July 27, 2011
— Ace I mentioned this poll earlier but Instapundit noted the Paul/Obama 50/50 split.
The poll analysis indicates that several Republican candidates suffer merely from a lack of name recognition. Scanning down the list, it appears that many of the names people tend to know wind up beating Obama -- Romney and Giuliani, for example, and even Ron Paul manages a tie.
People with higher name recognition (50% or higher) who don't win against Obama include, yes, Palin and Bachmann, and also Gingrich.
I'm thinking that this reinforces my belief that people do want to turn Obama out of office, and several people could win -- so long as the public is reasonably comfortable with them.
(Perry loses to Obama in this poll, but the same margins Palin and Bachmann do, but his name recognition is a mere 30%.)
Now how did Ron Paul manage a 50/50 split in this poll? Isn't he a "threatening" Republican with no executive experience?
Not really sure. Could just be that he's always running, so the public is comfortable with the idea of Ron Paul.
Posted by: Ace at
03:08 PM
| Comments (56)
Post contains 191 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Hadd Charper at July 27, 2011 03:10 PM (0F3ej)
Posted by: Dave C at July 27, 2011 03:11 PM (idSAM)
Posted by: James Tiberius Kirk at July 27, 2011 03:12 PM (AZGON)
Dude, e'rbody knows Palin and thinks she's stupid cause of SNL and "women be stupid, lolz" but Bachmann? Not so much. I think she hasn't broken through political junkie status.
Now, when she does break it'll probably be because she's Palinized, but still.
Posted by: William at July 27, 2011 03:12 PM (77TeU)
Posted by: nevergiveup at July 27, 2011 03:14 PM (7wmOW)
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at July 27, 2011 03:15 PM (vU8C3)
The Ace of Spades HQ: Where its Flame thread Wednesday! All Flame threads all the time!
Though I really can't buy people actually being comfortable with the idea Ron Paul. I think its because his name doesn't carry any of the negative press coverage that Palin and Bachmann get for the general public to associate with him. The MFM knows he's a joke so they don't do anything to damage him like they do other candidates.
Posted by: buzzion at July 27, 2011 03:15 PM (oVQFe)
Posted by: Generic Republican at July 27, 2011 03:16 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: sTevo at July 27, 2011 03:16 PM (vXr7p)
Posted by: rabidfox at July 27, 2011 03:16 PM (DObxx)
There be troubled times in BarackyLand.
Posted by: GnuBreed at July 27, 2011 03:17 PM (ENKCw)
Posted by: Sarah
Palin (TM) at July 27, 2011 07:11 PM (vU8C3)
Jesus Christ does beat Obama 54/46 but surprisingly you edge him out him on name recognition by 2%.
Posted by: lowandslow at July 27, 2011 03:18 PM (GZitp)
Dude, e'rbody knows Palin and thinks she's stupid cause of SNL and "women be stupid, lolz" but Bachmann? Not so much. I think she hasn't broken through political junkie status.
Now, when she does break it'll probably be because she's Palinized, but still.
Posted by: William at July 27, 2011 07:12 PM (77TeU)
Every 2012 candidate should study what happened to Palin in 2008 and be ready to counter it. They also shouldn't repeat her mistakes, as Palin had a hand in her own "Palinization" (the Katie Couric interview has some bizarre parts).
Also, don't have a pregnant teenage daughter when you agree to enter the race as that may prove to hurt you later on.
Posted by: robviously at July 27, 2011 03:18 PM (7UMow)
So, my choice is between an aggressively, maliciously incompetent, arrogant communist asshole and 76 year-old, tired, white guy who half the country thinks is a lunatic?
Damn, I think I'd rather have a triumvirate of Paul Krugman, Sarah Palin, and Lyndon LaRouche run the fucking country than have either Paul or Obama as president.
Posted by: Sharkman at July 27, 2011 03:20 PM (wMsKw)
Being smokin' hot doesn't hurt.
Posted by: pep at July 27, 2011 03:20 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: nevergiveup at July 27, 2011 03:21 PM (7wmOW)
Posted by: Molon Labe at July 27, 2011 03:23 PM (g5MrG)
Posted by: Vic at July 27, 2011 03:25 PM (M9Ie6)
I think any early poll that shows an R beating Obama by less than 20 signals a pretty much guaranteed electoral-vote win for the O. Your fatalism may vary.
Posted by: oblig. at July 27, 2011 03:25 PM (xvZW9)
Any one want to chip in on some airfare??? Me an Jesse Ventura want to get out to Colorado and throw pieces of WTC7, who George Bush personally blew up, at Michelle Malkin.
Posted by: Alex Jones!! at July 27, 2011 03:26 PM (KROfR)
Posted by: sTevo at July 27, 2011 03:28 PM (RD/KP)
Posted by: Anthony "The Ween' Weiner at July 27, 2011 03:29 PM (KROfR)
say what?
Posted by: The Great Satan's Ghost at July 27, 2011 03:30 PM (UrPTC)
For the moderates he scares off he makes up for in lefty isolationist libertarians who actually don't want socialism.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at July 27, 2011 03:32 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Y-not at July 27, 2011 03:33 PM (5H6zj)
I'd vote for Paul, too. Why? I don't know.
Well if it came down to Paul or 4 more years of Obama.
I am so RON PAUL! it isn't funny.
Which is actually what I think most conservatives would have said. The question is why doesn't he scare the squish? Or if he does scare the squish how is he making it up. (My theory)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at July 27, 2011 03:34 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Bwanieee at July 27, 2011 03:38 PM (q1Tbv)
The US is going into default anyway. May as well make the Democrats the party of 'No'. while the chairs are being rearranged.
Posted by: Dave C at July 27, 2011 03:41 PM (idSAM)
Second derivatives are your friend..
Posted by: pep at July 27, 2011 03:43 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: nati at July 27, 2011 03:45 PM (SsKEr)
Posted by: Clueless at July 27, 2011 03:48 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: DMXRoid at July 27, 2011 03:49 PM (tjc9E)
Posted by: Free2Smooze at July 27, 2011 03:59 PM (2cI+I)
Hit me baby!!11!
Too Old!!!! Not to mention, yer a dude.
Wait...yer still in congress right??? I could be like a staffer right???
Well, I hope your Johnson is smaller than my wife's fist or she's gonna be pissed.
Posted by: Anthony 'The Ween' Weiner at July 27, 2011 04:01 PM (KROfR)
Posted by: at July 27, 2011 04:04 PM (6IV8T)
Posted by: Chi-Town Barry at July 27, 2011 04:38 PM (+kznc)
Posted by: MlR at July 27, 2011 04:53 PM (Qsfvj)
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at July 27, 2011 05:13 PM (0fzsA)
Posted by: GhostShip at July 27, 2011 05:17 PM (sbaXF)
I've said before, I like having him in the running and in the debates. Regardless of whether you want Paul specifically as president, it shifts the terms of acceptable debate in the direction we want to go. And really, anyone on our side who does get beaten out by Paul is probably enough of a Rino they deserve to lose.
Posted by: Dave R. at July 27, 2011 05:18 PM (Ks0r0)
Ron Paul may be a bit crazy on foreign policy issues, but he is completely sane when it comes to fiscal policy.
Posted by: stickety at July 27, 2011 05:34 PM (FUDwf)
Posted by: rabidfox at July 27, 2011 07:16 PM (DObxx)
I'm not a Paulbot, but all these other fuckers in Washington must be crazy to think that spending more money means that we will become more solvent. At least Ron Paul isn't nuts when it comes to the existential problem that is our runaway government.
Posted by: Minuteman at July 27, 2011 06:17 PM (hbAPu)
Could it be that the Obamunist is SUCH a domestic disaster that Ron Paul looks awesome? (And frankly, on domestic policy alone, Ron Paul IS awesome)
Could it be that the Obamunist is SUCH a foreign policy disaster that even a naive isolationist fool like Ron Paul looks awesome in comparison?
Could John Boehner, Mitch McConnell and the other Republipussies might learn something from this poll and go back to the original House Cut Cap and Balance plan?
Posted by: Curmudgeon at July 27, 2011 06:57 PM (w7K7d)
Posted by: gm at July 27, 2011 07:35 PM (K0tm3)
Posted by: The Snowman Audio Book at July 28, 2011 05:38 AM (NLVZi)
Posted by: Texan Economist at July 28, 2011 06:23 PM (TC/9F)
If you believe Ron Paul can make it to 50/50 against Barack Obama, or at least close enough to make it a race, and Sarah Palin (just to cite one example) somehow can't...um, wow.
Posted by: Rich Fader at July 29, 2011 09:01 AM (SF/wy)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2392 seconds, 184 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: I'm in a New York state of mind at July 27, 2011 03:10 PM (4sQwu)