July 25, 2011
— Ace These documentaries expose the problems in education -- and the problems are mostly the teachers unions.
Waiting for Superman is a film by a liberal, who is forced to confront the fact that while he says he supports public education at dinner parties, nevertheless sends his kids to private schools, and would not even consider sending them to the hell-holes the public school system offers him.
It's a good film, with a strong emotional narrative. The film presents about eight kids who are all hoping to get out of the awful local schools they have been consigned to by literally winning "The Lottery" -- the lottery being the random-draw system set up to permit applicants to go to magnet schools and charter schools, the few functioning schools in the public school system.
But the teachers unions like to keep as few of those as possible, only grudgingly permitting a few to operate, to buy the public off as far as its demand for real, system-wide reform.
Thus, the teachers unions are sacrificing these children for the sake of blocking reform. The Lottery is just a sop to the public.
Waiting for Superman exposes this. You meet the kids, their parents (who really want a good education for their kids), and their dreams of just getting their name randomly pulled at the lottery.
The heartbreaking part is... well, most of the kids don't get picked in the lottery. So they're doomed.
Among the interesting tidbits in this film is something called "Dance of the Lemons." See, teachers can't be fired, pretty much, but each school can get rid of teachers who have caused scandals or who have become notorious for incompetence.
But all that happens is that all the schools nominate their "lemons" -- their bad teachers -- and pass them over to the next school, which itself passes its own lemons to the next, etc. Like the poker game "Pass the Trash."
The only thing a principle can do is hope the crap teachers he's getting rid of are slightly less bad than the crap teachers being sent to replace them.
I believe in this movie one reformer makes the statement that almost all the problems of bad teachers can be fixed, forever, by simply permitting the schools to fire their 6% most incompetent teachers.
But of course the unions won't permit that.
The Cartel is a similar documentary, but focusing on New Jersey, specifically. It's more of an overtly conservative tilting feature (which may be good or bad, depending on your politics) and doesn't have the emotional narrative arc that Waiting for Superman does. But also very good.
Finally, The Lottery. This one I didn't see, but it's about Harlem kids trying to win The Lottery again, this time, I think, for coveted preschool slots. It won all sorts of awards, and the opening line of the trailer is, "The problem is not the parents, the problem is not the students, the problem is a system that protects academic failure."
Now that I watch the trailer, I'm definitely going to watch this one.
All of these are available on Netfilx, and I think The Cartel and The Lottery are both available as streaming features. Or at least were.
I've wanted to mention these films for a long time. Thanks to joeindc44 for spurring me.
Below, a clip from Waiting for Superman -- "The Dance of the Lemons" sequence.
Remember, this is all for the children.
Posted by: Ace at
10:56 AM
| Comments (159)
Post contains 594 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: phoenixgirl at July 25, 2011 11:00 AM (eOXTH)
Tarnation is an autobiographical documentary focusing on Caouette's early life and adulthood, as well as his mother, Renee LeBlanc, who was treated with electroshock in her youth. She did not need this electroshock therapy, which resulted in lifelong insanity.
The documentarian put together the film using old photos, Super 8 footage, answering machine messages, etc for $220 on his iMac and it went on to get entered in Sundance and make over a million dollars.
Very interesting story.
Posted by: it's vintage, duh at July 25, 2011 11:00 AM (zbkeA)
MAD HOT BALLROOM
Great little documentary about kids in school and, get this, ballroom dancing. They're so cute. Highly recommend.
Posted by: soothsayer at July 25, 2011 11:01 AM (sqkOB)
I'll give Guggenheim credit, he did not pull punches either with making Waiting for Superman or during the press junket promoting it. I saw some of his interviews and he was adamant that the problem is the system and that the system is ruining lives. It was kind of fascinating to watch the MFM reaction to this since it's not like they could Breitbart him (hi Andrew!) what with Guggenheim actually being the one to win the Oscar for An Inconvenient Truth. What were they going to say, oh you can't trust him, he politicizes his documentaries?
Posted by: alexthechick at July 25, 2011 11:02 AM (VtjlW)
I've seen "Waiting for Superman" and I was shocked and saddened. I cried at the end. Of course, it was 1:30 in the morning and I had just finished my bottle of val-u-rite vodka. The little girl in LA wanting to get into that Science Charter School broke my heart. This documentary spurred me into action and I'm going back to college to finally finish my degree, although it is now changed to teaching.
If this is what my son is going to face, then I want to become a teacher to try and change the system for him.
Posted by: Agent P at July 25, 2011 11:04 AM (fPmeR)
Posted by: darkroom monitor at July 25, 2011 11:05 AM (0AkWH)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at July 25, 2011 11:05 AM (eOXTH)
Posted by: Agent P at July 25, 2011 11:06 AM (fPmeR)
Posted by: robtr 80'sbaby Liberation Front at July 25, 2011 11:06 AM (MtwBb)
haha so if you are a teacher and they keep transferring you......you are a LEMON...
just like a pedo-priest
Posted by: soothsayer at July 25, 2011 11:07 AM (sqkOB)
Posted by: Bob Saget at July 25, 2011 11:07 AM (F/4zf)
Posted by: nerdygirl at July 25, 2011 11:08 AM (/+j6L)
Posted by: Bob Saget at July 25, 2011 11:08 AM (F/4zf)
Posted by: ace at July 25, 2011 11:09 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: ATL Publik Skool Teechir Hack at July 25, 2011 11:10 AM (pLTLS)
Michelle Rhee, who is featured prominently in "Waiting for Superman" as some sort of education "hero" is married to Kevin Johnson, and was responsible for the damage control for him in the sex scandal that brought down the IG Walpin.
As with everything to do with liberals who seem like they are trying to "do good" what you really need to do is follow the money. She may come off as some sort of wonder woman for education but in reality it is all about the money--all the money she and her husband and their friends make off charter schools, which are for profit organizations that stand to rake in huge money.
I could go on and on (and on and on) about the state of "education reform" in this country now being spurred on by films like "Waiting for Superman" but I won't. Suffice it to say, they've painted teacher's unions as the big evil--which can be the case for sure--but there is a whole lot more to reforming public school education then throwing out bad teachers.
Look, basically I think about 10 years from now people are going to look back at "Waiting for Superman" as the "Inconvenient Truth" documentary of education reform.
Posted by: ParanoidWorkingGirlinSeattle at July 25, 2011 11:10 AM (RZ8pf)
And the movie was awesome!
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at July 25, 2011 11:11 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: nerdygirl at July 25, 2011 11:11 AM (/+j6L)
Posted by: pickles at July 25, 2011 11:12 AM (3cVE6)
look, if you're walking in a beautiful, well-kept, pretty suburb, and you walk by their public school, and it's a gang-infested hell-hole with metal detectors and graffiti and the whole nine yards, that is a failing school. but if you pass that exact same school, only this time you do so as you're walking in a dysfunctional, crime-ridden ghetto, it is not a failing school - in fact, it is succeeding quite aptly at representing its neighborhood. the problem isn't with the school, it's with the neighborhood. in fact, it would be far more unusual for the school to be clean and well-kept and be the one such building for blocks and blocks around.
i hate the teacher's unions, i do think they are making a bad situation even worse, and i would love for there to be a nice free-market quick fix to this, but it's a deeper cultural problem that will never get fixed unless the black and hispanic communities get their act together.
unfortunately i have to hurry off now so i can't stick around to argue much, but my two cents anyway.
Posted by: Adrian at July 25, 2011 11:12 AM (PY4xx)
And don't get me started on Bill Gates and his stupid Gates Foundation education reforms. I mean, I owe the man a lot, since I have a nice life because of his little software company, but he really needs to shut up already about education reform before he does in yet another several years of public school students.
His first efforts at reform failed spectacularly and the kids he and his foundation experimented on did not get the education they deserved, in some cases, like Manual High School in Denver, a lot of the students didn't even finish high school thanks to his "reforms."
Posted by: ParanoidWorkingGirlinSeattle at July 25, 2011 11:12 AM (RZ8pf)
But given all that members of my family have been through, my teacher sister in law still can't manage to stop her whining about how awful it is that the gov. of Mich. is trying to make it easier to get rid of substandard teachers, and make teachers pay 20% of their insurance premiums.
Posted by: nerdygirl at July 25, 2011 03:08 PM (/+j6L)
I'd be tempted to say, "with all your complaining about this it sounds like you think you are a substandard teacher"
Posted by: buzzion at July 25, 2011 11:13 AM (oVQFe)
Posted by: JohnW at July 25, 2011 11:13 AM (E1xLz)
Posted by: nerdygirl at July 25, 2011 11:13 AM (/+j6L)
Wrong way to go. Become something that makes more money, and send him to private school. Or find some way to home school.
If we really want to see real, substantive reforms in public schools, we have to take away their monopoly no matter the cost to us. They get paid based on attendance. Therefore, starve them of students.
Did you know, at least in Texas, you can "home school" up to 4 kids who aren't yours without any kind of licensing requirements? (I think it's up to 4- anyway, it's not many.) Now- you can even receive compensation from their parents. Getting certified as a private school isn't even that hard, as I understand it, so if you got enough parents together who would each teach one thing, you could have a pretty decent little school going on, and rescue however many kids from the doldrums of public school.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 25, 2011 11:14 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at July 25, 2011 11:14 AM (SB0V2)
Posted by: DarkFlounder at July 25, 2011 11:15 AM (P9cWA)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at July 25, 2011 11:16 AM (SB0V2)
Posted by: Adrian at July 25, 2011 11:16 AM (PY4xx)
I believe it was in Detroit from a few years ago.
Who was this? Gah - I can't remember!
Posted by: laceyunderalls at July 25, 2011 11:16 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: nerdygirl at July 25, 2011 03:11 PM (/+j6L)
Just a tip: You see her in the room, you have two choices. 1). Leave the room, or 2) Don't talk to her.
Posted by: Soona at July 25, 2011 11:17 AM (Bbn7l)
Posted by: nerdygirl at July 25, 2011 11:17 AM (/+j6L)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at July 25, 2011 11:17 AM (eOXTH)
Just a tip: You see her in the room, you have two choices. 1). Leave the room, or 2) Don't talk to her.
Posted by: Soona at July 25, 2011 03:17 PM (Bbn7l)
3) Beat her with a NERF bat until she gives in.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 25, 2011 11:18 AM (8y9MW)
Obama's credibility terminal.
Telegraph
Libya: Britain admits Col Gaddafi could stay on
Al Jazeera
US Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman acknowledged that NATO is in a "stalemate" in Libya campaign
Posted by: weft cut-loop at July 25, 2011 11:18 AM (DEcmU)
Thanks to the 52% for another liberal triumph.
Posted by: Hrothgar at July 25, 2011 11:19 AM (yrGif)
Yes, teachers unions are one component of the "failure" of public school education, but even if you broke them you'd still have all the other damn problems that exist in public schools today--large class sizes of kids for whom English is not the first language, mainstreaming students with developmental disabilities, the inability to remove severely troubled students from the classroom, parents who don't give a damn, etc.
Charter schools are not the one and only answer to the problem. They have a whole host of problems of their own.
Gaaaaaa, education reform discussions drive me absolutely nuts.
Posted by: ParanoidWorkingGirlinSeattle at July 25, 2011 11:19 AM (RZ8pf)
I can't remember his name but I think we had a post on it here. Maybe search AOS archives?
Posted by: Retread at July 25, 2011 11:19 AM (G+7cD)
They didn't seek to fire teachers; but ALL - all of them - left rather than teach in a charter school.
Regardless, the prison-like schools all turned around. No more police in the halls. Teachers keeping control. All kinds of good stuff.
IT IS THE UNION
Posted by: BlackOrchid at July 25, 2011 03:16 PM (SB0V2)
Well, I hope you're right, and I hope it lasts! Don't forget that the amazing turnaround engineered by Jaime Escalante lasted maybe ten years before the community took it back and ruined the school all over again.
Posted by: Adrian at July 25, 2011 11:20 AM (PY4xx)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at July 25, 2011 11:21 AM (SB0V2)
But the real problem isn't that people do not know what the problem with the public school system is. The problem is that they appear to be powerless to stop it. In the few instances where people have got their ass in the air and voted in some changes and reform, the damn liberal courts step in and undo it.
I have come to the conclusion that there is really only one way to fix this problem. That is to totally eliminate publicly financed education in this country. That will require tow major things and a lot of minor things:
Major: Eliminate the federal Dept of Education and all associated rules and regulations. And then Revise State constitutions that provide for a "free" K-12 education and publicly funded universities.
The eliminate all of the same, allowing those with the gumption to convert to private schools. Smart kids who had high academic standards could get funding for education through charities.
Children who could not get funding to go to academic schools or who were not suited for academic schools would be apprenticed into programs provided by business to train workers.
Posted by: Vic at July 25, 2011 11:21 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at July 25, 2011 11:21 AM (s222a)
If I could afford to stay home and home school my boy, I would in a nanosecond.
On Saturday, we were at the pool and my son started playing with another child and the mom and I started talking. She asked how old my son is and I said, "Five, starting Kindergarten in 6 weeks." She asked "Oh really, full day or half day?" I replied, "Full day at a private school." Her response, she curled her lip up and replied, "Oh really, and you think this is better than a public school? You better check their credentials."
I smiled (nicely) and said, "I hate the Clark County School District." Half day Kindergarten isn't even truly have days, it's 2 1/2 hours. It will take the teacher, 15-30 minutes to calm down 30 5 year olds. The school he is zoned for offered full day kindergarten for the previous 3 years, now they don't. If I want to put him in PUBLIC full day kindergarten at another school, the TWELVE Schools closest to us have waiting lists and I still have to pay $350 - $450 a month for PUBLIC school. So Private school Kindergarten it is.
Her reply to me was "I'm a Half Day Kindergarten teacher."
We didn't really talk much the rest of the afternoon at the pool, but our kids played.
Posted by: Agent P at July 25, 2011 11:22 AM (fPmeR)
True, but without it, nothing else really matters. If you aren't willing to tackle the most obvious problems, what are the chances that you'll really change things?
Posted by: pep at July 25, 2011 11:22 AM (GMG6W)
Posted by: nerdygirl at July 25, 2011 11:22 AM (/+j6L)
Waiting for Superman is available on Amazon instant video.
Posted by: Vic at July 25, 2011 11:23 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Alabaster Jones at July 25, 2011 11:23 AM (cNFJa)
Yes, teachers unions are one component of the "failure" of public school education, but even if you broke them you'd still have all the other damn problems that exist in public schools today--large class sizes
I don't know what reforms Gates did, you would know better than I but I did here him say one thing that was interesting.
In 1960 we had 40 adults per 1,000 students in schools accross the US. In 2010 we had 125 adults per 1,000 students. Test scores and graduation rates remained flat.
If we have class sizes that are to big what are the extra 85 adults per 1,000 adults doing?
Posted by: robtr 80'sbaby Liberation Front at July 25, 2011 11:24 AM (MtwBb)
I understand that there are folks who are trapped in a failing school district. But, these same folks still have access to a public library, if they choose.
Personally, I researched the schools and moved to an area that had an excellent public school. I could pay less in rent somewhere else (my rent is too damn high!), but that would mean putting the boy in a poorer performing school.
A poorer performing school within the same school district, btw. Is it not PC to point out that lower income families are the ones that traditionally populate poor performing public schools? Why would two schools in the same ISD, subject to the same policies, show such a disparity in performance?
My point, and yes I do have one, is that parents must be involved. You have help the kids with the homework, make sure they understand the concepts, supply additional information as needed and, yes, work to counteract the indoctrination. Correct their thinking so that they understand both sides of an issue and not just the side presented by the teacher.
Yeah, it's hard work and yeah, it's a pain in the ass, but that's what you gotta do. And it doesn't hurt to join the PTA or, if you're so inclined, run for the school board.
The system, the teacher's unions, or being poor is no excuse. They may be reasons, but ultimately your child's success or failure rests solely on your shoulders.
Posted by: mpurinTexas supports Rick Perry, bitch at July 25, 2011 11:24 AM (ignDe)
Posted by: Eric at July 25, 2011 11:25 AM (3f3uN)
Oh pickles. I'd love to see you say that about...say...inner city blacks.
Posted by: Jason at July 25, 2011 11:26 AM (L+onn)
The media will certainly do special reports on this, right? After all, they reported heavily when the Catholic Church was doing the same practice with bad priests
Posted by: The Flying Pigs at July 25, 2011 11:26 AM (so1xa)
I've never found anyone so down on Private (or home school) education as public teachers. There's always "Check their credentials" or "You can't do it on your own..."
And I think, "Really? In elementary school, I just read the book and learned what I was expected to learn. Certainly if I were teaching my kids, I could at least read the book along with them..."
Now, I know there are parents who take their kids out of school to avoid actually dealing with their education, but they are- by far- the minority.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 25, 2011 11:27 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at July 25, 2011 11:27 AM (yQWNf)
The system, the teacher's unions, or being poor is no excuse. They may be reasons, but ultimately your child's success or failure rests solely on your shoulders.
Exactly! I will be poor as a mofo the next 10 months paying for private school, since it is $200 more a month than the preschool I'm paying for right now, but his success is worth everything to me.
Posted by: Agent P at July 25, 2011 11:28 AM (fPmeR)
Posted by: nerdygirl at July 25, 2011 11:28 AM (/+j6L)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at July 25, 2011 11:28 AM (SB0V2)
khanacademy.org
We need to fix attitudes in order to fix the education problem. Getting rid of the department of education would probably be a good start. Push responsibility back to the states, even possibly as far as the local governments. I'm tired of the kid at McDonalds being puzzled how I can give them the correct amount of money before they total the register.
Programs like no child left behind make things worse. Time to learn in spite of the poor state of public schools.
Posted by: MrTea at July 25, 2011 11:28 AM (XWMLc)
Posted by: joeindc44 at July 25, 2011 11:29 AM (QxSug)
I love a profession that can blame its problems on those who use it. Would be great for mechanics to demand that customers change their oil regularly by themselves, wash the car before bringing it to the shop, and even carry the transmission into the shop from the parts department for them.
Posted by: kbdabear at July 25, 2011 11:30 AM (so1xa)
Posted by: pickles at July 25, 2011 11:30 AM (3cVE6)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at July 25, 2011 11:30 AM (SB0V2)
Posted by: ace at July 25, 2011 11:31 AM (nj1bB)
I am amazed that he is even willing to admit to his hypocrisy, since according to liberals, hypocrisy is the only real sin one can commit.
Follow the money. Seriously. This frustrates me so much because why, when conservatives usually view things with an appropriate level of skepticism, are conservatives willing to jump on this particular bandwagon of education reform? I know it seems easy and convenient to blame the unions, and there are charter schools who are doing amazing things for sure, but are any social problems really this simple when it comes to fixing them?
Posted by: ParanoidWorkingGirlinSeattle at July 25, 2011 11:31 AM (RZ8pf)
Posted by: nerdygirl at July 25, 2011 11:32 AM (/+j6L)
It does, but the same society that pushed kids into mandatory public schooling (did you know that Texas considered home schooling illegal until the mid 80's?) pushed those kids' parents into being "two income families." So, now, parents have a hard time even seeing their kids before bed-time, let alone helping them with school work.
Now, personally, I think "suck-it-up, buttercup," and my wife and I plan to home school our kids. But there are plenty of people out there who have been convinced they have to live this lifestyle that basically means they outsource the rearing of their children to the public schools. And Public School teachers were a core part of that. Or, at least, their unions were.
It's a multi-layered problem with no single fix- yes, parents need to take more responsibility. Yes, schools need to be able to fire bad teachers more easily. Yes, there needs to be more competition between private and public schools. It's a freaking elephant to be eaten- and we have to pick which bite to take first.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 25, 2011 11:32 AM (8y9MW)
robtr, the number of adults per student change, I would suggest you look to administration from the district to the state to the federal government.
Also, Bill Gates sends his kids to a private school with small class size, if he really wants us to accept class sizes of 50 students to one teacher I have one thing to say to him--his kids go first.
Posted by: ParanoidWorkingGirlinSeattle at July 25, 2011 11:33 AM (RZ8pf)
It's like in chess. Horsey guys and pointy guys are more important than pawns, so sometimes pawns get sacrificed. But the king is the only piece that really matters.
Posted by: FireHorse at July 25, 2011 11:33 AM (gTGz3)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at July 25, 2011 11:34 AM (s222a)
http://tinyurl.com/y8paxw7
I'd forgotten how bad it was.
Posted by: Retread at July 25, 2011 11:35 AM (G+7cD)
No, it's the customers fault for not knowing how to properly appreciate the exquisite examples of fine engineering and skilled labor we produced
Posted by: GM & Chrysler, not our fault either at July 25, 2011 11:35 AM (so1xa)
Posted by: Soona at July 25, 2011 11:35 AM (Bbn7l)
Dang it, 78's in the wrong thread.
Anyway, I've long thought the holy grail to be the removal of standardized tests.
Posted by: FireHorse at July 25, 2011 11:35 AM (gTGz3)
For too long have we allowed moron students to donate billions of dollars to political candidates.
Moron students and their powerful unions must be stopped.
Posted by: weft cut-loop at July 25, 2011 11:36 AM (DEcmU)
Posted by: pickles at July 25, 2011 11:36 AM (3cVE6)
If I had my way, the only way to get a Teacher's Certification would be to have a Bachelor's Degree in something real. No more "Education" degrees, no more "Women's Studies" or "African-American Studies" or whatever.
Degree in: English, History, Math (or derivations), or Science (or derivations). THEN you can go get your teacher's certification. And you can re-certify every 10 years. I'd prefer every 2, but that ain't gonna happen...
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 25, 2011 11:37 AM (8y9MW)
"You know why we almost went under? It wasn't our cars, they were fantastic and built by highly trained and motivated union labor."
You mean the same highly motivated union labor that goes to a local park and smokes a joint or enjoys a few beers on his lunch break.
Whatever takes the edge off, right?
Posted by: Agent P at July 25, 2011 11:37 AM (fPmeR)
Posted by: nerdygirl at July 25, 2011 11:37 AM (/+j6L)
Posted by: joeindc44 at July 25, 2011 11:38 AM (QxSug)
But, if I refuse to change my oil regularly or take care of routine maintenance (either do it myself or pay someone to do it), is it right for me to blame the mechanic when he tells me that the engine is blown?
Posted by: mpurinTexas supports Rick Perry, bitch at July 25, 2011 11:38 AM (ignDe)
DC has only had two semi-decent mayors in the past half-century: Tony Williams and Adrian Fenty. And coincidentally neither is viewed very warmly by the black community in DC.
Posted by: Jeff B. at July 25, 2011 11:38 AM (hIWe1)
Wait. Let me see if I understand this.
If a teacher can't teach, we should not hold them accountable for failing in their duty as educators. Is that right?
Posted by: soothsayer at July 25, 2011 11:38 AM (sqkOB)
Or are some kids born with an illiterate gene that makes it impossible to learn how to read and write, therefore not the fault of the teacher who fails in the task of teaching?
Posted by: soothsayer at July 25, 2011 11:40 AM (sqkOB)
All this, to make the slower or indifferent students catch up and close the fucking *achievement gap* that can never be closed. You all realize that most our tax money is about just that, right? closing the gap and making the Bell Curve into a straight line?
Posted by: jeanne at July 25, 2011 11:40 AM (GdalM)
Posted by: Jeff B. at July 25, 2011 11:41 AM (hIWe1)
Bullshit. Charter =/= a for-profit organization.
My two oldest are in a math and science charter high school in Atlanta's northern 'burbs. Our school has a lottery, no entrance requirements, and provides amazing opportunities to kids willing to work hard. My oldest took AP Calculus BC as a high school freshman, interned on campus at Georgia Tech as a junior, and is taking classes from Stanford as a high school senior. At his school, that's no big deal. The local public schools are good, but they aren't providing that.
Our school gets help through public, private, and corporate partnerships. We have a brand-new, beyond state-of-the-art building; every kid gets a laptop. There is no social promotion. Kids can and do flunk out, despite plenty of extra help and tutoring. You cheat, you're gone. For some reason, competence and ethics are strong selling points to corporate sponsors. And in Atlanta, that's not so easy to find.
Nobody's skimming at our school - the local paper wouldn't allow it. They've been trying to get us shut down. They've published articles claiming that we were requiring entrance exams. We weren't. They've complained that we don't have special ed students. At a high-level math and science school. They complained about a lack of diversity. Whites are actually underrepresented.
Why would they do that? Because it isn't fair that the kids who can use it best, because of their ethics, hard work, and intelligence, should have good equipment. Sometimes it shows, like when my son's online health and PE teacher (working for the county, NOT the school) bitched at his class for having too many opportunities.
After all, fairness and social justice means the only kids who should be denied opportunities are the ones who could actually benefit from them.
Posted by: VKI at July 25, 2011 11:41 AM (TKoA3)
Posted by: pickles at July 25, 2011 11:42 AM (3cVE6)
Posted by: joeindc44 at July 25, 2011 11:42 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: nerdygirl at July 25, 2011 11:43 AM (/+j6L)
The Bell Curve, eh? (That's a red flag if ever there was one.) So what you're really trying to say here, slightly disguised, is that black people are just stupider on average than other racial groups? I see.
Posted by: Jeff B. at July 25, 2011 11:44 AM (hIWe1)
Posted by: mpurinTexas supports Rick Perry, bitch at July 25, 2011 03:38 PM
The point I was making is that teachers complain that parents won't do 50 percent of their job for them. It strikes me that the oh so hardworking so important teachers who ought to make what CEOs make bitch because they might have to do more than take attendance and read a lesson plan from a textbook.
A lot of us in other professions are handed shit and we're expected to at least make every attempt to work on it.
I'm sorry, but the whole Wisconsin fiasco soured me completely on unionized teachers. They showed their true colors last spring.
Posted by: GM & Chrysler, not our fault either at July 25, 2011 11:44 AM (so1xa)
Posted by: pickles at July 25, 2011 11:46 AM (3cVE6)
That's the problem with people who belong to unions. My sister in law is a very good teacher, but like many of them, she defends a union that protects the bad ones and I can't figure out why.
I know several people who teach. In most schools there are great teachers who do all kinds of extra work for their students. There are other teachers who beat the kids out the door at dismissal and do no more than absolutely necessary. The bare minimum teachers get the same pay as the ones who work hard. And the entire unionized group endorses this.
Posted by: nerdygirl at July 25, 2011 03:37 PM (/+j6L)
Yes but I'm in favor of being a shit-stirrer. Hell if you said that to her, she'd probably get all pissy and upset at you accusing her of being such a bad teacher. And you could probably dig more asking why she's so upset about it since she's spending so much time trying to defend them, it shouldn't be so insulting to her, and they are apparently just as good as her.
Posted by: buzzion at July 25, 2011 11:46 AM (oVQFe)
Posted by: nerdygirl at July 25, 2011 03:43 PM (/+j6L)
I see what you did there.
Posted by: Soona at July 25, 2011 11:47 AM (Bbn7l)
Bullshit. Charter =/= a for-profit organization
It is not bullshit. Do some reading on Kevin Johnson. Do some reading on the fraud cases in Colorado in their charter schools. It sounds like your children are going to a great charter school, good for them but that isn't always the case.
Just like it isn't always the case that every public school is a pit of despair where kids don't learn, teachers are incompetent, etc.
Posted by: ParanoidWorkingGirlinSeattle at July 25, 2011 11:48 AM (RZ8pf)
lol. What's the teacher supposed to do if the kid makes no effort to learn?
Graduate the student to the next grade, of course!
Posted by: soothsayer at July 25, 2011 11:48 AM (sqkOB)
You do know that, once upon a time, we didn't care that little Johnny had ADHD, we still expected him to (at least) sit down and shut up while the teacher was talking, right? And not to be selling drugs or getting into fights?
As long as Public Schools (and, worse, Teachers Unions) are a protected state-run monopoly, schools will be bad. There may, as you suggest, be kids who really have trouble through no fault of their own (I'm not convinced, but we'll set that aside for now). But how do you know the difference between them and those gaming the system if parents don't have a real choice to take their kids out of a school where they're failing and put them in some other school? I bet, in a few years, you'd have schools that specifically cater to ADHD kids, and other schools that specifically cater to Autistic kids (there are actually some of those already), and yet others that specifically cater to thugs (other than military schools...).
The point is that, right now, we can't do that. And the key to breaking public schools' monopoly is to break the teachers' unions.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 25, 2011 11:49 AM (8y9MW)
A lot of us in other professions are handed shit and we're expected to at least make every attempt to work on it.
I'm sorry, but the whole Wisconsin fiasco soured me completely on unionized teachers. They showed their true colors last spring.
Ok, I can see that. But my point was that we have a whole slew of parents, for whatever reason, who drop their kids off at school and that's the extent of their involvement in their kid's education. Then, when little Johnny can't read, they weep and wail and blame the teachers.
Posted by: mpurinTexas supports Rick Perry, bitch at July 25, 2011 11:50 AM (ignDe)
Just answer this question: How do students end up in the 10th grade with no ability to read and write at an acceptable level? How does that happen?
Who is responsible for graduating students, the parents, the students, or the teachers?
Posted by: soothsayer at July 25, 2011 11:50 AM (sqkOB)
robtr, the number of adults per student change, I would suggest you look to administration from the district to the state to the federal government.
Also, Bill Gates sends his kids to a private school with small class size, if he really wants us to accept class sizes of 50 students to one teacher I have one thing to say to him--his kids go first.
Posted by: ParanoidWorkingGirlinSeattle at July 25, 2011 03:33 PM (RZ8pf)
He wasn't saying that large class sizes were good. He was saying that with the number of people schools employ right now you could take 25 adults for administration and maintenance and still have enough adults left over for class sizes of 10 students per teacher.
I don't know if its a Union work rules problem, a school board indifference problem, and administration problem or a combination of all three.
I do know it's not a manpower problem.
Posted by: robtr 80'sbaby Liberation Front at July 25, 2011 11:51 AM (MtwBb)
Posted by: pickles at July 25, 2011 03:46 PM (3cVE6)
Simple. Fail them. That's what they used to do when I was going to school. Some students were held back three or four times before they got the idea that failing meant, well, exactly that: Fail.
Posted by: Soona at July 25, 2011 11:51 AM (Bbn7l)
Bullshit. It's the union's fault that little Johnny has ADHD. Posted by: pickles at July 25, 2011 03:42 PM
There's another crock of shit pulled out of thin air by "experts". ADHD was invented because kids no longer burned off energy with outdoor recess time. So little Johnny gets fidgety and the underpaid, underappreciated teacher has to take a minute from reading her lesson plan to order Johnny to the nurse so he can get doped up with Ritalin
Every profession has its problems, it's time for those in the education field to suck it up or find another line of work
Posted by: kbdabear at July 25, 2011 11:51 AM (so1xa)
But now we've had many decades of middle class black kids going to school alongside middle class white kids -- and yet the achievement gap remains. And the schools are generally run by white liberals who desperately want blacks to succeed, so they can't really blame racist teachers.
So now the liberals are turning on their own and saying it's the teachers unions and that bad bottom 5% of teachers ruining everything. Perhaps.
I think the simpler explanation is more likely. That the well-documented racial/ethnic differences in avg IQ are what produce the achievement gap. Which is why poor Chinese kids, on average, do well in American schools despite growing up in poverty and often enduring racist treatment from the other kids.
These IQ differences are one reason I now support explicit quotas in Affirmative Action programs. Right now we pretend everybody is equal, but demand ethnic balance that mirrors the population. And the way that is achieved in things like firefighter jobs, is by dumbing down the test so enough blacks can pass. Problem is then too many whites then pass and they get selected at random. So you don't get the best of the whites and asians.
Explicit quotas mean you could get the best whites among the candidates, and the best blacks, and the best asians, etc, etc.
It sucks to do this. But if all groups aren't equal I think it's the least bad solution. Right now we pretend all groups are equal, try not to think about the decades of test score differences, and dumb down the test.
(There is increasing pressure to dumb down the bar now because so few black law school graduates are passing it.)
You can just select the objective best. And that would be my ideal. But I no longer believe that is possible in America, especially for govt jobs, since it leads to racial imbalance due to racial/ethnic trait differences. You get the NBA (overwhelmingly black) or CalTech (ultra asian and white).
Especially as the lower achieving groups (blacks and hispanics) grow in political power and #s, they will demand favorable treatment. Explicit quotas at least would allow us to select the best from each group.
It's an ugly solution to an ugly fact about the world -- there seem to be persistent avg IQ differences between racial/ethnic groups. Just as there are avg height differences and a myriad other traits.
We can either pretend these facts aren't true. Or we can try to craft a society that functions as well and as peaceful as possible given the harsh realities of the world we live in.
I look at Waiting for Superman as an example of epicycles. We are looking for ever more elaborate theories to explain away data we find too uncomfortable to face directly.
Posted by: Clubber Lang at July 25, 2011 11:51 AM (QcFbt)
Posted by: ParanoidWorkingGirlinSeattle at July 25, 2011 11:56 AM (RZ8pf)
Call it what you want, JeffB., and be all high and mighty and self-righteous about it, but how much you wanna bet that if you took the worst failing public school, left it exactly the same as it was, with all its crappy teachers and idiotic administrators, but simply magically switched out the student body overnight with the poor Jewish kids from the neighborhood I grew up in, who by the way came from immigrant families who dealt with far greater evils in their lives than any American blacks, the kids would do just fine and, in fact, excel? But please, keep living in your morally superior world, it'll help you sleep better. After all, just look at those terrific, high quality charter schools Asians in this country have been going to for decades and decades. oh, woops.
Posted by: Adrian at July 25, 2011 11:56 AM (PY4xx)
The thing I liked the most about "The Cartel" was how they gave the best pro-voucher argument that I have ever heard and showed that it would be good for the public schools as well by reducing class room sizes and forcing them to compete.
One thing that the Cartel did not bring up and I don't know about the other films either is the fact that you can't get rid of bad students anymore. They mentioned that good students are afraid to go to school because of violence, but they didn't point out that we give these assholes 35 second chances and still can't expel them. No child left behind equals every child left behind.
Posted by: Lemmiwinks at July 25, 2011 11:57 AM (54F2e)
Posted by: Mandy P. at July 25, 2011 11:58 AM (vGmv/)
At a top school like Univ. of Virginia, an asian kid has to score about a 1500 SAT to get the same odds of admittance as a black candidate who gets 1100. White kid has to get about 1400.
The universities try and hide all this data, but occasionally some Freedom of Information Act lawsuits get the data out.
A big problem is any written test shows racial/ethnic differences. The average black high school graduate reads about the 8th grade level. Just imagine a group of whites competing for the same job, one reads at the 12th grade level and one reads at the 8th grade level. Of course the better readers are going to be the preferred candidates.
But disparate outcome lawsuits mean that outcome is illegal if the two groups have different skin colors.
Posted by: Clubber Lang at July 25, 2011 11:59 AM (QcFbt)
Posted by: ParanoidWorkingGirlinSeattle at July 25, 2011 03:56 PM (RZ8pf)
No he was just pointing out that the number of employees per 1,000 students over the years has increased by a factor of 3 and test scores, graduation rates and school safety has either remained flat or gotten worse.
Posted by: robtr 80'sbaby Liberation Front at July 25, 2011 12:00 PM (MtwBb)
Thanks Ace....Thise type of nonsense has been on my mind alot, lately....I'm not quite sure why, but I think it has to do with the question, why would any educated citizen vote for an Obama presidency?
The answer of course is, we're running short of educated citizens. and THIS is by deliberate design.
Posted by: Dathi at July 25, 2011 12:00 PM (d0HfP)
So after exalting single motherhood, career first feminism, destruction of traditional family units, the welfare state, drug usage, self-indulgence, destruction of discipline, and the veneration of pop culture, they're upset that they have to deal with the actual consequences of their leftist religion
There's the bed, hop in
Posted by: kbdabear at July 25, 2011 12:02 PM (so1xa)
Posted by: Mandy P. at July 25, 2011 03:58 PM (vGmv/)
Well Mandy, I don't think anyone here is actually thinking that if we could just break the teacher's unions backs we would be pumping out schools of Einsteins.
Posted by: buzzion at July 25, 2011 12:04 PM (oVQFe)
You're better off reading Steve Sailor, if you want insightful, fact-based analysis, than wasting time on the above films.
Of course, if you want pablum oriented at finding "solutions" to impossible-to-solve "problems" in order to preserve the center-right's eternal optimism regarding America's future, then these documentaries will be right up your alley.
Posted by: Links at July 25, 2011 12:05 PM (cEdZt)
Posted by: Mandy P. at July 25, 2011 03:58 PM (vGmv/)
Well Mandy, I don't think anyone here is actually thinking that if we could just break the teacher's unions backs we would be pumping out schools of Einsteins.
Posted by: buzzion at July 25, 2011 04:04 PM (oVQFe)
I could care less about breaking up the teacher's union, but they are the one's that have stopped the implementation of a real voucher program. The voucher program should make schools more competitive...even the public schools.
Posted by: Lemmiwinks at July 25, 2011 12:09 PM (54F2e)
Posted by: Mandy P. at July 25, 2011 12:10 PM (vGmv/)
Posted by: joeindc44 at July 25, 2011 12:14 PM (QxSug)
Posted by: joeindc44 at July 25, 2011 12:18 PM (QxSug)
Posted by: Clubber Lang at July 25, 2011 12:18 PM (QcFbt)
The one factor that is continually overlooked is that teachers need the talent to teach.
No amount of education, certification, seminars, experience or anything else can replace a person who has the basic talent of being able to convey ideas and concepts to another.
YouÂ’ve either got it or you donÂ’t.
Posted by: jwest at July 25, 2011 12:20 PM (qeYI9)
Yeah there are some kids that refuse to learn but one thing critics never seem to tackle is the simple fact that teachers simply CAN NOT BE FIRED, even for sexually related offenses. This is the part critics ignore; there are really, really bad teachers who are so protected by the union contracts they can get away with anything.
Blame students all you want for public shool's failures but do not forget that there are definitely problems related to the unions.
Posted by: Ben (the original) at July 25, 2011 12:23 PM (pM0o+)
Posted by: Mandy P. at July 25, 2011 12:25 PM (vGmv/)
Posted by: Alabaster Jones at July 25, 2011 12:32 PM (cNFJa)
Posted by: cathy at July 25, 2011 12:39 PM (uzF6Z)
As if unions haven't destroyed enough in this country by chasing out entire manufacturing sectors (and then they blame "fat cats" for "shipping jobs overseas!") they are destroying our future by undereducating the vast majority of this country's children, especially compared with other countries. Unions are fucking EVIL.
Posted by: Beth at July 25, 2011 12:52 PM (5NfIh)
Links is not right.
His thinking seems to be: there's an achievement gap between the races, so therefore there are no problems with education and let's not fix our broken school systems. I don't get that.
Look at what happened in Wisconsin. The school system has been taken over by leftism. (It's even reached higher education, which is graduating huge numbers of committed leftists with no useful skills.)
There are serious problems which cannot be blamed on underachieving minorities, as Links would do, like the fact that bad teachers cannot be fired, and parents have little choice in where their kids go to school. Don't tell us to ignore those just because Links thinks we aren't aware enough of the problems in the black community.
Posted by: sandy burger at July 25, 2011 01:07 PM (XyoGP)
Yeah, pretty much.
But they can be useful in mafia states like, say, Cambodia, where the only way to stand up to the mafia is with another mafia.
Posted by: sandy burger at July 25, 2011 01:11 PM (XyoGP)
I used to teach at the college level, mostly freshmen. I experienced how the students' ability to write simple paragraphs worsened, year by year--and listened to their stories (amusing, in a horrible way) about their high school teachers' lack of teaching--which I could tell, anyway, because of my students' terrible writing and reading skills.
I became more and more jaded, and angrier, and then I realized that even at the college level, we were subtly encouraged to put empathy and how-should-I-say political interests ahead of actual teaching.
I went into teaching in the hope that I would embue others with a lifelong love of reading good literature, and be able to guide others into growing their ability to express themselves. I was wrong. I quit.
I still wish I could teach, but the politics; the nonsense; the ridiculous essays chosen not for the authors' excellence, but for some dimwitted "contemporary value"; the inability to adhere to high standards because we had to put the students' "self-esteem" above their best interests (and believe me, the students generally knew they were being screwed over)...I can't teach anywhere any more.
One of my neighbors is a teacher at a public middle school. Her stories about the incessant politics, the degradation of standards, and the terrible lack of discipline make me think my decision was right...
Posted by: Quint&Jessel, Sea of Azof, Bly, UK at July 25, 2011 01:33 PM (C7KNt)
Posted by: jeanne at July 25, 2011 01:37 PM (GdalM)
Oh, yeah, my neighbor the middle-school teacher also laments the high percentage of ESL students who have managed to spread whooping cough, TB, and other diseases amongst the kids...
And that more often than not, when she does try to impose some discipline in her classroom, the principal and other admin come down on her for it, as she's interfering with the students' self-esteem...she's an older person, and remembers when she could tell the class to quiet down and they would without them calling her names and otherwise ignoring her...
Posted by: Quint&Jessel, Sea of Azof, Bly, UK at July 25, 2011 01:38 PM (C7KNt)
I don't get this logic.
It's true that the collapse of family and various other social ills are a large part of the problem. (Theodore Dalrymple has some great essays on these topics.)
But, that means we should ignore other large parts of the problem? The school system side of the problem is the part we have the greatest ability to fix. There are known, serious problems there. Why should we not fix them?
Posted by: sandy burger at July 25, 2011 01:42 PM (XyoGP)
Posted by: Clubber Lang at July 25, 2011 01:57 PM (QcFbt)
We're blaming the unions for problems not of their making. In fact, after being virulently anti-teachers union for a while, I've come to see their demands as combat pay. But we want very, very badly to find a scapegoat we can all hate on. Why?
Posted by: jeanne at July 25, 2011 02:02 PM (GdalM)
Maybe if teachers actually taught these kids they would know how to read and write and could compete with people who went to private schools. But it's indoctrination all the way, and to hell with the truth and the kids' futures.
Posted by: PJ at July 25, 2011 02:24 PM (FlVA8)
Not me. I'm not blaming them for everything.
I am blaming them for the problems that are of their making, such as the inability to fire bad teachers, or lack of school choice.
But we want very, very badly to find a scapegoat we can all hate on.
Are those two examples I listed above real problems or not? Yes or no. If yes, then let's fix them.
Posted by: sandy burger at July 25, 2011 02:33 PM (XyoGP)
...
Bad kids produce bad schools.
These two sentences are somewhat at odds with each other.
He was fairly often cursed at, and even threatened with violence a couple times.
Yes, in modern schools teachers aren't allowed to maintain order. Seems like something we might consider fixing, no?
I don't think the school system can magically heal the racial achievement gap. And that's not its job. But so what? There are a bunch of obvious problems that are easy to describe and can be fixed, and you guys keep saying "but, kids from bad backgrounds are still gonna do worse". So we should ignore the glaring, obvious, fixable problems?
I went to a mostly white school with high rates of kids going on to college, etc. And still, there was tons of incompetence and wasted time and money.
Posted by: sandy burger at July 25, 2011 02:38 PM (XyoGP)
Posted by: pickles at July 25, 2011 02:46 PM (3cVE6)
Because I believe the improvements will be tangible. We could do much better. (e.g. I think it's nonsense that single-variable calculus is the highest math ever taught at most high schools.)
Smart and motivated kids can thrive in almost any environment.
In which case, why are we taxpayers paying so damn much for this? I want my taxes lowered.
Even if you're right that we can't do a better job educating kids, we can sure do a better job managing the cost of educating kids. It's ridiculous how much of our states' budgets are wasted in inefficient school systems. That needs to change.
Posted by: sandy burger at July 25, 2011 03:00 PM (XyoGP)
And it's not poverty. Middle class blacks do worse than middle class whites. Poor blacks do worse than poor whites. Hell middle class blacks do worse than poor asians.
The whole point that Sailor and the Bell Curve people make is that these racial/ethnic group average differences in IQ are real and enduring. Pointing out a stupid east asian or white kid and a smart black kid doesn't say anything about the avg.
You have to be able to think statistically to understand the world. We have decades and decades of data. School test scores, SAT, military aptitude test, IQ test, bar exams, LSAT, GMAT. Pretty much every test shows achievement breakdown of east asian > white > hispanic > black.
Which is why top schools are constantly struggling to find qualified blacks and hispanics and offering ever more remedial courses -- and using de facto quotas to limit the # of asians they let in, so they don't become filled entirely with Wongs, Kims, and Hus with 1500+ SAT scores.
Posted by: Clubber Lang at July 25, 2011 03:02 PM (QcFbt)
The black and hispanic achievement is what all these reforms are trying to fix.
Clubber Lang, you seem to be obsessed with race.
I want school districts to be able to fire bad teachers, and my reasons have nothing to do with race. I want to pay lower taxes. Again, my reasons have nothing to do with race. I want teachers to focus on math and literacy instead of leftist dogma. Not because of race.
I oppose affirmative action of any sort. I can guarantee you that the reforms I want to see, which most conservatives want to see, are just about better schools that cost less. That's all.
Posted by: sandy burger at July 25, 2011 03:17 PM (XyoGP)
Posted by: Clubber Lang at July 25, 2011 04:13 PM (QcFbt)
Oh, relax.
If you give a top-notch education to all Americans ... we will still have a racial achievement gap.
So? What people are talking about is ways to improve the education system (such as being able to fire bad teachers), and you keep jumping up saying there will still be racial achievement gaps. Well, so what?
"The union prevents firing bad teachers."
"That won't make the races equal!"
"There are too many overpaid administrators."
"There will still be racial disparities!"
"Parents should be able to choose among schools."
"The bell curve!"
I get your point already. And so what?
Most of the bullshit the schools do is about closing the racial achievement gap. This is a fact. They are the ones obsessed with race.
I agree. That's part of the leftist status quo in education. I want to change that model, and it seems like you keep objecting to any progress by pointing out racial disparities. I don't get it. Or maybe you're actually not objecting? It's hard to tell.
I believe it's due largely to innate, genetic differences.
I think that probably has little to do with it, but I don't really care; it has no bearing one way or the other on whether or not we should take on the teachers' unions and improve the schools we pay so much for.
Posted by: sandy burger at July 25, 2011 05:10 PM (XyoGP)
Posted by: Death by China Audiobook at July 25, 2011 05:54 PM (pCDVI)
Posted by: pickles at July 25, 2011 08:20 PM (3cVE6)
I agree 100%. And our education system needs cater to their needs, too. (Right now, it continually tells them they're failures, even if they're working as hard as they can.) We need a paradigm shift in education, and our sluggish unionised system is too calcified and leftist to be able to do it.
The racial achievement gaps (which do exist whether you believe in HBD or not) are the raison d'etre for the school reform movement.
I guess this is what's annoying me about you guys.
Because they want to reform schools for racial reasons doesn't mean I want to reform schools for racial reasons. My motivation is really quite simple: the current system sucks.
Maybe I'm missing the point, but it seems like you guys keep saying something like this: "We oppose school reform because it's about race." Well, get this through your heads, damn it: it's not about race for everybody who wants school reform.
This is why I say you and Clubber Lang are race-obsessed. It's not some cryptic way of calling you racists. It's just that people like me are talking about reform for reform's sake, and you keep talking about things that people like me aren't saying or thinking. I'm talking about genuine structural problems, and you guys keep bringing it back to race. Why? Because that's what leftists dwell on, and you assume that's who you're talking to? But, get this: I'm not a leftist; it's not about race for me.
And for heaven's sake, will one of you please answer the question I asked in comment 150: Are you or are you not OK with how difficult it is to fire bad public school teachers? Yes or no will do. Do you or do you not think parents should have more choice in which school their child attends? Yes or no.
Pointing out the disparities is still relevant because even when leftists increase the spending in public schools, sometimes even matching the spending per student you see in mid-tier private schools, not much changes.
Yeah, I know, and I want to cut spending on public schools. But I also want to change their structure so that they actually work well. The leftists are doing it wrong, as always; the public school system is definitely not failing due to a lack of cash.
Posted by: sandy burger at July 25, 2011 11:05 PM (blGOt)
Posted by: pickles at July 26, 2011 07:31 AM (3cVE6)
It has been tried. It's called private school, and it works.
We've tried to increase funding, we've tried to increase the amount of vouchers we could give out, we've tried to attract high quality teachers with Teach for America and similar programs, and let's not forget No Child Left Behind.
And none of that addressed the real structural problems. All of those so-called fixes are just smoke and mirrors. And none of them dismantle the parasitic teachers union.
Your defeatism on this issue is weird.
Posted by: sandy burger at July 26, 2011 10:09 AM (blGOt)
I went to a pretty "good" high school, got good SAT scores, and went on to a four-year university, like most of my classmates. Success, right?
Well, it was only years later, as an adult, that I began to fill in the many gaps in my education, things I should have learned as a child. I didn't even know basic civics! Most Americans don't.
I wish I had received a better education. It's possible to do.
Posted by: sandy burger at July 26, 2011 11:49 AM (XyoGP)
Posted by: Clark Kent at July 26, 2011 04:31 PM (m9bwx)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2049 seconds, 287 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








I'm waiting for God.
Posted by: soothsayer at July 25, 2011 10:58 AM (sqkOB)