May 07, 2011
— Open Blogger A new comprehensive study has uncovered yet another instance of the misogyny inherent in the system.
It may come as a surprise to you, but thanks to science, (and a healthy Gubm't grant, no doubt) we now know that kid's books are just a cesspool of gender inequality.
There seems to be some confusion by the good Doc running the study on why this would be so.
“I had kind of expected that books would start off in 1900 being unequal and become more equal over time,” she said.“We were surprised by the historical patterns and by the animals. The fact that the animals were the most unequal and even in the 1990s there were still two male animals to every one female animal.”
I'd like to think that the hobo-hunting hoardes of AoS could come up with some good theories as to why this might be so.
I'll start the ball rolling: Chick characters just aren't that interesting, what with their primping and gossiping and shopping and going on and on (and on) about their pretty ponies, and most of all, their disinclination to ever catch a hobo in a pit-trap.
Any other ideas?
(h/t to Vic from last night's ONT thread)
Posted by: Open Blogger at
08:26 AM
| Comments (160)
Post contains 212 words, total size 1 kb.
You're right. Except for Scarlett O'Hara and about a thousand others.
My personal favorite in the non-fiction category? Two. Delilah and Deborah from the Old Testament.
Posted by: Who Knows at May 07, 2011 08:31 AM (1cx/R)
He was a transgender bear!
Posted by: momma - West/Bolton 2012! at May 07, 2011 08:31 AM (penCf)
Sure was and it is still going now. The "perfect album" thingy took off and will not die.
Posted by: Vic at May 07, 2011 08:32 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: buzzion at May 07, 2011 12:32 PM (oVQFe)
Oh right, the morning after the ONT. Yep.
Posted by: Tami at May 07, 2011 08:33 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at May 07, 2011 08:33 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: Dr. Pointyhead, Professor of Ridiculous Studies at May 07, 2011 08:33 AM (lPLCj)
Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at May 07, 2011 08:33 AM (fjoLg)
Posted by: Vic at May 07, 2011 08:34 AM (M9Ie6)
Actually it's the opposite. Western media portrays women as equals and tough and stuff out of political correctness and the old wimpy female characters were put there for girls. Girls like that. female characters are very popular in other countries, just look as Japanese Anime and Manga. The difference is female characters there still accept and celebrate traditional female portrayals. The female character, no matter how tough, is still always really looking for Prince Charming and reverts to a traditional role in the end.
Posted by: Rocks at May 07, 2011 08:35 AM (th0op)
Posted by: Joejm65 at May 07, 2011 08:36 AM (0yeTf)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at May 07, 2011 08:36 AM (d0Tfm)
Yes, the study is an epic fail because the original target for the stories was the author's son.
Posted by: Vic at May 07, 2011 08:38 AM (M9Ie6)
In the time period you mentioned, all of Louisa May Alcott's books had leading female characters.
In Little Women, Jo. In Eight Cousins, it was Rose Campbell.
They were very strong characters. Jo financially supported her family.
Posted by: Who Knows at May 07, 2011 08:38 AM (1cx/R)
Posted by: pep at May 07, 2011 08:39 AM (gmlb7)
Posted by: catmman at May 07, 2011 08:40 AM (DTzwU)
I have always found that the boy characters in children's books find themselves in more interesting, crazy, or wild predicaments than the girl characters do so they are more fun to read about. But, the boy characters are often "schooled" by a girl character so there is that.
Note, I am not saying that the girl characters aren't ever interesting, certainly Alice led a pretty effed up life there for a bit in her books, and Dorothy as well, just that for the short pithy picture books it is often easier to telegraph a bunch of ideas about a character all at once by making that character a boy.
And I can't believe I just wasted any synapses thinking about an essentially nonsensical study.
Posted by: ParanoidAnxietyGirlInSeattle at May 07, 2011 08:42 AM (RZ8pf)
I used to love going to Drudge. Now I hate it because it depresses me.
Not just the London Islamists vowing revenge, it's the Fannie Mae story and the floods and all the other shit.
Posted by: Soothsayer, AoS Team 6 at May 07, 2011 08:42 AM (uFokq)
Soothsayer, could we call those Pakistan's Funniest Home Videos?
Posted by: Who Knows at May 07, 2011 08:43 AM (1cx/R)
Posted by: zmdavid at May 07, 2011 08:45 AM (6Wza6)
Posted by: oblig. as a boy at May 07, 2011 08:46 AM (xvZW9)
You're old, Soothsayer!
I like Benny Hill too. I can hear the music right now and see his chubby face.
Posted by: Who Knows at May 07, 2011 08:46 AM (1cx/R)
Posted by: Y-not at May 07, 2011 08:48 AM (pW2o8)
Posted by: FUBAR at May 07, 2011 08:49 AM (1fanL)
Very, very simple, as the parent of any boy can tell you. Boys don't care much about stories about girls. Even at very young ages, little boys will not listen to a story that doesn't have at least one or two boys in it. Maybe it's the writing style or subject matter of "all girl" stories, but even as a toddler, a boy just doesn't pick girl stories. Girls will listen to stories with only boys just fine.
Take from that what you will.
The market then decides.
Posted by: hobgoblin at May 07, 2011 08:49 AM (0L0eT)
Posted by: Y-not at May 07, 2011 12:48 PM (pW2o
Vajazzling. You poser.
Posted by: FUBAR at May 07, 2011 08:50 AM (1fanL)
Posted by: catmman at May 07, 2011 12:40 PM (DTzwU)
This is something I have wondered for a long time. Why are males better than women at almost everything. Take this study. It's not a lack of female characters in books over time. There are plenty of female characters. It's just all the classics seem to be about and/or written by men. You could put this down to inequality but there are plenty of women characters and writers who buck that trend even 150 years ago. So why?
It's like that in many things. Why aren't there more women Chess Grand masters? Why aren't women just as good as men in billiards at the top level? It can't be size and weight. Philippino men have come to have a very strong position in billiards despite being smaller and weaker than your average male.
Why? Is this true?
Posted by: Rocks at May 07, 2011 08:51 AM (th0op)
Only a little off topic.
On a trip through the northeast, a giant highlight for me was a visit to the Alcott home.
For a girl who had devoured each and every one of her books, it was like walking on hallowed ground. Each room was exactly as I had pictured them when I was a wee girl.
Word is that Louisa played for the opposite team, too. She hinted at it and never married.
Posted by: Who Knows at May 07, 2011 08:53 AM (1cx/R)
Of course, all of this is filtered through the researchers' world view that there's something horribly wrong with our society. I always chuckle when I remember the Time cover that declared there was no inherent difference between men and women, only to be contradicted with the other cover that said maybe there was a real difference.
Reality can be a harsh mistress, as every man knows...
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at May 07, 2011 08:53 AM (d0Tfm)
in Boston today they're having their SLUT WALK
Why? To raise awareness, of course! It's time to take the shame out of being promiscuous.
Sluts are no different from homosexuals, they say. The persecution must end, they say.
=====================================
"The walk will welcome both men and women in any form of clothing.
Schott-Mancini, also a survivor of sexual assault, likened the movement to successful gay rights campaigns of the past.
“It’s like ‘queer’ in the ‘80s,” she said. “That was a derogatory term and it’s almost been reclaimed. In a sense we’re trying to do that with ‘slut.’”"
Posted by: Soothsayer, AoS Team 6 at May 07, 2011 08:53 AM (uFokq)
The only solution is slow asphyxiation of the entire planet through overproduction of carbon dioxide.
Problem solved.
Posted by: nine coconuts at May 07, 2011 08:54 AM (uz3hs)
>>Why? Is this true?
Posted by: Rocks at May 07, 2011 12:51 PM (th0op)
Cuz girls have kooties and stuff.Posted by: Theodore B Cleaver at May 07, 2011 08:54 AM (HBqDo)
Why? Is this true?
Posted by: Rocks at May 07, 2011 12:51 PM (th0op)
Clearly it's not, evidenced by the erroneous conclusion you just came to.
;o~
Posted by: Tami at May 07, 2011 08:54 AM (VuLos)
“We were fed up how rape was being treated in our society and our culture,” Ouimette said.
...they also want to make people aware of the larger issues of “rape culture” and “slut shaming.”"
I have no clue what "rape culture" means.
Posted by: Soothsayer, AoS Team 6 at May 07, 2011 08:55 AM (uFokq)
That is the root of the problem.
Posted by: Vic at May 07, 2011 08:56 AM (M9Ie6)
A Slut Walk. Now that sounds fun.
Does everyone dress like sluts or do you only need an the attitude?
Is it too late for me to get there?
Posted by: Who Knows at May 07, 2011 08:56 AM (1cx/R)
These kinds of studies when reported on without the details are virtually worthless.
Posted by: Vic at May 07, 2011 08:58 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: eman: Japanese Babe Rescue Team at May 07, 2011 08:58 AM (mGq5S)
Posted by: Who Knows at May 07, 2011 12:31 PM (1cx/R)
And the bees made honey in the lion's head.Posted by: FUBAR at May 07, 2011 08:58 AM (1fanL)
Posted by: nine coconuts at May 07, 2011 08:59 AM (uz3hs)
A Slut Walk. Now that sounds fun.
...in addition to being a great place to pick up Moron-pre-approved women.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at May 07, 2011 09:00 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: Old grizzled gym coach at May 07, 2011 09:00 AM (QBQcg)
Because most women suck (not moronettes though we seem to be rational, thoughtful, caring, intelligent individuals). They are catty, selfish, insulting, etc., etc., etc.
I bet if you took a poll of the moronettes here, most of them don't have many women friends. Why? Because women are irritating bitches.
All my friends are guys. Always have been. I've been a chick since conception, but other than my mom and my daughter (and my hillbilly neighbor that is just like myself) I can't stand chicks.
Posted by: momma - West/Bolton 2012! at May 07, 2011 09:00 AM (penCf)
Posted by: Who Knows at May 07, 2011 09:00 AM (1cx/R)
I have no clue what "rape culture" means.
I think it's obvious that Winnie the Pooh's obsessive fixation on the deflowering of innocent bee-hives is a metaphor for the West's culture of rape and, more generally, its violent plundering of all the little brown & yellow citizens of the world.
Posted by: krakatoa at May 07, 2011 09:03 AM (MruVg)
>>evidenced by the erroneous conclusion you just came to.
Posted by: Tami at May 07, 2011 12:54 PM (VuLos)
I was tempted to hit that fat pitch over the fence for a three run homer, but it's too early.
Posted by: ontherocks at May 07, 2011 09:03 AM (HBqDo)
Defense Department releases new videos of Usama bin Laden taken during raid in single largest intelligence collection ever
Posted by: Tami at May 07, 2011 09:04 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: Tami at May 07, 2011 09:05 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: pep at May 07, 2011 09:05 AM (gmlb7)
Clearly this "professor" has never watched children's programming on PBS TV. Every woman is intelligent, brave and in command, and all of the boys are impotent, feckless dolts at best, but usually bullies and cowards who don't care about Gaia. Each episode consists of the girl teaching the boy a lesson in self-improvement, namely how to be more like a girl. Needless to say, there aren't a lot of Seal team 6 candidates on PBS.
FIFY
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at May 07, 2011 09:07 AM (d0Tfm)
Holy crap. I totally didn't answer your question. Oy. Sorry about that.
I think part of the difference is the way boys/girls are raised. Boys are pushed to do 'brain stimulating' games/hobbies. Girls are pushed to Dora or Barbie.
We tell boys they are so smart. We tell girls they are pretty.
Boys look mature. Girls look like a princess.
Boys play with building blocks/trains. Girls play with dolls.
Posted by: momma - West/Bolton 2012! at May 07, 2011 09:08 AM (penCf)
I nom'nate the Go Go's Beauty and the Beat
Posted by: USS Diversity at May 07, 2011 01:06 PM (RPYjQ)
Don't make me kick your ass.
Posted by: Joan Jett at May 07, 2011 09:08 AM (1fanL)
Posted by: LC LaWedgie at May 07, 2011 09:09 AM (Sos7/)
pep, how true. I hope to never have to hear Dora the Explora's voice again, or Rick Steeve's for that matter.
PBS should be called MTV now, anyway.
My other name for it is The Begging Channel.
Posted by: Who Knows at May 07, 2011 09:09 AM (1cx/R)
HERESY!
If they're offered stories with competent characters taking effective action, they'll be overrun by role models of penis people who create nations, make wars, build skyscrapers, engineer inventions and compose symphonies.
The whole history of wise mother figures who make quilts will be silenced.
Posted by: Little Miss Spellcheck at May 07, 2011 09:09 AM (xqhoO)
Have black, half white, fake personality and sprays people when he gets upset?
Posted by: momma - West/Bolton 2012! at May 07, 2011 09:10 AM (penCf)
________
I like the cut of your jib and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
Posted by: Anachronda at May 07, 2011 09:11 AM (6fER6)
Why? Is this true?
Posted by: Rocks at May 07, 2011 12:51 PM (th0op)
Clearly it's not, evidenced by the erroneous conclusion you just came to.
;o~
Posted by: Tami at May 07, 2011 12:54 PM (VuLos)
Actually that wasn't mean to be one sentence. I started with a conclusion, men are better than women at almost everything, and wondered why. The "Is it true?" was to give anyone commenting the opening to show there is no why as it isn't even true to begin with. Next time I will be sure to add a CR.
Posted by: Rocks at May 07, 2011 09:11 AM (th0op)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at May 07, 2011 09:12 AM (P+zzG)
We tell boys they are so smart. We tell girls they are pretty.
Boys look mature. Girls look like a princess.
Boys play with building blocks/trains. Girls play with dolls.
Posted by: momma - West/Bolton 2012! at May 07, 2011 01:08 PM (penCf)
Hi, momma? Yeah, can I have my stereotypes back please?
Posted by: 1952 at May 07, 2011 09:12 AM (1fanL)
I keep checking back on this thread to see if there are any booby pics posted yet and there is not.
AoSHQ is starting to go downhill IMO.
Posted by: robtr at May 07, 2011 09:13 AM (MtwBb)
krakatoa now must go attend to his duties as the "grass whisperer". The wife is telling him that the lawn is most definitely not going to mow itself next week while I'm off having fun on my business trip in the happening city of "Fresno".
Actually, I don't trust her to mow the right way. Sort of like how she doesn't like the way I do laundry. Heavy load means things just get cleaner, right? And drying on High keep me from having to run the dryer for over an hour. Good things, no?
Posted by: krakatoa at May 07, 2011 09:13 AM (MruVg)
Does the Obama Campaign have to pay for all the ads that they are running on every single channel with Michelle in them? All the cartoon channels are running he exercise commercial and now Prime time shows are running her commercial with Jill Biden @ supporting our troops.
I see her commercials at least 5 times a day between my shows at night and the kids' shows during the day.
Posted by: momma - West/Bolton 2012! at May 07, 2011 09:13 AM (penCf)
Girls will listen to stories with only boys just fine.
That's actually an excellent point. I think part of why girls will listen to stories about boys is because a lot of the stories about boys are more interesting/funny/clever. And the situations are universal. Enemy Pie comes to mind as an example of that.
Posted by: ParanoidAnxietyGirlInSeattle at May 07, 2011 09:14 AM (RZ8pf)
Posted by: krakatoa at May 07, 2011 01:13 PM (MruVg)
That is my thinking anyway.
Posted by: momma - West/Bolton 2012! at May 07, 2011 09:14 AM (penCf)
Posted by: krakatoa at May 07, 2011 01:13 PM (MruVg)
One more example of Easy Things That Women Make Complicated.
Posted by: FUBAR at May 07, 2011 09:15 AM (1fanL)
Krakatoa, look.
Holding your former favorite shirt up, between two fingers because it would fit a Ken doll now.
See what you did?
Posted by: Who Knows at May 07, 2011 09:15 AM (1cx/R)
Posted by: pep at May 07, 2011 01:05 PM (gmlb7)
To continue your point, beer commercials, aimed primarily towards the male of the species, are curious cases of attempting to sell a product by demeaning its audience. Check out the Miller Lite commercials in particular.
When I began to notice commercials that put down men as ignoramuseses, I stopped buying their products. If you think I'm an idiot, why should I buy your widget?
Remember the old show Home Improvement? Tim Taylor's wife hated his guts and was a condescending bitch towards him.
My ex loved that show.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at May 07, 2011 09:16 AM (d0Tfm)
When my unit at work was transferred out of one department into another we had three positions open up for clerical folks from admin. Every woman in that group put in for the transfer.
One of them told me it was because they all hated working for women and our group was headed up by a man.
Posted by: Vic at May 07, 2011 09:17 AM (M9Ie6)
Jennifer Griffin of Fox News confirms the AoS suspicion, Bin Laden was a pussy and went down like a whimpering scrunt.
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at May 07, 2011 09:17 AM (ndqJC)
Posted by: momma - West/Bolton 2012! at May 07, 2011 01:13 PM (penCf)
I don't think that Saddlebags has a mirror.
Posted by: ontherocks at May 07, 2011 09:18 AM (HBqDo)
Posted by: huerfano at May 07, 2011 09:18 AM (6zFxS)
Posted by: ParanoidAnxietyGirlInSeattle at May 07, 2011 09:18 AM (RZ8pf)
Hi, momma? Yeah, can I have my stereotypes back please?
Posted by: 1952 at May 07, 2011 01:12 PM (1fanL)
I'm not stereotyping. I'm telling you what I see. I can go to the park and my 3 year old girl will talk about paint ball guns and riding her 4 - wheeler, and the moms get that nervous look on their faces.
It is really weird. Plus I'm not saying all kids, but a lot of ads are geared this way too.
Go on the internet and look at the games for girls. They are matching, coloring, helping animals, etc.
The boys are about velocity, power, common sense, psi, etc.
Posted by: momma - West/Bolton 2012! at May 07, 2011 09:18 AM (penCf)
When I began to notice commercials that put down
men as ignoramuseses, I stopped buying their products.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at May 07, 2011 01:16 PM (d0Tfm)
So you're off the grid, is that what you're saying?
Posted by: FUBAR at May 07, 2011 09:19 AM (1fanL)
Also, I think the focus of the study was on children's books, which are horses of a different color. I don't think a gender imbalance in literature line of thinking would hold up for young adult or adult fiction at all.
But, I didn't read the article because I think gender inequality studies are stupid, especially when they involve male vs. female animal characters in books aimed for people whose idea of a good time is flinging cheerios across the room.
Posted by: ParanoidAnxietyGirlInSeattle at May 07, 2011 09:21 AM (RZ8pf)
Articles that should appear in Cosmo but never will:
Putting the toilet seat down: Gravity is on your side
Posted by: ErikW at May 07, 2011 09:21 AM (s+/VV)
Posted by: Who Knows at May 07, 2011 09:22 AM (1cx/R)
One of the things you are taught in the service is "target acquisition." basically meaning you make sure that you shoot the right thing, at the right time. Would it be WRONG! to engage a target during Adhan if they are walking AWAY from a point of prayer, or not preparing for prayer?
and I'm sorry, I am one of those people who thinks that we ARE at war with Islam, not ALL muslims as Larry O'Donnel likes to say, but with Islam. As I said, there are always fools who need something to believe, and will follow any huckster.
Posted by: Douglas at May 07, 2011 09:23 AM (YKOnu)
Articles that should appear in Cosmo but never will:
Putting the toilet seat down: Gravity is on your side
Posted by: ErikW at May 07, 2011 01:21 PM (s+/VV)
Careful What You Nag For: Toilet Seat Down Equals Sitting in Pee
Posted by: FUBAR at May 07, 2011 09:24 AM (1fanL)
Posted by: Animal Farm at May 07, 2011 09:27 AM (wOaLi)
Assuming this study isn't balls, which everyone here has pointed out that it is in various ways, what should the correct ratio be for female/male main and supporting characters? 50/50? 70/30, as to make up for this sin of male dominance?
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at May 07, 2011 09:29 AM (c0A3e)
__________
I like the cut of your vocabulary and would like to subscribe to your dictionary.
Posted by: Anachronda at May 07, 2011 09:29 AM (6fER6)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at May 07, 2011 01:29 PM (c0A3e)
Just send all the women you know some money....moronettes first.
Posted by: Tami at May 07, 2011 09:30 AM (VuLos)
Paranoid, is your dog back from boot camp yet? How did that go?
It's 5 weeks, he won't be back until June. So far it is going well, he is apparently partying hard with the other dogs and I already got a phone call for more money for food. He's fallen in love with a schnauzer, they are thinking about sharing a room.
Posted by: ParanoidAnxietyGirlInSeattle at May 07, 2011 09:30 AM (RZ8pf)
Guys? Just play golf and watch Television and you end up with a hot wife who hates you and children who don't appreciate you.
Ironically? One of the Best family based SitComs over the last 30 years? "Married With Children." Al was a fool, Peggy was a Fool, Bud was a Fool, Kelly was a Fool, but they were real people with real problems. Not in Every episode, but quite often there was a storyline of the family of fools dealing with the fact that they are a family. The offense was mutual, the conflicts were mutual, the situations were mutual, and while the family had their internal conflicts those conflicts were reserved for the family, with full knowledge that everyone else would stand up for their family. I remember one episode where Bud, who was BRUTAL to kelly saw his sister with a mouse under her eye, and little bud, threatened the bigguy that kelly was dating when he came back to apologize, and Bud got his butt kicked.
Doesn't matter if he won, but he stood for his sister, his sister that he mocks on a weekly basis.
Along those lines, good luck making a TV show like "Good Times." nowadays.
Posted by: Douglas at May 07, 2011 09:32 AM (YKOnu)
Back on the prowl! Tiger Wood's ex-wife Elin Nordegren returns to the dating scene
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at May 07, 2011 09:32 AM (c0A3e)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at May 07, 2011 01:29 PM (c0A3e)
No, she's a traitor to her gender because all the female characters were witches.
Posted by: FUBAR at May 07, 2011 09:32 AM (1fanL)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at May 07, 2011 09:35 AM (P+zzG)
Posted by: Douglas at May 07, 2011 01:33 PM (YKOnu)
It is? Looks like it's in the right thread to me.
Posted by: Tami at May 07, 2011 09:35 AM (VuLos)
you see Obama Osama watching tv?
He's sitting on the floor holding the remote. What's he watching?
a) American Idol
b) Celebrity Apprentice
c) the Weather Channel
Posted by: Soothsayer, AoS Team 6 at May 07, 2011 09:35 AM (uFokq)
No, she's a traitor to her gender because all the female characters were witches.
Posted by: FUBAR at May 07, 2011 01:32 PM (1fanL)
Yeah, and they all ran for Senate in MD!
Posted by: Vic at May 07, 2011 09:36 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Soothsayer, AoS Team 6 at May 07, 2011 01:35 PM (uFokq)
Million dollar compound, my ass. Where's the 62" plasma?
I bet he's flipping back and forth between scrambled channels trying to get a glimpse at tittays.
Posted by: ErikW at May 07, 2011 09:39 AM (s+/VV)
So you're off the grid, is that what you're saying?
Yep, pretty much. Thank goodness for Craftsman ads.
I do wonder if and when this trend will burn itself out and we can at least start to look upon the American male as an equal and not some oafish dolt who only thinks with "the little head". I think I can speak for the guy Morons that we don't have very many (if any) friends who fit that description.
We like our friends to be intelligent and honest, with their heads screwed on straight and aware of reality, regardless of gender.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at May 07, 2011 09:39 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: Altama bin Loaden at May 07, 2011 09:40 AM (GG7bD)
Yeah, and they all ran for Senate in MD!
Posted by: Vic at May 07, 2011 01:36 PM (M9Ie6)
No, They all ended up working for the Ministry of Magic. Other than the goblins, and Fred (crosses self and takes a moment of silence) and George, EVERYONE worked for the Ministry in some way.
Posted by: Douglas at May 07, 2011 09:40 AM (YKOnu)
You wish for a boobeh pic? Fine, here you are:
Boobeh pic.
/Am I not magnanimous?
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at May 07, 2011 09:42 AM (c0A3e)
(Who was a slut.)
Posted by: FUBAR at May 07, 2011 09:42 AM (1fanL)
Posted by: Douglas at May 07, 2011 09:42 AM (YKOnu)
Posted by: Douglas at May 07, 2011 09:43 AM (YKOnu)
Posted by: Douglas at May 07, 2011 09:44 AM (YKOnu)
Posted by: California Version of Team 6 at May 07, 2011 09:46 AM (jkZYN)
two male animals to every one female animal
My kids have noticed how many shows and books have 2 boys and 1 girl as main characters. Like Harry Potter and a million others.
Because males are better than females at almost everything?
Or it takes two males to accomplish as much as one female.
Posted by: Mama AJ at May 07, 2011 09:46 AM (XdlcF)
Has anyone read Friday by Robert Heinlein? That had a strong female main character.
Enjoyed that as a teenager.
Posted by: Mama AJ at May 07, 2011 09:47 AM (XdlcF)
Or it takes two males to accomplish as much as one female.
Posted by: Mama AJ at May 07, 2011 01:46 PM (XdlcF)
Yes, if by 'accomplish' you mean make every little thing endlessly complicated and worth talking about for hours and hours
Posted by: California Version of Team 6 at May 07, 2011 09:48 AM (jkZYN)
Of course, this is the Moron space after all. I would estimate that all the Morons have read all of his stuff.
Posted by: Vic at May 07, 2011 09:49 AM (M9Ie6)
Why did it take her so long?
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at May 07, 2011 09:49 AM (bxiXv)
most of the male leading men in movies lately are 'super-heros' or equally comic book Evil Masterminds
Posted by: California Version of Team 6 at May 07, 2011 09:50 AM (jkZYN)
Posted by: Douglas at May 07, 2011 01:42 PM (YKOnu)
You're just now noticing that? The guy's always had more I's than a fucking mexican hat dance.
He's the perfect cultural counterpoint to Lady Gaga, someone else that's gotten a million miles out of next to nothing.
Posted by: ontherocks at May 07, 2011 09:51 AM (HBqDo)
Word.
Posted by: NFL Cheerleaders, Hooters Waitresses, FOX News Babes, etc. at May 07, 2011 09:53 AM (wOaLi)
Posted by: Douglas at May 07, 2011 01:44 PM (YKOnu)
I did not see that. Which one plays the role of Friday?
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at May 07, 2011 09:53 AM (bxiXv)
Dr. Janice McCabe, a sociologist at Florida State University, examined nearly 6,000 childrenÂ’s books between 1900 and 2000 and determined the stories have a definitive gender bias and a disproportionate representation of genders.
Methinks those two points are reversed. She determined that the stories had a definite gender bias (primarily because she has one personally) and then she did her official "research."
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at May 07, 2011 09:54 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: Henny Penny at May 07, 2011 09:57 AM (xaCZY)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at May 07, 2011 01:35 PM (P+zzG)
I just tell them royalty are all inbred thieves who treat ordinary people like servants and sit around and do nothing while everyone else works.
Blackadder season three seems to work to reinforce that.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at May 07, 2011 09:58 AM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Inspector Asshole at May 07, 2011 10:02 AM (odfEr)
In most species, the males are more colorful/striking in appearance. Manes. Tail feathers. Etc.
Who wants to paint a picture book full of brown feathers when you can make one with reds and blues and yellows?
Posted by: HeatherRadish at May 07, 2011 10:04 AM (0vDuM)
Posted by: Douglas at May 07, 2011 10:11 AM (YKOnu)
people whose idea of a good time is flinging cheerios across the room.
What are you trying to imply here? What I do with my cheerios is my business.
Posted by: Penultimatum at May 07, 2011 10:17 AM (fJHpU)
My kids could care less what gender any literary character is. A great story is a great story. My boys read all manner of books - including loving Beverly Cleary's Ramona Quimby character. They have read Swiss Family Robinson and followed it up with The Long Winter by Laura Ingalls Wilder. . . geez. So what, boys and girls are different and may instinctually behave one way or another. . . but a great story is a great story.
By touting the "inequality" of such literature as Winnie-the-Pooh, this stupid doc/researcher is ruining good literature and taking the focus off the themes, ideas and more important junk in the story. It's shallow. I guess this is what is happening in culture. Instead of focusing on the the deeper stuff, we're too busy worrying about the shallow.
Posted by: HotinNC at May 07, 2011 10:20 AM (SQvIY)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at May 07, 2011 01:35 PM (P+zzG)
It's harmless enough. Role playing is one way that children begin to understand the world. It's no different than boys rough housing and playing soldier or cowboys and indians; the goal is to develop values through imitation. A boy playing at being a soldier doesn't imitate cowering in fear behind cover, raping civilians, or spending all day writing paperwork. He pretends to be fearless in battle, even dying valiantly, and to be tactically brilliant.
If a girl want's to go through a princess phase, then let her. But remind her that a princess should always be courteous, neat, well behaved, educated...
Posted by: Alex at May 07, 2011 10:23 AM (x40U+)
I read ALL of her books as a kid and loved them. After I got out of the Navy I watched the TV show for the first time.
I puked.
Posted by: Vic at May 07, 2011 10:25 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Mama AJ at May 07, 2011 10:33 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: Vic at May 07, 2011 10:35 AM (M9Ie6)
/Am I not magnanimous?
One, not proud I clicked it. Two, Lady Gaga makes me think I'm reliving the 1980s and 1990s in Madonna Bizarro World.
Posted by: Beagle at May 07, 2011 10:38 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Jypsea Rose at May 07, 2011 11:02 AM (DM6DH)
Posted by: Any Topic But the Huckster, Please! at May 07, 2011 11:08 AM (x/4B/)
Question #1: What is the gender split among the authors?
Question #2: How do sales of these 6,000 books compare (a) with each other and (b) among all children's books?
Easy to skew the data if you want do.
Posted by: Nitpicker And Naysayer at May 07, 2011 11:10 AM (F8LoM)
Posted by: The Monkey at the zoo sniffing your girl on the rag at May 07, 2011 11:16 AM (JpFM9)
Posted by: Beagle at May 07, 2011 12:04 PM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Mr. Wolf at May 07, 2011 12:14 PM (XbTw7)
The young adult books, though, were AWFUL. I could never stand "Babysitters' Club" or "Sweet Valley High." I tried to read "Little Women" and just couldn't do it. They bored the living daylights out of me. That's what ended up drawing me into fantasy and sci-fi novels; they were so much more interesting than the typical girly fare, and they could have heroes or heroines doing equally fun things. I still don't care for sci-fi or fantasy novels centered around a female protagonist, though. Very rarely do I find one where the female lead isn't either A) a stone cold bitch I'd love to kick the shit out of, or B) a whiny victim.
Posted by: MWR at May 07, 2011 12:39 PM (CA2NO)
So who most likely buys all these children's book. Most likely women. So even if this 'study" was correct it would most likely be women driving the "boy" book sales.
Posted by: Vic at May 07, 2011 12:52 PM (M9Ie6)
Have you read David Weber's Honor Harrington series? She is neither and it is an outstanding series
Posted by: Vic at May 07, 2011 12:54 PM (M9Ie6)
Little Women
Narnia Stories (2 girls 2 boys)
Cat in the Hat (sexless, but a male (I guess)
Asterix books (all male, pretty much)
TinTin (all male, with gay undertones)
Annie
Pippi Longstockings
Wind in the Willows (all male)
Oh, who gives a fuck what this guy said. Fuck him.
Posted by: Jack at May 07, 2011 01:41 PM (kCT7A)
Waiting for new works
قصي خضر
صور قصي
اخبار قصي
أغاني قصي
Posted by: qusai at May 07, 2011 01:54 PM (ihk4k)
Posted by: Midnight Clad at May 07, 2011 02:25 PM (Qbs3S)
Posted by: CMU VET at May 07, 2011 03:37 PM (h+0zh)
Posted by: mr. parker at May 07, 2011 07:01 PM (l/5aZ)
Posted by: Soothsayer, AoS Team 6 at May 07, 2011 12:53 PM (uFokq)
Doing that is just gay.
Posted by: Gaia at May 07, 2011 07:49 PM (Li2G9)
Somebody asked why girl stories are toxic to boys, but not the other way around. Part of it is that to be tomboy is cool. Girls are allowed to cross gender lines, even encouraged to do so with gusto these days. Perhaps too much so, don't kid yourself, the 90 lbs female warrior in the movies with all her ninja moves taking out all the big tough guys is a total fiction, and girls will get destroyed on high school football teams.
Yet the fact remains that boy-stuff is not off-limits to girls and girls are in fact encouraged to explore it. This is not true at all for boys. Girl-stuff is toxic to boys. Whereas girls gain status and praise by invading the boy-world, a boy will meet nothing but derision and scorn. Tomboys are good, girly-boys are a joke.
Failure to perform is also tolerated with girls. The girl out on the Little League field among the boys will get nothing but praise, re-inforcement, and positive notice by all spectators regardless of her athletic abilities. She might strike out every time, never catch a fly, never make an accurate throw, doesn't matter. Her male teammates will only get this kind of positive notice through exceptional play.
There was a credit card commercial a while back, featuring a woman who was doing all kinds of things with her new credit card. She was skiing! (and visibly sucking at it) Riding a motorcycle! (and visibly sucking at it) Golfing! (and visibly sucking at it). But it didn't matter one bit. She was a woman out there doing exciting things, and that was a selling point. Put a guy in that same comercial doing things in the same way, and the entire audience, men and women, would have one come-away, "That guy's a douche!"
Changing the gender bean-counts in children's stories isn't going to do a damn thing to change any of this, because all this falls out from nature. All this merely serves as another avenue for feminists to make busybody irritants of themselves in yet another area. Geena Davis has already started an effort to encourage young mothers to provide a running, feminist commentary when reading books or watching movies with their children. Always interjecting, "Did this character have to be a boy?" "Why are both those two roles male?", yada yada yada. That's Progressive, Positive Leadership! -- also, subversively screwing things up to where you might hardly be able to follow the movie with all that idiotic running commentary.
They're bitchy, spoiled brats.
Posted by: Cowboy at May 07, 2011 10:02 PM (W6Pjt)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2028 seconds, 288 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








LOL, here at AOSHQ we find that all the lesbian pron allways has more female characters so the study is flawed.
(and thanks for the H/T)
Posted by: Vic at May 07, 2011 08:29 AM (M9Ie6)