political issue. Well, when talking to squishes anyway. When talking to libs, we should egg them on to primary Barry.
Oh, and remember in '08 when they mocked McCain for singing "Bomb, Bomb Bomb Iran" as a joke? HAHAHAHAHAHA Who's your warmonger, now?
This is a serious issue, but it's always fun to harass progressives.
Posted by: Crazee at March 21, 2011 09:06 PM (xsoRi)
Posted by: Steph at March 21, 2011 09:07 PM (AkdC5)
Medved had a caller who is a Social Studies teacher. He said a lot of schools are cutting Social Studies entirely, and focusing on math, literature and science in order to focus on standardized testing. This is insane. Kids need to learn their civic history. I know when I was a kid, I actually read my history books cover to cover!
Yeah , I know. I'm a geek. Point is, though, a renewed sense of civics could fight a lot of the left wing bias in academia. We need to consider this with our next conservative administration...
Posted by: Crazee at March 21, 2011 09:11 PM (xsoRi)
We already have two odysseys past thousands of dawns.
Definition of ODYSSEY
1: a long wandering or voyage usually marked by many changes of fortune
2: an intellectual or spiritual wandering or quest
Posted by: Huckleberry at March 21, 2011 09:16 PM (fqOyi)
So which country is going to commit gravel grinders to finish off Gaffafi?
I don't claim to be a military expert but doesn't war 101 mean you have to physically overrun the opponent to win?
Oh winning/victory, never mind.
Posted by: YIKES! at March 21, 2011 09:16 PM (buXmi)
#6, et al, who've been asking about the B2:
The B2 is stationed in Missouri, and flies to and attacks targets world wide, then returns to US Soil. This is because there are a huge number of super-secret components inside the B2, including ones we don't even share with our allies. We don't want anyone to know all the capabilities of the B2.
Also, basing them anywhere but in the US means that a nation can sequester them--deny the use of their airspace if they don't agree with the foreign policy decisions we've made--like France andSpain did the first time we bombed Libya. If the B2 were based in a country that opted for this, we would be unable to use them. (Especially given a CinC who wouldn't want to upset anyone.)
The B2's unique stealth abilities allows it to drop 2K pound JDAMs and other munitions that can be used against very specific targets--guided by GPS, with terminal guidance from the aircrew. This allows the B2 to hit exactly what it is aiming at (Chinese Embassy.) Further, because it is so stealthy, it can be used to strike at radar facilities and Surface to Air Missile sites and equipment with relative impunity--they can turn on their search/aquisition radars to try to find the B2--but will likely get a HARM anti-radar missile for their troubles. The other option left is to shoot blind--which has a success rate about equal to playing Keno.
There still exists a threat from low-altitude AAA, the SA-7 and the DShK machine guns, but the B2 allows the other aircraft to fight almost with impunity from medium to high altitudes, since the enemy is either unable to hit them, or unwilling to power up its radars.
Posted by: Billy Mitchell at March 21, 2011 09:23 PM (Ig+B0)
Posted by: Crazee at March 21, 2011 09:28 PM (xsoRi)
We can save these African savages from themselves, but only if we kill the unreasonable ones. Who are the unreasonable ones? Um, the ones holding our allies' energy resources hostage.
57 days left and counting, Mr. President, - one for each state.
Posted by: Fritz at March 21, 2011 09:36 PM (/8mBu)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at March 21, 2011 09:36 PM (EiH7n)
Crazee, your heart's in the right place, but respectfully, I think what the next conservative administration needs to consider is getting the Feds out of educational matters. Note that it is the standardized testing that is creating the perverse incentives in the first place.
Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at March 21, 2011 09:38 PM (fjoLg)
Liberals play this short game/long game strategy well. If they can't change things now, they implement changes that help them down the road. If we can't eliminate the DoE, I think Plan B could be taking advantage of the institutional power we have to shape the curricula in a way that benefits us in terms of educating children. Whenever we can't do what we want, we always just give up and never try to shirt the agenda. Just a thought, though. I'm certainly no expert on this stuff, other than seeing how terrible our educational system is firsthand. I'm a pretty bright guy, I got a 34 on my ACT test. And I missed half my senior year of high school . Bright kids aren't getting the education they need in order to focus on the lesser kids...and even those kids aren't turning out well! It's sickening.
This is all OT, though. We agree, so let's move back to the feckless one.
Posted by: Crazee at March 21, 2011 09:48 PM (xsoRi)
Education was none too good when I was in school, either. I did very well on the SAT, but no thanks to my schools. I had to educate myself, for the most part.
Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at March 21, 2011 10:09 PM (fjoLg)
Posted by: George Orwell at March 21, 2011 10:13 PM (AZGON)
Sigh... I really wish folks would read the War Powers Act.
Yes, the President must inform Congress when he commits troops, but an earlier clause says WHEN he CAN commit troops...
Act of War, Specific authorization through legislation, OR if American Troops, or Territory is under imminent threat of attack... and THATS IT!
Now the President could send troops in to defend NATO, as there is specific legislation already in place allowing him to do so... as with other treaty partners...
But I sure don't see any of the above justifications for our involvment in Libya.
Posted by: Romeo13 at March 21, 2011 10:31 PM (NtXW4)
Posted by: ya2daup at March 21, 2011 11:37 PM (hsLUJ)
Posted by: ya2daup at March 21, 2011 11:39 PM (hsLUJ)
Posted by: Case at March 21, 2011 11:49 PM (0K+Kw)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 22, 2011 02:34 AM (kUaEF)
One pilot rescued the other in the process of being rescued
Posted by: MarkC at March 22, 2011 02:45 AM (ros+1)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at March 22, 2011 03:35 AM (ndlFj)
Posted by: deweyfromdetroit at March 22, 2011 06:55 AM (S3xh2)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2768 seconds, 199 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Jim McDermott (D- WA) wants to give Gaddafi safe passage to Venezuela.
Gaddafi's Billion$ and Terrorist connections all bundled up for Comrade Hugo Chavez.
What could go wrong?
Posted by: Gerry Owen at March 21, 2011 07:08 PM (4ABat)