February 06, 2011
— DrewM A selection of some of his greatest speeches.
First his seminal speech..."A Time For Choosing". A great speech from 1964 in support of Bary Goldwater. The depressing thing about it? Considering the speech is almost 50 years old and we are dealing with many of the same problems, we as a nation chose poorly.
Reagan's First Inaugural.
Favorite Quotes:
In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem....
So, as we begin, let us take inventory. We are a nation that has a government—not the other way around. And this makes us special among the nations of the Earth.
...
It is no coincidence that our present troubles parallel and are proportionate to the intervention and intrusion in our lives that result from unnecessary and excessive growth of government. It is time for us to realize that we are too great a nation to limit ourselves to small dreams. We are not, as some would have us believe, doomed to an inevitable decline. I do not believe in a fate that will fall on us no matter what we do. I do believe in a fate that will fall on us if we do nothing. So, with all the creative energy at our command, let us begin an era of national renewal. Let us renew our determination, our courage, and our strength. And let us renew our faith and our hope.
An excerpt from his Berlin Wall Speech.
Reagan makes teh funny. Yeah, he kicked the Soviets in the ass and laughed at them in the process.
I'll put up a few more but this is a good start.
Thanks to Nathan Wurtzel who did "A Regan Speech A Day" on Twitter for some of the suggestions. The Challenger Speech.
I love how he spoke directly to the kids watching the launch (this was the flight that had Krista McAuliffe, the First Teacher in Space on board). He told them death is a tragedy but it's part of the cost of exploration and that exploration must continue. Perfect.
The 40th Anniversary of D-Day
So many great moments to chose from. There's more here.
I think the fact that liberals like Barack Obama have to pretend to like Reagan and want to be seen as like him shows what an important, popular and transformative figure he was.
He wasn't perfect and he didn't win every fight but we'll be damn lucky if we see another like him in our lifetimes.
Posted by: DrewM at
09:12 AM
| Comments (254)
Post contains 421 words, total size 4 kb.
GE paid for RR to give pro capitalist speeches all over the country.
Now?
They are whoring for Obama.
Sad.
Posted by: Kemp at February 06, 2011 09:18 AM (JpFM9)
Sounds easy, doesn't it?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at February 06, 2011 09:20 AM (LH6ir)
We miss you, Ronnie.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 06, 2011 09:20 AM (9hSKh)
If one Reagan could rally the nation after the excesses, idiocy, treason and criminality of LBJ, Nixon, Ford and Carter, it would take an army of Reagans to begin undoing the ravages inflicted by the Traitor-in-Chief and his co-conspirators.
Posted by: MrScribbler© at February 06, 2011 09:22 AM (Ulu3i)
There's something about some people that makes or enables them to think they can fix everything with the proper application of power (they can't), and something about a lot of people that makes or enables them to think that someone else can fix everything for them (they can't).
And as an inevitable result, they fail, and we all pay for it. And each time they fail, the system gets more top-heavy and we all end up groaning from supporting it. Eventually, we can no longer afford the delusion.
I think we hit that point several years ago. Maybe a couple of decades.
Getting people to realize that is the hardest part - we can't afford it. Maybe the TEA Party folks understand, Ryan, Palin, a few others. Not enough.
Also, that's a lot of videos on the front page, Drew.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 06, 2011 09:22 AM (bxiXv)
Posted by: USS Diversity at February 06, 2011 09:24 AM (DLxD/)
Reagan was very much like Churchill in this regard concerning his writings, among other things.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 06, 2011 09:25 AM (9hSKh)
"A Time for Choosing" is a great speech. It will endure the test of time, as it already has. I saw it on TV as a child, and it was not incomprehensible to me then.
The questions raised and anwered then are still timely. To think that half the country thinks Reagan was a boob (including his son, namesake Ron, Jr.).
The country renewed itself under Reagan in the 80's because there were still people that remembered what was possible and what had been obscured and lost over the previous 20 years.. There are still people like that today, but they are much fewer in number, and the seed corn has, I fear, been eaten. There is no one on the political stage at this time, that can command the change of direction needed like Reagan did. (Sarah is a nice and courageous person in many ways, but her list of achievements is...thin. And better than half the country think she is an ignorant snow-billy.)
I think this country has lost its way in a profound manner, and I don't know if we can find our way out of this dark valley we are in. The final consequence of the Gramscian march through the institutions that began over 90 years ago.
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes..... at February 06, 2011 09:26 AM (sJTmU)
Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 09:26 AM (A0VTZ)
Posted by: MrScribbler© at February 06, 2011 01:22 PM (Ulu3i)
In a sick way, I wish Reagan would come back as a poltergeist and wreak havoc in the White House. I'm imagining Michelle screaming hysterically as she's chased down the halls by flying furniture from the Lincoln Bedroom.
Posted by: ErikW at February 06, 2011 09:27 AM (IfZbc)
Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 09:27 AM (A0VTZ)
It's the typical lazy liberal (but I repeat myself) charge against Reagan: he was stupid, he just read what was written, he was just an actor.
He knew American history, he knew world history, he understood the philosophical underpinnings of our republic, and he loved this country.
My dad met an old photographer who was in the same unit as Reagan. He said that Ronald Reagan was the nicest person he had ever met.
Not bad for a "parrot."
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at February 06, 2011 09:31 AM (LH6ir)
Yes, his version got rave review from the NYTs. I noted that as absolute horseshit.
Posted by: Vic at February 06, 2011 09:31 AM (M9Ie6)
He was able to organize enough communities to give 2 electoral ass-whuppings, first to Carter (489 EVs to 49) and then to Mondull (525 EVs to 10).
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 06, 2011 09:32 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: USS Diversity at February 06, 2011 09:36 AM (DLxD/)
GE paid for RR to give pro capitalist speeches all over the country.
Now?
They are whoring for Obama. They have been leftist and government whores forever. Did you know? Bobby Kennedy called up GE and told them to cancel GE Theater and can Reagan, or else they'd lose all their lucrative gocvernment contracts. GE did what it was told. That was 1962. Which gave Reagan plenty of time to support Goldwater and eventually run for president himself.
Posted by: Truman North at February 06, 2011 09:36 AM (+gfwN)
Posted by: t-bird at February 06, 2011 09:36 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Barry Obumbles at February 06, 2011 09:37 AM (zgZzy)
What's sick about that?
I'd be overjoyed if the ghost of Reagan went back to the White House. I'd even be willing to clean his vomit off the floor after he saw Osama Obama in "action."
We've endured a long, long fall from greatness since the days of RWR.
Posted by: MrScribbler© at February 06, 2011 09:38 AM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at February 06, 2011 09:38 AM (zgZzy)
I heard that "just an actor" charge as early as 9th grade, when my uber-lib football coach learned of my Rush Limbaugh listening habits and started hassling me about it.
While the hard-core libs still won't be won over by a logical argument about Reagan's prowess concerning history, economics, and foreign affairs, even an expert on Reagan will get a new appreciation of Reagan's mental acuity when reading through chapters and chapters of Regan's own writings.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 06, 2011 09:39 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Delta Smelt channeling Doc Brown at February 06, 2011 09:42 AM (A0VTZ)
Watch the videos of the real Ronald Reagan -- including those showing his warmth and humor -- and then try to endure two minutes'-worth of the inane babblings of our current "Republican leaders."
The answer is: we don't have one. Not even close.
Shit, we don't have anyone who could match up to Ike, or even JFK. Hubert Fuckin' Humphrey (who at least believed in the socialist crap he spewed) could mop the floor with a Mitch McConnell or John Boner.
Posted by: MrScribbler© at February 06, 2011 09:44 AM (Ulu3i)
Reagan was a good guy and a great leader, he put the Cold War in the "W" column for us, i'm very grateful for that.
but can we stop using the Reagan Yardstick to measure potenial conservative canidates now?
there ain't gonna be no more Reagan's, let's move on.
Posted by: Shoey at February 06, 2011 09:44 AM (yCH89)
Reagan had a good quip about the "He's just an actor charge":
"I'll probably be the first actor to win an Oscar posthumously".
/The quote may be a bit off, but the sentiment is the same.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 06, 2011 09:45 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at February 06, 2011 09:47 AM (zgZzy)
"The lesson of all this was, of course, that because we're a great nation, our challenges seem complex. It will always be this way. But as long as we remember our first principles and believe in ourselves, the future will always be ours. And something else we learned: Once you begin a great movement, there's no telling where it will end. We meant to change a nation, and instead, we changed a world."
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 06, 2011 09:48 AM (sZ+lP)
I regret to this day supporting Ford in 76. WTF was I thinking about?
Posted by: Kemp at February 06, 2011 09:48 AM (JpFM9)
there ain't gonna be no more Reagan's, let's move on.
Posted by: Shoey at February 06, 2011 01:44 PMWe're in today's pathetic and dangerous situation because we stopped using the "Reagan yardstick."
When a nation stops aspiring to greatness and honor, it ends up with lazy, corruptible (and corrupted) hacks in charge.
Posted by: MrScribbler© at February 06, 2011 09:48 AM (Ulu3i)
6 I don't know that I can define "the real problem," but I'm pretty sure that most of the things we think of our problem are symptoms of that problem. It's tempting to say it's a perverse desire for control, or power, or daddy issues, or whatever.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain
This is exactly right. Obama is not the problem. per se, although I loathe him and everything he claims to stand for.
The problem is the notion in the minds of many that we can have prosperity just by asking for it. That we "deserve" our way of life because of our American birth right. That making hard choices is "mean and icky", so lets not make any hard choices and just roll with it.
The problem is the same problem that has confronted Man and men since the first man discovered fire, and his friends probably ended up burning him at the stake for it.
The problem is the eternal struggle of the individual against the collective. The struggle of one man (or woman) to live their life as they see fit, regardless of the opinions of the many. The basic belief that one man has intrinsic value, and that no other man has the right to rule him unless he gives his consent by voting, and then even government, getting that consent, has limitations as to their reach and power.
A million academics, politicians and pundits will argue otherwise, and justify all the mini-tyrannies we accept in our everyday lives, "just to get along". But if our future is tyranny and not freedom, why bother?
"Live free or die" is not just a slogan for a license plate.
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes..... at February 06, 2011 09:48 AM (sJTmU)
http://tinyurl.com/4j5ysye
Posted by: ParisParamus at February 06, 2011 09:52 AM (zh69t)
The great thing about Reagan is that his speeches were filled with concepts and principles that had careful weight and meaning.
Obozo's speeches? Words. Platatudes. Nothingness. Empty soaring rhetoric. Hope and change signifying nothing. Well, not nothing - just the glossy outer shell to his Paul Krugman adherence to big socialist all-controlling government.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at February 06, 2011 09:53 AM (0fzsA)
Lord, how I miss him.
A surreal experience at church this morning. A woman who I've always assumed was a liberal (from CT, advanced degrees, etc.) came over to me and asked about our kid. I've always assumed she was a Barky supporter (we've still got a couple of Obama stickers in the parking lot), when she blurted how how she missed Reagan, and what a stinker we have as president now. And then she leaned in toward me, looked over her shoulder and whispered, "Please don't think I'm crazy, but I'm beginning to believe Obama really isn't a U. S. citizen. And I think he's trying to destroy this country. I'm sorry your son has to serve under him." And then she walked away.
My husband was a gobsmacked (and amused) as I when I told him about the encounter on the way home.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 06, 2011 09:53 AM (UOM48)
I read a good article a while back mainly on the subject of Sarah Palin and the drum beat from the left on how stupid she is and etc.and etc. But in the article the author brought up the fact that this type of attack is nothing new from the lying, deceitful left. He went on and listed every Republican president since Eisenhower and he quoted descriptions of each one by the left. And you know what? It seems that every one of them was lazy, stupid, incompetent, evil, disinterested, uncaring and on and on. If only we were all as smart as the left.
Posted by: PoconoJoe at February 06, 2011 09:54 AM (c4FgZ)
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at February 06, 2011 09:55 AM (0fzsA)
When a nation stops aspiring to greatness and honor, it ends up with lazy, corruptible (and corrupted) hacks in charge.
Posted by: MrScribbler© at February 06, 2011 01:48 PM (Ulu3i)
who said anything about not aspiring to greatness and honor? the Reagan Yardstick i'm speaking of is the one the RINO's use to club committed conservatives into not critizing them, into accepting the RINO position.
Posted by: Shoey at February 06, 2011 09:56 AM (yCH89)
the RINO's used the Reagan Yardstick to beat Sarah Palin to death and they are still using it, if Reagan were on the political scene today half of you would call him an idiot.
Reagan was a full spectrum conservative, the GOP is hard at work making sure no other full spectrum conservative ever gets nominated again.
Posted by: Shoey at February 06, 2011 10:01 AM (yCH89)
My how far we have fallen. I came of age in the Ronald Reagan 'shining city on a hill' era and I believe that I will get to see our great nations downfall due to the likes of Barky 'I'm sorry' Odumbass. Sad. Really, really sad.
Posted by: Truck Monkey at February 06, 2011 10:06 AM (yQWNf)
I been in this a LONG time. You really never know who will show up. Like I mentioned earlier, I supported Ford in 76. I loved RR, but I was chicken shit.
So it works out. I think Christie is the best shot right now. Sarah is good looking, etc, but that is not going to happen.
Don't sell out the crowd this early. What we need is fire in the belly, that would be Christie or Barbour. Fuck Newt and his ethanol sellout.
Posted by: Kemp at February 06, 2011 10:07 AM (JpFM9)
the RINO's used the Reagan Yardstick to beat Sarah Palin
*gasp* you actually mentioned she-who-shall-not-be-named.
It's like Mean Girls around here. You can't be in the clique unless you hate her too.
Posted by: beedubya at February 06, 2011 10:07 AM (AnTyA)
Sarah Palin can't hold Reagan's jock. Uh, ok bad visual, but still.
Let's get real here. Reagan spent years honing his message, learning and advocating his beliefs.
I'm sure the Great Communicator would have stayed away from reality shows as well.
Posted by: Delta Smelt channeling Doc Brown at February 06, 2011 10:08 AM (A0VTZ)
The power of RR's speeches is not in the delivery. During his Presidential years, I found his frequent sing-song voice annoying. The power is in the simple forceful articulation of the American idea and of historical truth.
When God calls Jimmy Carter home, let's see if Americans line the streets to honor him.
Posted by: Mr. Barky at February 06, 2011 10:09 AM (8EeTd)
Happy Birthday, Mr. President.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at February 06, 2011 10:12 AM (xUGL/)
Posted by: Jane D'oh
Don't ever be ashamed of your son's service as a Marine to the United States of America, especially because of Obama. He serves in the name of every American. Obama will pass in time, and things will turn again. But your son should ALWAYS be proud of serving as a Marine. He should always be proud he has been taught by some real tough hombres how to keep his honor clean.
I never served, I claim nothing in that way, But a lot of guys I knew (and still know) that were older than I served in Viet Nam, were treated with oblivious contempt at best, and sometimes a lot worse, for a lot of years. Most are STILL proud they wore this country's uniform when asked (or volunteered).
Always, ALWAYS be proud of who he is and why he volunteered to serve. I know I would be if he were my son. And I know your are. Just wanted to buck you up a bit.....
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes..... at February 06, 2011 10:13 AM (sJTmU)
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at February 06, 2011 02:12 PM (xUGL/)
Preach. I remember watching it live. So thankful my 1st memories of an American President are of him. It's been pretty disappointing ever since.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 10:14 AM (A0VTZ)
"The crisis we are facing today does not require of us the kind of sacrifice that Martin Treptow and so many thousands of others were called upon to make. It does require, however, our best effort and our willingness to believe in ourselves and to believe in our capacity to perform great deeds, to believe that together with God's help we can and will resolve the problems which now confront us. And after all, why shouldn't we believe that? We are Americans."
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 06, 2011 10:15 AM (sZ+lP)
Posted by: HeatherRadish is wearing a cheesehead at February 06, 2011 10:15 AM (ElYV9)
Posted by: buzzion at February 06, 2011 10:16 AM (oVQFe)
Incident at a frat house party at Youngstown St early this morning...12 shot/1 dead.
They don't mention the name of the frat..but the deceased is 25 year old Jamail Johnson who lived in the house
Posted by: beedubya at February 06, 2011 10:16 AM (AnTyA)
All that while continuing to field boring liberal shitty candidates like McCain who lose.
Posted by: Vic at February 06, 2011 10:16 AM (M9Ie6)
http://tinyurl.com/4j5ysye
Posted by: ParisParamus at February 06, 2011 01:52 PM (zh69t)
This is really good. I'm about 1/2 way through it.
Posted by: Tami-unban Nickless (99.174.64.43) at February 06, 2011 10:16 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: USS Diversity at February 06, 2011 10:17 AM (DLxD/)
Posted by: Annabelle at February 06, 2011 10:17 AM (4kxCX)
They don't mention the name of the frat..but the deceased is 25 year old Jamail Johnson who lived in the house
Don't knock it, friend.
Posted by: Stankowski from "Glory Daze" at February 06, 2011 10:19 AM (DLxD/)
Posted by: CoolCzech at February 06, 2011 10:19 AM (tJjm/)
I can't believe 30 years later America would elect an even bigger fuckup than carter. Obama couldn't lick Reagan's shoes.
Posted by: Berserker at February 06, 2011 10:22 AM (gWHrG)
All that while continuing to field boring liberal shitty candidates like McCain who lose.
Posted by: Vic at February 06, 2011 02:16 PM (M9Ie6)
11!
Posted by: Shoey at February 06, 2011 10:22 AM (yCH89)
Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 10:24 AM (A0VTZ)
A conservative candidate could find a cure for cancer, literally stop the seas from rising, and with a few well-chosen words, create global peace, and if he or she was the least bit squirrely looking, would be mocked and ridiculed into hiding. The average voter wants it all: charisma, looks, speechifying, and maybe a brain cell or two thrown in.
That's another reason we're all boned.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 06, 2011 10:24 AM (UOM48)
Someone has been hitting the Valu-Rite early today
Posted by: Uddercha0s at February 06, 2011 10:24 AM (cFPiX)
Posted by: Ben at February 06, 2011 10:24 AM (DKV43)
Happy birthday, Mr. President.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 06, 2011 10:25 AM (sZ+lP)
Fun Tweet:
AndrewBreitbart
Today @ericboehlert feigns reverence for Ronald Reagan. Here's 'Waist Up' Boehlert's attack on Reagan week he died: http://bit.ly/dIq0eEPosted by: AmishDude at February 06, 2011 10:27 AM (BvBKY)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 06, 2011 10:28 AM (UOM48)
I've been in a funk recently, recalling all the presidents I can remember living (and most times, suffering) through.
RR was the only one who had positive results. It was because of him that I became a conservative. The rest were mostly political hacks with only their power in mind, never what was best for America.
RIP, Mr. Reagan. I pray that your spirit will be reborn in America, and that we can become great once more.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at February 06, 2011 10:29 AM (b6qrg)
Fox is showing the Reagan Tribute and there is a bunch of Waiters on the stage in the band and in the audience.
I didn't know Reagan had such a waiter following.
Posted by: robtr at February 06, 2011 10:30 AM (hVDig)
Posted by: lowandslow, Packer fan at February 06, 2011 02:18 PM (GZitp)
how do we know that until we try?
Posted by: Shoey at February 06, 2011 10:30 AM (yCH89)
Did you just step out of a time machine? That's what all the "pragmatists" in the GOP said about Reagan before he was elected.
Posted by: Heorot at February 06, 2011 10:31 AM (btWzl)
Posted by: Rajiv Vindaloo at February 06, 2011 10:31 AM (BZ2Bm)
Likewise. Talk about uninspiring. Kemp-Dole would have been better against Clinton--still would have lost, but would have looked like the GOP was looking forward rather than backwards.
Posted by: HeatherRadish is wearing a cheesehead at February 06, 2011 10:32 AM (ElYV9)
Posted by: lowandslow, Packer fan at February 06, 2011 02:18 PM (GZitp)
Not to pee in your Wheaties, but polls have consistently shown that we're center-right and have been for over 40 years. If I could remember where the polls are, I'd post a link for you. And it's not just one, either.
We're overly succeptible to bullshit. That's how The Vapid One™ squirmed his way into office. The MBM never, ever, even once, looked into his radical background or examined his record. Or even told us anything about him other than he represented Hope&Change.
We got bamboozled, Shanghied, deceived, lied to, and screwed without even a kiss by the MBM. Except for those of us who actually did a little bit of research into this idiot who now props his hooves on the Defiant desk in the Oaffal Office. I think most of those who stupidly voted for him are silently regretting it.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at February 06, 2011 10:38 AM (b6qrg)
So much for gotcha journalism.
Reagan knew how to work the press, which is an essential skill any Reaganesque GOP candidate needs to possess.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 06, 2011 10:38 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Rajiv Vindaloo at February 06, 2011 10:39 AM (BZ2Bm)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius NO NICKLESS, NO PEACE at February 06, 2011 10:39 AM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at February 06, 2011 10:40 AM (b6qrg)
Posted by: Scott Brown, wicked smaht at February 06, 2011 10:40 AM (AnTyA)
Posted by: HeatherRadish is wearing a cheesehead at February 06, 2011 10:42 AM (ElYV9)
Thanks.
Posted by: sickinmass at February 06, 2011 02:43 PM (1rflU)
Make Believe Media. Ace coined it.
Posted by: Tami-unban Nickless (99.174.64.43) at February 06, 2011 10:44 AM (VuLos)
That's another reason we're all boned.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 06, 2011 02:24 PM
What the "average voter" fails to look for are the simple traits: honor, patriotism, a sense that a president serves America and not the other way around.
Reagan was admired by conservatives, and still is admired today. Some on the right (including some here) -- I'm not naming names -- have fallen into the trap so loved by the liberals: they worship particular candidates because they see those "average voter" traits. They look no farther, and defend their choices with platitudes and ad hominem attacks on the unconvinced.
I'm not going to worship any damn human, politician or otherwise. A select few, and Reagan was one of them -- perhaps the last among politicians in my lifetime as matters stand today -- earn our admiration.
When/if another is found, we may find ourselves back on the right path.
Posted by: MrScribbler© at February 06, 2011 10:44 AM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: Jake Scott at February 06, 2011 10:48 AM (zVOB7)
So much for gotcha journalism.
Reagan knew how to work the press, which is an essential skill any Reaganesque GOP candidate needs to possess.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 06, 2011 02:38 PM (9hSKh)
The press hated Reagan with a passion. Ron knew how to bypass them and make them irrelevant, not work them.
Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 10:49 AM (z1N6a)
Make Believe Media. Ace coined stole it.
Posted by: Scott Brown, wicked smaht at February 06, 2011 10:49 AM (AnTyA)
Make Believe Media. Ace coined stole it.
Posted by: Scott Brown, wicked smaht at February 06, 2011 02:49 PM (AnTyA)
Yeah...after I hit post I wondered whether he was repeating it or came up with it. Thieving friggin' ewoks.
Posted by: Tami-unban Nickless (99.174.64.43) at February 06, 2011 10:51 AM (VuLos)
If you have the chance visit the Reagan Library it is amazing. I've been there twice and plan to go again this year.
Posted by: mpfs at February 06, 2011 10:53 AM (3TjSM)
Obamao is as close to the anti Reagan as you could get; Reagan loved the United States and hated communism. Obamao - just the opposite; so for Obamao to be using Reagan's techniques to try to sell a megaton of crap to the American people is something approaching sacrilege.
Posted by: An Observation at February 06, 2011 10:55 AM (ylhEn)
If you have the chance visit the Reagan Library it is amazing. I've been there twice and plan to go again this year.
Posted by: mpfs at February 06, 2011 02:53 PM (3TjSM)
They've apparently redone the whole exhibit area. Plus the AirForce One extension if you haven't see that.
I live a couple miles away from it.
Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 10:56 AM (z1N6a)
Posted by: An Observation at February 06, 2011 02:55 PM (ylhEn)
Reagan's 'Technique' was sincerity. Don't think Barry can afford to try that one.
Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 10:57 AM (z1N6a)
Where is it?
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 06, 2011 10:57 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Jake Scott at February 06, 2011 02:48 PM (zVOB7)
Well, you have one party that has no principles, so they have to run an unknown. Then you take a second party that is afraid to say what its principles are because someone might make fun of them, and there you have it.
Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 10:59 AM (z1N6a)
Liberals see everything through "messaging". To them, the reason why lost big last election cycle was because we had better messaging.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 06, 2011 10:59 AM (9hSKh)
Where is it?
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 06, 2011 02:57 PM (9hSKh)
Simi Valley, right off the 23. Right on the border of Simi and Thousand Oaks.
Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 10:59 AM (z1N6a)
If you have the chance visit the Reagan Library it is amazing
(sigh) It just hit me that Jug Ears will get his own too.
I can see it now...Communist Manifesto, Rules for Radicals, the book about himself that he wrote, the one that Bill Ayers wrote for him...
Posted by: beedubya at February 06, 2011 11:00 AM (AnTyA)
Posted by: CoolCzech at February 06, 2011 11:01 AM (tJjm/)
I admire SP because she fights, she fights because she believes, no sane person would take the battering she has and keep going unless they cared very deeply about the future of this country, also she has the right idea's, she wants to put America back to work building things, making things. Oil wells, coal mines, light and heavy industry of all kinds are what this country needs and she knows and will actually do something about it rather than just talk about it.
you think Huckabee or Romney has the balls to tell the EPA to sit down and shut the fuck up?
Sarah does...
Posted by: Shoey at February 06, 2011 11:02 AM (yCH89)
Which means I'll never get to see it. Damn.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 06, 2011 11:02 AM (9hSKh)
To the leftist, it's "obvious" that they are right and we are wrong. Therefore, they must not be explaining themselves well enough. People are getting confused by listening to the wrong kinds of news shows or whatever.
Their attack plan against this "deception" on the right is to 1) silence the right and 2) figure out how to tell people what they want to hear.
Posted by: Truman North at February 06, 2011 11:05 AM (+gfwN)
Posted by: CoolCzech at February 06, 2011 11:05 AM (tJjm/)
Before and after he was elected he was reviled and ridiculed just as She Who Must Not Be Named is now. He beat their asses. Clues are available for the clueless.
Posted by: SurferDoc at February 06, 2011 11:07 AM (o3bYL)
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at February 06, 2011 11:08 AM (c5RQr)
you think Huckabee or Romney has the balls to tell the EPA to sit down and shut the fuck up?
Sarah does...
Yep. #1 reason I like Palin and Bachmann is they have bigger balls than any other Republicans now on the national stage, including Christie.
Bye for now, Morons! See you tomorrow probably.
Posted by: Truman North at February 06, 2011 11:08 AM (+gfwN)
Posted by: Tami-unban Nickless (99.174.64.43) at February 06, 2011 11:09 AM (VuLos)
Which means I'll never get to see it. Damn.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 06, 2011 03:02 PM (9hSKh)
Bah. Pop out, have Rum take you do Disneyland and see the library. Fly into Burbank and avoid most of LA.
Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 11:10 AM (z1N6a)
Just sayin'.
Posted by: The War Betwen the Undead States at February 06, 2011 11:10 AM (FYCiJ)
Posted by: Tami-unban Nickless (99.174.64.43) at February 06, 2011 03:09 PM (VuLos)
I have it, it is excellent.
Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 11:10 AM (z1N6a)
I used to live across the street from the library in Wood Ranch.
I did get to see the new Air Force One Pavilion, it is awesome.
Posted by: mpfs at February 06, 2011 11:11 AM (3TjSM)
Posted by: CoolCzech at February 06, 2011 11:12 AM (tJjm/)
I have it, it is excellent.
Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 03:10 PM (z1N6a)
Good....thanks. Done. (I have my kindle in front of me....2 clicks and it's mine.)
Posted by: Tami-unban Nickless (99.174.64.43) at February 06, 2011 11:12 AM (VuLos)
I did get to see the new Air Force One Pavilion, it is awesome.
Posted by: mpfs at February 06, 2011 03:11 PM (3TjSM)
Howdy, ex neighbor. I'm right off of Arboles on the 23.
Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 11:12 AM (z1N6a)
Just sayin'.
Posted by: The War Betwen the Undead States at February 06, 2011 03:10 PM (FYCiJ)
every day is a good day to die when you have nothing to lose...
Posted by: Shoey at February 06, 2011 11:15 AM (yCH89)
Before and after he was elected he was reviled and ridiculed just as She Who Must Not Be Named is now. He beat their asses. Clues are available for the clueless.
Really? the left joked about Reagan being gang-raped by a "bunch of brothers".
Did they ever refer to his gentials as "a fucking disgusting retard making fucking cunt"?
Did they ever joke about raping his kids?
Did they ever change the text of a play performed by school kids to say that he should have his head cut off?
Has any comedienne, D-rated as she may be, ever say she was going to target and destroy his 16 year old daughter?
Has any over-the-hill late night TV host ever joked about statutory rape of his 14 year old?
Posted by: beedubya at February 06, 2011 11:16 AM (AnTyA)
A Time For Snoozing
A Time For Schmoozing
A Time For Losing
A Time For Choosing Golf Courses
Posted by: GnuBreed at February 06, 2011 11:18 AM (bvXGR)
No we're not a center right country, we have moved so far to the left we just think we are. No way in hell would we have allowed same sex marriages or gay's in the military thirty years ago.
Uh we're not allowing it now. Everytime it comes up to a ballot even in liberal looney land it gets defeated. We don't get to choose about gays in the military. These are things being forced on us when they do occur. We are not allowing them.
No way would we have allowed mass immigration from Muslim countries fifty years ago, hell even universal healthcare was impossible just twenty years ago.
50 years ago muslim immigrants wouldn't be much of an issue, its been in the past 30 years they have become radicalized. And again universal healthcare is opposed by the majority of the country. That's again something force on us against our will.
Things like Title IX were hotly contested, now accepted. Things like single motherhood and divorce carried a stigma, now it's universally accepted. Now it's taboo just to mention black crime or to mention that Islam isn't compatible with western culture.
I could go on and on so don't me we're a center-right country.
Posted by: lowandslow, Packer fan at February 06, 2011 02:52 PM (GZitp)
So sorry but we are a center right country. Its liberals in the government that are acting against the will of the people doing what the nation does not want. Your examples point all this out.
Posted by: buzzion at February 06, 2011 11:18 AM (oVQFe)
Posted by: felix concolor at February 06, 2011 11:20 AM (vXagV)
Posted by: Joe Biden at February 06, 2011 11:21 AM (AnTyA)
Back from a quick jaunt to Walmart, which was surprisingly busy for a First Sunday (fast Sunday) in Utah. My tummy is still a bit off after that food poisoning so not hot wings today... instead we're going with nice, lean elk medallions and tater tots (latter bought at said Walmart). Comfort foods.
Go Pack!
Posted by: Y-not at February 06, 2011 11:21 AM (pW2o8)
Posted by: Nighthawk at February 06, 2011 11:25 AM (g3gh5)
Posted by: Barry O, SuperFan at February 06, 2011 11:26 AM (ElYV9)
Mark Steyn, who knows a thing or two about the Golden Age of Hollywood, on Reagan's film career.
Posted by: Barry O, SuperFan at February 06, 2011 11:27 AM (ElYV9)
Posted by: SurferDoc at February 06, 2011 11:27 AM (o3bYL)
Posted by: HeatherRadish is wearing a cheesehead at February 06, 2011 11:28 AM (ElYV9)
The Westerner - Badger Clark
My fathers sleep on the sunrise plains,
And each one sleeps alone.
Their trails may dim to the grass and rains,
For I choose to make my own.
I lay proud claim to their blood and name,
But I lean on no dead kin;
My name is mine, for the praise or scorn,
And the world began when I was born
And the world is mine to win.
They built high towns on their old log sills,
Where the great, slow rivers gleamed,
But with new, live rock from the savage hills
I'll build as they only dreamed.
The smoke scarce dies where the trail camp
lies,
Till the rails glint down the pass;
The desert springs into fruit and wheat
And I lay the stones of a solid street
Over yesterday's untrod grass.
I waste no thought on my neighbor's birth
Or the way he makes his prayer.
I grant him a white man's room on earth
If his game is only square.
While he plays it straight I'll call him mate;
If he cheats I drop him flat.
Old class and rank are a wornout lie,
For all clean men are as good as I,
And a king is only that.
I dream no dreams of a nurse-maid state
That will spoon me out my food.
A stout heart sings in the fray with fate
And the shock and sweat are good.
From noon to noon all the earthly boon
That I ask my God to spare
Is a little daily bread in store,
With the room to fight the strong for more,
And the weak shall get their share.
The sunrise plains are a tender haze
And the sunset seas are gray,
But I stand here, where the bright skies blaze
Over me and the big today.
What good to me is a vague "maybe"
Or a mournful "might have been,"
For the sun wheels swift from morn to morn
And the world began when I was born
And the world is mine to win.
I used to hang out at "Scrappleface" years ago, and I remember thinking of this poem and posting it on the day Ron Reagan died. I thought it fit him.
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes..... at February 06, 2011 11:29 AM (sJTmU)
Posted by: SurferDoc at February 06, 2011 03:27 PM (o3bYL)
I'm a little unclear on what it proves if Reagan was attacked slightly more or slightly less than certain current figures.
Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 11:33 AM (z1N6a)
I can't watch the movies of my beloved late father and I can't watch Reagan for very long---It's actually painful. The two also remind me of each other so much that the loss melds together to form one big hurt and a feeling of not being as safe again.
I wonder if that feeling of vunerability--in a cosmic way--not a literal one comes with age and seeing the ideosyncrosies of life or if figures like him were so inspiring and so imbued with character that there loss leaves a chasm?
Posted by: dagny at February 06, 2011 11:34 AM (6HG/9)
131 They failed to mention that Barak Obama Sr was a drunk who had already lost his legs and frequently drove drunk? Whoops. Can't let the narrative get in the way of the truth.
As for Reagan, they treated him like shit too. Maybe not as badly as Palin but only because society wasn't as base as it is today. They celebrated his shooting.
What I remember most from college is their producing movies about how quickly everyone would sicken and die after the Reagan induced nuclear holocaust. I also remember taking the young democrat bus to the polls to vote for reagan and jesse helms. There was no republican bus and I felt like their assisting me in my vote was amusing.
Posted by: dagny at February 06, 2011 11:39 AM (6HG/9)
I can't watch the movies of my beloved late father and I can't watch Reagan for very long---It's actually painful. The two also remind me of each other so much that the loss melds together to form one big hurt and a feeling of not being as safe again.
I wonder if that feeling of vunerability--in a cosmic way--not a literal one comes with age and seeing the ideosyncrosies of life or if figures like him were so inspiring and so imbued with character that there loss leaves a chasm?
Posted by: dagny at February 06, 2011 03:34 PM (6HG/9)
I don't remember Reagan making me feel safer - the times were still dangerous, with the Russians dominating a good part of the world. It was nice to feel strong, and able to face the problems without being held back by our own fears of acting. Its easy to cry about how hard things are and how boned everything is. Its harder to go fix things.
Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 11:39 AM (z1N6a)
Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 11:42 AM (A0VTZ)
I'm wearing green and gold party beads over a black sweater. Alas, no cheese head.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 06, 2011 11:42 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 11:43 AM (A0VTZ)
It's still a more prestigious resume item than anything in Obama's past.
Posted by: nickless the still-banned (99.174.64.43) at February 06, 2011 11:44 AM (qdtoY)
Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 02:24 PM (A0VTZ)
Oh gawd! Make my long nightmare end, now!
Posted by: Papa Editor at February 06, 2011 11:45 AM (YX6i/)
I don't remember Reagan making me feel safer - the times were still dangerous, with the Russians dominating a good part of the world.
Huh. I remember clearly feeling like we were so far more powerful when the hostages were released than when that actual fool Carter was in. I also knew that he was a powerful figure for good when watching him at Reykjavik. The soviets were still there but didn't seem to be winning. We were holding our own. No one was telling me to turn down my thermostat or get in line for gas. There was an optimism and a feeling that the United States was going to prevail. I never got the sense that Reagan was clueless as to who and what we were.
Posted by: dagny at February 06, 2011 11:46 AM (6HG/9)
Oh gawd! Make my long nightmare end, now!
Heh. You know what I'm talking about.
Congrats on the little one by the way. Haven't seen you around since the big news.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 11:47 AM (A0VTZ)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 06, 2011 11:48 AM (sZ+lP)
Posted by: Downsized Upscale at February 06, 2011 03:19 PM (IhHdM)
Did I miss something?
"Sarah Palin is fucking AWESOME!!!!1!!!eleven!!!!!!"
(waits to see if he gets banned)
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 06, 2011 11:50 AM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Y-not at February 06, 2011 11:51 AM (pW2o8)
Peter Robinson reminds me of Don Larsen in a way. Larsen is famous for one thing, throwing a perfect game in the World Series in 56.
Robinson, when he dies, the 1st thing mentioned will be that he wrote the "Tear Down This Wall" Speech.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 11:51 AM (A0VTZ)
Posted by: justin cord at February 06, 2011 11:53 AM (2C3OH)
/I was 3yo in '88, so I have stories & CDs but not memories.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 06, 2011 11:55 AM (sZ+lP)
Posted by: dagny at February 06, 2011 03:46 PM (6HG/9)
I do remember the left (particularly academia) going ballistic on Reagan (not quite as shrill or vulgar as with Palin), but I also remember that a lot of places we assume are lefty warehouses of propaganda today got caught up in America in the 80s.
I remember some bands going from vapid or anti-America (or more accurately vapid social commentary that resulted in same) to seeing a lot more positive and even pro-American sentiment. I remember having lost the early 70s "good feelings" for a grimmer view, a lot of TV shows and pop culture leaned back toward people working together and finding happy endings.
I remember that shaking when Bush I was elected, and the academic voice of criticism getting louder, and then that "good vibe" going away after Clinton was elected.
I think the "bad vibe" got pretty well entrenched and hasn't gone away since.
It's a shallow metric, but it means *something* if not everything.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 06, 2011 11:55 AM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Y-not at February 06, 2011 03:51 PM (pW2o
(shrug) A lot of people identify with her more strongly than any political figure in recent memory, and have taken the record-breaking ration of shit she's received quite personally.
Yeah, it's pretty maudlin (another word of the day for me), but I get it.
How's your tummy?
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 06, 2011 11:57 AM (bxiXv)
Not 100%, but good enough for some elk medallions, tater tots (mmmm...), and cheesey-cauliflower. Go Pack!
Posted by: Y-not at February 06, 2011 12:01 PM (pW2o8)
Posted by: Y-not
If I had a nickel for every time a Palin supporter mocked another candidate (can you say "Mutt" or "Mittens"?) in the same thread that they bellyached about getting no respect, I'd be one wealthy mofo.
Posted by: Bill Clinton at February 06, 2011 12:01 PM (hUf/c)
If I had a nickel for every time a Palin supporter mocked another candidate (can you say "Mutt" or "Mittens"?) in the same thread that they bellyached about getting no respect, I'd be one wealthy mofo.
Posted by: Bill Clinton at February 06, 2011 04:01 PM (hUf/c)
People were calling Romney names before Palin was a blip on the frickin' radar. Jeez.
Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 12:03 PM (z1N6a)
Posted by: dagny at February 06, 2011 12:06 PM (6HG/9)
I wish she'd announce that she's not running in 2012 just so we can get down to business of trying to identify and groom the best possible candidate.
Posted by: Y-not at February 06, 2011 12:07 PM (pW2o8)
Posted by: SurferDoc at February 06, 2011 12:07 PM (o3bYL)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 06, 2011 12:08 PM (sZ+lP)
Posted by: dagny at February 06, 2011 04:06 PM (6HG/9)
Yeah. I'm not sure why anyone needs to win the blog comments war rather than the primaries. I'm willing to let the campaigns and the voters decide.
Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 12:08 PM (z1N6a)
Posted by: Lincolntf at February 06, 2011 04:01 PM (hUf/c)
So, the way Romney and Palin have been treated for the last couple of years by the MBM and the chattering classes is somehow equivalent?
I get what you're saying, but while there's a "whiner" aspect to it, especially the "I'm about to be banned" histrionics, there isn't some balance of insults being maintained here, and it's not hypocritical for someone who supports a candidate to disparage a different candidate. That part's pretty normal.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 06, 2011 12:09 PM (bxiXv)
You're right.
I remember all of the slurs well, especially how he was going to get us into WWIII. I remember how "no one" voted for Reagan -- twice.
He did have a wonderful quality of being able to deal with a negative press without it getting to him. Bush (W) was sort of stoic about it all (which was amazing in and of itself), but Reagan actually somehow went beyond that. He just seemed more, I don't know, charming or warm or something no matter what they said.
Posted by: Y-not at February 06, 2011 12:11 PM (pW2o8)
I know Palin boosters didn't invent mocking other candidates, they just complain about it more than anyone else.
I'm talking about the intramural mockery, not the real sick shit that comes from the Left.
Posted by: Lincolntf at February 06, 2011 12:11 PM (hUf/c)
Posted by: dagny at February 06, 2011 12:13 PM (6HG/9)
Posted by: Nighthawk at February 06, 2011 12:14 PM (g3gh5)
Posted by: Y-not at February 06, 2011 04:07 PM (pW2o
I keep hearing about this, but I sure haven't seen this kind of thing nearly as much as blasting anyone mentioning Palin lately. I'm not saying it didn't happen, but the counteroffensive is just as bad.
If you think they are over the top, make a joke out of it. Like the Ron Paul stuff, or the "You know who this helps - Mitt Romney" lines of yesteryear. Because the Purity versus CounterPurity war isn't that amusing, or effective since SP got about 45 percent in that poll the other day.
Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 12:15 PM (z1N6a)
Posted by: Y-not at February 06, 2011 04:11 PM (pW2o
He was able to get past them and connect to the voters. His "There you go again" line is an example of talking to the audience over the reporters or debate opponents.
Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 12:17 PM (z1N6a)
I'm just hoping George Pataki throws his hat in the ring so folks have a real choice in 2012.
(I really don't have to use the sarc tag on this one do I?)
Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 12:17 PM (A0VTZ)
I know Palin boosters didn't invent mocking other candidates, they just complain about it more than anyone else.
It feels left.
It may not be but most of it is about how she can't win because she's........not left enough........ or is damaged (by the left) or .........something. I'm no huge supporter and I'd rather her stay in her role as king-maker but I completely understand how disparaging her seems.........left-ish..........and how that gets the ire up.
Posted by: dagny at February 06, 2011 12:17 PM (6HG/9)
Check out PowerLine's video of Mike Wallace interviewing Reagan on 60 Lies Minutes.
Wallace comes out as the total asshole he is while Reagan comes out as a giant.
Posted by: Ed Anger at February 06, 2011 12:17 PM (7+pP9)
I'm a life long Republican. I started working Presidential campaigns when I was 10 (Nixon vs McGovern). I have always voted Republican for POTUS and for everyone except a handful of local candidates over the years. But I'm a RINO now. Pretty laughable.
Posted by: Y-not at February 06, 2011 12:19 PM (pW2o8)
Here's to you, Gipper!
Posted by: Andy at February 06, 2011 12:19 PM (veZ9n)
So they take it personally.
Me, I think the left are going to pick our candidate, and we're boned. I think we're too far down the road for even difficult fixes, to hell with easy ones, and we can only fix our problems with some pretty disastrous changes - and we aren't going to do that.
Again, maybe I'm being grumpy.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 06, 2011 12:20 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Shit Reagan Said Vol 11 at February 06, 2011 12:21 PM (1fB+3)
I mock Palin and Mittens.
Thing is, Mittens can beat OWaffle...
Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 04:08 PMWhen you get down to it, that's the real motivation of the Anybody But Palin crowd. They don't really care about her lack of Big Government Experience, her gaffes, or lack of sophistication, it all comes down to "we don't think she can win". Fair enough, just say that.
Reagan ran in 1968, 1976, and 1980. Each time we were assured by the powerbrokers in the GOP and their MBM buddies that "Reagan is too extreme to be electable"
That's why we got Nixon, Ford, and almost Bush Sr. We got Dole and McCain because they were considered to be non-controversial and easily expendable
Posted by: kbdabear at February 06, 2011 12:21 PM (vdfwz)
"we don't think she can win". Fair enough, just say that.
I think you make a good point.
I like the lady, just have slowly soured on her over the last couple years for various reasons of which I'm in too good a mood today to list.
At this point I don't think she can win, so I look elsewhere.
Nothing personal, only business.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 12:24 PM (A0VTZ)
Posted by: Rajiv Vindaloo at February 06, 2011 02:31 PM (BZ2Bm)
Heh. That would be me.
Posted by: Herr Blücher at February 06, 2011 12:24 PM (5DwhA)
Anyone else remember that poll (I hate polls) about how beltway people (regardless of party) had a much more favorable view of government action than non-beltway (also regardless of party)? We don't have a citizen legislature, we have a professional legislature.
We explain things to them and they LITERALLY don't understand because they LITERALLY live in a diffeent world from the one we live in.
I don't know if we can fix that problem.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 06, 2011 12:24 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Nighthawk at February 06, 2011 12:24 PM (g3gh5)
Posted by: Papa Editor at February 06, 2011 12:25 PM (YX6i/)
Merovign,
I see similarities in "there were no wmds" and "oh, no not palin". Ugh. And because of that, you are probably right.
Posted by: dagny at February 06, 2011 12:25 PM (6HG/9)
Well, off to pretend I care who wins the Super Bowl. Go Coke commercial! Go Budweiser Clydesdales!
Woo-hoo!
Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 06, 2011 12:25 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: soothsayer flies air lingus, wink wink at February 06, 2011 12:25 PM (fH/eE)
Posted by: USS Diversity at February 06, 2011 12:29 PM (DLxD/)
So, just stop saying the Seahawks can't win the Super Bowl.
Posted by: Papa Editor at February 06, 2011 12:31 PM (YX6i/)
Posted by: Papa Editor at February 06, 2011 12:33 PM (YX6i/)
Posted by: Fawn Libowitz at February 06, 2011 12:33 PM (zVOB7)
Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 12:33 PM (A0VTZ)
Posted by: Leonard Church at February 06, 2011 12:34 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: soothsayer flies air lingus, wink wink at February 06, 2011 12:35 PM (fH/eE)
Posted by: Nighthawk at February 06, 2011 12:35 PM (g3gh5)
Posted by: Papa Editor at February 06, 2011 12:36 PM (YX6i/)
Palin ain't it- the media can play her like a Stradivarius and that fault, unfortunately, eliminates her as a candidate.
Posted by: Nighthawk at February 06, 2011 04:24 PM (g3gh5)
Well, then, when you find a firm, clear-minded, committed conservative candidate who has mastery over the lying, idologically-driven press corps, you just let us know.
I think both sides in this argument have to look up to see their pie. Which makes me sad like a bird who lost his french fry.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 06, 2011 12:37 PM (bxiXv)
he'd never be able to keep them on from all the butter covering his fingers.
Heh. Yup. Big time fumbler. Everyone always talked about his small hands.
Let me talk some more about Sarah Palin so I stay on the topic of Ronald Reagan, and not offend anyone.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at February 06, 2011 12:38 PM (A0VTZ)
Anything other than 100% defense of Palin against any real or perceived slight by anyone in the pundit or political class results in charges of RINOism. I'm sick to death of it.
Posted by: Y-not at February 06, 2011 04:07 PM (pW2o
I don't know. Remember now its gotten to the point where people criticizing Palin claim martyr status. You make a criticism of Palin and then immediately begin whining about being called a RINO sometimes before anyone even starts in at you. It gets annoying in both regards, and is really just a continuation of morons on both sides of the spectrum wanting to purge the other and thinking that will be the winning strategy.
Posted by: buzzion at February 06, 2011 12:38 PM (oVQFe)
Posted by: Papa Editor at February 06, 2011 12:39 PM (YX6i/)
Posted by: buzzion at February 06, 2011 12:39 PM (oVQFe)
Posted by: Nighthawk at February 06, 2011 12:40 PM (g3gh5)
I don't know that I agree with her on every issue. I didn't see enough of her in action to know where she stands on everything I care about.
I know I agree with Rush Limbaugh on a helluva lot of things, but I wouldn't vote for him to be President.
Palin is a pundit now, in my eyes.
Posted by: Y-not at February 06, 2011 12:40 PM (pW2o8)
Posted by: Tami-unban Nickless (99.174.64.43) at February 06, 2011 12:40 PM (VuLos)
Posted by: soothsayer flies air lingus, wink wink at February 06, 2011 12:41 PM (fH/eE)
Posted by: CoolCzech at February 06, 2011 12:43 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: justin cord at February 06, 2011 12:43 PM (2C3OH)
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at February 06, 2011 12:44 PM (c5RQr)
Posted by: Nighthawk at February 06, 2011 12:45 PM (g3gh5)
Posted by: Tami-unban Nickless (99.174.64.43) at February 06, 2011 12:45 PM (VuLos)
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at February 06, 2011 12:46 PM (c5RQr)
Posted by: eman at February 06, 2011 12:47 PM (QUxm7)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at February 06, 2011 12:48 PM (xdHzq)
Posted by: JackStraw at February 06, 2011 12:49 PM (TMB3S)
I honestly think Romney would be a better President at this point. Palin is definitely in my second/third (depending on who the "Other" folks are when it comes down to brass tacks) spot.
As to the "electability" issues, I believe she could win. It would be ridiculously tough, but she's got spine and principles, so it's not unthinkable. Romney will be skewered as a "Ken doll" (attractiveness is only a virtue in Dems) and mocked as a "RINO" (need I explicate?) by the "concerned" MSM no matter what his positions are. If they succeed in turning him into a caricature the way they turned Obama into a legend he'll have a tough row to hoe.
Posted by: Lincolntf at February 06, 2011 12:50 PM (hUf/c)
I want a naturally large breasted beautiful blonde wife who cooks like a gourmet, has an encyclopedic mind, loves sports but shuts up during the game, doesn't cheat, has a big inheritance coming, can sing, dance, has a great family, holds conservative viewpoints, and gives a world class blowjob
Many of us are looking for a custom fit in an off the rack world
Posted by: kbdabear at February 06, 2011 12:51 PM (vdfwz)
Posted by: Nighthawk at February 06, 2011 12:54 PM (g3gh5)
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at February 06, 2011 12:56 PM (c5RQr)
Who?
Posted by: dagny at February 06, 2011 04:29 PM (6HG/9)
That's always an interesting question
Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 12:57 PM (z1N6a)
I honestly think Romney would be a better President at this point. Palin is definitely in my second/third (depending on who the "Other" folks are when it comes down to brass tacks) spot.
Posted by: Lincolntf at February 06, 2011 04:50 PM (hUf/c)
After the way Romney got rick-rolled by Huck and McCain, I am not so sure. If you are getting blitzed in the practice, the real game will likely not go well.
Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 01:01 PM (z1N6a)
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at February 06, 2011 01:04 PM (c5RQr)
Posted by: dagny at February 06, 2011 01:05 PM (6HG/9)
Posted by: Oldcat
Yeah, there are a lot of factors to consider, and that's one of them. I've been a supporter of Romney since the Nineties, so him being involved in the 2008 primary felt almost like a victory to me. Certainly a step in the right direction. Doesn't mean he's perfect or anyone else in the field is incompetent/evil, he's just my preference. The primary campaign/debates will tell the tale. If he wins, he wins. If he loses, I support whoever the nominee is.
Posted by: Lincolntf at February 06, 2011 01:08 PM (hUf/c)
Posted by: dagny at February 06, 2011 05:05 PM (6HG/9)
I was always wary of W's "Compassionate Conservatism" thing. It never seemed to make the other side tone down the hate either.
Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 01:09 PM (z1N6a)
Posted by: Lincolntf at February 06, 2011 05:08 PM (hUf/c)
Heresy! As the Ace-o-Spades comment threads go, SO GOES THE NATION!
Posted by: Oldcat at February 06, 2011 01:11 PM (z1N6a)
Posted by: SurferDoc at February 06, 2011 01:13 PM (o3bYL)
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at February 06, 2011 01:16 PM (c5RQr)
That's the kind of reaction to someone's preference for another candidate (that is, a candidate not named Palin) that makes me hope Ace will post a special Palin thread one day.
The ground rules would be simple: Palin supporters would be required to present factual information supporting their choice. No "but...but...but she single-handedly made the Canada-Alaska Gas Pipeline!!11!!...she kills moose with one hand while fighting off packs of rabid wolves with the other hand!!!...she would have dusted Katie Couric except for editing and trick questions!!!!...she's Teh Hawt!!!eleventy!!!!...all of you who don't love her are H8ters!!11!!!and so on.
In return, those with questions could ask them; snarks not permitted, but real questions about her ability, record, views.
I mean, you who support her do so based on reality, right? You're all more on the ball than orgasmic teeny-boppers swooning over the Beatles, right?
Posted by: MrScribbler© at February 06, 2011 01:22 PM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at February 06, 2011 01:24 PM (c5RQr)
Posted by: Nighthawk at February 06, 2011 01:24 PM (g3gh5)
Posted by: JackStraw at February 06, 2011 01:25 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: Nighthawk at February 06, 2011 01:42 PM (g3gh5)
Posted by: Y-not at February 06, 2011 01:44 PM (pW2o8)
Posted by: CAC at February 06, 2011 01:45 PM (Hz91g)
could you imagine Katie Couric treating Liz Cheney, an outed lesbian, the same way she treated Palin? No way.
You're right. I couldn't imagine it. Mary Cheney is the outed lesbian, not Liz.
Posted by: RushBabe at February 06, 2011 01:46 PM (urYpw)
Posted by: Nighthawk at February 06, 2011 01:49 PM (g3gh5)
Posted by: Y-not at February 06, 2011 01:54 PM (pW2o8)
Posted by: Nighthawk at February 06, 2011 01:56 PM (g3gh5)
Posted by: SurferDoc at February 06, 2011 01:56 PM (o3bYL)
Posted by: Nighthawk at February 06, 2011 02:03 PM (g3gh5)
Posted by: wang dang doodle at February 06, 2011 05:02 PM (tXbf1)
Posted by: CoolCzech at February 06, 2011 05:28 PM (tJjm/)
Awesome job, folks.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at February 06, 2011 06:42 PM (FYCiJ)
Posted by: Shoey at February 06, 2011 09:07 PM (yCH89)
I was watching Ronald Reagan's inaurural speech went to take clothes from washer to dryer and now see George W Bush. Is he our next republican icon? I dislike O'Reilly on FNC, he is to easy on Obama. I had television on when I paid attention to it, to CSPAN, I saw Sarah Palin's speech again along with Dick Cheney's and the Q & A that followed, which I founs interesting.
Rather than watch an Obama commerical on Fox , I am no into football, I changed to CNN or MSNBC. I'm sorry I was not paying attention to it but one host asked commentator if GWB might be the next republican that we honor, guest said only time will tell.
Posted by: Carol at February 06, 2011 09:24 PM (bdB1C)
But I still want to pursue Heroic Dreams!
That's fuckin' Awesome!
Gen X'rs bitch a lot, but at least we were ""there"" wen shit was happening.
Posted by: Deety is not above making chalk squeak, on purpose! at February 07, 2011 04:31 AM (Jb3+B)
Proud to say that my first time voting was for Reagan for President. I still remember my mouth dropping open like a trouth when he gave his speech at the Berlin Wall. He was a man seeped in midwestern values and love for his country that was unmistakable. He didn't equivocate, he didn't spin, when it mattered he called it like it was. Whether or not you agreed with his every decision, there was no doubt that he loved his country and was doing the best job that he could in order to ensure it's survival and it's future. He was a cheerleader, but it was real. Not spin, not pomp and circumstance, he believed in America.
...to the point where I think that there was this general feeling like it would always be thus. Something that was missed was that the strength and commitment, the fortitude and patriotism of those of the Greatest Generation would end with that generation. That unless WE the children of those people, didn't carry the mantle, it could be irrevocably lost in time. We took it for granted.
That is what I've learned from living through the Reagan years and beyond. That false sense of security that one has and then realizing late that if anyone is going to carry that on to pass it on to future generations, that can only come from US.
He isn't with us to be the elder statesman. I can only imagine what would come out of his mouth were he to see the antics of present day DC. With dignity and grace and a goodly sense of humour, lobbing well aimed verbal grenades at those who needed most to hear his words.
Posted by: JR at February 07, 2011 02:14 PM (jCNOU)
solar panelThe main products we manufacture and export as below:
Monocrystalline silicon solar panel, polycrystalline silicon solar panel, solar power system.
solar street light, wind solar hybrid street light, solar garden light, solar sensor light, solar lawn light.
LED lamp for solar garden light, solar brick light, solar street lightsolar post cap, solar road stud, other solar lights and accessories
Posted by: srg at March 02, 2011 06:13 AM (XQ9/u)
Posted by: abercrombie and fitch uk at April 16, 2011 12:37 AM (9gvtN)
Posted by: werwr at July 05, 2011 01:48 AM (KYBJN)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2829 seconds, 382 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








The assholes from 64 are still around.
Posted by: Kemp at February 06, 2011 09:17 AM (JpFM9)