September 06, 2011
— DrewM 59 points? There were 9 that he just couldn't live without or they couldn't come up with 1 more to round things off?
Pro tip for Team Mitt: When voters say they want details, they are lying. People want to feel comfortable with a candidate and a basic understanding of their positions. That's it. The rest is just stuff people say to reporters so they don't look like slackers. In a world where 140 characters on Twitter has made reading a full length blog post like slogging through War and Peace, no one other than rival campaigns and political reporters are going to read all of that.
But since they went through all of the trouble to put it together, let me summarize a summary of it for you (slackers!). Here are 10 things, finally a nice round number, Mitt says he would do on the day he's inaugurated.
They would include five proposed bills that would: lower the corporate tax rate to 25 percent from 35 percent; implement free-trade agreements with Colombia, Panama and South Korea; expand domestic energy exploration; consolidate worker retraining programs and turn them over to the states; and cut non-security discretionary spending by 5 percent. (Obama also supports those three trade agreements, although he has been accused of dithering to satisfy the demands of organized labor.)If elected, the former Massachusetts governor said he would also issue five executive orders on Inauguration Day. They would roll back President ObamaÂ’s health-care overhaul; eliminate Obama-era regulations; issue new oil-drilling permits; sanction China for currency manipulation; and reverse a number of policies that favor organized labor.
Romney also said he would cut the size of the federal workforce by 10 percent through attrition, possibly by hiring only one new government employee for every two who leave.
Romney says all of this will produce dramatic results.
According to his campaign, by the end of RomneyÂ’s first term, his proposals would lead to GDP growth averaging 4 percent per year over four years; 11.5 million additional private-sector jobs; an unemployment rate reduced to 5.9 percent and a reduction in spending of $1.6 trillion less than the projected amount under the current administration.
The Club for Growth gives Mitt a generally positive review except for his talk about China.
That strikes me much like Obama's promise to renegotiate NAFTA, (hey, how is that coming along?) a good primary talking point but in the cold light of actually governing, not so great.
The histories of campaigns are littered with plans and policy papers and most GOP candidates share the same broad outlines (cutting corporate taxes, cutting spending, reforming entitlements, etc.). The differences are within who has the record of doing what they say and their ability to make it happen if they are elected.
Related enough: Perry is reported to be attending tomorrow's debate in California.
Posted by: DrewM at
03:38 PM
| Comments (151)
Post contains 494 words, total size 4 kb.
How about 41 more for a nice, even hundred.
Posted by: Adrian Monk at September 06, 2011 03:40 PM (5H6zj)
I predict that if Romney loses to Perry, it will be because he was awol during the debt ceiling debate. Whichever side he endorses, sitting on the sideline for a seminal debate won't play well this cycle.
Posted by: pep at September 06, 2011 03:42 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: buzzion at September 06, 2011 03:43 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failuree at September 06, 2011 03:44 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at September 06, 2011 03:46 PM (npr0X)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failuree at September 06, 2011 03:46 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: steevy at September 06, 2011 03:48 PM (fyOgS)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at September 06, 2011 03:49 PM (npr0X)
Who chose that venue? I hope there wasn't an unfortunate audience of people listening to Mitt.
Seriously, though, it seems overdue. Has he released a similarly detailed plan for getting rid of Obamacare? If he has, it's not on his campaign web site. That's what concerns me coming from him. No details on "Repeal and replace."
Posted by: Y-not at September 06, 2011 03:50 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Barky O'Genius at September 06, 2011 03:50 PM (QKKT0)
lower the corporate tax rate to 25 percent from 35 percent;
That's a start. A quick Bing search says that Mexico is at 35%. Canada's current corporate tax rate is 16.5% and the conservatives are trying to get it to 15%.
Posted by: Stateless Infidel at September 06, 2011 03:50 PM (GKQDR)
Posted by: logprof at September 06, 2011 03:52 PM (lh7Yc)
Posted by: Phineas at September 06, 2011 07:43 PM (afrI6)
--I'm sure plenty of Texas morons have.
Posted by: logprof at September 06, 2011 03:54 PM (lh7Yc)
Posted by: Phineas at September 06, 2011 07:43 PM (afrI6)
--I'm sure plenty of Texas morons have.
Posted by: logprof at September 06, 2011 07:54 PM (lh7Yc)
Oh, there he is
Posted by: Ferb at September 06, 2011 03:55 PM (afrI6)
Seriously, though, it seems overdue. Has he released a similarly detailed plan for getting rid of Obamacare? If he has, it's not on his campaign web site. That's what concerns me coming from him. No details on "Repeal and replace."
Posted by: Y-not at September 06, 2011 07:50 PM (5H6zj)
You mean a waiver for everyone isn't enough?
Posted by: buzzion at September 06, 2011 03:56 PM (GULKT)
Now, Mitt, you know and I know, that you're stealing my schtick.
That dog won't hunt. It's just that simple.
Posted by: H. Ross Perot at September 06, 2011 03:57 PM (lh7Yc)
"good day"
Posted by: Mitt Milquetoast at September 06, 2011 03:58 PM (AEIYh)
OT: well they identified the Nevada shooter.
Authorities say the suspect, 32-year-old Eduardo Sencion of Carson City, also killed a female civilian and wounded five other people before shooting himself
Posted by: robtr at September 06, 2011 03:58 PM (MtwBb)
Man, I sort of wish we could genetically crossbreed our two leading candidates. Rick Romney? Mitt Perry?
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 06, 2011 04:00 PM (hIWe1)
Canada having a rate less than half the American rate tells you all you need to know about why we're getting dickstomped....
foreign business headquarters in canada to sell to the US market vis a vis Nafta and have some socialism without that neo-luddite chaser
Posted by: sven10077 at September 06, 2011 04:00 PM (AEIYh)
Authorities say the suspect, 32-year-old Eduardo Sencion of Carson City, also killed a female civilian and wounded five other people before shooting himself
Posted by: robtr at September 06, 2011 07:58 PM (MtwBb)
I read somewhere else today that supposedly his girlfriend (or ex-girlfriend) was sitting with the national guard. No idea if that true...interweb thing. But if so, that might be the female civilian that was killed.
Posted by: Tami at September 06, 2011 04:01 PM (X6akg)
Posted by: Romneycare at September 06, 2011 04:01 PM (gUMu2)
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 06, 2011 04:01 PM (hIWe1)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at September 06, 2011 04:01 PM (AZGON)
Somehow... no.
This plan roll out seems really poorly thought out. Kind of a fizzle to me. Heck, Huntsman - who blows donkey sticks - had some specifics out recently (on tax reform) and grabbed lots of attention in the process and he's only been at this a couple of months. Romney's been going for this job for-friggin-ever. Coming up with concrete plans should have been priority one... particularly when it comes to Health Care. His record is weak and dusty and people simply don't trust him on that issue (rightfully so).
Posted by: Y-not at September 06, 2011 04:01 PM (5H6zj)
I read somewhere else today that supposedly his girlfriend (or ex-girlfriend) was sitting with the national guard. No idea if that true...interweb thing. But if so, that might be the female civilian that was killed.
Posted by: Tami at September 06, 2011 08:01 PM (X6akg)
No, the woman killed was national guard. The story is at seattletimes.com
Posted by: robtr at September 06, 2011 04:02 PM (MtwBb)
Posted by: robtr at September 06, 2011 04:03 PM (MtwBb)
Posted by: Oily Taints at September 06, 2011 04:04 PM (TUax9)
Posted by: Slublog at September 06, 2011 04:04 PM (o2qEX)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at September 06, 2011 04:04 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at September 06, 2011 04:04 PM (npr0X)
Posted by: Romneycare at September 06, 2011 08:01 PM (gUMu2)
I do, but you'll have the buy the airtime yourself!
Posted by: H. Ross Perot at September 06, 2011 04:04 PM (lh7Yc)
Posted by: Andy at September 06, 2011 04:05 PM (z6jMn)
Like 103% of all economists. . .In FY2007 it's up to 106% this year.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at September 06, 2011 04:05 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Y-not at September 06, 2011 04:06 PM (5H6zj)
No, the woman killed was national guard. The story is at seattletimes.com
Posted by: robtr at September 06, 2011 08:02 PM (MtwBb)
Above you just said a 'female civilian' was killed. The story says:
"Five Nevada National Guard troops sitting together at the back of the restaurant were shot - two of them fatally. Another woman was also killed, and the gunman, 32-year-old Eduardo Sencion of Carson City, shot himself in the head and died at a hospital."
Doesn't appear the woman was national guard.
Posted by: Tami at September 06, 2011 04:06 PM (X6akg)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at September 06, 2011 04:06 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: Oily Taints at September 06, 2011 04:06 PM (TUax9)
Posted by: Trish at September 06, 2011 04:07 PM (yqhkv)
Doesn't appear the woman was national guard.
Posted by: Tami at September 06, 2011 08:06 PM (X6akg)
See 33
Posted by: robtr at September 06, 2011 04:07 PM (MtwBb)
Posted by: sven10077 at September 06, 2011 08:00 PM (AEIYh)
I know. And it's America lite with no great cultural differences to overcome.
But if Romney's going to be cutting corporate taxes, that $1.5 Trillion deficit is going to have to be slashed. Heck, even if you don't cut corporate taxes, government spending still needs to be slashed.
CNN is reporting now that Obama's plan is going to be a $300 Billion spending plan on that never-specific infrastructure stuff. The spending is supposed to be offset by $300 Billion in cuts from somewhere, most likely phantom cuts.
Posted by: Stateless Infidel at September 06, 2011 04:08 PM (GKQDR)
See 33
Posted by: robtr at September 06, 2011 08:07 PM (MtwBb)
Yeah, sorry....saw it after I posted.
Posted by: Tami at September 06, 2011 04:08 PM (X6akg)
There is a PDF summary at Mitt's website.
I still think they mishandled this roll out. The timing seems odd, the venue sounds like it was disastrously bad, and the plan should have been shorter with the details referenced in an addendum.
It's like a grad student who slaves away for seven years on their Ph.D. only to produce an overly wordy dissertation. They want to have a long document to show how hard they worked, but those dissertations are invariably badly in need of editing.
Posted by: Y-not at September 06, 2011 04:09 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 06, 2011 08:00 PM (hIWe1)
"Rick Romney" sounds like something Scooby Doo would say.
"Rook, shaggy, is Rick Romney!"
Posted by: Max Power at September 06, 2011 04:09 PM (q177U)
CNN is reporting now that Obama's plan is going to be a $300 Billion spending plan on that never-specific infrastructure stuff. The spending is supposed to be offset by $300 Billion in cuts from somewhere, most likely phantom cuts.
Posted by: Stateless Infidel at September 06, 2011 08:08 PM (GKQDR)
Because maintaining the current level of spending would be just perfect with no problems
Posted by: buzzion at September 06, 2011 04:10 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at September 06, 2011 04:10 PM (AZGON)
"Rick Romney" sounds like something Scooby Doo would say.
"Rook, shaggy, is Rick Romney!"
Gah. Ear worm.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at September 06, 2011 04:11 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at September 06, 2011 04:11 PM (ABrjU)
Also, having seen the speech he gave today, it's good politics. The policy recommendations are solid, they're not really pie-in-the-sky (at least not the executive order stuff), and even the "get tough with China" stuff actually resonates with me.
I'll be interested to see how Perry responds. Does he just swat it away and ignore it (as the new frontrunner, he might be able to)? Does he outline a plan of his own?
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 06, 2011 04:11 PM (hIWe1)
Posted by: Stateless Infidel at September 06, 2011 04:12 PM (GKQDR)
Posted by: Oily Taints at September 06, 2011 08:06 PM (TUax9)
Maybe it's a tumor
Posted by: that kid in Kindergarden Cop at September 06, 2011 04:12 PM (UqKQV)
Posted by: Andy at September 06, 2011 04:12 PM (z6jMn)
Romney is the sort who will say what he has to in order to get elected. He is like Kerry in that regard. Neither of them places anything above their own advancement.
What is it about MA that turns out so many wholly unprincipled politicians?
Posted by: Voluble at September 06, 2011 04:12 PM (JKX4x)
no Bambi is not looking for phantom cuts friend he'll ask the civillian feds to cut $0.98 and DoD to gut $299,999,999,999.02
"change MFers"
Posted by: sven10077 at September 06, 2011 04:12 PM (AEIYh)
Posted by: Jon Huntsman at September 06, 2011 04:13 PM (U9jjw)
Posted by: tangonine at September 06, 2011 04:13 PM (x3YFz)
If this is really it, then he's boned. He's boned and he knows it, too.
Therefore, I can't really believe that this is all. This would be tantamount to rhetorical & political surrender.
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 06, 2011 04:14 PM (hIWe1)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at September 06, 2011 04:14 PM (AZGON)
There are better ways for Mitt to make a clear distinction between himself and Obam-bam. "Walking back" Romney care, for example.....
Condense his 'mini-book' into a Snappy Slogan. People like snappy slogans
Posted by: that kid in Kindergarden Cop at September 06, 2011 04:14 PM (UqKQV)
Posted by: S. Wolf at September 06, 2011 04:15 PM (AX2j1)
Posted by: Oily Taints at September 06, 2011 04:15 PM (TUax9)
Related enough: Perry is reported to be attending tomorrow's debate in California.
I am going to a Meet & Greet for him tomorrow night here in San Diego, after the debate. Hopefully I won't sound like a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure if I get to meet him.
Posted by: John P. Squibob at September 06, 2011 04:15 PM (kqqGm)
Posted by: nevergiveup at September 06, 2011 04:16 PM (i6RpT)
Posted by: fish out of water on dock at September 06, 2011 04:16 PM (jxiWx)
Remember that SCOAMF said he had visited 57 states so far and had two more to go to. So 59 it id.
Posted by: John P. Squibob at September 06, 2011 04:16 PM (kqqGm)
Posted by: Beau Biden at September 06, 2011 04:17 PM (afrI6)
Posted by: Detective John Kimble at September 06, 2011 04:17 PM (UqKQV)
OT. Has anyone heard from Vic? How is he doing?
At least Romney has a plan. Odumbbo talks about planning a plan.
Posted by: Cicerokid at September 06, 2011 04:17 PM (h0dw7)
Now, to endlessly pick apart every last one of his proposals until nothing but their glistening skeletons lay bare in the desert.
Posted by: GnuBreed at September 06, 2011 04:17 PM (ENKCw)
Posted by: Pug Mahon at September 06, 2011 04:17 PM (nzRGp)
SRSLY?
If that is the best she can do, SCOAMF would generate more excitement with a bowl of her day-old tomato soup.
Really?
REALLY?
So take money from one bucket, and put it in another? Money you were going to pay folks a, b, and c, and use it instead to pay folks x, y, and z? And this is going to do....what exactly?
We've graduated from economic theory to fantasy.
Your economy has a flat tire, you rotate the tires and keep driving.
Or take those deck chairs and move them to the side away from the iceberg.
Pick your metaphor.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at September 06, 2011 04:17 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Dustin at September 06, 2011 04:18 PM (fF625)
Posted by: Max Power at September 06, 2011 04:18 PM (q177U)
Posted by: cantankerous at September 06, 2011 04:18 PM (k1rwm)
What he had going for him was a reputation, carefully cultivated by his supporters, that he was a thoughtful, smart businessman. But that's based on a different economic climate, frankly, and his record as governor of Massachusetts has this big fat turd in it: Masscare. Early on when I had him at the top of the pile I kept waiting for him to shovel that turd out of there or, even better, to use that turd as fertilizer for a wonderful garden of great ideas on health care. But that never happened. That's inexcusable and it tells me he does not accept what a disaster Masscare and things like it are.
Ironically, he's still kind of my back up guy, because I just haven't seen enough from Bachmann to make me think she's up to the job. So that's pretty sad.
Posted by: Y-not at September 06, 2011 04:18 PM (5H6zj)
There is a PDF summary at Mitt's website.
I still think they mishandled this roll out. The timing seems odd, the venue sounds like it was disastrously bad, and the plan should have been shorter with the details referenced in an addendum.
It's like a grad student who slaves away for seven years on their Ph.D. only to produce an overly wordy dissertation. They want to have a long document to show how hard they worked, but those dissertations are invariably badly in need of editing.
Posted by: Y-not at September 06, 2011 08:09 PM (5H6zj)
Yeah, wouldn't it have been better for him to take these 59 details and combine them down into a sort of 10 point plan, and then have the 5-6 details in each point. You could get people to know the 10 points and then when he's asked about a specific one he can get down into those 5 specific details. Because if he starts talking about his 59 ideas people's eyes are going to start glazing over and they're not going to bother listening to any of them.
Posted by: buzzion at September 06, 2011 04:18 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: ParisParamus at September 06, 2011 04:19 PM (hhE0T)
Almost half the population gets a government check--most apparently do not care where the $$$$ originates from, or whose money it originally was
Posted by: Detective John Kimble at September 06, 2011 04:19 PM (UqKQV)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failuree at September 06, 2011 04:20 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: Joseph at September 06, 2011 04:20 PM (afrI6)
Posted by: Johnny (John E.) at September 06, 2011 04:21 PM (nRTou)
Posted by: ParisParamus at September 06, 2011 04:21 PM (hhE0T)
Your economy has a flat tire, you rotate the tires and keep driving.
Or take those deck chairs and move them to the side away from the iceberg.
Pick your metaphor.
Something with Slurpees would be nice.
Posted by: Barky O'Genius at September 06, 2011 04:22 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Barack "Emma" Obama at September 06, 2011 04:22 PM (afrI6)
Posted by: Cicerokid at September 06, 2011 04:22 PM (h0dw7)
Each of Romney's key points are well taken, with the notable exceptions of the worker retraining item, the EO regarding Obamacare and the China currency gambit.
The EO rolling back Obamacare merely is a fig leaf. Getting rid of Obamacare will require new legislation. There's also the related point that for Romney even to discuss Obamacare is the height of irony, given the fact of Romneycare.
Sanctioning China for currency manipulation is a bad idea. We don't need to pick a fight with our largest creditor.
Concerning worker retraining the better approach would be to eliminate this area of federal spending. The private sector can fund its own job training efforts. The public sector needs to jettison workers, not retrain them.
Romney's team does need to learn to be a lot more concise (the chances of Zombieland absorbing such a detailed plan are zero), but at least they're putting together a (mostly) viable plan. It'll be interesting to see what Perry's team comes up with as far as the economy and job creation go. I suspect Perry's approach will be less heavy and a lot clearer.
Posted by: Tsar Nicholas II at September 06, 2011 04:22 PM (f8XyF)
And I'm hungry...
Posted by: Y-not at September 06, 2011 04:23 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failuree at September 06, 2011 04:23 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: SCOAMF at September 06, 2011 04:24 PM (h0dw7)
Deatails provide certainity and accountability. People don't want it? Really? They really want Obamacare?
They want to know what's in it after they pass it?
Pathetic.
Posted by: Molon Labe at September 06, 2011 04:24 PM (e36+G)
Posted by: rdbrewer at September 06, 2011 04:26 PM (BDTek)
Deatails provide certainity and accountability. People don't want it? Really? They really want Obamacare?
---
I'm happy enough with details, but the plan is overdue, imho, and was poorly rolled out.
But the really funny thing about your comment (not meaning to pick on you, actually) is your use of Obamacare as an example. To date, Romney has not delivered a detailed plan of what he means by "repeal and replace." That's unforgivable coming from him.
Posted by: Y-not at September 06, 2011 04:27 PM (5H6zj)
He was great to me at least five times!
Posted by: Ann Romney at September 06, 2011 04:27 PM (afrI6)
Posted by: ParisParamus at September 06, 2011 04:27 PM (hhE0T)
So, Perry's got all the fires out now and is free to attend the debate? /s
More seriously, did the fires materially change enough/calm down enough for him to legitimately attend without looking like a flip-flopper?
Posted by: knob at September 06, 2011 04:27 PM (qKPU8)
Posted by: Johnny (John E.) at September 06, 2011 04:29 PM (nRTou)
Agencies need to be eliminated, I don't see any in this plan.
What about auditing the Fed?
What about outlawing subsidies and bailouts?
Only structural changes I see are the BBA, spending caps, and outlawing carbon regulation. All good things.
Posted by: Jose at September 06, 2011 04:30 PM (WTNJJ)
IIRC I read today that all but that last one are "contained." I think that last one is the one near Austin, however, so it's hard to picture him leaving TX if it doesn't at least have some sort of containment towards the biggest populations. Can a Texas moron jump in here, please?
Posted by: Y-not at September 06, 2011 04:30 PM (5H6zj)
Also, for those who make a huge deal about the fact that rove dislikes perry. well laura ingram, God bless her, just asked him right out about it in a way only a woman could or would and he denied it. So another one (rumor) bites the dust.
Posted by: cantankerous at September 06, 2011 04:31 PM (k1rwm)
Posted by: somebody else, not me at September 06, 2011 04:31 PM (7EV/g)
More seriously, did the fires materially change enough/calm down enough for him to legitimately attend without looking like a flip-flopper?
Posted by: knob at September 06, 2011 08:27 PM (qKPU
Damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. That should about summarize the issue.
Posted by: GnuBreed at September 06, 2011 04:33 PM (ENKCw)
Posted by: buzzion at September 06, 2011 04:33 PM (GULKT)
This still isn't as detailed as a Sarah Facebook post!!!11!!1!!!
She's playing checkers and they are all playing chess.
Wait, did I get that right??????
Posted by: Tepid Air Nista at September 06, 2011 04:37 PM (VxqUc)
Wait, did I get that right??????
Posted by: Tepid Air Nista at September 06, 2011 08:37 PM (VxqUc)
B+
Posted by: GnuBreed at September 06, 2011 04:39 PM (ENKCw)
Romney needs to get his ass beat. I hate this guy with a burning passion
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at September 06, 2011 04:39 PM (tqXjx)
Karl Rove was very credible, watch the re run later.
Posted by: cantankerous at September 06, 2011 04:39 PM (k1rwm)
Posted by: buzzion at September 06, 2011 04:41 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: cantankerous at September 06, 2011 04:41 PM (k1rwm)
Posted by: buzzion at September 06, 2011 08:41 PM (GULKT)
btw, buzzion, stop with the sexual comments. Cease and desist now.
Posted by: cantankerous at September 06, 2011 04:42 PM (k1rwm)
Posted by: buzzion at September 06, 2011 04:43 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: Y-not at September 06, 2011 08:30 PM (5H6zj)
I'm not a Texas moron but here's a link to all the fires and their status.
Posted by: Tami at September 06, 2011 04:43 PM (X6akg)
Posted by: buzzion at September 06, 2011 08:43 PM (GULKT)
btw, buzzion, stop with the sexual comments. Cease and desist now.
Posted by: cantankerous at September 06, 2011 04:44 PM (k1rwm)
Posted by: buzzion at September 06, 2011 08:46 PM (GULKT)
btw, buzzion, stop with the sexual comments. Cease and desist now.
Posted by: cantankerous at September 06, 2011 04:47 PM (k1rwm)
Posted by: buzzion at September 06, 2011 04:48 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: TexasJew at September 06, 2011 05:00 PM (wTSvK)
Posted by: buzzion at September 06, 2011 05:00 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: ParisParamus at September 06, 2011 05:01 PM (N4/l+)
Posted by: ginaswo at September 06, 2011 05:02 PM (QngP/)
Posted by: ginaswo at September 06, 2011 05:08 PM (QngP/)
Posted by: ginaswo at September 06, 2011 09:02 PM (QngP/)
He's done for me. Two hundred grand is peanuts. the people who are really suffering are making more than that, they are in the big cities, trying to keep their jobs of which they are making the same or less than when this mess started, usually less. And most are underwater with their homes and still paying their mortgages, not walking away. And they are probably paying tuition for a couple of kids in college or paying off their own student loans off and therefore they were late into acquiring their dream house.
Posted by: cantankerous at September 06, 2011 05:14 PM (k1rwm)
Can Romney accomplish that? Romney is not philosophically opposed to a mandated health care purchase anyway, which does place him in severe contrast to Perry (no, an optional gardisil vaccination doesn't make a difference).
But I'm glad to see something on that.
Romney has to try harder than Perry, because Romney doesn't have a record on successfully governing. He made MA worse, and was unpopular at the end of his term (didn't even run for reelection).
Romney needs something to make up that gap in credibility. It's always amazed me that Romney isn't seen as about equal with Palin in credentials. Perry has something more than a promise of how he'll govern, since he's governing right now, but I do hope Perry can match Romney's agenda.
It's a little different though. I'm not worried about Perry when it comes to entitlements or spending so much as I am about foreign policy.
Posted by: Dustin at September 06, 2011 05:15 PM (fF625)
ugh only have my ipad and iphone with me. kindle is home.
will it work on the ipad or iphone?
Posted by: cantankerous at September 06, 2011 05:17 PM (k1rwm)
68, 90 - BS yourself. Following the link there is simply a chart and Geoff's opinion, no analysis, that GDP will never reach 4% again. 2% GDP is bare bones growth, you remove some of the heavy regulatory burden coming from DC and re-incent investment and risk taking and 4% is certainly doable.
130 - exactly. Romney has said repeatedly he would grant everyone a waiver to Obamacare effectively making it null. Yes that doesn't repeal it (you need Congress to do it) but it is more than any other candidate has said. To keep saying that doesn't count because of Romneycare is a cop out
Romney is not the perfect candidate (still looking at Perry myself) but deserves credit for putting out a detailed plan in direct contrast to O and some of the other R candidates.
Posted by: notfeelinggoodabout12 at September 06, 2011 05:26 PM (GkYyh)
#136 - Can he accomplish this? that is why he is saying Executive Order
"he made MA worse - any evidence of this"
"was unpopular when he left" - He was a GOP governor in a heavy Dem state and was constantly attacked by the Dem heavy media. The only way to be popular in MA was to go full blown RINO - see Scott Brown
"Romney isn't seen as creditaled as Palin" - only a Palinista or MSM Dem talking point could say this with a straight face. So the 20+ yrs running businesses and running the Olympics don't matter?
Posted by: notfeelinggoodabout12 at September 06, 2011 05:33 PM (GkYyh)
It's a clever way to move taxation back to a broader base (it's the carrot for the stick of fewer exemptions in a simpler code (that's my take; not something he said).
Posted by: ParisParamus at September 06, 2011 05:36 PM (kfz40)
Pussy. Promise to fire / layoff 10% of the Federal workforce. "Attrition" just means letting the good people go, and keeping the ones who are so incompetent they can't find a job any place else.
Posted by: Greg Q at September 06, 2011 05:39 PM (U8vES)
Posted by: matt foley at September 06, 2011 05:48 PM (bY+Nu)
Posted by: ParisParamus at September 06, 2011 09:01 PM (N4/l+)
--
He's for Repeal and Replace. I'd like to see a 159-page document dissecting Masscare and Obamacare the way he attacks Obama in this jobs plan and I'd like to know what, specifically he means by replace.
That's not too much to ask from someone who voted for the guy last time and who was willing to support him this time.
You spend so much time wondering what camp the criticisms on Romney are coming from that you completely blow off the substance of the criticisms.
(BTW, Masscare did make wait times for medical procedures worse so Romney gets to own that. Link to Cato. )
Posted by: Y-not at September 06, 2011 06:04 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Y-not at September 06, 2011 06:07 PM (5H6zj)
See link to Cato study on Masscare in comment 143.
It made health care worse in Massachusetts.
Posted by: Y-not at September 06, 2011 06:08 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: phreshone at September 06, 2011 06:28 PM (T3vCe)
Posted by: Eric S at September 06, 2011 06:44 PM (GPwIb)
Posted by: notfeelinggoodabout12 at September 06, 2011 09:33 PM (GkYyh)"
Palin also did things before she was governor.
So while it's nice that Romney had some success laying people off with businesses he bought, no, it doesn't really settle the matter.
The Olympics thing is not significant. Certainly not compared to Palin putting crooks in prison for corruption.
Romney's work at Bain is interesting and impressive in a way, but it's not like he really knows how to create jobs. He knows how to eliminate dead weight, and clearly is a smart guy, though Palin also is no dummy.
Like I said, I think Palin and Romney are at about the same credibility level. Except I don't really know whether Romney means what he says, or is just calculating it's what I want to hear. Palin doesn't have a record of fundamental principle changes like Romney does.
I'm no Palin shill. That's a ridiculous charge. I won't even address the claim I'm a dem plant. I do not think she has enough experience to be a credible presidential candidate. I've long noted I want someone with proven success implementing conservative ideas as a government executive, successful enough to win reelection.
Romney clearly made MA far more liberal in policy. That's just a fact. He's on record opposing being a 'Reagan conservative', and he's erratic on policy unless his policy is to follow the polls. Romney was unable to win reelection because he didn't do a good job. It was bad enough that he didn't even try to run. And yes, that's a fair analysis. He had no chance and avoided the humiliation of trying to win.
Frankly, Romney has one single thing: that Bain experience. It was very lucrative work. It's worth some credit. It's not enough.
We have only one serious candidate with a record of successfully cutting spending, keeping regulations stable so employers keep hiring (the opposite of Romneycare, might I note) and successful winning reelection. Rick Perry has also handled many disasters with low drama and high effectiveness. I've noticed that this state's government managed to turn the table on some horrible fires. That was partly mother nature, but partly very hard work run well. It takes a lot of administrative skill to handle that on the scale of Texas.
Romney is not terrible. I don't hate the guy. He's just no Rick Perry. He's a Sarah Palin.
Posted by: Dustin at September 06, 2011 07:54 PM (fF625)
Is that serious?
Look, he sounds pretty great now. If I knew nothing about his record, or anyone else's, I'd certainly favor him. He's the best debater, and he presents pretty realistic sounding agendas.
Yet he has never been effective in government leadership before, and a lot of his talk today is inconsistent with his principles yesterday.
A lot of politicians are like that. Maybe Perry is, for all I know. But this fundamental problem with Romney, combined with his inferior experience level, just keep him from being a top level candidate.
There's a reason he went from 1st to 2nd at the drop of a hat. There's a reason so many of his supporters could so easily be swayed away. This guy would have the same problem in a general election.
I'm sure he's a really smart guy, and I'm sure he wants to help this country. I'm not trying to demonize Romney. But it blows my mind he's considered significantly more credible than Palin.
Posted by: Dustin at September 06, 2011 07:58 PM (fF625)
Posted by: DHSmonkey at September 07, 2011 08:00 AM (1kvqG)
This web site is my breathing in, really fantastic pattern and perfect subject matter.
Posted by: Vampire Moon AudioBook at September 07, 2011 04:24 PM (HJAc6)
Posted by: christine at September 07, 2011 08:11 PM (k0JNn)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2339 seconds, 279 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: SantaRosaStan at September 06, 2011 03:40 PM (UqKQV)