March 21, 2011

Presidentin Is Hard, Second Verse
— Dave in Texas

It's not much of a point, this post, now that the CIC finally got around to telling Congress about the intervention. Mostly just an excuse to post this awesome p-shop by Stoaty Weasel.

This glued up, mucked up who "knows what the hell policy is actually in play" is now our official mission. For a few days it seems.

The nation is mobilized.

libya.jpg

Laser-focused.

I haven't been this inspired since the night Geraldo opened "the vault".

via Andy who also posts killer headline stuff here.


Posted by: Dave in Texas at 07:04 PM | Comments (71)
Post contains 95 words, total size 1 kb.

1

Jim McDermott (D- WA) wants to give Gaddafi safe passage to Venezuela.

Gaddafi's Billion$ and Terrorist connections all bundled up for Comrade Hugo Chavez.

What could go wrong? 

Posted by: Gerry Owen at March 21, 2011 07:08 PM (4ABat)

2 What a Precedent!  God willing, we won't see his like again in another 200 years.  It is a good thing no one takes an oath seriously these days, or the cries for his impeachment would be ringing throughout the land.  I am so proud that we have our troops being lead by the likes of the UN and the Arab League.

The only good news is that Obama has driven me to drink, and I will be eternally grateful for that (apologies to WC Fields).

Posted by: Hrothgar at March 21, 2011 07:14 PM (DCpHZ)

3 Simply the most incoherent foreign policy since Nevile Chamberlain...with possibly a worse outcome.

Posted by: Jehu at March 21, 2011 07:16 PM (YtoR3)

4 President Clinton is quite pleased with her Secretary of Recreation.

Posted by: eman: Japanese Babe Rescue Team at March 21, 2011 07:18 PM (G8NKv)

5 The United States cannot sit idly by while there are parties to attend and brackets to fill out.

Posted by: Johnny at March 21, 2011 07:18 PM (mhmc7)

6 The most amazing thing I have read about this is we actually flew 2 B-2 Stealth bombers out of MO to Libya, 25 hours round trip and who knows how many aerial refuels, to drop 45 stinking 2000 lb bombs.  What the hell was the point of that?

Posted by: Rocks at March 21, 2011 07:19 PM (th0op)

7 Thank you 54% fools who needed to have your political masturbation event. White liberals needed to assuage their white guilt. Blacks needed to express their tribal loyalty over loyalty to country. Young people needed to express how hip, and culturally aware they were. Multiculturalists needed to celebrate their victory by planting a tombstone on the America Ideal. Thank you one and f'ing all.

Posted by: Jehu at March 21, 2011 07:21 PM (YtoR3)

8 The most amazing thing I have read about this is we actually flew 2 B-2 Stealth bombers out of MO to Libya, 25 hours round trip and who knows how many aerial refuels, to drop 45 stinking 2000 lb bombs. What the hell was the point of that? Posted by: Rocks at March 21, 2011 11:19 PM (th0op) Practice.

Posted by: eman: Japanese Babe Rescue Team at March 21, 2011 07:21 PM (G8NKv)

9

Jim McDermott (D- WA) wants to give Gaddafi safe passage to Venezuela.

Gaddafi's Billion$ and Terrorist connections all bundled up for Comrade Hugo Chavez.

What could go wrong? 

Posted by: Gerry Owen at March 21, 2011 11:08 PM (4ABat)


That's the really surreal thing here. Daffy is an avowed socialist. At the very least he throws them a lot of cash. He's basically the George Soros of the VERY far left. They must be squealing right now.

Posted by: Rocks at March 21, 2011 07:22 PM (th0op)

10

Talk about backing into a war.  We're in number three, and no fanfare, no brass band, no Congress, no nutten'...

When Kucinich starts to make some sense, you know that you've really fallen down the rabbit hole.

Do they even know who in the hell the 'rebels' are? Could we be 'supporting' AQ?  Is the administration really that stupid?  I keep trying to keep myself from asking questions, but this is the most f'd up bag of manure that I've seen from this guy so far and that's certainly saying something after the last two years.

This ain't going to be Bosnia, not even the previous Iraq NFZ.  I predict that it's not going to end well, and can guarantee that it's going to be EXPENSIVE in life and treasure...

Posted by: JR at March 21, 2011 07:22 PM (u/+WC)

11 O, yeah and we just borrowed 1 million each for Tomahawk cruise missiles from China, cause we cannot afford them. Yeah now we are borrowing money to kill Muslims, when if we left them alone, they would kill each other for free....argghhhh!

Posted by: Jehu at March 21, 2011 07:23 PM (YtoR3)

12 The most amazing thing I have read about this is we actually flew 2 B-2 Stealth bombers out of MO to Libya, 25 hours round trip and who knows how many aerial refuels, to drop 45 stinking 2000 lb bombs. What the hell was the point of that?

Come on.  Since when have these Dems been stingy with the air travel?

Posted by: nickless at March 21, 2011 07:25 PM (MMC8r)

13 Personally, I think I'd like to have a p-shop of a mosque being bombed while Teh Won does the samba.

Yeah.

That would be sweet.

Posted by: Shibumi at March 21, 2011 07:27 PM (OKZrE)

14 It has reached the point where I hate the liberal media more than I hate Obama. They're chortling about how magnificently he handled this, while completely ignoring the fact that he missed the opportunity of taking advantage of the momentum that the people in the streets of Libya had built up weeks ago. Now that Quadafee has the upper hand back, the media people are thrilled that His Awesomeness has finally decided to step in? Now that it will be HARDER, he's decided to step in, and they're happy about it? The media people are as stupid and dickless as His Awesomeness.

Posted by: nerdygirl at March 21, 2011 07:27 PM (e11O8)

15

Is the administration really that stupid?

Why yes - yes they are. 

Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at March 21, 2011 07:29 PM (py9B+)

16 I predict that Libya is going to become Obama's Vietnam......

Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at March 21, 2011 07:29 PM (py9B+)

17 I predict that Libya is going to become Obama's Vietnam......

Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at March 21, 2011 11:29 PM (py9B+)


I predict this war will end like every other democrat started war which is Balkanization leading to permanent border skirmishes.

Posted by: Rocks at March 21, 2011 07:33 PM (th0op)

18 Posted by: nerdygirl at March 21, 2011 11:27 PM (e11O

Who led this unprecedented (TM) international action?  Was Obama thoughtfully cautious in his deliberation of this serious multinational effort or is he heading the action to free the oppressed people of the world through strong international leadership?

It's funny how it changes depending on whether the media wants him to appear "thoughtful" or "strong".

Posted by: Johnny at March 21, 2011 07:34 PM (mhmc7)

19 It's a quagmire.
The advance has clearly stalled.
What is the withdrawal date?
Does everyone and everything have adequate armor?


What about the Global Test?

Where are the WMD's?


Posted by: sifty at March 21, 2011 07:37 PM (Vw9EX)

20 ON a serious note:

I think it's really nice of us to create a replacement Lawless Oil State for Al Qaeda since we were so mean and took away Afghanistan.

Posted by: sifty at March 21, 2011 07:40 PM (Vw9EX)

21 I was busy today and haven't looked at the news - how is Obama's illegal war going?

Posted by: 141Driver at March 21, 2011 07:42 PM (/E3ql)

22 This war is lost.

Posted by: Harry Reid at March 21, 2011 07:42 PM (SBIko)

23 Shit, this little ol' thang? It's just a sand trap. Now toss me a wedge and watch me get outta here in no time.

Posted by: Bagger Vance Obama at March 21, 2011 07:42 PM (rrkE9)

24

Obama:  "I gave explicit orders of which targets were to be off limits.  Absolutely no golf courses were harmed by the bombing.  Everything else, not so much."

Posted by: Filthy Sockpuppet at March 21, 2011 07:44 PM (1kwr2)

25 Filthy Sockpuppet, funny thing is there are attempts by Jack Nicklaus to actually build a GC in Tripoli. Barack is probably just frustrated that it is taking too long.

Posted by: Mick at March 21, 2011 07:51 PM (rrkE9)

26

To #6

A picture for you: Here

Posted by: USCitizen at March 21, 2011 07:51 PM (a1FJJ)

27 It it just me or does it seem like 98% of the people running things around the world read the table of contents and, perhaps, the first chapter of a history book and declared themselves experts in everything? I remember when reading Cliffs Notes was considered lazy and cheating. Now it seems that that is too much to even ask of anyone.

Posted by: Damiano at March 21, 2011 07:52 PM (3nrx7)

28 I think the solution is to divide Libya into 3 semi-autonomous regions. Now that's gravitas, baby!

Posted by: Joe Biden at March 21, 2011 07:54 PM (SBIko)

29

Bigger pic here.

 

Posted by: USCitizen at March 21, 2011 07:54 PM (a1FJJ)

30 Heh. Maybe I'll get a t-shirt with a peace sign

Posted by: dagny at March 21, 2011 07:55 PM (pOVW6)

31 Come to think of it, his creases don't look quite so sharp. And the pointy head? Surprisingly dull.

Posted by: David Brooks at March 21, 2011 08:05 PM (swuwV)

32 "It's funny how it changes depending on whether the media wants him to appear "thoughtful" or "strong"." Beautiful statement. The media decides how he should appear, and creates the desired illusion. Saves his administration a lot of hard work, cooking up good spin. And by "thoughtful" we mean he thought and thought, while guadafi was on the verge of collapse. And so now that qadaffy is no longer on the verge of collapse, he has decided to act, well, in between golfing and touring Brazil. Are close to half of the American people so stupid that they don't see that he missed an obvious opportunity several days ago? Are his supporters that dumb. I'm actually praying that he stumbles into some sort of victory. Who knows, maybe Khadafi will die of aids or something. Just to make it easier on the military men and women, who deserve better decision making than this.

Posted by: nerdygirl at March 21, 2011 08:06 PM (e11O8)

33 A truly amazing collection of quotes about what's going on:

http://tinyurl.com/46o8h5c

Two of the most depressing:

Ham was asked what U.S. forces are instructed to do when they encounter pro-Gadhafi military units that are heavily armed but arenÂ’t actually attacking civilians... He described a hypothetical situation in which an American pilot spotted a Libyan unit south of Benghazi. If the pilot determined the unit was moving toward the city, he could attack. If he determined the unit was setting up some sort of position, he could also attack. But if he determined the unit was moving away, then he couldnÂ’t attack.

Confusion within Britain’s political and military leadership opened up as David Cameron and cabinet colleagues argued the Libyan leader, Muammar Gaddafi, may be a legitimate target while the Chief of the Defence Staff, Sir David Richards, said he was ‘absolutely not’.

Posted by: Llarry at March 21, 2011 08:09 PM (SI/pw)

34 I predict that Libya is going to become Obama's Vietnam.
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX



Not so much Libya, but rather Libya plus Egypt plus Yemen plus all the rest.  Basically everything between The Pillars of Hercules and the Radcliffe Line going up in Muslim revolution all at once.

Pretty clear analogy to what happened in South East Asia, with events in Vietnam triggering more Communist fun in Laos and Cambodia.

Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 21, 2011 08:13 PM (MF4YG)

35 Okay, I apologize for the aids remark. I know families who have had sons with aids, and I'm not being snarky here. I feel creepy about that. Must be my guilt ridden Catholic upbringing kicking in.

Posted by: nerdygirl at March 21, 2011 08:13 PM (e11O8)

36 nerdygirl: "Are close to half of the American people so stupid that they don't see that he missed an obvious opportunity several days ago? Are his supporters that dumb."

Have you seen the latest results of the U.S. citizenship test (Newsweek's Take the Quiz: What We Don't Know - 3/20/11)?

IOW, yes.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at March 21, 2011 08:17 PM (swuwV)

37 Nerdy Girl: Don't sweat it. My Catholic guilt i.e. consience doesn't extend to these goat f'kers.

Posted by: CMU VET at March 21, 2011 08:38 PM (dExXN)

38 OK, I just took the citizenship exam and scored 39/40 (I said there are 26 amendments to the Constitution when there are really 27).  How the hell could anyone with a functional knowledge base flunk that test?

Posted by: James Madison, spinning like a top at March 21, 2011 08:39 PM (YxscT)

39 Posted by: nerdygirl at March 22, 2011 12:13 AM (e11O

Nerdygirl rules.  Gestures like that are one reason I like this site so much.

Posted by: Catholic living in a modern world at March 21, 2011 08:41 PM (YxscT)

40 The most amazing thing I have read about this is we actually flew 2 B-2 Stealth bombers out of MO to Libya, 25 hours round trip and who knows how many aerial refuels, to drop 45 stinking 2000 lb bombs. What the hell was the point of that?

I told Barry he'd better get rid of those damn planes!

Posted by: Claire McCaskill at March 21, 2011 08:48 PM (vUpp0)

41 The most amazing thing I have read about this is we actually flew 2 B-2 Stealth bombers out of MO to Libya, 25 hours round trip and who knows how many aerial refuels, to drop 45 stinking 2000 lb bombs. What the hell was the point of that?

Top.  Men.

Posted by: It's not "war war" at March 21, 2011 08:51 PM (YxscT)

42 Well, airports are surprisingly resistant to damage. You gotta bomb the crap out of them to put them out of operation for more than a day or two. Which means, you need a lot of bombs. A "first day of the war" strike by B-2s makes good tactical sense. They are virtually invulnerable to the antiquated Libyan air defenses, and they carry a metric shitload of bombs. Also, airports are a nice target for the US in that they tend to not have a lot of civilians living right next to the parts you want to bomb, like the runways and taxiways and ramp spaces.

Posted by: XBradTC at March 21, 2011 08:53 PM (X0Ona)

43 I get the sense something greater was at work in Libya. Perhaps Gaddafi had really snapped, and was planning on making Libya a new state sponsor of terrorism, to get revenge on the West who had 'betrayed him'? It's the only logical explanation for the expedited Security Council actions and military intervention.

Posted by: alexander at March 21, 2011 08:56 PM (1BToE)

44 Anonymous Drivel, Yeah, and that was an easy test. What was done at the Constitutional Convention? Lordy, lordy, lordy. Don't they make kids take civics or government classes any more?

Posted by: nerdygirl at March 21, 2011 08:57 PM (e11O8)

45 What's all this talk about Libbia? She on American Idol or something? I'll check it out after the NCAA's...

Posted by: Baracket O'B-Ball at March 21, 2011 08:58 PM (FcR7P)

46 This is really only justified if there's something going on we don't know about...but in that case, why aren't we being informed?

 I see conservatives with authority are taking the "I support the mission, but it's being handled incompetently and/or illegitimately" approach".  That's probably the right tack , or close to it as far as P.R goes. When objecting to it later, cons are better off objecting to a third war rather than getting into the nuances of American interests. Independents are too stupid to understand the distinction, they'll think we're playing games to justify other wars.

 I'd also rip on the lack of congressional involvement. We need to be precise on why we think this is an overreach if we're going to make this a political issue. Well, when talking to squishes anyway. When talking to libs, we should egg them on to primary Barry.

 Oh, and remember in '08 when they mocked McCain for singing "Bomb, Bomb Bomb Iran" as a joke? HAHAHAHAHAHA Who's your warmonger, now?

 This is a serious issue, but it's always fun to harass progressives.

Posted by: Crazee at March 21, 2011 09:06 PM (xsoRi)

47 No, alexander, the UN expedited it because the Arab League said pretty please.   That's the only reason deWon got involved, too.   Period.  End of story.

Posted by: Steph at March 21, 2011 09:07 PM (AkdC5)

48
Ain't I just a rascal?

Posted by: Pres**ent Super Kool at March 21, 2011 09:07 PM (buXmi)

49 Oh, as far as the literacy tests...

 Medved had a caller who is a Social Studies teacher. He said a lot of schools are cutting Social Studies entirely, and focusing on math, literature and science in order to focus on standardized testing. This is insane. Kids need to learn their civic history. I know when I was a kid, I actually read my history books cover to cover!

 Yeah , I know. I'm a geek. Point is, though, a renewed sense of civics could fight a lot of the left wing bias in academia. We need to consider this with our next conservative administration...

Posted by: Crazee at March 21, 2011 09:11 PM (xsoRi)

50 Operation "Odyssey Dawn"... gee I sure hope not.  
We already have two odysseys past thousands of dawns. 
 
Definition of ODYSSEY 
1: a long wandering or voyage usually marked by many changes of fortune  
2: an intellectual or spiritual wandering or quest

Posted by: Huckleberry at March 21, 2011 09:16 PM (fqOyi)

51
So which country is going to commit gravel grinders to finish off Gaffafi?
I don't claim to be a military expert but doesn't war 101 mean you have to physically overrun the opponent to win?
Oh winning/victory, never mind.

 

Posted by: YIKES! at March 21, 2011 09:16 PM (buXmi)

52

#6, et al, who've been asking about the B2:

The B2 is stationed in Missouri, and flies to and attacks targets world wide, then returns to US Soil.  This is because there are a huge number of super-secret components inside the B2, including ones we don't even share with our allies.  We don't want anyone to know all the capabilities of the B2.

Also, basing them anywhere but in the US means that a nation can sequester them--deny the use of their airspace if they don't agree with the foreign policy decisions we've made--like France andSpain did the first time we bombed Libya.  If the B2 were based in a country that opted for this, we would be unable to use them.  (Especially given a CinC who wouldn't want to upset anyone.)

The B2's unique stealth abilities allows it to drop 2K pound JDAMs and other munitions that can be used against very specific targets--guided by GPS, with terminal guidance from the aircrew.  This allows the B2 to hit exactly what it is aiming at (Chinese Embassy.)  Further, because it is so stealthy, it can be used to strike at radar facilities and Surface to Air Missile sites and equipment with relative impunity--they can turn on their search/aquisition radars to try to find the B2--but will likely get a HARM anti-radar missile for their troubles.  The other option left is to shoot blind--which has a success rate about equal to playing Keno.

There still exists a threat from low-altitude AAA, the SA-7 and the DShK machine guns, but the B2 allows the other aircraft to fight almost with impunity from medium to high altitudes, since the enemy is either unable to hit them, or unwilling to power up its radars. 

Posted by: Billy Mitchell at March 21, 2011 09:23 PM (Ig+B0)

53 I'm not a military expert...my strategy is kill 'em all and knock their civilization back 200 years.Which in their case, would be Biblical times. Or earlier.

Posted by: Crazee at March 21, 2011 09:28 PM (xsoRi)

54 Operation Odyssey Dawn:  A misapplication of the authority limiting granted to the Executive via the War Powers Resolution to support a ginned-up internationally-recognized humanitarian crisis. 

We can save these African savages from themselves, but only if we kill the unreasonable ones.  Who are the unreasonable ones?  Um, the ones holding our allies' energy resources hostage.

57 days left and counting, Mr. President, - one for each state.

Posted by: Fritz at March 21, 2011 09:36 PM (/8mBu)

55 Let's do what we usually do; Catch him, take half his stuff, scold him, give him back his country. Look at our great work in Saudi Arabia. If we were in WWll that would be almost like selling weapons to Germany. Am i wrong in this comparison?

Posted by: humphreyrobot at March 21, 2011 09:36 PM (EiH7n)

56 Point is, though, a renewed sense of civics could fight a lot of the left wing bias in academia. We need to consider this with our next conservative administration...

Crazee, your heart's in the right place, but respectfully, I think what the next conservative administration needs to consider is getting the Feds out of educational matters. Note that it is the standardized testing that is creating the perverse incentives in the first place.

Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at March 21, 2011 09:38 PM (fjoLg)

57 I actually agree with you, I'm just not sure anyone will ever have the balls to do it. Conservatives always talk about eliminating or limiting federal departments, and it just never happens. I support it, but we have to think Plan B, Plan C, etc.

 Liberals play this short game/long game strategy well. If they can't change things now, they implement changes that help them down the road. If we can't eliminate the DoE, I think Plan B could be taking advantage of the institutional power we have to shape the curricula in a way that benefits us in terms of educating children. Whenever we can't do what we want, we always just give up and never try to shirt the agenda. Just a thought, though. I'm certainly no expert on this stuff, other than seeing how terrible our educational system is firsthand. I'm a pretty bright guy, I got a 34 on my ACT test. And I missed half my senior year of high school . Bright kids aren't getting the education they need in order to focus on the lesser kids...and even those kids aren't turning out well! It's sickening.

 This is all OT, though. We agree, so let's move back to the feckless one.

Posted by: Crazee at March 21, 2011 09:48 PM (xsoRi)

58 *shape, not shirt the agenda.

 Gah! That certainly makes my chances of being bright look  dim.

Posted by: Crazee at March 21, 2011 09:49 PM (xsoRi)

59 metric shitload of bombs

 
What's the conversion from Imperial fuckton for that?

Posted by: Dave at March 21, 2011 10:08 PM (gzJsG)

60 Crazee, it seems we are on the same page regarding goals, and my younger self would agree with your plan B. Experience has shown, however, that big-government conservatism is an oxymoron in practice as well as in theory. One person, one administration is never in charge long enough to stick to such a plan and see it through, and it only ends up as an own-goal in the end.

Education was none too good when I was in school, either. I did very well on the SAT, but no thanks to my schools. I had to educate myself, for the most part.

Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at March 21, 2011 10:09 PM (fjoLg)

61 http://tinyurl.com/t3uj

Ha, I should have checked 1st, 2 pages of Urban Dictionary.

Posted by: Dave at March 21, 2011 10:11 PM (gzJsG)

62 "What's the conversion from Imperial fuckton for that?" Long or short fuckton?

Posted by: George Orwell at March 21, 2011 10:13 PM (AZGON)

63

Sigh... I really wish folks would read the War Powers Act.

Yes, the President must inform Congress when he commits troops, but an earlier clause says WHEN he CAN commit troops...

Act of War, Specific authorization through legislation, OR if American Troops, or Territory is under imminent threat of attack... and THATS IT!

Now the President could send troops in to defend NATO, as there is specific legislation already in place allowing him to do so... as with other treaty partners...

But I sure don't see any of the above justifications for our involvment in Libya.

Posted by: Romeo13 at March 21, 2011 10:31 PM (NtXW4)

64 Jugears the jackass jugglin' a futball ... how I loathe this incompetent poseur.

Posted by: ya2daup at March 21, 2011 11:37 PM (hsLUJ)

65 The next thing you know, Preznint Splutnik will go full bore hacky sack on us to complete his transformation to most worthless president ever.

Posted by: ya2daup at March 21, 2011 11:39 PM (hsLUJ)

66 I suppose Shehag and Code Pink will be out protesting in full force.

Posted by: Case at March 21, 2011 11:49 PM (0K+Kw)

67 It's hilarious watching the usual lib stooges on Morning Joe morph into war hawks this morning on my TV screen. Andrea Mitchel in particular is just gushing over the Big O, with a gleam in her eye strongly suggestive that her Little Man is standing at full attention in his Boat. Need anyone wonder, "If this was Bush..."

Posted by: CoolCzech at March 22, 2011 02:34 AM (kUaEF)

68 Soccer Bracket, right. Its hardly a sport.

Posted by: sTevo at March 22, 2011 02:41 AM (q1Tbv)

69 The Telegraph reporting an F15 Strike Eagle has crashed in Libya.
One pilot rescued the other in the process of being rescued

Posted by: MarkC at March 22, 2011 02:45 AM (ros+1)

70 I haven't been this inspired since the night Geraldo opened "the vault".

He found a Coke bottle!

Posted by: dfbaskwill at March 22, 2011 03:35 AM (ndlFj)

71 They're not photoshopped, butt MOTUS has more of BO's talented toes at work here, along with some lunch losing pics of FLOTUS.

Posted by: deweyfromdetroit at March 22, 2011 06:55 AM (S3xh2)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
106kb generated in CPU 0.0817, elapsed 0.3179 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.2768 seconds, 199 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.