January 07, 2011
— Gabriel Malor Now this is what I'm talking about. Read the advance of George Will's Sunday column about Congressman Fred Upton's plans to challenge the Obama Administration on several fronts.
[L]ast month, the Democratic-controlled Federal Communications Commission, on a partisan 3-2 vote, did what a federal court says it has no power to do: It decided to regulate the Internet in the name of "net neutrality." The next morning, a man who can discipline the FCC said: Well, we'll just see about that. "We are going to be a dog to the Frisbee on this issue."
Also on Upton's list is, of course, repeal of ObamaCare:
But Upton has a bigger repeal in mind. He thinks enough Democrats will join all 242 House Republicans in voting to repeal Obamacare, and that repeal will come within 25 or so votes of the 290 necessary to override a presidential veto. This will intensify pressure on other Democratic members -- imagine their town hall meetings -- who could provide the veto-proof margin.
He's also interested in deregulating Medicaid and stopping the EPA's climate change power grab.
Update: Changed the post. The original Will column implies that Upton, as chair of House Energy and Commerce will seek to repeal the lightbulb ban law that we've talked about previously. But that didn't sound quite right to me and it's because Upton was a champion of that bill in the first place. Upton may have the power to push repeal, but there's no indication to me that he actually intends to.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
03:42 AM
| Comments (108)
Post contains 270 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: nickless at January 07, 2011 03:55 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Cobalt Shiva at January 07, 2011 04:02 AM (sDzFM)
Posted by: Mr Pink at January 07, 2011 04:10 AM (0OWWD)
www.fashionspaceonline.com is one of the great resource for brand new fashionable clothing, shoes and accessories.
Here are the main products that we deal with:
Shoes: Nike Air Jordan, Air Force 1, Nike Air Jordan AFJ Fusion, Dunk SB, Nike Air Max, Air Shox Running Shoes, Nike Air Zoom Dunkesto, Air Yeezy, Nike Work Boots, ACG, Nike Foamposite, Gucci, Prada, Puma Ferrari, Supra, Ato Matsumoto, Lacoste, James, Kobe, Converse, Creative Recreation, CR DICOCO, Ed hardy, Evisu, Mauri, Coogi, Dsquared, Ice Cream, New Balance, Greedy Genius, Clae Shoes and Sneakers.
Jeans: Evisu, Gucci, Armani, Bape BBC, Red Monkey, G-Star, Levis, Diesel, Versace, Prada, Louis Vuitton, Ed Hardy, True Religion, Coogi, Christian Audigier, Affliction, Laguna Beach, Iceberg, Crown Holder, Roca wear, Dolce & Gabbana, Artful Dodger, Blac Label, Rock & Republic Jeans Shorts and Pants.
T-shirt: BBC, Bape, G-Star, Evisu, Coogi, Armani, LV, 5ive jungle, Akademiks, Smet, A & F, Affliction, Ed Hardy, Christian Audigier, Blac Label, Polo, Lacoste, Crown Holder, Dolce & Gabbana, Versace, Ecko, Gucci, Adidas, Nike, Levis T-shirts and dress shirts.
Other Accessories: Chanel, Chloe, Coach, Dior, Gucci, Fendi, LV, Juicy, Prada, D&G, Ed Hardy, Christian Audigier Leather Handbag, Purse and Wallets.
Rolex, Breitlint, JACOB & CO. Cartier, Gucci, Ed Hardy Watches.
D&G, Okley, Fendi, Coach, Chanel, Gucci, Prada, Armani, Versace, Burberry, Ray.Ban, Ed hardy, Louis Vuitton, Christian Dior, Cartier Sun Glasses
Armani, CK, D&G, LV, Versace, Ed Hardy, Diesel, Gucci, polo, Prada, Puma, Versace, G-star Underwears.
Juicy, Bikini, Ed Hardy, A&F, Polo, Christian Audigier Swimming Wear, Bikini, Bathing suits.
Bape, Ed Hardy, New Era, Coogi, Gucci, New era with light, Louis Vuitton, Monster Energy Caps
DSQ, D&G, LV, Bape, Armani, Gucci, Chanel, Boss, Affliction, Versace, Ed Hardy, Christian Audigier Belts.
Welcome to contact us by MSN: babydress898@hotmail.com .Thanks!
Posted by: China-store at January 07, 2011 04:11 AM (t24Na)
Posted by: Case at January 07, 2011 04:20 AM (0K+Kw)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 07, 2011 04:21 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: **** at January 07, 2011 04:23 AM (MIaPf)
(will they be illegal in Canada, too? I remember college students who bought Canada-strength beer in college; will have to make bulb runs to Montreal?)
Posted by: ParisParamus at January 07, 2011 04:28 AM (Q16sd)
Posted by: ParisParamus at January 07, 2011 04:30 AM (Q16sd)
"under color of law." that sounds racist!
I predict Hillary Clinton ass will gain seven inches this year.
Posted by: Case at January 07, 2011 04:31 AM (0K+Kw)
-------------------------
Pet peeve here - could we please never, never use the term "climate change"? It was "global warming" and it should stay "global warming". "Climate change" is what the warm-mongers came up with when people started noticing inconvenient things like lots of rain and snow. Don't let them get away with weaseling out of it when their old predictions of heat and drought and melted polar caps don't come true.
They screetched "global warming" for twenty years, they should be stuck with it. If they try to correct you, ask "So what happened to the warming you so confidently predicted?"
Posted by: schizuki at January 07, 2011 04:32 AM (M+lbD)
Posted by: Brian at January 07, 2011 04:32 AM (sYrWB)
WWPD? What would Paulson do certainly doesn't contain what Geithner or the next autonomous authoritarian Sec./Treasury will do having been empowered to disregard Congress by the departing GWB executive order. /From his buddy's impeached lips, "Because I could."
Posted by: maverick muse at January 07, 2011 04:33 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: Tami at January 07, 2011 08:14 AM (VuLos)
No, they're just still out from last night.
I would really like to see the FCC smacked down. And then all of its authority taken away. That would be sweet.
Of course, I'm not sure how we'd prevent radio/tv stations from trying to use the same frequencies, but I'm sure we could come up with something- and why is it the Federal Government's business of someone curses on air? Regardless of what Society thinks about on-air profanity, how is that the Government's business?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at January 07, 2011 04:35 AM (KxyHe)
They could certainly figure out how to avoid stepping on each other, and if they have problems they could go to court. The FCC is superfluous -- simply a power grab by the federal government. As for profanity? Here's some for the FCC -- fuck you and your anti-freedom regulations.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at January 07, 2011 04:41 AM (LH6ir)
As you said, he was a co-sponsor of the stupid CFL light bulb scam. A quick check shows that he meets the very definition of a RINO and most likely a DIABLO as well.
His ACU ratings for the past two years have been 72/44 with a lifetime of 72.
One wonders how a RINO like this got to be chair of the energy committee?
Posted by: Vic at January 07, 2011 04:42 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Nighthawk at January 07, 2011 04:45 AM (02uN6)
It will take a budget bill like we have been discussing for the past many months to get that POS under control.
Posted by: Vic at January 07, 2011 04:49 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 07, 2011 04:49 AM (tJjm/)
You poor, deluded bitter clinger. Perhaps if you left behind your preconceived notions of archaic industrial-economy models and try to grasp the beauty and forward thinking brilliance of the new Obamericatm.
The bulbs are manufactured by green industry, which, if you knew anything, you would know do not pollute at all. Just the savings from the lack of pollution dwarfs the small increase in cost per bulb (government subsidy of 200% of retail cost). Th mercury in each bulb can be recycled. Just drive your hybrid to your regional government reclamation center (opening date for site #1: 2017), drop off the bulbs, pay the small fee ($5/bulb), and maybe you will finally feel like you are a part of this brave new world.
Posted by: NJProgressive at January 07, 2011 04:53 AM (LH6ir)
A little know fact is that the FCC was not created to allocate radio station frequencies. There was already a federal department in place that did that. It was allocated to shutdown radio stations and programs that opposed FDR and his policies.
It was a blatant censorship grab by the FDR adm and it was rubber stamped by the commie congress. Never think that if you get enough Dems together that they would vote themselves in to a communist dictatorship.
Posted by: Vic at January 07, 2011 04:53 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Brian at January 07, 2011 04:56 AM (sYrWB)
21 Gubmint's been suckin' Nanny State TITS so long, Washingtonians are all titty babies. Taxed teats have gone bone dry. Wean the teat drainers.
Posted by: maverick muse at January 07, 2011 04:57 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: Vic at January 07, 2011 04:58 AM (M9Ie6)
That is a great idea.
Posted by: real joe at January 07, 2011 05:00 AM (w7Lv+)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at January 07, 2011 05:00 AM (9T/th)
It said: talking several naps a day prevents growing old and saves money. . . . Especially if taken while driving. President BO thanks you for your support. Now, all you middle class/lower class crackers, if you wouldn't mind getting behind the wheel and falling asleep. You know (fist bump) Uncle BO wants needs you to!
Posted by: momma at January 07, 2011 05:05 AM (penCf)
The packages that exploded in Maryland? There was a note in one of them that complained about the highway signs that told people how to "report suspicious activity". In their brillance, they have come up with the following profile: (seriously) Male, white, socially awkward.
I guess the extremely obvious connection with groups who approve of "suspicious activity" isn't a factor.
We're doomed.
Posted by: dagny at January 07, 2011 05:05 AM (2sLWg)
Posted by: dagny at January 07, 2011 05:08 AM (2sLWg)
Posted by: Vic
Like this:
Fred Upton wins House energy gavel
Overcoming concerns that he's too moderate for the job, Rep. Fred Upton emerged Tuesday as the winner of a bitter internal Republican battle to lead the powerful Energy and Commerce Committee.
The Michigan Republican won the steering panel nod with critical support from Rep. John Boehner and a collection of senior and rank-and-file GOP lawmakers closely allied with the incoming House speaker.
The full GOP caucus must now ratify UptonÂ’s selection Wednesday, but that is expected to be a formality as former Energy and Commerce Chairman Joe Barton (R-Texas) told POLITICO he will not challenge the steering committeeÂ’s decision.
With his win, Upton navigated an internal GOP feud between the upstart tea party movement and the party's rank-and-file establishment. Conservative commentators Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck both called him a socialist on their programs because of his co-authorship of legislation banning the incandescent light bulb. Former House GOP Majority Leader Dick Armey's Freedom Works tea party campaign ran a 'Down With Upton' Internet petition campaign.
Politico 12/7
As mentioned in the article, Comrade Upton has begum purging the committee staff of ideological undesirables.
The Republicanstm win again.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at January 07, 2011 05:14 AM (W/gz4)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 07, 2011 08:49 AM (tJjm/)
In thirty years everyone will be too afflicted with mercury poisoning to be able to ask the question. We'll all be bumping into furniture and slurring our words as we blindly grope for our blackmarket Valu-Rite.
Also, good morning, all!
Posted by: MWR at January 07, 2011 05:15 AM (4df7R)
Well I guess there is no chance that Boner will get him to allow a "firebrand" to take the lead on attacks. We are seriously boned on this committee. It is now worthless.
Tell me again why it is better to elect RINOs in blue States?
This also gives me grave doubts about Boner.
Posted by: Vic at January 07, 2011 05:18 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Baron of Grey Matter at January 07, 2011 05:18 AM (LnfsE)
Posted by: Vic at January 07, 2011 09:18 AM (M9Ie6)
I've said it in the past, but he's on probation in my book. He's shown moments of awesome (his little note in response to the Senate democrats urging the House not to try repealing Obamacare was particularly perfect), but I expect a LOT more if he wants to solidify himself in my good graces. And I know I'm not alone!
Posted by: MWR at January 07, 2011 05:21 AM (4df7R)
If we hand this too them on a platter I guarantee it will come back at a later time to bite us in the ass when they want to ban some really needed product because of microscopic Hg content.
Posted by: Vic at January 07, 2011 05:21 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: real joe at January 07, 2011 05:23 AM (w7Lv+)
In other words, these people fear nothing. So what if they are voted out of office, they will still have their pension and they will take some high paying job. They always win and land on their feet so they really don't care what the American people think.
Posted by: curious at January 07, 2011 05:33 AM (p302b)
Any democrat who votes NOT to repeal - you're job is on the line and 2012 is fast approaching.
Huh Claire McCatkill?
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at January 07, 2011 05:35 AM (0fzsA)
BAILOUTS
Voted YES for TARP
Voted YES on the auto bailout
Voted YES on Cash for Clunkers
SPENDING
* Voted NO on 7 of the last 9 RSC Budgets
* Voted YES on the Farm Bill
* Voted YES on the 2005 Highway Bill
* Voted NO to cap farm subsidies
* Voted YES four times to extend unemployment benefits
* Voted NO to end milk subsidies
* Voted NO to cut sugar subsidies
* Voted NO to cut NEA spending
* Voted NO to cut AMTRAK spending
* Voted YES to increase funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting
TAXES
* Voted YES on Patriot Tax – a surtax on high income earners
REGULATIONS
* Voted YES for Sarbanes-Oxley
* Voted YES to increase the minimum wage
* Voted YES on energy bill with new CAFÉ standards and tax hikes
POLITICAL FREE SPEECH
* Voted YES to force 527s to disclose their donors
* Voted YES on McCain-Feingold
Redstate
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at January 07, 2011 05:35 AM (W/gz4)
Ben Nelson(D-Neb) will be out of a job in 2012 regardless.
His one vote sold us all down the river.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at January 07, 2011 05:35 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: curious at January 07, 2011 05:38 AM (p302b)
Posted by: dagny at January 07, 2011 05:41 AM (2sLWg)
Operation Demoralize. Join the democrats and their media mouth pieces and whine about the imperfect rethuglicans.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at January 07, 2011 05:41 AM (0fzsA)
The Case for Fred Upton for Chairman of House Energy and Commerce Committee
By FRED BARNES
I know Upton quite well. HeÂ’s not as conservative as I am. But he is especially well suited to be chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at January 07, 2011 05:43 AM (W/gz4)
Posted by: Bill Clinton at January 07, 2011 05:44 AM (0aJSF)
Posted by: Tami at January 07, 2011 09:39 AM (VuLos)
As I said earlier, he is most likely a DIABLO, that list pretty much confirms it.
Posted by: Vic at January 07, 2011 05:45 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: curious at January 07, 2011 05:45 AM (p302b)
Posted by: dagny at January 07, 2011 05:47 AM (2sLWg)
Conservatives on the Hill, in think tanks and on K Street are fighting to keep Upton from the chair, but Upton's closeness with Boehner -- including his record of raising funds for GOP candidates and coming to heel when Boehner has snapped the whip -- could ensure he gets the gavel.
Upton earned conservative ire with his liberal voting record, including votes on energy and health policy, which are under E&C's jurisdiction. Out of 158 returning Republican congressmen, Upton ranks as the 10th most liberal, judging by lifetime American Conservative Union ratings.
While outsiders focus on Upton's ideology, Republican House staffers know that a lawmaker's voting record isn't how party loyalty is measured on the Hill. Leadership staffers and K Street lobbyists emphasized to me how much Upton has raised for other Republican candidates -- through his TRUST PAC, by hosting fundraisers, and by transferring funds from his campaign.
By giving Upton the gavel, Boehner would anger the conservative base. By denying Upton the chair, Boehner would disrupt the system of seniority and fundraising incentives that makes the conference function.
Washex 11/10
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at January 07, 2011 05:48 AM (W/gz4)
That's our problem in a nutshell. Nothing is going to change....
Posted by: Tami at January 07, 2011 05:50 AM (VuLos)
So unemployment's down from 9.7% to 9.4%. But the number of people who gave up looking for work has risen.
Gee, wonder why that would be? Maybe because unemployment bennies got extended again?
20 consecutive months with unemployment over 9%, a new record...Preznt Toonces is nothing if not ambitious.
Posted by: Kortezzi at January 07, 2011 05:50 AM (piR98)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 07, 2011 05:50 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: eman at January 07, 2011 05:51 AM (0aJSF)
61 Well then give Upton some other committee on whose issues Upton has voted properly. Instead of putting the fox in the henhouse put him in charge of something less tempting for him to screw up
Posted by: dagny at January 07, 2011 05:51 AM (2sLWg)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 07, 2011 05:52 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: eman at January 07, 2011 05:55 AM (0aJSF)
This is why the RNC is broke. Party loyalty is not measured by how well a member supports the ideology and platform of the party. It is measure by how much money they can raise from freakin' lobbyists.
It is definitely time for new leadership. It is time for some more primaries. It looks like chances are good we will be boned for another 2 years despite taking the House by a wide margin.
Posted by: Vic at January 07, 2011 05:57 AM (M9Ie6)
Maybe there are some illegal immigrants we could get to do the job the State Media won't do?
Posted by: 18-1 at January 07, 2011 05:58 AM (7BU4a)
Revert? What makes you think that they weren't always spinless hacks?
Posted by: KG at January 07, 2011 06:04 AM (DeCj1)
Posted by: Iblis at January 07, 2011 06:04 AM (9221z)
Today's Lesson About Liberalism:
I am completing a writing residency and my lodgings have no paper towels, disinfectant, or meat, but there is a half-used bottle of fair trade hemp shampoo generously left in the shower.
Note left in the room:
"You may hear a scratching on the door from a cute little black dog. I let him in while I was here, thinking he might be eaten by a coyote, but he peed on the refrigerator."
Posted by: Filly at January 07, 2011 06:08 AM (t+B38)
Posted by: 18-1
It is odd that this law effecting every single home, business and public place in the nation has gotten so little attention. Hopefully it'll be repealed with the same lack of fanfare with which it was instituted. As to the Mercury issue, I think it's the smartest way to make the appeal (if one is needed) to the people wavering. It objectively exists in the bulbs, whereas every other criticism of the bulb is subjective. I've had Libs tell me with a straight face that the love the new CFL's as we're sitting there waiting for them to warm up. They can and do lie about the quality, cost, "green-ness", etc. of the CFL's but they can't pretend the Mercury doesn't exist.
Posted by: Lincolntf at January 07, 2011 06:09 AM (hUf/c)
Posted by: eman at January 07, 2011 06:10 AM (0aJSF)
Given time and the proper pressure, this will be the metric system of the '10's. I personally look forward to people shooting the curly lightbulbs out in public buildings.
Posted by: Filly at January 07, 2011 06:10 AM (t+B38)
Per Drudge, 41% of pregnancies in NYC are terminated.
Great at taking out what they see as real garbage.
Posted by: Who Knows at January 07, 2011 06:12 AM (QLiYt)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 07, 2011 06:14 AM (tJjm/)
Posted by: BobInFL at January 07, 2011 06:16 AM (edlRB)
(Sun - UK tabloid link)
So after ten seconds, when straight men will notice the photobomb, try to figure out what that is.
Posted by: Beagle at January 07, 2011 06:17 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 07, 2011 06:17 AM (tJjm/)
Posted by: schizuki at January 07, 2011 08:32 AM (M+lbD)
Well, they had to jump on the warming wagon as the 'New Ice Age' they were hollering about before sure wasnt happening
Posted by: Flammenwerfer at January 07, 2011 06:20 AM (FIDMq)
The rank-and-file foot soldiers of the eco-tard agenda are ignorant and easily led, but the higher-ups know exactly what they're doing. The Gores and Prince Charles of the intend to profit mightily from their green-schemes and place themselves in exulted positions over our emaciated, impoverished selves.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at January 07, 2011 06:20 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: curious at January 07, 2011 06:22 AM (p302b)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 07, 2011 08:49 AM (tJjm/)
My neighbor down the street had an accident with mercury in their house and called the MD dept of hazardous waste or some such fucking agency. Apparently a mercury thermometer/thermostat broke in their basement. They had to move out for weeks while the Gubmint agency assessed their problem then cleaned it up. They had just moved here when their house was destroyed by Katrina.
There is no fucking way that I will use these lightbulbs if given another option and if I have to, they are going right in the trash when done. No recycling...nothing. If these fuckers are going to make me put hazardous materials in my house, they're getting them right back into the landfill.
Posted by: Hedgehog at January 07, 2011 06:23 AM (Rn2kl)
Posted by: curious at January 07, 2011 06:26 AM (p302b)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 07, 2011 06:29 AM (tJjm/)
Posted by: eman at January 07, 2011 06:31 AM (0aJSF)
Posted by: CoolCzech
Anyone who claims to be concerned about the environment, dependence on foreign fuel or those evil oil companies, but doesn't list nuclear power as their number one goal is either ignorant or a fraud. Nuke power would solve all of those "problems", but it would also strengthen America's positon in the world, which is the exact opposite of the Greenies goal.
Posted by: Lincolntf at January 07, 2011 06:34 AM (hUf/c)
Posted by: Some dope at January 07, 2011 06:41 AM (Gh3dS)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 07, 2011 06:43 AM (tJjm/)
Posted by: Brian at January 07, 2011 06:43 AM (sYrWB)
I won.
Posted by: john boehner at January 07, 2011 06:43 AM (S5YRY)
Posted by: Fred Thompson at January 07, 2011 06:43 AM (0aJSF)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 07, 2011 06:52 AM (tJjm/)
Posted by: Brian at January 07, 2011 06:55 AM (sYrWB)
I like to follow the environmentalists wackos off my porch asking them about nuclear power? Why are you opposed to it? Why can the navy use it without a problem but we aren't building reactors? How many people were killed at 3 mile island? What happened there? Was the China syndrome fact or fiction? Who did it star? Why can france have nuclear power and we can't? Why don't you want the US to have it's own power resources?
HAHA As I wrote, I just got a cold call from someone who wanted to survey me about "Investing in Green Energy". I told them that that was the LAST thing I would ever invest in since it's a scam.
Posted by: dagny at January 07, 2011 07:01 AM (2sLWg)
You're partly wrong, mainly because you misunderstand (and underestimate) Osama Obama. He knows full well what he's doing and has a definite agenda in place. Just because he learned his hatred for America from others -- he actually has no experience with living in the America the rest of us have known -- doesn't mean his immature lust for revenge on The Man isn't real.
Boner, on the other hand, strikes me as the classic rube, a nice-enough guy who would be right at home running the local hardware store and being a big in the Chamber of Commerce.
Neither one of them should have any part of running the country, but for opposite reasons. The Mohammedan Mouthpiece is an enemy of all that the USA stands for, while Boner is simply in way over his head. The sharks will eat him alive.
Posted by: MrScribbler© at January 07, 2011 07:12 AM (Ulu3i)
I believe that it was Rush Limbaugh who once said, also, that more people have died in Teddy Kennedy's car than in all of the nuclear power plants that were ever built in this country. That quip befuddled the liberal caller who was on the phone with him.
Posted by: Brian at January 07, 2011 07:21 AM (sYrWB)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 07, 2011 07:26 AM (e7n7W)
I don't misunderstand ot underestimate Obama. I know exactly where he is coming from.
That doesn't alter the facts that he doesn't have any executive, managerial or leadership skills, that he is an empty suit, that he is a street hustler and that he is a decadent dilletante. He coasted to the top with his charm and with a lot of help from affirmative action and political correctness - not with any qualifications to become POTUS, nor because he has ever rolled up his sleeves and gotten his hands dirty, figuratively speaking.
Posted by: Brian at January 07, 2011 07:32 AM (sYrWB)
Posted by: cbullitt at January 07, 2011 08:11 AM (M/WbE)
Just out of curiosity, how did you package them to prevent breakage?
Posted by: someone else at January 07, 2011 08:13 AM (/hia0)
Just out of curiosity, how did you package them to prevent breakage?
Posted by: someone else at January 07, 2011 12:13 PM (/hia0)
I keep them in their original sleeve packaging, then use crumpled paper along the bottom, sides, and top of the cardboard packing box. A standard UHaul type box can hold around 60-70 incandescents.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at January 07, 2011 08:23 AM (9T/th)
Posted by: The New GOP House at January 07, 2011 08:43 AM (AZGON)
Thanks for the info. I may have to do the same at some point.
Posted by: someone else at January 07, 2011 08:43 AM (/hia0)
Posted by: motionview at January 07, 2011 09:37 AM (zRbkQ)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2055 seconds, 236 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: beanervt at January 07, 2011 03:44 AM (sHazT)