December 15, 2011
— Ace Cancer is horrible.
He was 62. When I saw him a few years ago (the famous getting-into-shit-with-Syrian-Nazis-affair), he acted as if he was 25.
I guess I can mention this. I saw him last year at Union Station. His hair was thinning from cancer treatment.
He was outside, smoking. Puffing away.
Something about his defiant character in that, I guess. Or foolishness. Or both.
Posted by: Ace at
07:51 PM
| Comments (407)
Post contains 70 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: tasker at December 15, 2011 07:54 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Morgan at December 15, 2011 07:57 PM (hqlrn)
Posted by: ParisParamus at December 15, 2011 07:59 PM (m4nvO)
Posted by: Bomber at December 15, 2011 08:01 PM (d88g9)
Posted by: manofaiki at December 15, 2011 08:01 PM (iGKkt)
Something about his defiant character in that, I guess. Or foolishness. Or both.
Death smiles at us all. All a man can do is smile back.
Posted by: Maximus at December 15, 2011 08:01 PM (UR5vq)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 15, 2011 08:01 PM (Pyea/)
Posted by: ace at December 15, 2011 08:03 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Tjexcite at December 15, 2011 08:04 PM (9D5EX)
The Left will not brook dissent in its own ranks, and many he thought were friends refused to speak with him after that
Posted by: kbdabear at December 15, 2011 08:04 PM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: Bomber at December 15, 2011 08:05 PM (d88g9)
Posted by: not from around here at December 15, 2011 08:06 PM (3akB4)
He was a great and brave man, and a hero to me. I loved his humanitarianism even as I thought there may not be an ultimately objective rational basis for it. But he never claimed so. He claimed it evolved out of his warm, social primate emotions, and in that, he was no doubt correct.
On that basis, from that perspective, I agreed with most of his thoughts -- from being pro-life to anti-religion.
I'm glad you lived, Christopher Hitchens, because you made my life better and set a good example.
I will tip a glass of scotch tonight -- Johnny Walker black label if I can find it in town -- to you, in celebration of how you lived, bravely and openly.
Maybe I should stop being such a chickenshit and follow you. I often long for death in this world, but it will come soon enough, right? Perhaps I can hold out a little longer and try to accomplish something, however futile that is in the end.
To Christopher Hitchens! A of virtue and courage, especially courage; a hard worker and a passionate lover - including of his family; and a lover of humanity and fellow mammals, even of those whose beliefs he opposed.
Posted by: Random at December 15, 2011 08:06 PM (YiE0S)
Posted by: eman at December 15, 2011 08:06 PM (kEKwc)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at December 15, 2011 08:07 PM (DxKBi)
Posted by: Penis Good Time Now at December 15, 2011 08:08 PM (xx2Hb)
But I hope he found the true God in his last moments.
Otherwise I'm reminded of Hilaire Belloc's Epitaph on a Puritan:
"He served his god faithfully and well,
and now he sees him face to face in Hell."
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 15, 2011 08:08 PM (mAm+G)
Posted by: not from around here at December 15, 2011 08:10 PM (3akB4)
Posted by: tasker at December 15, 2011 08:10 PM (r2PLg)
One of the many things I admire him for. She was providing places for people to die without proper medical treatment nor family visits in appalling in conditions, hobnobbing with the royalty and dicators of the world, and raising money mostly used for nunneries in her honor.
Posted by: Random at December 15, 2011 08:11 PM (YiE0S)
In my years as a nurse, most smokers have said 2 things to me.
1) My lungs are fine, why should I quit smoking?
2) Since my lungs are already crap, why should I quit?
I really enjoyed watching Hitchens on Dennis Miller's HBO show, and his book on Clinton is great.
Posted by: Darth Randall at December 15, 2011 08:11 PM (98AOY)
Posted by: tasker at December 15, 2011 08:11 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Christopher Johnson at December 15, 2011 08:12 PM (Zl2Qs)
I see you've suckled the same shit right from Hitch's arsehole.
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 15, 2011 08:13 PM (mAm+G)
You could both admire him and detest him in the same column or article, I believe that he did his best not to bore you
Posted by: kbdabear at December 15, 2011 08:13 PM (Y+DPZ)
He was outside, smoking. Puffing away.
Something about his defiant character in that, I guess. Or foolishness. Or both.
He knew he was probably going to die then, let him die his way.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at December 15, 2011 08:14 PM (yGl9Q)
Posted by: Chesty LaRue at December 15, 2011 08:14 PM (KTtrN)
You're missing the point. You can believe, or not believe, anything you choose. Reality will catch up to you someday. Like it did today for Mr Hitchens.
But in honor of a man that I agreed with on some important issues and disagreed with on other important issues, I'll let it go.
From what I have read of the man, he died the way he lived.
Posted by: Bomber at December 15, 2011 08:15 PM (d88g9)
Posted by: eman at December 15, 2011 08:16 PM (kEKwc)
He didn't get sent to hell. He got sent to the same place 50 plus percent of us will get sent. A place where unbelievers go to be proven wrong or right.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at December 15, 2011 08:16 PM (yGl9Q)
Posted by: Arbalest at December 15, 2011 08:19 PM (grAEd)
Posted by: A Liberal AoSHQ Reader, Really! at December 15, 2011 08:19 PM (sk3ka)
Posted by: eman at December 15, 2011 08:19 PM (kEKwc)
Imagine the rhetorical arguments he's having, either with God or with Satan. One hopes it's with the former, but one delights in thinking of him having it with the latter, just to give the other side his own version of Hell.
Again, RIP Hitch.
Posted by: John P. Squibob at December 15, 2011 08:20 PM (wEGQO)
I believe in God but I won't presume that I can read his mind
Posted by: kbdabear at December 15, 2011 08:20 PM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: eman at December 15, 2011 08:21 PM (kEKwc)
Remember: Stalin was our ally in WWII. Shall we all shed a tear for Uncle Joe too?
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 15, 2011 08:22 PM (mAm+G)
When they ceased to function, he ceased to exist.
He was not sent anywhere.
Posted by: eman at December 16, 2011 12:19 AM (kEKwc)
Kinda believe that too, (just don't know), but didn't want to start a fight. But saying he was going to hell deserved some kind of measured response. I guess I'm not drunk enough yet.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at December 15, 2011 08:23 PM (yGl9Q)
Remember: Stalin was our ally in WWII. Shall we all shed a tear for Uncle Joe too?
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 16, 2011 12:22 AM
Shaking my head. What can you do? It takes all kinds.
I agree with Hitchens about more things than not, for the record. You may hate me too, Leo. I shall consider it a great honor.
Posted by: Random at December 15, 2011 08:26 PM (YiE0S)
Posted by: eman at December 15, 2011 08:28 PM (kEKwc)
Posted by: not from around here at December 15, 2011 08:28 PM (3akB4)
Posted by: DM! at December 15, 2011 08:29 PM (O0Qwy)
Posted by: tasker at December 15, 2011 08:29 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: kbdabear at December 15, 2011 08:32 PM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: Corona at December 15, 2011 08:35 PM (fh2Y7)
Posted by: Thresher at December 15, 2011 08:35 PM (PA3G8)
Posted by: A Liberal AoSHQ Reader, Really! at December 15, 2011 08:36 PM (sk3ka)
Posted by: eman at December 15, 2011 08:36 PM (kEKwc)
Ripped you a new one.
Probably. He was first and foremost a humanitarian.
I like people from all races, incidentally. I wish the evidence pointed in a different direction than it does (I wish also all my loved ones would get to live forever in internal bliss; I also wish I didn't have certain weaknesses). Anyway, this thread isn't about me.
It's about a great and brave man, Christopher Hitchens, who lived with great integrity, boldness, and joie de vivre.
Posted by: Random at December 15, 2011 08:36 PM (YiE0S)
Please. Why would I adopt his terms of reference--terms which I and 2,000 years of orthodox Christianity reject? Frankly, he had rhetorical flourish but understood little of Christian history or theology.
So I should leave him in peace, yeah, just like the peace he let Blessed Mother Teresa rest in.
And what "peace" are you talking about? "Rest in peace" is a phrase from Christian Scripture and tradition. But, according to you and him, he's not at peace: he's just worm food. It's hilarious how all the village atheists rail against Christianity but have nothing else to fall back but the moral and spiritual capital of 2,000 years of Christendom.
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 15, 2011 08:37 PM (mAm+G)
Posted by: eman at December 15, 2011 08:38 PM (kEKwc)
Posted by: manofaiki at December 15, 2011 08:39 PM (iGKkt)
Posted by: Gern Blandsden at December 15, 2011 08:39 PM (4qU0l)
Posted by: Random at December 15, 2011 08:39 PM (YiE0S)
Posted by: manofaiki at December 15, 2011 08:40 PM (iGKkt)
Posted by: RIP at December 15, 2011 08:40 PM (MwTP4)
Posted by: Elize Nayden at December 15, 2011 08:40 PM (FGxvI)
RIP Chris. You did some good things and some bad, just like all of us. May God have mercy and grant you eternal life.
Posted by: Miss Marple at December 15, 2011 08:40 PM (GoIUi)
Posted by: kbdabear at December 15, 2011 08:42 PM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: Clubber Lang at December 15, 2011 08:43 PM (QcFbt)
Posted by: Baddad at December 15, 2011 08:43 PM (IpwTX)
Seriously.
Think about it.
Since the announcement of his cancer, frequently. Thanks for asking. He was the kind of leftist, like Douglas Hyde or Bella Dodd or Eugene Genovese, who would have made a good convert.
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 15, 2011 08:44 PM (mAm+G)
Posted by: eman at December 15, 2011 08:44 PM (kEKwc)
RIP Chris. You did some good things and some bad, just like all of us. May God have mercy and grant you eternal life.
Posted by: Miss Marple at December 16, 2011 12:40 AM (GoIUi)
Ya know, that is sweet, and anyone on this thread hoping he went to hell, is just wrong.
And for all you who think you have the last word, grow up.
Posted by: lous a girl at December 15, 2011 08:45 PM (R21xD)
Posted by: eman at December 15, 2011 08:48 PM (kEKwc)
Oh, and :
Maybe one day, girls (yes, girls!) like her can help us find a cure once and for all.
Kids like this make me wonder what I've wasted my life on
Posted by: Lone Marauder, pre-denounced for your convenience at December 15, 2011 08:48 PM (/bVuS)
It does not mean we think you must exist now in some other world in some other way.
Right, like "Merry Christmas" means "I hope you get lots of presents during the Winter Festival." Nothing to do with the feast of the Nativity of the Savior, the awesome revelation of God to man in Christ. Nope, nothing at all.
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 15, 2011 08:49 PM (mAm+G)
RIP.
Posted by: PJ at December 15, 2011 08:49 PM (DQHjw)
Posted by: eman at December 16, 2011 12:48 AM (kEKwc)
Yep
Posted by: lous a girl at December 15, 2011 08:50 PM (R21xD)
Posted by: Nickie Goomba at December 15, 2011 08:51 PM (jeLTI)
I believe that this thread is a tribute to a great writer who was an athiest but to my memory didn't try to convince the reader to believe as he did.
Pissing on his grave is rather un-Christian I would say
Posted by: kbdabear at December 15, 2011 08:51 PM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: eman at December 15, 2011 08:52 PM (kEKwc)
Posted by: jimi ray at December 15, 2011 08:53 PM (0bg9i)
Posted by: Y-not at December 15, 2011 08:55 PM (5H6zj)
Dude, I think you mean Rowan Williams.
Posted by: Lone Marauder, pre-denounced for your convenience at December 15, 2011 08:55 PM (/bVuS)
Posted by: kbdabear at December 15, 2011 08:55 PM (Y+DPZ)
Other than that, well, I got other things to keep me busy.
Posted by: eman at December 16, 2011 12:52 AM (kEKwc)
eman, I hope you see that there are people that don't think they know God's plan and live our lives accordingly.
Posted by: lous a girl at December 15, 2011 08:55 PM (R21xD)
Well, I guess he has his answers. God rest his soul.
Posted by: Beverly at December 15, 2011 08:55 PM (4KZiq)
Posted by: Lone Marauder, pre-denounced for your convenience at December 16, 2011 12:55 AM
Thank you, that's who I meant. Whatever, he's still a hack and a clown
Posted by: kbdabear at December 15, 2011 08:56 PM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: Clubber Lang at December 15, 2011 08:56 PM (QcFbt)
No worries, I saw your original post and was all "Whaaa? Mr. Bean was the Archbishop?"
Posted by: Lone Marauder, pre-denounced for your convenience at December 15, 2011 08:57 PM (/bVuS)
Check it out to see him in his finest, most eviscerating form.
He was surprised and not displeased to hear the vocal one-third of us who had shown up to root for him and against the pro-jihad leftwads. Whom he addressed with elegant sarcasm as "Comrades."
Posted by: Beverly at December 15, 2011 08:58 PM (4KZiq)
Posted by: A Liberal AoSHQ Reader, Really! at December 15, 2011 08:58 PM (sk3ka)
Posted by: Nickie Goomba at December 15, 2011 08:59 PM (jeLTI)
Posted by: Clubber Lang at December 15, 2011 08:59 PM (QcFbt)
39At least he got sent to Hell during winter.
According to what major religion? According to what individual interpretation of that religion?
STFU
RIP Hitch
Posted by: Reggie1971 at December 15, 2011 09:00 PM (yCFFM)
Posted by: A Liberal AoSHQ Reader, Really! at December 16, 2011 12:58 AM (sk3ka)
16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.
Posted by: lous a girl at December 15, 2011 09:01 PM (R21xD)
Posted by: ace at December 15, 2011 09:01 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Random at December 15, 2011 09:02 PM (a0H5z)
The beauty of calling Blessed Mother Teresa a "bitch" and a "cow" and a "fraud"?
I don't know of any species of conservatism that would brook such slander, let alone celebrate it.
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 15, 2011 09:02 PM (mAm+G)
Posted by: eman at December 15, 2011 09:02 PM (kEKwc)
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 15, 2011 09:04 PM (mAm+G)
Posted by: ace at December 15, 2011 09:04 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Reggie1971 at December 15, 2011 09:04 PM (yCFFM)
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 16, 2011 01:04 AM (mAm+G)
---
Is this the time and the place? Grow the fuck up.
Posted by: Y-not at December 15, 2011 09:04 PM (5H6zj)
Yeah ace. What about that?
Posted by: Full Nelson at December 15, 2011 09:05 PM (EL+OC)
Posted by: kbdabear at December 15, 2011 09:06 PM (Y+DPZ)
Close this thread down.
Leave the tribute to Hitchens but kill the comments.
I am sorry that on the night you lost a friend, you have to see crap like this.
Posted by: Y-not at December 15, 2011 09:06 PM (5H6zj)
Not everyone really understands religion or Christianity in particular at a high level.
Seriously, what the hell are you talking about.
Posted by: RIP at December 15, 2011 09:07 PM (MwTP4)
Posted by: Random at December 15, 2011 09:07 PM (a0H5z)
Posted by: ace at December 15, 2011 09:08 PM (nj1bB)
Oh, them OK.
Posted by: RIP at December 15, 2011 09:11 PM (MwTP4)
Posted by: ace at December 15, 2011 09:11 PM (nj1bB)
Did anyone really say that here? A few joked that might be damned but anyone who believes in damnation knows that judgment belongs to God alone.
I admired Hitch as a rhetorician, but I agreed with him on almost nothing. I see almost no common cause between him and anything resembling modern American conservatism.
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 15, 2011 09:12 PM (mAm+G)
Posted by: ace at December 15, 2011 09:13 PM (nj1bB)
I think some people are mouthing the words without understanding the plot. Posted by: ace at December 16, 2011 01:08 AM
Very much so ...
Posted by: ABBA at December 15, 2011 09:13 PM (Y+DPZ)
124ace,
Close this thread down.
Leave the tribute to Hitchens but kill the comments.
I am sorry that on the night you lost a friend, you have to see crap like this.
I completely disagree. Hitch would love to see lively and somewhat vulgar debate in his honor. Let the thread flow....
Posted by: Reggie1971 at December 15, 2011 09:14 PM (yCFFM)
Really? Unlike Breitbart, I don't think you're actually reading the comments.
I made no serious comment on Hitchens's ultimate disposition.
Can you explain to me how he is in any way a conservative hero?
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 15, 2011 09:15 PM (mAm+G)
Posted by: A Liberal AoSHQ Reader, Really! at December 15, 2011 09:15 PM (sk3ka)
Posted by: Samuel Adams at December 15, 2011 09:16 PM (yGl9Q)
Posted by: Random at December 15, 2011 09:17 PM (a0H5z)
Posted by: eman at December 15, 2011 09:18 PM (kEKwc)
As for cancer, we just pretend to treat it. But really, all modern medicine can do is stave off the end for a while. However, it will kill you, and while killing you, put you through the most horrific treatments just so you can have one more day on earth. I know how horrible it is; I lost my Mother to it almost a year ago.
For all of those here who have the gall to insult a man who has just died a horrific death- all I can say is that I hope you don't have to live through what he did. Because what he went through is worse than any hell you can imagine.
Posted by: shibumi at December 15, 2011 09:18 PM (z63Tr)
Remember: Stalin was our ally in WWII. Shall we all shed a tear for Uncle Joe too?
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 16, 2011 12:22 AM
I felt the same way when Dennis Hopper died and this degenerate lot wanted to deify him. I am so glad that I am not the only douchebag that reads this blog!!
Posted by: MrPaulRevere at December 15, 2011 09:19 PM (uuOfy)
Posted by: ace at December 15, 2011 09:19 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Curmudgeon at December 15, 2011 09:20 PM (w7K7d)
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 16, 2011 01:12 AM (mAm+G)
That is why you fail.
Again, really? Where's the list of his conservative accomplishments and positions arrayed here for us all to admire?
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 15, 2011 09:20 PM (mAm+G)
BTW, I was sad to hear you are married. Many fantasies died at that moment.
*wink*
Posted by: eman at December 16, 2011 01:02 AM (kEKwc)
Ya know, I was drunk the other night, am I forgivin, or what?
Posted by: lous a girl at December 15, 2011 09:22 PM (R21xD)
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 16, 2011 01:20 AM (mAm+G)
So you can only admire conservatives?
Well I guess that's a difference between us then.
Posted by: Mætenloch at December 15, 2011 09:22 PM (/IES6)
Posted by: ace at December 15, 2011 09:22 PM (nj1bB)
As a secular conservative Republican I am really starting to get my blood pressure up. A couple more Mike's hard lemonades and I should go to bed.
Posted by: Reggie1971 at December 15, 2011 09:22 PM (yCFFM)
Instead, you're trying to ventriloquize God. You are dragging God and Christ into your vengeance fantasies.
Where did I do that, Ace? Come on. The No. 3 Conservative Blogger can do better than that.
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 15, 2011 09:23 PM (mAm+G)
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 16, 2011 01:12 AM
I have the feeling that you and many others see religion and politics as a "yay team" kind of thing
The kind who hopes Aaron Rodgers or Tom Brady blow out a knee if he's playing your guys, but he's the greatest man in the world if he's playing against a team you hate or he's on your fantasy football team
Posted by: kbdabear at December 15, 2011 09:23 PM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: ace at December 16, 2011 01:19 AM (nj1bB)
well said, ace.
sorry to hear that you lost a friend.
Posted by: garrett at December 15, 2011 09:23 PM (o8Elw)
<i> Again, really? Where's the list of his conservative accomplishments and positions arrayed here for us all to admire? </i>
His unflinching support of the wars against Islamic Barbarism, both Iraq and Afghanistan.
His realization that "multiculturalism" was rotten and dishonest to the core, and from that, his walking away from the Left.
At the end, he realized that private enterprise was a god thing after all.
Did he start out a leftist shithead? Sure. But he did wise up.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at December 15, 2011 09:23 PM (w7K7d)
No we didn't. Hopper changed himself without any prodding by conservative bloggers.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at December 15, 2011 09:24 PM (yGl9Q)
Posted by: Lone Marauder, pre-denounced for your convenience at December 16, 2011 12:57 AM (/bVuS)
It would be a definite upgrade.
Posted by: MrCaniac at December 15, 2011 09:24 PM (uuOfy)
Posted by: Clubber Lang at December 15, 2011 09:25 PM (QcFbt)
Posted by: ace at December 16, 2011 01:19 AM (nj1bB)
Truer words have never been spoken. God Bless You ace, love you, mean it..
Posted by: lous a girl at December 15, 2011 09:25 PM (R21xD)
Posted by: cicerokid at December 15, 2011 09:25 PM (7fIFD)
Posted by: A Liberal AoSHQ Reader, Really! at December 15, 2011 09:25 PM (sk3ka)
<i> At the end, he realized that private enterprise was a god thing after all. </i>
Ack, unintentional ironic funny spelling error.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at December 15, 2011 09:26 PM (w7K7d)
Posted by: eman at December 15, 2011 09:27 PM (kEKwc)
Posted by: ace at December 15, 2011 09:27 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Baddad at December 15, 2011 09:27 PM (IpwTX)
>>>"He served his god faithfully and well,
and now he sees him face to face in Hell."
And given that Hitchens had nasty words for Mother Theresa, I can't say he doesn't deserve some backbiting in his own death.
Well, that was Belloc's voice--and it was a joke and a fine literary reference as well! Good God.
Oh, and by the way, it's Mother "Teresa." When Agnes Bojaxhiu entered religion she was given the name of "Teresa" for St. Teresa of Avila. Of course, she said she preferred another Carmelite saint Therese of Lisieux, also known as the Little Flower.
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 15, 2011 09:28 PM (mAm+G)
The kind who hopes Aaron Rodgers or Tom Brady blow out a knee if he's playing your guys, but he's the greatest man in the world if he's playing against a team you hate or he's on your fantasy football team
Posted by: kbdabear at December 16, 2011 01:23 AM (Y+DPZ)
Shit, I'm a bad Christian then. Plus with the drinking, cussing, pron and fapping, I'm probably fucked like him.
Posted by: MrCaniac at December 15, 2011 09:29 PM (uuOfy)
Posted by: Deety at December 15, 2011 09:29 PM (Pm8ax)
Posted by: A Liberal AoSHQ Reader, Really! at December 15, 2011 09:29 PM (sk3ka)
Posted by: ace at December 15, 2011 09:30 PM (nj1bB)
159@Reggie1971 - I am currently drinking Mike's "Harder" Lemonade with the wife after a show in Birmingham, AL after a show. Have to say, not bad at all. Cheers.
Cheers to you as well. I'm tragically out of Mike's lemonade. I've got four beers left in the fridge, and a commemorative bottle of 1979 Cabernet that my dad got during the 1984 GOP convention in Dallas. I can't tell you how much self control it's taken me not to drink it when I've been out of booze. I'll drink it if we get SCOAMF out of office....whether the cork disintegates into it or not.
Posted by: Reggie1971 at December 15, 2011 09:30 PM (yCFFM)
Posted by: eman at December 15, 2011 09:30 PM (kEKwc)
Posted by: Clubber Lang at December 16, 2011 01:25 AM (QcFbt)
Nah, him living here as well as Steyn proves that the accent don't mean shit. Americans perfected the Brits own language. Other than that, Hitchens was alright.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at December 15, 2011 09:30 PM (yGl9Q)
Posted by: Evan3457 at December 15, 2011 09:31 PM (J4B6X)
Can you explain to me how he is in any way a conservative hero?
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 16, 2011 01:15 AM
Did he claim that he was?
This isn't an all in or all out kind of blog, in fact Ace has vented furiously at those with purity tests.
I'm also confident that like myself, Ace is not a big fan of the What Would Jesus Do/Say line of thinking
One of Jesus' last mortal acts was to promise paradise to a condemned and admitted criminal. I don't think that's on the 110 Percent Pure Conservative checklist...
Posted by: kbdabear at December 15, 2011 09:31 PM (Y+DPZ)
I think a couple of people here should consider if they're expressing God's will
What fool knows God's will?
Posted by: cicerokid at December 15, 2011 09:32 PM (7fIFD)
Posted by: Max Power at December 15, 2011 09:32 PM (+wxCD)
Posted by: ace at December 15, 2011 09:33 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Samuel Adams at December 16, 2011 01:24 AM (yGl9Q)
I only want pure Christians and Conservatives. All others are not. The night Hopper passed, so many commenters were trying to start a new religion praising him.
Posted by: MrPaulRevere Purity Christian and Conservative at December 15, 2011 09:34 PM (uuOfy)
I always respected the fact that he spoke his mind. Hell, I watched the episode of the Maher show when he flipped off the audience. To me, he was a guy that pissed everybody off. When that happens, sometimes you have to take note of the guy pissing you off.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at December 15, 2011 09:35 PM (yGl9Q)
You did me no injury. I was worried I had said something stupid and injured you.
It seems you bad day has passed by. This is a good thing.
Posted by: eman at December 16, 2011 01:30 AM (kEKwc)
DUDE I am a raider fan, they got the shit beatin out of them, and thebroncos pulled out a win, that was the gist of it.
And the bottom line is, I am not as smart as the majority on aos, sadly.
Posted by: lous a girl at December 15, 2011 09:35 PM (R21xD)
Posted by: ace at December 15, 2011 09:36 PM (nj1bB)
I think such a line of thinking can be great when guiding your own actions, but doesn't work anymore when evaluating others because Jesus didn't think we were effective judges of our peers. We're so bad we might as well just forgive everybody we're pissed at. I'm paraphrasing somewhat.
I imagine Jesus and Hitchens would have had lively conversation, as both were pretty provocative.
Posted by: Dustin at December 15, 2011 09:36 PM (rQ/Ue)
Posted by: A Liberal AoSHQ Reader, Really! at December 15, 2011 09:37 PM (sk3ka)
Posted by: sandy burger at December 15, 2011 09:37 PM (l7ujU)
He'll be missed.
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at December 15, 2011 09:38 PM (i0App)
Posted by: A Liberal AoSHQ Reader, Really! at December 16, 2011 01:29 AM (sk3ka)
I think it's more the "Liberal" than the "Harder Lemonade" having the effect on your ability to post coherently.
Posted by: MrCaniac at December 15, 2011 09:38 PM (uuOfy)
Posted by: ace at December 15, 2011 09:39 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: eman at December 15, 2011 09:40 PM (kEKwc)
Posted by: Elize Nayden at December 15, 2011 09:41 PM (FGxvI)
But he was a noxious force in most things--a prep-school Voltaire.
I would rather celebrate leftist atheists who found God and conservatism. Anyone remember Douglas Hyde or Bella Dodd or Eugene Genovese?
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 15, 2011 09:41 PM (mAm+G)
Hitchens was too obviously intelligent to have ignorance or laziness as an excuse for supporting Marxism, and so I have to question his overall character.
That being said, he got a few things right, and maybe got a few people to rethink a few things, and he did it very well. So that's not too shabby.
Posted by: Optimizer at December 15, 2011 09:41 PM (As94z)
Shit, I'm a bad Christian then. Plus with the drinking, cussing, pron and fapping, I'm probably fucked like him.
I'm hoping that the Almighty tells me that he doesn't sweat the small shit like that, especially in light of the horrors done by the monsters on earth
I'll leave the idea that God smiles when you kill an unbeliever to the types who fly passenger jets into occupied skyscrapers
Posted by: kbdabear at December 15, 2011 09:42 PM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: eman at December 15, 2011 09:43 PM (kEKwc)
Posted by: A Liberal AoSHQ Reader, Really! at December 15, 2011 09:44 PM (sk3ka)
This is obviously, I think, a PERSONAL vindication sort of thing. This is giving Leo and RIP pleasure to consider.
It is an awful combination of envy and resentment...
and you are fully correct that strays far from the path they profess to follow.
Regardless of your rank amongst those who knew the man, I feel for you having to deal with these asshats when you should be reflecting on whatever you took from that relationship.
I know ewoks are thick skinned creatures, I also know that you slice with a banhammer.
Posted by: garrett at December 15, 2011 09:44 PM (o8Elw)
Posted by: ace at December 15, 2011 09:45 PM (nj1bB)
Not as smart? Feh.
Some of us can find the cheese in record time, but we are still mice in a maze.
Posted by: eman at December 16, 2011 01:40 AM (kEKwc)
Yep, and I got God on my side. so theres that. You are good people..
Put your money on the Raiders, broncows going down, tee hee..
We will win the AFC West, just sayin..
And no, I am not saying I know what the fudge is gonna happen this weekend in football, so dont give me no shit..
Posted by: lous a girl at December 15, 2011 09:46 PM (R21xD)
Posted by: Ken Royall at December 15, 2011 09:46 PM (9zzk+)
you're postulating the many devilments Hitchens will now face, and delighting in his eternal torment, to be forever tormented, forever, beyond the time when the stars fade from the sky.
176 >>>What fool knows God's will?
Posted by: cicerokid at December 15, 2011 09:48 PM (7fIFD)
Shit, I'm a bad Christian then. Plus with the drinking, cussing, pron and fapping, I'm probably fucked like him.
I'm hoping that the Almighty tells me that he doesn't sweat the small shit like that, especially in light of the horrors done by the monsters on earth
I'll leave the idea that God smiles when you kill an unbeliever to the types who fly passenger jets into occupied skyscrapers
Posted by: kbdabear at December 16, 2011 01:42 AM (Y+DPZ)
I hope God doesn't think my tube sock is a mini Auschwitz then.
Posted by: MrCaniac at December 15, 2011 09:48 PM (uuOfy)
Posted by: eman at December 15, 2011 09:49 PM (kEKwc)
I would have respected Hitchens more if he hadn't so blatantly turned to neo-athiesm as a means to get back into the good graces of the left following the seeming failures of the Iraq War. I am not arguing that Hitchens was not sincere. I simply think that unlike David Horrowitz he was unwilling to come to grips with the full implications of his anatomizing of one aspect of liberalism suggested about the entire body of liberalism. Of course the other side of this coin is that unlike some paleo-conservatives he did not let one policy dispute effect his perception of an entire movement, but it nonetheless seems to me that he would always have been uncomfortable not being welcome in Vanity Fair and Salon. When you are that tied to the organs of the establishment it is difficult for me to truly believe that you are a "truth-teller." But I don't really consider that a fault because the notion of Hitchens as a truth teller was largely not a self creation. Hitchens like Mencken poked at pretension without ever truly getting any closer to truth, because at the end of the day neither actually believed in truth.
Posted by: tennvols87 at December 15, 2011 09:50 PM (YW07Z)
Posted by: A Liberal AoSHQ Reader, Really! at December 16, 2011 01:44 AM (sk3ka)
It was pretty low hanging fruit.
Posted by: MrCaniac at December 15, 2011 09:50 PM (uuOfy)
Posted by: ace at December 15, 2011 09:51 PM (nj1bB)
The Church only runs the largest private educational and healthcare systems in the world. It runs more hospices, nursing homes, orphanages, leprosaria, and clinics than any other organization on the face of the earth. Did you know that 90% of African-American women with a Ph.D. got their advanced degree at a Catholic university? Not a good record, eh?
As I said, Hitch was criminally ignorant about Christian history and theology.
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 15, 2011 09:51 PM (mAm+G)
Posted by: GnuBreed at December 15, 2011 09:51 PM (ENKCw)
I don't believe in God, dopey.
Posted by: ace at December 16, 2011 01:39 AM (nj1bB)
But do you believe in Doc?
Sorry, could'nt resist..
Posted by: lous a girl at December 15, 2011 09:51 PM (R21xD)
Posted by: Dustin at December 16, 2011 01:36 AM
Or maybe Jesus is telling him to have a seat, wait for his number to be called, he's really busy right now. Who knows? I don't
I believe that life exists on other planets in the galaxy but I don't know and can't realistically guess what kind of music they like
Same with our deities
Posted by: kbdabear at December 15, 2011 09:51 PM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: cicerokid at December 15, 2011 09:52 PM (7fIFD)
Posted by: ace at December 15, 2011 09:54 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: eman at December 15, 2011 09:54 PM (kEKwc)
I was actually talking about the dude Jesus, as in if Hitchens and Jesus had lived in the same time. Both were people who would debate points that annoyed a lot of people around them. That takes very little on the internet, but in person that takes quite a personality.
Posted by: Dustin at December 15, 2011 09:54 PM (rQ/Ue)
As a cancer survivor, my heart goes out to you. I pray that you can see the beauty and majesty of a simple sunrise.
Posted by: ExExZonie at December 15, 2011 09:55 PM (8M59W)
Posted by: lous a girl at December 16, 2011 01:46 AM (R21xD)
Shit withheld. I don't even follow football anymore. (No TV.)
I miss it, though. I'll watch some when visiting family and friends over the Holidays.
Posted by: eman at December 16, 2011 01:54 AM (kEKwc)
But do you still want to Marry me?
Posted by: lous a girl at December 15, 2011 09:55 PM (R21xD)
We get it, we get it. You've got issues with hell. And you've got a time machine and you've gone back in history to BFF David Mamet.
Consider that horse beaten to death.
(But don't suppose you're really descrying anyone's heart here.)
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 15, 2011 09:55 PM (mAm+G)
Posted by: Clubber Lang at December 15, 2011 09:56 PM (QcFbt)
Posted by: ace at December 15, 2011 09:58 PM (nj1bB)
God's eternal punishment
?
The second death.
The punishment is death, not a torture chamber. God will not torture you for 'all eternity' for sins during 4 score and 10.
Posted by: cicerokid at December 15, 2011 09:59 PM (7fIFD)
Posted by: eman at December 15, 2011 09:59 PM (kEKwc)
Posted by: Deety at December 15, 2011 10:00 PM (Pm8ax)
I don't have issues with hell.
The repeated umbradge you've taken even at joking suggestions that Hitchens is damned suggests you do.
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 15, 2011 10:00 PM (mAm+G)
Posted by: ace at December 16, 2011 01:45 AM
It's the "yay team" attitude that drives that, but God loves MY team so you're evil.
How many liberals do we know that in their own life live "conservative" lifestyles and conservatives who act "liberal"?
"He may be a prick, but he's OUR prick"
Posted by: kbdabear at December 15, 2011 10:03 PM (Y+DPZ)
As a Christian, my thoughts on someone like Hitchens are odd. He seemed to be a principled person who lived his life with honor. And naturally, he's a human being that did no real evil...so any hatred is undeserved from my point of view. It's hard for me to have much warmth for someone that personally attacked all I stand for, though. Maybe that makes me a bad person, but it's just a human reaction.
I don't hope he was right, for my sake. Nevertheless, I take no joy in his fate if I'm right.
Posted by: Crazee at December 15, 2011 10:03 PM (sbtxl)
Same with our deities<<
Is that yours kbdabear?
I hope so.
I like it.
Posted by: Deety at December 16, 2011 02:00 AM
Thanks. Even Joe Biden finds a blind squirrel now and then
Posted by: kbdabear at December 15, 2011 10:05 PM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: ace at December 15, 2011 10:05 PM (nj1bB)
Just getting back but, you seem to think I said this or something like it. I never did and never would.
Posted by: RIP at December 15, 2011 10:05 PM (MwTP4)
I don't hope he was right, for my sake. Nevertheless, I take no joy in his fate if I'm right.
In that respect....I really hope you're not right. I respectfully think you aren't.
Posted by: Reggie1971 at December 15, 2011 10:06 PM (yCFFM)
I'll take a sincere atheist over a religious dogmatic who believes in the kind of God who could have no use for one of His own creations in the next world.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at December 15, 2011 10:07 PM (MWcDw)
Posted by: ace at December 15, 2011 10:08 PM (nj1bB)
That's a pretty anti-intellectual point of view. His works did great harm. He was an apologist for leftist ideologies that condemned millions to death and destruction in the 20/c.
He was also a dime-store atheist who probably led many away from faith. "Better to have a millstone hung around his neck . . . ."
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 15, 2011 10:09 PM (mAm+G)
12 “What do you think? If a man owns a hundred sheep, and one of them wanders away, will he not leave the ninety-nine on the hills and go to look for the one that wandered off? 13 And if he finds it, truly I tell you, he is happier about that one sheep than about the ninety-nine that did not wander off. 14 In the same way your Father in heaven is not willing that any of these little ones should perish.
There's some disagreement in the wording of translations (this is NIV), but the basic point here is that there is no rejoicing in Heaven when a soul is finally and irretrievably lost. Those of you doing a happy dance on Christopher's metaphoric grave (on the presumption that he failed to come around before the end) might want to take a step back and think about whether it is your new nature in Christ or your old Adam that is guiding your choice of words tonight.
Posted by: Methos at December 15, 2011 10:09 PM (sOXQX)
Posted by: ace at December 15, 2011 10:09 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: eman at December 15, 2011 10:10 PM (kEKwc)
Posted by: Deety at December 15, 2011 10:11 PM (Pm8ax)
Posted by: lous a girl at December 16, 2011 01:55 AM (R21xD)
You are taken. It is too late.
I shall be content to stand at the far corner, catching a glimpse now and then.
Posted by: eman at December 16, 2011 01:59 AM (kEKwc)
Hell to the no, you will marry me..
eman
Just kidding..
God Bless.
Thanks aos
I read all the rest, they are the garbage sites, aos is the good stuff.
Posted by: lous a girl at December 15, 2011 10:11 PM (R21xD)
Posted by: ace at December 15, 2011 10:12 PM (nj1bB)
231>>> The punishment is death, not a torture chamber. God will not torture you for 'all eternity' for sins during 4 score and 10.
I got what little Bible-teaching I have from some born again Christians (I don't know what denomination) but they taught the "eternal torment" version.
It all depends on the individual iteration of interpretation. The Dante's inferno stuff really does seem to be a stretch for me beyond Hebrew and Greek language.
Posted by: Reggie1971 at December 15, 2011 10:14 PM (yCFFM)
Posted by: ace at December 15, 2011 10:14 PM (nj1bB)
I'll take a sincere atheist over a religious dogmatic who believes in the kind of God who could have no use for one of His own creations in the next world.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at December 16, 2011 02:07 AM (MWcDw)"
I'm not sure what you're taking him for, but I think Hitchens was takeable if you wanted a provocative person to argue with, and not so great as a leader.
I think anyone in the GOP primary field other than Paul would be a million times better for their intended goal than Hitchens, a marxist after all.
"The most conservative intellectual value, to me, is the ability and willingness to think independently and arrive at one's own conclusions, independent of the prevailing wisdom. "
Not sure what you think the word conservative means. This is classical liberalism. Individuality is the heart of it.
I do agree that Hitchens thought for himself, arrived at his own conclusions, and this is of great merit. I'm quite sure that a great many people, such as those who believe in the existence of hell, did the same thing.
I guess I don't really grok the concept of praising A basically by saying how little he was like B whom is soooo horrible.
Posted by: Dustin at December 15, 2011 10:16 PM (rQ/Ue)
Posted by: ace at December 16, 2011 02:14 AM (nj1bB)
and, somehow they failed to win you over...hard to imagine.
Posted by: garrett at December 15, 2011 10:16 PM (o8Elw)
Posted by: Clubber Lang at December 15, 2011 10:17 PM (QcFbt)
@151
Hey! Watch it there buddy. No need for that kind of talk. Don't even think about what bad thoughts somebody else might be thinking about Aaron Rodgers.....er.....and stuff.
Bad vibes......dude
Bad vibes
Posted by: packerfanrandomlysurfingthenetinhisunderwear at December 15, 2011 10:17 PM (aHfHQ)
Posted by: eman at December 15, 2011 10:17 PM (kEKwc)
God will judge people's actions and their effect on others, but I see it as a shame to lose anyone who isn't a complete monster. Most of us are a mixture of good and bad qualities, and I'm humble enough to know that if my every utterance was public...people would find a lot of it objectionable. There is no polite mask in public life.
Reggie, it's all good. Reality isn't defined by how you or I feel, so I'm not offended when people disagree.
Posted by: Crazee at December 15, 2011 10:18 PM (sbtxl)
I doubt any god who inflicts pain for his own pleasure !
Posted by: Dr Leonard McCoy at December 15, 2011 10:18 PM (Y+DPZ)
It really is very hard for me to accept there is a hell because of this.
I just don't understand how that could be.
But whatever. Different strokes for different folks.
Posted by: Dustin at December 15, 2011 10:18 PM (rQ/Ue)
Posted by: eman at December 15, 2011 10:19 PM (kEKwc)
Posted by: ace at December 16, 2011 02:14 AM
They don't shower very often either !!
Posted by: Martin Luther at December 15, 2011 10:21 PM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: ace at December 15, 2011 10:22 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: eman at December 15, 2011 10:22 PM (kEKwc)
I think they taught that. My memory's hazy. Posted by: ace at December 16, 2011 02:12 AM
What does God need with a starship?
Posted by: ace in theology class at December 15, 2011 10:22 PM (Y+DPZ)
Reggie, it's all good. Reality isn't defined by how you or I feel, so I'm not offended when people disagree.
I understand and agree. I think reality is ultimately a mystery. We are all involved in (perhaps a vain) effot to achieve an understanding of it.
Posted by: Reggie1971 at December 15, 2011 10:23 PM (yCFFM)
individual iteration of interpretation really, you don't get this?
Everyone thinks they have the answer..
His eye sees every precious thing.
Night All, God Bless.
Ace, thanks for the number #3 conservative blog, well done..
I found you from lgf and someone steered me to aos, and I am glad.
Night All.
Ace, fight the good fight..
Posted by: lous a girl at December 15, 2011 10:23 PM (R21xD)
Lie back and think of England. Posted by: eman at December 16, 2011 02:22 AM
Damn, I had a theory that it was like the DMV
Posted by: kbdabear at December 15, 2011 10:23 PM (Y+DPZ)
Take care, people.
Posted by: Crazee at December 15, 2011 10:24 PM (sbtxl)
That's one of those varying-interpretation-why-we-have-denominations things. I think the traditional view is more that Lucifer has free reign in Hell to do what he wishes with those left to his 'care' (I couldn't really tell you where that came from and don't really buy it). Dante's Inferno has some ideas in that vein that were probably not his invention, but they're not really laid out in that kind of detail in the Bible, either.
My own reading of it is that 'Hell' is more of a storage tank for the dead, and not necessarily just the lost (one of the epistles talks about Jesus spending the time between crucifixition and resurrection there mainly to claim all the faithful Jews up to that time-but he was there in victory, not for further punishment). The idea of an Inferno comes from Revelation when towards the end, Hell is tossed into the lake of fire prepared for the Devil and his angels. That could mean eternal torment. Or it could mean annihilation. I don't really know.
Posted by: Methos at December 15, 2011 10:26 PM (sOXQX)
Posted by: Clubber Lang at December 15, 2011 10:26 PM (QcFbt)
individual iteration of interpretation really, you don't get this?
Uh no, I guess not...but good nite
Posted by: Reggie1971 at December 15, 2011 10:26 PM (yCFFM)
I found you from lgf and someone steered me to aos, and I am glad.
Night All.
Ace, fight the good fight..
Posted by: lous a girl at December 16, 2011 02:23 AMAmazing Ace, how sweet the sound
That saved a Lizardoid like me
I once was downdinged
But now I see ...
Posted by: AoSHQ Hymn # 14 at December 15, 2011 10:26 PM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: eman at December 15, 2011 10:28 PM (kEKwc)
That's a nice way of boiling down an important question. Basically, what is Christianity? Instructions for how to live, or a message about Jesus's life and death and what they mean?
It's a fraction each, but how much of each?
Those who are trying to get right with Jesus by living a certain way, in exchange for not being roasted, might be missing something by not just doing it for its own sake. That's always been my objection to Hell as a motivator. Duress.
Posted by: Dustin at December 15, 2011 10:29 PM (rQ/Ue)
Hey, I just watched that last night.
Posted by: Random at December 16, 2011 02:27 AM
Thank God for dead batteries in the remote
Posted by: William Shatner at December 15, 2011 10:29 PM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: A Liberal AoSHQ Reader, Really! at December 15, 2011 10:29 PM (sk3ka)
Posted by: Deety at December 15, 2011 10:29 PM (Pm8ax)
Posted by: ace at December 15, 2011 10:29 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: ace at December 16, 2011 02:23 AM
Had to smite your comment there, Ace
Nothing personal, it's business
Posted by: The Almighty at December 15, 2011 10:31 PM (Y+DPZ)
Those who are trying to get right with Jesus by living a certain way, in exchange for not being roasted, might be missing something by not just doing it for its own sake. That's always been my objection to Hell as a motivator. Duress.
Honestly, there is scant biblical indication of an eternal fiery torment. Especially in the Old Testament.
I'm talking pre-KJV here BTW
Posted by: Reggie1971 at December 15, 2011 10:34 PM (yCFFM)
I try to be humble in regards to sin and personal shortcomings. I fail at it quite often, but it's an effort I try to put forth. I remember C.S Lewis mentioning that (according to Christianity) people's natures and temperaments are affected by God's grace and redemption...but natural inclinations and biology play a role as well. So, someone might be blessed with a good disposition and a kind heart...and he might routinely act callously. He's actually a bad person, his genetics mask it. Another person might be naturally cantankerous with an anger problem, but he tries real hard to avoid it and act decently. Robbed of their genetic gifts/faults, the mean guy is actually a much better man.
The point is, I extend this to things I don't like in the culture. Because of the way the world is, a lot of people have inclinations to stuff I think is harmful. But at their core...if they are moral people then I think that matters to some extent. Our worth as people shouldn't be defined by genetic leanings or personality inclinations.
I hope I'm making sense, I need to get some sleep. Later, guys.
Posted by: Crazee at December 15, 2011 10:35 PM (sbtxl)
Posted by: ace at December 15, 2011 10:35 PM (nj1bB)
The Church only runs the largest private educational and healthcare systems in the world. It runs more hospices, nursing homes, orphanages, leprosaria, and clinics than any other organization on the face of the earth. Did you know that 90% of African-American women with a Ph.D. got their advanced degree at a Catholic university? Not a good record, eh?
As I said, Hitch was criminally ignorant about Christian history and theology.
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 16, 2011 01:51 AM (mAm+G)
The Jewish faith does the same, as do the Mormons, Baptists, Episcopalians, Methodists, Presbyterians.
I would venture that more African American women probably got their advanced degrees from a state school. Maybe women from Africa get their advanced degrees from Catholic universities.
As for it being one of the largest at doing x, y, and z, yes it does. It is also one of the largest religious sects in the world, so it should be the largest at doing those things.
The only thing I have against the Roman Catholic church is that they consider anyone who leaves the HRCC to join any other Christian church as a heretic. I have several friends who have no relationship with their family because they joined the Presbyterian Church. It's not like they are renouncing anything, but according to the HRCC, they are now heretics.
Posted by: MrCaniac at December 15, 2011 10:36 PM (uuOfy)
If one were to map that out literally, that would mean being stuck in the middle of the Sahara desert in the middle of the night - and no matter how far you wandered, you still wouldn't find any hint of civilization.
And with that comforting thought, it's time to go to bed. G'night, all
Posted by: The Q at December 15, 2011 10:39 PM (LnQhT)
Posted by: Crazee at December 15, 2011 10:39 PM (sbtxl)
Put it in your movie brother.
Posted by: RIP at December 15, 2011 10:40 PM (MwTP4)
Posted by: ace at December 15, 2011 10:40 PM (nj1bB)
@272 ace
It sounds biblical to me,. The jist of it is that if you want to be separate from God - great. enjoy the warm weather; otherwise, welcome to paradise.
Posted by: Roy at December 15, 2011 10:41 PM (tiOTz)
Posted by: eman at December 15, 2011 10:41 PM (kEKwc)
Posted by: Clubber Lang at December 15, 2011 10:41 PM (QcFbt)
If one were to map that out literally, that would mean being stuck in the middle of the Sahara desert in the middle of the night - and no matter how far you wandered, you still wouldn't find any hint of civilization.
Are there cookies?
Posted by: garrett at December 15, 2011 10:41 PM (o8Elw)
I understand. You found paradise in America, had a good trade, made a good living. The police protected you; and there were courts of law. And you didn't need a friend of me. But uh, now you come to me and you say -- give me justice." -- But you don't ask with respect. You don't offer friendship.
What have I ever done to make you treat me so disrespectfully? Had you come to me in friendship, then this scum that ruined your daughter would be suffering this very day. And that by chance if an honest man such as yourself should make enemies, then they would become my enemies. And then they would fear you.
Good. Some day, and that day may never come, I'll call upon you to do a service for me. But uh, until that day -- accept this justice as a gift
Posted by: The Godfather at December 15, 2011 10:42 PM (Y+DPZ)
This is one of the many reasons I support suicide being an option for anyone at any time for any reason. People should be able to buy effective means, not be reduced to hit or miss, possibly (probably) disabling but non-lethal methods.
Posted by: Random at December 15, 2011 10:44 PM (YiE0S)
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven—the Son of Man. 14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the wilderness, so the Son of Man must be lifted up, 15 that everyone who believes may have eternal life in him.”
16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. 18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because they have not believed in the name of GodÂ’s one and only Son. 19 This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but people loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. 20 Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that their deeds will be exposed. 21 But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what they have done has been done in the sight of God.
The whole passage is important, but the part we tend to screw up is verse 17. The natural state of us all leads to condemnation, and there is a fear among us that if we, as Christ's ambassadors, fail to speak out against sin (you mention homosexuality, but it would apply to any sin that people want to believe isn't really a sin), then we're aiding and abetting the false belief that it's not a problem. Which deprives any sinner in question of the motivation to repent.If you look throughout the Gospels, you'll find that Jesus doesn't convert anyone with condemnations. He's highly critical of some people who are not doing right by God, but they don't change their ways. The people whose lives he changes are the ones who are already broken by their own awareness of their sinfulness.
Some of our failure is likely our old nature trying to point at the faults of others so we look good by comparison, but I don't think that's the bulk of it.
Posted by: Methos at December 15, 2011 10:44 PM (sOXQX)
Posted by: eman at December 16, 2011 02:41 AM
Nope, against union rules
Posted by: Universal Damnation Workers Guild at December 15, 2011 10:45 PM (Y+DPZ)
Religion is a complicated thing. I only became a Christian because I chose to follow Christ, otherwise I had no use for anything supernatural.
Posted by: Crazee at December 15, 2011 10:45 PM (sbtxl)
Posted by: eman at December 15, 2011 10:48 PM (kEKwc)
Posted by: Deety at December 15, 2011 10:50 PM (Pm8ax)
We are men, we are flawed, we are and will sin. If you accept Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior, you are in the club. That's about it. It doesn't matter when you do it, whether it is when you are young or on your deathbed, it does not matter. The verse those who were first shall be last and those who were last shall be first really rings true.
Bottom line, we shouldn't be worried about what others are doing, because we are also sinners.
Posted by: MrCaniac at December 15, 2011 10:51 PM (uuOfy)
As for his smoking to the end, I offer this.
The bitter cup gets passed to us all in due time. How we drink from it is up to us.
Posted by: navybrat at December 15, 2011 10:56 PM (DayNF)
Actually the "poor" anecdote kind of explains alot about the current state of political and cultural atheism as opposed to theological athiesm and political liberalism in general. For the neo-atheist like Hitchens Nietzsche's critique of Christiainty is reduced to "slave morality." It is why much of the left seems so uninterested in actual you know poor people. Since H.G. Wells and later Foucault the left has been poisoned with a Nietscheaen snobbery which disdains weakness.
This disdain of weakness could synthesize with the Marxian notion of the world historical role of the proletariate, but once it became clear that the welfare state replaced world revolution as the platform of the left the poor lost their assocation with the force of history. To compensate, the left has increasingly turned its latent Nietscheanism towards an attack on religion as the slave morality which allows for weakness to persist in this world. I consider this the reason why many secularists are so interested in Tebow's failing and yet where effectively cowed by Kurt Warner's success into focusing their disdain on Brenda Warner. It is also why the antimating spirit of Lyndon Johnson's reforms seems so differnt that Obama's despite the fact that ideologically they are very similar. The left now has clients not consituents.
Posted by: tennvols87 at December 15, 2011 10:56 PM (YW07Z)
Actually the "poor" anecdote kind of explains alot about the current state of political and cultural atheism as opposed to theological athiesm and political liberalism in general. For the neo-atheist like Hitchens Nietzsche's critique of Christiainty is reduced to "slave morality." It is why much of the left seems so uninterested in actual you know poor people. Since H.G. Wells and later Foucault the left has been poisoned with a Nietscheaen snobbery which disdains weakness.
This disdain of weakness could synthesize with the Marxian notion of the world historical role of the proletariate, but once it became clear that the welfare state replaced world revolution as the platform of the left the poor lost their assocation with the force of history. To compensate, the left has increasingly turned its latent Nietscheanism towards an attack on religion as the slave morality which allows for weakness to persist in this world. I consider this the reason why many secularists are so interested in Tebow's failing and yet where effectively cowed by Kurt Warner's success into focusing their disdain on Brenda Warner. It is also why the antimating spirit of Lyndon Johnson's reforms seems so differnt that Obama's despite the fact that ideologically they are very similar. The left now has clients not consituents.
Posted by: tennvols87 at December 16, 2011 02:56 AM (YW07Z)
I always love how the people attacking Tebow always talk about the great respect they always had for Warner, Reggie White, Joe Gibbs and Tom Landry, but when they were alive and/or playing, they were the subject of ridicule by the same people.
Posted by: MrCaniac at December 15, 2011 11:01 PM (uuOfy)
Posted by: Deety steps back at December 15, 2011 11:02 PM (Pm8ax)
Posted by: tennvols87 at December 15, 2011 11:04 PM (YW07Z)
Posted by: BrianInWisconsin at December 15, 2011 11:09 PM (GMzH2)
Posted by: Dr Spank at December 15, 2011 11:15 PM (Sh42X)
Revelation is particularly open to interpretation mainly because it's hard to wrap one's head around. It's been a while since I looked at the historic interpretations (pre-millenialism vs. post millenialism), so I'm hesitant to get into detail on those. I know there was a thought for a while that the world was getting better, so folks thought when it finally got good enough, Christ would return and rule 1000 years, and, I don't know, leave again and the antichrist would take over briefly before Judgment Day. WW1 and WW2 kind of quashed that idea. In any case, many of us are at this point are amillenial and generally consider the 1000 years to be a metaphor for the perfect length of time (10 times itself three times) for Christ to rule through the Church (the time from Pentecost to the last moment the faith has influence on earth).
I'm still murky on the ideas surrounding the Left Behind series. That basic set of ideas is relatively new. Which doesn't invalidate it-if the end is near, maybe God is opening some people's eyes to something that's been in the Bible for 2000 years that people in other times didn't need to know. Those are in my category of "I don't know."
And they said the REAL torment would be the darkness of separation from god, but I didn't buy that, because they were saying I'd literally be tortured for a 1000 years, and then cast into a lake of fire to burn (alive, feeling) forever, and to the extent I could imagine "separation from God," it does tend to seem less torturous than the actual physical tortures.
I had a severe personal break from my church some time ago (and have since returned due to growth out of my failings), and there was a period when I lashed out at God over the matter and I felt Him recede for a long time. I think it's something one can't understand without experience. It wasn't a lack of faith, but a break in the prayer relationship. I think it would be much worse to know God for a certainty (having been through Judgment Day) and then forever shut away. I think I'd prefer annihilation given that choice.
It does seem to me that there's an interpretive inconsistency in seeing damnation as a permanent complete separation from God, but that he would bother to maintain anyone in that state, in physical torment or otherwise.
Posted by: Methos at December 15, 2011 11:21 PM (sOXQX)
Posted by: Dustin at December 16, 2011 02:16 AM (rQ/Ue)
It's not being a perpetually whiny, long-winded butt-hurt cretin, for one thing.
That lets you out.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at December 15, 2011 11:46 PM (MWcDw)
Read it and weep.
Posted by: navybrat at December 15, 2011 11:47 PM (DayNF)
Posted by: MrCaniac at December 16, 2011 02:36 AM (uuOfy)
That's rather silly if true, since the HRCC recognizes the Presbyterian Baptism as sacramental.
They might have some issues with the church, and they may be heretics, but that's in an official definition, which isn't so much like the common understanding of the word. Heresy of that level is a sin, but but if we cut off contact from people who sinned at that low a threshold, we'd be hermits. Perhaps there is more to that relationship than just the religious aspect, eh?
Posted by: mtwzzyzx at December 15, 2011 11:57 PM (yByQb)
Posted by: Deety at December 16, 2011 12:05 AM (Pm8ax)
Posted by: Juicer at December 16, 2011 12:21 AM (SjIvO)
Posted by: Not Bomber's Dickishness at December 16, 2011 12:23 AM (zAKRi)
Posted by: Deety at December 16, 2011 12:26 AM (Pm8ax)
Posted by: Deety at December 16, 2011 12:32 AM (Pm8ax)
Posted by: MissTammy at December 16, 2011 12:43 AM (SsG4J)
The notion that Hitch is in hell right now because he said publicly that he was an atheist is absurd. We don't know what he actually believed, and his final photos showed quite a lot of fear in his eyes. Even if he was an atheist until the bitter end, so fucking what?
I'm just a human, but I wouldn't send anyone to or allow anyone to slip into eternal hellfire just because they didn't believe in me. The Creator is going to have infinitely more capacity for understanding than I do, and He's not a vindictive, petty shithead.
I don't worry about Hitch's soul. I bet what happened was a whole bunch of departed folks greeted him with "Surprise!" and he was flooded with relief, and then there was some kind of life review (which is apparently what happens, based on the testimonial of people who've died and been resuscitated), and he--being a man of amazing intelligence--expressed remorse for his various sins, and then he got to move on to the next stage, whatever that is.
I happen to think that we come back here a few times until we get it right, and then we're sent on to something I can't comprehend. But I don't worry about that part, because my lack of comprehension is the result of the reducer valve that is in my head. But I've had enough experiences in my life to convince me that not only does our consciousness survive the death of our bodies, we have multiple lives here. I've met at least one person I knew before, in a previous existence. I recognized her the second I met her for the first time.
So Hitch is fine, I'm sure. Still, if you'd like, why not say a prayer for his soul? I pray every night for those who died that day. I say, "Dear God, please take care of everyone who died today. Please ease their pain; please ease their fear; please ease their anger; please ease their shock; please ease their guilt; please ease their bitterness; please ease their confusion. Please bring them peace. Please guide them to the next stage, and please let them know that someone here on earth cares about them. Amen."
Every little bit helps.
Posted by: Llarry at December 16, 2011 12:46 AM (vW888)
Posted by: Rev. Fred Phelps at December 16, 2011 12:57 AM (zAKRi)
RIP Mr. Hitchens, the world always misses a good writer.
Posted by: Vic at December 16, 2011 01:11 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Rev. Fred Phelps at December 16, 2011 01:37 AM (zAKRi)
It's not being a perpetually whiny, long-winded butt-hurt cretin, for one thing.
That lets you out.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at December 16, 2011 03:46 AM (MWcDw)"
You consistently project that crap onto my comments for no apparent reason.
Nothing I said was cretinous or whiny.
I just think you're being a bit too judgmental and even arguably hateful, considering you were critical of that very behavior in the same comment. My point is that those who differ from you on religion are not necessarily evil. Perhaps they are just mistaken, but otherwise kind and good people.
Anyway, my mistake trying to have a civil and intelligent comment with you. The frothing nutty furious reply is basically all you're good for these days.
You obviously let internet debates affect you way too much. Maybe you just miss Texas.
Posted by: Dustin at December 16, 2011 01:38 AM (rQ/Ue)
That is sad, Clubber Lang, but it helps to know he rests in peace now. Cancer is truly awful, and now he no longer faces the worst of it.
And he did life a great life by his own measure. I recall him lamenting he didn't suffer and die for some grand cause, but we don't get to pick how we die, and he lived very bravely and relevantly.
I think whoever above said he was a damaged soul with a superb mind got it right. Perhaps it's unfair to evaluate his soul, as I'm not his judge, though I do disagree with him on religious matters and pray for his soul.
Posted by: Dustin at December 16, 2011 01:45 AM (rQ/Ue)
Posted by: I. Buttocks at December 16, 2011 02:08 AM (u+8qs)
He cared a lot more than he let on about what for lack of a better term might be called "good" or "goodness." He truly cared about the state of humanity; there was no posturing for political advantage involved. No pretense. He fought for it fearlessly, like a genius wild man. There is so much to respect in that, so much to look up to. It was noble. He fought for what he believed in eloquently and in an informed, persuasive, and in a fair fashion.
The guy was a hero. Reagan was too. They were the same-but-different. Obvious differences and obvious similarities. It was the similarities that put them in the same class for me.
It's hard to think of someone alive now that fits that description.
Posted by: rdbrewer at December 16, 2011 02:24 AM (ouW/g)
fuck him
I always hated him, always will
Hate to see someone die from cancer but Im not wiping any tears today
Posted by: AuthorLMendez at December 16, 2011 03:14 AM (wkzF6)
Damn. I can't believe he is gone. I read his last article a few weeks ago; His words still had the same power. I really thought he would beat cancer and die of old age. I never thought that belief in God was a pre-requisite for going to heaven. I still don't. I just thought that if you tried to be a good person, especially when you were tested, you have a place in Heaven.
If Hitch ain't in Heaven, then there is no Hell.
Posted by: qzy at December 16, 2011 03:29 AM (6b8Wh)
Posted by: Juicer at December 16, 2011 03:36 AM (SjIvO)
Aw shit.
Love him or hate him, I don't think there was an ounce of deciet in him. He told you what he thought and damn anyones feelings. And he did it with elegance and style. The only pundit for the left worth reading.
Until that time, Hitch.
Posted by: Mueller at December 16, 2011 03:41 AM (/AU3V)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 16, 2011 03:50 AM (niZvt)
Resquiescat in pace.
He was the product of his functioning brain and body.
When they ceased to function, he ceased to exist.
He was not sent anywhere.
You’ve unwittingly made a fairly compelling case for the existence of a psyche, viz, a soul. You’ve resolved that Hitchens is not the sum of his material, physical body – for as I write this his brain and body most certainly do exist in much the same state as they did when Hitchens was alive. So what is it – precisely - that you would say “no longer exists” or which others would say exists in another state? What is it that Hitchens’ body was possessed of yesterday morning that is (or as you would say was) “Hitchens” in se?
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 16, 2011 04:04 AM (4DS5T)
Posted by: packsoldier at December 16, 2011 04:16 AM (y4kqS)
The man was a fucking asshole and it's a good thing he's dead. I know he was ace's friend and I'm sorry for ace, but that doesn't change the objective fact the world is still better off without the human excrement who went by the name of Christopher Hitchens.
Posted by: Juicer at December 16, 2011 07:36 AM
You're not good enough to be tasked with scooping dogshit off his grave.
Posted by: Random at December 16, 2011 04:18 AM (YiE0S)
If you are "glad" that Hitchens is in hell, then you go against everything Christianity stands for.
Posted by: packsoldier at December 16, 2011 08:16 AM
Posted by: Random at December 16, 2011 04:20 AM (YiE0S)
Posted by: Juicer at December 16, 2011 04:28 AM (SjIvO)
Hitchens' work never rose to Orwell's level: his essays don't come close to Orwell's best, and none of his books come anywhere near "1984" or "Animal Farm" (or "Burmese Days", for that matter). Most of his political and economic tracts smack of inside baseball: scoring points on his critics for not having read this or that economist, rather than a serious discussion of issues. And his anti-religious tracts were the work of a ranting village atheist rather than a serious critic. These, I think, will soon be forgotten.
Instead, I think, the good that Hitchens leaves behind is the example of a man speaking the truth, as it had been given to him know the truth, openly and fearlessly. He was always his own man. In our era of fools, ignoramuses, and lickspittle sycophants, that means a lot.
I'll miss him. Requiescat in pacem, Christopher. And thank you.
Posted by: Brown Line at December 16, 2011 05:31 AM (GWk5C)
Posted by: The Chap in the Deerstalker Cap at December 16, 2011 05:42 AM (qndXR)
Posted by: eman at December 16, 2011 05:48 AM (kEKwc)
Posted by: Kerry at December 16, 2011 05:49 AM (a/VXa)
Like other loudmouth atheists, Hitchens held that two contradictory claims were true:
Evolutionism is correct.
Religion is an impediment to human progress.
F in logic, Hitch.
Posted by: Chuckit at December 16, 2011 05:54 AM (AEza8)
Also: there is not a single thing wrong with saying that if Hitchens did not acknowledge Christ as the son of God who was crucified to pay for the sins of humanity, then his soul has been damned for eternity. I truly hope that he repented and acknowledged Christ before he died, but my guess based on his life is that he did not. Christ clearly mourns for every soul who rejects him, given that Christ gave his life in the most painful and humiliating possible way -- to the point of being separated from God entirely -- to save people like Hitchens. But if Hitchens was an atheist to the end, there is no longer any hope for his soul.
The Bible is very clear about the fate of those who reject Christ. And there is nothing hateful or mean-spirited about point out the truths of the Bible. If you believe that "being a good person" is sufficient to receive Christ's salvation, that's all well and good, but it's a belief that is rejected by the Bible. Nobody on earth is good; we are all sinful and therefore in need of Christ's grace and forgiveness. If you think that everybody goes to Heaven (i.e., given eternal life with God), regardless of their religious beliefs, that is all well and good, yet it is also a belief that is clearly rejected by the Bible.
Which gets us to the main point: either you believe in the the clear teachings and life of Christ, as prophesied in the Old Testament and detailed in the New Testament, or you don't.
If you don't, the upside is that you'll have all of eternity to spend with your friend Hitch.
Posted by: Chesty LaRue at December 16, 2011 06:02 AM (KTtrN)
Posted by: eman at December 16, 2011 06:31 AM (kEKwc)
Posted by: Luke at December 16, 2011 06:42 AM (Insvo)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at December 16, 2011 06:46 AM (ndlFj)
Only a few people (in my book, and only my book) deserve cancer. I would not count him among them.
May his passage to wherever be peaceful. My sympathies to those in pain and regret today.
Posted by: Xenophon at December 16, 2011 06:50 AM (gHBfR)
Posted by: Friarbones at December 16, 2011 06:56 AM (B5Ly9)
Which gets us to the main point: either you believe in the the clear teachings and life of Christ, as prophesied in the Old Testament and detailed in the New Testament, or you don't.
Not only do you tout notions from a fantasy novel, but you tout the least beautiful parts.
Posted by: Luke at December 16, 2011 07:13 AM (Insvo)
Posted by: Joejm65 at December 16, 2011 07:14 AM (zjkh9)
The key
word is "functioning".
The mind is an emergent property of the functioning brain.
Turn off the brain and the mind vanishes.
Your talk of a soul is illogical.
You’re just kicking the can down the road. There is something immaterial that was Hitchens and which is no longer animating his material form. You may call it “mind,” the Greeks (inventors of logic, by the way) would have called it psyche, and Christians may call it a “soul.” Keep in mind, I have not postulated a mind/psyche/soul as an eternal entity, nor speculated about where or in what state it may exist after the death of the body for that is irrelevant to my point that you accept the fact that an essential component of that which was or remains Hitchens was immaterial. This is a highly logical conclusion. It is very likely that as I type this all the matter that was Hitchens during his life is still intact somewhere, and yet we all agree that Hitchens is “gone” in some meaningful sense. Stressing “functioning” is merely your way of slipping the rabbit into the hat and skirting the ultimate issue – “functioning” is the analogue of the Greeks’ “animated” or the Christians’ “ensouled,” if you will.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 16, 2011 07:15 AM (mg08E)
Posted by: Chuckit at December 16, 2011 07:21 AM (AEza8)
Posted by: Luke at December 16, 2011 11:13 AM (Insvo)
You know, I have mixed feelings about the death of Hitchens. I own and have read a few of his books. I have found some of his writing illuminating, some brave and audacious, and some nothing more than a bit of sophistry and preening by a man a little too much in awe of his own intellect. But I think the thing which was most unfortunate about the man was his habit of being unnecessarily provocative and insulting towards those who believe in and/or practice a religion – with a particular emphasis upon Catholicism. To be sure, Hitchens was more brave than most others of that ilk in that he did not shy away from tweaking practitioners of Islam. But in life he was not so much a principled atheist as an anti-religion evangelist with a penchant for giving particular, targeted offense.
I do believe that it was this dimension of Hitchens which has attracted the derogatory comments in this thread. True to form, the resident atheists and anti-religionists have responded in kind with their canned pejoratives and overestimated self-regard. I donÂ’t think either is particularly appropriate so soon after the manÂ’s death.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 16, 2011 07:32 AM (mg08E)
Posted by: Luke at December 16, 2011 07:36 AM (Insvo)
Posted by: Luke at December 16, 2011 07:43 AM (Insvo)
Ah, I see, because it is self-regard that causes one not to be a Christian. And it is only Muslims who wish ill upon those who reject their beliefs.
No, it is overestimated self-regard and the pomposity that would cause one to need to stick a red hot poker in the eye of others (“fantasy novel”) that causes one to be an asshole. And as we all know, assholes can be found in most belief systems.
And I do find it quite amusing that someone who clearly doesn’t believe in an afterlife is indignant about the fact that someone else believes that he won’t be invited to the “good” part of the afterlife. Bemused indifference, and reserving your strongest objection for those who actively seek to kill you in life for rejecting their religion might be a more appropriate response consistent with your professed atheist beliefs.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 16, 2011 07:46 AM (mg08E)
Posted by: Luke at December 16, 2011 07:51 AM (Insvo)
Ironically his name, Christopher, meant "one who carries Christ in his heart." I love that. Everywhere he went he carried that name and thus proclaiming the exact opposite of what came out of his mouth. Odd he never changed it.
Posted by: madamex at December 16, 2011 07:53 AM (5+Fw+)
Posted by: Luke at December 16, 2011 07:54 AM (Insvo)
You said you weren't indignant after you acted indignantly, and decidedly not with bemused indifference. You needed to hurl an insult in response to someone stating that he didn't believe that Hitchens would be in heaven, and that he may well be in Hell. Neither of which you (purportedly) or Hitchens believed existed. Thou dost protest.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 16, 2011 08:03 AM (mg08E)
Posted by: ace at December 16, 2011 08:06 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Luke at December 16, 2011 08:09 AM (Insvo)
But, according to your worldview, not only don't Heaven and Hell exist - the man no longer exists either - one person's quite wrong belief as to the relationship between two null sets, if you will. So what, exactly, bothered you?
"Fantasy novel" is entirely accurate, wherever it sticks and however hot.
The very fact that you must give offense in reply is indicative of the fact that you're not merely an atheist - your non-belief is not a calmly decided rational idea as you like to posit. You didn't simply say to yourself "I have found no compelling evidence for the existence of a God and therefore I will order my life accordingly." It's now your identity - you must now not only not believe, you must ridicule others for their belief and make converts to non-belief. Why?
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 16, 2011 08:15 AM (mg08E)
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 16, 2011 08:24 AM (mg08E)
Yes, we must continue to keep Western values and Christianity completely separate.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 16, 2011 08:25 AM (mg08E)
I quit smoking for the last time ten years ago. I lasted nine days. I decided that I'd rather die in my 50's or 60's then live a miserable life. You have to die of something, and I'd rather enjoy life and die young than live longer and be miserable. Hitch made it to 62 and that ain't too shabby. I'd be happy with that and I'm glad Hitchens was able to write right up until the end. It fits.
And let's face it, if ever you need a cigarette it's after you get fucking cancer.
Posted by: Jaynie59 at December 16, 2011 08:25 AM (4zKCA)
Let's look a a little closer, courtesy of Dennis Prager:
You are trying to find where you parked your car in the downtown area of a strange city. You walk into an alley and see a group of young men approaching. Would you feel better or worse knowing that they had just left a Bible study class?
Posted by: Chuckit at December 16, 2011 08:33 AM (AEza8)
Despite your on-the-fly attempt to look into my soul, I really don't self-identify as an atheist. I've probably spent more time chiding atheists than provoking Christians. Still, I don't think many of the comments here about Hitchens by professed Christians put you believers in a good light.
Posted by: Luke at December 16, 2011 08:34 AM (Insvo)
RIP
I can't think of anyone I read often whom I either so vehemently disagree with, or completely agree with, depending on the issue. No middle ground with Hitch.
And he lived more in those 62 (62!?!?) than most.
Posted by: MostlyRight at December 16, 2011 08:36 AM (ZG8Ti)
One of Heinlein's books was "JOB" (I think) where whatever you believed in your heart, that's what you got at the end. If you were a christian looking for the Rapture that's what happened. The protagonist's girlfriend was Scandi and believed in Valhalla, so when he got to heaven he couldn't find her. I think he found heaven to be a cast-system. So, if your an atheist and you believed in no after life, that's what you get. I liked the premiss.
Posted by: Paladin at December 16, 2011 08:36 AM (mCOPv)
Ha! Suck it, Hitchens!
Posted by: Mother Theresa at December 16, 2011 08:36 AM (znT2j)
Oh, no, I did not mean to say that. I think quite the opposite.
Posted by: Luke at December 16, 2011 08:37 AM (Insvo)
Posted by: Nick B. at December 16, 2011 08:51 AM (tQmh7)
RIP, Chris.
Posted by: baldilocks at December 16, 2011 08:56 AM (T2/zQ)
Posted by: Hamilton Burger at December 16, 2011 09:11 AM (zFMCq)
Posted by: 13times at December 16, 2011 09:34 AM (h6XiD)
Posted by: unintended irony at December 16, 2011 09:40 AM (sHY5w)
I have relatives who have died as unbelievers, and have prayed that God had mercy on their souls. I pray the same for Mr. Hitchens. I want the same for myself, by the way, when I pass on. Any other view seems cruel and heartless. Just my take.
Posted by: tubal at December 16, 2011 09:40 AM (BoE3Z)
Posted by: unintended irony at December 16, 2011 01:40 PM (sHY5w)
Beautiful.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 16, 2011 09:44 AM (mg08E)
Posted by: Mother Theresa at December 16, 2011 09:51 AM (zFMCq)
the need for a ciggie is a powerful thing: I had a boss once who died of lung cancer after a 3-pack a day habit.
A couple of days before he died, he was in the hospital surrounded by pure oxygen and kept asking for a smoke. His rationale was that he knew he would die sooner instead of later, and after 3 packs a day for 50 years can 1 final ciggie really be that harmful?
He didnt get his smokes and died a few days later.
Posted by: Mike D. at December 16, 2011 10:06 AM (p8QOg)
So the guy got to make a career of attacking Christ and Christians, but those of us who point out what is reserved for those who reject Christ are the bad guys?
You know what makes me sad? That we're celebrating the sad life of an angry old man who thought it was great sport to mock the millenia-old faith of hundreds of millions of people.
You know what else makes me sad? That you tolerate and encourage those who label the Bible a "'fantasy novel" but attack those of us who actually take its teachings seriously.
There is noting hateful about pointing out the logical end of a life that existed to mock the salvation provided by Christ's death.
Posted by: Chesty LaRue at December 16, 2011 10:11 AM (KTtrN)
We all deserve punishment and have no right to Christ's grace or forgiveness -- as the Bible says: "The wage of sin is death." It is only through repentance and acceptance of Christ that anyone can be saved.
That is what you atheists refuse to acknowledge for whatever reason. No mortal man has ever been saved by works.
I am not at all arguing that I am better than Hitchens or that he "deserved" eternal damnation. He was given a lifetime to finally acknowledge Christ and he made a career out of rejecting it. It is very sad, but what is done is done.
Posted by: Chesty LaRue at December 16, 2011 10:16 AM (KTtrN)
Posted by: What would Hitch do? at December 16, 2011 10:25 AM (zFMCq)
It may irk you, but from the look of things, Hitchens had quite a happy life.
Posted by: Luke at December 16, 2011 10:44 AM (Insvo)
Most fantasy novels do not concern themselves with historical figures and events for which there is sufficient evidence and are therefore historical fact. The Bible is full of figures of events which have lived and have happened. Was there no King David? This gives lie to your statement - you don't mean that it is a "fantasy novel" in the proper sense - like, for example, The Lord of the Rings. You mean to make a comparison between historical figures and events and hobbits and elves and dragons and so forth in order to belittle. Isn't it sufficient to state that you do not accept the supernatural claims made in the Bible and leave it at that? Why the extraordinary effort to ridicule?
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 16, 2011 10:52 AM (mg08E)
Because I stumbled onto a nest of those smug, nasty Christians my atheist acquaintances are always complaining about.
There are all sorts of novels and fantasy stories that incorporate historical figures. So I think this gives the lie to your assertion.
Posted by: Luke at December 16, 2011 10:55 AM (Insvo)
Perhaps he did, but one cannot tell simply "from the look of things." Happiness is not synonymous with "fun," "satiated," or "inebriated." I would suggest that it is more difficult to derive true happiness from life if one is stuck pondering the meaningless abyss on a somewhat consistent basis.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 16, 2011 10:57 AM (mg08E)
You stumbled upon a nest of smug, nasty Christians discussing the life and death of an often smug, nasty contrarian, who delivered many of his most damning comments about beloved public figures in the hours following their deaths. This is the complaint of your supposed "atheist acquaintances?" For someone who ridicules their beliefs you sure have no problem pointing out precisely when they fall short of living up to them.
There are all sorts of novels and fantasy stories that incorporate historical figures. So I think this gives the lie to your assertion.
When they incorporate historical figures and events they are commonly classified as "historical fiction," not "fantasy." You use "fantasy" for a particularly derogatory purpose, in order to liken widely held beliefs to stories of dragons and unicorns and other such things in which a comparatively negligible number of people have sincere belief.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 16, 2011 11:09 AM (mg08E)
Posted by: Luke at December 16, 2011 02:55 PM (Insvo)
Projection is practiced by the oblivious.
Posted by: baldilocks at December 16, 2011 11:24 AM (T2/zQ)
Posted by: FPW at December 16, 2011 11:26 AM (BDNF5)
The man had a wife and children, numerous friends, was a terrific writer who was intellectually engaged (right up to the end), and pretty much seemed to live his life on his own terms. He did not appear to be obsessed with the abyss (unlike you Christers), but rather everything that came before it. Not a bad life.
When they incorporate historical figures and events they are commonly classified as "historical fiction," not "fantasy." You use "fantasy" for a particularly derogatory purpose, in order to liken widely held beliefs to stories of dragons and unicorns and other such things in which a comparatively negligible number of people have sincere belief.
If the shoe fits, let St. George wear it.
The fact that a belief is widely held says nothing of its merit, especially one where the evidence is so very thin.
Posted by: Luke at December 16, 2011 11:30 AM (Insvo)
mass and energy cannot be destroyed. i wonder where consciousness falls within those categories. some combination of electrical biochemistry, right? thus "supernatural". synaptic firing leaves echoes. data is stored. it is possible that Mr. Hitchens exists in some state or another, perhaps a quark of sorts imprinted with data. the bridge between mass and energy is gone, the vessel that housed that core being that was Christopher Hitchens is gone. no complex organism named Christopher Hitchens that can drink whiskey and play with legos, but since nothing can be destroyed, there must be some tiny particle of mass or some form of energy that was Christopher Hitchens has to be out there somewhere.
Posted by: technology is cool at December 16, 2011 11:46 AM (lHdBc)
Posted by: nikkolai at December 16, 2011 12:53 PM (hA896)
You know who you are.
We are all guests of Mr. Ace here. Show your appreciation for his hospitality.
Posted by: Trying to be civil is hard to do at December 16, 2011 01:22 PM (Onw8c)
You know who you are.
We are all guests of Mr. Ace here. Show your appreciation for his hospitality.
Posted by: Trying to be civil is hard to do at December 16, 2011 01:24 PM (Onw8c)
Posted by: Trying to be civil is hard to do at December 16, 2011 01:29 PM (Onw8c)
Late to this thread but have to say: I remember a couple years back, when he was first diagnosed, Hitch wrote a column specifically asking people not to pray for him. Thinking that that was cool, I said a quick one anyway figuring he'd never know.
On his passing I do pray that the Good Lord smiles kindly on him...after He pulls a nasty practical joke on Hitch's ass, threatening him with Fire and Brimstone, all the while laughing maniacally...MWAHAHAHAH....and then saying "Just kidding Hitch. All is forgiven".
That's what I'd like.
Posted by: LGoPs at December 16, 2011 02:54 PM (lHn6+)
Wow i really found this to be an interesting read; thanks for sharing
Posted by: D.C. Dead iBooks at December 16, 2011 04:59 PM (GeprT)
Posted by: Fortunata at December 16, 2011 05:00 PM (90H1N)
Posted by: Christmas Sleigh Plan at December 16, 2011 05:33 PM (l94RK)
Posted by: RSS Newsreader Apps at December 16, 2011 05:57 PM (fA4z/)
Posted by: Apollo’s Angels ePub at December 16, 2011 09:16 PM (m1psR)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.4842 seconds, 535 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: tasker at December 15, 2011 07:52 PM (r2PLg)