May 10, 2011
— andy Today's Wall Street Journal has some great statistics on the success of RomneyCare in Massachusetts.
- Average wait time for a routine checkup with an internist: 48 days
- Time to secure an appointment with a gastroenterologist for chronic heartburn: 43 days, up from 36 last year
- Time to secure an appointment with an OB/GYN: 41 days, up from 34 last year
The numbers are going up, Up, UP! This is good news, right?
No! Putting this in terms President Tee Time can understand, lower scores are better.
The Journal also reports another grim milestone: "fewer than half of the state's primary care practices are accepting new patients, down from 70% in 2007, before former Governor Mitt Romney's health-care plan came online." So everyone in Massachusetts has "Health Care", they just have an increasingly difficult time finding a doctor.
You'd think with the lack of access to care that costs would be falling, but you'd be wrong. Massachusetts' health insurance premiums continue to rank among the highest in the country, and the only way this trend is likely to reverse is from ObamaCare closing the gap by increasing the costs for everyone else.
Massachusetts health regulators also estimate that emergency room visits jumped 9% between 2004 and 2008, in part due to the lack of routine access to providers. The Romney-Obama theory was that if everyone is insured by the government, costs would fall by squeezing out uncompensated care. Yet emergency medicine accounts for only 2% of all national health spending.
But RomneyCare really is succeeding wildly ... in proving its detractors right. And Mitt's continued defense of it, even though much less spirited than before, should move him into the "not just no, but hell no" category for the 2012 GOP presidential nod. After 4 years of listening to Barry try to blow sunshine up our asses on everything from ObamaCare to Green Jobs to the Summer of Recovery™, the last thing we need on our side is someone who refuses to acknowledge the reality of the policies he supports. So, buh-bye Mitt.
Posted by: andy at
07:12 AM
| Comments (39)
Post contains 352 words, total size 2 kb.
With any luck, this will chase him out of the race once and for all due to terminal stupidity.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at May 10, 2011 07:44 AM (UvFnc)
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at May 10, 2011 07:50 AM (AZGON)
Andy--New scourge of Ace of Spades.
Where's my buddy Drew M.? Is he all in for Mitch? Christie?
Agree with Andy. Mitt does not get my support for 2012.
Posted by: Scoob at May 10, 2011 07:50 AM (T7+JL)
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at May 10, 2011 07:51 AM (AZGON)
I'm not sure Romney read this article... He's planning a speech for Thursday addressing health care and will apparently be pitching a version of his 2008 plan as an ObamaCare alternative.
With any luck, this will chase him out of the race once and for all due to terminal stupidity.
I've little doubt that his Thurs speech will be intended as damage control. He has political advisors; I can't imagine that they'd hand him a speech that hurts him even more.
Voters are fickle. With the right hair, presentation and catchphrases they'll forgive and forget past transgressions. We saw it in 2008, I'm not certain that we couldn't see it again in 2012.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 10, 2011 07:52 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at May 10, 2011 07:52 AM (AZGON)
The problem is that I think he and his advisers are looking at things in terms of shaping a narrative for the general election to pull in "moderates", NOT being able to make it through the primaries to begin with.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at May 10, 2011 07:59 AM (UvFnc)
Sweet!
* Clears space on mantel between Nobel Peace Prize and "Everybody Gets a Trophy" Little League trophy *
I actually supported Mitt early on in the '08 cycle because of his business background, and I wasn't too worried about RomneyCare given the realities of the Massachusetts legislature's ability to override his veto if he had done so.
But his steadfast refusal to unhitch his wagon from this POS makes it very different this go-round.
Posted by: Andy at May 10, 2011 08:00 AM (5Rurq)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 10, 2011 08:02 AM (AZGON)
Headline: Northwestern University Cancels Class That Included a Live Sex Act Using a Chainsaw Dildo.
Dang, I needed that one to complete my Anthropology major.
Posted by: Northwestern Undergrad at May 10, 2011 08:02 AM (K/USr)
Headline: Northwestern University Cancels Class That Included a Live Sex Act Using a Chainsaw Dildo.
Dang, I needed that one to complete my Anthropology major.
It's still available as an independent study course, though the fees for that are significantly higher than a regular class.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at May 10, 2011 08:03 AM (UvFnc)
Posted by: joncelli at May 10, 2011 08:04 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Louis Tully at May 10, 2011 08:04 AM (K/USr)
Its strange if you assume that the GOP brass shares your goal of complete repeal of Ocare. If you assume instead that they intend to "fix" it, not repeal it, it makes perfect sense. Don't forget, many GOP elites--not just Mitt--have bought into national healthcare. See for example, Charles Krauthammer, alleged conservative, who has called it a "moral imperative." Romney is their candidate.
Posted by: Louis Tully at May 10, 2011 08:11 AM (K/USr)
Romney challenges Kennedy for Senate seat, runs as conservative, loses.
Romney runs for Governor, runs as moderate, wins.
Romney runs for President, runs as ummm....more conservative than John McCain, loses.
Romney runs for President, runs as ______________, ______________.
Romney will run as a moderate. He is shameless, and this is what he past experience has taught him 'works'.
Posted by: Paper at May 10, 2011 08:13 AM (VoSja)
No wait here! Come on down! We are having a special on twins this month. 2 for the price of 1!*
*Triplets and higher are extra.
Posted by: Planned Parenthood of MASS at May 10, 2011 08:13 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 10, 2011 08:14 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 10, 2011 08:15 AM (AZGON)
I'm self employed.
My cost this year for health insurance for a family of four?
$18,000.
I voted for Romney twice (once for governor and once in 1994 when he ran against Ted Kennedy).
I would have voted for him for a second term as governor had he decided to run again since he's about the best you can do in a state like Mass.
But on a national level there are much better candidates.
Posted by: Rich at May 10, 2011 08:16 AM (u/XqU)
Posted by: Acceptable and Electable Establishment Candidate Mitt Romney at May 10, 2011 08:17 AM (VoSja)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 10, 2011 08:18 AM (AZGON)
12
Yes, I too supported Mitt against McCain in 2008. But I was troubled by his tenure as governor of MA and his promise to bail out MI to win that primary.
Now that we have Obamacare, we need a candidate who will be a strong advocate for repeal. My concern with Romney is that once he is in, he will try to *fix* it.
Posted by: Scoob at May 10, 2011 08:19 AM (T7+JL)
What's funny is that Romney is at or near the top of many MSM lists for 2012 Republican candidates for president.
Count me in the "Hell no!" category.
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at May 10, 2011 08:39 AM (1rHeD)
Posted by: Potosi Joel at May 10, 2011 08:45 AM (YHiRL)
Assuming Alaska's former governor does not run, and that there will be no surprise candidates who emerge from the pack, Mittens is basically running against Huckleberry and Noot and... who else? Nobody, really.
He and his handlers probably know what they're doing, and he'll probably win the nomination because people are stupid.
Posted by: Mr. Fire at May 10, 2011 08:46 AM (TOk1P)
Posted by: glowing blue meat at May 10, 2011 08:50 AM (K/USr)
Teh Fred, you're our only hope.
I wish lefty states like New Hampshire didn't pick our nominee before we Texans get to vote. I think Primaries should be held in order of the percentage they vote GOP in the previous election. Like if Texas voted 64% GOP, and New Hampshire voted only 53% or in fact went Dem, their primary would be after Texas. This would help limit Dem shenanigans, and create friendly competition between the states to become more GOP. Maybe no more McVain's evuh.
Posted by: Schwalbe : The © at May 10, 2011 08:51 AM (UU0OF)
منتدى قصي
صور قصي
اغاني قصي خضر
Posted by: qusai at May 10, 2011 09:19 AM (ihk4k)
Putting this in terms President Tee Time can understand, lower scores are better.
"Just like bowling!" -- Barky
Posted by: Henry Harold Humphries - you can call me 'H' at May 10, 2011 09:41 AM (/CMAw)
Unlike Huck, who has realized his 2008 mistakes and backpedals from them on his Fox News show almost daily, Mitt still does not get it. I supported Mitt over McLame in 2008, but not in 2012.
Mitt might make a fine Secretary of the Treasury or Commerce in someone else's administration, but otherrwise....
Posted by: Curmudgeon at May 10, 2011 10:51 AM (ujg0T)
Nominating Mitt Romneycare will almost certainly cause a conservative party to break away from the GOP. So his candidacy has that going for it, if nothing else.
And insuring a Commiecrat victory is helpful how?
Posted by: Curmudgeon at May 10, 2011 10:55 AM (ujg0T)
Posted by: Curmudgeon at May 10, 2011 11:01 AM (ujg0T)
It's an insane world, apparently.
Nature was designed without a mechanism for removing people who say "It will work *this* time!" from the gene pool.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at May 10, 2011 12:16 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: monkeytoe at May 10, 2011 01:13 PM (sOx93)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2277 seconds, 167 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Temper Tantrum at May 10, 2011 07:42 AM (bAL0J)