February 06, 2011

Ronald Reagan At 100
— DrewM

A selection of some of his greatest speeches.

First his seminal speech..."A Time For Choosing". A great speech from 1964 in support of Bary Goldwater. The depressing thing about it? Considering the speech is almost 50 years old and we are dealing with many of the same problems, we as a nation chose poorly.

Reagan's First Inaugural.

Favorite Quotes:

In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem.

...

So, as we begin, let us take inventory. We are a nation that has a government—not the other way around. And this makes us special among the nations of the Earth.

...

It is no coincidence that our present troubles parallel and are proportionate to the intervention and intrusion in our lives that result from unnecessary and excessive growth of government. It is time for us to realize that we are too great a nation to limit ourselves to small dreams. We are not, as some would have us believe, doomed to an inevitable decline. I do not believe in a fate that will fall on us no matter what we do. I do believe in a fate that will fall on us if we do nothing. So, with all the creative energy at our command, let us begin an era of national renewal. Let us renew our determination, our courage, and our strength. And let us renew our faith and our hope.

An excerpt from his Berlin Wall Speech.

Reagan makes teh funny. Yeah, he kicked the Soviets in the ass and laughed at them in the process.

I'll put up a few more but this is a good start.

Thanks to Nathan Wurtzel who did "A Regan Speech A Day" on Twitter for some of the suggestions. The Challenger Speech.

I love how he spoke directly to the kids watching the launch (this was the flight that had Krista McAuliffe, the First Teacher in Space on board). He told them death is a tragedy but it's part of the cost of exploration and that exploration must continue. Perfect.

The 40th Anniversary of D-Day

So many great moments to chose from. There's more here.

I think the fact that liberals like Barack Obama have to pretend to like Reagan and want to be seen as like him shows what an important, popular and transformative figure he was.

He wasn't perfect and he didn't win every fight but we'll be damn lucky if we see another like him in our lifetimes.

Posted by: DrewM at 09:12 AM | Comments (254)
Post contains 421 words, total size 4 kb.

1 Yes Drew "The Speech" is still the battle cry.

The assholes from 64 are still around.

Posted by: Kemp at February 06, 2011 09:17 AM (JpFM9)

2 You know what is really sad? 

GE paid for RR to give pro capitalist speeches all over the country.

Now?

They are whoring for Obama.

Sad.

Posted by: Kemp at February 06, 2011 09:18 AM (JpFM9)

3 This is the kind of politician that the founders had in mind. Was he perfect? Of course not. But he loved this country, had its best interests in mind, and had a coherent political philosophy.

Sounds easy, doesn't it?

Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at February 06, 2011 09:20 AM (LH6ir)

4 Not one mention of high-speed rail.  Obama, take note - there was a great man, and there was a great President. 

We miss you, Ronnie. 

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 06, 2011 09:20 AM (9hSKh)

5 Imagine how distraught President Reagan would be if he could see how much destruction has been visited on his dream by the Osama Obama regime.

If one Reagan could rally the nation after the excesses, idiocy, treason and criminality of LBJ, Nixon, Ford and Carter, it would take an army of Reagans to begin undoing the ravages inflicted by the Traitor-in-Chief and his co-conspirators.

Posted by: MrScribbler© at February 06, 2011 09:22 AM (Ulu3i)

6 I don't know that I can define "the real problem," but I'm pretty sure that most of the things we think of our problem are symptoms of that problem. It's tempting to say it's a perverse desire for control, or power, or daddy issues, or whatever.

There's something about some people that makes or enables them to think they can fix everything with the proper application of power (they can't), and something about a lot of people that makes or enables them to think that someone else can fix everything for them (they can't).

And as an inevitable result, they fail, and we all pay for it. And each time they fail, the system gets more top-heavy and we all end up groaning from supporting it. Eventually, we can no longer afford the delusion.

I think we hit that point several years ago. Maybe a couple of decades.

Getting people to realize that is the hardest part - we can't afford it. Maybe the TEA Party folks understand, Ryan, Palin, a few others. Not enough.

Also, that's a lot of videos on the front page, Drew.

Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 06, 2011 09:22 AM (bxiXv)

7 RIP Gipper. Best 2 votes I ever cast.

Posted by: USS Diversity at February 06, 2011 09:24 AM (DLxD/)

8 If you want ammo against the liberal charge that Reagan only parroted what other people told him, read Reagan, In His Own Hand.  Many of Reagan's public speeches were products of his frequent writings (done in a hotel room, at home, or even his car), which were produced and edited by hand. 

Reagan was very much like Churchill in this regard concerning his writings, among other things.

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 06, 2011 09:25 AM (9hSKh)

9

"A Time for Choosing" is a great speech.  It will endure the test of time, as it already has.  I saw it on TV as a child, and it was not incomprehensible to me then.

The questions raised and anwered then are still timely.  To think that half the country thinks Reagan was a boob (including his son, namesake Ron, Jr.).

The country renewed itself under Reagan in the 80's because there were still people that remembered what was possible and what had been obscured and lost over the previous 20 years..  There are still people like that today, but they are much fewer in number, and the seed corn has, I fear, been eaten.  There is no one on the political stage at this time, that can command the change of direction needed like Reagan did. (Sarah is a nice and  courageous person in many ways, but her list of achievements is...thin. And better than half the country think she is an ignorant snow-billy.)

I think this country has lost its way in a profound manner, and I don't know if we can find our way out of this dark valley we are in. The final consequence of the Gramscian march through the institutions that began over 90 years ago.

Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes..... at February 06, 2011 09:26 AM (sJTmU)

10 His Normandy Speech in 84 and the Challenger Speech are must watches as well.

Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 09:26 AM (A0VTZ)

11

Posted by: MrScribbler© at February 06, 2011 01:22 PM (Ulu3i)

In a sick way, I wish Reagan would come back as a poltergeist and wreak havoc in the White House. I'm imagining Michelle screaming hysterically as she's chased down the halls by flying furniture from the Lincoln Bedroom.

Posted by: ErikW at February 06, 2011 09:27 AM (IfZbc)

12 And the 64 speech could be given today with very few updates.  It's uncanny.

Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 09:27 AM (A0VTZ)

13 Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 06, 2011 01:25 PM (9hSKh)

It's the typical lazy liberal (but I repeat myself) charge against Reagan: he was stupid, he just read what was written, he was just an actor.

He knew American history, he knew world history, he understood the philosophical underpinnings of our republic, and he loved this country.

My dad met an old photographer who was in the same unit as Reagan. He said that Ronald Reagan was the nicest person he had ever met.

Not bad for a "parrot."

Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at February 06, 2011 09:31 AM (LH6ir)

14 Faux interviewed some idiot who has done a Reagan biography yesterday. He explained some of the "myth" about Reagain such as he was against taxes.

Yes, his version got rave review from the NYTs. I noted that as absolute horseshit.

Posted by: Vic at February 06, 2011 09:31 AM (M9Ie6)

15 I feel lucky to have come of age during Reagan's presidency. 

Posted by: Y-not at February 06, 2011 09:32 AM (pW2o8)

16 Maybe, but did he ever organize a single community?

He was able to organize enough communities to give 2 electoral ass-whuppings, first to Carter (489 EVs to 49) and then to Mondull (525 EVs to 10). 

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 06, 2011 09:32 AM (9hSKh)

17 OK who are the "Reagans" waiting in the GOP wings to really stomp Jimmy Obama? Anyone?

Posted by: USS Diversity at February 06, 2011 09:36 AM (DLxD/)

18 2 You know what is really sad? 

GE paid for RR to give pro capitalist speeches all over the country.

Now?

They are whoring for Obama.
  They have been leftist and government whores forever.   Did you know?  Bobby Kennedy called up GE and told them to cancel GE Theater and can Reagan, or else they'd lose all their lucrative gocvernment contracts.  GE did what it was told.  That was 1962.   Which gave Reagan plenty of time to support Goldwater and eventually run for president himself.

Posted by: Truman North at February 06, 2011 09:36 AM (+gfwN)

19 I bet he would have offered to go get General Chiarelli a drink.

Posted by: t-bird at February 06, 2011 09:36 AM (FcR7P)

20 Happy Birthday, Ron!  You and I?  We're the same!

Posted by: Barry Obumbles at February 06, 2011 09:37 AM (zgZzy)

21 Posted by: ErikW at February 06, 2011 01:27 PM

What's sick about that?

I'd be overjoyed if the ghost of Reagan went back to the White House. I'd even be willing to clean his vomit off the floor after he saw Osama Obama in "action."

We've endured a long, long fall from greatness since the days of RWR.

Posted by: MrScribbler© at February 06, 2011 09:38 AM (Ulu3i)

22 19 OK who are the "Reagans" waiting in the GOP wings to really stomp Jimmy Obama? Anyone?         Crickets.  We don't have any right now.  Not any that would be ready for 2012, anyway.

Posted by: Wyatt Earp at February 06, 2011 09:38 AM (zgZzy)

23 It's the typical lazy liberal (but I repeat myself) charge against Reagan: he was stupid, he just read what was written, he was just an actor.

I heard that "just an actor" charge as early as 9th grade, when my uber-lib football coach learned of my Rush Limbaugh listening habits and started hassling me about it. 

While the hard-core libs still won't be won over by a logical argument about Reagan's prowess concerning history, economics, and foreign affairs, even an expert on Reagan will get a new appreciation of Reagan's mental acuity when reading through chapters and chapters of Regan's own writings. 

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 06, 2011 09:39 AM (9hSKh)

24 I miss him so much.

Posted by: alexthechick at February 06, 2011 09:40 AM (qPgNK)

25

Crickets.  We don't have any right now.

You mean you haven't caught "Haley Barbour Fever" yet??!?

Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 09:41 AM (A0VTZ)

26 Reagan was President?  Who was Secratary of State?  Jack Benny?

Posted by: Delta Smelt channeling Doc Brown at February 06, 2011 09:42 AM (A0VTZ)

27 Posted by: USS Diversity at February 06, 2011 01:36 PM

Watch the videos of the real Ronald Reagan -- including those showing his warmth and humor -- and then try to endure two minutes'-worth of the inane babblings of our current "Republican leaders."

The answer is: we don't have one. Not even close.

Shit, we don't have anyone who could match up to Ike, or even JFK. Hubert Fuckin' Humphrey (who at least believed in the socialist crap he spewed) could mop the floor with a Mitch McConnell or John Boner.

Posted by: MrScribbler© at February 06, 2011 09:44 AM (Ulu3i)

28

Reagan was a good guy and a great leader, he put the Cold War in the "W" column for us, i'm very grateful for that.

but can we stop using the Reagan Yardstick to measure potenial conservative canidates now?

there ain't gonna be no more Reagan's, let's move on.

Posted by: Shoey at February 06, 2011 09:44 AM (yCH89)

29 28 Reagan was President?  Who was Secratary of State?  Jack Benny?

Reagan had a good quip about the "He's just an actor charge":

"I'll probably be the first actor to win an Oscar posthumously".

/The quote may be a bit off, but the sentiment is the same. 

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 06, 2011 09:45 AM (9hSKh)

30

You mean you haven't caught "Haley Barbour Fever" yet??!?

 

Yeah, and it gives me the sweats.

Posted by: Wyatt Earp at February 06, 2011 09:47 AM (zgZzy)

31 From his farewell address:

"The lesson of all this was, of course, that because we're a great nation, our challenges seem complex. It will always be this way. But as long as we remember our first principles and believe in ourselves, the future will always be ours. And something else we learned: Once you begin a great movement, there's no telling where it will end. We meant to change a nation, and instead, we changed a world."

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 06, 2011 09:48 AM (sZ+lP)

32 I was blessed to meet RR and Nancy in CLT.  It was just the two of us and my attorney.  It was sort of surreal.  I was struck by how short Nancy is and how much she looked after him.  They adored each other.  In the 10 minutes we chatted the thing that came through was, what you see is what you get.  RR was the real deal.  I thought she was too protective, but it worked for him.

I regret to this day supporting Ford in 76.  WTF was I thinking about?

Posted by: Kemp at February 06, 2011 09:48 AM (JpFM9)

33

there ain't gonna be no more Reagan's, let's move on.

Posted by: Shoey at February 06, 2011 01:44 PM

We're in today's pathetic and dangerous situation because we stopped using the "Reagan yardstick."

When a nation stops aspiring to greatness and honor, it ends up with lazy, corruptible (and corrupted) hacks in charge.

Posted by: MrScribbler© at February 06, 2011 09:48 AM (Ulu3i)

34

6 I don't know that I can define "the real problem," but I'm pretty sure that most of the things we think of our problem are symptoms of that problem. It's tempting to say it's a perverse desire for control, or power, or daddy issues, or whatever.


Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain

This is exactly right.  Obama is not the problem. per se, although I loathe him and everything he claims to stand for.

The problem is the notion in the minds of many that we can have prosperity just by asking for it.  That we "deserve" our way of life because of our American birth right. That making hard choices is "mean and icky", so lets not make any hard choices and just roll with it.

The problem is the same problem that has confronted Man and men since the first man discovered fire, and his friends probably ended up burning him at the stake for it.

The problem is the eternal struggle of the individual against the collective. The struggle of one man (or woman) to live their life as they see fit, regardless of the opinions of the many. The basic belief that one man has intrinsic value, and that no other man has the right to rule him unless he gives his consent by voting, and then even government, getting that consent, has limitations as to their reach and power.

A million academics, politicians and pundits will argue otherwise, and justify all the mini-tyrannies we accept in our everyday lives, "just to get along". But if our future is tyranny and not freedom, why bother?

"Live free or die" is not just a slogan for a license plate.

Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes..... at February 06, 2011 09:48 AM (sJTmU)

35 I highly recommend the Uncommon Knowledge done with Long, Steyn, and Robinson; such a great discussion of that 1964 speech.  I believe the segments can be found at the URL below; one may be missing.  I saw this this past summer or fall, and it still kind of gives me goosebumps:

http://tinyurl.com/4j5ysye

Posted by: ParisParamus at February 06, 2011 09:52 AM (zh69t)

36

The great thing about Reagan is that his speeches were filled with concepts and principles that had careful weight and meaning.

 

Obozo's speeches?  Words. Platatudes. Nothingness. Empty soaring rhetoric. Hope and change signifying nothing.  Well, not nothing - just the glossy outer shell to his Paul Krugman adherence to big socialist all-controlling government.

Posted by: Lemon Kitten at February 06, 2011 09:53 AM (0fzsA)

37 Happy Birthday, Mr. President.

Lord, how I miss him.

A surreal experience at church this morning.  A woman who I've always assumed was a liberal (from CT, advanced degrees, etc.) came over to me and asked about our kid.  I've always assumed she was a Barky supporter (we've still got a couple of Obama stickers in the parking lot), when she blurted how how she missed Reagan, and what a stinker we have as president now.  And then she leaned in toward me, looked over her shoulder and whispered, "Please don't think I'm crazy, but I'm beginning to believe Obama really isn't a U. S. citizen.  And I think he's trying to destroy this country.  I'm sorry your son has to serve under him."  And then she walked away.

My husband was a gobsmacked (and amused) as I when I told him about the encounter on the way home.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 06, 2011 09:53 AM (UOM48)

38 25It's the typical lazy liberal (but I repeat myself) charge against Reagan: he was stupid, he just read what was written, he was just an actor.

I read a good article a while back mainly on the subject of Sarah Palin and the drum beat from the left on how stupid she is and etc.and etc. But in the article the author brought up the fact that this type of attack is nothing new from the lying, deceitful left. He went on and listed every Republican president since Eisenhower and he quoted descriptions of each one by the left. And you know what? It seems that every one of them was lazy, stupid, incompetent, evil, disinterested, uncaring and on and on. If only we were all as smart as the left.

Posted by: PoconoJoe at February 06, 2011 09:54 AM (c4FgZ)

39 Listening to the MSM today while at the gym - I am sickened by the MSM/Obozo administration's attempts to whitewahs the muslim brotherhood.  Did you know - according to our MSM,  the Muslim brotherhood are "moderate".  Geeez.  It's Iran all over again. 

Posted by: Lemon Kitten at February 06, 2011 09:55 AM (0fzsA)

40 We're in today's pathetic and dangerous situation because we stopped using the "Reagan yardstick."

When a nation stops aspiring to greatness and honor, it ends up with lazy, corruptible (and corrupted) hacks in charge.

Posted by: MrScribbler© at February 06, 2011 01:48 PM (Ulu3i)

 

 

who said anything about not aspiring to greatness and honor? the Reagan Yardstick i'm speaking of is the one the RINO's use to club committed conservatives into not critizing them, into accepting the RINO position.

Posted by: Shoey at February 06, 2011 09:56 AM (yCH89)

41 9/11 WAS AN ISLAM JOB11!!!

Posted by: confused truther at February 06, 2011 09:58 AM (+gfwN)

42 Hey, Where the fuck am I?  That asshole gave speeches without me.

RACIST!

Posted by: TOTUS at February 06, 2011 10:01 AM (JpFM9)

43

the RINO's used the Reagan Yardstick to beat Sarah Palin to death and they are still using it, if Reagan were on the political scene today half of you would call him an idiot.

Reagan was a full spectrum conservative, the GOP is hard at work making sure no other full spectrum conservative ever gets nominated again. 

Posted by: Shoey at February 06, 2011 10:01 AM (yCH89)

44

My how far we have fallen.  I came of age in the Ronald Reagan 'shining city on a hill' era and I believe that I will get to see our great nations downfall due to the likes of Barky 'I'm sorry' Odumbass.  Sad.  Really, really sad.

Posted by: Truck Monkey at February 06, 2011 10:06 AM (yQWNf)

45 24 19 OK who are the "Reagan's" waiting in the GOP wings to really stomp Jimmy Obama? Anyone?         Crickets.  We don't have any right now.  Not any that would be ready for 2012, anyway.

I been in this a LONG time.  You really never know who will show up.  Like I mentioned earlier, I supported Ford in 76.  I loved RR, but I was chicken shit.

So it works out.  I think Christie is the best shot right now.  Sarah is good looking, etc, but that is not going to happen. 

Don't sell out the crowd this early.  What we need is fire in the belly, that would be Christie or Barbour.  Fuck Newt and his ethanol sellout.

Posted by: Kemp at February 06, 2011 10:07 AM (JpFM9)

46

the RINO's used the Reagan Yardstick to beat Sarah Palin

*gasp* you actually mentioned she-who-shall-not-be-named.

It's like Mean Girls around here. You can't be in the clique unless you hate her too.

 

Posted by: beedubya at February 06, 2011 10:07 AM (AnTyA)

47

Sarah Palin can't hold Reagan's jock.  Uh, ok bad visual, but still.

Let's get real here.  Reagan spent years honing his message, learning and advocating his beliefs. 

I'm sure the Great Communicator would have stayed away from reality shows as well.

Posted by: Delta Smelt channeling Doc Brown at February 06, 2011 10:08 AM (A0VTZ)

48

#47

 

whatever floats your boat

Posted by: Shoey at February 06, 2011 10:09 AM (yCH89)

49

The power of RR's speeches is not in the delivery. During his Presidential years, I found his frequent sing-song voice annoying. The power is in the simple forceful articulation of the American idea and of historical truth.

When God calls Jimmy Carter home, let's see if Americans line the streets to honor him.

Posted by: Mr. Barky at February 06, 2011 10:09 AM (8EeTd)

50

#50

you got that right, brother

Posted by: Shoey at February 06, 2011 10:11 AM (yCH89)

51 My clearest and best memory of Ronald Reagan is his Challenger speech.  In these few minutes, he at once honored the seven astronauts; comforted millions of stunned schoolchildren like myself; interjected a sly dig at the Soviets; and firmly laid out a recommitment to the American philosophy of guts, risk, and reward.

Happy Birthday, Mr. President.

Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at February 06, 2011 10:12 AM (xUGL/)

52 "...I'm sorry your son has to serve under him."  And then she walked away.

Posted by: Jane D'oh

Don't ever be ashamed of your son's service as a Marine to the United States of America, especially because of Obama.  He serves in the name of every American.  Obama will pass in time, and things will turn again.  But your son should ALWAYS be proud of serving as a Marine.  He should always be proud he has been taught by some real tough hombres how to keep his honor clean. 

I never served, I claim nothing in that way, But a lot of guys I knew (and still know) that were older than I served in Viet Nam, were treated with oblivious contempt at best, and sometimes a lot worse, for a lot of years.  Most are STILL proud they wore this country's uniform when asked (or volunteered).

Always, ALWAYS be proud of who he is and why he volunteered to serve. I know I would be if he were my son.  And I know your are.  Just wanted to buck you up a bit.....

Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes..... at February 06, 2011 10:13 AM (sJTmU)

53

Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at February 06, 2011 02:12 PM (xUGL/)

Preach.  I remember watching it live.  So thankful my 1st memories of an American President are of him.  It's been pretty disappointing ever since.

Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 10:14 AM (A0VTZ)

54 First Inaugural, 1981:

"The crisis we are facing today does not require of us the kind of sacrifice that Martin Treptow and so many thousands of others were called upon to make. It does require, however, our best effort and our willingness to believe in ourselves and to believe in our capacity to perform great deeds, to believe that together with God's help we can and will resolve the problems which now confront us. And after all, why shouldn't we believe that? We are Americans."

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 06, 2011 10:15 AM (sZ+lP)

56 So the Pregame show on Fox is starting, and they're listing all the people who are going to be on "Plus the interview everyone has been waiting for: Bill O'reilly interviews the president"  I wish there was a real time Nielsen's viewer so we could watch the ratings drop when those two self absorbed pricks come on.

Posted by: buzzion at February 06, 2011 10:16 AM (oVQFe)

57

Incident at a frat house party at Youngstown St early this morning...12 shot/1 dead.

They don't mention the name of the frat..but the deceased is 25 year old Jamail Johnson who lived in the house

Posted by: beedubya at February 06, 2011 10:16 AM (AnTyA)

58 We have plenty of people just as conservative s Reagan now. And just like Reagan, every time they step forward a host of liberals try to swamp then in derision. They say the same things now as they did then.

All that while continuing to field boring liberal shitty candidates like McCain who lose.

Posted by: Vic at February 06, 2011 10:16 AM (M9Ie6)

59 I highly recommend the Uncommon Knowledge done with Long, Steyn, and Robinson; such a great discussion of that 1964 speech.  I believe the segments can be found at the URL below; one may be missing.  I saw this this past summer or fall, and it still kind of gives me goosebumps:

http://tinyurl.com/4j5ysye

Posted by: ParisParamus at February 06, 2011 01:52 PM (zh69t)

This is really good.  I'm about 1/2 way through it.

Posted by: Tami-unban Nickless (99.174.64.43) at February 06, 2011 10:16 AM (VuLos)

60 Palin/Hologram Reagan 2012!

Posted by: eman at February 06, 2011 10:17 AM (QUxm7)

61 It's like the presidency has been so.....watered down since RR. Does that make sense? I think Bush 41 kind of pulled it up, at least first term.

Posted by: USS Diversity at February 06, 2011 10:17 AM (DLxD/)

62 I was ten when he was first elected president.  As I became a teenager I started paying attention and have been a conservative ever since.  He made me feel safe, optimistic and sure.  How I miss him.

Posted by: Annabelle at February 06, 2011 10:17 AM (4kxCX)

63 Zombie Reagan/Zombie Coolidge 2012!

Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 10:18 AM (A0VTZ)

64

They don't mention the name of the frat..but the deceased is 25 year old Jamail Johnson who lived in the house

Don't knock it, friend.

Posted by: Stankowski from "Glory Daze" at February 06, 2011 10:19 AM (DLxD/)

65 I hope they play Hail to The Chief for Reagan. I hate the way Liberal Turd Monkeys elected POTUS always order that it not be played. But I must admit, it's altogether fitting that Obama not be praisednin any way.

Posted by: CoolCzech at February 06, 2011 10:19 AM (tJjm/)

66 The first time I was old enough to vote I voted for Reagan.  I hated carter with every bone in my body, he was an ass sucking bufoon, and I remember it like it was yesterday. I said to myself wow, I actually have a chance to send this moron back to Georgia so he can play with his nuts.  It really was amazing to live through the rebirth of the country under Reagan.

I can't believe 30 years later America would elect an even  bigger fuckup than carter.  Obama couldn't lick Reagan's shoes.

Posted by: Berserker at February 06, 2011 10:22 AM (gWHrG)

67 62 We have plenty of people just as conservative s Reagan now. And just like Reagan, every time they step forward a host of liberals try to swamp then in derision. They say the same things now as they did then.

All that while continuing to field boring liberal shitty candidates like McCain who lose.

Posted by: Vic at February 06, 2011 02:16 PM (M9Ie6)

 

11!

Posted by: Shoey at February 06, 2011 10:22 AM (yCH89)

68 Bob Dole got my 1st vote for President.  Eat your heart out!

Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 10:24 AM (A0VTZ)

69 Let's face it.  Today's voters want their candidates pretty.  (Yeah, I know, Barry....ugh.) 

A conservative candidate could find a cure for cancer, literally stop the seas from rising, and with a few well-chosen words, create global peace, and if he or she was the least bit squirrely looking, would be mocked and ridiculed into hiding.  The average voter wants it all:  charisma, looks, speechifying, and maybe a brain cell or two thrown in.

That's another reason we're all boned.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 06, 2011 10:24 AM (UOM48)

70 What happened to that whole videos below the fold thing I read about a few days ago?

Someone has been hitting the Valu-Rite early today

Posted by: Uddercha0s at February 06, 2011 10:24 AM (cFPiX)

71

I'm gonna put the superbowl thread up around 4-5.

Yinz better like it.

 

man i miss ronnie.

Posted by: Ben at February 06, 2011 10:24 AM (DKV43)

72 I am too young to remember President Reagan but I started reading a number of biographies after hearing my parents talk about him. He was a great man and an outstanding president who understood the American dream and encouraged his fellow citizens to greater things. Another thing that's telling about him is that he didn't take himself too seriously and possessed a wonderful sense of humor. 

Happy birthday, Mr. President.

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 06, 2011 10:25 AM (sZ+lP)

73

Fun Tweet:

AndrewBreitbart

Today @ feigns reverence for Ronald Reagan. Here's 'Waist Up' Boehlert's attack on Reagan week he died: http://bit.ly/dIq0eE

Posted by: AmishDude at February 06, 2011 10:27 AM (BvBKY)

74 Is Ron-Ron Jr. at the b-day party?  I'd love for someone to shove his ballet-dancing face in a punch bowl.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 06, 2011 10:28 AM (UOM48)

75

I've been in a funk recently, recalling all the presidents I can remember living (and most times, suffering) through.

RR was the only one who had positive results. It was because of him that I became a conservative. The rest were mostly political hacks with only their power in mind, never what was best for America.

RIP, Mr. Reagan. I pray that your spirit will be reborn in America, and that we can become great once more.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy at February 06, 2011 10:29 AM (b6qrg)

76

Fox is showing the Reagan Tribute and there is a bunch of Waiters on the stage in the band and in the audience.

I didn't know Reagan had such a waiter following.

Posted by: robtr at February 06, 2011 10:30 AM (hVDig)

77 It has nothing to do with me, it's you true conservatives. What you true conservatives fail to recognize is it isn't the RINO's holding back any true conservative political savior, it's the populous. In case you haven't noticed this country has moved dramatically to the left in thirty years. If any politician had the courage to speak some simple truths about immigration, Social Security, the decay of families (and why), federal debt, consumer debt, education, energy, etc. etc. they would get killed in a general election. That's just the way it is, we don't have to like it but there isn't much we can do about it. Things are going to get a lot worse (and they will) before people start changing their minds of those thing.

Posted by: lowandslow, Packer fan at February 06, 2011 02:18 PM (GZitp)

 

how do we know that until we try?

 

Posted by: Shoey at February 06, 2011 10:30 AM (yCH89)

78 It has nothing to do with me, it's you true conservatives. What you true conservatives fail to recognize is it isn't the RINO's holding back any true conservative political savior, it's the populous. In case you haven't noticed this country has moved dramatically to the left in thirty years.

Did you just step out of a time machine? That's what all the "pragmatists" in the GOP said about Reagan before he was elected.

Posted by: Heorot at February 06, 2011 10:31 AM (btWzl)

79 Okay, which one of you is "ValuRiteVodka" on YouTube?

Posted by: Rajiv Vindaloo at February 06, 2011 10:31 AM (BZ2Bm)

80 Bob Dole got my 1st vote for President.  Eat your heart out!

Likewise. Talk about uninspiring.  Kemp-Dole would have been better against Clinton--still would have lost, but would have looked like the GOP was looking forward rather than backwards.

Posted by: HeatherRadish is wearing a cheesehead at February 06, 2011 10:32 AM (ElYV9)

81 Something fun: Reagan and Sam Donaldson

So much for gotcha journalism.

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 06, 2011 10:35 AM (sZ+lP)

82

Posted by: lowandslow, Packer fan at February 06, 2011 02:18 PM (GZitp)

Not to pee in your Wheaties, but polls have consistently shown that we're center-right and have been for over 40 years. If I could remember where the polls are, I'd post a link for you. And it's not just one, either.

We're overly succeptible to bullshit. That's how The Vapid One™ squirmed his way into office. The MBM never, ever, even once, looked into his radical background or examined his record. Or even told us anything about him other than he represented Hope&Change.

We got bamboozled, Shanghied, deceived, lied to, and screwed without even a kiss by the MBM. Except for those of us who actually did a little bit of research into this idiot who now props his hooves on the Defiant desk in the Oaffal Office. I think most of those who stupidly voted for him are silently regretting it.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy at February 06, 2011 10:38 AM (b6qrg)

83 86 Something fun: Reagan and Sam Donaldson

So much for gotcha journalism.

Reagan knew how to work the press, which is an essential skill any Reaganesque GOP candidate needs to possess. 

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 06, 2011 10:38 AM (9hSKh)

84 Holy shit, it's real. I had no idea it was real, at least in North Carolina: http://www.ncabc.com/pricing/special_items.aspx (Scroll down to 43-951.)

Posted by: Rajiv Vindaloo at February 06, 2011 10:39 AM (BZ2Bm)

85 Lieutenant Dan.

Posted by: FlaviusJulius NO NICKLESS, NO PEACE at February 06, 2011 10:39 AM (SJ6/3)

86

OK, Magic and Celtics game is on.

Adios M&M's.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy at February 06, 2011 10:40 AM (b6qrg)

87 I have no idear who this Ronald Reagan is.

Posted by: Scott Brown, wicked smaht at February 06, 2011 10:40 AM (AnTyA)

Posted by: HeatherRadish is wearing a cheesehead at February 06, 2011 10:42 AM (ElYV9)

89 Pardon me. I know MFM. I must have missed the new meme: MBM. Please enlighten me!
Thanks.

Posted by: sickinmass at February 06, 2011 02:43 PM (1rflU)

Make Believe Media.  Ace coined it.

Posted by: Tami-unban Nickless (99.174.64.43) at February 06, 2011 10:44 AM (VuLos)

90 The average voter wants it all:  charisma, looks, speechifying, and maybe a brain cell or two thrown in.

That's another reason we're all boned.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 06, 2011 02:24 PM

What the "average voter" fails to look for are the simple traits: honor, patriotism, a sense that a president serves America and not the other way around.

Reagan was admired by conservatives, and still is admired today. Some on the right (including some here) -- I'm not naming names -- have fallen into the trap so loved by the liberals: they worship particular candidates because they see those "average voter" traits. They look no farther, and defend their choices with platitudes and ad hominem attacks on the unconvinced.

I'm not going to worship any damn human, politician or otherwise. A select few, and Reagan was one of them -- perhaps the last among politicians in my lifetime as matters stand today -- earn our admiration.

When/if another is found, we may find ourselves back on the right path.

Posted by: MrScribbler© at February 06, 2011 10:44 AM (Ulu3i)

91 How in the hell did we go from Reagan to this piece of pig shit Obama. Now I see purple lip commie boy Obama says Reagan was his hero. He is supposedly reading his books. What a joke and a waste of human flesh. Obama would have been better born as a tampon...At least he would have been useful. I do miss Ronnie and hope we have another Ronnie Reagan moment in 2012 and throw this garbage we have back to Jakarta !!!!!!

Posted by: Jake Scott at February 06, 2011 10:48 AM (zVOB7)

92 Something fun: Reagan and Sam Donaldson

So much for gotcha journalism.

Reagan knew how to work the press, which is an essential skill any Reaganesque GOP candidate needs to possess. 

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 06, 2011 02:38 PM (9hSKh)

The press hated Reagan with a passion. Ron knew how to bypass them and make them irrelevant, not work them.

Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 10:49 AM (z1N6a)

93

Make Believe Media.  Ace coined  stole it.

Posted by: Scott Brown, wicked smaht at February 06, 2011 10:49 AM (AnTyA)

94

Make Believe Media.  Ace coined  stole it.

Posted by: Scott Brown, wicked smaht at February 06, 2011 02:49 PM (AnTyA)

Yeah...after I hit post I wondered whether he was repeating it or came up with it.  Thieving friggin' ewoks.

Posted by: Tami-unban Nickless (99.174.64.43) at February 06, 2011 10:51 AM (VuLos)

95 Happy Birthday Mr President.

If you have the chance visit the Reagan Library it is amazing.  I've been there twice and plan to go again this year.

Posted by: mpfs at February 06, 2011 10:53 AM (3TjSM)

96

Posted by: Tami-unban Nickless (

Breitbart & Co. have been using it for quite a while

Posted by: beedubya at February 06, 2011 10:55 AM (AnTyA)

97 Obamao is studying Reagan so that he can improve his 'messaging'. To liberals Reagan was effective because he was so good at 'messaging'. The lefttists know they themselves are lying through their teeth; so they assume that the other side is doing the same thing. Leftists really don't understand that people on the right really mean what they are saying. Conversely people on the right don't get that the people on the left mean nothing of what they are saying.

Obamao is as close to the anti Reagan as you could get; Reagan loved the United States and hated communism. Obamao - just the opposite; so for Obamao to be using Reagan's techniques to try to sell a megaton of crap to the American people is something approaching sacrilege. 

Posted by: An Observation at February 06, 2011 10:55 AM (ylhEn)

98 Happy Birthday Mr President.

If you have the chance visit the Reagan Library it is amazing.  I've been there twice and plan to go again this year.

Posted by: mpfs at February 06, 2011 02:53 PM (3TjSM)

They've apparently redone the whole exhibit area. Plus the AirForce One extension if you haven't see that.

I live a couple miles away from it.

Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 10:56 AM (z1N6a)

99 Obamao is as close to the anti Reagan as you could get; Reagan loved the United States and hated communism. Obamao - just the opposite; so for Obamao to be using Reagan's techniques to try to sell a megaton of crap to the American people is something approaching sacrilege. 

Posted by: An Observation at February 06, 2011 02:55 PM (ylhEn)

Reagan's 'Technique' was sincerity. Don't think Barry can afford to try that one.

Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 10:57 AM (z1N6a)

100 #104  If you have the chance visit the Reagan Library it is amazing.  I've been there twice and plan to go again this year.

Where is it? 

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 06, 2011 10:57 AM (9hSKh)

101 How in the hell did we go from Reagan to this piece of pig shit Obama. Now I see purple lip commie boy Obama says Reagan was his hero. He is supposedly reading his books. What a joke and a waste of human flesh. Obama would have been better born as a tampon...At least he would have been useful. I do miss Ronnie and hope we have another Ronnie Reagan moment in 2012 and throw this garbage we have back to Jakarta !!!!!!

Posted by: Jake Scott at February 06, 2011 02:48 PM (zVOB7)

Well, you have one party that has no principles, so they have to run an unknown. Then you take a second party that is afraid to say what its principles are because someone might make fun of them, and there you have it.

Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 10:59 AM (z1N6a)

102 106 Obamao is studying Reagan so that he can improve his 'messaging'. To liberals Reagan was effective because he was so good at 'messaging'

Liberals see everything through "messaging".  To them, the reason why lost big last election cycle was because we had better messaging. 

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 06, 2011 10:59 AM (9hSKh)

103 If you have the chance visit the Reagan Library it is amazing.  I've been there twice and plan to go again this year.

Where is it? 

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 06, 2011 02:57 PM (9hSKh)

Simi Valley, right off the 23. Right on the border of Simi and Thousand Oaks.

Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 10:59 AM (z1N6a)

104

If you have the chance visit the Reagan Library it is amazing

(sigh) It just hit me that Jug Ears will get his own too.

I can see it now...Communist Manifesto, Rules for Radicals, the book about himself that he wrote, the one that Bill Ayers wrote for him...

Posted by: beedubya at February 06, 2011 11:00 AM (AnTyA)

105 Who the hell allowed that fukkitty-fuck-fuck Ron Jr. to the ceremony? I wish someone would throw a pie in the little weenie's snout. Is Michael Reagan even there?

Posted by: CoolCzech at February 06, 2011 11:01 AM (tJjm/)

106

I admire SP because she fights, she fights because she believes, no sane person would take the battering she has and keep going unless they cared very deeply about the future of this country, also she has the right idea's, she wants to put America back to work building things, making things. Oil wells, coal mines, light and heavy industry of all kinds are what this country needs and she knows and will actually do something about it rather than just talk about it.

you think Huckabee or Romney has the balls to tell the EPA to sit down and shut the fuck up?

Sarah does...

Posted by: Shoey at February 06, 2011 11:02 AM (yCH89)

107 #112  Simi Valley, right off the 23. Right on the border of Simi and Thousand Oaks.

Which means I'll never get to see it.  Damn. 

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 06, 2011 11:02 AM (9hSKh)

108 The website for The Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Library is here.

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 06, 2011 11:05 AM (sZ+lP)

109

To the leftist, it's "obvious" that they are right and we are wrong.  Therefore, they must not be explaining themselves well enough.  People are getting confused by listening to the wrong kinds of news shows or whatever.

Their attack plan against this "deception" on the right is to 1) silence the right and 2) figure out how to tell people what they want to hear.

Posted by: Truman North at February 06, 2011 11:05 AM (+gfwN)

110 I could go on and on so don't me we're a center-right country. Posted by: lowandslow, Packer fan at February 06, 2011 02:52 PM (GZitp) The real question is, How did that happen? I blame Leftist infiltration of public education. The next time we are in power, we need to do something about that. Sort of a "purge," you might say.

Posted by: CoolCzech at February 06, 2011 11:05 AM (tJjm/)

111 The BLM took a dump on Reagan's head every night on the News for eight years.  The lead story every night was, "Here is How Reagan Lied to You/Fucked Up Today." 


Before and after he was elected he was reviled and ridiculed just as She Who Must Not Be Named is now.  He beat their asses.  Clues are available for the clueless.

Posted by: SurferDoc at February 06, 2011 11:07 AM (o3bYL)

112 Let us work hard in 2012 to get a new RR nominated. Let us stop all the H W Bushes and Fords.

Posted by: Flapjackmaka at February 06, 2011 11:08 AM (c5RQr)

113

you think Huckabee or Romney has the balls to tell the EPA to sit down and shut the fuck up?

Sarah does...

 

Yep.  #1 reason I like Palin and Bachmann is they have bigger balls than any other Republicans now on the national stage, including Christie.

 

Bye for now, Morons!  See you tomorrow probably.

Posted by: Truman North at February 06, 2011 11:08 AM (+gfwN)

114 Has anyone read 'Reagan, In His Own Hand'....should I buy it?

Posted by: Tami-unban Nickless (99.174.64.43) at February 06, 2011 11:09 AM (VuLos)

115 Simi Valley, right off the 23. Right on the border of Simi and Thousand Oaks.

Which means I'll never get to see it.  Damn. 

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 06, 2011 03:02 PM (9hSKh)

Bah. Pop out, have Rum take you do Disneyland and see the library. Fly into Burbank and avoid most of LA.

Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 11:10 AM (z1N6a)

116 Today ought to be a day for honoring the memory and legacy of Ronald Reagan, and not for hijacking that memory and legacy for the purposes of continuing the internecine red-on-red shit and promoting one's preferred 2012 presidential candidate.

Just sayin'.

Posted by: The War Betwen the Undead States at February 06, 2011 11:10 AM (FYCiJ)

117 Has anyone read 'Reagan, In His Own Hand'....should I buy it?

Posted by: Tami-unban Nickless (99.174.64.43) at February 06, 2011 03:09 PM (VuLos)

I have it, it is excellent.

Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 11:10 AM (z1N6a)

118 Oldcat,
I used to live across the street from the library in Wood Ranch. 

I did get to see the new Air Force One Pavilion, it is awesome.

Posted by: mpfs at February 06, 2011 11:11 AM (3TjSM)

119 "I'm Proud to be an American" is being sung by the original artist! I wish everyone in the audience would raise their arms and wave them side to side!

Posted by: CoolCzech at February 06, 2011 11:12 AM (tJjm/)

120

I have it, it is excellent.

Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 03:10 PM (z1N6a)

Good....thanks.  Done.  (I have my kindle in front of me....2 clicks and it's mine.)

Posted by: Tami-unban Nickless (99.174.64.43) at February 06, 2011 11:12 AM (VuLos)

121 I used to live across the street from the library in Wood Ranch. 

I did get to see the new Air Force One Pavilion, it is awesome.

Posted by: mpfs at February 06, 2011 03:11 PM (3TjSM)

Howdy, ex neighbor.  I'm right off of Arboles on the 23.

Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 11:12 AM (z1N6a)

122 125 Today ought to be a day for honoring the memory and legacy of Ronald Reagan, and not for hijacking that memory and legacy for the purposes of continuing the internecine red-on-red shit and promoting one's preferred 2012 presidential candidate.

Just sayin'.

Posted by: The War Betwen the Undead States at February 06, 2011 03:10 PM (FYCiJ)

 

 

every day is a good day to die when you have nothing to lose...

Posted by: Shoey at February 06, 2011 11:15 AM (yCH89)

123

Before and after he was elected he was reviled and ridiculed just as She Who Must Not Be Named is now.  He beat their asses.  Clues are available for the clueless.

Really? the left joked about Reagan being gang-raped by a "bunch of brothers".

Did they ever refer to his gentials as "a fucking disgusting retard making fucking cunt"?

Did they ever joke about raping his kids?

Did they ever change the text of a play performed by school kids to say that he should have his head cut off?

Has any comedienne, D-rated as she may be, ever say she was going to target and destroy his 16 year old daughter?

Has any over-the-hill late night TV host ever joked about statutory rape of his 14 year old?

 

Posted by: beedubya at February 06, 2011 11:16 AM (AnTyA)

124 So 47 more years will have passed, and the media will feature Barky's greatest speeches:
 
A Time For Snoozing
 
A Time For Schmoozing
 
A Time For Losing
 
A Time For Choosing Golf Courses

Posted by: GnuBreed at February 06, 2011 11:18 AM (bvXGR)

125

No we're not a center right country, we have moved so far to the left we just think we are. No way in hell would we have allowed same sex marriages or gay's in the military thirty years ago.

Uh we're not allowing it now.  Everytime it comes up to a ballot even in liberal looney land it gets defeated.  We don't get to choose about gays in the military.  These are things being forced on us when they do occur.  We are not allowing them.

No way would we have allowed mass immigration from Muslim countries fifty years ago, hell even universal healthcare was impossible just twenty years ago.

50 years ago muslim immigrants wouldn't be much of an issue, its been in the past 30 years they have become radicalized.  And again universal healthcare is opposed by the majority of the country.  That's again something force on us against our will.

Things like Title IX were hotly contested, now accepted. Things like single motherhood and divorce carried a stigma, now it's universally accepted. Now it's taboo just to mention black crime or to mention that Islam isn't compatible with western culture.
I could go on and on so don't me we're a center-right country.

Posted by: lowandslow, Packer fan at February 06, 2011 02:52 PM (GZitp)

So sorry but we are a center right country.  Its liberals in the government that are acting against the will of the people doing what the nation does not want.  Your examples point all this out.

Posted by: buzzion at February 06, 2011 11:18 AM (oVQFe)

126 Anyone remember that wonder of oratory Obama gave last week? The State of the Union - WTF speech? Well, HuffPo writer Stephen M. Wing has just posted an explanation as to what it all means. I'm sure they'd welcome thoughtful comments.

Posted by: felix concolor at February 06, 2011 11:20 AM (vXagV)

127 What time is tip-off for the football game today?

Posted by: Joe Biden at February 06, 2011 11:21 AM (AnTyA)

128 Hola!  No one on the football thread?  Is this it now? 

Back from a quick jaunt to Walmart, which was surprisingly busy for a First Sunday (fast Sunday) in Utah.  My tummy is still a bit off after that food poisoning so not hot wings today... instead we're going with nice, lean elk medallions and tater tots (latter bought at said Walmart).  Comfort foods. 


Go Pack!

Posted by: Y-not at February 06, 2011 11:21 AM (pW2o8)

129 At Mass this morning the Gospel was the conclusion of the Sermon on the Mount from St. Matthew. It contains the passage "You are the light of the world. A city set on a hill cannot be hid." I thought that was particularly appropriate on President Reagan's birthday.

Posted by: Nighthawk at February 06, 2011 11:25 AM (g3gh5)

130 What time is tip-off for the football game today?

First pitch at 6:30 Eastern.

Posted by: Barry O, SuperFan at February 06, 2011 11:26 AM (ElYV9)

131 A few Reagan movies

Mark Steyn, who knows a thing or two about the Golden Age of Hollywood, on Reagan's film career.

Posted by: Barry O, SuperFan at February 06, 2011 11:27 AM (ElYV9)

132 133 They said he was drooling moron.  They said he was a senile idiot with no ideas.  One of my colleagues sent her two sons to Canada because he was going to push the button and nuke Russia bringing about the end of the US.  Want more?

Posted by: SurferDoc at February 06, 2011 11:27 AM (o3bYL)

133 Bloody sock.  Although that does kinda work.  Kinda.

Posted by: HeatherRadish is wearing a cheesehead at February 06, 2011 11:28 AM (ElYV9)

134

The Westerner - Badger Clark 

My fathers sleep on the sunrise plains,
    And each one sleeps alone.
Their trails may dim to the grass and rains,
    For I choose to make my own.
I lay proud claim to their blood and name,
    But I lean on no dead kin;
My name is mine, for the praise or scorn,
And the world began when I was born
    And the world is mine to win.

They built high towns on their old log sills,
    Where the great, slow rivers gleamed,
But with new, live rock from the savage hills
    I'll build as they only dreamed.
The smoke scarce dies where the trail camp
        lies,
    Till the rails glint down the pass;
The desert springs into fruit and wheat
And I lay the stones of a solid street
    Over yesterday's untrod grass.

I waste no thought on my neighbor's birth
    Or the way he makes his prayer.
I grant him a white man's room on earth
    If his game is only square.
While he plays it straight I'll call him mate;
    If he cheats I drop him flat.
Old class and rank are a wornout lie,
For all clean men are as good as I,
    And a king is only that.

I dream no dreams of a nurse-maid state
    That will spoon me out my food.
A stout heart sings in the fray with fate
    And the shock and sweat are good.
From noon to noon all the earthly boon
    That I ask my God to spare
Is a little daily bread in store,
With the room to fight the strong for more,
    And the weak shall get their share.

The sunrise plains are a tender haze
    And the sunset seas are gray,
But I stand here, where the bright skies blaze
    Over me and the big today.
What good to me is a vague "maybe"
    Or a mournful "might have been,"
For the sun wheels swift from morn to morn
And the world began when I was born
    And the world is mine to win.

 

I used to hang out at "Scrappleface" years ago, and I remember thinking of this poem and posting it on the day Ron Reagan died.  I thought it fit him.

Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes..... at February 06, 2011 11:29 AM (sJTmU)

135 They said he was drooling moron.  They said he was a senile idiot with no ideas.  One of my colleagues sent her two sons to Canada because he was going to push the button and nuke Russia bringing about the end of the US.  Want more?

Posted by: SurferDoc at February 06, 2011 03:27 PM (o3bYL)

I'm a little unclear on what it proves if Reagan was attacked slightly more or slightly less than certain current figures.

Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 11:33 AM (z1N6a)

136

I can't watch the movies of my beloved late father and I can't watch Reagan for very long---It's actually painful. The two also remind me of each other so much that the loss melds together to form one big hurt and a feeling of not being as safe again.

I wonder if that feeling of vunerability--in a cosmic way--not a literal one comes with age and seeing the ideosyncrosies of life or if figures like him were so inspiring and so imbued with character that there loss leaves a chasm?

Posted by: dagny at February 06, 2011 11:34 AM (6HG/9)

137

131 They failed to mention that Barak Obama Sr was a drunk who had already lost his legs and frequently drove drunk? Whoops. Can't let the narrative get in the way of the truth.

As for Reagan, they treated him like shit too. Maybe not as badly as Palin but only because society wasn't as base as it is today. They celebrated his shooting.

What I remember most from college is their producing movies about how quickly everyone would sicken and die after the Reagan induced nuclear holocaust. I also remember taking the young democrat bus to the polls to vote for reagan and jesse helms. There was no republican bus and I felt like their assisting me in my vote was amusing.

Posted by: dagny at February 06, 2011 11:39 AM (6HG/9)

138

I can't watch the movies of my beloved late father and I can't watch Reagan for very long---It's actually painful. The two also remind me of each other so much that the loss melds together to form one big hurt and a feeling of not being as safe again.

I wonder if that feeling of vunerability--in a cosmic way--not a literal one comes with age and seeing the ideosyncrosies of life or if figures like him were so inspiring and so imbued with character that there loss leaves a chasm?

Posted by: dagny at February 06, 2011 03:34 PM (6HG/9)

I don't remember Reagan making me feel safer - the times were still dangerous, with the Russians dominating a good part of the world. It was nice to feel strong, and able to face the problems without being held back by our own fears of acting.  Its easy to cry about how hard things are and how boned everything is. Its harder to go fix things.

Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 11:39 AM (z1N6a)

139 Geez, I forgot about all the obligatory Cowboy talk in the pre game.

Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 11:42 AM (A0VTZ)

140 HeatherRadish, you still here?  We're leaving with friends shortly for a party, and we're rooting for the Packers.  We were going with the Steelers, until King Barry doomed them.

I'm wearing green and gold party beads over a black sweater.  Alas, no cheese head.


Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 06, 2011 11:42 AM (UOM48)

141 People make jokes about Bedtime for Bonzo but it's actually a pretty good flick.

Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 11:43 AM (A0VTZ)

142 People make jokes about Bedtime for Bonzo but it's actually a pretty good flick.

It's still a more prestigious resume item than anything in Obama's past.

Posted by: nickless the still-banned (99.174.64.43) at February 06, 2011 11:44 AM (qdtoY)

143 Bob Dole got my 1st vote for President.  Eat your heart out!

Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 02:24 PM (A0VTZ)

Oh gawd!  Make my long nightmare end, now!

Posted by: Papa Editor at February 06, 2011 11:45 AM (YX6i/)

144

I don't remember Reagan making me feel safer - the times were still dangerous, with the Russians dominating a good part of the world.

Huh. I remember clearly feeling like we were so far more powerful when the hostages were released than when that actual fool Carter was in. I also knew that he was a powerful figure for good when watching him at Reykjavik. The soviets were still there but didn't seem to be winning. We were holding our own. No one was telling me to turn down my thermostat or get in line for gas. There was an optimism and a feeling that the United States was going to prevail. I never got the sense that Reagan was clueless as to who and what we were.

Posted by: dagny at February 06, 2011 11:46 AM (6HG/9)

145

Oh gawd!  Make my long nightmare end, now!

Heh.  You know what I'm talking about. 

Congrats on the little one by the way.  Haven't seen you around since the big news.

Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 11:47 AM (A0VTZ)

146 I've said it before, but NRO: The Corner had & has some great Reagan stories. It's been an absolute treat to read them.

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 06, 2011 11:48 AM (sZ+lP)

147 If I even mention her name with too much praise, I may be banned from this blog. And that's just sad.

Posted by: Downsized Upscale at February 06, 2011 03:19 PM (IhHdM)

Did I miss something?

"Sarah Palin is fucking AWESOME!!!!1!!!eleven!!!!!!"

(waits to see if he gets banned)

Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 06, 2011 11:50 AM (bxiXv)

148 The martyr act by some of Palin's supporters is really getting old. 

Posted by: Y-not at February 06, 2011 11:51 AM (pW2o8)

149

Peter Robinson reminds me of Don Larsen in a way.  Larsen is famous for one thing, throwing a perfect game in the World Series in 56.

Robinson, when he dies, the 1st thing mentioned will be that he wrote the "Tear Down This Wall" Speech.

Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 11:51 AM (A0VTZ)

150 She's a Steeler's fan, so that explains a great deal.

Posted by: justin cord at February 06, 2011 11:53 AM (2C3OH)

151 It's understandable that people would make Reagan comparisons today, but it seems to have overshadowed the stories and other memories. Though perhaps it's too painful for people to remember what we had versus what we have, so that could be it.

/I was 3yo in '88, so I have stories & CDs but not memories.

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 06, 2011 11:55 AM (sZ+lP)

152 There was an optimism and a feeling that the United States was going to prevail. I never got the sense that Reagan was clueless as to who and what we were.

Posted by: dagny at February 06, 2011 03:46 PM (6HG/9)

I do remember the left (particularly academia) going ballistic on Reagan (not quite as shrill or vulgar as with Palin), but I also remember that a lot of places we assume are lefty warehouses of propaganda today got caught up in America in the 80s.

I remember some bands going from vapid or anti-America (or more accurately vapid social commentary that resulted in same) to seeing a lot more positive and even pro-American sentiment. I remember having lost the early 70s "good feelings" for a grimmer view, a lot of TV shows and pop culture leaned back toward people working together and finding happy endings.

I remember that shaking when Bush I was elected, and the academic voice of criticism getting louder, and then that "good vibe" going away after Clinton was elected.

I think the "bad vibe" got pretty well entrenched and hasn't gone away since.

It's a shallow metric, but it means *something* if not everything.

Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 06, 2011 11:55 AM (bxiXv)

153 160 The martyr act by some of Palin's supporters is really getting old.

Posted by: Y-not at February 06, 2011 03:51 PM (pW2o

(shrug) A lot of people identify with her more strongly than any political figure in recent memory, and have taken the record-breaking ration of shit she's received quite personally.

Yeah, it's pretty maudlin (another word of the day for me), but I get it.

How's your tummy?

Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 06, 2011 11:57 AM (bxiXv)

154 @165
Not 100%, but good enough for some elk medallions, tater tots (mmmm...), and cheesey-cauliflower.  Go Pack!

Posted by: Y-not at February 06, 2011 12:01 PM (pW2o8)

155

Posted by: Y-not

 

If I had a nickel for every time a Palin supporter mocked another candidate (can you say "Mutt" or "Mittens"?) in the same thread that they bellyached about getting no respect, I'd be one wealthy mofo.

Posted by: Bill Clinton at February 06, 2011 12:01 PM (hUf/c)

156

Sock off.

 

Posted by: Lincolntf at February 06, 2011 12:02 PM (hUf/c)

157

If I had a nickel for every time a Palin supporter mocked another candidate (can you say "Mutt" or "Mittens"?) in the same thread that they bellyached about getting no respect, I'd be one wealthy mofo.

Posted by: Bill Clinton at February 06, 2011 04:01 PM (hUf/c)

People were calling Romney names before Palin was a blip on the frickin' radar. Jeez.

Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 12:03 PM (z1N6a)

158 Funny, although a little whorish, I like everyone who isn't Obama. I also like them in order of how not like Obama they are. Since, right now that appears to be Palin, I like her lots but am skeptical if that works for many people because the vast majority of americans like to believe the liberal media. I'll just let things shake out a lot more before I insult a republican in any guise (except for Newt--that Pelosi gig sent me over the edge).

Posted by: dagny at February 06, 2011 12:06 PM (6HG/9)

159 That's my concern with the Palin stuff.  It's all become so personal that we can't have rational discussions about any of our prospective candidates.  Anything other than 100% defense of Palin against any real or perceived slight by anyone in the pundit or political class results in charges of RINOism.   I'm sick to death of it.  I thought she was an asset in 2008, but now I think she's a liability, at least in terms of our chances of getting Obama out of office in 2012. 

I wish she'd announce that she's not running in 2012 just so we can get down to business of trying to identify and groom the best possible candidate. 

Posted by: Y-not at February 06, 2011 12:07 PM (pW2o8)

160 My only point in mentioning any of that is that Reagan overcame every slur and that others can do so as well, if they have his strength of character.

Posted by: SurferDoc at February 06, 2011 12:07 PM (o3bYL)

161 Looks like the weather in Dallas is going to remain light jacket weather (lower 50s) instead of sleet.

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 06, 2011 12:08 PM (sZ+lP)

162 I'll just let things shake out a lot more before I insult a republican in any guise (except for Newt--that Pelosi gig sent me over the edge).

Posted by: dagny at February 06, 2011 04:06 PM (6HG/9)

Yeah. I'm not sure why anyone needs to win the blog comments war rather than the primaries. I'm willing to let the campaigns and the voters decide.

Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 12:08 PM (z1N6a)

163

I mock Palin and Mittens. 

Thing is, Mittens can beat OWaffle...

Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 12:08 PM (A0VTZ)

164 If I had a nickel for every time a Palin supporter mocked another candidate (can you say "Mutt" or "Mittens"?) in the same thread that they bellyached about getting no respect, I'd be one wealthy mofo.

Posted by: Lincolntf at February 06, 2011 04:01 PM (hUf/c)

So, the way Romney and Palin have been treated for the last couple of years by the MBM and the chattering classes is somehow equivalent?

I get what you're saying, but while there's a "whiner" aspect to it, especially the "I'm about to be banned" histrionics, there isn't some balance of insults being maintained here, and it's not hypocritical for someone who supports a candidate to disparage a different candidate. That part's pretty normal.

Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 06, 2011 12:09 PM (bxiXv)

165 @172
You're right. 

I remember all of the slurs well, especially how he was going to get us into WWIII.  I remember how "no one" voted for Reagan -- twice.

He did have a wonderful quality of being able to deal with a negative press without it getting to him.  Bush (W) was sort of stoic about it all (which was amazing in and of itself), but Reagan actually somehow went beyond that.  He just seemed more, I don't know, charming or warm or something no matter what they said. 

Posted by: Y-not at February 06, 2011 12:11 PM (pW2o8)

166

I know Palin boosters didn't invent mocking other candidates, they just complain about it more than anyone else.

I'm talking about the intramural mockery, not the real sick shit that comes from the Left.

Posted by: Lincolntf at February 06, 2011 12:11 PM (hUf/c)

167 Drew:

Plz put those videos under the fold.

They kill the main page loading.

Posted by: Ed Anger at February 06, 2011 12:11 PM (7+pP9)

168 Reagan was also the last candidate to win in an actual landslide. That also made him a more powerful figure. The left could only do so much with just Minnisota dissenting.

Posted by: dagny at February 06, 2011 12:13 PM (6HG/9)

169 He did have a wonderful quality of being able to deal with a negative press without it getting to him. Bush (W) was sort of stoic about it all (which was amazing in and of itself), but Reagan actually somehow went beyond that. He just seemed more, I don't know, charming or warm or something no matter what they said. Posted by: Y-not at February 06, 2011 04:11 PM (pW2o Reagan treated the press like they were the neighbor's spoiled children- which is better than they deserved but spot on for the purposes of neutralizing their bile.

Posted by: Nighthawk at February 06, 2011 12:14 PM (g3gh5)

170 Anything other than 100% defense of Palin against any real or perceived slight by anyone in the pundit or political class results in charges of RINOism.   I'm sick to death of it.

Posted by: Y-not at February 06, 2011 04:07 PM (pW2o

I keep hearing about this, but I sure haven't seen this kind of thing nearly as much as blasting anyone mentioning Palin lately. I'm not saying it didn't happen, but the counteroffensive is just as bad.

If you think they are over the top, make a joke out of it. Like the Ron Paul stuff, or the "You know who this helps - Mitt Romney" lines of yesteryear. Because the Purity versus CounterPurity war isn't that amusing, or effective since SP got about 45 percent in that poll the other day.

Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 12:15 PM (z1N6a)

171 He did have a wonderful quality of being able to deal with a negative press without it getting to him.  Bush (W) was sort of stoic about it all (which was amazing in and of itself), but Reagan actually somehow went beyond that.  He just seemed more, I don't know, charming or warm or something no matter what they said. 

Posted by: Y-not at February 06, 2011 04:11 PM (pW2o

He was able to get past them and connect to the voters. His "There you go again" line is an example of talking to the audience over the reporters or debate opponents.

Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 12:17 PM (z1N6a)

172

I'm just hoping George Pataki throws his hat in the ring so folks have a real choice in 2012.

(I really don't have to use the sarc tag on this one do I?)

Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 12:17 PM (A0VTZ)

173

I know Palin boosters didn't invent mocking other candidates, they just complain about it more than anyone else.

It feels left.

It may not be but most of it is about how she can't win because she's........not left enough........ or is damaged (by the left) or .........something. I'm no huge supporter and I'd rather her stay in her role as king-maker but I completely understand how disparaging her seems.........left-ish..........and how that gets the ire up.

Posted by: dagny at February 06, 2011 12:17 PM (6HG/9)

174

Check out PowerLine's video of Mike Wallace interviewing Reagan on 60 Lies Minutes.

Wallace comes out as the total asshole he is while Reagan comes out as a giant.

Posted by: Ed Anger at February 06, 2011 12:17 PM (7+pP9)

175 One thing that occurs to me about the Palin phenomenon (current) is that it seems to be having the effect of pushing people out of "the base," rather than drawing people into the base.  I've seen no evidence that she has broadened her support. 

I'm a life long Republican.  I started working Presidential campaigns when I was 10 (Nixon vs McGovern).  I have always voted Republican for POTUS and for everyone except a handful of local candidates over the years.  But I'm a RINO now.  Pretty laughable.

Posted by: Y-not at February 06, 2011 12:19 PM (pW2o8)

176 There are so many great ones to choose from, but my favorite Reagan speech is still the one he gave in Normandy on the 40th anniversary of D-Day.

Here's to you, Gipper!

Posted by: Andy at February 06, 2011 12:19 PM (veZ9n)

177 I think one of the reasons the Palin thing is so "emo" is that her biggest negative is "the MBM hates her guts" and the "don't let the left choose our candidates" meme has enormous emotional impact, because the part of the right that signed up for the TEA Party thinks that's been the problem for years and that's probably what's going to kill us as a country.

So they take it personally.

Me, I think the left are going to pick our candidate, and we're boned. I think we're too far down the road for even difficult fixes, to hell with easy ones, and we can only fix our problems with some pretty disastrous changes - and we aren't going to do that.

Again, maybe I'm being grumpy.

Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 06, 2011 12:20 PM (bxiXv)

178 "Jimmy Carter can suck it!"

Posted by: Shit Reagan Said Vol 11 at February 06, 2011 12:21 PM (1fB+3)

179 175

I mock Palin and Mittens. 

Thing is, Mittens can beat OWaffle...

Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 04:08 PM

When you get down to it, that's the real motivation of the Anybody But Palin crowd. They don't really care about her lack of Big Government Experience, her gaffes, or lack of sophistication, it all comes down to "we don't think she can win". Fair enough, just say that.

Reagan ran in 1968, 1976, and 1980. Each time we were assured by the powerbrokers in the GOP and their MBM buddies that "Reagan is too extreme to be electable"

That's why we got Nixon, Ford, and almost Bush Sr. We got Dole and McCain because they were considered to be non-controversial and easily expendable
 

Posted by: kbdabear at February 06, 2011 12:21 PM (vdfwz)

180

"we don't think she can win". Fair enough, just say that.

I think you make a good point.

I like the lady, just have slowly soured on her over the last couple years for various reasons of which I'm in too good a mood today to list.

At this point I don't think she can win, so I look elsewhere.

Nothing personal, only business.

 

Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 12:24 PM (A0VTZ)

181 84 Okay, which one of you is "ValuRiteVodka" on YouTube?

Posted by: Rajiv Vindaloo at February 06, 2011 02:31 PM (BZ2Bm)

Heh. That would be me.

Posted by: Herr Blücher at February 06, 2011 12:24 PM (5DwhA)

182 I also think that Palin makes a better kingmaker than a king, but I also don't think that the "old money" part of the party (money being a metaphor here) is ready to let that happen. I think it's less "RINO / real conservative" than it is "beltway/non-beltway."

Anyone else remember that poll (I hate polls) about how beltway people (regardless of party) had a much more favorable view of government action than non-beltway (also regardless of party)? We don't have a citizen legislature, we have a professional legislature.

We explain things to them and they LITERALLY don't understand because they LITERALLY live in a diffeent world from the one we live in.

I don't know if we can fix that problem.

Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 06, 2011 12:24 PM (bxiXv)

183 It may not be but most of it is about how she can't win because she's........not left enough........ or is damaged (by the left) or .........something. I'm no huge supporter and I'd rather her stay in her role as king-maker but I completely understand how disparaging her seems.........left-ish..........and how that gets the ire up. Posted by: dagny at February 06, 2011 04:17 PM (6HG/9) What bugs me most about the Palinistas is that when you point out the fact that she will not win they immediately start in with the "false choice" arguments and accuse you of wanting to run Olympia Snowe or Lindsay Graham. No. I want to run a firm, clear-minded, committed conservative candidate WHO WILL WIN. Palin ain't it- the media can play her like a Stradivarius and that fault, unfortunately, eliminates her as a candidate.

Posted by: Nighthawk at February 06, 2011 12:24 PM (g3gh5)

184 And McCain ran an awesome campaign!!!! 

Posted by: Papa Editor at February 06, 2011 12:25 PM (YX6i/)

185

Merovign,

I see similarities in "there were no wmds" and "oh, no not palin". Ugh. And because of that, you are probably right.

Posted by: dagny at February 06, 2011 12:25 PM (6HG/9)

186 Compare the Reagan speech at Normandy vs. Barky's.  No, don't. 

Well, off to pretend I care who wins the Super Bowl.  Go Coke commercial!  Go Budweiser Clydesdales!

Woo-hoo!

Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 06, 2011 12:25 PM (UOM48)

187 Why do I have a sick feeling that Obama's giant head will be on the jumbotron in Dallas today?

Posted by: soothsayer flies air lingus, wink wink at February 06, 2011 12:25 PM (fH/eE)

188 Frank O'Harris still looks pretty good.

Posted by: USS Diversity at February 06, 2011 12:29 PM (DLxD/)

189

So are we going to get a Ego vs. Ego thread.

OLuffah Vs. OWaffle I mean.

Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 12:29 PM (A0VTZ)

190
I want to run a firm, clear-minded, committed conservative candidate WHO WILL WIN.

Who?

Posted by: dagny at February 06, 2011 12:29 PM (6HG/9)

191 What I really hate is how all you assholes keep saying the Seahawks can't win the Super Bowl.  Yeah,well, I've heard that over and over and over.  All it's given us is Cowboy Championships, '49er Championships, Green Bay Championships, on and on.  Even gave us a Chicago Bear championship with a fatass running the ball. 

So, just stop saying the Seahawks can't win the Super Bowl. 

Posted by: Papa Editor at February 06, 2011 12:31 PM (YX6i/)

192 I mean really, is it gong to kill you if the Seahawks win a Super Bowl? 

Posted by: Papa Editor at February 06, 2011 12:33 PM (YX6i/)

193 Obama is Reagan?  I think not...Obama couldn't even be considered his left nut!!

Posted by: Fawn Libowitz at February 06, 2011 12:33 PM (zVOB7)

194 I thought Dave Krieg had 2 or 3 Super Bowl rings???

Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 12:33 PM (A0VTZ)

195 There is a fucking football thread, God DAMMIT, rookie, you are driving me CRAZY!

Posted by: Leonard Church at February 06, 2011 12:34 PM (bxiXv)

196 Sarah Palin is not running. So forget it. But if she were, which she's not, we'd be lucky to have her. Some of you need to think for a moment of what you want. Does it make sense that you'd automatically eliminate the ONLY prominent Republican alive today that agrees with you on 100% of the issues just because the left/media hates her?

Posted by: soothsayer flies air lingus, wink wink at February 06, 2011 12:35 PM (fH/eE)

197 I want to run a firm, clear-minded, committed conservative candidate WHO WILL WIN. Who? Posted by: dagny at February 06, 2011 04:29 PM (6HG/9) Looking at the current crop of contenders I have no earthly idea. I'm hoping that a dark horse ticket will emerge. My personal favorite would be a an Allen West / Liz Cheney ticket because it would absolutely tounge-tie the MBM.

Posted by: Nighthawk at February 06, 2011 12:35 PM (g3gh5)

198 If Dave Krieg had any SB rings he'd never be able to keep them on from all the butter covering his fingers.

Posted by: Papa Editor at February 06, 2011 12:36 PM (YX6i/)

199 I want to run a firm, clear-minded, committed conservative candidate WHO WILL WIN.

Palin ain't it- the media can play her like a Stradivarius and that fault, unfortunately, eliminates her as a candidate.

Posted by: Nighthawk at February 06, 2011 04:24 PM (g3gh5)

Well, then, when you find a firm, clear-minded, committed conservative candidate who has mastery over the lying, idologically-driven press corps, you just let us know.

I think both sides in this argument have to look up to see their pie. Which makes me sad like a bird who lost his french fry.

Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 06, 2011 12:37 PM (bxiXv)

200

he'd never be able to keep them on from all the butter covering his fingers.

Heh.  Yup.  Big time fumbler.  Everyone always talked about his small hands.

Let me talk some more about Sarah Palin so I stay on the topic of Ronald Reagan, and not offend anyone.

Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 12:38 PM (A0VTZ)

201

Anything other than 100% defense of Palin against any real or perceived slight by anyone in the pundit or political class results in charges of RINOism.   I'm sick to death of it.

Posted by: Y-not at February 06, 2011 04:07 PM (pW2o

I don't know.  Remember now its gotten to the point where people criticizing Palin claim martyr status.  You make a criticism of Palin and then immediately begin whining about being called a RINO sometimes before anyone even starts in at you.  It gets annoying in both regards, and is really just a continuation of morons on both sides of the spectrum wanting to purge the other and thinking that will be the winning strategy.

Posted by: buzzion at February 06, 2011 12:38 PM (oVQFe)

202 Well, my whole Seahawks rant was contribution to the Palin snark happening by both sides.  It was a commentary on it.  So, Merovign can stuff it.

Posted by: Papa Editor at February 06, 2011 12:39 PM (YX6i/)

203 I wish there was a real time Nielsen's viewer.  I want to see Fox's ratings drop when Obama's ugly mug shows up on screen.

Posted by: buzzion at February 06, 2011 12:39 PM (oVQFe)

204 Obama is Reagan? I think not...Obama couldn't even be considered his left nut!! Posted by: Fawn Libowitz at February 06, 2011 04:33 PM (zVOB7) Call me when they try to make him Margaret Thatcher- THAT I wanna see.

Posted by: Nighthawk at February 06, 2011 12:40 PM (g3gh5)

205 Does it make sense that you'd automatically eliminate the ONLY prominent Republican alive today that agrees with you on 100% of the issues just because the left/media hates her?

I don't know that I agree with her on every issue.  I didn't see enough of her in action to know where she stands on everything I care about. 

I know I agree with Rush Limbaugh on a helluva lot of things, but I wouldn't vote for him to be President.

Palin is a pundit now, in my eyes. 

Posted by: Y-not at February 06, 2011 12:40 PM (pW2o8)

206 Oop....they just said the interview is up next.  Wonder what's on TV Land?

Posted by: Tami-unban Nickless (99.174.64.43) at February 06, 2011 12:40 PM (VuLos)

207 I'm gonna bite my tongue... but cut the shit with the RINO bitchin, please

Posted by: soothsayer flies air lingus, wink wink at February 06, 2011 12:41 PM (fH/eE)

208 Why don't we just save the arguments over Palin unyil she actually runs. Right now, she can't be bothered to even attend CPAC. That's not a sign she wants to run. And if she doesn't, arguing about her is pointless AND sucks all the oxygen out of the room for real potential nominees.

Posted by: CoolCzech at February 06, 2011 12:43 PM (tJjm/)

209 214) they won in 1984, is that too obscure. I probably would have voted for every candidate going back to Nixon, who really was a gift that kept on giving. but compared to Humphrey and McGovern, no contest.

Posted by: justin cord at February 06, 2011 12:43 PM (2C3OH)

210 Ras has a poll out. Palin down 11 to bambi. Mittens and Huck tied. They are done. They are simply tied with no negative press. Palin has received th most negative press out of anyone in recent memory and she is only down 11. She just needs to gain 4 to be in McLame range.

Posted by: Flapjackmaka at February 06, 2011 12:44 PM (c5RQr)

211 Well, then, when you find a firm, clear-minded, committed conservative candidate who has mastery over the lying, idologically-driven press corps, you just let us know. Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 06, 2011 04:37 PM (bxiXv) And, with all due respect, when you find a way to get Palin's favorables above 51% with the general populace who still believe the crap spewed by that same lying, ideologically-driven press corps I will be the first one to jump on her band wagon.

Posted by: Nighthawk at February 06, 2011 12:45 PM (g3gh5)

212 SB thread is up. 

Posted by: Tami-unban Nickless (99.174.64.43) at February 06, 2011 12:45 PM (VuLos)

213 hy don't we just save the arguments over Palin unyil she actually runs. Right now, she can't be bothered to even attend CPAC. That's not a sign she wants to run. And if she doesn't, arguing about her is pointless AND sucks all the oxygen out of the room for real potential nominees. Posted by: CoolCzech at February 06, 2011 04:43 PM (tJjm/) ----------------------- Well she did do the Reagan speech but remember her birthday is the 11th along with that big race Alaskans have each year. I do not think you can get enough info on her CPAC decision.

Posted by: Flapjackmaka at February 06, 2011 12:46 PM (c5RQr)

214 Palin is running. She has been since July 2009.

Posted by: eman at February 06, 2011 12:47 PM (QUxm7)

215 Add my kudos in his memory.  A great man, a great President.  I miss the Gipper.  And having an actual president instead of a spineless narcissist.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at February 06, 2011 12:48 PM (xdHzq)

216 >>Let me talk some more about Sarah Palin so I stay on the topic of Ronald Reagan, and not offend anyone. Funny because it's true.

Posted by: JackStraw at February 06, 2011 12:49 PM (TMB3S)

217

I honestly think Romney would be a better President at this point. Palin is definitely in my second/third (depending on who the "Other" folks are when it comes down to brass tacks) spot. 

As to the "electability" issues, I believe she could win. It would be ridiculously tough, but she's got spine and principles, so it's not unthinkable. Romney will be skewered as a "Ken doll" (attractiveness is only a virtue in Dems) and mocked as a "RINO" (need I explicate?) by the "concerned" MSM no matter what his positions are. If they succeed in turning him into a caricature the way they turned Obama into a legend he'll have a tough row to hoe.

Posted by: Lincolntf at February 06, 2011 12:50 PM (hUf/c)

218 211 I want to run a firm, clear-minded, committed conservative candidate WHO WILL WIN.

I want a naturally large breasted beautiful blonde wife who cooks like a gourmet, has an encyclopedic mind, loves sports but shuts up during the game, doesn't cheat, has a big inheritance coming, can sing, dance, has a great family, holds conservative viewpoints, and gives a world class blowjob

Many of us are looking for a custom fit in an off the rack world

Posted by: kbdabear at February 06, 2011 12:51 PM (vdfwz)

219 Many of us are looking for a custom fit in an off the rack world Posted by: kbdabear at February 06, 2011 04:51 PM (vdfwz) I have no problem with "off the rack" except in the cases where it forces me to walk out of the store naked.

Posted by: Nighthawk at February 06, 2011 12:54 PM (g3gh5)

220 I honestly think Romney would be a better President at this point. --------------- No he would not.

Posted by: Flapjackmaka at February 06, 2011 12:56 PM (c5RQr)

221 I want to run a firm, clear-minded, committed conservative candidate WHO WILL WIN.

Who?

Posted by: dagny at February 06, 2011 04:29 PM (6HG/9)

That's always an interesting question

Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 12:57 PM (z1N6a)

222

I honestly think Romney would be a better President at this point. Palin is definitely in my second/third (depending on who the "Other" folks are when it comes down to brass tacks) spot. 

Posted by: Lincolntf at February 06, 2011 04:50 PM (hUf/c)

After the way Romney got rick-rolled by Huck and McCain, I am not so sure.  If you are getting blitzed in the practice, the real game will likely not go well.

Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 01:01 PM (z1N6a)

223 After the way Romney got rick-rolled by Huck and McCain, I am not so sure. If you are getting blitzed in the practice, the real game will likely not go well. Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 05:01 PM (z1N6a) --------------- The guy said in his debate with Kennedy that he did not want to return to Reagan.. so there you have it.

Posted by: Flapjackmaka at February 06, 2011 01:04 PM (c5RQr)

224 I think I'll decide who I want on the basis of their reaction to the word : "bipartisan". Whoever recoils the most violently wins.

Posted by: dagny at February 06, 2011 01:05 PM (6HG/9)

225

Posted by: Oldcat

 

Yeah, there are a lot of factors to consider, and that's one of them. I've been a supporter of Romney since the Nineties, so him being involved in the 2008 primary felt almost like a victory to me. Certainly a step in the right direction. Doesn't mean he's perfect or anyone else in the field is incompetent/evil, he's just my preference. The primary campaign/debates will tell the tale. If he wins, he wins. If he loses, I support whoever the nominee is.

Posted by: Lincolntf at February 06, 2011 01:08 PM (hUf/c)

226 I think I'll decide who I want on the basis of their reaction to the word : "bipartisan". Whoever recoils the most violently wins.

Posted by: dagny at February 06, 2011 05:05 PM (6HG/9)

I was always wary of W's "Compassionate Conservatism" thing. It never seemed to make the other side tone down the hate either.

Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 01:09 PM (z1N6a)

227 The primary campaign/debates will tell the tale. If he wins, he wins. If he loses, I support whoever the nominee is.

Posted by: Lincolntf at February 06, 2011 05:08 PM (hUf/c)

Heresy! As the Ace-o-Spades comment threads go, SO GOES THE NATION!

Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 01:11 PM (z1N6a)

228 I will never again vote for another Moderate or RINO.  If teh GOP doesn't run a conservative, I stay home.  Let Obungler ride this fucker into the basement.

Posted by: SurferDoc at February 06, 2011 01:13 PM (o3bYL)

229 It will be my first time voting in 2012. I will not give my first vote to Romney or Huck

Posted by: Flapjackmaka at February 06, 2011 01:16 PM (c5RQr)

230 No he would not. Posted by: Flapjackmaka at February 06, 2011 04:56 PM

That's the kind of reaction to someone's preference for another candidate (that is, a candidate not named Palin) that makes me hope Ace will post a special Palin thread one day.

The ground rules would be simple: Palin supporters would be required to present factual information supporting their choice. No "but...but...but she single-handedly made the Canada-Alaska Gas Pipeline!!11!!...she kills moose with one hand while fighting off packs of rabid wolves with the other hand!!!...she would have dusted Katie Couric except for editing and trick questions!!!!...she's Teh Hawt!!!eleventy!!!!...all of you who don't love her are H8ters!!11!!!and so on.

In return, those with questions could ask them; snarks not permitted, but real questions about her ability, record, views.

I mean, you who support her do so based on reality, right? You're all more on the ball than orgasmic teeny-boppers swooning over the Beatles, right?

Posted by: MrScribbler© at February 06, 2011 01:22 PM (Ulu3i)

231 Posted by: MrScribbler© at February 06, 2011 05:22 PM (Ulu3i) I must've irritated you. Anyway I'm going to go watch GB win now.

Posted by: Flapjackmaka at February 06, 2011 01:24 PM (c5RQr)

232 You're all more on the ball than orgasmic teeny-boppers swooning over the Beatles, right? Posted by: MrScribbler© at February 06, 2011 05:22 PM (Ulu3i) That's gonna leave a mark... :-)

Posted by: Nighthawk at February 06, 2011 01:24 PM (g3gh5)

233 >>After the way Romney got rick-rolled by Huck and McCain, I am not so sure. If you are getting blitzed in the practice, the real game will likely not go well. And Reagan got smacked by Ford, and Reagan was much better known on the national stage at that point in their careers and Ford was a 2nd string fill in for an impeached president. Palin didn't exactly ring the bell against one of the dimmest bulbs in the donkey party, Biden, in their one debate. What's that prove? 2012 is a whole new ballgame. I'm willing to give Palin a chance but it's time for her to get off twitter and facebook, get off Fox News and engage. Reagan happily walked into hostile territory and won with his ability to make a persuasive argument against a very hostile press and public. Palin so far plays only to her base by tossing out bromides and whenever she is challenged her both she and her supporters whine about the unfairness of it all as if any politician on the right ever gets treated fairly. Her supporters can say all they want that the polls are meaningless and she is running a unique kind of campaign but all people can do is judger her on what she has done. She had a great opportunity after the 2010 election to demonstrate her ability on the world stage and her grasp of the complexities of the job at a very dangerous time. She may have done that for you but it's clear she has not done it for many outside her base. You can blame anyone but her but that's not going to make her candidacy any stronger.

Posted by: JackStraw at February 06, 2011 01:25 PM (TMB3S)

234 Reagan happily walked into hostile territory and won with his ability to make a persuasive argument against a very hostile press and public Posted by: JackStraw at February 06, 2011 05:25 PM (TMB3S) This. Two things must happen to insure that we win in 2012: 1) The MBM must be neutralized And 2) The MBM must be neutralized How that happens is pretty much up for grabs. The preferred method would be to nominate a ticket that had a "Reganesque" effect on the press- either by their own personality skills or by means of being something unassailable - for example could you imagine Katie Couric treating Liz Cheney, an outed lesbian, the same way she treated Palin? No way. Her PC-addled mind would fumble and stutter and allow no more difficult question than "what is your favorite color?" to pass her lips. Charlie Gibson? Fuggedaboudit. The other method of neutralizing the MBM is a bit dirtier and would fall to the likes of us. For example- I haven't heard Charlie Gibson deny raping that intern yet, have you?

Posted by: Nighthawk at February 06, 2011 01:42 PM (g3gh5)

235 I don't think Liz Cheney is the lesbian.  It's the other daughter, Mary. 

Posted by: Y-not at February 06, 2011 01:44 PM (pW2o8)

236 I was born in 1985. I barely remember Reagan on television. My deepest political regret is I was -19 years too young to vote for him. Going to the Reagan Library on Wednesday. I watched Fox today and saw the video of Reagan, and I'll admit it. I cried at the realization of how far we have just sunk. I will be an old man when we see another leader like that. If ever. My generation was raised in Reagan America (even through the years of Clinton, who held onto many of Reagan's advisors), and the FIRST big electoral move they did when they got the chance? Vote for Obama. It's terribly depressing. But the trip should be fun Wednesday, if seeing the Berlin Wall and thinking of Obamacare doesn't depress me further...

Posted by: CAC at February 06, 2011 01:45 PM (Hz91g)

237

could you imagine Katie Couric treating Liz Cheney, an outed lesbian, the same way she treated Palin? No way.

You're right.  I couldn't imagine it.  Mary Cheney is the outed lesbian, not Liz.

Posted by: RushBabe at February 06, 2011 01:46 PM (urYpw)

238 Re 248 251 My apologies, I had the wrong Cheney. But the principle is the same.

Posted by: Nighthawk at February 06, 2011 01:49 PM (g3gh5)

239 I hate it when I get the wrong lesbian, don't you? 

Posted by: SurferDoc at February 06, 2011 01:51 PM (o3bYL)

240 The media is so shameless that there really is no combination of candidates we could put up for POTUS/VP that wouldn't be subjected to smears and attacks.  We just have to find people who are able to weather it with class and rise above it. My recollection is that Reagan was quite good at that.  I like Palin as a person, but I think the attacks have gotten to her (and her circle of advisors) and it shows in some of her responses. 

Posted by: Y-not at February 06, 2011 01:54 PM (pW2o8)

241 hate it when I get the wrong lesbian, don't you? Posted by: SurferDoc at February 06, 2011 05:51 PM (o3bYL) Since this is, ostensibly, a family blog I will refrain from recounting some of the "Crocadile Dundee" moments I've witnessed over the years....

Posted by: Nighthawk at February 06, 2011 01:56 PM (g3gh5)

242 Reagan blew them off in a good-natured way, or pretended to do so.  After a few years of that they started calling him the Teflon President.

Posted by: SurferDoc at February 06, 2011 01:56 PM (o3bYL)

243 The media is so shameless that there really is no combination of candidates we could put up for POTUS/VP that wouldn't be subjected to smears and attacks. We just have to find people who are able to weather it with class and rise above it. My recollection is that Reagan was quite good at that. I like Palin as a person, but I think the attacks have gotten to her (and her circle of advisors) and it shows in some of her responses. Posted by: Y-not at February 06, 2011 05:54 PM (pW2o I agree whole-heartedly.

Posted by: Nighthawk at February 06, 2011 02:03 PM (g3gh5)

244 How come President Reagan was not hawking t-shirts   during the Challenger disaster speech?  Sure missed a great opportunity.

Posted by: wang dang doodle at February 06, 2011 05:02 PM (tXbf1)

245 Mary Cheney is the outed lesbian, not Liz. Posted by: RushBabe at February 06, 2011 05:46 PM (urYpw) Lez Cheney?

Posted by: CoolCzech at February 06, 2011 05:28 PM (tJjm/)

246 Aaaaaaand so yet another thread, this one meant to honor the 100th birthday of one of the greatest leaders of the 20th Century, is run off the rails and turned into a treatise on the glory of Sarah Palin™.

Awesome job, folks.

Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at February 06, 2011 06:42 PM (FYCiJ)

247 for me it isn't even about Palin so much, it's that any conservative to the right of Lindsey Graham automatically gets ripped to shreds and half the repubs join in, happens over and over and over... i'm sick of it.

Posted by: Shoey at February 06, 2011 09:07 PM (yCH89)

248

I was watching Ronald Reagan's inaurural speech went to take clothes from washer to dryer and now see George W Bush.  Is he our next republican icon?  I dislike O'Reilly on FNC, he is to easy on Obama.  I had television on when I paid attention to it, to CSPAN, I saw Sarah Palin's speech again along with Dick Cheney's and the Q & A that followed, which I founs interesting.

Rather than watch an Obama commerical on Fox , I am no into football, I changed to CNN or MSNBC. I'm sorry I was not paying attention to it but one host asked commentator if GWB might be the next republican that we honor, guest said only time will tell. 

 

Posted by: Carol at February 06, 2011 09:24 PM (bdB1C)

249 I know I'm pushing middle age....

But I still want to pursue Heroic Dreams!

That's fuckin' Awesome!


Gen X'rs bitch a lot, but at least we were ""there"" wen shit was happening.




Posted by: Deety is not above making chalk squeak, on purpose! at February 07, 2011 04:31 AM (Jb3+B)

250

Proud to say that my first time voting was for Reagan for President.  I still remember my mouth dropping open like a trouth when he gave his speech at the Berlin Wall.  He was a man seeped in midwestern values and love for his country that was unmistakable. He didn't equivocate, he didn't spin, when it mattered he called it like it was.  Whether or not you agreed with his every decision, there was no doubt that he loved his country and was doing the best job that he could in order to ensure it's survival and it's future.  He was a cheerleader, but it was real.  Not spin, not pomp and circumstance, he believed in America.

...to the point where I think that there was this general feeling like it would always be thus.  Something that was missed was that the strength and commitment, the fortitude and patriotism of those of the Greatest Generation would end with that generation. That unless WE the children of those people, didn't carry the mantle, it could be irrevocably lost in time.  We took it for granted.

That is what I've learned from living through the Reagan years and beyond.  That false sense of security that one has and then realizing late that if anyone is going to carry that on to pass it on to future generations, that can only come from US.

He isn't with us to be the elder statesman.  I can only imagine what would come out of his mouth were he to see the antics of present day DC.  With dignity and grace and a goodly sense of humour, lobbing well aimed verbal grenades at those who needed most to hear his words.

 

Posted by: JR at February 07, 2011 02:14 PM (jCNOU)

Posted by: kolla at February 12, 2011 01:33 AM (Nck7j)

252

solar panelThe main products we manufacture and export as below:

  Monocrystalline silicon solar panel, polycrystalline silicon solar panel, solar power system.

  solar street light, wind solar hybrid street light, solar garden light, solar sensor light, solar lawn light.

LED lamp for solar garden light, solar brick light, solar street lightsolar post cap, solar road stud, other solar lights and accessories

Posted by: srg at March 02, 2011 06:13 AM (XQ9/u)

253 You can may be discovered to be very splendid looking all round person, by just picking your most beloved where how can you buy abercrombie and fitchand fitch through the uk. even although you will step from home, each and every person.

Posted by: abercrombie and fitch uk at April 16, 2011 12:37 AM (9gvtN)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
233kb generated in CPU 0.1538, elapsed 0.3343 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.2829 seconds, 382 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.