October 11, 2011
— Ace Offensive:
Mitt Romney said today that Rick Perry needs to “repudiate” the remarks made by Baptist pastor Robert Jeffress about Mormonism Saturday in his introduction of Perry at the Value Voters Summit.
This is sort of interesting. Jeffress intended his remarks to help Perry, and also, I suppose, to further the notion that Mormonism is a cult.
But what's going to end up happening is that Perry will either say Mormonism is not a cult, which in thus hurts Jeffress' second goal, or will not say either way, which will hurt Perry, at least with voters who are against the idea of a religious test and different classes of citizenship based on religious allegiance.
Perhaps that's a good thing. It's interesting, though, that bringing stuff like this into the open so often backfires. There's some kind of lesson in that.
Bryan Preston isn't having any of this, though.
Romney even hit Perry for saying that Jeffress’ remarks “hit it out of the park.” Romney decried a “religious test” and called on Perry to disassociate himself from Jeffress’ remarks.The problem with Romney’s version of what happened is that it’s almost entirely untrue.
The Perry campaign did not select Rev. Jeffress; the Summit selected him and got a perfunctory sign-off from the campaign. Rev. JeffressÂ’ remark that Mormonism is a cult was not made in his introduction to Gov. Perry, but in remarks made to reporters later. As soon as he was aware of JeffressÂ’ remark, Perry did in fact disassociate himself with them entirely.
Romney seems to be demanding much more than a simple "disassociation," though. He basically wants Perry to repudiate and scold his base.
Which obviously would be bad for Perry.
Jeffress' anti-Mormon stuff might have worked if it had been stealthier, but he went obvious with it and now the guy he'd hoped to help is in even more political trouble.
Christie also rapped Perry hard on that at today's endorsement. He then went on to defend RomneyCare...
Speaking about Romney’s Massachusetts health-care program, Christie said it was “completely intellectually dishonest” to compare it to Obamacare.
...and it turns out that today is a particularly bad day to claim the systems cannot "honestly" be compared.
The records, gleaned from White House visitor logs reviewed by NBC News, show that senior White House officials had a dozen meetings in 2009 with three health-care advisers and experts who helped shape the health care reform law signed by Romney in 2006, when the Republican presidential candidate was governor of Massachusetts. One of those meetings, on July 20, 2009, was in the Oval Office and presided over by President Barack Obama, the records show.“The White House wanted to lean a lot on what we’d done in Massachusetts,” said Jon Gruber, an MIT economist who advised the Romney administration on health care and who attended five meetings at the Obama White House in 2009, including the meeting with the president. “They really wanted to know how we can take that same approach we used in Massachusetts and turn that into a national model.”
Politico casts tonight as "Now or Never" for Perry, and, despite his solid fundraising, I think that might be right.
And will the knives come out for Cain?
Santorum's in a huff that no one's taking him seriously yet.
One candidate, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, has signaled that he may be taking aim at Cain. Before Cain’s recent surge, many speculated that Santorum could be the next to rise.In a new radio ad running in Iowa, Santorum accuses Cain of “strongly” supporting “the Wall Street bailouts.” (RELATED: Country singer Lee Greenwood endorses Cain)
And Santorum, whose campaign didn’t respond to a request for comment for this story, also has made it clear he doesn’t agree with Cain’s tax plan: “I know there’s a plan out there, the 9-9-9. I’ve got a better one; it’s the zero-zero-zero plan,” he said at a conservative gathering last week.
Zero Zero Zero plan? Awesome. Bullshit bullshit bullshit.
Posted by: Ace at
12:21 PM
| Comments (388)
Post contains 681 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: Rocks at October 11, 2011 12:25 PM (19AIg)
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at October 11, 2011 12:26 PM (JxMoP)
Posted by: Dr Spank at October 11, 2011 12:26 PM (Sh42X)
Posted by: Lemmiwinks at October 11, 2011 12:26 PM (54F2e)
Posted by: buzzion at October 11, 2011 12:26 PM (GULKT)
In Presidential politics, YOU are responsible for any speaker your campaign signs off on. If you don't KNOW what the guy is going to say, you go to him and find out or give him a script and get his agreement NOT to say anything off-message for the whole of the conference, or you DON'T approve him.
If Perry's people can't even do that, his campaign is more not-ready-for-prime-time than we realized.
Better to find out now.
Romney is fully within his rights. If the jackass preacher had called Catholicism a "cult" I would expect a repudiation, too.
Posted by: Adjoran at October 11, 2011 12:26 PM (VfmLu)
Posted by: dagny at October 11, 2011 12:26 PM (LVNkq)
Posted by: L. Ron Hubbard at October 11, 2011 12:27 PM (QKKT0)
Mitt Romney said today that Rick Perry needs to “repudiate” the remarks made by Baptist pastor Robert Jeffress about Mormonism Saturday in his introduction of Perry at the Value Voters Summit.
Or what?
Posted by: Secundus at October 11, 2011 12:28 PM (dEtCk)
Posted by: dagny at October 11, 2011 12:28 PM (LVNkq)
Posted by: Roy at October 11, 2011 12:28 PM (VndSC)
So, it looks like Christie is an "opportunity commenter" when it comes to political items as well.........go figure.
Sorry, fatman. When the word comes down that the SAME GUYS architected it, you have no chicken leg to stand on.
Posted by: © Sponge at October 11, 2011 12:29 PM (UK9cE)
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at October 11, 2011 12:29 PM (OhYCU)
Posted by: Adjoran at October 11, 2011 04:26 PM (VfmLu)
Load of crap. The Pastor said nothing wrong in his intro. The campaign can't control what someone will say to a reporter and he's not a campaign spokesman anyway.
Posted by: Rocks at October 11, 2011 12:30 PM (19AIg)
You know why? They know the built in current that Romney will have to swim against. It fits with the scheme; divide and conquer. For these bastards the more they can segment our society and then play to the individual segments and when necessary, pit the segments against each other, the better off they are.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 11, 2011 12:30 PM (jx2j9)
I have to say I am more than a little disappointed in the way this is going down. I don't want to vote for Romney or Cain at this time. What a slime Romney is....
Posted by: The terrorist Hobbit formerly known as Donna at October 11, 2011 12:30 PM (5Wl/f)
Posted by: Paul Zummo at October 11, 2011 12:31 PM (IGkEP)
And it's this kind of bald-faced dishonesty which really puts Mittens over-the-top for me. Everything he stated as fact (except the comments themselves) was incorrect. So either he's misinformed (not good) or lying (worse).
Romney is fully within his rights. If the jackass preacher had called Catholicism a "cult" I would expect a repudiation, too.
Bull crap. First off, you're positing something that has about zero chance of happening. What if he'd called Islam a cult? Should they expect a complete repudiation? There are people on this blog who would agree 100% that it is.
Second, Perry did immediately say that he did not believe that Mormonism is a cult. A full repudiation is not, and should not be, necessary. He didn't choose Jeffress (the summit did), and he never asked Jeffress to say anything on his behalf.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at October 11, 2011 12:31 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Dr Spank at October 11, 2011 12:31 PM (Sh42X)
Posted by: Snort! (tha wunder hawg) at October 11, 2011 12:31 PM (OlN4e)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 11, 2011 12:31 PM (i6RpT)
Not the way it was reported so I just learned something.
Mitt is a dumb ass. And he needs to shut up before someone really looks into this nut roll cult he belongs to.
Posted by: Dang at October 11, 2011 12:31 PM (BbX1b)
Posted by: R. Perry at October 11, 2011 12:32 PM (W1mrP)
The correct response here is "bite me".
I would have thought the correct response would be "You gonna repudiate government health care?"
Posted by: Secundus at October 11, 2011 12:32 PM (dEtCk)
If Perry's people can't even do that, his campaign is more not-ready-for-prime-time than we realized.
Better to find out now.
Romney is fully within his rights. If the jackass preacher had called Catholicism a "cult" I would expect a repudiation, too.
Posted by: Adjoran at October 11, 2011 04:26 PM (VfmLu)
Uh, you might want to read a little closer. Put all the pixels together this time...
The Perry campaign did not select Rev. Jeffress; the Summit selected him and got a perfunctory sign-off from the campaign. Rev. JeffressÂ’ remark that Mormonism is a cult was not made in his introduction to Gov. Perry, but in remarks made to reporters later. As soon as he was aware of JeffressÂ’ remark, Perry did in fact disassociate himself with them entirely.
Posted by: Havedash at October 11, 2011 12:32 PM (sFD5n)
Posted by: Juan McStain at October 11, 2011 12:32 PM (ieDPL)
I really am starting to despise the man. I voted for him in the last primary.
Posted by: Lizabth at October 11, 2011 12:32 PM (JZBti)
Fixed.
Posted by: Dr Spank at October 11, 2011 12:33 PM (Sh42X)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 11, 2011 12:33 PM (jx2j9)
Romney raising this issue again will hurt Perry but it will hurt Romney as well.
Like Bachmann's injection issue hurt both candidates.
Putting the religious beliefs and practices of Mormons in play will not help Romney in the long run. Most GOP voters just think of Mormons as moral, with traditional values, but the fact is Mormons have some hard to explain practices and beliefs. Romney does not want to get into a running defense of Mormon theology.
Posted by: Bob from Ohio at October 11, 2011 12:33 PM (ROFkf)
What's a cult? Isn't Jeffress just using the word C-word to mean a bunch of people following some bullshit some guy just made up?
I mean, is there a non-Mormon in the entire world who thinks Joseph Smith jr.'s Book of Mormon isn't a bunch of made-up hogwash?
Of course it is.
Just like Scientology is a cult. Right? L.Ron Hubbard just made up Scientology out of thin air.
But if you call either of those things cults, then you have to consider that Islam is a cult. And so is Judaism. And Christianity. And Hinduism. Etc.
So maybe he's just using the word less to describe Mormonism but more to marginalize it. Because, after all, it would be hypocritical for a believer in one religion to ridicule the believer of another.
Posted by: seattle slough at October 11, 2011 12:34 PM (JRGA6)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at October 11, 2011 12:34 PM (l9zgN)
Posted by: Richard McEnroe at October 11, 2011 12:34 PM (qvify)
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at October 11, 2011 12:34 PM (OhYCU)
Posted by: t-bird at October 11, 2011 12:35 PM (FcR7P)
Romney supporters like to use Article Six to dismiss his Mormonism but that's not what it's about. Nothing wrong with looking at someones religion when making a decision to vote for or against them.
Posted by: lowandslow at October 11, 2011 12:35 PM (9TXA3)
Posted by: Zombie Hunter Thompson at October 11, 2011 12:35 PM (GOG1H)
Posted by: Theresa D., TPT--SCOaMF is one and done! at October 11, 2011 12:35 PM (Zgfnd)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 11, 2011 12:35 PM (i6RpT)
>>>If Perry's people can't even do that, his campaign is more not-ready-for-prime-time than we realized.
Yeah, not buying it either. Tony Perkins was quite clear on how the process went: they suggested Jeffress to Perry and his team because they knew he was Perry's pastor and that he would endorse him. They asked Perry for the okay on it, and Perry said "sounds great." Sorry, but that's 'ownership' right there. Jeffress hasn't exactly been shy in the past about his views on Mormonism -- if Perry's team GENUINELY didn't know that he would go off on a tear like this (or if they didn't even consider the possibility) then, seriously, is this supposed to be something that gets them off the hook? It's stunning, campaign-crippling incompetence AT BEST, and something more sinister at worst.
I'm actually pretty certain the "incompetence" explanation is the correct one, simply on the logic that Perry's team would have known an anti-Mormon rant would backfire had they considered the possibility, but so what? It happened, and now Romney gets to tie it around Perry's neck. This ain't beanball, and the attack was hatefully offensive.
As for Romney calling on Perry to repudiate Jeffress? I'm a bit amused to see dagny getting his (her?) panties in a bunch about it -- it's called politics. And, to be perfectly honest, I found Jeffress' comments to be thoroughly insulting, and maybe just a little bit short of outright revolting. We expected the "Mormon card" to played against Mitt Romney -- but we didn't expect it to be played against by someone on our own team. That was supposed to be Obama's low blow. Why do we all cordially loathe Mike Huckabee, after all? He broke the same rule, and we never forgot it.
But now, because Romney's the guy people don't want to see win the nomination, and Perry's the theoretically more conservative candidate, I guess the same rules kinda sorta don't really apply anymore.
Posted by: Jeff B. at October 11, 2011 12:36 PM (XonkM)
Of course it wasn't the way it was reported. It was reported by the MFM and Romney's camp. However, it didn't take long (if you read a full article instead of just the first few paragraphs, or listened to a whole segment on yesterday's news) to find out the truth: Jeffress made his comments directly to the press after Perry spoke.
Indeed, the only reason it can be "tied" to Perry at all is that Dr. Jeffress gave the introduction to Perry's speech. Had he been chosen to provide the introduction to, say, Mr. Cain's speech or Mrs. Bachman's, this would either have stuck to them or (more likely) not have been a story in the first place.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at October 11, 2011 12:36 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: tommygun at October 11, 2011 12:36 PM (T2ydq)
Posted by: Mitt Romney at October 11, 2011 12:36 PM (Sh42X)
Hell, we knew his convictions were fluid. He's always said what he thought he had to, to who he thought he had to, and when he thought he had to.
That's probably the nicest way I've ever seen anyone be called a bullshit artist.
Posted by: Secundus at October 11, 2011 12:36 PM (dEtCk)
Posted by: Dave at October 11, 2011 12:37 PM (Xm1aB)
I watched the Christie endorsement and was getting close to lining up behind Romney after hearing Christie speak. Then in the questions they both lost me again goddamnit.
Romney lied about the entire cult thing and then Christie jumped in and said yeah it's just like when I appointed the muzzie.
Jeebus.
Posted by: robtr at October 11, 2011 12:37 PM (MtwBb)
It'll be more interesting to see, if by some disaster Romney gets the nomination, what consequence rubbing his cult in the noses of the GOP voting base has. Ace wouldn't understand, but there are a lot of people who put their loyalty to God first and won't stand up to be counted with His enemies no matter what the fiscal situation may be.
Put in terms you might understand, humiliating a large swath of the voting base (which seems to be the establishment goal here) is not a good means of encouraging the have your back in the general election.
There's no upside for anyone here.
Posted by: Methos at October 11, 2011 12:37 PM (sOXQX)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at October 11, 2011 12:37 PM (deaac)
Posted by: Snort! (tha wunder hawg) at October 11, 2011 12:39 PM (OlN4e)
Heh. Romney should be called on to repudiate Joseph Smith's obvious racism.
Posted by: al-Cicero, Tea Party Jihadist at October 11, 2011 12:39 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Heretics Local 666 at October 11, 2011 12:39 PM (ieDPL)
Posted by: ParisParamus at October 11, 2011 12:39 PM (bN5ZU)
*crickets*
Posted by: Dang at October 11, 2011 12:39 PM (BbX1b)
*crickets*
Posted by: Dang at October 11, 2011 12:39 PM (BbX1b)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 11, 2011 12:39 PM (i6RpT)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at October 11, 2011 12:39 PM (deaac)
Because, after all, it would be hypocritical for a believer in one religion to ridicule the believer of another.
If that's what you think, then you don't know a whole lot about theology.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at October 11, 2011 12:40 PM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Heretics Local 666 at October 11, 2011 04:39 PM (ieDPL)
Silly rabbit, Romney isn't the Antichrist; he's the anti-SCOAMF.
Posted by: ParisParamus at October 11, 2011 12:40 PM (bN5ZU)
I'm going to put it in a card and send it to him then.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 11, 2011 12:40 PM (jx2j9)
Posted by: RioBravo at October 11, 2011 12:40 PM (eEfYn)
Posted by: joncelli at October 11, 2011 12:40 PM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at October 11, 2011 12:41 PM (XE2Oo)
And he needs to shut up before someone really looks into this nut roll cult he belongs to.
Fuck you and your two inbred brain cells, you mewling puss.
Posted by: Proud Mormon Emperor of Icecream at October 11, 2011 12:41 PM (epBek)
Vote for Mitt Romney. He's been running for the past 4 years. The base hates him and he can't answer a simple question to save his life, but hey. Maybe just maybe he won't depress Republican voters as Obama will depress Democrats.
If that doesn't seal the deal then I don't know what will.
Posted by: buzzion at October 11, 2011 12:41 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at October 11, 2011 12:41 PM (deaac)
Why is it that Republicans are more likely to attack each other, and defend themselves aggresively against each other, than they are to lay a finger on the ass of Obama?
Romney's best play is to set it up as Romney versus Cain.
Posted by: Truman North at October 11, 2011 12:42 PM (I2LwF)
It is because there are, for all intents and purposes, an infinite supply of the terrorists that are being let go; it's not like there will be an uptick in terrorism.
Posted by: ParisParamus at October 11, 2011 12:42 PM (bN5ZU)
I just hope that whoever the nominee is goes after Obama with 1/1000th of the energy they are all going after each other.
Also, protip to Romney's campaign, if you want people to stop thinking you are an opportunistic weasel who will bend the facts to fit whatever you want, well, stop freaking lying about stuff.
Posted by: alexthechick at October 11, 2011 12:42 PM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Frodo Bin Laden at October 11, 2011 12:42 PM (ieDPL)
Here is what Perry NEEDS to say.
In America we have Freedom of Religion. Just as Mitt Romney is free to believe as he does, it is NOT MY PLACE to comment on the Preachers Religious Beliefs, nor INFRINGE his FREEDOM OF SPEECH.
If you have questions about what the Preacher said, I suggest you talk to him, I have a campaign to run.
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 11, 2011 12:42 PM (NtXW4)
Posted by: Rick "Bite Me" Perry at October 11, 2011 12:42 PM (FcR7P)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 11, 2011 12:42 PM (i6RpT)
72 Thanks Jeff. I was just getting around to that but the stupid was so strong I was trying to figure out how to approach it. And to
71 Why do you want to know? Joining? Writing a paper?
Posted by: dagny at October 11, 2011 12:43 PM (LVNkq)
Mormonism is most closely associated with fairy tails pulled wholesale outta some dude named Joseph Smith's ass.
Posted by: Snort! (tha wunder hawg) at October 11, 2011 12:43 PM (OlN4e)
It would take several (very long) blog posts, but I can actually provide Logical, Philosophical (in the classic sense) reasoning that states that Judaism and Christianity are not "just made up." For the record.
And, no, there is a "technical" definition of cult- one which Mormonism once met, but no longer does (IIRC).
because they knew he was Perry's pastor and that he would endorse him.
Except that he's not Perry's pastor (it would be very difficult for a Baptist pastor in Dallas to be the pastor of the Governor who actually hails from West Texas). So, at most, they knew he would endorse Perry. Perry, for his part, probably knows nothing about Dr. Robert Jeffress beyond the fact that he was involved with the Day of Prayer (if he even knows that much).
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at October 11, 2011 12:43 PM (8y9MW)
No, because the use of 'cult' is as a perjorative. I know you know the difference, and you are being an obtuse Leftist ... but I repeat myself.
What you don't know is that we're going to pick an asshole and he's going to drub your ManChild next November.
Be sure to stock up on Kleenex, turdmuffin.
Posted by: weft cut-loop at October 11, 2011 12:44 PM (kt1UQ)
Is Mormonism a cult?
Well that's debatable. They used to exclude Blacks and they had some strange beliefs. I guess you could call almost every Religion a cult. The point here is There is going to be a lot of this cult talk once Romney gets the nod.The media has just been cooling their jets waiting for this to happen. Of course this is just my opinion...
Posted by: The terrorist Hobbit formerly known as Donna at October 11, 2011 12:44 PM (5Wl/f)
Posted by: Dave at October 11, 2011 12:44 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: Soona (soona) at October 11, 2011 12:44 PM (ieWmi)
Posted by: lorien1973 at October 11, 2011 12:44 PM (usXZy)
This guy Jeffries is a dumb-bunny, but I wish Mitt would have shut up about the whole thing.
I understand why Mitt wants to drag the troglodytes out of the woodwork. Because it probably benefits him politically to have them spew their contempt in the public eye.
But its bad for America and, frankly, it strikes me as cynically using the Faith as a means to an end.
Come on, Mitt. You can't be that desperate.
Posted by: Proud Mormon Emperor of Icecream at October 11, 2011 12:44 PM (epBek)
Posted by: dagny at October 11, 2011 12:45 PM (LVNkq)
I want that to be Romney. Maybe two bucks.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 11, 2011 12:45 PM (jx2j9)
Posted by: Burt TC at October 11, 2011 12:45 PM (TOk1P)
Also, protip to Romney's campaign, if you want people to stop thinking you are an opportunistic weasel who will bend the facts to fit whatever you want, well, stop freaking lying about stuff.
Posted by: alexthechick at October 11, 2011 04:42 PM (VtjlW)
I know, I watched the Christie thing and said ok this guy can win, he's smart, the polls show he can win so fine I am going with him. Then bang, the fucker lied again.
What the f*ck, it has to be a character trait.
Posted by: robtr at October 11, 2011 12:45 PM (MtwBb)
In other news, project veritas has o'keefe over on wall street. pretty funny. its like capitalism or something.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at October 11, 2011 12:45 PM (qpKJT)
in b4 the revelation that Christmas is a pagan holiday!
*I hear this every year. And the a-hole who says it, either online or in person, says it like s/he just discovered the information and no one ever heard it before.
Posted by: soothie at October 11, 2011 12:45 PM (G/zuv)
Perry should go for the home run, ask him if he agrees that we all become gods, ask about Joseph Smith's polygamy (and Brigham Young's), and about all the other crazy stuff Mormons believe.
Home run, dude! Perry could then really seal the deal by asking Mitt why he doesn't believe in Young Earth Creationism. Zing!
Posted by: Proud Mormon Emperor of Icecream at October 11, 2011 12:46 PM (epBek)
Posted by: Shiggz at October 11, 2011 12:46 PM (I9fXA)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at October 11, 2011 12:46 PM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Sub-Tard at October 11, 2011 12:46 PM (0M3AQ)
because they knew he was Perry's pastor and that he would endorse him.
Except that he's not Perry's pastor (it would be very difficult for a Baptist pastor in Dallas to be the pastor of the Governor who actually hails from West Texas). So, at most, they knew he would endorse Perry. Perry, for his part, probably knows nothing about Dr. Robert Jeffress beyond the fact that he was involved with the Day of Prayer (if he even knows that much).
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at October 11, 2011 04:43 PM (8y9MW)
Gee, you mean Seattle Stupid was wrong on the facts and doesn't know what the hell he's talking about. I'm shocked I tell ya.
Posted by: buzzion at October 11, 2011 12:46 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at October 11, 2011 12:46 PM (deaac)
This is one of the reasons I can not stand neocon Krauthammer
Krauthammer: Perry should sever ties with Mormon-denouncing pastor
Krauthammer stressed that Perry is now connected with Jeffress, and said that the candidate now must publicly rebuke the reverend. “It isn’t quite enough to say he doesn’t agree,” Krauthammer said. “Like it or not, he’s associated with the Rev. Jeffress.”
What ties Krautstupid? He is not PerryÂ’s pastor. Perry doesnÂ’t pal around with him. And hell, they are not even in the same religious denomination. The only tie he has is a fictitious one that asshole Romney supporters in the media keep pushing. Does Romney need to break ties with Obama? After all, they have more in common than Perry and this other asshole.
So piss on Krautstupid and piss double on Romney asshole and all his loud and obnoxious bots. You would would thing the 4 or 5 supporters he has here were thousands from all the posts and noise they make.Posted by: Vic at October 11, 2011 12:47 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 11, 2011 12:47 PM (i6RpT)
Posted by: Florida Fran at October 11, 2011 12:47 PM (hrme2)
Wait a second, let me get this straight -- so you're saying that Mitt Romney, as a MORMON (not as a RINO or anything, but rather as a Mormon) is an "enemy of God?" And a cult member?
If I'm reading this correctly, then yo, straight up: go fuck yourself.
Posted by: Jeff B. at October 11, 2011 12:47 PM (XonkM)
Posted by: Anony at October 11, 2011 12:47 PM (Yigvc)
Posted by: some non-candidate at October 11, 2011 12:47 PM (eHr/6)
How is Perry supposed to be responsible for what the dick said after his remarks? What if the dick said it the next day?
Let's just get the standard down for all to be aware: candidates are responsible for everything their supporters say.
Sound good, JeffB?
Posted by: weft cut-loop at October 11, 2011 12:48 PM (kt1UQ)
Okay, now this made me laugh. Well-played, my friend.
Posted by: Jeff B. at October 11, 2011 12:48 PM (XonkM)
Mormonism should not be a topic in this election.
Perry doesn't have to repudiate anyone's faith. Just about every faith is mutually exclusive of other faiths. Non mormons do not think Mormons are correct, and Mormons don't think non mormons are correct. This shouldn't offend us. We just need to keep this conversation about policies instead of religion.
It is not surprising that Romney plays victim hustle like a democrat.
What Perry should do is say he is more interested in the kinds of pandering you will find if you click the link on my name, such as Romney pandering directly for more goodies than Obama is giving folks.
Perry hasn't raised anyone's race or religion. He owes no more apologies than Mccain owed Obama when folks claimed he was a muslim.
Posted by: Dustin at October 11, 2011 12:48 PM (fF625)
Posted by: t-bird at October 11, 2011 12:48 PM (FcR7P)
Perry said after his speech that he didn't agree that Mormonism was a cult. His team released a statement. Perry won't apologize for something The Head of the Baptist Convention says...sheeesh!
Romney is an ass trying to recover from Perry's monday ad and this morning's leak about his own hired Romneycare advisers meeting at the WH in 09' 12 times to discuss implementing Obamacare. That is gonna stick. Conservatives aren't gonna have Romney shoved down their throats...Nope!
Gig Em'
Posted by: workingclass artist at October 11, 2011 12:48 PM (tBMfq)
Posted by: HeartlessBlackOrchid at October 11, 2011 12:48 PM (SB0V2)
Just wanting to know if what the preacher said is true.
Posted by: Dave at October 11, 2011 04:44 PM (Xm1aB)
OK. But it doesn't matter and shouldn't be pursued by a candidate because we don't have religious tests in America. Secondly, if Rev Wright gets a pass so does everyone else.
Posted by: dagny at October 11, 2011 12:48 PM (LVNkq)
Posted by: JeffC at October 11, 2011 12:48 PM (A3tpD)
Posted by: Bosk at October 11, 2011 12:49 PM (n2K+4)
Posted by: The terrorist Hobbit formerly known as Donna at October 11, 2011 04:44 PM (5Wl/f)
CNN probably has their little graphics package from 2008 ready to go from when Romney had a press conference about his faith and they ran it side by side.Posted by: buzzion at October 11, 2011 12:49 PM (GULKT)
If she does, I'm done with her.
An Argentine Tango, on the other hand...
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at October 11, 2011 12:49 PM (8y9MW)
How dare Romney condemn the freedom of Americans to believe other faiths?
It's none of Romney's damn business. Romney can waste his time hassling anti mormon arguments, but Perry never made any argument relating to Mormonism of any kind.
Posted by: Dustin at October 11, 2011 12:49 PM (fF625)
Here is what Perry NEEDS to say.
In America we have Freedom of Religion. Just as Mitt Romney is free to believe as he does, it is NOT MY PLACE to comment on the Preachers Religious Beliefs, nor INFRINGE his FREEDOM OF SPEECH.
If you have questions about what the Preacher said, I suggest you talk to him, I have a campaign to run.
The last sentence isn't bad. The first part is sub-zero stupid. Freedom of Speech doesn't mean what you think it means, since the Founders weren't drooling morons.
Posted by: Proud Mormon Emperor of Icecream at October 11, 2011 12:49 PM (epBek)
Posted by: Frodo Bin Laden at October 11, 2011 12:49 PM (ieDPL)
Posted by: ErikW at October 11, 2011 12:49 PM (LgBjx)
You'll be hearing from our lawyers, asshole.
Posted by: Hallmark at October 11, 2011 12:49 PM (sOXQX)
Posted by: Frodo Bin Laden at October 11, 2011 04:42 PM (ieDPL)
Don't give up. The primary season will run on into the convention. I truly believe that our nominee will be chosen there. This is going to be a close race.
Posted by: Soona (soona) at October 11, 2011 12:50 PM (ieWmi)
Posted by: Sub-Tard at October 11, 2011 12:51 PM (0M3AQ)
"Romney seems to be demanding much more than a simple "disassociation," though. He basically wants Perry to repudiate and scold his base."
just like your typical progressive, facts don't matter, truth doesn't matter, all that matters is the story i want to tell.
Posted by: shoey at October 11, 2011 12:51 PM (jdOk/)
Well how about this: Perry asks him to repudiate all the Mormon lunacy out there, the golden tablets, the polygamy, the lost tribe stuff, the we become gods stuff, the saving the dead.
Why, yes. Because if Perry starts spouting the dumb anti-Mormon cliches of the bottom-half of the evangelical bell curve, his election is assured. Assured.
Posted by: Proud Mormon Emperor of Icecream at October 11, 2011 12:51 PM (epBek)
Posted by: Dave at October 11, 2011 12:51 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at October 11, 2011 04:46 PM (sbV1u)
Everyone of these "religion" questions should be steered back to Rev Wright, liberation theology and socialism, and chickens, roosts et al. Period.
Posted by: dagny at October 11, 2011 12:52 PM (LVNkq)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at October 11, 2011 12:52 PM (0yt4x)
What Perry needs to say:
"Right now, U6 is over 15%, the country is drowning in debt, and the federal government has grown 25% in the past three years, and you are worried about me denouncing what some pastor said to a reporter, or some racist graffiti on a rock that my father removed more than two decades ago? Grow up, and start giving some solutions, instead of playing the democrat pity game."
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at October 11, 2011 12:53 PM (3GASg)
heh, well .. reform ,conservative or Orthodox?
Posted by: willow at October 11, 2011 12:53 PM (h+qn8)
Posted by: the MFM asks the important questions at October 11, 2011 12:53 PM (eHr/6)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at October 11, 2011 12:53 PM (loxcN)
You know, for the first time, I am beginning to think the Republicans may just f*cking lose this thing.
You mean to tell me this is the best we can do for candidates to take on Obama?
God help us. Don't worry too much Dave, we are still talking about running against Sparky here. Hell Newt could murder this turd in a general.
Posted by: Sub-Tard at October 11, 2011 12:53 PM (0M3AQ)
You can darn well believe that the left and the MFM will be exposing all the strange mormon beliefs once Romney is nominated.
I've worked closely with several mormons. Wait until people hear of some of their beliefs. Did you know that a good mormon is a god in training who will one day rule their own planet? Did you know that their women will be eternally pregnant? Do you know about the very isolated 2 year "missions" their children are required to go on? All of this, and more, will be exposed and ridiculed by the left.
Posted by: Havedash at October 11, 2011 12:53 PM (sFD5n)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at October 11, 2011 12:53 PM (deaac)
Posted by: Dave at October 11, 2011 12:54 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: Rick Perry at October 11, 2011 12:54 PM (ieDPL)
Posted by: Sub-Tard at October 11, 2011 12:54 PM (0M3AQ)
Posted by: nickless at October 11, 2011 12:54 PM (MMC8r)
If tonight's debate goes the way we suspect it will go, the White House is lost.
After tonight, we ought to concentrate on winning the Senate and keeping the House. Because no one in that gang of fools on the stage tonight can defeat Obama.
Posted by: soothie at October 11, 2011 12:54 PM (G/zuv)
>>>Let's just get the standard down for all to be aware: candidates are responsible for everything their supporters say.
>>>Sound good, JeffB?
No, no, I get your point: it gets them off the hook in the sense of moral culpability. Fair enough -- and yes, that is important. But it sure doesn't advertise as to their intelligence or campaign acumen, which is really flippin' important. Why is it that we keep saying Herman Cain can't be a serious candidate, after all? Not just because he lacks experience, but because he makes gaffes, tons of gaffes, unforced errors. THIS is a mother of an unforced error -- as I said later on in my post, I don't think it was intentional, I think Perry's team are genuinely not that sharp -- and it speaks to a candidate and a campaign that, as we have seen over and over, ain't ready for prime-time.
Oh, and I've got news for you: in the real world, campaigns pretty much ARE on the hook for really controversial stuff that their major supporters say. That's not fair, it's just the way politics works. Remember how we spent a week hanging Hoffa's (quite analogous) remarks around the neck of Barack Obama?
Posted by: Jeff B. at October 11, 2011 12:55 PM (XonkM)
Posted by: joncelli at October 11, 2011 12:55 PM (RD7QR)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at October 11, 2011 12:55 PM (deaac)
Posted by: willow at October 11, 2011 12:55 PM (h+qn8)
What are that racist rock's views on Mormons?
The racist rock is too stoned to be coherant but was heard to mumble something about magic underwear. It then retreated into stoney silence before it gathered moss.
Posted by: dagny at October 11, 2011 12:56 PM (LVNkq)
Posted by: ejo at October 11, 2011 12:56 PM (2DjJb)
Posted by: Jornolist 3.0 at October 11, 2011 12:56 PM (FcR7P)
#148
I've worked closely with several mormons. Wait until people hear of some of their beliefs. Did you know that a good mormon is a god in training who will one day rule their own planet? Did you know that their women will be eternally pregnant? Do you know about the very isolated 2 year "missions" their children are required to go on?
And 'by worked closely' you meant you read Decker or some other pulp anti-Mormon purple prose guy.
Anyway, dude, because I like you, I promise that when I take your wife to populate my planet, I'll get her a good doula.
Posted by: Proud Mormon Emperor of Icecream at October 11, 2011 12:57 PM (epBek)
Posted by: Dave at October 11, 2011 12:57 PM (Xm1aB)
all this stinks . gah
Posted by: willow at October 11, 2011 12:57 PM (h+qn8)
I really do not give a shit what the 4% or 5% Romneybots think anyway.
Posted by: Vic at October 11, 2011 12:57 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: DavidFrum at October 11, 2011 12:57 PM (deaac)
Posted by: Dave at October 11, 2011 12:58 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 11, 2011 12:58 PM (i6RpT)
Neither is Greek Orthodox.
Posted by: Pope Leo IX at October 11, 2011 12:58 PM (QKKT0)
Soothie, Newt can pull the chestnuts out of the fire if it is required. Team him with a solid VP (Pretraus?) and let him go on automatic. Not only will Sparky be seen running for cover but the entire Dem ticket will be ducking. Funny thing about media smears, once they have been played they lose their effect the second time around. Just ask Hillary.
Posted by: Sub-Tard at October 11, 2011 12:59 PM (0M3AQ)
seconded
Posted by: willow at October 11, 2011 12:59 PM (h+qn8)
Why do I have this funny feeling that Romney is going to be a one term president if he makes it to the White House.
Posted by: YIKES! at October 11, 2011 12:59 PM (70TBD)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at October 11, 2011 12:59 PM (qpKJT)
Of course, another way to read this episode is that Perry, although successful in Texas in elections, isn't quite ready for the national political stage, while Romney is one tough SOB who has with a lot of savvy kept Perry on the defensive for the past month.
In other words, while I hate the "gotcha" move on race or religion, I weirdly like the fact that Romney looks like a guy who is willing to play hardball. It ain't beanbag, after all.
Posted by: The Regular Guy at October 11, 2011 01:00 PM (qHCyt)
Ummm... I did say he worked with him on the Day of Prayer. My real question is how much they actually worked together, and how much was "have your people call my people." The point being there is no evidence that the two are well acquainted with each other.
Rick Perry is the Governor of the State of Texas. With all the work that entails. Dr. Jeffress is the pastor of one of the largest Baptist Churches in Dallas. With all the work that entails.
That means, even working closely together on the Day of Prayer, they may not know each other beyond that specific event. I don't know, and no one has shown any evidence that they do.
And there is a vast difference between an implication (not inference: I imply something when I use subtext in a comment, you infer it when you hear it)- which no one has complained about, btw- and the actual "LDS is a Cult" statement- which people are and Perry has already denounced that to the degree it should be necessary.
BTW- Polynikes: what was it you were saying about RomneyCare not being all that similar to ObamaCare? Because a couple of the guys who crafted what actually got implemented in MA disagree with you.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at October 11, 2011 01:00 PM (8y9MW)
He's already let everybody know he's cool with the GOP being smeared as racists.
Now he's coming right out and letting everybody know that a big part of the GOP is chock-full of Bible-thumping religious bigots.
11th Commandment? That fucker don't care, it's his turn.
And you Cain folks, you all need to take a serious, serious look at how you can support a guy who has nothing but nice things to say about Romney. You need to ask yourself why he can support a guy who's done what Romney has done but hates Perry for, well, vague shit and stuff.
Hey, polynikes, get yer ass in here and tell us again how Romney is awesome and we don't know jack-shit about his real conservative record.
Posted by: Jimmuy at October 11, 2011 01:00 PM (CQSQC)
Posted by: Vic at October 11, 2011 01:00 PM (M9Ie6)
I think a comparison of Mormon belief with that of the bottom half of the evangelical bell-curve as you put it would shine favorably on the evangelical
In that said evangelical would finely be exposed to some light, you betcha.
Look, I'm glad that some pretty dimwitted people have found some religious consolation in life, and if believing dimwitted scare stories about Mormons helps them along, so be it. Christianity shouldn't only be for logical, literate, educated people, I get that.
Posted by: Proud Mormon Emperor of Icecream at October 11, 2011 01:00 PM (epBek)
Posted by: DavidFrum at October 11, 2011 01:00 PM (deaac)
Uh, not really. Obama is topping out at 42% right now. The other 58% aren't going to be joining him any time soon.
Posted by: MaxMBJ at October 11, 2011 04:53 PM (deaac)
Hmmm. Please read my comment again. I believe I was talking about the repub primaries.
Posted by: Soona (soona) at October 11, 2011 01:01 PM (ieWmi)
Posted by: Snort! (tha wunder hawg) at October 11, 2011 01:01 PM (OlN4e)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at October 11, 2011 01:01 PM (loxcN)
Posted by: Proud Mormon Emperor of Icecream at October 11, 2011 04:51 PM (epBek)
Cliches? Really?
Posted by: Havedash at October 11, 2011 01:01 PM (sFD5n)
It's as if these various crises were being made to order. And whether Perry can effectively respond to the latest flung shit or not, they've effectively kept him from proactively campaigning.
I think this is another setup.
I'm beginning to think that a Romney campaign is bad news. After four years of "I can manage socialism better than the democrat can" turns into four more years of depression, we'll be facing a likely Obama victory in 2016.
We need more than a placeholder for the next Democrat administration.
Posted by: Abdominal Snowman at October 11, 2011 01:01 PM (rVfMa)
Uh, mormons aren't christians. Neither are Scientologists, buddhists, or wiccans. What's the debate on that? Christians have this thing called the Bible. Mormons have this thing called the Book of Mormon.
You know what else Mormons have? This thing called the Bible. And also this belief in this guy named Jesus who was the son of God, was crucified for our sins, was resurrected, and is the only name by which we can be saved. Just like Buddhists, Scientologists, and Wiccans, in fact.
Posted by: Proud Mormon Emperor of Icecream at October 11, 2011 01:02 PM (epBek)
Posted by: Dave at October 11, 2011 01:02 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: DavidFrum at October 11, 2011 01:02 PM (deaac)
The last sentence isn't bad. The first part is sub-zero stupid. Freedom of Speech doesn't mean what you think it means, since the Founders weren't drooling morons.
Posted by: Proud Mormon Emperor of Icecream at October 11, 2011 04:49 PM (epBek)
Uh.... the Preacher said it AFTER the event... on his OWN time... he is free so say what he thinks... that IS Freedom of Speech.... and since he is speaking of his religious belief... also Freedom of Religion...
Both are berock American Beliefs.... contrary to your assertion of stupidity, it would play really well with Moderates.
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 11, 2011 01:02 PM (NtXW4)
Posted by: joncelli at October 11, 2011 01:02 PM (RD7QR)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 11, 2011 01:02 PM (i6RpT)
Are you ready for some stupidityyyy?!?
Are you ready for some retardationnnnnn?!?!
Monday night shitheaderyyyyyy!
Posted by: Soothie Williams Jr at October 11, 2011 01:03 PM (G/zuv)
If you know mormons, you know they aren't bad Americans.
Perry hasn't brought it up, and Romney is hitting below the belt demanding Perry pass a religious test or tell his supporters what the think. It's obvious different religions are mostly mutually exclusive.
But taking this is a 'Mormons are weird' direction is beneath us.
Posted by: Dustin at October 11, 2011 01:03 PM (fF625)
Posted by: Proud Mormon Emperor of Icecream at October 11, 2011 05:02 PM (epBek)
So, by that logic... Christians are Jews?
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 11, 2011 01:04 PM (NtXW4)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at October 11, 2011 01:04 PM (deaac)
Posted by: Mike James at October 11, 2011 01:04 PM (FMUMi)
btw, Romney was asked about Operation Fast and Furious today: Would you call upon Holder to resign? His answer was a scoamf.
Posted by: arhooley at October 11, 2011 01:04 PM (Rt5P7)
Posted by: Dave at October 11, 2011 01:04 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: Vic at October 11, 2011 01:04 PM (M9Ie6)
#171,
try 'not.' Except, yes, Mormon men do go on two-year proselyting missions. They are very 'isolated' in the sense that you spend the whole time constantly talking to people about religion.
Posted by: Proud Mormon Emperor of Icecream at October 11, 2011 01:04 PM (epBek)
Except that the Hoffa remarks were done as part of Obama's introduction. Jeffress' remarks were said to a reporter off the stage and not as part of the official program.
Posted by: Ian S. at October 11, 2011 01:05 PM (tqwMN)
It is better for Romney to have to deal with some of the Mormon stuff now. He has very high name recognition now, but only about half of people know that he is a Mormon.
He is going to have to deal with it sooner or later, and Perry has given him a ridiculously good opportunity to do so in a way that makes it look like everyone else is the problem.
(Not a Mitt supporter)
Posted by: Paper at October 11, 2011 01:05 PM (IvlIt)
Posted by: Frodo Bin Laden at October 11, 2011 01:05 PM (ieDPL)
Posted by: shoey at October 11, 2011 01:05 PM (jdOk/)
And 'by worked closely' you meant you read Decker or some other pulp anti-Mormon purple prose guy.
Anyway, dude, because I like you, I promise that when I take your wife to populate my planet, I'll get her a good doula.
Posted by: Proud Mormon Emperor of Icecream at October 11, 2011 04:57 PM (epBek)
Nope, what I meant by "worked closely with" is having worked side by side with a mormon bishop, along with dozens of his church members. These were people in professional positions.
Posted by: Havedash at October 11, 2011 01:05 PM (sFD5n)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 11, 2011 01:05 PM (i6RpT)
Posted by: Snort! (tha wunder hawg) at October 11, 2011 01:06 PM (OlN4e)
I could care less about Romney's potentially strange religious beliefs.
I am more concerned about his questionable and strange political conversions and decisions.
Posted by: Paper at October 11, 2011 01:06 PM (IvlIt)
Posted by: Dr Spank at October 11, 2011 01:06 PM (Sh42X)
btw, is Hank Williams Jr retarded?
Posted by: soothie at October 11, 2011 05:02 PM (G/zuv)
No, just likes the booze a little to much
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 11, 2011 05:02 PM (i6RpT)
Uh oh, did he speak his mind again?
Posted by: ErikW at October 11, 2011 01:07 PM (LgBjx)
None of the candidates are and I beginning to think expecting the perfect candidate is folly. Hand delt, Perry's not a racist for a rock, and he's not a bigot because of a jackass pastor. Period.
The field is as good as it's going to get. Flinging this victimology around is stupid when the Left does it. Why the fuck are we doing it?
Oh, and I've got news for you: in the real world, campaigns pretty much ARE on the hook for really controversial stuff that their major supporters say. That's not fair, it's just the way politics works. Remember how we spent a week hanging Hoffa's (quite analogous) remarks around the neck of Barack Obama? Posted by: Jeff B.
Actually, it's a poor analogy. The next President, be it Perry or Romney, will have absolutely zero to do with crafting policies that outline true Christianity or the definition of a cult.
Hoffa's remarks regarding unions and the size public sector are entirely relevant to the politics and policies of Obama right here and now.
Posted by: weft cut-loop at October 11, 2011 01:07 PM (kt1UQ)
Posted by: The terrorist Hobbit formerly known as Donna at October 11, 2011 01:07 PM (5Wl/f)
If you want to stay sober as a judge, take a shot every time someone mentions Obama.
Posted by: Waterhouse at October 11, 2011 01:07 PM (eHr/6)
194 @185
Winning friends and influencing people for Romney I see
You think I care about Romney because . . . why?
Not all of mix our religion and our politics like that.
I'm totally on board with the folks here who said that Perry has already dealt with the issue by saying he thinks Mormonism isn't a cult. Mitt is just playing politics here and should be called on it.
What I'm doing is arguing with the people who disagree with Perry when he says that he thinks Mormons aren't cultists.
Posted by: Proud Mormon Emperor of Icecream at October 11, 2011 01:07 PM (epBek)
192
btw, is Hank Williams Jr retarded?
Just slow. Better question, is he actually the real son of Hank Williams? Shit, it looks like Mrs Hank did the milkman while Hank was touring. They don't sound alike either. Just sayin. BTW Hank Williams is a national treasure. Jr. not so much. Having said that, ESPN sucks big cocks nightly.
Posted by: Sub-Tard at October 11, 2011 01:08 PM (0M3AQ)
Nope, what I meant by "worked closely with" is having worked side by side with a mormon bishop, along with dozens of his church members. These were people in professional positions.
So, basically, you're a liar. Because you didn't get that stuff from any actual Mormons.
Posted by: Proud Mormon Emperor of Icecream at October 11, 2011 01:09 PM (epBek)
Posted by: Dave at October 11, 2011 01:09 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: Dr Spank at October 11, 2011 01:09 PM (Sh42X)
lyrics, opening line:
“So Fox & Friends.
Wanna put me down. Ask for my opinion.
Then twist it all around.
Supposed to be talkinÂ’ about my fatherÂ’s new CD.
Well, two can play that gotcha game, just wait and see,”
/I shit you not
Posted by: Soothie Williams Jr at October 11, 2011 01:09 PM (G/zuv)
If they defend Romney, they're not. Because he's an asshole.
Posted by: oblig. at October 11, 2011 01:09 PM (xvZW9)
Posted by: Frodo Bin Laden at October 11, 2011 05:07 PM (ieDPL)
Yep
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 11, 2011 01:09 PM (NtXW4)
Posted by: Frodo Bin Laden at October 11, 2011 01:09 PM (ieDPL)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at October 11, 2011 01:10 PM (loxcN)
If I'm reading this correctly, then yo, straight up: go fuck yourself.
Posted by: Jeff B. at October 11, 2011 04:47 PM (XonkM)
JeffB in his usual pompous manner misses the point and skips the explanation in the comment.Once again for our slower students like JeffB.: People act and make decisions because of certain factors that motivate them. In a vacuum an actual Christian might say 'sure I'll vote for Mitt if I have to.' If instead geniuses like you beat us over the head with your dhimmi-style calls for tolerance and that we renounce anyone who speaks the truth, then we are likely to spend more time thinking about this particular issue (and in a mood soured by your repeated divisiveness). Mormonism is a false religion, as any Bible based Christian can tell you, and all false religions are the work of demons (I don't know the cite of the top of my head, but it's not the point). And it's in a sense worse because it's unlikely anyone would convert out of it to some legitimate branch of Christianity (and why would they, as they already think they are Christians). So in the sense, if you harp on the topic, yes, he gets to label himself an enemy of God.
As to what I think-eh, it's not high on my list of great evils to thwart. If Glenn Beck was running, I wouldn't care in the slightest about his Mormonism (which probably has to do with familiarity with him and how his faith motivates him), so I think it's mostly more of an excuse for the general sense of 'ick' people get from Romney.
My point was (again) that it's not helpful in any context to be having this discussion at length. As your thoughtless outburst demonstrates.
Posted by: Hallmark at October 11, 2011 01:10 PM (sOXQX)
Posted by: Waterhouse at October 11, 2011 01:10 PM (eHr/6)
So, by that logic... Christians are Jews?
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 11, 2011 05:04 PM (NtXW4)
Up until the 2d century or so, AD, most of the Christians were Jews. In case you've forgotten, Jesus was a pretty much a devout Jew.
Posted by: Soona (soona) at October 11, 2011 01:10 PM (ieWmi)
Posted by: Judge Smails at October 11, 2011 01:10 PM (UU0OF)
Posted by: The terrorist Hobbit formerly known as Donna at October 11, 2011 01:11 PM (5Wl/f)
Okay, guess I'm a little slow on the take today, but I swear I just read another of your posts wherein you said wiccans were Christians. Sarcasm, Dave. Its not just a river in Egypt.
Posted by: Proud Mormon Emperor of Icecream at October 11, 2011 01:11 PM (epBek)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at October 11, 2011 04:34 PM (l9zgN)
Whoa, whoa, whoa.... what now?
Posted by: Charles Gibson at October 11, 2011 01:12 PM (O/onO)
His response should be Jeffers isn't his pastor, he didn't sit in his pew for 20 years (Like some people) and he repudiated the pastor's statement as soon as he was aware of it. If Romney is so dang hot on diversity then you don't achieve that by repudiating people, you repudiate bad ideas unless it's very clear the man himself is closed to adjusting his viewpoint.
Posted by: Rocks at October 11, 2011 01:12 PM (19AIg)
Posted by: Rex the Wonder God at October 11, 2011 01:12 PM (vahvH)
Posted by: oblig. at October 11, 2011 05:09 PM (xvZW9)"
I actually agree with this. My understanding of the Book of Mormon is contrary to a pro choicer gun taxing gun grabbing POV.
But I'll leave the religious aspect out of it. I don't understand Romney supporters who actually favor the guy from a conservative POV.
I do understand the idea that Romney is the only guy who can beat Obama though I think that is completely incorrect.
Posted by: Dustin at October 11, 2011 01:12 PM (fF625)
Posted by: Christian Romney at October 11, 2011 01:13 PM (90TGT)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at October 11, 2011 01:13 PM (vzFJV)
btw, Romney was asked about Operation Fast and Furious today: Would you call upon Holder to resign? His answer was a scoamf.
Posted by: arhooley at October 11, 2011 05:04 PM (Rt5P7)
Gee, you mean Mitt Romney was unable to answer a yes or no question AGAIN?
I'm telling you, the guy would take a full minute to answer "Do you love your mother" and you wouldn't know if he did or not afterwards.
Posted by: buzzion at October 11, 2011 01:14 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: Juan McCain at October 11, 2011 01:14 PM (ieDPL)
And Mormonism isn't one.
Just ask my devoted followers.
Posted by: Chucky Johnson "I am LFG" at October 11, 2011 01:14 PM (H2XPX)
Well, IS IT?
Posted by: Rex the Wonder God at October 11, 2011 05:12 PM (vahvH)
I like Perry's reaction. Perry makes sure to note he doesn't consider Mormonism a cult. But he doesn't act like this is a major issue. He is not trying to benefit from this issue. He doesn't want to talk about it.
Perry wants to talk about the balanced budget amendment and getting government regulations out of the way while cutting agency budgets.
I like that. I don't want Perry to act like anyone's religion is a worthwhile topic. We have much more important issues to talk about, in my opinion.
Posted by: Dustin at October 11, 2011 01:15 PM (fF625)
Up until the 2d century or so, AD, most of the Christians were Jews. In case you've forgotten, Jesus was a pretty much a devout Jew.
Posted by: Soona (soona) at October 11, 2011 05:10 PM (ieWmi)
And pre Joseph Smith, the Mormons were Christian... sooo your point is?
And heck, Moslems give credence to the Bible, and think Jesus was a Prophet at least... does that make THEM Christians?
Its only MY opinion, and as a NON CHRISTIAN, but I see Mormonism, and Christianity, as seperate Faiths...
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 11, 2011 01:15 PM (NtXW4)
Nothing says "We are the party that is going to reverse Obama's terrible economic policies" quite like arguing over Mormon theology and racist rocks.
I think the candidates should go after each other. Is it too much to ask it be about immigration, health care, or the economy?
Posted by: Paper at October 11, 2011 01:15 PM (IvlIt)
1. a particular system of religious worship, especially with reference to its rites and ceremonies. 2. an instance of great veneration of a person, ideal, or thing, especially as manifested by a body of admirers: the physical fitness cult. 3. the object of such devotion. 4. a group or sect bound together by veneration of the same thing, person, ideal, etc. 5. Sociology . a group having a sacred ideology and a set of rites centering around their sacred symbols.
Is Mormonism a cult? Yes, according to the above definitions, But hey, aren't most religions basically a cult? How about the fans of a sports team? How about brain-dead Obama worshipers? How about those dirty OWS fuckers?
The Mormon religion has a sketchy past and they do some weird shit when they worship. However, other than the ones who are very self-righteous, you'll never meet any nicer people. But be prepared, they will try to make you a convert from the get-go.
Posted by: Apostate and Infidel in Utah at October 11, 2011 01:15 PM (90BnA)
Posted by: arhooley at October 11, 2011 05:13 PM (Rt5P7)
Ain't that the truth.
Posted by: ErikW at October 11, 2011 01:16 PM (LgBjx)
Religious fights are a specialty of the Stupid Party.
You know who else got in fights about religion? Jesus. You calling Jesus stupid, homeslice.
Posted by: Proud Mormon Emperor of Icecream at October 11, 2011 01:16 PM (epBek)
Nothing says "We are the party that is going to reverse Obama's
terrible economic policies" quite like arguing over Mormon theology and
racist rocks.
Word, ol' chum.
Posted by: Soothie at October 11, 2011 01:16 PM (G/zuv)
And Mormonism isn't one.
Just ask my devoted followers.
Posted by: Chucky Johnson "I am LFG" at October 11, 2011 05:14 PM (H2XPX)
Yeah, you guys are world record holders for longest human centepede. Congrats!
Posted by: Snort! (tha wunder hawg) at October 11, 2011 01:16 PM (OlN4e)
Oh well, I think I'll watch "Keeping Up With The Kardashians". That will be more informative than this debate.
And BTW, Ace if you are still around. This again shows that this debate will be seen by very few people. But I'll be willing to bet that it will quoting endlessly on the morning talk shows; all spewing about how great rotten Romney was and how Perry once again failed to answer the racist rock question adequately.
Posted by: Vic at October 11, 2011 01:17 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: joncelli at October 11, 2011 01:18 PM (RD7QR)
Posted by: arhooley at October 11, 2011 05:13 PM (Rt5P7)
One of the special things that makes them the Stupid Party.
Posted by: Tami-Cardinals! at October 11, 2011 01:18 PM (X6akg)
Posted by: The terrorist Hobbit formerly known as Donna at October 11, 2011 01:19 PM (5Wl/f)
Ummm... no, because he said no such thing during the introduction. Or am I missing dog-whistles again?
The "Mormonism is a Cult" comment was specifically in later remarks directly to the press. As soon as Perry became aware of those remarks, he did issue a statement that said, as politely as possible, "Everything he just said is BS."
What - Perry sending out a minion to say 'Perry doesn't THINK it's a cult' is a complete disassociation at the first opportunity? Bullshit.
Inasmuch as one should be required? Yes. Once more: the statements weren't made during the intro, they were made afterwords directly to the press. Also: unless you're Mitt Romney who will engaged in scorched-earth politics to prevent anyone else from being electable (since the base has roundly rejected you after 4 years), you know this is a stupid thing, and that the Perry camp's immediate response was sufficient.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at October 11, 2011 01:20 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Jay at October 11, 2011 01:20 PM (KaJBC)
try 'not.' Except, yes, Mormon men do go on two-year proselyting missions. They are very 'isolated' in the sense that you spend the whole time constantly talking to people about religion.
Posted by: Proud Mormon Emperor of Icecream at October 11, 2011 05:04 PM (epBek)
How many times are they allowed to have contact with their families during this time? Isn't it basically twice a year, with the child initiating the contact?
Look, I can debate this stuff all evening, but my point is that the left and MFM is going to have a FIELD DAY with this stuff once Ronmey secures the nomination. It's not about mormons not being good people. I have to say the ones I've worked with, and continue to work with, are nice personable people. Does this stuff personally bother me? Not really because Im very familiar with it. But you can bet your "special underwear" that Romney will be made into a laughing stock and a fool over his religion.
Posted by: Havedash at October 11, 2011 01:20 PM (sFD5n)
Proud Mormon Icecream Dumbass
I notice you never mention any facts related to how anyone's assertions regarding Mormonism are wrong. That is what jerks like you do best. That's why this will actually help Perry. Thank you. Keep up the good work. Perry needs some help now.
Posted by: RioBravo at October 11, 2011 01:20 PM (eEfYn)
Q: Hank Jr, what do you think about Obama?
A: He's Hitler!
One week later: Hey, you twisted my words around.
Posted by: Soothie at October 11, 2011 01:20 PM (G/zuv)
Posted by: Dave at October 11, 2011 01:20 PM (Xm1aB)
And meanwhile, Satan's Army is plotting their moves and laughing their asses off at us.
Keep it up, dipshits.
Posted by: ErikW at October 11, 2011 01:20 PM (LgBjx)
Posted by: Rex the Wonder God at October 11, 2011 01:20 PM (vahvH)
Posted by: The Schwalbe : © at October 11, 2011 01:21 PM (UU0OF)
So, by that logic... Christians are Jews?
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 11, 2011 05:04 PM (NtXW4)
Well after their hearts are circumcized. Um, can we just move on to another topic?
Posted by: Paul at October 11, 2011 01:21 PM (sOXQX)
Jumbo jugged shrimpdick,
Mormons arent Christian....
Mormons do not follow or believe in the historic Jesus Christ of the Bible, but rather in a difference Jesus.
Mormons believe in the guy who was born in Bethlehem around 1 AD, give or take, preached in Jerusalem, told people he was the Son of God, told people he'd forgive their sins if they accepted him as their lord, was crucified by the Romans, and then amazingly was resurrected. That guy. I thought that was the Jesus y'all believe in, but I stand corrected. Next time I get Jesus Castillo to cut my hair, I'll ask if he can have y'all his followers calm down.
Posted by: Proud Mormon Emperor of Icecream at October 11, 2011 01:21 PM (epBek)
Its only MY opinion, and as a NON CHRISTIAN, but I see Mormonism, and Christianity, as seperate Faiths...
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 11, 2011 05:15 PM (NtXW4)
Except for the seagull bullshit, polygemy, and a guy named Joseph Smith elevating himself to the right hand of Jesus, there are a lot of similarities.
Posted by: Soona (soona) at October 11, 2011 01:21 PM (ieWmi)
Posted by: Judge Smails at October 11, 2011 05:10 PM (UU0OF)
it doesn't work that way, silly goose...
Posted by: MSM at October 11, 2011 01:22 PM (jdOk/)
Posted by: Snort! (tha wunder hawg)
218
I could care less about Romney's potentially strange religious beliefs.
I am more concerned about his questionable and strange political conversions and decisions.
Posted by: Paper
Exactly. Romney may want us to believe conservative opposition to him is bigotry, but it's really not, except on some fringe. It's got ZERO to do with anything Perry has actually said. It's just another shameful Romney maneuver. I would prefer the clumsy Perry, who obviously isn't a bigot and knows to lead, to the guy who is masterful at the Obama victim hustle (I recall those claiming Obamacare opponents must be racist, even when most of them never said or endorsed anything racist).
btw, Romney was asked about Operation Fast and Furious today: Would you call upon Holder to resign? His answer was a scoamf.
Posted by: arhooley at October 11, 2011 05:04 PM (Rt5P7)
Are you kidding me? Even that? The guy is a moron. he never thinks on his feet. If there's any controversy he is MIA until the polls are out and his staffers feed him something to memorize that simply sounds smart. As Romney about something that isn't settled and he can't answer it without sounding like an idiot.
This is why I think Perry is much smarter than Romney. This is why I think real leader are smarter than George Clooney reading clever lines.
You'd think that was a softball.
Anyway, I hope Perry's reaction to this is that he isn't going to tell baptists not to disagree with Mormism and he doesn't think Romney's religion is a legitimate issue in this election, nor did he agree to the comments he had no control over. He should then launch into a comment criticizing how the left would say Obamacare = racism, searching for some example that most Obamacare opponents never said. That's not how adults argue.
Posted by: Dustin at October 11, 2011 01:22 PM (fF625)
Posted by: The terrorist Hobbit formerly known as Donna at October 11, 2011 01:23 PM (5Wl/f)
Posted by: The Schwalbe : © at October 11, 2011 05:21 PM (UU0OF)"
Yup. That was one of Perry's great ads. He's got a great campaign, and unlike Romney, they aren't wasting money. They act like they can handle money properly.
Posted by: Dustin at October 11, 2011 01:23 PM (fF625)
Posted by: dogfish at October 11, 2011 01:24 PM (N2yhW)
My mistake. And I'm sorry.
I forgot to mention a crucial step in making a list of cults.
It's really quite simple.
1. Make a list of all the world's past and current religions.
2. Erase the ones you believe in.
Done.
"Cult" is a derogatory term for adherents of one religion to use to denigrate adherents of another.
Posted by: seattle slough at October 11, 2011 01:24 PM (JRGA6)
Posted by: Jay at October 11, 2011 05:20 PM (KaJBC)
Yeah, we need a real slick communicator. Someone like, uh, Obama. Yeah, that's the ticket. What if we found a Reagan who just happened to stutter? Would he warrant taking a look at? Nah, we need a real slick talker.
Posted by: Havedash at October 11, 2011 01:24 PM (sFD5n)
Posted by: dagny at October 11, 2011 01:25 PM (LVNkq)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at October 11, 2011 01:25 PM (loxcN)
Posted by: Sub-Tard at October 11, 2011 01:26 PM (0M3AQ)
Posted by: ChristianHarryReid at October 11, 2011 01:26 PM (90TGT)
How many times are they allowed to have contact with their families during this time? Isn't it basically twice a year, with the child initiating the contact?
You aren't 'allowed' anything, since going on a Mormon mission is voluntary and remaining on a Mormon mission is voluntary, and abiding by Mormon mission rules is voluntary.
The mission rules are that you can write and email your family as much as you like, but you aren't supposed to call except on Mothers Day and Christmas, if memory serves. So what? Its basically like living as a monk for two years. Two years preaching Christ exclusively was a small return, a very small return, on the debt I owe him.
And what is all this 'child' crap. I went on my mission at 19. So do all the other Mormon men. I wasn't a child, I was a fucking man. You non-Mormons who think people are children until they're 30 make me sick. If it wasn't for y'alls 'child' crap, we wouldn't have nobody getting married in this country and nobody having kids and nobody getting jobs living in their parents' basement and our economy and demography wouldn't be terminal. Child. What a load.
Posted by: Proud Mormon Emperor of Icecream at October 11, 2011 01:27 PM (epBek)
Nothing?
Umm... OK, what the fuck are we talking about?
As Mitt said himself, there are plenty of reasons not to vote for him. Foremost being his ideological flexibility and dishonesty. The differences between mainstream Christianity and his Mormon faith? How is this remotely relevant?
Posted by: Hollowpoint at October 11, 2011 01:27 PM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Dave at October 11, 2011 01:27 PM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: soothie
Yes. Kind of. But he can drive a car.
Posted by: Dang at October 11, 2011 05:22 PM (BbX1b)
Hank is an excellent driver...
Posted by: Rainman at October 11, 2011 01:28 PM (90BnA)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at October 11, 2011 01:28 PM (XE2Oo)
Posted by: Sub-Tard at October 11, 2011 01:28 PM (0M3AQ)
------
It was already reported that same day that Gov. Perry said he does not believe the LDS Church is a cult.
I don't think Perry needs to go further than that. If someone wants to point to Perry's record and argue that he has discriminated against Latter-Day Saints, they can go ahead and try do that. I haven't seen any evidence of that sort of thing, but it's a free country. Likewise, if someone wants to look at the hiring practices of Herman Cain or Mitt Romney and make arguments about how they may incorporate religion into their hiring practices, they can do that too. I wonder which would bear the most fruit.
Posted by: Y-not at October 11, 2011 01:28 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: dogfish at October 11, 2011 05:24 PM (N2yhW)
Or he could say: "Hey, Mitt. Let's stop fucking around and talk about the asshole that's destroying our nation".
He'd definitely get my vote.
Posted by: Soona (soona) at October 11, 2011 01:29 PM (ieWmi)
So the guy thinking he's going to be in a presidential campaign for the next 13 months helps himself by showing he has a thin skin.
What do you all do for fun in Backwardsland?
Posted by: FireHorse at October 11, 2011 01:29 PM (gyHyY)
Posted by: dagny at October 11, 2011 01:29 PM (LVNkq)
Chicken in every pot bitches!
Posted by: Clubber Lang at October 11, 2011 01:30 PM (QcFbt)
Show some respect to their request.
Good luck with that. "Adherent to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints" isn't exactly headline-friendly. What else would one say other than Mormonism?
Posted by: Hollowpoint at October 11, 2011 01:31 PM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: dagny at October 11, 2011 01:31 PM (LVNkq)
i try to be a respector of all faiths, i believe what i believe and everyone else is welcome to believe what they want, as long as they are not harming me or forcing their ways on me, it's live and let live.
that's why i hate Statists, Progs, & Socialists with bitter intensity, they are ALWAYS trying to tell me what to think and how to live, God Damn their pathetic souls to hell!
mormons i can live with...
Posted by: MSM at October 11, 2011 01:31 PM (jdOk/)
Posted by: Sub-Tard at October 11, 2011 05:28 PM (0M3AQ)
Knowing that he probably won't win the nomination, Newt, in his own way, is becoming a blessing to this primary season.
Posted by: Soona (soona) at October 11, 2011 01:31 PM (ieWmi)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at October 11, 2011 01:32 PM (loxcN)
Posted by: Dr Spank at October 11, 2011 01:32 PM (Sh42X)
Posted by: ChristianHarryReid at October 11, 2011 01:32 PM (90TGT)
Posted by: Proud Mormon Emperor of Icecream at October 11, 2011 05:27 PM (epBek)"
If you're actually what you claim to be, you are nothing like the good mormons I've met. Even if they aren't perfect, they try to be nice people when representing their religion. I've had mormons in my home to talk about their views. They would be embarrassed by your commentary.
There's no need.
-----
Perry should start the debate asking Romney to apologize. Perry should note that America is a land of many religions and some are mutually exclusive. They think other religions are incorrect. This is not something Perry or Romney or other presidential candidates should insist be repudiated. It is simply freedom. Perry should say he has never and will never make an issue of Romney's religion, and that's because he treasures religious freedom. He should then say he refuses to further dignify effort to associate Perry with things he didn't say.
Posted by: Dustin at October 11, 2011 01:33 PM (fF625)
Posted by: Dang at October 11, 2011 01:34 PM (BbX1b)
Posted by: Y-not at October 11, 2011 05:28 PM (5H6zj)
There is no fruit to be had. We ate it!
Posted by: Adam and Eve at October 11, 2011 01:35 PM (90BnA)
The Southern Baptists are not the only religious group that considers Mormonism a cult. The following is from www.catholic.com:
Full Question
What does the Catholic Church say about the practices and beliefs of Mormonism?
Answer
While individual Mormons may be persons of good conscience, Mormonism itself is a belief system that would reduce the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit from being the three Persons of the one, true, and infinite God to being three limited, finite deities among an uncounted multitude of deities, all of whom merely reshaped small parts of a preexisting cosmos.
Mormonism teaches that human beings may, by practicing the tenets of its faith, become gods and goddesses themselves, with their own planets full of people worshiping them.
While the Catholic Church would reject nothing that is true or good in Mormonism or any other world religion, Catholic theology would have to note that there is a tremendous amount in Mormonism that is neither true nor good. Further, because Mormonism presents itself as a form of Christianity yet is incompatible with the historic Christian faith, sound pastoral practice would need to warn the Christian faithful: Mormon theology is blasphemous, polytheistic, and cannot be considered on par with the theology of other Christian groups.
Posted by: Just a guy at October 11, 2011 01:35 PM (YJvVE)
In 2010 the Church provided relief to people affected by 119 disasters in 58 countries.
The Church also assists communities in establishing local water committees and hygiene training for families. Over 7.5 million people now have access to clean water because of Church efforts from 2002 through 2010.
A program called “Helping Babies Breathe"helps save the lives of newborns in resource limited countries. Since 2002, over 193,000 health care workers have been trained in these life-saving techniques.
Since 2003, over 550,000 people have benefitted from Church vision projects throughout the world.
The Church's mobility initiative provides wheelchairs for rough terrain, hospital wheelchairs, crutches, walkers, and canes. Since 2002, over 415,000 people have received one of these devices.
Yea, so all of you crazy non-cultists are correct. We are pretty much a bunch of ass holes.
Posted by: elliot m at October 11, 2011 01:35 PM (zPich)
Now they get mad at Romney for talking to Perry about his misrepresented religion.
Next time on the Perry soap opera. They get mad at Bachman for talking to Perry about being a woman.
Posted by: ChristianHarryReid at October 11, 2011 05:32 PM (90TGT)"
More likely they will get mad at Obama for criticizing Perry for being southern. I think Romney really messed up, and this will help Perry. This is the kind of move that sounds good to political experts, but just doesn't work on mainstream voters anymore. Tea Partiers are so sick and tired of being called bigots every time we disagree with a liberal like Romney or Obama.
Posted by: Dustin at October 11, 2011 01:35 PM (fF625)
Dang,
I would be insulted if you had a clue. You aren't even wrong, just too stupid for the human race.
Dustin,
I could care less that I hurt your feelings. If Mormon families want to welcome you into their homes while you spout the kind of smear and filth that are getting spouted in this thread, that's their business, but in my home that would get you tossed out on your ear.
Posted by: Proud Mormon Emperor of Icecream at October 11, 2011 01:37 PM (epBek)
Just a guy
whoever wrote that website got a lot wrong, but I don't really expect Catholics to be experts on the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints anyway. Curious that you used the word 'cult' and they didn't, though. Is anyone that the Catholic church regards as 'blasphemous' therefore a cult?
Regards.
Posted by: Proud Mormon Emperor of Icecream at October 11, 2011 01:39 PM (epBek)
Posted by: Dang at October 11, 2011 01:40 PM (BbX1b)
You really shouldn't cite anything other than the Vatican's web site for Church teaching.
The Catholic Church has an increasingly cordial relationship with the Church of Latter Day Saints, despite major theological differences. One of our Cardinals spoke at BYU last year and I know (from talking with members of the LDS here who are well-placed in the church authority) that the two denominations have tried to work more closely on issues like Prop 8. The Church certainly does not teach that the LDS are members of a cult.
Posted by: Y-not at October 11, 2011 01:41 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Dang at October 11, 2011 01:41 PM (BbX1b)
Posted by: SCOAMF, mmmm, mmmm, mmmm. at October 11, 2011 01:43 PM (ieWmi)
Posted by: ChristianHarryReid at October 11, 2011 01:44 PM (90TGT)
I could care less that I hurt your feelings. If Mormon families want to welcome you into their homes while you spout the kind of smear and filth that are getting spouted in this thread, that's their business, but in my home that would get you tossed out on your ear.
Posted by: Proud Mormon Emperor of Icecream at October 11, 2011 05:37 PM (epBek)"
Why are you saying I spout smears and filth? I have nothing to say about your religion. I've offered no criticism of it, ever, in my entire life, aside from declining to join the few times I've been invited, because I have different beliefs.
And you didn't offend me. I just think you're a terrible representative of Mormonism. All the mormons I know are a lot more pleasant than you, and very thoughtful in discussing their religion if you want to talk about it.
Rage is a human condition, and I'm sure every mormon and non mormon has some, but it's just not the best way to discuss this.
----
"
I forgot that they consider Stan and Jesus to be brothers. Not in sync
with the Bible at all there. But I guess that doesn't matter to them.
Posted by: Dang at October 11, 2011 05:40 PM (BbX1b)"
I just don't see what that matters. Explaining why you disagree with Mormonism is not relevant because there are much bigger issues in play today.
We've got to talk about entitlement reform, immigration, balance budget amendment, and the war on terror. It's beneath us, in my opinion, to go down the road of putting down a minority religion for being in conflict with the majority one.
Posted by: Dustin at October 11, 2011 01:44 PM (fF625)
"Mittens, I'm sorry that your feelings got hurt by someone exercising their first amendment rights. I wish that you would show the same level of passion and anger for all of the people hurt by large government policies such as mandated health care"
Posted by: Mark E at October 11, 2011 01:44 PM (Nmzeu)
You know this religous bashing goes on all the time. Here's how I look at it. Most if not all do good things, feed the poor, uplift the downtrodden. Around the world they bring hope to those that need it the most. Except for Islam.
So I refrain from making negative comments on them because I think the good they do overrides the little "nuances" they might have. Except for Islam.
Posted by: Bosk at October 11, 2011 01:45 PM (n2K+4)
Keep swingin' Proud Emperor! You haven't hit a thing!
I landed a solid on the Dang cranium, but it turned out to be totally devoid of substance. Figures.
Posted by: Proud Mormon Emperor of Icecream at October 11, 2011 01:45 PM (epBek)
Anyone can read these threads and see what I mean.
I wonder, actually if some of these clowns are actually mobies trying to make Romney fans look like idiots. I mean, Jeff B for example, it's like he doesn't want to persuade anyone. He actually avoids arguments I could make in his shoes if I wanted to, and opts instead to be a prick.
But I shouldn't attribute to malice what incompetence can explain.
Regardless, I'm still waiting for someone to give me any reason to support Romney other than 'I hate you if you don't support Romney'.
Posted by: Dustin at October 11, 2011 01:50 PM (fF625)
obama is the enemy boys. keep your eye on the ball. please don't piss this victory away.
Please forward to the candidates. This "my dress is prettier" crap needs to end.
Which one of you dicks [candidates] has the best plan to beat the SCOAMF? Part of that process would be detailing what a SCOAMF he is and not talking about fucking rocks and fucking underwear.
Everytime they queue up one of these debates, all I can think of is the "chicken dance" from Arrested Development. So that's how America ends. Bully.
Posted by: The Poster Formerly Known as Mr. Barky at October 11, 2011 01:50 PM (qwK3S)
I'm really saddened by this. It's sad to think that folks like Rev. Jeffress think this sort of discussion belongs in politics, but it's doubly sad to watch Romney try politicize it further. Maybe Mitt really feels like he's been victimized (I doubt it, but maybe he does), but even if he is a victim, that's not making me more inclined to vote for him.
Posted by: Y-not at October 11, 2011 01:50 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Spud at October 11, 2011 01:51 PM (uoLEx)
Posted by: RioBravo at October 11, 2011 01:54 PM (eEfYn)
Is anyone actually looking forward to this next debate or is it seen as more of an unpleasant duty to pay attention?
Posted by: RioBravo at October 11, 2011 01:58 PM (eEfYn)
JeffB. basically wants to browbeat people into voting for whoever the GOP nominee is because he feels 'GOP in power >Obama in power' is the only consideration. He has been a Perry supporter for a while, I didn't catch if that's changed.
He might be more persuasive if, like most northeastern liberals, he didn't start from the presumption that he's better than everyone he'll ever have an argument with.
Posted by: Methos at October 11, 2011 01:58 PM (sOXQX)
In 2008 in NH primary Podhertz reported, Ponnuru quoted, Romney got 94% of the Mormon vote.
In NV MSNBC reported Romney selection by Mormons "nearly unanimous" with over 9 in 10 going for the DIABO.
I think the bigotry banner is going to fly in lots of demographics. Hell I'm a bigot and I'm independent. Pass one over here too.
Posted by: icepick at October 11, 2011 02:01 PM (o0Uno)
Posted by: Methos at October 11, 2011 05:58 PM (sOXQX)"
Agreed.
He barely even attempts an argument, so it's difficult to even know what thinks. All I know is that if you articulate a good faith and proven problem with Romney, he starts screaming about how stupid and pathetic you are, and how he hopes the GOP wins without your help and it makes you so sad. It's like junior high cheerleaders being bitchy, and it's completely counterproductive. It's so bad that it really does come across as a moby.
Posted by: Dustin at October 11, 2011 02:04 PM (fF625)
Posted by: Bill at October 11, 2011 02:05 PM (ztMxN)
Mormon beliefs are not Christian. If you are such a proud mormon.. embrace it.
Don't tell me what I believe. I embrace Jesus Christ and Mormon christianity, not your Jack Chick oogedy-boogedy version of Mormons that you picked up on some xeroxed sheet that is half capitals and half exclamation points.
Posted by: Proud Mormon Emperor of Icecream at October 11, 2011 02:09 PM (epBek)
Posted by: mrp at October 11, 2011 02:09 PM (HjPtV)
Mormons tend to study foreign languages to assist with their missions. As a result they have valuable language skills that have been seen as useful by the CIA, FBI, and others.
Posted by: RioBravo at October 11, 2011 02:10 PM (eEfYn)
Sorry, Rick. Barring a miraculous turn-around in tonight's debate, I'm back with Romney.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at October 11, 2011 02:12 PM (qHVJJ)
Posted by: Joffen at October 11, 2011 02:15 PM (EPcuy)
Posted by: Y-not at October 11, 2011 05:50 PM (5H6zj)
You can't blame Romney for seizing a golden opportunity handed to him on a silver platter by a primary opponent.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at October 11, 2011 02:15 PM (qHVJJ)
There's a big difference between a bigoted candidate and a candidate who has a bigoted supporter.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at October 11, 2011 02:16 PM (SY2Kh)
"The early church was corrupted by this Babylonian mystery religion and today the Roman Catholic Church is the result of that corruption.
Much of what you see in the Catholic Church today doesnÂ’t come from GodÂ’s word. It comes from that cult-like, pagan religion Â… IsnÂ’t that the genius of Satan? If you want to counterfeit a dollar bill, you donÂ’t do it with purple paper and red ink. YouÂ’re not going to fool anybody with that. But if you want to counterfeit money, what you do is make it look closely related to the real thing as possible.
And thatÂ’s what Satan does with counterfeit religion. He uses, he steals, he appropriates all of the symbols of true biblical Christianity and he changes it just enough in order to cause people to miss eternal life."
http://tinyurl.com/3oznzje
Hey now, fuck this guy.
Posted by: Jeff B. at October 11, 2011 02:17 PM (hIWe1)
Exactly. Romney didn't "play the religion card," despite what Perry supporters angry about his campaign getting whacked AGAIN are claiming. He had it played ON HIM. What is he supposed to do, slink away quietly instead of standing up for himself in the middle of a hotly contested primary?
Posted by: Jeff B. at October 11, 2011 02:19 PM (hIWe1)
You realize that Perry (1) did not select Rev. Jefferes to introduce him, (2) was not present when he made the cult comments, and (3) immediately put out a statement saying he (Perry) does not think the Church of LDS is a cult, right?
I find smears of these types offensive, no matter to whom they are directed, but I just don't see a tight connection between Perry and Jefferes except for the endorsement. And, don't be mistaken, it's a valuable endorsement. I think there are something like 16 million Southern baptists.
Nothing Perry says is going to change the fact that some of those folks - and many other folks - feel the way Jefferes does about Romney's (and Huntsman's) religion. It surprises me that Mitt would want to accentuate this matter since it argues against the main argument for Romney: electability.
Posted by: Y-not at October 11, 2011 02:20 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: steevy at October 11, 2011 02:20 PM (fyOgS)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at October 11, 2011 06:16 PM (SY2Kh)
If Perry won't explicitly disown this guy (and he hasn't) then everything Jeffress says reflects upon him.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at October 11, 2011 02:20 PM (qHVJJ)
Posted by: naturalfake at October 11, 2011 02:22 PM (jkSbV)
Posted by: Jeff B. at October 11, 2011 06:17 PM (hIWe1)
No seriously, f*** YOU, Jeff B.
Posted by: Martin Luther, Charles Wesley, et al. at October 11, 2011 02:22 PM (sOXQX)
By a minister, not by Perry.
What is he supposed to do, slink away quietly instead of standing up for himself in the middle of a hotly contested primary?
He could graciously accept Perry's statement, issued the day the comments were made, and leave it at that.
Or, I suppose, he could call Rev. Jefferes out on the mat.
What he chose to do is not helping persuade the people who think as Jefferes does and it's alienating those of us who don't feel that way, but who prefer Perry.
Posted by: Y-not at October 11, 2011 02:23 PM (5H6zj)
"Everyone's entitled to their opinion. I obviously disagree, but I don't think it's constructive to waste time on matters that will not be decided in this election."
Posted by: An answer a statesman would have given at October 11, 2011 02:25 PM (sOXQX)
Perry's campaign signed off on this guy, who has made similar statements in the past. Whether he was present at the moment(s) this troglodyte did his evangelical-baiting is irrelevant; the only correct thing to do when you're running for president and find yourself linked to people like this is to disown them. Perry's statement in response was tepid and I'm not buying it.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at October 11, 2011 02:26 PM (qHVJJ)
—Ace
Tsk tsk. Next, Mittens will be calling Perry a bigot.
Methodist Perry already denied assent to the Jeffress non-introductory off the cuff Baptist position given in dialog with reporters after the fact. Romney should have thanked Perry for responding immediately contrary to Jeffress' point. In effect, Perry said he doesn't take it upon himself to play god judging the souls of men. Again, Mitt would take that as an offensive challenge about "not playing god".
This entire ball of wax is not worth the trouble it causes, and so long as Romney's a potus GOP candidate the ball of wax is not going away. Romney's candidacy plays like the blob. And the Democrats await, not having started their smear campaigning yet.
Comments and cobloggers here have made much ado over not getting stuck fighting to preserve this or that constitutional item, forfeited to policy, judicial activism, or even legal "precedence" that erases relevance given the Supreme Law of the Land. "Not a hill worth dying on" is how those discussions went before going overboard playing Alinsky. So why a fetish to defend Mitt's agenda? Romney's platform or candidacy is more valuable and pertinent than the integrity of the Constitution? No. Mitt Romney best represents the globalist banking interests, and the Republican leadership feel comfortable with Romney and their common values shared across the aisle with the Pelosi cabal. Yes.
Voters are frustrated with that major Republican Party disconnect. Having gifted America the DHS, bail-out precedence and an autonomous Sec. of the Treasury, Republican leadership lack the necessary motivation to govern constitutionally. The Republican Party refuses to constrain government to constitutional limits, to cut federal spending and taxes for a balanced budget, to impeach the potus and attorney general. It's not in the establishment status quo nature to function conservatively. I hardly wonder if the leadership would abide by conservative constituent voter "mandates" even if the constitutional conservative percentage of Americans were 99% of the nation's population. What the Republican leadership gives the Tea Party is a tax rebate on lipstick for us piggies getting weighed in for auction at market "value".
The primary season provides the rare moment when voters own a portion of the political discussion. Where's the conservative Republican Platform being promoted? Where are the Republican Party sponsored candidate debates?! I got another RNC email subject last week: "change we can believe in" as lame as "is Obama a socialist?" and "is it ok to call democrats socialists?" from previous year's RNC emails. Lag time. Hand-me-down slogans. Disgusting. And we're supposed to care that Mitt wins because why exactly? Mitt isn't going to do American Constitutional Governance any favor from the Oval Office. He will, however, do elitists and the global investment frauds many favors. But not with my voluntary $.02.
Posted by: didn't take long at October 11, 2011 02:27 PM (lpWVn)
Posted by: I'm just joshin... at October 11, 2011 02:28 PM (kR0j3)
You can't blame Romney for seizing a golden opportunity handed to him on a silver platter by a primary opponent
Perry already said what needed to be said, Romney is just being desperate.
Posted by: Proud Mormon Emperor of Icecream at October 11, 2011 02:30 PM (epBek)
Does anybody even hear us this far down the thread?? Hello,,,hello,,,Beuller?
Just what I thought. Anyway, its still too damn early for anyone to be shown the door. Its October People, not February.
Posted by: Rcih K at October 11, 2011 02:35 PM (X4l3T)
Posted by: Jaynie59 at October 11, 2011 02:37 PM (4zKCA)
Is it just me, or is Mitt getting more Alinsky-like each week? Freeze the target, isolate it, then polarize. Nice.
I really do not want him at the top of a Republican ticket. I don't like the way he campaigns, and I don't like the way he talks.
If we are going to run another McCain, we may as well re-elect Obama and lock him up with a Republican congress. At least until we can find a Republican Presidential candidate.
Posted by: Advo at October 11, 2011 02:39 PM (5qFlA)
See!!! I told You!!!
Posted by: the Atlas Shrugs chick whose name escapes me at the moment at October 11, 2011 02:40 PM (sOXQX)
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at October 11, 2011 02:48 PM (qHVJJ)
Posted by: Proud Mormon Emperor of Icecream at October 11, 2011 02:52 PM (epBek)
Posted by: Tonestaple at October 11, 2011 02:53 PM (V+wqJ)
I dunno, Sarah Palin™ fired back angrily at every single slight, real or imagined, hurled at her by both the media and (potential) political opponents within her own party, and for this she was held up as a shining example of the kind of "fighter" the Republican Party needed.
Go figure.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at October 11, 2011 02:59 PM (qHVJJ)
The guy is a minister. It's his religious belief that the Church of Latter Day Saints is fundamentally flawed and wrong... and a cult, apparently. Why should Perry enter into a theological debate with him over it?
How many Mormons criticized their church leaders pre-1978 over the exclusion of men of African descent from the priesthood?
Should every Catholic politician have to dress down Catholic clergy for their teachings on artificial birth control or the status of women in the church?
If Jefferes were a member of Perry's campaign (or gubernatorial) staff, then I'd expect a personal repudiation. But that's simply not the case here. What happened here is that a clergyman, speaking at a religiously-overtoned political event, expressed his sincere belief about two of the candidates based on his religious beliefs. He didn't call for violence to Romney. He didn't even say Romney was evil (au contraire, he called him a good man). He simply told people he thought would take his position seriously (Southern Baptists) that he thought one candidate was superior to another.
I completely disagree with the reverend's position, but I'm not going to argue with him about an opinion. And that's what his characterization of the LDS Church was - an opinion.
Since you believe that these remarks were entirely predictable, why hasn't Romney (or you) called for a repudiation of Rev. Jefferes by the organizers of the Values Voters Summit which I believe was the Family Research Council?
Posted by: Y-not at October 11, 2011 03:14 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Timothy Leary's Outside Looking In at October 11, 2011 03:20 PM (I49Jm)
Posted by: snowcrash at October 11, 2011 03:25 PM (w3YD7)
She was always called a whiner by the very same people who are now whining.
This "Palinista" is laughing his ass off at these chumps we have to choose from now.
You Romney and Perry people got what you wanted: no Sarah. Now you get to live with it.
Romney and Perry deserve each other.
Posted by: trumpetdaddy at October 11, 2011 03:32 PM (dcoFe)
Oh no. Whatever shall we do without the Wasilla Messiah?
Why, we might have to actually find another reality show to watch.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at October 11, 2011 03:41 PM (qHVJJ)
Jeffress is entirely within his rights to be a pig-ignorant bigot who prescribes religious tests for political candidates. Perry, on the other hand, as a presidential candidate, should know better than to allow himself to be linked to a guy like this. He doesn't get a pass, especially since this looks a whole lot like the sort of "good cop/bad cop" routine that is one of the oldest games in politics.
Since you believe that these remarks were entirely predictable, why hasn't Romney (or you) called for a repudiation of Rev. Jefferes by the organizers of the Values Voters Summit which I believe was the Family Research Council?
Why do I care anything about either the Values Voters Summit or the Family Research Council? Are they running for president?
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at October 11, 2011 03:46 PM (qHVJJ)
As far as I can tell, Perry himself, unlike Sarah Palin and Mitt Romney, has not complained about unfair attacks or responded personally. Seems about right to me.
Posted by: TH at October 11, 2011 03:59 PM (T8AL6)
Don't worry, he isn't.
There's no reason for the guilt by association trick.
We could do the same to Romney, but it would be similarly goofy.
Remember he's married to lady who donated to Planned Parenthood? Doesn't strike me as a legit thing to demand he repudiate, though.
Posted by: Dustin at October 11, 2011 04:08 PM (fF625)
If Perry won't explicitly disown this guy (and he hasn't) then everything Jeffress says reflects upon him.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at October 11, 2011 06:20 PM (qHVJJ)"
Absurd, since Perry specifically disagrees with the comment folks are upset about, and had no control over the rest of it anyway. Sure, a lot of people disagree with Mormonism. What's so bad about that? It's unusual, and people have deep feelings about religion. I suspect millions of Americans, supporters of every candidate including even Romney, think there is something peculiar about many different religions, from Catholisim to scientology to Mormonism.
You're telling me Perry has to screen out many mainstream baptists, even if he specifically disagrees with them, or it reflects on him?
LOL. This is silly. Perry isn't bringing religion into this. Cain has about Islam and now Romney is with his religious test.
The preacher said a preachery thing that Perry disagreed with. There's no reason for serious folks to care about this, aside from being annoyed with the assumptions Romney is making about so many Americans.
Posted by: Dustin at October 11, 2011 04:13 PM (fF625)
351. "Don't tell me what I believe."
All right then, do you believe the Creator has a body of flesh and bones and lives on the planet Kolob with a day lasting a thousand earth years? That anyone who denies the doctrine of Telestial Marriage is "damned"?
Do you believe Joseph Smith was murdered? Do you believe a bunch of Semites lived in the Americas for centuries and killed each other off but their history was recorded in heaven on gold plates?
Do you believe the Book of Abraham in the Pearl of Great Price was translated from Egyptian papyrii?
Do you believe that the Aaronic Priesthood is obsolete, the Melchizedek Priesthood complete and their will be no more Prophets from Jesus until the end?
Posted by: icepick at October 11, 2011 04:21 PM (o0Uno)
Posted by: icepick at October 11, 2011 04:30 PM (o0Uno)
386. " a pig-ignorant bigot "
I don't happen to like the chances for an afterlife for people who don't know themselves to be pig-ignorant bigots, at least when awake.
Posted by: icepick at October 11, 2011 04:39 PM (o0Uno)
Posted by: Hungry Girl Supermarket Survival ePub at October 11, 2011 04:49 PM (T16Q5)
This is a Democrat leftist victim game.
Posted by: bobbymike at October 11, 2011 05:08 PM (xpx19)
Posted by: Twilight The Graphic Novel Volume 2 epub at October 11, 2011 05:20 PM (L2SVL)
Posted by: Train Dreams AudioBook at October 11, 2011 05:39 PM (9p9YC)
Posted by: Beautiful Outlaw ePub at October 11, 2011 06:24 PM (0FIQt)
Romney is fully within his rights.
Romney is a member of a cult. He can complain all he likes about people saying that about his faith, but it is what it is.
In Mormonism, Jesus lies to Peter when He says thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. Because according to their beliefs, the Church Peter established fell into apostacy and Christianity ceased to exist.
Somehow, I don't see Jesus telling fibs...
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at October 11, 2011 08:48 PM (cYzZf)
SO WHAT?
Romney is way, way out of line demanding Perry repudiate or condemn a huge number of peaceful people who don't agree with Mormonism, which to them is mutually exclusive with their views.
You don't hear Perry making any fuss over Romney's faith. Romney needs to find something else to cry about.
Posted by: Dustin at October 12, 2011 02:30 AM (fF625)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2545 seconds, 516 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Paul Zummo at October 11, 2011 12:24 PM (IGkEP)